1
|
Glicksman RM, Jiang DM, Bedard PL, Ye XY, Anson-Cartwright L, Billfalk-Kelly A, Krishna S, O'Malley M, Cheung CC, Shin A, Hamilton RJ, Warde P, Chung P. Clinical outcomes of stage IIA/IIB seminoma treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy: should regional therapy be considered the preferred treatment approach? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025:S0360-3016(25)00003-3. [PMID: 39778682 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2024] [Revised: 12/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal management of patients with de novo clinical stage IIA/B (CSIIA/B) or relapsed CSIIA/B (Rel-CSIIA/B) seminoma remains debated due to a lack of randomized evidence. Herein, we sought to evaluate outcomes following radiotherapy and chemotherapy in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospectively maintained single-institutional database was retrospectively queried for patients diagnosed between 1995-2016 with de novo or Rel-CSIIA/B. Patients with Rel-CSIIA/B were managed similarly to de novo CSIIA/B. All patients were reviewed by the multidisciplinary team. While the preferred management policy was radiotherapy, the treatment decision was individualized at the physician/patient level. RESULTS There were 153 patients: 67 had de novo CSIIA/B (IIA-32, IIB-35) and 86 patients had Rel-CSIIA/B seminoma (IIA-51, IIB-35). Of the total, 120 patients (78%) received radiotherapy (IIA-78, IIB-42) and 33 (22%) received platinum-based chemotherapy (IIA-5, IIB-28). Median follow-up was 7.1 years (IQR 4.3-9.9). Eleven patients (IIA- 9/78, IIB- 2/42) relapsed following radiotherapy and 1 patient (IIB) relapsed following chemotherapy, corresponding to 5-year relapse rates of 10% (95% CI 6-18%) for radiotherapy and 3% (95% CI 0-23%) for chemotherapy. All 12 patients who relapsed were treated with subsequent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy and chemotherapy result in excellent oncologic outcomes for patients with de novo or Rel-CSIIA/B seminoma. All patients should be informed about both management options. However, radiotherapy with its favourable acute toxicity profile, could be considered the treatment of choice in most patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Glicksman
- Radiation Medicine Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto.
| | - Di Maria Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
| | - Xiang Y Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network
| | - Lynn Anson-Cartwright
- Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | | | - Satheesh Krishna
- Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - Martin O'Malley
- Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - Carol C Cheung
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto
| | - Abigail Shin
- Radiation Medicine Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - Padraig Warde
- Radiation Medicine Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Le Guévelou J, Nicosia L, Blanchard P, Ralite F, Durand X, Marchesi V, Roubaud G, Sargos P. Radiation therapy for stage IIA/IIB seminomas: Back to the future? Radiother Oncol 2025; 202:110626. [PMID: 39557127 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Revised: 11/05/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/20/2024]
Abstract
Seminoma is a highly curable disease; therefore, long-term morbidity of oncological treatment represents a crucial stake. In view of the considerable advances made in radiotherapy in the past decade, we aim to shed light on current and future strategies that hold promises for the management of stage II seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Flavien Ralite
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Xavier Durand
- Department of Urology, Hopital Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Marchesi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre de Radiothérapie Charlebourg, La Défense, Groupe Amethyst, 65, avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sigg S, Rothermundt C, Fankhauser CD. Surgical management of testicular cancer with limited retroperitoneal disease. Curr Opin Urol 2024:00042307-990000000-00212. [PMID: 39704052 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chemotherapy offers excellent long-term survival rates for men with clinical stage II germ cell tumours. However, in this predominantly younger population, chemotherapy is associated with long-term adverse effects. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) may serve as an alternative treatment option, preserving oncological safety while potentially reducing adverse effects in men with limited retroperitoneal disease. RECENT FINDINGS The rate of negative surgical specimens (pN0) in primary RPLND series varies between 4% and 16% in seminoma and 12-29% in nonseminoma, respectively. This suggests that early restaging, novel biomarkers, and/or percutaneous biopsies should be considered to minimize overtreatment. In stage II seminoma, three prospective RPLND series with follow-up periods ranging from 22 to 51 months report recurrence rates between 6% and 30%. In contrast, only retrospective data are available for stage II nonseminoma, with follow-up periods and recurrence rates yet to be fully defined. Following primary RPLND with confirmed viable cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence risk. In cases of recurrence after primary RPLND, first-line chemotherapy remains a highly effective salvage option. Ongoing research is needed to identify risk factors for contralateral retroperitoneal disease to refine surgical templates and to determine predictors of recurrence, allowing for more personalized decisions regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up strategies. SUMMARY Men with clinical stage II germ cell tumours may benefit from RPLND due to its lower risk of long-term side effects. Chemotherapy is an effective salvage treatment if needed. Although RPLND is a safe and promising option, further studies are required to better understand relapse risks and to tailor treatment plans based on individual patient factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvan Sigg
