Usefulness of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to confirm suspected pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the detection of pancreatic lesions in high-risk individuals

Individuals at high risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are eligible for surveillance within research programs. These programs employ periodic imaging in the form of magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound for the detection of early cancer or high-grade precursor lesions. This narrative review discusses the role of endoscopic ultrasound within these surveillance programs. It details its overall strengths and limitations, yield, burden on patients, and how it compares to magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, recommendations are given when and how to incorporate endoscopic ultrasound in the surveillance of high-risk individuals.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is expected to be ranked second in the next 10 years due to poor prognosis and a rising incidence. Distant metastatic PDAC is associated with the worst prognosis among the different phases of PDAC. The diagnostic options for PDAC are convenient and available for staging, tumor response evaluation, and management of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. However, imaging is crucial in PDAC diagnosis, monitoring, resectability appraisal, and response evaluation. The advancement of medical technologies is evolving, hence the use of imaging in PDAC treatment options has grown as well as the utilization of ctDNA as a tumor marker. Treatment options for metastatic PDAC are minimal with the primary goal of therapy limited to symptom relief or palliation, especially in patients with low functional capacity at the point of diagnosis. Molecular profiling has shown promising potential solutions that would push the treatment boundaries for patients with PDAC. In this review, we will discuss the latest updates from evidence-based guidelines regarding diagnosis, therapy response evaluation, prognosis, and surveillance, as well as illustrating novel therapies that have been recently investigated for PDAC, in addition to discussing the molecular profiling advances in PDAC.

Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common and lethal cancer. From diagnosis to disease staging, response to neoadjuvant therapy assessment and patient surveillance after resection, imaging plays a central role, guiding the multidisciplinary team in decision-planning.

Review aims and findings

This review discusses the most up-to-date imaging recommendations, typical and atypical findings, and issues related to each step of patient management. Example cases for each relevant condition are presented, and a structured report for disease staging is suggested.

Conclusion

Despite current issues in PDAC imaging at different stages of patient management, the radiologist is essential in the multidisciplinary team, as the conveyor of relevant imaging findings crucial for patient care.

18F-FAPI-04 Outperforms 18F-FDG PET/CT in Clinical Assessments of Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Accurate diagnosis and staging are crucial for selecting treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The desmoplastic responses associated with PDAC are often characterized by hypometabolism. Here, we investigated 18F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-04 PET/CT in evaluation of PDAC and compared the findings with those obtained using 18F-FDG. Methods: Sixty-two PDAC patients underwent 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Identification of primary lesions, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and distant metastasis (DM) by these methods was evaluated, and TNM staging was performed. Correlation between SUVmax of the primary lesion and treatment response was explored in patients who received systemic therapy. Results: 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT identified all patients with PDAC; 18F-FDG PET/CT missed 1 patient. Tracer uptake was higher in 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT than in 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary tumors (10.63 vs. 2.87, P < 0.0001), LN metastasis (2.90 vs. 1.43, P < 0.0001), and DM (liver, 6.11 vs. 3.10, P = 0.002; peritoneal, 4.70 vs. 2.08, P = 0.015). The methods showed no significant difference in the T staging category, but the N and M values were significantly higher for 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT than for 18F-FDG PET/CT (P = 0.002 and 0.008, respectively). Thus, 14 patients were upgraded, and only 1 patient was downgraded, by 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. A high SUVmax of the primary tumor did not correlate with treatment response for either 18F-FAPI-04 or 18F-FDG. Conclusion: 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT performed better than 18F-FDG PET/CT in identification of primary tumors, LN metastasis, and DM and in TNM staging of PDAC.

Oncogenic KRAS triggers metabolic reprogramming in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease with an extremely high lethality rate. Oncogenic KRAS activation has been proven to be a key driver of PDAC initiation and progression. There is increasing evidence that PDAC cells undergo extensive metabolic reprogramming to adapt to their extreme energy and biomass demands. Cell-intrinsic factors, such as KRAS mutations, are able to trigger metabolic rewriting. Here, we update recent advances in KRAS-driven metabolic reprogramming and the associated metabolic therapeutic potential in PDAC.

Comparing the clinical value of baseline [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: additional prognostic value of the distal pancreatitis

PURPOSE

Anatomical and molecular staging strategies are needed for the personalized treatment of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study evaluated the performance of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT on the disease staging and prognostic value of patients with localized PDAC on contrast-enhanced (CE)-CT images.

METHODS

Patients with suspected localized PDAC on CE-CT were recruited for static [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and 18[F]F-FDG and PET/CT, and select patients underwent simultaneous 60-min dynamic 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT. The diagnostic and staging performances of the static PET/CT results were evaluated by delineating regions of interest in the primary tumor, whole pancreas, and distal pancreas in both types of scans and then evaluating correlations between the PET/CT findings and clinicopathological characteristics. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier and hazard ratio (log-rank) methods were used to evaluate the prognostic value of the combined dynamic [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and static [18F]F-FDG PET/CT method.

RESULTS

We included 49 patients with histologically confirmed PDAC adenocarcinomas; 32 underwent 60-min dynamic [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging simultaneously. The static [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 method had significantly higher accuracy and uptake values than the static [18F]F-FDG method for primary PDAC lesions, metastatic lymph nodes, and distal metastases. Furthermore, 18.4% and 10.2% of the patients' stages changed after using the [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT methodologies, respectively, compared to the CE-CT-designated stage. The Ki values obtained from dynamic [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT did not differ between PDAC and distal obstructive pancreatitis lesions. Pathologically enlarged tumor size, poor differentiation, and perineural invasion were associated with increased [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake but not with [18F]F-FDG uptake. The preoperative prognostic performance of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was better than that of [18F]F-FDG. Interestingly, combined [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]F-FDG uptake results in the whole pancreas could further stratify patients based on their postoperative prognosis.

