Survival prediction in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who undergo infrainguinal revascularization

Surgery or endovascular therapy for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia requiring infrapopliteal interventions

OBJECTIVE

The recent publication of randomized trials comparing open bypass surgery to endovascular therapy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, namely, Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) and Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg-2 (BASIL-2), has resulted in potentially contradictory findings. The trials differed significantly with respect to anatomical disease patterns and primary end points. We performed an analysis of patients in BEST-CLI with significant infrapopliteal disease undergoing open tibial bypass or endovascular tibial interventions to formulate a relevant comparator with the outcomes reported from BASIL-2.

METHODS

The study population consisted of patients in BEST-CLI with adequate single segment saphenous vein conduit randomized to open bypass or endovascular intervention (cohort 1) who additionally had significant infrapopliteal disease and underwent tibial level intervention. The primary outcome was major adverse limb event (MALE) or all-cause death. MALE included any major limb amputation or major reintervention. Outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional regression models.

RESULTS

The analyzed subgroup included a total of 665 patients with 326 in the open tibial bypass group and 339 in the tibial endovascular intervention group. The primary outcome of MALE or all-cause death at 3 years was significantly lower in the surgical group at 48.5% compared with 56.7% in the endovascular group (P = .0018). Mortality was similar between groups (35.5% open vs 35.8% endovascular; P = .94), whereas MALE events were lower in the surgical group (23.3% vs 35.0%; P<.0001). This difference included a lower rate of major reinterventions in the surgical group (10.9%) compared with the endovascular group (20.2%; P = .0006). Freedom from above ankle amputation or all-cause death was similar between treatment arms at 43.6% in the surgical group compared with 45.3% the endovascular group (P = .30); however, there were fewer above ankle amputations in the surgical group (13.5%) compared with the endovascular group (19.3%; P = .0205). Perioperative (30-day) death rates were similar between treatment groups (2.5% open vs 2.4% endovascular; P = .93), as was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (5.3% open vs 2.7% endovascular; P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with suitable single segment great saphenous vein who underwent infrapopliteal revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia, open bypass surgery was associated with a lower incidence of MALE or death and fewer major amputation compared with endovascular intervention. Amputation-free survival was similar between the groups. Further investigations into differences in comorbidities, anatomical extent, and lesion complexity are needed to explain differences between the BEST-CLI and BASIL-2 reported outcomes.

Relevance of BEST-CLI trial endpoints in a tertiary care limb preservation program

OBJECTIVE

Major adverse limb event-free survival (MALE-FS) differed significantly by initial revascularization approach in the BEST-CLI randomized trial. The BEST-CLI trial represented a highly selected subgroup of patients seen in clinical practice; thus, we examined the endpoint of MALE-FS in an all-comers tertiary care practice setting.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study of consecutive, unique patients who underwent technically successful infrainguinal revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (2011-2021). MALE was major amputation (transtibial or above) or major reintervention (new bypass, open bypass revision, thrombectomy, or thrombolysis).

RESULTS

Among 469 subjects, the mean age was 70 years, and 34% were female. Characteristics included diabetes (68%), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (16%), Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage 4 (44%), Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) stage 3 (62%), and high pedal artery calcium score (pMAC) (22%). Index revascularization was autogenous vein bypass (AVB) (30%), non-autogenous bypass (NAB) (13%), or endovascular (ENDO) (57%). The composite endpoint of MALE or death occurred in 237 patients (51%) at a median time of 189 days from index revascularization. In an adjusted Cox model, factors independently associated with MALE or death included younger age, ESRD, WIfI stage 4, higher GLASS stage, and moderate-severe pMAC, whereas AVB was associated with improved MALE-FS. Freedom from MALE-FS, MALE, and major amputation at 30 days were 90%, 92%, and 95%; and at 1 year were 63%, 70%, and 83%, respectively. MALE occurred in 144 patients (31%) and was associated with ESRD, WIfI stage, GLASS stage, pMAC score, and index revascularization approach. AVB had superior durability, with adjusted 2-year freedom from MALE of 72%, compared with 66% for ENDO and 51% for NAB. Within the AVB group, spliced vein conduit had higher MALE compared with single-segment vein (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.7; P = .008 after inverse propensity weighting), but there was no statistically significant difference in major amputation. Of the 144 patients with any MALE, the first MALE was major reintervention in 47% and major amputation in 53%. Major amputation as first MALE was associated with non-AVB index approach. Indications for major reintervention were symptomatic stenosis/occlusion (54%), lack of clinical improvement (28%), asymptomatic graft stenosis (16%), and iatrogenic events (3%). Conversion to bypass occurred after 6% of ENDO cases, two-thirds of which involved distal bypass targets at the ankle or foot.

