1
|
Fiala O, Buti S, Bamias A, Massari F, Pichler R, Maruzzo M, Grande E, De Giorgi U, Molina-Cerrillo J, Seront E, Calabrò F, Myint ZW, Facchini G, Kopp RM, Berardi R, Kucharz J, Vitale MG, Pinto A, Formisano L, Büttner T, Messina C, Monteiro FSM, Battelli N, Kanesvaran R, Büchler T, Kopecký J, Santini D, Giudice GC, Porta C, Santoni M. Real-World Impact of Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (A Sub-Analysis from the ARON-1 Retrospective Study). Target Oncol 2024; 19:587-599. [PMID: 38704759 PMCID: PMC11230988 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01065-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 20% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with non-clear cell histology (nccRCC), encompassing various histological types. While surgery remains pivotal for localized-stage nccRCC, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic nccRCC is contentious. Limited data exist on the role of CN in metastatic nccRCC under current standard of care. OBJECTIVE This retrospective study focused on the impact of upfront CN on metastatic nccRCC outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) combinations or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy. METHODS The study included 221 patients with nccRCC and synchronous metastatic disease, treated with IO combinations or TKI monotherapy in the first line. Baseline clinical characteristics, systemic therapy, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis involved the Fisher exact test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS Median OS for patients undergoing upfront CN was 36.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9-71.3) versus 20.8 (95% CI 12.6-24.8) months for those without CN (p = 0.005). Upfront CN was significantly associated with OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% CI 0.31-0.72], p < 0.001). In patients without CN, the median OS and PFS was 24.5 (95% CI 18.1-40.5) and 13.0 months (95% CI 6.6-23.5) for patients treated with IO+TKI versus 7.5 (95% CI 4.3-22.4) and 4.9 months (95% CI 3.0-8.1) for those receiving the IO+IO combination (p = 0.059 and p = 0.032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates the survival benefits of upfront CN compared with systemic therapy without CN. The study suggests that the use of IO+TKI combination or, eventually, TKI monotherapy might be a better choice than IO+IO combination for patients who are not candidates for CN regardless of IO eligibility. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine the role of CN in current mRCC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondřej Fiala
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University Prague, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
- Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marco Maruzzo
- Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Enrique Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Emmanuel Seront
- Medical Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Centre Hospitalier de Jolimont Institut Roi Albert II, Haine Saint Paul, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fabio Calabrò
- Medical Oncology 1-IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Zin W Myint
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40536-0293, USA
| | - Gaetano Facchini
- Oncology Operative Unit, Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL NA2 NORD, Pozzuoli, Naples, 80078, Italy
| | - Ray Manneh Kopp
- Clinical Oncology, Sociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jakub Kucharz
- Department of Uro-oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria Giuseppa Vitale
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Alvaro Pinto
- Medical Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luigi Formisano
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Thomas Büttner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Fernando Sabino M Monteiro
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, LACOG and Oncology and Hematology Department, Hospital Sirio-Libanês, SGAS 613 Lote 94, Brasília, DF, Brazil
| | | | | | - Tomáš Büchler
- Department of Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jindřich Kopecký
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto1, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Claire Giudice
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
- Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicina, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kumada N, Iinuma K, Kubota Y, Takagi K, Nakano M, Ishida T, Yokoi S, Sugino F, Kawase M, Takeuchi S, Kawase K, Kato D, Takai M, Tobisawa Y, Ito T, Nakane K, Koie T. Impact of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Diseases 2024; 12:122. [PMID: 38920554 PMCID: PMC11202703 DOI: 10.3390/diseases12060122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to determine the utility of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in real-world clinical practice and investigate whether CN contributes to improved oncological outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This retrospective multicenter cohort study enrolled patients with mRCC who received systemic therapy at six institutions between May 2005 and May 2023. The patients were divided into those who did not undergo CN (Group I) and those who underwent CN (Group II). The primary endpoints were oncological outcomes, including cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Altogether, 137 patients with mRCC were included in this study. The median CSS was 14 months in Group I and 32 months in Group II (p < 0.001). Additionally, the median PFS in Groups I and II was 5 and 13 months, respectively (p = 0.006). A multivariate analysis showed that CN was an independent prognostic factor for CSS and PFS. Hence, CN is a potential treatment modality that can improve oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naotaka Kumada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
- Department of Urology, Matsunami General Hospital, 185-1 Kasamatsucho, Hashima-gun, Gifu 501-6062, Japan
| | - Koji Iinuma
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Yasuaki Kubota
- Department of Urology, Toyota Memorial Hospital, 1-1 Heiwacho, Toyota 471-8513, Japan;
| | - Kimiaki Takagi
- Department of Urology, Daiyukai Hospital, 1-9-9 Sakura, Ichinomiya 491-8551, Japan;
| | - Masahiro Nakano
- Department of Urology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, 4-6-1 Noisiki, Gifu 500-8717, Japan;
| | - Takashi Ishida
- Department of Urology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, 7-1 Kashimacho, Gifu 500-8513, Japan;
| | - Shigeaki Yokoi
- Department of Urology, Central Japan International Medical Center, Minokamo 505-8510, Japan;
| | - Fumiya Sugino
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Makoto Kawase
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Shinichi Takeuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Kota Kawase
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Daiki Kato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Manabu Takai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Yuki Tobisawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Takayasu Ito
- Center for Clinical Training and Career Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1194, Japan;
| | - Keita Nakane