CONCLUSION

6[68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was more sensitive and accurate than [18F]F-FDG PET/CT for tumor, node, and metastasis staging of PDAC identified on CE-CT. Additionally, [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake was significantly associated with pathologically aggressive tumor features. Combined [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT findings improved the prognostic value, potentially providing a non-invasive guide for clinical management. Finally, increased fibroblast activity in PDAC-induced obstructive pancreatitis may be associated with poor patient survival rates.

FAP-targeted PET imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies: a comprehensive review

F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) plays a crucial role in tumour diagnosis, staging, and therapy response evaluation of various cancer types and has been a standard imaging modality used in clinical oncology practice for many years. However, it has certain limitations in evaluating some particular gastrointestinal cancer types due to low FDG-avidity or interphering physiological background activity. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a protein of the tumour microenvironment, is overexpressed in a wide range of cancers which makes it an attractive target for both tumour imaging and therapy. Recently, FAP-targeted radiopharmaceuticals are widely used in clinical research and achieved great results in tumour imaging. Considering the limitations of FDG PET/CT and the lack of physiological FAP-targeted tracer uptake in liver and intestinal loops, gastrointestinal cancers are among the most promising indications of FAP-targeted imaging. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of FAP-targeted imaging in gastrointestinal cancers in order to clarify the current and potential future role of this class of molecules in gastrointestinal oncology.

Radiation Therapy Planning Using Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor

Computed tomography (CT), MR imaging, and PET with fluorodeoxyglucose F18/CT are commonly used for radiation therapy planning; however, issues including precise nodal staging on CT or false positive results on PET/CT limit their usability. Clinical trials using fibroblast activation protein ligands for additional imaging have provided promising results regarding staging and target volume delineation-particularly suitable for sarcoma, some gastrointestinal tumors, head and neck tumors, and lung and pancreatic cancer. Although further prospective trials are necessary to identify clinical settings for its application in radiation oncology, fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT indisputably represents an excellent opportunity for assisting radiotherapy planning.

Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary digestive system cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Althoug ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely accepted as a diagnostic tool for detecting digestive cancers, ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT may perform better in detecting gastrointestinal malignancies at an earlier stage. This study aimed to systematically review the diagnostic performance of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with that of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in primary digestive system cancers.

Methods

In this study, a comprehensive search using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was performed to identify studies that met the eligibility criteria from the beginning of the databases to March 2023. The quality of the relevant studies with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) method was assessed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic and meta-regression analysis using the R 4.22 software.

Results

A total of 800 publications were identified in the initial search. Finally, 15 studies comprising 383 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.23-1.00), whereas those of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.60-0.84) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.52-0.95), respectively. ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT performed better for specific tumours, particularly in gastric, liver, biliary tract, and pancreatic cancers. Both imaging modalities had essentially the same diagnostic efficacy in colorectal cancer.

Conclusions

⁶⁸Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed a higher diagnostic ability than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in terms of diagnosing primary digestive tract cancers, especially gastric, liver, biliary tract, and pancreatic cancers. The certainty of the evidence was high due to the moderately low risk of bias and low concern regarding applicability. However, the sample size of the included studies was small and heterogeneous. More high-quality prospective studies are needed to obtain higher-quality evidence in the future.

Systematic Review Registration

The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42023402892].

DNA methylation-based classifier differentiates intrahepatic pancreato-biliary tumours

BACKGROUND

Differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA) from hepatic metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is challenging. Both tumours have similar morphological and immunohistochemical pattern and share multiple driver mutations. We hypothesised that DNA methylation-based machine-learning algorithms may help perform this task.

METHODS

We assembled genome-wide DNA methylation data for iCCA (n = 259), PAAD (n = 431), and normal bile duct (n = 70) from publicly available sources. We split this cohort into a reference (n = 399) and a validation set (n = 361). Using the reference cohort, we trained three machine learning models to differentiate between these entities. Furthermore, we validated the classifiers on the technical validation set and used an internal cohort (n = 72) to test our classifier.

FINDINGS

On the validation cohort, the neural network, support vector machine, and the random forest classifiers reached accuracies of 97.68%, 95.62%, and 96.5%, respectively. Filtering by anomaly detection and thresholds improved the accuracy to 99.07% (37 samples excluded by filtering), 96.22% (17 samples excluded), and 100% (44 samples excluded) for the neural network, support vector machine and random forest, respectively. Because of best balance between accuracy and number of predictable cases we tested the neural network with applied filters on the in-house cohort, obtaining an accuracy of 95.45%.

INTERPRETATION

We developed a classifier that can differentiate between iCCAs, intrahepatic metastases of a PAAD, and normal bile duct tissue with high accuracy. This tool can be used for improving the diagnosis of pancreato-biliary cancers of the liver.

FUNDING

This work was supported by Berlin Institute of Health (JCS Program), DKTK Berlin (Young Investigator Grant 2022), German Research Foundation (493697503 and 314905040 - SFB/TRR 209 Liver Cancer B01), and German Cancer Aid (70113922).

A Novel Diagnostic Imaging Method for the Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has an extremely poor prognosis, with a survival rate of less than 10% [...].

