Antipsychotic type and correlates of antipsychotic treatment discontinuation in the outpatient treatment of schizophrenia

Global Neuropsychopharmacological Prescription Trends in Adults with Schizophrenia, Clinical Correlates and Implications for Practice: A Scoping Review

It is important to examine the psychotropic prescription practices in schizophrenia, as it can inform regarding changing treatment choices and related patient profiles. No recent reviews have evaluated the global neuropsychopharmacological prescription patterns in adults with schizophrenia. A systematic search of the literature published from 2002 to 2023 found 88 empirical papers pertinent to the utilization of psychotropic agents. Globally, there were wide inter-country and inter-regional variations in the prescription of psychotropic agents. Overall, over time there was an absolute increase in the prescription rate of second-generation antipsychotics (up to 50%), mood stabilizers (up to 15%), and antidepressants (up to 17%), with an observed absolute decrease in the rate of antipsychotic polypharmacy (up to 15%), use of high dose antipsychotic (up to 12% in Asia), clozapine (up to 9%) and antipsychotic long-acting injectables (up to 10%). Prescription patterns were mainly associated with specific socio-demographic (such as age), illness (such as illness duration), and treatment factors (such as adherence). Further work, including more evidence in adjunctive neuropsychopharmacological treatments, pharmaco-economic considerations, and examination of cohorts in prospective studies, can proffer insights into changing prescription trends relevant to different treatment settings and predictors of such trends for enhancement of clinical management in schizophrenia.

Oral and long-acting injectable antipsychotic discontinuation and relationship to side effects in people with first episode psychosis: a longitudinal analysis of electronic health record data

Background

Discontinuation of treatment in people with first episode psychosis (FEP) is common, but the extent to which this is related to specific adverse effects of antipsychotic medications is unclear.

Objectives

To investigate whether antipsychotic discontinuation is associated with the prescription of particular antipsychotics and particular adverse effects.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We assembled de-identified electronic health record (EHR) data from 2309 adults with FEP who received care from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust between 1st April 2008 and 31st March 2019. Associations between antipsychotic medications, clinician-recorded side effects and treatment discontinuation were investigated across a mean follow-up period of 34.2 months using Cox regression.

Results

The mean age of patients was 26.7 years and 1492 (64.6%) were male. Among first prescribed antipsychotic medications, discontinuation occurred earlier with haloperidol [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.69-4.60] and quetiapine (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.16-1.80) than with olanzapine. Discontinuation occurred sooner when there was evidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.08-1.64) or sexual dysfunction (HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.03-2.46). Among antipsychotics prescribed at any point during treatment, lurasidone (HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.10-1.78) and aripiprazole (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19) were associated with earlier discontinuation than olanzapine. Conversely, clozapine (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.73) and paliperidone 1-monthly (PP1M) long-acting injectable (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68-0.94) were associated with later discontinuation. Unexpectedly, for antipsychotics prescribed at any stage of treatment, sedation (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81-0.97), weight gain (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.83), and multiple side effects (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.76-0.90) were associated with later discontinuation.

Conclusion

Earlier treatment discontinuation associated with sexual or extrapyramidal side effects could be related to their rapid onset and poor tolerability. Later treatment discontinuation associated with clozapine and PP1M could be related to the relative efficacy of these treatments. These findings merit consideration when selecting antipsychotic therapy for people with FEP.

The Impact of Antipsychotic Formulations on Time to Medication Discontinuation in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Dutch Registry-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Many patients with schizophrenia discontinue antipsychotic medication, frequently with adverse outcomes. Although different antipsychotic formulations are associated with different times to discontinuation, not much is known about discontinuation rates with oral-weekly formulations. Such a formulation of penfluridol is available in both the Netherlands and several other countries.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the impact of antipsychotic formulations on time to discontinuation, especially the oral-weekly formulation.

METHODS

In a large, registry-based, retrospective cohort study from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016, we determined the time to medication discontinuation during the follow-up period with antipsychotic formulations, including oral-daily, oral-weekly, depot, or a combination of these. Patients with schizophrenia aged between 18 and 69 years were included and stratified according to the duration of recent antipsychotic use (taking the same formulation for ≤ 60 days or > 60 days before follow-up: short-term or long-term recent antipsychotic use). Medication discontinuation was defined as discontinuation of current antipsychotic formulation.

RESULTS

Overall, 8257 patients were included for analyses, with 80% of patients discontinuing antipsychotic medication. Time to discontinuation was longer in those with long-term recent antipsychotic use before the follow-up period and longest for oral-daily formulations. Patterns for discontinuation of oral-weekly and depot formulations were similar, regardless of the duration of recent antipsychotic use before follow-up. More prior discontinuations were associated with shorter time to discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Time to discontinuation differed considerably between formulations. The duration of recent antipsychotic use was a strong predictor of time to discontinuation. While oral-daily formulations had the longest time to discontinuation in the long-term recent antipsychotic use group, discontinuation trends were similar for oral-weekly and depot formulations. An oral-weekly formulation, whose administration route is noninvasive, might therefore be considered an alternative to depot formulations.

The Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study: 3-year results of antipsychotic treatment discontinuation and related clinical factors in Spain

Introduction

This article presents the long-term results in terms of antipsychotic medication maintenance and factors influencing it in a representative sample of patients with schizophrenia recruited in the SOHO study within Spain.

Methods

The SOHO was a prospective, 3-year observational study of the outcomes of schizophrenia treatment in outpatients who initiated therapy or changed to a new antipsychotic performed in 10 European countries with a focus on olanzapine. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyse the time to treatment discontinuation and the Cox proportional hazards model to investigate correlates of discontinuation.

Results and conclusions

In total, 1688 patients were included in the analyses. Medication maintenance at 3 years varied with the antipsychotic prescribed, being highest with clozapine (57.6%, 95% CI 39.2–74.5), followed by olanzapine (48.3%, 95% CI 45.1–51.5); and lowest with quetiapine (19.0%, 95% CI 13.0–26.3). Treatment discontinuation was significantly less frequent with olanzapine than with risperidone (p = 0.015), depot typical (p = 0.001), oral typical antipsychotics (p < 0.001) or quetiapine (p < 0.001); but not than with clozapine (p = 0.309). Longer maintenance was also associated with higher social abilities and better cognitive status at baseline; in contrast, a shorter time to discontinuation was associated with the need for mood stabilisers during follow-up. This study emphasises the different value of antipsychotics in day-to-day clinical practice, as some of them were associated with longer medication maintenance periods than others. This study has some limitations because of possible selection and information biases derived from the non-systematic, non-randomised allocation to treatments and the existence of unobserved covariates that may influence the outcome.

Attitudes of European physicians towards the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

Prescription rates for long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulations remain relatively low in Europe despite improved adherence over alternative oral antipsychotic treatments. This apparent under-prescription of LAI antipsychotics may have multiple contributing factors, including negative mental health practitioner attitudes towards the use of LAIs.

METHODS

The Antipsychotic Long acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) non-interventional study (NIS), conducted across several European countries, utilised a questionnaire that was specifically designed to address physicians' attitudes and beliefs towards the treatment of schizophrenia with LAI antipsychotics. Exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) of feedback from the questionnaire aimed to identify and characterize the factors that best explained the physicians' attitudes towards prescription of LAIs.

RESULTS

Overall, 136/234 solicited physicians returned fully completed questionnaires. Physicians' mean age was 48.5 years, with mean psychiatric experience of 20.0 years; 69.9% were male, 84.6% held a consultant position, and 91.9% had a clinical specialty in general adult care. Most physicians considered themselves to have a high level of clinical experience with LAI antipsychotics (77.2%), with an increased rate of LAI antipsychotics prescription over the last 5 years (59.6%). Although the majority of physicians (69.9%) declared feeling no difference in stress levels when offering LAI compared to oral antipsychotics, feelings of 'no/more stress' versus 'less stress' was found to influence prescription patterns. PCA identified six factors which collectively explained 66.1% of the variance in physician feedback. Multivariate analysis identified a positive correlation between physicians willing to accept usage of LAI antipsychotics and the positive attitude of colleagues (co-efficient 3.67; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The physician questionnaire in the ALTO study is the first to evaluate the attitudes around LAI antipsychotics across several European countries, on a larger scale. Findings from this study offer an important insight into how physician attitudes can influence the acceptance and usage of LAI antipsychotics to treat patients with schizophrenia.

Health and work disability outcomes in parents of patients with schizophrenia associated with antipsychotic exposure by the offspring

This study aimed to identify if antipsychotic exposure in offspring is associated with psychiatric and non-psychiatric healthcare service use and work disability of their parents. This Swedish population-based cohort study was based on data comprising 10,883 individuals with schizophrenia, who had at least one identifiable parent in the nationwide registers, and their parents (N = 18,215). The register-based follow-up during 2006–2013 considered the level of antipsychotic exposure and persistence of use of the offspring, further categorized into first (FG) and second generation (SG) antipsychotics, and orals versus long-acting injections (LAIs). The main outcome measure was parental psychiatric healthcare service use, secondary outcomes were non-psychiatric healthcare use and long-term sickness absence. SG-LAI use was associated with a decreased risk (relative risks [RR] 0.81-0.85) of parental psychiatric healthcare use compared with not using SG-LAI, whereas oral antipsychotics were associated with an increased risk (RRs 1.10–1.29). Both FG- and SG-LAI use by the offspring were associated with a lower risk of long-term sickness absence (range of odds ratios 0.34–0.47) for the parents, compared with non-use of these drugs. The choice of antipsychotic treatment for the offspring may have an impact on work disability and healthcare service use of their parents.

