Transcranial direct current stimulation in refractory continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep: a controlled study

Impact of transcranial electrical stimulation on simultaneous stereoelectroencephalography recordings: A randomized sham-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Clinical exploitation of transcranial electrical stimulation for focal epilepsy treatment lacks quantification of the underlying neurophysiological changes. This study explores the immediate effects of transcranial alternating (tACS) and direct (tDCS) current stimulation on local and network brain activity using simultaneous stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) recordings.

METHODS

Patients were randomized for personalized tACS (n = 5) or tDCS (n = 6). Active stimulation (20 min) was preceded by sham stimulation (20 min). Changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), functional connectivity (FC) and power spectral density (PSD) were quantified against baseline.

RESULTS

Results demonstrated variable responses. Spike rate decreased in 2/6 subjects following sham and tDCS, while 2/6 showed an increase. Alpha power and aperiodic PSD components generally increased during and after tDCS but decreased following tACS. FC changes varied among subjects and were detectable even during sham sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong variability suggests that tES does not have a univocal effect on immediate changes in IED or FC, possibly due to the single session format and challenges in affecting subcortical areas.

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first study to examine intracranial FC changes during tACS and tDCS, highlighting the importance of sham comparisons and individual variability in tES response, offering valuable insights into its application for epilepsy treatment.

Neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy

The experience with neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy is far less extensive than for adults. Nevertheless, the implementation of these techniques could be of great value, especially considering the detrimental effects of ongoing seizures on the developing brain. In this review, we discuss the available evidence for neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the most studied neurostimulation modality in children. Based on mostly retrospective, open-label studies, we can conclude that VNS has a similar safety and efficacy profile in children compared to adults. Although there is little available evidence for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in children, both DBS and RNS show promise in reducing seizure frequency with few complications. The implementation of non-invasive techniques with a more appealing safety profile has gained interest. Small randomized control trials and open-label studies have investigated transcranial direct current simulation for childhood epilepsy, demonstrating promising but inconsistent findings.

Acute effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on photoparoxysmal response

INTRODUCTION

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, used to modify the excitability of the central nervous system. The main mechanism of tDCS is to change the excitability by subthreshold modulation by affecting neuronal membrane potentials in the direction of depolarization or repolarization. tDCS was previously investigated as an alternative adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy. We aimed here to investigate the acute effect of tDCS on the photoparoxysmal response (PPR) in EEG.

METHODS

We enrolled 11 consecutive patients diagnosed with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who had PPR on at least 2 EEGs. Three different procedures, including sham, anodal, and cathodal tDCS were applied to the patients at intervals of one week by placing the active electrode over Oz, for 2 mA, 20 minutes. Spike-wave indices (SWI) were counted by two researchers independently and were compared during intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) on EEGs both before and after the application.

RESULTS

After cathodal tDCS, SWI increased compared to baseline EEG and sham EEG in 3 patients, and after anodal tDCS, SWI increased in 2 patients. Although the SWI values did not change significantly, 8 patients reported subjectively that the applications were beneficial for them and that they experienced less discomfort during photic stimulation after the sessions. There were no side effects except transient skin rash in one patient, only.

CONCLUSIONS

In our sham controlled tDCS study with both cathodal and anodal stimulation, our data showed that there was no significant change in SWI during IPS, despite subjective well-being. tDCS' modulatory effect does not seem to act in the acute phase on EEG parameters after photic stimulation.

Therapeutical impacts of transcranial direct current stimulation on drug-resistant epilepsy in pediatric patients: A double-blind parallel-group randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant epilepsy is a challenging problem in pediatrics. Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) is a non-invasive neurostimulation technique suggested as a promising method for treating epilepsy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of TDCS in focal epilepsy in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHOD

We conducted a randomized sham-controlled study with 18 subjects between 6 and 16 years of age, divided equally into two groups. TDCS was performed in 20-minute daily stimulation protocol for five days for both groups. The current intensity was one mA for the first three days, increasing to 1.5 mA on day four and 2 mA on the last day of stimulation. EEG was done before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in seizure duration in the case group compared with the sham group.

CONCLUSION

five consecutive days of performing TDCS significantly reduced seizure duration in children with focal Drug-resistant epilepsy. However,further studies in this field are necessary to test the effectiveness and set up a coherent and comprehensive protocol.

Personalized, Multisession, Multichannel Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Medication-Refractory Focal Epilepsy: An Open-Label Study

PURPOSE

Animal and proof-of-principle human studies suggest that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation may suppress seizures in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The present study tests the safety, tolerability, and effect size of repeated daily cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in epilepsy have not been established, limiting development of clinically meaningful interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a 2-center, open-label study on 20 participants with medically refractory, focal epilepsy, aged 9 to 56 years (11 women and 9 children younger than18 years). Each participant underwent 10 sessions of 20 minutes of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over 2 weeks. Multielectrode montages were designed using a realistic head model-driven approach to conduct an inhibitory electric field to the target cortical seizure foci and surrounding cortex to suppress excitability and reduce seizure rates. Patients recorded daily seizures using a seizure diary 8 weeks prior, 2 weeks during, and 8 to 12 weeks after the stimulation period.

RESULTS

The median seizure reduction was 44% relative to baseline and did not differ between adult and pediatric patients. Three patients experienced an increase in seizure frequency of >50% during the stimulation period; in one, a 36% increase in seizure frequency persisted through 12 weeks of follow-up. Otherwise, participants experienced only minor adverse events-the most common being scalp discomfort during transcranial direct current stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study supports the safety and efficacy of multifocal, personalized, multichannel, cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation for adult and pediatric patients with medication-refractory focal epilepsy, although identifies a possibility of seizure exacerbation in some. The data also provide insight into the effect size to inform the design of a randomized, sham-stimulation controlled trial.

