1
|
Cei F, Larcher A, Rosiello G, Basile G, Musso G, Re C, Fallara G, Belladelli F, Brembilla G, Guazzarotti G, De Cobelli F, Marandino L, Necchi A, Briganti A, Salonia A, Bertini R, Montorsi F, Capitanio U. Preoperative risk calculator for the probability of completing nephron sparing for kidney cancer. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:247.e21-247.e27. [PMID: 38644109 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In absence of predictive models, preoperative estimation of the probability of completing partial (PN) relative to radical nephrectomy (RN) is invariably inaccurate and subjective. We aimed to develop an evidence-based model to assess objectively the probability of PN completion based on patients' characteristics, tumor's complexity, urologist expertise and surgical approach. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS 675 patients treated with PN or RN for cT1-2 cN0 cM0 renal mass by seven surgeons at one single experienced centre from 2000 to 2019. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES The outcome of the study was PN completion. We used a multivariable logistic regression (MVA) model to investigate predictors of PN completion. We used SPARE score to assess tumor complexity. We used a bootstrap validation to compute the model's predictive accuracy. We investigated the relationship between the outcomes and specific predictors of interest such as tumor's complexity, approach and experience. RESULTS Of 675 patients, 360 (53%) were treated with PN vs. 315 (47%) with RN. Smaller tumors [Odds ratio (OR): 0.52, 95%CI 0.44-0.61; P < 0.001], lower SPARE score (OR: 0.67, 95%CI 0.47-0.94; P = 0.02), more experienced surgeons (OR: 1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.02; P < 0.01), robotic (OR: 10; P < 0.001) and open (OR: 36; P < 0.001) compared to laparoscopic approach resulted associated with higher probability of PN completion. Predictive accuracy of the model was 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.95). CONCLUSIONS The probability of PN completion can be preoperatively assessed, with optimal accuracy relaying on routinely available clinical information. The proposed model might be useful in preoperative decision-making, patient consensus, or during preoperative counselling. PATIENT SUMMARY In patients with a renal mass the probability of completing a partial nephrectomy varies considerably and without a predictive model is invariably inaccurate and subjective. In this study we build-up a risk calculator based on easily available preoperative variables that can predict with optimal accuracy the probability of not removing the entire kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cei
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Musso
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fallara
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Belladelli
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco De Cobelli
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bertini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Maida F, Grosso AA, Lambertini L, Nardoni S, Giudici S, Paganelli D, Coco S, Minervini A. Seeking for the determinants of renal function loss after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: what is below the tip of the iceberg. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:233. [PMID: 38819579 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01998-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Lambertini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Samuele Nardoni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Sofia Giudici
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Paganelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Coco
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferriero M, Ragusa A, Mastroianni R, Tuderti G, Costantini M, Anceschi U, Misuraca L, Brassetti A, Guaglianone S, Bove AM, Leonardo C, Gallucci M, Papalia R, Simone G. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Off-Clamp Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Cystic Renal Tumors: A Propensity Score Matched-Pair Comparison of Cystic versus Pure Clear Cell Carcinoma. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2985-2993. [PMID: 38920711 PMCID: PMC11203107 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31060227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Few data are available on survival outcomes of partial nephrectomy performed for cystic renal tumors. We present the first long-term oncological outcomes of cystic (cystRCC) versus pure clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Our "renal cancer" prospectively maintained database was queried for "cystRCC" or "ccRCC" and "off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy" (off-C RPN). The two groups were compared for age, gender, tumor size, pT stage, and Fuhrman grade. A 1:3 PSM analysis was applied to reduce covariate imbalance to <10% and two homogeneous populations were generated. Student t- and Chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Ten-year oncological outcomes were compared between the two cohorts using log-rank test. Univariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of disease progression after RPN. Out of 859 off-C RPNs included, 85 cases were cystRCC and 774 were ccRCC at histologic evaluation. After applying the PSM analysis, two cohorts were selected, including 64 cystRCC and 170 ccRCC. Comparable 10-year cancer-specific survival probability (95.3% versus 100%, p = 0.146) was found between the two cohorts. Conversely, 10-year disease-free survival probability (DFS) was less favorable for pure ccRCC than cystRCC (66.69% versus 90.1%, p = 0.035). At univariable regression analysis, ccRCC histology was the only independent predictor of DFS probability (HR 2.96 95% CI 1.03-8.47, p = 0.044). At the 10-year evaluation, cystRCC showed favorable oncological outcomes after off-C RPN. Pure clear cell variant histology displayed a higher rate of disease recurrence than cystic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Alberto Ragusa
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (R.P.)
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Manuela Costantini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Salvatore Guaglianone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (R.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (M.C.); (U.A.); (L.M.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.M.B.); (C.L.); (M.G.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iwatani K, Kimura S, Urabe F, Matsukawa A, Aikawa K, Yanagisawa T, Shimizu K, Miki K, Kimura T, Miki J. Preoperative Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Before Percutaneous Cryoablation for Clinical T1b Renal Tumors. Cureus 2024; 16:e60345. [PMID: 38883051 PMCID: PMC11177236 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To treat renal cell carcinoma, local ablative therapy is a viable alternative treatment option. Traditionally, cryoablation has been used for the treatment of T1a renal tumors. However, recent technological developments have expanded its application to encompass select T1b renal tumors. Here, we present a retrospective study of the utilization of preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to induce tumor shrinkage and achieve favorable outcomes in percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). Methods We retrospectively evaluated the data from nine patients with clinical T1b renal tumors who underwent PCA. Six patients with TKI pretreatment at our institution between 2016 and 2018 were included in the study. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of preoperative TKIs prior to PCA. Results All patients received axitinib with a median treatment duration of 80.5 days (IQR: 49-85). All patients experienced tumor shrinkage (median: 13.5 mm; IQR: 7-16); five experienced downstaging to T1a following tumor shrinkage. There were no severe adverse events (common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3) in TKIs. After the discontinuation of TKIs for two weeks, all PCA procedures were performed successfully without any severe complications. During a median follow-up of 46 months, no local recurrence was observed in any of these cases. Conclusion In cases with large renal tumors, TKI pretreatment prior to PCA had potential benefits in terms of tumor shrinkage and long-term local control rate. Further well-designed studies in larger populations are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, JPN
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, JPN
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Koichi Aikawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN
| | | | - Kanichiro Shimizu
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, JPN
| | - Kenta Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mastroianni R, Chiacchio G, Perpepaj L, Tuderti G, Brassetti A, Anceschi U, Ferriero M, Misuraca L, D’Annunzio S, Bove AM, Guaglianone S, Flammia RS, Proietti F, Pula M, Milanese G, Leonardo C, Galosi AB, Simone G. Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Scored Match Analysis. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:2822. [PMID: 38732928 PMCID: PMC11086121 DOI: 10.3390/s24092822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Off-clamp partial nephrectomy represents one of the latest developments in nephron-sparing surgery, with the goal of preserving renal function and reducing ischemia time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the functional, oncologic, and perioperative outcomes between off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (off-C RAPN) and off-clamp open partial nephrectomy (off-C OPN) through a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. A 1:1 PSM analysis was used to balance variables potentially affecting postoperative outcomes. To report surgical quality, 1 year trifecta was used. Univariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of trifecta achievement. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) probabilities between groups. Overall, 542 patients were included. After PSM analysis, two homogeneous cohorts of 147 patients were obtained. The off-C RAPN cohort experienced shorter length of stay (LoS) (3.4 days vs. 5.4 days; p < 0.001), increased likelihoods of achieving 1 year trifecta (89.8% vs. 80.3%; p = 0.03), lower postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≤ 2 complications (1.3% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), and lower postoperative transfusion rates (3.4% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.008). At univariable analysis, the surgical approach (off-C RAPN vs. off-C OPN, OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.09-4.46, p = 0.02) was the only predictor of 1 year trifecta achievement. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, no differences were observed between the two groups in terms of OS (log-rank p = 0.451), CSS (log-rank p = 0.476), DFS (log-rank p = 0.678), and MFS (log-rank p = 0.226). Comparing RAPN and OPN in a purely off-clamp scenario, the minimally invasive approach proved to be a feasible and safe surgical approach, with a significantly lower LoS and minor rate of postoperative complications and transfusions as a result of improved surgical quality expressed by higher 1 year trifecta achievement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Mastroianni
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Chiacchio
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
- Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.P.); (G.M.); (A.B.G.)
| | - Leonard Perpepaj
- Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.P.); (G.M.); (A.B.G.)
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Simone D’Annunzio
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Salvatore Guaglianone
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Rocco Simone Flammia
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Flavia Proietti
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Marco Pula
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Giulio Milanese
- Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.P.); (G.M.); (A.B.G.)