CONCLUSIONS

In this consecutive, all-comers cohort, disease complexity was associated with procedural selection and MALE-FS. AVB independently provided the greatest MALE-FS and freedom from MALE and major amputation. Compared with the BEST-CLI randomized trial, MALE after ENDO in this series was more frequently major amputation, with relatively few conversions to open bypass.

Analysis of in-hospital deaths in patients with critical limb ischemia necessitating invasive treatments: based on a Japanese nationwide database

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with systemic cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases. Treatments primarily targeting limb-related outcomes may not improve overall life prognosis. We aimed to describe in-hospital mortality and the underlying etiologies in Japanese patients with CLI. We analyzed the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database from approximately 1200 Japanese acute-care hospitals between April 2018 and March 2020. The definition of patients with CLI was based on the diagnostic codes listed as the most resource-intensive diagnosis and information regarding invasive procedures (endovascular treatment, bypass, or amputation). The DPC database provides information on whether in-hospital death was caused by the most resource-intensive diagnosis. Among 15,228 distinct patients with CLI, we identified 18,970 records, including 5,378 amputations. In-hospital death occurred in 1238 (6.5%) patients. Among them, 811 (65.5%) were due to causes unrelated to CLI. In patients who underwent amputation (n = 5378), causes unrelated to CLI accounted for 70.0% of in-hospital deaths, whereas among patients who did not undergo amputation (n = 13,592), this proportion was 60.1%. When compared to patients who died due to causes related to CLI, the prevalence of male patients was higher (62.6% vs 52.7%, p = 0.001), and amputation was more frequently performed (58.0% vs 47.1%, p < 0.001) in those who died due to causes unrelated to CLI. The majority of in-hospital deaths among patients with CLI necessitating endovascular treatment, bypass, or amputation were attributable to factors unrelated to the primary condition of CLI. Managing systemic cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases beyond the affected limb is crucial to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Advancements in Omics and Breakthrough Gene Therapies: A Glimpse into the Future of Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD), a highly prevalent global disease, associates with significant morbidity and mortality in affected patients. Despite progress in endovascular and open revascularization techniques for advanced PAD, these interventions grapple with elevated rates of arterial restenosis and vein graft failure attributed to intimal hyperplasia (IH). Novel multiomics technologies, coupled with sophisticated analyses tools recently powered by advances in artificial intelligence, have enabled the study of atherosclerosis and IH with unprecedented single-cell and spatial precision. Numerous studies have pinpointed gene hubs regulating pivotal atherogenic and atheroprotective signaling pathways as potential therapeutic candidates. Leveraging advancements in viral and nonviral gene therapy (GT) platforms, gene editing technologies, and cutting-edge biomaterial reservoirs for delivery uniquely positions us to develop safe, efficient, and targeted GTs for PAD-related diseases. Gene therapies appear particularly fitting for ex vivo genetic engineering of IH-resistant vein grafts. This manuscript highlights currently available state-of-the-art multiomics approaches, explores promising GT-based candidates, and details GT delivery modalities employed by our laboratory and others to thwart mid-term vein graft failure caused by IH, as well as other PAD-related conditions. The potential clinical translation of these targeted GTs holds the promise to revolutionize PAD treatment, thereby enhancing patients' quality of life and life expectancy.

