1
|
Yong C, Slaven JE, Wu Z, Margulis V, Djaladat H, Antonelli A, Simone G, Bhanvadia R, Ghoreifi A, Moghaddam FS, Ditonno F, Tuderti G, Bronimann S, Dhanji S, Eilender B, Franco A, Finati M, Tozzi M, Helstrom E, Mendiola DF, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Moon SC, Rais-Bahrami S, Derweesh I, Mehrazin R, Autorino R, Abdollah F, Ferro M, Correa A, Singla N, Gonzalgo ML, Sundaram CP. The impact of bladder cuff excision on outcomes after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An analysis of the ROBUUST 2.0 registry. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:373.e1-373.e7. [PMID: 39112105 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine whether bladder cuff excision and its technique influence outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS AND MATERIALS A multicenter, international, retrospective analysis using the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer Study (ROBUUST) 2.0 registry identified 1,718 patients undergoing RNU for UTUC between 2015 and 2023 at 17 centers across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Data was gathered on (1) whether bladder cuff excision was performed and (2) what technique was used, including formal excision or other techniques (pluck technique, stripping/intussusception technique) and outcomes. Multivariate and survival analyses were performed to compare the groups. RESULTS Most patients (90%, 1,540/1,718) underwent formal bladder cuff excision in accordance with EAU and AUA guidelines. Only 4% (68/1,718) underwent resection using other techniques, and 6% (110/1,718) did not have a bladder cuff excised. Median follow up for the cohort was 24 months (IQR 9-44). When comparing formal bladder cuff excision to other excision techniques, there were no differences in oncologic or survival outcomes including bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), or cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, excision of any kind conferred a decreased risk of bladder-specific recurrence compared to no excision. There was no difference in RFS, MFS, OS, or CSS when comparing bladder cuff excision, other techniques, and no excision. CONCLUSIONS Bladder cuff excision improves recurrence-free survival, particularly when considering bladder recurrence. This benefit is conferred regardless of technique, as long as the intramural ureter and ureteral orifice are excised. However, the benefit of bladder cuff excision on metastasis-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival is unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Yong
- Indiana University Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - James E Slaven
- Indiana University Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University Department of Urology, Shanghai, China
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Giuseppe Simone
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Gabriele Tuderti
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Stephan Bronimann
- Department of Urology, The Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sohail Dhanji
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine Department of Urology, La Jolla CA
| | - Benjamin Eilender
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | | | - Marco Finati
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Marco Tozzi
- European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS Division of Urology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Dinno F Mendiola
- Department of Urology, Desai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Sol C Moon
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Ithaar Derweesh
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine Department of Urology, La Jolla CA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | | | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Matteo Ferro
- European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS Division of Urology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nirmish Singla
- Departments of Urology and Oncology, The Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology, Desai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deng S, Liu L, Wang Y, Zhou C, Zhang H. Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies. Surg Innov 2024; 31:520-529. [PMID: 39101895 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) vs open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis of studies based on propensity score-matched cohorts to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LNU and ONU in UTUC patients. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until July 12, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized to assess the quality of eligible studies. Measurements of surgical and oncological outcomes were extracted and pooled including mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Five high-quality retrospective studies were included, totaling 6422 patients; 2080 (32.4%) underwent LNU, and 4342 (67.6%) underwent ONU. With respect to surgical outcomes, patients in the LNU group experienced less estimated blood loss and had shorter hospital stay than those in the ONU group, but there was no significant difference in complication rates and operation time. In regard to oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences between the LNU and ONU groups in 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, 3-year intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRFS) was worse in the LNU group compared to the ONU group. CONCLUSION LNU was associated with less estimated blood loss and shorter hospital stays than ONU, but there were no differences in OS and CSS between the surgical modalities. Nonetheless, LNU might result in poorer IVRFS than ONU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shidong Deng
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Lingzhi Liu
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Yurou Wang
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Chuan Zhou
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Huihui Zhang
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
- Institute of Hospital Administration, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alqahtani A, Bhattacharjee S, Almopti A, Li C, Nabi G. Radiomics-Based Computed Tomography Urogram Approach for the Prediction of Survival and Recurrence in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3119. [PMID: 39335090 PMCID: PMC11429600 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. The accurate prediction of survival and recurrence in UTUC is crucial for effective risk stratification and guiding therapeutic decisions. Models combining radiomics and clinicopathological data features derived from computed tomographic urograms (CTUs) can be a way to predict survival and recurrence in UTUC. Thus, preoperative CTUs and clinical data were analyzed from 106 UTUC patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Radiomics features were extracted from segmented tumors, and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was used to select the most relevant features. Multivariable Cox models combining radiomics features and clinical factors were developed to predict the survival and recurrence. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was applied to evaluate the performance and survival distribution analyses were assessed by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The significant outcome predictors were identified by multivariable Cox models. The combined model achieved a superior predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.73) and higher recurrence prediction (C-index: 0.84). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in the survival (p < 0.0001) and recurrence (p < 0.002) probabilities for the combined datasets. The CTU-based radiomics models effectively predicted survival and recurrence in the UTUC patients, and enhanced the prognostic performance by combining radiomics features with clinical factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulsalam Alqahtani
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
- Radiology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran 55461, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sourav Bhattacharjee
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 W6F6 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Abdulrahman Almopti
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Chunhui Li
- School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
| | - Ghulam Nabi
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsuboi I, Matsukawa A, Kardoust Parizi M, Klemm J, Schulz RJ, Cadenar A, Mancon S, Chiujdea S, Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, Katayama S, Iwata T, Bekku K, Wada K, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Teoh J, Singla N, Araki M, Shariat SF. Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:488. [PMID: 39162743 PMCID: PMC11335797 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05185-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, it is unclear which specific surgical technique may lead to improve oncological outcomes in term of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UTUC. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU in reducing IVR in UTUC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases were queried in January 2024 for studies analyzing UTUC patients who underwent RNU. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of IVR among various types of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective study, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rate of IVR was significantly lower in RNU patients who had an early ligation (EL) of the ureter compared to those who did not (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic RNU significantly increased the IVR compared to open RNU (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.54, p < 0.001). Intravesical bladder cuff removal significantly reduced the IVR compared to both extravesical and transurethral bladder cuff removal (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p = 0.02 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.15-2.34, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS EL of the affected upper tract system, ureteral management, open RNU, and intravesical bladder cuff removal seem to yield the lowest IVR rate in patients with UTUC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to conclusively elucidate the optimal surgical technique in the setting of single post-operative intravesical chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert J Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Murures, University of Medicine, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Pharmacy, Mures, Romania
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, PARIS, F- 75013, France
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia.
