1
|
Scilipoti P, Longoni M, de Angelis M, Zaurito P, Massiet A, Dutto D, Soria F, Álvarez-Maestro M, Bazán AA, Pradere B, Klatte T, Contieri R, Hurle R, Krajewski W, Subiela JD, Pichler R, Szostek A, Marcq G, Elena JLR, Aranda J, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Necchi A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Xylinas E, Moschini M. Gemcitabine and docetaxel for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: EuroGemDoce group results. BJU Int 2025. [PMID: 39797535 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the oncological efficacy and safety of sequential intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel (Gem/Doce) therapy in a European cohort of patients with high-risk and very-high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after previous Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from 95 patients with NMIBC, treated with Gem/Doce at 12 European centres between 2021 and 2024. Patients previously treated with BCG who had completed a full induction course and received at least one follow-up evaluation were included. One-year disease-free survival (DFS), high-grade DFS and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded through medical interviews. RESULTS Of 75 patients, 63 (84%) were classified as having high-risk and 12 (16%) as having very-high-risk NMIBC. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 9 (5-14) months, 20 patients (27%) relapsed and five (6.7%) underwent radical cystectomy. The 1-year DFS was 73% (95% confidence interval [CI] 62-86%), 1-year high-grade DFS was 79% (95% CI 68-91%) and 1-year PFS was 95% (95% CI 90-100%). AEs occurred in 34 patients (45%), with six (8.7%) experiencing severe AEs. Limitations of the study include the short follow-up and variability in both treatment dwelling times and dosage across centres. CONCLUSION The intravesical Gem/Doce regimen demonstrated promising short-term oncological outcomes and was well tolerated in this cohort of patients with high- and very-high-risk NMIBC previously treated with BCG. Prospective studies and randomised trials are awaited to define the ideal candidates for Gem/Doce therapy and to standardise treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Scilipoti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Zaurito
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Albane Massiet
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Daniele Dutto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - José Daniel Subiela
- Department of Urology, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Javier Aranda
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, GRC no 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steinmetz AR, Jazayeri B, Pierce M, Mokkapati S, McConkey D, Li R, Dinney CP. Integrating gene therapy into the treatment paradigm for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2025:1-11. [PMID: 39779686 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2445674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 12/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 75% of bladder cancer cases are non-muscle invasive at diagnosis. Drug development for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has historically lagged behind that of other malignancies. No treatment has demonstrated the ability to overcome drug resistance that ultimately leads to recurrence and progression. Gene therapy is emerging as a promising option for patients with NMIBC. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the clinical application of gene therapy in NMIBC management and discusses recent clinical trials involving the adenoviral vector-based treatment nadofaragene firadenovec, and the oncolytic serotype 5 adenovirus, cretostimogene grenadenorepvec. Nadofaragene received approval by the Food and Drug Administration in December 2022, and cretostimogene has been granted Fast Track Designation and Breakthrough Therapy Designation. Ongoing trials are investigating strategies to augment efficacy and durability of these therapies. EXPERT OPINION Gene therapy may overcome resistance mechanisms of other NMIBC treatments, and data suggest a role for combination therapy with additive or synergistic agents. Significant differences in trial design limit comparability of agents across trials, highlighting the need for critical assessment of published findings. While initial investigations were in high-risk patients who recur despite frontline therapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), there is growing interest in BCG-naïve and intermediate-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis R Steinmetz
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Behzad Jazayeri
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Morgan Pierce
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sharada Mokkapati
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David McConkey
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zaurito P, Scilipoti P, Longoni M, de Angelis M, Re C, Quarta L, Tremolada G, Burgio G, Pellegrino F, Rosiello G, Necchi A, Colombo R, Gandaglia G, Salonia A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Moschini M. Identifying optimal candidates for active surveillance in low-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2024; 43:52. [PMID: 39739061 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05417-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/02/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (IR-NMIBC) prognostic group is heterogeneous. Growing evidence supports the role of active surveillance (AS) for patients with low-risk NMIBC, however, no clear data exists considering IR-NMIBC. The aim of the study was to assess the risk of recurrence of patients eligible for AS based on the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) stratification. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 174 LG IR-NMIBC patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (index TURBT) from 2012 to 2023 at a tertiary referral center and fulfilled the inclusion criteria for enrollment in AS protocols at the index TURBT (≤ 5 suspicious lesions, no macrohematuria, negative urine cytology, lesions ≤ 1 cm). Patients were then stratified according to the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) risk factors: frequent recurrence, early recurrence, previous instillation, and multifocality. Kaplan Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression analysis (MVA) were used to assess the risk of any and high-grade (HG) recurrence according to the number of risk factors. RESULTS Overall, 168 (97%) patients had a Ta low grade bladder tumor. After a median follow-up of 36 months [Interquartile range (IQR) 20-54], 75 (43%) and 32 (18%) patients experienced any- and HG recurrence, respectively. The 3-year recurrence free-survival (RFS) was 86% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 76-98%] for patients with 0, 76% (95% CI 68-84%) for those with 1-2, and 54% (95% CI 34-84%) for those with ≥ 3 risk factors. The 3-year HG-RFS was > 90% for patients with 0 and 1-2 risk factors, compared to 76% (95% CI 58-99%) for those with ≥ 3 risk factors. At MVA, the presence of ≥ 3 risk factors was associated with a higher risk of recurrence [hazard ratio: 4.74, 95% CI 1.75-12.8, p = 0.002]. CONCLUSION Among patients with LG IR-NMIBC eligible for AS, those with more than 2 IBCG risk factors may not be suitable candidates due to a higher risk of developing HG recurrence. Randomized controlled trials with standardized AS protocols are necessary to validate these findings and optimize patient selection for AS in LG IR-NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Zaurito
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tremolada
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giusy Burgio
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guerrero-Ramos F, Boormans JL, Daneshmand S, Gontero P, Kamat AM, Rouprêt M, Vilaseca A, Shariat SF. Novel Delivery Systems and Pharmacotherapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1267-1279. [PMID: 38849286 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Therapeutic options for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) have traditionally been limited to intravesical immunotherapy or chemotherapy. A considerable number of new options have been investigated in recent years. Our aim was to review the efficacy and toxicity of novel therapeutic options (results already reported or currently under investigation) for patients with NMIBC. METHODS We assessed the efficacy of various novel therapeutic options by examining key endpoints in diverse settings, including recurrence, progression, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and complete response. We identified the principal advantages and limitations for each option. Safety was predominantly evaluated as the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events. Our investigation focused on evidence from scientific articles and congress abstracts published in English within the past 5 yr. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS To date, pembrolizumab, nadofaragene firadenovec, and the combination of BCG with N-803 have received US Food and Drug administration approval for the treatment of BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ of the bladder (with or without papillary tumours). Five phase 3 trials are recruiting BCG-naïve patients with high-risk NMIBC. There is increasing interest in an ablative rather than an adjuvant approach for patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Novel drugs and device-assisted drug delivery systems are on the verge of changing the treatment of NMIBC. Novel intravesical options seem to have the same efficacy with fewer adverse events in comparison to systemic therapies. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed new therapy options for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Two agents (pembrolizumab and nadofaragene firadenovec) have been approved to date. Ongoing trials are assessing direct delivery of drugs in solution into the bladder. This route seems to have similar efficacy and fewer side effects than intravenous immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - Antoni Vilaseca