Pancreatic duct epithelial malignancy suggested by large focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy in cystic diseases of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: A cystic lesion is common in the pancreas. Focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (FPPA) has been reported as a sign of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma in situ (HGP/CIS). Some cystic lesions accompany FPPA. However, the relationship between a cystic lesion, FPPA, and the histopathological background of the pancreatic duct is unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the data of 98 patients with a cystic lesion who underwent serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) because of accompanying FPPA, increased size of the cystic lesion, and pancreatic duct stricture at the base.

RESULTS

The clinical diagnosis of a cystic lesion was intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) and cysts in 72 (73.5%) and 26 (26.5%) patients, respectively. Ninety of the 98 patients (91.8%) had FPPA. Positive results (adenocarcinoma and suspicion) on SPACE were observed in 56 of all cases (57.1%), 48 of IPMN (66.7%), 8 of cysts (30.8%), and 54 of FPPA (59.3%), and were significantly associated with IPMN (p = 0.002) and the large FPPA (>269.79 mm^2,p = 0.0001); moreover, these disorders are considerably related (p = 0.0003). Fifty patients (51.0%) with positive results on SPACE underwent surgery, with the histopathological diagnosis of epithelial malignancy in 42 patients (42.9%, 42/50, 84%). Many cystic lesions clinically diagnosed as IPMN were dilated branches covered by pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive results on SPACE were significantly associated with the clinical diagnosis of IPMN and the large FPPA. Moreover, these disorders are significantly related. Surgery owing to positive results could lead to the histopathological diagnosis of HGP/CIS.

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

We sought to assess the performance of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR for the diagnosis of primary tumours as well as metastatic lesions in patients with pancreatic cancer and to compare the results with those of 18F-FDG PET/CT.

METHODS

Prospectively, we evaluated 33 patients suspected to have pancreatic adenocarcinoma, of whom thirty-two were confirmed by histopathology, and one had autoimmune pancreatitis confirmed by needle biopsy and glucocorticoid treatment. Within 1 week, each patient underwent both 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Comparisons of the detection abilities for primary tumours, lymph nodes, and metastases were conducted for the two imaging approaches. The original maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) and normalised SUVmax (SUVmax/SUVbkgd) of paired lesions on 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET/CT were measured and compared.

RESULTS

Thirty pancreatic cancer patients and three pancreatitis patients were enrolled. 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET/CT exhibited equivalent (100%) detection rates for primary tumours. The original/normalised SUVmax of primary tumours on 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET was markedly higher than that on 18F-FDG (p < 0.05). Sixteen pancreatic cancer patients had pancreatic parenchymal uptake, whereas 18F-FDG PET images showed parenchymal uptake in only four patients (53.33% vs. 13.33%, p < 0.001). 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET detected more positive lymph nodes than 18F-FDG PET (42 vs. 30, p < 0.001), while 18F-FDG PET was able to detect more liver metastases than 68 Ga-FAPI-04 (181 vs. 104, p < 0.001). In addition, multisequence MR imaging helped explain ten pancreatic cancers that could not be definitively revealed due to 68 Ga-FAPI-04 inflammatory uptake and identified more liver metastases than 18F-FDG (256 vs. 181, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET might be better than 18F-FDG PET in the detection of suspicious lymph node metastases. MR multiple sequence imaging of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR was helpful for explaining pancreatic lesions in patients with obstructive inflammation and detecting tiny liver metastases.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology: III. Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate the characterization of radioactivity from deep or dense structures, and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The third report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Abstract

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, assessment of response to therapy, restaging and longitudinal surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, and the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications. In the third of these review articles, key tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided to outline the role that PET-CT plays in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The focus is on the use of ¹⁸F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), rather than on research radiopharmaceuticals under development. Many different types of gastrointestinal tumors exist, both pediatric and adult. A discussion of the role of FDG PET-CT for all of these is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this article focuses on the most common adult gastrointestinal malignancies that may be encountered in clinical practice. The information provided here will provide information outlining the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies for healthcare professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides interpretive guidance related to PET-CT for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.

Pretherapeutic Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer: Comparison of FDG PET/CT Plus Delayed PET/MR and Contrast-Enhanced CT/MR

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the diagnostic performance of whole-body FDG PET/CT plus delayed abdomen PET/MR imaging in the pretherapeutic assessment of pancreatic cancer in comparison with that of contrast-enhanced (CE)-CT/MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients with pancreatic cancer underwent nonenhanced whole-body FDG PET/CT, delayed abdomen PET/MR imaging, and CE-CT/MR imaging. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed these images and discussed to reach a consensus, determining tumor resectability according to a 5-point scale, N stage (N0 or N positive), and M stage (M0 or M1). With use of clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as the reference standard, diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared by using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT plus delayed PET/MR imaging was not significantly different from that of CE-CT/MR imaging in the assessment of tumor resectability [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.927 vs. 0.925 (p = 0.975)], N stage (accuracy: 80% (16 of 20 patients) vs. 55% (11 of 20 patients), p = 0.125), and M stage (accuracy: 100% (40 of 40 patients) vs. 93% (37 of 40 patients), p = 0.250). Moreover, 14 of 40 patients had liver metastases. The number of liver metastases detected by CE-CT/MR imaging, PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging were 33, 18, and 61, respectively. Compared with CE-CT/MR imaging, PET/MR imaging resulted in additional findings of more liver metastases in 9/14 patients, of which 3 patients were upstaged. Compared with PET/CT, PET/MR imaging resulted in additional findings of more liver metastases in 12/14 patients, of which 6 patients were upstaged.