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahn B, Kim D, Park KJ, Park JM, Yoon SY, Hong B, Cho YM, Kim D. Invasiveness of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Clinical Significance and Integrative Diagnostic Strategy. Cancer Res Treat 2024; 56:856-870. [PMID: 38147818 PMCID: PMC11261206 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.1150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to determine the clinicopathologic, radiologic, and molecular significance of the tumor invasiveness to further stratify the patients with high-grade (HG) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who can be treated less aggressively. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinicopathologic and radiologic characteristics of 166 surgically resected HG UTUC (48 noninvasive, and 118 invasive) cases were evaluated. Six noninvasive UTUC cases with intratumoral tumor grade heterogeneity were selected for whole-exome sequencing (WES) to understand the underlying molecular pathophysiology. Barcode-tagging sequencing was done for validation of the target genes from WES data. RESULTS Patients with noninvasive UTUC showed no cancer-specific death with better cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (p < 0.001) compared to the patients with invasive UTUC. Compared to the invasive UTUC, noninvasive UTUC was correlated to a low grade (LG) on the preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) grading system (p < 0.001), histologic intratumoral tumor grade heterogeneity (p=0.018), discrepancy in preoperative urine cytology diagnosis (p=0.018), and absence of urothelial carcinoma in situ (p < 0.001). WES of the heterogeneous components showed mutually shared HRAS and FGFR3 mutations shared between the HG and LG components. HRAS mutation was associated with the lower grade on preoperative abdominal CT and intratumoral tumor grade heterogeneity (p=0.045 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas FGFR3 mutation was correlated to the absence of carcinoma in situ (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION According to our comprehensive analysis, HG noninvasive UTUC can be preoperatively suspected based on distinct preoperative radiologic, cytologic, histologic, and molecular features. Noninvasive HG UTUC shows excellent prognosis and thus should be treated less aggressively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bokyung Ahn
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doeun Kim
- Department of Medical Science, Biomedical Science, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kye Jin Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja-Min Park
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Young Yoon
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bumsik Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Mee Cho
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Deokhoon Kim
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang Y, Wu Q, Warrick JI, DeGraff DJ, Raman JD, Truong H, Chen G. Clinicopathological risk factors associated with tumor relapse of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: A single institution 20-year experience. Ann Diagn Pathol 2024; 73:152357. [PMID: 38941945 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare yet aggressive malignancy. While radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the cornerstone treatment, UTUC has high local and metastatic relapse rates, leading to a dismal prognosis. To identify the clinicopathological factors associated with an increased risk of local and metastatic relapse in UTUC, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 133 consecutive UTUC patients who underwent RNU from 1998 to 2018. Patients lost to follow-up or with a history of bladder cancer were excluded from the study. The remaining 87 patients were categorized into two subgroups: those with tumor recurrence/relapse (40 cases) and those without recurrence/relapse (47 cases). Clinical and pathological characteristics were compared across the two groups. Multiple factors are associated with UTUC recurrence/relapse including larger tumor size, histology divergent differentiations/subtypes, high tumor grade, advanced pathologic T stage, positive margin, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), positive lymph node status, and preoperative hydronephrosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that squamous differentiation predicted recurrence/relapse (p = 0.012), independent of tumor stage. Moreover, compared to the conventional histology type, UTUC with squamous differentiation had a significantly higher relapse rate (p = 0.0001) and poorer survival (p = 0.0039). This observation was further validated in invasive high-grade UTUC cases. Our findings suggest that many pathological factors contribute to UTUC recurrence/relapse, particularly, squamous differentiation may serve as an independent risk predictor for relapse and a potent prognosticator for adverse cancer-specific survival in UTUC patients. Recognizing and thoroughly assessing the pathological factors is essential for better oncologic management of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Qingqing Wu
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Joshua I Warrick
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America; Department of Urology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - David J DeGraff
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America; Department of Urology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Hong Truong
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Guoli Chen
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Rouprêt M, Singla N, Teoh JYC, Chlosta P, Babjuk M, Abufaraj M, Margulis V, D'Andrea D, Klemm J, Matsukawa A, Laukhtina E, Fazekas T, Karakiewicz PI, Bhanvadia R, Gontero P, Shariat SF. Preoperative Plasma Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I and Its Binding Proteins-Based Risk Stratification of Patients Treated With Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102133. [PMID: 38945766 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1), IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) and -3 (IGFBP-3) in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database comprising 753 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC and had a preoperative plasma available. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. The discriminative ability and clinical utility of the models was calculated using the lasso regression test, area under receiver operating characteristics curves, C-index, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS Lower preoperative plasma levels of IGFBP-2 and -3 independently correlated with increased risks of lymph node metastasis, pT3/4 disease, nonorgan confined disease, and worse recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) (all P ≤ .004). The addition of both IGFBP-2 and -3 to a postoperative multivariable model, that included standard clinicopathologic characteristics, improved the model's concordance index by 10%, 9%, and 8% for RFS, CSS, and OS, respectively. On DCA, addition of both IGFBP-2 and -3 to base models improved their performance for RFS, CSS, and OS by a statistically and clinically significant margin. Plasma IGF-1 was not associated with any of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed that a lower plasma levels of IGFBP-2 and -3 both are independent and clinically significant predictors of adverse pathological features and survival outcomes in UTUC patients treated with RNU. These findings might help guide the clinical decision-making regarding perioperative systemic therapy and follow-up scheduling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Departement of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tamas Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Departement of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Departement of Urology, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ferro M, Chiujdea S, Vartolomei MD, Bove P, Porreca A, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Antonelli A, Foschi N, Racioppi M, Autorino R, Chiancone F, Longo N, Barone B, Crocetto F, Musi G, Luzzago S, Piccinelli ML, Mistretta FA, de Cobelli O, Tataru OS, Hurle R, Liguori G, Borghesi M, Veccia A, Greco F, Schips L, Marchioni M, Lucarelli G, Dutto D, Colucci F, Russo GI, Giudice AL, Montanari E, Boeri L, Simone G, Rosazza M, Livoti S, Gontero P, Soria F. Advanced Age Impacts Survival After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:27-37. [PMID: 37661507 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is rare but has a poor prognosis. Prognostic factors have been extensively studied in order to provide the best possible management for patients. We have aimed to investigate commonly available factors predictive of recurrence and survival in this patient population at high risk of death and recurrence, with an emphasis on the effects of age (using a cutoff of 70 years) on survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1387 patients with clinically nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy at 21 academic hospital centers between 2005 and 2021, 776 patients were eligible and included in the study. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were built to evaluate the independent prognosticators for intravesical and extravesical recurrence, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival according to age groups. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS We did not find an association between groups aged <70 and >70 years old and preoperatively clinical or histopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was found no statistical significance between the 2 age groups in terms of intravesical or extravesical recurrence (P = .09 and P = .57). Overall survival (P = .0001) and cancer-specific survival (P = .0001) have been found to be statistically significantly associated with age as independent predictors (confounding factors: gender, tumor size, tumor side, clinical T stage, localization, preoperative hydronephrosis, tumor localization, type of surgery, multifocality of the tumor, pathological grade, lymphovascular invasion, concomitant CIS, lymph node status, necrosis, or history of previous bladder cancer). CONCLUSION This research confirms that patients aged 70 and above who undergo radical nephroureterectomy may have worse outcomes compared to younger patients, older patients needing an improved care and management of UTUC to improve their outcomes in the setting of an increase in this aged population group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Pierluigi Bove
- San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy; Department of Experimental Medicine, Tor vergata Oncoscience Research Centre of Excellence, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nazario Foschi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Racioppi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicola Longo
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania; Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Liguori
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marco Borghesi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical Integrated Sciences (DISC), Urology Section, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Dutto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvia Colucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ivan Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Arturo Lo Giudice
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Rosazza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Livoti
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Klemm J, Bekku K, Abufaraj M, Laukhtina E, Matsukawa A, Parizi MK, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Current Surveillance Strategies for Non-Metastatic Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:44. [PMID: 38201472 PMCID: PMC10777993 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Non-metastatic upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) is a comparatively rare condition, typically managed with either kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Irrespective of the chosen therapeutic modality, patients with UTUC remain at risk of recurrence in the bladder; in patients treated with KSS, the risk of recurrence is high in the remnant ipsilateral upper tract system but there is a low but existent risk in the contralateral system as well as in the chest and in the abdomen/pelvis. For patients treated with RNU for high-risk UTUC, the risk of recurrence in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, as well as the contralateral UT, depends on the tumor stage, grade, and nodal status. Hence, implementing a risk-stratified, location-specific follow-up is indicated to ensure timely detection of cancer recurrence. However, there are no data on the type and frequency/schedule of follow-up or on the impact of the recurrence type and site on outcomes; indeed, it is not well known whether imaging-detected asymptomatic recurrences confer a better outcome than recurrences detected due to symptoms/signs. Novel imaging techniques and more precise risk stratification methods based on time-dependent probabilistic events hold significant promise for making a cost-efficient individualized, patient-centered, outcomes-oriented follow-up strategy possible. We show and discuss the follow-up protocols of the major urologic societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8525, Japan
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada;
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hoeh B, Kosiba M, Wenzel M, Meister N, Preisser F, Shariat SF, Hohenhorst JL, Becker A, Mandel P, Banek S, Roos F, Karakiewicz PI, Chun FK, Kluth LA. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic versus open radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial cancer patients: Experiences of a tertiary care single center. Curr Urol 2023; 17:292-298. [PMID: 37994335 PMCID: PMC10662872 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To test for differences in overall and recurrence-free survival between laparoscopic and open surgical approaches in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Materials and methods We retrospectively identified patients treated for UTUC from 2010 to 2020 from our institutional database. Patients undergoing laparoscopic or open RNU with no suspicion of metastasis (cM0) were for the current study population. Patients with suspected metastases at diagnosis (cM1) or those undergoing other surgical treatments were excluded. Tabulation was performed according to the laparoscopic versus open surgical approach. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to test for differences in overall and recurrence-free survival with regard to the surgical approach. Furthermore, separate Kaplan-Meier plots were used to test the effect of preoperative ureterorenoscopy on overall and recurrence-free survival within the overall study cohort. Results Of the 59 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy, 29% (n = 17) underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, whereas 71% (n = 42) underwent open nephroureterectomy. Patient and tumor characteristics were comparable between groups (p ≥ 0.2). The median overall survival was 93 and 73 months in the laparoscopic nephroureterectomy group compared to the open nephroureterectomy group (p = 0.5), respectively. The median recurrence-free survival did not differ between open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomies (73 months for both groups; p = 0.9). Furthermore, the median overall and recurrence-free survival rates did not differ between patients treated with and without preoperative ureterorenoscopy. Conclusions The results of this retrospective, single-center institution showed that overall and recurrence-free survival rates did not differ between patients with UTUC treated with laparoscopic and open RNU. Furthermore, preoperative ureterorenoscopy before RNU was not associated with higher overall or recurrence-free survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marina Kosiba