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Surgery and Surgical Specialties, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abou Chaaya C, Ourfali S, Marchand C, Merienne C, Ruffion A, Brouzes H, Abid N, Pirot F, Colombel M. Comparing efficacy and safety of in-house gemcitabine to mitomycin for bladder instillation in intermediate-risk NMIBC. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102699. [PMID: 39038654 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intermediate-risk (IR) Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) is associated with a high rate of tumor recurrence. To improve patient outcomes, it is recommended to use adjuvant intravesical therapy, by mitomycin C (MMC) or Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG). Gemcitabine (GMC) is a known molecule used in urothelial cancer. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety profile of a gemcitabine solution, compared to mitomycin C, in the treatment of IR NMIBC. MATERIAL In this retrospective study, patients with IR NMIBC treated between 2016 and 2020 were selected from two participating centers using either gemcitabine (center A) as the intravesical chemotherapy regimen or mitomycin C (center B). The primary endpoint was recurrence rate and secondary end points were treatment interruption and its causes. RESULTS In our cohort of 102 IR NMIBC patients, 49 patients received GMC and 53 MMC with a median follow-up of 30 months. Overall recurrence rate was 42.1% with 22.4% in the GMC group and 60.3% in the MMC group (P<0.01). This difference was also found in the multifactorial analysis. Course interruption was observed in 14.7% of all patients, primarily attributed to adverse events (46.6%), without difference between groups. CONCLUSION Adjuvant intravesical gemcitabine in patients with IR NMIBC seems to be an interesting option associated with a lower tumor recurrence rate and a favorable tolerance profile when compared to MMC. Larger scale prospective randomized trials are needed to validate our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Abou Chaaya
- Service d'urologie et chirurgie de la transplantation, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, Lyon, France; Service d'urologie, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Université Claude-Bernard-Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
| | - Said Ourfali
- Service d'urologie, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Chloe Marchand
- Plateforme FRIPHARM®, service de pharmacie, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Camille Merienne
- Plateforme FRIPHARM®, service de pharmacie, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Service d'urologie, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Université Claude-Bernard-Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Hugo Brouzes
- Service d'urologie et chirurgie de la transplantation, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, Lyon, France; Service d'urologie, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Université Claude-Bernard-Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Nadia Abid
- Service d'urologie et chirurgie de la transplantation, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Fabrice Pirot
- Plateforme FRIPHARM®, service de pharmacie, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, Lyon, France; Université Claude-Bernard-Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Marc Colombel
- Service d'urologie et chirurgie de la transplantation, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, Lyon, France; Université Claude-Bernard-Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scilipoti P, Ślusarczyk A, de Angelis M, Soria F, Pradere B, Krajewski W, D'Andrea D, Mari A, Giudice FD, Pichler R, Subiela JD, Afferi L, Albisinni S, Mertens L, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Radziszewski P, Shariat SF, Necchi A, Xylinas E, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Moschini M. The Role of Mitomycin C in Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1293-1302. [PMID: 38902138 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) instillations are recommended to prevent recurrence of intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (IR-NMIBC); however, the optimal regimen and dose are uncertain. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of adjuvant MMC and compare different MMC regimens in preventing recurrence. METHODS We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in November 2023 for studies investigating recurrence-free survival (RFS) among patients with IR-NMIBC who received adjuvant MMC. Prospective trials with different MMC regimens or other intravesical drugs as comparators were considered eligible. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 14 studies were eligible for systematic review and 11 for meta-analysis of RFS. Estimates of 1-yr, 2-yr, and 5-yr RFS rates were 84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79-89%), 75% (95% CI 68-82%), and 51% (95% CI 40-63%) for patients treated with MMC induction plus maintenance, and 88% (95% CI 83-94%), 78% (95% CI 67-89%), and 66% (95% CI 57-75%) for patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) maintenance, respectively. Estimates of 2-yr RFS rates for MMC maintenance regimens were 76% (95% CI 69-84%) for 40 mg MMC (2 studies) and 66% (95% CI 60-72%) for 30 mg MMC (4 studies). Among the studies included, BCG maintenance provided comparable 2-yr RFS to 40 mg MMC with maintenance (78% vs 76%). RFS did not differ by MMC maintenance duration (>1 yr vs 1 yr vs <1 yr). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS MMC induction and maintenance regimens seem to provide short-term RFS rates equivalent to those for BCG maintenance in IR-NMIBC. For adjuvant induction and maintenance, 40 mg of MMC appears to be more effective in preventing recurrence than 30 mg. We did not observe an RFS benefit for longer maintenance regimens. PATIENT SUMMARY For patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, bladder treatments with a solution of a drug called mitomycin C (MMC) seem to be as effective as BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin) in preventing recurrence after tumor removal. Further trials are needed for stronger evidence on the best MMC dose and treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Aleksander Ślusarczyk
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - José Daniel Subiela
- Department of Urology, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Laura Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Piotr Radziszewski
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC no. 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Scilipoti P, Longoni M, de Angelis M, Re C, Bertini A, Cannoletta D, Burgio G, Lucianò R, Rosiello G, Colombo R, Gandaglia G, Salonia A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Moschini M. Mitomycin C vs. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for treatment of intermediate-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer patients-A comparative analysis from a single center. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:451.e1-451.e10. [PMID: 39060208 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction followed by 1 year maintenance instillation of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the standard treatment for intermediate-risk (IR) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. Few data exist on the efficacy of Mitomycin C (MMC) instillation in this setting. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 226 IR-NMIBC patients classified by the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) and 250 IR-NMIBC intravescical treatment-naïve patients classified by the European Association of Urology (EAU). All patients received either a full induction course of BCG or 40 mg/40 ml MMC from 2012 to 2022. Optimal treatment was defined as 1-year maintenance for BCG and 11 monthly maintenance instillations for MMC. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) before and after inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate difference in recurrence after adjustment for clinically relevant variables before and after IPTW. RESULTS Optimal BCG and MMC courses were administered to 21% of IR-IBCG and 23% of IR-EAU patients. At 4-years, patients treated with optimal MMC and BCG treatment had similar RFS and PFS in both EAU and IBCG groups. Patients receiving nonoptimal BCG compared to optimal MMC exhibited lower 4-year RFS after IPTW (82% vs. 68% in EAU and 82% vs. 65% in IBCG). At 4-year optimal MMC had greater PFS non optimal BCG. Optimal MMC treatment predicted recurrence in EAU (adjusted and weighted HR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.11-0.98) and IBCG (adjusted and weighted HR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.08-0.97) groups compared to nonoptimal BCG. CONCLUSIONS Optimal 40 mg/40 ml MMC treatment was as effective as optimal BCG in IR-IBCG and IR-EAU NMIBC patients, reducing both recurrence and progression compared to nonoptimal BCG. MMC could be a valid first line alternative to BCG for both IR-EAU and IR-IBCG intravescical treatment-naïve patients, during BCG shortages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bertini
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giusy Burgio
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Lucianò
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soria F, Rosazza M, Livoti S, Moschini M, De Angelis M, Giudice FD, Pichler R, Hurle R, Mancon S, Carrion DM, Krajewski W, Mertens LS, D'Andrea D, Mari A, Di Maida F, Dutto D, Colucci F, Casale G, Fertitta G, Laukhtina E, Albisinni S, Pradere B, Teoh JYC, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Kamat AM, Gontero P. Clinical Validation of the Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Scoring System and Substratification Model Proposed by the International Bladder Cancer Group: A Multicenter Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Working Group Collaboration. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1497-1503. [PMID: 38906794 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) encompasses a broad spectrum of disease, with heterogeneous outcomes in terms of disease recurrence and progression. The International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) recently proposed an updated scoring model for IR substratification that is based on five key risk factors. Our aim was to provide a clinical validation of the IBCG scoring system and substratification model for IR NMIBC. METHODS This was an international multicenter retrospective study. Patients diagnosed with IR NMIBC between 2012 and 2022 and treated with transurethral resection of the bladder and adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy were included. According to the presence or absence of risk factors, patients with IR NMIBC were further categorized in IR-low (no risk factors), IR-intermediate (1-2 risk factors), and IR-high (≥3 risk factors) groups. The 1-yr and 3-yr rates for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated for each subgroup. Cox regression analyses were used to compare oncological outcomes between the groups. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 677 patients with IR NMIBC included in the study, 231 (34%), 364 (54%), and 82 (12%) were categorized in the IR-low, IR-intermediate, and IR-high groups, respectively. There were significant differences in RFS and PFS rates between these groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS We provide the first clinical validation of the IBCG scoring system and model for substratification of IR NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study demonstrates that patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be correctly classified into three distinct subgroups according to their risk of both disease recurrence and progression. Our results support use of this scoring system in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.
