1
|
Chan HH, Fisher BM, Oimoen MA, Chintada L, Khanna H, Sonneborn CA, Hogue O, Machado AG, Baker KB. Carry-Over Effect of Deep Cerebellar Stimulation-Mediated Motor Recovery in a Rodent Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2024; 38:808-819. [PMID: 39215643 PMCID: PMC11567800 DOI: 10.1177/15459683241277194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously demonstrated that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN) can enhance motor recovery and functional reorganization of perilesional cortex in rodent models of stroke or TBI. OBJECTIVE Considering the treatment-related neuroplasticity observed at the perilesional cortex, we hypothesize that chronic LCN DBS-enhanced motor recovery observed will carry-over even after DBS has been deactivated. METHODS Here, we directly tested the enduring effects of LCN DBS in male Long Evans rats that underwent controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury targeting sensorimotor cortex opposite their dominant forepaw followed by unilateral implantation of a macroelectrode into the LCN opposite the lesion. Animals were randomized to DBS or sham treatment for 4 weeks during which the motor performance were characterize by behavioral metrics. After 4 weeks, stimulation was turned off, with assessments continuing for an additional 2 weeks. Afterward, all animals were euthanized, and tissue was harvested for further analyses. RESULTS Treated animals showed significantly greater motor improvement across all behavioral metrics relative to untreated animals during the 4-week treatment, with functional gains persisting across 2-week post-treatment. This motor recovery was associated with the increase in CaMKIIα and BDNF positive cell density across perilesional cortex in treated animals. CONCLUSIONS LCN DBS enhanced post-TBI motor recovery, the effect of which was persisted up to 2 weeks beyond stimulation offset. Such evidence should be considered in relation to future translational efforts as, unlike typical DBS applications, treatment may only need to be provided until such time as a new function plateau is achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh H. Chan
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Brittany M. Fisher
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Margaret A. Oimoen
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Latavya Chintada
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Hemen Khanna
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Claire A. Sonneborn
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Olivia Hogue
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Ohio
| | | | - Kenneth B. Baker
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Ohio
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rabelo TK, Campos ACP, Almeida Souza TH, Mahmud F, Popovic MR, Covolan L, Betta VHC, DaCosta L, Lipsman N, Diwan M, Hamani C. Deep brain stimulation mitigates memory deficits in a rodent model of traumatic brain injury. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:1186-1196. [PMID: 39419474 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2024] [Revised: 10/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major life-threatening event. In addition to neurological deficits, it can lead to long-term impairments in attention and memory. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for movement disorders that has been recently investigated for memory improvement in various disorders. In models of TBI, stimulation delivered to different brain targets has been administered to rodents long after the injury with the objective of treating motor deficits, coordination and memory impairment. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that DBS administered soon after TBI may prevent the development of memory deficits and exert neuroprotective effects. METHODS Male rats were implanted with DBS electrodes in the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) one week prior to lateral fluid percussion injury (FPI). Immediately after TBI, animals received active or sham stimulation for 6 h. Four days later, they were assessed in a novel object/novel location recognition test (NOR/NLR) and a Barnes maze paradigm. After the experiments, hippocampal cells were counted. Separate groups of animals were sacrificed at different timepoints after TBI to measure cytokines and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). In a second set of experiments, TBI-exposed animals receiving active or sham stimulation were injected with the tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) antagonist ANA-12, followed by behavioural testing. RESULTS Rats exposed to TBI given DBS had an improvement in several variables of the Barnes maze, but no significant improvements in NOR/NLR compared to Sham DBS TBI animals or non-implanted controls. Animals receiving stimulation had a significant increase in BDNF levels, as well as in hippocampal cell counts in the hilus, CA3 and CA1 regions. DBS failed to normalize the increased levels of TNFα and the proinflammatory cytokine IL1β in the perilesional cortex and the hippocampus of the TBI-exposed animals. Pharmacological experiments revealed that ANA-12 administered alongside DBS did not counter the memory improvement observed in ANT stimulated animals. CONCLUSIONS DBS delivered immediately after TBI mitigated memory deficits, increased the expression of BDNF and the number of hippocampal cells in rats. Mechanisms for these effects were not related to an anti-inflammatory effect or mediated via TrkB receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Faiza Mahmud
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Milos R Popovic
- Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luciene Covolan
- Department of Physiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Victor H C Betta
- Department of Physiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Leodante DaCosta
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Clement Hamani
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davis CK, Arruri V, Joshi P, Vemuganti R. Non-pharmacological interventions for traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2024; 44:641-659. [PMID: 38388365 PMCID: PMC11197135 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x241234770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Heterogeneity and variability of symptoms due to the type, site, age, sex, and severity of injury make each case of traumatic brain injury (TBI) unique. Considering this, a universal treatment strategy may not be fruitful in managing outcomes after TBI. Most of the pharmacological therapies for TBI aim at modifying a particular pathway or molecular process in the sequelae of secondary injury rather than a holistic approach. On the other hand, non-pharmacological interventions such as hypothermia, hyperbaric oxygen, preconditioning with dietary adaptations, exercise, environmental enrichment, deep brain stimulation, decompressive craniectomy, probiotic use, gene therapy, music therapy, and stem cell therapy can promote healing by modulating multiple neuroprotective mechanisms. In this review, we discussed the major non-pharmacological interventions that are being tested in animal models of TBI as well as in clinical trials. We evaluated the functional outcomes of various interventions with an emphasis on the links between molecular mechanisms and outcomes after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles K Davis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Vijay Arruri
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Pallavi Joshi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Raghu Vemuganti
