Impact of diagnosis-to-treatment waiting time on survival in esophageal cancer patients - A population-based study in The Netherlands

Impact of pre-treatment waiting intervals on short-term postoperative outcomes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy: A population-based study using the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) data

INTRODUCTION

The pre-treatment waiting interval of gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) followed by gastrectomy includes pre-nCT (diagnosis to nCT) and preoperative (diagnosis to surgery) waiting intervals. This study aimed to investigate the impact of these two distinct intervals on short-term postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients (cT1-4aN0-3M0) who underwent nCT plus gastrectomy were included using the Dutch national DUCA-database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the impact of the two waiting intervals upon short-term postoperative outcomes: pre-nCT waiting intervals (≤5, 5-8 and 8-12 weeks) and preoperative waiting intervals (≤17, 17-22, and >22 weeks).

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2021, 1242 patients were included. Compared to the pre-nCT waiting interval ≤5 weeks, the longer intervals (5-8 and 8-12 weeks) were not associated with worse 30-day mortality (p-value = 0.707; p-value = 0.900), overall complications (p-value = 0.733; p-value = 0.453), pulmonary complications (p-value = 0.250; p-value = 0.238), gastrointestinal complications (p-value = 0.396; p-value = 0.992), re-interventions (p-value = 0.407; p-value = 0.072) and 30-day readmission (p-value = 0.992; p-value = 0.664). Compared to the preoperative waiting interval ≤17 weeks, the longer intervals (17-22 and > 22 weeks) were also not associated with worse 30-day mortality (p-value = 0.926; p-value = 0.732), overall complications (p-value = 0.286; p-value = 0.510), pulmonary complications (p-value = 0.912; p-value = 0.351), gastrointestinal complications (p-value = 0.765; p-value = 0.882), re-interventions (p-value = 0.617; p-value = 0.800) and 30-day readmission (p-value = 0.592; p-value = 0.782).

CONCLUSION

A longer pre-nCT or preoperative waiting interval is not associated with worse short-term postoperative outcomes in Western gastric cancer patients undergoing nCT plus gastrectomy.

Association between surgery treatment delays and survival outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer in Hebei, China

Introduction

The delays in cancer therapies have the potential to impact disease progression by allowing the unchecked growth and spread of cancer cells. However, the understanding of the association between treatment waiting time and survival outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) is limited. This study aims to assess the impact of waiting time on survival outcomes among EC patients in Hebei province, which is recognized as one of the high-risk areas for EC in China.

Methods

A total of 9,977 non-metastatic EC patients who underwent surgical treatment were identified between 2000 and 2020. The survival outcomes of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the impact of treatment delays on OS and CSS.

Results

The average delay time for initiating EC surgical treatment after diagnosis was 1.31 months (95%CI=1.29-1.34). Patients with a long delay (≥ 3 months) in treatment, comprising 9977 EC patients, exhibited significantly lower rates of 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS compared to those without any delay in treatment initiation. A long delay in EC treatment independently associated with an elevated risk of all-cause and cancer-cause mortality among various patient subgroups, including males, older individuals, single individuals, low-income patients, residents of nonmetropolitan counties, as well as those diagnosed with poorly differentiated and stage IV EC.

Discussion

The long delay of treatment initiation impacts the outcomes of OS and CSS in EC patients. Optimizing treatment timing may enhance life expectancy for individuals diagnosed with EC.

Time to treatment of esophageal cancer in Ontario: A population-level cross-sectional study

Objective

Timely cancer treatment improves survival and anxiety for some sites. Patients with esophageal cancer require specific workup before treatment, which can prolong the time from diagnosis to treatment (treatment interval [TI]). The geographical variation of this interval remains uninvestigated in patients with esophageal cancer.

Methods

This retrospective population-level study conducted in Ontario used linked administrative health care databases. Patients treated for esophageal cancer between 2013 and 2018 were included. The TI was time from diagnosis to treatment. Patients were assigned a geographical Local Health Integration Network on the basis of postal code. Covariates included patient, disease, and diagnosing physician characteristics. Quantile regression modeled TI length at the 50th and 90th percentile and identified associated factors.

