Diagnostic Performance of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Targeted plus Regional Biopsy Approach in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Regional Versus Systematic Biopsy in Addition to Targeted Biopsy: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intensification of targeted biopsy (TBx) around a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible lesion with regional biopsy (RBx) could obviate the need for systematic biopsy (SBx). We aimed to compare the detection yields of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa)-defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group ≥2-between TBx + RBx and the reference standard (TBx + SBx).

METHODS

RBx was defined as perilesional or ipsilateral biopsy. A literature search was conducted up to September 2023 using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Included studies were eligible when presenting data from SBx, TBx, and TBx + RBx cores and their detection yields. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria were used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Twenty-one studies were included for a meta-analysis. The overall detection yield of csPCa was not statistically different between TBx + SBX and TBx + RBx (46.1% vs 44.2%; odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.16, p = 0.07); similar findings were found also for ISUP grade group ≥3 prostate cancer (PCa; OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92-1.22, p = 0.43) and in different subgroup analyses. TBx + SBx was associated with higher cancer detection of ISUP grade group 1 PCa (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.30, p = 0.008). The main limitations include the retrospective nature of most of the selected studies, heterogeneity of RBx definition, and template.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our study supports the use of the TBx + RBx template in the early detection pathway for the detection of csPCa. SBx can be omitted when targeting lesions visible on MRI.

PATIENT SUMMARY

A prostate biopsy strategy consisting of taking biopsy in and around an magnetic resonance imaging-visible lesion reduces the risk of detecting indolent prostate cancers without affecting the detection of aggressive tumours.

Systematic Prostate Biopsy Versus Perilesional Sampling: If It Isn't Broke, Why Fix It?

The 2024 EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines for prostate cancer recommend a targeted and perilesional biopsy (TPLBx) strategy for primary diagnosis. In comparison to the classical approach of combined targeted and systematic biopsy, TPLBx may reduce overdiagnosis of insignificant cancers and mitigate the grade shift associated with targeted biopsy.

Biopsy strategies in the era of mpMRI: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Since its initial description the prostate biopsy technique for detection of prostate cancer (PCA) has constantly evolved. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been proven to have a sensitivity exceeding 90% to detect the index lesion. This narrative review discusses the evidence around several biopsy strategies, especially in the context of patients that might be eligible for focal therapy.

METHOD

A non-systematic literature research was performed on February 15th 2024 using the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Web of Science and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

The transrectal (TR) route is associated with an increased postoperative sepsis rate, even with adequate antibiotic prophylaxis. The transperineal (TP) route is now recommended by international guidelines, firstly for its decreased rate of urosepsis. Recent evidence shows a non-inferiority of TP compared to TR route, and even a higher detection rate of clinically significant PCA (csPCA) in the anterior and apical region, that are usually difficult to target using the TR route. Several targeting techniques (cognitive, software-fusion or in-bore) enhance our ability to provide an accurate risk assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness and burden, while reducing the number of cores and reducing the number of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCA). While MRI-TB have proven their role, the role of systematic biopsies (SB) is still important because it detects 5-16% of csPCA that would have been missed by MRI-TB alone. The strategies of SB depend mainly on the route used (TR vs. TP) and the number of cores to be collected (10-12 cores vs. saturation biopsies vs. trans-perineal template mapping-biopsies or Ginsburg Protocol vs. regional biopsies).

CONCLUSION

Several biopsy strategies have been described and should be known when assessing patients for focal therapy. Because MRI systematically under evaluates the lesion size, systematic biopsies, and especially perilesional biopsies, can help to increase sensitivity at the cost of an increased number of cores.

[Diagnostic efficacy of targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy in prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4-5]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy in prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prostate imaging reporting and data system v2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) 4-5.