Reasons for clozapine discontinuation in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Although clozapine is more effective than other antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia, the rate of its discontinuation is also high. The aim of this retrospective chart-review study was to investigate the causes of clozapine discontinuation in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. This study included a total of 396 patients with schizophrenia, 240 still on clozapine therapy and 156 who discontinued clozapine, and compared their clinical characteristics. Those who discontinued clozapine had a longer history of illness and more hospitalizations before clozapine and tended to be older. Inadequate response was more common among clozapine discontinuers compared to continuers. The most common reason for discontinuation was the side-effects associated with clozapine (49%). Discontinuation from patient decision or by the psychiatrist due to noncompliance was the second (29.7%) and discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was the third most frequent reason (21.3%). The patients who discontinued clozapine because of cardiac side effects were younger, had shorter duration of clozapine use, and had lower maximum clozapine dose compared to the other discontinuers. Our findings point out the importance of enhancing psychiatrists' ability to handle manageable side effects to minimize discontinuations and maximize the benefits of clozapine in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Clozapine as a first- or second-line treatment in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

No consensus exists on whether clozapine should be prescribed in early stages of psychosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore focus on the use of clozapine as first-line or second-line treatment in non-treatment-resistant patients.

METHODS

Articles were eligible if they investigated clozapine compared to another antipsychotic as a first- or second-line treatment in non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SCZ) patients and provided data on treatment response. We performed random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were eligible for the systematic review (N = 314 subjects on clozapine and N = 800 on other antipsychotics). Our meta-analysis comparing clozapine to a miscellaneous group of antipsychotics revealed a significant benefit of clozapine (Hedges' g = 0.220, P = 0.026, 95% CI = 0.026-0.414), with no evidence of heterogeneity. In addition, a sensitivity analysis revealed a significant benefit of clozapine over risperidone (Hedges' g = 0.274, P = 0.030, 95% CI = 0.027-0.521).

CONCLUSION

The few eligible trials on this topic suggest that clozapine may be more effective than other antipsychotics when used as first- or second-line treatment. Only large clinical trials may comprehensively probe disease stage-dependent superiority of clozapine and investigate overall tolerability.

Clozapine and long-acting injectable antipsychotic combination: A retrospective one-year mirror-image study

To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of the combination of clozapine with an antipsychotic long-acting injectable (LAI) in multi-episode patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed in seventeen patients admitted to a hospital in Paris between January 2010 and June 2015, using a one-year mirror-image design. Number and length of hospitalizations significantly decreased after introducing the combination (2.1 vs 0.8, p=0.004 and 155.4days vs 26.6days, p<0.001 respectively). No major adverse events occurred in terms of increased weight, agranulocytosis, hyperglycemia and/or dyslipidemia. This combination can be beneficial and safe in multi-episode patients.

Use of second-generation antipsychotics in the acute inpatient management of schizophrenia in the Middle East

BACKGROUND

Management of acute psychotic episodes in schizophrenic patients remains a significant challenge for clinicians. Despite treatment guidelines recommending that second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) should be used as monotherapy, first-generation antipsychotics, polypharmacy, and lower than recommended doses are frequently administered in clinical practice. Minimal data exist regarding the use of SGAs in the Middle East. The objective of this study was to examine the discrepancies between current clinical practice and guideline recommendations in the region.

METHODS

RECONNECT-S Beta was a multicenter, noninterventional study conducted in Egypt, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates to observe the management of schizophrenic patients who were hospitalized due to an acute psychotic episode. Patients underwent one visit on the day of discharge. Demographic and medical history, together with data on antipsychotic treatment and concomitant medication during the hospitalization period and medication recommendations at discharge were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 1,057 patients, 180 (17.0%) and 692 (65.5%) received SGAs as monotherapy and in combination therapy, respectively. Overall, the most frequently administered medications were given orally, and included risperidone (40.3%), olanzapine (32.5%), and quetiapine (24.6%); the doses administered varied between countries and deviated from the recommended guidelines. Upon discharge, 93.9% of patients were prescribed SGAs as maintenance therapy, and 84.8% were prescribed the same medication(s) as during hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Current clinical practice in the Middle East differs from guideline recommendations. Patients frequently received antipsychotics in combination therapy, by various methods of administration, and at doses above and below the recommended guidelines for the management of their acute psychotic episodes.

Discontinuation of clozapine: a 15-year naturalistic retrospective study of 320 patients

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is underutilized in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. To understand contributing factors, we analyzed the frequency and causes of clozapine discontinuations that occurred over a 15-year period in a clinical setting.

METHOD

Data were extracted from computerized records and from mandatory termination reports for discontinuation events 1993-2007. The reasons for termination were analyzed.

RESULTS

Over half of the patients (n = 183/320; 57%) had at least one discontinuation (median time 609 days). The two most common causes for discontinuation were non-adherence (35%) and side-effects (28%). Hematological side-effects accounted for 45% of all side-effect associated discontinuations; most such patients remained eligible for clozapine treatment, and a significant fraction remained on clozapine after rechallenge. Central nervous system side-effects accounted for 35% of side-effect induced discontinuations. General factors significantly associated with discontinuation were African American race, older age at initiation of clozapine and less improvement in psychiatric symptoms.