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.P.); (G.M.); (A.B.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (A.B.); (U.A.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (A.M.B.); (S.G.); (R.S.F.); (F.P.); (M.P.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ditonno F, Bertolo R, Veccia A, Costantino S, Montanaro F, Artoni F, Baielli A, Boldini M, Brusa D, De Marco V, Migliorini F, Porcaro AB, Rizzetto R, Cerruto MA, Autorino R, Antonelli A. Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8658. [PMID: 38622320 PMCID: PMC11018825 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59404-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement (vs. omission) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), focusing on complications, time to canalization, deambulation, and pain management. A prospectively-maintained institutional database was queried to get data of patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses between January 2018 and May 2023 at our Institution. Baseline, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. Retrieved patients were stratified based upon placement of abdominal drain (Y/N). Descriptive analyses comparing the two groups were conducted as appropriate.77 After adjusting for potential confounders, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate significant predictors of any grade and "major" complications. 342 patients were included: 192 patients in the "drain group" versus 150 patients in the "no-drain" group. Renal masses were larger (p < 0.001) and at higher complexity (RENAL score, p = 0.01), in the drain group. Procedures in the drain group had statistically significantly longer operative time, ischemia time, and higher blood loss (all p-values < 0.001). The urinary collecting system was more likely involved compared to the no-drain group (p = 0.01). At multivariate analysis, abdominal drainage was not a significant predictor of any grade (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.33-1.87) and major postoperative complications (OR 3.62, 95%CI 0.53-9.68). Patients in the drain group experienced a statistically significantly higher hemoglobin drop (p < 0.01). Moreover, they exhibited statistically significant higher paracetamol consumption (p < 0.001) and need for additional opioids (p = 0.02). In summary, the study results suggest the safety of omitting drain placement and remark on the need for personalized decision-making, which considers patient and procedural factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sonia Costantino
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Brusa
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
DI Maida F, Bravi CA, Piramide F, Dell'oglio P, DE Groote R, Andras I, Turri F, Covas Moschovas M, Paciotti M, Grosso AA, Minervini A, Larcher A. How to tailor renorrhaphy technique during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:263-266. [PMID: 38742561 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.05878-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio DI Maida
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy -
| | - Carlo A Bravi
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, UK
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Ruben DE Groote
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Filippo Turri
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio A Grosso
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mazzoleni F, Perri D, Pacchetti A, Morini E, Berti L, Besana U, Faiella E, Moramarco L, Santucci D, Fior D, Bozzini G. Indocyanine green-marked fluorescence-guided off-clamp versus intraoperative ultrasound-guided on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: Outcomes on surgical procedure. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:466-472. [PMID: 38633831 PMCID: PMC11019242 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To compare surgical and functional outcomes between off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with indocyanine-green tumour marking through preliminary superselective embolization and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with intraoperative ultrasound identification of the renal mass. Material and methods One hundred and forty patients with a single renal mass underwent indocyanine-green fluorescence-guided off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with preoperative superselective embolization (Group A, 70 patients) versus intraoperative ultrasound-guided on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without embolization (Group B, 70 patients). We assessed operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, length of stay, renal function, need for ancillary procedures and blood transfusions. Results Mean tumour size was 24 versus 25 mm in Group A versus Group B (p = 0.19). Mean operative time was 86.5 versus 121.8 min (p = 0.02), mean blood loss was 72.8 versus 214.2 mL (p = 0.02), and mean haemoglobin drop on postoperative day 1 was 1.1 versus 2.6 g/dL (p = 0.04) in Group A versus Group B. One-month creatinine, hospital stay and enucleated tumour volume were comparable. Ten postoperative complications occurred in Group A (13.3%) and 11 in Group B (15.3%). Following superselective embolization, no patients required blood transfusions versus two patients in Group B. Postoperative selective renal embolization was needed in one case per group. Conclusions Preoperative superselective embolization of a renal mass with indocyanine-green before off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy significantly reduces operative time and intraoperative blood loss compared to on-clamp intraoperative ultrasound-guided robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. A longer follow-up is needed to establish the effect on renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davide Perri
- Division of UrologySant'Anna HospitalSan Fermo della BattagliaItaly
| | - Andrea Pacchetti
- Division of UrologySant'Anna HospitalSan Fermo della BattagliaItaly
| | - Elena Morini
- Division of UrologySant'Anna HospitalSan Fermo della BattagliaItaly
| | - Lorenzo Berti
- Division of UrologyBusto Arsizio HospitalBusto ArsizioItaly
| | - Umberto Besana
- Division of UrologySant'Anna HospitalSan Fermo della BattagliaItaly
| | - Eliodoro Faiella
- Division of RadiologySant'Anna HospitalSan Fermo della BattagliaItaly
| | - Lorenzo Moramarco
- Division of RadiologySant'Anna HospitalSan Fermo della BattagliaItaly
| | | | - Davide Fior
- Division of RadiologySant'Anna HospitalSan Fermo della BattagliaItaly
| | - Giorgio Bozzini
- Division of UrologySant'Anna HospitalSan Fermo della BattagliaItaly
- Division of UrologyBusto Arsizio HospitalBusto ArsizioItaly
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sica M, Piazzolla P, Amparore D, Verri P, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Volpi G, Piana A, Di Dio M, Alba S, Gatti C, Burgio M, Busacca G, Giordano A, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Checcucci E. 3D Model Artificial Intelligence-Guided Automatic Augmented Reality Images during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3454. [PMID: 37998590 PMCID: PMC10670293 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
More than ever, precision surgery is making its way into modern surgery for functional organ preservation. This is possible mainly due to the increasing number of technologies available, including 3D models, virtual reality, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence. Intraoperative surgical navigation represents an interesting application of these technologies, allowing to understand in detail the surgical anatomy, planning a patient-tailored approach. Automatic superimposition comes into this context to optimally perform surgery as accurately as possible. Through a dedicated software (the first version) called iKidney, it is possible to superimpose the images using 3D models and live endoscopic images during partial nephrectomy, targeting the renal mass only. The patient is 31 years old with a 28 mm totally endophytic right-sided renal mass, with a PADUA score of 9. Thanks to the automatic superimposition and selective clamping, an enucleoresection of the renal mass alone was performed with no major postoperative complication (i.e., Clavien-Dindo < 2). iKidney-guided partial nephrectomy is safe, feasible, and yields excellent results in terms of organ preservation and functional outcomes. Further validation studies are needed to improve the prototype software, particularly to improve the rotational axes and avoid human help. Furthermore, it is important to reduce the costs associated with these technologies to increase its use in smaller hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Sica
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Pietro Piazzolla
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.P.); (G.V.); (C.G.)
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.P.); (G.V.); (C.G.)
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy;
| | | | - Cecilia Gatti
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.P.); (G.V.); (C.G.)
| | - Mariano Burgio
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Angelo Giordano
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.P.); (G.V.); (C.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tuderti G, Mastroianni R, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, Ferriero M, Misuraca L, Guaglianone S, Costantini M, Torregiani G, Saidian A, Mari A, Narasimhan R, Derweesh I, Minervini A, Gallucci M, Simone G. Assessing the Trade-off Between the Safety and Effectiveness of Off-clamp Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses with a High RENAL Score: A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes in a Multicenter Analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:1037-1043. [PMID: 37263828 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumors with a high nephrometry score represent a challenging surgical scenario for which robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a primary option in expert hands. OBJECTIVE To compare perioperative and functional outcomes of off-clamp and on-clamp RPN in patients with renal masses with a high RENAL score (≥9). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS For this retrospective analysis, an RPN data set including 1604 patients treated at three institutions between 2003 and 2021 was queried for cases with a RENAL score ≥9. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We used 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to select a cohort in which imbalances between the off-clamp and on-clamp groups were minimized. We used χ2 and Student t tests to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the probability of having an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥45 ml/min during follow-up. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of a trifecta outcome (negative surgical margin status, no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications, eGFR decline ≤30%) and of retaining eGFR ≥45 ml/min over time. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS From an overall cohort of 354 patients (142 on-clamp, 212 off-clamp), a homogeneous PSM cohort of 78 patients in each group was selected (p ≥ 0.17). In the PSM cohort, operative time was significantly shorter in the off-clamp group (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in the rates of severe complications (p = 0.32) and positive surgical margins (p = 0.24). The rate of trifecta achievement was significantly higher in the off-clamp group (83.3% vs 67.9%; p = 0.03). Warm ischemia time >20 min was independently negatively associated with trifecta achievement (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.74). Moreover, the off-clamp group had a significantly higher probability of retaining eGFR ≥45 ml/min over time (3 yr: 95.9% vs 81.6%; p = 0.03); every 1-min increase in warm ischemia time reduced this probability by 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS We found a favorable trade-off between the benefits and risks of off-clamp RPN, with similar perioperative outcomes and a net benefit in terms of trifecta achievement and long-term renal function outcomes in comparison to on-clamp RPN. PATIENT SUMMARY The complexity of surgery for kidney tumors can be assessed using the RENAL score, which is a measure of the location and size of a kidney tumor. In a multicenter series of patients with tumors with a high RENAL score, we compared outcomes between strategies with (on-clamp) and without (off-clamp) clamping of kidney blood vessels during robot-assisted removal of part of the affected kidney. We found that off-clamp surgery results in better postoperative kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Manuela Costantini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Torregiani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Ava Saidian
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Diego Health System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rekha Narasimhan
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Diego Health System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ithaar Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Diego Health System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pandolfo SD, Cerrato C, Wu Z, Franco A, Del Giudice F, Sciarra A, Verze P, Lucarelli G, Imbimbo C, Perdonà S, Cherullo EE, Porpiglia F, Derweesh IH, Autorino R. A systematic review of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes for advanced indications: Large tumors (cT2-T3), solitary kidney, completely endophytic, hilar, recurrent, and multiple renal tumors. Asian J Urol 2023; 10:390-406. [PMID: 38024426 PMCID: PMC10659988 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become widely used for treatment of renal cell carcinoma and it is expanding in the field of complex renal masses. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze outcomes of RAPN for completely endophytic renal masses, large tumors (cT2-T3), renal cell carcinoma in solitary kidney, recurrent tumors, completely endophytic and hilar masses, and simultaneous and multiple tumors. Methods A comprehensive search in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was performed in December 2022 for English language papers. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the role of RAPN in the setting of each category of complex renal masses considered. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes. Results After screening 1250 records, 43 full-text manuscripts were selected, comprising over 8500 patients. Twelve and thirteen studies reported data for endophytic and hilar renal masses, respectively. Five and three studies reported outcomes for cT2-T3 and solitary kidney patients, respectively. Four studies focused on redo-RAPN for recurrent tumors. Two studies investigated simultaneous bilateral renal masses and five reports focused on multiple tumor excision in ipsilateral kidney. Conclusion Over the past decade, evidence supporting the use of RAPN for the most challenging nephron-sparing surgery indications has continuously grown. Although limitations remain including study design and lack of detailed long-term functional and oncological outcomes, the adoption of RAPN for the included advanced indications is associated with favorable surgical outcomes with good preservation of renal function without compromising the oncological result. Certainly, a higher likelihood of complication might be expected when facing extremely challenging cases. However, none of these indications should be considered per se an exclusion criterion for performing RAPN. Ultimately, a risk-adapted approach should be employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urologic Sciences, La Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urologic Sciences, La Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department Uro-Gynecology, IRCCS G. Pascale Foundation, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Ithaar H. Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Okhawere KE, Pandav K, Grauer R, Wilson MP, Saini I, Korn TG, Meilika KN, Badani KK. Trends in the surgical management of kidney cancer by tumor stage, treatment modality, facility type, and location. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2451-2460. [PMID: 37470910 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01664-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Partial nephrectomy (PN) is an alternative to radical nephrectomy (RN) in the appropriate localized renal tumor. The scope of PN has expanded over time and, since the advent and proliferation of minimally invasive surgery, more surgeons have access to and have been trained in laparoscopic and robotic technology. Amid the changing surgical landscape, we sought to characterize the trends in management by cancer stage, institution type, and geographic location using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We queried the NCDB for patients with kidney cancer from 2004 to 2019. Overall, 241,311 patients who underwent PN or RN were included in the study. The nephrectomy approach was categorized as robotic partial (RPN), robotic radical (RRN), laparoscopic partial (LPN), laparoscopic radical (LRN), open or unspecified partial (OPN), and open or unspecified radical (ORN). The categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentages. Overall, there was an increase in the utilization of robotic approaches from 2010 to 2019. For cT1 tumors, the use of RPN and RRN increased from 14.27 to 33.06% and 5.24% to 19.63%, respectively. The use of ORN for cT2 and cT3 tumors declined, with rates dropping from 54.71 to 10.76% and 64.71 to 46.64%, respectively. Conversely, the utilization of RRN rose during this period. However, ORN remained the most common approach for cT3 tumors. The use of RPN increased across different facility types, with the highest utilization observed in academic/research programs. The use of ORN for cT2 and cT3 tumors declined across facility types, although it remained most prevalent in community cancer programs. The use of robot-assisted surgery to treat localized renal cancer increased in the US between 2010 and 2019 across all stages of disease. RPN became the most used approach for cT1 disease, while LRN was preferred for cT2 disease. ORN remained the approach of choice for cT3 disease throughout the study period. Trends in facility type and geographic location largely mirrored the overall trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kennedy E Okhawere
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Krunal Pandav
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ralph Grauer
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Michael P Wilson
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Indu Saini
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Talia G Korn
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Kirolos N Meilika
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ketan K Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lv Z, Chen G, Chen X, Li Y, Bao E, Hu K, Yu X. Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: a meta-analysis of perioperitive and functional outcomes. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:1955-1965. [PMID: 37415066 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01652-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being used for the complex surgical management of renal masses. The comparison of RAPN with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) has not yet led to a unified conclusion with regard to perioperative outcomes. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the perioperative outcomes of RAPN compared with OPN. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database for randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compare OPN to RAPN. The primary outcomes included perioperative, functional and oncologic. The odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Five studies, comprising 936 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings indicated that there were no significant differences in blood loss, minor complication rate, eGFR decline from baseline, positive surgical margin, and ischemia time between OPN and RAPN. However, RAPN was associated with a shorter hospital stay (WMD 1.64 days, 95% CI - 1.17 to 2.11; p < 0.00001), lower overall complication rate (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21-2.45; p < 0.002), lower transfusion rate (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.39-5.02; p = 0.003) and lower major complication rate (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.11-2.79; p < 0.02) compared to OPN. Additionally, the operation time for OPN was shorter than that for RAPN (WMD - 10.77 min, 95% CI - 18.49 to - 3.05, p = 0.006). In comparison with OPN, RAPN exhibits better results in terms of hospital stay, overall complications, blood transfusion rate, and major complications, with no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, minor complications, PSM, ischemia time, and short-term postoperative eGFR decline. However, the operation time of OPN is slightly shorter than that of RAPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ZongYing Lv
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - GuiYuan Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - XiaoBin Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Yugen Li
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - ErHao Bao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - XiaoDong Yu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hawlina S, Cerovic K, Kondza A, Popovic P, Bizjak J, Smrkolj T. Does tumor rupture during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy have an impact on mid-term tumor recurrences? Radiol Oncol 2023; 57:348-355. [PMID: 37470753 PMCID: PMC10476903 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative kidney tumor rupture (TR) can occur during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in daily clinical practice, but there are no solid guidelines on the management and implications of it. The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of TR on tumor recurrences, what a surgeon should do if this adverse event occurs, and how to avoid it. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the first 100 patients who underwent RAPN at University Medical Centre Ljubljana, between 2018 and 2021. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (TR and no-TR) and were compared according to patient, tumor, pathologic, perioperative and postoperative characteristics and tumor recurrences, using the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-squared test. RESULTS Of the 100 patients, 14 had TR (14%); this occurred in tumors with higher RENAL nephrometry scores (P = 0.028) and mostly with papillary renal cell carcinomas (P = 0.043). Median warm ischemia time was longer for the TR group (22 vs. 15 min, P = 0.026). In terms of studied outcomes, there were no cases of local or distant recurrence after a median observation time of 39 months (interquartile range, 31-47 months) in both groups. We observed positive surgical margins on the final oncologic report in one case in the no-TR group. CONCLUSIONS Tumor rupture during RAPN seems to be of no mid-term oncologic importance. According to presented results, we would recommend surgeons to proceed with tumor resection if this event occurs and abstain from conversion to radical nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy. However, more similar cases should be studied to make more solid conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Hawlina
- Clinical Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Kosta Cerovic
- Clinical Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andraz Kondza
- Clinical Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Peter Popovic
- Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jure Bizjak
- Clinical Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tomaz Smrkolj
- Clinical Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hattori Y, Kambe T, Mine Y, Hagimoto H, Kokubun H, Abe Y, Yamashita D, Tsutsumi N, Arizono S, Yamasaki T, Kawakita M. Impact of renal sinus protrusions on achieving trifecta in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:584-590. [PMID: 37636206 PMCID: PMC10447216 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this work is to assess the relationship between the morphological characteristics of a central tumour and the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Subjects and Methods We retrospectively analysed the data from 186 patients with central tumours involving the renal sinus, who underwent RAPN in a single-centre study between February 2015 and June 2022. All cases were assigned a RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative images. The shape of the protruding portion of the tumour was classified into four types: 'flat', 'spherical', 'single-hump', and 'complex-hump', and was independently assessed by two readers. The trifecta is defined as the warm ischemia time within 25 min, negative surgical margins, and no major postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with the failing trifecta. Results Trifecta was achieved in 113 cases (60.8%), and the achievement rate in flat, spherical, single-hump, and complex-hump types was 83.3%, 74.5%, 64.3%, and 21.3%, respectively. Prolonged warm ischemia time was the primary cause of the failure to achieve the trifecta. The rate of positive surgical margins and upstage to pathological T3a was greater for complex humps while the rate of major complications and postoperative GFR preservation did not differ between shapes. On multivariate analysis for failing trifecta achievement, the complex-hump protrusion was found to be an independent positive predictor (odds ratio: 15.8; p < 0.001), whereas the height and width of protrusion were not significantly related. Conclusions The degree of difficulty varied among central tumours, and it was not possible to precisely measure it with existing scoring systems. Complex-hump protrusions strongly correlate with failure to achieve the trifecta. Preoperative assessment of the morphology of protrusion is useful for predicting outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuto Hattori
- Department of UrologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | - Takanari Kambe
- Department of UrologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | - Yuta Mine
- Department of UrologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | - Hiroki Hagimoto
- Department of UrologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | - Hidetoshi Kokubun
- Department of UrologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | - Yohei Abe
- Department of UrologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | - Daisuke Yamashita
- Department of PathologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | - Naofumi Tsutsumi
- Department of UrologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | - Shigeki Arizono
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| | | | - Mutsushi Kawakita
- Department of UrologyKobe City Medical Centre General HospitalKobeJapan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee CU, Alabbasi M, Chung JH, Kang M, Seo SI. How far has robot-assisted partial nephrectomy reached? Investig Clin Urol 2023; 64:435-447. [PMID: 37668199 PMCID: PMC10482664 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Nephron-sparing surgery is the standard treatment for small renal mass (SRM). Nephron-sparing surgery has evolved from an open to a minimally invasive technique. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is the latest technique in this field and is reported to be safe and feasible, showing oncologically and functionally superior or compatible results compared with open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for SRM. This is not limited to only SRM but also applies to large and complex renal masses and other challenging situations. RAPN showed good oncological and functional outcomes for ≥clinical T2 renal tumors, complex renal masses (PADUA score ≥10, RENAL score ≥10), hilar renal tumors, and multiple renal tumors. In addition, the outcomes of RAPN in these challenging cases were not inferior to those in conventional cases. RAPN could also be applied to a number of challenging cases in which the open technique was considered first. RAPN showed good results in patients with a solitary kidney, horseshoe kidney, and in repeat surgeries. Furthermore, RAPN could be safely performed on obese, elderly, and pediatric patients. Finally, this review evaluates efficiency and utility of RAPN based on the results of challenging cases of renal masses and to project the future of RAPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mahmood Alabbasi
- Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Riffa, Southern, Bahrain
| | - Jae Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shin TY, Han H, Min HS, Cho H, Kim S, Park SY, Kim HJ, Kim JH, Lee YS. Prediction of Postoperative Creatinine Levels by Artificial Intelligence after Partial Nephrectomy. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1402. [PMID: 37629692 PMCID: PMC10456500 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Multiple factors are associated with postoperative functional outcomes, such as acute kidney injury (AKI), following partial nephrectomy (PN). The pre-, peri-, and postoperative factors are heavily intertwined and change dynamically, making it difficult to predict postoperative renal function. Therefore, we aimed to build an artificial intelligence (AI) model that utilizes perioperative factors to predict residual renal function and incidence of AKI following PN. Methods and Materials: This retrospective study included 785 patients (training set 706, test set 79) from six tertiary referral centers who underwent open or robotic PN. Forty-four perioperative features were used as inputs to train the AI prediction model. XG-Boost and genetic algorithms were used for the final model selection and to determine feature importance. The primary outcome measure was immediate postoperative serum creatinine (Cr) level. The secondary outcome was the incidence of AKI (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/h). The average difference between the true and predicted serum Cr levels was considered the mean absolute error (MAE) and was used as a model evaluation parameter. Results: An AI model for predicting immediate postoperative serum Cr levels was selected from 2000 candidates by providing the lowest MAE (0.03 mg/dL). The model-predicted immediate postoperative serum Cr levels correlated closely with the measured values (R2 = 0.9669). The sensitivity and specificity of the model for predicting AKI were 85.5% and 99.7% in the training set, and 100.0% and 100.0% in the test set, respectively. The limitations of this study included its retrospective design. Conclusions: Our AI model successfully predicted accurate serum Cr levels and the likelihood of AKI. The accuracy of our model suggests that personalized guidelines to optimize multidisciplinary plans involving pre- and postoperative care need to be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Young Shin
- Synergy A.I. Co., Ltd., Seoul 07985, Republic of Korea;
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Republic of Korea;
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 07985, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunho Han
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea;
| | - Hyun-Seok Min
- Tomocube, Inc., Daejeon 34109, Republic of Korea; (H.-S.M.); (H.C.)
| | - Hyungjoo Cho
- Tomocube, Inc., Daejeon 34109, Republic of Korea; (H.-S.M.); (H.C.)
