Robotic Urologic Surgical Interventions Performed with the Single Port Dedicated Platform: First Clinical Investigation

Does Incision Location Matter? Analysis of Single-Port Cosmesis in Urologic Reconstructive Surgery

Introduction and Objective: One potential advantage of single-port (SP) robotic surgery compared with multiport (MP) robotic surgery is improved cosmesis. The only studies in urology patients to suggest this finding did not assess differences based on incision site. Our study evaluated SP, MP, incision location, age, gender, and prior abdominal surgery as predictors of cosmesis and scar consciousness for reconstructive procedures. Methods: This is a cohort study using an institutional review board-approved prospective genitourinary reconstruction database. Patients at least 3 months from surgery were emailed and called to complete the Consciousness subsection of the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire. Bothersome was defined as a score of 11 or greater. Overall consciousness was scored with a single item as "not conscious" or "conscious." Pearson's chi-squared, Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression were performed to assess how age, gender, prior surgery, and incision location affect cosmesis. Results: There were 111 patients (54 MP, 57 SP), of which 27 were SP umbilical, 14 were SP midline nonumbilical, and 16 were SP lower quadrant. On univariate analysis the periumbilical incision had the lowest consciousness. Age was associated with Bother (p = 0.012) and Consciousness (p = 0.002), whereas gender, prior abdominal surgery, and incision site were not significant. On logistic regression, all SP incisions were less likely to be bothered compared with MP, although only SP umbilical was statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01,0.38; p = 0.005). Age was also significant on logistic regression for Bother (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93,0.99; p = 0.005). Gender and prior abdominal surgery were not associated with Bother or Consciousness. Conclusions: SP periumbilical incisions provide the best outcomes for cosmesis compared with other SP incision sites and MP incisions. This finding should be discussed and taken into account when planning surgical approaches for patients undergoing urinary reconstruction, especially in patients younger than 40 years of age.

Recent Advances in Robotic Surgery for Urologic Tumors

This review discusses recent advances in robotic surgery for urologic tumors, focusing on three key areas: robotic systems, assistive technologies, and artificial intelligence. The Da Vinci SP system has enhanced the minimally invasive nature of robotic surgeries, while the Senhance system offers advantages such as tactile feedback and eye-tracking capabilities. Technologies like 3D reconstruction combined with augmented reality and fluorescence imaging aid surgeons in precisely identifying the anatomical relationships between tumors and surrounding structures, improving surgical efficiency and outcomes. Additionally, the development of artificial intelligence lays the groundwork for automated robotics. As these technologies continue to evolve, we are entering an era of minimally invasive, precise, and intelligent robotic surgery.

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison Among Extraperitoneal Single-port and Transperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy-A Single-center Experience

Background and objective

The role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer is still controversial. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PLND between extraperitoneal single-port (SP eRARP) and transperitoneal multiport (MP tRARP) robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis from our single-center database for patients who underwent SP eRARP or MP tRARP with PLND between 2015 and 2023. The primary endpoint was to analyze and compare specific data related to PLND between the two populations by the detection of pN+ patients, the total number of lymph nodes removed, and the number of positive lymph nodes removed. The secondary endpoints included comparing major complications, lymphoceles, and biochemical recurrence between the two cohorts of the study.

Key findings and limitations

A total of 293 patients were included, with 85 (29%) undergoing SP eRARP and 208 (71%) undergoing MP tRARP. SP eRARP showed significant differences in PLND extension from MP tRARP, while MP tRARP yielded more lymph nodes (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pN+ patient detection (p = 0.7) or the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.6). The rates of major complications (p = 0.6), lymphoceles (p = 0.2), and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.9) were similar between the two groups. Additionally, SP eRARP had shorter operative time (p = 0.045), hospital stay (p < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at discharge (p = 0.03). Limitations include a retrospective, single-center analysis.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Despite the SP approach in RARP resulting in fewer retrieved lymph nodes, outcomes were comparable with the MP approach regarding the detection of patients with positive lymph nodes and the number of positive nodes. Additionally, the SP approach led to lower pain levels and shorter hospital stays.

Patient summary

With this study, we demonstrate that pelvic lymph node dissection performed via the extraperitoneal approach during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single-port system provides comparable outcomes with the standard transperitoneal multiport approach in detecting patients with positive lymph nodes and retrieving positive nodes. In addition, it offers significantly reduced pain levels and shorter hospital stays.

Robot-assisted Single-port Radical Prostatectomy with the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP Platforms: Comparison of the Technology, Intraoperative Performance, and Outcomes

Background and objective

The purpose-built SHURUI single-port (SP) robotic platform has recently been introduced for several procedures in urology, general surgery, and gynecology. However, comparative evidence on its performance in relation to earlier models such as the da Vinci SP is lacking. Our aim was to compare the step-by-step techniques and 1-yr outcomes for radical prostatectomy (RP) between the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP robots.

Methods

Data were retrieved from two prospectively maintained databases. The SHURUI SP robot was used to perform RP in 34 patients in China (September 2021 to August 2022); the da Vinci SP robot was used to perform 100 consecutive RP cases in the USA (June 2019 to October 2020). A comparative analysis was conducted before and after 1:1 propensity score matching for age, body mass index, American Urological Association symptom score, prostate size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, biopsy grade group, and D'Amico risk group. Intraoperative performance and short-term oncological and continence outcomes were compared between the groups. Biochemical recurrence was defined as two consecutive postoperative PSA levels >0.2 ng/ml. Continence was defined as full recovery of urinary control without the use of pads. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate continence recovery curves, and a log-rank test for trend was used to detect ordered differences in continence recovery between the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP groups after surgery.

Key findings and limitations

For the matched SHURUI and da Vinci groups, median age (69 vs 69 yr), median PSA (8.4 vs 7.1 ng/ml), and the proportion of patients with low-risk (33.3% vs 29.6%), intermediate-risk (66.7% vs 63%), and high-risk disease (0% vs 7.4%) were comparable (all p > 0.05). All surgeries were successfully accomplished without conversion. A higher percentage of cases in the SHURUI group involved extraperitoneal access (81.5% vs 0%; p < 0.001) and a pure SP approach (25.9% vs 0%; p = 0.01), while a higher percentage of cases in the da Vinci group had nerve-sparing surgery. The median total operative (215 vs 110 min; p < 0.001) and median console time (162 vs 75 min; p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the SHURUI group. No intraoperative or major postoperative complications were observed in either group. Rates of positive surgical margins (18.5% vs 14.8%; p = 1.0) and extraprostatic extension (14.8% vs 29.6%; p = 0.19) were similar. At median follow-up of 13.5 versus 15.9 mo, none of the patients had experienced biochemical recurrence. At 1 yr after surgery, the continence rate was 96.3% in both groups.

Conclusions

Despite differences in driving mechanisms between the two SP robotic systems, RP can be performed safely and effectively with the SHURUI RP robot during the initial learning phase, with similar short-term oncological and continence outcomes to those with the da Vinci SP robot.