CONCLUSION

In addition to anticipating and addressing causes of non-adherence, psychiatrists should consider clozapine rechallenge in eligible patients and implement measures to mitigate clozapine-associated sedation, seizures, and other side-effects. Future studies should particularly address why African American and older patients may be more likely to discontinue clozapine.

Factors related to different reasons for antipsychotic drug discontinuation in the treatment of schizophrenia: a naturalistic 18-month follow-up study

In recent years, measurement of the effectiveness of antipsychotic therapy in schizophrenia has received increasing attention from clinicians and researchers. Several studies have used time to antipsychotic discontinuation for any reason as a global index of antipsychotic effectiveness because it reflects both the physician's and patient's judgment of drug efficacy and tolerability. In this study, we extend this approach by analyzing the rate of discontinuation for different reasons of antipsychotics administered to patients with schizophrenia in a naturalistic setting of care, and explore the determinants of such discontinuation. Ninety-nine patients with schizophrenia who received a first or second generation antipsychotic were followed for 18 months in the Italian outpatient community psychiatric system. We found discontinuation rates for different reasons to be variable and to be influenced by several factors not involving the type of pharmacologic therapy. Some of these factors, such as the frequency of visits to the care unit, underline the need to take into account the role of the care delivery system as potentially influencing the effectiveness of antipsychotics in the "real world".

The psychopathological characteristics of treatment discontinuation group in 6-month treatment with paliperidone ER

OBJECTIVE

To examine the demographic and psychopathological characteristics of the treatment discontinuation group compared with patients who completed with paliperidone ER treatment for 6 months.

METHODS

A total of 984 patients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia who switched their antipsychotics were recruited from 61 sites in five countries in Southeast Asia. The patients with early discontinuation were then compared with those who completed the 6-month treatment in terms of demographic and psychopathological variables at baseline and also at the end of the evaluation period, which included PANSS score, sleep quality, daytime drowsiness, PSP score, ESRS score and clinical global impression-severity (CGI-S) score. Finally, logistic regression analysis was applied to determine predictive factors that were associated with discontinuation.

RESULTS

Of 984 patients, 284 patients (28.9%) discontinued without completing the 6-month treatment period with paliperidone. Significant differences in patient baseline characteristics for the discontinuation group compared with the completion group were observed for gender, number of previous hospitalisations with psychosis, PANSS total score and all of its subscales, daytime drowsiness score, total ESRS score, CGI-S, PSP and Insight. Patients who completed the study period had significantly better scores in all psychopathology variables compared with the discontinuation group at the end of the evaluation period. Numbers of previous hospitalisations because of psychosis, being exposed with first generation antipsychotics, gender and PANSS total scores were found to be significant predictors of discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Patients who discontinued early from a 6-month treatment period with Paliperidone have some characteristic differences compared with completion patients. Many factors including frequent hospitalisations, female gender, high PANSS score (indicating more disease severity) and previous exposure to first generation of antipsychotic agent might lead patients to discontinue from treatment.

Risk factors for suicide behaviors in the observational schizophrenia outpatient health outcomes (SOHO) study

BACKGROUND

To identify risk factors for suicide using data from a large, 3-year, multinational follow-up study of schizophrenia (SOHO study).

METHODS

Baseline characteristics of 8,871 adult patients with schizophrenia were included in a logistic regression post-hoc analysis comparing patients who attempted and/or committed suicide during the study with those who did not.

RESULTS

384 (4.3%) patients attempted or committed suicide. Completed suicides were 27 (0.3%). The significant risk factors for suicide behaviors were previous suicidality, depressive symptoms, prolactin-related adverse events, male gender and history of hospitalization for schizophrenia.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the observational design of the study and the post-hoc nature of the analysis, the identified risk factors should be confirmed by ad-hoc specifically designed studies.

Comparative effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia: what have real-world trials taught us?

Real-world, effectiveness studies add an important new dimension to the evaluation of the benefits of individual antipsychotics. Efficacy studies have already shown the unique effectiveness of clozapine, and suggested improved outcomes for olanzapine compared with some atypical antipsychotics and a reduced tendency to produce acute and chronic movement disorders for atypical compared with typical drugs. Recent effectiveness studies largely confirm these prior observations. The CATIE (Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness), CUtLASS (Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study) and SOHO (Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes) programmes confirmed the superiority of clozapine over other antipsychotics; CATIE and SOHO also confirmed olanzapine as probably the second most effective antipsychotic. Effectiveness studies have confirmed the high incidence of adverse metabolic effects with clozapine, olanzapine and (with less certainty) quetiapine but the ZODIAC (Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes) study found no excess cardiovascular events or deaths for olanzapine compared with ziprasidone. Prior observations on reduced frequency of movement disorders for second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotics were also largely (but not uniformly) supported. Overall, recent real-world studies have done much to confirm prior observations from efficacy-based randomized, controlled trials.

