Insights on the Role of Diabetes and Geographic Variation in Patients with Criticial Limb Ischaemia

Clinical Effect of Revascularization Strategies and Pharmacologic Treatment on Long-Term Results in Patients with Advanced Peripheral Artery Disease with TASC C and D Femoropopliteal Lesions

Background

This study was to assess the clinical outcome and associated parameters of endovascular therapy (EVT group) and bypass surgery (bypass group) in patients with long femoropopliteal TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) C and D peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods

187 patients who underwent successful EVT or bypass surgery were assessed. The endpoints included the events of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and lower-extremity amputation (LEA), 3-year primary patency, and 3-year amputation-free survival (AFS).

Results

The 3-year primary and secondary patency rates were better in the bypass group (P=0.007 and P=0.039, respectively), while the incidences of LEA, new CVD events, and mortality were comparable between groups. Weighted multivariate Cox analyses showed that cilostazol treatment (hazard ratio (HR): 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3–0.72, P=0.001), statin treatment (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33–0.9, P=0.014), and direct revascularization (DR) (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.29–0.74, P=0.001) were predictive factors of 3-year primary patency. Kaplan–Meier curve analyses of time-to-primary cumulative AFS showed that nondiabetes mellitus, mild PAD, and cilostazol and statin treatment were correlated with a superior 3-year AFS (log rank test, P=0.001, P < 0.001, P=0.009, and P=0.044, respectively).

Conclusions

Endovascular stenting based on the angiosome concept and bypass surgery provide comparable benefits for the treatment of long, advanced femoropopliteal lesions after a short follow-up period, whereas cilostazol therapy for more than 3 months, aggressive treatment of dyslipidemia, and surgical revascularization were associated with higher primary patency.

E-Selectin-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy Confers Improved Reperfusion, Repair, and Regeneration in a Murine Critical Limb Ischemia Model

AIMS

Novel cell-based therapeutic angiogenic treatments for patients with critical limb ischemia may afford limb salvage. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) do not overexpress E-selectin; however, we have previously demonstrated the cell-adhesion molecule's vital role in angiogenesis and wound healing. Thus, we created a viral vector to overexpress E-selectin on MSCs to increase their therapeutic profile.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Femoral artery ligation induced hind limb ischemia in mice and intramuscular injections were administered of vehicle or syngeneic donor MSCs, transduced ex vivo with an adeno-associated viral vector to express either GFP+ (MSCGFP) or E-selectin-GFP+ (MSCE-selectin-GFP). Laser Doppler Imaging demonstrated significantly restored reperfusion in MSCE-selectin-GFP-treated mice vs. controls. After 3 weeks, the ischemic limbs in mice treated with MSCE-selectin-GFP had increased footpad blood vessel density, hematoxylin and eosin stain (H&E) ischemic calf muscle sections revealed mitigated muscular atrophy with restored muscle fiber size, and mice were able to run further before exhaustion. PCR array-based gene profiling analysis identified nine upregulated pro-angiogenic/pro-repair genes and downregulated Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) gene in MSCE-selectin-GFP-treated limb tissues, indicating that the therapeutic effect is likely achieved via upregulation of pro-angiogenic cytokines and downregulation of inflammation.

CONCLUSION

This innovative cell therapy confers increased limb reperfusion, neovascularization, improved functional recovery, decreased muscle atrophy, and thus offers a potential therapeutic method for future clinical studies.

Gangrene, revascularization, and limb function improved with E-selectin/adeno-associated virus gene therapy

OBJECTIVE

Novel therapeutic angiogenic concepts for critical limb ischemia are still needed for limb salvage. E-selectin, a cell-adhesion molecule, is vital for recruitment of the stem/progenitor cells necessary for neovascularization in ischemic tissues. We hypothesized that priming ischemic limb tissue with E-selectin/adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy, in a murine hindlimb ischemia and gangrene model, would increase therapeutic angiogenesis and improve gangrene.

METHODS

FVB/NJ mice were given intramuscular hindlimb injections of either E-selectin/AAV or LacZ/AAV and then underwent induction of gangrene via femoral artery ligation and concomitant systemic injections of the nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor L-NAME (L-NG-Nitro arginine methyl ester; 40 mg/kg). Gangrene was evaluated via the Faber hindlimb appearance score. The rate of ischemic limb reperfusion and ischemic tissue angiogenesis were evaluated using laser Doppler perfusion imaging and DiI perfusion with confocal laser scanning microscopy of the ischemic footpads, respectively. The treadmill exhaustion test was performed on postoperative day (POD) 8 to determine hindlimb functionality.

