Luteinizing hormone concentrations after gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration do not influence pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer

Effect of trigger day serum luteinising hormone levels on the in-vitro fertilization outcome: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

Controlled ovarian stimulation leads to profound changes in the endocrine characteristics of the ovarian cycle. Serum luteinising hormone (LH) levels on the day of trigger have been shown to correlate with oocyte quality and pregnancy rate in antagonist cycles.

METHODS

This is an observational study of 86 women undergoing an antagonist in-vitro fertilisation cycle. Oocyte maturation trigger used was either Inj. human chorionic gonadotropin or Inj. triptorelin 0.2 mg s/c or a combination of both. Women were categorised into four groups based on serum LH levels on the day of trigger i.e., LH ≤0.5 (n=8), LH=0.6- 1.0 international units (IU)/L (n=12), LH=1.0-1.5 IU/L (n=13), and LH >1.6 IU/L (n=53) and the subgroup analysis was done based on type of trigger used.

RESULTS

Mature oocyte (MII) retrieval rate did not show a significant relation with serum LH levels (87%, 89%, 77%, and 76% in groups with LH <0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.0-1.5, and >1.5 IU/L respectively; P-value=0.243). There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate either when women were split according to the type of trigger given or according to trigger day LH levels. Women with low LH levels (<0.5 IU/L) required significantly more doses of gonadotropins compared to women with LH levels of 1.0-1.5 IU/L. (3,531+1,133 vs. 2,281+938; P-value=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Based on the observation from the current study, there was no significant association of serum LH levels with MII retrieval rate and clinical pregnancy rate. The group with low LH levels required slightly longer days of stimulation.

Association between serum LH levels on hCG trigger day and live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations

Objective

To investigate whether serum LH levels on hCG trigger day are associated with live birth rate (LBR) after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations.

Methods

This study was a retrospective study. A total of 3059 fresh embryo transfers were divided into three populations: predicted normal ovarian responders (NOR) (n=2049), patients with PCOS (n=533), and predicted poor ovarian responders (POR) (n=477). Each population was stratified into three groups based on LH levels: < 25th percentile, 25-75th percentile, and > 75th percentile. The primary outcome of the study was LBR, and secondary outcomes included implantation, clinical pregnancy, and early pregnancy loss rates. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounders.

Results

In NOR, compared to the reference group (>75th percentile), LBR was significantly lower in the < 25th percentile group (adjusted OR=0.662; 95%CI, 0.508-0.863) and 25-75th percentile group (adjusted OR=0.791; 95%CI, 0.633-0.988). In PCOS patients, LBR decreased significantly in the < 25th percentile group (41.4%) compared to the 25-75th percentile group (53.7%) and > 75th percentile group (56.1%). In addition, the LBR was lower in the < 25th percentile group (33.6%) compared with the 25-75th percentile group (43.4%) and the>75th percentile group (42.0%) in POR, but this was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

High serum LH levels are associated with increased LBR after fresh embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycles, which may be attributable to higher implantation rate. LH may be a predictor of whether to schedule fresh embryo transfer in IVF cycles for better clinical outcomes.

Recombinant-luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GNRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the beneficial effect of recombinant-luteinizing Hormone (r-LH) addition in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and whether an optimal time of Recombinant-Luteinizing Hormone (r-LH) supplementation exist during the controlled of stimulation (COS). The primary outcomes are clinical Pregnancy rate and the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes are the number of metaphase II oocytes, miscarriage rate and live birth rate. Results show that supplementation of LH generated a greater number of oocytes retrieved than patients who did not receive LH supplementation, but it did not help with other pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, the result of the subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the outcomes with different LH addition times.

Is there a relationship between luteinizing hormone levels and ART outcome in GnRH antagonist protocols? A retrospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential link between serum LH concentrations on the day of oocyte triggering and pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, data of women ≤42 years undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycles and who had downregulated with GnRH antagonist protocol in a 12-month period was reviewed. Patients with incomplete hospital records were excluded. Women were divided into four groups based on the percentiles of the serum LH level on the day of oocyte triggering: <1.49 (<25^th percentile), 1.49-2.59 (25-50^th percentile), 2.60-4.60 (50-75^th percentile), and >4.60 IU/L (>75^th percentile). Clinical pregnancy was considered the primary outcome, while chemical pregnancy and implantation rate were the most important secondary outcomes which were compared between the four groups.

RESULTS

Four hundred and nighty-three women of 1003 infertile women, who were initially assessed for eligibility, met the inclusion criteria. Finally, 426 women were analyzed. Levels of progesterone were significantly correlated with the level of LH on the day of trigger in the >4.60 IU/L group (r = 0.20, P = 0.034). Furthermore, the levels of estradiol were significantly correlated with the level of LH on the day of trigger in the <1.49 IU/L (r = 0.21, P = 0.026). The number of retrieved oocytes, 2PNs (two pronucleis), number, and quality of total embryos were similar between groups (P > 0.05). With regard to oocyte maturity rate, fertilization proportion, fertilization rate, chemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, there was no difference between varied LH levels in the four groups (P > 0.05). The only observed difference was the implantation rate that was significantly higher in the 2.60-4.60 IU/L group than the <1.49 IU/L group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our result could not show the potential link between LH concentrations during GnRH antagonist cycles and pregnancy outcomes. However, very low LH levels during ovarian stimulation period may negatively affect the implantation rate.