Effectiveness of two formulations of oral olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in a natural setting: results from a 1-year European observational study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the proportion of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder who discontinued treatment with one of two oral formulations of olanzapine within 12 months in outpatient settings in Germany, Greece, and France.

METHODS

This 1-year, prospective, observational study included patients who had recently initiated treatment with olanzapine-coated tablets (OC) or the orodispersible (OD) formulation. Primary endpoint was olanzapine discontinuation for any reason. Clinical and functional status were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of 927 enrolled patients, 903 were included in the analyses (612 patients with schizophrenia, 291 with bipolar disorder). Within 12 months, 46 of 903 patients discontinued olanzapine. Most (95%) patients remained on olanzapine for 12 months with similar rates for patients with either diagnosis (94.5% for schizophrenia, 94.9% for bipolar disorder) and for both formulations (93.7% with OC, 95.3% with OD). The only factor significantly associated with time to discontinuation was baseline disease severity. Patients with more severe disease at baseline had a lower discontinuation risk. There were significant improvements in functioning and well-being and non-significant improvements in therapeutic alliance and compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was seen between discontinuation rates of the two formulations. Higher baseline severity was associated with a lower discontinuation rate.

Medication discontinuation with depot and oral antipsychotics in outpatients with schizophrenia: comparison of matched cohorts from a 12-month observational study

AIMS

This study compared all-cause medication discontinuation (any switch, augmentation or medication discontinuation) in matched cohorts of patients with schizophrenia who were initiated on depot or oral antipsychotics. Other objectives included between-group comparisons of resource use, and clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of a one-year, multicentre, prospective, observational study included outpatients with schizophrenia who required a change in their antipsychotic medication because of a physician-perceived risk of medication non-adherence. Patients were matched 1 : 1 using an optimal algorithm with rank-based Mahalanobis distances. All-cause medication discontinuation was compared using the Klein and Moeschberger test for survival and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model, stratifying on matched pairs.

RESULTS

Forty patients who initiated a depot antipsychotic could be matched to patients who initiated an oral antipsychotic. Fewer depot-treated patients discontinued their antipsychotic medication at least once compared with oral-treated patients [20% (8/40) vs. 40% (16/40)]. Depot-treated patients discontinued their medication later (Klein and Moeschberger test p = 0.025) and were less likely to discontinue their initial antipsychotic medication [HR = 0.33 (95% CI, 0.12-0.92), p = 0.033] than oral-treated patients. There were few differences in resource use and no differences in clinical and functional outcomes between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

In this matched-cohort analysis, patients with schizophrenia who were considered to be non-adherent with their prior oral antipsychotics were less likely to discontinue their medication for any cause if they were initiated on depot compared with oral antipsychotics.

Treatment discontinuation and clinical outcomes in the 1-year naturalistic treatment of patients with schizophrenia at risk of treatment nonadherence

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to improve physicians' understanding of the treatment circumstances and needs of outpatients with schizophrenia at risk of nonadherence, by naturalistically assessing antipsychotic treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and health care service use in this little-studied patient population.

METHODS

In this one-year, prospective, multicenter, noninterventional, observational study, patients considered at risk of nonadherence by their physicians were switched from their primary oral antipsychotic to another oral or a depot antipsychotic at study entry. All cause treatment discontinuation (antipsychotic switch, augmentation, or discontinuation) during the study was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and descriptive statistics. Patients' illness severity, quality of life, attitude towards medication, patient-reported adherence, and health care resource utilization were assessed during the study.

RESULTS

Of the 406 enrolled patients, 43 (10.6%) were switched to depot and 363 (89.4%) were switched to oral antipsychotics at study entry. During the study, 99 (24.4%) patients switched, augmented, or discontinued their antipsychotic (all cause treatment discontinuation). Of the 99 patients who switched, augmented, or discontinued their antipsychotic, 8 (18.6%) were taking depot and 91 (25.0%) were taking oral antipsychotics. These patients were switched to either depot (n = 15) or oral (n = 78) antipsychotics, or discontinued their antipsychotic medication (n = 6). Inadequate response was the most frequently reported reason for medication discontinuation. During the study, patients' clinical and functional status improved significantly and service use was low. Most patients considered themselves to be adherent at study entry, and this favorable self-perception increased during the study (from 68.5% to 88.1%).

CONCLUSION

Although identified as at risk of nonadherence, few patients in this naturalistic study discontinued their prescribed antipsychotic medication during the study. The discrepancy between the physicians' perception of their patient's medication adherence and the patients' self-perceived adherence highlights the need to better understand the underlying reasons for this phenomenon.

