1
|
Checcucci E, Bauckneht M, Cisero E, Volpi G, Rizzo A, Zattoni F, Bianchi L, De Angelis M, Cangemi D, Heetman J, Farolfi A, Piramide F, De Cillis S, Amparore D, De Luca S, Di Dio M, Dal Moro F, Fanti S, Schiavina R, Briganti A, Fiori C, Gandaglia G, Porpiglia F. PSMA PET-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Initial Experience From a Multicenter Cohort. Urology 2024:S0090-4295(24)00909-9. [PMID: 39426743 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the initial experience with PSMA-PET/CT-guided biopsy in European referral centres. METHODS This multicenter observational cohort study was endorsed by the Young Academic Urologist (YAU) Prostate Cancer Group of the EAU and conducted across 6 tertiary-level European centres. PSMA-guided biopsies were carried out in a cognitive/fusion manner for all the recruited patients with or without MRI-guided biopsies and/or standard biopsy (SB). PCa and clinical significant PCa (csPCA) detection rate (DR) at prostate biopsy was assessed. Uni- and multivariable models were employed to identify features related to csPCA. RESULTS Overall, 72 patients were recruited. The topographic location of the dominant lesion depicted by PSMA PET/CT was significantly associated with the location of csPCa, especially in the biopsy naïve cohort. The DR for PCa and csPCa of PSMA-PET/CT-guided biopsies was significantly higher than SB (0.40 ± 0.43 vs 0.23 ± 0.29, and 0.36 ± 0.44 vs 0.21 ± 0.30, respectively, both P <.05) but did not surpass MRI-guided biopsies (0.40 ± 0.43 vs 0.47 ± 0.44, and 0.36 ± 0.44 vs 0.47 ± 0.34, respectively, both P >.05). PSMA-PET/CT-guided biopsy performed better in the biopsy naïve than in the repeated biopsy setting. A SUVmax cut-off value equal to 4.8 provided the best results for detecting csPCa. CONCLUSION Our real-world data illustrate the potentialities of PSMA-PET/CT-guided biopsy in diagnosing PCa. Specifically, in biopsy naïve patients with suspicion of high-risk disease, the use of PSMA-PET/CT-targeted biopsy can be considered. Additionally, in the context of repeated biopsies, a PSMA-PET/CT target biopsy might be advisable over the SB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Cisero
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO)
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessio Rizzo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Turin, Italy
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mario De Angelis
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Danilo Cangemi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Joris Heetman
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO)
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO)
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO)
| | - Stefano De Luca
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO)
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO)
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muñoz-Iglesias J, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Paredes-Barranco P, Rodríguez-Fraile M, Gómez-Grandef A, Simó-Perdigó M, Castell-Conesa J. PSMA PET/CT quick procedure guide. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2024; 43:500045. [PMID: 39094838 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2024.500045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
The application of PET/CT with radiopharmaceuticals targeting PSMA is significantly transforming the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of patients with prostate cancer. In Spain, the availability and access to positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) have significantly changed in recent months. These changes are affecting their use in diagnostic procedures. As a result, its use within diagnostic protocols for patients with prostate cancer is undergoing significant modifications. In this collective and cooperative document, the authors have selected the most robust evidence accumulated to date to generate a clinical guide to achieve appropriate use of this technology. A format that presents the most frequent clinical situations and the patient profiles in which PSMA PET/CT plays a significant role or will do so in the immediate future has been chosen. It should be taken into account that regulatory restrictions mediate the current indications for its use in Spain, as well as its current cost and the production capacity of radiopharmaceuticals. The guideline presents a review of the established methodology for optimized imaging with each of the radiopharmaceutical variants targeting PSMA and recommendations for structured and accurate reporting of metabolic findings in combination with CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Muñoz-Iglesias
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
| | - A Rodríguez-Fernández
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain; Instituto Investigación Biosanitaria (IBS) Granada, Spain.