Validation of the global limb anatomical staging system in Vietnamese patients treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

BACKGROUND

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the most severe clinical form of peripheral artery disease (PAD), accounting for approximately 11%, and is strongly associated with the incidence of amputation, cardiovascular events, and mortality. The Global Vascular Guideline (GVG) proposed a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) for evaluating the anatomic complexity of arterial lesions. However, more research is required to evaluate outcomes after endovascular intervention in CLTI patients using the GLASS.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to describe clinical characteristics, arterial lesions, and endovascular interventions according to three grades of GLASS in the Vietnamese population. We evaluated the technical success, mortality rate, and probability to preserve the limb according to the GLASS.

METHODS

All patients were diagnosed with CLTI and underwent infrainguinal endovascular intervention at the Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City from June 2020 to June 2022. All patients were evaluated before intervention and follow-up at 6 and 12 months after intervention. Patients were divided into three groups according to the GLASS, thereby comparing the technical success, mortality, and amputation rates. This retrospective study describes a series of cases.

RESULTS

The study sample evaluated 82 lower limbs of 82 patients, in which GLASS class I, II, and III lesions accounted for 36.6%, 43.9%, and 19.5% of the patients, respectively. The rates of technical success in the groups gradually decreased according to the complexity of the lesions (90%, 86.11%, and 56.25% for GLASS I, II, and III, respectively; p = 0.012). Notably, limb-based patency (LBP) at 12 months was significantly lower in the GLASS III group than in the GLASS I and II groups (22.22% vs 88.89% and 67.74%, respectively; p = 0.001). The amputation rates at 12 months in GLASS groups I, II, and III were 13.3%, 22.2%, and 50%, respectively (p = 0.021), while the mortality rates at 12 months were 0%, 8.33%, and 25%, respectively (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

In patients with CLTI of higher GLASS stages, the rates of technical success were lower and the amputation and mortality rates were higher.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Infrainguinal Bypass in the Endovascular Era

BACKGROUND

The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) developed objective performance goals (OPGs) for lower extremity bypass (LEB) in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) based on studies that included patients who were at good risk for open revascularization. In the endovascular era, many LEB patients have had prior interventions, and most would be considered high-risk by the original SVS OPG standards. The goal of this study is to characterize a contemporary patient population undergoing LEB for CLTI and determine if outcomes remain commensurate with the parameters established by the SVS OPG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent LEB for CLTI over a 10-year period (2012-2021) were identified. Patients were stratified into low- and high-risk categories based upon the clinical, conduit, and anatomic parameters used in the SVS OPG. Limb salvage at 1 year and amputation-free survival, a composite outcome of major amputation and mortality, at 1 year were compared with the SVS OPG cohort. Primary, assisted, and secondary patency at 1 and 3 years were also evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

There were 169 LEBs performed for CLTI. One hundred and two (60.36%) males, 101 (59.76%) current or former smokers, 115 (68.05%) with hypertension, 69 (40.83%) with diabetes mellitus, and 40 (23.67%) with coronary artery disease. Median age was 71.84 years, and mean follow-up was 2.17 years. 65 (38.46%) had a prior ipsilateral endovascular intervention, and 18 (10.65%) were redo bypasses. 21 (12.43%) were deemed clinically high-risk, 44 (26.04%) were high-risk conduits, and 118 (69.82%) had high-risk anatomic factors. Freedom from amputation at 1 year was 87.05% in this cohort which was similar to the overall SVS OPG cohort (88.9%). Amputation-free survival at 1 year was 77.78%, which was also similar to the overall SVS OPG cohort (76.5%). Primary patency at one and three years was 46.84% and 37.59%, assisted patency at one and three years was 61.87% and 44.81%, and secondary patency at one and three years was 72.13% and 61.16%.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients undergoing LEB in the endovascular era meet the SVS OPG criteria for high risk. Despite this, the 1-year limb salvage and amputation-free survival in this cohort were equivalent to the SVS OPG LEB cohort. This supports the continued use of LEB for limb salvage in high-risk patients and those who have failed endovascular approaches.

