Oocyte donor age has a significant impact on oocyte recipients' cumulative live-birth rate: a population-based cohort study

IVF and obstetric outcomes among women of advanced maternal age (≥45 years) using donor eggs

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does very advanced maternal age (VAMA; age ≥45 years) influence obstetric outcomes among women using donor oocytes in IVF?

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study analysed data from a nationwide IVF registry in Taiwan, focusing on IVF cycles involving women aged 45 years and older using donated oocytes between 2007 and 2016. The study assessed cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) and secondary outcomes such as clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth and twin pregnancy rates, alongside perinatal outcomes such as Caesarean section rates, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and birthweight.

RESULTS

The study included 1226 embryo transfer cycles from 745 women, with a stable live birth rate of about 40% across the study period. The CLBR was slightly lower in women aged 50 years and older (54.2%) compared with those aged 45-46 years (58.0%), but these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.647). Secondary outcomes and perinatal outcomes did not significantly differ across age groups. Regression analysis suggested a non-significant trend towards a decrease in live birth rate and birthweight with increasing maternal age. The study also found that single-embryo transfer (SET) minimized the risk of twin pregnancies without significantly affecting live birth rates.

CONCLUSIONS

IVF with donor oocytes remains a viable option for women of VAMA, with consistent live birth rates across age groups. However, the study underscores the importance of elective SET to reduce the risk of twin pregnancies and associated adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the impact of other factors such as paternal age and embryo development stage on IVF success in this population.

Development of an IVF prediction model for donor oocytes: a retrospective analysis of 10 877 embryo transfers

STUDY QUESTION

Can we develop a prediction model for the chance of a live birth following the transfer of an embryo created using donated oocytes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Three primary models that included patient, past treatment, and cycle characteristics were developed using Australian data to predict the chance of a live birth following the transfer of an embryo created using donated oocytes; these models were well-calibrated to the population studied, achieved reasonable predictive power and generalizability when tested on New Zealand data.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Nearly 9% of ART embryo transfer cycles performed globally use embryos created using donated oocytes. This percentage rises to one-quarter and one-half in same-sex couples and women aged over 45 years, respectively.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study uses population-based Australian clinical registry data comprising 9384 embryo transfer cycles that occurred between 2015 and 2021 for model development, with an external validation cohort of 1493 New Zealand embryo transfer cycles.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Three prediction models were compared that incorporated patient characteristics, but differed in whether they considered use of prior autologous treatment factors and current treatment parameters. We internally validated the models on Australian data using grouped cross-validation and reported several measures of model discrimination and calibration. Variable importance was measured through calculating the change in predictive performance that resulted from variable permutation. The best-performing model was externally validated on data from New Zealand.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The best-performing model had an internal validation AUC-ROC of 0.60 and Brier score of 0.20, and external validation AUC-ROC of 0.61 and Brier score of 0.23. While these results indicate ∼15% less discriminatory ability compared to models assessed on an autologous cohort from the same population the performance of the models was clearly statistically significantly better than random, demonstrated generalizability, and was well-calibrated to the population studied. The most important variables for predicting the chance of a live birth were the oocyte donor age, the number of prior oocyte recipient embryo transfer cycles, whether the transferred embryo was cleavage or blastocyst stage and oocyte recipient age. Of lesser importance were the oocyte-recipient parity, whether donor or partner sperm was used, the number of prior autologous embryo transfer cycles and the number of embryos transferred.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The models had relatively weak discrimination suggesting further features need to be added to improve their predictive power. Variation in donor oocyte cohorts across countries due to differences such as whether anonymous and compensated donation are allowed may necessitate the models be recalibrated prior to application in non-Australian cohorts.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These results confirm the well-established importance of oocyte age and ART treatment history as the key prognostic factors in predicting treatment outcomes. One of the developed models has been incorporated into a consumer-facing website (YourIVFSuccess.com.au/Estimator) to allow patients to obtain personalized estimates of their chance of success using donor oocytes.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This research was funded by the Australian government as part of the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Emerging Priorities and Consumer Driven Research initiative: EPCD000007. L.R. declares personal consulting fees from Abbott and Merck, lecture fees from Abbott, receipt of an educational grant from Merck, past presidency of the Fertility Society of Australia & New Zealand and World Endometriosis Society and being a minor shareholder in Monash IVF Group (ASX:MVF). G.M.C. declares receipt of Australian government grant funding for the research study and the development and maintenance of the YourIVFSuccess website. O.F., J.N., and A.P. report no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

In vitro fertilization and perinatal outcomes of patients with advanced maternal age after single frozen euploid embryo transfer: a propensity score-matched analysis of autologous and donor cycles

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in vitro fertilization (IVF) and perinatal outcomes of donor egg and autologous cycles in patients with advanced reproductive age after undergoing single frozen euploid embryo transfer.