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan or (N.K.); (F.S.); (M.K.); (S.T.); (K.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (Y.T.); (K.N.); (T.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nohara S, Nakanishi S, Matsuo T, Tamaki T, Saito S. A case report of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC). Urol Case Rep 2024; 54:102738. [PMID: 38633512 PMCID: PMC11021952 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2024.102738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) are rare autosomal dominant cancer syndromes characterized by cutaneous leiomyoma, uterine leiomyoma, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RCC in HLRCC is an aggressive metastatic tumor that develops at a young age. Here, we report the case of a patient with HLRCC who was diagnosed after the spontaneous rupture of a renal tumor. The patient underwent cytoreductive surgery, followed by combination therapy with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab and cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); however, no improvements were achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunao Nohara
- Department of Urology University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, 9030215, Japan
| | - Shotaro Nakanishi
- Department of Urology University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, 9030215, Japan
| | - Tomoki Matsuo
- Department of Urology University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, 9030215, Japan
| | - Tomoko Tamaki
- Department of Pathology University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, 9030215, Japan
| | - Seiici Saito
- Department of Urology University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, 9030215, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brönimann S, Ged Y, Singla N. Beyond the knife: strategic patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:210-216. [PMID: 38240477 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To evaluate the current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) within the context of evolving treatment paradigms, focusing on implications for patient selection. RECENT FINDINGS Two randomized trials failed to show significant benefits from CN for intermediate and poor-risk patients undergoing targeted therapy. Despite this, subgroup analysis and retrospective data suggest potential benefits for a subset of good and intermediate-risk patients. Although currently used risk stratification tools guide CN eligibility, they have limitations, including, subjectivity, perioperative variability, and missing validation. Deferred CN may benefit patients responding to systemic treatment, whereas other patients may benefit from upfront CN. Emerging data supports the value of CN with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in selected patients, emphasizing the need for ongoing trials in the ICI era. SUMMARY The role and timing of CN in mRCC have evolved across therapeutic eras. Although awaiting prospective evidence in the current era of ICI, CN still has a role in the therapeutic approach for a subset of patients. The decision to recommend CN must be personalized and involve multidisciplinary discussions considering both patient- and tumor-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Brönimann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Oncology
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Moraes FCA, Vilbert M, Alves VFC, de Oliveira Almeida G, Priantti JN, Madeira T, Stecca C, Fernandes MR, dos Santos NPC. Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Advanced Papillary Renal-Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:17582. [PMID: 38139411 PMCID: PMC10744118 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Papillary subtypes of renal-cell carcinoma (pRCC) represent 10-15% of the cases and commonly have MET alterations. This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis evaluated MET inhibitor therapy (METi) efficacy and safety in adults with confirmed advanced pRCC. The search strategy included PubMed, Web-of-science, Cochrane, and Scopus. We used the DerSimonian/Laird random effect model for all analyses; p-value < 5% was considered significant, and heterogeneity was assessed with I2. Three clinical trials and six cohort studies were included with 504 patients; 31% were MET-driven. Our pooled analysis demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) in MET-driven, MET-independent, and overall patients of: 36% (95%CI: 10-62), 0% (95%CI: 0-3), and 21% (95%CI: 1-41), respectively. One-year disease control and progression-free survival rates were, respectively, 70% (95%CI: 52-88) and 15% (95%CI: 10-20). Twelve- and twenty-four-month survival rates were, respectively, 43% (95%CI: 23-64) and 10% (95%CI: 0-30). The prevalence of adverse events of any grade and grades 3-5 were 96% (95%CI: 91-100) and 44% (95%CI: 37-50), respectively. We suggest METi has anti-tumor activity and is tolerable in patients with advanced pRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maysa Vilbert
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
| | | | | | - Jonathan N. Priantti
- School of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas—UFAM, Manaus 69020-160, Brazil
| | - Thiago Madeira
- School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais—UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Carlos Stecca
- Mackenzie Evangelical University Hospital, Curitiba 80710-390, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Das A, Shapiro DD, Craig JK, Abel EJ. Understanding and integrating cytoreductive nephrectomy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of metastatic RCC. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:654-668. [PMID: 37400492 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00776-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
Cytoreductive nephrectomy became accepted as standard of care for selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) because of improved survival observed in patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy in combination with interferon-α in two randomized clinical trials published in 2001. Over the past two decades, novel systemic therapies have shown higher treatment response rates and improved survival outcomes compared with interferon-α. During this rapid evolution of mRCC treatments, systemic therapies have been the primary focus of clinical trials. Results from multiple retrospective studies continue to suggest an overall survival benefit for selected patients treated with nephrectomy in combination with systemic mRCC treatments, with the notable exception of one debated clinical trial. The optimal timing for surgery is unknown, and proper patient selection remains crucial to improving surgical outcomes. As systemic therapies continue to evolve, clinicians have an increasing need to understand how to incorporate cytoreductive nephrectomy into the management of mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arighno Das
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel D Shapiro
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Juliana K Craig
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - E Jason Abel