METHODS

From January 2023 to October 2023, patients who underwent prostate biopsy for the first time with total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) ≤ 20 ng/mL and had a multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) PI-RADS of 4-5 in Peking University First Hospital were prospectively collected. All the patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive fusion targeted biopsy (3 cores) followed by systematic biopsy (12 cores). Various hypothetical biopsy schemes were defined based on different biopsy sites. The detection effectiveness of targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy and other biopsy schemes for prostate cancer were compared using Cochran's Q and McNemar tests.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients were enrolled, of whom 204 (80.0%) were detected with prostate adenocarcinoma and 187 (73.3%) were clinically significant with prostate cancer (csPCa). The detection rate of PCa with targeted biopsy was significantly lower than that of targeted biopsy combined with 12-core system biopsy (77.3% vs. 80.0%, P=0.016), and 71.4% (5/7) of the missed patients was csPCa. There was no significant difference in the detection rate between targeted biopsy combined with 4-core regional system biopsy and 12-core system biopsy (P>0.999), and 1 case of csPCa and clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa) were missed. There was no significant difference in the detection rate of PCa between targeted combined regional system biopsy and targeted combined lateral or traditional 6-core system biopsy and the number of cores were reduced. Missed diagnosis of targeted biopsy was correlated with the maximum diameter of the lesion (OR=0.086, 95%CI: 0.013-0.562, P=0.010). For the patients with PI-RADS 5, only 1 case of PCa was missed in 122 cases by targeted biopsy alone. For patients with PI-RADS 4, 6 PCa cases were missed among the 133 patients with targeted biopsy alone, and 1 case of csPCa and cisPCa were missed by targeted biopsy combined with regional system biopsy. The statistics of positive core counts for different biopsy schemes indicated that targeted combined regional systematic biopsy had a higher proportion of positive cores second only to targeted biopsy alone.

CONCLUSION

Targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy has high diagnostic efficacy in patients with PI-RADS 4-5 and can be considered as one of the improved schemes for combined biopsy. Targeted biopsy alone is also a feasible option for patients for patients with a PI-RADS score of 5.

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa.

METHODS

The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This article is the summary of the guidelines for "curable" prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is "found" through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with "active surveillance", a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making.

Comparison of Regional Saturation Biopsy, Targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Levels of 4-20 ng/ml: A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided targeted biopsy (TB) to identify suspicious prostate lesions, it may still miss clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) or result in false-negative findings. Recent evidence suggests that combining biopsies taken from within and around magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions can improve the detection of csPCa.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the regional saturation biopsy (RSB) method, involving template-based nine-core biopsies for suspected regions, with that of the MRI-directed TB and/or the systematic biopsy (SB) methods in biopsy-naïve patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ranging from 4 to 20 ng/ml.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial included 434 biopsy-naïve patients with suspected lesions on mpMRI and PSA levels between 4 and 20 ng/ml (from January 2022 to July 2023).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The detection rates of csPCa for the RSB, TB, and SB methods were analyzed using the McNemar test for intrapatient comparisons. The Fisher's exact test was used for comparisons between RSB and TB.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The RSB approach yielded a significantly higher detection rate of csPCa than both the TB approach (44.1% vs 31.8%, p = 0.01) and the SB approach (44.1% vs 34.1%, p = 0.03). The RSB approach exhibited a comparable detection rate of csPCa (44.1% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.3) to the combined approach (TB + SB), while requiring fewer biopsy cores and a higher positive core number to avoid sampling the entire prostate gland (32.7% vs 18.3%, p < 0.001). Upon conducting a whole-mount histopathological analysis, it was observed that the RSB approach successfully identified 97% (32 out of 33) of the prostate cancer foci as the index lesion, whereas only 59.18% (29 out of 49) were classified as index lesions using the SB approach. Furthermore, mpMRI underestimated the average diameter of histological tumor size by a median of 0.76 cm, highlighting the importance of an optimal biopsy area for the RSB procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with suspected lesions on mpMRI and PSA levels between 4 and 20 ng/ml, the RSB approach has shown improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, accurately identifying index lesions, and minimizing biopsy cores compared with the MRI-directed TB and SB approaches.

PATIENT SUMMARY

For patients with suspected lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen levels between 4 and 20 ng/ml, the regional saturation biopsy method provides enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, as well as precise identification of index lesions, surpassing both magnetic resonance imaging-directed targeted biopsy and the systematic biopsy method.

Transperineal 3-Core Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Plus Laterally 6-Core Systematic Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

It is important to explore strategies reducing the number of SB cores taken to minimize biopsy-related morbidity and patient's discomfort during biopsy. This study aims to optimize prostate biopsy procedures by reducing the number of systematic biopsy (SB) cores while preserving cancer detection rates in the era of combined biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively recruited patients with ≥1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions and they underwent transperineal combined 12-core SB+3-core targeted prostate biopsy (TB, reference standard). New strategy was defined as a laterally 6-core SB+3-core TB. Patients were served as their own control. Detection rates for overall prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) were compared among the standard SB, MRI-TB, 6-core SB +3-core TB, and reference standard. Pathology consistency was assessed using the Kappa test.