DESIGN

A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated and private IVF centers.

PATIENT(S)

Patients aged 39-46 years who underwent IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using whole-chromosome sequencing with donor (n = 278) or autologous (n = 278) oocytes between October 2017 and October 2021.

INTERVENTION(S)

Single frozen euploid embryo transfer with donor or autologous euploid embryo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The main outcome measure was the live birth rate (LBR) after the first embryo transfer, calculated per embryo transfer. The secondary outcomes included the implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and gestational age and birth weight at the time of delivery.

RESULT(S)

Patients using donor or autologous oocytes had a similar likelihood of implantation (57.91% [51.87-63.78] vs. 57.19% [51.15-63.09]) and LBR (41.01% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 35.17-47.04] vs. 42.45% [95% CI, 36.56-48.49]). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the ectopic pregnancy rate (0.72% [0.09-2.57] vs. 0.36% [0.01-1.99]), miscarriage rate (16.19% [12.06-21.05] vs. 14.39% [95% CI, 10.48-19.08]), gestational age (38.50 [38.08-38.92] vs. 39.16 [38.25-40.07] weeks), or birth weight of infants (2,982.25 [2,606.69-3,357.81] vs. 3,128.24 [2,962.30-3,294.17] kg). The univariate analysis showed no association between advanced maternal age and the LBR (relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.84-1.25]). Multivariate analysis using putative confounders for embryo competency found no associations with LBR (adjusted relative risk, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.75-1.98]).

CONCLUSION(S)

Patients with euploid blastocysts derived from donor or autologous oocytes did not reveal statistically significant differences in the LBR, implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, duration of gestation, or infant birth weight. These findings suggest that age-related reproductive decline and/or poor IVF outcomes associated with women with advanced reproductive age undergoing IVF are heavily driven by embryonic aneuploidy.

Assessing the effect of below-benchmark vitrified/warmed donor-oocyte survival rates in subsequent laboratory and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of below-benchmark (95%-100%) donor-oocyte survival rates on vitrification/warming in the laboratory and clinical outcomes of recipient cycles.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A network of European private in vitro fertilization units.

PATIENT(S)

We analyzed 12,690 vitrified-warmed donor-oocyte recipient cycles performed from 2018-2022.

INTERVENTION(S)

All cycles analyzed used exclusively vitrified/warmed donor oocytes. The cycles were grouped according to the survival rate experienced: benchmark 95%-100%; competence 85%-95%; below competence 70%-85%; poor 50%-70%; and very poor <50%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary endpoint of the study was the total usable blastocyst rate per 2 pronuclear (2PN) zygote. Secondary endpoints were the fertilization rate, the live birth rate after the first single blastocyst transfer, and the cumulative live birth rate.

RESULT(S)

The mean number of warmed oocytes per intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle was 11.4 ± 3.2, with a mean survival rate of 89.1%. More oocytes per cycle were consumed in the lower survival groups, yet the total number of oocytes available for ICSI was smaller in the below-competence, poor, and very poor survival groups. The total usable blastocyst rate was lower in the lower survival groups (benchmark: 48.9%; competence: 47.0%, below competence: 46.0%; poor: 43.6%; and very poor: 43.6%), as well as the fertilization rates (benchmark: 76.8%; competence: 76.6%, below competence: 75.6%; poor: 74.7%; and very poor:75.5%). The adjusted relative risk (aRR) of live birth rate of the first embryo transferred was equal to the benchmark survival group in all the lower survival groups (benchmark: 40.9%; competence: aRR = 0.986, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.931-1.045; below-competence: aRR = 0.992, 95% CI: 0.929-1.059; poor: aRR = 1.103, 95% CI: 1.009-1.207; and very poor: aRR = 1.169, 95% CI: 0.963-1.419). The cumulative live birth rate decreased in lower survival groups compared with benchmark survival (benchmark: 79.2%; competence: aRR = 0.988, 95% CI: 0.961-1.015; below competence: aRR = 0.911, 95% CI: 0.880-0.944; poor: aRR = 0.802, 95% CI: 0.757-0.851; and very poor: aRR = 0.793, 95% CI: 0.693-0.907). The lower cumulative rates maintained in a subanalysis with equal metaphase-II available for ICSI (benchmark: 69.5%; competence: aRR = 0.909, 95% CI: 0.827-1.000; below competence: aRR = 0.942, 95% CI: 0.848-1.046; poor: aRR = 0.833, 95% CI: 0.7386-0.941; and very poor: aRR = 0.873, 95% CI: 0.695-1.097) CONCLUSIONS: Lower donor-oocyte cryo-survival rates have a moderate negative impact on the blastocyst utilization rate per 2PN zygote, fertilization rate, and the cumulative live birth rates of a donation cycle, even after adjusting for equal metaphase-II oocytes available for ICSI. Nonetheless, the surviving oocytes of a cohort seem to maintain a high competence level, with very similar laboratory outcomes, irrespective of the cohort's survival rates, as well as equal implantation potential of the resulting blastocysts.

