1
|
Lama DJ, Okunowo O, Yamzon J, Zhumkhawala AA, Wilson TG, Lau CS, Yuh BE, Chan KG. Long-term oncologic outcomes and complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00687-2. [PMID: 39443252 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 10/05/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To report the long-term outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for the treatment of muscle invasive and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. METHODS We reviewed a single tertiary center database of RARC from 2004 to 2020. Concomitant extended pelvic lymph node dissection and extracorporeal urinary diversion were performed. Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to identify factors associated with and report time-to-event estimations of recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Clavien-Dindo complications were identified, categorized, and substratified by time from surgery within 90-days and between 90-days and >5-years postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 510 patients with median follow-up of 57.1 months (IQR 21.8-103.6) were included. Continent diversion was performed in 259 (51%) patients. Of the 340 (67%) ≥cT2 patients, 153 (45%) received cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Recurrence was identified in 157 (31%) patients, and 118 (23%) died from bladder cancer. The overall complication rate was 52% with 267 (41%) major grade ≥ III events. Infectious (25%) and genitourinary (22%) complications were the most common irrespective of the time interval beyond 90-days. The risk of recurrence or death were increased by extravesical disease (HR 1.91 and 1.97, respectively) and lymph node positivity (HR 4.58 and 2.42, respectively) in multivariable analysis (all, P < 0.001). The estimated 5-, and 10-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 69% and 64% and 61% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS RARC is a durable treatment that optimizes the probability of cure for patients requiring extirpation for bladder cancer. Targeting the modifiable complications of radical surgery may further improve the risk/benefit ratio of RARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Lama
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
| | - Oluwatimilehin Okunowo
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Jonathan Yamzon
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Ali-Asghar Zhumkhawala
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Timothy G Wilson
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Department of Urologic Oncology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Clayton S Lau
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Bertram E Yuh
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Kevin G Chan
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gabriel PE, Pinar U, Lenfant L, Parra J, Vaessen C, Mozer P, Chartier-Kastler E, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 39433445 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) vs open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a real-life monocentric study including all consecutive patients who underwent RARC with ICUD or ORC for BC at our institution from 2014 to 2023. Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare perioperative, oncological and stricture outcomes between both groups by calculating odds (ORs) and hazard (HRs) ratios with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. RESULTS Overall, 316 patients underwent either RARC with ICUD (n = 228 [72.2%]) or ORC (n = 88 [27.8%]). The perioperative benefits of RARC vs ORC included decreased risks of major blood loss (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.23; P < 0.001), perioperative transfusion (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57; P < 0.001), 90-day major complications (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29-0.99; P = 0.04), and prolonged initial length of hospital stay (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.35; P < 0.001), as well as more days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.46-4.6; P < 0.01). In addition, the use of RARC vs ORC was associated with a higher lymph node (LN) count (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.83-6.30; P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in recurrence-free (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49-1.07; P = 0.1), cancer-specific (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43-1.10; P = 0.1), overall (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47-1.20; P = 0.3) and uretero-ileal stricture-free (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.62-2.25; P = 0.6) survival between both groups after a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 42.3 (16.4-73.8) months. CONCLUSION Our real-world study supports the effectiveness of RARC with ICUD vs ORC for BC. We generally observed better perioperative outcomes, as well as similar oncological-except for higher LN count-and uretero-ileal stricture outcomes after RARC with ICUD vs ORC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Etienne Gabriel
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Louis Lenfant
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Parra
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Vaessen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mozer
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Afferi L, Spahn M, Hayoz S, Strebel RT, Rothschild SI, Seifert H, Özdemir BC, Kiss B, Maletzki P, Engeler D, Wirth G, Hadaschik B, Lucca I, John H, Sauer A, Müntener M, Bubendorf L, Schneider M, Musilova J, Petrausch U, Cathomas R. Safety and quality of cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine. BJU Int 2024; 134:388-397. [PMID: 38456541 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report on the surgical safety and quality of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) and PLND for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) 06/17 was an open-label single-arm phase II trial including 61 cisplatin-fit patients with clinical stage (c)T2-T4a cN0-1 operable urothelial MIBC or upper urinary tract cancer. Patients received neoadjuvant cisplatin/gemcitabine and durvalumab followed by surgery. Prospective quality assessment of surgeries was performed via central review of intraoperative photographs. Postoperative complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS A total of 50 patients received RC and PLND. All patients received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. The median (interquartile range) number of lymph nodes removed was 29 (23-38). No intraoperative complications were registered. Grade ≥III postoperative complications were reported in 12 patients (24%). Complete nodal dissection (100%) was performed at the level of the obturator fossa (bilaterally) and of the left external iliac region; in 49 patients (98%) at the internal iliac region and at the right external iliac region; in 39 (78%) and 38 (76%) patients at the right and left presacral level, respectively. CONCLUSION This study supports the surgical safety of RC and PLND following neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in patients with MIBC. The extent and completeness of protocol-defined PLND varies between patients, highlighting the need to communicate and monitor the surgical template.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Räto T Strebel
