Treatment of infertility associated with deep endometriosis: definition of therapeutic balances

Galectin-3 promotes fibrosis in ovarian endometriosis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the potential role of galectin-3 (Gal-3) in the pathogenesis of fibrotic alterations in ovarian endometriosis (OVE).

Methods

In this study, we collected the ectopic endometrial tissues and eutopic endometrial tissues from 31 OVE patients treated by laparoscopy, and the eutopic endometrial tissues from 23 non-OVE patients with leiomyoma or other benign diseases were used as control. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's trichrome staining were utilized for histopathological assessment. The primary normal endometrial stromal cells (NESC), ectopic endometrial stromal cells (ECSC), and eutopic endometrial stromal cells (EUSC) were isolated. Gal-3 overexpression plasmids (Gal-OE) and short hairpin RNA targeting Gal-3 (Gal-3-shRNA) were transfected into the immortalized human endometriotic cell line 12Z, respectively. RT-qPCR, Western blot analysis, and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the mRNA and protein expression levels of Gal-3, type I collagen (COL-1), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), respectively.

Results

H&E and Masson staining showed that ovarian ectopic endometrium exhibited glandular hyperplasia, high columnar glandular epithelium, apical plasma secretion, more subnuclear vacuoles, and obvious fibrosis, compared with normal endometrium. The mRNA and protein levels of Gal-3 , CTGF, α-SMA, and COL-1 were all upregulated in the ectopic endometrial tissues of OVE patients compared to the eutopic endometrial tissues from OVE patients and non-OVE patients. Moreover, ECSC expressed higher levels of Gal-3, CTGF, α-SMA, and COL-1 than EUSC and NESC. Follow-up investigations demonstrated that the Gal-3 overexpression substantially increased fibrosis-related markers including CTGF, α-SMA, and COL-1 within the 12Z cell line. Conversely, Gal-3 knockdown showed the opposite effects.

Conclusion

Gal-3 promotes fibrosis in OVE, positioning it as a prospective therapeutic target for mitigating fibrosis in endometriosis.

Factors associated with deep infiltrating endometriosis, adenomyosis and ovarian endometrioma

Introduction: To compare epidemiological features and clinical presentations of deep infiltrating endometriosis with endometrioma and adenomyosis, as well as to identify risk factors for the respective histologically confirmed conditions. Method: Patients undergoing index surgery at the National University Hospital, Singapore for endometriosis or adenomyosis over a 7-year period—from 2015 to 2021—were identified from hospital databases using the Table of Surgical Procedures coding. Social and epidemiological features of cases with histologically confirmed diagnoses of endometrioma only, adenomyosis only, and deep infiltrating endometriosis were compared. Significant variables from univariate analysis were entered into 3 binary multivariate logistic regression models to obtain independent risk factors for: deep infiltrating endometriosis versus endometrioma only, deep infiltrating endometriosis versus adenomyosis only, and adenomyosis only versus endometrioma only. Results: A total of 258 patients were included with 59 ovarian endometrioma only, 47 adenomyosis only, and 152 deep infiltrating endometrioses. Compared to endometrioma only, deep infiltrating endometriosis was associated with higher rates of severe dysmenorrhoea (odds ratio [OR] 2.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–7.70) and out-of-pocket private surgical care (OR 4.72, 95% CI 1.85–12.04). Compared to adenomyosis only, deep infiltrating endometriosis was associated with a higher fertility desire (OR 13.47, 95% CI 1.01–180.59) and a lower body mass index (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79–0.99). In contrast, heavy menstrual bleeding was the hallmark of adenomyosis, being less common in patients with endometriosis. Conclusion: Deep infiltrating endometriosis is associated with severe dysmenorrhoea, pain related to urinary and gastrointestinal tracts, higher fertility desire and infertility rate. Patients with pain symptomatology and subfertility should be referred early to a tertiary centre with the capability to diagnose and manage deep infiltrating endometriosis. Keywords: Adenomyosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis, obstetrics and gynaecology, ovarian endometrioma, public health

EFFECTIVENESS OF HORMONAL MONOTHERAPY BEFORE SURGICAL TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH EXTERNAL GENITAL ENDOMETRIOSIS

OBJECTIVE

The aim: Evaluation of the effectiveness of hormone therapy before and after surgical treatment in patients with external genital endometriosis (HRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: Bibliographic, information-analytical, clinical-instrumental, laboratory, histomorphological methods were used in the work. The sources of information were data from the scientific literature on the topic of the study, modern guidelines, a review of randomized controlled studies.