Development of the DONOR prediction model on the risk of hypertensive complications in oocyte donation pregnancy: study protocol for a multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

Oocyte donation (OD) pregnancy is accompanied by a high incidence of hypertensive complications, with serious consequences for mother and child. Optimal care management, involving early recognition, optimisation of suitable treatment options and possibly eventually also prevention, is in high demand. Prediction of patient-specific risk factors for hypertensive complications in OD can provide the basis for this. The current project aims to establish the first prediction model on the risk of hypertensive complications in OD pregnancy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The present study is conducted within the DONation of Oocytes in Reproduction project. For this multicentre cohort study, at least 541 OD pregnancies will be recruited. Baseline characteristics and obstetric data will be collected. Additionally, one sample of maternal peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood after delivery or a saliva sample from the child will be obtained, in order to determine the number of fetal-maternal human leucocyte antigen mismatches. Following data collection, a multivariate logistic regression model will be developed for the binary outcome hypertensive complication 'yes' and 'no'. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool will be used as guide to minimise the risk of bias. The study will be reported in line with the 'Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis' guideline. Discrimination and calibration will be determined to assess model performance. Internal validation will be performed using the bootstrapping method. External validation will be performed with the 'DONation of Oocytes in Reproduction individual participant data' dataset.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee LDD (Leiden, Den Haag, Delft), with protocol number P16.048 and general assessment registration (ABR) number NL56308.058.16. Further results will be shared through peer-reviewed journals and international conferences.

Factors influencing natural fecundity in fertile couples: a survey of puerperae and their partners

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the fecundity rate among fertile couples, and which factors influence it?

DESIGN

Retrospective study of all puerperae attending Cruces University Hospital Human Reproduction Unit over 9 months. An anonymous questionnaire was circulated to all patients, and 2510 valid completed questionnaires were collected. The main inclusion criterion was natural conception resulting in delivery. Pregnancies resulting from ART and contraceptive method failure were excluded. Investigated parameters were time to pregnancy, age and smoking (in women and men), previous pregnancies and intercourse frequency. A mathematical formula was developed to predict the per-month fecundity rate (PMFR).

RESULTS

The cumulative fecundity rate was 29.08%, 54.26%, 68.61%, 89.88%, 96.95% and 98.63% (at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months); between 12 and 36 months, the average PMFR ranged from 8.53-7.48%. Only 1.68% of pregnancies occurred between 24 and 36 months, and only 1.37% thereafter. The best fecundity markers were obtained in the group who had sexual intercourse seven to eight times a week. Women and men younger than 25 years had lower fecundity markers than those aged between 25 and 40 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Fertile couples have a non-negligible per-month fecundity rate between 12 and 36 months, which should be considered when planning fertility studies. The lower fecundity rate observed in women and men aged younger than 25 years deserves more study. Coital frequencies of more than two or three times a week did not affect the fecundity rate and was better with frequencies of seven to eight times a week.

[Impact of donor parity on oocyte donation outcomes]

OBJECTIVES

Since 2015, in France, men and women who have never procreated are allowed to donate their gametes. This has led to an increase in the number of female oocyte donors, whereas there are many couples waiting for gametes that have a long waiting time. The aim of this study is to compare the results of donation with oocytes from nulliparous and non-nulliparous donors.

METHODS

Monocentric retrospective observational study (Lille University Hospital) between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2019. Phenotypic characteristics and clinical and biological outcomes of oocytes donations were compared according to donor parity (nulliparous versus primiparous or multiparous).

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-five donors (66 nulliparous and 119 non-nulliparous) were included in the study, allowing 284 ICSI cycles to be performed in recipient couples. On average, 11.5 oocytes were obtained per donation cycle, of which 7.8 were mature. In total, 4.6 mature oocytes were obtained per attempt and per recipient couple. Nulliparous donors are younger than non-nulliparous ones. An early pregnancy was obtained in 55.6% of the nulliparous donors and in 50.8% of the non-nulliparous donors (P=0.55). A progressive pregnancy was obtained in 49.2% of the nulliparous women and in 42.1% of the non-nulliparous women (P=0.36). There was therefore no difference in terms of early pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy whether the donation came from a nulliparous or non-nulliparous woman.

CONCLUSION

Donor parity does not seem to have an impact on the success of oocyte donation attempts.