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Sacha I Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Bernhard Kiss
- Department of Urology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel Engeler
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Gregory Wirth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital HUG, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ilaria Lucca
- Department of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Sauer
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Richard Cathomas
- Divison of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pyrgidis N, Volz Y, Ebner B, Westhofen T, Staehler M, Chaloupka M, Apfelbeck M, Jokisch F, Bischoff R, Marcon J, Weinhold P, Becker A, Stief C, Schulz GB. Evolution of Robotic Urology in Clinical Practice from the Beginning to Now: Results from the GRAND Study Register. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00159-7. [PMID: 39209568 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Major urological guidelines do not currently recommend robot-assisted surgery compared with laparoscopic or open surgery due to the lack of high-quality evidence. We aimed to provide real-world data on the evolution of robotic urology and to compare its perioperative outcomes with those of laparoscopic and open surgeries. METHODS We used the GeRmAn Nationwide inpatient Data (GRAND), provided by the Research Data Center of the Federal Bureau of Statistics (2005-2021), and performed multiple patient-level analyses. We included patients undergoing major urological surgeries and report the largest study in the field with 993 276 patients. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS An open approach was performed in 733 416 cases, a laparoscopic approach in 109 428, and a robot-assisted approach in 150 432. Overall, 442 811 (45%) patients underwent radical prostatectomy, 129 943 (13%) radical cystectomy, 192 340 (19%) radical nephrectomy, 123 648 (12%) partial nephrectomy, 56 114 (5.6%) nephroureterectomy, and 48 420 (4.9%) pyeloplasty. The number of patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery increased exponentially, while the number of patients undergoing open surgery decreased substantially throughout the past few years. Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery displayed slightly better, but clinically insignificant, baseline characteristics. After adjusting for the major risk factors in the multivariate regression analysis, robotic versus open surgery was associated with significantly lower odds of mortality for all five major oncological surgeries and with lower odds of intensive care unit admission, transfusion, and length of hospital stay for all six major urological surgeries. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Robotic surgery is becoming the mainstay in major urological operations. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients selected for robotic surgery in Germany presented better perioperative outcomes compared to those operated with an open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yannic Volz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Ebner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Thilo Westhofen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Maria Apfelbeck
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Robert Bischoff
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Marcon
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Weinhold
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Armin Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Gerald B Schulz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lambertini L, Di Maida F, Cadenar A, Grosso AA, Valastro F, Bacchiani M, Giudici S, Sandulli A, Lipparini F, Salamone V, Paganelli D, Coco S, Mari A, Minervini A. Step by step technique of Stentless Florence Robotic Intracorporeal Neobladder (FloRIN), does the ureteral management influence functional outcomes? Urologia 2024; 91:563-567. [PMID: 38752506 DOI: 10.1177/03915603241252908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Benefits and harms of avoid the sent placement during IntraCorporeal Neobladder configuration are still debated. Our objective was to describe the step-by-step technique of Florence intracorporeal neobladder (FloRIN) configuration performed with stentless procedure focusing on perioperative and mid-term functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single institution prospective randomized 1:1 series all consecutive patients underwent Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) and FloRIN reconfiguration from January 2021 to March 2021 were enrolled. Functional perioperative and mid-term outcomes were gathered. Postoperative complications were graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification and divided in early (<30 days from discharge) and delayed (>30 days). RESULTS Overall, 10 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, the 50.0% was treated with Stentless FloRIN. In terms of baseline features, no differences were recorded between the two groups. Median age was 65 and 66 years while median BMI was 27 and 25 in the stentless and in the stent group, respectively. Concerning intraoperative variables, no intraoperative complications as well as open conversion occurred among both groups. As regard introperative features, a shorter console time was associated with stentless procedure (331 min vs 365 min). In terms of perioperative outcomes, canalization and time to drainage removal didn't differ between groups while length of hospital stay was significantly lower in stentless group 10 days versus 14 days. Early and delayed postoperative complication rate was not influenced by the ureteral management at a preliminary assessment with comparable rates of Clavien Dindo ⩾ 3a between the two groups. Mid-term functional outcomes did not differ between groups in terms of kidney function loss. CONCLUSIONS FloRIN with Stentless technique showed functional and perioperative preliminary outcomes comparable with the standard ureteral management strategy. Further series with longer functional follow-up assessment will be needed to confirm our preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Lambertini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Valastro