RESULTS

Results: All women involved in the study received hormone therapy before and after surgery for 3-6-9 months: 45.0% - only COCs, 25.0% - courses of a-GnRH drugs; 30.0% - only progestogens. Comparative evaluation of the function of the relapse-free course of UHD using the Kaplan-Meier method showed that when using a-GnRH in patients with UHD, the duration of the relapse-free period is higher than for other groups of drugs: the indicator of the function of maintaining remission before surgical treatment decreases from 100% to 0% during the first 6 months in 89.0%, and during 9 months - in 66.0% of patients. Progression of the disease, after surgery and withdrawal of a-GnRH, with a 3-month course occurred - after 3 months - in 45.0%, with a 6-month course - after 9 months - in 33.0%, with a 9-month course - after 12 months - in 12.0% of people. Thus, the average median of the recurrence-free course was ±11.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: The most effective hormone therapy in patients with HRT before and after surgical treatment is therapy with drugs of the α-¬HnRH group, courses of at least 6 months.

Endometriosis-associated infertility: From pathophysiology to tailored treatment

Despite the clinically recognized association between endometriosis and infertility, the mechanisms implicated in endometriosis-associated infertility are not fully understood. Endometriosis is a multifactorial and systemic disease that has pleiotropic direct and indirect effects on reproduction. A complex interaction between endometriosis subtype, pain, inflammation, altered pelvic anatomy, adhesions, disrupted ovarian reserve/function, and compromised endometrial receptivity as well as systemic effects of the disease define endometriosis-associated infertility. The population of infertile women with endometriosis is heterogeneous, and diverse patients' phenotypes can be observed in the clinical setting, thus making difficult to establish a precise diagnosis and a single mechanism of endometriosis related infertility. Moreover, clinical management of infertility associated with endometriosis can be challenging due to this heterogeneity. Innovative non-invasive diagnostic tools are on the horizon that may allow us to target the specific dysfunctional alteration in the reproduction process. Currently the treatment should be individualized according to the clinical situation and to the suspected level of impairment. Here we review the etiology of endometriosis related infertility as well as current treatment options, including the roles of surgery and assisted reproductive technologies.

Endometriosis and Infertility: A Long-Life Approach to Preserve Reproductive Integrity

Laparoscopic surgery was originally considered the gold standard in the treatment of endometriosis-related infertility. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) was indicated as second-line treatment or in the case of male factor. The combined approach of surgery followed by ART proved to offer higher chances of pregnancy in infertile women with endometriosis. However, it was highlighted how pelvic surgery for endometriosis, especially in cases of ovarian endometriomas, could cause iatrogenic damage due to ovarian reserve loss, adhesion formation (scarring), and ischemic damage. Furthermore, in the last few years, the trend to delay the first childbirth, recent technological advances in ultrasound diagnosis, and technological progress in clinical and laboratory aspects of ART have certainly influenced the approach to infertility and endometriosis with, ART assuming a more relevant role. Management of endometriosis should take into account that the disease is chronic and involves the reproductive system. Consequently, treatment and counselling should aim to preserve the chances of pregnancy for the patient, even if it is not associated with infertility. This review will analyse the evolution of the management of infertility associated with endometriosis and propose an algorithm for treatment decision-making based on the most recent acquisitions.

Treating Deep Endometriosis in Infertile Patients before Assisted Reproductive Technology

Deep endometriosis (DE) causes infertility and pelvic pain. Surgical management of DE has become a topic of increasing interest in gynecological surgery. In women desirous of pregnancy, optimal management such as surgery versus first-line assisted reproductive technology (ART) for patients with severe endometriosis is strongly debated. Current guidelines and literature including retrospective and prospective studies in English available on DE surgery, infertility, and pregnancy outcomes following surgery were searched in Cochrane Library with DE, DIE, Infertility, "DE surgery and pregnancy outcomes," and "Deep infiltrating endometriosis and assisted reproduction" as keywords. The purpose was to find evidence to answer the following clinical questions: How does DE affect fertility and pregnancy? What are the possible benefits of primary surgery for DIE before in vitro fertilization (IVF)? Several studies have recently concluded that surgical removal of DE nodules might actually have a favorable impact on IVF outcomes. This is in contradiction to European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology statement which stated that there was no evidence supporting surgical management of DE prior to ART to improve pregnancy rate; several studies have suggested that the surgical removal of DE nodules might actually have a favorable impact on IVF outcomes. Treatment of DE affecting the rectovaginal septum or bowel requires complex surgery with considerable risk of complications. This review article tries to analyze the rationale of surgical treatment of DE before ART. A balance must be struck between exposing the patient to surgical risk and improvement in pain and fertility potential. Decisions should be tailored according to the individual needs of each woman and most importantly on the ability of the surgeons.

Safety of in-vitro fertilization in women with endometriosis

Management of women with endometriosis in general is complex. It requires a multidisciplinary and tailored approach. The time of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) may be particularly complicated because women with the disease face peculiar additional risks. In particular, oocytes retrieval may be more difficult and women with endometriomas are exposed to a low but consistent risk of infection and ovarian abscess development. There are also concerns regarding progression of deep invasive peritoneal lesions and misdiagnosis of an occult early ovarian cancer. However, evidence on these latter points is more controversial. Taken together, this body evidence is generally reassuring and does not justify prophylactic surgery prior to IVF to shrink these risks. However, given the uncertainties, women with endometriosis must be informed in depth of these peculiar additional risks.