Pregnancies through oocyte donation. A mini review of pathways involved in placental dysfunction

Pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are increasingly prevalent worldwide. While most pregnancies conceived through in-vitro fertilization (IVF) progress without complications, mounting evidence suggests that these pregnancies are at a heightened risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Specifically, IVF pregnancies involving oocyte donation have garnered attention due to numerous reports indicating an elevated risk profile for pregnancy-related complications within this subgroup of patients. The precise mechanisms contributing to this increased risk of complications remain incompletely understood. Nonetheless, it is likely that they are mediated by an abnormal immune response at the fetal-maternal interface. Additionally, these outcomes may be influenced by baseline patient characteristics, such as the etiology of infertility, absence of corpus luteum, and variations in endometrial preparation protocols, among other factors. This review aims to succinctly summarize the most widely accepted mechanisms that potentially contribute to the onset of placental dysfunction in pregnancies conceived through oocyte donation.

Sperm cryopreservation does not affect live birth rate in normozoospermic men: analysis of 7969 oocyte donation cycles

STUDY QUESTION

Does sperm cryopreservation influence the reproductive outcomes of normozoospermic patients in oocyte donation cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

After controlling for confounders, the use of cryopreserved semen from normozoospermic patients does not affect pregnancy and live birth rates after elective ICSI.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Sperm cryopreservation by slow freezing is a common practice in ART. While frozen-thawed semen typically presents reduced motility and vitality, its use for ICSI is generally considered adequate in terms of reproductive outcomes. Nevertheless, most studies comparing reproductive outcomes between fresh and cryopreserved sperm include patients with severe male factor (testicular sperm, oligo-, and/or asthenozoospermia) or women of advanced maternal age, where the altered quality of the gametes can partially mask the full effect of freezing/thawing.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The study included a retrospective cohort of 7969 couples undergoing their first oocyte donation cycle between January 2013 and December 2019 in one large clinic, using normozoospermic semen from the male partner. All cycles involved elective ICSI, fresh oocytes, and a fresh embryo transfer, either at cleavage or blastocyst stage. Two study groups were established based on the sperm status: fresh (n = 2865) and cryopreserved (n = 5104).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A slow freezing protocol was used for all sperm cryopreservation. Sperm washing, capacitation, and selection prior to ICSI were performed identically for fresh and frozen-thawed samples, using pellet swim-up. Fertilization rate (FR), pregnancy (biochemical and ongoing), and live birth rates were compared between study groups using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Male and female age, sperm concentration and motility after ejaculation, and number of oocytes inseminated were similar between cycles using fresh or cryopreserved sperm. Analysis by Student's t-test did not indicate a significant difference in FR between fresh and cryopreserved sperm (P = 0.0591); however, after adjusting for confounders, this difference reached statistical significance: 74.65% FR for fresh (CI 95%: 73.92-75.38) versus 73.66% for cryopreserved sperm (CI 95%: 73.11-74.20), P = 0.0334. The adjusted regression analysis revealed higher odds of biochemical pregnancy when using fresh sperm (odds ratio (OR): 1.143, P = 0.0175), but no significant effects of sperm cryopreservation were observed for ongoing pregnancy (OR: 1.101, P = 0.0983) and live birth (OR: 1.082, P = 0.1805).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Caution should be exerted when extrapolating these results to different protocols for sperm cryopreservation and selection, or to IVM, advanced maternal age and classical IVF cycles, which were excluded from analysis. Owing to the retrospective nature of the study, some uncontrolled for variables may affect the results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Sperm cryopreservation does not affect pregnancy and live birth rates in normozoospermic patients, and although it may lower FR s slightly, this would not be clinically relevant. In line with previous studies that included patients with an apparent male or female factor, sperm cryopreservation is a safe and convenient technique.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study received no external funding and all authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Does paternal age affect the live birth rate in donor oocyte cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

While delayed parenthood is increasing worldwide, the effect of paternal age on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes remains unclear. The egg donation model appears to be relevant to studying the independent impact of paternal age on clinical outcome, but the available studies are heterogeneous and contradictory. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the relationship between paternal age and live birth rate (LBR) in egg donation cycles.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 30, 2021. All studies on egg donation cycles where LBR is reported according to male age were included. Study selection, bias assessment, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers according to the Cochrane methods.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 10,527 egg donation cycles were finally included. The meta-analysis showed a slight but significant and linear decrease in LBR with increasing paternal age (estimate - 0.0055; 95% CI (- 0.0093; - 0.0016), p = 0.006), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 25%). No specific threshold was identified. A similar trend toward decreased clinical pregnancy rate with advancing paternal age was found but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that increasing paternal age is associated with a slight but significant and linear decrease in the live birth rate in egg donation cycles, with no apparent threshold effect. Although this requires further confirmation, this information is important for counseling men who are considering delayed childbearing.