The Effect of Luteinising Hormone Suppression in In Vitro Fertilisation Antagonist Cycles

Use of GnRH antagonists in IVF stimulation protocols shortens controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and reduces the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). However, profound reduction in LH levels has been associated with use of GnRH antagonists. This study aims to determine if LH suppression during GnRH antagonist cycles results in poorer IVF outcomes. This was a prospective pilot longitudinal study where serum LH levels were measured on day 2/3 of the menstrual cycle before COH, 1/2 days following institution of GnRH antagonist and at the day of ovulation trigger. A threshold of LH <0.5 IU/L was used to define profound LH suppression. Data on IVF outcomes was collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate risk factors associated with LH suppression following GnRH antagonist IVF treatment. Ninety-one eligible women were recruited. Women underwent a standard antagonist cycle with Puregon 200u and Ganirelix. No participant had LH <0.5 IU/L prior to GnRH antagonist treatment, and 27 participants (29.7%) had significant LH suppression at either time point. Predictors of profound LH suppression following GnRH antagonist treatment identified (P < 0.20) were age (OR = 0.80, P = 0.013), no previous ovulation induction (OR = 0.26, P = 0.033) and previous GnRH antagonist IVF cycle (OR = 4.32, P = 0.125). Numbers of oocytes, embryos and ongoing pregnancy rates at 12 weeks gestation in patients with and without LH suppression did not differ significantly. We found associations between clinical characteristics and risk of profound LH suppression in women undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF cycles, but no significant differences in IVF and pregnancy outcomes between women with and without significant LH suppression.

Patients With Deep Ovarian Suppression Following GnRH Agonist Long Protocol May Benefit From a Modified GnRH Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To verify if patients with deep ovarian suppression following gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist long protocol may benefit from a modified GnRH antagonist protocol based on luteinizing hormone (LH) levels.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-based hospital.

PATIENTS

110 patients exhibited ultra-low LH levels during ovarian stimulation using GnRH agonist long protocol.

INTERVENTIONS

As all the embryos in the first cycle were exhausted without being pregnant, these patients proposed to undergo a second cycle of ovarian stimulation. 74 of them were treated with a modified GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels. Other 36 patients were still stimulated following GnRH agonist long protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). The second outcomes were biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and cancellation rate.

RESULTS

Reproductive outcomes were much better in the modified GnRH antagonist protocol. The OPR and LBR were much higher in the GnRH antagonist protocol group than in the GnRH agonist long protocol group [odds ratio (OR) 3.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47, 10.61, P=0.018; OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.38, 13.60, P=0.008; respectively]. Meanwhile, the cancellation rate was much lower in the GnRH antagonist protocol group (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02, 0.72; P=0.014). Mean LH level during stimulation did not have a predictive value on live birth. However, it was independently associated with the occurrence of ongoing pregnancy (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.25, 5.85; P=0.01). The results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the data mentioned above. The patients got completely different and excellent clinical outcomes in their second cycles stimulated with the modified GnRH antagonist protocol.

CONCLUSION

Patients with deep ovarian suppression following GnRH agonist long protocol may benefit from a modified GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels.

Low Serum LH Levels During Ovarian Stimulation With GnRH Antagonist Protocol Decrease the Live Birth Rate After Fresh Embryo Transfers but Have No Impact in Freeze-All Cycles

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between serum LH levels and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) within one complete cycle, and the impact of serum LH levels on the live birth rate (LBR) after the initial embryo transfer (ET) considering different ET strategies (fresh or freeze-all).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated reproductive center.

PATIENTS

1480 normogonadotrophic women who underwent COS with GnRH antagonist protocol for the first IVF/ICSI attempt.

INTERVENTIONS

The sample was stratified into low and higher LH groups according to serum LH peak levels of <4 (Group A) and ≥4 IU/L (Group B) during COS. Patients were also sub-grouped into conventional fresh/frozen ET cycles and freeze-all cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The LBR after the initial embryo transfer and the CLBR within one complete cycle.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The numbers of day-3 high-quality embryos, the numbers of embryos available, and the other pregnancy outcomes after the initial ET.

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, the CLBRs decreased significantly in the low (63.1% vs. 68.3%, P=.034) LH group compared to the higher LH group. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with low LH levels had lower LBR after fresh ET (38.0% vs. 51.5%, P=.005) but comparable LBR after the first frozen-thawed ET (FET) in freeze-all cycles (49.8% vs. 51.8%, P=.517) than patients with higher LH peak levels. Likewise, patients with low LH levels had lower CLBR for conventional fresh/frozen ET cycles (54.8% vs. 66.1%, P=.015) but comparable CLBR for the freeze-all cycles (66.8% vs. 69.2%, P=.414) than those with higher LH levels. Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analyses showed that low LH level was an independent risk factor for the CLBR in the whole cohort (odds ratio (OR): 0.756, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.604-0.965, P=.014) and in patients who underwent the conventional ET strategy (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.408-0.917, P=.017). Moreover, the adverse impact of low LH levels on LBRs maintained statistically significant after fresh transfers (OR: 0.532, 95% CI: 0.353-0.800, P=.002) but not after the first FETs in freeze-all cycles (OR: 0.918, 95% CI: 0.711-1.183, P=.508).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with higher LH levels, low LH levels decrease the CLBRs per oocyte retrieval cycle for normogonadotrophic women who underwent COS using GnRH antagonists. This discrepancy may arise due to the significant detrimental effect of low LH levels on the LBRs after fresh embryo transfers.

Expression of genes that regulate follicle development and maturation during ovarian stimulation in poor responders

RESEARCH QUESTION

Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), androgen receptor (AR), LH beta polypeptide (LHB), progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) and progesterone receptor membrane component 2 (PGRMC2) regulate follicle development and maturation. Their mRNA expression was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of normal and poor responders, during ovarian stimulation.

DESIGN

Fifty-two normal responders and 15 poor responders according to the Bologna criteria were enrolled for IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection and stimulated with 200 IU of follitrophin alpha and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist. HCG was administered for final oocyte maturation. On days 1, 6 and 10 of stimulation, blood samples were obtained, serum hormone levels were measured, RNA was extracted from PBMC and real-time polymerase chain reaction was carried out to identify the mRNA levels. Relative mRNA expression of each gene was calculated by the comparative 2^-DDCt method.

RESULTS

Differences between mRNA levels of each gene on the same time point between the two groups were not significant. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 mRNA levels were downregulated, adjusted for ovarian response and age. Positive correlations between PGRMC1 and AR (standardized beta = 0.890, P < 0.001) from day 1 to 6 and PGRMC1 and LHB (standardized beta = 0.806, P < 0.001) from day 1 to 10 were found in poor responders. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 were positively correlated on days 6 and 10 in normal responders.