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne
| | - Christian Rothermundt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen
| | - Christian Daniel Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne
- University of Zurich, Zurich
- University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pfister D, Rieger C, Seelemeyer F, Heidenreich A. [Stage-dependent treatment of seminomas]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 63:1285-1293. [PMID: 39446232 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02446-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
Germ cell neoplasms of the testis are rare solid tumors predominantly in young men. Seminomas are slightly more frequent than nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. A special feature of seminomas is that they are sensitive to radiation, so that this represents an option in tumor stages with few metastases; however, the guideline recommendation is cautious due to the increased risk of secondary malignancies. In nonmetastasized tumor stages active surveillance is the primary approach to avoid overtreatment of patients. This is also the reason for primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in cases of a low metastasis load. This concept has already been implemented in the American Urological Association (AUA) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, whereas in the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines it is still considered to be an individual approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Pfister
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, spezielle urologische und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - Constantin Rieger
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, spezielle urologische und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Felix Seelemeyer
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, spezielle urologische und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, spezielle urologische und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
- Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baky F, Liso N, Williams B, Knezevic A, Funt SA, Feldman DR, Carver B, Sheinfeld J, Matulewicz RS. Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Negative Pathology (pN0) at Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102217. [PMID: 39307609 PMCID: PMC11606754 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2024] [Revised: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who undergo primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) for early-stage testicular cancer and have no cancer (pN0) found in the retroperitoneum are believed to have an excellent prognosis. However, some experience relapse, potentially due to limitations of current staging methods. We aim to describe long-term outcomes and relapse patterns among a contemporary cohort of patients found to be pN0 at pRPLND to identify opportunities for improved diagnostic approaches and optimal patient selection. METHODS We reviewed our prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent pRPLND for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at our tertiary cancer center during the period from January 1, 2000, through September 30, 2023 (n = 628). We excluded 282 patients with node-positive pathology for a final analytic cohort of 346 patients. Our primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included timing and location of recurrence. RESULTS Of 346 included patients with pN0 pathology, 23 experienced relapse with a 2-year RFS rate of 93% (95% confidence interval: 90, 96). Most recurrences (70%) occurred in the lungs and within 6 months of pRPLND. Serum tumor markers were positive in 43% of patients at the time of relapse. All patients who relapsed were treated with salvage chemotherapy; 6 patients required additional surgical procedures. There was no testis cancer-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS Two-year RFS for patients with pN0 pRPLND pathology is excellent. All recurrences were outside of the retroperitoneum, suggesting subclinical distant metastases at time of surgery and the benefits of a bilateral template dissection. Improved diagnostics may help better identify patients with disease within or outside of the retroperitoneum prior to pRPLND, helping guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fady Baky
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Urology Service, New York, NY
| | - Nicole Liso
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Urology Service, New York, NY
| | - Brandon Williams
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Urology Service, New York, NY
| | - Andrea Knezevic
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel A Funt
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Genitourinary Oncology Service, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Darren R Feldman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Genitourinary Oncology Service, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Brett Carver
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Urology Service, New York, NY
| | - Joel Sheinfeld
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Urology Service, New York, NY
| | - Richard S Matulewicz
