Recommended practices for the management of embryology, andrology, and endocrinology laboratories: a committee opinion

Recalculating the staff required to run a modern assisted reproductive technology laboratory

STUDY QUESTION

What number of staff is sufficient to perform increasingly complicated processes in today's modern ART laboratories?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The adequate number of personnel required for the efficient and safe operation of modern ART laboratories needs to be calculated.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In today's modern ART laboratories, the amount of time required to perform increasingly complicated processes has more than doubled, with a downward trend in the amount of work an embryologist can do. Different workload unit values have been used to evaluate each workload task and efficiency in a particular ART laboratory, as well as to occasionally compare one laboratory with another.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Seven senior embryologists working at different IVF centers, three public and four private centers, participated in this multicenter study conducted between 2019 and 2020. We prepared a survey to create a calculator for staff using the average (of three attempts) time spent in every laboratory by each embryologist of the center to perform any ART process.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Different laboratory processes and activities related to quality control, time spent and conventional human double witnessing were included in the survey. To calculate the number of processes that each embryologist can perform per year, an embryologist was considered to be having a full-time contract and working 7 or 8 h/day. The times included in the calculation of each task were those corresponding to the 95th percentile. For the calculations, Microsoft® Office Excel® Professional Plus 2019 was used.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The survey showed that the time needed per embryologist to perform the different processes necessary for a classic IVF cycle without time lapse (TL) was 8.11 h, and with TL, it was 10.27 h. The calculated time also considered the time spent in documentation handling, cycle preparation, database management and conventional human double witnessing verification. An ICSI without TL needed 8.55 h, and with TL, it needed 10.71 h. An ICSI-PGT without a TL cycle needed 11.75 h, and with TL, it needed 13.91 h. Furthermore, 1.81 h should be added for every vitrification support needed. The time needed to control more than 200 critical steps, including equipment control and culture parameters, was 30 min per day plus 3.9 min per device to control.The time spent in semen analysis (including documentation handling, cycle preparation and database management) or intrauterine insemination with a partner sperm was 2.7 h. For donor sperm, an additional hour was required for the management involved. The time required to perform a testicular biopsy and cryopreserve the sample was 4 h. Similarly, the time required to perform seminal cryopreservation was 3.7 h.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study was conducted considering a full-time contract embryologist working 7 or 8 h/day, 5 days a week, with days off according to the Spanish regulations. However, our findings can be adapted to foreign regulations using the developed online calculation platform.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

A new advanced staff calculator allows any IVF laboratory to estimate the minimum number of embryologists necessary without compromising the security or success of the results. Nevertheless, we recommend a minimum of two qualified embryologists in every laboratory, regardless of the workload.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was funded by the Asociación para el Estudio de la Biología de la Reproducción (ASEBIR). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Common practices among consistently high-performing in vitro fertilization programs in the United States: 10-year update

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate similarities and differences in clinical and laboratory practices among high-performing fertility clinics.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional questionnaire study of selected programs.

SETTING

Academic and private fertility practices performing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

PATIENT(S)

Not applicable.

INTERVENTION(S)

A comprehensive survey was conducted of 13 IVF programs performing at least 100 cycles a year and having high cumulative singleton delivery rates for 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical and laboratory IVF practices.

RESULT(S)

Although many areas of clinical practice varied among top programs, some commonalities were observed. All programs used a combination of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone for IVF stimulation, intramuscular progesterone in frozen embryo transfer cycles, ultrasound-guided embryo transfers, and a required semen analysis before starting the IVF cycle. Common laboratory practices included vitrification of embryos at the blastocyst stage, air quality control with positive air pressure and high-efficiency particulate air filtration, use of incubator gas filters, working on heated microscope stages, and incubating embryos in a low-oxygen environment, most often in benchtop incubators.

CONCLUSION(S)

Some areas of consistency in clinical and laboratory practices were noted among high-performing IVF programs that are likely contributing to their success. High-performing programs focused on singleton deliveries. As the field of IVF is rapidly evolving, it is imperative that we share best practices in an effort to improve outcomes from all clinics for the good of our patients.

Minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies: a committee opinion

This document is designed to provide a framework for assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs that meet or exceed the requirements suggested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for certification of ART laboratories. This document replaces the document "Revised Minimum Standards for Practices Offering Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Committee Opinion" published in 2019.