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Meister
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Jan Lukas Hohenhorst
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Severine Banek
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Frederik Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Felix K.H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A. Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luo Z, Jiao B, Huang T, Zhao H, He W, Bo Y, Ding Z, Zhang G. Development and external validation of a novel nomogram to predict intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy: a multicenter study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:11223-11231. [PMID: 37355502 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05016-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to establish and validate nomograms to predict the probability of intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper urinary tract epithelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS Clinical data of 528 patients with UTUC after RNU were collected from two medical centers between 2009 and 2020. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select variables for multivariable Cox regression analysis in the training cohort and included independent risk factors into nomogram models predicting IVR-free survival (IVRFS). Another center was applied as the external cohort to validate the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram by performing area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), consistency index (C-index), and calibration curve. RESULTS History of bladder cancer, tumor size, preoperative urine cytology, postoperative instillation, Ki-67, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were identified as independent risk factors for IVR. The prognosis model including these predictors demonstrated excellent discriminatory performance in both the training cohort (C-index, 0.814) and external validation cohort (C-index, 0.748). The calibration plots of the nomogram revealed good consistency in both cohorts. Finally, patients could be classified into two risk groups based on scores obtained from the nomogram, with significant differences in IVRFS. CONCLUSION Our study provided a reliable nomogram for predicting the probability of IVR in patients with UTUC after RNU. Risk stratification based on this model may assist urologists make optimal clinical decisions on the management of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenkai Luo
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 9 Dongdan Santiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Binbin Jiao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300. Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Hang Zhao
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Weifeng He
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Yuxuan Bo
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Zhenshan Ding
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
| | - Guan Zhang
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Somiya S, Kobori G, Ito K, Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Koterazawa S, Takaoka N, Haitani T, Nagahama K, Ito M, Megumi Y, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Akao T, Yamada H, Kanno T. Preoperative risk classification for intravesical recurrence after laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in a multi-institutional cohort. Int J Urol 2023; 30:853-858. [PMID: 37278493 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to identify preoperative risk factors and create a risk classification for intravesical recurrence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma only after laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 283 patients who had undergone laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial cancer between March 2002 and March 2020. The cumulative incidence of intravesical recurrence for 224 patients without previous or concomitant bladder cancer was examined using multivariate Fine-Gray competing risks proportional hazards models. A risk stratification model was created to predict subsequent patient outcomes based on the results. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 33.3 months, and 71 (31.7%) patients experienced intravesical recurrence. The estimated cumulative incidence of intravesical recurrence at one and 5 years was 23.5% and 36.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the presence of ureter tumors and multiple tumors were shown to be independently significant predictive factors for intravesical recurrence. Based on the results, we classified patients into three risk groups. The cumulative incidence rates of intravesical recurrence within 5 years after surgery were 24.4%, 42.5%, and 66.7% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We identified risk factors and created a risk classification model for intravesical recurrence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma only after laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Based on this model, an individualized surveillance protocol or adjuvant therapy could be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Go Kobori
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Naoto Takaoka
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takao Haitani
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kanji Nagahama
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuzuru Megumi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Toshiya Akao
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu J, Wu P, Lai S, Wang J, Hou H, Zhang Y. Prognostic models for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients after radical nephroureterectomy based on a novel systemic immune-inflammation score with machine learning. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:574. [PMID: 37349696 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11058-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of a novel systemic immune-inflammation score (SIIS) to predict oncological outcomes in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy(RNU). METHOD The clinical data of 483 patients with nonmetastatic UTUC underwent surgery in our center were analyzed. Five inflammation-related biomarkers were screened in the Lasso-Cox model and then aggregated to generate the SIIS based on the regression coefficients. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. The Cox proportional hazards regression and random survival forest model were adopted to build the prognostic model. Then we established an effective nomogram for UTUC after RNU based on SIIS. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time-dependent AUC), and calibration curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the net benefits of the nomogram at different threshold probabilities. RESULT According to the median value SIIS computed by the lasso Cox model, the high-risk group had worse OS (p<0.0001) than low risk-group. Variables with a minimum depth greater than the depth threshold or negative variable importance were excluded, and the remaining six variables were included in the model. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of the Cox and random survival forest models were 0.801 and 0.872 for OS at five years, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that elevated SIIS was significantly associated with poorer OS (p<0.001). In terms of predicting overall survival, a nomogram that considered the SIIS and clinical prognostic factors performed better than the AJCC staging. CONCLUSION The pretreatment levels of SIIS were an independent predictor of prognosis in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after RNU. Therefore, incorporating SIIS into currently available clinical parameters helps predict the long-term survival of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyong Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of the Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Beijing Hospital Continence Center, Beijing, China
| | - Pengjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of the Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Beijing Hospital Continence Center, Beijing, China
| | - Shicong Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, 100044, Beijing, China
| | - Jianye Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of the Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, China.
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Hospital Continence Center, Beijing, China.
| | - Huimin Hou
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of the Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, China.
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Hospital Continence Center, Beijing, China.
| | - Yaoguang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of the Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, China.
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Hospital Continence Center, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Birtle AJ, Capoun O, Compérat EM, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Gürses Andersson I, Liedberg F, Mariappan P, Hugh Mostafid A, Pradere B, van Rhijn BWG, Shariat SF, Rai BP, Soria F, Soukup V, Wood RG, Xylinas EN, Masson-Lecomte A, Gontero P. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 84:S0302-2838(23)02652-0. [PMID: 36967359 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 130.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France.
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alison J Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris
| | | | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Department of Urology, Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Evanguelos N Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lindner AK, Pichler M, Maier S, Ulmer H, Gorreri T, Luger AK, Barth DA, Seeber A, Kocher F, Pichler R. Optimization of postoperative surveillance protocols in upper tract urothelial cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1143030. [PMID: 36998439 PMCID: PMC10043336 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1143030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an aggressive disease that is managed by radical or organ-sparing surgery. High recurrence rates require early detection and strict follow-up (FU) protocols. Recommendations are assigned to a low level of evidence. Our aim was to identify time-to-tumor recurrence, analyze the temporal relation to recommended FU regimens, and provide a critical proposal for further surveillance. This retrospective study included 54 patients receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in high-risk UTUC and 14 patients assigned to kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with low-risk disease. FU surveillance protocols consisted of close intervals irrespective of the received type of surgery. In total, 68 patients were included with a median FU of 23 months. Mean overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in RNU compared to KSS (P = .027). Recurrence in the bladder and/or upper urinary tract (UUT) was 57.1% in KSS and 38.9% after RNU (P = .241). Mean recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly shorter in RNU patients compared to KSS (22.4 vs. 47.9 months, P = .013), and 76.2% of the recurrences in the RNU group occurred in the first postoperative year. UUT recurrence was diagnosed after a median of 3.0 (RNU) and 25.0 (KSS) months. There was a frequent onset of metastases in the RNU group, with 85.7% in the first year compared to the KSS group with 50%. Multivariable regression analysis showed that the tumor stage was the parameter independently related to OS (P = .002), RFS (P = .008), and metastasis-free survival (MFS, P = .002). In conclusion, surveillance of UTUC should be adapted to real-time occurrence patterns. Strict imaging protocols are recommended in the first two years irrespective of the method of surgery. As recurrence is equally distributed over the years after KSS, cystoscopy should be offered regularly for five years and diagnostic URS for three years. After RNU, cystoscopies should be decreased to yearly intervals after year three. Contralateral UUT should also be examined after RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Katharina Lindner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Translational Oncology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Maier
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hanno Ulmer
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas Gorreri
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Dominik A. Barth
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andreas Seeber
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Florian Kocher
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- *Correspondence: Renate Pichler,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comparison between robot-assisted versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: outcomes from a pooled analysis. J Robot Surg 2023:10.1007/s11701-023-01551-9. [PMID: 36884204 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01551-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) and open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to locate pertinent studies published in English up to January 2023. The primary outcomes evaluated included perioperative results, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Statistical analyses and calculations were performed using Review Manager 5.4. The study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022383035). In total, eight comparative trials, including 37,984 patients were enrolled. Compared to ONU, RANU was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] - 1.63 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.90, - 0.35; p = 0.01), less blood loss (WMD - 107.04 mL, 95% CI - 204.97, - 9.11; p = 0.03), less major complication(OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.88; p < 0.0001), and lower positive surgical margin (PSM) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12, 0.92; p = 0.03). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in operative time, transfusion rates, rate of lymph node dissection, lymph node yield, overall complications, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival. RANU has superior advantages compared to ONU in terms of length of hospital stay, blood loss, postoperative complications, and PSM, while providing comparable oncologic outcomes in patients with UTUC.
Collapse
|
17
|
Clinical Characteristics and Current Status of Treatment for Recurrent Bladder Cancer after Surgeries on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13051004. [PMID: 36900148 PMCID: PMC10000489 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13051004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare, but highly malignant, disease with an estimated annual incidence of 2 cases per 100,000 people. The main surgical treatment modalities for UTUC are radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection. After surgery, intravesical recurrence (IVR) can occur in up to 47% of patients, and 75% of them present with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, there are few studies focused on the diagnosis and treatment of postoperatively recurrent bladder cancer for patients with previous UTUC history (UTUC-BC), and many of the influencing factors are still controversial. In this article, we performed a narrative review of the recent literature, mainly summarizing the factors influencing postoperative IVR in patients with UTUC and discussing the subsequent prevention, monitoring, and treatment tools for it.