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Urology Service, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Heidenreich J, Gößmann R, Seelemeyer F, Pfister D, Paffenholz P, Heidenreich A. [Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular germ cell cancer in clinical stage IIA/B-renaissance of an established treatment?]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 63:1129-1136. [PMID: 39269528 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02435-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The guideline-recommended treatment of choice for clinical stage IIA/B testicular germ cell tumors is chemotherapy with three cycles of PEB/four cycles of PE or, alternatively, radiation for seminomas. Despite their high curative efficacy, both options are associated with significant long-term toxicities. We evaluated the functional and oncological outcomes of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a therapeutic alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2018 and 2022, 76 patients (n = 34 seminomas, n = 42 nonseminomas) underwent primary RPLND for marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B testicular germ cell cancer. All patients underwent nerve-sparing RPLND with a unilateral or bilateral template dissection and had a follow-up ≥ 3 months. None of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. In 24 patients, the serum concentration of miR371a-3p was evaluated preoperatively. Follow-up was performed according to EAU guidelines. RESULTS Median age and median follow-up were 30.1 (17-62) years and 29.3 (3-72) months, respectively. Mean operation time, blood loss, and duration of hospitalization were 131 (105-195) min, < 150 ml, and 4.5 (3-9) days, respectively. A Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication was experienced by 8 (10.9%) patients. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 90.8%. A mean number of 19 (7-68) lymph nodes were dissected. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was 1.1 (1-5), and the mean diameter of positive lymph nodes was 2.4 (0.8-4.6) cm. Eleven (14.5%) patients had stage pN0 (3/34 seminomas, 8/42 nonseminomas). In 24/27 patients (88.9%) miR371 was positive, and it was negative in 4/4 with pN0 and 3/3 (100%) with teratoma. An outfield relapse was experienced by 7 patients (9.2%), who then received salvage chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Primary RPLND for marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B germ cell tumors results in high cure rates without adjuvant chemotherapy and is associated with a low rate of complications if performed in experienced hands. Therefore, primary RPLND should be included in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Heidenreich
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Ruben Gößmann
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Felix Seelemeyer
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927, Köln, Deutschland
| | - David Pfister
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927, Köln, Deutschland.
- Klink für Urologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu J, Hiwase M, Woon DTS, Thomas B, Tran B, Lawrentschuk N. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in stage II testicular seminoma: a systematic review. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 39448381 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of the current literature to determine the current role of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in stage II testicular seminoma and its associated oncological, functional and peri-operative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Scopus for publications from inception until November 2023. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42023449781), was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and utilised the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS Six studies involving 385 patients were analysed, with 48.5% clinical stage IIA and 51.5% stage IIB seminomas. The patients' mean (range) age was 37 (20-64) years. The median operation time was 187 min, median estimated blood loss was 150 mL and median length of hospital stay was 4 days. In all, 6.1% of patients developed complications that were greater or equal to Clavien-Dindo grade 3. Only four studies reported on anejaculation rate (median: 4.9%). Only one study had long-term data, demonstrating a 92% 5-year overall survival for stage IIA/B disease treated with RPLND. The remaining five studies had a median follow-up of between 18.5 and 37 months and reported a mean recurrence rate of 15.6%. Most recurrences (78%) were not within the field of RPLND. Recurrence was associated with higher clinical and pathological lymph node stage, and metachronous or delayed development of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (initially stage I disease, as opposed to de novo stage IIA/B disease). DISCUSSION Primary RPLND, performed by experienced surgeons, has good peri-operative outcomes. Recurrence is more common than with standard treatment, but long-term survival and functional data are limited, although promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianliang Liu
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mrunal Hiwase
- Department of Urology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Dixon T S Woon
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Benjamin Thomas
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ben Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xia L, Daneshmand S. Update on the Management of Low-stage Seminoma. Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:377-385. [PMID: 38925740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
The contemporary paradigm of testicular cancer management is achieving high and durable cure rates while minimizing the burden of treatment given the potential long-term toxicities associated with radiation therapy and systemic therapies. The management of low-stage seminoma has seen significant changes in recent years. Nuances of surveillance strategies for stage I seminoma exist and continue to evolve. Emerging data show retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a viable treatment option for selected patients with clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilei Xia