CONCLUSIONS

Although FDG PET/CT plus delayed PET/MR imaging showed a diagnostic performance similar to that of CE-CT/MR imaging in the pretherapeutic assessment of the resectability and staging of pancreatic tumors, it still has potential as the more efficient and reasonable work-up approach for the additional value of metastatic information provided by delayed PET/MR imaging.

Selective and sensitive detection of miRNA-198 using single polymeric microfiber waveguide platform with heterogeneous CHA amplification strategy

Pancreatic cancer (PC), which has a high fatality rate, is a kind of cancer with poor diagnosis and poor prognosis. Development of selective and sensitive detection platform to diagnose and prognostic of PC has attracted considerable attention. The miRNA-198 has been reported a potential prognostic and early diagnostic marker signature of PC. Herein, we report a novel sensitive detection of miRNA-198 in buffer and serum based on one dimensional chitosan/fluorescein isothiocyanate (CS/FITC) fluorescent microfiber waveguide system combined with the catalytic hairpin assembly amplification strategy. By combination with condensing enrichment effect, the proposed detection platform exhibited high specificity and sensitivity to miRNA-198 target, giving a detection limit as low as 2 fM. More importantly, the proposed detection platform can be applied directly to distinguish the expression of miRNA-198 in clinical serum, affording the ability to distinguish pancreatic cancer patients from those of healthy human beings, and quantify the expression variation of miRNA-198 for the pancreatic cancer patients before and after resection, which may pave the way to develop novel clinical diagnostic equipment for cancer diagnosis and therapeutic evaluation.

Evolving pancreatic cancer treatment: From diagnosis to healthcare management

The prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is still the worst among solid tumors. In this review, a panel of experts addressed the main unanswered questions about the clinical management of this disease, with the aim of providing practical decision support for physicians. On the basis of the evidence available from the literature, the main topics concerning pancreatic cancer are discussed: the diagnosis, as the need for a pathological characterization and the role for germ-line and somatic molecular profiling; the therapeutic management of resectable disease, as the role of upfront surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the post-operative restaging and the optimal timing foradjuvant chemotherapy, the management of the borderline resectable and locally advanced disease; the metastatic disease and the role of surgery for the management of patients with isolated metastasis and the use of biomarkers of metastatic potential; the role of supportive care and the healthcare management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

18F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Gastrointestinal malignancies encompass a variety of primary tumor sites, each with different staging criteria and treatment approaches. In this review we discuss technical aspects of 18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning to optimize information from both the PET and computed tomography components. Specific applications for 18F-FDG-PET/CT are summarized for initial staging and follow-up of the major disease sites, including esophagus, stomach, hepatobiliary system, pancreas, colon, rectum, and anus.

Pancreatic FDG uptake on follow-up PET/CT in patients with cancer

To evaluate the breakdown of unexpected pancreatic ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and the proportion of secondary primary pancreatic cancer on follow-up, patients with cancer underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The participants consisted of 4,473 consecutive patients with cancer who underwent follow-up PET/CT between January 2015 and March 2019 at Kochi Medical School. Among the participants, 225 with a history of pancreatic cancer were excluded from the present study. Retrospective and blinded PET/CT evaluations of 4,248 patients were performed. In patients with pancreatic FDG uptake, the distribution of FDG uptake in the pancreas was evaluated. The final diagnosis was determined pathologically. A total of 14 (0.3%) of the 4,248 patients exhibited FDG uptake in the pancreatic area. Pancreatic abnormalities were detected in 14 patients, and included five cases of pancreatic metastases (36%), four cases of secondary primary pancreatic cancer (29%), two cases of lymph node metastases (14%), one case of malignant lymphoma (7%), one case of autoimmune pancreatitis (7%) and one case of pseudolesion (7%). One patient with early-stage secondary primary pancreatic cancer had a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) <3.0. The remaining 13 patients had a SUV_max >3.0 in the pancreas. Of the 14 patients, two had multiple foci of FDG uptake in the pancreas. Patients with multiple foci of FDG uptake exhibited pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma and malignant lymphoma. In conclusion, the majority of patients with unexpected pancreatic FDG uptake on follow-up PET/CT exhibited malignancies; furthermore, ~30% of the malignancies detected in patients with pancreatic FDG uptake were secondary primary pancreatic cancers. In patients with unexpected pancreatic FDG uptake on follow-up PET/CT, primary cancer should be considered as well as metastatic tumors.

The Role of Positron Emission Tomography in Pancreatic Cancer and Gallbladder Cancer

18F-FDG-PET is complementary to conventional imaging in patients with clinical suspicion for exocrine pancreatic malignancies. It has similar if not superior sensitivity and specificity for detection of cancer, and when combined with contrast enhanced anatomic imaging of the abdomen, can improve diagnostic accuracy and aid in staging, assessment for resectability, radiation therapy planning, and prognostication. Various metabolic pathways affect FDG uptake in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The degree of uptake reflects histopathology, aggressiveness, metastatic potential, and metabolic profile of malignant cell and their interaction with cancer stroma. After treatment, FDG-PET is useful for detection of residual or recurrent cancer and can be used to assess and monitor response to therapy in unresectable or metastatic disease. The degree and pattern of uptake combined with other imaging features are useful in characterization of incidental pancreatic lesions and benign processes such as inflammation. Several novel PET radiopharmaceuticals have been developed to improve detection and management of pancreatic cancer. Gallbladder carcinoma is typically FDG avid and when anatomic imaging is equivocal PET can be used to assess metastatic involvement with high specificity and inform subsequent management.