Association of the Cumulative Live Birth Rate with the Factors in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Retrospective Study of 16,583 Women

The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) can better reflect the overall treatment effect by successive treatments, and continuous rather than categorical variables as exposure variables can increase the statistical power in detecting the potential correlation. Therefore, the dose-response relationships might find an optimal dose for the better CLBR, offering evidence-based references for clinicians. To determine the dose-response relationships of the factors and the optimal ranges of the factors in assisted reproductive technology (ART) associated with a higher CLBR, this study retrospectively analyzed 16,583 patients undergoing the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) from January 2017 to January 2019. Our study demonstrated the optimal ranges of age with a higher CLBR were under 32.10 years. We estimated the CLBR tends to increase with increased levels of AMH at AMH levels below 1.482 ng/mL, and the CLBR reaches a slightly high level at AMH levels in the range from 2.58-4.18 ng/mL. The optimal ranges of basal FSH with a higher CLBR were less than 9.13 IU. When the number of cryopreserved embryos was above 1.055 and the number of total transferred embryos was 2, the CLBR was significantly higher. In conclusion, there is a non-linear dose-response relationship between the CLBR with age, AMH, basal FSH, and the number of cryopreserved embryos and total transferred embryos. We proposed the optimal ranges of the five factors that were correlated with a higher CLBR in the first oocyte retrieval cycle, which may help consultation at IVF clinics.

Development and validation of a live birth prediction model for expected poor ovarian response patients during IVF/ICSI

BACKGROUND

A number of live birth predictive model during assisted reproductive technology treatment have been available in recent years, but few targeted evaluating the chances of live birth in poor ovarian response(POR) patients. The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram based on POSEIDON criteria to predict live birth in patients with expected POR.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study using clinical data from 657 patients in POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4 (antral follicle count [AFC] ≤5 and AMH <1.2 ng/ml) in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, and Construction a nomogram model t.

RESULTS

Among 657 expected POR patients, 111 (16.89%) had live births, and 546 (83.11%) did not have live births. These were divided into a training set(n=438) and a validation set (n=219). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the age (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97), BMI (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.09-3.67), AMH (OR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.45-8.51), normal fertilized oocytes (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.21-1.63), and the basal FSH (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.98) of the female were independent factors predicting live birth in patients with expected POR. Then, an individualized nomogram prediction model was built from these five factors. The area under the ROC curve of the live birth prediction model was 0.820 in the training set and 0.879 in the validation set.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a nomogram combining clinical and laboratory factors to predict the probability of live birth in patients with an expected POR during IVF/ICSI, which can helpful for clinician in decision-making. However, the data comes from the same center, needs a prospective multicenter study for further in-depth evaluation and validation of this prediction model.

Pregnancy outcome and follow-up of offspring of donor oocytes recipient from PCOS patients

Background

The use of donated oocytes (DO) for in vitro fertilization(IVF) treatment in patients with infertility is generally recognized, and females with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) can participate in oocyte donation programs as donor patients. However, the pregnancy outcomes and offspring follow-up in patients with PCOS as the recipients are unclear. This study was to compare the pregnancy outcomes and follow-up of offspring in PCOS and non-PCOS receptor.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of 62 patients undergoing the oocyte reception program were separated into 2 groups: Group I, PCOS oocyte recipients (n = 30); Group II, non-PCOS recipients (n = 32). Medical records were reviewed, and rates of fertilization, cleavage, high-quality embryos and blastocysts were compared between PCOS and non-PCOS groups. Rates of implantation, pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, early abortion, multiple pregnancies, and offspring outcomes were calculated using the first single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) analysis between the groups.

Results

The average recipient age and body mass index (BMI) of PCOS and non-PCOS patients was (36.3 ± 2.6 vs. 36.2 ± 2.8, and 23.4 ± 3.9 vs. 23.7 ± 4.0), respectively (P > 0.05). The fertilization, cleavage, high-quality embryos and blastocyst rates were not significantly different between the PCOS and non-PCOS groups. Rates of implantation, pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, early abortion, and multiple pregnancies were not significantly different in SVBT between the PCOS and non-PCOS groups. The incidence of complications, such as pre-eclampsia or gestational diabetes, between PCOS and non-PCOS groups was similar (11.8% vs.11.1%, 5.9% vs.5.5%; P > 0.05). Preterm births were also similar (11.8% vs.16.7%, P > 0.05). Donor oocytes are more likely to be delivered via cesarean Sect. (80.0% vs. 86.7%: P > 0.05). The mean gestational age, birth weight, and height were comparable between the 2 groups during full-term delivery.

Conclusion

There was no difference in the pregnancy outcomes and follow-up of the offspring between the PCOS and non-PCOS groups.

C. elegans as a model organism to study female reproductive health

Female reproductive health has been historically understudied and underfunded. Here, we present the advantages of using a free-living nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, as an animal system to study fundamental aspects of female reproductive health. C. elegans is a powerful high-throughput model organism that shares key genetic and physiological similarities with humans. In this review, we highlight areas of pressing medical and biological importance in the 21st century within the context of female reproductive health. These include the decline in female reproductive capacity with increasing chronological age, reproductive dysfunction arising from toxic environmental insults, and cancers of the reproductive system. C. elegans has been instrumental in uncovering mechanistic insights underlying these processes, and has been valuable for developing and testing therapeutics to combat them. Adopting a convenient model organism such as C. elegans for studying reproductive health will encourage further research into this field, and broaden opportunities for making advancements into evolutionarily conserved mechanisms that control reproductive function.

