1
|
Di Bello F, Jannello LMI, Siech C, de Angelis M, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Ruvolo CC, Califano G, Creta M, Morra S, Saad F, Shariat SF, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Puliatti S, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Improved Survival After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:7229-7236. [PMID: 39031261 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15814-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to test for survival differences according to adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) status in radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) patients with pT2-T4 and/or N1-2 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER, 2007-2020), patients with UTUC treated with AC versus RNU alone were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models addressed cancer-specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS Of 1995 patients with UTUC, 804 (40%) underwent AC versus 1191 (60%) RNU alone. AC rates increased from 36.1 to 57.0% over time in the overall cohort [estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) ± 4.5%, p < 0.001]. The increase was from 28.8 to 50.0% in TanyN0 patients (EAPC ± 7.8%, p < 0.001) versus 50.0-70.9% in TanyN1-2 patients (EAPC ± 2.3%, p = 0.002). Within 698 patients harboring TanyN1-2 stage, median CSM was 31 months after AC versus 16 months in RNU alone (Δ = 15 months, p < 0.0001) and AC independently predicted lower CSM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.64; p < 0.001]. Similarly, within subgroup analyses according to stage, relative to RNU alone, AC independently predicted lower CSM in T2N1-2 (HR 0.49; p = 0.04), in T3N1-2 (HR 0.72; p = 0.015), and in T4N1-2 (HR 0.49, p < 0.001) patients. Conversely, in all TanyN0 as well as in all stage-specific subgroup analyses addressing N0 patients, AC did not affect CSM rates (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In RNU patients, AC use is associated with significantly lower CSM in lymph-node-positive (N1-2) patients but not in lymph-node-negative patients (N0). The distinction between N1-2 and N0 regarding the effect of AC on CSM applied across all T stages from T2 to T4, inclusively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alqahtani A, Bhattacharjee S, Almopti A, Li C, Nabi G. Radiomics-Based Computed Tomography Urogram Approach for the Prediction of Survival and Recurrence in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3119. [PMID: 39335090 PMCID: PMC11429600 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. The accurate prediction of survival and recurrence in UTUC is crucial for effective risk stratification and guiding therapeutic decisions. Models combining radiomics and clinicopathological data features derived from computed tomographic urograms (CTUs) can be a way to predict survival and recurrence in UTUC. Thus, preoperative CTUs and clinical data were analyzed from 106 UTUC patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Radiomics features were extracted from segmented tumors, and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was used to select the most relevant features. Multivariable Cox models combining radiomics features and clinical factors were developed to predict the survival and recurrence. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was applied to evaluate the performance and survival distribution analyses were assessed by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The significant outcome predictors were identified by multivariable Cox models. The combined model achieved a superior predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.73) and higher recurrence prediction (C-index: 0.84). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in the survival (p < 0.0001) and recurrence (p < 0.002) probabilities for the combined datasets. The CTU-based radiomics models effectively predicted survival and recurrence in the UTUC patients, and enhanced the prognostic performance by combining radiomics features with clinical factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulsalam Alqahtani
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
- Radiology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran 55461, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sourav Bhattacharjee
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 W6F6 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Abdulrahman Almopti
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Chunhui Li
- School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
| | - Ghulam Nabi
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen L, Fu Z, Dong Q, Zheng F, Wang Z, Li S, Zhan X, Dong W, Song Y, Xu S, Fu B, Xiong S. Machine Learning-based Nomograms for Predicting Clinical Stages of Initial Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Urology 2024:S0090-4295(24)00656-3. [PMID: 39153604 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To construct and externally validate machine learning-based nomograms for predicting progression stages of initial prostate cancer (PCa) using biomarkers and clinicopathologic features. METHODS Three hundred sixty-two inpatients diagnosed with PCa at the First Affiliated Hospital were randomly assigned to training and testing sets in a 3:7 ratio, while 136 PCa patients from People's Hospital formed the external validation set. Imaging and clinicopathologic information were collected. Optimal features distinguishing advanced prostate cancer (APC) and metastatic PCa (mPCa) were identified through logistic regression (LR). ML algorithms were