The Role of Imaging in Current Treatment Strategies for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

In pancreatic cancer, imaging plays an essential role in surveillance, diagnosis, resectability evaluation, and treatment response evaluation. Pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals has been attempted using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Imaging diagnosis and resectability evaluation are the most important factors influencing treatment decisions, where computed tomography (CT) is the preferred modality. EUS, MRI, and positron emission tomography play a complementary role to CT. Treatment response evaluation is of increasing clinical importance, especially in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. This review aimed to comprehensively review the role of imaging in relation to the current treatment strategy for pancreatic cancer, including surveillance, diagnosis, evaluation of resectability and treatment response, and prediction of prognosis.

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part I, AJCC staging system, NCCN guidelines, and borderline resectable disease

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor 5-year survival rate. Accurate staging of PDAC is an important initial step in the development of a stage-specific treatment plan. Different staging systems/consensus statements convened by different societies and academic practices are currently used. The most recent version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor/node/metastases (TNM) staging system for PDAC has shifted its focus from guiding management to assessing prognosis. In order to preoperatively define the resectability of PDAC and to guide management, additional classification systems have been developed. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, one of the most commonly used systems, provide recommendations on the management and the determination of resectability for PDAC. The NCCN divides PDAC into three categories of resectability based on tumor-vessel relationship: 'resectable,' 'borderline resectable,' and 'unresectable'. Among these, the borderline disease category is of special interest given its evolution over time and the resulting variations in the definition and the associated recommendations for management between different societies. It is important to be familiar with the evolving criteria, and treatment and follow-up recommendations for PDAC. In this article, the most current AJCC staging (8th edition), NCCN guidelines (version 2.2019-April 9, 2019), and challenges and controversies in borderline resectable PDAC are reviewed.

Pitfalls in the MDCT of pancreatic cancer: strategies for minimizing errors

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is a widely used cross-sectional imaging modality for initial evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, diagnosis of PDAC can be challenging due to numerous pitfalls associated with image acquisition and interpretation, including technical factors, imaging features, and cognitive errors. Accurate diagnosis requires familiarity with these pitfalls, as these can be minimized using systematic strategies. Suboptimal acquisition protocols and other technical errors such as motion artifacts and incomplete anatomical coverage increase the risk of misdiagnosis. Interpretation of images can be challenging due to intrinsic tumor features (including small and isoenhancing masses, exophytic masses, subtle pancreatic duct irregularities, and diffuse tumor infiltration), presence of coexisting pathology (including chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm), mimickers of PDAC (including focal fatty infiltration and focal pancreatitis), distracting findings, and satisfaction of search. Awareness of pitfalls associated with the diagnosis of PDAC along with the strategies to avoid them will help radiologists to minimize technical and interpretation errors. Cognizance and mitigation of these errors can lead to earlier PDAC diagnosis and ultimately improve patient prognosis.

Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses

Solid pancreatic lesions include mainly adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors pancreatic cystic neoplasms with solid component, solid pseudopapillary tumor, pancreatoblastoma, pancreatic lymphoma, and pancreatic metastasis. The most frequent pancreatic lesion is the adenocarcinoma, representing between 70% and 95% of all solid pancreatic neoplasm. The diagnosis of these lesions can be a challenge and currently, there are different imaging techniques such as CT scan, EUS and MRI with high sensitivity and specificity. The most widely used technique for the initial evaluation is the CT scan with a sensitivity between 76% and 92% for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The EUS has a sensitivity for the detection of pancreatic lesions of around 98% and is accepted to be the most sensitive technique for the detection of small pancreatic tumors (<2 cm). The MRI, with a very high soft-tissue contrast resolution, provides an accuracy in the detection and staging of adenocarcinoma of 90-100%. A multimodality approach is usually necessary in patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic lesion. The EUS is required for the local evaluation of the relation of the lesion with vessels and for tissue acquisition and the CT scan and/or MRI is usually required for the local and distance staging in case of pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of solid pancreatic lesions and the role of the different imaging techniques in their evaluation.

The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in predicting lymph node micrometastases of pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels in predicting lymph node micrometastases in patients with pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 160 patients with pancreatic carcinoma were included in the study from 2012 to 2017. All patients underwent surgical treatment and PET/CT scans as well as tests to measure CA 19-9 levels before surgery. The PET/CT scans were evaluated by 2 nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to the clinical information and were compared to the postsurgical pathological findings. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the variables that could predict lymph node micrometastases. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to find the best cutoff value of the variables related to predicting lymph node micrometastases.

RESULTS

The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) of the primary tumor and CA 19-9 level were potent predictors for determining the lymph node status. The best SUV_max and CA 19-9 cutoff values for predicting lymph node micrometastases were 7.05 (sensitivity = 71.2%, specificity = 76.6%) and 240.55 U/ml (sensitivity = 62.1%, specificity = 79.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pancreatic cancer with a tumor SUV_max ≥ 7.05 or a CA 19-9 value ≥ 240.55 are likely to have lymph node micrometastases.

The Utility of PET/Computed Tomography for Radiation Oncology Planning, Surveillance, and Prognosis Prediction of Gastrointestinal Tumors

At present, the strongest evidence for the use of PET/computed tomography (CT) in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies is to rule out distant metastatic disease at diagnosis, radiation treatment planning for anal malignancies, and disease recurrence monitoring in colorectal and anal malignancies. Use of PET/CT for GI malignancies continues to evolve over time, with new studies evaluating prognostic abilities of PET/CT and with increasing sensitivity and spatial resolution of more modern PET/CT scanners. The authors encourage future applications and prospective evaluation of the use of PET/CT in the staging, prognostication, and recurrence prediction for GI malignancies.