Patient summary

We compared two surgical robots (SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP) used to perform robotic surgery to remove the prostate through a single keyhole incision instead of multiple incisions. Our results show comparable technology and similar surgical and short-term cancer control outcomes for the two robots.

Privacy-proof Live Surgery Streaming: Development and Validation of a Low-cost, Real-time Robotic Surgery Anonymization Algorithm

OBJECTIVE

Develop a pioneer surgical anonymization algorithm for reliable and accurate real-time removal of out-of-body images validated across various robotic platforms.

BACKGROUND

The use of surgical video data has become a common practice in enhancing research and training. Video sharing requires complete anonymization, which, in the case of endoscopic surgery, entails the removal of all nonsurgical video frames where the endoscope can record the patient or operating room staff. To date, no openly available algorithmic solution for surgical anonymization offers reliable real-time anonymization for video streaming, which is also robotic-platform and procedure-independent.

METHODS

A data set of 63 surgical videos of 6 procedures performed on four robotic systems was annotated for out-of-body sequences. The resulting 496.828 images were used to develop a deep learning algorithm that automatically detected out-of-body frames. Our solution was subsequently benchmarked against existing anonymization methods. In addition, we offer a postprocessing step to enhance the performance and test a low-cost setup for real-time anonymization during live surgery streaming.

RESULTS

Framewise anonymization yielded a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve score of 99.46% on unseen procedures, increasing to 99.89% after postprocessing. Our Robotic Anonymization Network outperforms previous state-of-the-art algorithms, even on unseen procedural types, despite the fact that alternative solutions are explicitly trained using these procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our deep learning model, Robotic Anonymization Network, offers reliable, accurate, and safe real-time anonymization during complex and lengthy surgical procedures regardless of the robotic platform. The model can be used in real time for surgical live streaming and is openly available.

Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port (SP) versus multi-port (MP) robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries.

METHODS

A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA criteria for primary outcomes of interest, and quality assessment followed AMSTAR. Four databases were systematically searched: Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search time range is from database creation to December 2022. Stata16 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 17 studies involving 5015 patients. In urological surgeries, single-port robotics had shorter length of stay (WMD = - 0.63, 95% Cl [- 1.06, - 0.21], P < 0.05), less estimated blood loss (WMD = - 19.56, 95% Cl [- 32.21, - 6.91], P < 0.05), less lymph node yields (WMD = - 3.35, 95% Cl [- 5.16, - 1.55], P < 0.05), less postoperative opioid use (WMD = - 5.86, 95% Cl [- 8.83, - 2.88], P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, positive margins rate, overall complications rate, and major complications rate.

CONCLUSION

Single-port robotics appears to have similar perioperative outcomes to multi-port robotics in urological surgery. In radical prostatectomy, single-port robotics has shown some advantages, but the specific suitability of single-port robots for urological surgical types needs to be further explored.

A prospective study on single-port versus multiport patient-reported surgical outcomes

Introduction

We sought to determine potential patient reported advantages of the da Vinci single-port (SP) robotic system for urological procedures compared with the previous model, the da Vinci multiport (MP) system. The SP model utilizes a single 30 to 40 mm incision rather than multiple 5 to 22 mm incisions. This project aims to prospectively investigate the impact of the novel SP system on patient reported cosmetic and psychometric surgical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of patients who underwent uro-oncologic surgery by three urologists at the University of Illinois Chicago from April to November 2021. Study participants completed a Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire 20 and 90 days post-procedure. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire is a reliable measure of surgical scars that includes five subscales: Appearance, Symptoms, Consciousness, Satisfaction with Appearance, and Satisfaction with Symptoms. Higher scores represented worse reported outcomes.

Results

On Postoperative Day 20, there were 77 responses (53 SP and 24 MP). Patients receiving SP procedures reported more favourable outcomes in terms of appearance, symptoms, consciousness, and pain medication. On Day 90, there were 37 responses (24 SP and 13 MP). Patients receiving SP procedures reported more favourable outcomes in terms of appearance. No significant differences were seen on Day 90 in terms of pain, medication, symptoms, consciousness, or satisfaction.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the superiority of the SP in patient reported cosmetic and pain outcomes on short- and long-term follow-up after uro-oncological surgical procedures. Symptomatic and cosmetic advantages are present at the 20 day follow-up, with better scar appearance being significant 90 days after surgery.

Perioperative, function, and positive surgical margin in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal single port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches are two common modalities in single-port (SP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), but differences in safety and efficacy between the two remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the perioperative, function, and positive surgical margin of extraperitoneal with transperitoneal approaches SP-RARP.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, this study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42023409667). We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies published up to February 2023. Stata 15.1 software was used to analyze and calculate the risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD).

RESULTS

A total of five studies, including 833 participants, were included in this study. The SP-TPRP group is superior to the SP-EPRP group in intraoperative blood loss (WMD: - 43.92, 95% CI - 69.81, - 18.04; p = 0.001), the incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II and above complications (RR: 0.55, 95% CI - 0.31, 0.99; p = 0.04), and postoperative continence recovery (RR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.05, 1.45; p = 0.04). Conversely, the hospitalization stays (WMD: 7.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.65, 15.1; p = 0.03) for the SP-EPRP group was shorter than that of the SP-TPRP group. However, there was no significant difference in operation time, postoperative pain score, total incidence of postoperative complications, and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that both extraperitoneal and extraperitoneal SP-RARP approaches are safe and effective. SP-TPRP is superior to SP-EPRP in postoperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II and above complications, and postoperative continence recovery, but it is accompanied by longer hospital stays.

Surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Thulium enucleation versus single-port transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy

Objective

The objective of this work is to compare our outcomes using thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) to the single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 through December 2021 of men who underwent SP RASP and ThuLEP performed by a single surgeon with an enucleation experience of >300 cases and extensive robotic experience. The primary outcome was changed in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were operative time, length of stay (LOS), change in post-void residuals (PVR), de novo stress- or urge-urinary incontinence (SUI, UUI), and rate of complications.

Results

One hundred two patients underwent surgery during the study period: 33 RASP and 69 ThuLEP. There was no difference in preoperative characteristics, including age and body mass index, between both groups. Changes in IPSS scores postoperatively were not significant between SP RASP versus ThuLEP (-17 vs. -14, p = 0.2956). SP RASP had a longer operative time (180 vs. 90 min, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in LOS (0 vs. 0 days, p = 0.2904). There was no difference in change in PVR (-96 vs. -91 mL, p = 0.8504). SP RASP patients had significantly less postoperative SUI than ThuLEP (0 vs. 13 patients, p = 0.0083), while there was no difference in UUI between both groups (4 vs. 2 patients, p = 0.0843). There was no difference in 30-day complication rate (21.2% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.9517), although there were three ThuLEP patients with Clavien-Dindo Class III or higher complication.

Conclusions

There was no difference in change in IPSS scores between the two groups. ThuLEP is associated with shorter postoperative catheter days and decreased operative times. Hospital LOS was equivalent. SP RASP demonstrates significantly improved continence rates. Though SP RASP is within the initial learning curve at our institution, early results demonstrate the role for this modality alongside ThuLEP in the treatment of large gland BPH.