Out of the Freezer and into the Policy Fire: Quandaries in Reproductive Cryopreservation

The field of assisted reproduction is advancing rapidly and is ripe for regulation and guidance. In 2018, over four thousand frozen eggs and embryos were lost to approximately one thousand patients at Ahuja University Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio, due to an accidental thaw of a cryopreservation tank. The precedent that will be set by the Ahuja class-action case is significant for both past events and future possibilities and is core to the discussion of policy involving the cryopreservation of gametes and embryos.

ESHRE Clinical Embryologist certification: the first 10 years

STUDY QUESTION

What has the ESHRE programme ‘ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists’ achieved after 10 years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The post-exam analysis showed a pass rate of 60% for Clinical and 50% for Senior Clinical Embryologists and a high level of internal consistency of all exams, leading to a total of 773 certified Clinical and 493 Senior Clinical Embryologists over the decade.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In an ESHRE survey on the educational and professional status of Clinical Embryology in Europe, it was found that education of laboratory personnel working in the field of assisted reproduction is highly variable between countries. In 2008, ESHRE introduced a programme, curriculum and certification in the field of Clinical Embryology. Knowledge gained by postgraduate study of recommended literature, following a clear curriculum, is verified by a written two-level exam for obtaining a certificate for Clinical (basic) or Senior Clinical (advanced) Embryologists. With a total of 1266 certificates awarded over a period of 10 years and recognition by the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes and their Council for European Specialists Medical Assessment, the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams have become an internationally recognized educational standard in the field of Clinical Embryology.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective analysis of all applications for ESHRE Clinical (2009–2018) and Senior Clinical Embryologist Certification (2008–2018) and exam results of the first decade was carried out by the Steering Committee for Clinical Embryologist Certification.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 2894 applications for ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists and the results of 10 exams for the Clinical (1478 candidates) and 11 exams for Senior Clinical (987 candidates) levels were analysed. A detailed post-exam retrospective analysis was performed regarding difficulty, discrimination and reliability levels of 1600 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) with a single best answer among four options, from eight different curriculum topics (Basic cell biology, Genetics, Developmental biology, Female reproduction, Male reproduction, IVF laboratory, Cryopreservation and Laboratory management), representing the core theoretical knowledge of Clinical Embryology. Difficulty levels of the MCQs were subsequently compared regarding each topic and each yearly exam. The participation and success rates in the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams were also assessed in terms of the educational and geographic backgrounds of candidates.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Over the 10 years studied, the mean pass rate for the Clinical Embryologist exam was 60% (range 41–86%), and for the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam was 50% (range 34–81%). On average, 63% European candidates and 35% non-European candidates passed the Clinical Embryologist exam, while 52% European candidates and 31% non-European candidates passed the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The candidates’ educational level impacted on the success of the Clinical Embryologist exam but not of the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The mean difficulty indices by study topic showed that in the period of 10 years, there were no statistically significant differences between topics, for either the Clinical or Senior Clinical Embryologist exams. However, the overall exam difficulty varied between years. Reassuringly, the exam MCQ discrimination and reliability indices always showed a high level of internal consistency in all exams.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Some data from the initial ESHRE certification programme were not obtained electronically, in particular data for education, implying tables and figures reflect the specified valid data periods. Several countries exhibit different study profiles for those working in ART laboratories, such that laboratory technicians/technologists predominate in some countries, while in others only biologists and medical doctors are allowed to work with human embryos. Such differences could consequently affect the exam performance of candidates from specific countries.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The ESHRE exams on Clinical Embryology are the most widely, internationally accepted tests of knowledge in the rapidly growing area of human reproduction. Clinical Embryology is increasingly recognized as a specific discipline for scientific staff who are collaborating closely with clinicians in managing human infertility through medically assisted reproduction. The analysis of the first 10 years of application of a two-level exam for Clinical Embryology shows a consistent high quality and reliability of the exam and MCQs used. These results represent an important follow-up of the quality of the ESHRE Certification programme for Clinical Embryologists, and convincingly position Clinical Embryology in the wider group of health disciplines that are harmonized through professional bodies such as ESHRE and European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The exams provide a clear step towards the increasing professional recognition and establishment of Clinical Embryology within health systems at both European and international level.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No competing interest. All costs of the Steering Committee meetings were covered by ESHRE.

Evaluation of fertilization, usable blastocyst development and sustained implantation rates according to intracytoplasmic sperm injection operator experience

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) operator experience associated with fertilization, usable blastocyst development and sustained implantation rates (SIR) when at least two embryologists carry out ICSI for a single cohort of oocytes?