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Heidenreich A, Seelemeyer F, Gößmann R, Heidenreich J, Pfister D. [Clinical stage IIA/B seminoma - to do or not to do: the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy]. Aktuelle Urol 2024. [PMID: 39089325 DOI: 10.1055/a-2358-8224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
About 10% of patients with seminomatous testicuar germ cell tumors are diagnosed with clinical stage II/B. The current guideline recommended treatment options include systemic chemotherapy with 3 cycles PEB or radiation therapy with 30 Gy for CS IIA and 36 Gy for CS IIB. Despite a high cure rate of 90-94% and 82-90% for CS IIA and CS IIB, respectively, both options are associated with a high rate of treatment-associated long-term toxicities. A significantly increased risk for the development of secondary malignancies, cardiovascular and metabolic disease as well as an increased for treatment-associated mortality has been proven in various studies. Primary nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) has been evaluated in 5 prospective and retrospective clinical studies and it has emerged as a valid treatment alternative. The relapse-rate after a median follow-up of 25-33 months is in the range of 11-30%, so that 70-90% of patients are cured without being subjected to chemotherapy and potential long-term toxicities. All relapsing patients have been cured with secondary salvage chemotherapy. The frequency of significant surgery-associated complications is low with 3-13%. Therapeutic success depends on the surgical experience of the various surgeons and the chosen template, so that this type of surgical interventions should only be performed in centres of excellence with dedicated surgeons. Preoperative evaluation of the new biomarker miR371 has been shown to predict the presence of metastatic disease with an accuracy of around 100% so that this marker might be used in daily routine prior to active treatment in CS IIA/B seminomas.
Collapse
|
10
|
Thor A, Negaard HF, Grenabo Bergdahl A, Almås B, Melsen Larsen S, Lundgren PO, Gerdtsson A, Halvorsen D, Johannsdottir B, Jansson AK, Hellström M, Wahlqvist R, Langberg CW, Hedlund A, Akre O, Glimelius I, Ståhl O, Haugnes HS, Cohn-Cedermark G, Kjellman A, Tandstad T. Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as Treatment for Low-volume Metastatic Seminoma in a Population-based Cohort: The Swedish Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group Experience. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 65:13-19. [PMID: 38966804 PMCID: PMC11222926 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective There is an unmet need to avoid long-term morbidity associated with standard cytotoxic treatment for low-volume metastatic seminoma. Our aim was to assess the oncological efficacy and surgical safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as treatment in a population-based cohort of metastatic seminoma patients with limited retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Methods Sixty-two seminoma patients in Norway and Sweden were included in the cohort from 2019 to 2022. Patients with lymphadenopathy ≤3 cm, having primary clinical stage (CS) IIA/B or CS I with a relapse, were operated with uni- or bilateral template RPLND, open or robot assisted. The outcome measures included surgical complications as per Clavien-Dindo, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for 24-mo progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Key findings and limitations In the cohort, 33 (53%) had CS I with a relapse during surveillance, six (10%) CS I with a relapse following adjuvant chemotherapy, and 23 (37%) initial CS IIA/B. Metastatic seminoma was verified in 58 patients (94%) with a median largest diameter of 18 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 13-24). Robot-assisted RPLND was performed in 40 patients (65%). Clavien-Dindo III complications were observed in three patients (5%); no grade ≥IV complications occurred. Eighteen patients (29%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The median follow-up was 23 mo (IQR 16-30), and recurrence occurred in six patients (10%) after a median of 8 mo (IQR 4-14). PFS was 90% (95% confidence interval: 0.86-1) and OS was 100% at 24 mo. Conclusions and clinical implications RPLND as primary treatment is an option for selected low-stage seminomas with a limited burden of disease, showing low complications and low relapse rates, with the potential to reduce long-term morbidity. Patient summary In seminoma patients with limited metastatic spread, surgery is a treatment option offering an alternative to chemotherapy or radiation. This paper covers the first 62 patients operated in Norway and Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Thor
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Anna Grenabo Bergdahl
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bjarte Almås
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Per-Olof Lundgren
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Axel Gerdtsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Dag Halvorsen
- Department of Urology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Berglind Johannsdottir
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna K. Jansson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Hellström
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Rolf Wahlqvist
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Annika Hedlund
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Olof Ståhl
