1
|
Canfield KN, Hubbell B, Rivers L, Rodan B, Hassett-Sipple B, Rea A, Gleason T, Holder A, Berg C, Chatelain CD, Coefield S, Schmidt B, McCaughey B. Lessons learned and recommendations in conducting solutions-driven environmental and public health research. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 354:120270. [PMID: 38377748 PMCID: PMC10939729 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Solutions-driven research is a transdisciplinary approach that incorporates diverse forms of expertise to identify solutions to stakeholder-identified environmental problems. This qualitative evaluation of early solutions-driven research projects provides transferable recommendations to improve researcher and stakeholder experiences and outcomes in transdisciplinary environmental research projects. Researchers with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development recently piloted a solutions-driven research approach in two parallel projects; one addressing nutrient management related to coastal waters and another studying wildland fire smoke impacts on indoor air quality. Studying the experiences of those involved with these pilots can enhance the integration of researcher and experiential expertise, improving solutions-driven research outcomes. Data collection included semi-structured interviews with 17 EPA researchers and 12 other stakeholders and reflective case narratives from the authors. We used conventional content analysis to qualitatively analyze perspectives on implementing innovative engagement and research approaches in a solutions-driven process. Findings that reflect common perspectives include the importance of continuous engagement, the challenges of differing timelines and priorities for researchers and stakeholders, and the need to define consistent markers of success across researchers and stakeholders. Key lessons to improve transdisciplinary research identified from the analysis are (1) improving clarity of roles and responsibilities; (2) planning to provide sufficient, continuous project funding over multiple years; (3) expecting research needs and plans to adapt to evolving circumstances; and (4) clearly defining the end of the project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine N Canfield
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, 27 Tarzwell Dr., Narragansett, RI, 02882, USA.
| | - Bryan Hubbell
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 8101R Washington, DC, 20460, USA.
| | - Louie Rivers
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 8101R Washington, DC, 20460, USA.
| | - Bruce Rodan
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 8101R Washington, DC, 20460, USA.
| | - Beth Hassett-Sipple
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Integrated Climate Sciences Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
| | - Anne Rea
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
| | - Timothy Gleason
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, 27 Tarzwell Dr., Narragansett, RI, 02882, USA.
| | - Amara Holder
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Air Methods and Characterization Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
| | - Chelsea Berg
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Center Research Planning and Implementation Staff, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
| | | | - Sarah Coefield
- Missoula City-County Health Department, 301 W Alder St, Missoula, MT, 59802, USA.
| | - Ben Schmidt
- Missoula City-County Health Department, 301 W Alder St, Missoula, MT, 59802, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maxwell K, Eisenhauer E, Lustig A. Toward Coequality of the Social Sciences in the National Climate Assessment. WEATHER, CLIMATE, AND SOCIETY (PRINT) 2022; 14:1219-1229. [PMID: 36545267 PMCID: PMC9762488 DOI: 10.1175/wcas-d-21-0157.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Integration of the social sciences into climate assessments enhances report content and actionable science. The literature has identified the benefits and challenges in achieving coequal intellectual partnerships between the social and biogeophysical sciences in climate research. Less has been written on how to rectify the issue in the particular institutional context of a climate assessment. This article uses qualitative research methods to analyze social science integration in the United States' Fourth National Climate Assessment. It presents findings from focus groups held with social science-and nonsocial science-trained report authors. It finds that knowledge governance, or the formal and informal mechanisms shaping how information is produced and used, and cultural worldviews about the role of social sciences in assessments and assessments in society, affected social science integration. Report authors' principal orientation toward the social sciences was as a means of achieving what they saw as the assessment's public function, namely, to support education, decision-making, and action. Author expertise, report framing, and knowledge systems were other key themes that emerged. Based on this analysis, we propose potential pathways toward coequal intellectual partnerships in assessments by expanding the diversity of chapter teams' expertise, enhancing connections between authors and society, reconsidering report framing, and broadening inclusion of knowledge systems. We also discuss the potential role of applying social science theories and methods throughout the report life cycle from framing and engagement to evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keely Maxwell
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Allyza Lustig
- U.S. Global Research Program–ICF International, Washington, D.C
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Canfield KN, Mulvaney K, Chatelain CD. Using researcher and stakeholder perspectives to develop promising practices to improve stakeholder engagement in the solutions-driven research process. SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL PRACTICE RESEARCH 2022; 4:189-203. [PMID: 35855106 PMCID: PMC9281378 DOI: 10.1007/s42532-022-00119-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Translational approaches to science have the potential to produce research that better meets the needs of community stakeholders and advances scientific understanding. Researchers involved in translational research make committed efforts to increased engagement and communication with stakeholders throughout the research process, from planning through implementation and evaluation. Referred to as solutions-driven research within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research Development, this approach is being piloted on Cape Cod (Barnstable County), Massachusetts. EPA researchers are working