employed to build and compare ML models. The best-performing algorithm established models for PCa progression stage. Models performance was evaluated using metrics, ROC curves, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in training, testing, and external validation sets. RESULTS Following LR analyses, PSA (P = .001), maximum tumor diameter (P = .026), Gleason score (P <.001), and RNF41 (P <.001) were optimal features for predicting APC, while ALP (P <.001), PSA (P <.001), and GS score (P = .024) were for mPCa. Among ML models, the LR models exhibited superior performance. Consequently, the LR algorithm was used for the APC-risk-nomogram and mPCa-risk-nomogram construction, with AUC values of 0.848, 0.814, 0.810, and 0.940, 0.913, 0.910, in the training, testing, and external validation sets, respectively. Calibration and DCA curves affirmed nomograms' consistency and net benefits for clinical decision-making. CONCLUSION In summary, ML-based APC-risk-nomogram and mPCa-risk-nomogram exhibit outstanding predictive performance for PCa progression stages. These nomograms can assist clinicians in finely categorizing newly diagnosed PCa patients, facilitating personalized treatment plans and prognosis assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luyao Chen
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Zhehong Fu
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Qianxi Dong
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Fuchun Zheng
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Zhipeng Wang
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Sheng Li
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zhan
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wentao Dong
- Department of Radiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Yanping Song
- Department of Quality Control, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Songhui Xu
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Bin Fu
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Situ Xiong
- Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sasahara T, Yanagisawa T, Sugaya S, Hisakane A, Sakanaka K, Hara S, Otsuka T, Takamizawa S, Yata Y, Takahashi Y, Takiguchi Y, Mori K, Tsuzuki S, Kimura S, Miki J, Kimura T. Prognostic factors for overall survival in clinical node-positive patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2024; 31:386-393. [PMID: 38169105 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is sparse evidence regarding optimal management and prognosticators for oncologic outcomes in patients with clinical node-positive (cN+) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data from 105 UTUC patients with cN1-2M0 between June 2010 and June 2022 at multiple institutions affiliated with our university. At the time of diagnosis, all patients received standard-of-care treatment including radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), chemotherapy, and/or palliative care. We employed a Cox regression model to analyze the prognostic importance of various factors on overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 105 patients, 54 (51%) underwent RNU, while 51 (49%) did not. RNU was likely to be selected in patients with younger and higher G8 score, resulting in better median OS in patients who underwent RNU than in those who did not (42 months vs. 15 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis among the entire cohort revealed that low G8 score (≤14) (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-3.99), elevated pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR: 3.35, 95%CI: 1.63-6.90), and failure to perform RNU (HR: 2.16, 95%CI: 1.06-4.42) were independent prognostic factors for worse OS. In the subgroup analyses of cohorts who did not undergo RNU, elevated pretreatment CRP was the only independent prognostic factor for worse OS in cN+ UTUC patients. CONCLUSIONS RNU seems to be a reasonable treatment option in cN+ UTUC patients where applicable. Elevated pretreatment CRP appears to be a reliable prognosticator of worse OS and may be helpful in optimizing candidate selection for intensified treatment in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taishiro Sasahara
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Machida Municipal Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shingo Sugaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Machida Municipal Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Hisakane
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keigo Sakanaka
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Hara
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Otsuka
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Takamizawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Yata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Takahashi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Takiguchi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Urso L, Bauckneht M, Albano D, Chondrogiannis S, Grassetto G, Lanfranchi F, Dondi F, Fornarini G, Lazzeri M, Evangelista L. The evolution of PET imaging in renal, bladder, upper urinary tract urothelial, testicular and penile carcinoma - Today's impact, tomorrow's potential. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024; 21:55-72. [PMID: 38072680 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2293919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advancement of hybrid PET/CT or PET/MRI imaging for non-prostate genitourinary cancers has not experienced the rapid progress of prostate cancer. Nevertheless, these neoplasms are aggressive and reliable imaging plays a pivotal role in enhancing patients' quality of life and prognosis. AREAS COVERED the main evidence regarding [18F]FDG and non-[18F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in non-prostate uro-oncological malignancies are summarized and discussed. Moreover, potential future directions concerning PET imaging in these neoplasms are debated, with the aim to stimulate future research projects covering these fields. EXPERT OPINION In Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), [18F]FDG PET/CT demonstrates varying efficacy in staging, restaging, and prognostic stratification, but PSMA PET/CT is emerging as a potential game-changer, particularly in advanced, high-grade aggressive clear cell RCC. [18F]FDG PET/CT may see an increased use in N and M-staging of bladder cancer, as well as for detecting recurrence and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Preliminary data regarding [68Ga]-FAPI also looks promising in this context. [18F]FDG PET/MRI could be useful for the T-staging of bladder cancer, while upper tract urothelial carcinoma still lacks of molecular imaging literature reports. In testicular and penile cancer [18F]FDG PET/CT has demonstrated its usefulness in several clinical settings, although experiences with non-[18F]FDG radiotracers are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Urso
- Department of Nuclear Medicine - PET/CT Center, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico, San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Domenico Albano
- Nuclear Medicine Department, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sotirios Chondrogiannis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine - PET/CT Center, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Gaia Grassetto
- Department of Nuclear Medicine - PET/CT Center, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Francesco Lanfranchi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico, San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesco Dondi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico, San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Klemm J, Bekku K, Abufaraj M, Laukhtina E, Matsukawa A, Parizi MK, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Current Surveillance Strategies for Non-Metastatic Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:44. [PMID: 38201472 PMCID: PMC10777993 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Non-metastatic upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) is a comparatively rare condition, typically managed with either kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Irrespective of the chosen therapeutic modality, patients with UTUC remain at risk of recurrence in the bladder; in patients treated with KSS, the risk of recurrence is high in the remnant ipsilateral upper tract system but there is a low but existent risk in the contralateral system as well as in the chest and in the abdomen/pelvis. For patients treated with RNU for high-risk UTUC, the risk of recurrence in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, as well as the contralateral UT, depends on the tumor stage, grade, and nodal status. Hence, implementing a risk-stratified, location-specific follow-up is indicated to ensure timely detection of cancer recurrence. However, there are no data on the type and frequency/schedule of follow-up or on the impact of the recurrence type and site on outcomes; indeed, it is not well known whether imaging-detected asymptomatic recurrences confer a better outcome than recurrences detected due to symptoms/signs. Novel imaging techniques and more precise risk stratification methods based on time-dependent probabilistic events hold significant promise for making a cost-efficient individualized, patient-centered, outcomes-oriented follow-up strategy possible. We show and discuss the follow-up protocols of the major urologic societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8525, Japan
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada;
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu Y, Zhang H, Wen Z, Jiang Y, Huang J, Wang C, Chen C, Wang J, Bao E, Yang X. Simultaneous radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy in the treatment of panurothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1233125. [PMID: 37817773 PMCID: PMC10561089 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1233125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Panurothelial carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy that requires effective treatment strategies to enhance patient outcomes. Methods We conducted a systematic search of English publications in databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to May 2023. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Methodological Quality and Synthesis of Case Series and Case Reports tool. Data statistics and analysis were performed using Stata 15.1 software (StataSE, USA). Results Six studies involving 339 patients were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that Simultaneous Radical Cystectomy and Nephroureterectomy had 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates of 68% (95% CI 60%-76%, I2 = 12.4%, P < 0.001) and 44% (95% CI 36%-53%, I2 = 0, P < 0.001), respectively. The 2-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 91% (95% CI 86%-95%, I2 = 95%, P < 0.001) and 65% (95% CI 58%-73%, I2 = 91.5%, P < 0.001), respectively. The 2-year and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 73% (95% CI 66%-81%, I2 = 16.7%, P < 0.001) and 57% (95% CI 49%-66%, I2 = 0, P < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, the incidence of minor complications was 19% (95% CI 15%-23%, P < 0.01), major complications was 49% (95% CI 34%-63%, P < 0.01), and the intraoperative blood transfusion rate was 53% (95% CI 44%-61%, P < 0.01). Conclusions Simultaneous radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy represent feasible approaches for the treatment of Panurothelial carcinoma. Nonetheless, a comprehensive assessment of the surgical risks and benefits is imperative, and larger-scale prospective cohort studies are required to validate therapeutic efficacy. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023426401.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Huimin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Chengdu Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to North Sichuan Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhi Wen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Yu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Jing Huang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Chongjian Wang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Caixia Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Jiahao Wang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Erhao Bao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Xuesong Yang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Evmorfopoulos K, Mitrakas L, Karathanasis A, Zachos I, Tzortzis V, Vlachostergios PJ. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Rare Malignancy with Distinct Immuno-Genomic Features in the Era of Precision-Based Therapies. Biomedicines 2023; 11:1775. [PMID: 37509415 PMCID: PMC10376290 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11071775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, occurring in 5-10% of patients diagnosed with UC, and involves the renal pelvis, calyces, or ureters. UTUC can be sporadic or hereditary as a clinical manifestation of Lynch syndrome. Therapeutic management of these patients is challenging. Following risk stratification of localized disease, patients with low-grade UTUC may undergo kidney-sparing surgery or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and/or chemoablation with mitomycin-c instillation to reduce recurrence. In high-grade disease, RNU followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard of care. For decades, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment for locally advanced and metastatic disease. The aim of the present review is to summarize recent advances in UTUC's therapeutic management through the lens of its genomic and immune landscape. Accumulating knowledge on the genetic and immune aspects of UTUC tumors has increased our understanding of their underlying biology, supporting a luminal papillary, T-cell depleted contexture and enrichment in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) expression. These advances have fueled successful clinical testing of several precision-based therapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, and agents targeting the FGFR axis such as erdafitinib and other kinase inhibitors, allowing their entry into the therapeutic armamentarium and improving the prognosis of these patients. Not all patients respond to these precision-based targeted therapies; thus, validating and expanding the toolkit of potential biomarkers of response or resistance, including molecular subtypes, FGFR pathway gene alterations, DNA repair gene defects, tumor mutational burden (TMB), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), nectin-4, TROP2, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), are key to maximizing the benefit to these particular subgroups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Evmorfopoulos
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Lampros Mitrakas
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Karathanasis
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis Zachos
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Vassilios Tzortzis
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Panagiotis J. Vlachostergios
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
- Department of Medical Oncology, IASO Thessalias Hospital, 41500 Larissa, Greece
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wei W, Liu J, Wang L, Duan X, Ding D. Segmental ureterectomy for high-risk ureteral carcinoma: a preliminary report. BMC Urol 2023; 23:103. [PMID: 37277741 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01265-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND EAU guidelines strongly recommend kidney sparing surgery (KSS) as the primary treatment option for the low-risk UTUC patients. While there are few reports involving the KSS treated for the high-risk counterparts, especially the ureteral resection. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the segmental ureterectomy (SU) for the patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 20 patients from May 2017 to December 2021 who underwent segmental ureterectomy (SU) in Henan Provincial People's Hospital. The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Besides, the ECOG scores and postoperative complications were also included. RESULTS As of December 2022, the mean OS was 62.1months (95%CI:55.6-68.6months) and the mean PFS was 45.0months (95%CI:35.9-54.1months). The median OS and median PFS were not reached. The 3-year OS rate was 70% and the 3-year PFS rate was 50%. The percentage of Clavien I and II complications was 15%. CONCLUSION For the selected patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma, the efficacy and safety of segmental ureterectomy were satisfactory. But we still need to conduct prospective or randomized study to validate the value of SU in patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wei