CONCLUSIONS

PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 mRNA are significantly decreased during ovarian stimulation, with some potential differences between normal and poor responders.

Low LH Level on the Day of GnRH Agonist Trigger Is Associated With Reduced Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates and Increased Early Miscarriage Rates Following IVF/ICSI Treatment and Fresh Embryo Transfer

Objective: To examine the correlation between serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on the day of GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) trigger and reproductive outcomes following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment and fresh embryo transfer, and to identify a pre-trigger serum LH threshold which would be compatible with the most optimal cycle outcome. Design: This study is based on data from a previously published randomized controlled trial conducted from 2014 to 2016. Patients: A total of 322 participants were enrolled. Setting: Private IVF center. Intervention(s): GnRH-antagonist-based IVF cycles triggered with GnRH-a. For the purpose of the study, patients were stratified according to preovulatory LH quartiles (Q1-Q4). Main Outcome Measure(s): Ongoing pregnancy rates (OP), live birth rates (LB) and early pregnancy loss (EPL) rates. Results: The results of the present study showed increasing OP as well as LB rates and decreasing EPL rates with increasing pre-trigger serum LH levels (P for trend < 0.06, 0.07, and 0.02), respectively. The absolute difference between the highest LH(Q4) and the lowest LH (Q1) group was 13.4%, 12.1%, and 12% in OP, LB, and EPL rates, respectively. In multivariate regression analysis, a pre-trigger serum LH level of 1.60 mIU/ml was identified as a threshold below which reproductive outcomes decreased. The ROC curve values were statistically significant for OP, LB, and EPL; the AUC (95% CI) = [0.57 (0.50-0.63) P < 0.04; 0.57 (0.50-0.63) P < 0.05, and 0.60 (0.51-0.70) P < 0.04], respectively. A significant positive correlation was found on the day of GnRH-a trigger between serum LH, the number of follicles, serum P4, and serum E2, p < 0.03; P < 0.03; and P < 0.001, respectively. Conclusion: Low serum LH levels on the day of GnRH-a trigger is associated with reduced ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates and increased early miscarriage rates. Our findings suggest a lower threshold of serum LH values on the day of GnRH-a trigger necessary to optimize reproductive outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: 02053779.

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle stimulating hormone therapy in gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue cycles: what is the evidence?

OBJECTIVE

To look into current evidence exploring the added value of rLH supplementation to rFSH in GnRH analogues cycles, to identify groups of women that still have no evidence for adjuvant rLH therapy and to discuss ways that may advance research on this topic.

METHODS

Eight systematic reviews and meta-analyses exploring the benefit for pregnancy achievement of rLH supplementation, excluding other LH activity preparations, to GnRH analogues cycles in the ART setting were thoroughly evaluated.

RESULTS

Evidence exists to show that rLH supplementation seems to have added value for pregnancy achievement in women with poor ovarian response and in women ≥35 years of age employing the GnRH agonist protocol, while the evidence is still debatable when the GnRH antagonist is administered. In the general infertile population, rLH supplementation does not have added value in the GnRH-antagonist cycles while the evidence is still controversial when the GnRH agonist is employed. Whether rLH supplementation may have a benefit in some young, normo-gonadotropic women, who may develop LH deficiency following GnRH analogues, is still to be shown. The main task remains how to identify subgroups of women that may benefit from rLH supplementation.

CONCLUSION

An accurate definition of the LH threshold in GnRH analogue treated cycles may contribute to the discussion of which subgroups of women may benefit from adjuvant rLH therapy.

The effect of rLH supplementation to the GnRH-antagonist protocol on endocrine dynamics in the advanced reproductive age

PURPOSE

To explore serum endocrine dynamics, specifically LH levels, following rLH supplementation to rFSH following GnRH-antagonist treatment in the advance reproductive age.

METHODS

Women were prospectively and similarly treated employing rFSH and the flexible GnRH-antagonist protocol, while rLH was supplemented only to the study group. Serum FSH, LH, E_2, and P were evaluated throughout the follicular phase. Three strategies were a priori planned to examine endocrine dynamics among women enrolled.

RESULTS

While serum LH drop were similar before GnRH-antagonist stimulation, it dropped more times in the control group compared to the study group. Among women receiving rFSH only, serum LH levels dropped ≤2, ≤1 and ≤0.5 mIU/mL in 71.4, 46.4, and 28.6% of cases, while this occurred only in 38.7% (P = 0.01), 6.5% (P = 0.0004) and 3.2% (P = 0.007) of women receiving combined rFSH and rLH treatment, respectively. The same trend was found when serum LH dropped in at least two occasions following the GnRH-antagonist administration. Conversely, serum LH diagrams throughout the follicular phase did not differ between the two groups. Furthermore, individual area under the curve values of LH, E_2, and P was similar between the two groups following GnRH-antagonist initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Different strategies to explore LH dynamics following the GnRH-antagonist administration have resulted in diverse results, implying the need for a consensus definition of LH threshold for adequate folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis. Such action would pave the way for understanding which groups of patients may benefit from rLH supplementation.

Serum luteinizing hormone level on the third day after ovarian stimulation in GnRH agonist short protocol is predictive of outcome in poor responders but not in normal responders

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether prognostic value of LH measurement in normal responders (NR) is different from poor responders (POR).

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study was conducted among patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with short protocol, with 300 NR and 101 POR, according to Bologna Consensus criteria. LH was measured on 3rd and 5th day after stimulation and HCG administration day.

RESULTS

There was significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated among those with LH level on the third day after stimulation (a) below the 25 centile (b) between the 25 and 75 centile and (c) above the 75 centile in women with POR (7.7%, 15.1% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.02) but not in NR. There was significant correlation between LH ranks and clinical pregnancy rate in POR (p = 0.02) but not in NR. Factors associated with clinical pregnancy rate in POR were age and LH on the third of stimulation, while factors in NR were age, AFC and FSH.