RESULTS

A total of 204 men were included, of which 111 (54.41%) and 92 (45.10%) harbored overall PCa and csPCa. Referenced combined biopsy detected significantly 6.86% (P = .0005) or 4.90% (P = .0044) more csPCa than performing only SB or 3-core TB, but was comparable to the new biopsy strategy. (45.10% vs. 43.14%, P = .1336) Similar results persisted when limiting patients in biopsy-naïve men or stratified by Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores, PSAD, and index lesion parameters. Additionally, performing 6-core SB+3-core TB demonstrated high consistency with reference standard in grade group distribution (Kappa coefficient: 0.952 for all, 0.961 for biopsy-naïve men) and achieved superior sensitivity of 95.7% (All: 95% CI: 89.2%-99.8%) and 96.9% (Biopsy-naïve: 95% CI: 91.1%-99.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 6-core SB+3-core TB approach maintains expected detection rates while reducing the total core count, offering a promising alternative to the reference standard, which may help to tailor transperineal combined biopsy procedures.

MRI-Targeted Prostate Fusion Biopsy: What Are We Missing outside the Target? Implications for Treatment Planning

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the added diagnostic value of systematic biopsies (SBx) after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies (TBx) and the presence of prostate cancer (PCa) outside MRI targets, in a prospective, contemporary, multicentric series of fusion biopsy patients. Methods: We collected data on 962 consecutive patients who underwent fusion biopsy between 2022 and 2024. Prostate cancer was considered clinically significant (csPCa) in the case of grade ≥ 2. Median test and Fisher exact chi-square tests were used. To identify predictors of out-field positivity, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Prostate cancer and csPCa were detected by TBx only in 56% and 50%, respectively, and by SBx only in 55% and 45%, respectively (p < 0.001). Prostate cancer and csPCa were diagnosed by TBx in 100 (10%) and 82 (8%) SBx-negative cases and by SBx in 86 (9%) and 54 (6%) TBx-negative cases (p < 0.001). Tumors outside MRI targets were found in 213 (33%) cases in the same lobe and 208 (32%) in the contralateral lobe, most of them being csPCa. Predictors of out-field contralateral PCa were positive DRE (HR 1.50, p 0.03), PSA density ≥ 0.15 (HR 2.20, p < 0.001), and PI-RADS score 5 (HR 2.04, p 0.01). Conclusions: Both TBx and SBx identify a non-negligible proportion of csPCa when the other modality is negative. SBx after TBx should always be considered given the risk of missing other csPCa foci within the prostate, especially in patients with positive DRE, PSA density ≥ 0.15, and PIRADS 5 lesions.

Diagnostic performance of regional systematic biopsy for prostate cancer stratified by PI-RADS and histologic zones

OBJECTIVES

To explore the diagnostic performance of targeted biopsy (TB) combined with regional systematic biopsy (RSB) in patients with different Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and histologic zones for prostate lesions.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 1301 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI followed by combined MRI/US fusion-guided TB+systematic biopsy (SB) between January 2019 and October 2022. RSB was defined as the four perilesional SB cores adjacent to an MRI-positive lesion. Cancer detection rates were calculated for TB + SB, TB, SB, and TB + RSB, while the McNemar test was utilized for multiple comparisons among them. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different Pl-RADS and histologic zones.

RESULTS

Of 1301 included participants (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 63-74 years), 16,104 total biopsy cores were performed. TB + RSB detected clinically significant prostate cancer in 70.9% (922/1301) of patients, which was significantly higher than TB (67.4%, p < 0.001) or SB (67.5%, p < 0.001) but similar to TB + SB (71.0%, p = 0.50). Compared with TB + SB, TB + RSB required fewer median biopsy cores (6.3 vs. 12.4, p < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of positive cores (56.3% vs. 39.0%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that TB had outstanding sensitivity for detecting PI-RADS 5 lesions in the PZ.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TB + SB, TB + RSB achieved a similar clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate while requiring fewer biopsy cores and exhibiting higher diagnostic efficiency.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

For MRI-positive prostate lesions, targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy could serve as an alternative diagnostic approach to targeted biopsy combined with systematic biopsy.

KEY POINTS

The scheme of prostate biopsy needs to be optimized. Regional systematic biopsy decreases the total number of cores taken. Targeted biopsies combined with regional systematic biopsies improve prostate diagnostic efficiency.

A PSMA PET/CT-based risk model for prediction of concordance between targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in detecting prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study is to investigate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in improving the concordance between mpMRI-TB and combined biopsy (CB) in detecting PCa.