RESULTS

The E-selectin/AAV-treated mice (n = 10) had decreased Faber ischemia scores compared with those of the LacZ/AAV-treated mice (n = 7) at both PODs 7 and 14 (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively), improved laser Doppler perfusion imaging reperfusion indexes by POD 14 (P < .01), and greater gangrene footpad capillary density (P < .001). E-selectin/AAV-treated mice also had improved exercise tolerance (P < .05) and lower relative muscular atrophy (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

We surmised that E-selectin/AAV gene therapy would significantly promote hindlimb angiogenesis, reperfusion, and limb functionality in mice with hindlimb ischemia and gangrene. Our findings highlight the reported novel gene therapy approach to critical limb ischemia as a potential therapeutic option for future clinical studies.

PLX-PAD Cell Treatment of Critical Limb Ischaemia: Rationale and Design of the PACE Trial

BACKGROUND

Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) is a life threatening condition with a considerable risk of major amputation and death. Besides revascularisation, no treatment has been proven to reduce the risks. Therapeutic angiogenesis by gene or cell therapy has not demonstrated definitive evidence in randomised controlled trials. PLX-PAD is an "off the shelf" allogeneic placental derived, mesenchymal like cell therapy, which, in preclinical studies, has shown pro-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative properties. Favourable one year amputation free survival (AFS), and trends in reduction of pain scores and increase of tissue perfusion have been shown in two small, open label, phase I trials.

METHODS

The PACE study is a phase III randomised, double blind, multicentre, multinational placebo controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of intramuscular injections of PLX-PAD cells to treat patients with atherosclerotic CLI with minor tissue loss (Rutherford Category 5) up to the ankle level, who are unsuitable for revascularisation or carry an unfavourable risk benefit for that treatment. The study will enroll 246 patients, who after screening are randomised in a ratio of 2:1 to treatment with intramuscular injections of PLX-PAD 300 × 10⁶ cells or placebo on two occasions, eight weeks apart. The primary efficacy endpoint is time to major amputation or death (amputation free survival), which will be assessed in follow up of at least 12 months and up to 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on favourable pre-clinical and initial clinical study results, the PACE phase III randomised controlled trial will evaluate placenta derived PLX-PAD cell treatment in patients with critical limb ischaemia, with an unfavourable risk benefit for revascularisation. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03006770.

Covered stent versus bare-metal stents for chronic total occluded long complicated femoropopliteal lesions: A 2-year single center review

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy, safety, and results of Viabahn versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in chronic total occluded (CTO) long femoropopliteal lesions.

METHODS

From April 2009 to August 2014, a total 97 patients (71.2 ± 9.7, 45-90 years old, 70 males) with occluded femo-ropopliteal lesions underwent Viabahn (55 patients) or BMS (42 patients) implantation. The clinical findings, procedural factors, and overall outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The average lesion length was 22.1 ± 4.8 cm in the Viabahn group and 17.8 ± 3.3 cm in the BMS group. Both groups had a 100% technical success rate. Although there was no difference between the groups in complication, mortality, and major amputation rates, the Viabahn group had a significantly better average post-operative ankle brachial index (ABI) at 1-year and 2-year follow-ups. The Viabahn group also had significantly less in-stent restenosis (ISR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with the BMS group. Nevertheless, the two groups shared similar 2-year primary patency rates (63.6% vs. 50.0%, p = .178) and 2-year secondary patency rates (85.5% vs. 81.0%, p = .554).

CONCLUSION

Both Viabahn and BMS were efficient treatments for long femoropopliteal CTO lesions. However, the Viabahn group had significantly improved results compared with the BMS group in TLR and ISR, but the difference was not sufficient enough to result in different primary and secondary patency rates.