Recent advances in single-site/incision robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (ssRARP) has been successfully applied to treat prostate cancer. This review aims to describe the recent advances of surgical approaches, working accesses and novel robotic platforms in ssRARP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus databases in December 2022 to identify all literature related to ssRARP.

RESULTS

A total of 48 relevant studies were found worldwide from 2008 to 2023. Since the introduction of ssRARP, various modifications of this technique in surgical approaches, working accesses and novel robotic platforms have been developed. The application of ssRARP using the da Vinci SP platform has shown great superiority with encouraging clinical outcomes.

DISCUSSION

There has been a potential shift toward ssRARP using the da Vinci SP platform due to its potential advantages in terms of lower blood loss, minimal postoperative pain, better cosmetic outcome and rapid recovery. More convincing evidence, further technical improvement and higher cost-effectiveness are needed for its widespread acceptance.

Outcomes of single-port robotic ureteral reconstruction using the da Vinci SP® system

PURPOSE

The da Vinci SP^® robotic system enables three double-jointed wristed instruments and a fully wristed three-dimensional camera to be placed through a single port. This study presents our experience with robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction using the SP system and reports its outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2018 and April 2022, a single surgeon performed robotic ureteral reconstruction using the SP system in 39 patients: 18 underwent pyeloplasty and 21 received ureteral reimplantation. Demographic and perioperative patient data were collected and analyzed. Radiographic and symptomatic improvements were assessed 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

In pyeloplasty group, 12 patients (66.7%) were female and two patients (11.1%) had undergone previous surgery for ureteral obstruction. The median operative time was 152 minutes, the median blood loss was 8 mL, and the median length of stay in hospital was 3 days. There was one case of a complication involving postoperative percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN). In ureteral reimplantation group, 19 patients (90.5%) were female and ten patients (47.6%) had undergone gynecological surgery that caused ureteral obstruction. The median operative time was 152 minutes, the median blood loss was 10 mL, and the median length of stay in hospital was 4 days. We observed one case of open conversion and two cases of complications (colonic serosal tearing and postoperative PCN after ileal ureter replacement). The radiographic results and symptoms successfully improved following both surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite adhesion-related complications, the SP system appears to be safe and effective for use in robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction.

Perioperative results of single-port vs multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via peritoneal approach: a meta-analysis

To compare the perioperative outcomes of single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and multiport robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (MP-RARP) via transperitoneal approach, we conducted a comprehensive database search of eligible studies up to October 2022 and compared their results. This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to control for heterogeneity and risk of bias. A total of six articles were included, involving 926 patients, among which 256 underwent SP-RARP and 670 underwent MP-RARP. Comparing the two, SP-RARP was associated with shorter hospitalization time (- 0.5 days; 95% CI - 1.02, - 0.06, p < 0.05) and less intraoperative blood loss (- 29.88 ml; 95% CI - 45.66, - 14.10, p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in any complications, operative time, positive surgical margins, or short-term follow-up outcomes (continence and potency at 3 months). These findings provide reference data for the selection of surgical methods in performing transperitoneal RP and support further research on the broad applicability of the SP platform.

And then there was one … incision. First single-port pediatric robotic case series

BACKGROUND

In the past two decades, technology has advanced to augment an already minimally-invasive approach in laparoscopic surgery. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic platforms have now evolved to its 4th-generation product: a single-port system, first cleared through the FDA for urologic procedures last year. A single, 2.5 cm incision allows for placement of a port that admits a fully-wristed camera as well as three fully-wristed instruments, all controlled by the surgeon at the console.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to document the feasibility of the single-port (SP) robotic platform in the first clinical series of pediatric patients, reporting use of this system for dismembered pyeloplasty and Mitrofanoff. Secondary aims were to report intraoperative details and perioperative outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Seven patients underwent surgery using the da Vinci SP Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Six patients, two girls and 4 boys, were diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and underwent SP robotic-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty while one male patient with neurogenic bladder underwent SP robotic-assisted Mitrofanoff procedure. Patient's ages ranged from 22 months to 14 years. A 2.5-cm incision was made within the Pfannenstiel line in HIdES fashion for the pyeloplasties, while the previous gastrostomy tube site was used for the Mitrofanoff. Through this incision a 25-mm multichannel port was placed. The 12 × 10-mm articulating robotic camera and two 6-mm articulating robotic instruments were utilized.

RESULTS

All surgeries were completed successfully through the single port without intraoperative complications, need for separate ports, or conversion. Median operative time was 120 min, and all patients were dismissed in less than 24 h, taking only acetaminophen and ibuprofen for pain control. There was no issue with instrumentation in older patients; however, shorter working distance in the 22-month-old pyeloplasty limited wristing of the instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first cases utilizing the SP robotic platform in children. Despite their smaller size and limited workspace, we had no issues with instrument clashing or triangulation in older patients, completing the procedures in a similar timeframe as multiport robotic platforms. Use of the SP platform is not recommended if working distance will be < 10 cm from the end of the port as instrument movement is prohibitive. The HIdES approach of placing the port in the Pfannenstiel line gave additional working distance and kept the incision below the swimsuit line for excellent cosmesis (Figure 1). Further study with additional cases will compare this approach with standard multiport robotics to analyze and compare operative data and outcomes.

Do Skills Naturally Transfer Between Multiport and Single-Port Robotic Platforms? A Comparative Study in a Simulated Environment

Introduction and Objective: With introduction of the da Vinci single-port (SP) system, we evaluated which multiport (MP) robotic skills are naturally transferable to the SP platform. Methods: Three groups of urologists: Group 1 (5 inexperienced in MP and SP), Group 2 (5 experienced in MP without SP experience), and Group 3 (2 experienced in both MP and SP) were recruited to complete a validated urethrovesical anastomosis simulation using MP followed by SP robots. Performance was graded using both GEARS and RACE scales. Subjective cognitive load measurements (Surg-TLX and difficulty ratings [/20] of instrument collisions camera and EndoWrist movement) were collected. Results: GEARS and RACE scores for Groups 1 and 3 were maintained on switching from MP to SP (Group 3 scored significantly higher on both systems). Surg-TLX and difficulty scores were also maintained for both groups on switching from MP and SP except for a significant increase in SP camera movement (+7.2, p = 0.03) in Group 1 compared to Group 3 that maintained low scores on both. Group 2 demonstrated significant lower GEARS (-2.9, p = 0.047) and RACE (-5.1, p = 0.011) scores on SP vs MP. On subanalysis, GEARS subscores for force sensitivity and robotic control (-0.7, p = 0.04; -0.9, p = 0.02) and RACE subscores for needle entry, needle driving, and tissue approximation (-0.9, p = 0.01; -1.0, p = 0.02; -1.0, p < 0.01) significantly decreased. GEARS (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, and efficiency) and RACE subscores (needle positioning and suture placement) were maintained. All participants scored significantly lower in knot tying on the SP robot (-1.0, p = 0.03; -1.2, p = 0.02, respectively). Group 2 reported higher Surg-TLX (+13 pts, p = 0.015) and difficulty ratings on SP vs MP (+11.8, p < 0.01; +13.6, p < 0.01; +14 pts, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The partial skill transference across robots raises the question regarding SP-specific training for urologists proficient in MP. Novices maintained difficulty scores and cognitive load across platforms, suggesting that concurrent SP and MP training may be preferred.