in close coordination with community partners on the Cape to better understand and address challenges with managing nonpoint source nitrogen. The pilot also aims to assess the usefulness of solutions-driven research approaches for application in future EPA research efforts. Using semi-structured interviews with researchers and other stakeholders, we examined researchers' and stakeholders' perspectives on the impacts of intentional and intensive stakeholder engagement on research efforts to improve coastal water quality. This study provides a reflexive assessment of the perceived benefits and drawbacks for researchers and other stakeholders when there is an institutional expectation of an increased focus on engagement. We found that engagement has been truly intertwined with research in the pilot, participants perceived an improvement in research usefulness through developing valuable collaborative relationships, and that these relationships required significant time commitments to maintain. We also identified a need for an efficient infrastructure for developing and distributing communication materials for continued engagement with diverse stakeholders throughout the research process. The paper provides transferable practices for researchers seeking to use a solutions-driven research approach based on lessons learned thus far in how to support researchers and research planning in simultaneously prioritizing effective engagement and sound collaborative environmental science research to address a localized environmental challenge. This is an innovative approach in that interviews occurred as the implementation phase of the project began, with the goal of implementing the lessons learned outlined here in the ongoing project. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42532-022-00119-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine N. Canfield
- Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Management and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 27 Tarzwell Dr., Narragansett, RI 02882 USA
| | - Kate Mulvaney
- Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Management and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 27 Tarzwell Dr., Narragansett, RI 02882 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eisenhauer E, Williams KC, Margeson K, Paczuski S, Hano MC, Mulvaney K. Advancing Translational Research in Environmental Science: The Role and Impact of Social Sciences. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY 2021; 120:165-172. [PMID: 36960164 PMCID: PMC10031653 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Increasing recognition of the complexity of environmental problems and the need to understand social processes and human values is leading environmental management agencies in many nations, including the USA, to integrate more research from the social sciences through the inclusion of social scientists on interdisciplinary teams. For this study we conducted focus groups at three research laboratories within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development to better understand how inclusion of social sciences influenced the research process and outcomes, and the barriers to and facilitators of integration. The focus groups identified effects on the research process including improved problem framing, the introduction of new methodologies, and greater stakeholder and public inclusion, while research outcomes included the inclusion or refinement of social and environmental perspectives and systems thinking, increased translatability of research, and new partnerships. Barriers identified included lack of familiarity with social sciences which affected perceptions of social sciences and organizational capacity to absorb and apply social science expertise. Facilitators included receptivity of team members, intentional communication strategies, and project structures and organizational commitment that support interdisciplinary work. Finding a key barrier to be lack of clarity about the different roles social sciences play in translational research, we present a conceptual model defining the roles and contributions of social scientists that clarifies the distinction between "integration" of social sciences in research and "application" of skills and knowledge from the social sciences which play distinct but equally important roles in translational research approaches and solutions-driven research. These insights on the ways social sciences contribute to translational research efforts advance integration of social and natural sciences in environmental science research, particularly in applied contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Eisenhauer
- US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20460, United States
| | - Kathleen C. Williams
- US Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Boulevard, Duluth, MN 55804, United States
| | - Keahna Margeson
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, 6201 Congdon Boulevard, Duluth, MN 55804, United States
| | - Sebastian Paczuski
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, 6201 Congdon Boulevard, Duluth, MN 55804, United States
| | - Mary Clare Hano
- US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 United States
| | - Kate Mulvaney
- US Environmental Protection Agency, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, RI, 02882, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martinez KF, Morrow JB. Lessons learned in managing risk: Tools and strategies for confident operations from the CLEAN 2020 Summit. Toxicol Ind Health 2020; 36:736-742. [PMID: 33241768 DOI: 10.1177/0748233720971381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Risk mitigation of COVID-19 in the indoor environment requires an articulated strategy for creating a bridge between science and the business community that focuses on knitting together four core capabilities-environmental microbiology, transmission science, building science, and social science-advancing scientific knowledge. The purpose of this article is to share insights from the CLEAN 2020 Summit, which assembled leaders from business, policy, standards development, science, and engineering working to mitigate risk of transmission in the built environment. The Summit worked to assess current challenges and pain points felt by industries from around the globe as well as innovative solutions applied to meet these challenges. Although SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 diseases are unique, the foundation of knowledge to assess and mitigate the risk of viral transmission in the built environment is robust. There are opportunities to improve science and engineering technology solutions, processes, and procedures to better meet the dynamic needs of the evolving pandemic.
Collapse
|