Gene therapy for peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), caused by narrowing of the arteries in the limbs, is increasing in incidence and prevalence as our population is ageing and as diabetes is becoming more prevalent. PAD can cause pain in the limbs while walking, known as intermittent claudication, or can be more severe and cause pain while at rest, ulceration, and ultimately gangrene and limb loss. This more severe stage of PAD is known as 'critical limb ischaemia'. Treatments for PAD include medications that help to reduce the increased risk of cardiovascular events and help improve blood flow, as well as endovascular or surgical repair or bypass of the blocked arteries. However, many people are unresponsive to medications and are not suited to surgical or endovascular treatment, leaving amputation as the last option. Gene therapy is a novel approach in which genetic material encoding for proteins that may help increase revascularisation is injected into the affected limbs of patients. This type of treatment has been shown to be safe, but its efficacy, especially regarding ulcer healing, effects on quality of life, and other symptomatic outcomes remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of gene therapy for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched Cochrane CENTRAL, the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, and AMED, along with trials registries (all searched 27 November 2017). We also checked reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews for further studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised and quasi-randomised studies that evaluated gene therapy versus no gene therapy in people with PAD. We excluded studies that evaluated direct growth hormone treatment or cell-based treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, performed quality assessment, and extracted data from the included studies. We collected pertinent information on each study, as well as data for the outcomes of amputation-free survival, ulcer healing, quality of life, amputation, all-cause mortality, ankle brachial index, symptom scores, and claudication distance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included in this review a total of 17 studies with 1988 participants (evidence current until November 2017). Three studies limited their inclusion to people with intermittent claudication, 12 limited inclusion to people with varying levels of critical limb ischaemia, and two included people with either condition. Study investigators evaluated many different types of gene therapies, using different protocols. Most studies evaluated growth factor-encoding gene therapy, with six studies using vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-encoding genes, four using hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-encoding genes, and three using fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-encoded genes. Two studies evaluated hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) gene therapy, one study used a developmental endothelial locus-1 gene therapy, and the final study evaluated a stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) gene therapy. Most studies reported outcomes after 12 months of follow-up, but follow-up ranged from three months to two years.Overall risk of bias varied between studies, with many studies not providing sufficient detail for adequate determination of low risk of bias for many domains. Two studies did not utilise a placebo control, leading to risk of performance bias. Several studies reported in previous protocols or in their Methods sections that they would report on certain outcomes for which no data were then reported, increasing risk of reporting bias. All included studies reported sponsorships from corporate entities that led to unclear risk of other bias. The overall quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low, generally as the result of heterogeneity and imprecision, with few or no studies reporting on outcomes.Evidence suggests no clear differences for the outcomes of amputation-free survival, major amputation, and all-cause mortality between those treated with gene therapy and those not receiving this treatment (all moderate-quality evidence). Low-quality evidence suggests improvement in complete ulcer healing with gene therapy (odds ratio (OR) 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 4.59; P = 0.04). We could not combine data on quality of life and can draw no conclusions at this time regarding this outcome (very low-quality evidence). We included one study in the meta-analysis for ankle brachial index, which showed no clear differences between treatments, but we can draw no overall association (low-quality evidence). We combined in a meta-analysis pain symptom scores as assessed by visual analogue scales from two studies and found no clear differences between treatment groups (very low-quality evidence). We carried out extensive subgroup analyses by PAD classification, dosage schedule, vector type, and gene used but identified no substantial differences.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-quality evidence shows no clear differences in amputation-free survival, major amputation, and all-cause mortality between those treated with gene therapy and those not receiving gene therapy. Some evidence suggests that gene therapy may lead to improved complete ulcer healing, but this outcome needs to be explored with improved reporting of the measure, such as decreased ulcer area in cm², and better description of ulcer types and healing. Further standardised data that are amenable to meta-analysis are needed to evaluate other outcomes such as quality of life, ankle brachial index, symptom scores, and claudication distance.

A Reliable Mouse Model of Hind limb Gangrene

BACKGROUND

Lack of a reliable hind limb gangrene animal model limits preclinical studies of gangrene, a severe form of critical limb ischemia. We develop a novel mouse hind limb gangrene model to facilitate translational studies.

METHODS

BALB/c, FVB, and C57BL/6 mice underwent femoral artery ligation (FAL) with or without administration of N^G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an endothelial nitric oxide synthase inhibitor. Gangrene was assessed using standardized ischemia scores ranging from 0 (no gangrene) to 12 (forefoot gangrene). Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and DiI perfusion quantified hind limb reperfusion postoperatively.

RESULTS

BALB/c develops gangrene with FAL-only (n = 11/11, 100% gangrene incidence), showing mean limb ischemia score of 12 on postoperative days (PODs) 7 and 14 with LDI ranging from 0.08 to 0.12 on respective PODs. Most FVB did not develop gangrene with FAL-only (n = 3/9, 33% gangrene incidence) but with FAL and L-NAME (n = 9/9, 100% gangrene incidence). Mean limb ischemia scores for FVB undergoing FAL with L-NAME were significantly higher than for FVB receiving FAL-only. LDI score and capillary density by POD 28 were significantly lower in FVB undergoing FAL with L-NAME. C57BL/6 did not develop gangrene with FAL-only or FAL and L-NAME.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducible murine gangrene models may elucidate molecular mechanisms for gangrene development, facilitating therapeutic intervention.