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Vries-Brilland M, Rioux-Leclercq N, Meylan M, Dauvé J, Passot C, Spirina-Menand E, Flippot R, Fromont G, Gravis G, Geoffrois L, Chevreau C, Rolland F, Blanc E, Lefort F, Ravaud A, Gross-Goupil M, Escudier B, Negrier S, Albiges L. Comprehensive analyses of immune tumor microenvironment in papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e006885. [PMID: 37935564 PMCID: PMC10649801 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the most common non-clear cell RCC, and associated with poor outcomes in the metastatic setting. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the immune tumor microenvironment (TME), largely unknown, of patients with metastatic pRCC and identify potential therapeutic targets. METHODS We performed quantitative gene expression analysis of TME using Microenvironment Cell Populations-counter (MCP-counter) methodology, on two independent cohorts of localized pRCC (n=271 and n=98). We then characterized the TME, using immunohistochemistry (n=38) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) (n=30) on metastatic pRCC from the prospective AXIPAP trial cohort. RESULTS Unsupervised clustering identified two "TME subtypes", in each of the cohorts: the "immune-enriched" and the "immune-low". Within AXIPAP trial cohort, the "immune-enriched" cluster was significantly associated with a worse prognosis according to the median overall survival to 8 months (95% CI, 6 to 29) versus 37 months (95% CI, 20 to NA, p=0.001). The two immune signatures, Teff and JAVELIN Renal 101 Immuno signature, predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in clear cell RCC, were significantly higher in the "immune-enriched" group (adjusted p<0.05). Finally, five differentially overexpressed genes were identified, corresponding mainly to B lymphocyte populations. CONCLUSION For the first time, using RNA-seq and immunohistochemistry, we have highlighted a specific immune TME subtype of metastatic pRCC, significantly more infiltrated with T and B immune population. This "immune-enriched" group appears to have a worse prognosis and could have a potential predictive value for response to immunotherapy, justifying the confirmation of these results in a cohort of metastatic pRCC treated with CPI and in combination with targeted therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02489695.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon de Vries-Brilland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Integrated Centers of Oncology (ICO) Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | | | - Maxime Meylan
- Equipe inflammation, complément et cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jonathan Dauvé
- Department of Clinical Biology, Integrated Centers of Oncology (ICO) Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Christophe Passot
- Department of Clinical Biology, Integrated Centers of Oncology (ICO) Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Elena Spirina-Menand
- Department of Clinical Biology, Integrated Centers of Oncology (ICO) Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT-Oncopôle Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Fréderic Rolland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Integrated Centers of Oncology (ICO) René Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | - Ellen Blanc
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Félix Lefort
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Alain Ravaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bernard Escudier
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- U1015 INSERM, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Sylvie Negrier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lyon I University, Lyon, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Song SH, Lee S. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the age of immunotherapy-based combination treatment. Investig Clin Urol 2023; 64:425-434. [PMID: 37668198 PMCID: PMC10482658 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) displays a wide spectrum of oncological prognosis and clinical behavior, and is noted for its generally poor outcome in metastatic settings. However, the introduction of immunotherapy after the cytokine era has changed the landscape of treatment for metastatic RCC, outperforming previous targeted therapy and providing new hope for patients with advanced disease. Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been the center of controversy, with questionable survival benefit when compared to systemic therapy. Despite discouraging results from the two randomized clinical trials (CARMENA & SURTIME), interest into the role of CN is being rekindled, and contemporary real-world studies provide supporting evidence to suggest that CN may still have a role in well-selected patients treated or expecting treatment with immunotherapy, not only for symptomatic control but also for oncological benefit. In this review article, we attempt to review the modern insight into the role of CN for metastatic RCC in contemporary medicine, with a focus on treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor combination-based immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hun Song
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sangchul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen B, Li J, Huang Y, Tang B, Jiang J, Chen Z, Li J, Wang P, Cao D, Liu L, Wei Q. The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the targeted therapy and immunological therapy era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:982-994. [PMID: 36974696 PMCID: PMC10389335 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains controversial. In addition, several unanswered questions regarding the use of CN remain: Can CN provide survival benefits for patients with mRCC? Where do we place CN in the treatment sequence paradigm among patients with mRCC? How do we best stratify patients with mRCC for CN therapy? MATERIALS AND METHODS A search strategy was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Studies were included only in the English language. The risk of bias assessment was made by using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions) and RoB 2 (Risk of Bias 2) tools. The expected outcomes were analyzed by meta-analyses with the fixed-effects model or random effects model, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The measure of effect was the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the reliability of the final results. RESULTS A total of 30 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The HR for OS was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.50-0.61), and PFS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.80), favoring CN compared with no CN. The upfront CN plus targeted therapy (TT) group had superior OS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.64) compared with the TT alone group. Furthermore, upfront CN plus systemic therapy (ST) was associated with numerically inferior OS compared with ST plus deferred CN in patients with mRCC (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.98-1.74). Finally, the leave-one-out test of sensitivity analysis indicated that the results of this meta-analysis were stable and reliable in the overall HR estimates for these survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS First, CN was associated with better survival than no CN in patients with mRCC. Second, the combination of upfront CN and TT may lead to superior survival outcomes compared to TT alone in patients with mRCC. Survival outcomes were similar between the upfront CN+ST group and the ST+deferred CN group in patients with mRCC. Exact patient selection based on baseline prognostic factors is needed to promise maximal survival for patients with mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Chen
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jinze Li
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yin Huang
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bo Tang
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jinjiang Jiang
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jin Li
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Puze Wang
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dehong Cao
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Liangren Liu
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology
- Institution of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Surgical Approach in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061804. [PMID: 36980688 PMCID: PMC10046362 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has undergone considerable advances in the last two decades. Cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy retains a role in patients with a limited metastatic burden. The choice of optimal treatment regimen remains a matter of debate. The article summarises the current role of surgery in metastatic kidney cancer.