| | - P Paredes-Barranco
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Rodríguez-Fraile
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - A Gómez-Grandef
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Simó-Perdigó
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Castell-Conesa
- SIMM Molecular Atrys Health, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cattabriga A, Renzetti B, Galuppi F, Bartalena L, Gaudiano C, Brocchi S, Rossi A, Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Brunocilla E, Spinozzi L, Catanzaro C, Castellucci P, Farolfi A, Fanti S, Tunariu N, Mosconi C. Multiparametric Whole-Body MRI: A Game Changer in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2531. [PMID: 39061171 PMCID: PMC11274871 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer ranks among the most prevalent tumours globally. While early detection reduces the likelihood of metastasis, managing advanced cases poses challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Current international guidelines support the concurrent use of 99Tc-Bone Scintigraphy and Contrast-Enhanced Chest and Abdomen CT for the staging of metastatic disease and response assessment. However, emerging evidence underscores the superiority of next-generation imaging techniques including PSMA-PET/CT and whole-body MRI (WB-MRI). This review explores the relevant scientific literature on the role of WB-MRI in metastatic prostate cancer. This multiparametric imaging technique, combining the high anatomical resolution of standard MRI sequences with functional sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and bone marrow relative fat fraction (rFF%) has proved effective in comprehensive patient assessment, evaluating local disease, most of the nodal involvement, bone metastases and their complications, and detecting the increasing visceral metastases in prostate cancer. It does have the advantage of avoiding the injection of contrast medium/radionuclide administration, spares the patient the exposure to ionizing radiation, and lacks the confounder of FLARE described with nuclear medicine techniques. Up-to-date literature regarding the diagnostic capabilities of WB-MRI, though still limited compared to PSMA-PET/CT, strongly supports its widespread incorporation into standard clinical practice, alongside the latest nuclear medicine techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arrigo Cattabriga
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
| | - Benedetta Renzetti
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
| | - Francesco Galuppi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
| | - Laura Bartalena
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Caterina Gaudiano
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Stefano Brocchi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Alice Rossi
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Spinozzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Calogero Catanzaro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (P.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (P.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (P.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Clinical Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital & Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JJ, UK;
| | - Cristina Mosconi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.R.); (F.G.); (L.B.); (C.G.); (S.B.); (C.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (R.S.); (L.B.); (E.B.); (L.S.); (C.C.); (S.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sachpekidis C, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Long Axial Field-of-View (LAFOV) PET/CT in Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2024:S0001-2998(24)00045-X. [PMID: 38825439 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
PSMA-targeted PET/CT is currently considered the most effective non-invasive diagnostic technique for imaging PSMA-positive lesions in prostate cancer (PC), and its introduction has significantly enhanced the role of nuclear medicine in both the diagnosis and therapy (theranostics) of this oncological entity. In line with developments in radiopharmaceuticals, significant progress has been made in the development of PET/CT systems. In particular, the advent of long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanners has represented a major leap forward in molecular imaging, with early results from clinical applications of these systems showing significant improvements over previous standard axial field-of-view systems in terms of sensitivity, image quality and lesion quantification, while enabling whole-body dynamic PET imaging. In this context, the introduction of the new LAFOV scanners may further enhance the use and potential of PSMA-ligand PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of PC. The initial but steadily growing literature on the application of the new technology in the field of PSMA-ligand PET/CT has already yielded encouraging results regarding the detection of PC lesions with high sensitivity while providing the possibility of ultra-fast or ultra-low dose examinations. Moreover, whole-body dynamic PET has rendered for the first time feasible to capture the pharmacokinetics PSMA-ligands in all major organs and most tumor lesions with high temporal resolution. The main results of these studies are presented in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Droghetti M, Bianchi L, Presutti M, Vetrone L, Farolfi A, Mei R, Giunchi F, Degiovanni A, Mottaran A, Piazza P, Cangemi D, Castellucci P, D’Errico A, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Fanti S. Immunohistochemistry analysis of PSMA expression at prostatic biopsy in high-risk prostate cancer: potential implications for PSMA-PET patient selection. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1324631. [PMID: 38807770 PMCID: PMC11130476 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1324631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane protein expressed by normal prostatic tissue. Therefore, molecular imaging targeting PSMA (PSMA-PET) has gained particular interest and diffusion for PCa staging and restaging. Several factors may affect PSMA-PET results, and many tools have been proposed to improve patient selection. Furthermore, PSMA expression is not homogeneous among different tissues and within the prostate itself. The aims of this study were to evaluate immunohistochemistry (IHC) features of prostate biopsy samples and to assess their correlation with whole-mount specimens and PSMA-PET parameters. Methods We included consecutive high-risk PCa patients who underwent PSMA-PET for staging proposal at our institution from January 2022 to December 2022. The PET parameters selected were SUVmax, total volume (TV), and total lesion activity (TL). Each patient underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and fusion-targeted prostate biopsy prior to surgery. IHC analyses were performed on the index lesion cores. IHC visual score (VS) (1, 2, 3) and visual pattern (VP) (membranous, cytoplasmic, and combined) and the percentage of PSMA-negative tumor areas (PSMA%neg) within biopsy cores were evaluated. Results Forty-three patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy after PSMA-PET were available for analyses. Concordance between VS and VP at biopsy and final pathology showed a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.39 and 0.38, respectively. Patients with PSMA%neg <20% had a higher concordance in VS and VP (Cohen's kappa 0.49 and 0.4, respectively). No difference emerged in terms of median PSMA-TV (p = 0.3) and PSMA-TL (p = 0.9) according to VS at biopsy, while median SUVmax was higher in patients with VS 3 (p = 0.04). Higher SUVmax was associated with membranous and combined VP expression (p = 0.008). No difference emerged between patients with PSMA%neg <20% or PSMA%neg >20% on biopsy cores in terms of SUVmax, PSMA-TL, and PSMA-TV (p = 0.5, p = 0.5, and p = 0.9 respectively). Conclusions We found a correlation between IHC VS and VP on targeted biopsy cores and SUVmax at PSMA-PET. However, the correlation between the IHC parameters of biopsy cores and final pathology was not as high as expected. Nevertheless, the presence of PSMA%neg <20% seems to have a better concordance in terms of visual score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Droghetti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Presutti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luigia Vetrone
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mei
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Giunchi
- Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Degiovanni
- Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Mottaran
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Danilo Cangemi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonietta D’Errico
- Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee KH, Mena E, Shih J, Lindenberg L, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Patel KR, Citrin DE, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. Predicting 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT Scan Positivity in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:1419-1428. [PMID: 37775447 PMCID: PMC10965502 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To analyze variables that can predict the positivity of 18F-DCFPyL- positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and extent of disease in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer after primary local therapy with either radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective single institutional review board-approved study. We included 199 patients with biochemical recurrence and negative conventional imaging after primary local therapies (radical prostatectomy n = 127, radiation therapy n = 72). All patients underwent 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of a positive scan for both cohort of patients. Regression-based coefficients were used to develop nomograms predicting scan positivity and extra-pelvic disease. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was implemented to quantify nomogram's clinical benefit. RESULTS Of the 127 (63%) post-radical prostatectomy patients, 91 patients had positive scans - 61 of those with intrapelvic lesions and 30 with extra-pelvic lesions (i.e., retroperitoneal or distant nodes and/or bone/organ lesions). Of the 72 post-radiation therapy patients, 65 patients had positive scans - 39 of them had intrapelvic lesions and 26 extra-pelvic lesions. In the radical prostatectomy cohort, multivariate regression analysis revealed original International Society of Urological Pathology category, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSAdt), and time from BCR (mo) to scan were predictors for scan positivity and presence of extra-pelvic disease, with an area under the curve of 80% and 78%, respectively. Positive versus negative tumor margin after radical prostatectomy was not related to scan positivity or to the presence of positive extra-pelvic foci. In the radiation therapy cohort, multivariate regression analysis revealed that PSA, PSAdt, and time to BCR (mo) were predictors of extra-pelvic disease, with area under the curve of 82%. Because only seven patients in the radiation therapy cohort had negative scans, a prediction model for scan positivity could not be analyzed and only the presence of extra-pelvic disease was evaluated. CONCLUSION PSA and PSAdt are consistently significant predictors of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT positivity and extra-pelvic disease in BCR prostate cancer patients. Stratifying the patient population into primary local treatment group enables the use of other variables as predictors, such as time since BCR. This nomogram may guide selection of the most suitable candidates for 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina H Lee
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.); Center of Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., B.J.W.)
| | - Esther Mena
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.).
| | - Joanna Shih
- Division Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis: Biometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (J.S.)
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.)
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Center of Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., B.J.W.)
| | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (P.A.P.)
| | - Krishnan R Patel
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.R.P., D.E.C.)
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.R.P., D.E.C.)
| | - Peter L Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.)