Growth factors for angiogenesis in peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with a high clinical and socioeconomic burden. Treatments to alleviate the symptoms of PAD and decrease the risks of amputation and death are a high societal priority. A number of growth factors have shown a potential to stimulate angiogenesis. Growth factors delivered directly (as recombinant proteins), or indirectly (e.g. by viral vectors or DNA plasmids encoding these factors), have emerged as a promising strategy to treat patients with PAD.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of growth factors that promote angiogenesis for treating people with PAD of the lower extremities.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Specialised Register (June 2016) and CENTRAL (2016, Issue 5). We searched trial registries for details of ongoing or unpublished studies. We also checked the reference lists of relevant publications and, if necessary, tried to contact the trialists for details of the studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing growth factors (delivered directly or indirectly) with no intervention, placebo or any other intervention not based on the growth factor's action in patients with PAD of the lower extremities. The primary outcomes were limb amputation, death and adverse events. The secondary outcomes comprised walking ability, haemodynamic measures, ulceration and rest pain.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials and assessed the risk of bias. We used outcomes of the studies at low risk of bias for the main analysis and of all studies in the sensitivity analyses. We calculated odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We evaluated statistical heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and Cochrane's Q test. We conducted meta-analysis for the overall effect and for each growth factor as a subgroup analysis using OR in a fixed-effect model. We evaluated the robustness of the results in a sensitivity analysis using risk ratio (RR) and/or a random-effects model. We also assessed the quality of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 trials in the review and used 14 studies (on approximately 1400 participants) with published results in the analyses. Six published studies compared fibroblast growth factors (FGF), four studies hepatocyte growth factors (HGF) and another four studies vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), versus placebo or no therapy. Six of these studies exclusively or mainly investigated participants with intermittent claudication and eight studies exclusively participants with critical limb ischaemia. Follow-up generally ranged from three months to one year. Two small studies provided some data at 2 years and one of them also at 10 years.The direction and size of effects for growth factors on major limb amputations (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.38; 10 studies, N = 1075) and death (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.41; 12 studies, N = 1371) at up to two years are uncertain. The quality of the evidence is low due to risk of bias and imprecision (at one year, moderate-quality evidence due to imprecision). However, growth factors may decrease the rate of any limb amputations (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.99; 6 studies, N = 415). The quality of the evidence is low due to risk of bias and selective reporting.The direction and size of effects for growth factors on serious adverse events (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.50; 13 studies, N = 1411) and on any adverse events (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.64; 4 studies, N = 709) at up to two years are also uncertain. The quality of the evidence is low due to risk of bias and imprecision (for serious adverse events at one year, moderate-quality evidence due to imprecision).Growth factors may improve haemodynamic measures (low-quality evidence), ulceration (very low-quality evidence) and rest pain (very low-quality evidence) up to one year, but they have little or no effect on walking ability (low-quality evidence). We did not identify any relevant differences in effects between growth factors (FGF, HGF and VEGF).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review do not support the use of therapy with the growth factors FGF, HGF or VEGF in people with PAD of the lower extremities to prevent death or major limb amputation or to improve walking ability. However, the use of these growth factors may improve haemodynamic measures and decrease the rate of any limb amputations (probably due to preventing minor amputations) with an uncertain effect on adverse events; an improvement of ulceration and rest pain is very uncertain. New trials at low risk of bias are needed to generate evidence with more certainty.

Five-Year Outcome of Self-Expanding Covered Stents for Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease and an Analysis of Factors Predicting Failure

Purpose: To investigate the 5-year outcome of patients treated with self-expanding covered stents for superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease and identify parameters that could predict loss of primary patency. Methods: In a dual-center study, 315 consecutive patients (mean age 69.0±10.1 years; 232 men) treated for SFA occlusive disease in 334 limbs with Viabahn self-expanding covered stents between 2001 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Mean lesion length was 11.7±8.8 cm, and half of the lesions were classified as TASC II C/D. Five-year patency rates were calculated, and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess potential factors affecting patency. Results: All-cause mortality at 5 years was 14.1%. Primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 72.2%, 51.8%, and 47.6%, respectively, with secondary patency rates of 86.2%, 78.7%, and 77.5%. Parameters predicting loss of primary patency in a univariate analysis were covered stent diameter (p=0.001), the number of covered stents per lesion (p=0.015), and TASC II D classification (p=0.007). Covered stent diameter was the only parameter predicting loss of primary patency in the multivariate regression analysis (p=0.001), with 7-mm covered stents having superior performance. Conclusion: Five-year patency rates of self-expanding covered stents inserted for SFA occlusive disease are within an acceptable range. Covered stent diameter is the most relevant factor in predicting loss of primary patency, and thus, an adequate diameter of the distal landing site seems to be among the most important factors in the decision-making process. In smaller vessels, one should not use covered stents but venous conduits, as oversizing may be detrimental.