METHODS

115 consecutive men with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT prior to prostate biopsy were included for analysis. PSMA intensity, quantified as maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) and other clinical characteristics were evaluated relative to biopsy concordance using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A prediction model was developed based on the identified parameters, and a dynamic online diagnostic nomogram was constructed, with its discrimination evaluated through the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and consistency assessed using calibration plots. To assess its clinical applicability, a decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed, while internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping methods.

RESULTS

Concordance between mpMRI-TB and CB occurred in 76.5% (88/115) of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed that SUVmax (OR= 0.952; 95% CI 0.917-0.988; P= 0.010) and ADCmin (OR= 1.006; 95% CI 1.003-1.010; P= 0.001) were independent risk factors for biopsy concordance. The developed model showed a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of 0.67, 0.78, 0.81 and 0.78 in the full sample. The calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram's predicted outcomes closely resembled the ideal curve, indicating consistency between predicted and actual outcomes. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis (DCA) highlighted the clinical net benefit achievable across various risk thresholds. These findings were reinforced by internal validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed prediction model based on SUVmax and ADCmin showed practical value in guiding the optimization of prostate biopsy pattern. Lower SUVmax and Higher ADCmin values are associated with greater confidence in implementing mono-TB and safely avoiding SB, effectively balancing benefits and risks.

The Impact of Omitting Contralateral Systematic Biopsy on the Surgical Planning of Patients with a Unilateral Suspicious Lesion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

Background and objective

A combined approach of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and bilateral systematic biopsy (SBx) is advised in patients who have an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa). The diagnostic gain of SBx in detecting PCa for treatment planning of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is unknown. This study aims to determine the impact of omitting contralateral SBx on the surgical planning of patients undergoing RARP in terms of nerve-sparing surgery (NSS) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND).

Methods

Case files from 80 men with biopsy-proven PCa were studied. All men had a unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI, and underwent TBx and bilateral SBx. Case files were presented to five urologists for the surgical planning of RARP. Each case file was presented randomly using two different sets of information: (1) results of TBx + bilateral SBx, and (2) results of TBx + ipsilateral SBx. The urologists assessed whether they would perform NSS and/or ePLND.

Key findings and limitations

A change in the surgical plan concerning NSS on the contralateral side was observed in 9.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4-12.2) of cases. Additionally, the indication for ePLND changed in 5.3% (95% CI 3.3-7.9) of cases. Interobserver agreement based on Fleiss' kappa changed from 0.44 to 0.15 for the indication of NSS and from 0.84 to 0.83 for the indication of ePLND.

Conclusions and clinical implications

In our series, the diagnostic information obtained from contralateral SBx has limited impact on the surgical planning of patients with a unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI scheduled to undergo RARP.

Patient summary

In patients with one-sided prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging, omitting biopsies on the other side rarely changed the surgical plan with respect to nerve-sparing surgery and the indication to perform extended lymph node dissection.

Prostate MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: Update and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent decades, there has been an increasing role for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). The purpose of this review is to provide an update and outline future directions for the role of MRI in the detection of csPC.

RECENT FINDINGS

In diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer pre-biopsy, advances include our understanding of MRI-targeted biopsy, the role of biparametric MRI (non-contrast) and changing indications, for example the role of MRI in screening for prostate cancer. Furthermore, the role of MRI in identifying csPC is maturing, with emphasis on standardization of MRI reporting in active surveillance (PRECISE), clinical staging (EPE grading, MET-RADS-P) and recurrent disease (PI-RR, PI-FAB). Future directions of prostate MRI in detecting csPC include quality improvement, artificial intelligence and radiomics, positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI and MRI-directed therapy.

SUMMARY

The utility of MRI in detecting csPC has been demonstrated in many clinical scenarios, initially from simply diagnosing csPC pre-biopsy, now to screening, active surveillance, clinical staging, and detection of recurrent disease. Continued efforts should be undertaken not only to emphasize the reporting of prostate MRI quality, but to standardize reporting according to the appropriate clinical setting.

A novel biopsy scheme for prostate cancer: targeted and regional systematic biopsy

PURPOSE

To explore a novel biopsy scheme for prostate cancer (PCa), and test the detection rate and pathological agreement of standard systematic (SB) + targeted (TB) biopsy and novel biopsy scheme.