The combined use of risperidone long-acting injection and clozapine in patients with schizophrenia non-adherent to clozapine: a case series

Poor adherence to clozapine treatment represents an important problem in clinical practice because additional useful treatment options are unavailable. Although switching to risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) has been recommended for those with compliance problems, this medication has been found to be less suitable for patients who previously received clozapine. Based on the suggested beneficial effects of RLAI, such as higher rates of treatment continuation and patient satisfaction, and the possible effectiveness of oral risperidone augmentation, it seems worthwhile to try RLAI augmentation for clozapine non-adherence. In this article, we present the cases of four patients with schizophrenia undergoing combined treatment with RLAI and clozapine for more than one year after multiple relapses related to clozapine non-adherence. Durations and frequencies of hospitalizations markedly declined after RLAI augmentation. Indeed, three patients receiving RLAI and clozapine for 1.2-3.5 years were never hospitalized during this period. The lengths of hospitalizations before and after augmenting with RLAI were 54.7 +/- 33.1 and 4.2 +/- 4.2 days/year, respectively. Participants also showed great improvements in social skills. These findings suggest the possible beneficial effects of RLAI augmentation in cases of clozapine nonadherence. However, controlled clinical trials are necessary to confirm whether RLAI augmentation represents a useful treatment option for patients who have not adhered to clozapine treatment.

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) and continuous antipsychotic treatment: 3-year results from the Schizophrenia Health Outcomes (SOHO) study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the association between continuous antipsychotic use and health-related quality of life (HRQL) 3-year change in the European Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (EU-SOHO) study.

METHODS

EU-SOHO is an observational study of outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia in an outpatient setting. HRQL was assessed at study entry and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). UK population time trade-off (TTO) tariffs were applied to the self-rated EQ-5D health states to calculate HRQL ratings (0 = death, 1 = best). An epoch analysis approach was used as a conceptual framework to analyze the longitudinal data. Follow-up was divided into epochs or periods of continuous treatment. When a patient changed antipsychotic treatment, he or she was considered to have a new observation. Multilevel models were employed to evaluate the association of HRQL with medication and other clinical and sociodemographic variables for each epoch. A total of 9340 patients were analyzed (42.1% women; mean age 40 years).

RESULTS

Mean EQ-5D scores increased over time; the largest improvement occurred in the first 6 months (mean increase of 0.19). Longer duration of illness and older age at first treatment were associated with worse baseline EQ-5D scores. Improvements in EQ-5D scores were greater for more socially active patients or those in paid employment. Few significant differences were found between antipsychotic medications. Olanzapine and clozapine were associated with higher HRQL increases.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous antipsychotic treatment is associated with important HRQL benefits at 3 years, most of which occurs during the first 6 months. Although some medications are associated with better HRQL outcomes, differences are small.

Recovery in the outpatient setting: 36-month results from the Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (SOHO) study

Recovery is an important outcome of schizophrenia that has not been well defined or researched. Using a stringent definition of recovery that included long-lasting symptomatic and functional remission as well as an adequate quality of life for a minimum of 24 months and until the 36-month visit, we determined the frequency and predictors of recovery in patients with schizophrenia during 3 years of antipsychotic treatment in the prospective, observational Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (SOHO) study. Of the 6642 patients analysed, 33% achieved long-lasting symptomatic remission, 13% long-lasting functional remission, 27% long-lasting adequate quality of life, and 4% achieved recovery during the 3 year follow-up period. Logistic regression analysis revealed that social functioning at study entry (having good occupational/vocational status, living independently and being socially active) and adherence with medication were factors significantly associated with achieving recovery. Higher negative symptom severity, higher BMI and lack of effectiveness as the reason for change of medication at baseline were baseline factors associated with a lower likelihood of achieving recovery. Treatment with olanzapine was also associated with a higher frequency of recovery compared with risperidone, quetiapine, typical antipsychotics (oral, depot) and patients taking two or more antipsychotic medications. There were no differences among the patients taking olanzapine, clozapine and amisulpride. Predictors of long-lasting symptomatic remission, functional remission and adequate quality of life were also independently analysed. Although the results should be interpreted conservatively due to the observational, non-randomised study design, they indicate that only a small proportion of patients with schizophrenia achieve recovery and suggest that social functioning, medication adherence and type of antipsychotic are important predictors of recovery.

Comparing the treatment patterns of patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine and quetiapine in the Pennsylvania Medicaid population

OBJECTIVE

Compare treatment patterns for patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine versus quetiapine in the Pennsylvania Medicaid population.

METHODS

Patients (18-64 years) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (ICD-9-CM: 295.xx) and treated with olanzapine or quetiapine were identified from the Pennsylvania Medicaid claims database (1999-2003). Patients were continuously enrolled in the 12-month pre- and 12-month post-initiation periods. To control for selection bias, propensity score method with optimal matching algorithm was used to match patients from the two treatment groups. The key study outcomes including rates of augmentation, polypharmacy, discontinuation, and switching were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Medication possession ratio and use of concurrent psychotropic drugs were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2321 quetiapine and 6929 olanzapine patients were identified. In all, 2321 pairs of patients were matched between the two groups and they had similar baseline characteristics. Over the 12-month study period, olanzapine patients had a better medication adherence (0.47 vs. 0.43; p < 0.0001), and were less likely to use other psychotropic medications concomitantly (all p < 0.05). Olanzapine patients had a significantly lower risk of augmentation and polypharmacy with other antipsychotics. The 6-month augmentation rates with antipsychotics were 12.9% and 16.7% for olanzapine and quetiapine, respectively (p < 0.05); the polypharmacy rates with any antipsychotics were 12.5% and 18.6% for olanzapine and quetiapine, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for discontinuation and switching between the two treatment groups. Sensitivity analysis with a 60-day minimum monotherapy requirement showed similar results.