Collapse
|
18
|
Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051409. [PMID: 36900201 PMCID: PMC10000228 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify correlates of survival and perioperative outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing open (ORNU), laparoscopic (LRNU), and robotic (RRNU) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study that included non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU between 1990-2020. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical treatment and were adjusted by 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes per group were estimated for recurrence-free survival (RFS), bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Perioperative outcomes: Intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and overall (OPC) and major postoperative complications (MPCs; defined as Clavien-Dindo > 3) were assessed between groups. RESULTS Of the 2434 patients included, 756 remained after PSM with 252 in each group. The three groups had similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. The median follow-up was 32 months. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS between groups. BRFS was found to be superior with ORNU. Using multivariable regression analyses, LRNU and RRNU were independently associated with worse BRFS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.22-2.28, p = 0.001 and HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.22-2.47, p = 0.002, respectively). LRNU and RRNU were associated with a significantly shorter LOS (beta -1.1, 95% CI -2.2-0.02, p = 0.047 and beta -6.1, 95% CI -7.2-5.0, p < 0.001, respectively) and fewer MPCs (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.31-0.79, p = 0.003 and OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16-0.46, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this large international cohort, we demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS among ORNU, LRNU, and RRNU. However, LRNU and RRNU were associated with significantly worse BRFS, but a shorter LOS and fewer MPCs.
Collapse
|
19
|
Mertens LS, Sharma V, Matin SF, Boorjian SA, Houston Thompson R, van Rhijn BW, Masson-Lecomte A. Bladder Recurrence Following Upper Tract Surgery for Urothelial Carcinoma: A Contemporary Review of Risk Factors and Management Strategies. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:60-66. [PMID: 36793750 PMCID: PMC9922921 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Bladder recurrences have been reported in 22-47% of patients after surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This collaborative review focuses on risk factors for and treatment strategies to reduce bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for UTUC. Objective To review the current evidence on risk factors and treatment strategies for intravesical recurrence (IVR) after upper tract surgery for UTUC. Evidence acquisition This collaborative review is based on a literature search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and currently available guidelines on UTUC. Relevant papers on bladder recurrence (etiology, risk factors, and management) after upper tract surgery were selected. Special attention has been paid to (1) the genetic background of bladder recurrences, (2) bladder recurrences after ureterorenoscopy (URS) with or without a biopsy, and (3) postoperative or adjuvant intravesical instillations. The literature search was performed in September 2022. Evidence synthesis Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for UTUC are often clonally related. Clinicopathologic risk factors (patient, tumor, and treatment related) have been identified for bladder recurrences after UTUC diagnosis. Specifically, the use of diagnostic ureteroscopy before radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is associated with an increased risk of bladder recurrences. Further, a recent retrospective study suggests that performing a biopsy during ureteroscopy may further worsen IVR (no URS: 15.0%; URS without biopsy: 18.4%; URS with biopsy: 21.9%). Meanwhile, a single postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy has been shown to be associated with a reduced bladder recurrence risk after RNU compared with no instillation (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.82). Currently, there are no data on the value of a single postoperative intravesical instillation after ureteroscopy. Conclusions Although based on limited retrospective data, performing URS seems to be associated with a higher risk of bladder recurrences. Future studies are warranted to assess the influence of other surgical factors as well as the role of URS biopsy or immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy after URS for UTUC. Patient summary In this paper, we review recent findings on bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 20 512 2553.
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Surena F. Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Bas W.G. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wu G, Li H, Li J, Chen M, Xie L, Luo H, Chen Z, Ye D, Lai C. Case Report: Step-by-step procedures for total intracorporeal laparoscopic kidney autotransplantation in a patient with distal high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1142819. [PMID: 37168366 PMCID: PMC10164996 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1142819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A 47-year-old man presented to the emergency department with right abdominal pain and a new onset of painless haematuria two weeks earlier. Urine cytology test results suggested urothelial carcinoma. Computed tomography urography (CTU) showed a filling defect in the lower right ureter with right hydronephrosis. Lymphadenopathy and any signs of metastatic disease were absent on CTU. Cystoscopy appeared normal. Creatinine level was also normal before surgery. After the treatment options were discussed, the patient chose to undergo 3D total intracorporeal laparoscopic kidney autotransplantation, bladder cuff excision, and segmental resection of the proximal two-thirds of the ureter based on the membrane anatomy concept. After more than one year of follow-up, the patient was in good health and showed no signs of haematuria. Surveillance cystoscopy and CTU examination showed no evidence of disease recurrence. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that kidney-sparing surgery may be considered for carefully selected patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohao Wu
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Haomin Li
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Junqiang Li
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Mubiao Chen
- Operating Room, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Lishan Xie
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Huilan Luo
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Zhihui Chen
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Dongming Ye
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Caiyong Lai
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- Institute of Kidney Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Caiyong Lai,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Takemoto K, Hayashi T, Hsi RS, Kobatake K, Sekino Y, Kitano H, Ikeda K, Goto K, Hieda K, Sentani K, Kajiwara M, Nishizaka T, Teishima J, Oue N, Hinata N. Histological variants and lymphovascular invasion in upper tract urothelial carcinoma can stratify prognosis after radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:539.e9-539.e16. [PMID: 36244916 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with histological variants (HV) of bladder cancer have more advanced disease and poorer survival rates than those with pure urothelial carcinoma (UC). Moreover, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an important biomarker after RNU in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Thus, here we investigated the clinical and prognostic impact of HV and LVI in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS Data from 223 UTUC patients treated with RNU without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed differences in clinicopathological features and survival rates between patients with pure UC and those with HV. Conditional survival (CS) analysis was performed to obtain prognostic information over time. RESULTS A total of 32 patients (14.3%) had HV, with the most common variant being squamous differentiation, followed by glandular differentiation. UTUC with HV was significantly associated with advanced pathological T stage (pT ≥ 3), higher tumor grade (G3), and LVI, compared to pure UC (all P < 0.01). Progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), were all significantly worse in the HV group compared to the pure UC group (all, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, HV and LVI were independent predictors of CSS and OS. We classified the patients into three groups using these two predictors: low-risk (neither HV nor LVI), intermediate-risk (either HV or LVI), and high-risk (both HV and LVI). Significant differences in PFS, CSS, and OS rates were found among the 3 groups. In CS analysis, the conditional PFS, CSS, and OS rates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years improved with increased duration of event-free survival. CS analysis revealed that most progression events occurred within 2 years after RNU, and patients with risk factors had worse PFS at all time points. CONCLUSIONS A risk model using HV and LVI can stratify PFS, CSS, and OS of patients treated with RNU. In addition, CS analysis revealed that HV and LVI were poor prognostic factors over time after RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenshiro Takemoto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan; Department of Urology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tetsutaro Hayashi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | - Ryan S Hsi
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN
| | - Kohei Kobatake
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yohei Sekino
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kitano
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keisuke Goto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keisuke Hieda
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Sentani
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Kajiwara
- Department of Urology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takashi Nishizaka
- Department of Pathology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Jun Teishima
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Naohide Oue
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Hinata
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Neuzillet Y, Seisen T, Traxer O, Allory Y, Audenet F, Leon P, Loriot Y, Pradère B, Roumiguié M, Xylinas E, Masson-Lecomte A, Roupret M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). Prog Urol 2022; 32:1164-1194. [PMID: 36400481 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0). CONCLUSION These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Neuzillet
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France.