Single-port robotic partial nephrectomy: impact on perioperative outcomes and hospital stay

Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a novel technology and is at the beginning of its adoption curve in urology. The goal of this narrative review is to provide an overview of SP-robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) 4 years after the introduction of the da Vinci SP dedicated platform, focusing on perioperative outcomes, length of stay, and surgical technique. A nonsystematic review of the literature was conducted. The research included the most updated articles that referred to SP robotic PN. Since its commercial release in 2018, several institutions have reproduced robotic PN by using the SP platform, both via a transperitoneal and a retroperitoneal approach. The published SP-robotic PN series are generally based on preliminary experiences by surgeons who had previous experience with conventional multi-arms robotic platforms. The reported outcomes are encouraging. Overall, three studies reported that SP-robotic PN cases had nonsignificantly different operative time, estimated blood loss, overall complications rate, and length of stay compared to the conventional 'multi-arms' robotic PN. However, in all these series, renal masses treated by SP had overall lower complexity. Moreover, two studies underlined decreased postoperative pain as a major pro of adopting the SP system. This should reduce/avoid the need for opioids after surgery. No study compared SP-robotic versus multi-arms robotic PN in cost-effectiveness. Published experience with SP-robotic PN has reported the feasibility and safety of the approach. Preliminary results are encouraging and at least noninferior with respect to those from the multi-arms series. Prospective comparative studies with long-term oncologic and functional results are awaited to draw more definitive conclusions and better establish the more appropriate indications of SP robotics in the field of PN.

Technique and perioperative outcomes of single-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci SP platform in urology

OBJECTIVE

To describe surgical technique for single port robotic surgery using the da Vinci SP system and report the perioperative outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between Jan 2019 and Jan 2021, single-port robotic urologic surgeries were performed in 120 patients by a single surgeon. Clinicopathologic data and perioperative outcomes were collected. All surgical procedures were performed with a transperitoneal approach through an umbilical single port. Additional assistant port was used in complex procedures for malignant disease. Surgeries were carried out using both above and below camera position for effective retraction. For reconstructive surgery using intestine, an extra-intracorporeal hybrid method was used. Surgical procedures involving both kidney and pelvis were performed without change of patient position or trocar placement.

RESULTS

Mean age was 62.7 years and 102 patients were male. For oncologic indication, 105 patients underwent surgeries including 66 radical prostatectomy, 25 partial nephrectomy, six radical nephrectomies, five nephroureterectomy and three radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Fifteen cases with benign indication included four ureterolithotomy, seven uretero/pyeloplasty, three ureteroneocystostomy, and one ileal ureter reconstruction. All surgeries were performed successfully without conversion to other surgical approach. Clavien-Dindo grade III complication occurred in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The da Vinci SP system provides a new robotic surgical platform for single port surgery while maintaining the major features of robotic surgery similar to multi-port surgery. Various single port urologic surgeries can be safely performed with this platform.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Adrenalectomy

Background

Single-port (SP) robotic surgery has been utilized in several surgical procedures. We aim to describe our institution’s approach and perioperative experience with SP robotic adrenalectomy and compare it to the traditional multi-port (MP) approach.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent robotic adrenalectomy by a single surgeon between March 2019 and March 2020. Patient demographic, perioperative factors, and pathologic outcomes were recorded and analyzed using t-tests, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

Thirty-six patients underwent SP (n = 11) and MP (n = 25) robotic adrenalectomy. Age, body mass index, gender, operative time, major Clavien-Dindo complications, and margin status showed no differences. Patients undergoing SP adrenalectomy had a lower estimated blood loss (18.1 ± 13.0 vs 65.6 ± 95.0 cc, P = .02) and smaller lesion size (2.8 ± 1.3 vs 4.1 ± 1.8 cm, P = .04) compared to those undergoing MP.

Conclusions

SP adrenalectomy appears to be a feasible approach in select adrenal masses. Further studies are needed to establish its safety and cost effectiveness.

Efficacy and safety of single port robotic radical prostatectomy and multiport robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of single port (SP) robot radical prostatectomy and multiport (MP) robot radical prostatectomy.

Methods

Using the China National Knowledge database, EMBASE, Cochrane library, PubMed, and other databases to obtain relevant research, SP robot radical prostatectomy and MP robot radical prostatectomy were comprehensively evaluated. The software used to evaluate the impact of the results in the selected articles was Review Manager 5.2. Deviation analysis, forest plot analysis, and sensitivity analysis were carried out for the collected data.

Results

A total of 7 related studies that met the criteria were finally included. The data showed that the operation time of MP in the control group was significantly longer than that in the SP group [mean difference (MD) =−13.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): (−17.35, −9.23); P<0.00001; I²=50%]. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay for SP surgery was shorter than that for MP surgery [MD =−18.30; 95% CI: (−29.17, −7.42); P=0.0010; I²=94%]. The blood loss of SP surgery was less than that of MP surgery [MD =−15.54; 95% CI: (−28.37, −2.71); the total effective rate was 0.02; I²=0%]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between SP and MP surgery [risk ratio (RR) =0.95; 95% CI: (0.55, 1.63); P=0.85; I²=0%]. At the same time, the sensitivity analysis and funnel plot showed that this study was robust and publication bias was limited.

Discussion

Our results show that SP robotic radical prostatectomy is superior to MP robotic radical prostatectomy in terms of efficacy and safety. SP robot radical prostatectomy is worthy of wide promotion.

Medical gloves modified by a one-minute spraying process with blood-repellent, antibacterial and wound-healing abilities

During clinical surgery, bleeding that occurs in the operative region is inevitable. Due to the blood adhesion on ordinary medical gloves, it reduces surgery quality to a certain extent and even prolongs operation time. Herein, we show that medical blood-repellent gloves (MBRG) can be obtained by spraying the blood-repellent mist spray (MS) on the surface of ordinary medical gloves, which are available for immediate use in around one minute. After the modification, MBRG not only have a significantly higher blood repellent rate than that of ordinary medical gloves, but also can effectively inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli), and even promote the healing of infected wounds. MS is easy to prepare, low-toxic, and can be widely used on the surface of various medical gloves, such as rubber gloves, polyethylene film gloves, and nitrile gloves, which may have an impact on the development of future medical gloves.

Initial Experience of Single-port Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Surgeon’s Experience with Technique Description

Background

With the implementation of da Vinci SP robot platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA), we described our initial experience with the da Vinci SP robot platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP).