Results

Of 7509 patients, 78% were male and most were aged between 60 and 69 years. The 50th and 90th percentile TI was 36 (interquartile range, 22-55) and 77 days, respectively. The difference between the Local Health Integration Network with the longest and shortest TI at the 50th and 90th percentile was 18 and 25 days, respectively. Older age (P < .0001), greater comorbidity (P = .0005), greater material deprivation (P = .001), rurality (P = .03), histology (P = .02), and treatment group (P < .0001) were associated with a longer median TI. Older age (P = .03), greater comorbidity (P = .003), greater material deprivation (P = .005), rurality (P = .04), and treatment group (P < .0001) were associated with a longer 90th percentile TI.

Conclusions

Geographic variability of time to treatment exists across Ontario. Investigation of facility-level differences is warranted. Patient and disease factors are associated with longer wait times. These results might inform future health care policy and resource allocation.

Time to Surgery for Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Trimodal Therapy in Ontario: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Patients with resectable esophageal cancer are recommended to undergo chemoradiotherapy before esophagectomy. A longer time to surgery (TTS) and/or time to consultation (TTC) may be associated with inferior cancer-related outcomes and heightened anxiety. Thoracic cancer surgery centers (TCSCs) oversee esophageal cancer management, but differences in TTC/TTS between centers have not yet been examined. This Ontario population-level study used linked administrative healthcare databases to investigate patients with esophageal cancer between 2013–2018, who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and then surgery. TTC and TTS were time from diagnosis to the first surgical consultation and then to surgery, respectively. Patients were assigned a TCSC based on the location of the surgery. Patient, disease, and diagnosing physician characteristics were investigated. Quantile regression was used to model TTS/TTC at the 50th and 90th percentiles and identify associated factors. The median TTS and TTC were 130 and 29 days, respectively. The adjusted differences between the TCSCs with the longest and shortest median TTS and TTC were 32 and 18 days, respectively. Increasing age was associated with a 16-day longer median TTS. Increasing material deprivation was associated with a 6-day longer median TTC. Significant geographic variability exists in TTS and TTC. Therefore, the investigation of TCSC characteristics is warranted. Shortening wait times may reduce patient anxiety and improve the control of esophageal cancer.

Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada

IMPORTANCE

Esophageal cancer remains one of the most deadly cancers, ranking sixth highest among cancers leading to the greatest years of life lost.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how patients with esophageal cancer are diagnosed and treated in Ontario's regionalized thoracic surgery centers.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018, identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry, in a single-payer health care system with regionalization of thoracic surgery in the province of Ontario, Canada.

EXPOSURES

Exposures included incidence of esophageal cancer and stage at diagnosis; time from the first health care visit until treatment; and the use of specialist consultations, endoscopic ultrasonography, positron emission tomography and computed tomography, endomucosal resection, esophagectomy, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, radiation alone, and chemotherapy alone or in combination with other treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcome measures included wait times, health care use, treatment, and overall survival. Data were analyzed from March 2020 to February 2021.