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mara Bacchiani
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sofia Giudici
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sandulli
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Filippo Lipparini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Salamone
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Paganelli
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Coco
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yokoyama M, Chen W, Waseda Y, Fujiwara M, Kato D, Shirakawa T, Shimizu Y, Nenohi T, Matsumoto Y, Okumura T, Urushibara M, Ai M, Fushimi K, Fukagai T, Eto M, Fujii Y, Ishizaka K. Comparisons of in-hospital fee and surgical outcomes between robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open radical cystectomy: a Japanese nationwide study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024; 54:822-826. [PMID: 38553780 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate in-hospital fees and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC) using a Japanese nationwide database. METHODS All data were obtained from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2020 and March 2022. Basic characteristics and perioperative indicators, including in-hospital fees, were compared among the RARC, LRC and ORC groups. Propensity score-matched comparisons were performed to assess the differences between RARC and ORC. RESULTS During the study period, 2931, 1311 and 2435 cases of RARC, LRC and ORC were identified, respectively. The RARC group had the lowest in-hospital fee (median: 2.38 million yen), the shortest hospital stay (26 days) and the lowest blood transfusion rate (29.5%), as well as the lowest complication rate (20.9%), despite having the longest anesthesia time (569 min) among the three groups (all P < 0.01). The outcomes of LRC were comparable with those of RARC, and the differences in these indicators between the RARC and ORC groups were greater than those between the RARC and LRC groups. In propensity score-matched comparisons between the RARC and ORC groups, the differences in the indicators remained significant (all P < 0.01), with an ~50 000 yen difference in in-hospital fees. CONCLUSIONS RARC and LRC were considered to be more cost-effective surgeries than ORC due to their superior surgical outcomes and comparable surgical fees in Japan. The widespread adoption of RARC and LRC is expected to bring economic benefits to Japanese society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minato Yokoyama
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
- Department of Insured Medical Care Management, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Yuma Waseda
- Department of Insured Medical Care Management, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | | | - Daisuke Kato
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Takeshi Shirakawa
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Yohei Shimizu
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Tsunehiro Nenohi
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Yuki Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Taisuke Okumura
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Masayasu Urushibara
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| | - Masumi Ai
- Department of Insured Medical Care Management, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Takashi Fukagai
- Department of Urology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo
| | - Kazuhiro Ishizaka
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki City
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cella L, Basile G, Moretto S, Paciotti M, Hurle R, Lughezzani G, Avolio PP, Piccolini A, Mancon S, Lazzeri M, Gallioli A, Berquin C, Diana P, Mertens LS, Baboudjian M, Buffi NM, Contieri R, Uleri A. Robotic assisted vs open radical cystectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:277. [PMID: 38961035 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02026-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Several randomized control trials (RCTs) have been published comparing open (ORC) with robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). However, uncertainty persists regarding this issue, as evidences and recommendations on RARC are still lacking. In this systematic review and metaanalysis, we summarized evidence in this context. A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA criteria, using PubMed/Medline, Web Of Science and Embase, up to March 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. The primary endpoint was to investigate health-related quality of life (QoL) both at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints include pathological and perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications and oncological outcomes. Furthermore, we conducted a cost evaluation based on the available evidence. Eight RCTs were included, encompassing 1024 patients (515 RARC versus 509 ORC). QoL appeared similar among the two groups both after 3 and 6 months. No significant differences in overall and major complications at 30 days (p = 0.11 and p > 0.9, respectively) and 90 days (p = 0.28 and p = 0.57, respectively) were observed, as well as in oncological, pathological and perioperative outcomes, excepting from operative time, which was longer in RARC (MD 92.34 min, 95% CI 83.83-100.84, p < 0.001) and transfusion rate, which was lower in RARC (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61, p < 0.001). Both ORC and RARC are viable options for bladder cancer, having comparable complication rates and oncological outcomes. RARC provides transfusion rate advantages, however, it has longer operative time and higher costs. QoL outcomes appear similar between the two groups, both after 3 and 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovica Cella
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Moretto