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mapelli P, Ghezzo S, Pini C, Samanes Gajate AM, Spataro A, Bezzi C, Landoni C, Scifo P, Briganti A, Chiti A, Picchio M. Predictors of PSMA PET Positivity: Analysis in a Selected Cohort of Biochemical Recurrence Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4589. [PMID: 37760557 PMCID: PMC10526235 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized prostate cancer (PCa) can be treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Up to 30% of patients undergoing this procedure experience biochemical recurrence (BCR), namely the rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels during the post-surgical follow-up, requiring further treatments and with the risk of severe disease progression. Currently, the most accurate imaging technique to confirm, detect, and locate disease relapses in BCR patients is prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET, as recommended by international clinical guidelines. The aim of the study was to investigate potential clinical and pathological predictors of PSMA PET positivity, validated by clinical and instrumental follow-up or histopathological data. In this study, a selected cohort of BCR patients after RP and no other PCa-related therapy who underwent either PSMA PET/CT or PSMA PET/MRI has been analysed. Among the considered predictors, both pathological staging after RP equal or higher than pT3a and higher PSA levels at the time of the scan were significantly correlated with PSMA PET positivity on multivariate logistic regression analysis. As expected, PSMA PET confirmed its role as an accurate imaging technique in the setting of BCR in PCa. These findings may inform appropriate and tailored patient selection and scan timing to optimize and fully exploit this powerful diagnostic tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Mapelli
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Samuele Ghezzo
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Cristiano Pini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (C.P.); (A.S.); (C.L.)
| | - Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Alessandro Spataro
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (C.P.); (A.S.); (C.L.)
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Claudio Landoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (C.P.); (A.S.); (C.L.)
| | - Paola Scifo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Maria Picchio
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, Cho SY, Fanti S, Giesel FL, Goffin K, Haberkorn U, Jacene H, Koo PJ, Kopka K, Krause BJ, Lindenberg L, Marcus C, Mottaghy FM, Oprea-Lager DE, Osborne JR, Piert M, Rowe SP, Schöder H, Wan S, Wester HJ, Hope TA, Herrmann K. PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1466-1486. [PMID: 36604326 PMCID: PMC10027805 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06089-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 108.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Here we aim to provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. Procedures and characteristics are reported for a variety of available PSMA small radioligands. Different scenarios for the clinical use of PSMA-ligand PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence, to support the implementation of PSMA PET/CT imaging in research and routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging & Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Steve Y Cho
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Frederik L Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Leuven, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heather Jacene
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Charles Marcus
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Morand Piert
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Walther-Meißner-Str. 3, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bianchi L, Ceci F, Balestrazzi E, Costa F, Droghetti M, Piazza P, Pissavini A, Presutti M, Farolfi A, Mei R, Castellucci P, Gandaglia G, Larcher A, Robesti D, Mottrie A, Briganti A, Morganti AG, Fanti S, Montorsi F, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E. PSMA-PET Guided Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients with Oligorecurrent Progression after Previous Salvage Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072027. [PMID: 37046687 PMCID: PMC10093227 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is used to select recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients for metastases-directed therapy (MDT). We aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of second-line PSMA-guided MDT in oligo-recurrent PCa patients. Methods: we performed a retrospective analysis of 113 recurrent PCa after previous radical prostatectomy and salvage therapies with oligorecurrent disease at PSMA-PET (≤3 lesions in N1/M1a-b) in three high-volume European centres. Patients underwent second-line salvage treatments: MDT targeted to PSMA (including surgery and/or radiotherapy), and the conventional approach (observation or Androgen Deprivation Therapy [ADT]). Patients were stratified according to treatments (MDT vs. conventional approach). Patients who underwent MDT were stratified according to stage in PSMA-PET (N1 vs. M1a-b). The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant PCa free survival (CRPC-FS). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS. Multivariable Cox regression models identified predictors of progression and metastatic disease. Results: Overall, 91 (80%) and 22 (20%) patients were treated with MDT and the conventional approach, respectively. The median follow-up after PSMA-PET was 31 months. Patients who underwent MDT had a similar PFS compared to the conventional approach (p = 0.3). Individuals referred to MDT had significantly higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to those who were treated with the conventional approach (73.5% and 94.7% vs. 30.5% and 79.5%; all p ≤ 0.001). In patients undergoing MDT, no significant differences were found for PFS and MFS according to N1 vs. M1a-b disease, while CRPC-FS estimates were significantly higher in patients with N1 vs. M1a-b (100% vs. 86.1%; p = 0.02). At multivariable analyses, age (HR = 0.96) and ADT during second line salvage treatment (HR = 0.5) were independent predictors of PFS; MDT (HR 0.27) was the only independent predictor of MFS (all p ≤ 0.04) Conclusion: Patients who underwent second-line PSMA-guided MDT experienced higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to men who received conventional management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Eleonora Balestrazzi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Costa