CONCLUSION

LH level on the 3rd day of stimulation was predictive of clinical pregnancy in POR but not in NR.

Comparison of ovulation induction protocols after endometrioma resection

Background and Objectives:

The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols in endometriosis patients who have undergone laparoscopic endometrioma resection surgery. To our knowledge, there is no study in the current literature that compares the effectiveness of long GnRH-a and GnRH-ant protocols in management of IVF cycles in endometriosis patients who underwent laparoscopic endometrioma resection surgery.

Methods:

Eighty-six patients with stage III to IV endometriosis who had undergone laparoscopic resection surgery for endometrioma were divided into 2 groups: those who had ovarian stimulation with a long GnRH-a protocol (n = 44), and those who had ovarian stimulation with a GnRH-ant protocol (n = 42).

Results:

The number of follicles on human chorionic gonadotropin injection day, duration of hyperstimulation, number of retrieved metaphase II oocytes, and total number of grade 1 embryos were statically significantly higher in the long GnRH-a protocol. There were no significant differences in positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy rates (25% vs 21.4%; P = .269) and ongoing pregnancy rates per patient (20.5% vs 19.1%; P = .302) between the 2 protocols.

Conclusions:

Long GnRH-a and GnRH-ant protocols both present similar IVF outcomes in patients with endometriosis who have undergone laparoscopic endometrioma resection surgery. A long GnRH-a protocol may lead to a higher number of embryos that can be cryopreserved, providing the possibility of additional embryo transfers without having to go through the process of ovarian stimulation again.

The criteria for optimal down-regulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate whether the degree of down-regulation using GnRH-agonists is associated with pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective analysis was performed on 2708 cycles from 2514 patients undergoing down-regulation with the luteal phase long protocol. The serum oestradiol (E2D) and luteinising hormone (LHD) levels, the diameter of the largest follicle (DLFD) and the endometrial-thickness (ENTD) after down-regulation were used to evaluate the degree of down-regulation. One-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni adjustment, the chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The cumulative clinical pregnancy rates (CCPR) and the cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) were higher in the cycles with E2D < 30 pg/ml (63.7%, OR = 1.405 (1.055-1.870) and 56.8%, OR = 1.372 (1.039-1.813)) and 30-55pg/ml (66.8%, OR = 1.439 (1.104-1.874) and 59.8%, OR = 1.397 (1.080-1.806)) than in those with E2D > 55 pg/ml (62.8% and 54.7%). There was a trend towards lower CCPRs and CLBRs in the cycles with DLFD > 10 mm or ENTD ≥ 6 mm; however, this difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

The degree of down-regulation is associated with ovarian response, pregnancy, and live birth. We propose the following criteria for optimal down-regulation: E2D 30-55 pg/ml, ENTD < 6 mm, and no apparent ovarian activity.

Is there a Need for Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Estimation in Patients Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonists and Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rFSH)?

AIM

To find out effect of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on Day 1 (Day 2 of cycle) and Day 5 of stimulation and Day of trigger hCG in controlled ovulation stimulation with antagonist protocol of IVF-ICSI cycle on cycle outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a University Hospital setting. One hundred and 62 patients underwent 165 cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with recombinant Follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) and Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in one year were included. Serum LH levels estimated on Day 1, Day 5 and the day of trigger hCG injections were divided into three groups based on the percentile and outcome measured.

RESULTS

The average number of follicles >18 mm in size were significant in the patients with LH levels between 25th to 75th percentile group on Day 1, Day 5 and Day of trigger hCG. The fertilization rate was significant (p= 0.04) in the patients with LH levels < 25thpercentile on the day of trigger hCG. Oocyte recovery rate, oocyte maturation rate and average number of best quality embryos (Grade 1) were not affected significantly in all three groups.

CONCLUSION

In GnRH antagonist and rFSH protocols, low serum LH concentrations on the day of trigger hCG has better fertilization rate. LH levels between 25th and 75th percentile have an influence on the average number of > 18 mm size follicles. However, the LH level on Day 1, Day 5 and Day of hCG does not affect the cycle outcome in COS with antagonist protocol of IVF cycle. Hence, LH estimation is not mandatory in ART cycles with GnRH antagonist protocol.

Early initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment results in a more stable endocrine milieu during the mid- and late-follicular phases: a randomized controlled trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist initiation on cycle day 2 or 6

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of initiating GnRH antagonist (GnRH-a) on cycle day (CD) 2 vs. CD 6 on LH, E₂, and P levels in the mid and late follicular phases.

DESIGN

Nested study within a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Reproductive medicine center in an university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred sixty patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

INTERVENTION(S)

Recombinant FSH (150-225 IU) was administered daily from CD 2 onward. The study group (CD 2) started GnRH-a cotreatment on CD 2, whereas the control group (CD 6) started on CD 6.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The follicular phase endocrine profile.

RESULT(S)

The LH levels on CD 6 were lower in the CD 2 group (0.6 ± 0.4 vs. 1.9 ± 1.4 IU/L). The CD 2 group demonstrated both lower E₂ levels on CD 6 (520.1 ± 429.6 pmol/L vs. 1,071.7 ± 654.2 pmol/L) and on the day of hCG administration (3,341.4 ± 1,535.3 pmol/L vs. 4,573.2 ± 2,445.4 pmol/L). The P levels did not differ on CD 6 or on the day of hCG administration.

CONCLUSION(S)

Early initiation of GnRH-a cotreatment results in a more stable endocrine profile, with more physiological levels of E2 and LH during the follicular phase. The effect on clinical outcomes must be established in larger trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00866034.