Repeated long sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: An open-label extension study

OBJECTIVE

Although clinical trials have demonstrated that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective for seizure reduction, its long-term efficacy is unknown. This study aimed to determine the long-term effects of repeated cathodal long tDCS sessions on seizure suppression in patients with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

Patients were recruited to participate in an extended phase of a previous randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, three-arm, parallel, multicenter study on tDCS. The patients were divided into an active tDCS group (20 min of tDCS per day) and an intensified tDCS group (2 × 20 min of tDCS per day). Each tDCS session lasted 2 weeks and the patients underwent repeated sessions at intervals of 2 to 6 months. The cathode was placed over the epileptogenic focus with the current intensity set as 2 mA. Seizure frequency reduction from baseline was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for two related samples. A generalized estimating equation model was used to estimate group, time, and interaction effects.

RESULTS

Among the 19 patients who participated in the extended phase, 11 were in the active tDCS group and underwent 2-16 active tDCS sessions, and eight were in the intensified tDCS group and underwent 3-11 intensified tDCS sessions. Seizure reduction was significant from the first to the seventh follow-up, with a median seizure frequency reduction of 41.7%-83.3% (p < 0.05). Compared to the regular tDCS protocol, each intensified tDCS session substantially decreased seizure frequency by 0.3680 (p < 0.05). One patient experienced an increase of 8.5%-232.8% in the total number of seizures during three treatment sessions and follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

Repeated long cathodal tDCS sessions yielded significant and progressive long-term seizure reductions in patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

Transcranial current stimulation in epilepsy: A systematic review of the fundamental and clinical aspects

Purpose

Transcranial electrical current stimulation (tES or tCS, as it is sometimes referred to) has been proposed as non-invasive therapy for pharmacoresistant epilepsy. This technique, which includes direct current (tDCS) and alternating current (tACS) stimulation involves the application of weak currents across the cortex to change cortical excitability. Although clinical trials have demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of tES, its specific effects on epileptic brain activity are poorly understood. We sought to summarize the clinical and fundamental effects underlying the application of tES in epilepsy.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A database search was performed in PUBMED, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL for articles corresponding to the keywords “epilepsy AND (transcranial current stimulation OR transcranial electrical stimulation)”.

Results

A total of 56 studies were included in this review. Through these records, we show that tDCS and tACS epileptic patients are safe and clinically relevant techniques for epilepsy. Recent articles reported changes of functional connectivity in epileptic patients after tDCS. We argue that tDCS may act by affecting brain networks, rather than simply modifying local activity in the targeted area. To explain the mechanisms of tES, various cellular effects have been identified. Among them, reduced cell loss, mossy fiber sprouting, and hippocampal BDNF protein levels. Brain modeling and human studies highlight the influence of individual brain anatomy and physiology on the electric field distribution. Computational models may optimize the stimulation parameters and bring new therapeutic perspectives.

Conclusion

Both tDCS and tACS are promising techniques for epilepsy patients. Although the clinical effects of tDCS have been repeatedly assessed, only one clinical trial has involved a consistent number of epileptic patients and little knowledge is present about the clinical outcome of tACS. To fill this gap, multicenter studies on tES in epileptic patients are needed involving novel methods such as personalized stimulation protocols based on computational modeling. Furthermore, there is a need for more in vivo studies replicating the tES parameters applied in patients. Finally, there is a lack of clinical studies investigating changes in intracranial epileptiform discharges during tES application, which could clarify the nature of tES-related local and network dynamics in epilepsy.

Safety and efficacy of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with Lennox Gastaut Syndrome: An open-label, prospective, single-center, single-blinded, pilot study

PURPOSE

Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (SLG) is a severe form of childhood refractory epilepsy. Only one pilot study has been conducted using cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCs; 2mAx30minx5days) in LGS with promising results (-99% seizure reduction at 5 days). Our aim was to explore and replicate the efficacy and safety of 10 daily sessions of c-tDCs in SLG.

METHODS

We conducted a one-blinded, single-center pilot clinical study of c-tDCs (2mAx 30 min x 10 days), applied over the highest amplitude or frequent epileptiform interictal discharges areas using scalp EEG recordings without changes in their treatments. The tDCS device used was Enobio EEG® (Neuroelectrics, Barcelona, Spain). The primary outcome was based on the seizure frequency using seizure diaries before, during 10 days of treatment, and then on a 4 and 8 weeks of follow-up. The rate of adverse events was recorded as a secondary outcome. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. The mean age was 10.1 ± 5.8 years old and 75% male. All the patients had severe mental retardation and abnormal neurological examinations. A significant median percentual seizure frequency reduction was found: 68.12% (p = 0.05) at 1 week, 68.12% (p = 0.002) in the second week. We found no significant reduction at 1 and 2 months; mainly tonic and atonic seizures were reduced significantly at all times. Only mild self-limited side effects were recorded mainly itching and erythema in the application zone CONCLUSION: Ten sessions of c-tDCs in combination with pharmacologic treatment in LGS is safe and appears to reduce significatively tonic and atonic seizure frequency at 2 months of follow-up.

Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Refractory Epilepsy: A Noninvasive Neuromodulation Therapy

SUMMARY

Epilepsy is a chronic disease of the brain that affects individuals of all ages and has a worldwide distribution. According to a 2006 World Health Organization report, 50 million people had epilepsy. Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy have refractory disease despite recent therapeutic developments. Consequently, new treatments are necessary. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive method for cortical excitability modulation by subthreshold membrane depolarization or hyperpolarization (cathodal stimulation decreases cortical excitability, whereas anodal stimulation increases it), which has been shown to be safe, economical, and easy to use. The mechanism of action of tDCS is partially understood. Cathodal tDCS in vitro and in vivo animal studies have shown that direct current and cathodal tDCS can successfully induce suppression of epileptiform activity in EEG recordings. Cathodal tDCS has been used in heterogeneous clinical trials in pediatric and adult patients with refractory epilepsy and is well tolerated. A comprehensive review of the clinical trials based on their quality and biases shows evidence that cathodal tDCS in patients with epilepsy is potentially effective. However, additional randomized clinical trials are needed with other etiologies, special populations, additional concomitants therapies, long-term follow-up, and new parameters of stimulation.

Acute effects of spaced cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in drug resistant focal epilepsies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and temporal dynamic of the antiepileptic effect of spaced transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in different focal epilepsies.

METHODS

Cathodal tDCS with individual electrode placement was performed in 15 adults with drug resistant focal epilepsy. An amplitude of 2 mA was applied twice for 9 minutes, with an interstimulation interval of 20 minutes. Tolerability was assessed via the Comfort Rating Questionnaire and the frequency of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) was sequentially compared between the 24 hours before and after tDCS.