| | - Matteo Rosazza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Simone Livoti
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario De Angelis
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Diego M Carrion
- Department of Urology, Torrejon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Dutto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Fulvia Colucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Giulia Casale
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Giorgia Fertitta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Unit of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Scilipoti P, Moschini M, de Angelis M, Afferi L, Lonati C, Longoni M, Tremolada G, Zaurito P, Viti A, Santangelo A, Pichler R, Necchi A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Mari A, Krajewski W, Laukthina E, Pradere B, Del Giudice F, Mertens L, Gallioli A, Soria F, Gontero P, Albisinni S, Shariat SF, Carando R. The role of re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with TaHG non muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:630. [PMID: 39503747 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05342-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is lack of evidence regarding the indication for re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT) for Ta high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aims to evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with TaHG NMIBC to determine the benefit from performing reTURBT. METHODS We relied on a multicenter cohort of 317 TaHG NMIBC from 12 centers who underwent TURBT and a subsequent complete Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction from 2009 to 2021. Kaplan Meier analyses estimated recurrence free survival (RFS) and progression free survival (PFS) according to reTURBT. Sub-analyses evaluated PFS in patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT according to international guidelines (multifocality, size > 3 cm, recurrent cancer, carcinoma in situ, lymph vascular invasion, histological variant, incomplete and absence of muscle layer at index TURBT). Multivariable cox-regression analysis predicted recurrence and progression. RESULTS Of the 317 patients, 123 (39%) underwent reTURBT, while 194 (61%) did not. Residual disease was detected in 46% of cases, with a 3.2% upstaging rate. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year RFS was higher in patients who underwent reTURBT (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in PFS. ReTURBT reduced the risk of recurrence [multivariable hazard ratio: 0.45, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.71]. Among patients who did not undergo reTURBT, those with ≥ 2 risk factors had lower 3-year PFS (73% vs. 92%, p < 0.001) than those with 0-1 risk factor, whereas no difference in 3-year PFS was observed in patients who underwent reTURBT regardless of the number of risk factors (85% vs. 87%, p = 0.8). CONCLUSION ReTURBT demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence among patients with TaHG NMIBC, yet its impact on progression remained uncertain. Our study underscores the importance of adhering to current international guidelines, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Scilipoti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Lonati
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tremolada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Zaurito
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Viti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfonso Santangelo
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukthina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roberto Carando
- Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland
- Sant'Anna Clinic, Swiss Medical Group, Sorengo, Switzerland
- Belegarzt für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diao M, Li Y, Gao Z, Wang C, Gu Y. Comparison of prognosis after transurethral resection of bladder tumor between solitary and multiple bladder cancers. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e40314. [PMID: 39496057 PMCID: PMC11537651 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000040314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/06/2024] Open
Abstract
This study investigates the difference in overall survival rates after transurethral resection of bladder tumor between solitary and multiple bladder cancers, aiming to provide guidance for clinical practitioners. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 133 patients with bladder cancer who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor from April 2017 to October 2023, of which 112 patients had complete clinical and follow-up data. Clinical and follow-up data were collected, and the overall survival rates after surgery were compared between solitary and multiple bladder cancers. In this study, the recurrence rate after transurethral resection of bladder tumor was 23.21% (26/112), and the overall survival rate was 80.36% (90/112). The overall survival rate after transurethral resection of bladder tumor was 92.11% (35/38) in the solitary bladder cancer group and 74.32% (55/74) in the multiple bladder cancer group, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .025). The proportion of high-grade pathology was 7.89% (3/38) in the solitary bladder cancer group and 25.68% (19/74) in the multiple bladder cancer group after transurethral resection of bladder tumor, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .025). The mean tumor diameter after transurethral resection of bladder tumor was 2.76 ± 1.66 cm in the solitary bladder cancer group and 4.04 ± 3.17 cm in the multiple bladder cancer group, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .023). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses revealed that the number of bladder tumors is a risk factor for overall survival after bladder cancer surgery (P = .004). Multiple bladder cancers have a higher pathological grade, larger tumor diameter, and poorer prognosis after transurethral resection of bladder tumor compared to solitary bladder cancers. The number of bladder tumors is an independent risk factor for overall survival after bladder cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxin Diao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital-Miyun Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Li
- Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zihui Gao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital-Miyun Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chunji Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital-Miyun Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yaming Gu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital-Miyun Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Akand M, Veys R, Ost D, Vander Eeckt K, Baekelandt F, Van Reusel R, Mattelaer P, Baekelandt L, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Joniau S, Van der Aa F. Cohort Profile: VZNKUL-NMIBC Quality Indicators Program: A Flemish Prospective Cohort to Evaluate the Quality Indicators in the Treatment of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3653. [PMID: 39518090 PMCID: PMC11545168 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Revised: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Bladder cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with varying outcomes, influenced by disease heterogeneity and variability in treatment and follow-up. Risk groups have been established for non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) to standardize therapy, and several quality control indicators (QCIs) monitor adherence to these risk group-based guidelines. However, controversial results had been obtained regarding the oncological benefits of these QCIs until recent high-quality studies from large registries showed their usefulness. To improve adherence to the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines and benchmark current care in Flemish hospitals within Vlaams Ziekenhuisnetwerk-KU Leuven (VZNKUL), a QCI program for NMIBC was initiated in 2013. This study aims to describe the demographic, clinical, and treatment data of patients enrolled in this program. Participants: The VZNKUL-NMIBC Quality Indicators Program Registry is a prospective cohort including patients treated and followed up with at seven academic and non-academic Flemish hospitals since June 2013. Data collection includes patient characteristics, tumor data, treatment, and oncological outcomes. Findings to date: From June 2013 to December 2020, 4744 transurethral resections of bladder tumors (TURBTs) from 2237 unique patients were analyzed. Most