1
|
van Erning FN, van den Heuvel TBM, Sijtsma FPC, Boerma D, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Bremers AJ, van Duyn EB, van Grevenstein HMU, Hemmer PHJ, Kok NFM, Madsen E, de Reuver PR, Wiezer RJ, Witkamp AJ, Nienhuijs SW, Poelmann FB, Tuynman JB, Been LB, Rovers KP, de Hingh IHJT. An observational cohort of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases or pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with CRS-HIPEC: Development and first results of the Dutch CRS-HIPEC quality registry. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108568. [PMID: 39241538 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To improve care for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) or pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), the Dutch CRS-HIPEC quality registry was initiated in 2019. The aims are to describe the development and content of this registry and to give insight into the data collected during the first years. MATERIALS AND METHODS The registry is an observational cohort in the Netherlands. All patients with CRC-PM or PMP who intend to undergo cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) from 6 hospitals are included. Clinical data and outcomes (including hospital variation) were analyzed. RESULTS In 2019-2022, 889 patients were included in the CRS-HIPEC quality registry: 749 (84 %) with CRC-PM and 140 (16 %) with PMP. Peritoneal metastases were diagnosed synchronously in 51 % of CRC-PM patients and in 94 % of PMP patients. In patients undergoing complete CRS, the median peritoneal cancer index was 8 (IQR 4-13) for CRC-PM and 15 (IQR 6-26) for PMP. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 639 CRC-PM patients (97 %) and 108 PMP patients (82 %). HIPEC was mainly performed with mitomycin C (CRC-PM: 94 %, PMP: 92 %). Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred in 148 CRC-PM patients (22 %) and 30 PMP patients (23 %) with 90-day mortality rates of 2 %. In CRC-PM, differences between hospitals were observed regarding proportions of diagnostic laparoscopies/laparotomies, (neo)adjuvant treatment, ostomy formations and re-admissions. CONCLUSION The CRS-HIPEC quality registry provides insight into the outcomes of CRS-HIPEC and enables clinical auditing and observational cohort studies aiming to improve treatment outcomes for patients with CRC-PM and PMP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Teun B M van den Heuvel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Femke P C Sijtsma
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - André J Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Eino B van Duyn
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - René J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Arjan J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Floris B Poelmann
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucas B Been
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quénet F, Carrère S, Sgarbura O. [Contribution of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinoma. HIPEC, PIPAC, state of the art and future directions]. Bull Cancer 2024; 111:285-290. [PMID: 38331695 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
After more than a decade of good results using the combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinosis of colorectal origin, the PRODIGE7 study, which specifically evaluated the role of HIPEC, failed to show any superiority in terms of overall and disease-free survival for the CRS+HIPEC combination compared with CRS alone. This study constituted a radical change in the knowledge and therapeutic attitudes observed to date. After reviewing the literature and the consensus of national and international experts, a synthesis is provided, together with an outlook on the questions raised and the therapeutic trials and innovations of the near future. An analysis of recent advances due to the advent of a new technique, PIPAC, is also proposed, as well as a review of current therapeutic trials in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Quénet
- Service de chirurgie oncologique, ICM Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34000 Montpellier, France.