LIMITATIONS

This study's limitations include the analysis of a single Medicaid state, which may limit the generalizability to the entire Medicaid population with schizophrenia or to all patients with schizophrenia.

CONCLUSION

This large Medicaid claims database analysis showed that olanzapine patients were significantly more compliant to treatment and less likely to augment or have polypharmacy with antipsychotics during the course of treatment compared to quetiapine patients.

Update on the management of symptoms in schizophrenia: focus on amisulpride

Amisulpride is an atypical antipsychotic drug with a unique receptor pharmacology which is dose dependent. It is a standard treatment in dysthymia as well as in psychosis. Amisulpride is efficacious, effective and well tolerated in positive symptoms of schizophrenia: there is extensive evidence that it treats negative symptoms when given in low doses, although relative lack of EPS and an antidepressant effect may contribute. In first-episode patients amisulpride is an option, although there is little comparative work available. Amisulpride has the best evidence as an effective adjunct to clozapine treatment. Regarding intellectual function, amisulpride appears cognitive sparing but the clinical relevance of this remains obscure. There is evidence that amisulpride can improve social function but again there is little comparative work to demonstrate any particular advantages. Regarding the current conventional versus atypical antipsychotic controversy, amisulpride did better in switching studies and meta-analyses than in the single large pragmatic randomized trial reported to date. It is a versatile drug, and may offer advantages over other atypical antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms, and tolerability advantages such as the avoidance of weight gain. Essentially it rests with the treating clinician to employ a rational psychopharmacological approach towards the individual patient: there will be few circumstances in which amisulpride will not be a likely contender as a treatment choice.

Remission in the outpatient care of schizophrenia: 3-Year results from the Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (SOHO) Study in France

Objective

To analyse the contribution of socio-demographics, clinical profile and psychotropic treatment on remission in patients with schizophrenia.

Methods

Among 933 French outpatients recruited in the European observational Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study (SOHO), 563 were followed-up for 3 years, had at most one missing visit, and were included in the analysis. Symptomatic remission was defined as a score of 3 (mild severity) or less on the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI) overall, positive, negative and cognitive symptom scales, maintained for at least 6 months and without hospitalization. A logistic regression model was used to analyse the factors associated with time in remission.

Results

60.6% of patients achieved remission during the 3-year follow-up. Patients never treated before inclusion in the study (OR = 2.3) and those having paid employment (OR = 1.4) were more likely to achieve remission. Higher baseline clinical severity was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of achieving remission: CGI overall (OR = 0.67), CGI positive (OR = 0.85) and CGI negative (OR = 0.74). Compared with olanzapine, other atypicals (OR = 0.71) and conventional antipsychotics (OR = 0.69) were associated with a lower probability of achieving remission.

Conclusions

Remission can be achieved in a high proportion of patients. Factors such as being previously untreated, having paid employment and taking olanzapine are predictors of remission.

Symptomatic remission in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia: 2-year results from the SOHO study

RATIONALE

Symptomatic remission is an achievable goal of treatment in patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of symptomatic remission and baseline factors associated with symptomatic remission in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia during 2 years of antipsychotic treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Schizophrenia Health Outcomes (SOHO) study is a 3-year, prospective, observational study of the treatment of schizophrenia in the outpatient setting in ten European countries. Symptomatic remission was defined as a score of < or =3 on the clinical global impression (CGI) overall severity score, CGI positive symptoms score, CGI negative symptoms score and CGI cognitive symptoms score, maintained for at least 6 months and without hospitalisation.

RESULTS

Of the patients enrolled at baseline, 1,009 patients were never-treated and prescribed only one antipsychotic; 701 patients (69%) were included in the follow-up analysis at 24 months. Of this sample, 70% achieved symptomatic remission during 24 months of treatment. Baseline factors associated with higher symptomatic remission were: lower negative CGI, lower cognitive CGI, lower overall CGI, having hostile behaviour, lower body mass index, taking olanzapine instead of typical antipsychotics or atypical antipsychotics (except risperidone) and being employed.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients with schizophrenia who start antipsychotic treatment achieve remission after 2 years of treatment. Type of medication, symptom severity and previous functioning are important predictors of outcome.

Quality of life and subjective well-being during treatment with antipsychotics in out-patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the Quality of Life (QOL) in outpatients with schizophrenia under antipsychotics from two perspectives: a "subjective" perspective as rated by the patient and an "objective" perspective as rated by the physician.