Comparison of lower extremity bypass and peripheral vascular intervention for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative

OBJECTIVE

There is a relative lack of comparative effectiveness research on revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We examined the association between lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for CLTI and 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day and 5-year amputation.

METHODS

Patients undergoing LEB and PVI of the below-the-knee popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries between 2014 and 2019 were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative, and outcomes data were obtained from the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database. Propensity scores were calculated on 15 variables using a logistic regression model to control for imbalances between treatment groups. A 1:1 matching method was used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox proportional hazards regression with a random intercept for site and operator nested in site to account for clustered data compared 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality between groups. Thirty-day and 5-year amputation were subsequently compared using competing risk analysis to account for the competing risk of death.

RESULTS

There was a total of 2075 patients in each group. The overall mean age was 71 ± 11 years, 69% were male, and 76% were white, 18% were black, and 6% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics in the matched cohort were balanced between groups. There was no association between all-cause mortality over 30 days and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 2.3% vs 2.3% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value = .906; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.44; P-value = .80). All-cause mortality over 5 years was lower for LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 55.9% vs 60.1% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value < .001; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P-value < .001). Accounting for competing risk of death, amputation over 30 days was also lower in LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 1.9% vs 3.0%; Fine and Gray P-value = .025; subHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P-value = .025). There was no association between amputation over 5 years and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 22.6% vs 23.4%; Fine and Gray P-value = .184; subHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05; P-value = .184).

CONCLUSIONS

In the Vascular Quality Initiative-linked Medicare registry, LEB vs PVI for CLTI was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation and 5-year all-cause mortality. These results will serve as a foundation to validate recently published randomized controlled trial data, and to broaden the comparative effectiveness evidence base for CLTI.

Three-Year Real-World Outcomes of Interwoven Nitinol Supera Stent Implantation in Long and Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions

BACKGROUND

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains a major issue in modern societies and affects more than 200 million people around the world. Endovascular methods have been evaluated to be safe and effective in limb salvage. The Supera is able to withstand increased compression, biomechanical stress and to have higher radial force. The objective of this study is to evaluate performance, durability and 3-year patency of Supera stent implantation in severe femoropopliteal disease.

METHODS

A retrospective real-world analysis was performed with consideration of 77 patients that had a Supera stent implanted with femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease at a single center. Among the 77 individuals, 92 Supera stents were implanted. Analysis of patients' demographics, lesions characteristics, reintervention rates and patency rates was performed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 33 months and ranged from 0 to 84 months. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia was observed among 43 patients. Mean lesion length was 152.8 ± 94.6 mm. Chronic total occlusions were observed in a majority of lesions. Overall, primary patency rates at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months were 85.0%, 73.6%, 59.2% and 53.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Supera stent is effective in the management of long and complex lesions. The results of patency rates were evaluated to be worse among lesions extending to the popliteal artery.

A vein bypass first versus a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion (BASIL-2): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia is the severest manifestation of peripheral arterial disease and presents with ischaemic pain at rest or tissue loss (ulceration, gangrene, or both), or both. We compared the effectiveness of a vein bypass first with a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy in terms of preventing major amputation and death in patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal, revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion.

METHODS

Bypass versus Angioplasty for Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL)-2 was an open-label, pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3, randomised trial done at 41 vascular surgery units in the UK (n=39), Sweden (n=1), and Denmark (n=1). Eligible patients were those who presented to hospital-based vascular surgery units with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia due to atherosclerotic disease and who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal, revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either vein bypass (vein bypass group) or best endovascular treatment (best endovascular treatment group) as their first revascularisation procedure through a secure online randomisation system. Participants were excluded if they had ischaemic pain or tissue loss considered not to be primarily due to atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease. Most vein bypasses used the great saphenous vein and originated from the common or superficial femoral arteries. Most endovascular interventions comprised plain balloon angioplasty with selective use of plain or drug eluting stents. Participants were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Data were collected locally at participating centres. In England, Wales, and Sweden, centralised databases were used to collect information on amputations and deaths. Data were analysed centrally at the Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival defined as time to first major (above the ankle) amputation or death from any cause measured in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed by monitoring serious adverse events up to 30-days after first revascularisation. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN27728689.