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pissavini
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Presutti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mei
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:128-136. [PMID: 36804735 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) had a substantial impact on the management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a stage migration phenomenon and consequent treatment changes. OBJECTIVE To summarise the role of PSMA-PET to define the burden of disease through an accurate location of metastatic site(s) in PCa patients, describing the most common locations at PSMA-PET in the primary staging and recurrence setting, and to assess the clinical impact in the decision-making process. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive nonsystematic literature review was performed in April 2022. Literature search was updated until March 2022. The most relevant studies have been summarised, giving priority to registered clinical trials and multicentre collaborations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS PSMA-PET showed higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional imaging both in newly diagnosed PCa and in recurrent disease. This greater accuracy led to a migration of a higher proportion of patients identified with metastatic disease. Bone metastases were reported as the most frequent site of metastatic spread in staging (up to 17%) and restaging (up to 18%). In staging, considering the suboptimal sensitivity in lymph node metastasis detection prior to radical surgery, PSMA-PET should be performed in patients with high risk or unfavourable intermediate risk only, and it is not recommended to routinely avoid pelvic lymph node dissection in case of a negative scan. In case of prostate-specific antigen relapse, PSMA-PET had higher diagnostic accuracy than other diagnostic procedures in the early detection of the sites of recurrence, thus influencing the therapy decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET detects a higher number of lesions than conventional imaging or other PET radiotracers, especially metastatic lesions unseen with other modalities. The high diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET leads to a significant patient upstage and thus an impact in clinical management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) identifies metastatic lesions with higher accuracy than conventional imaging, both in primary prostate cancer and during disease recurrence. Skeletal metastasis and extrapelvic lymph nodes are the most common sites of metastatic spread. The high accuracy of PSMA-PET in the detection of metastatic disease led to a significant impact on patient management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed.
Collapse
|
11
|
Quality Goal for Salvage Treatment for Patients with Prostate Cancer at Prostate-specific Antigen Relapse. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:732-733. [PMID: 35135731 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
12
|
Bukavina L, Luckenbaugh AN, Hofman MS, Hope T, Kamran SC, Murphy DG, Yamoah K, Ost P. Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2022; 83:521-533. [PMID: 36404204 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising molecular target for prostate cancer (PCa) that has allowed the development of a novel diagnostic approach to PCA in the primary and recurrent settings. OBJECTIVE To summarize available data and recommendations regarding the use of PSMA in newly diagnosed and recurrent PCa via a narrative review. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Scopus. The search strategy included meta-analyses, reviews, and original studies on staging and restaging with 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Studies comparing PSMA-targeted imaging and conventional imaging suggest superior performance of PSMA-targeted imaging in primary and recurrent PCa, albeit with several clinically relevant limitations. Pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT allowed more accurate PCa staging in compared to routine practice for high-risk cases, and identified a number of otherwise unknown metastatic lesions. In biochemically recurrent PCa, PSMA PET can reveal sites of recurrence with greater sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging, potentially detecting a major proportion of occult disease. This review will help providers in applying the most up-to-date and relevant literature to (1) determine which patients truly have oligometastatic disease and (2) ascertain who is most likely to experience a meaningful response to local consolidation in the biochemical recurrence setting. CONCLUSIONS Data on PSMA diagnostic studies in primary and recurrent PCa highlight the accuracy and clinical application of PSMA PET. While this review and the evidence to date might lead to a perception of superiority in metastasis directed therapy, fundamental lack of phase III clinical trials with clinically meaningful outcomes are yet to be determined. PATIENT SUMMARY PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) scans have shown great promise for initial evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) and in detection of PCa recurrence. The benefits are more apparent for initial staging of PCa. There are more limited clinical trial results for PCa recurrence on how best to use this new technique to guide cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kubilay E, Akpinar Ç, Oǧuz ES, Araz MS, Soydal Ç, Baltacı S, Ürün Y, Süer E. Significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion uptake measured using Ga-68 labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:408.e19-408.e25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