| | - Seonggyun Kim
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Republic of Korea;
| | - Sung Yul Park
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea;
| | - Hyung Joon Kim
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Republic of Korea;
| | - Jung Hoon Kim
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Gwangmyeong 14353, Republic of Korea;
| | - Yong Seong Lee
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Gwangmyeong 14353, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Li KP, Chen SY, Wang CY, Yang L. Comparison between minimally invasive partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1769-1782. [PMID: 37094827 PMCID: PMC10389432 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in patients with complex renal tumors (defined as PADUA or RENAL score ≥7). METHODS The present study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/A394 . We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until October 2022. MIPN and OPN-controlled trials for complex renal tumors were included. The primary outcomes were perioperative results, complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS A total of 2405 patients were included in 13 studies. MIPN outperformed OPN in terms of hospital stay [weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.84 days, 95% CI -2.35 to -1.33; P <0.00001], blood loss (WMD -52.42 ml, 95% CI -71.43 to -33.41; P <0.00001), transfusion rates [odds ratio (OR) 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.67; P =0.002], major complications (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.86; P =0.007) and overall complications (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.59; P <0.0001), while operative time, warm ischemia time, conversion to radical nephrectomy rates, estimated glomerular decline, positive surgical margins, local recurrence, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrated that MIPN was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, less blood loss, and fewer complications in treating complex renal tumors. MIPN may be considered a better treatment for patients with complex tumors when technically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Li Yang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rosiello G, Larcher A, Fallara G, Cignoli D, Re C, Martini A, Tian Z, Karakiewicz PI, Mottrie A, Boarin M, Villa G, Trevisani F, Marandino L, Raggi D, Necchi A, Bertini R, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Capitanio U. A comprehensive assessment of frailty status on surgical, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy-A large, retrospective, single-center study. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:149.e17-149.e25. [PMID: 36369233 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial nephrectomy (PN) is a challenging procedure, which can be associated with severe complications. In consequence, the search for accurate and independent indicators of unfavorable surgical outcomes appears warranted. We aimed at evaluating the impact of frailty status on surgical, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing PN for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS A retrospective, single-center study including 1,282 patients treated with PN for clinically localized cT1 RCC was performed. The modified Frailty Index (mFI) was used to assess preoperative frailty. Multivariable logistic, Poisson and linear regression analyses(MVA) tested the effect of frailty on complications, acute kidney injury(AKI), renal function decline after PN. Cumulative incidence and competing-risk analyses investigated survival outcomes. RESULTS Of 1,282 patients, 220 (17%) were frail. Overall, 982 (76%) vs. 123 (9.6%) vs. 171 (13%) patients underwent open vs. laparoscopic vs. robot-assisted PN. Median follow-up was 66 (IQR: 35-107) months. At MVA, frailty status predicted increased risk of complications [Odds ratio (OR): 1.46, 95%CI 1.17-1.84; P < 0.001]. Moreover, frail patients were at higher risk of postoperative AKI (OR: 1.95, 95%CI 1.13-3.35; P = 0.01). In frail patients, renal function permanently decreased over time (P = 0.01) without any renal function plateau or improvement during the follow-up, which were instead observed in the nonfrail cohort. At competing-risks analyses, frailty status predicted higher risk of other-cause mortality [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.67, 95%CI 1.05-2.66; P = 0.02], but not of cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS Frailty status predicts higher risk of adverse surgical outcomes after PN. Moreover, greater renal function decline was observed in frail patients, compared with nonfrail patients. Finally, the risk of OCM significantly overcomes the risk of dying due to RCC in frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Rosiello
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fallara
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Cignoli
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Mattia Boarin
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Villa
- Center for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Trevisani
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bertini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Molecular Imaging Diagnosis of Renal Cancer Using 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT/CT and Girentuximab PET-CT-Current Evidence and Future Development of Novel Techniques. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040593. [PMID: 36832081 PMCID: PMC9954934 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Novel molecular imaging opportunities to preoperatively diagnose renal cell carcinoma is under development and will add more value in limiting the postoperative renal function loss and morbidity. We aimed to comprehensively review the research on single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) molecular imaging and to enhance the urologists' and radiologists' knowledge of the current research pattern. We identified an increase in prospective and also retrospective studies that researched to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions and between different clear cell renal cell carcinoma subtypes, with small numbers of patients studied, nonetheless with excellent results on specificity, sensitivity and accuracy, especially for 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT that delivers quick results compared to a long acquisition time for girentuximab PET-CT, which instead gives better image quality. Nuclear medicine has helped clinicians in evaluating primary and secondary lesions, and has lately returned with new and exciting insights with novel radiotracers to reinforce its diagnostic potential in renal carcinoma. To further limit the renal function loss and post-surgery morbidity, future research is mandatory to validate the results and to clinically implement the diagnostic techniques in the context of precision medicine.
Collapse
|
21
|
Michiels C, Khene ZE, Prudhomme T, Boulenger de Hauteclocque A, Cornelis FH, Percot M, Simeon H, Dupitout L, Bensadoun H, Capon G, Alezra E, Estrade V, Bladou F, Robert G, Ferriere JM, Grenier N, Doumerc N, Bensalah K, Bernhard JC. 3D-Image guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR study 51). World J Urol 2023; 41:303-313. [PMID: 33811291 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03645-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a difficult procedure with risk of significant perioperative complications. The objective was to evaluate the impact of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with 3D model reconstructions on perioperative outcomes of RAPN. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent RAPN for kidney tumor by three high-volume expert surgeons from academic centers. Clinical data were collected prospectively after written consent into the French kidney cancer network database UroCCR (CNIL-DR 2013-206; NCT03293563). Our cohort was divided into two groups: 3D-Image guided RAPN group (3D-IGRAPN) and control group. A propensity score according to age, pre-operative renal function and RENAL tumor complexity score was used. Both surgical techniques were compared in terms of perioperative outcomes. RESULTS The initial study cohort included 230 3D-IGRAPN and 415 control RAPN. Before propensity-score matching, patients in the 3D-IGRAPN group had a larger tumor (4.3 cm vs. 3.5 cm, P < 0.001) and higher RENAL complexity score (9 vs. 8, P < 0.001). Following propensity-score matching, there were 157 patients in both groups. The rate of major complications was lower for patients in the 3D-IGRAPN group (3.8% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.04). The median percentage of eGFR variation recorded at first follow-up was lower in the 3D-IGRAPN group (- 5.6% vs. - 10.5%, P = 0.002). The trifecta achievement rate was higher in the 3D-IGRAPN group (55.7% vs. 45.1%; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION Three-dimensional kidney reconstructions use for pre-operative planning and intraoperative surgical guidance lowers the risk of complications and improve perioperative clinical outcomes of RAPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Michiels
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
| | | | - Thomas Prudhomme
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - François H Cornelis
- Department of Radiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Radiology, Tenon Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Mélanie Percot
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Hélène Simeon
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Laure Dupitout
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Henri Bensadoun
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Grégoire Capon
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric Alezra
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Vincent Estrade
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Franck Bladou
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Nicolas Grenier
- Department of Radiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nicolas Doumerc
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Li Q, Zhang Y, Liu M, Li H, Guan W, Meng X, Hu Z, Wang Z, Wang S, Li Z, Liu J, Liu Z. Identification of predictive factors for outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy based on three-dimensional reconstruction of preoperative enhanced computerized tomography. Front Oncol 2023; 13:927582. [PMID: 36925922 PMCID: PMC10011456 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.927582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Information from the RENAL score is limited. This study aimed to identify new parameters based on three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of preoperative enhanced computerized tomography (CT) for predicting outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN). Materials and methods The records of kidney cancer patients who underwent RPN at Tongji Hospital from March 2015 to July 2019 were reviewed. Demographic data, laboratory examinations, postoperative hospitalization time, and enhanced CT were retrospectively collected. Some tumor parameters were obtained from 3D reconstruction of CT data. The association between these predictive factors and outcomes after RPN was analyzed. Results A larger tumor bed area (TBA) was associated with a longer warm ischemia time (WIT) (P-value <0.001) and tumor resection time (P-value <0.001). Moreover, TBA was significantly associated with the elevation of postoperative creatinine (P-value = 0.005). TBA (P = 0.008), distance from the tumor to the first bifurcation of the renal artery (DTA) (P <0.034), and RENAL score (P = 0.005) were significantly associated with WIT in univariate logistic regression. In multivariate logistic regression, TBA (P = 0.026) and DTA (P = 0.048) were independent risk factors for prolonged WIT (over 25 min). The predictive effect of the combination of TBA, DTA, and RENAL score was higher than the predictive effect of RENAL score alone for WIT (area under curve: 0.786 versus 0.72). Conclusion TBA and DTA are independently associated with the WIT of RPN, which provides additional assessment value for the complexity of kidney cancer in RPN over the RENAL score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinyu Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yucong Zhang
- Department of Geriatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Man Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Guan
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyan Meng
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiquan Hu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhihua Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shaogang Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dhanji S, Wang L, Liu F, Meagher MF, Saidian A, Derweesh IH. Recent Advances in the Management of Localized and Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:99-108. [PMID: 36879830 PMCID: PMC9985462 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s326987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To review the current status of surgical and procedural treatments for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), focusing on oncological and functional outcomes, and the use of techniques for advanced disease over the last 10 years. Findings Partial nephrectomy (PN) has become the reference standard for most T1 and T2 masses. In cT2 RCC, PN exhibits oncological equivalence and improved functional outcomes compared to radical nephrectomy (RN). Additionally, emerging data suggest that PN may be used to treat cT3a RCC. The robot-assisted platform is increasingly used to treat locally advanced RCC. Studies suggest safety and feasibility of robotic RN and robotic inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy. Additionally, single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic approaches are comparable to multiport approaches in select patients. Long-term data show that cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation are equipotent in management of small renal masses. Emerging data suggest that microwave may effectively treat cT1b masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohail Dhanji
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Luke Wang