FINDINGS

Between July 22, 2014, and Nov 30, 2020, 345 participants (65 [19%] women and 280 [81%] men; median age 72·5 years [62·7-79·3]) with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia were enrolled in the trial and randomly assigned: 172 (50%) to the vein bypass group and 173 (50%) to the best endovascular treatment group. Major amputation or death occurred in 108 (63%) of 172 patients in the vein bypass group and 92 (53%) of 173 patients in the best endovascular treatment group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·35 [95% CI 1·02-1·80]; p=0·037). 91 (53%) of 172 patients in the vein bypass group and 77 (45%) of 173 patients in the best endovascular treatment group died (adjusted HR 1·37 [95% CI 1·00-1·87]). In both groups the most common causes of morbidity and death, including that occurring within 30 days of their first revascularisation, were cardiovascular (61 deaths in the vein bypass group and 49 in the best endovascular treatment group) and respiratory events (25 deaths in the vein bypass group and 23 in the best endovascular treatment group; number of cardiovascular and respiratory deaths were not mutually exclusive).

INTERPRETATION

In the BASIL-2 trial, a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy was associated with a better amputation-free survival, which was largely driven by fewer deaths in the best endovascular treatment group. These data suggest that more patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal, revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion should be considered for a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy.

FUNDING

UK National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Programme.

Outcomes of a bypass-first strategy in chronic limb-threatening ischemia based on the Global Vascular Guidelines

OBJECTIVE

The Global Vascular Guidelines (GVGs) recommend initial revascularization (bypass or endovascular therapy) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) based on anatomical complexity and limb severity. This decision is made based on a prediction of the outcomes after endovascular intervention. This study was performed to evaluate outcomes after distal bypass in cases recommended for GVG bypass.

METHODS

A total of 239 distal bypasses for CLTI were evaluated in 195 patients with a GVG bypass recommendation treated between 2009 and 2020 at a single center in Japan. Comparisons were made between crural and pedal bypass cases.

RESULTS

The 195 patients (median age, 77 years; 67% male) underwent 133 crural bypasses (106 patients; 54%) and 106 pedal bypasses (89 patients; 46%). Hemodialysis was more common in pedal cases than in crural cases (P = .03). Hospital deaths occurred in two cases (1%) within 30 days. The whole cohort has a follow-up rate of 96% over a mean of 28 ± 26 months, with 3-year limb salvage rates of 87% and 3-year primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of 40%, 65%, and 67%, all without significant differences between crural and pedal cases. The 1-year wound healing rate was 88% and tended to be higher in crural cases than in pedal cases (P = .068). The 3-year survival rate was 52% in the cohort and did not differ significantly between crural and pedal cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CLTI with a GVG bypass recommendation had acceptable limb salvage, graft patency, wound healing, and survival after distal bypass, regardless of the bypass method. These findings indicate that a GVG bypass recommendation as an initial revascularization method is valid in the real world.

LATE RESULTS OF TREATING PATIENTS WITH OCCLUSIVE-STENOTIC LESIONS OF THE AORTA INFRARENAL SEGMENT'S MAIN ARTERIES

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To analyze the results of surgical treatment in the late postoperative period after using modern types of surgical technologies for occlusive-stenotic atherosclerotic lesions of the infrarenal aorta's main arteries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: The total of 420 patients were operated on. The patient's age ranged from 45 to 87 years (in the mean, 66.7±2.3 years). Men pre¬dominated - 375 (89.29%), and women were 45 (10.71%). According to the ischemia classification by Rutherford - 324 (77%) patients fell under categories 4, 5, 6 of the classification. 98 patients were operated on by the open method, 243 by the endovascular method, and 79 by the hybrid method. We assessed such indices as: postoperative thrombosis, limb amputations, mortality, and repeated operations performed due to complications or unsuccessful results of the primary operation.