Methods

This retrospective review included 30 consecutive patients with prostate biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer who underwent SP-RARP by a single surgeon between June and November 2020. SP-RARP was performed with a single-incision plus one method, in which the multichannel guide port was inserted directly with an additional assist port. We report our initial experience of perioperative and early functional outcomes.

Results

The mean operative time (SD), console time (SD), and blood loss were 142.8 (15.1) min, 109.9 (15.7) min, and 133.0 (72.9) mL, respectively. No intraoperative complications or blood transfusions were reported. Of the 30 patients, 21 (70.0%), 7 (23.3%) and 2 (6.7%) had stage pT2, pT3a and pT3b disease, respectively. Positive surgical margins were reported in 5 of the 30 (16.7%) patients in the final pathology report, including 2 of 21 (9.5%) with stage pT2 and 3 of 9 (33.3%) with ≥ pT3. At 12 weeks after SP-RARP, 80.0% of patients had achieved continence and the potency was 46.7%; 8 of 11 (72.7%) had sexual health inventory for men (SHIM) scores ≥ 17 and 6 of 19 (31.6%) had SHIM scores < 17.

Conclusions

The SP platform for radical prostatectomy was technically safe and feasible. After overcoming the technical learning curve, this platform may provide high-quality outcomes comparable to those of multi-port platforms.

Single-Port versus Multiple-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy has been reported as a safe and feasible technique. However, recent studies comparing single-port versus multiple-port robotic radical prostatectomy have displayed conflicting results. Objectives: To investigate the benefit of single-port robotic radical prostatectomy and the impact on outcome compared to multiple-port robotic radical prostatectomy. Methods: Based on PRISMA and AMSTAR criteria, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out. Finally, we considered the controlled studies with two cohorts (one cohort for single-port RARP and the other cohort for multiple-port RARP). For statistical analysis, Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.4 was used. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results: Five non-randomized controlled studies with 666 patients were included. Single-port robotic radical prostatectomy was associated with shorter hospital stays. Only 60.6% of single-port patients (109/180) required analgesia compared to 90% (224/249) of multiple-port patients (Z = 3.50; p = 0.0005; 95% CI 0.07:0.47). Opioid administration was also significantly lower in single-port patients, 26.2% (34/130) vs. 56.6% (77/136) (Z = 4.90; p < 0.00001; 95% CI 0.15:–0.44) There was no significant difference in operative time, blood loss, complication rate, positive surgical margin rate, or continence at day 90. Conclusion: The available data on single-port robotic radical prostatectomy is very limited. However, it seems comparable to the multiple-port platform in terms of short-term outcomes when performed with expert surgeons. Single-port prostatectomies might provide a shorter hospital stay and a lower requirement for opioids; however, randomized trials with long-term follow-up are mandatory for valid comparisons.

Single-Port versus Multi-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Comparative Study

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent single-port (SP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and those who underwent multi-port (MP)-RARP.

METHODS

Data on 40 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RARP between June 2020 and February 2021 and 129 who underwent MP-RARP between June 2019 and February 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Using logistic regression, 31 patients who underwent SP-RARP were matched to 31 patients who underwent MP-RARP (1:1) based on propensity scores. The available perioperative parameters and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared to MP-RARP, SP-RARP showed no significant differences in perioperative parameters, including the console times (111.0±15.7 vs. 102.6±18.8 minutes, p=0.569), operation time (151.3±15.1 vs. 158.7±20.3 minutes, p=0.863), estimated blood loss (121.1±64.7 vs. 140.5±90.5 mL, p=0.638), positive surgical margins (19.4% in both groups), and 3-month continence (77.4% vs. 83.9%, p=0.563) and potency (45.2% vs. 48.4%, p=0.891) rates. Patients who underwent SP-RARP had lower proportions of complete nerve sparing than those who underwent MP-RARP (SP-RARP vs. MP-RARP in subjective scores: 4.0±0.8 vs. 4.4±0.9, p=0.046; SP-RARP vs. MP-RARP in pathologic score of 5, 35.5% vs. 64.5%, p=0.049; score of 4, 41.9% vs. 19.4%, p=0.038; score of 3, 19.4% vs. 9.7%, p=0.398; score of 2, 3.2% vs. 0.0%, p=0.365; and score of 1, 3.2% vs. 3.2%, p=0.932, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SP-RARP showed lower nerve sparing scores than MP-RARP, the present study suggests that SP-RARP is safe and feasible with comparable short-term functional outcomes as those of MP-RARP.

Single-Port Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Bowel Diversion: Initial Experience and Review of Surgical Outcomes

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVE

Scant literature is available on surgical outcomes of radical cystectomies on the new single-port (SP) system. This study compares short term outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) on the multi-port (MP) vs. SP platform.

METHODS

This IRB approved study used a prospective cystectomy database and non-parametric testing including Chi-Squared, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher Exact tests to analyze all variables stratified by surgical approach.

RESULTS

34 patients underwent radical cystectomy with ICUD from 9/1/2019 to 2/8/2021. 20 patients were in the MP cohort, while 14 were in the SP group. Table 1 presents the demographics of both groups and shows no statistically significant differences. Intra- and post-operative as well as pathology data is shown in Table 2. Patients in the SP group had less narcotic use (MP: 25 MME vs. SP: 11.5 MME, p=0.047) and shorter return of bowel function (MP: 3 days vs. SP: 2 days, p=0.032). Operative times were similar between both groups despite having fewer patients undergoing ileal conduit (MP: 85% vs. SP: 50%, p=0.027) in the SP group. In table 3, we list the early short term post-operative follow up data for each group which showed no significant differences between the two groups with an average follow up of 4.9 months for MP and 4.4 months for SP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience with SP robotic cystectomy and ICUD appears to be safe and an effective alternative to MP cystectomies. A learning curve was involved but the overall transition from MP to SP was smooth. Operative times were similar despite fewer patients undergoing ileal diversion, shorter return of bowel function, and less narcotic use in the SP group. Further studies including longer follow ups with multi-institutional data are underway.

Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

The field of robotic surgery continues to evolve and the advent of the single-port (SP) platform is another step toward the future. The SP platform is a new technology that has promising implications for urologic surgery. Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared this platform in 2018, multiple urologic procedures have been described, with radical prostatectomy being the most common. This article aims to describe and illustrate the step-by-step technique of SP radical prostatectomy. We have described our technique from the patient positioning and trocar placement until the anastomosis. We included in the video compilation surgical steps such as bladder dropping and anterior bladder neck dissection, posterior bladder neck and seminal vesicles, posterior prostate dissection and nerve sparing, apical dissection and dorsal venous complex control, posterior reconstruction and anastomosis, and lymph node dissection.