Recombinant human LH supplementation versus supplementation with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol: a matched case-control study

An observational, matched, case-control study was carried out to compare the efficacy of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) supplementation with that of urinary human menopausal gonadotrophin (u-hMG)-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for assisted reproductive technology (ART) using a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist protocol. A total of 4719 women, 1573 per group, matched by age, body mass index, indication and number of previous ART cycles, were treated with either recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) and r-hLH in a fixed 2:1 ratio or u-hMG, either alone or in combination with r-hFSH, after down-regulation in a long GnRH-agonist protocol. Compared with the two u-hMG groups (u-hMG alone or in combination with r-hFSH, respectively), r-hFSH consumption was significantly lower (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), and pregnancy rates per cycle (p = 0.006; p = 0.022) and per embryo transfer (p = 0.025; p = 0.008), and implantation rate per embryo transferred (p < 0.001; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group treated with the fixed combination of r-hFSH and r-hLH. In COS protocols with r-hFSH, supplementation with r-hLH appears to be more effective than supplementation with u-hMG using the long GnRH-agonist protocol for ART.

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET)

Several protocols are actually available for in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. The review summarizes the main differences and the clinic characteristics of the protocols in use with GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists by emphasizing the major outcomes and hormonal changes associated with each protocol. The majority of randomized clinical trials clearly shows that in "in Vitro" Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, the combination of exogenous Gonadotropin plus a Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist, which is able to suppress pituitary FSH and LH secretion, is associated with increased pregnancy rate as compared with the use of gonadotropins without a GnRH agonist. Protocols with GnRH antagonists are effective in preventing a premature rise of LH and induce a shorter and more cost-effective ovarian stimulation compared to the long agonist protocol. However, a different synchronization of follicular recruitment and growth occurs with GnRH agonists than with GnRH antagonists. Future developments have to be focused on timing of the administration of GnRH antagonists, by giving a great attention to new strategies of stimulation in patients in which radio-chemotherapy cycles are needed.

“Serum and follicular LH, pregnancy prediction and assisted reproduction”

The aim of this study was to determine the mean serum and follicular fluid LH and estradiol values in patients treated by IVF/ET (ICSI) after completed ovarian stimulation and to determine the range of values for these hormones with higher chances of conceiving pregnancies. All patients underwent stimulation in long agonistic protocol. Collected samples of body fluids (serum n = 31, follicular fluid n = 93) were centrifuged and supernatant was separated, aliquoted, frozen and stored at − 20°C. LH and E2 were measured in serum and follicular fluids. Cutoff value of E2 determined using follicular LH and follicular E2 correlation was 2100 nmol/L. If the E2 value was lower than 2100 nmol/L the ratio of results related to pregnancy was 29,4% (15/51). If the follicular E2 values were higher than 2100 nmol/L the ratio of results related to pregnancy was (7,1%, 3/42). The observed differences were significant (p 0.03). Follicular LH values higher than 3.1 IU/L and follicular E2 values < than 2100 nmol/L indicate higher conceiving probability. Our results can be fit in previous findings on negative effects of low LH values in IVF treatment procedures.

Effectiveness of a low gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist dose in preventing premature luteinizing hormone rise during controlled ovarian stimulation

The current prospective randomized study was designed to test the efficacy of a low dose (0.125 mg/day) of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix in preventing premature luteinizing hormone (LH) rise during controlled ovarian stimulation in comparison with the standard dose of 0.25 mg/day. Ovarian stimulation was started with 225 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) on day 2 of the menstrual cycle. Cetrorelix was injected daily from day 6 of gonadotropin administration. Blood was sampled from each woman on day 3 of ovarian stimulation and then daily from day 5 onward up to human chorionic gonadotropin administration for analysis of FSH, LH, progesterone, and estradiol. LH rise was defined as serum LH ≥ 10 mIU/ml. There were 40 patients receiving cetrorelix at 0.25 mg/day and 36 patients receiving cetrorelix at 0.125 mg/day. Premature LH rise was recorded in 10% of patients injecting antagonist at 0.25 mg/day and in 14% of patients administered with antagonist at 0.125 mg/day. These frequencies did not differ statistically. In conclusion, our results suggest that a cetrorelix dose of 0.125 mg/day is effective as the standard dose (0.25 mg/day) in preventing premature LH rise during controlled ovarian stimulation.

Low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin may improve in vitro fertilization cycle outcomes in patients with low luteinizing hormone levels after gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of low levels of endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) supplementation on in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Military medical center.

PATIENT(S)

General in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET) population.

INTERVENTION(S)

Addition of low-dose urinary hCG to IVF stimulations using a recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and GnRH antagonist protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Implantation and live-birth rates.

RESULT(S)

As part of a larger cohort of 239 patients, 42 patients with LH levels ≤ 0.5 mIU/mL were evaluated. In the larger cohort, there were no differences in implantation and pregnancy rates between the recombinant FSH only (n = 113) and the recombinant FSH with low-dose hCG supplementation (n = 126) groups. In the FSH-only group, patients with LH levels ≤ 0.5 mIU/mL had decreased implantation rates (19% vs. 42%) and live-birth rates (25% vs. 54%) as compared with patients with LH levels >0.5 mIU/mL. Low LH patients in the recombinant FSH with low-dose urinary hCG group had statistically significantly higher implantation rates (54% vs. 19%) and live-birth rates (64% vs. 25%) as compared with patients with similar low LH levels in the recombinant FSH-only group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Endogenous LH levels ≤ 0.5 mIU/mL after GnRH antagonist treatment are associated with statistically significantly lower implantation and pregnancy rates in recombinant FSH-only cycles. The addition of low-dose urinary hCG results in improved implantation and live-birth rates in patients with low LH levels.

No association between endogenous LH and pregnancy in a GnRH antagonist protocol: part I, corifollitropin alfa

The relationship between endogenous LH concentrations and ongoing pregnancy rates among normogonadotrophic patients undergoing ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol were examined. In the Engage trial, 1506 patients received corifollitropin alfa (150 μg) or daily recombinant FSH (rFSH) (200 IU) for the first 7 days of stimulation with 0.25mg ganirelix from stimulation day 5. Patients were retrospectively stratified by serum LH percentiles (< 25th, 25th-75th and >75th) on stimulation day 8 and day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Odds ratios (OR) with and without adjustment for predictive factors for ongoing pregnancy were estimated. LH concentration was not associated with pregnancy rates in either treatment arm, in contrast to ovarian response and serum progesterone. With adjustment for these predictors and age, OR (95% confidence interval) for ongoing pregnancy on stimulation day 8 for LH categories < P25 versus ≥ P25, >P75 versus ≤ P75 and < P25 versus >P75 were 0.75 (0.53-1.06), 1.26 (0.87-1.83) and 0.70 (0.46-1.09) in the corifollitropin alfa arm and 0.80 (0.54-1.17), 1.28 (0.87-1.87) and 0.73 (0.46-1.16) in the rFSH arm respectively. There was also no significant difference in pregnancy rates between LH categories on day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration with either treatment.