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Franklin Liu
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ava Saidian
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Grosso AA, Di Maida F, Tellini R, Viola L, Lambertini L, Valastro F, Mari A, Masieri L, Carini M, Minervini A. Assessing the impact of socio-economic determinants on access to care, surgical treatment options and outcomes among patients with renal mass: Insight from the universal healthcare system. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13666. [PMID: 35869594 PMCID: PMC9787702 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether socio-economic disparities exist on access to care, treatment options and outcomes among patients with renal mass amenable of surgical treatment within the universal healthcare system. METHODS Data of consecutive patients submitted to partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) at our Institution between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were grouped according to their income level (low, intermediate, and high) based on the Indicator of Equivalent Economic Situation national criterion. Survival analysis was performed. Cox regression models were employed to analyse the impact of socio-economic variables on survival outcomes. RESULTS One thousand forty-two patients were included (841 PN and 201 RN). Patients at the lowest income level were found more likely symptomatic and with a higher pathological tumour stage in the RN cohort (p > 0.05). The guidelines adherence on surgical indication rate as well as the access to minimally invasive surgery did not differ according to patient's income level in both cohorts (p > 0.05). Survival curves were comparable among the groups. Cox regression analysis showed that none of the included socio-economic variables was associated with survival outcomes in our series. CONCLUSIONS Universal healthcare system may increase the possibility to ensure egalitarian treatment modalities for patients with renal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Riccardo Tellini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Lorenzo Viola
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Luca Lambertini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Francesca Valastro
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Lorenzo Masieri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Marco Carini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of Florence ‐ Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi HospitalFlorenceItaly
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bianchi L, Cercenelli L, Bortolani B, Piazza P, Droghetti M, Boschi S, Gaudiano C, Carpani G, Chessa F, Lodi S, Tartarini L, Bertaccini A, Golfieri R, Marcelli E, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E. 3D renal model for surgical planning of partial nephrectomy: A way to improve surgical outcomes. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1046505. [PMID: 36338693 PMCID: PMC9634646 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1046505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to evaluate the impact of 3D model for a comprehensive assessment of surgical planning and quality of partial nephrectomy (PN). MATERIALS AND METHODS 195 patients with cT1-T2 renal mass scheduled for PN were enrolled in two groups: Study Group (n= 100), including patients referred to PN with revision of both 2D computed tomography (CT) imaging and 3D model; Control group (n= 95), including patients referred to PN with revision of 2D CT imaging. Overall, 20 individuals were switched to radical nephrectomy (RN). The primary outcome was the impact of 3D models-based surgical planning on Trifecta achievement (defined as the contemporary absence of positive surgical margin, major complications and ≤30% postoperative eGFR reduction). The secondary outcome was the impact of 3D models on surgical planning of PN. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of selective clamping and Trifecta's achievement in patients treated with PN (n=175). RESULTS Overall, 73 (80.2%) patients in Study group and 53 (63.1%) patients in Control group achieved the Trifecta (p=0.01). The preoperative plan of arterial clamping was recorded as clampless, main artery and selective in 22 (24.2%), 22 (24.2%) and 47 (51.6%) cases in Study group vs. 31 (36.9%), 46 (54.8%) and 7 (8.3%) cases in Control group, respectively (p<0.001). At multivariate logistic regressions, the use of 3D model was found to be independent predictor of both selective or super-selective clamping and Trifecta's achievement. CONCLUSION 3D-guided approach to PN increase the adoption of selective clamping and better predict the achievement of Trifecta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Cercenelli
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Bortolani
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sara Boschi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Caterina Gaudiano
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Carpani
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Chessa
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Lodi
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tartarini
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bertaccini
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emanuela Marcelli
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bacchiani M, Grosso AA, Di Maida F, Masieri L, Minervini A, Mari A. Editorial: Influences in the progression of renal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1059615. [PMID: 36313667 PMCID: PMC9616685 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1059615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Bacchiani
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Masieri
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Andrea Mari,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hori S, Sakamoto K, Onishi K, Tomizawa M, Morizawa Y, Gotoh D, Nakai Y, Miyake M, Torimoto K, Yoneda T, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K. Perioperative outcomes of open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with moderate to high complexity renal tumors. Asian J Surg 2022:S1015-9584(22)01436-1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
28
|
Brassetti A, Cacciamani GE, Mari A, Garisto JD, Bertolo R, Sundaram CP, Derweesh I, Bindayi A, Dasgupta P, Porter J, Mottrie A, Schips L, Rah KH, Chen DYT, Zhang C, Jacobsohn K, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Costantini M, Ferriero M, Mastroianni R, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Kutikov A, White WM, Ryan ST, Porpiglia F, Kaouk J, Minervini A, Gill I, Autorino R, Simone G. On-Clamp vs. Off-Clamp Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for cT2 Renal Tumors: Retrospective Propensity-Score-Matched Multicenter Outcome Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184431. [PMID: 36139591 PMCID: PMC9496892 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared perioperative outcomes after on-clamp versus off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for >7 cm renal masses. A multicenter dataset was queried for patients who had undergone RAPN for a cT2cN0cM0 kidney tumor from July 2007 to February 2022. The Trifecta achievement (negative surgical margins, no severe complications, and ≤ 30% postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction) was considered a surrogate of surgical quality. Overall, 316 cases were included in the analysis, and 58% achieved the Trifecta. A propensity-score-matched analysis generated two cohorts of 89 patients homogeneous for age, ASA score, preoperative eGFR, and RENAL score (all p > 0.21). Compared to the on-clamp approach, OT was significantly shorter in the off-clamp group (80 vs. 190 min; p < 0.001), the incidence of sRFD was lower (22% vs. 40%; p = 0.01), and the Trifecta rate higher (66% vs. 46%; p = 0.01). In a crude analysis, >20 min of hilar clamping was associated with a significantly higher risk of sRFD (OR: 2.30; 95%CI: 1.13−4.64; p = 0.02) and with reduced probabilities of achieving the Trifecta (OR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.27−0.79; p = 0.004). Purely off-clamp RAPN seems to be a safe and viable option to treat cT2 renal masses and may outperform the on-clamp approach regarding perioperative surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-065-266-6772
| | - Giovanni E. Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine, Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Juan D. Garisto
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Division of Urology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Ithaar Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UCSD Health System, La Jolla, CA 92103, USA
| | - Ahmet Bindayi
- Department of Urology, UCSD Health System, La Jolla, CA 92103, USA
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, King’s College, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | | | | | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Urology, Annunziata Hospital, G. D’Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Koon Ho Rah
- Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - David Y. T. Chen
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Kenneth Jacobsohn
- Department of Urology, Medical College Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WA 53226, USA
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo M. Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Costantini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Wesley M. White
- Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA
| | - Stephen T. Ryan
- Department of Urology, UCSD Health System, La Jolla, CA 92103, USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10124 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Inderbir Gill
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine, Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jiang XL, OuYang K, Yang R, Yu XY, Yang DD, Wu JT, Zhao HW. The application of internal traction technique in retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal ventral tumors. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:213. [PMID: 35739505 PMCID: PMC9219164 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02684-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery or multiple arteries, the retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN) is a better choice. The renal ventral tumor poses an additional challenge due to poor tumor exposure. This study is determined to assess the feasibility of an internal traction technique (ITT) in rRAPN for the management of renal ventral tumors. Methods From November 2019 to March 2021, a total of 28 patients with renal ventral tumor underwent rRAPN. All patients had prior abdominal surgery or multiple arteries. The ITT group (20 patients), which improved the tumor exposure by traction of the kidney with suture, was compared with the traditional technique group (8 patients) in terms of warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, retroperitoneal drainage, R.E.N.A.L. score, and serum creatinine. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. Results All rRAPN surgeries were successful without conversion to radical nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy. The warm ischemia time was lower in the ITT group (17.10 min vs. 24.63 min; P < 0.05). Estimated blood loss in the traditional technique group was 324.88 ± 79.42 mL, and in the ITT group, it was 117.45±35.25 mL (P < 0.05). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, retroperitoneal drainage, R.E.N.A.L. score, and serum creatinine were observed between both groups. Surgical margins were negative and no intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 10 months of follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all cases. Conclusion ITT is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in rRAPN for renal ventral tumors. Application of ITT improved the exposure and reduces warm ischemic time in comparison with the conventional procedure. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02684-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Lu Jiang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Kui OuYang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Xiao-Yang Yu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Dian-Dong Yang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Ji-Tao Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
| | - Hong-Wei Zhao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Selective renal artery clamp during robot assisted partial nephrectomy: The use of indocyanine green. UROLOGY VIDEO JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolvj.2022.100148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
31
|
Potential benefit of lymph node dissection during radical nephrectomy for kidney cancer: A review and critical analysis of current literature. Asian J Urol 2022; 9:215-226. [PMID: 36035351 PMCID: PMC9399553 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of lymph node dissection (LND) is still controversial in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing surgery. We aimed to provide a comprehensive review of the literature about the effect of LND on survival, prognosis, surgical outcomes, as well as patient selection and available LND templates. Methods Recent literature (from January 2011 to December 2021) was assessed through PubMed and MEDLINE databases. A narrative review of most relevant articles was provided. Results The frequencies in which LNDs are being carried out are decreasing due to an increase in minimally invasive and nephron sparing surgery. Moreover, randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses failed to show any survival advantage of LND versus no LND. However, retrospective studies suggest a survival benefit of LND in high-risk patients (bulky tumors, T3-4 stage, and cN1 patients). Moreover, extended LND might provide important staging information, which could be of interest for adjuvant treatment planning. Conclusion No level 1 evidence of any survival advantage deriving from LND is currently available in literature. Thus, the role of LND is limited to staging purposes. However, low grade evidence suggests a possible role of LND in high-risk patients. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to corroborate these findings.