| | - Sébastien Carrère
- Service de chirurgie oncologique, ICM Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Service de chirurgie oncologique, ICM Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34000 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hübner M, van Der Speeten K, Govaerts K, de Hingh I, Villeneuve L, Kusamura S, Glehen O. 2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:567-576. [PMID: 37940803 PMCID: PMC10695877 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14368-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) can benefit from potentially curative cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 40 months. OBJECTIVE The aims of this evidence-based consensus were to define the indications for HIPEC, to select the preferred HIPEC regimens, and to define research priorities regarding the use of HIPEC for PM-CRC. METHODS The consensus steering committee elaborated and formulated pertinent clinical questions according to the PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) method and assessed the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Standardized evidence tables were presented to an international expert panel to reach a consensus (4-point, weak and strong positive/negative) on HIPEC regimens and research priorities through a two-round Delphi process. The consensus was defined as ≥ 50% agreement for the 4-point consensus grading or ≥ 70% for either of the two combinations. RESULTS Evidence was weak or very weak for 9/10 clinical questions. In total, 70/90 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (78%), with a consensus for 10/10 questions on HIPEC regimens. There was strong negative consensus concerning the short duration, high-dose oxaliplatin (OX) protocol (55.7%), and a weak positive vote (53.8-64.3%) in favor of mitomycin-C (MMC)-based HIPEC (preferred choice: Dutch protocol: 35 mg/m2, 90 min, three fractions), both for primary cytoreduction and recurrence. Determining the role of HIPEC after CRS was considered the most important research question, regarded as essential by 85.7% of the panelists. Furthermore, over 90% of experts suggest performing HIPEC after primary and secondary CRS for recurrence > 1 year after the index surgery. CONCLUSIONS Based on the available evidence, despite the negative results of PRODIGE 7, HIPEC could be conditionally recommended to patients with PM-CRC after CRS. While more preclinical and clinical data are eagerly awaited to harmonize the procedure further, the MMC-based Dutch protocol remains the preferred regimen after primary and secondary CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Kurt van Der Speeten
- Department of Abdominal and Oncological Surgery, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg (ZOL), Genk, Belgium
| | - Kim Govaerts
- Department of Abdominal and Oncological Surgery, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg (ZOL), Genk, Belgium
| | - Ignace de Hingh
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
- CICLY: Center for Innovation in Cancer in Lyon, University Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Witmer HDD, Dhiman A, Turaga KK. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: Where do we stand? Cancer 2023; 129:495-502. [PMID: 36527271 PMCID: PMC10107206 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to the lining of the abdomen (peritoneum) benefit from surgery to remove all the cancer. The addition of certain types of intra-abdominal chemotherapy during surgery improves survival for select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter D D Witmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ankit Dhiman
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kiran K Turaga
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van de Vlasakker VCJ, van den Heuvel TBM, Rijken A, Nienhuijs SW, Ketelaers SHJ, Verrijssen ASE, Rutten HJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Burger JWA, de Hingh IHJT. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Intra-Operative Radiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced or Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer and Peritoneal Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:858. [PMID: 36765814 PMCID: PMC9913342 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the safety and long-term outcome of a multimodality treatment consisting of radical surgery, intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT), and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) or locally recurrent rectal carcinoma (LRRC) and peritoneal metastases (PM). Methods: The present study was a single-center cohort study, including all consecutive patients undergoing this treatment in a tertiary referral center for LARC, LRRC, and PM. Postoperative complications, intensive care stay (ICU stay), and re-admission rates were assessed as well as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 14 LARC and 16 LRRC patients with PM were included in the study. The median ICU stay was 1 day, and 57% of patients developed a severe postoperative complication. No 90-day mortality was observed. Median DFS was 10.0 months (Interquartile Range 7.1-38.7), and median OS was 31.0 months (Interquartile Range 15.9-144.3). Conclusions: As postoperative complications and survival were in line with treatments that are accepted for LARC or LRRC and PM as separate procedures, we conclude that combined treatment with IORT and CRS-HIPEC should be considered as a treatment option for selected patients with LARC or LRRC and peritoneal metastases in tertiary referral centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anouk Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W. Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Harm J. Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW–School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW–School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, P.O. Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sommariva A, Tonello M, Coccolini F, De Manzoni G, Delrio P, Pizzolato E, Gelmini R, Serra F, Rreka E, Pasqual EM, Marano L, Biacchi D, Carboni F, Kusamura S, Sammartino P. Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: The Impact of the Results of PROPHYLOCHIP, COLOPEC, and PRODIGE 7 Trials on Peritoneal Disease Management. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010165. [PMID: 36612161 PMCID: PMC9818482 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