Comparison of intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic multi-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci Si system and single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system in children

PURPOSE

We compared the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (S-RALP) using the da Vinci SP® system and conventional multi-port robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (M-RALP) in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multi-port and single-port pyeloplasty have been performed in pediatric patients in our institution since October 2015 and February 2019, respectively. We conducted an entire cohort comparison. Considering the learning curve of M-RALP, we defined the last 15 cases of M-RALP as a subgroup of M-RALP and compared this subgroup with the entire cohort of S-RALP patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients who underwent multi-port pyeloplasty and 15 patients who underwent single-port pyeloplasty were enrolled in this study. Age, height, body weight, laterality, surgical indication, and ipsilateral differential renal function were statistically similar in the M-RALP and S-RALP groups. The median operative time (3.0 h vs. 2.4 h; p=0.01) and the median console time (2.2 h vs. 1.5 h; p<0.001) were longer in the M-RALP group than in the S-RALP group. There was no significant difference in operative time or console time between the M-RALP subgroup and the S-RALP group. There were no significant differences in the length of hospitalization, pain score, morphine-equivalent use of analgesics, or postoperative differential renal function in all comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that pyeloplasty using the da Vinci® SP system can be started by robotic surgeons who can overcome the learning curve. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty is feasible in noninfant pediatric patients.

Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and "Multi-Port" Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where do we stand?

OBJECTIVES

To report the results of the first quantitative synthesis of literature data from studies comparing Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy performed using the novel SP surgical platform (SP-RARP) versus RARP performed by using multi-arms robotic systems.

METHODS

Studies comparing the use of da Vinci SP versus that of other available multi-arms da Vinci platforms were eligible for inclusion in the present review. From selected studies, data were extracted by using a standardized data extraction form. Patients baseline demographics and disease characteristics and perioperative variables of interest for the present review (operative time, blood losses, complications, length of stay and positive surgical margins rate) were noted whenever available. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used as a summary measure for continuous outcomes, whereas the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for binary variables. Pooled estimates were calculated by using the random-effect model to account for clinical heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using Review manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK).

RESULTS

Four comparative studies were retrieved, analysing a total of 610 patients. Baseline characteristics of treatment groups were statistically similar. No significant differences were found when comparing SP-RARP versus multi-arms robotic systems in terms of operative time, blood losses, complications rate and positive surgical margins. Conversely, SP-RARP was found to allow for a shorter hospital stay (WMD = -0.79 days, 95% CI = -1.07; -0.52, P-value < .001).

CONCLUSION

The adoption of the SP platform for duplicating the technique of minimally-invasive RARP appears to be safe and feasible.

Minimizing minimally invasive surgery: Current status of the single-port robotic surgery in Urology

BACKGROUND

The novel da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robotic platform received the US FDA approval in 2018. The device, specifically conceived for single-site approach, is pushing through the limits of minimally invasive surgery. We sought to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of the clinical experiences accomplished by the da Vinci SP in urology, and to discuss future perspectives.

METHODS

A non-systematic literature review was performed focusing on single port articles in urological surgery using Medline/PubMed and Embase search electronic engines. The authors analyzed findings and a brief report of the clinical experience for surgical procedures completed by the SP platform was described.

RESULTS

The current data available from single-port robotic established the safety and feasibility of urologic procedures using this novel platform. However, the results come from single-center case series, small cohorts and retrospective studies that need to be cautiously interpreted. Additional evidence is required to determine the asset of the SP platform in the urological community.

CONCLUSIONS

The SP robotic system opens new frontiers on the surgical scenery facilitating the completion of urological surgeries through a single incision. Further comparative studies will be required to assess perioperative and long-term oncological and functional outcomes among SP, multi-arm robotic and open approaches.

Minimizing minimally invasive surgery: Current status of the single-port robotic surgery in Urology

BACKGROUND

The novel da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robotic platform received the US FDA approval in 2018. The device, specifically conceived for single-site approach, is pushing through the limits of minimally invasive surgery. We sought to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of the clinical experiences accomplished by the da Vinci SP in urology, and to discuss future perspectives.

METHODS

A non-systematic literature review was performed focusing on single port articles in urological surgery using Medline/PubMed and Embase search electronic engines. The authors analyzed findings and a brief report of the clinical experience for surgical procedures completed by the SP platform was described.

RESULTS

The current data available from single-port robotic established the safety and feasibility of urologic procedures using this novel platform. However, the results come from single-center case series, small cohorts and retrospective studies that need to be cautiously interpreted. Additional evidence is required to determine the asset of the SP platform in the urological community.

CONCLUSIONS

The SP robotic system opens new frontiers on the surgical scenery facilitating the completion of urological surgeries through a single incision. Further comparative studies will be required to assess perioperative and long-term oncological and functional outcomes among SP, multi-arm robotic and open approaches.

Single Port Robotic Surgery in Urology

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review on the new da Vinci SP (single port) robotic surgical system. The published literature to date within urology and a description of the new system will be discussed.

FINDINGS

There are currently no high-quality published studies with the SP robotic system. All studies are case series, many with 10 or fewer patients. However, all studies have found the SP system to be safe and feasible in performing most urological procedures. Renal and pelvic surgery using the SP robotic system is safe and feasible in the hands of expert robotic surgeons. Long-term, high-quality data is lacking. While the current high price and the learning curve will limit the SP systems' use in many health care systems, new updates and the release of robotic surgical systems from other developers may help drive down costs and encourage uptake.

Predictive factors of postoperative complications and hospital readmission after implementation of the single-port robotic platform: A single-center and single-surgeon experience

OBJECTIVES

To measure the incidence, and identify potential risk factors of conversion, postoperative complication and readmission for patients treated with urological robotic single-port surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive urological surgery procedures carried out with the single-port robotic platform by the same surgeon in a single institution between September 2018 and March 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographic data, main perioperative outcomes and information related to the surgical technique were gathered and analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to assess predictive factors for any grade and high-grade (e.g. Clavien grade ≥3) postoperative complications, as well as predictive factors for readmission.

RESULTS

Analysis included 221 patients, of whom 194 (88%) underwent pelvic surgery and 27 (12.2%) underwent upper urinary tract surgery. Only one patient was converted to open surgery in the entire cohort. A total of 40 patients (18.1%) experienced postoperative complications, with grade ≥3 postoperative complications in 7.6% of the entire cohort. On multivariable analysis, the factors significantly associated with the risk of postoperative complication of any grade were diabetes (P < 0.001), perineal approach (P < 0.01) and postoperative pain management with opioids (P = 0.01). Only diabetes (P = 0.03) predicted a grade ≥3 complication. Overall, 17 patients (7.7%) were readmitted during the 3 months after surgery. A body mass index >30 kg/m² was the only identified predictor of readmission (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A wide range of pelvic, extraperitoneal and upper-tract urological procedures can be carried out using the robotic single-port platform with a minimal conversion rate and low complication or readmission rate.

Robotic radical perineal prostatectomy: tradition and evolution in the robotic era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an updated review of robotic radical perineal prostatectomy (r-RPP) with emphasis on the recent advances in terms of surgical technique, outcomes, and new robotic platforms.

