Qu’en est-il de l’annonce du diagnostic de schizophrénie aujourd’hui en France ?

The lived experience of French parents concerning the diagnosis of their children with borderline personality disorder

BACKGROUND

Psychiatrists often hesitate to diagnose borderline personality disorder (BPD). While individuals with BPD have reported both positive and negative experiences upon receiving their diagnosis, no study has specifically explored this issue among parents. Parents of children diagnosed with BPD can benefit from recently developed family-support interventions such as the Family Connections program. Our study aimed to explore the experiences of parents learning about their child's BPD diagnosis and to investigate the impact of the Family Connections program on their experiences.

METHODS

This qualitative study, conducted in France following the five-stage IPSE method, involved parents of children with BPD recruited through the Family Connections association in Versailles. We conducted semi-structured interviews and used purposive sampling for data collection until data saturation was reached. Data analysis was performed using a descriptive and structuring approach with NVivo 12 software to elucidate the structure of lived experiences.

RESULTS

The study included 21 parents. The structure of the lived experiences was characterized by three central axes: (1) the long and difficult road to diagnosis; (2) communicating the BPD diagnosis to parents: a necessary step; (3) the pitfalls of receiving the diagnosis. The Family Connections program provided significant support in these areas, particularly in understanding the diagnosis, enhancing communication with their child, and reducing social isolation.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the challenges parents face when receiving a BPD diagnosis for their child and underscore the need for an early, clear, and detailed explanation of the diagnosis. The specific experiences of receiving the diagnosis are indicative of the broader care experience parents undergo and highlight their need and right to be informed, supported, and guided throughout their child's treatment.

Comparing stigma between French people experiencing schizophrenia versus bipolar disorders

BACKGROUND

Among the multiple challenges that people experiencing mental illness in general, and schizophrenia or bipolar disorders in particular, have to face, stigma appears to be one of the most difficult to tackle. In France, the body of research about stigma regarding people experiencing schizophrenia or bipolar disorders is growing, but not as much as in other western countries.

AIMS

In this context, our study aims to explore and compare stigma in French people experiencing schizophrenia or bipolar disorders, along with their respective mental healthcare system experience, in order to better address them within public health policies.

METHODS

20 French mental health service users experiencing schizophrenia and 20 experiencing bipolar disorders answered the Stigma Scale, which assesses three dimensions of stigma (discrimination, difficulties of divulgation and lack of positive aspects). A semi-structured interview was used to collect information about the experience of the mental healthcare system (level of information, access to diagnosis, treatment, access to psychoeducation, etc.).

RESULTS

People experiencing schizophrenia and people experiencing bipolar disorders are different populations in terms of social impairment. However, they share a comparable negative experience of the mental healthcare system and a comparable level of information about their illness, to the exception of diagnosis divulgation, as people experiencing bipolar disorders have a better access to their diagnosis. People experiencing schizophrenia perceive a higher actual discrimination than people experiencing bipolar disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Public health policies should take into account the strong perception of actual discrimination of people experiencing schizophrenia, with capitalizing on what seems beneficial for people experiencing bipolar disorders.

Causal Beliefs About and Perceptions of Illness in Persons Experiencing Schizophrenia and in Close Relatives of Such Individuals: An Exploratory Study

BACKGROUND

The cause to which persons experiencing schizophrenia attribute their illness influences emotional and adjustment variables. This is also true for close relatives (CRs), who are important players in the affected individual's environment and whose mood can influence the person's day-to-day life or treatment adherence. Recent literature has highlighted a need to further explore the impact of causal beliefs on different aspects of recovery as well as on stigma.

AIMS

The objective of this study was to explore causal beliefs about the illness and their relationship to other illness perceptions and stigma among persons experiencing schizophrenia and their CRs.

METHODS

Twenty French individuals experiencing schizophrenia and 27 CRs of individuals with schizophrenia answered the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, which investigates probable causes of an illness and other illness perceptions, and the Stigma Scale. A semi-structured interview was used to collect information about diagnosis, treatment, and access to psychoeducation.