RESULTS

TDCS led to a significant reduction in the total number of IEDs/24 h by up to 68% (mean ± SD: -30.4 ± 21.1%, p = 0.001) as well as in seizure frequency (p = 0.041). The maximum IED reduction was observed between the 3rd and 21st hour after stimulation. Favorable clinical response was associated with structural etiology and clearly circumscribed epileptogenic foci but did not differ between frontal and temporal epilepsies. Overall, the tDCS treatment was well tolerated and did not lead to severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The spaced stimulation approach proved to be safe and well-tolerated in patients with drug-resistant unifocal epilepsies, leading to sustained IED and seizure frequency reduction.

SIGNIFICANCE

Spaced tDCS induces mediate antiepileptic effects with promising therapeutic potential.

Phase-IIa randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel group trial on anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left and right tempo-parietal junction in autism spectrum disorder-StimAT: study protocol for a clinical trial

Background

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by impaired social communication and interaction, and stereotyped, repetitive behaviour and sensory interests. To date, there is no effective medication that can improve social communication and interaction in ASD, and effect sizes of behaviour-based psychotherapy remain in the low to medium range. Consequently, there is a clear need for new treatment options. ASD is associated with altered activation and connectivity patterns in brain areas which process social information. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique that applies a weak electrical current to the brain in order to modulate neural excitability and alter connectivity. Combined with specific cognitive tasks, it allows to facilitate and consolidate the respective training effects. Therefore, application of tDCS in brain areas relevant to social cognition in combination with a specific cognitive training is a promising treatment approach for ASD.

Methods

A phase-IIa pilot randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group clinical study is presented, which aims at investigating if 10 days of 20-min multi-channel tDCS stimulation of the bilateral tempo-parietal junction (TPJ) at 2.0 mA in combination with a computer-based cognitive training on perspective taking, intention and emotion understanding, can improve social cognitive abilities in children and adolescents with ASD. The main objectives are to describe the change in parent-rated social responsiveness from baseline (within 1 week before first stimulation) to post-intervention (within 7 days after last stimulation) and to monitor safety and tolerability of the intervention. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of change in parent-rated social responsiveness at follow-up (4 weeks after end of intervention), change in other ASD core symptoms and psychopathology, social cognitive abilities and neural functioning post-intervention and at follow-up in order to explore underlying neural and cognitive mechanisms.

Discussion

If shown, positive results regarding change in parent-rated social cognition and favourable safety and tolerability of the intervention will confirm tDCS as a promising treatment for ASD core-symptoms. This may be a first step in establishing a new and cost-efficient intervention for individuals with ASD.

Trial registration

The trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00014732. Registered on 15 August 2018.

Protocol version

This study protocol refers to protocol version 1.2 from 24 May 2019.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05172-1.

Functional Network Alterations as Markers for Predicting the Treatment Outcome of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Focal Epilepsy

Background and Purpose

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation technique for focal epilepsy. Because epilepsy is a disease affecting the brain network, our study was aimed to evaluate and predict the treatment outcome of cathodal tDCS (ctDCS) by analyzing the ctDCS-induced functional network alterations.

Methods

Either the active 5-day, -1.0 mA, 20-min ctDCS or sham ctDCS targeting at the most active interictal epileptiform discharge regions was applied to 27 subjects suffering from focal epilepsy. The functional networks before and after ctDCS were compared employing graph theoretical analysis based on the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. A support vector machine (SVM) prediction model was built to predict the treatment outcome of ctDCS using the graph theoretical measures as markers.

Results

Our results revealed that the mean clustering coefficient and the global efficiency decreased significantly, as well as the characteristic path length and the mean shortest path length at the stimulation sites in the fMRI functional networks increased significantly after ctDCS only for the patients with response to the active ctDCS (at least 20% reduction rate of seizure frequency). Our prediction model achieved the mean prediction accuracy of 68.3% (mean sensitivity: 70.0%; mean specificity: 67.5%) after the nested cross validation. The mean area under the receiver operating curve was 0.75, which showed good prediction performance.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that the response to ctDCS was related to the topological alterations in the functional networks of epilepsy patients detected by fMRI. The graph theoretical measures were promising for clinical prediction of ctDCS treatment outcome.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the management of epilepsy: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Current therapies for the management of epilepsy are still suboptimal for several patients due to inefficacy, major adverse events, and unavailability. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), an emergent non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has been tested in epilepsy samples over the past two decades to reduce either seizure frequency or electroencephalogram (EEG) epileptiform discharges.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO record CRD42020160292). A thorough electronic search was completed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Scopus databases for trials that applied tDCS interventions to children and adults with epilepsy of any cause, from inception to April 30, 2020.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies fulfilled eligibility criteria, including nine sham-controlled and 18 uncontrolled trials or case reports/series. Samples consisted mainly of drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients that received cathodal tDCS stimulation targeted at the site with maximal EEG abnormalities. At follow-up, 84 % (21/25) of the included studies reported a reduction in seizure frequency and in 43 % (6/14) a decline in EEG epileptiform discharge rate was observed. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Cathodal tDCS is both a safe and probably effective technique for seizure control in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, published trials are heterogeneous regarding samples and methodology. More and larger sham-controlled randomized trials are needed, preferably with mechanistic informed stimulation protocols, to further advance tDCS therapy in the management of epilepsy.

Neurostimulation in the treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening condition with a mortality of up to 60% in the advanced and comatose forms of SE. In one out of five adults, first and second line fails to control epileptic activity, leading to refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and in around 3% to super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), where SE continues despite anesthetic treatment for 24 h or more. In this rare but devastating condition, innovative and safe treatments are needed. In a recent review on the use of vagal nerve stimulation in RSE and SRSE, a 74% response rate for abrogation of SE was reported. Here, we review the currently available evidence supporting the use of neurostimulation, including vagal nerve stimulation, direct cortical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, and deep brain stimulation in RSE and SRSE. This article is part of the Special Issue "Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures".