HIPEC is a potentially useful locoregional treatment combined with cytoreduction in patients with peritoneal colorectal metastases. Despite being widely used in several cancer centers around the world, its role had never been investigated before the results of three important RCTs appeared on this topic. The PRODIGE 7 trial clarified the role of oxaliplatin-based HIPEC in patients treated with radical surgery. Conversely, the PROPHYLOCHIP and the COLOPEC were designed to chair the role of HIPEC in patients at high risk of developing peritoneal metastases. Although all three trials demonstrated the relative ineffectiveness of HIPEC for treating or preventing peritoneal metastases, these results are not sufficient to abandon this technique. In addition to some criticisms relating to the design of the trials and their statistical value, the oxaliplatin-based HIPEC was found to be ineffective in preventing or treating peritoneal colorectal metastases, especially in patients already treated with systemic platinum-based chemotherapy. Several studies are ongoing investigating further HIPEC drugs and regimens. The review deeply discussed all the aspects and relapses of this new evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Sommariva
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-423-421306
| | - Marco Tonello
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, “Fondazione Giovanni Pascale” IRCCS, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Elisa Pizzolato
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Roberta Gelmini
- SC Chirurgia Generale d’Urgenza ed Oncologica, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Francesco Serra
- SC Chirurgia Generale d’Urgenza ed Oncologica, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Erion Rreka
- General and Peritoneal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Enrico Maria Pasqual
- DAME University of Udine-AOUD Center Advanced Surgical Oncology, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Luigi Marano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Daniele Biacchi
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Roma, Italy
| | - Fabio Carboni
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Paolo Sammartino
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Delhorme JB, Sauvinet G, Séverac F, Diab S, Liu D, Rohr S, Romain B, Brigand C. Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Origin Treated with Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: The Efficiency of Mitomycin C. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7568-7576. [PMID: 35882692 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12221-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival of patients affected by colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) can be improved with combined complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Two chemotherapeutic agents are mainly used: mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin. A recent prospective randomized clinical trial showed that oxaliplatin-based HIPEC does not improve survival compared with CCRS alone. The purpose of our study was to compare the survival effectiveness of MMC versus oxaliplatin-based HIPEC using a homogeneous surgical technique and drug protocol. METHODS This retrospective monocentric study included all patients prospectively registered for having undergone CCRS and HIPEC using MMC or oxaliplatin for CRC-PM in Strasbourg University Hospital, France, from December 2004 until December 2019. MMC-based HIPEC and oxaliplatin-based HIPEC groups were compared with an inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS A total of 137 patients were included. Groups were comparable for all baseline characteristics except for peritoneal carcinomatosis index. In the weighted multivariate analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) and peritoneal disease-free survival (PDFS) were significantly higher in the MMC-based HIPEC group compared with the oxaliplatin-based HIPEC group with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (CI 95% 0.56-0.98), p = 0.035 and 0.59 (CI 95% 0.40-0.98), p = 0.0084, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival or postoperative morbidity between groups. CONCLUSIONS These results favor a superiority of MMC for DFS and PDFS in comparison with oxaliplatin in HIPEC after CCRS in treatment with curative intent for CRC-PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Baptiste Delhorme
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France. .,INSERM UMR_S1113, Université de Strasbourg, FMTS, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Guillaume Sauvinet
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - François Séverac
- Department of Public Health, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Samer Diab
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - David Liu
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Serge Rohr
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.,INSERM UMR_S1113, Université de Strasbourg, FMTS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Benoît Romain
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.,INSERM UMR_S1113, Université de Strasbourg, FMTS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cécile Brigand