RESULTS

The individuals with schizophrenia identified fewer causal attributions than the CRs. They were more likely to endorse psychosocial stress and family environment as probable causes, while CRs mostly favored genetic explanations. We found significant relationships between causal attributions and most negative perceptions of the illness, including components of stigma, in both samples. Among CRs, having received family psychoeducation was strongly correlated with viewing substance abuse as a probable cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Relationships between causal beliefs about illness and perceptions of illness both in individuals experiencing schizophrenia and in CRs of such individuals should be explored further with harmonized and detailed tools. Assessing causal beliefs about schizophrenia as a framework for psychiatric clinical practice could prove useful for all those involved in the recovery process.

[Integrating close relatives of people experiencing schizophrenia in the mental health system]

OBJECTIVES

Schizophrenia is a long-term, stigmatized disease which often leads to social impairment, unemployment and isolation, with heavy negative social and psychological consequences both on patients and their families. Close relatives' perceptions of the illness have an impact on their mood, and then on the course of the patient's disease itself. In this context, our objective is to evaluate the perceptions of French close relatives of people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorders, about the disease itself, as well as their experience within the mental healthcare system.

METHODS

Our population is constituted of close relatives of people experiencing schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recruited through an active patient and families association. We used a French translation of a standardized questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, as well as an extensive semi-structured interview assessing the experience of the mental healthcare system (diagnosis divulgation, information about disease and treatment, family psychoeducation, hospitalization experience, and access to health professionals). Some questions in the last were open-ended questions, which allowed us to gather detailed and personal responses, in order to be able to illustrate our quantitative findings with brief clinical cases.

RESULTS

Among the 27 close relatives included in our research, results to the standardized questionnaires show threatening perceptions of the disease, in particular regarding the probable duration of the disease and the frequency of symptoms. In our study, a better access to diagnosis is associated with a shorter perceived probable duration of the disease, while an easier communication with healthcare professionals (in particular nurses) is associated with the perception of a better efficiency of the treatment. Family psychoeducation seems to be associated with the perception of less frequent symptoms. When the patient lives independently or is older, close relatives of our sample perceive a higher risk of chronicity of the disease. Our results tend to confirm the available literature on the subject of information towards families in psychiatric services: indeed, studies, especially in the field of nursing research, have shown that families tend to feel excluded from care processes and from useful information exchanges about the patient's illness. Our study also confirms the fact that family psychoeducation seems to reduce the frequency of present symptoms in the patient as perceived by the close relative. This effect could be caused by a better understanding of the real symptoms or by an enhancement of the family mood and functioning. Even if the patient's hospitalization was a difficult or very difficult experience for close relatives, it showed no relationship with their illness negative perceptions. Sociodemographic variables of the patient, such as age or the fact of living in an independent household, were associated in our research with the close relatives' view of a higher potential chronicity of the illness; this could be explained by a different stage of acceptation of the illness when compared to close relatives taking care of a younger or still dependent patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results plead for further research on a larger and less homogeneous sample. Confirming our findings could help build useful recommendations leading to better integrated families who currently seem to feel relatively isolated and exclused in the healthcare process, despite the strategic role they could play and despite the many recommendations of public health policies in that matter. Efforts should continue to be made to reach the goal of a better inclusion of families and close relatives of people experiencing schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorders, in particular in the field of information and communication with health professionals, both areas which seem to have a potential effect on close relatives' illness negative perceptions. Family psychoeducation deserves more attention and should be more systematically proposed to French families with an easier and free access.

Four reasons why early detection centers for psychosis should be renamed and their treatment targets reconsidered: we should not catastrophize a future we can neither reliably predict nor change

Since the 1990s, facilities for individuals at putative risk for psychosis have mushroomed and within a very short time have become part of the standard psychiatric infrastructure in many countries. The idea of preventing a severe mental disorder before its exacerbation is laudable, and early data indeed strongly suggested that the sooner the intervention, the better the outcome. In this paper, the authors provide four reasons why they think that early detection or prodromal facilities should be renamed and their treatment targets reconsidered. First, the association between the duration of untreated psychosis and outcome is empirically established but has become increasingly weak over the years. Moreover, its applicability to those who are considered at risk remains elusive. Second, instruments designed to identify future psychosis are prone to many biases that are not yet sufficiently controlled. None of these instruments allows an even remotely precise prognosis. Third, the rate of transition to psychosis in at-risk patients is likely lower than initially thought, and evidence for the success of early intervention in preventing future psychosis is promising but still equivocal. Perhaps most importantly, the treatment is not hope-oriented. Patients are more or less told that schizophrenia is looming over them, which may stigmatize individuals who will never, in fact, develop psychosis. In addition self-stigma has been associated with suicidality and depression. The authors recommend that treatment of help-seeking individuals with mental problems but no established diagnosis should be need-based, and the risk of psychosis should be de-emphasized as it is only one of many possible outcomes, including full remission. Prodromal clinics should not be abolished but should be renamed and restructured. Such clinics exist, but the transformation process needs to be facilitated.