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of all IVF/ICSI cycles at a single large infertility centre between 2008 and 2018. Cycles were included if a cohort of oocytes was split between two embryologists for ICSI. The embryologist's experience of ICSI was used to evaluate laboratory and clinical outcomes overall and by pairs of inseminating embryologists. Logistic regression, analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis testing were used where appropriate.

RESULTS

Analysis of 14,362 ICSI procedures showed an association between least ICSI experience and lower mean fertilization rates (P < 0.0001), higher odds of failed fertilization (adjusted OR 4.3; P < 0.0001) and lower number of fertilization 'wins' per cohort (P < 0.0001). Usable blastocyst development rates (number of usable blastocysts/number of two pronuclear zygotes) were not associated with ICSI embryologist experience (P = 0.44), but the odds of obtaining no usable blastocysts were higher (adjusted OR 1.4; P < 0.0001) and the proportion of usable blastocyst 'wins' was lower (P = 0.0001) when embryologists with the least experience carried out ICSI. Increased ICSI experience was associated with higher mean SIR (P < 0.0001). Laboratory and clinical outcomes were similar among embryologists once 1000 ICSI cycles and above were carried out.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased ICSI operator experience is associated with higher fertilization rates, SIR and a lower likelihood of failed fertilization and usable blastocyst development. Splitting a single oocyte cohort between more than one embryologist for ICSI is a quality-control measure that can be implemented.

Cryostorage failures: a medicolegal review

PURPOSE

To heighten awareness of the potential legal and financial burdens faced by those providing cryopreservation storage services of embryos and gametes in light of recent lawsuits involving inadvertent thawing of specimens.

METHODS

Case law review of US legal databases and courthouse dockets with a focus on lawsuits against reproductive endocrinologists and cryostorage facilities offering cryopreservation. Emphasis was placed on court decisions, awarded damages, and legal and media coverage related to cryostorage failure events.

RESULTS

Lawsuits pertaining to two notable ongoing cases of cryostorage failure that occurred at fertility clinics in the US in 2018 were reviewed. Media coverage of these events and plaintiff and defense attorney strategies were evaluated. Legal documents from previous, similar cryostorage failures were also reviewed. Common claims in cryostorage system failures include breach of contract and negligent handling of property. Facilities offering cryostorage services are vulnerable to significant burden, legally and financially, if they are to experience a storage system failure.

CONCLUSION

Providing cryostorage services is not without significant financial risk. Inadvertent thawing of specimens can lead to high damage awards against cryostorage facilities and those individuals linked to a cryostorage failure event. Because monetary damages can surpass insurance policy limits, those providing cryostorage services should be aware of plaintiff attorney strategies, common legal defenses, and basic asset protection principles to safeguard themselves if ever faced with these situations. Facilities should also carry out regular maintenance and safety checks on equipment and alarm structures to deter such events.

How do laboratory embryo transfer techniques affect IVF outcomes? A review of current literature

Over the last few years, many studies have focused on embryo selection methods, whereas little attention has been given to the standardization of the procedure of embryo transfer. In this review, several parameters of the embryo transfer procedure are examined, such as the: (i) culture medium volume and loading technique; (ii) syringe and catheters used for embryo transfer; (iii) viscosity and composition of the embryo transfer medium; (iv) environment of embryo culture; (v) timing of embryo transfer; (vi) and standardization of the embryo transfer techniques. The aim of this manuscript is to review these factors and compare the existing embryo transfer techniques and highlight the need for better embryo transfer standardization.

'By the work, one knows the workman': the practice and profession of the embryologist and its translation to quality in the embryology laboratory

The embryologist presides over the fulfillment of a patient's treatment in the laboratory for IVF through use of assisted reproduction techniques, and is in a unique position to impart quality to the process. Although the technical skill of the embryologist is critical, the embryologist's contribution to quality is equally conveyed through a knowledge of reproductive biology, keen observation and judgment, astute decision-making, the 'grit' to work under pressure and time constraints, and a sense of mission in the provision and continual development of a safe and effective laboratory. The embryologist also ensures that the laboratory complies with the regulations of federal, state, local and institutional authorities and the recommendations and guidelines of professional associations. In these roles, the embryologist assumes unique responsibilities counterbalanced by the unique rewards of assisting patients in having a family. This article aspires to illuminate this singular profession for those who may be contemplating a career in embryology and act as a resource for those who seek insight into this amalgam of basic science, technical proficiency, and managerial skill and acumen that characterize the practice of clinical embryology and the myriad of ways that practitioners contribute to the quality of assisted reproduction techniques and patient care.