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pier Paolo Avolio
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Piccolini
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Camille Berquin
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolò Maria Buffi
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
He W, Zeng S, Xu C. Re: Riccardo Mastroianni, Gabriele Tuderti, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, et al. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Totally Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: 3-Year Outcomes from a Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2024;85:422-30. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00082-8. [PMID: 38834426 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei He
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuxiong Zeng
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Chuanliang Xu
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China; Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khetrapal P, Bains PS, Jubber I, Ambler G, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Sridhar A, Ta A, Kelly JD, Catto JWF. Digital Tracking of Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Daily Step Counts Before and After Surgery Within the iROC Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:485-493. [PMID: 37852921 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to improve recovery after radical cystectomy (RC) are needed. OBJECTIVE To investigate wrist-worn wearable activity trackers in RC participants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An observational cohort study was conducted within the iROC randomised trial. INTERVENTION Patients undergoing RC at nine cancer centres wore wrist-based trackers for 7 days (d) at intervals before and after surgery. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Step counts were compared with participant and operative features, and recovery outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 308 participants, 284 (92.2%) returned digital activity data at baseline (median 17 d [interquartile range: 8-32] before RC), and postoperatively (5 [5-6] d) and at weeks 5 (43 [38-43] d), 12 (94 [87-106] d), and 26 (192 [181-205] d) after RC. Compliance was affected by the time from surgery and a coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic lockdown (return rates fell to 0-7%, chi-square p < 0.001). Step counts dropped after surgery (mean of 28% of baseline), before recovering at 5 weeks (wk) (71% of baseline) and 12 wk (95% of baseline; all analysis of variance [ANOVA] p < 0.001). Baseline step counts were not associated with postoperative recovery or death. Patients with extended hospital stays had reduced postoperative step counts, with a difference of 2.2 d (95% confidence interval: 0.856-3.482 d) between the lowest third and highest two-third tertiles (linear regression analysis; p < 0.001). Additionally, they spent less time out of the hospital within 90 d of RC (80.3 vs 74.3 d, p = 0.013). Lower step counts at 5, 12, and 26 wk were seen in those seeking medical help and needing readmission (ANOVA p ≤ 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Baseline step counts were not associated with recovery. Lower postoperative step counts were associated with longer length of stay at the hospital and postdischarge readmissions. Studies are required to determine whether low step counts can identify patients at a risk of developing complications. PATIENT SUMMARY Postoperative step counts appear to be a promising tool to identify patients in the community needing medical help or readmission. More work is needed to understand which measures are most useful and how best to collect these.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pramit Khetrapal
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Parasdeep S Bains
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ibrahim Jubber
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Norman R Williams
- Surgical & Interventional Trials Unit (SITU), Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Chris Brew-Graves
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anthony Ta
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - James W F Catto
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Flammia RS, Licari LC, Bologna E, Mastroianni R, Proietti F, Tuderti G, Anceschi U, Brassetti A, Franco A, De Nunzio C, Autorino R, Leonardo C, Simone G. Comparative Outcomes of Open Radical Cystectomy vs. Robot-Assisted Approaches with Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion: A Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis of Perioperative and Quality of Life Outcomes. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2421. [PMID: 38673693 PMCID: PMC11051502 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs that compare outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intra- or extracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD or ECUD) and the standard open approach (oRC). Methods: A systematic review identified RCTs including patients aged >18 years with non-metastatic bladder cancer treated with RARC (ICUD or ECUD) vs. oRC and reporting peri- and post-operative outcomes and quality of life (QoL) assessment. Standard and network metanalyses were performed. Results: Data from 1024 patients included in eight RCTs were analyzed. The standard meta-analysis found that RARC had longer OT, lower EBL, and a lower transfusion rate compared to oRC (all p < 0.001). No significant differences in terms of LOS between the ICUD vs. ECUD vs. ORC were recorded. RARC patients demonstrated better scores in fatigue, insomnia, pain, physical functioning, and role functioning-according to QoL assessment-compared to ORC at early follow-up, despite no difference at baselines. Finally, at network metanalysis, ICUD (OR = 0.74, p < 0.001) but not ECUD (OR = 0.92, p < 0.08) yielded a lower rate of high-grade 90-day complications compared to ORC despite longer OT (MD = 89.56, p = 0.0351). Conclusions: RARC represents a safe and feasible option to reduce perioperative bleeding with no definitive impact on LOS compared to ORC. Interestingly, ICUD may reduce the burden of 90-day complications to a greater extent than ECUD. Nonetheless, surgeons should be aware of the extended OT and steep learning curve of ICUD. Finally, RARC may provide some short-term benefits in terms of QoL, but more research is needed to determine its long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Simone Flammia
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (L.C.L.)