METHODS

Positive needles were collected from 194 patients who underwent SB + TB (STB) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). Our novel biopsy scheme, targeted and regional systematic biopsy (TrSB) was defined as TB + regional SB (4 SB-needles closest to the TB-needles). The McNemar test was utilized to compare the detection rate performance for clinical significant PCa (csPCa) and clinical insignificant PCa (ciPCa). Moreover, the accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were investigated. The agreement between the different biopsy schemes grade group (GG) and RP GG were assessed. The concordance between the biopsy and the RP GG was evaluated using weighted κ coefficient analyses.

RESULTS

In this study, the overall detection rate for csPCa was 83.5% (162 of 194) when SB and TB were combined. TrSB showed better NPV than TB (97.0% vs. 74.4%). Comparing to STB, the TB-detection rate of csPCa had a significant difference (p < 0.01), while TrSB showed no significant difference (p > 0.999). For ciPCa, the overall detection rate was 16.5% (32 of 194). TrSB showed better PPV (96.6% vs. 83.3%) and NPV (97.6% vs. 92.9%) than TB. Comparing to STB, the detection rate of both schemes showed no significant difference (p = 0.077 and p = 0.375). All three schemes GG showed poor agreement with RP GG (TB: 43.3%, TrSB: 46.4%, STB: 45.9%). Using weighted κ, all three schemes showed no difference (TB: 0.48, TrSB: 0.51, STB: 0.51). In our subgroup analysis (PI-RADS = 4/5, n = 154), all three schemes almost showed no difference (Weighted κ: TB-0.50, TrSB-0.51, STB-0.50).

CONCLUSION

Our novel biopsy scheme TrSB (TB + 4 closest SB needles) may reduce 8 cores of biopsy compared with STB (standard SB + TB), which also showed better csPCa detection rate than TB only, but the same as STB. The pathological agreement between three different biopsy schemes (TB/TrSB/STB) GG and RP GG showed no difference.

PIRADS≥4 MRI lesion: Is performing systematic biopsies still essential for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer?

INTRODUCTION

In the era of targeted prostate biopsies, the necessity of performing randomized biopsies systematically is under question. Our objective is to evaluate the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), defined by presence of ISUP≥2 prostate cancer, diagnosed only on randomized cores in case of a PIRADS≥4 target lesion on MRI. The secondary objective is to evaluate whether specific variables can predict the presence of undetected csPCa in targeted biopsies.

METHODS

Retrospective data on targeted biopsies performed from 2015 to 2021 in our hospital were collected. Procedures were performed with MRI/Transrectal US fusion Trinity platform from Koelis®. All the MRI images were reviewed and the targets were classified using the PIRADS V2.1 classification. Inclusion criteria comprised procedures featuring at least one PIRADS≥4 targeted lesion were included. All procedures consisted 1-4 targeted cores and 12-core systematic biopsy.

RESULTS

We included 358 patients. In 44 patients (12.3%) csPCa was exclusively detected in randomized cores. Among these cases, only 12 patients (27.2%) showed no cancer on the targeted biopsies. Merely 4 patients (9.09%) lacked csPCa-positive cores on the same side as the index lesion. Factors such as PSA, PSA density, prostate volume, and digital rectal examination showed no significant association with the presence of csPCa exclusively on randomized cores. Likewise, the size, location, and PIRADS classification of the target demonstrated no significant impact.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that in 12.3% of cases, targeted biopsies alone are insufficient for detecting the presence of csPCa. As such, systematic biopsies remain necessary to date.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Targeted Prostate Biopsies-What the Radiologist Needs to Know

The emergence of multiparametric MR imaging has enabled a more reliable targeted approach to diagnosis of prostate cancer. Targeted biopsies are central to the MR imaging-dependent pathway to prostate cancer diagnosis and potentially improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. In a targeted biopsy, tissue samples are obtained from suspicious regions identified on a prebiopsy diagnostic MR imaging. This article describes and compares principles, advantages, and disadvantages of the different strategies available for targeting an MR imaging-visible suspicious lesion.

Outcomes of a Diagnostic Pathway for Prostate Cancer Based on Biparametric MRI and MRI-Targeted Biopsy Only in a Large Teaching Hospital

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer (PCa) balance detection rates and burden. MRI impacts biopsy indication and strategy.

METHODS

A prospectively collected cohort database (N = 496) of men referred for elevated PSA and/or abnormal DRE was analyzed. All underwent biparametric MRI (3 Tesla scanner) and ERSPC prostate risk-calculator. Indication for biopsy was PIRADS ≥ 3 or risk-calculator ≥ 20%. Both targeted (cognitive-fusion) and systematic cores were combined. A hypothetical full-MRI-based pathway was retrospectively studied, omitting systematic biopsies in: (1) PIRADS 1-2 but risk-calculator ≥ 20%, (2) PIRADS ≥ 3, receiving targeted biopsy-cores only.