| | - T Seisen
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - O Traxer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire et EndoUrologie, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Service d'anatomopathologie, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - F Audenet
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - P Leon
- Service d'urologie, clinique Pasteur, Royan, France
| | - Y Loriot
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - B Pradère
- Service d'urologie UROSUD, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M Roupret
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kuo CC, Chen GH, Chang CH, Huang CY, Chen CH, Li CC, Wu WJ, Yu CC, Lo CW, Chen YT, Chen SH, Cheng PY, Hsueh T, Chiu AW, Lin PH, Tseng JS, Lin JT, Jiang YH, Wu CC, Lin WY, Huang HC, Chiang HS, Chiang BJ. Surgical outcome predictor analysis following hand-assisted or pure laparoscopic transperitoneal nephroureterectomy using the Taiwan upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma database. Front Surg 2022; 9:934355. [PMID: 36117820 PMCID: PMC9475171 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.934355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeTaiwan has a high incidence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes following transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (TP-HALNU) and transperitoneal pure laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (TP-LNU) from the Taiwan nationwide UTUC collaboration database using different parameters, including surgical volumes.Materials and methodsThe nationwide UTUC collaboration database includes 14 hospitals in Taiwan from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 622 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy between July 1988 and September 2020. In total, 322 patients who received TP-LNU or TP-HALNU were included in the final analysis. Clinical and pathological data and oncological outcomes were compared.ResultsOf the 322 patients, 181 and 141 received TP-LNU and TP-HALNU, respectively. There were no differences in clinical and histopathological data between the two groups. No differences were observed in perioperative and postoperative complications. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes between the two surgical approaches. In the multivariate analysis, the cohort showed that age ≥70 years, positive pathological lymph node metastasis, tumors located in the upper ureter, and male sex were predictive factors associated with an increased risk of adverse oncological outcomes. A surgical volume of ≥20 cases showed a trend toward favorable outcomes on cancer-specific survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.154, p = 0.052] and marginal benefit for overall survival (HR 0.326, p = 0.019) in the multivariate analysis.ConclusionAlthough different approaches to transperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy showed no significant differences in surgical outcomes, age, sex, lymph node metastasis, and tumor in the upper ureter in the following period were predictive factors for oncological outcomes. Higher surgical volume did not impact disease-free survival and bladder recurrence-free survival but was associated with improved overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Exploration of unknown influencing factors is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chun Kuo
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Guang-Heng Chen
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Hong Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pai-Yu Cheng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Han Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Che Huang
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Sun Chiang
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Correspondence: Bing-Juin Chiang ; Han-Sun Chiang
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Correspondence: Bing-Juin Chiang ; Han-Sun Chiang
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhao H, Jiao B, Liu K, Luo Z, Ding Z, Lai S, Ren J, Zhang G. Intravesical recurrence factors and outcome after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Multivariate analysis with propensity score matching. Front Oncol 2022; 12:984014. [PMID: 36059684 PMCID: PMC9433701 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.984014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe risk factors for intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remain inconsistent and unclear. Thus, the risk factors of IVR after RNU and the prognostic significance of the risk indicators were explored herein.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed UTUC patients upon RNU in our center from January 2009 to December 2019. After propensity score matching, 139 patients were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were measured using the Kaplan–Meier curve with a log-rank test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsWe included 139 patients with a median follow-up of 42 months, of which 48 patients had an intravesical recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed cytological abnormalities in urine (HR=3.101, P=0.002), hydronephrosis (HR=1.852, P=0.042), adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.242, P<0.001), and previous history of bladder cancer (HR=5.51, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for IVR. As for clinical outcomes, OS and CSS suggested disadvantages in patients with IVR compared with patients without recurrence (P=0.042 for OS, P<0.0001 for CSS), OS of patients with abnormal urine cytology and OS and CSS of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy did not present clinical significance, and other risk factors all affected the clinical outcome.ConclusionIn this propensity-score matching study, cytological abnormality of urine, hydronephrosis, adjuvant chemotherapy and previous history of bladder cancer were shown to be independent risk factors for IVR. Moreover, risk factors also influence clinical outcomes, thereby rendering it necessary to adopt more active postoperative surveillance and treatment strategies for these patients, which may help improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Zhao
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Binbin Jiao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kunpeng Liu
- Beijing Laboratory of Biomedical Materials, State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composite Materials, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenkai Luo
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenshan Ding
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shicong Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Ren
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Guan Zhang, ; Jian Ren,
| | - Guan Zhang
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Guan Zhang, ; Jian Ren,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pallauf M, König F, D’Andrea D, Laukhtina E, Mostafaei H, Motlagh RS, Quhal F, Aydh A, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Rajwa P, Lusuardi L, Soria F, Karakiewicz PI, Rouprêt M, Rink M, Lotan Y, Margulis V, Singla N, Xylinas E, Shariat SF, Pradere B. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Nomograms After UTUC Surgery. Front Oncol 2022; 12:907975. [PMID: 35847838 PMCID: PMC9283688 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.907975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current guidelines recommend assessing the prognosis in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients (UTUC) after surgery. However, no specific method is endorsed. Among the various prognostic models, nomograms represent an easy and accurate tool to predict the individual probability for a specific event. Therefore, identifying the best-suited nomogram for each setting seems of great interest to the patient and provider. Objectives To identify, summarize and compare postoperative UTUC nomograms predicting oncologic outcomes. To estimate the overall performance of the nomograms and identify the most reliable predictors. To create a reference tool for postoperative UTUC nomograms, physicians can use in clinical practice. Design A systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of Cochrane’s Prognosis Methods Group. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for studies published before December 2021. Nomograms were grouped according to outcome measurements, the purpose of use, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate nomogram group performance and predictor reliability. Reference tables summarizing the nomograms’ important characteristics were created. Results The systematic review identified 26 nomograms. Only four were externally validated. Study heterogeneity was significant, and the overall Risk of Bias (RoB) was high. Nomogram groups predicting overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and intravesical recurrence (IVR) had moderate discrimination accuracy (c-Index summary estimate with 95% confidence interval [95% CI] and prediction interval [PI] > 0.6). Nomogram groups predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) had good discrimination accuracy (c-Index summary estimate with 95% CI and PI > 0.7). Advanced pathological tumor stage (≥ pT3) was the most reliable predictor of OS. Pathological tumor stage (≥ pT2), age, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were the most reliable predictors of CSS. LVI was the most reliable predictor of RFS. Conclusions Despite a moderate to good discrimination accuracy, severe heterogeneity discourages the uninformed use of postoperative prognostic UTUC nomograms. For nomograms to become of value in a generalizable population, future research must invest in external validation and assessment of clinical utility. Meanwhile, this systematic review serves as a reference tool for physicians choosing nomograms based on individual needs. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=282596, identifier PROSPERO [CRD42021282596].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D’Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Departments of Urology and Oncology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
- Karl Landsteiner Insitute of Urology and Andrology, Karl Landsteiner Society, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
- *Correspondence: Benjamin Pradere,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Martini A, Lonati C, Nocera L, Fallara G, Raggi D, Herout R, Zamboni S, Ploussard G, Predere B, Mattei A, Simeone C, Krajewski W, Simone G, Soria F, Gontero P, Roupret M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Shariat SF, Necchi A, Moschini M. Oncologic Surveillance After Radical Nephroureterectomy for High-risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:451-459. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
27
|
Pentafecta for Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Proposal for Standardization of Quality Care Metrics. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071781. [PMID: 35406553 PMCID: PMC8997024 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Measuring quality of care indicators is important for clinicians and decision making in health care to improve patient outcomes. Objective: The primary objective was to identify quality of care indicators for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to validate these in an international cohort treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The secondary objective was to assess the factors associated with failure to validate the pentafecta. Design: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients treated with RNU for EAU high-risk (HR) UTUC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Five quality indicators were consensually approved, including a negative surgical margin, a complete bladder-cuff resection, the absence of hematological complications, the absence of major complications, and the absence of a 12-month postoperative recurrence. After multiple imputations and propensity-score matching, log-rank tests and a Cox regression were used to assess the survival outcomes. Logistic regression analyses assessed predictors for pentafecta failure. Results: Among the 1718 included patients, 844 (49%) achieved the pentafecta. The median follow-up was 31 months. Patients who achieved the pentafecta had superior 5-year overall- (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to those who did not (68.7 vs. 50.1% and 79.8 vs. 62.7%, respectively, all p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, achieving the pentafecta was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and OS. No preoperative clinical factors predicted a failure to validate the pentafecta. Conclusions: Establishing quality indicators for UTUC may help define prognosis and improve patient care. We propose a pentafecta quality criteria in RNU patients. Approximately half of the patients evaluated herein reached this endpoint, which in turn was independently associated with survival outcomes. Extended validation is needed.
Collapse
|
28
|
Prognostic value of renal function for upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical nephroureterectomy: Sex differences. J Formos Med Assoc 2022; 121:2182-2190. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
29
|
Zeng S, Ying Y, Yu X, Wang L, Zhang Z, Xu C. Impact of previous, simultaneous or intravesical recurrence bladder cancer on prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy: a large population-based study. Transl Androl Urol 2022; 10:4365-4375. [PMID: 35070818 PMCID: PMC8749064 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, the impact of previous, simultaneous, or subsequent bladder cancer on the prognosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is controversial. We aimed to investigate the impact of previous, simultaneous or intravesical recurrence (IVR) bladder cancer on the prognosis of UTUC based on a large population-based cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods A total of 8,431 UTUC patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2018 met the inclusion criteria were identified based on the SEER database. We evaluated the impact of bladder cancer on the prognosis of UTUC by Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching (PSM). Results In all, 6,831 patients only had UTUC (UTUC-only), 880 patients with previous or simultaneous bladder cancer (UTUC-Bca), 720 patients with IVR (UTUC-IVR). After adjusting baseline covariates that varied significantly among groups, we found UTUC-Bca cohort, regardless of tumor grade and stage, had poorer prognosis than UTUC-only cohort. In general, we demonstrated IVR had no significant impact on the prognosis of UTUC compared to PSM matched patients without IVR. However, subgroup analysis revealed that UTUC patients with subsequent MIBC recurrence or shorter interval (<20 months) between UTUC and IVR had worse prognosis compared with UTUC-only cohort. Conclusions UTUC patients with previous or simultaneous bladder cancer, IVR with MIBC, and shorter interval between UTUC and IVR were significant predictor for worse prognosis. Thus, more stringent postoperative surveillance and active treatment strategies should be considered for UTUC patients with those risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxiong Zeng
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yidie Ying
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaowen Yu
- Department of Geriatrics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhensheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuanliang Xu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Molecular intricacies of upper tract urothelial carcinoma and their relevance for therapy considerations. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:48-53. [PMID: 34772864 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this study was to give an overview of molecular alterations in upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) and to discuss them in the context of current and prospective systemic therapies. RECENT FINDINGS UTUCs not only share a similar molecular landscape with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), but also have distinct molecular features that can have an impact on therapy selection. FGFR3 alterations occur with a significant higher frequency in UTUC, with up to 40% of tumours harbouring FGFR3 driver mutations compared with 20% in UCB. In addition, a substantial number of high-grade UTUC show an immune-depleted phenotype and a luminal papillary expression subtype, thus predisposing them for FGFR inhibitor treatment. Approximately 20% of UTUC tumours have acquired mutations in TP53 and demonstrate a significant degree of genomic instability, which makes them candidates for systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Whereas microsatellite instability (MSI) is rare in sporadic UTUC, 5-10% of UTUC patients have germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, which leads to high MSI with enriched neoantigen load and presumably better response rates to immunotherapy. SUMMARY Treatment decisions in UTUC should take molecular tumour characteristics into account. The currently most therapy-relevant molecular alterations in UTUC comprise FGFR3 mutational status and mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes with concomitant microsatellite instability.