Endometriosis of the Paralumbar Muscles: A Case Report and Literature Review

The objective of this study is to report a case of deep endometriosis of the paralumbar muscles (psoas, multifidus, and erector spinae) and review existing literature on its management. A 34-year-old female with a history of endometriosis was seen for infertility. Paralumbar muscle masses seen on computed tomography (CT) scan were sampled, confirming endometriosis. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was given for 2 months. The patient was primed for assisted reproduction. A literature review was conducted to provide an understanding of paralumbar muscle endometriosis. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of multifidus and erector spinae muscle endometriosis and fifth case of psoas muscle endometriosis. Because the available information is scarce, data from the existing literature on deep endometriosis may aid in the diagnosis and management. Magnetic resonance imaging and CT scan are essential imaging techniques to map lesions. Excision seems prudent, but the approach should be individualized depending on the patient's presentation and her preferences.

Endometriosis screening in patients attending an IVF clinic: a proof-of-concept retrospective cohort study

Given that (i) endometriosis affects approximately 40% of women diagnosed with fertility problems and (ii) this condition may be an underestimated cause of idiopathic infertility, it is essential to identify high-risk patients for laparoscopic screening and reduce the diagnostic delay. We performed a retrospective analysis of 312 women (208 diagnosed with endometriosis and 104 controls) admitted to an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) unit in the city of Brest (France) between June 2007 and July 2014. As part of the women's infertility treatment, levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) were assayed in blood samples collected on the day of oocyte retrieval. Surplus serum was used to set up a new sperm agglutination test. It was observed that sperm agglutination was significantly correlated with endometriosis and CA-125 levels (p < 0.01 for both). By building a decision tree, we identified a subpopulation of patients with low CA-125 levels and a high risk of endometriosis. This proof-of-concept study constitutes a first step towards a high-quality, controlled, multi-centre trial. If our preliminary results are confirmed, the decision tree should improve the medical care given to women in IVF programmes by identifying potential endometriosis sufferers for laparoscopic examination and enabling them to be counselled about precautionary measures.

Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, which causes pelvic pain and infertility. This disease should be viewed as a public health problem with a major effect on the quality of life of women as well as being a substantial economic burden. In light of the considerable progress with diagnostic imaging (for example, transvaginal ultrasound and MRI), exploratory laparoscopy should no longer be used to diagnose endometriotic lesions. Instead, diagnosis of endometriosis should be based on a structured process involving the combination of patient interviews, clinical examination and imaging. Notably, a diagnosis of endometriosis often leads to immediate surgery. Therefore, rethinking the diagnosis and management of endometriosis is warranted. Instead of assessing endometriosis on the day of the diagnosis, gynaecologists should consider the patient's 'endometriosis life'. Medical treatment is the first-line therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain and no desire for immediate pregnancy. In women with infertility, careful consideration should be made regarding whether to provide assisted reproductive technologies prior to performing endometriosis surgery. Modern endometriosis management should be individualized with a patient-centred, multi-modal and interdisciplinary integrated approach.

The impact of IVF on deep invasive endometriosis

Objective

Ovarian hyper-stimulation during IVF is associated with a significant raise in serum estrogens and one may expect detrimental effects on estrogen-dependent diseases such as endometriosis. However, available evidence from large case series of affected women performing IVF is generally reassuring with the possible exception of women carrying deep invasive lesions. On this basis we deemed important investigating more in depth whether women with deep invasive endometriosis could be a subgroup at higher risk of recurrence or disease progression during IVF.

Study design

Women with endometriosis who underwent IVF and who had a second evaluation after 3–6 months from a failed cycle were retrospectively reviewed. The main inclusion criteria were the presence of deep invasive endometriosis and/or a history of surgery for this form of the disease. The primary aim of the study was to determine the frequency of endometriosis-related complications in the interval between the two evaluations. Secondary aims were pain symptoms and lesion size modifications.

Results

Eighty-four women were ultimately selected: baseline ultrasound documented deep invasive lesions in 60 of them. One case of possible endometriosis-related complication was recorded, corresponding to a rate of 1.2% (95%: 0.05%–5.5%) for the whole cohort and 1.7% (95%CI: 0.08–7.6%) for the subgroup of women with ultrasound detected lesions. This rate appears similar to the reported frequency of endometriosis progression in women not receiving IVF. No significant modifications in pain symptoms or lesions size occurred.

Conclusions

Women with deep invasive endometriosis who underwent IVF do not seem to be exposed to a substantially increased risk of recurrence/disease progression. Larger evidence from independent groups is however required for a definitive conclusion.