METHOD

EASE (External Assessment of Quality of Life in Out-patients with Schizophrenia) is a 12-month, prospective, naturalistic study of the QOL in patients on antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia in an out-patient setting in Germany. The study included 1462 patients who were initiated on a new antipsychotic or switched to another antipsychotic. The Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics scale (SWN) and the Quality of Life Scale (QLS) were used to assess the QOL in these patients. The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale was used to assess overall symptom severity. Four cohorts were identified and evaluated: (a) patients treated with olanzapine monotherapy (N=1007), (b) another atypical antipsychotic as monotherapy (N=335), (c) a typical antipsychotic as monotherapy (N=32) and (d) combination therapy with more than one antipsychotic (N=88).

RESULTS

QOL as assessed by both SWN and QLS improved in all treatment cohorts. SWN responses in the respective cohorts were (a) 52.3%, (b) 38.8%, (c) 31.3% and (d) 44.3%, whilst the QLS responses were (a) 58.2%, (b) 45.1%, (c) 59.4% and (c) 40.9%. Symptom severity as assessed by the CGI also improved over time regardless of the type of antipsychotic. An increase of one point on the CGI corresponded to a change in SWN total score of -9.67 points and a change in QLS total score of -13.36 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Both QOL and symptom severity improved over the 12-month study period, regardless of the type of antipsychotic taken. QOL improvement as perceived both from a "subjective" and an "objective" perspective was greatest in the cohort on olanzapine monotherapy.

Three-year antipsychotic effectiveness in the outpatient care of schizophrenia: observational versus randomized studies results

Antipsychotic discontinuation rates are a powerful indicator of medication effectiveness in schizophrenia. We examined antipsychotic discontinuation in the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study, a 3-year prospective, observational study in outpatients with schizophrenia in 10 European countries. Patients (n=7728) who started antipsychotic monotherapy were analyzed. Medication discontinuation for any cause ranged from 34% and 36% for clozapine and olanzapine, respectively, to 66% for quetiapine. Compared to olanzapine, the risk of treatment discontinuation before 36 months was significantly higher for quetiapine, risperidone, amisulpride, and typical antipsychotics (oral and depot), but similar for clozapine. Longer medication maintenance was associated with being socially active and having a longer time since first treatment contact for schizophrenia, whereas higher symptom severity, treatment with mood stabilizers, substance abuse, having hostile behaviour were associated with lower medication maintenance. Antipsychotic maintenance in SOHO was higher than the results of previous randomized studies.

The SOHO (Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcome) study: implications for the treatment of schizophrenia

The European SOHO (Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcome) study is an observational, naturalistic study of the outpatient treatment of schizophrenia. The patient recruitment and assessment began in September 2000 and finished in early 2005. A total of 10 972 adult patients from ten European countries who were initiating or changing antipsychotic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia within the normal course of care have been enrolled. The patients have been followed at regular intervals over the 3-year timeframe of the study. Evaluation includes clinical severity, measured with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale; health-related quality of life; social functioning; and medication tolerability. The 6- and 12-month results have been published so far and have demonstrated that the patients in whom treatment was initiated with olanzapine or clozapine or who were started on more than one antipsychotic of any class at baseline tended to have somewhat greater improvement than patients treated with other atypical or typical antipsychotics, both in terms of symptoms measured with the CGI and quality of life. Numbers of social contacts increased with the treatment, but other aspects of social functioning did not show any significant change. Atypical antipsychotics as a class were associated with a lower frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and anticholinergic use than typical antipsychotics. The frequency of EPS was lowest in the clozapine-, quetiapine- and olanzapine-treated patients, at around 10%. The atypical antipsychotics also conferred a lower risk for tardive dyskinesia than the typical antipsychotics. Weight gain occurred in all treatment cohorts over the first 12 months of treatment and was statistically significantly greater in the patients who started treatment with olanzapine and clozapine. Prolactin- and sexually-related adverse events were frequent at baseline assessment: amenorrhoea was present in around one- third of women, impotence in around 40% of men, and loss of libido in 50% of both male and female patients. Patients treated with olanzapine, clozapine and quetiapine were significantly less likely to have sexual/endocrine-related dysfunctions after 6 months of treatment (the 12-month results of this parameter are yet to be published) than those in the other treatment cohorts (typical antipsychotics, risperidone and amisulpride). Concomitant medication use during the study has been high, ranging from 5% to 29% for anticholinergics, 8% to 23% for antidepressants, 22% to 37% for anxiolytics and 7% to 19% for mood stabilisers, depending on the type of antipsychotic prescribed. Fewer olanzapine-, quetiapine- and clozapine-treated patients used concomitant anticholinergics or anxiolytics/hypnotics. The current results from the SOHO study indicate that differences in effectiveness and tolerability do exist between the antipsychotics. Future results from the study will be published during the coming months and years, and will allow patterns of antipsychotic use in routine clinical practice (including how often and why changes are made) to be determined. This important information is likely to impact on the future use of antipsychotics and will assist clinicians in refining the use of these drugs and improving the outcome of patients to whom they are prescribed.