patients (80%) were men with a median age of 73. The median time from diagnosis to TURBT was 19 days. A single tumor was detected in 37% of TURBTs. Tumors larger than 3 cm were found in 20.8% of cases. In 46% of TURBTs, a reTURBT was scheduled according to guidelines. The complication rates were 7.5% and 2.4% for bladder perforation and bleeding, respectively. Postoperative single intravesical instillation of chemotherapy (SIVIC) was administered to 56.9% of 1533 indicated patients with a median time to administration of 4.7 h. Among the cohort, 60.4% had NMIBC, and 9.3% had muscle-invasive BC. Of 972 high-risk patients, 60.7% received adequate BCG induction, while 39.4% received adequate maintenance. After BCG induction ± maintenance, 39.7% were tumor-free, with 17.7% recurrence and 4% progression to muscle-invasive BC. BCG treatment was terminated early for 17% of patients due to intolerance. Early cystectomy was performed for 2.4% of the BCG-naïve patients, and 27.7% of patients with BCG failure underwent a BCG rechallenge. For intermediate-risk patients, 2.1% received adequate BCG, and 23% received intravesical chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 57 months. Five-year recurrence-free, progression-free, cancer-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival rates were 53%, 91.6%, 89%, 70.6%, and 95.6%, respectively, for the NMIBC patients. Of 400 non-metastatic MIBC patients, 217 (54.3%) underwent radical cystectomy (RC), of whom 46% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 18 (4.5%) refused RC, and 74 (18.5%) were considered unfit for the surgery. Future plans: The VZNKUL-NMIBC Quality Indicators Program Registry will continue collecting data to evaluate QCIs and monitor treatment quality, enabling hospitals to benchmark their performance and improve patient care. Additionally, the registry's real-world data can support research and international collaboration. Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04167332).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Akand
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (M.A.); (L.B.); (B.V.C.); (S.J.)
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ralf Veys
- Department of Urology, AZ Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium;
| | - Dieter Ost
- Department of Urology, AZ Sint Blasius, 9200 Dendermonde, Belgium; (D.O.); (K.V.E.)
| | - Kathy Vander Eeckt
- Department of Urology, AZ Sint Blasius, 9200 Dendermonde, Belgium; (D.O.); (K.V.E.)
| | | | - Raf Van Reusel
- Department of Urology, AZ Turnhout, 2300 Turnhout, Belgium;
| | - Pieter Mattelaer
- Department of Urology, AZ Oostende Damiaan, 8400 Oostende, Belgium;
| | - Loic Baekelandt
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (M.A.); (L.B.); (B.V.C.); (S.J.)
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Van Cleynenbreugel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (M.A.); (L.B.); (B.V.C.); (S.J.)
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (M.A.); (L.B.); (B.V.C.); (S.J.)
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frank Van der Aa
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (M.A.); (L.B.); (B.V.C.); (S.J.)
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Laukhtina E, Gontero P, Babjuk M, Moschini M, Teoh JYC, Rouprêt M, Trinh QD, Chlosta P, Nyirády P, Abufaraj M, Soria F, Klemm J, Bekku K, Matsukawa A, Shariat SF. Adjuvant intravesical therapy in intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024; 134:644-651. [PMID: 38627025 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of adjuvant therapy on oncological outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), as due to the poorly-defined and overlapping diagnostic criteria optimal decision-making remains challenging in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicentre study, patients treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumour for Ta disease were retrospectively analysed. All patients with low- or high-risk NMIBC were excluded from the analysis. Associations between adjuvant therapy administration with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were assessed in Cox regression models. RESULTS A total of 2206 patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC were included in the analysis. Among them, 1427 patients underwent adjuvant therapy, such as bacille Calmette-Guérin (n = 168), or chemotherapeutic agents, such as mitomycin C or epirubicin (n = 1259), in different regimens up to 1 year. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 73.3 (38.4-106.9) months. The RFS at 1 and 5 years in patients treated with adjuvant therapy and those without were 72.6% vs 69.5% and 50.8% vs 41.3%, respectively. Adjuvant therapy was associated with better RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.89, P < 0.001), but not with PFS (P = 0.09). In the subgroup of patients aged ≤70 years with primary, single Ta Grade 2 <3 cm tumours (n = 328), adjuvant therapy was not associated with RFS (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-1.02, P = 0.06). While in the subgroup of patients with at least one risk factor including patient age >70 years, tumour multiplicity, recurrent tumour and tumour size ≥3 cm (n = 1878), adjuvant intravesical therapy was associated with improved RFS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.88, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION In our study, patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC benefit from adjuvant intravesical therapy in terms of RFS. However, in patients without risk factors, adjuvant intravesical therapy did not result in a clear reduction in the recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
| | - Péter Nyirády
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li R, Linscott J, Catto JWF, Daneshmand S, Faltas BM, Kamat AM, Meeks JJ, Necchi A, Pradere B, Ross JS, van der Heijden MS, van Rhijn BWG, Loriot Y. FGFR Inhibition in Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02605-8. [PMID: 39353825 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The 2024 US Food and Drug Administration approval of erdafitinib for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with FGFR3 alterations ushered in the era of targeted therapy for bladder cancer. In this review, we summarize the effects of FGFR pathway alterations in oncogenesis, clinical data supporting FGFR inhibitors in the management of bladder cancer, and the challenges that remain. METHODS Original articles relevant to FGFR inhibitors in urothelial cancer between 1995 and 2024 were systematically identified in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases using the search terms "FGFR" and "bladder cancer". An international expert panel with extensive experience in FGFR inhibitor treatment was convened to synthesize a collaborative narrative review. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Somatic FGFR3 alterations are found in up to 70% of low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers; these activate downstream signaling cascades and culminate in cellular proliferation. Beyond a link to lower-grade/lower-stage tumors, there is little consistency regarding whether these alterations confer prognostic risks for cancer recurrence or progression. FGFR3-altered tumors have been linked to a non-inflamed tumor microenvironment, but paradoxically do not seem to impact the response to systemic immunotherapy. Several pan-FGFR inhibitors have been investigated in mUC. With the introduction of novel intravesical drug delivery systems, FGFR inhibitors are poised to transform the therapeutic landscape for early-stage UC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS With deepening understanding of the biology of bladder cancer, novel diagnostics, and improved drug delivery methods, we posit that FGFR inhibition will lead the way in advancing precision treatment of bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Joshua Linscott
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James W F Catto
- Department of Urology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bishoy M Faltas
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Department of Urology and Biochemistry, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Department of Pathology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Office of the CEO, Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rodríguez Faba Ó, Fernández Gómez JM, Guerrero-Ramos F, Álvarez-Maestro M, Ledo Cepero MJ, Unda Urzaiz M, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Cózar Olmo JM, Redorta JP, Álvarez-Ossorio JL. Consensus document on the implications of standardization of BCG supply in the management of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Actas Urol Esp 2024:S2173-5786(24)00109-4. [PMID: 39341566 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
Patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in the intermediate and high-risk groups must receive adjuvant treatment with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) following transurethral resection (TUR), as it reduces the risk of recurrence and presumably the risk of progression as well. Optimization of BCG efficacy is achieved by administering maintenance therapy. However, since many immunological aspects of the mechanism of action of BCG in the bladder remain unknown, the implementation of the optimal dose, number of instillations, strains and adequate maintenance regimen over the last decades has been heterogeneous. Additionally, this has hindered the interpretation of efficacy in terms of oncologic outcomes. This, together with the shortages of BCG in recent years, have forced scientific societies to adapt their clinical practice guidelines and modify their protocols of adjuvant treatment with BCG. This includes changes to strains, doses, and maintenance during this period of time. This consensus document evaluates the current status of adjuvant BCG treatment and the implications of BCG supply availability in the treatment of patients with NMIBC. It also addresses the implementation of novel therapies that will improve cancer prognosis and the quality of life of patients with NMIBC in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ó Rodríguez Faba
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - J M Fernández Gómez
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - F Guerrero-Ramos
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, ROC Clinic y Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - M Unda Urzaiz
- Laboratorio Mixto de Investigación Traslacional en Cáncer de Próstata, CICbioGUNE-Basurto, IIS Biobizkaia, Spain
| | | | - J M Cózar Olmo
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - J Palou Redorta
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Contieri R, Soloway MS, Gontero P, Herr H, Kassouf W, Mertens LS, Moschini M, O'Donnell M, Palou J, Psutka SP, Rouprêt M, Teoh JYC, Kamat AM. Deintensification of Treatment for Low-grade Bladder Tumors: A Collaborative Review by the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG). Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00186-X. [PMID: 39218742 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Management of low-grade (LG) urothelium-confined (Ta stage) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) poses a distinct therapeutic challenge. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), the standard treatment, frequently has to be repeated because of high tumor recurrence rates. This places a considerable strain on both patients and health care infrastructure, underscoring the need for alternative management approaches. Herein, the IBCG (International Bladder Cancer Group), conducted a review to explore the efficacy and safety of deintensified treatment strategies for recurrent LG Ta NMIBC. METHODS We conducted a collaborative review of relevant literature in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Our focus was on high-quality evidence, including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. We also reviewed guidelines published by prominent urological associations. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Active surveillance, chemoablation, and office fulguration are valid treatment options for recurrent LG Ta NMIBC. These deintensified approaches offer several advantages over TURBT: lower complication rates, less morbidity, lower health care costs, and better quality of life for patients. Importantly, these benefits are achieved without compromising oncological safety. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Our review demonstrates that less intensive treatment strategies for recurrent LG Ta NMIBC are both feasible and valuable. The IBCG recommends use of these approaches for carefully selected patients to help lower health care costs and enhance patients' quality of life. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed studies on less invasive management options for low-grade noninvasive bladder cancer, including active surveillance, chemical ablation, and heat treatment. Recent results confirm that these less intense treatment options can reduce the treatment burden and costs for patients and preserve their quality of life without negatively affecting cancer control outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark S Soloway
- Division of Urology, Urologic Oncology Memorial Physician Group, Memorial Hospital, Hollywood, FL, USA
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Harry Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael O'Donnell
- Department of Urology, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Department of Urology, Sorbonne University, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yao D, Xin F, He X. RNF26-mediated ubiquitination of TRIM21 promotes bladder cancer progression. Am J Cancer Res 2024; 14:4082-4095. [PMID: 39267687 PMCID: PMC11387874 DOI: 10.62347/tecq5002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
RNF26 is an important E3 ubiquitin ligase that has been associated with poor prognosis in bladder cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms of RNF26 in bladder cancer tumorigenesis are not fully understood. In the present study, we found that RNF26 expression level was significantly upregulated in the bladder cancer tissues, and higher RNF26 expression is closely associated with poorer prognosis, lower immune cell infiltration, and more sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade drugs and chemotherapy drugs, including cisplatin, VEGFR-targeting drugs and MET-targeting drugs. RNF26 knockdown in UMUC3 and T24 cell lines inhibited cell growth, colony formation and migratory capacity. Meanwhile, RNF26 overexpression had the opposite effects. Mechanistically, RNF26 exerts its oncogenic function by binding to TRIM21 and promoting its ubiquitination and subsequent degradation. Moreover, we revealed ZHX3 as a downstream target of RNF26/TRIM21 pathway in bladder cancer. Taken together, we identified a novel RNF26/TRIM21/ZHX3 axis that promotes bladder cancer progression. Thus, the RNF26/TRIM21/ZHX3 axis constitutes a potential efficacy predictive marker and may serve as a therapeutic target for the treatment of bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongwei Yao
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang Lianyungang 222023, Jiangsu, China
| | - Feng Xin
- Department of Urology, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang Lianyungang 222023, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaozhou He
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chi BJ, Duan ZL, Hasan AKHAM, Yin XZ, Cui BY, Wang FF. Effect and Mechanism of Curdione Combined with Gemcitabine on Migration and Invasion of Bladder Cancer. Biochem Genet 2024; 62:2933-2945. [PMID: 38049684 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-023-10584-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BCa), which usually occurs in bladder epithelial cells and is the fifth most common type of cancer in the world. he recurrence rate within 5 years after surgery is 0.8-45% of patients with early bladder cancer. Therefore, finding appropriate drug therapy for patients with bladder cancer can provide a reference for clinical treatment and play an important role in improving the prognosis of patients. In this study, CCK8 assay result showed that the inhibition of bladder cancer cell activity by Curdione and GEM increased with time and dose. Subsequently, CCK8, clone formation assay and Transwell result showed Curdione enhances GEM inhibition of bladder cancer cell activity, clonal formation and migration, these combine therapeutic schedule also could inhibited growth of in vivo xenograft tumors. The comprehensive database showed that CA2 is a potential target genes of Curdione, and Knockdown CA2 enhances GEM induced inhibition of cell proliferation and migration. Based on these advantages, Curdione may be a new type of action drug or adjunct for the treatment of bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao-Jin Chi
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Heilongjiang, 154002, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhong-Lei Duan
- Graduate School, Jiamusi University, 148 Xuefu Road, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang, 154007, People's Republic of China.