LH concentrations do not correlate with pregnancy in rFSH/GnRH antagonist cycles

The possible relationship between endogenous LH concentrations and clinical outcome was evaluated in 750 patients treated with a standardized gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and recombinant FSH (rFSH)-only protocol. Serum LH concentrations were measured during stimulation by a central laboratory and patients were stratified into quantiles of <P25, P25-P75, and >P75. The P25 values were 3.38 IU/l, 0.93 IU/l, and 0.91 IU/l on stimulation days 1, 5, and 8, respectively. The ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle of patients within the <P25 subset on stimulation day 1, 5, or 8 were highly similar to those in the P25-P75, and >P75 subsets and ranged in the various subsets between 35.0% and 39.5%. In keeping with previous, smaller studies, these findings demonstrate that in good prognosis, non-obese patients endogenous LH in a GnRH antagonist protocol is able to support treatment with rFSH only.

Results with early follicular phase recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation during stimulation for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of early follicular phase recombinant LH supplementation on stimulation outcome among women undergoing IVF using the GnRHa long protocol and recombinant FSH.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Private IVF unit.

PATIENT(S)

Women under the age of 40 with normal ovarian function undergoing their first or second IVF cycle.

INTERVENTION(S)

All stimulations followed the standard luteal long GnRHa down-regulation protocol. At suppression, patients in the experimental group received 75 IU of rLH daily for 4 days, and recombinant FSH at a fixed starting dose of 150 IU for the first 5 days was started a day later, on day 2 of rLH. In the control group, patients started rFSH at a fixed dose of 150 IU for the first 5 days at suppression.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Baseline, stimulation, embryology parameters, and treatment outcome were compared. Of primary interest, recombinant FSH need during stimulation was assessed.

RESULT(S)

Stimulation, embryology parameters, and treatment outcome were comparable. The amount of gonadotropins used and medication expense were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Early follicular phase recombinant LH supplementation at a daily dose of 75 IU does not improve response to stimulation among normal responder women undergoing IVF.

Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists--a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Highly purified hMG (hp-hMG) has recently shown better cycle outcome than the recombinant FSH (rFSH) when compared in GnRH agonist long protocol cycles. However, they have not yet been compared in GnRH antagonist cycles.

METHODS

A RCT comparing the ongoing pregnancy rate (primary end-point) in 280 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI after stimulation with hp-hMG or rFSH controlled with a GnRH antagonist.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between hp-hMG and rFSH in terms of the ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle (35.0 versus 32.1%, respectively; P = 0.61); relative risk: 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.78-1.51; risk difference: 2.9%). No differences were observed for implantation, clinical pregnancy and pregnancy loss rates. More oocytes were obtained from patients receiving rFSH then hMG (14.4 +/- 8.1 versus 11.3 +/- 6.0, respectively; P = 0.001). Estradiol was higher at the end of stimulation in the hp-hMG group (P = 0.02), whereas progesterone was higher in patients stimulated with rFSH (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A similar outcome was observed for hp-hMG and rFSH when used for stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycles. However, some differences were found in ovarian response in terms of oocyte yield and hormonal profile. Clinical Trials.gov

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00669786.

Understanding the role of LH: myths and facts

This review summarizes a series of lectures given at a recent Continuing Medical Education meeting in Hamburg, Germany (May 2007), aiming to understand the role of luteinizing hormone (LH) in follicular development during the natural menstrual cycle and controlled ovarian stimulation. Clinical situations and target groups of patients who might benefit from LH supplementation during their ovarian stimulation were discussed and defined. The lectures updated knowledge on the physiology of LH during the normal menstrual cycle and the role of LH in ovarian stimulation. The concept of the 'LH window' was presented, and the use of LH supplementation in different groups of patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation was discussed, including those with advanced age, hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, pituitary down-regulation and poor response. In addition, the different ways of using LH or human chorionic gonadotrophin supplementation in ovulation induction protocols were described.

GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols for stage I–II endometriosis and endometrioma in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with GnRH antagonist or GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) in mild-to-moderate endometriosis and endometrioma.

DESIGN

Prospective randomize trial.

SETTING

A private IVF center.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 246 ICSI cycles in 246 patients were divided into three groups: women with mild-to-moderate endometriosis (n = 98); women who had ovarian surgery for endometrioma (n = 81); women with endometrioma and no history of previous surgery (n = 67).

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients in each group were randomized to COH with either triptrolein or cetrorelix.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical parameters, characteristics of COH, and ICSI results were analyzed.

RESULT(S)

Outcomes of COH with both GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a were similar in patients with mild-to-moderate endometriosis. Implantation rates were 15.9% vs. 22.6% and clinical pregnancy rates were 27.5% vs. 39% with GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols, respectively, in patients who had ovarian surgery for endometrioma. Implantation rates were 12.5% vs. 14.8% and clinical pregnancy rates were 20.5% vs. 24.2% with GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols, respectively, in patients with endometrioma and no history of ovarian surgery.

CONCLUSION(S)

Considering the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, COH with both GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols may be equally effective in patients with mild-to-moderate endometriosis and endometrioma who did and did not undergo ovarian surgery.

[Management of an ovarian stimulation in case of a Kallmann-De Morsier syndrome. The role of LH]

We report a case of ovarian stimulation in a woman with a Kallmann-De Morsier syndrome, which resulted in a triple pregnancy and childbirth by caesarean section at 36 weeks of amenorrhea of three girls weighing from 1,950 to 2,300 g. Starting from a literature review of Kallmann-De Morsier syndrome, we discuss the role of LH during the follicular phase and the monitoring of ovarian stimulation.