A Review of Neurostimulation for Epilepsy in Pediatrics

Neurostimulation for epilepsy refers to the application of electricity to affect the central nervous system, with the goal of reducing seizure frequency and severity. We review the available evidence for the use of neurostimulation to treat pediatric epilepsy, including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation (CSCS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We consider possible mechanisms of action and safety concerns, and we propose a methodology for selecting between available options. In general, we find neurostimulation is safe and effective, although any high quality evidence applying neurostimulation to pediatrics is lacking. Further research is needed to understand neuromodulatory systems, and to identify biomarkers of response in order to establish optimal stimulation paradigms.

Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, and three-arm parallel multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been explored in epilepsy with limited samples, varied parameters, and inconclusive results. We aimed to study the efficacy of tDCS for patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

METHOD

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, and three-arm (Group 1 (sham), Group 2 (20-min), and Group 3 (2 × 20-min)) tDCS parallel multicenter study. The primary outcome measurement was seizure frequencies (SFs). The study consisted of 28-days baseline, 14-days treatment, and 56-days follow-up. The cathode was placed over the epileptogenic focus, and the current intensity was 2 mA. The generalized estimating equations model, one-way analysis of variance, chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 82 enrolled patients, 70 patients were included for final analysis (Group 1, n = 21; Group 2, n = 24; and Group 3, n = 25). There was a significant reduction in SFs for both active tDCS groups compared with the sham group. Patients in Group 2 showed a significantly 50.73-21.91% greater reduction in SFs that lasted for 4 weeks (p = 0.008-0.060). Patients in Group 3 showed a significantly 63.19-49.79% greater reduction in SFs compared with the sham group that lasted for 5 weeks (p = 0.011-0.045). Patients in Group 3 had a 64.98-66.32% greater reduction in SFs at W9-W10, when compared with Group 2 (p = 0.021-0.022).

CONCLUSION

Fourteen consecutive days tDCS significantly decreased SFs in patients with refractory focal epilepsy, with 2 × 20-min daily stimulation protocol being superior to 20-min daily stimulation protocol.

Neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation for seizure suppression: From electrode to magnetic coil

Non-invasive brain tissue stimulation with a magnetic coil provides several irreplaceable advantages over that with an implanted electrode, in altering neural activities under pathological situations. We reviewed clinical cases that utilized time-varying magnetic fields for the treatment of epilepsy, and the safety issues related to this practice. Animal models have been developed to foster understanding of the cellular/molecular mechanisms underlying magnetic control of epileptic activity. These mechanisms include (but are not limited to) (1) direct membrane polarization by the magnetic field, (2) depolarization blockade by the deactivation of ion channels, (3) alteration in synaptic transmission, and (4) interruption of ephaptic interaction and cellular synchronization. Clinical translation of this technology could be improved through the advancement of magnetic design, optimization of stimulation protocols, and evaluation of the long-term safety. Cellular and molecular studies focusing on the mechanisms of magnetic stimulation are of great value in facilitating this translation.

Therapeutic Applications of Noninvasive Neuromodulation in Children and Adolescents

Recent advances and growing evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of noninvasive neuromodulatory techniques in adults have facilitated the study of neuromodulation applications in children and adolescents. Noninvasive brain stimulation methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation have been considered in children with depression, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and other neuropsychiatric disorders. However, current clinical applications of neuromodulation techniques in children and adolescents are nascent. There is a great need for developmentally informed, large, double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy and safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents.

Extended Multiple-Field High-Definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) is well tolerated and safe in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

High definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) has been administered over single brain regions for small numbers of sessions. Safety, feasibility and tolerability of HD-tDCS over multiple brain regions, multiple daily stimulations and long periods are not established.

OBJECTIVE

We studied safety, feasibility and tolerability of daily HD-tDCS over 2-4 brain regions for 20 sessions in healthy adults.

METHODS

Five healthy adults underwent physical and neurological examination, electrocardiogram (EKG), electroencephalogram (EEG) and cognitive screening (ImpACT) before, during and after HD-tDCS. Four networks (left/right temporoparietal and frontal) were stimulated in sequence (20 min each) using HD-tDCS in 20 daily sessions. Sessions 1-10 included sequential stimulation of both temporoparietal networks, sessions 11-15 stimulations of 4 networks and sessions 16-20 two daily stimulation cycles of 4 networks/cycle (1.5 mA/network). Side effects, ImpACT scores and EEG power spectrum were compared before and after HD-tDCS.

RESULTS

All subjects completed the trial. Adverse events were tingling, transient redness at the stimulation site, perception of continuing stimulation after end of session and one self-resolving headache. EEG power spectrum showed decreased delta power in frontal areas several days after HD-tDCS. While at the group level ImpACT scores did not differ before and after stimulations, we found a trend for correlation between decreased EEG delta power and individual improvements in ImpACT scores after HD-tDCS.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged, repeat daily stimulation of multiple brain regions using HD-tDCS is feasible and safe in healthy adults. Preliminary EEG results suggest that HD-tDCS may induce long lasting changes in excitability in the brain.

Cumulative effect of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with partial refractory epilepsy and its association with phase lag index-A preliminary study

There is an urgent need for alternative treatments for refractory epilepsy. We investigated the effect of two courses of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in nine patients with partial refractory epilepsy. A two-course treatment (1 month per course, with six sessions of stimulation per course within the first 2 weeks by 2-mA cathodal tDCS for 20 min) was administered to each patient. After the first course of tDCS, the average seizure frequency had decreased by 37.8 ± 21.9% compared with baseline (p = 0.001). After the second course, the average seizure frequency had decreased by 48.9 ± 31.2% compared with baseline (p = 0.002). Only seven of the nine patients maintained the same state of wakefulness in three electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. We analyzed the EEG recordings of these seven patients on day 0 immediately posttreatment and on days 4 and 9 in the first course of tDCS. When compared with baseline, no significant change in the number of epileptiform discharges was observed. The day 9 phase lag index (PLI) decreased in five patients with seizure reduction after tDCS but increased in two patients without seizure reduction after tDCS. A significant negative correlation was observed between the day 9 PLI of alpha band and first-course seizure reduction (R² = 0.6515) (p = 0.028). The results revealed that tDCS may be considered as an alternative treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy, and its effect might be cumulative after repeated stimulations and associated with a decrease in PLI.

Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines

Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in humans, encompassing transcranial direct current (tDCS), transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS), transcranial alternating current (tACS), and transcranial random noise (tRNS) stimulation or their combinations, appears to be safe. No serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported so far in over 18,000 sessions administered to healthy subjects, neurological and psychiatric patients, as summarized here. Moderate adverse events (AEs), as defined by the necessity to intervene, are rare, and include skin burns with tDCS due to suboptimal electrode-skin contact. Very rarely mania or hypomania was induced in patients with depression (11 documented cases), yet a causal relationship is difficult to prove because of the low incidence rate and limited numbers of subjects in controlled trials. Mild AEs (MAEs) include headache and fatigue following stimulation as well as prickling and burning sensations occurring during tDCS at peak-to-baseline intensities of 1-2mA and during tACS at higher peak-to-peak intensities above 2mA. The prevalence of published AEs is different in studies specifically assessing AEs vs. those not assessing them, being higher in the former. AEs are frequently reported by individuals receiving placebo stimulation. The profile of AEs in terms of frequency, magnitude and type is comparable in healthy and clinical populations, and this is also the case for more vulnerable populations, such as children, elderly persons, or pregnant women. Combined interventions (e.g., co-application of drugs, electrophysiological measurements, neuroimaging) were not associated with further safety issues. Safety is established for low-intensity 'conventional' TES defined as <4mA, up to 60min duration per day. Animal studies and modeling evidence indicate that brain injury could occur at predicted current densities in the brain of 6.3-13A/m2 that are over an order of magnitude above those produced by tDCS in humans. Using AC stimulation fewer AEs were reported compared to DC. In specific paradigms with amplitudes of up to 10mA, frequencies in the kHz range appear to be safe. In this paper we provide structured interviews and recommend their use in future controlled studies, in particular when trying to extend the parameters applied. We also discuss recent regulatory issues, reporting practices and ethical issues. These recommendations achieved consensus in a meeting, which took place in Göttingen, Germany, on September 6-7, 2016 and were refined thereafter by email correspondence.

Neurostimulation as a promising epilepsy therapy

The revolution in theory, swift technological developments, and invention of new devices have driven tremendous progress in neurostimulation as a third‐line treatment for epilepsy. Over the past decades, neurostimulation took its place in the field of epilepsy as an advanced treatment technique and opened up a new world. Numerous animal studies have proven the physical efficacy of stimulation of the brain and peripheral nerves. Based on this optimistic fundamental research, new advanced techniques are being explored in clinical practice. Over the past century, drawing on the benefits brought about by vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy, various new neurostimulation modalities have been developed to control seizures. Clinical studies including case reports, case series, and clinical trials have been booming in the past several years. This article gives a comprehensive review of most of these clinical studies. In addition to highlighting the advantages of neurostimulation for the treatment of epilepsy, concerns with this modality and future development directions are also discussed. The biggest advantage of neurostimulation over pharmacological treatments for epilepsy is the modulation of the epilepsy network by delivering stimuli at a specific target or the “hub.” Conversely, however, a lack of knowledge of epilepsy networks and the mechanisms of neurostimulation may hinder further development. Therefore, theoretical research on the mechanism of epileptogenesis and epilepsy networks is needed in the future. Within the multiple modalities of neuromodulation, the final choice should be made after full discussion with a multidisciplinary team at a presurgical conference. Furthermore, the establishment of a neurostimulation system with standardized parameters and rigorous guidelines is another important issue. To achieve this goal, a worldwide collaboration of epilepsy centers is also suggested in the future.

Oscillatory Activities in Neurological Disorders of Elderly: Biomarkers to Target for Neuromodulation

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been under investigation as adjunct treatment of various neurological disorders with variable success. One challenge is the limited knowledge on what would be effective neuronal targets for an intervention, combined with limited knowledge on the neuronal mechanisms of NIBS. Motivated on the one hand by recent evidence that oscillatory activities in neural systems play a role in orchestrating brain functions and dysfunctions, in particular those of neurological disorders specific of elderly patients, and on the other hand that NIBS techniques may be used to interact with these brain oscillations in a controlled way, we here explore the potential of modulating brain oscillations as an effective strategy for clinical NIBS interventions. We first review the evidence for abnormal oscillatory profiles to be associated with a range of neurological disorders of elderly (e.g., Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), stroke, epilepsy), and for these signals of abnormal network activity to normalize with treatment, and/or to be predictive of disease progression or recovery. We then ask the question to what extent existing NIBS protocols have been tailored to interact with these oscillations and possibly associated dysfunctions. Our review shows that, despite evidence for both reliable neurophysiological markers of specific oscillatory dis-functionalities in neurological disorders and NIBS protocols potentially able to interact with them, there are few applications of NIBS aiming to explore clinical outcomes of this interaction. Our review article aims to point out oscillatory markers of neurological, which are also suitable targets for modification by NIBS, in order to facilitate in future studies the matching of technical application to clinical targets.

Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms

The objective of this review is to summarize the contribution of animal research using direct current stimulation (DCS) to our understanding of the physiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We comprehensively address experimental methodology in animal studies, broadly classified as: (1) transcranial stimulation; (2) direct cortical stimulation in vivo and (3) in vitro models. In each case advantages and disadvantages for translational research are discussed including dose translation and the overarching "quasi-uniform" assumption, which underpins translational relevance in all animal models of tDCS. Terminology such as anode, cathode, inward current, outward current, current density, electric field, and uniform are defined. Though we put key animal experiments spanning decades in perspective, our goal is not simply an exhaustive cataloging of relevant animal studies, but rather to put them in context of ongoing efforts to improve tDCS. Cellular targets, including excitatory neuronal somas, dendrites, axons, interneurons, glial cells, and endothelial cells are considered. We emphasize neurons are always depolarized and hyperpolarized such that effects of DCS on neuronal excitability can only be evaluated within subcellular regions of the neuron. Findings from animal studies on the effects of DCS on plasticity (LTP/LTD) and network oscillations are reviewed extensively. Any endogenous phenomena dependent on membrane potential changes are, in theory, susceptible to modulation by DCS. The relevance of morphological changes (galvanotropy) to tDCS is also considered, as we suggest microscopic migration of axon terminals or dendritic spines may be relevant during tDCS. A majority of clinical studies using tDCS employ a simplistic dose strategy where excitability is singularly increased or decreased under the anode and cathode, respectively. We discuss how this strategy, itself based on classic animal studies, cannot account for the complexity of normal and pathological brain function, and how recent studies have already indicated more sophisticated approaches are necessary. One tDCS theory regarding "functional targeting" suggests the specificity of tDCS effects are possible by modulating ongoing function (plasticity). Use of animal models of disease are summarized including pain, movement disorders, stroke, and epilepsy.