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Junfeng Liu
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lingdian Wang
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Duan
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Degang Ding
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang X, Zhang S, Wu L, Feng B, Shen H, Gu Y, Zhang Q, Fang F, Yang R, Guo H. Diagnostic performance of an immunoassay based on urine exfoliated cell enrichment nanotechnology for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective, monocentric study. BMC Urol 2022; 22:194. [PMID: 36434570 PMCID: PMC9700989 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01122-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noninvasively urine-based diagnostic modalities for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) were still lacking. We evaluated the diagnostic value of our previously developed urine-based assay (UTC assay) in UTUC. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients with suspected UTUC and 40 donors without UTUC. Voided urine specimens were analyzed by UTC assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The performance of UTC assay and FISH was compared among the 60 histologically proven UTUC patients and the 40 donors with benign disease. RESULTS Of the 60 UTUCs, there were 8 low-grade and 52 high-grade cases. Overall sensitivity for UTC assay and FISH were 85% and 73.3%, respectively (P = 0.116). Specificities for UTC assay and FISH were 92.5% and 95%, respectively (P = ns.). By grade, sensitivities of UTC assay and FISH were 87.5% vs. 37.5% for low-grade (P = 0.119), and 84.6% vs. 78.8% for high- grade UTUC (P = 0.446), respectively. By stage, UTC assay showed significantly higher sensitivity than FISH for detecting non-muscle-invasive UTUC, which were 88.5% vs. 61.5%, respectively (P = 0.025). CONCLUSION UTC assay has good performance for the non-invasive diagnosis of UTUC. UTC assay may improve the diagnosis and surveillance of low-grade or superficial UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Rd, 210008, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shiwei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Rd, 210008, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lang Wu
- PerMed Biomedicine Institute, 201321, Shanghai, China
| | - Baofu Feng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Rd, 210008, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hongwei Shen
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Rd, 210008, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yuanyuan Gu
- PerMed Biomedicine Institute, 201321, Shanghai, China
| | - Qun Zhang
- PerMed Biomedicine Institute, 201321, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Fang
- Department of Pharmacology, Nanjing Medical University, 210000, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Rong Yang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Rd, 210008, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Rd, 210008, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu F, Zhang P, Li L, Lin S, Liu J, Sun Y, Wang Y, Luo C, Huang Y, Yan X, Zhang M, Liu G, Li K. Inadvertent radical nephrectomy leads to worse prognosis in renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma patients: A propensity score-matched study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:948223. [PMID: 36249047 PMCID: PMC9561472 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.948223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma (RPUC) patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (NU) and inadvertent radical nephrectomy (RN).Patients and methodsIn this retrospective study, patients with RPUC who underwent NU or RN diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. To adjust the confounders, the propensity score-matched analysis was conducted. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were performed to explore the effect of different surgical methods on OS and CSS.ResultsA total of 2197 cases were finally included in this analysis, among which, 187 (8.5%) patients were treated with RN and 2010 (91.5%) patients were treated with NU. Before matching, the survival analysis revealed that the OS (HR: 1.444, 95%CI: 1.197, 1.741) and CSS (HR: 1.522, 95%CI: 1.211, 1.914) of patients who received RN were worse than that of patients who received NU (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, respectively). After matching, the RN group had a worse OS (HR: 1.298, 95%CI: 1.002, 1.682) than the NU group (p = 0.048). No significant difference was observed in CSS between the RN and NU groups (p = 0.282). The hierarchical analysis showed that there was no significant difference observed in OS and CSS in patients with tumor size ≤4.2 cm (p = 0.884 and p = 0.496, respectively). In tumor size >4.2 cm, both OS (HR: 1.545, 95%CI: 1.225, 1.948) and CSS (HR: 1.607, 95%CI: 1.233, 2.095) of patients who received RN were worse than those of patients who received NU (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0005).ConclusionRN could lead to worse oncological outcomes than NU in patients with renal pelvis urothelial carcinoma. Accurate diagnosis of renal pelvis urothelial carcinoma is extremely important.
Collapse
|
12
|