RESULTS

There were 10 364 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.3 [11.9] years; 7876 men [76%]) identified during the study period. The incidence of esophageal cancer increased over the study period from 1041 in 2010 to 1309 in 2018, which was driven by a 30% increase in the number of adenocarcinomas. The time from first health care encounter to start of treatment was a median 93 days (interquartile range, 56-159 days). Endoscopic ultrasonography was observed for 12% of patients, and positron emission tomography and computed tomography (CT) in 45%. Use of endoscopic mucosal resection was observed for 8% of patients with stage 0 to I disease. A total of 114 of 547 patients (21%) receiving endoscopic resection had a subsequent esophagectomy. Only 2778 patients (27%) had consultations with a thoracic surgeon, a medical oncologist, and a radiation oncologist, whereas 1514 patients (15%) did not see any of these specialists. Of 3047 patients who had an esophagectomy, those receiving neoadjuvant therapy had better overall survival (median survival, 36 months; 95% CI, 32-39 months) than patients who received esophagectomy alone (median survival, 27 months; 95% CI, 24-30 months) or those who received esophagectomy with adjuvant therapy (median survival, 36 months; 95% CI, 32-44 months) despite significant early mortality (log-rank P < .001). There was significant variation in treatment modality across hospitals: esophagectomy ranged from 5% to 39%; esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy ranged from 33% to 93%; and esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy ranged from 0 to 34% (P < .001). Perioperative mortality was higher at 30 days for patients receiving esophagectomy at low-volume centers (odds ratio [OR], 3.66; 95% CI, 2.01-6.66) and medium-volume centers (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.33-3.23) compared with high-volume centers (P < .001). A longer wait time until treatment was associated with better overall survival (median overall survival was 15 to 17 days vs 5 to 8 days for patients who received treatment earlier than 30 days vs 30 days or longer after diagnosis; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this cohort study suggest that despite regionalization, there was significant regional variability in volumes at designated centers and in the evaluation and treatment course for patients with esophageal cancer across Ontario.

Delayed care for patients with newly diagnosed cancer due to COVID-19 and estimated impact on cancer mortality in France

BACKGROUND

The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses.

RESULTS

A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years.

Time to surgery in thoracic cancers and prioritization during COVID-19: a systematic review

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has overwhelmed hospital resources worldwide, requiring widespread cancellation of non-emergency operations, including lung and esophageal cancer operations. In the United States, while hospitals begin to increase surgical volume and tackle the backlog of cases, the specter of a “second wave,” with a potential vaccine months to years away, highlights the ongoing need to triage cases based upon the risk of surgical delay. We synthesize the available literature on time to surgery and its impact on outcomes along with a critical appraisal of the released triage guidelines in the United States.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines evaluating relevant literature from the past 15 years.

Results

Out of 679 screened abstracts, 12 studies investigating time to surgery in lung cancer were included. In stage I–II lung cancer, delayed resection beyond 6 to 8 weeks is consistently associated with lower survival. No identified evidence justifies a 2 cm cutoff for immediate versus delayed surgery. For stage IIIa lung cancer, time to surgery greater than 6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy is similarly associated with worse survival. For esophageal cancer, 254 abstracts were screened and 23 studies were included. Minimal literature addresses primary esophagectomy, but time to surgery over 8 weeks is associated with lower survival. In the neoadjuvant setting, longer time to surgery is associated with increased pathologic complete response, but also decreased survival. The optimal window for esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy is 6 to 8 weeks.

Conclusions

In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, timely resection of lung and esophageal cancer should be prioritized whenever possible based upon local resources and disease-burden.

Impact of time from diagnosis to chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study to Balance Prognostic Factors

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether treatment delay affects the clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (A-GC).

AIM

To assess whether treatment delay affects the clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in A-GC.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study examined consecutive patients with A-GC between April 2012 and July 2018. In total, 110 patients with stage IV A-GC who underwent chemotherapy were enrolled. We defined the wait time (WT) as the interval between diagnosis and chemotherapy initiation. We evaluated the influence of WT on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The mean OS was 303 d. The median WT was 17 d. We divided the patients into early and elective WT groups, with a 2-wk cutoff point. There were 46 and 64 patients in the early and elective WT groups, respectively. Compared with the elective WT group, the early WT group had significantly lower albumin (Alb) levels and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels but not a lower performance status. The elective WT group underwent more combination chemotherapy than did the early WT group. OS was different between the two groups (230 d vs 340 d, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that higher CRP levels, lower Alb levels and monotherapy were significantly related to a poor prognosis. To minimize potential selection bias, patients in the elective WT group were 1:1 propensity score matched with patients in the early WT group; no significant difference in OS was found (303 d vs 311 d, respectively, log-rank P = 0.9832).

CONCLUSION

A longer WT in patients with A-GC does not appear to be associated with a worse prognosis.