14
|
Predictors of Bone Metastases at 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (HSPC) Patients with Early Biochemical Recurrence or Persistence. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061309. [PMID: 35741119 PMCID: PMC9221902 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen/positron-emission-tomography (PSMA-PET) can accurately detect disease localizations in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with early biochemical recurrence/persistence (BCR/BCP), allowing for more personalized image-guided treatments in oligometastatic patients with major impact in the case of bone metastases (BM). Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors of BM at PSMA-PET in early-BCR/BCP hormone-sensitive PCa (HSPC) patients, previously treated with radical intent (radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy ± salvage-radiotherapy (SRT)). A retrospective analysis was performed on 443 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT scans. The cohort median PSA at PET-scan was 0.60 (IQR: 0.38–1.04) ng/mL. PSMA-PET detection rate was 42.0% (186/443), and distant lesions (M1a/b/c) were found in 17.6% (78/443) of cases. BM (M1b) were present in 9.9% (44/443) of cases, with 70.5% (31/44) showing oligometastatic spread (≤3 PSMA-positive lesions). In the multivariate binary logistic regression model (accuracy: 71.2%, Nagelkerke-R2: 13%), T stage ≥ 3a (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13–5.60; p = 0.024), clinical setting (previous SRT vs. first-time BCR OR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.32–6.35; p = 0.008), and PSAdt (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88–0.99; p = 0.026) were proven to be significant predictors of bone metastases, with a 7% risk increment for each single-unit decrement of PSAdt. These predictors could be used to further refine the indication for PSMA-PET in early BCR/BCP HSPC patients, leading to higher detection rates of bone disease and more personalized treatments.
Collapse
|
15
|
Evangelista L, Maurer T, van der Poel H, Alongi F, Kunikowska J, Laudicella R, Fanti S, Hofman MS. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA Versus [18F]PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Staging of Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:273-282. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
16
|
Ceci F, Rovera G, Iorio GC, Guarneri A, Chiofalo V, Passera R, Oderda M, Dall'Armellina S, Liberini V, Grimaldi S, Bellò M, Gontero P, Ricardi U, Deandreis D. Event-free survival after 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients eligible for salvage therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3257-3268. [PMID: 35217883 PMCID: PMC9250462 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05741-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background/aim Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen/positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) detects with high accuracy disease-recurrence, leading to changes in the management of biochemically-recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, data regarding the oncological outcomes of patients who performed PSMA-PET are needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of clinically relevant events during follow-up in patients who performed PSMA-PET for BCR after radical treatment. Materials and methods This analysis included consecutive, hormone-sensitive, hormone-free, recurrent PCa patients (HSPC) enrolled through a prospective study. All patients were eligible for salvage therapy, having at least 24 months of follow-up after PSMA-PET. The primary endpoint was the Event-Free Survival (EFS), defined as the time between the PSMA-PET and the date of event/last follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the EFS curves. EFS was also investigated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Events were defined as death, radiological progression, or PSA recurrence after therapy. Results One-hundred and seventy-six (n = 176) patients were analyzed (median PSA 0.62 [IQR: 0.43–1.00] ng/mL; median follow-up of 35.4 [IQR: 26.5–40.3] months). The EFS was 78.8% at 1 year, 65.2% (2 years), and 52.2% (3 years). Patients experiencing events during study follow-up had a significantly higher median PSA (0.81 [IQR: 0.53–1.28] vs 0.51 [IQR: 0.36–0.80] ng/mL) and a lower PSA doubling time (PSAdt) (5.4 [IQR: 3.7–11.6] vs 12.7 [IQR: 6.6–24.3] months) (p < 0.001) compared to event-free patients. The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that PSA > 0.5 ng/mL, PSAdt ≤ 6 months, and a positive PSMA-PET result were associated with a higher event rate (p < 0.01). No significant differences of event rates were observed in patients who received changes in therapy management after PSMA-PET vs. patients who did not receive therapy changes. Finally, PSA > 0.5 ng/mL and PSAdt ≤ 6 months were statistically significant event-predictors in multivariate model (p < 0.001). Conclusion Low PSA and long PSAdt were significant predictors of longer EFS. A lower incidence of events was observed in patients having negative PSMA-PET, since longer EFS was significantly more probable in case of a negative scan. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05741-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ceci
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. .,Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncolology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. .,Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
| | - Guido Rovera
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Guarneri
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Valeria Chiofalo
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Dall'Armellina
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Virginia Liberini
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Grimaldi
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marilena Bellò
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|