Pallauf M, König F, D’Andrea D, Laukhtina E, Mostafaei H, Motlagh RS, Quhal F, Aydh A, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Rajwa P, Lusuardi L, Soria F, Karakiewicz PI, Rouprêt M, Rink M, Lotan Y, Margulis V, Singla N, Xylinas E, Shariat SF, Pradere B. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Nomograms After UTUC Surgery. Front Oncol 2022; 12:907975. [PMID: 35847838 PMCID: PMC9283688 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.907975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current guidelines recommend assessing the prognosis in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients (UTUC) after surgery. However, no specific method is endorsed. Among the various prognostic models, nomograms represent an easy and accurate tool to predict the individual probability for a specific event. Therefore, identifying the best-suited nomogram for each setting seems of great interest to the patient and provider. Objectives To identify, summarize and compare postoperative UTUC nomograms predicting oncologic outcomes. To estimate the overall performance of the nomograms and identify the most reliable predictors. To create a reference tool for postoperative UTUC nomograms, physicians can use in clinical practice. Design A systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of Cochrane’s Prognosis Methods Group. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for studies published before December 2021. Nomograms were grouped according to outcome measurements, the purpose of use, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate nomogram group performance and predictor reliability. Reference tables summarizing the nomograms’ important characteristics were created. Results The systematic review identified 26 nomograms. Only four were externally validated. Study heterogeneity was significant, and the overall Risk of Bias (RoB) was high. Nomogram groups predicting overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and intravesical recurrence (IVR) had moderate discrimination accuracy (c-Index summary estimate with 95% confidence interval [95% CI] and prediction interval [PI] > 0.6). Nomogram groups predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) had good discrimination accuracy (c-Index summary estimate with 95% CI and PI > 0.7). Advanced pathological tumor stage (≥ pT3) was the most reliable predictor of OS. Pathological tumor stage (≥ pT2), age, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were the most reliable predictors of CSS. LVI was the most reliable predictor of RFS. Conclusions Despite a moderate to good discrimination accuracy, severe heterogeneity discourages the uninformed use of postoperative prognostic UTUC nomograms. For nomograms to become of value in a generalizable population, future research must invest in external validation and assessment of clinical utility. Meanwhile, this systematic review serves as a reference tool for physicians choosing nomograms based on individual needs. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=282596, identifier PROSPERO [CRD42021282596].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D’Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Departments of Urology and Oncology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
- Karl Landsteiner Insitute of Urology and Andrology, Karl Landsteiner Society, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
- *Correspondence: Benjamin Pradere,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Longo N, Celentano G, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Capece M, Califano G, Collà Ruvolo C, Mangiapia F, Fusco F, Morra S, Turco C, Di Bello F, Fusco GM, Cirillo L, Cacciapuoti C, Spirito L, Calogero A, Sica A, Sagnelli C, Creta M. Metastasis-Directed Radiation Therapy with Consolidative Intent for Oligometastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2373. [PMID: 35625979 PMCID: PMC9139743 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) represents an evolving field in uro-oncology, and the role of metastasis-directed therapies, including metastasectomy and metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDRT), is gaining increasing attention. Herein, we summarize available evidence about the role of MDRT with consolidative intent in oligometastatic UC patients. A systematic review was performed in December 2021. Six studies involving 158 patients were identified. Most patients (n = 120, 90.2%) had a history of bladder cancer and the most frequent sites of metastases were lymph nodes (n = 61, 52.1%) followed by the lungs (n = 34, 29%). Overall, 144 metastases were treated with MDRT. Median follow-up ranged from 17.2 to 25 months. Local control rates ranged from 57% to 100%. Median Overall Survival (OS) ranged from 14.9 to 51.0 months and median progression-free survival ranged from 2.9 to 10.1 months. Rates of OS at one and two years ranged from 78.9% to 96% and from 26% to 63%, respectively. Treatment-related toxicity was recorded in few patients and in most cases a low-grade toxicity was evident. MDRT with consolidative intent represents a potential treatment option for selected patients with oligometastatic UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Marco Capece
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Francesco Mangiapia
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Ferdinando Fusco
- Department of Woman, Child and General, Specialized Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.F.); (L.S.)
| | - Simone Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Carmine Turco
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Giovanni Maria Fusco
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Crescenzo Cacciapuoti
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Department of Woman, Child and General, Specialized Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.F.); (L.S.)