Cerebellar and Spinal Direct Current Stimulation in Children: Computational Modeling of the Induced Electric Field

Recent studies have shown that the specific application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the cerebellum can modulate cerebellar activity. In parallel, transcutaneous spinal DC stimulation (tsDCS) was found to be able to modulate conduction along the spinal cord and spinal cord functions. Of particular interest is the possible use of these techniques in pediatric age, since many pathologies and injuries, which affect the cerebellar cortex as well as spinal cord circuits, are diffuse in adults as well as in children. Up to now, experimental studies of cerebellar and spinal DC stimulation on children are completely missing and therefore there is a lack of information about the safety of this technique as well as the appropriate dose to be used during the treatment. Therefore, the knowledge of electric quantities induced into the cerebellum and over the spinal cord during cerebellar tDCS and tsDCS, respectively, is required. This work attempts to address this issue by estimating through computational techniques, the electric field distributions induced in the target tissues during the two stimulation techniques applied to different models of children of various ages and gender. In detail, we used four voxel child models, aged between 5- and 8-years. Results revealed that, despite inter-individual differences, the cerebellum is the structure mainly involved by cerebellar tDCS, whereas the electric field generated by tsDCS can reach the spinal cord also in children. Moreover, it was found that there is a considerable spread toward the anterior area of the cerebellum and the brainstem region for cerebellar tDCS and in the spinal nerve for spinal direct current stimulation. Our study therefore predicts that the electric field spreads in complex patterns that strongly depend on individual anatomy, thus giving further insight into safety issues and informing data for pediatric investigations of these stimulation techniques.

Cathodal transcranial direct-current stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Objective

To investigate the effect of cathodal transcranial direct‐current stimulation (c‐tDCS) on seizure frequency in patients with drug‐resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

Method

Twenty‐nine patients with drug‐resistant TLE participated in this study. They were randomized to experimental or sham group. Twenty participants (experimental group) received within‐session repeated c‐tDCS intervention over the affected temporal lobe, and nine (sham group) received sham tDCS. Paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in primary motor cortex ipsilateral to the affected temporal lobe. SICI was measured from motor evoked potentials recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle. Adverse effects were monitored during and after each intervention in both groups. A seizure diary was given to each participant to complete for 4 weeks following the tDCS intervention. The mean response ratio was calculated from their seizure rates before and after the tDCS intervention.

Results

The experimental group showed a significant increase in SICI compared to the sham group (F = 10.3, p = 0.005). None of the participants reported side effects of moderate or severe degree. The mean response ratio in seizure frequency was −42.14% (standard deviation [SD] 35.93) for the experimental group and −16.98% (SD 52.41) for the sham group.

Significance

Results from this pilot study suggest that tDCS may be a safe and efficacious nonpharmacologic intervention for patients with drug‐resistant TLE. Further evaluation in larger double‐blind randomized controlled trials is warranted.

Efficacy of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: a proof of principle

It has been proved that Transcranial DCS (tDCS) can modulate cortical excitability, enhancing or decreasing, respectively by anodal or cathodal polarity. The short-term and lasting alterations induced by tDCS are strictly related to the charge density, duration of stimulation and the depth of neuron below the skull. Epilepsy represents a pathophysiological model of unbalanced relation between cortical excitation and inhibition. In this line, tDCS can be exploited to counterbalance the neuronal hyper-excitation through electric neural modulation. This paper aims at providing the efficacy of cathodal tDCS in reducing seizures' frequency in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The study was single blind and sham-controlled with an observation period of one month during which the patients or the caregivers provided a detailed seizures' calendar (frequency as n°/week; basal, post sham and post tDCS). Patients received sham or real tDCS treatment on the 8th and 22th days. Two patients affected by focal resistant epilepsy were enrolled. They both underwent a consistent reduction of the seizures'frequency: about 70 % for Patient 1 and about 50% for Patient 2. This study represents the proof that cathodal tDCS may be efficient in reducing seizures'frequency in focal resistant epilepsy.

Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents: a comprehensive review

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that has shown promising results in various neuropsychiatric disorders in adults. This review addresses the therapeutic use of tDCS in children and adolescents including safety, ethical, and legal considerations. There are several studies addressing the dosage of tDCS in children and adolescents by computational modeling of electric fields in the pediatric brain. Results suggest halving the amperage used in adults to obtain the same peak electric fields, however, there are some studies reporting on the safe application of tDCS with standard adult parameters in children (2 mA; 20-30 min). There are several randomized placebo controlled trials suggesting beneficial effects of tDCS for the treatment of cerebral palsy. For dystonia there are mixed data. Some studies suggest efficacy of tDCS for the treatment of refractory epilepsy, and for the improvement of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism. Interestingly, there is a lack of data for the treatment of childhood and adolescent psychiatric disorders, i.e., childhood onset schizophrenia and affective disorders. Overall, tDCS seems to be safe in pediatric population. More studies are needed to confirm the preliminary encouraging results; however, ethical deliberation has to be weighed carefully for every single case.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Childhood Pharmacoresistant Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Background

Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe childhood epileptic syndrome with high pharmacoresistance. The treatment outcomes are still unsatisfied. Our previous study of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in children with focal epilepsy showed significant reduction in epileptiform discharges. We hypothesized that cathodal tDCS when applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) combined with pharmacologic treatment will be more effective for reducing seizure frequency in patients with LGS than pharmacologic treatment alone.