| | | | - Xing-Zhong Yin
- Basic Medical College, Jiamusi University, Heilongjiang, 154007, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo-Yang Cui
- Graduate School, Jiamusi University, 148 Xuefu Road, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang, 154007, People's Republic of China
| | - Fang-Fang Wang
- Basic Medical College, Jiamusi University, Heilongjiang, 154007, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang L, Wang W. Symptom management and nursing interventions for postoperative bladder instillation chemotherapy in bladder cancer patients. Minerva Surg 2024; 79:392-394. [PMID: 38088755 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.23.10162-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Weizhen Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China -
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Choi J, Kim KH, Kim HS, Yoon HS, Kim JH, Kim JW, Lee YS, Choi SY, Chang IH, Ko YH, Song W, Jeong BC, Nam JK. Comparative analysis of recurrence rates between intravesical gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction therapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumors in patients with intermediate- and high-risk bladder cancer: A retrospective multicenter study. Investig Clin Urol 2024; 65:248-255. [PMID: 38714515 PMCID: PMC11076792 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine as an alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were retrospectively collected across seven institutions from February 1999 to May 2023. Inclusion criteria included patients with intermediate- or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) and received at least four sessions of intravesical gemcitabine or BCG induction therapy. Patient characteristics, complete remission (CR), occurrence, and progression rates were compared. RESULTS In total, 149 patients were included in this study (gemcitabine, 63; BCG, 86). No differences were apparent between the two groups in baseline characteristics, except for the follow-up period (gemcitabine, 9.2±5.9 months vs. BCG, 43.9±41.4 months, p<0.001). There were no consistent significant differences observed between the two groups in the 3-month (gemcitabine, 98.4% vs. BCG, 95.3%; p=0.848), 6-month (94.9% vs. 90.0%, respectively; p=0.793) and 1-year CR rates (84.2% vs. 83.3%, respectively; p=0.950). Also, there was no significant statistical difference in progression-free survival between the two groups (p=0.953). The occurrence rates of adverse events were similar between the groups (22.2% vs. 22.1%; p=0.989); however, the rate of Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher was significantly higher in the BCG group (1.6% vs. 16.3%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Intravesical gemcitabine demonstrated efficacy comparable to BCG therapy for the first year in patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. However, long-term follow-up studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joongwon Choi
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
| | - Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyun Sik Yoon
- Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Kim
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Jin Wook Kim
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Yong Seong Lee
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Se Young Choi
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Ho Chang
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hwii Ko
- Department of Urology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Kil Nam
- Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rosazza M, Soria F, Gontero P. Editorial comment-Risk stratification and management of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: A physician survey in six Asia-Pacific territories. Int J Urol 2024; 31:71-72. [PMID: 37967160 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Rosazza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Um PK, Praharaj M, Lombardo KA, Yoshida T, Matoso A, Baras AS, Zhao L, Srikrishna G, Huang J, Prasad P, Kates M, McConkey D, Pardoll DM, Bishai WR, Bivalacqua TJ. Improved bladder cancer antitumor efficacy with a recombinant BCG that releases a STING agonist. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.12.15.571740. [PMID: 38168333 PMCID: PMC10760079 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.15.571740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Despite the introduction of several new agents for the treatment of bladder cancer (BC), intravesical BCG remains a first line agent for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. In this study we evaluated the antitumor efficacy in animal models of BC of a recombinant BCG known as BCG-disA-OE that releases the small molecule STING agonist c-di-AMP. We found that compared to wild-type BCG (BCG-WT), in both the orthotopic, carcinogen-induced rat MNU model and the heterotopic syngeneic mouse MB-49 model BCG-disA-OE afforded improved antitumor efficacy. A mouse safety evaluation further revealed that BCG-disA-OE proliferated to lesser degree than BCG-WT in BALB/c mice and displayed reduced lethality in SCID mice. To probe the mechanisms that may underlie these effects, we found that BCG-disA-OE was more potent than BCG-WT in eliciting IFN-β release by exposed macrophages, in reprogramming myeloid cell subsets towards an M1-like proinflammatory phenotypes, inducing epigenetic activation marks in proinflammatory cytokine promoters, and in shifting monocyte metabolomic profiles towards glycolysis. Many of the parameters elevated in cells exposed to BCG-disA-OE are associated with BCG-mediated trained innate immunity suggesting that STING agonist overexpression may enhance trained immunity. These results indicate that modifying BCG to release high levels of proinflammatory PAMP molecules such as the STING agonist c-di-AMP can enhance antitumor efficacy in bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter K. Um
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, USA
| | - Monali Praharaj
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, USA
- The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA
| | - Kara A. Lombardo
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Baltimore, USA
| | - Takahiro Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Japan, 6620918
| | - Andres Matoso
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Alex S. Baras
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Liang Zhao
- The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA
| | - Geetha Srikrishna
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, USA
| | - Joy Huang
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, USA
| | - Pankaj Prasad
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, USA
| | - Max Kates
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Baltimore, USA
| | - David McConkey
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Baltimore, USA
| | - Drew M. Pardoll
- The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA
| | - William R. Bishai
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, USA
| | - Trinity J. Bivalacqua
- School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
McElree IM, Orzel J, Stubbee R, Steinberg RL, Mott SL, O'Donnell MA, Packiam VT. Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel for treatment-naïve and previously treated intermediate-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:485.e1-485.e7. [PMID: 37442741 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adjuvant intravesical therapy is recommended for patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC. While intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has demonstrated favorable outcomes for high-risk NMIBC, its utility in the intermediate-risk setting is not well described. We report outcomes of Gem/Doce as an adjuvant treatment for intermediate-risk NMIBC. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC by AUA criteria treated with Gem/Doce following TURBT between 2012 and 2022. Patients received weekly sequential intravesical instillations of 1 g gemcitabine and 37.5 mg docetaxel for 6 weeks. Monthly maintenance of 2 years was initiated if disease-free at first surveillance. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS), assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The cohort included 77 patients with median follow-up of 26 (IQR 14-50) months. Prior to induction, 67 (87%) patients presented with Ta low-grade (LG) lesions, 3 (3.9%) with Ta high-grade (HG), 5 (6.5%) with TaLG plus focal TaHG, and 2 (2.6%) with T1LG. Thirty-three (43%) patients received previous intravesical therapy including BCG (23), mitomycin (13), and docetaxel monotherapy (12). The 2-year RFS was 71% among all patients. Treatment-naïve patients had superior RFS compared to previously treated patients (P = 0.04); 2-year estimates were 79% and 64%, respectively. Twenty-nine (38%) patients experienced adverse events; all were Grade 1 to 2 except 1 (1.3%) Grade 3 (acute oxygen desaturation). Three (3.9%) patients did not tolerate a full induction course. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective review of a heterogenous population of patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC, Gem/Doce was an effective and well-tolerated adjuvant therapy. Further prospective evaluation in this setting is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian M McElree
- Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Joanna Orzel
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Reid Stubbee
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | | | - Sarah L Mott
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tan WS, O'Donnell M, Li R, Kamat AM, Packiam VT. Reply to Wen-Wei Sung's Letter to the Editor re: Wei Shen Tan, Ian M. McElree, Facundo Davaro, et al. Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Is an Alternative to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for the Treatment of Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.011. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 7:S2588-9311(23)00225-0. [PMID: 39492318 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Roger Li