Collapse
|
31
|
Olson KM, Faraj KS, Singh P, Tyson MD. Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
32
|
Nadler N, Oedorf K, Jensen JB, Azawi N. Intraoperative Mitomycin C Bladder Instillation During Radical Nephroureterectomy Is Feasible and Safe. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 34:41-46. [PMID: 34934966 PMCID: PMC8655381 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bladder recurrence after radical treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is frequent, and patients are required to undergo surveillance cystoscopies following surgery. The use of intravesical adjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted method to prevent bladder recurrence, but the timing of this method is not standardized and the concept of intraoperative use is unexplored. Objective The objective of the study is to examine the feasibility and safety of intraoperative intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) instillation using a closed-circuit system following bladder cuff excision and bladder closure. Design setting and participants All patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC at the Department of Urology of Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark from 2017 to 2020 were identified. Patient complications within 30 d and data regarding oncological outcome were registered. Outcome measurements and statistical ana lysis Clavien-Dindo grade for complications and descriptive statistics were used. Results During the study period, 64 patients underwent RNU. Of these patients, 49 received bladder instillation of MMC during RNU. Complications were observed in 11 patients (21.4%), where four patients (8.2%) had Clavien-Dindo complication grade (CD) I, four patients (8.2%) had CD II, one patient (2%) had CD III, and one patient (2%) had CD IIIa. None of the complications were suspected to be related to MMC. Five of the 15 patients (33%) who did not receive MMC experienced complications. There were no significant differences in complication rates between patients who received MMC and those who did not. Study limitations include a small sample size and a single-center study. Conclusions Intraoperative vesical instillation of MMC is feasible and was, in the present study, not associated with an increased complication rate. Patient summary Bladder recurrence after radical treatment of upper urinary tract cancer is frequent. The present study findings indicate that intraoperative bladder irrigation with the chemotherapeutic mitomycin C during surgery does not lead to excessive complications and could be a method to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Nadler
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kimie Oedorf
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nessn Azawi
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Giudici N, Bonne F, Blarer J, Minoli M, Krentel F, Seiler R. Characteristics of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in the context of bladder cancer: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:4036-4050. [PMID: 34804846 PMCID: PMC8575564 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinomas (UC) arise from the urothelium that covers the proximal urethra, urinary bladder, and the upper urinary tract. In daily routine and clinical trials UC originating from different locations are often treated and investigated in the same manner. However, differences between the two locations seem to be apparent and may question in handling them as a single oncologic entity. In this review we discuss similarities and differences between bladder and upper urinary tract UC and consider their potential impact on treatment strategies. Despite similarities of UC in the bladder (BC) and the upper urinary tract (UTUC), clinicopathologic and molecular differences may question to generally assemble both as a single tumor entity. Treatment standards for UTUC are often adopted from BC. However, a specific investigation in the former may still be meaningful as shown by the example of adjuvant cisplatin based chemotherapy. In conclusion, future investigations should prioritize the understanding of the tumor biology of both BC and UTUC. This may reveal which UTUC can be treated according to treatment standards of BC and in which cases, a separate approach may be more appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Giudici
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fieke Bonne
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Blarer
- Department of Urology, Hospital Center Biel/Bienne, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland
| | - Martina Minoli
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Friedemann Krentel
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Seiler
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chung JH, Song W, Kang M, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Sung HH. Conditional Intravesical Recurrence-Free Survival Rate After Radical Nephroureterectomy With Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:730114. [PMID: 34692504 PMCID: PMC8529179 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.730114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the conditional intravesical recurrence (IVR)–free (IVRF) survival rate in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who had no history of bladder cancer and no concomitant bladder cancer. Hence, we aimed to analyze a relatively large number of patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision (RNUx). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 1,095 patients with UTUC who underwent RNUx. Their baseline characteristics, bladder tumor history, and UTUC features were analyzed to evaluate oncological outcomes. To determine the factors affecting IVR, surgical modality, use of preoperative ureteroscopy, TNM stage, and pathological outcomes were evaluated. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the factors affecting IVR. Conditional IVRF survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results Among the 1,095 patients, 462 patients developed IVR, and the mean time to the development of IVR was 13.08 ± 0.84 months after RNUx. A total of 30.74% of patients with IVR and 15.32% of those without IVR had a history of bladder cancer (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that a history of bladder cancer, multifocal tumors, use of preoperative ureteroscopy, extravesical bladder cuffing method, lymph node involvement, positive surgical margins, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy were determined to be risk factors for IVR. The conditional IVRF rate was 74.0% at 12 months after RNUx, 87.1% at 24 months after RNUx, 93.6% at 36 months after RNUx, and 97.3% at 60 months after RNUx. The median IVRF survival period was 133.00 months for all patients. In patients with IVRF at 24 months after RNUx, only ureteroscopy was an independent risk factor for IVR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.945, p = 0.040]. In patients with IVRF at ≥36 months, there was no significant factor affecting IVR. Conclusions Active IVR assessment is required until 36 months after RNUx. In addition, patient education and regular screening tests, such as urine analysis and cytology, are required for patients with IVRF for ≥36 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Liu G, Yao Z, Chen G, Li Y, Liang B. Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14639. [PMID: 34309982 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects. METHODS A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was done and 36 studies included 23 013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; 8178 of them were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14 835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91-66.90, P < .001), shorter hospital stay (MD, -1.71; 95% CI, -2.42 to -1.00, P < .001), lower blood loss (MD, -133.82; 95% CI, -220.92 to -46.73, P = .003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.67, P < .001) and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90, P < .001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2-5-years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69-1.18, P = .46), 2-5-years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.28, P = .68) and 2-5-years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91-1.87, P = .15). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, lower blood loss, transfusion need and overall complication compared with open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Zeqin Yao
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Yalang Li
- Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
The Impact of Diagnostic Ureteroscopy Prior to Radical Nephroureterectomy on Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10184197. [PMID: 34575307 PMCID: PMC8465597 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The incidence of intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is reported in up to 50% of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). It was suggested that preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) could increase the IVR rate after RNU. However, the available data are often conflicting. Thus, in this systematic review and meta-analysis we sought to synthesize available data for the impact of pre-RNU URS for UTUC on IVR and other oncological outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in June 2021. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were conducted. The primary endpoint was intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), with the secondary endpoints being cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results: Among a total of 5489 patients included in the sixteen selected papers, 2387 (43.4%) underwent diagnostic URS before RNU and 3102 (56.6%) did not. Pre-RNU diagnostic URS was significantly associated with worse IVRFS after RNU (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.29–1.61, p < 0.001) than RNU alone. However, subgroup analysis including patients without biopsy during URS revealed no significant impact of diagnostic URS on IVRFS (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.90–1.80, p = 0.16). The results of other analyses showed no significant differences in CSS (HR = 0.94, p = 0.63), OS (HR: 0.94, p = 0.56), and MFS (HR: 0.91, p = 0.37) between patients who underwent URS before RNU and those who did not. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis confirm that diagnostic URS prior to RNU is significantly associated with worse IVRFS, albeit with no concurrent impact on the other long-term survival outcomes. Our results indicate that URS has a negative impact on IVRFS only when combined with endoscopic biopsy. Future studies are warranted to assess the role of immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy in patients undergoing biopsy during URS for suspected UTUC.