The role of multimodal imaging in guiding resectability and cytoreduction in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: focus on PET and MRI

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare neoplasms that secrete peptides and neuro-amines. pNETs can be sporadic or hereditary, syndromic or non-syndromic with different clinical presentations and prognoses. The role of medical imaging includes locating the tumor, assessing its extent, and evaluating the feasibility of curative surgery or cytoreduction. Pancreatic NETs have very distinctive phenotypes on CT, MRI, and PET. PET have been demonstrated to be very sensitive to detect either well-differentiated pNETs using ⁶⁸Gallium somatostatin receptor (SSTR) radiotracers, or more aggressive undifferentiated pNETS using ¹⁸F-FDG. A comprehensive interpretation of multimodal imaging guides resectability and cytoreduction in pNETs. The imaging phenotype provides information on the differentiation and proliferation of pNETs, as well as the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of tumors with prognostic and therapeutic implications. This review provides a structured approach for standardized reading and reporting of medical imaging studies with a focus on PET and MR techniques. It explains which imaging approach should be used for different subtypes of pNET and what a radiologist should be looking for and reporting when interpreting these studies.

Myoferlin Contributes to the Metastatic Phenotype of Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Enhancing Their Migratory Capacity through the Control of Oxidative Phosphorylation

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest malignancies with an overall survival of 5% and is the second cause of death by cancer, mainly linked to its high metastatic aggressiveness. Accordingly, understanding the mechanisms sustaining the PDAC metastatic phenotype remains a priority. In this study, we generated and used a murine in vivo model to select clones from the human Panc-1 PDAC cell line that exhibit a high propensity to seed and metastasize into the liver. We showed that myoferlin, a protein previously reported to be overexpressed in PDAC, is significantly involved in the migratory abilities of the selected cells. We first report that highly metastatic Panc-1 clones expressed a significantly higher myoferlin level than the corresponding low metastatic ones. Using scratch wound and Boyden’s chamber assays, we show that cells expressing a high myoferlin level have higher migratory potential than cells characterized by a low myoferlin abundance. Moreover, we demonstrate that myoferlin silencing leads to a migration decrease associated with a reduction of mitochondrial respiration. Since mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation has been shown to be implicated in the tumor progression and dissemination, our data identify myoferlin as a valid potential therapeutic target in PDAC.

Incidental liver metastasis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Exocrine cancer of pancreas is the fourth leading cause of death in the USA among both men and women. Contrast enhanced multidetector-row computer tomography (MDCT) is the current modality of choice for the detection of distant metastasis in pancreatic cancer as a part of pre-operative workup, which helps decide on resectability. Authors present a first ever reported case of an incidental liver metastasis found on intra-operative wedge hepatic biopsy during Whipple’s procedure for pancreatic cancer. This pancreatic cancer was initially thought to be resectable based on MDCT staging per guidelines. The case highlights the importance of diagnostic staging laparoscopy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy before resecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Recommendations of the Working Group of the Polish Pancreatic Club

These recommendations refer to the current management in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a neoplasia characterised by an aggressive course and extremely poor prognosis. The recommendations regard diagnosis, surgical, adjuvant and palliative treatment, with consideration given to endoscopic and surgical methods. A vast majority of the statements are based on data obtained in clinical studies and experts' recommendations on PDAC management, including the following guidelines: International Association of Pancreatology/European Pancreatic Club (IAP/EPC), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Polish Society of Gastroenterology (PSG) and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). All recommendations were voted on by members of the Working Group of the Polish Pancreatic Club. Results of the voting and brief comments are provided with each recommendation.

Current Approaches to Pancreatic Cancer Screening

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year survival rate of only 8% and is estimated to be the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2021. Prior convention held that screening for PDAC would not be beneficial; however, a deeper understanding of the carcinogenesis pathway supports a potential window of opportunity among the target population. Screening for PDAC is not a standard practice among the general population because of its low incidence. However, screening may be beneficial for individuals with familial history, chronic diseases with genetic predispositions, or inherited cancer syndromes, such as hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial atypical multiple mole melanoma, Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer), ataxia telangiectasia, and Li-Fraumeni syndrome, all of which have been associated with an increased risk of developing PDAC. The screening strategies among these high-risk individuals are targeted to identify precursor lesions and PDAC at an early resectable stage. This review describes the risk factors for pancreatic cancer, especially the genetic risk factors in high-risk individuals and current screening strategies available for PDAC.

Different biological behaviors in left-sided pancreatic cancer according to Yonsei criteria: Proposal of a modified Yonsei criteria score

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Our institutional experience has demonstrated that bloodless and margin-negative resection is the most potent prognostic factor in treating left-sided pancreatic cancer and we developed selection guideline. The Yonsei criteria (YC) is selection criteria for oncologically safe and effective resection of left-sided pancreatic cancer by a minimally invasive approach. In this study, we investigated whether left-sided pancreatic cancer with YC can be more individualized to predict long-term survival by using clinically and pathologically detectable parameters.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2015, 105 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer. The medical records of the patients were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Among clinically and pathologically detectable parameters to predict tumor conditions, radiologically determined tumor size (p = 0.080) and SUV_max (p = 0.086) were identified as predictors of early tumor recurrence with marginal significance. Among them, 20% of the patients with YC were identified as having the most favoring tumor condition, with an modified YC score of 3. The patient group with the lowest mYC score was found to have a very long disease-free survival time, with a mean of 108 months, which was statistically different from those with other mYC scores (mYC score = 4, mean 47.1 months [95% CI: 27.8-69.5] vs. mYC score = 5, mean 36.7 months [95% CI: 12.7-60.7], vs. mYC score = 6, mean 10.7 months [95% CI: 3.9-17.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

Modified Yonsei criteria score can predict long-term survival in resected left-sided pancreatic cancer. And patients within YC with a mYC score = 3 could have a favorable survival outcome.