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Vignesh T Packiam
- Department of Urology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tan WS, Hall E, Kamat AM, Kelly JD. Clinical trial design for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:575-576. [PMID: 37328547 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00789-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tan WS, McElree IM, Davaro F, Steinberg RL, Bree K, Navai N, Dinney CP, O'Donnell MA, Li R, Kamat AM, Packiam VT. Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel is an Alternative to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for the Treatment of Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:531-534. [PMID: 37468392 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Adjuvant treatment with either chemotherapy or bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is recommended for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). In this multi-institutional retrospective review, we evaluated oncological outcomes for 182 patients with IR-NMIBC treated with BCG (n = 100) or intravesical sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce; n = 82). Median follow-up was 48.6 mo (interquartile range 24.9-70.9). No patient had a previous diagnosis of high-grade disease. Recurrence rates were similar in the two treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.73; p = 0.8). Results were consistent after adjusting for International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) risk subgroups, use of single-instillation postoperative chemotherapy, use of blue light cystoscopy, and receipt of maintenance therapy (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47-1.64; p = 0.7). Similarly, there was no difference in the rate of stage/grade progression between the treatment groups (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.21-2.12; p = 0.5). Rates of progression to muscle-invasive disease/metastasis (2.2%) and cancer-specific mortality (1.7%) were low in the cohort. Our results support the use of Gem/Doce as an alternative to BCG in patients with IR-NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared cancer control outcomes for two different treatments for intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Our results show that a chemotherapy combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine is as effective as the BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin) treatment traditionally used for this type of bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ian M McElree
- Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Facundo Davaro
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Kelly Bree
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neema Navai
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Roger Li
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Piszczek R, Krajewski W, Subiela JD, Del Giudice F, Nowak Ł, Chorbińska J, Moschini M, Masson-Lecomte A, Bebane S, Cimadamore A, Grobet-Jeandin E, Rouprêt M, D'Andrea D, Mastroianni R, Gutierrez Hidalgo B, Gomez Rivas J, Mori K, Soria F, Laukhtina E, Mari A, Albisinni S, Gallioli A, Mertens LS, Pichler R, Marcq G, Łaszkiewicz J, Hałoń A, Carrion DM, Akand M, Pradere B, Shariat SF, Palou J, Babjuk M, Burgos Revilla J, Małkiewicz B, Szydełko T. Prognosis of patients with T1 low-grade urothelial bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:591-599. [PMID: 37728495 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05418-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The existence and prognosis of T1LG (T1 low-grade) bladder cancer is controversial. Also, because of data paucity, it remains unclear what is the clinical history of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treated T1LG tumors and if it differs from other NMIBC (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer) representatives. The aim of this study was to analyse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with T1LG bladder cancers treated with BCG immunotherapy. METHODS A multi-institutional and retrospective study of 2510 patients with Ta/T1 NMIBC with or without carcinoma in situ (CIS) treated with BCG (205 T1LG patients) was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test for RFS and PFS to compare the survival between TaLG, TaHG, T1LG, and T1HG NMIBC were used. Also, T1LG tumors were categorized into EAU2021 risk groups and PFS analysis was performed, and Cox multivariate model for both RFS and PFS were constructed. RESULTS The median follow-up was 52 months. For the T1LG cohort, the estimated RFS and PFS rates at 5-year were 59.3% and 89.2%, respectively. While there were no differences in RFS between NMIBC subpopulations, a slightly better PFS was found in T1LG NMIBC compared to T1HG (5-year PFS; T1LG vs. T1HG: 82% vs. 89%; P<0.001). A heterogeneous classification of patients with T1LG NMIBC was observed when EAU 2021 prognostic model was applied, finding a statistically significant worse PFS in patients classified as high-risk T1LG (5-year PFS; 81.8%) compared to those in intermediate (5-year PFS; 93,4%), and low-risk T1LG tumors (5-year PFS; 98,1%). CONCLUSIONS The RFS of T1LG was comparable to other NMIBC subpopulations. The PFS of T1LG tumors was significantly better than of T1HG NMIBC. The EAU2021 scoring model heterogeneously categorized the risk of progression in T1LG tumors and the high-risk T1LG had the worst PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radosław Piszczek
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland -
| | - Jose D Subiela
- Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Łukasz Nowak
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sonia Bebane
- Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jan Łaszkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Hałoń
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Diego M Carrion
- Department of Urology, Torrejon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Murat Akand
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Juan Palou
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Javier Burgos Revilla
- Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grabe-Heyne K, Henne C, Mariappan P, Geiges G, Pöhlmann J, Pollock RF. Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1170124. [PMID: 37333804 PMCID: PMC10272547 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1170124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer ranks among the most common cancers globally. At diagnosis, 75% of patients have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients with low-risk NMIBC have a good prognosis, but recurrence and progression rates remain high in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC, despite the decades-long availability of effective treatments for NMIBC such as intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). The present review provides an overview of NMIBC, including its burden and treatment options, and then reviews aspects that counteract the successful treatment of NMIBC, referred to as unmet treatment needs. The scale and reasons for each unmet need are described based on a comprehensive review of the literature, including insufficient adherence to treatment guidelines by physicians because of insufficient knowledge, training, or access to certain therapy options. Low rates of lifestyle changes and treatment completion by patients, due to BCG shortages or toxicities and adverse events as well as their impact on social activities, represent additional areas of potential improvement. Highly heterogeneous evidence for the effectiveness and safety of some treatments limits the comparability of results across studies. As a result, efforts are underway to standardize treatment schedules for BCG, but intravesical chemotherapy schedules remain unstandardized. In addition, risk-scoring models often perform unsatisfactorily due to significant differences between derivation and real-world cohorts. Reporting in clinical trials suffers from a lack of consistent outcomes reporting in bladder cancer clinical trials, paired with an under-representation of racial and ethnic minorities in many trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery (EBCS), Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Montorsi F, Moschini M, Briganti A. Re: Wei Shan Tan, Gary Steinberg, J. Alfred Witjes, et al. Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Updated Consensus Definition and Management Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. Eur Urol Oncol 2022;5:505-16. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:354. [PMID: 37031078 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Contieri R, Lazzeri M, Hurle R. When and How To Perform Active Surveillance for Low-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00095-0. [PMID: 37059619 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) has been proposed as a possible management option for patients with recurrent low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Recent studies suggest that AS is a safe and effective management strategy. Nevertheless, a consensus statement is needed to standardize inclusion criteria and follow-up schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sharma V, Chamie K, Schoenberg M, Lee VS, Fero K, Lec P, Munneke JR, Aaronson DS, Kushi LH, Quesenberry CP, Tang L, Kwan ML. Natural History of Multiple Recurrences in Intermediate-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Lessons From a Prospective Cohort. Urology 2023; 173:134-141. [PMID: 36574911 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the risk of multiple recurrences in intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (IR-NMIBC) and their impact on progression. Prognostic studies of IR-NMIBC have focused on initial recurrences, yet little is known about subsequent recurrences and their impact on progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS IR-NMIBC patients from the Be-Well Study, a prospective cohort study of NMIBC patients diagnosed from 2015 to 2019 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, were identified. The frequency of first, second, and third intravesical recurrences of urothelial carcinoma were characterized using conditional Kaplan-Meier analyses and random-effects shared-frailty models. The association of multiple recurrences with progression was examined. RESULTS In 291 patients with IR-NMIBC (median follow-up 38 months), the 5-year risk of initial recurrence was 54.4%. After initial recurrence (n = 137), 60.1% of patients had a second recurrence by 2 years. After second recurrence (n = 70), 51.5% of patients had a third recurrence by 3 years. In multivariable analysis, female sex (Hazard Ratio 1.51, P< .01), increasing tumor size (HR 1.14, P< .01) and number of prior recurrences (HR 1.24, P< .01) were associated with multiple recurrences; whereas maintenance BCG (HR 0.66, P = .03) was associated with reduced recurrences. The 5-year risk of progression varied significantly (P< .01) by number of recurrences: 9.5%, 21.9%, and 37.9% for patients with 1, 2, and 3+ recurrences, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Multiple recurrences are common in IR-NMIBC and are associated with progression. Female sex, larger tumors, number of prior recurrences, and lack of maintenance BCG were associated with multiple recurrences. Multiple recurrences may prove useful as a clinical trial endpoint for IR-NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mark Schoenberg