Collapse
|
37
|
Liu G, Yao Z, Chen G, Li Y, Liang B. Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:729686. [PMID: 34485377 PMCID: PMC8414582 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In this meta-analysis, we will focus on evaluating the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects. Methods: A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was performed, and 36 studies included 23,013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; of them, 8,178 were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14,835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Results: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91–66.90, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (MD, −1.71; 95% CI, −2.42 to −1.00, p < 0.001), lower blood loss (MD, −133.82; 95% CI, −220.92 to −46.73, p = 0.003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47–0.67, p < 0.001), and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70–0.90, p < 0.001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2–5 years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69–1.18, p = 0.46), 2–5 years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69–1.28, p = 0.68), and 2–5 years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91–1.87, p = 0.15). Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, and lower blood loss, transfusion need, and overall complication compared to open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Zeqin Yao
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Yalang Li
- Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen H, Wang M, Weng T, Wei Y, Yang L, Ren K, Tang Z, Gou X. Prognostic Analysis of Diagnostic Ureteroscopic Biopsy for Intravesical Recurrence of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urol Int 2021; 106:186-194. [PMID: 34492655 DOI: 10.1159/000517789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate whether diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) biopsy is unfavourable for bladder tumour recurrence in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 195 patients diagnosed with UTUC, who were divided into a diagnostic URS group (URS+) and a nondiagnostic URS group (URS-) according to whether diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy was performed. A Cox regression model was used to analyse the risk factors for intravesical recurrence (IVR)-free survival (IRFS) and overall survival (OS) in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the influence of factors on the incidence of IVR and the cumulative survival rate of UTUC. RESULTS Patients with a maximum tumour diameter of less than 3.1 cm, low-stage tumours, and ureteral tumours were more likely to undergo diagnostic URS before radical surgery. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumour pathological stage and diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy can be used as predictors of IVR after RNU (p = 0.019, 0.033). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis found that diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy was a high-risk factor for IRFS (p = 0.034). Subcomponent analysis showed that pTa/Tis/T1, pT2, pT3/pT4 stage, and diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy with pTa/Tis/T1 stage were unfavourable for IVR (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION Diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy before RNU should be carefully selected for patients with atypical preoperative UTUC. We believe that intravesical chemotherapy drug perfusion can be used after surgery to prevent IVR if biopsy is unavoidable, but this still requires further prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Chen
- Department of Urology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, China,
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Tonghui Weng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yu Wei
- Department of Master, The Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ke Ren
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhaobing Tang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xin Gou
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lai S, Long X, Wu P, Liu J, Seery S, Hou H, Liu M, Li Y, Wang J. Developing a nomogram for predicting intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy: a retrospective cohort study of mainland Chinese patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:1132-1141. [PMID: 33634310 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of Ki-67 in predicting subsequent intravesical recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy and to develop a predictive nomogram for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients. METHODS This retrospective analysis involved 489 upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision. The data set was randomly split into a training cohort of 293 patients and a validation cohort of 196 patients. Immunohistochemical analysis was used to assess the immunoreactivity of the biomarker Ki-67 in the tumor tissues. A multivariable Cox regression model was utilized to identify independent intravesical recurrence predictors after radical nephroureterectomy before constructing a nomographic model. Predictive accuracy was quantified using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve. Decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical benefit of models. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 54 months, intravesical recurrence developed in 28.2% of this sample (n = 137). Tumor location, multifocality, pathological T stage, surgical approach, bladder cancer history and Ki-67 expression levels were independently associated with intravesical recurrence (all P < 0.05). The full model, which intercalated Ki-67 with traditional clinicopathological parameters, outperformed both the basic model and Xylinas' model in terms of discriminative capacity (all P < 0.05). Decision-making analysis suggests that the more comprehensive model can also improve patients' net benefit. CONCLUSIONS This new model, which intercalates the Ki-67 biomarker with traditional clinicopathological factors, appears to be more sensitive than nomograms previously tested across mainland Chinese populations. The findings suggest that Ki-67 could be useful for determining risk-stratified surveillance protocols following radical nephroureterectomy and in generating an individualized strategy based around intravesical recurrence predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shicong Lai
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xingbo Long
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Pengjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jianyong Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Samuel Seery
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.,Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Huimin Hou
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jianye Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rouprêt M, Audenet F, Roumiguié M, Pignot G, Masson-Lecomte A, Compérat E, Houédé N, Larré S, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. [French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma]. Prog Urol 2021; 30:S52-S77. [PMID: 33349430 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30750-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION -The purpose was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS - A systematic Medline search was performed between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS - The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low risk lesion: unifocal tumor, possible complete resection and low grade and absence of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce risk of bladder recurrence. A systemic chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION - These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-urology, AP-HP, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Paris, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, Montpellier Université, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles - Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-urology, AP-HP, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pizzighella M, Bruyere F, Peyronnet B, Grafeille V, Brichart N, Mori K, Verhoest G, Bensalah K, Moschini M, Xylinas E, Pradere B. THE MANAGEMENT OF DISTAL URETER DURING RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY DOES NOT INFLUENCE BLADDER RECURRENCE. J Endourol 2021; 36:77-82. [PMID: 34121446 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The bladder cuff management and its surgical approach represent an essential and debated step in radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The objective of our study was to determine which bladder-cuff management has the best oncological outcomes in terms of bladder recurrence-free survival ( BRFS). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent an open robot-assisted laparoscopic (RNU) or a combined RNU between March 2012 and March 2019 in three academic hospitals. Bladder-cuff management approaches were divided into two categories: (O-cuff) open bladder cuff and (R-cuff) robot-assisted bladder cuff. We assessed demographic characteristics, distal ureter approach, pathology, and operative details as well as oncological outcomes including BRFS. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of bladder recurrence. RESULTS A total of 117 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 40.4 months. Patients with a history of bladder cancer, RNU with pure laparoscopic approach and endoscopic bladder cuff were excluded. There were 53 (45%) patients in the O-cuff group and 64 (55%) in the R-cuff group. BRFS at 2 years was 73.3% and 72.7% for O-cuff and R-cuff respectively (p=0.9). On multivariable analysis, distal ureter tumor (odds ratio (OR): 6.24, 95% CI: 1.95- 21.5; p < 0.01) was associated with bladder recurrence (BR). CONCLUSION There was no statistically significant difference in BRFS between the O-cuff and R-cuff groups. Nevertheless, we underlined that distal ureter tumor was associated with bladder recurrence. Although we did not find differences regarding the surgical approach, bladder-cuff remains a very important step of RNU and caution should be taken when performed laparoscopically to avoid any tumor spillage. Risk factors for bladder cancer recurrence might be taken into account for the choice of its surgical approach. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Franck Bruyere
- CHRU Tours, 26928, urology, 2 bd Tonnellé, Tours, France, 37044;
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- CHU Rennes, Department of urology, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, Rennes, France, 35000;
| | - Vivien Grafeille
- CHU Rennes, 36684, Department of urology, Rennes, Bretagne, France;
| | - Nicolas Brichart
- CHR Orleans, 52817, Department of urology, Orleans, Centre, France;
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- The Jikei University School of Medicine, Urology, Minato, Tokyo, Japan;
| | - Gregory Verhoest
- RENNES Univeristy Hospital, Urology, Henri Le Guillou St, RENNES, France, 35033;
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Rennes University Hospital (France), Urology, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, Rennes, France, 35000;
| | - Marco Moschini
- Luzerner Kantonsspital, 30748, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland, 6000.,United States;
| | | | - Benjamin Pradere
- CHU Tours, Department of urology, Tours, France.,Medical University of Vienna, 27271, urology, Wien, Wien, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Robot-assisted versus open radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: A retrospective cohort study across ten years. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101607. [PMID: 34022505 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical nephroureterectomy is the gold standard of treatment for high-risk non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. However, the optimal surgical approach remains a controversial debate. This study compared the perioperative and oncological outcomes of open and robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomies. METHODS 131 consecutive radical nephroureterectomies (66 robot-assisted nephroureterectomies vs. 65 open nephroureterectomies) for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract at a single tertiary referral center were included from 2009 to 2019. The perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared between both surgical approaches, including logistic regression analysis, propensity score matching, Kaplan Meier analyses, and Cox regression models. RESULTS Overall, robot-assisted surgery had less blood loss (150 ml vs. 250, p = 0.004) and less positive surgical margins (1.5% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.004) at a comparable operating time (robotic 188min vs. 178). Any grade complications were more frequent after open surgery (40.9% vs. 63.1%, p = 0.011), and the length of stay was shorter after robotic nephroureterectomy (9 days vs. 12, p < 0.001). These differences remained significant in the propensity score matched analysis, except for the complication rates, which were still lower for the robotic approach, but no longer significant. At a median follow-up of 30.9 months (range 1.4-129.5), neither the progression-free survival (PFS, 2-year: robotic 66.7% vs. open 55.3%), nor the overall survival differed significantly (OS, 2-year: robotic 76.2% vs. open 68.4%). In the Cox regression, the surgical approach did not impact the PFS or OS. Lymph node metastases (HR 3.32, p = 0.008) had the strongest impact on the PFS besides patient age (HR 1.51 per 10 years, p = 0.025) and prior cystectomy (HR 2.42, p = 0.026) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy had significant perioperative advantages at comparable oncological outcomes compared to open surgery for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract at a high volume center, experienced in robotic surgery.