RECENT FINDING

The technological innovations in the urological field have been applied to radical prostatectomy with the aim of preserving important anatomical structures and reduce patients' morbidity and mortality. In recent years, robotic surgery contributed to resurge radical perineal prostatectomy. In 2014, the Cleveland Clinic group was the first to demonstrate the utility of a robotic approach in RPP. To date, the majority of the reported studies showed that r-RPP has noninferior perioperative, short-term oncological, and functional outcomes compared with the traditional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Given these benefits, r-RPP is a promising approach in selected patients, such as obese ones. Moreover, robotic perineal pelvic lymph node dissection performed through the same incision of r-RPP and the new Single-Port (SP) Robotic System represent further steps towards the overcoming of some intrinsic limitation of this surgical approach making this technique suitable for a larger number of patients with prostatic cancer.

SUMMARY

Overall, r-RPP represents a reliable and effective novel surgical technique. However, more studies with long-term follow-up are needed to clarify the advantages over RARP.

Single port robotic radical prostatectomy versus multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: A human factor analysis during the initial learning curve

BACKGROUND

Studies have thus far neglected to evaluate the impact of the da Vinci single port (SP) robotic platform on surgeon experience and operating room efficiency. We sought to assess the effect of the SP platform on surgeon cognitive load measures during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

METHODS

We prospectively compared the first 20 SP-RALPs performed at our institution to 20 multi-port (MP)-RALPs performed by a single experienced robotic surgeon. Three multi-dimensional assessment tools were used to evaluate mental and surgical workload, teamwork and workflow disruptions.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the MP-RALP and SP-RALP cohorts when evaluated by NASA Task Load Index, Surgery Task Load Index and Observational Teamwork Assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The SP robotic platform did not adversely affect human factor performance of the surgeon during RALP. Multi-institutional validation will be necessary to confirm these initial findings.

Predictive factors for opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy: the value of the SP® robotic platform

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative factors associated with opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy in a single institution.

METHODS

From January 2019 to January 2020, data from patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy was retrospectively entered in a preapproved IRB database. Data were analyzed according to the postoperative opioid administration in hospital and/or after discharge. Robotic radical prostatectomy was performed using either the standard multi-port Da Vinci Si robotic platform with a transperitoneal approach (MP-RALP) or the novel DaVinci SP^® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with an extraperitoneal approach (SP-EPP). Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery were included in the "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) protocol regardless of the surgery approach.

RESULTS

During the study period, 210 patients matched the selection criteria. Of those, 158(75%) patients received opioids during the hospital stay or after discharge and 52(25%) patients never received opioids. SP-EPP surgical approach and shorter LOS were predictors of never receiving opioids (Odds Ratio [OR]=4.97, (95% CI 1.81-14.77, P=0.002 and OR=0.56, CI 95% 0.35-0.86, P=0.011, respectively). SP-EPP surgical approach was increasing the odds of remaining opioid free whether in-hospital or after discharge (OR= 11.97, 95% CI 4.8-32, P<0.0001 and OR=11.6, 95% CI 4.6-31, P<0.0001, respectively). Finally, a high BMI increased the odds of receiving opioid in hospital or after discharge (OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, P=0.003 and OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, P=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, after robotic radical prostatectomy the use of a less invasive approach (SP-EPP), a shorter LOS and a lower BMI, were predictive of opioid-free status.

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy-a Contemporary Review

Prostatectomy has been widely accepted as a treatment option for prostate cancer and can be performed via an open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach. The outcomes following prostatectomy are primarily sub-grouped into oncological and functional outcomes. Oncological outcomes have been comparable in the above three surgical modalities. However, the robotic platform seems to have a better functional outcome compared to open prostatectomy. The data on the outcome of the laparoscopic approach is scarce and is not widely performed due to technical difficulty. With experience continence outcomes have reached a plateau in many robotic series, however, the potency outcome is the real Achilles tendon of this procedure. Many factors influence potency outcomes but the amount and quality of nerve-sparing is one factor that is under a surgeon's control and it improves with experience.

A novel "three-port" trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Background

To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A, three-port LRP; group B, conventional four-five-port LRP; group C, open RP (ORP); and group D, robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages.

Results

All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases of conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8 min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2 ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0 days, the mean hospitalization was 5.1 days, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p < 0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased.

Conclusions

Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice.

Applications of the da Vinci single port (SP) robotic platform in urology: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgical technology has evolved to include a new platform specifically designed for the single-port (SP) approach. Benefits of the da Vinci SP are still under investigation. This study aimed to review the urological literature since the first report of the use of the platform.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a systematic literature review of PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science databases on June 15, 2020 searching for all available articles of da Vinci SP use from December 2014 (date of the first clinical report of da Vinci SP in the urology) until June 1, 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 43 articles were eligible for inclusion. Ten studies reported different surgeries and techniques on cadavers while the rest described the clinical experience of different groups. We divided our article and tables into preclinical experience with surgery on cadavers, radical prostatectomy (RP) approach, and multiple types of procedures described in the same study.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of da Vinci SP in urologic procedures after five years of the first clinical investigation is feasible and safe. Radical prostatectomy is the most common intervention performed with this robot. Some groups described benefits in terms of less postoperative pain and early discharge, especially with the extraperitoneal approach. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are awaited.

A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Scar Cosmesis Based on Operative Approach for Radical Prostatectomy

Objective: Recent developments in minimally invasive approaches to radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer have improved oncological outcomes, but may also affect surgical scar cosmesis, an important component of survivorship and patient quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate surgical scar appearance based on operative approach to RP using a validated tool for evaluating psychosocial impact of scar appearance. Methods: Men between the ages of 45 and 80 were surveyed on an online crowdsourcing platform. Well-healed surgical scars after open, multiport (MP) robotic (transperitoneal and extraperitoneal), and single-port (SP) robotic RP were digitally rendered on stock photos to control for patient appearance. Respondents evaluated images using the SCAR-Q© psychosocial impact domain. Additionally, different RP scars were ranked by appearance and assigned 10-point appearance scores. Results: Two hundred thirty-four surveys were included for analysis (completion rate 84.2%). The median age was 54 (IQR: 49-61) and 35% (85/234) had previous abdominal surgery, of which 45% (38/85) was robotic or laparoscopic. SP scars had better psychosocial impact scores (median 100 out of 100 vs 69 and 58) than MP and open, respectively (both p < 0.001). SP scars were consistently ranked higher by appearance (median rank 1, IQR: 1-1) than MP (2, IQR: 2-3) and open (3, IQR: 3-4) (p < 0.001). SP without assistant port had the highest appearance score (median 9, IQR: 7-9) among all scars (p < 0.001). Conclusion: SP scars scored highest on psychosocial impact and were consistently ranked highest in appearance. These findings may be informative for optimizing both cosmetic appearance and quality of life for patients undergoing RP.