Collapse
|
32
|
Nardis PG, Cipollari S, Lucatelli P, Basilico F, Rocco B, Corona M, Cannavale A, Leonardo C, Flammia RS, Proietti F, Vallati G, Gallucci M, Catalano C. Cone-beam CT-guided tagging of endophytic renal tumors with indocyanine green via trans-arterial selective delivery in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with near infrared fluorescence imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2022; 33:934-941. [PMID: 35487346 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical impact of pre-operative cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided selective embolization of endophytic renal tumors with the fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) and lipiodol in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using near infrared fluorescent imaging (NIFI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with renal endophytic tumors eligible for RAPN and trans-arterial embolization with ICG and lipiodol were prospectively included. Technical success was defined as the completion of the embolization procedure. Radiographic success, defined as the lipiodol accumulation into the nodule, was classified as poor, moderate, good, and optimal based on post-embolization CBCT. Surgical visibility of the tumors during RAPN with the use of NIFI was classified as: not visible, visible with poorly defined margins, and visible with well-defined margins. RESULTS Forty-one patients underwent pre-operative selective embolization. Technical success was 100%. Lipiodol accumulation at CBCT was poor in 2/41 (4.9%), moderate in 6/41 (14.6%), good in 25/41 (61.0%), and optimal in 8/41 patients (19.5%). During RAPN with NIFI, tumors were visible with well-defined margins in 26/41 (63.4%), visible with blurred margins in 14/41 (34.1%) and not visible in 1/41 (2.4%) of cases. There were no adverse events following endovascular embolization. CONCLUSION Pre-operative trans-arterial super-selective embolization of endophytic renal tumors with ICG and lipiodol in patients undergoing RAPN is safe and effective, allowing accurate intraoperative visualization and resection of endophytic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Giorgio Nardis
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Cipollari
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierleone Lucatelli
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Basilico
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Bianca Rocco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Corona
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cannavale
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Simone Flammia
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Proietti
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulio Vallati
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Campi R, Grosso AA, Lane BR, DE Cobelli O, Sanguedolce F, Hatzichristodoulou G, Antonelli A, Noyes S, DI Maida F, Mari A, Rodriguez-Faba O, Keeley FX, Langenhuijsen J, Musi G, Klatte T, Roscigno M, Akdogan B, Furlan M, Karakoyunlu N, Marszalek M, Capitanio U, Volpe A, Brookman-May S, Gschwend JE, Smaldone MC, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A, Minervini A. Impact of Trifecta definition on rates and predictors of "successful" robotic partial nephrectomy for localized renal masses: results from the Surface-Intermediate-Base Margin Score International Consortium. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:186-193. [PMID: 35345387 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04601-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the years, five different Trifecta score definitions have been proposed to optimize the framing of "success" in partial nephrectomy (PN) field. However, such classifications rely on different metrics. The aim of the present study was to explore how the success rate of robotic PN, as well as its drivers, vary according to the currently available definitions of Trifecta. METHODS Data from consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated with robotic PN at 16 referral centers from September 2014 to March 2015 were prospectively collected. Trifecta rate was defined for each of the currently available definitions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate possible predictors of "Trifecta failure" according to the different adopted formulation. RESULTS Overall, 289 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among the definitions, Trifecta rates ranged between 66.4% and 85.9%. Multivariable analysis showed that predictors for "Trifecta failure" were mainly tumor-related (i.e. tumor's nephrometry) for those Trifecta scores relying on WIT as a surrogate metric for postoperative renal function deterioration (definitions 1,2), while mainly surgery-related (i.e. ischemia time and excision strategy) for those including the percentage change in postoperative eGFR as the functional cornerstone of Trifecta (definitions 3-5). CONCLUSIONS There was large variability in rates and predictors of "unsuccessful PN" when using different Trifecta scores. Further research is needed to improve the value of the Trifecta metrics, integrating them into routine patient counseling and standardized assessment of surgical quality across institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio A Grosso
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Brian R Lane
- Department of Urology, Spectrum Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Ottavio DE Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Sanguedolce
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.,Unit of Uro-Oncology, Puigvert Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Georgios Hatzichristodoulou
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Sabrina Noyes
- Department of Urology, Spectrum Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Fabrizio DI Maida
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Frank X Keeley
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Johan Langenhuijsen
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Roscigno
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Bulent Akdogan
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Maria Furlan
- Department of Urology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Nihat Karakoyunlu
- Department of Urology, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Martin Marszalek
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Donauspital, Austria.,Department of Urology, Graz Medical University, Graz, Austria
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Department of Urology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Sabine Brookman-May
- Department of Urology, Campus Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) Munich, Germany.,Janssen Pharma Research and Development, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc C Smaldone
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy - .,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Beksac AT, Okhawere KE, Abou Zeinab M, Harrison B, Stifelman MD, Eun DD, Abaza R, Badani KK, Kaouk JH. Robotic partial nephrectomy for management of renal mass in patients with a solitary kidney: can we expand the indication to T2 and T3 disease? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:203-208. [PMID: 35345388 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04671-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of complex renal masses is challenging in a solitary kidney setting. We retrospectively compared oncological and renal functional outcomes between robotic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with a pT2-pT3 renal mass and a solitary kidney. METHODS From a multi-institutional series, we identified 20 robotic partial nephrectomies (RPN) and 15 open partial nephrectomies (OPN) patients confirmed to have a pT2 or pT3 renal cancer. Surgeries were performed between January 2012 and July 2019. Patients with familial renal cell carcinoma, prior ipsilateral PN, or multiple ipsilateral synchronous tumors were excluded from the analysis. Baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared using χ2 test, Fisher's Exact Test, Mann-Whitney U Test, and Student's t-test. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were comparable. Cold ischemia was utilized more in the open group (92.9% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001). OPN group had a longer ischemia time (48.9 min vs. 27.3 min, P<0.001), a higher major complication rate (38.5% vs. 11.1%, P=0.009), and a higher length of stay was (5 vs. 3.5 days, P=0.023). Positive surgical margin rate was comparable (20% OPN vs. 15% RPN; P=1.000). At a mean follow up of 21 months local recurrence rates (1 OPN vs. 2 RPN, P=1.000) were comparable, chronic kidney disease upstaging rate (46.7% OPN vs. 45.0% RPN, P=0.922) and estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation at one year (75.2%% in OPN vs. 79.1% RPN, P=0.707) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS In select cases and experienced hands, the robotic approach offers a reasonable alternative to open surgery in patients with pT2 and pT3 tumors and a solitary kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alp T Beksac
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kennedy E Okhawere
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Urology, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mahmoud Abou Zeinab
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bobby Harrison
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Michael D Stifelman
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Daniel D Eun
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Ketan K Badani
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Urology, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jihad H Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The Impact of Postoperative Renal Function Recovery after Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58040485. [PMID: 35454324 PMCID: PMC9028221 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58040485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the association between warm ischemic time (WIT) and postoperative renal function using Trifecta achievement in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent robotic (RAPN) or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with RCC who underwent RAPN (RAPN group) or LPN (LPN group) at three institutions in Japan between March 2012 and October 2021. The primary endpoints were the rate of trifecta achievement in both surgical techniques and the association between WIT and recovery of postoperative renal function surgical outcomes. Results: The rate of trifecta achievement was significantly lower in patients with LPN than in those with RAPN (p < 0.001). WIT ≥ 25 min were 18 patients (18%) in the RAPN group and 89 (52.7%) in the LPN group. The postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was almost the same. However, 13 patients (7.7%) had a decreased in eGFR ≥ 15% at 3 months after LPN compared with the preoperative eGFR. Conclusions: The rate of trifecta achievement in the RAPN group was significantly higher than that in the LPN group. However, eGFR was identified as relatively better preserved after PN in both groups.
Collapse
|
36
|
Tuderti G, Brassetti A, Mastroianni R, Misuraca L, Bove A, Anceschi U, Ferriero M, Guaglianone S, Gallucci M, Simone G. Expanding the limits of nephron-sparing surgery: Surgical technique and mid-term outcomes of purely off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy for totally endophytic renal tumors. Int J Urol 2022; 29:282-288. [PMID: 34973156 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report surgical technique, perioperative, oncological, and mid-term functional outcomes in a single-center purely off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy series for totally endophytic masses. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected, institutional review board-approved renal cancer database was carried out to include patients with a totally endophytic renal tumor treated with off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy between January 2013 and December 2020 at our center. Our database was queried to identify cases that had been assigned 3 points for the "E" domain of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and 3 points for the "exophytic rate" domain of the PADUA (Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical) nephrometry score. Preoperative indocyanine green renal mass marking was performed in 33 patients, in whom the tumor was vascularized by a specific feeding artery. Surgical steps, perioperative, oncological and functional data were reported. RESULTS Fifty-six consecutive patients with totally endophytic renal masses were treated. The median tumor diameter was 3 cm, and median PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores were both 10. The median operative time was 82 min. Low-grade Clavien complications occurred in two patients (3.6%) and high-grade Clavien complications were observed in four patients (7.1%). Positive surgical margins were detected in one patient; 2-year recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 98.2%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 24 months, new onset of chronic kidney disease stage 3b occurred in one patient. At last follow-up, the median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 77 mL/min, with a median estimated glomerular filtration rate percent decrease of 5.5%. Trifecta was achieved in 91% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Purely off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical approach, even in totally endophytic renal tumors, providing a favorable perioperative complications rate, excellent oncological outcomes, and negligible impact on renal function at mid-term follow-up. Indocyanine green preoperative marking of endophytic renal tumors represents a useful tool for rapid intraoperative identification of the mass, real-time control of resection margins, and a more precise dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Impact of surgical approach and resection technique on the risk of Trifecta Failure after partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:687-693. [PMID: 34862095 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to compare the outcomes of open vs robotic partial nephrectomy (PN), focusing on predictors of Trifecta failure in patients with highly complex renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS We queried the prospectively collected database from the SIB International Consortium, including 507 consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated at 16 high-volume referral centres, to select those with highly complex (PADUA score ≥10) tumors undergoing PN. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection or resection according to the SIB score. Trifecta was defined as achievement of negative surgical margins, no acute kidney injury and no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 postoperative surgical complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of Trifecta failure. RESULTS 113 patients were included. Patients undergoing open PN (n = 47, 41.6%) and robotic PN (n = 66, 58.4%) were comparable in baseline characteristics. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection and resection in 46.9%, 34.0% and 19.1% of open PN, and in 50.0%, 40.9% and 9.1% of robotic PN (p = 0.28). Trifecta was achieved in significantly more patients after robotic PN (69.7% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, surgical approach (open vs robotic, OR: 2.62; 95%CI: 1.11-6.15, p = 0.027) and tumor complexity (OR for each additional unit of the PADUA score: 2.27; 95%CI: 1.27-4.06, p = 0.006) were significant predictors of Trifecta failure, while RT was not. The study is limited by lack of randomization; as such, selection bias and confounding cannot be entirely ruled out. CONCLUSIONS Tumor complexity and surgical approach were independent predictors of Trifecta failure after PN for highly complex renal masses.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abu-Ghanem Y, Challacombe B. How to Deal with Renal Cell Carcinoma Tumours >7 cm: Referee. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 33:45-47. [PMID: 34632422 PMCID: PMC8488232 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ben Challacombe
- Urology Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Minervini A, Grosso AA, Di Maida F. How To Deal with Renal Cell Carcinoma Tumors >7 cm: The Role of Nephron-sparing Surgery. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 33:42-44. [PMID: 34632421 PMCID: PMC8488235 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Minervini
- Corresponding author. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Viale San Luca, 50134 Firenze, Italy. Tel. +39 055 2758011; Fax: +39 055 2758014.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Techniques to Improve Clinical Outcomes. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:51. [PMID: 34622373 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01068-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize current options available for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy RECENT FINDINGS: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is a standard treatment option for management of cT1 renal masses. It may be carried out by multiple approaches. Robot-assisted (RA) PN is one such option. The goal of treatment is both correct oncological (negative surgical margins) and functional (preservation of sufficient amount of renal parenchyma of the operated kidney) outcome. Appropriate outcomes depend on multiple factors. There are many, but among others tumor characteristics (size, location, i.e., tumor complexity), patient baseline renal function, patient comorbidities, and performance status etc. Based on all these, the surgeon adapts the intervention for each mass/patient by preoperative planning, absence/use/duration of warm or cold ischemia, perioperative imaging, resection technique adapted to tumor location and depth of invasion, use of hemostatics, type and degree of renal parenchymal closure and others details. Nephroprotective agents have not shown efficacy so far. It should not be forgotten that surgeon's experience plays a key role in the achievement of good results. Although multiple factors have a role in the RA partial nephrectomy, surgeon experience and adaptation of technique of intervention have the crucial role in the achievement of both functional and oncological results.