Ureteral endometriosis: a systematic review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, risk of malignant transformation and fertility

BACKGROUND

The ureter is the second most common site affected by urinary tract endometriosis, after the bladder. Optimal strategies in the diagnosis and treatment of ureteral endometriosis (UE) are not yet well defined.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this study was to systematically review evidence regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, impact on fertility and risk of malignant transformation of UE.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic literature review, by searching the MEDLINE and PUBMED database until April 2018, was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO registry (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO CRD42017060065). A total of 67 articles were selected to be included in this review.

OUTCOMES

The involvement of the ureter by endometriosis is often asymptomatic or leads to non-specific symptoms. When the diagnosis is delayed, UE may lead to persistent hydronephrosis and eventually loss of renal function. Ultrasonography is the first-line technique for the assessment of UE; alternatively, magnetic resonance imaging provides an evaluation of ureteral type involvement. The surgical treatment of UE aims to relieve ureteral obstruction and avoid disease recurrence. It includes conservative ureterolysis or radical approaches, such as ureterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis or ureteroneocystostomy performed in relation to the type of ureteral involvement. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes are in line with those observed after surgical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Current evidence does not support the potential risk of malignant transformation of UE.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

In this article, we review available evidence on ureteral endometriosis, providing a useful tool to guide physicians in the management of this disease. Diagnosis and management of UE remain a challenge. In relation to the degree of ureteral involvement and the association with other DIE implants, the surgical approach should be planned and carried out in an interdisciplinary collaboration between gynecologist and urologist.

Bowel surgery as a fertility-enhancing procedure in patients with colorectal endometriosis: methodological, pathogenic and ethical issues

Bowel surgery for colorectal endometriosis is being promoted to infertile women without severe sub-occlusive symptoms, with the objective of improving the likelihood of conception. Contrary to rectal shaving, bowel surgery involving full-thickness disk excision and segmental resection entails opening of the intestinal lumen thus increasing the risk of postoperative infectious complications. About 1 in 10 patients undergoing colorectal resection for intestinal endometriosis will experience severe sequelae, including anastomotic dehiscence, rectovaginal fistula formation, and bladder and bowel denervation. Similar to other surgical procedures aiming at enhancing fertility in women with endometriosis, bowel surgery has been introduced into clinical practice without adequate evaluation through randomized controlled trials. According to systematic literature reviews based mainly on case series, the incremental gain of adding bowel procedures to standard surgery appears uncertain in terms of pregnancy rate after both natural attempts and IVF. Considering the methodological drawbacks and the high risk of bias in the available observational studies, it is not possible to exclude the suggestion that the benefit of colorectal surgery has been overestimated. Given the risk of harms to women's health and the important ethical implications, less emphasis should be put on strict statistical significance and more emphasis should be placed on the magnitude of the effect size. In this regard, the published data may not be generalizable, as the surgeons publishing their results may not be representative of all surgeons. Until the results of adequately designed and conducted RCTs are available, colorectal surgery with the sole intent of improving the reproductive performance of infertile patients with intestinal endometriosis should be performed exclusively within research settings and by highly experienced surgeons. Women should be informed about the uncertainties regarding the harms and benefits of bowel surgery in different clinical conditions, and preoperative counselling must be conducted impartially with the objective of achieving a truly shared medical decision.

Effect of Anterior Compartment Endometriosis Excision on Infertility

Background and Objectives:

Laparoscopic surgical excision of bladder nodules has been demonstrated to be effective in relieving associated painful symptoms; the data are lacking concerning the impact of anterior compartment endometriosis on infertility. We conducted this study to evaluate whether or not the surgical excision of deep endometriosis affecting the anterior compartment plays a role in restoring fertility.

Methods:

This multicentre, retrospective study included a group of 55 patients presenting with otherwise-unexplained infertility who had undergone laparoscopic excision of anterior compartment endometriosis with histological confirmation. Patient medical records and operative reports were reviewed. Telephone interviews were conducted for long-term followup of fertility outcomes.

Results:

The pregnancy rate following surgical excision of endometriotic lesions was 44% (n = 11) among those with anterior compartment involvement alone and 50% (n = 15) in case of posterior lesions association without any significant difference. The symptoms related to bladder endometriosis resolved in the 84.2% of the cases with a recurrence rate of 1.8% at the 2-year followup not requiring further surgery.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic excision of anterior compartment endometriosis is effective in restoring fertility in patients with otherwise-unexplained infertility and in treating endometriosis-related symptoms.