"You have to believe in something": Risk of psychosis and psychiatrists' beliefs in the self-fulfilling prophecy

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric care is a fruitful setting for exploring the rise of surveillance medicine, which shapes gray zones of uncertainty between health and illness. Predicting psychosis has become a priority in the international mental health field, but French psychiatrists appear reluctant to refer their young patients for standardized assessments or disclose their risks to them.

AIM

This research addressed French psychiatrists' attitudes towards risk disclosure about psychosis to adolescents presenting symptoms that might reflect either typical teenager unease or the first signs of psychosis onset.

METHODS

A mixed-method design included 12 in-depth qualitative interviews followed by an online survey with responses from 487 psychiatrists.

RESULTS

French psychiatrists' reluctance to engage in risk disclosure emerges from a professional norm: a belief in the self-fulfilling prophecy. They - especially those with a background in social science and psychology - believe in the optimistic self-fulfilling prophecy. They fear the consequences of pessimistic predictions, struggle to maintain functional optimism, favor long-term inconspicuous medical watchfulness, and systematically understand favorable outcomes as a consequence of medical care, independent of the accuracy of risk detection.

Mechanisms of Creativity Differences Between Art and Non-art Majors: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study

Creativity is considered the ability to generate new ideas or behaviors, an ability that have diverse expressions in different human groups, such as painters and non-painters. Art major students require more creative activities than non-art students do. In this study, we plan to explore the figural creativity abilities of art major students and whether these students exhibited higher figural creativity scores and why their brain structure of gray matter are lower which may benefit from their professional training relative to non-art majors. Therefore, in this study, we use voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to identify different behavioral and brain mechanisms between art major students and non-art major students by using the figural Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Our results showed that the TTCT-figural (TTCT-F) scores of art majors were higher than those of non-art majors. The TTCT-F score of art major students and practicing and study time have positive correlations which means art major's figural creativity score benefit from there art professional training in some degree. Subsequently, the interaction analysis revealed that the TTCT-figural scores of art majors and non-majors exhibited significant correlations with the gray matter volumes (GMV) of the left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the left medial frontal gyrus (MFG). While the simple slope analysis showed that art majors, compared with non-art majors, exhibited a marginal significantly positive association with the left ACC and MFG, non-art majors exhibited a significantly negative association with the left ACC and MFG. Overall, our study revealed that people who major in artistic work are more likely to possess enhanced figural creative skills relative to non-artistic people. These results indicated that professional artistic programs or training may increase creativity skills via reorganized intercortical connections.

An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices

AIMS

To examine health professionals' views and practices relating to the specific barriers to communication that arise at the time of mental health diagnosis, and the strategies used to support individuals throughout this process.

METHODS

An online survey of the beliefs and practices of 131 mental health clinicians working in different clinical settings across Australia was conducted.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis of the items relating to barriers to communication resulted in three latent factors ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances' such as the person receiving the diagnosis being young, having a culturally and linguistically diverse background or being unwell at the time of conversation). Using linear regression it was found that variance in 'stigma, diagnosis and risk' was significantly explained by whether participating clinicians had medical training, their experience working with serious mental health problems, their confidence handling distress and attitude towards diagnosis. Variance in 'individual circumstances' was significantly explained by participating clinicians' confidence handling distress. The most frequently used strategies to support diagnostic discussions centred on the health professionals' communication skills, gauging the individual's perception of their circumstances, responding with empathy, following-up after discussion, addressing stigma concerns, using collaborative practice and setting up for the conversation.

CONCLUSIONS

Three main areas for health professionals to reflect on, plan for and ultimately address when discussing news with the individual concerned emerged ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances'). Variations in practice indicate that practitioners should be cognisant of their own beliefs and background and how this impacts their communication practice.