RESULTS

Results: It was ascertained, a decrease in the number of postoperative complications from 7.87% to 4.39% (t=2,11, p=0,035), repeated operations - from 7.87% to 4.39% (t=2,11, p=0,035), amputations - from 3.63% to 2.19% (t=1,24, p=0,214) and mortality - from 3.03% to 1.09% (t=2,03, p=0,042) in the group where in-depth examination methods were applied, a treatment algorithm based on individual anatomical and hemodynamic features was implemented, techniques for performing operations were improved.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: The analysis of late results of surgical interventions showed that the largest number of complications was found in the group of patients with multistory occlusive-stenotic lesions of arteries.

CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LIMB-THREATENING ISCHEMIA

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To review the results of endovascular treatment in patients with chronic threatening ischemia of lower extremities as well as to assess the level of complications developed after the use of modern endovascular technologies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: 243 patients with occlusive-stenotic lesions of major arteries of infrarenal aorta, operated on by various endovascular techniques, were studied. 51 of them (20.98%) had multi-level lesions. All experimental group patients (83) were thoroughly evaluated preoperatively including assessment of probable development of arterial thrombosis of affected extremity after the surgery. Besides, endovascular treatment algorithm developed and introduced by the authors on the basis of individual anatomical and hemodynamic parameters was used.

RESULTS

Results: Thrombosis was the major early postoperative complication in both study groups, being registered in 21 patients (10.6%). The incidence of thrombosis was statistically higher in the control group as compared to experimental group - 11.53% and 7.14%, respectively (p<0.05). 15 patients of both groups underwent amputations - 12 patients (7.5%) in the control group, and 3 patients (3.6%) in experimental group. Early postoperative mortality rate was 2.56% in the control group, while there were no deaths in experimental group in early postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Continuous ultrasound monitoring, avoidance of subintimal positioning of endovascular devices, use of rotary-mechanical thromboaspiration, drug-coated balloons and stents, regional thrombolytic therapy, as well as the concept of angiosome-directed therapy used in the study for restoration of artery patency, made it possible to improve treatment outcomes and decrease complications.

EVALUATION OF GLASS STAGE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LIMB THREATENING ISCHEMIA TREATED WITH AUTOGENOUS BYPASS GRAFTS

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship of GLASS stages with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic limb threatened ischemia (CLTI) submitted to distal bypasses using venous graft.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with CLTI submitted to distal bypasses with vein graft between January 2012 and December 2019 were included. The primary end point was freedom from CLTI (amputation-free survival, with complete wound healing and without ischemic rest pain). Secondary end points included a composite outcome of recurrence (patients that achieved freedom from CLTI but developed a new wound or ischemic rest pain), major limb amputation, amputation free-survival, overall survival, major adverse limb events (MALE), limb-based patency (LBP) and primary and secondary patency rates.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients were submitted to 211 distal bypasses with a median follow up of 30 months. Eighty percent of the cases had diabetes or end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis. Most patients (63%) had major or extensive tissue loss (Wound class ≥ 2) with more than half of these with some degree of infection of the foot. Severe anatomic pattern (GLASS stage III) was predominant with a prevalence of 78%. There were no significant differences between GLASS I-II and GLASS III stage groups for all the outcomes analysed. About 80% of the 211 revascularized limbs were free from CLTI at 12 months. At 4 years of follow up we observed that 25% of the cases had recurrence of CLTI, 83% were free from major amputation and 61% were free from MALE. LBP, primary patency, and secondary patency were 79%, 80% and 93% at one year, and 64%, 65% and 81% at four years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GLASS stage was not related with patency and clinical outcomes after distal bypasses with vein graft. Distal open revascularization presents excellent rates of freedom from CLTI with low rates of recurrence of CLTI, two key time-integrated outcomes of clinical disease severity in patients with CLTI.