Mutation analysis of ZP1, ZP2, ZP3 and ZP4 genes in 152 Han Chinese samples with ovarian endometriosis

Endometriosis is characterized by the ectopic implant of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity and found in ˜35-50% of subfertile women. Previous studies have found that endometriosis had frequent defects in zona pellucida (ZP), and mutations in ZP genes could lead to ZP defects, raising the possibility that mutations in ZP genes might exist in endometriosis. We analyzed a total of 152 Han Chinese samples with ovarian endometriosis for the presence of mutations in the ZP1, ZP2, ZP3 and ZP4 genes. Two novel nonsynonymous ZP4 mutations were identified in three out of 152 (2.0%) samples: a p.M1?/(c.3 G > C) mutation in a 27- and 35-year-old sample, respectively, and a p.A433 V (c.1298C > T) mutation in a 31-year-old patient. No mutations were detected in ZP1, ZP2 or ZP3 genes; furthermore, no mutations in ZP genes were identified in 85 female control samples without endometriosis. The p.M1?/(c.3 G > C) mutation could lead to the usage of a downstream translation initiation site, while the evolutionary conservation and protein structural modeling analyses suggested that the p.A433 V mutation might be functionally important. However, there were strikingly different fertility outcomes among the three samples with ZP4 mutations: the p.A433V-mutated sample had no problem in fertility; while the p.M1?-mutated samples presented with paradoxical effects on fertility: the 35-year-old patient had a child while the 27-year-old patient was infertile, who underwent two spontaneous abortions and an implantation failure after IVF treatment. These results suggested that the potential role of ZP4 mutations on human fertility might be more complex than we thought, and other genetic and environment factors might play a role. In conclusion, we identified two novel mutations in the ZP4 gene in 2.0% of Han Chinese patients with ovarian endometriosis for the first time, our results suggested that mutations in ZP4, but not ZP1, ZP2 and ZP3, might play active roles in the pathogenesis of ovarian endometriosis, despite the mutation-carriers present with complex fertility outcomes.

The efficacy of non-assisted reproductive technology treatment might be limited in infertile patients with advanced endometriosis in their 30s

AIM

To determine the efficacious treatment for infertile couples, we assessed the impact of infertility factors including endometriosis on assisted reproductive technology (ART) and non-ART treatment, and the effect of age in infertility treatment outcomes was also investigated.

METHODS

The medical records of 1864 females, infertile patients from January 2000 to December 2015 at our hospital, were retrospectively reviewed under the approval of the Institutional Review Board. We extracted 10 representative factors and calculated the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in these patients. Multivariate analysis of ART and non-ART treatment was performed to assess the impact of infertility factors, and the age-related decline in cumulative live birth rate was calculated by creating eight age-stratified subgroups.

RESULTS

In total, 21.9% and 49.4% of the patients conceived after being treated with non-ART and ART, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age > 35, advanced endometriosis defined by the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification system stages III to IV, and the past history or current presence of uterine fibroid had significantly negative impact on the outcome of non-ART. Age stratification revealed that advanced endometriosis adversely affected the outcome of non-ART, especially for patients in their 30s. Assisted reproductive technology treatment for patients with advanced endometriosis was shown to be efficacious because the negative impact had been diminished.

CONCLUSION

Considering that non-ART treatment had limited role in patients with advanced endometriosis, prompt initiation of ART in these patients aged as young as 30 years can be recommended to achieve conception.

[First line management without IVF of infertility related to endometriosis: Result of medical therapy? Results of ovarian superovulation? Results of intrauterine insemination? CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]

INTRODUCTION

Using the structured methodology of French guidelines (HAS-CNGOF), the aim of this chapter was to formulate good practice points (GPP), in relation to optimal non-ART management of endometriosis related to infertility, based on the best available evidence in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This guideline was produced by a group of experts in the field including a thorough systematic search of the literature (from January 1980 to March 2017). Were included only women with endometriosis related to infertility. For each recommendation, a grade (A-D, where A is the highest quality) was assigned based on the strength of the supporting evidence.

RESULTS

Management of endometriosis related to infertility should be multidisciplinary and take account into the pain, the global evaluation of infertile couple and the different phenotypes of endometriotic lesions (good practice point). Hormonal treatment for suppression of ovarian function should not prescribe to improve fertility (grade A). After laproscopy for endometriosis related to infertility, the Endometriosis Fertility Index should be used to counsel patients regarding duration of conventional treatments before undergoing ART (grade C). After laparoscopy surgery for infertile women with AFS/ASRM stage I/II endometriosis or superficial peritoneal endometriosis, controlled ovarian stimulation with or without intrauterine insemination could be used to enhance non-ART pregnancy rate (grade C). Gonadotrophins should be the first line therapy for the stimulation (grade B). The number of cycles before referring ART should not exceed up to 6 cycles (good practice point). No recommendation can be performed for non-ART management of deep infiltrating endometriosis or endometrioma, as suitable evidence is lacking.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Non-ART management is a possible option for the management of endometriosis related to infertility. Endometriosis Fertilty Index could be a useful tool for subsequent postoperative fertility management. Controlled ovarian stimulation can be proposed.