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Leslie Claire Licari
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (L.C.L.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Eugenio Bologna
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (L.C.L.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Flavia Proietti
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (G.T.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hanna P, Zabell J, Konety B, Warlick C. Perioperative complications and oncological outcomes of open versus robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a propensity score-matched study. World J Urol 2024; 42:220. [PMID: 38587653 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04907-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a comparative effectiveness analysis between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and open approach (ORC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving all patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for invasive bladder cancer at our institution from 2010 to 2018. Of a total 296 patients, we matched ORC and RARC cases based on age, BMI, Charlson comorbidity index, pathological TN staging of the tumor, prior radiotherapy, and type of diversion. The perioperative complications and oncological outcomes were compared. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients were matched in the ORC and RARC groups. The median operative time was longer in RARC group (430 min) than that of ORC group (372 min) (p = 0.03); however, the median estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in RARC group (500 ml) than that of ORC (700 ml) (p < 0.0001). The median length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly reduced in the RARC group (7 days) compared to the ORC group (8 days) (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between both groups in 30- and 90-day postoperative complications (p = 0.3 and p = 0.2, respectively). A total of 68 deaths (38.2%) were observed, of which 36 (40.4%) were in ORC group while 32 (36%) were in RARC group (p = 0.5). The results were comparable in both groups regarding 5-year survival rate and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.3 and p = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSION RARC showed better perioperative outcomes in the form of less EBL and shortened LOS compared to ORC group. However, both RARC and ORC provide similar postoperative oncologic control, in terms of similar positive surgical margins, cancer-specific rates, and 5-year survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hanna
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Department of Urology, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
| | - Joseph Zabell
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dahm P, Ergun O, Sathianathen N. Re: Pramit Khetrapal, Joanna Kae Ling Wong, Wei Phin Tan, et al. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol 2023;84:393-405. Eur Urol 2024; 85:e116. [PMID: 38272783 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Dahm
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Onuralp Ergun
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hage L, O’Donnell MA, Abou Chakra M, Kime A, Sibony M, Peyromaure M, Duquesne I. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the urinary bladder: A systematic review of the literature and report of a case. Indian J Urol 2024; 40:88-95. [PMID: 38725889 PMCID: PMC11078447 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_50_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are intermediate-grade lesions that frequently recur and rarely metastasize. There are currently no guidelines on the management of bladder IMTs. This systematic review aims to describe the clinical presentation and compare the management options for bladder IMTs. Methods A PubMed/Medline search was conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using the following Mesh terms: ("inflammatory myofibroblastic") AND ("tumor") OR ("tumor") AND ("bladder") AND ("case report"). A total of 75 case reports were included in the analysis. Results The mean age of the patients was 36 years. 65% of the cases initially presented with hematuria. 68% of the tumors stained positive for anaplastic lymphoma kinase, and 20% invaded the muscularis. Patients underwent either transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) only (34%), TURBT followed by complementary partial cystectomy (16%), or TURBT followed by radical cystectomy (4%). 36% and 9% of the cases underwent partial and radical cystectomy after the initial diagnosis, respectively. Cystectomies were performed using an open (74%), laparoscopic (14%), robotic-assisted (10%), or unknown (2%) approach. At a mean follow-up of 14 months, the recurrence and metastasis rates were about 9% and 4%, respectively. In addition, we present the case of a 49-year-old woman with a bladder IMT who underwent TURBT followed by laparoscopic partial cystectomy. The patient remains tumor free postoperatively (follow-up period of 12 months). Conclusion A complete surgical excision of the bladder IMT is crucial for the optimal management of these cases. Proper differentiation of this tumor from sarcoma or leiomyosarcoma leads to the best outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lory Hage
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Michael A O’Donnell
- Department of Urology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mohamad Abou Chakra
- Department of Urology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Amel Kime
- Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Sibony
- Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Michaël Peyromaure
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Igor Duquesne