Collapse
|
11
|
Katsimperis S, Tzelves L, Bellos T, Pikramenos K, Manolitsis I, Tsikopoulos I, Mitsogiannis I. Cytoreductive nephrectomy for synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Is there enough evidence? Arch Ital Urol Androl 2022; 94:476-485. [PMID: 36576474 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2022.4.476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for synchronous metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma patients in the Systemic Therapy era and beyond regarding the Overall Survival, the optimal sequence between Systemic Therapy and Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and prognostic factors. METHODS The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Bibliographic search was performed in Medline (PubMed), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Studies included were those indexed from 2005 in an attempt to limit those conducted in the cytokine era. Risk of bias assessment was performed by two authors (K.S and T.L) using the Cochrane Collaborative Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials, the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for nonrandomized studies. RESULTS Cytoreductive nephrectomy was associated with improved overall survival in all but one of the observational studies. While in all of these studies the unvariable analysis showed improved overall survival in favor of the cytoreductive nephrectomy group in some studies the subgroup analysis showed no benefit. Regarding the optimal sequence, deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy demonstrated better results in more studies than upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy but a advantage was not clearly certain. In the analysis of possible prognostic factors for overall survival with cytoreductive nephrectomy, most common prognostic factors found were age (in 8 studies), tumor histology (in 7 studies), number of metastasis (in 6 studies), and T stage. CONCLUSIONS Cytoreductive nephrectomy can still play an important role in wisely selected patients, although the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the new immunotherapy era needs to be defined.
Collapse
|
12
|
Clinical, pathological and long-term oncologic outcomes of papillary type I vs. type II renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:384.e15-384.e21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
13
|
Naito S, Kato T, Tsuchiya N. Surgical and focal treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A literature review. Int J Urol 2022; 29:494-501. [PMID: 35340081 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Accompanied by the development of systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the concept of focal treatment, including surgical treatment, has been changing. Although immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy was essentially considered for synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients, the CARMENA trial and SURTIME trial revealed the negative impact of immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy. Therefore, immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy is currently considered only for a limited number of patients. Besides, deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy seems to have efficacy for overall survival in prior retrospective studies. Two randomized controlled trials, the PROBE trial (NCT04510597) and the NORDIC-SUN trial (NCT03977571), are underway to elucidate deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy. Metastasectomy is also considered in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients because previous studies demonstrated the overall survival benefit of metastasectomy. However, since all reports were retrospective studies, physicians could exclude the patients who were not expected to show the efficacy of metastasectomy. Therefore, an adequate patient selection for metastasectomy is important. A common factor predicting better overall survival was complete resection. Radiotherapies for metastatic lesions during systemic therapy showed approximately 90% local disease control rate at 1 year. However, no report has demonstrated that radiotherapy improves survival so far. Since surgical and focal treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients generally have minimal evidence, further investigations are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sei Naito
- Department of Urology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Kato
- Department of Urology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Norihiko Tsuchiya
- Department of Urology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nam HK, Jeong SR, Pyo MC, Ha SK, Nam MH, Lee KW. Methylglyoxal-Derived Advanced Glycation End Products (AGE4) Promote Cell Proliferation and Survival in Renal Cell Carcinoma Cells through the RAGE/Akt/ERK Signaling Pathways. Biol Pharm Bull 2021; 44:1697-1706. [PMID: 34719646 DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b21-00382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are the products formed through a non-enzymatic reaction of reducing sugars with proteins or lipids. There is a potential for toxicity in the case of AGEs produced through glycation with dicarbonyl compounds including methylglyoxal, glyoxal, and 3-deoxyglucosone. The AGEs bind the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and stimulate the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathway that can increase the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In addition, AGE-induced protein kinase B (Akt) signaling can promote cancer cell proliferation and contribute to many diseases such as kidney cancer. In light of the lack of extensive study of the relationship between methylglyoxal-induced AGEs (AGE4) and renal cancer, we studied the proliferous and anti-apoptotic effects of AGE4 on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in this study. AGE4 treatment was involved in the proliferation and migration of RCC cells in vitro by upregulating proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and MMPs while suppressing apoptotic markers such as Bax and caspase 3. Moreover, Akt and extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) were phosphorylated in RCC cells with AGE4 treatment. As a result, this study demonstrated that AGE4-RAGE axis can promote the growth ability of RCC by inducing PCNA, MMPs, and inhibiting apoptosis in RCC via the Akt and ERK signaling pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Kyul Nam
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University
| | - So-Ra Jeong
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University
| | - Min Cheol Pyo
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University
| | - Sang-Keun Ha
- Division of Functional Food Research, Korea Food Research Institute
| | - Mi-Hyun Nam