Pancreatic cancer: French clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, AFC)

BACKGROUND

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA), updated in July 2018.

DESIGN

This collaborative work was produced under the auspices of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of PA. It is based on the previous guidelines, recent literature review and expert opinions. Recommendations were graded in three categories, according to the level of evidence.

RESULTS

Over the last seven years, significant changes in PA management have been implemented in clinical practice. Imaging/staging: diffusion magnetic resonance imaging is useful before surgery to rule out small liver metastases.

SURGERY

centralization of pancreatic surgery in expert centers is associated with a decreased postoperative mortality. Adjuvant chemotherapy: modified FOLFIRINOX in fit patients, or gemcitabine, or 5-FU, or gemcitabine plus capecitabine, to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Locally advanced PA: no survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy. Metastatic PA: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination are first-line standards in fit patients; second-line with 5FU/nal-IRI or 5FU/oxaliplatin combination after first-line gemcitabine.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines for management of PA are continuously evolving and need to be regularly updated. This constant progress is made possible through clinical and translational research. However, as each individual case is particular, they cannot substitute to multidisciplinary tumor board discussion.

Prognostic stratification of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Past, present, and future

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the digestive cancer with the poorest prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 7%. Complete surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the only treatment with curative intent. However, many patients with an apparently localized disease who may undergo primary tumor resection already have micro-metastatic disease and will promptly develop metastases. Considering the significant rate of morbidity and mortality upon pancreatic surgery, the pre-operative identification of patients with an aggressive disease is therefore a major clinical issue. Although tumor size, differentiation, margins, and lymph node invasion are the main "classical" prognostic factors, they are not sufficient to fully predict early disease recurrence. In the last decade, multi-omics high-throughput analyses have provided a new insight into PDAC biology and have led to the description of multiple molecular subtypes, with a significant prognostic value for most of them, but that have not yet been transposed to routine clinical practice, mainly due to poor availability of tumor tissue material prior to surgical resection. In this review, we provide an overview of the current status of clinico-pathological and molecular biomarkers (tumor and blood) to predict early recurrence, and their implications for clinical practice and future research development.

Clinical impact of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: diagnosing lymph node metastasis and predicting survival

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) for lymph node (LN) metastasis and the prognostic significance of F-FDG PET/CT LN parameters in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent staging F-FDG PET/CT between May 2007 and September 2016 were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed through medical record and image re-evaluation. The diagnostic accuracy of F-FDG PET/CT in predicting LN metastasis was evaluated and compared with that of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CECT). Prognostic variables, including LN parameters assessed by F-FDG PET/CT [standardized uptake value (SUV)LN and LN/tumor SUV ratio], that affect disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by regression analysis.

RESULTS

When predicting LN metastasis, F-FDG PET/CT showed greater sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy than CECT. Among prognostic factors affecting DFS, PET-positive LN (P=0.008), and LN/tumor SUV ratio (P=0.003) were found to be significant by regression analysis. Among the variables affecting OS, lymphovascular invasion (P=0.018) and the LN/tumor SUV ratio (P=0.046) were found to be significant.

CONCLUSION

F-FDG PET/CT showed higher diagnostic accuracy in predicting LN metastasis than CECT in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Only the LN/tumor SUV ratio of F-FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic variable in both DFS and OS.

Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a growing source of cancer related death, yet has poor survival rates which have not improved in the last few decades. Its high mortality rate is attributed to pancreatic cancer biology, difficulty in early diagnosis and the lack of standardised international guidelines in assessing suspicious pancreatic masses. This review aims to provide an update in the current state of play in pancreatic cancer diagnosis and to evaluate the benefits and limitations of available diagnostic technology. The main modalities discussed are imaging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound and positron emission tomography and tissue acquisition with fine needle aspiration. We also review the improvements in the techniques used for tissue acquisition and the opportunity for personalised cancer medicine. Screening of high risk individuals, promising biomarkers and common mimickers of pancreatic cancer are also explored, as well as suggestions for future research directions to allow for earlier detection of pancreatic cancer. Timely and accurate diagnosis of pancreatic cancer can lead to improvements in the current poor outcome of this disease.

Role of staging laparoscopy in the management of Pancreatic Duct Carcinoma (PDAC): Single-center experience from a tertiary hospital in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Proper staging is critical to the management of pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC). Laparoscopy has been used to stage patients without gross metastatic disease with variable success.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify the frequency of patients diagnosed by laparoscopy with occult metastatic disease. Also, we looked for variables related to a higher chance of occult metastasis.