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.,INSERM UMR_S1113, Université de Strasbourg, FMTS, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Current Trends in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Disease from Appendiceal and Colorectal Malignancies. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102840. [PMID: 35628966 PMCID: PMC9143396 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a poor prognostic factor for all malignancies. This extent of metastatic disease progression remains difficult to treat with systemic therapies due to poor peritoneal vascularization resulting in limited drug delivery and penetration into tissues. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are surgical interventions that directly target peritoneal tumors and have improved outcomes for PC resulting from appendiceal and colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite these radical therapies, long-term survival remains infrequent, and recurrence is common. The reasons for these outcomes are multifactorial and signal the need for the continued development of novel therapeutics, techniques, and approaches to improve outcomes for these patients. Here, we review landmark historical studies that serve as the foundation for current recommendations, recent discoveries, clinical trials, active research, and areas of future interest in CRS/HIPEC to treat PC originating from appendiceal and colorectal malignancies.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pereira F, Serrano A, Manzanedo I, Pérez-Viejo E, González-Moreno S, González-Bayón L, Arjona-Sánchez A, Torres J, Ramos I, Barrios ME, Cascales P, Morales R, Boldó E, García-Fadrique A, Arteaga X, Gutierrez-Calvo A, Sánchez-García S, Asensio E, Ramírez CP, Artiles M, Vaqué J, Parra PA, Villarejo P, Muñoz-Casares C, Turienzo E, Calero A, Torrejimeno IJ, Prieto I, Galindo J, Borrego V, Marcello ME, Rihuete C, Carrasco J, Gomez-Quiles L. GECOP-MMC: phase IV randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mytomicin-C after complete surgical cytoreduction in patients with colon cancer peritoneal metastases. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:536. [PMID: 35549912 PMCID: PMC9097342 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09572-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The French PRODIGE 7 trial, published on January 2021, has raised doubts about the specific survival benefit provided by HIPEC with oxaliplatin 460 mg/m2 (30 minutes) for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. However, several methodological flaws have been identified in PRODIGE 7, specially the HIPEC protocol or the choice of overall survival as the main endpoint, so its results have not been assumed as definitive, emphasizing the need for further research on HIPEC. It seems that the HIPEC protocol with high-dose mytomicin-C (35 mg/m2) is the preferred regime to evaluate in future clinical studies. METHODS GECOP-MMC is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase IV clinical trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HIPEC with high-dose mytomicin-C in preventing the development of peritoneal recurrence in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis from colon cancer (not rectal), after complete surgical cytoreduction. This study will be performed in 31 Spanish HIPEC centres, starting in March 2022. Additional international recruiting centres are under consideration. Two hundred sixteen patients with PCI ≤ 20, in which complete cytoreduction (CCS 0) has been obtained, will be randomized intraoperatively to arm 1 (with HIPEC) or arm 2 (without HIPEC). We will stratified randomization by surgical PCI (1-10; 11-15; 16-20). Patients in both arms will be treated with personalized systemic chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is peritoneal recurrence-free survival at 3 years. An ancillary study will evaluate the correlation between surgical and pathological PCI, comparing their respective prognostic values. DISCUSSION HIPEC with high-dose mytomicin-C, in patients with limited (PCI ≤ 20) and completely resected (CCS 0) peritoneal metastases, is assumed to reduce the expected risk of peritoneal recurrence from 50 to 30% at 3 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT number: 2019-004679-37; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05250648 (registration date 02/22/2022, ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Pereira
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino 2, Fuenlabrada, 28942, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Angel Serrano
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino 2, Fuenlabrada, 28942, Madrid, Spain
| | - Israel Manzanedo
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino 2, Fuenlabrada, 28942, Madrid, Spain
| | - Estibalitz Pérez-Viejo
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino 2, Fuenlabrada, 28942, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Luis González-Bayón
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/ Doctor Esquerdo, 46 -, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Juan Torres
- Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, Calle Hermandad de Donantes de Sangre s/n, 04009, Almería, Spain
| | - Isabel Ramos
- Hospital Sant Joan Despi Moises Broggi, Carrer de Jacint Verdaguer, 90, 08970 Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria E Barrios
- Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Avenida de Blasco Ibañez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pedro Cascales
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Rafael Morales
- Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79. 07210 Palma, Mallorca, Spain
| | - Enrique Boldó
- Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial De Castellón, Avenida del Doctor Clarà 19, 12006, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | | | - Xabier Arteaga
- Hospital Universitario Donostia, Begiristain Doktorea Pasealekua 109, 20014, Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Alberto Gutierrez-Calvo
- Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias, Carretera Alcalá-Meco, s/n - 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Susana Sánchez-García
- Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, C/ Obispo Rafael Torija s/n - Pol. Larache, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Enrique Asensio
- Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Calle Dulzaina, 2, 47012, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Cesar P Ramírez
- Hospital Quirónsalud Málaga, Avenida de Imperio Argentina, 1, 29004, Málaga, Spain
| | - Manuel Artiles
- Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Barranco de la Ballena, 0, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Javier Vaqué
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pedro A Parra
- Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, Avda. Intendente Jorge Palacios, 1, 30003, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pedro Villarejo
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Avda. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Estrella Turienzo
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Avenida de Roma, 0, 33011, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Alicia Calero
- Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Camí de la Almazara, 11, 03203 Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Prieto
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio Galindo
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo km. 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vicente Borrego
- Hospital Clínico Universitario "Lozano Blesa", Avda. San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Manuel E Marcello
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Calle de Budapest, 1, 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Rihuete
- Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena, Avenida de los Reyes Católicos 21, 28340 Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquin Carrasco
- Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Avda. Carlos Haya 82-88, 29010, Málaga, Spain
| | - Luis Gomez-Quiles
- Hospital General Universitario De Castellón, Avenida de Benicassim, 128, 12004, Castellón, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vogel JD, Felder SI, Bhama AR, Hawkins AT, Langenfeld SJ, Shaffer VO, Thorsen AJ, Weiser MR, Chang GJ, Lightner AL, Feingold DL, Paquette IM. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:148-177. [PMID: 34775402 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Amy J Thorsen
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis of non-primary origin. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:2817-2825. [PMID: 34686891 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02354-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to analyze the role of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy that has developed in the treatment of patients with peritoneal metastasis of non-primary origin. METHODS Patients who underwent treatment for secondary gastrointestinal and ovarian malignancies over a 20-year period were reviewed. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and the log-rank test was used to assess differences between subgroups. RESULTS The study included 293 patients. The most common histology was ovarian cancer (56.3%). Median PCI was 16 and CC0-1 resection was obtained in 88.1% of cases. Grade III and IV complications occurred in 12 patients (4.1%) and 47 patients (16%), respectively. The 30- and 60-day mortality rate was 1.3% (4 patients) and 2.4% (7 patients). Five-year OS was 21.7%, 73.6%, 42.1%, and 0 for colorectal, appendiceal, ovarian, and gastric cancer (p = < 0.0001), respectively, whereas 5-year DFS was 12.4%, 48.4%, 24.3%, and 0 (p = < 0.0001), respectively. Survival outcomes were significantly higher for CC0 in each subgroup of patients. CONCLUSION Despite being a complex procedure, cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be considered a safe treatment with acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, if performed in high-volume centers. Good survival outcomes have been increasingly obtained in selected patients with peritoneal metastasis of non-primary origin.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bacalbasa N, Balescu I, Cretoiu D, Halmaciu I, Dimitriu M, Socea B, Diaconu C, Iliescu L, Savu C, Savu C, Filipescu A, Stoica C, Stiru O. Determination of whether HIPEC is beneficial in patients with synchronous peritoneal and liver metastases from colorectal cancer (Review). Exp Ther Med 2021; 22:1267. [PMID: 34594404 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis, as well as the presence of liver metastases from colorectal cancer, has been long considered as the sign of a systemic disease, transforming the patient into a candidate for palliation and best supportive care. However, in recent decades, progress in the field of medical and surgical oncology has allowed scientists worldwide to produce curative therapeutic strategies for these cases such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or extended liver resection. In addition, the association of these two therapies has also been performed with encouraging results. The aim of the current study was to review articles published thus far in regard to the association of these two therapeutic strategies, in order to identify which cases can benefit the most, which is the most efficient agent or combination of agents, and whether these types of therapy should be performed as monotherapy or as a two-stage procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolae Bacalbasa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'I. Cantacuzino' Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Balescu
- Department of Visceral Surgery, 'Ponderas' Academic Hospital, 021188 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dragos Cretoiu
- Department of Cellular, Molecular and Histology Biology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Histology Scientific Researcher, 'Alessandrescu-Rusescu' National Institute of Mother and Child Health, Fetal Medicine Excellence Research Center, 020395 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Halmaciu
- Department of Anatomy, 'George Emil Palade' University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Mihai Dimitriu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Sf. Pantelimon' Emergency Clinical Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bogdan Socea
- Department of Surgery, 'Sf. Pantelimon' Emergency Clinical Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Camelia Diaconu
- Department of Internal Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 105402 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laura Iliescu