- Sue Anschutz-Rodgers Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado
| | - Kwang-Won Lee
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is There Still a Debate? Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:54. [PMID: 34654989 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01073-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence on the current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). RECENT FINDINGS Since the advent of systemic targeted therapies for mRCC treatment, the role of CN has been questioned. Several retrospective observational studies demonstrated a therapeutic benefit for CN, while recent prospective randomized trials have challenged this evidence. As such, patient selection has become of paramount importance in this setting. The role of CN on mRCC treatment is still object of debate. In carefully selected patients, CN remains an important option as a component of a multimodal therapeutic approach. As systemic therapies for mRCC continue to evolve, future trials are needed to evaluate the benefits and limits of CN in the immunotherapy era, tailoring the treatment sequence and selecting the patients who are most likely to benefit from surgical interventions.
Collapse
|
16
|
Laru L, Ronkainen H, Ohtonen P, Vaarala MH. Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status-results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:190. [PMID: 34183025 PMCID: PMC8240260 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02308-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and metastasectomies on the survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) using real-life, population-based national dataset. Methods Nationwide data, including all cases of synchronous mRCC in Finland diagnosed on a 6-year timeframe, based on the Finnish Cancer Registry and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals, were analyzed. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 3–4 were excluded. Univariate and adjusted multivariable survival analysis were performed, including subgroup analysis for patients with different medical therapies. Nephrectomy complications were also analyzed. Results A total of 732 patients were included in the analysis. CN was performed for 389 (53.1%) patients, whereas 68 (9.3%) patients underwent nephrectomy and metastasectomies of all lesions (surgery with curative intent). Median overall survival (OS) for patients who did not undergo nephrectomy was 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.6–7.2) months. Patients who had a CN had a median OS of 16.6 (95% CI = 14.2–19.1, p < 0.001) months, whereas patients who had surgery with curative intent had a median OS of 51.3 (95% CI = 36.0–66.6, p < 0.001) months. The survival benefit of CN and metastasectomies remained significant in all medical therapy subgroups and in both of the applied multivariable statistical models. Conclusions Surgical treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with good and moderate performance status, regardless of the chosen medical therapy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02308-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauri Laru
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. .,Department of Urology, Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 21, FI-90029 OYS, Oulu, Finland.
| | - Hanna Ronkainen
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Pasi Ohtonen
- Division of Operative Care, Oulu University Hospital and Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Markku H Vaarala
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ishihara H, Takagi T, Kondo T, Fukuda H, Tachibana H, Yoshida K, Iizuka J, Kobayashi H, Okumi M, Ishida H, Tanabe K. Prognostic impact of systemic therapy change in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:296-304. [PMID: 32989464 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited data are available regarding the effect of systemic therapy change in the post-cytokine era on survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). METHODS Overall, 161 patients with synchronously mRCC were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups based on the time of diagnosis: (i) early molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) (2008-2011), (ii) late mTT (2012-8/2016) and (iii) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) eras (9/2016-2018). Overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis was compared among the eras. RESULTS Of the 161 patients, 52 (32%), 75 (46%), and 34 patients (21%) were classified into the early mTT, late mTT and ICI eras, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the ICI and late mTT eras than that in the early mTT era (P = 0.0065 and P = 0.0010, respectively) but did not significantly differ between the ICI and late mTT eras (P = 0.389). In 112 patients undergoing CN and systemic therapy, OS was significantly longer in the ICI and late mTT eras than that in the early mTT era (P = 0.0432 and P = 0.0498, respectively) but did not significantly differ between the ICI and late mTT eras (P = 0.320). Multivariate analysis of OS in the 161 synchronous mRCC patients revealed that the era was an independent factor (P < 0.0001), together with the histopathological type (P = 0.0130), CN status (P = 0.0010), International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk (P = 0.0002) and liver metastasis status (P = 0.0124). CONCLUSION This retrospective analysis showed that systemic therapy change in the post-cytokine era improved OS of mRCC patients undergoing CN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Ishihara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hironori Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Tachibana
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirohito Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Okumi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients Presenting With Advanced Disease: Have We Finally Answered the Question? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 26:382-389. [PMID: 32947306 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Determining the appropriate patients for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has evolved with the integration of more effective systemic therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). While previously considered to be first-line therapy for mRCC, CN has not demonstrated a significant survival advantage over systemic therapy in more recent randomized trials when compared with targeted therapy. Conversely, multiple observational studies demonstrate a therapeutic benefit for CN. This review synthesizes the current literature regarding patient selection for CN and further evaluates the role of CN in the current era of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. With careful patient selection, CN maintains an important role in the management of mRCC patients.