RESULTS

Significant PCa (GG ≥ 2) was detected in 120 (24%) men. Omission of systematic cores in cases with PIRADS 1-2 but risk-calculator ≥ 20%, would result in 34% less biopsy indication, not-detecting 7% significant tumors. Omission of systematic cores in PIRADS ≥ 3, only performing targeted biopsies, would result in a decrease of 75% cores per procedure, not detecting 9% significant tumors. Diagnosis of insignificant PCa dropped by 52%. PCa undetected by targeted cores only, were ipsilateral to MRI-index lesions in 67%.

CONCLUSIONS

A biparametric MRI-guided PCa diagnostic pathway would have missed one out of six cases with significant PCa, but would have considerably reduced the number of biopsy procedures, cores, and insignificant PCa. Further refinement or follow-up may identify initially undetected cases. Center-specific data on the performance of the diagnostic pathway is required.

Perilesional Targeted Biopsy Combined with MRI-TRUS Image Fusion-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy: An Analysis According to PI-RADS Scores

A prostate-targeted biopsy (TB) core is usually collected from a site where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicates possible cancer. However, the extent of the lesion is difficult to accurately predict using MRI or TB alone. Therefore, we performed several biopsies around the TB site (perilesional [p] TB) and analyzed the association between the positive cores obtained using TB and pTB and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores. This retrospective study included patients who underwent prostate biopsies. The extent of pTB was defined as the area within 10 mm of a TB site. A total of 162 eligible patients were enrolled. Prostate cancer (PCa) was diagnosed in 75.2% of patients undergoing TB, with a positivity rate of 50.7% for a PI-RADS score of 3, 95.8% for a PI-RADS score of 4, and 100% for a PI-RADS score of 5. Patients diagnosed with PCa according to both TB and pTB had significantly higher positivity rates for PI-RADS scores of 4 and 5 than for a PI-RADS score of 3 (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0009, respectively). Additional pTB may be performed in patients with PI-RADS ≥ 4 regions of interest for assessing PCa malignancy.

[Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy : The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND

Transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). It requires a precise and safe technique for sample acquisition.

OBJECTIVE

Several approaches will be discussed to avoid overdiagnosis, false-negative results, and complications of the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed national and European guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, as well as prospective and retrospective studies to describe current trends in indication and performance of biopsies.

RESULTS

Incorporation of risk calculators and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into daily routine reduces biopsy rates and results in a more precise diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Combination of random- and MRI-fusion guided biopsy-but also extending the radius of sampling by 10 mm beyond the MRI lesion and a transperineal (TP) sampling approach - lead to a higher tumor-detection rate. Bleeding is the most common complication after prostate biopsy and is usually self-limiting. Postbiopsy infection rates can be reduced through TP biopsy.

CONCLUSION

TR MRI-fusion guided biopsy is a widely acknowledged tool in primary diagnostics of csPC. Higher detection rates and safety can be achieved through a TP sampling approach.

Index lesion contouring on prostate MRI for targeted MRI/US fusion biopsy - Evaluation of mismatch between radiologists and urologists

PURPOSE

Mistargeting of focal lesions due to inaccurate segmentations can lead to false-negative findings on MRI-guided targeted biopsies. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine inter-reader agreement of prostate index lesion segmentations from actual biopsy data between urologists and radiologists.

METHOD

Consecutive patients undergoing transperineal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy for PI-RADS 3-5 lesions between January 2020 and December 2021 were included. Agreement between segmentations on T2w-images between urologists and radiologists was assessed with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95 % Hausdorff distance (95 % HD). Differences in similarity scores were compared using Wilcoxon test. Differences depending on lesion features (size, zonal location, PI-RADS scores, lesion distinctness) were tested with Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation with prostate signal-intensity homogeneity score (PSHS) and lesion size was tested with Spearman's rank correlation.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (mean age 64.9 ± 7.1y, median serum PSA 6.5 [4.33-10.00]) were included. Mean similarity scores were statistically significantly lower between urologists and radiologists compared to radiologists only (DSC 0.41 ± 0.24 vs. 0.59 ± 0.23, p < 0.01; 95 %HD 6.38 ± 5.45 mm vs. 4.47 ± 4.12 mm, p < 0.01). There was a moderate and strong positive correlation between DSC scores and lesion size for segmentations from urologists and radiologists (ρ = 0.331, p = 0.002) and radiologists only (ρ = 0.501, p < 0.001). Similarity scores were worse in lesions ≤ 10 mm while other lesion features did not significantly influence similarity scores.