Materials and methods

Study participants were randomized to receive either (1) pharmacologic treatment with five consecutive days of 2 mA cathodal tDCS over M1 for 20 min or (2) pharmacologic treatment plus sham tDCS. Measures of seizure frequency and epileptic discharges were performed before treatment and again immediately post-treatment and 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-week follow-up.

Result

Twenty-two patients with LGS were enrolled. Participants assigned to the active tDCS condition reported significantly more pre- to post-treatment reductions in seizure frequency and epileptic discharges that were sustained for 3 weeks after treatment.

Conclusion

Five consecutive days of cathodal tDCS over M1 combined with pharmacologic treatment appears to reduce seizure frequency and epileptic discharges. Further studies of the potential mechanisms of tDCS in the LGS are warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02731300 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov).

Ten minutes of 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation was well tolerated by children and adolescents: Self-reports and resting state EEG analysis

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising and well-tolerated method of non-invasive brain stimulation, by which cortical excitability can be modulated. However, the effects of tDCS on the developing brain are still unknown, and knowledge about its tolerability in children and adolescents is still lacking. Safety and tolerability of tDCS was assessed in children and adolescents by self-reports and spectral characteristics of electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Nineteen typically developing children and adolescents aged 11-16 years participated in the study. Anodal and cathodal tDCS as well as sham stimulation were applied for a duration of 10 min over the left primary motor cortex (M1), each with an intensity of 1 mA. Subjects were unable to identify whether they had received active or sham stimulation, and all participants tolerated the stimulation well with a low rate of adverse events in both groups and no serious adverse events. No pathological oscillations, in particular, no markers of epileptiform activity after 1mA tDCS were detected in any of the EEG analyses. In summary, our study demonstrates that tDCS with 1mA intensity over 10 min is well tolerated, and thus may be used as an experimental and treatment method in the pediatric population.

Acute seizure suppression by transcranial direct current stimulation in rats

OBJECTIVE

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a focal neuromodulation technique that suppresses cortical excitability by low-amplitude constant electrical current, and may have an antiepileptic effect. Yet, tDCS has not been tested in status epilepticus (SE). Furthermore, a combined tDCS and pharmacotherapy antiseizure approach is unexplored. We therefore examined in the rat pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) SE model whether cathodal tDCS (1) suppresses seizures, (2) augments lorazepam (LZP) efficacy, and (3) enhances GABAergic cortical inhibition.

METHODS

Experiment 1 aimed to identify an effective cathodal tDCS intensity. Rats received intraperitoneal PTZ followed by tDCS (sham, cathodal 1 mA, or cathodal 0.1 mA; for 20 min), and then a second PTZ challenge. In Experiment 2, two additional animal groups received a subtherapeutic LZP dose after PTZ, and then verum or sham tDCS. Clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) epileptic activity were compared between all groups. In Experiment 3, we measured GABA-mediated paired-pulse inhibition of the motor evoked potential by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) in rats that received PTZ or saline, and either verum or sham tDCS.

RESULTS

Cathodal 1 mA tDCS (1) reduced EEG spike bursts, and suppressed clinical seizures after the second PTZ challenge, (2) in combination with LZP was more effective in seizure suppression and improved the clinical seizure outcomes compared to either tDCS or LZP alone, and (3) prevented the loss of ppTMS motor cortex inhibition that accompanied PTZ injection.

INTERPRETATION

These results suggest that cathodal 1 mA tDCS alone and in combination with LZP can suppress seizures by augmenting GABAergic cortical inhibition.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation therapy in epilepsy with conflicting results in terms of efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVE

Review the literature about the efficacy and safety of tDCS in epilepsy in humans and animals.

METHODS

We searched studies in PubMed, MedLine, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar (January 1969 to October 2013) using the keywords 'transcranial direct current stimulation' or 'tDCS' or 'brain polarization' or 'galvanic stimulation' and 'epilepsy' in animals and humans. Original articles that reported tDCS safety and efficacy in epileptic animals or humans were included. Four review authors independently selected the studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, PRISMA guidelines and Jadad Scale. A meta-analysis was not possible due to methodological, clinical and statistical heterogeneity of included studies.

RESULTS

We analyzed 9 articles with different methodologies (3 animals/6 humans) with a total of 174 stimulated individuals; 109 animals and 65 humans. In vivo and in vitro animal studies showed that direct current stimulation can successfully induce suppression of epileptiform activity without neurological injury and 4/6 (67%) clinical studies showed an effective decrease in epileptic seizures and 5/6 (83%) reduction of inter-ictal epileptiform activity. All patients tolerated tDCS well.

CONCLUSIONS

tDCS trials have demonstrated preliminary safety and efficacy in animals and patients with epilepsy. Further larger studies are needed to define the best stimulation protocols and long-term follow-up.

Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor cortex excitability in healthy children and adolescents.

METHODS

We applied 1mA anodal or cathodal tDCS for 10min on the left primary motor cortex of 19 healthy children and adolescents (mean age 13.9±0.4years). In order to prove whether the effects of tDCS may be attributed to the stimulation intensity, 10 children and adolescents were studied again using 0.5mA anodal and cathodal tDCS. Sham stimulation was used as a control.

RESULTS

Compared with sham stimulation, both 1mA anodal and cathodal tDCS resulted in a significant increase of Motor evoked potentials (MEP) amplitudes which remained to be prominent even one hour after the end of stimulation. Interestingly, the 0.5mA cathodal tDCS decreased cortico-spinal excitability whereas the 0.5mA anodal stimulation did not result in any effect.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, the study demonstrates age-specific influences of tDCS on cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex.

SIGNIFICANCE

Thus, the stimulation protocols of the tDCS have to be optimized according to age by planning studies in pediatric population.

Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial current stimulation (tCS) have the potential to mitigate a variety of symptoms associated with neurological and psychiatric conditions, including stroke, cerebral palsy, autism, depression, and Tourette syndrome. While the safety of these modalities has been established in adults, there is a paucity of research assessing the safety of NIBS among children.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the existing literature regarding the safety of NIBS techniques in children and adolescents with neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed on online databases for studies using NIBS in individuals less than 18 years of age. Non-English publications, diagnostic studies, electroconvulsive therapy, single/dual pulse TMS studies, and reviews were excluded. Adverse events reported in the studies were carefully examined and synthesized to understand the safety and tolerability of NIBS among children and adolescents.