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hege Sagstuen Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology - Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Kjellman
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Seelemeyer F, Pfister D, Pappesch R, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Paffenholz P, Heidenreich A. Evaluation of a miRNA-371a-3p Assay for Predicting Final Histopathology in Patients Undergoing Primary Nerve-sparing Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for Stage IIA/B Seminoma or Nonseminoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:319-322. [PMID: 37932157 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Patients with marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B seminoma or nonseminoma represent a therapeutic challenge, as 20-30% might harbor nonmalignant histologies. MicroRNA 371a-3p (miR371) may represent a biomarker with diagnostic and predictive properties in testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs). We evaluated the predictive accuracy of this biomarker in identifying the presence or absence of lymph node metastases (LNMs) in clinical stage IIA/B TGCT. In a cohort of 24 consecutive patients with marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B TGCT (n = 15 seminoma, n = 9 nonseminoma) serum miR371 was assessed 1 d before nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Histology revealed metastatic TGCT in 22/24 patients (91.7%), with positive miR371a findings for 20 of these 22 patients with metastases (90.9%). Histology revealed no malignancy in one patient and lymphoma in another, both of whom had negative miR371a findings. One additional patient with pure teratoma and one with a microscopic seminomatous LNM had false-negative miR371a findings. The miR371 assay had sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 50%. The positive predictive value was 100.0% and the negative predictive value was 75.0%. According to the data available, miR371a represents a highly reliable, personalized tumor marker for predicting the presence of low-volume retroperitoneal LNMs in marker-negative TGCT. miR371 has potential for inclusion in the diagnostic armamentarium for men with equivocal lymph nodes to facilitate avoidance of unnecessary treatment and the associated toxicity. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study demonstrates that blood tests for the biomarker miR371 are highly reliable in predicting the presence of lymph node metastases in patients with stage IIA/B testicular cancer. For patients with equivocal findings, use of this test may help in avoiding unnecessary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Seelemeyer
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roberto Pappesch
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Myers AA, Briganti A, Leibovich B, Lerner SP, Moschini M, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Spiess PE, Stenzl A, Taneja SS, Touijer KA, Kamat AM. Contemporary Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Genitourinary Cancers: Where Are We in 2023? Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:412-420. [PMID: 37980250 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lymphadenectomy during surgery for genitourinary malignancies has varying benefits. OBJECTIVE To review contemporary evidence on lymph node dissection in genitourinary cancers. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a collaborative review to summarize current evidence supporting lymph node dissection in urothelial, prostate, kidney, penile, and testis cancers. We present the evidence on patient selection and recommended dissection templates, and highlight knowledge gaps and ongoing areas of investigation. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Lymph node dissection remains the reference standard for lymph node staging. Pathologic nodal stage informs prognosis and guides adjuvant treatment. Appropriate template and patient selection are paramount to optimize outcomes and capitalize on the selective therapeutic benefits. CONCLUSIONS Accurate staging with lymphadenectomy is contingent on appropriate template selection. The cumulative benefit will depend on judicious patient selection. PATIENT SUMMARY We performed a collaborative review by a diverse group of experts in urology. We reviewed current evidence on lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda A Myers
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Seth P Lerner
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology and Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oing C, Rescigno P, Paffenholz P, Heinzelbecker J, Patrikidou A, Matulewicz RS, Huddart R. Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Stage II Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumour. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:361-363. [PMID: 39095218 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 06/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Treatment de-escalation strategies in patients with seminoma with retroperitoneal metastases are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection conducted by expert surgeons may avoid any cytotoxic treatment and related long-term side effects in ≥70% of patients with clinical stage IIA/B seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Oing
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Centre for Integrated Oncology Köln-Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Heinzelbecker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Centre Saarland and Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Anna Patrikidou
- Genitourinary Oncology Group, Departments of Cancer Medicine and Early Drug Development, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Richard S Matulewicz
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Huddart
- Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cazzaniga W, Pierorazio P, Heidenreich A. Review of Discordance Between American Urological Association and European Association of Urology Guideline Recommendations for Testicular Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:383-386. [PMID: 38849277 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
We compared the American Urological Association and the European Association of Urology guidelines on testicular cancer. We identified a few differences, in particular for management of low-volume metastatic serum tumor marker-negative stage IIA/B seminoma and nonseminoma, and of advanced and relapsing disease. Overall the rate of concordance between the guidelines is high. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared guidelines on testicular cancer published by the American Urological Association and the European Association of Urology. We found a high rate of agreement between the two guidelines, with some differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Cazzaniga
- Department of Urology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Phillip Pierorazio
- Section of Urology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yuen KL, Pandit K, Puri D, Yodkhunnatham N, Bagrodia A. Testicular cancer with small metastatic burden: optimal approach in 2024. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:204-209. [PMID: 38305430 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recent advancements in the management of clinical stage II (CS II) testicular cancer have transformed it into a predominantly curable condition. This success in treatment advancements has markedly extended patient survival. However, these treatments carry risks and morbidities, which is important to consider given the disease's impact on young men and the emerging understanding of long-term treatment consequences. RECENT FINDINGS Emerging data support primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for select CS II seminoma patients, with similar short-term outcomes to chemotherapy but less treatment intensity. Recent studies have also challenged the reflexive use of adjuvant chemotherapy for pathologic node-positive disease, as growing evidence shows low relapse rates regardless of nodal stage. Furthermore, novel biomarkers like circulating serum microRNA-371a-3p levels can help predict the presence of viable germ cell tumor at time of RPLND. SUMMARY Advances in risk stratification and therapy enable personalized de-escalation approaches for oligometastatic testicular cancer, optimizing survivorship. Upfront RPLND, reassessing adjuvant systemic therapy for RPLND pN+ disease, and novel biomarkers will shape precision treatment to achieve high cure rates with excellent quality of life. Ongoing trials of reduced-intensity regimens, accurate prognostic models, improved surgical strategy, and emerging biomarkers represent the next frontier in tailored curative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit L Yuen
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ran L, Liu Y, Jiang L. Iodine‑125 seeds combined with carboplatin in the treatment of retroperitoneal metastatic seminoma: A case report and literature review. Oncol Lett 2024; 27:156. [PMID: 38426154 PMCID: PMC10902756 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Testicular seminoma is a relatively rare malignant tumor, with the most common site of recurrence and metastasis being the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Since seminoma is highly sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, even if it metastasizes, its cure rate is still >95%. However, the long-term toxicity and side effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy cannot be ignored. Iodine-125 seeds represent a low-energy radioactive source that kills tumor cells while protecting the surrounding normal tissues, and brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds has been widely used for the treatment of various malignancies. In addition, carboplatin can be used as an alternative to cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of pulmonary toxicity, neurological damage and renal toxicity. In the present study, a case in which iodine-125 seeds were implanted for the treatment of retroperitoneal metastatic seminoma is reported. The patient was diagnosed with postoperative recurrence of seminoma that metastasized to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Since the tumor was large and surrounded blood vessels, surgical intervention and external radiotherapy were not considered. Moreover, considering the potential long-term toxic side effects of standard chemotherapy, a treatment plan for the patient using iodine-125 seed implantation combined with carboplatin (AUC7) therapy was finally formulated. No disease recurrence or toxic reactions occurred during the 3-year follow-up after treatment. The present case therefore demonstrated the antitumor efficacy and reduced toxicity of iodine-125 seeds combined with carboplatin for treating seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linhao Ran
- Department of Radiology, People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District, Chongqing 401320, P.R. China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Radiology, People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District, Chongqing 401320, P.R. China
| | - Li Jiang