- Department of Urology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Valerie S Lee
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Katherine Fero
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Patrick Lec
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Julie R Munneke
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - David S Aaronson
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA
| | - Lawrence H Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Li Tang
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Marilyn L Kwan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cerrato C, Roupret M, Mir MC. Results from HIVEC-II for Intermediate-risk Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Is This a Dead End for Mitomycin C Hyperthermia? Eur Urol 2023; 83:505-507. [PMID: 36967360 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
32
|
Reply to Suman Sahoo, Abhishek Pandy, Swarnendu Mandal, Manoj Kumar Das, and Prasant Nayak's Letter to the Editor re: Wei Shen Tan, Aaron Pendergast, Charlotte Ackerman, et al. Adjuvant Intravesical Chemohyperthermia Versus Passive Chemotherapy in Patients with Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (HIVEC-II): A Phase 2, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.003. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e48-e49. [PMID: 36456403 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
33
|
Tan WS, Kelly JD. Reply to Fabio Campodonico, Francesca Mattioli, and Carlo Introini's Letter to the Editor re: Wei Shen Tan, Aaron Pendergast, Charlotte Ackerman, et al. Intravesical Chemohyperthermia Versus Passive Chemotherapy in Patients with Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (HIVEC-II): A Phase 2, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.003. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e29-e30. [PMID: 36272948 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wu P, Guo Y. Susceptibility Loci in SLC15A1, UGT1A3, and CWC27 Genes Associated with Bladder Cancer in the Northeast Chinese Population. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:2988159. [PMID: 36124064 PMCID: PMC9482523 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2988159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BCa) is an increasingly severe clinical and public health issue. Therefore, we aim to investigate BCa susceptibility loci in the Chinese population. In this study, 487 BCa patients and 563 controls were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from July 2015 to September 2020. A total of ten single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in solute carrier family 15 member 1 (SLC15A1), CWC27 spliceosome associated cyclophilin (CWC27), or UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A3 (UGT1A3) genes were genotyped. The associations between the candidate SNPs and BCa were analyzed using genotype and haplotype analysis. The results demonstrated that Rs4646227 of SLC15A1 has a significant association with BCa. The patients with CG (OR =2.513, p < 0.05) and GG (OR =2.859, p < 0.05) genotypes had an increasing risk of BCa compared with the CC genotype. For the CWC27 gene, genotypic frequency analysis revealed that the GT or TT genotype of rs2042329 and the CT or TT genotype of rs1870437 were more frequent in BCa patients than those in the control group, indicating that these genotypes were associated with a higher risk of BCa (all p < 0.05). Haplotypes of SLC15A1, UGT1A3, and CWC27 genes found that the C-C-C haplotype of SLC15A1 was associated with a lower risk of BCa while the C-G-C haplotype was associated with a higher risk. For the UGT1A3 gene, a moderate protective effect was observed with the most frequent T-T-C haplotype, and for the CWC27 gene, most of the haplotypes showed no association with BCa, except the G-G-C-T haplotype (order of SNPs: rs2042329-rs7735338-rs1870437-rs2278351, OR =0.81, p =0.038). In sum, this study indicated that rs2042329 and rs1870437 in the CWC27 gene and rs4646227 in the SLC15A1 gene are independent indicators for BCa risk in Chinese people. Further large-scale studies are required to validate these findings. Also, this study provided the theoretical basis for developing new therapeutic drug targeting of BCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peihong Wu
- Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Yaoxing Guo
- Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tan WS, Prendergast A, Ackerman C, Yogeswaran Y, Cresswell J, Mariappan P, Phull J, Hunter-Campbell P, Lazarowicz H, Mishra V, Rane A, Davies M, Warburton H, Cooke P, Mostafid H, Wilby D, Mills R, Issa R, Kelly JD. Adjuvant Intravesical Chemohyperthermia Versus Passive Chemotherapy in Patients with Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (HIVEC-II): A Phase 2, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2022; 83:497-504. [PMID: 35999119 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy following tumour resection is recommended for intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant intravesical chemohyperthermia (CHT) for intermediate-risk NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS HIVEC-II is an open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial of CHT versus chemotherapy alone in patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC recruited at 15 centres between May 2014 and December 2017 (ISRCTN 23639415). Randomisation was stratified by treating hospital. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to adjuvant CHT with mitomycin C at 43°C or to room-temperature mitomycin C (control). Both treatment arms received six weekly instillations of 40 mg of mitomycin C lasting for 60 min. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was 24-mo disease-free survival as determined via cystoscopy and urinary cytology. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS A total of 259 patients (131 CHT vs 128 control) were randomised. At 24 mo, 42 patients (32%) in the CHT group and 49 (38%) in the control group had experienced recurrence. Disease-free survival at 24 mo was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51-69%) in the CHT arm and 60% (95% CI 50-68%) in the control arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.62-1.37; log-rank p = 0.8). Progression-free survival was higher in the control arm (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.09-10.82; log-rank p = 0.02) on intention-to-treat analysis but was not significantly higher on per-protocol analysis (HR 2.87, 95% CI 0.83-9.98; log-rank p = 0.06). Overall survival was similar (HR 2.55, 95% CI 0.77-8.40; log-rank p = 0.09). Patients undergoing CHT were less likely to complete their treatment (n =75, 59% vs n = 111, 89%). Adverse events were reported by 164 patients (87 CHT vs 77 control). Major (grade III) adverse events were rare (13 CHT vs 7 control). CONCLUSIONS CHT cannot be recommended over chemotherapy alone for intermediate-risk NMIBC. Adverse events following CHT were of low grade and short-lived, although patients were less likely to complete their treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY The HIVEC-II trial investigated the role of heated chemotherapy instillations in the bladder for treatment of intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We found no cancer control benefit from heated chemotherapy instillations over room-temperature chemotherapy. Adverse events following heated chemotherapy were low grade and short-lived, although these patients were less likely to complete their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Aaron Prendergast
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Ackerman
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Yathushan Yogeswaran
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Joanne Cresswell
- Department of Urology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Department of Urology, Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jaspal Phull
- Department of Urology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| | | | - Henry Lazarowicz
- Department of Urology, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Abhay Rane
- Department of Urology, East Surry Hospital, Redhill, UK
| | - Melissa Davies
- Department of Urology, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK
| | - Hazel Warburton
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Cooke
- Department of Urology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Daniel Wilby
- Department of Urology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Robert Mills
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Rami Issa
- Department of Urology, St George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Soria F, Gontero P. Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Time To Tidy Up the Mess? Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:517-518. [PMID: 35907762 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|