Collapse
|
19
|
Shimamura Y, Ishikawa S, Takizawa H. Unusual etiology of persistent fever after urinary tract infection: Papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Gen Fam Med 2020; 21:193-194. [PMID: 33014672 PMCID: PMC7521785 DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
This manuscript presents a case report of type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma presenting with persistent fever and abdominal tenderness after treatment for urinary tract infection. The purpose of this article is to aid physicians in understanding that papillary renal cell carcinomas should be considered in patients with a persistent fever after urinary tract infection and computed tomography was useful to diagnose this entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shuhei Ishikawa
- Department of UrologyTeine Keijinkai Medical CenterSapporoJapan
| | - Hideki Takizawa
- Department of NephrologyTeine Keijinkai Medical CenterSapporoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Choueiri TK, Heng DYC, Lee JL, Cancel M, Verheijen RB, Mellemgaard A, Ottesen LH, Frigault MM, L’Hernault A, Szijgyarto Z, Signoretti S, Albiges L. Efficacy of Savolitinib vs Sunitinib in Patients With MET-Driven Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SAVOIR Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:1247-1255. [PMID: 32469384 PMCID: PMC7260692 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Importance Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is the most common type of non-clear cell RCC. Because some cases of PRCC are MET-driven, MET inhibition could be a targeted treatment approach. In previous studies, savolitinib (AZD6094, HMPL-504, volitinib), a highly selective MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in this patient group. Objective To determine whether savolitinib is a better treatment option for this patient population, vs standard of care, sunitinib. Design, Setting, and Participants The SAVOIR phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial was a multicenter study carried out in 32 centers in 7 countries between July 2017 and the data cutoff in August 2019. Overall, 360 to 450 patients were to be screened to randomize approximately 180 patients. Patients were adults with MET-driven (centrally confirmed), metastatic PRCC, with 1 or more measurable lesions. Exclusion criteria included prior receipt of sunitinib or MET inhibitor treatment. Overall, 254 patients were screened. Interventions Patients received 600 mg of savolitinib orally once daily (qd), or 50 mg of sunitinib orally qd for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS, assessed by investigator and confirmed by blinded independent central review). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and safety/tolerability. Results At data cutoff, 60 patients were randomized (savolitinib n = 33; sunitinib n = 27); most patients had chromosome 7 gain (savolitinib, 30 [91%]; sunitinib, 26 [96%]) and no prior therapy (savolitinib, 28 [85%]; sunitinib, 25 [93%]). For savolitinib and sunitinib, 4 (12%) and 10 (37%) patients were women, and the median (range) age was 60 (23-78) and 65 (31-77) years, respectively. Following availability of external data on PFS with sunitinib in patients with MET-driven disease, study enrollment was closed. Progression-free survival, OS, and ORR were numerically greater with savolitinib vs sunitinib. Median PFS was not statistically different between the 2 groups: 7.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-not calculated) for savolitinib and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.9) for sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.37-1.36; P = .31). For savolitinib and sunitinib respectively, grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were reported in 14 (42%) and 22 (81%) of patients and AE-related dose modifications in 10 (30%) and 20 (74%). After discontinuation, 12 (36%) and 5 (19%) of patients on savolitinib and sunitinib respectively, received subsequent anticancer therapy. Conclusions and Relevance Although patient numbers and follow-up were limited, savolitinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy vs sunitinib, with fewer grade 3 or higher AEs and dose modifications. Further investigation of savolitinib as a treatment option for MET-driven PRCC is warranted. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03091192.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni K. Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Y. C. Heng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Jae Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sabina Signoretti
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
A Case of Metastatic Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer Syndrome-Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with a Sequence of Axitinib and Nivolumab Following Cytoreductive Nephrectomy. J Kidney Cancer VHL 2020; 7:6-10. [PMID: 32953419 PMCID: PMC7479808 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.2020.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
22
|
de Vries-Brilland M, Gross-Goupil M, Seegers V, Boughalem E, Beuselinck B, Thibault C, Chevreau C, Ladoire S, Barthélémy P, Negrier S, Borchiellini D, Huillard O, Geoffrois L, Gravis G, Saldana C, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Escudier B, Ravaud A, Albiges L. Are immune checkpoint inhibitors a valid option for papillary renal cell carcinoma? A multicentre retrospective study. Eur J Cancer 2020; 136:76-83. [PMID: 32653774 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the most common non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). Pivotal studies evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors mostly excluded nccRCC. The aim of this retrospective and multicentre study was to evaluate the activity of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/ programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors specifically in metastatic pRCC. METHODS The primary end-point was time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS From 02/2016 to 01/2019, 57 patients with pRCC were included. Histology included 16 (28%) type 1 pRCC, 34 (60%) type 2 pRCC and 7 (12%) unclassified pRCC. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors was used in the first-line setting in 4 patients (7%), in the second-line setting in 32 patients (56%) and in the third-line setting or more in 21 patients (37%). With a median follow-up of 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.9-21.0), the median TTF was 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.0). Among the 55 patients evaluable for ORR, best response was complete response/partial response in 6 patients (11%), stable disease in 18 patients (33%) and progressive disease in 31 patients (56%). The median OS was 14.6 months (95% CI: 9.0- not reached). TRAEs of grade III-IV were noted in 6 patients (10%) leading to treatment discontinuation, and no grade V TRAEs were observed. CONCLUSION PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors exhibit limited activity as monotherapy in this pRCC population, which remains an unmet need. Our findings underline the need for further prospective clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in patients with pRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon de Vries-Brilland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Integrated Centers of Oncology (ICO) Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-André, University of Bordeaux-CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | - Valérie Seegers