CONCLUSION

There is significant mismatch of prostate index lesion segmentations between urologists and radiologists. Segmentation agreement positively correlates with lesion size. PI-RADS scores, zonal location, lesion distinctness, and PSHS show no significant impact on segmentation agreement. These findings could underpin benefits of perilesional biopsies.

Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted Biopsy with Four Cores Versus Target Saturation Biopsy with Nine Cores in Transperineal Prostate Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TB) facilitate accurate detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). However, it remains unclear how targeted cores should be applied for accurate diagnosis of csPC.

OBJECTIVE

To assess csPC detection rates for two target-directed MRI/transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion biopsy approaches, conventional TB and target saturation biopsy (TS).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a prospective single-center study of outcomes for transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsies for 170 men. Half of the men (n = 85) were randomized to conventional TB with four cores per lesion and half (n = 85) to TS with nine cores. Biopsies were performed by three experienced board-certified urologists.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

PC and csPC (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2) detection rates for systematic biopsy (SB), TB, and TS were analyzed using McNemar's test for intrapatient comparisons and Fisher's exact test for TS versus TB. A combination of targeted biopsy (TS or TB) and SB served as the reference.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

According to the reference, csPC was diagnosed for 57 men in the TS group and 36 men in the TB group. Of these, TS detected 57/57 csPC cases and TB detected 33/36 csPC cases (p = 0.058). Detection of Gleason grade group 1 disease was 10/12 cases with TS and 8/17 cases with TB (p = 0.055). In addition, TS detected 97% of 63 csPC lesions, compared to 86% with TB (p = 0.1). Limitations include the single-center design, the limited generalizability owing to the transperineal biopsy route, the lack of central review of pathology and radical prostatectomy correlation, and uneven distributions of csPC prevalence, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesions, men with two or more PI-RADS ≥3 lesions, and prostate-specific antigen density between the groups, which may have affected the results.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, rates of csPC detection did not significantly differ between TS and TB.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we investigated two targeted approaches for taking prostate biopsy samples after observation of suspicious lesions on prostate scans. We found that the rates of detection of prostate cancer did not significantly differ between the two approaches.

External validation of the Rotterdam prostate cancer risk calculator within a high-risk Dutch clinical cohort

PURPOSE

This study aims to externally validate the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (RPCRC)-3/4 and RPCRC-MRI within a Dutch clinical cohort.

METHODS

Men subjected to prostate biopsies, between 2018 and 2021, due to a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) were retrospectively included. The performance of the RPCRC-3/4 and RPCRC-MRI was analyzed in terms of discrimination, calibration and net benefit. In addition, the need for recalibration and adjustment of risk thresholds for referral was investigated. Clinically significant (cs) PCa was defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4.

RESULTS

A total of 1575 men were included in the analysis. PCa was diagnosed in 63.2% (996/1575) of men and csPCa in 41.7% (656/1575) of men. Use of the RPCRC-3/4 could have prevented 37.3% (587/1575) of all MRIs within this cohort, thereby missing 18.3% (120/656) of csPCa diagnoses. After recalibration and adjustment of risk thresholds to 20% for PCa and 10% for csPCa, use of the recalibrated RPCRC-3/4 could have prevented 15.1% (238/1575) of all MRIs, resulting in 5.3% (35/656) of csPCa diagnoses being missed. The performance of the RPCRC-MRI was good; use of this risk calculator could have prevented 10.7% (169/1575) of all biopsies, resulting in 1.2% (8/656) of csPCa diagnoses being missed.

CONCLUSION

The RPCRC-3/4 underestimates the probability of having csPCa within this Dutch clinical cohort, resulting in significant numbers of csPCa diagnoses being missed. For optimal performance of a risk calculator in a specific cohort, evaluation of its performance within the population under study is essential.

Current role of systematic biopsy in diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in primary combined MRI-targeted biopsy: a high-volume single-center study

PURPOSE

Additive systematic biopsy (SB) contributes to prostate cancer (PCA) detection in MRI-targeted biopsy (TB). However, the reasons for this are not yet clear. We compared the performance of TB, SB and the combined approach (CB) in biopsy-naive men to determine the added value of SB for tumor grading and spatial tumor distribution.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-nine men with PI-RADS 3-5 graded lesions who underwent CB were enrolled. Data were prospectively collected, and cancer detection rates (CDR) were compared at patient and lesion level. Gleason grade up- and down-grading from biopsy to prostatectomy specimens (n = 56; 21.6%) were determined. Clinically significant cancer (csPCA) was defined as Gleason grade ≥ 2.