- Department of Internal Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Internal Medicine, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cornel Savu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, 'Marius Nasta' Institute of Pneumonology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carmen Savu
- Department of Anesthesiology, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandru Filipescu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Elias' Emergency Hospital, 125100 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Claudia Stoica
- Department of Visceral Surgery, County Emergency Hospital Ilfov, 022104 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ovidiu Stiru
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 'Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu' Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, 022322 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Davis CH, Alexander HR. What is the Current Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer? Adv Surg 2021; 55:159-174. [PMID: 34389090 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H Davis
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. https://twitter.com/CDavisMD
| | - H Richard Alexander
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Stein RM, Aalbers AGJ, Sonke GS, van Driel WJ. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Ovarian and Colorectal Cancer: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1231-1238. [PMID: 33956063 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Importance The peritoneal surface is a common site of disease in ovarian and colorectal cancer. Peritoneal metastases carry a poor prognosis, despite maximal therapeutic efforts, including surgical removal of tumor deposits and intravenous chemotherapy. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a single intraoperative procedure that delivers chemotherapy directly into the abdominal cavity, leading to high intracellular drug concentration at the peritoneal surface. This review describes the current knowledge regarding the mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal metastases from epithelial ovarian and colorectal cancers and explores current knowledge gaps. Observations Toxic effects of HIPEC are limited. Evidence from a randomized trial shows improved recurrence-free and overall survival after HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer who are ineligible for primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The effect of HIPEC for patients with ovarian cancer undergoing primary CRS or CRS for recurrent disease has not yet been determined, and results of ongoing trials must be awaited. A recent study in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer did not show a benefit of HIPEC when added to perioperative chemotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance Based on available evidence, various international guidelines include the option to add HIPEC to interval CRS for patients with stage III ovarian cancer. The role of HIPEC in colorectal cancer is less well defined. Future studies will need to tailor patient selection, timing, and optimal regimens of HIPEC to improve the effectiveness of this specialized treatment in ovarian, colorectal, and other tumor types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruby M van Stein
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bhatt A, de Hingh I, Van Der Speeten K, Hubner M, Deraco M, Bakrin N, Villeneuve L, Kusamura S, Glehen O. HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9098-9113. [PMID: 34142293 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10193-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is performed with a wide variation in methodology, drugs, and other elements vital to the procedure. Adoption of a limited number of regimens could increase the collective experience of peritoneal oncologists, make comparison between studies more meaningful, and lead to a greater acceptance of results from randomized trials. This study aimed to determine the possibility of standardizing HIPEC methodology and regimens and to identify the best method of performing such a standardization. METHODS A critical review of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects of different HIPEC drugs and drug regimens, the impact of hyperthermia, and the efficacy of various HIPEC regimens as well as studies comparing different regimens was performed. RESULTS The preclinical and clinical data were limited, and studies comparing different regimens were scarce. Many of the regimens were neither supported by preclinical rationale or data nor validated by a dose-escalating formal phase 1 trial. All the regimens were based on pharmacokinetic data and did not take chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases into account. Personalized medicine approaches such as patient-derived tumor organoids could offer a solution to this problem, although clinical validation is likely to be challenging. CONCLUSIONS Apart from randomized trials, more translational research and phases 1 and 2 studies are needed. While waiting for better preclinical and clinical evidence, the best way to minimize heterogeneity is by an expert consensus that aims to identify and define a limited number of regimens for each indication and primary site. The choice of regimen then can be tailored to the patient profile and its expected toxicity and the methodology according regional factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Ignace de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eidhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martin Hubner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Department of Clinical Research, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bhatt A, Mehta S, Kammar P, Saklani A. Limitations of the PRODIGE 7 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e175. [PMID: 33932373 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00062-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus hospital, Ahmedabad 380054, India.