| | - Armando Calogero
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Va Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonello Sica
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Caterina Sagnelli
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Largo Madonna delle Grazie n. 1, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peyrottes A, Califano G, Ouzaïd I, Lainé-Caroff P, Long Depaquit T, Hermieu JF, Xylinas E. Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review. Front Surg 2022; 9:852969. [PMID: 35402485 PMCID: PMC8987284 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.852969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Although lymphonodal dissection is well-accepted for muscle-invasive bladder cancer management, its role is still debated during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim of this study was to summarize the current knowledge concerning the indication, anatomical template, prognostic, and therapeutic roles of lymph node dissection (LND) performed at the time of RNU. Quality control markers, such as the number of lymph nodes (LN) removed, lymph node density, and safety of the different surgical approaches, were assessed. We performed a narrative review using the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We identified and analyzed articles based on the practice and the role of lymph node dissection for non-metastatic UTUC. There are no clear guidelines regarding the indication of LND for UTUC, but aggressive tumors may beneficiate from lymphadenectomy since lymph node invasion is a clear independent poor prognostic factor, allowing for adjuvant treatments. It seems that an extended lymphadenectomy may provide therapeutic advantages as a higher number of nodes removed may be related to the removal of undetected LNs micrometastases and a subsequent improvement in recurrence rate and cancer-specific survival. Clear anatomical templates are thus needed based on the location and the laterality of the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Peyrottes
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Idir Ouzaïd
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Paul Lainé-Caroff
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Thibaut Long Depaquit
- Urology Unit, Military Teaching Hospital Sainte Anne, French Military Health Service, Toulon, France
| | - Jean-François Hermieu
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
- *Correspondence: Evanguelos Xylinas
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Białek Ł, Bilski K, Dobruch J, Krajewski W, Szydełko T, Kryst P, Poletajew S. Non-Invasive Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma-A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061520. [PMID: 35326672 PMCID: PMC8945959 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Beyond laboratory, imaging and endoscopic procedures, new diagnostic tools are increasingly being sought for the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), especially those that are non-invasive. In this systematic review, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of non-invasive tests in the diagnosis of UTUC. PubMed and Embase electronic databases were searched to identify studies assessing effectiveness of non-invasive tests in the primary diagnosis of UTUC. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020216480). Among 10,084 screened publications, 25 were eligible and included in the analysis. Most of them were conducted on small samples of patients and the control groups were heterogenous. The test used in the largest number of studies was voided urinary cytology, which has poor sensitivity (11-71.1%) with favorable specificity (54-100%). Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnostic cytology showed higher sensitivity (35-85.7%) with equally good specificity (80-100%). There were also studies on the use of tests known to diagnose bladder cancer such as NMP22, uCYT or BTA test. Other urine or blood tests have been the subject of only isolated studies, with varying results. To conclude, currently there is a lack of high-quality data that could confirm good effectiveness of non-invasive tests used in the diagnosis of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Łukasz Białek
- Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (K.B.); (J.D.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Konrad Bilski
- Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (K.B.); (J.D.)
| | - Jakub Dobruch
- Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (K.B.); (J.D.)
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland; (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland; (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Piotr Kryst
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (P.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Sławomir Poletajew
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (P.K.); (S.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Califano G, Ouzaid I, Laine-Caroff P, Peyrottes A, Collà Ruvolo C, Pradère B, Elalouf V, Misrai V, Hermieu JF, Shariat SF, Xylinas E. Current Advances in Immune Checkpoint Inhibition and Clinical Genomics in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: State of the Art. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:687-697. [PMID: 35200559 PMCID: PMC8870958 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29020060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and challenging-to-treat malignancy. In most patients it is a sporadic tumor entity, less commonly it falls on the spectrum of Lynch syndrome, an autosomal dominant familial tumor syndrome. Localized UTUC with high-risk features as well as the metastatic disease scenario might require systemic therapy. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is currently the recommended management option. However, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors into the therapeutic armamentarium has led to a paradigm shift in treatment standards. Immunotherapy has been shown to be safe and effective in treating at least metastatic UTUC, although UTUC-specific high-level evidence is still lacking. Recent technological advances and noteworthy research efforts have greatly improved the general understanding of the biological landscape of UTUC. According to the main findings, UTUC represent a particular subtype of urothelial carcinoma frequently associated with activated FGFR3 signaling, a luminal–papillary phenotype and a T-cell-depleted microenvironment. This improved knowledge promises precision oncology approaches that match treatment decision strategies and genomic profile to ultimately result in better clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to summarize the main currently available evidence on immune checkpoint inhibition and clinical genomics in UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluigi Califano
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.C.); (C.C.R.)
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France; (I.O.); (P.L.-C.); (A.P.); (J.-F.H.)
| | - Idir Ouzaid
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France; (I.O.); (P.L.-C.); (A.P.); (J.-F.H.)
| | - Paul Laine-Caroff
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France; (I.O.); (P.L.-C.); (A.P.); (J.-F.H.)
| | - Arthur Peyrottes
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France; (I.O.); (P.L.-C.); (A.P.); (J.-F.H.)
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.C.); (C.C.R.)
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Vincent Elalouf
- Department of Urology, Hospital Claude Galien, 91480 Quincy-sous-Sénart, France;
| | - Vincent Misrai
- Department of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, UMR-1048 Toulouse, France;
| | - Jean-François Hermieu
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France; (I.O.); (P.L.-C.); (A.P.); (J.-F.H.)