RESULTS

CDR by CB based on PI-RADS categories 3, 4 and 5 for PCA were 24%, 72% and 98% and 17%, 64% and 96% for csPCA. CB detected more PCA and csPCA than TB (p < 0.001). However, TB showed higher efficiency, defined as CDR per biopsy core, for PCA and csPCA in PI-RADS 4-5 rated patients (p < 0.001). Concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy grading was highest in CB with misdiagnosis of csPCA in 25% of men. TB missed cancer attributed to the index lesion in 10.2% and underestimated csPCA in 7%. In these cases, 76% of csPCA were detected and 85% were upgraded to csPCA by SB in adjacent sectors.

CONCLUSION

SB cannot be safely abundant without increased diagnostic uncertainty. When TB missed csPCA, SB detected it close to the MRI-target lesion. Therefore, perifocal biopsies could potentially replace 12-core SB with increased efficiency in taking manageable risks.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared with Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer

Background

It remains uncertain whether transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsies can be omitted and rely solely on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsies (MRI-TBx) in biopsy-naïve men suspected of prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective

To compare PCa detection in biopsy-naïve men between systematic biopsy and MRI-TBx.

Design, setting, and participants

A prospective cohort study was conducted in a Dutch teaching hospital. Consecutive patients with suspected PCa, no history of biopsy, and no clinical suspicion of metastasis underwent both TRUS-guided systematic biopsies and MRI-TBx by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-ultrasound fusion, including sham biopsies in case of negative mpMRI.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as group ≥2 on the International Society of Urological Pathology grading, was detected.

Results and limitations

The overall prevalence of csPCa, irrespective of biopsy technique, was 37.4% (132/353) in our population. MRI-TBx were performed in 263/353 (74.5%) patients with suspicious mpMRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] ≥3). The detection rates for csPCa were 39.5% for MRI-TBx and 42.9% for systematic biopsies. The added values, defined as the additional percentages of patients with csPCa detected by adding one biopsy technique, were 8.7% for the systematic biopsies and 5.3% for MRI-TBx. In patients with nonsuspicious mpMRI, five cases (6%) of csPCa were found by systematic biopsies.

Conclusions

This study in biopsy-naïve patients suspected for PCa showed that systematic biopsies have added value to MRI-TBx alone in patients with mpMRI PI-RADS >2.

Patient summary

We studied magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy for diagnosing prostate cancer and compared it with the standard method of prostate biopsy. Standard systematic biopsies cannot be omitted in patients with suspicious MRI, as they add to the detection of significant prostate cancer.

An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”

Background

Considering that most men benefit diagnostically from increased sampling of index lesions, limiting systematic biopsy (SBx) to the region around the index lesion could potentially minimize overdetection while maintaining the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a hypothetical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach.

Design, setting, and participants

This single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively generated data included all biopsy-naïve men with unilateral MRI-positive lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category ≥3), undergoing both MRI-directed targeted biopsies and SBx. Grade group 2–5 cancers were considered csPCa.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The diagnostic performance of a targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach was compared with that of a targeted-plus-systematic biopsy approach. The primary outcome was the detection of csPCa. Secondary outcomes included the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCa) and the number of total biopsy cores.

Results and limitations

A total of 235 men were included in the analysis; csPCa and ciPCa were detected, respectively, in 95 (40.4%) and 86 (36.6%) of these 235 men. A targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach would have detected 92/95 (96.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 91.0–99.3%) csPCa cases. At the same time, detection of systematically found ciPCa would be reduced by 11/86 (12.8%; 95% CI 6.6–21.7%). If a targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach would have been performed, the number of biopsy cores per patient would have been reduced significantly (a mean difference of 5.2; 95% CI 4.9–5.6, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

An MRI-directed targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach detected almost all csPCa cases, while limiting overdiagnosis and reducing the number of biopsy cores. Prospective clinical trials are needed to substantiate the withholding of nonperilesional SBx in men with unilateral lesion(s) on MRI.

Patient summary

Limiting systematic biopsies to the proximity of the suspicious area on magnetic resonance imaging helps detect an equivalent number of aggressive cancers and fewer indolent cancers. These findings may help patients and physicians choose the best biopsy approach.