Collapse
|
41
|
Mari A, Tellini R, Antonelli A, Porpiglia F, Schiavina R, Amparore D, Bertini R, Brunocilla E, Capitanio U, Checcucci E, Da Pozzo L, Di Maida F, Fiori C, Furlan M, Gontero P, Longo N, Roscigno M, Simeone C, Siracusano S, Ficarra V, Carini M, Minervini A. A Nomogram for the Prediction of Intermediate Significant Renal Function Loss After Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study (RECORd2 Project). Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:980-987. [PMID: 34561199 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly adopted for the treatment of localized renal tumors; however, rates and predictors of significant renal function (RF) loss after RAPN are still poorly investigated, especially at a long-term evaluation. OBJECTIVE To analyze the predictive factors and develop a clinical nomogram for predicting the likelihood of ultimate RF loss after RAPN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We prospectively evaluated all patients treated with RAPN in a multicenter series (RECORd2 project). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Significant RF loss was defined as >25% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from preoperative assessment at 48th month follow-up after surgery. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses for RF loss were performed. The area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC) was used to quantify predictive discrimination. A nomogram was created from the multivariable model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 981 patients were included. The median age at surgery was 64.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 54.3-71.4) yr, and 62.4% of patients were male. The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 1 (IQR 0-2), 12.9% of patients suffered from diabetes mellitus, and 18.6% of patients showed peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The median Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score was 7 (IQR 7-9). Imperative indications to partial nephrectomy were present in 3.6% of patients. Significant RF loss at 48th month postoperative evaluation was registered in 108 (11%) patients. At multivariable analysis, age (p = 0.04), female gender (p < 0.0001), CCI (p < 0.0001), CCI (p < 0.0001), diabetes (p < 0.0001), PVD (p < 0.0001), eGFR (p = 0.02), imperative (p = 0.001) surgical indication, and PADUA score (p < 0.0001) were found to be predictors of RF loss. The developed nomogram including these variables showed an AUC of 0.816. CONCLUSIONS We developed a clinical nomogram for the prediction of late RF loss after RAPN using preoperative and surgical variables from a large multicenter dataset. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed a nomogram that could represent a clinical tool for early detection of patients at the highest risk of significant renal function impairment after robotic conservative surgery for renal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Tellini
- Department of Urology, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (A.O.U.I.), Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, School of Medicine, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, School of Medicine, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Bertini
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI-Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI-Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, School of Medicine, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Luigi Da Pozzo
- Department of Urology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Urology, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, School of Medicine, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Furlan
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Urology, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Roscigno
- Department of Urology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Claudio Simeone
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (A.O.U.I.), Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ficarra
- Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Gaetano Barresi, Urologic Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- Department of Urology, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Robotic surgery for cT2 kidney cancer: analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:723-729. [PMID: 34435278 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01300-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Robotic surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasingly adopted for cT1 disease, but its utilization for cT2 disease remains unexplored. We aimed to characterize the trend in robotic approach for cT2 RCC. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who were diagnosed with cT2N0M0 RCC from 2010 to 2016 and underwent subsequent radical (RN) or partial (PN) nephrectomy. Analysis of treatment trends was performed and logistic regression (LR) undertaken for predictors of surgical approach. 21,258 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis; 1698 (8%) underwent a PN and 19,560 (92%) underwent RN. Use of robotics in PN increased 346% (12.3-42.6%) and 351% (6.2-21.8%) for RN during the studied time period. Robotic PN or RN was associated with shorter hospital stay compared to non-robotic approaches (p < 0.001). Academic institutions were more likely to perform a robotic procedure and the uninsured were less likely to receive robotic approach. There was no association between age, sex, race, or income and surgical approach. On LR, robotic approach was independently associated with academic institutions and a more recent year of diagnosis. There was no significant difference in the rate of positive margins, 30-day readmission, or 30/90-day mortality between approaches. Robotic PN and RN is becoming an increasingly popular approach in the treatment of cT2 RCC. Utilization of robotics is associated with academic institutions and results in a shorter hospital stay without significant differences rate of positive margins, readmission rates, or 30/90-day mortality.
Collapse
|
43
|
Klett DE, Tsivian M, Packiam VT, Lohse CM, Ahmed ME, Potretzke TA, Gopalakrishna A, Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Potretzke AM. Partial versus radical nephrectomy in clinical T2 renal masses. Int J Urol 2021; 28:1149-1154. [PMID: 34382267 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report perioperative, renal functional and oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy for cT2 renal masses. METHODS Retrospective review of patients who underwent partial (n = 72) or radical nephrectomy (n = 379) for cT2 renal masses from 2000 to 2016. After propensity adjustment using inverse probability weighting, the following were compared by surgery (partial or radical nephrectomy): complications, renal function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate as continuous and as <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 and 3 years postoperatively and overall, metastases-free survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS After propensity adjustment, clinical and radiographic features were well-balanced between groups. Overall and severe complications were more common for partial compared with radical nephrectomy, although not statistically significant (19 vs 13%, P = 0.14 and 4 vs 2%, P = 0.3, respectively). Estimated glomerular filtration rate change at 1 and 3 years was more pronounced in radical compared with partial nephrectomy (median -16 vs -5 and -14 vs -2, respectively, P < 0.001). A greater proportion of radical nephrectomy patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 at 1 and 3 years (55 vs 17% and 48 vs 17%, respectively, P < 0.01). In renal cell carcinoma patients, overall, metastases-free and cancer-specific survival were not significantly different between groups (median survivor follow up 7.1 years, interquartile range 3.6-11.4). CONCLUSIONS Partial nephrectomy appears to be a relatively safe and a potentially effective treatment for cT2 renal masses, conferring better renal functional preservation compared with radical nephrectomy. These data support continued use of partial nephrectomy for renal masses >7 cm in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dane E Klett
- Departments of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matvey Tsivian
- Departments of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Christine M Lohse
- Department of, Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mohamed E Ahmed
- Departments of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wang Z, Yin Y, Wang J, Zhu Y, Li X, Zeng X. Standardized Incidence Rate, Risk and Survival Outcomes of Second Primary Malignancy Among Renal Cell Carcinoma Survivors: A Nested Case-Control Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:716741. [PMID: 34395291 PMCID: PMC8362854 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.716741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Second primary malignancy (SPM) is challenging for treatment and long-term survival. We sought to investigate the standardized incidence rate (SIR), risk factors, and survival outcomes for SPM after renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment. Method A nested case-control study was designed, we identified all T1-4N0-1M0 RCC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and followed them for SPM diagnosis for up to 13 years. Patients with SPM diagnosis ≥6 months after treatment of primary T1-4N0-1M0 RCC were identified as the case cohort and SPM-free patients were the control cohort. SIRs and the excess risk were calculated. A competing risks and Cox model were used to evaluate the risk factors of SPM and overall survival (OS). Results A cohort of 6,204 RCC patients with SPM were matched with a control group of 31,020 RCC patients without SPM. The median time-to-SPM interval was 54.5 months in RCC patients with SPM diagnosis. Besides, an SPM of T3/4 or/and M1 stage diagnosis was positively associated with a longer time-to-SPM interval. SIR of SPM increased by follow-up time and decreased with age at diagnosis (Pfor all <0.001). SPM in the kidney had the highest SIR (54.6, P <0.001) among all SPMs. Prostate cancer (29.8%) in males and breast cancer (23.5%) in females were the most common SPM. Older age, black ethnicity, male sex, higher family income, papillary RCC, and lower TNM stage were significant risk factors for SPM diagnosis. The proportion of deaths from SPM exceeds that of deaths from RCC 3 years after the first RCC treatment. Patients with SPM and early time-to-SPM interval shortens the OS compared with SPM-free patients. The 5-year OS was 85.9% and 58.9% from the first RCC and the SPM diagnosis, respectively. Besides, patients with low-grade/early-stage SPM could benefit from aggressive surgical treatment for solid tumors. Conclusions Collectively, our study described the epidemiological characteristics of SPM among RCC survivors and identified the independent predictors of the SPM diagnosis and its survival outcomes. This study highlights the importance of patient education and follow-up after the surgery for RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhixian Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yisheng Yin
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yunpeng Zhu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xing Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyong Zeng
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang CH, Li CS, Jiang Y, Zhang H, Mu HD, Bao GC. The efficacy evaluation of partial nephrectomy with selective renal artery branch occlusion by laparoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e26581. [PMID: 34190202 PMCID: PMC8257873 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000026581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the clinical application and effect of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with renal artery branch occlusion in the treatment of early renal tumors. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 15 cases of renal tumor patients who underwent partial nephrectomy by laparoscopic selective renal artery branch occlusion in our department from January 2017 to January 2018. Nine male patients and 6 female patients were aged 46 to 65 years, with an average age of 54.3 ± 7.2 years. The diameters of tumors were 2.2 to 4.0 cm, with an average of 3.3 ± 0.7 cm. There are 10 tumors locating on the left side and 5 on the right side. Preoperative renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were 77.3 to 61.9 mL/min with an average of 47.6 ± 7.5 mL/min. All patients' diseased kidneys underwent renal computer tomography angiography examination before surgery. And the diseased kidney underwent reexamination of renal GFR. The operation time, renal artery branch occlusion time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, changes of renal function, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS All surgery were completed successfully, the surgery time was 136.7 ± 15.2 min, intraoperative renal artery branch occlusion time was 21.3 ± 4.5 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 223.3 ± 69.5 mL, the postoperative hospital stay was 6.5 ± 1.7 days, and the postoperative 1-month GFR was 49.5 ± 6.6 mL/min. There was no significant difference between the renal GFR before and after surgery (P > .05). There was no blood transfusion and transfer open surgery cases. The patients were followed up for 3 to 15 months without complications. CONCLUSIONS Partial nephrectomy with selective renal artery branch occlusion by laparoscopy is a safe, feasible, and effective method for the treatment of early renal cancer. It makes good use of the technical advantages of clear operation field and fine operation of laparoscopic surgery, avoids the heat ischemia process of the whole kidney, and can better protect the renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Hui Wang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University, No. 42 Wangfu Street, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Chun-Sheng Li