Pregnancy outcomes after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with endometriosis-associated infertility: GnRH-agonist versus GnRH-antagonist

BACKGROUND OR OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis is common in women referred for infertility. In vitro fertilization provides good results but the choice of the best-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol remains a subject of debate. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis-associated infertility after COH with a long agonist protocol or a six-week oral contraception-antagonist protocol.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospective database identified 284 COH cycles - 165 with GnRH-agonist protocol (GnRH-agonist group) and 119 with GnRH-antagonist protocol (GnRH-antagonist group) - in 218 women, with endometriosis from January 2013 to October 2015.

RESULTS

No difference in the epidemiological characteristics was found between the groups. Per started cycle, pregnancy and live-birth rates after fresh embryo transfer were higher with the GnRH-agonist protocol (25% vs. 13%, P=0.02 and 18% vs. 8%, P=0.04, respectively). Considering analysis per cycle with embryo transfer, the pregnancy rate was similar in both groups while the live-birth rate was higher in the GnRH-agonist group (29% vs. 17%, P=0.053 and 22% vs. 10%, P=0.02, respectively). No difference was observed between the groups with freeze-thaw embryo transfer. Subgroup analysis (endometrioma alone, deep infiltrating endometriosis with and without endometrioma, endometriosis with and without adenomyosis) revealed no difference between the groups for either pregnancy or live-birth rates.

CONCLUSION

A GnRH-agonist protocol appears to result in higher pregnancy and live-birth rates after fresh embryo transfer in women with endometriosis-associated infertility, suggesting that a GnRH-antagonist protocol might negatively impact endometrial receptivity.

[Bowel endometriosis and infertility: Do we need to operate?]

Endometriosis is a benign chronic inflammatory disease, whose pathogenesis is still unclear. Endometriosis is responsible for infertility and/or pelvic pain. One of the most important features of the disease is the heterogeneity (clinical and anatomical: superficial peritoneal, ovarian and/or deep infiltrating lesions). Bowel involvement constitutes one particularly severe form of the disease, affecting 8-12% of women with deep endometriosis. In case of associated infertility, bowel endometriosis constitutes a real therapeutic challenge for gynecologists. Indeed, while complete resection of the lesions alleviates pain and seems to improve spontaneous fertility, surgery remains technically challenging and may cause severe complications. Reverting to assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) is another valuable therapeutic option regarding pregnancy rates. Thus, the choice between surgical management or ART is still debated. Benefits and risks of these two options should be considered and discussed before planning treatment. In the present study, we aimed to answer the question: Bowel endometriosis and infertility: do we need to operate?

Endometriosis and Infertility: A Systematic Review

Endometriosis is one of the most common gynaecological conditions affecting 6% to 12% of women in the reproductive age group. It can be found in 35% to 45% of women who are trying to conceive and are infertile. Infertility is one of the most common problems associated with endometriosis. This review will look at the evidence that endometriosis may lead to infertility and the data looking at whether surgical correction of endometriosis may improve fertility outcomes.

Spontaneous fertility after expectant or surgical management of rectovaginal endometriosis in women with or without ovarian endometrioma: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate spontaneous pregnancy rate (SPRs) of women with rectovaginal endometriosis (RV) with/without ovarian endometrioma (OMA) and treated with the use of expectant or surgical management.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

The study included patients with RV with or without OMA who tried to conceive spontaneously for 1 year either without undergoing surgery (group E; n = 284) or after surgery (group S; n = 221). The study population was further divided into four subgroups: women with RV without OMA who directly tried to conceive (group eRV; n = 121) or tried to conceive after surgery (group sRV; n = 96), and women with RV with OMA who directly tried to conceive (group eOMA; n = 163) or tried to conceive after surgery (group sOMA; n = 125).

INTERVENTIONS(S)

Expectant or surgical management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Crude and cumulative SPRs.

RESULT(S)

At 1 year, crude and cumulative SPRs were lower in group E (17.3% and 23.8%, respectively) than in group S (35.7% and 39.5%). Similarly, crude and cumulative SPRs were lower in group eRV (24.8% and 30.6%) than in group sRV (42.7% and 45.7%, respectively) and in group eOMA (11.7% and 18.0%) than group sOMA (30.4% and 34.5%). At 1 year, crude and cumulative SPRs were higher in group eRV (24.8% and 30.6%) than in group eOMA (11.7% and 18.0%), and in group sRV (42.7% and 45.7%) than in group sOMA (30.4% and 34.5%).

CONCLUSION(S)

Crude and cumulative SPRs are lower in women treated with the use of expectant rather than surgical management. The presence of OMAs decreases SPRs independently from the treatment modality adopted.