Tail stump syndrome associated with chromosomal translocation in two brothers attempting intracytoplasmic sperm injection

OBJECTIVE

To raise the possibility that a familial chromosomal translocation associated with teratozoospermia can disrupt a gene necessary for flagellum assembly.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Two brothers with infertility related to anomalies of meiotic division and of the flagella assembly, presenting the same balanced 5-12 autosomal translocation.

INTERVENTION(S)

Several intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in our IVF department for both couples.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Sperm analysis, karyotypes, electron microscopy, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of spermatozoa performed using probes coding for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, and 21.

RESULT(S)

In both brothers, sperm analysis indicated a tail stump syndrome. Electron microscopy analysis displayed complex abnormalities, which were probably related to meiotic errors. The FISH analysis indicated an increase of diploid germ cells. Karyotypes of both patients revealed the same balanced chromosomal t(5;12) (p15.1; q21) translocation. Results of ICSI cycles were comparable for both couples. A twin pregnancy was achieved in one of these two couples, but a spontaneous miscarriage occurred at 10 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSION(S)

The flagella anomalies raise the possibility that the translocation disrupts a gene necessary for the flagellum assembly, although a mutation in a gene unrelated to the chromosome breakpoints cannot be excluded.

LH in the follicular phase: neither too high nor too low

The role of LH in the natural menstrual cycle is not disputed. However, there are a variety of opinions regarding the potential role of exogenous LH in ovulation induction and whether it is actually needed. Recent years have seen renewed interest in this issue for several reasons. First, ovulation-inducing drugs are increasingly being administered to normally ovulating women. Second, recombinant human FSH products completely devoid of LH activity are now available. Third, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (agonists and antagonists) prevent the untimely LH surge but also suppress endogenous LH activity during the follicular phase. This review analyses whether or not all patients need LH for follicular growth stimulation and new opportunities for improved treatment as a result of the availability of recombinant human LH both in patients with ovulatory disorders (World Health Organization (WHO) groups I and II anovulatory patients) and those undergoing multiple follicular development for assisted reproduction.

The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization

To allow selection of embryos for transfer after in vitro fertilization, ovarian stimulation is usually carried out with exogenous gonadotropins. To compensate for changes induced by stimulation, GnRH analog cotreatment, oral contraceptive pretreatment, late follicular phase human chorionic gonadotropin, and luteal phase progesterone supplementation are usually added. These approaches render ovarian stimulation complex and costly. The stimulation of multiple follicular development disrupts the physiology of follicular development, with consequences for the oocyte, embryo, and endometrium. In recent years, recombinant gonadotropin preparations have become available, and novel stimulation protocols with less detrimental effects have been developed. In this article, the scientific background to current approaches to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization is reviewed. After a brief discussion of the relevant aspect of ovarian physiology, the development, application, and consequences of ovarian stimulation strategies are reviewed in detail.

Assessment of luteinizing hormone level in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol

In the GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol, the LH level retrieved from a single measurement during ovarian stimulation and concomitant GnRH-antagonist administration can vary according to [1] the time point of sampling with respect to the GnRH-antagonist injection and [2] episodic changes in circulating LH concentration due to the pulsatile release of LH from the pituitary gland. To exemplify the size of pharmacodynamic effect of a single 0.25-mg cetrorelix administration on LH concentration profile and pulsatility, we measured endogenous LH levels every 15 minutes from 8 hours before the first cetrorelix administration until 24 hours thereafter on ovarian stimulation day 6 and 7 in a single patient.

Effect of an oral contraceptive pill on follicular development in IVF/ICSI patients receiving a GnRH antagonist: a randomized study

This randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with or without oral contraceptive (OC) pretreatment on the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients. Sixty-four patients were randomized to start recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) on day 2 or 3 after OC withdrawal (OC group) or on day 2 of a natural cycle (control group). From stimulation day 6 onwards, all patients were treated with daily (0.5 mg/ml) GnRH antagonist (Antide). OC pretreatment resulted in significantly lower starting concentrations of FSH, LH and oestradiol (P < 0.001) and a thinner endometrium (P < 0.0001). In the early stimulation period, fewer large follicles were found after OC pretreatment, leading to a significantly extended stimulation period (11.6 versus 8.7 days, P < 0.0001) with more follicles on the day of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin administration (15.4 versus 12.5, P = 0.02) and more oocytes retrieved (13.5 versus 10.2, P < 0.001) as compared with the control group. GnRH antagonist regimen, pretreated with OC, prevented the early endogenous FSH rise and improved follicular homogeneity, resulting in more oocytes. As a consequence of the extended treatment period, more rhFSH was required.

Differences in serum LH and FSH levels using depot or daily GnRH agonists in controlled ovarian stimulation: influence on ovarian response and outcome of ART

PURPOSE

To study effects of endogenous LH levels on ovarian response and outcome in ART cycles a controlled study was performed with two patient groups differing in the intensity of pituitary downregulation.

METHODS

Group I (n = 27) received 3.75 mg of the GnRH agonist triptorelin acetate depot, group II (n = 54) was given 0.1 mg triptorelin acetate daily, followed by ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH.

RESULTS

After downregulation serum LH and FSH levels were significantly lower in group I. Patients of group I needed significantly higher FSH doses to achieve comparable levels of serum estradiol and preovulatory follicles. The number of retrieved oocytes and transferable embryos was lower in group I.

CONCLUSION

Patients with profound endogenous LH suppression by depot GnRH agonists show higher FSH stimulation dose requirements and lower oocyte number and fertilization rate, indicating a need for minimal LH activity in folliculogenesis and oocyte development.

Serum luteinizing hormone in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and its relationship with cycle outcome

The serum LH was determined on days 3, 6, and 8 of stimulation and on the day of hCG in 110 normogonadotropic patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF induced with GnRH antagonists and recombinant FSH, creating three groups of patients according to Tukey's hinges (percentiles 25 and 75) for each determination. No differences were observed between the number of oocytes recovered or the fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy rates (PR) of the groups, although patients with high serum LH levels during stimulation showed significantly higher serum E2 levels on the day of hCG.