METHODS

Patients with PDAC submitted to staging laparoscopy either immediately before pancreatectomy or as a separate procedure between January 2010 and December 2016 were included. None presented gross metastatic disease at initial staging. We used logistic regression to search for variables associated with metastatic disease.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 63 patients. Among all patients, nine (16.7%) had occult metastases at laparoscopy. Unresectable tumor (Odds ratio = 18.0, P = 0.03), increasing tumor size (Odds ratio = 1.36, P = 0.01), and abdominal pain (Odds ratio = 5.6, P = 0.04) significantly predicted the risk of occult metastases in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only tumor size predicted the risk of occult metastases.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy remains a valuable tool in PDAC staging. Patients with either large or unresectable tumors, or presenting with abdominal pain present the highest risk for occult intra-abdominal metastases.

Medical oncology and pancreatic cancer: what the radiologist needs to know

The majority of PCs present as advanced disease, and treatment goals are for prolongation of life and palliation of the symptoms. Oncologists rely on our radiology colleagues to provide information on the extent of disease and the effectiveness of our treatment. The stakes rise in those patients where the disease has seemingly not spread and who might be treated with a goal of cure. For this subset of patients, medical oncologists and surgeons require as precise a radiologic description as possible in order to most accurately characterize the extent of the disease, in turn informing us as to the likelihood of a successful surgery and potential cure. In this paper, we review the fine points of imaging that distinguish resectable from borderline or unresectable patients, explain the principles of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer, highlight some of the novel therapies now being pioneered in pancreatic cancer, and review radiologic features important for palliative care in patients with these tumors.

PET-PANC: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and health economic analysis study of the impact of combined modality 18fluorine-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer diagnosis and staging can be difficult in 10-20% of patients. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) adds precise anatomical localisation to functional data. The use of PET/CT may add further value to the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incremental diagnostic accuracy and impact of PET/CT in addition to standard diagnostic work-up in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer.

DESIGN

A multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and clinical value study of PET/CT in suspected pancreatic malignancy.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients to undergo PET/CT following standard diagnostic work-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in addition to standard diagnostic work-up with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Secondary outcomes were (1) changes in patients' diagnosis, staging and management as a result of PET/CT; (2) changes in the costs and effectiveness of patient management as a result of PET/CT; (3) the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in chronic pancreatitis; (4) the identification of groups of patients who would benefit most from PET/CT; and (5) the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in other pancreatic tumours.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2013, 589 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer underwent MDCT and PET/CT, with 550 patients having complete data and in-range PET/CT. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were 88.5% and 70.6%, respectively, for MDCT and 92.7% and 75.8%, respectively, for PET/CT. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax.) for a pancreatic cancer diagnosis was 7.5. PET/CT demonstrated a significant improvement in relative sensitivity (p = 0.01) and specificity (p = 0.023) compared with MDCT. Incremental likelihood ratios demonstrated that PET/CT significantly improved diagnostic accuracy in all scenarios (p < 0.0002). PET/CT correctly changed the staging of pancreatic cancer in 56 patients (p = 0.001). PET/CT influenced management in 250 (45%) patients. PET/CT stopped resection in 58 (20%) patients who were due to have surgery. The benefit of PET/CT was limited in patients with chronic pancreatitis or other pancreatic tumours. PET/CT was associated with a gain in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.0157 (95% confidence interval -0.0101 to 0.0430). In the base-case model PET/CT was seen to dominate MDCT alone and is thus highly likely to be cost-effective for the UK NHS. PET/CT was seen to be most cost-effective for the subgroup of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who were thought to be resectable.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT provided a significant incremental diagnostic benefit in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and significantly influenced the staging and management of patients. PET/CT had limited utility in chronic pancreatitis and other pancreatic tumours. PET/CT is likely to be cost-effective at current reimbursement rates for PET/CT to the UK NHS. This was not a randomised controlled trial and therefore we do not have any information from patients who would have undergone MDCT only for comparison. In addition, there were issues in estimating costs for PET/CT. Future work should evaluate the role of PET/CT in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and prognosis and response to therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73852054 and UKCRN 8166.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a difficult disease to treat and continues to portend a poor prognosis, as most patients are unresectable at diagnosis. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT (PET/CT) has been a cornerstone in oncological imaging of different cancers; however, the role of PET/CT in PDAC is continually evolving and currently not well established. Studies have shown the potential of PET/CT in guiding the management of patients with PDAC, with possible added benefit over anatomic imaging with CT or MRI in certain scenarios. PET/CT may be useful in diagnosis, initial staging, treatment response assessment, differentiation of recurrent tumor from post-treatment fibrosis, and radiotherapy planning. Additionally, PET/CT may be a cost-effective modality due to upstaging of patients originally deemed as surgical candidates. Recently, the advent of simultaneous PET/MRI represents an exciting advancement in hybrid functional imaging with potential applications in the imaging of PDAC. The advantages of PET/MRI include simultaneous acquisition to improve registration of fusion images, lower radiation dose, superior soft tissue contrast, and availability of multiparametric imaging. Studies are underway to evaluate the utility of PET/MRI in PDAC, including in initial staging and treatment response assessment and to determine the subgroup of patients that will benefit from PET/MRI. Further studies are warranted in both PET/CR and PET/MRI to better understand the role of these modalities in PDAC.

The role of imaging in the clinical practice of radiation oncology for pancreatic cancer

Advances in technology have enabled the delivery of high doses of radiation therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with low rates of toxicity. Although the role of radiation for pancreatic cancer continues to evolve, encouraging results with newer techniques indicate that radiation may benefit selected patient populations. Imaging has been central to the modern successes of radiation therapy for PDAC. Here, we review the role of diagnostic imaging, imaging-based planning, and image guidance in radiation oncology practice for PDAC.