Role of sentinel node biopsy in patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Twenty-five years of change in the management of the axilla in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is now used worldwide. It has led to many changes in how we manage the axilla in patients with breast cancer. This review covers four areas of management of the axilla in breast cancer: assessing the clinically node-negative axilla, managing the clinically negative axilla found to be involved at SLN biopsy, management of the clinically positive axilla in the context of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment of the diseased axilla when radical therapy is required. We suggest that the evidence supports an optimum number of 3 nodes to be removed for accurate SLN biopsy. Breast cancer departments that have not adopted Z0011 patient management cannot continue to avoid change. The evidence is clear: Not all patients with limited axillary nodal disease on sentinel node biopsy need axillary lymph node dissection. For patients who do need axillary treatment, axillary radiotherapy continues to be under-used. Patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy can be safely assessed by post-therapy SLN biopsy, with retrieval of any previously biopsied involved nodes by targeted axillary dissection. There is much to support the trend to doing less in the axilla. We are obliged to act based on the available robust clinical trial data in a way that limits morbidity while at the same time does not increase the risk of disease recurrence.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes at initial diagnosis

AIM

To evaluate the utility of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes at initial diagnosis treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was performed from January 2008 to December 2012 in 52 women, mean age 50.7 years, with infiltrating breast carcinoma T1-3, N1, M0 (1 bilateral, 7 multifocal) treated with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, docetaxel and trastuzumab in Her2/neu-positive patients. Axillary evaluation included physical examination, axillary ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of any suspicious lymph node. The day before surgery, 74-111 MBq of (99m)Tc-albumin nanocolloid was injected periareolarly. All patients underwent breast surgery, with SLNB and complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The SLNs were examined by frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin staining, immunohistochemical analysis or one-step nucleic acid amplification assay (OSNA).

RESULTS

Mean tumor size: 3.5 cm. Histologic type: 81.1% invasive ductal carcinoma. Complete response of primary tumor was clinical 43.4%, pathological 41.5%. All patients were clinically node-negative after NAC. Pathological complete response of axillary node was 42.2%. SLN identification rate was 84.9%. Axilla was positive in the pathology study in 6 of 8 patients without nanocolloid migration. SLN accurately represented the axillary status in 95.5%. False negative rate was 8.3%. SLN was the only positive node in 68.2% of patients. Mean number of SLN removed was 1.9 and of nodes resected from the ALND 13.2.

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy after NAC is a feasible and accurate tool in patients with operable breast cancer T1-3, N1 and clinically node-negative after therapy.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cytologically proven node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis

BACKGROUND

The performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) was investigated in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

METHODS

After NCT of 178 patients with cytology-proven axillary/supraclavicular nodes metastasis at the time of diagnosis, SLNB using radioisotope was performed including completion node dissection between 2008 and 2011. The detection rate, sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of SLNB were analyzed.

RESULTS

SLNB was successfully performed in 169 (94.9%) patients. Tumor nonresponse and extensive residual nodal disease were found to be significantly associated with detection failure of sentinel nodes. Sensitivity, FNR, NPV, and accuracy of SLNB were 78.0, 22.0, 75.8, and 87.0%, respectively, and a greater number of retrieved SLNs increased all four of these performance measures. Conversion to node-negative disease was achieved in 69 (40.8%) patients: 24% of patients with the luminal A subtype, 51.6% of patients with the luminal B, 51.7% of patients with the HER2-enriched, and 58.5% of patients with the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Luminal B, HER2-enriched, and TNBC subtypes showed comparable responses to NCT; however, the TNBC subtype had a significantly better FNR and accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB was found to be technically feasible, but its routine use was not recommended for LABCs after NCT. However, acceptable performance was noted for locally advanced TNBCs, and thus SLNB might be safely considered in these selected patients.

Timing of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy - recommendations for clinical guidance

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an increasingly important component in the treatment of both locally advanced and early-stage breast cancer. With this, a debate on the timing of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged. At the end of the last century, the SLNB was introduced as an axillary staging modality, and this paper aims to further elucidate this issue in the context of NAC. We compiled available data on the SLNB after NAC and provide clinical guidance for timing the SLNB in this context. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that the SLNB can be performed after NAC in all cases. In patients with a clinically node-negative (cN0) status prior to NAC, the SLNB should be performed after NAC, and in case of a histologically confirmed negative SLNB, a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has no added value and can be omitted. In patients with clinically positive nodal involvement (cN+) prior to NAC, all axillary surgery can also be performed after NAC.

International expert consensus on primary systemic therapy in the management of early breast cancer: highlights of the Fourth Symposium on Primary Systemic Therapy in the Management of Operable Breast Cancer, Cremona, Italy (2010)

A panel of international breast cancer experts formulated a declaration of consensus regarding many key issues in the use of primary systemic therapy (PST) either in clinical routine or research practice. The attainment of pathological complete response (pCR), defined as no residual invasive tumor in the surgical specimens both in breast and in axillary nodes, is one of the main goals of PST, and pCR can be used as the primary objective in prospective clinical trials. However, pCR is not a reliable endpoint with all treatment approaches, and alternatives such as Ki67 index of the residual invasive disease or after 2 weeks of PST are also potential endpoints. PST has several advantages: breast conservation and the unique opportunity to obtain information on the interaction between treatment and tumor biology. Changes in tumor biology after PST are an early phenomenon; so, an additional core biopsy performed after 14 days from treatment start should be considered in clinical trials.

Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients with initial axillary lymph node metastasis after primary systemic therapy

Purpose

Primary systemic therapy (PST) downstages up to 40% of initial documented axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases in breast cancer. The current surgical treatment after PST consists of breast tumor resection and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). This strategy, however, does not eliminate unnecessary ALND in patients with complete remission of axillary metastases. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after PST among patients with documented ALN metastasis at presentation and to identify the rate of pathologic complete-remission (CR) with ALN after PST.

Methods

We analyzed 66 patients with ALN metastasis that was pathologically proven preoperatively who underwent SLNB and concomitant ALND after PST. Axillary ultrasound (AUS) was used to evaluate the clinical response of initially documented ALN metastasis after PST. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping was performed using blue dye with or without radioisotope.

Results

After PST, 34.8% of patients had clinical CR of ALN on AUS and 28.8% patients had pathologic CR of ALN. The overall success rate of SLNB after PST was 87.9%, and the sentinel lymph node identification rate in patients with clinical CR was 95.7%. In patients with successful lymphatic mapping, 70.7% of patients had residual axillary metastases. The overall accuracy and false-negative rate were 87.9% and 17.1% in all patients: 95.5% and 10.0% in patients with clinical CR of ALN, and 83.3% and 19.4% in patients with residual axillary disease after PST.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that SLNB may be feasible in patients with initial documented ALN metastasis who have clinical CR for metastatic ALN after PST. Further investigation in a prospective setting should be performed to confirm our results.