To operate or not to operate on women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) before in vitro fertilization (IVF)

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) can cause infertility and pelvic pain. There is little evidence of a clear connection between DIE and infertility, and the absolute benefits of surgery for DIE have not been established. This paper aimed to review the current literature on the effect of surgery for DIE on fertility, pregnancy, and IVF outcomes. Clinicians should bear in mind that a comprehensive clinical history is useful to identify patients at risk for endometriosis, although many women remain asymptomatic. Imaging can be useful to plan surgery. The effect of surgery on the fertility of women with DIE remains unanswered due to the heterogeneous nature of the disease and the lack of trials with enough statistical power and adequate follow-up. Surgery is not recommended when the main goal is to treat infertility or to improve IVF results. Decisions should be tailored according to the individual needs of each woman. Patients must be provided information on the potential benefits, harm, and costs of each treatment alternative, while the medical team observes factors such as presence of pelvic pain, patient age, lesion location, and previous treatments. In this scenario, management by a multidisciplinary endometriosis team is a key step to achieving successful outcomes.

Surgery for endometriosis: beyond medical therapies

Endometriosis-associated pelvic pain and subfertility may be managed medically in many cases; however, the surgical management of this insidious disease remains a necessary part of the treatment algorithm. Laparoscopy for diagnosis alone is rarely indicated with the advancements in preoperative imaging. When surgery is performed, the ideal goal would be a therapeutic and effective surgical intervention based on the preoperative evaluation. Surgery for women with pain due to endometriosis may be indicated in patients who cannot or do not wish to take medical therapies; acute surgical or pain events; deep endometriosis; during concomitant management of other gynecologic disorders; and patients seeking fertility with pain. The role of surgery for endometriosis-related subfertility may be considered in those with hydrosalpinges undergoing IVF; management of ovarian endometriomas in specific circumstances; and when a patient requests surgery as an alternative to assisted reproductive technology (ART). Surgery for ovarian endometriomas requires special attention due to the risk of potential harm on future fertility. Finally, a combined approach of surgery followed by postoperative medical therapy offers the best long-term outcomes for recurrence of disease and symptoms. A patient-centered approach and a goal-oriented approach are essential when determining the options for care in this population.

[Deep infiltrative endometriosis without digestive involvement, what is the impact of surgery on in vitro fertilization outcomes? A retrospective study]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of complete removal of endometriosis in case of deep infiltrative endometriosis without digestive involvement, on in vitro fertilization outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective monocentric study. We included infertile women with deep infiltrative endometriosis without colorectal involvement that underwent IVF. Women were divided in two groups, following their history: "surgery" when they underwent complete endometriosis resection before IVF and "without surgery" when they underwent IVF without endometriosis removal. We analysed IVF outcomes considering pregnancy rates per cycle and cumulative pregnancy rates per patient.

RESULTS

We included 72 patients: 35 in the "surgery" group and 37 in the "without surgery" group. Women in the two groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics (age, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicular count), endometriosis localizations and in vitro fertilization parameters. Cumulative pregnancy rates per patient were similar in both groups (40 % in the "surgery" group and 41 % in the "without surgery" group; P=1). Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle were also comparable groups (24 % in the "surgery" group and 28 % in the "without surgery" group; P=0.67). Surgery performed was comparable in women that became pregnant and in women that did not. Age was lower in women that became pregnant (P=0.01) and there were more pregnancy obtained in women under 35 years.

CONCLUSION

In women with deep infiltrative endometriosis without digestive involvement, in vitro fertilization outcomes were not impacted by surgery. Therapeutic choice between IVF or surgery as first-line treatment remains thus questionable and shall be guided by other influencing factors, such as pain symptomatology, age, tubal permeability, ovarian reserve, partner's sperm characteristics and woman's choice.

Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment, Impact on Fertility, and Risk of Malignant Transformation

CONTEXT

The bladder is the most common site affected in urinary tract endometriosis. There is controversy regarding the pathogenesis, clinical management (diagnosis and treatment), impact on fertility, and risk of malignant transformation of bladder endometriosis (BE).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate evidence regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, impact on female fertility, and risk of malignant transformation of BE.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of PubMed/Medline from inception until October 2016 was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO registry (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; CRD42016039281). Eighty-seven articles were selected for inclusion in this analysis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

BE is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma in the detrusor muscle. Ultrasonography is the first-line technique for assessment of BE owing to its accuracy, safety, and cost. Clinical management can be conservative, using hormonal therapies, or surgical. When conservative treatment is preferred, estrogen-progestogen combinations and progestogens should be chosen because of their favorable profile that allows long-term therapy. Surgery should guarantee complete removal of the bladder nodule to minimize recurrence, so transurethral surgery alone should be avoided in favor of segmental bladder resection. There is not a strong rationale for hypothesizing a detrimental impact of BE per se on fertility. Furthermore, current evidence does not support the removal of bladder endometriotic lesions because of the potential risk of malignant transformation since this phenomenon is exceedingly rare.