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University, No. 42 Wangfu Street, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of Reproductive Center, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University, No. 42 Wangfu Street, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University, No. 42 Wangfu Street, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Ha-Da Mu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University, No. 42 Wangfu Street, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Guo-Chang Bao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University, No. 42 Wangfu Street, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Anceschi U, Brassetti A, Tuderti G, Ferriero MC, Minervini A, Mari A, Grosso AA, Carini M, Capitanio U, Larcher A, Montorsi F, Autorino R, Veccia A, Fiori C, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Eun D, Lee J, Gallucci M, Simone G. Risk factors for progression of chronic kidney disease after robotic partial nephrectomy in elderly patients: results from a multi-institutional collaborative series. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 74:452-460. [PMID: 34156202 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04469-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in patients ≥75 years is certainly underused with concerns regarding surgical quality and a negligible impact on renal function. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of progression of chronic kidney disease for purely off-clamp (ocRPN) and on-clamp RPN (onRPN) in elderly patients on a multi-institutional series. METHODS A collaborative minimally-invasive renal surgery dataset was queried for "RPN" performed between July 2007 and March 2021 and "age≥75 years". A total of 205 patients matched the inclusion criteria. Descriptive analyses were used. Frequencies and proportions were reported for categorical variables while medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported for continuous variables. Baseline, perioperative and functional data were compared between groups. New-onset of stages 3b,4,5 CKD in onRPN and ocRPN cohorts was computed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of progression to severe CKD (sCKD [stages ≥3b]). For all statistical analyses, a two-sided p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Mean age of the cohort considered was 78 years (IQR 76-80). At a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 14.5-44.5), new onset CKD-3b and CKD-4,5 stages was observed in 16.6% and 2.4% of patients, respectively. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, onRPN was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing sCKD (p=0.002). On multivariable analysis, hypertension (HR 2.64; 95% CI 1.14-6.11; p=0.023), on-clamp approach (HR 3.41; 95% CI 1.50-7.74; p=0.003) non-achievement of trifecta (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.17-0.78; p=0.01) were independent predictors of sCKD. CONCLUSIONS RPN in patients≥75 years is a safe surgical option. On-clamp approach, hypertension and non-achievement of trifecta were independent predictors of sCKD in the elderly after RPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy -
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria C Ferriero
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio A Grosso
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, Oncology Division, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology, Oncology Division, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Oncology Division, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniel Eun
- Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Lee
- Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Martini A, Turri F, Barod R, Rocco B, Capitanio U, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Challacombe B, Lagerveld BW, Bensalah K, Abaza R, Badani KK, Mehrazin R, Buscarini M, Larcher A. Salvage Robot-assisted Renal Surgery for Local Recurrence After Surgical Resection or Renal Mass Ablation: Classification, Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes. Eur Urol 2021; 80:730-737. [PMID: 34088520 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage treatment for local recurrence after prior partial nephrectomy (PN) or local tumor ablation (LTA) for kidney cancer is, as of yet, poorly investigated. OBJECTIVE To classify the treatments and standardize the nomenclature of salvage robot-assisted renal surgery, to describe the surgical technique for each scenario, and to investigate complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Sixty-seven patients underwent salvage robot-assisted renal surgery from October 2010 to December 2020 at nine tertiary referral centers. SURGICAL PROCEDURE Salvage robot-assisted renal surgery classified according to treatment type as salvage robot-assisted partial or radical nephrectomy (sRAPN or sRARN) and according to previous primary treatment (PN or LTA). MEASUREMENTS Postoperative complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 32 and 35 patients underwent salvage robotic surgery following PN and LTA, respectively. After prior PN, two patients underwent sRAPN, while ten underwent sRARN for a metachronous recurrence in the same kidney. No intra- or perioperative complication occurred. For local recurrence in the resection bed, six patients underwent sRAPN, while 14 underwent sRARN. For sRAPN, the intraoperative complication rate was 33%; there was no postoperative complication. For sRARN, there was no intraoperative complication and the postoperative complication rate was 7%. At 3 yr, the local recurrence-free rates were 64% and 82% for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively, while the 3-yr metastasis-free rates were 80% and 79%, respectively. At 33 mo, the median estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were 57 and 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively. After prior LTA, 35 patients underwent sRAPN and no patient underwent sRARN. There was no intraoperative complication; the overall postoperative complications rate was 20%. No local recurrence occurred. The 3-yr metastasis-free rate was 90%. At 43 mo, the median eGFR was 38 ml/min/1.73 m2. The main limitations are the relatively small population and the noncomparative design of the study. CONCLUSIONS Salvage robot-assisted surgery has a safe complication profile in the hands of experienced surgeons at high-volume institutions, but the risk of local recurrence in this setting is non-negligible. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients with local recurrence after partial nephrectomy or local tumor ablation should be aware that further treatment with robot-assisted surgery is not associated with a worrisome complication profile, but also that they are at risk of further recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Turri
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Urological Residency School Network, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ravi Barod
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bernardo Rocco
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Urological Residency School Network, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Ben Challacombe
- Department of Urology, Guys and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Ronney Abaza
- Robotic Urologic Surgery, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ketan K Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maurizio Buscarini
- Department of Urology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Amparore D, Pecoraro A, Piramide F, Checcucci E, DE Cillis S, Volpi G, Piana A, Verri P, Granato S, Sica M, Manfredi M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Comparison between minimally-invasive partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of clinical T2 renal masses: results of a 10-year study in a tertiary care center. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:509-517. [PMID: 33887896 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04390-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Even if partial nephrectomy (PN) is nowadays considered the standard for managing cT1 renal masses, its role in the management of cT2 kidney tumors is controversial. We aimed to compare oncologic and functional outcomes of minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (RN) and PN in cT2 renal masses. METHODS Patients with cT2 renal masses underwent minimally-invasive PN or RN performed by a highly experienced single surgeon from 2009 to 2019 were considered. Demographic, perioperative and functional variables were compared. Cumulative incidence plot and competing risks regression (CRR) models were used to test differences in 5-year cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and 5-year other-cause mortality (OCM) rates. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model was used to test differences in 5-year progression free survival (PFS) rates. RESULTS Overall, 52 PN vs. 64 RN patients were identified. Relative to RN, PN patients recorded higher rates of complications (25% vs. 7.8%, P=0.02) but lower upstaging rate (≥pT3a 64.1% vs. 19.2%, P<0.0001). Functional outcomes were in favor of PN (all P<0.001). No differences were recorded between 5-year CSM and OCM according to nephrectomy type. At CRR models, older age and upstaging were independent predictors of 5-year OCM and CSM, respectively (all P<0.01). Finally, only upstaging, high grade tumors and presence of positive surgical margins were identified as independent predictors of 5-year PFS (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS In experienced hands the treatment of cT2 renal neoplasms with minimally-invasive PN is feasible, providing perioperative and oncological safety profiles comparable to RN, with advantages in terms of functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy - .,Renal Cancer Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, the Netherlands -
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.,Renal Cancer Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.,Uro-technology and SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Sabrina DE Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Granato
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zhang F, Gao S, Zhao Y, Wu B, Chen X. Comparison of Sutureless and Conventional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:649356. [PMID: 33763380 PMCID: PMC7982573 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.649356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To compare the functional outcome, safety and efficacy of sutureless and conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Methods: After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, our study reviewed 379 patients with T1 stage renal tumors. We applied propensity score matching (PSM) to limit potential baseline confusion. Perioperative and functional outcomes between sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (sLPN) and conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (cLPN) groups were compared and analyzed before and after PSM. Results: Of our 379 patients with T1 stage renal tumors, 199 and 180 were identified in the cLPN and sLPN groups, respectively. After applying PSM with preoperative features, 116 patients in the cLNP group were paired to 116 patients in the sLNP group. We found that all differences in preoperative baseline characteristics disappeared. All the preoperative characteristics (age, gender, tumor diameter, RENAL nephrometry score, side, preoperative eGFR, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ASA score) were not statistically different between the two groups. The operative time (OT) (p < 0.001) and warm ischemia time (WIT) (p < 0.001) of the sLPN group were of shorter duration than that of the cLPN group. The eGFR baseline was almost equal, but there was a statistically smaller decrease in eGFR in the sLPN than in the cLPN group 1 week after surgery (14.3 vs. 7.4, p < 0.001) and after 6 months (11.9 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001). After both preoperative features and WIT were included in PSM, fifty-one pairs of patients were identified between the groups, the WIT difference between them disappeared, while the decrease in eGFR between the groups remained as it was previously at 1 week (15.4 vs. 8.6, p < 0.001) and at 6 months (13.0 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is as safe and effective as conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and compared to cLPN, sLPN can effectively reduce the WIT, retain more renal parenchyma and protect renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shuang Gao
- Department of Pathology, The People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| | - Yiqiao Zhao
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaonan Chen
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Junejo NN, Alkhateeb SS, Alrumayyan MF, Alkhatib KY, Alzahrani HM, Alotaibi MF, Alothman KI, Al-Hussain TO, Altaweel WM. Trends in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma in a contemporary tertiary care setting. Urol Ann 2021; 13:111-118. [PMID: 34194135 PMCID: PMC8210727 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_151_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the last three eras, the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has increased, due to increased radiological studies. The expected 5-year survival rate has become better, associated with the identification of small size renal masses. However, this survival improvement may be secondary to improved surgical techniques and medical therapies for these malignancies. Objectives The objective was to report the trends of clinical presentation, peri-operative, oncological outcomes, and surgical management trends for RCCs over the period. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective study for adult patients was conducted, who presented with renal mass and were managed between 2008 and 2019. Variables, including demographics, perioperative and pathological outcomes analyzed using descriptive statistics for continuous variables reported as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables values compared by Chi-square test. Survival Analysis calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The level of significance is set at P-value < 0.05. Results A total of 588 patients underwent surgical treatment for kidney cancer from January 2008 to January 2019. 237 (40.30%) were females and 351 (59.69%) males. The clinical presentation was higher as an incidental diagnosis of 58.67%. 71.25% of patients were from outside Riyadh city. Pathology was mostly clear cell RCC 61.22% and grade 2 (57.48%). Tumor size, surgery time, and length of hospital stay showed a significant difference between the three periods (both P > 0.05). Robotic surgery performed more than open (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the survival time, when compared to patients by the regions and when compared by the primary tumors (Log-Rank P = 0.4821). Patients from the Riyadh region (median = 54.0) had a significantly higher recurrence time (Log-Rank P < 0.0001). Conclusion There was a rising trend in the incidence of RCC associated with comorbidities and incidental diagnosis. In our study period we found increase in the trend of minimal invasive approach. The size of the tumor, blood loss and operative time decreases over the period of time. The Robotic assisted nephrectomy approach has become increased over the period of time duration in present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Nabi Junejo
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sultan Saud Alkhateeb
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majed Faisal Alrumayyan
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Hassan Messfer Alzahrani
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Faihan Alotaibi
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Ibrahim Alothman
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Turki Omar Al-Hussain
- Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waleed Mohamed Altaweel
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|