Long Term Survival and Limb Salvage in Patients With Non-Revascularisable Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide long term survival and limb salvage rates for patients with non-revascularisable (NR) chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, derived from a randomised controlled trial (JUVENTAS) investigating the use of a regenerative cell therapy. Survival and limb salvage of the index limb in CLTI patients without viable options for revascularisation at inclusion were analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome was amputation free survival, a composite of survival and limb salvage, at five years after inclusion in the original trial.

RESULTS

In 150 patients with NR-CLTI, amputation free survival was 43% five years after inclusion. This outcome was driven by an equal rate of all cause mortality (35%) and amputation (33%). Amputation occurred predominantly in the first year. Furthermore, 33% of those with amputation subsequently died within the investigated period, with a median interval of 291 days.

CONCLUSION

Five years after the initial need for revascularisation, about half of the CLTI patients who were deemed non-revascularisable survived with salvage of the index limb. Although the prospects for these high risk patients are still poor, under optimal medical care, amputation free survival seems comparable with that of revascularisable CLTI patients, while the major amputation rate within one year, especially among NR-CLTI patients with ischaemic tissue loss, is very high.

Associations of Clinical Frailty with Severity of Limb Threat and Outcomes in Chronic Limb-threatening Ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the relationship of frailty and severity of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), and their comparative associations with one-year outcomes, in patients presenting to a vascular limb salvage (VaLS) clinic.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilised data collected from a prospectively maintained VaLS clinic database. Patients aged ≥50 presenting to the VaLS clinic with CLTI between February 2018 and April 2019 were included. Frailty was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and limb threat severity by the Wound, Ischaemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score. Excessive polypharmacy was defined as ≥10 medications. Anticholinergic burden (ACB) score and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were calculated for all patients. The primary outcome measure was a composite endpoint of death or amputation at one-year. Associations with outcome were assessed using Cox regression and reported as hazards ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients were included, with CFS scores available for 190 patients. 98 patients (52%) were frail (CFS ≥5). 127 patients (67%) initially underwent endovascular revascularisation. Excessive polypharmacy was common (55 patients; 28%). Frailty was associated with increased WIfI stage (P = 0.025) as well as age, female sex, CCI score, number of medications, excessive polypharmacy but not ACB score. Frail patients were more frequently managed non-operatively (P = 0.017). Frailty (HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.09, 3.34; P = 0.024) and WIfI stage 4 (HR 3.29; 95%CI 1.23, 8.80; P = 0.018) were associated with death or amputation on univariable analysis. WIfI stage 4 (HR 2.80; 95%CI 1.04, 7.57; P = 0.042) and CCI score (HR 1.21; 95%CI 1.03, 1.41; P = 0.015), but not frailty (HR 1.25; 95%CI 0.67, 2.33; P = 0.474), were independently associated with death or amputation on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is highly prevalent among CLTI patients and related to severity of limb threat. The CFS may be a useful adjunct to patient risk assessment in CLTI.

The impact of chronic kidney disease on outcomes following peripheral vascular intervention

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have worsened clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention; however, limited evidence exists in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI).

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the effect of CKD on outcomes following PVI for symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

METHODS

Using patients from the LIBERTY 360 study, we compared the rates of 30 day and 1 year major adverse vascular events (MAVE), a composite of all-cause mortality, major amputation, and target vessel/lesion revascularization, between patients with and without CKD (estimated glomular filtration rate less than 60) following PVI. Multivariable adjustment was performed to assess for independent association between CKD and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1189 patients enrolled, 378 patients (31.8%) had CKD. At 1 year, patients with CKD had higher rates of MAVE (34.6% vs 25.6%), all-cause mortality (11.9% vs 5.5%), and major amputation (5.9% vs 2.6%) when compared with patients without CKD (all P < .05). After adjustment, patients with CKD had higher risks of 1-year MAVE (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.64; P = .023) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.22-2.91; P = .005) when compared with patients without CKD. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of major amputations (HR 1.70, 95% CI 0.91-3.17; P = .094).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high procedural success and low amputation rates, patients with CKD remain at greater risk for MAVE and all-cause mortality after PVI. Further research is needed to determine treatment strategies to mitigate substantial mortality risk in this vulnerable population.