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang KY, Hu JS, Liu XH. Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted total cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:2028-2032. [PMID: 38242792 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Yu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, 445000, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiang-Sheng Hu
- Department of Urology, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, 445000, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Hua Liu
- Department of Urology, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, 445000, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gavi F, Foschi N, Fettucciari D, Russo P, Giannarelli D, Ragonese M, Gandi C, Balocchi G, Francocci A, Bizzarri FP, Marino F, Filomena GB, Palermo G, Totaro A, Racioppi M, Bientinesi R, Sacco E. Assessing Trifecta and Pentafecta Success Rates between Robot-Assisted vs. Open Radical Cystectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1270. [PMID: 38610948 PMCID: PMC11011078 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) using trifecta and pentafecta parameters. METHODS The clinical data of 41 patients who underwent RARC between 2018 and 2022 were prospectively collected and retrospectively compared to those of 330 patients undergoing ORC using 1:1 propensity score matching. Trifecta was defined as simultaneous negative surgical margins (SMs), a lymph node (LN) yield ≥ 16, and the absence of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III-V) within 90 days postoperatively. Pentafecta additionally included a 12-month recurrence-free rate and a time between the transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (TURBT) and radical cystectomy (RC) ≤ 3 months. The continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-squared test. RESULTS No statistically significant differences in trifecta and pentafecta success rates were observed between the RARC and ORC cohorts after propensity score matching. However, the RARC group exhibited significantly reduced blood loss (RARC: 317 mL vs. ORC: 525 mL, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS RARC offers distinct advantages over ORC in terms of reduced blood loss, while trifecta and pentafecta success rates do not differ significantly between the two surgical approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Gavi
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Nazario Foschi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Daniele Fettucciari
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Pierluigi Russo
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Facility of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Ragonese
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Carlo Gandi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Giovanni Balocchi
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Alessandra Francocci
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Francesco Pio Bizzarri
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Filippo Marino
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Giovanni Battista Filomena
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Palermo
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Angelo Totaro
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Marco Racioppi
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Riccardo Bientinesi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco 8 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy (G.P.)
| | - Emilio Sacco
- Postgraduate School of Urology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Francesco 6 Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.P.B.); (F.M.); (M.R.)
- Urology Department, Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola Hospital, Catholic University Medical School, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ohene-Agyei J, Madhira M, Smith H, Sardiu ME, Lee EK. Open or robotic? Radical cystectomies for patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Transl Sci 2024; 8:e57. [PMID: 38655453 PMCID: PMC11036446 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This systematic review and meta-analysis will review randomized control trials for localized bladder cancer, evaluating surgical and pathologic outcomes of ORC versus RARC. Methods Randomized studies evaluating adults with non-metastatic bladder cancer who underwent a radical cystectomy. Randomized trials were selected for final review. Data was extracted and analyzed with Revman 5 software. The primary outcome was complication rates within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included postoperative quality of life, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and other perioperative outcomes. Continuous variables were reported using mean difference with 95% confidence intervals, and dichotomous variables were reported using risk difference with 95% confidence intervals with RARC as the experimental group and ORC as the reference group. Results Of 134 articles screened, six unique randomized studies were selected. For Grade I-II complications, the risk ratio (RR) was 0.92 (95% CI [0.79,1.08], p = 0.33), and for Grade III-V complications, RR 0.93 (95% CI [0.73,1.18], p = 0.59). RARC resulted in decreased blood loss (95% CI [-438.08, -158.44], p < 0.00001) and longer operative time (95% CI [55.23, 133.13], p < 0.00001). Quality of life using the EORTC-QLQ-30 global health score at 3 months post-op appeared to favor RARC with a mean difference of 4.46 points (95% CI [1.78, 7.15], p = 0.001). Pathologic outcomes neither statistically nor clinically favored one modality, as there was no significant difference between mean lymph node yield (p = 0.49), positive lymph nodes (p = 1.00), and positive surgical margins (p = 0.85) between the surgical modalities. Conclusions Although one surgical modality is not overtly superior, the choice may be decided by mitigating individual operative risk factors like intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative quality of life, as well as institutional costs and learning curve among surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jada Ohene-Agyei