The role of cellular senescence in female reproductive aging and the potential for senotherapeutic interventions

BACKGROUND

Advanced maternal age is associated with decreased oocyte quantity and quality as well as uterine and placental dysfunctions. These changes lead to infertility, pregnancy complications and birth defects in the offspring. As the mean age of giving birth is increasing worldwide, prevention of age-associated infertility and pregnancy complications, along with the more frequent use of ART, become extremely important. Currently, significant research is being conducted to unravel the mechanisms underlying female reproductive aging. Among the potential mechanisms involved, recent evidence has suggested a contributing role for cellular senescence, a cellular state of irreversible growth arrest characterized by a hypersecretory and pro-inflammatory phenotype. Elucidating the role of senescence in female reproductive aging holds the potential for developing novel and less invasive therapeutic measures to prevent or even reverse female reproductive aging and increase offspring wellbeing.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The review will summarize the positive and negative implications of cellular senescence in the pathophysiology of the female reproductive organs during aging and critically explore the use of novel senotherapeutics aiming to reverse and/or eliminate their detrimental effects. The focus will be on major senescence mechanisms of the ovaries, the uterus, and the placenta, as well as the potential and risks of using senotherapies that have been discovered in recent years.

SEARCH METHODS

Data for this review were identified by searches of MEDLINE, PubMed and Google Scholar. References from relevant articles using the search terms 'Cellular Senescence', 'Aging', 'Gestational age', 'Maternal Age', 'Anti-aging', 'Uterus', 'Pregnancy', 'Fertility', 'Infertility', 'Reproduction', 'Implant', 'Senolytic', 'Senostatic', 'Senotherapy' and 'Senotherapeutic' where selected. A total of 182 articles published in English between 2005 and 2020 were included, 27 of which focus on potential senotherapies for reproductive aging. Exclusion criteria were inclusion of the terms 'male' and 'plants'.

OUTCOMES

Aging is a major determinant of reproductive wellbeing. Cellular senescence is a basic aging mechanism, which can be exploited for therapeutic interventions. Within the last decade, several new strategies for the development and repurposing of drugs targeting senescent cells have emerged, such as modulators of the anti-inflammatory response, oxidative stress, DNA damage, and mitochondria and protein dysfunctions. Several studies of female reproductive aging and senotherapies have been discussed that show promising results for future interventions.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

In most countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the average age at which women give birth is above 30 years. Currently, in countries such as the Netherlands, Australia, Spain, Finland, Germany and the UK, birth rates among 30- to 34-year-olds are now higher than in any other age groups. This review will provide new knowledge and scientific advancement on the senescence mechanisms during female reproductive aging, and benefit fundamental and clinical scientists and professionals in the areas of reproduction, cancer, immunobiology and fibrosis.

Outcomes After a Single Ovarian Stimulation Cycle in Women of Advanced Reproductive Age: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies showed that age is the most important factor that determines the outcome after embryo transfer (ET), with either in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), regardless whether fresh or frozen cycles. The average cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) following a single ovarian stimulation cycle in women of advanced reproductive age (≥38 years of age) has been reported to be 22.6-34.1%. The purpose of this study is to compare the CLBR after a single ovarian stimulation cycle in women of different advanced reproductive age bracket (38/39, 40/41, 42/43 years of age or older), and to explore the factors (e.g., age, type of infertility, body mass index (BMI), ovarian stimulation protocols) associated with CLBR.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included all women of advanced reproductive age (38 years or older) undergoing IVF or ICSI at authors' institute during a period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (No. 2021-P045). Subjects with underlying diseases were excluded from analysis. The last follow-up was conducted in December 2020, with minimal 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 826 women (40.00 ± 2.10 years of age at the time of ovarian stimulation; n = 633 and 193 for IVF-ET and ICSI-ET, respectively). The number of women in each age bracket was: 424 for 38/39 y, 226 for 40/41 y, 118 for 42/43 y, and 58 for ≥44 y. The number of transferable embryos was 2 (interquartile range: 2,4) for 38/39 y, 2 (2,3) for 40/41 y, 2 (2,3) for 42/43 y, and 2 (1.75,3) for ≥44 y. The rate of fresh embryo transfer was comparable (62.03-72.58%) among the 4 age brackets. The average CLBR following a single cycle was 26.27% in the overall study population, 32.31% for 38/39 y, 26.99% for 40/41 y, 14.4% for 42/43 y, and 3.44% for ≥44 y (P <0.001). In multivariate regression, CLBR was independently associated with younger age (OR for each year: 1.538, 95%CI: 1.193, 1.984) and higher number of transferable embryos (OR for each embryo: 1.495, 95%CI: 1.297, 1.722). CLBR differed significantly in the 38/39 group (P = 0.014), with higher rate in women receiving the Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long or GnRH-a ultra-long protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-two years of age seemed to be a critical cutoff to achieve reasonable level of CLBR after a single ovarian stimulation cycle in women of advanced reproductive age.