CONCLUSIONS

BE is a challenging condition, and the common coexistence of other types of endometriosis means that clinical management of BE should involve collaboration between gynecologists and urologists.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this article we review available knowledge on bladder endometriosis. The review provides a useful tool to guide physicians in the management of this complex condition.

A Qualitative Study on the Practice of Yoga for Women with Pain-Associated Endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

To understand the meaning women with pain-associated endometriosis attribute to yoga practice regarding their physical and emotional state at the beginning of the practice; pain management by integrating body and mind; secondary benefits of the practice of yoga, such as self-knowledge, self-care, and autonomy; and the role of the yoga group as psychosocial support.

DESIGN

Qualitative study conducted simultaneously with a randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Public university hospital in southeastern Brazil between August 2013 and December 2014.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen women with pain-associated endometriosis who practiced yoga for 8 weeks.

INTERVENTION

After completing the twice-a-week program, all women participated in a single, semi-structured interview. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analyses were performed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The main themes of analysis were women's expectations regarding the practice of yoga, physical and emotional state of women at the beginning of yoga practice, control and pain management through the integration of body and mind, secondary benefits, acquisition of self-knowledge and autonomy, and the role of yoga group as psychosocial support.

RESULTS

All participants reported that yoga was beneficial to control pelvic pain. They related that they were aware of the integration of body and psyche during yoga practice and that this helped in the management of pain. Women said they had identified a relationship between pain management and breathing techniques (pranayama) learned in yoga and that breathing increased their ability to be introspective, which relieved pain. The participants have developed greater self-knowledge, autonomy, and self-care and have reduced the use of pain and psychiatric medications. They created ties among themselves, suggesting that the yoga group allowed psychosocial support.

CONCLUSIONS

Bodily and psychosocial mechanisms to control pain were identified in women with endometriosis. To reach such control, it is crucial that mind and body integrative techniques are learned.

Postoperative hormonal therapy after surgical excision of deep endometriosis

The clinical management of women with deep peritoneal endometriosis remains controversial. The debate focuses mainly on the precise role of hormonal medical treatment and surgery and on the most suitable surgical technique to be used. In particular, considering the risks of second-line surgery, prevention of recurrences after first-line surgery is a priority in this context. Post-surgical medical therapy has been advocated to improve the effectiveness of surgery and prevent recurrences. However, adjuvant therapy, i.e. a short course of 3-6 months of hormonal therapy after surgery, has been proven to be of limited or no benefit for endometriosis in general and for deep peritoneal endometriosis in particular. On the other hand, two cohort studies suggest a beneficial effect of prolonged hormonal therapy after surgery for deep endometriosis. Even if this evidence is too weak to confidently advocate systematic administration of prolonged medical therapy after surgery, we argue in favour of this approach because of the strong association of deep endometriosis with other disease forms. In fact, women operated on for deep endometriosis may also face recurrences of endometriomas, superficial peritoneal lesions and pelvic pain in general. The demonstrated high effectiveness of prolonged postoperative therapy for the prevention of endometriomas' formation and dysmenorrhea recurrence should thus receive utmost consideration in the decision-making process.

Modern Management of Endometrioma-Associated Infertility: in Favor of ART

Introduction

Endometrioma is present in 17% to 40% of women with endometriosis. Since it has been traditionally believed that the presence of an endometrioma adversely affects the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART), surgery has been suggested by many practitioners before advancing to ART, in the hope of improving results.

Scientific Evidence

In the present article, we outline the impact of an endometrioma on the ovarian reserve and describe how surgical resection of an endometriotic cyst affects ovarian reserve, ovarian response after stimulation and ART outcome. Several studies suggest that the sole presence of an endometrioma may have a negative impact on ovarian reserve of the affected ovary, and surgery (particularly cystectomy) has been the choice of treatment in ovarian endometriosis for many years. However, detrimental effects of laparoscopic surgical removal on ovarian reserve and responsiveness to hyperstimulation has made that ART practices are shifting towards a more conservative approach: experimental and clinical data supporting this shift are thoroughly reviewed here.

Clinical Implications

Opposed to the conventional criteria of performing cystectomy when ovarian endometrioma is observed, careful consideration of patient symptoms as well as her age and ovarian reserve will help to select the patients that require surgery prior to ART, whereas the majority will not need surgery prior to ART; even more, surgery may compromise ovarian reserve in most cases even if performed by careful surgeons.

Conclusions

Individualization of the treatment is imperative. Each case should be thoroughly assessed, looking at both the advantages and complications of cyst removal prior to ART. Surgery should be approached with caution in women with endometriomas, especially if the woman has had previous ovarian surgery. In the presence of infertility, we recommend generally sparing surgical treatment and proceeding directly to ART. This reduces the time to achieve a pregnancy, avoids potential surgical risks and limits patient costs.