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France; (I.O.); (P.L.-C.); (A.P.); (J.-F.H.)
- University of Paris, INSERM, Immunologie Humaine Physiopathologie & Immunothérapie, F-75010 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-140-257-102
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu WJ, Luo HL, Chen TS. The cancer behavior and current treatment strategy for upper urinary tract cancer. UROLOGICAL SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/uros.uros_58_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
|
18
|
Collà Ruvolo C, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, Wenzel M, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Verze P, Imbimbo C, Briganti A, Mirone V, Karakiewicz PI. Stage and cancer-specific mortality differ within specific Asian ethnic groups for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: North American population-based study. Int J Urol 2021; 28:1247-1252. [PMID: 34480378 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the effect of specific Asian ethnic subgroups on stage at presentation and cancer-specific mortality in non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma among North American upper tract urothelial carcinoma Asian patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. METHODS We relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, from 2004 to 2016. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models predicting cancer-specific mortality were used. RESULTS Of 584 upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients, 173 (29.6%) were Chinese versus 130 (22.3%) Japanese versus 68 (11.6%) Korean versus 64 (11.0%) Filipino versus 40 (6.8%) Vietnamese versus 109 (18.7%) other. Vietnamese and Chinese patients showed the highest rates of T4 N0 M0 and/or T1-4 N1-2 M0 (25.0% and 18.5%, respectively), relative to other Asian ethnic subgroups. In Kaplan-Meier plots, Vietnamese patients showed the highest cancer-specific mortality rate. In multivariable models, Vietnamese ethnicity also independently predicted higher cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 2.15, P = 0.02 and hazard ratio 1.96, P = 0.03), relative to Japanese and Chinese patients. All other Asian ethnic subgroups showed similar cancer-specific mortality patterns. CONCLUSION Vietnamese and Chinese patients are at a stage disadvantage at upper tract urothelial carcinoma diagnosis, relative to all other Asian ethnicities. After adjustment for stage, only Vietnamese patients showed a survival disadvantage relative to all other Asian ethnic subgroups. As a result, it appears that Vietnamese patients not only present at a higher upper tract urothelial carcinoma stage, but additionally appear to harbor upper tract urothelial carcinoma that progresses at a faster rate than in other Asian ethnic subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Paolo Verze
- Urology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Collà Ruvolo C, Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Nocera L, Celentano G, Mangiapia F, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Chun FHC, Briganti A, Longo N, Mirone V, Karakiewicz PI. Comparison between 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization grading in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1707-1713. [PMID: 34091795 PMCID: PMC8364897 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01941-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Aims The European Association of Urology guideline for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) relies on two grading system: 1973 World Health Organization (WHO) and 2004/2016 WHO. No consensus has been made which classification should supersede the other and both are recommended in clinical practice. We hypothesized that one may be superior to the other. Methods Newly diagnosed non-metastatic UTUC patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010–2016). Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models (CRMs) tested cancer-specific mortality (CSM), according to 1973 WHO (G1 vs. G2 vs. G3) or to 2004/2016 WHO (low-grade vs. high-grade) grading systems. Haegerty’s C-index quantified accuracy. Results Of 4271 patients, according to 1973 WHO grading system, 134 (3.1%) were G1, 436 (10.2%) were G2 and 3701 (86.7%) were G3; while according to 2004/2016 WHO grading system, 508 (11.9%) were low grade vs 3763 (88.1%) high grade. In multivariable CRMs, high grade predicted higher CSM (Hazard ratio: 1.70, p < 0.001). Conversely, neither G2 (p = 0.8) nor G3 (p = 0.1) were independent predictors of worse survival. The multivariable models without consideration of either grading system were 74% accurate in predicting 5-year CSM. Accuracy increased to 76% after either addition of the 1973 WHO or 2004/2016 WHO grade. Conclusions From a statistical standpoint, either 1973 WHO or 2004/2016 WHO grading system improves the accuracy of CSM prediction to the same extent. In consequence, other considerations such as intra- and interobserver variability may represent additional metrics to consider in deciding which grading system is better. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-021-01941-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Mangiapia
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Felix H C Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|