- Department of Ultrasound, People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District, Chongqing 401320, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dason S, Lee CT. Paradigm Shifting Research: Key Studies in Urologic Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2529-2537. [PMID: 38300402 PMCID: PMC10908645 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14838-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genitourinary malignancies have a substantial impact on men and women in the USA as they include three of the ten most common cancers (prostate, renal, and bladder). Other urinary tract cancers are less common (testis and penile) but still have profound treatment implications related to potential deficits in sexual, urinary, and reproductive function. Evidenced-based practice remains the cornerstone of treatment for urologic malignancies. METHODS The authors reviewed the literature in consideration of the four top articles influencing clinical practice in the prior calendar year, 2022. RESULTS The PROTECT trial demonstrates favorable 15-years outcomes for active monitoring of localized prostate cancer. The SEMS trial establishes retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a viable option for patients with seminoma of the testis with limited retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. CheckMate 274 supports adjuvant immunotherapy following radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a high risk of recurrence. Data reported from the IROCK consortium reinforce stereotactic ablative radiotherapy as an option for localized renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION The care for patients with urologic cancers has been greatly improved through advances in surgical, medical, and radiation oncologic treatments realized through prospective randomized clinical trials and large multicenter collaborative groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Dason
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Margulis V, Bagrodia A, Bekku K, Klemm J, Matsukawa A, Alimohammadi A, Motlagh RS, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Shariat SF. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage II seminoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and oncological effectiveness. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:102-109. [PMID: 38360519 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
To evaluate the oncological outcomes and safety of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with clinical stage (CS) II seminomatous testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT). A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted on July 2023 to identify relevant studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The pooled recurrence rate and treatment-related complications were calculated using a random effects model. Overall 8 studies published between 1997 and 2023 including a total of 355 patients were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis with the overall median follow-up of 38 months. The overall and infield recurrence rate were 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.22) and 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00-0.11), respectively. The overall pooled rate of ≥ Clavien Dindo grade III complications was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.01-0.10); there was no significant heterogeneity (I^2 = 35.10%, P = 0.19). Antegrade ejaculation was preserved with the overall pooled rate of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00); there was no significant heterogeneity on Chi-square and I2 tests (I^2 = 0.00%, P = 0.58). Primary RPLND is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with CS II seminomatous TGCT resulting highly promising cure rates combined with low treatment-associated adverse events, at medium-term follow-up. However, owing to the lack of comparative studies to the current standard of care and the limited follow-up, individual decision must be made with the informed patient in a shared decision process together with a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arman Alimohammadi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Farkouh A, Shete K, Cheng KW, Buell MI, Hu B. A systematic review of pN0 testicular seminoma: a new clinical entity and future directions. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:476-482. [PMID: 37968167 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testicular seminoma with enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes has received increased consideration and exposed a new clinical entity: pN0 disease. Enlarged, nonmetastatic retroperitoneal lymph nodes provide insight into the natural history of seminoma while offering a benchmark for improving the accuracy of staging. The purpose of this systematic review was to report the pN0 rates, describe risk factors associated with it, and discuss emerging research that may reduce its incidence. We performed a systemic review of published literature on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, as well as oncology meeting abstracts evaluating histology of lymph nodes in patients with testicular seminoma treated primarily with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Studies were excluded if histology was not reported. A total of 15 publications and abstracts were included. Although study designs were heterogeneous, there was a minimal risk of bias. Overall, the reported pN0 rates were 0% to 22%. In prospective clinical trials it was 9% to 16%. The presence of pN0 was associated with preoperative smaller lymph nodes, a solitary enlarged lymph node, or negative serum miRNA-371. The incidence of pN0 seminoma is concerning as it points to a potential historical overtreatment; however, it also represents an important inflection for testicular cancer research as quantifiable improvements in clinical staging will translate to clear benefits to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala'a Farkouh
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Kanha Shete
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Kai Wen Cheng
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Matthew I Buell
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Brian Hu
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA.
| |
Collapse
|