Collapse
|
43
|
Milojevic B, Dzamic Z, Grozdic Milojevic I, Bumbasirevic U, Santric V, Kajmakovic B, Janicic A, Durutovic O, Dragicevic D, Bojanic N, Radisavcevic D, Sipetic Grujicic S. Prognostic value of Balkan endemic nephropathy and gender on upper tract urothelial carcinoma outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy: A cohort study. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:786.e9-786.e16. [PMID: 34006438 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To identify the prognostic impact of residence in a BEN-endemic area and gender on upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) outcomes in Serbian patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS The study included 334 consecutive patients with UTUC. Patients with permanent residence in Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN) or non-endemic areas from their birth to the end of follow-up were included in the analysis. Cox regression analyses were used to address recurrence-free (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) estimates. RESULTS Female patients were more likely to have preoperative pyuria (P = 0.01), tumor multifocality was significantly associated with the female gender (P = 0.003). Gender was not associated with pathologic stage and grade, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, adjuvant chemotherapy, bladder cancer history, tumor size, distribution of tumor location, preoperative anemia and demographic characteristics. A total of 107 cases recurred, with a median time to bladder recurrence of 24.5 months. History of bladder tumor (HR, 1.98; P = 0.005), tumor multifocality (HR, 3.80; P < 0.001) and residence in a BEN-endemic area (HR, 1.81; P = 0.01) were independently associated with bladder cancer recurrence. The 5-year bladder cancer RFS for the patients from areas of BEN was 77.8 % and for the patients from non-BEN areas was 64.7 %. The 5-year CSS for the men was 66.2% when compared to 66.6% for the women (P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS Residence in a BEN-endemic area represents an independent predictor of bladder cancer recurrence in patients who underwent RNU. Gender cannot be used to predict outcomes in a single-centre series of consecutive patients who were treated with RNU for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogomir Milojevic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
| | - Zoran Dzamic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Isidora Grozdic Milojevic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Center of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Serbia
| | - Uros Bumbasirevic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Veljko Santric
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Boris Kajmakovic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Aleksandar Janicic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Otas Durutovic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dejan Dragicevic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Nebojsa Bojanic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Björnsson O, Jónsson E, Guðmundsson EO, Marteinsson VÞ, Nikulásson SÞ, Guðjónsson S. Operative management in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Iceland: a population-based study. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:197-202. [PMID: 33913379 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1916073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radical nephroureterectomy is the standard treatment of organ-confined upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The objective of this study was to investigate survival and bladder recurrence rate in Icelandic patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterctomy (RNU) or other procedures with curative intent. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients who were diagnosed with UTUC in Iceland from 2003 to 2016 and treated with curative intent were included in the study. Information on patients was obtained retrospectively from patients' medical records and from the Icelandic Cause of Death Registry. RESULTS Overall 63 patients underwent a procedure for UTUC with curative intent in Iceland during the study period. The median age was 71 years and the majority were male (65%). In 50 patients (79%), the tumor was a primary UTUC. The most common procedure was RNU (78%) and eight patients (13%) underwent a kidney-sparing procedure. No patient died within 90 d of surgery. Twenty-eight patients (44%) had pathological stage T2 or higher, whereas 35 patients (56%) had pathological stage T1 or lower. The median follow-up time was 98.8 months . During the follow-up time 25 patients (40%) were diagnosed with recurrence in the bladder. Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 67%. CONCLUSIONS This population-based study shows that the oncologic outcome in Icelandic patients with UTUC is similar to what has been reported in other countries. Bladder recurrence rate is high and can hopefully be reduced by improvements in surgical and intravesical instillation treatment. Possibly more kidney-sparing surgeries could have been done during the study period; however, careful selection for those procedures is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oddur Björnsson
- Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Eiríkur Jónsson
- Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abrate A, Vella M, Mogorovich A, Giaimo R, Serretta V, Pavone C, Bartoletti R, Simonato A. Time to safely omit bladder cuff removal for low-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:417-420. [PMID: 33887892 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04299-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Abrate
- Unit of Urology, Department of Surgery, ASST Valtellina e Alto Lario, Sondrio, Italy
| | - Marco Vella
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Mogorovich
- Unit of Urology, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord Ovest, Viareggio, Lucca, Italy
| | - Rosa Giaimo
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Serretta
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Carlo Pavone
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
The cornerstone for diagnosis and treatment of bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma involves surgery. Transurethral resection of bladder tumors forms the basis of further management. Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder carcinoma provides good oncologic outcomes. However, it can be a morbid procedure, and advances such as minimally invasive surgery and early recovery after surgery need to be incorporated into routine practice. Diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract carcinoma is needed in cases of doubt after cytology and imaging studies. Low-risk cancers can be managed with conservative endoscopic surgery without compromising oncological outcomes; however, high-risk disease necessitates radical nephroureterectomy.
Collapse
|
47
|
Lai S, Wu P, Diao T, Seery S, Liu J, Hou H, Liu M, Wang J. Does Xylinas' nomogram accurately predict intravesical recurrence risk after radical nephroureterectomy for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma when applied to Asian populations? Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:469-477. [PMID: 32734304 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To validate a prognostic nomogram (Xylinas' nomogram) for intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients of Asian descent. METHODS Clinicopathological and survival data from 243 primary urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision between January 2004 and May 2017 were collated. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors associated with intravesical recurrence-free survival. External validation was determined using regression coefficients abstracted from previously published data. Performance was then quantified through calibration and discrimination, according to concordance indexes (c-index) in receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS 163 patients met our eligibility criteria and were finally included in this study. At a median follow-up of 60 months, intravesical recurrence occurred in 29.4% (n = 48). Multivariable analysis revealed that being male, ureteral tumor location, tumor multifocality and previous bladder cancer were independent prognostic factors of intravesical recurrence-free survival. When Xylinas' nomogram was applied to our cohort, the discriminatory power was found to be roughly equivalent with a c-index of 68.3% for the reduced model and 68.4% for the full model. Calibration plots also revealed intravesical recurrence predictions at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months had relative concordance. Contrasting the respective performances of the reduced and full model suggests there is no significant difference between the two (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This nomogram appears accurate at predicting intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for primary urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Asian populations. However, it remains necessary to data mine for unknown prognostic factors for optimization. Further external validation is required across larger, ethically diverse populations before applying this nomogram in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shicong Lai
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Pengjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Tongxiang Diao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Samuel Seery
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianyong Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Huimin Hou
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jianye Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.,Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wu J, Xu PH, Luo WJ, Dai B, Shen YJ, Ye DW, Wang YC, Zhu YP. Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Large Population-Based Investigation of Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Survival Outcomes. Front Surg 2021; 8:590448. [PMID: 33693025 PMCID: PMC7938894 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.590448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), 22–47% developed bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. Furthermore, the effect of surgery for UTUC-bladder cancer (BC) has not been well validated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of standard primary BC surgical strategy on survival of patients diagnosed with UTUC-BC. Patients and Methods: A total of 676 UTUC-BC patients and 197,753 primary BC patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2016, were identified based on the SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Fine and Gray competing risks analysis were performed to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Multivariate Cox regression model and competing risks regression model were used to identify independent risk factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was also performed to adjust potential confounding factors. Results: The baseline characteristics and survival outcomes of the two BC patient cohorts are quite different. For UTUC-BC patients, no significant difference in OS (NMIBC: p = 0.88; MIBC: p = 0.98) or cumulative incidence of CSM (NMIBC: p = 0.12; MIBC: p = 0.96) were noted for various surgical procedures. Local tumor treatment and partial cystectomy for UTUC-NMIBC patients produced lower 1-year (6.1%) and 3-year CSM (16.2%). Radical cystectomy for UTUC-MIBC patients produced lower 1-year (11.8%) but higher 3-year CSM (62.7%). After PSM for covariates, UTUC-BC patients still had a worse prognosis after surgery compared with primary BC patients. Based on regression models, older age, advanced T stage, N positive disease, M positive disease, and shorter interval between UTUC and BC were identified as independent risk factors for UTUC-BC patients. Conclusion: Standard primary BC surgical strategy did not provide significant survival benefit for UTUC-BC patients. Compared with primary BC patients, UTUC-BC patients had a worse prognosis after surgery, suggesting that current primary BC surgical guidelines are not entirely appropriate for UTUC-BC patients. Our findings underscore the continued importance and need for better prognosis and improved guidelines for management of UTUC-BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Wu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Pei-Hang Xu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Jie Luo
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Dai
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Jun Shen
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding-Wei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu-Chen Wang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Ping Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Selection, Administration and Description of Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Therapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
50
|
Risk Stratification of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma for Kidney-Sparing Surgery. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|