Are endogenous LH levels during ovarian stimulation for IVF using GnRH analogues associated with the probability of ongoing pregnancy? A systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate, among women with normal ovulation or World Health Organization (WHO) II oligoanovulation who undergo ovarian stimulation for IVF using GnRH analogues, whether endogenous LH levels predict the likelihood of ongoing pregnancy beyond 12 weeks. A literature search identified six studies that answered the research question, among which two were prospective studies (one in GnRH agonist and one in GnRH antagonist cycles). None of the retrospective studies suggest that low endogenous LH levels are associated with a significantly decreased probability of ongoing pregnancy beyond 12 weeks in such patients. In the two prospective studies high endogenous LH levels during down-regulation were associated with a decreased probability of ongoing pregnancy beyond 12 weeks. Until further prospective studies modify the existing evidence summarized here, an adverse effect of low endogenous LH levels on the probability of ongoing pregnancy beyond 12 weeks is not a sensible rationale for LH supplementation during ovarian stimulation for IVF using GnRH analogues.

Similar endometrial development in oocyte donors treated with either high- or standard-dose GnRH antagonist compared to treatment with a GnRH agonist or in natural cycles

BACKGROUND

This descriptive study evaluates the impact on endometrial development of standard and high doses of a GnRH antagonist in stimulated cycles compared with GnRH agonist and natural cycles.

METHODS

Thirty-one oocyte donors were treated with a combination of rFSH and 0.25 mg/day ganirelix (standard dose), 2 mg/day ganirelix (high dose) or 0.6 mg/day buserelin (long protocol). Vaginal progesterone (200 mg/day) was administered in the luteal phase. Endometrial biopsies were performed 2 and 7 days after HCG administration. Additional biopsies were carried out in a subset of 12 subjects, 2 and 7 days following the LH peak of their previous natural cycle. Biopsies were evaluated histologically and by scanning electron microscopy. Gene expression profiles were also studied.

RESULTS

At HCG +2, all the parameters studied were similar in all the groups and comparable to those observed in the natural cycle. At HCG +7, endometrial dating, steroid receptors and the presence of pinopodes were comparable in both GnRH antagonist groups and in the natural cycle. In buserelin group, endometrial dating and pinopode expression suggested an arrested endometrial development. For window of implantation genes, expression patterns were closer to those in the natural cycle following standard- or high-dose ganirelix than after buserelin administration.

CONCLUSION

No relevant alteration was observed in the endometrial development in the early and mid-luteal phases in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation following daily treatment with a standard- or high-dose GnRH antagonist. In addition, the endometrial development after GnRH antagonist mimics the natural endometrium more closely than after GnRH agonist.

Why is the clinical acceptance of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cotreatment during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization so slow?

The use of GnRH antagonist rather than agonist cotreatment during ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF is not widely accepted. Possible benefits, current shortcomings, and avenues for future development are discussed.

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone induced ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol

BACKGROUND

Suppression of endogenous LH production by mid-follicular phase GnRH-antagonist administration in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol using recombinant (rec) FSH preparations void of LH activity may potentially affect ovarian response and the outcome of IVF treatment. The present study prospectively assessed the effect of using a combination of recFSH and recLH on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome in a fixed GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol.

METHODS

127 infertile patients with an indication for IVF or ICSI were recruited and randomized (using sealed envelopes) to receive a starting dose of either 150 IU recFSH (follitropin alpha) or 150 IU recFSH plus 75 IU recLH (lutropin alpha) for ovarian hyperstimulation. GnRH-antagonist (Cetrorelix) 0.25 mg was administered daily from stimulation day 6 onwards up to and including the day of the administration of recombinant HCG (chorion gonadotropin alpha). Gonadotropin dose adjustments were allowed from stimulation day 6 onwards, HCG was administered as soon as three follicles > or =18 mm were present. The primary outcome parameter was treatment duration until administration of HCG.

RESULTS

Exogenous LH did not shorten the time necessary to reach ovulation induction criteria. Serum estradiol (E(2)) and LH levels were significantly higher on the day of HCG administration in the recLH-supplemented group (1924.7 +/- 1256.4 vs 1488.3 +/- 824.0 pg/ml, P < 0.03), and 2.1 +/- 1.4 vs 1.4 +/- 1.5 IU/l, P < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Except for higher E(2) and LH levels on the day of HCG administration, no positive trend in favour of additional LH was found as defined by treatment outcome parameters.

To add or not to add LH: consideration of LH concentration changes in individual patients

The availability of recombinant FSH and LH opens an opportunity to individualize ovarian stimulation. While the need for FSH is universal, a question remains whether exogenous LH is beneficial. Previous research on adding LH to an unselected group of patients failed to demonstrate any advantage. Indeed, it may seem presumptuous to expect that all patients will respond in the same manner. Recent studies hint that LH supplementation should be individualized. These studies indirectly suggest that the changes in LH concentration may be more important than the concentration per se. The growing follicle, and particularly oestradiol biosynthesis, may be sensitive to decreases in LH concentrations. The challenge is to identify the patient whose LH will drop during stimulation. This individualized approach will assure that supplemented LH will only be given to those who need it.

Extrapituitary effects of GnRH antagonists in assisted reproduction: a review

GnRH antagonists are used to prevent premature LH surges in assisted reproduction. The pregnancy rates obtained in several studies have been similar to those obtained in the long protocol with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. However, lower oestrogen serum concentrations have been observed and fewer oocytes retrieved using GnRH antagonists. Thus, potential effects at extrapituitary GnRH receptors in the ovary and the endometrium have been claimed. The article reviews the currently available data from the literature as well as current investigations with respect to effects of cetrorelix on the ovary and the endometrium. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis of extrapituitary effects of GnRH antagonists such as cetrorelix at doses used in assisted reproduction.