Robot-Assisted Nephrectomy Using the Newly Developed EDGE SP1000 Single-Port Robotic Surgical System: A Feasibility Study in Porcine Model

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the EDGE SP1000 single-port robotic platform by performing nephrectomy in live porcine model. Materials and Methods: Robotic nephrectomy was performed on sample group of five gilts using the EDGE SP1000 single-port robotic system. The continuous vital signs of all gilts were monitored throughout the operation to examine the safety of the operation. Data regarding surgical complications and technical difficulties throughout the operation were recorded for future evaluation. Finally, the survival of the sample gilts 2 weeks after the operation were recorded. Results: The robot-assisted nephrectomy yielded an impressive result that all sample gilts survived after 2 weeks. Furthermore, neither surgical complications nor technical difficulties were encountered during the operation. The average duration to establish the operation channel was 12.4 ± 1.52 minutes, the average time taken to install EDGE SP1000 single-port robotic system was 2.8 ± 0.84 minutes, the average time to dissociate and remove the kidney was 47 ± 5.61 minutes, and average total operational duration was 71 ± 5.24 minutes. Most importantly, the surgeon and assistant who were using the system found it convenient and performed excellently during the operation. Conclusions: This study shows that the EDGE SP1000 single-port robotic surgical system is safe and feasible for the use of nephrectomy in gilts. Our further research will expand the application of the EDGE SP1000 system to other urologic procedures and accumulate more preclinical data for further clinical trial.

Retroperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multicenter Matched-pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

With increasing acceptance of robotic partial nephrectomy over the last decade, there is an ongoing discussion about the transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal access.

OBJECTIVE

To report outcomes after transperitoneal (TRPN) versus retroperitoneal (RRPN) robotic partial nephrectomy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 754 patients were identified from the databases of three high-volume centers who underwent either TRPN (n = 551) or RRPN (n = 203).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Perioperative data were evaluated retrospectively. A propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed with the following variables: grade of renal insufficiency, age, body mass index, tumor diameter, and preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score with a subsequent subgroup analysis for tumor location. For quality outcomes, the margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) criteria were used (negative margins, ischemia time <20 min, and no major complications). Statistical analyses included chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In all, 176 patients could be matched in each group. The median tumor diameter was 28 mm with a PADUA score of 9. In 11% of RRPN versus 44% of TRPN cases, an anterior tumor location was found, and in 55% versus 30%, a posterior lesion was found (p < 0.001). Operative time (119 vs 139 min, p < 0.001) and warm ischemia time (9 vs 10 min, p = 0.003) were significantly shorter for RRPN. No significant differences were observed between intra- and postoperative complication rates, with 8% major complications in TRPN versus 3% in RRPN (p = 0.06). The MIC criteria were achieved in 90% in the RRPN versus 88% in the TRPN group, without differences for tumor location.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences between TRPN and RRPN could be found for intraoperative time, while complication rates and quality outcomes were comparable. RRPN can also be a considerable alternative for anterior tumors.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we demonstrate that robotic partial nephrectomy is feasible with either a transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal surgical access. The posterior approach can also be used for anterior renal tumors and may result in shorter operative time.

Comparison of Perioperative and Pathologic Outcomes Between Single-port and Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Analysis of a High-volume Center and the Pooled World Experience

OBJECTIVE

To perform an early comparative study of outcomes between single-port and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (SP-RALRP) and standard RALRP at our institution and pooled analysis of series to date.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with organ-confined prostate cancer undergoing SP-RALRP at a high-volume institution were identified retrospectively along with reported SP-RALRP series to date. Data were compared to a contemporary prospective cohort of men undergoing standard RALRP. Patient demographics, perioperative and postoperative data, and complications categorized by the Clavien-Dindo system were compared for the institutional and pooled SP-RALRP cohorts to standard RALRP.

RESULTS

A total of 208 SP-RALRP cases were identified (26 from our institution) and compared to 376 standard RALRP cases. In the institutional analysis, there was no difference in operative time, length of stay, overall complications (15.4% vs 17.3%, P= 1.0), major (Clavien ≥III) complications (3.8% vs 3.7%, P = .6), inpatient opioid use, or patient-reported pain scores; median estimated blood loss (100 mL vs 150 mL, P = .02) and number of lymph nodes removed (5.5 vs 9, P = .002) were lower for SP-RALRP. In the pooled analysis, 208 patients receiving SP-RALRP had similar estimated blood loss and complication rates but fewer lymph nodes removed (P = .02) and marginally longer operating time (+16 minutes, P = .01) compared to standard RALRP. The difference in rate of positive surgical margins was not statistically significant (31.3% vs 24.5%, P = .08).

CONCLUSION

Based on an early experience with SP-RALRP at a high-volume center and a pooled analysis of SP series to date, perioperative and pathologic outcomes appear nearly equivalent compared to standard RALRP.

Single-incision robotic adrenalectomy (SIRA): the future of adrenal surgery?

In compliance with the trend toward less invasive techniques, single incision robotic surgeries have become more common and they have been increasingly used for several surgeries including adrenalectomy. Single incision robotic adrenalectomy (SIRA) aims to combine the merits of robotic surgery with previously defined single incision laparoscopic techniques. It has been shown to be safe and feasible, however, there are only few studies on this new technique. Due to scant data on SIRA in the current literature, it remains to be a current challenge in adrenal surgery. In this review, our goal is to present current literature on SIRA and discuss the data regarding perioperative outcomes, patient selection, learning curve, and its limitations.

Outcomes of Gender Affirming Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty Using the Da Vinci Single Port Versus Xi Robotic Systems

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted peritoneal flap gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV) with the da Vinci Xi system has been reported to be a safe alternative to traditional penile inversion vaginoplasty. Utilizing the Single Port (SP) robot system, our surgical approach has evolved.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a step-by-step technique for RPGAV using the SP robot and to compare outcomes between Xi and SP systems.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 145 transgender women underwent RPGAV between September 2017 and December 2019. We retrospectively reviewed data for patients with a minimum 6 mo of follow-up.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

Peritoneal flaps are harvested from the posterior bladder and pararectal fossa. The vaginal space is dissected transabdominally. Inverted penile flap with or without scrotal graft is sutured to the peritoneal flaps, which form the neovaginal apex.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographics, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 100 (Xi = 47; SP = 53) patients had a minimum 6 mo of follow-up. The mean age was 36.2 (range 16.1-71.4) yr. Average procedure times were 4.2 and 3.7 h in Xi and SP cohorts, respectively (p <0.001). At the mean follow-up of 11.9 (range 6.0-25.4) mo, vaginal depth and width were 13.6 (range 9.7-14.5) and 3.7 (range 2.9-3.8) cm in the Xi group, and 14.1 (range 9.7-14.5) and 3.7 (range 3.5-3.8) cm in the SP group (p =0.07 and 0.04, respectively). Complications included transfusion (6%), rectovaginal fistula (1%), bowel obstruction (2%), pelvic abscess (1%), and vaginal stenosis (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

RPGAV using the SP robot reduces operative time by facilitating a dual-surgeon abdominal-perineal approach. There is no difference in complication rates between the two approaches.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We studied the outcomes of robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty with two robot systems. With both systems, patients had good vaginal depth and width at an average follow-up of 1 yr. Surgery time was shorter with the Single Port (SP) robot.