RESULTS

The data from 48 studies involving more than 513 children/adolescents (2.5-17.8 years of age) indicate that the side effects of NIBS were, in general, mild and transient [TMS: headache (11.5%), scalp discomfort (2.5%), twitching (1.2%), mood changes (1.2%), fatigue (0.9%), tinnitus (0.6%); tCS: tingling (11.5%), itching (5.8%), redness (4.7%), scalp discomfort (3.1%)] with relatively few serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that both repetitive TMS and tCS are safe modalities in children and adolescents with various neurological conditions, especially when safety guidelines are followed. The incidence of adverse events appears to be similar to that observed in adults; however, further studies with longer treatment and follow-up periods are needed to better understand the benefits and tolerance of long-term use of NIBS in children.

Feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation use in children aged 5 to 12 years

Transcranial direct current stimulation is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that has been studied for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders in adults, with minimal side effects. The objective of this study is to report the feasibility, tolerability, and the short-term adverse effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in children from 5 to 12 years of age. It is a naturalistic study of 14 children who underwent 10 sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation as an alternative, off-label, and open-label treatment for various languages disorders. Frequency, intensity, adverse effects, and perception of improvement reported by parents were collected. The main side effects detected were tingling (28.6%) and itching (28.6%), acute mood changes (42.9%), and irritability (35.7%). Transcranial direct current stimulation is a feasible and tolerable technique in children, although studies regarding plastic and cognitive changes in children are needed to confirm its safety. In conclusion, this is a naturalistic report in which we considered transcranial direct current stimulation as feasible in children.

Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation in the child brain: implications for the treatment of refractory childhood focal epilepsy

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was recently proposed for the treatment of epilepsy. However, the electrode arrangement for this case is debated. This paper analyzes the influence of the position of the anodal electrode on the electric field in the brain. The simulation shows that moving the anode from scalp to shoulder does influence the electric field not only in the cortex, but also in deeper brain regions. The electric field decreases dramatically in the brain area without epileptiform activity.

Non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of brain diseases in childhood and adolescence: state of the art, current limits and future challenges

In the last decades interest in application of non-invasive brain stimulation for enhancing neural functions is growing continuously. However, the use of such techniques in pediatric populations remains rather limited and mainly confined to the treatment of severe neurological and psychiatric diseases. In this article we provide a complete review of non-invasive brain stimulation studies conducted in pediatric populations. We also provide a brief discussion about the current limitations and future directions in a field of research still very young and full of issues to be explored.

Dosage considerations for transcranial direct current stimulation in children: a computational modeling study

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is being widely investigated in adults as a therapeutic modality for brain disorders involving abnormal cortical excitability or disordered network activity. Interest is also growing in studying tDCS in children. Limited empirical studies in children suggest that tDCS is well tolerated and may have a similar safety profile as in adults. However, in electrotherapy as in pharmacotherapy, dose selection in children requires special attention, and simple extrapolation from adult studies may be inadequate. Critical aspects of dose adjustment include 1) differences in neurophysiology and disease, and 2) variation in brain electric fields for a specified dose due to gross anatomical differences between children and adults. In this study, we used high-resolution MRI derived finite element modeling simulations of two healthy children, ages 8 years and 12 years, and three healthy adults with varying head size to compare differences in electric field intensity and distribution. Multiple conventional and high-definition tDCS montages were tested. Our results suggest that on average, children will be exposed to higher peak electrical fields for a given applied current intensity than adults, but there is likely to be overlap between adults with smaller head size and children. In addition, exposure is montage specific. Variations in peak electrical fields were seen between the two pediatric models, despite comparable head size, suggesting that the relationship between neuroanatomic factors and bioavailable current dose is not trivial. In conclusion, caution is advised in using higher tDCS doses in children until 1) further modeling studies in a larger group shed light on the range of exposure possible by applied dose and age and 2) further studies correlate bioavailable dose estimates from modeling studies with empirically tested physiologic effects, such as modulation of motor evoked potentials after stimulation.

Transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric brain: a computational modeling study

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a method of non-invasive brain stimulation which uses weak electric currents applied on the scalp to modulate activity of underlying brain tissue. In addition to being used as a tool for cognitive neuroscience investigations, tDCS has generated considerable interest for use as a therapeutic modality for neurologic disorders. Though the safety and tolerability of tDCS in adults is well-established, there is little information on the safety of tDCS in children. Because there are differences between children and adults in several key parameters (such as skull thickness and cerebrospinal fluid volume) which affect current flow through the brain, special consideration should be given to the stimulation parameters which are used in a pediatric study population. In this study we present cortical electrical field maps at different stimulation intensities and electrode configurations using a high-resolution-MRI derived finite element model of a typically developing, anatomically normal 12 year old child. The peak electrical fields for a given stimulus intensity in the adolescent brain were twice as high as in the adult brain for conventional tDCS and nearly four times as high for a 4X1 High-Definition tDCS electrode configuration. These data suggest that acceptable tDCS stimulation parameters may be different in children compared to adults, and that further modeling studies are needed to help guide decisions about applied current intensity.

Electrode assembly design for transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a FEM modeling study

Despite accelerating progress in transcranial Direct Current Stimulation clinical and cognitive research, there remains remarkably little consistency in the control of electrode design and preparation. Electrode assembly design determines skin sensation and failure at the electrode can lead to skin burns. Though tDCS is generally well tolerated, the desire for rigor in electrode design is motivated by applications in increasingly diverse environments and populations. Generally the tDCS electrode assembly consists of a flat rubber or metal electrode and a saline/water saturated sponge. Here we show using FEM simulations, that each of these factors should be controlled to regulate current flow density across the skin: 1) sponge thickness 2) solution salinity 3) electrode size, 4) electrode placement in the sponge (including surface or pocket configuration) 5) control of excess fluid at the skin surface 6) use of rivets. Two general patterns of current distribution emerge as a result of integrated design: edge concentration or center concentration. Poor control over any of these electrode assembly parameters will result in unpredictable current density at the skin during tDCS.