- University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Holly Smith
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Eugene K Lee
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thakker PU, Hemal AK. Editorial comment re: a modified ureteroileal anastomosis can reduce ureteroileal anastomotic stricture after ileal conduit. Int Urol Nephrol 2024:10.1007/s11255-024-03994-x. [PMID: 38413552 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-03994-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ashok Kumar Hemal
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thakker PU, Refugia JM, Wolff D, Casals R, Able C, Temple D, Rodríguez AR, Tsivian M. Ileal Conduit versus Cutaneous Ureterostomy after Open Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of 90-Day Morbidity and Tube Dependence at Intermediate Term Follow-Up. J Clin Med 2024; 13:911. [PMID: 38337606 PMCID: PMC10856161 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aims to compare perioperative morbidity and drainage tube dependence following open radical cystectomy (ORC) with ileal conduit (IC) or cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) for bladder cancer. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ORC with IC or CU urinary diversion between 2020 and 2023 was carried out. The 90-day perioperative morbidity, as per Clavien-Dindo (C.D.) complication rates (Minor C.D. I-II, Major C.D. III-V), and urinary drainage tube dependence (ureteral stent or nephrostomy tube) after tube-free trial were assessed. Results: The study included 56 patients (IC: 26, CU: 30) with a 14-month median follow-up. At 90 days after IC or CU, the frequencies of any, minor, and major C.D. complications were similar (any-69% vs. 77%; minor-61% vs. 73%; major-46% vs. 30%, respectively, p > 0.2). Tube-free trial was performed in 86% of patients with similar rates of tube replacement (19% IC vs. 32% CU, p = 0.34) and tube-free survival at 12 months was assessed (76% IC vs. 70% CU, p = 0.31). Conclusions: Compared to the ORC+IC, ORC+CU has similar rates of both 90-day perioperative complications and 12-month tube-free dependence. CU should be offered to select patients as an alternative to IC urinary diversion after RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parth U. Thakker
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; (P.U.T.)
| | - Justin Manuel Refugia
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; (P.U.T.)
| | - Dylan Wolff
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; (P.U.T.)
| | - Randy Casals
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; (P.U.T.)
| | - Corey Able
- John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
| | - Davis Temple
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Alejandro R. Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; (P.U.T.)
| | - Matvey Tsivian
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; (P.U.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Galosi AB, Delle Fave RF, Perpepaj L, Milanese G, Polisini G, Mantovan M, Brocca C, Palantrani V, Tramanzoli P, Antezza A, De Angelis MV, Giulioni C, Castellani D. Does Alexis Wound Protector/Retractor Reduce the Risk of Surgical Site Infections After Open Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer? Results From a Single Center, Comparative Study. Urology 2024; 184:162-168. [PMID: 37940079 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess if Alexis dual-ring wound protector/retractor reduced the incidence of superficial and deep incisional infection following open radical cystectomy (ORC). METHODS Since January 2020, all procedures were performed using the Alexis retractor. We retrospectively reviewed our ORC database and compared patients who were operated on with Alexis with the same number of consecutive patients operated with a stainless steel retractor in the previous period. Data are presented as median and (interquartile range). RESULTS Seventy-four patients underwent RC with Alexis (group 1) and 74 with stainless steel retractor (group 2). Median age was 73.0(13) in group 1, 73.5(14) in group 2 (P = .338). There were 59(79.7%) men in both groups. The groups were comparable in terms of comorbidities, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy rate. There was no statistically significant difference in type of lymph node dissection and urinary diversion, total surgical time. Postoperative stay was shorter in group 1 [8(4) days vs 9(4) in group 2, P = .012]. Group 2 had a significantly higher rate of both superficial (8.1% vs 18.9%, P = .045) and deep incisional infection (2.7% vs 14.9%, P = .009). At multivariable analysis, body mass index (OR 1.129 95% CI 1.162-1.283, P = .043) was significantly associated with higher odds of superficial incisional infection. The use of Alexis was significantly associated with lower odds of having both superficial (OR 0.274 95%CI 0.033-0.781, P = .023) and deep incisional infection (OR 0.159 95% CI 0.034-0.745, P = .020). CONCLUSION The use of Alexis significantly reduces the rate of superficial and deep incisional infection following ORC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rocco Francesco Delle Fave
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Leonard Perpepaj
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giulio Milanese
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; Urology Unit, AST 5, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Giordano Polisini
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Matteo Mantovan
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Carlo Brocca
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vanessa Palantrani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Tramanzoli