- Biostatistics Department, Integrated Centers of Oncology (ICO) Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Elouen Boughalem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Integrated Centers of Oncology (ICO) Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Benoit Beuselinck
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | - Olivier Huillard
- Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study Group, Paris, France
| | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Carolina Saldana
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France
| | | | - Bernard Escudier
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Alain Ravaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-André, University of Bordeaux-CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mollica V, Rizzo A, Massari F. Re: Bimal Bhindi, Jeffrey Graham, J. Connor Wells, et al. Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.038: Cytoreductive Nephrectomy: To Whom and When? Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:559-560. [PMID: 32553708 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Mollica
- Division of Oncology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Division of Oncology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mir MC, Albiges L, Bex A, Hora M, Giannarini G, Volpe A, Rouprêt M. Management of Metastatic Nonclear Renal Cell Carcinoma: What Are the Options and Challenges? Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 4:843-850. [PMID: 32553707 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This case presents a 68-yr-old female patient with primary metastatic nonclear renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with multiple bone lesions. The patient underwent a single resection of skull bone lesion (diagnostic for poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown origin) and cytoreductive nephrectomy. The pathology of the kidney specimen demonstrated an oncocytic papillary RCC. Within 3 mo, she developed skeletal progressive disease and was started on systemic therapy (sunitinib). After initial stabilization, bone metastasis progressed during the third cycle of sunitinib and required second-line therapy (cabozantinib). One of the major unmet needs in non-clear cell RCC is the lack of specific systemic therapy. Data on immunotherapy are still limited. Inclusion of these patients in clinical trials is strongly recommended. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with metastatic kidney cancer who present with the less common histological subtype (non-clear cell) have poor survival. In this case, the patient responded to second-line therapy. Very few therapies provide response to treatment. Patients should be offered participation in clinical trials testing combinations with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Universite Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Axel Bex
- The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Milan Hora
- Department of Urology, Faculty Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Urology Unit, Academic Medical Centre "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, Maggiore della Carita Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Predictive onco-uro, APHP, Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Biles MJ, Patel HD, Allaf ME. Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase and Immuno-Oncology Checkpoint Inhibitors. Urol Clin North Am 2020; 47:359-370. [PMID: 32600537 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The role for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved with advancements in systemic therapy. During the cytokine-based immunotherapy era, CN provided a clear survival benefit and was considered standard of care in management of mRCC. The development of targeted systemic therapy directed at the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway altered the treatment paradigm and accentuated the importance of risk stratification in treatment selection. This article reviews the literature evaluating the benefit of CN during the evolution of systemic therapy and provides clinical recommendations for current utilization of CN in patients with mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Biles
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street / Marburg 144, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Hiten D Patel
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street / Marburg 144, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Mohamad E Allaf
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street / Marburg 144, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Variant histology renal cell carcinoma (vRCC) encompasses rare non-clear cell subtypes that have long been associated with poor prognosis and minimal response to therapies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor. Molecular advances have helped classify vRCC into distinct entities and identify putative targetable driver alterations, such as MET in papillary subtypes. More have since been identified in other vRCC subtypes, including alterations of tumor metabolism, chromatin remodeling genes, cell-cycle genes, and inactivation of tumor suppressors such as TP53 or NF2. New targeted therapies, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been in development and yielded encouraging results. Collaborative clinical trials will be an essential step toward better implementation of these regimens in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
27
|