| | - Sanket Mehta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Praveen Kammar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Avanish Saklani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pei W, Zhou S, Zhang J, Zhou H, Chen H, Bi J, Zheng Z, Liu Z, Jiang Z, Wang Z, Liu Q, Wang X, Liang J, Feng Q. Lobaplatin-Based Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis from Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancer: Safety and Efficacy Profiles. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:12099-12110. [PMID: 33262658 PMCID: PMC7699987 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s281434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lobaplatin in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) arising from colorectal or appendiceal cancer. Materials and Methods Patients with synchronous or metachronous PM who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with HIPEC were systematically reviewed at the China National Cancer Center and Huanxing Cancer Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019. All enrolled patients were grouped into either lobaplatin or nonlobaplatin groups depending on the different chemotherapeutic agents used during HIPEC. Clinical characteristics, pathological features, perioperative parameters, and prognostic data were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled, with 48 patients in the lobaplatin group and 52 in the nonlobaplatin group. The two groups were well balanced in terms of clinicopathological characteristics. The two groups had comparable perioperative outcomes. However, more patients in the lobaplatin group than in the nonlobaplatin group developed abnormal platelet levels on postoperative day (POD)3 and abnormal ALT levels on POD5. Moreover, the average platelet count in the lobaplatin group was significantly lower than that in the nonlobaplatin group on POD5. There were no significant differences in the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates (48.4% vs 35.1%, P=0.298) and the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates (34.9% vs 21.0%, P=0.470) of the two groups. Conclusion Lobaplatin-based HIPEC is safe and feasible for the treatment of patients with PM arising from colorectal or appendiceal cancer with comparable low mortality and acceptable morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Huanxing Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100122, People's Republic of China
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Haipeng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianjun Bi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoxu Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Feng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang X, Wu Q, Wei M, Deng X, Gu C, Wang Z. Oxaliplatin versus mitomycin C in HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1831-1839. [PMID: 32725345 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03702-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been applied for peritoneal metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to compare oxaliplatin (OX) with mitomycin C (MMC) in HIPEC for PM from CRC in surgical and survival outcomes. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Ovid databases for studies comparing OX with MMC in HIPEC for PM from CRC. The last search was performed on June 21, 2020. RESULTS Eleven articles published between 2006 and 2020 with 2091 patients were included. When compared with MMC group, the OX group showed significantly higher rate of major complications (P = 0.006, OR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.14, 2.16], I2 = 0%). Besides, no significant difference was observed between the two groups for survival outcomes, regardless of 3-year overall survival (P = 0.98, OR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.83, 1.22], I2 = 0%), 3-year disease-free survival (P = 0.98, OR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.83, 1.22], I2 = 0%), or 5-year overall survival (P = 0.91, OR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.81, 1.26], I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION OX and MMC could achieve comparable survival in HIPEC for PM from CRC. However, in consideration of the high incidence of major complication in OX group, MMC might be the safer one in clinical routines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xubing Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang No. 37, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Qingbin Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang No. 37, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Mingtian Wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang No. 37, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang No. 37, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Chaoyang Gu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang No. 37, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang No. 37, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ashrafizadeh M, Zarrabi A, Hashemi F, Moghadam ER, Hashemi F, Entezari M, Hushmandi K, Mohammadinejad R, Najafi M. Curcumin in cancer therapy: A novel adjunct for combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and alleviation of its adverse effects. Life Sci 2020; 256:117984. [PMID: 32593707 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Dealing with cancer is of importance due to enhanced incidence rate of this life-threatening disorder. Chemotherapy is an ideal candidate in overcoming and eradication of cancer. To date, various chemotherapeutic agents have been applied in cancer therapy and paclitaxel (PTX) is one of them. PTX is a key member of taxane family with potential anti-tumor activity against different cancers. Notably, PTX has demonstrated excellent proficiency in elimination of cancer in clinical trials. This chemotherapeutic agent is isolated from Taxus brevifolia, and is a tricyclic diterpenoid. However, resistance of cancer cells into PTX chemotherapy has endangered its efficacy. Besides, administration of PTX is associated with a number of side effects such as neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity and so on, demanding novel strategies in obviating PTX issues. Curcumin is a pharmacological compound with diverse therapeutic effects including anti-tumor, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic and so on. In the current review, we demonstrate that curcumin, a naturally occurring nutraceutical compound is able to enhance anti-tumor activity of PTX against different cancers. Besides, curcumin administration reduces adverse effects of PTX due to its excellent pharmacological activities. These topics are discussed with an emphasis on molecular pathways to provide direction for further studies in revealing other signaling networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milad Ashrafizadeh
- Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ali Zarrabi
- Sabanci University Nanotechnology Research and Application Center (SUNUM), Tuzla 34956, Istanbul, Turkey; Center of Excellence for Functional Surfaces and Interfaces (EFSUN), Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Tuzia, Istanbul 34956, Turkey
| | - Farid Hashemi
- DVM, Graduated, Young Researcher and Elite Club, Kazerun Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kazeroon, Iran
| | - Ebrahim Rahmani Moghadam
- Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Fardin Hashemi
- Student Research Committee, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Maliheh Entezari
- Department of Genetics, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kiavash Hushmandi
- Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Division of Epidemiology & Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Mohammadinejad
- Pharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Masoud Najafi
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|