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Angelo Antezza
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria De Angelis
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Carlo Giulioni
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mastroianni R, Iannuzzi A, Ragusa A, Tuderti G, Ferriero M, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, Misuraca L, D’Annunzio S, Guaglianone S, Papalia R, Simone G. Health Related Quality of Life in Patients with Bladder Cancer Receiving a Radical Cystectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5830. [PMID: 38136375 PMCID: PMC10741964 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical Cystectomy (RC) and Urinary Diversion (UD) is a complex surgery associated with a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, HRQoL assessment is too often overlooked, with survival and complications being the most commonly investigated outcomes. This study aimed to identify the most impaired HRQoL features in patients receiving RC, compared to a healthy population (HP) control, as well as patients' recovery after surgery, differentiating between patients receiving ORC and RARC. Patients with Bca, who were candidates for RC with curative intent, were enrolled in the "BCa cohort". HRQoL outcomes were collected with an EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. These were collected at baseline, and then at 6-, 12- and 24 mo after surgery in the BCa cohorts, and at baseline in the HP cohort. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM)-analysis, adjusted for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and smoking history, was performed. Between January 2018 and February 2023, a total of 418 patients were enrolled in the study, 116 and 302 in the BCa and HP cohorts, respectively. After applying the 1:1 propensity scored match (PSM) analysis, two homogeneous cohorts were selected, including 85 patients in each group. Baseline HRQoL assessment showed a significant impairment in terms of emotional and cognitive functioning, appetite loss and financial difficulties for the BCa cohort. Among secondary outcomes, we investigated patients' recovery after RC and UD, comparing HRQoL outcome questionnaires between the HP and BCa cohorts at 6-, 12- and 24 mo after surgery, and a subgroup analysis was performed differentiating between patients receiving ORC and RARC with totally intracorporeal UD. Interestingly, ORC compared to RARC provided a major impact on HRQoL recovery across the early, mid and long term. In particular, the ORC cohort experienced a major impairment in terms of symptoms scales items such as fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain and appetite loss. Consequently, comparing ORC and RARC vs. HP reported a major HRQoL impairment in the ORC cohort, possibly defining a benefit of RARC in early, mid- and long-term recovery. To conclude, this study confirmed the undeniable impact of RC on HRQoL. Interestingly, we highlighted the benefit of RARC in early, mid- and long-term recovery, expressed as less impairment of symptoms scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Andrea Iannuzzi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.I.); (A.R.); (R.P.)
| | - Alberto Ragusa
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.I.); (A.R.); (R.P.)
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Simone D’Annunzio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Salvatore Guaglianone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.I.); (A.R.); (R.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ji Q, Su Y. Re: Pramit Khetrapal, Joanna Kae Ling Wong, Wei Phin Tan, et al. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol. Eur Urol. 2023;84:393-405. Eur Urol 2023; 85:S0302-2838(23)03153-6. [PMID: 39492006 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Quansong Ji
- Department of Urology, Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China
| | - Yunwei Su
- Department of Urology, Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dyrskjøt L, Hansel DE, Efstathiou JA, Knowles MA, Galsky MD, Teoh J, Theodorescu D. Bladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2023; 9:58. [PMID: 37884563 PMCID: PMC11218610 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-023-00468-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Bladder cancer is a global health issue with sex differences in incidence and prognosis. Bladder cancer has distinct molecular subtypes with multiple pathogenic pathways depending on whether the disease is non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive. The mutational burden is higher in muscle-invasive than in non-muscle-invasive disease. Commonly mutated genes include TERT, FGFR3, TP53, PIK3CA, STAG2 and genes involved in chromatin modification. Subtyping of both forms of bladder cancer is likely to change considerably with the advent of single-cell analysis methods. Early detection signifies a better disease prognosis; thus, minimally invasive diagnostic options are needed to improve patient outcomes. Urine-based tests are available for disease diagnosis and surveillance, and analysis of blood-based cell-free DNA is a promising tool for the detection of minimal residual disease and metastatic relapse. Transurethral resection is the cornerstone treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and intravesical therapy can further improve oncological outcomes. For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care with evidence supporting trimodality therapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated benefit in non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers patient characteristics and molecular disease characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Dyrskjøt
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Margaret A Knowles
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Dan Theodorescu
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|