Association Between Systemic Therapy and/or Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and Survival in Contemporary Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 7:598-607. [PMID: 32444303 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal management of metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccmRCC) remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE To test the effect of systemic therapy (ST) and/or cytoreductive nephrectomy (CNT) on overall mortality (OM) in patients with non-ccmRCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry (2006-2015), we identified patients with papillary, chromophobe, sarcomatoid, and collecting duct metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Temporal trends (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]), Kaplan-Meier plots, and multivariable Cox regression models were used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 1573 patients with non-ccmRCC, 22%, 25%, 25%, and 28% underwent no treatment, ST, CNT, and CNT with ST, respectively. Between 2006 and 2015, rates of CNT and the combination of CNT and ST decreased (EAPC: -6.3% and -3.2%, respectively). Conversely, rates of no treatment and ST increased over time (EAPC: 4.6% and 7.5%, respectively). In multivariable Cox regression models, relative to no treatment, ST (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.5; p < 0.001), CNT (HR: 0.4; p < 0.001), and CNT with ST (HR: 0.3; p < 0.001) were associated with lower OM. Histological subtypes were associated with OM, relative to papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC): chromophobe (HR: 0.7; p < 0.01), sarcomatoid (HR: 2.1; p < 0.001), and collecting duct RCC (HR: 1.9; p < 0.001). Limitations include the impossibility to stratify patients according to mRCC risk groups. CONCLUSIONS Most non-ccmRCC patients are treated with a combination of CNT and ST or CNT alone or ST alone. The rates of ST alone are increasing. Conversely, the rates of combined CNT and ST and CNT alone are decreasing. These observed temporal patterns of treatment rates are counterintuitive with respect to associated OM benefits, where combination of CNT and ST, as well as CNT alone, resulted in the lowest absolute OM, relative to ST alone, or, even worse, no treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY We investigated the effect of treatment modalities on survival of patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The combination of cytoreductive nephrectomy and systemic therapy confers greater benefit with respect to single treatments alone.
Collapse
|
28
|
Haaker L, Tryssesoone L, Renders I, Verbiest A, Lerut E, Baldewijns M, Bourgain C, Roussel E, Van den Bulck H, Wynendaele W, Laguerre B, Rioux-Leclercq N, Oudard S, Laenen A, Debruyne PR, Albersen M, Beuselinck B. Bone metastasis is associated with poor prognosis in metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first agent angiogenesis inhibitors. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:686.e1-686.e9. [PMID: 32430250 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Papillary renal cell carcinoma (papRCC) is a rare (10%-15%) subtype of renal cancer. Few prognostic biomarkers have been described in metastatic papRCC (m-papRCC) patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). We aimed to study the prognostic impact of bone metastases (BM) on response rate, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) in patients with m-papRCC treated with first agent VEGFR-TKIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicentric, retrospective analysis of patient records was conducted. BM were detected by computed tomography and/or bone scintigraphy. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score was calculated at start of first agent VEGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS Forty-nine patients were included. Best objective response was partial response in 20%, stable disease in 60% and early progressive disease in 20% of patients. Median PFS (mPFS) was 6.0 months and median OS (mOS) 14.0 months after start of first agent VEGFR-TKI. The IMDC score correlated with mOS: 77.5 months in good, 17.0 months in intermediate and 8.0 months in poor risk patients (P = 0.002). Patients with BM had a poorer outcome compared to patients without BM: mPFS was 4.0 vs. 7.0 months (P = 0.006) and mOS 7.5 vs. 19.0 months (P = 0.002). On bivariate analysis, the presence of BM was independently associated with PFS (P = 0.02) and OS (P = 0.049), independent of the IMDC risk groups. CONCLUSION In m-papRCC patients treated with first agent VEGFR-TKIs, the presence of BM is an unfavorable prognostic factor, associated with shorter PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz Haaker
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Loesia Tryssesoone
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Inne Renders
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annelies Verbiest
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyne Lerut
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Claire Bourgain
- Department of Pathology, Imelda Ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Wim Wynendaele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Imelda Ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | | | - Stéphane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philip R Debruyne
- Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Benoit Beuselinck
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hsiang WR, Kenney PA, Leapman MS. Redefining the Role of Surgical Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:35. [PMID: 32170461 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-0895-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) continues to evolve with ongoing advancements in systemic therapy, raising further questions about the optimal role of surgery in the management of mRCC. Herein, we provide a context and review of the recent evidence concerning the role of surgical therapy for patients with mRCC including cytoreductive nephrectomy and distant metastatectomy. RECENT FINDINGS One randomized trial has been published in the targeted therapy era suggesting that initial systemic therapy is non-inferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy among patients with intermediate and poor-risk mRCC. Delaying cytoreductive nephrectomy until after systemic therapy may be a viable treatment approach, although a high level of evidence is lacking. Additional questions remain regarding the sequence of surgery with systemic therapy, utility of distant metastatectomy, as well as the application of these findings to the current generation of immunotherapy. Recent evidence challenges the need of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy for unselected patients with mRCC. However, surgical therapy continues to play an important role in the management of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick A Kenney
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Michael S Leapman
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
| |
Collapse
|