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gao J, Pang X, Zhang L, Li S, Qin Z, Xie X, Liu J. Transcriptome analysis reveals the neuroprotective effect of Dlg4 against fastigial nucleus stimulation-induced ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. BMC Neurosci 2023; 24:40. [PMID: 37525090 PMCID: PMC10391810 DOI: 10.1186/s12868-023-00811-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated that electrical stimulation of the cerebellar fastigial nucleus (FNS) can considerably decrease infarction volume and improve neurofunction restoration following cerebral ischemia. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism of the neuroprotective effect of FNS is still vague. METHODS In this study, we developed a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion that included 1 h FNS followed by reperfusion for 3, 6, 12, 24, and 72 h. The expression profile of molecular alterations in brain tissues was obtained by transcriptome sequencing at five different time points. The function and pathway of miRNA expression pattern and core genes were annotated by Allen Brain Atlas, STRING database and Cytoscape software, so as to explore the mechanism of FNS-mediated neuroprotection. RESULTS The results indicated that FNS is associated with the neurotransmitter cycle pathway. FNS may regulate the release of monoamine neurotransmitters in synaptic vesicles by targeting the corresponding miRNAs through core Dlg4 gene, stimulate the Alternative polyadenylation (APA) incident's anti -apoptosis effect on the brain, and stimulate the interaction activation of neurons in cerebellum, cortex/thalamus and other brain regions, regulate neurovascular coupling, and reduce cerebral damage. CONCLUSION FNS may activate neuronal and neurovascular coupling by regulating the release of neurotransmitters in synaptic vesicles through the methylation of core Dlg4 gene and the corresponding transcription factors and protein kinases, inducing the anti-apoptotic mechanism of APA events. The findings from our investigation offer a new perspective on the way brain tissue responds to FNS-driven neuroprotection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinggui Gao
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Xiaomin Pang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Shenghua Li
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Zhenxiu Qin
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Xiaoyun Xie
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jingli Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ziesel D, Nowakowska M, Scheruebel S, Kornmueller K, Schäfer U, Schindl R, Baumgartner C, Üçal M, Rienmüller T. Electrical stimulation methods and protocols for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: a critical review of preclinical research. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2023; 20:51. [PMID: 37098582 PMCID: PMC10131365 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01159-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of disabilities resulting from cognitive and neurological deficits, as well as psychological disorders. Only recently, preclinical research on electrical stimulation methods as a potential treatment of TBI sequelae has gained more traction. However, the underlying mechanisms of the anticipated improvements induced by these methods are still not fully understood. It remains unclear in which stage after TBI they are best applied to optimize the therapeutic outcome, preferably with persisting effects. Studies with animal models address these questions and investigate beneficial long- and short-term changes mediated by these novel modalities. METHODS In this review, we present the state-of-the-art in preclinical research on electrical stimulation methods used to treat TBI sequelae. We analyze publications on the most commonly used electrical stimulation methods, namely transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), that aim to treat disabilities caused by TBI. We discuss applied stimulation parameters, such as the amplitude, frequency, and length of stimulation, as well as stimulation time frames, specifically the onset of stimulation, how often stimulation sessions were repeated and the total length of the treatment. These parameters are then analyzed in the context of injury severity, the disability under investigation and the stimulated location, and the resulting therapeutic effects are compared. We provide a comprehensive and critical review and discuss directions for future research. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We find that the parameters used in studies on each of these stimulation methods vary widely, making it difficult to draw direct comparisons between stimulation protocols and therapeutic outcome. Persisting beneficial effects and adverse consequences of electrical simulation are rarely investigated, leaving many questions about their suitability for clinical applications. Nevertheless, we conclude that the stimulation methods discussed here show promising results that could be further supported by additional research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ziesel
- Institute of Health Care Engineering with European Testing Center of Medical Devices, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
| | - M Nowakowska
- Research Unit of Experimental Neurotraumatology, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - S Scheruebel
- Gottfried Schatz Research Center for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging, Biophysics Division, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - K Kornmueller
- Gottfried Schatz Research Center for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging, Biophysics Division, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - U Schäfer
- Research Unit of Experimental Neurotraumatology, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - R Schindl
- Gottfried Schatz Research Center for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging, Biophysics Division, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - C Baumgartner
- Institute of Health Care Engineering with European Testing Center of Medical Devices, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - M Üçal
- Research Unit of Experimental Neurotraumatology, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - T Rienmüller
- Institute of Health Care Engineering with European Testing Center of Medical Devices, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
- BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Surendrakumar S, Rabelo TK, Campos ACP, Mollica A, Abrahao A, Lipsman N, Burke MJ, Hamani C. Neuromodulation Therapies in Pre-Clinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Translational Applications. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:435-448. [PMID: 35983592 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been associated with several lasting impairments that affect quality of life. Pre-clinical models of TBI have been studied to further our understanding of the underlying short-term and long-term symptomatology. Neuromodulation techniques have become of great interest in recent years as potential rehabilitative therapies after injury because of their capacity to alter neuronal activity and neural circuits in targeted brain regions. This systematic review aims to provide an overlook of the behavioral and neurochemical effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in pre-clinical TBI models. After screening 629 abstracts, 30 articles were pooled for review. These studies showed that tDCS, TMS, DBS, or VNS delivered to rodents restored TBI-induced deficits in coordination, balance, locomotor activity and improved cognitive impairments in memory, learning, and impulsivity. Potential mechanisms for these effects included neuroprotection, a decrease in apoptosis, neuroplasticity, and the restoration of neural circuit abnormalities. The translational value, potential applicability, and the interpretation of these findings in light of outcome data from clinical trials in patients with TBI are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanan Surendrakumar
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thallita Kelly Rabelo
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ana Carolina P Campos
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adriano Mollica
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Agessandro Abrahao
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Hurvitz Brain Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Hurvitz Brain Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew J Burke
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Hurvitz Brain Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Hurvitz Brain Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|