Pathophysiology and management of classic galactosemic primary ovarian insufficiency

Classic galactosemia is an inborn error of carbohydrate metabolism associated with early-onset primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) in young women. Our understanding of the consequences of galactosemia upon fertility and fecundity of affected women is expanding, but there are important remaining gaps in our knowledge and tools for its management, and a need for continued dialog so that the special features of the condition can be better managed. Here, we review galactosemic POI and its reproductive endocrinological clinical sequelae and summarize current best clinical practices for its management. Special consideration is given to the very early-onset nature of the condition in the pediatric/adolescent patient. Afterward, we summarize our current understanding of the reproductive pathophysiology of galactosemia, including the potential action of toxic galactose metabolites upon the ovary. Our work establishing that ovarian cellular stress reminiscent of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is present in a mouse model of galactosemia, as well as work by other groups, are summarized.

LAY SUMMARY

Patients with the condition of classic galactosemia need to maintain a strict lifelong diet that excludes the sugar galactose. This is due to having mutations in enzymes that process galactose, resulting in the buildup of toxic metabolic by-products of the sugar. Young women with classic galactosemia often lose the function of their ovaries very early in life (termed 'primary ovarian insufficiency'), despite adherence to a galactose-restricted diet. This means that in addition to the consequences of the disease, these women also face infertility and the potential need for hormone replacement therapy. This article summarizes current strategies for managing the care of galactosemic girls and women and also what is known of how the condition leads to early primary ovarian insufficiency.

Factors predicting clinical outcomes from 494 vitrified oocyte donation cycles at a UK-regulated egg bank

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do donor age, AMH, AFC, BMI and reproductive history predict response to ovarian stimulation? Do donor and recipient clinical markers and embryology parameters predict recipient pregnancy and live birth?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 494 altruistic oocyte donors aged 18-35 years; 340 were matched to 559 recipients. Predictors of donor total oocyte yield and total mature oocyte yield were identified. Total and mature oocyte number were compared according to stratified donor AMH and age. Donor, recipient and embryology parameters predictive of recipient primary outcomes (clinical pregnancy and live birth) were identified.

RESULTS

Donor age and AMH predicted total oocyte yield (P = 0.030 and P < 0.001)) and total mature oocyte yield (P = 0.011 and P < 0.001). Donors aged 30-35 years with AMH 15-29.9 pmol/l had lower total oocyte yield (P = 0.004) and mature oocyte yield (P < 0.001) than donors aged 18-24 years. Up to an AMH threshold of 39.9 pmol/l, increasing AMH levels predicted higher total oocyte yield (<15 pmol/l versus 15-29.9 pmol/l, P = 0.001; 15-29.9 pmol/l versus 30-39.9 pmol/l, P < 0.001; 30-39.9pmol/l versus ≥ 40 pmol/l, P = 1.0) and mature oocyte yield (<15 pmol/l versus 15-29.9 pmol/l, P = 0.005; 15-29.9 pmol/l versus 30-39.9 pmol/l, P = 0.006; 30-39.9 pmol/l versus ≥40 pmol/l, P = 1.0). In recipients, the rate of transferrable embryos per oocytes received, fertilized and number of embryo transfers needed to achieve the primary outcome were predictors of cumulative clinical pregnancy (P = 0.011, P = 0.017 and P < 0.001) and live birth (P = 0.008, P = 0.012 and P < 0.001) rates. Recipient BMI (P = 0.024) and previous miscarriages (P = 0.045) were predictors of cumulative live birth rate. Donor age 18-22 years was associated with a lower incidence of recipient clinical pregnancy (P = 0.004) and live birth (P = 0.001) after the first embryo transfer versus donor age 23-29 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor age and AMH are independent predictors of oocyte yield. Raised recipient BMI and history of miscarriages reduce cumulative live birth rates, which may be increased by selecting donors aged 23-29 years, instead of younger donors.

Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program

The superiority of day 5 blastocysts compared to day 6 blastocysts in fresh cycle transfers was previously demonstrated and attributed mainly to endometrial asynchrony. Data from frozen blastocysts transfers showed conflicting results, possibly due to heterogeneous patient population and embryo quality. The aim of this study was to compare clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) between transfers of vitrified day 5 blastocysts and day 6 blastocysts in oocyte donation, blastocyst-only cycles. In a retrospective, multi-center study, with a single oocyte donation program, a total of 1840 frozen embryo transfers (FET’s) were analyzed, including 1180 day 5 blastocysts and 660 day 6 blastocysts transfers. Day 5 blastocyst transfers had better embryonic development and significantly higher CPRs (34.24% vs. 20.15%, P < 0.0001), higher LBRs (26.89% vs. 14.77%, P < 0.0001), less cycles to LBR (1.83 ± 0.08 vs. 2.39 ± 0.18, P = 0.003) and shorter time to LBRs (76.32 ± 8.7 vs. 123.24 ± 19.1 days, P = 0.01), compared to day 6 transfers, respectively. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression indicated, that day 5 transfer was an independent factor for CPRs (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.43–2.54, P < 0.001) and LBRs (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.19–4.28, P = 0.01), regardless of embryo quality, compared to day 6. In conclusion, day 5 blastocysts in oocyte donation program have significantly higher CPRs and LBRs, and present shorter time to delivery, compared to day 6 blastocysts, regardless of embryo quality.

Ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Since its introduction in the 1980s, oocyte donation (OD) has been largely integrated into ART. Lately, both demand and the indications for OD have increased greatly. Oocyte donors are healthy and potentially fertile women undergoing voluntarily ovarian stimulation (OS). Selection of the optimal type of stimulation is of paramount importance in order to achieve the most favourable outcomes for the oocyte recipients, but most importantly for the safety of the oocyte donors.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This is the first systematic review (SR) with the objective to summarize the current evidence on OS in oocyte donors. The scope of this SR was to evaluate the OD programme by assessing four different aspects: how to assess the ovarian response prior to stimulation; how to plan the OS (gonadotrophins; LH suppression; ovulation trigger; when to start OS); how to control for the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and other complications; and the differences between the use of fresh versus vitrified donated oocytes.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in May 2020, according to PRISMA guidelines in the databases PubMed and Embase, using a string that combined synonyms for oocytes, donation, banking, freezing, complications and reproductive outcomes. Studies reporting on the safety and/or efficacy of OS in oocyte donors were identified. The quality of the included studies was assessed using ROBINS-I and ROB2. Meta-analysis was performed where appropriate. Data were combined to calculate mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odd ratios (OR) for binary data with their corresponding 95% CIs. Heterogeneity between the included studies was assessed using I2 and tau statistics.

OUTCOMES

In total, 57 manuscripts were selected for the review, out of 191 citations identified. Antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone levels correlate with ovarian response to OS in OD but have limited value to discriminate donors who are likely to show either impaired or excessive response. Five randomized controlled trials compared different type of gonadotrophins as part of OS in oocyte donors; owing to high heterogeneity, meta-analysis was precluded. When comparing different types of LH control, namely GnRH antagonist versus agonist, the studies showed no differences in ovarian response. Use of progesterone primed ovarian stimulation protocols has been evaluated in seven studies: the evidence has shown little or no difference, compared to GnRH antagonist protocols, in mean number of retrieved oocytes (MD 0.23, [95% CI 0.58-1.05], n = 2147; 6 studies; I2 = 13%, P = 0.33) and in clinical pregnancy rates among recipients (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.60-1.26], n = 2260, I2 = 72%, P < 0.01). There is insufficient evidence on long-term safety for babies born. GnRH agonist triggering is the gold standard and should be used in all oocyte donors, given the excellent oocyte retrieval rates, the practical elimination of OHSS and no differences in pregnancy rates in recipients (four studies, OR 0.86, 95%CI 0.58-1.26; I2 = 0%). OS in OD is a safe procedure with a low rate of hospitalization after oocyte retrieval. The use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device or a progestin contraceptive pill during OS does not impact the number of oocytes retrieved or the clinical pregnancy rate in recipients. Ultrasound monitoring seems enough for an adequate follow up of the stimulation cycle in OD. Use of fresh versus vitrified donated oocytes yielded similar pregnancy outcomes.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This update will be helpful in the clinical management of OS in OD based on the most recent knowledge and recommendations, and possibly in the management of women under 35 years undergoing oocyte vitrification for social freezing, owing to the population similarities. More clinical research is needed on OS protocols that are specifically designed for OD, especially in term of the long-term safety for newborns, effective contraception during OS, and treatment satisfaction.

Is It Possible to Expand Oocyte Donors by Decreasing Number of Oocytes for Own Use? Insights From a Large Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Currently, in China, only women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles can donate oocytes to others, but at least 15 oocytes must be kept for their own treatment. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether oocyte donation compromises the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of donors and whether it is possible to expand oocyte donors' crowd.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from August 2015 to July 2017 including a total of 2,144 patients, in which 830 IVF-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) patients were eligible for oocyte donation and 1,314 patients met all other oocyte donation criteria but had fewer oocytes retrieved (10-17 oocytes). All 830 patients were advised to donate approximately three to five oocytes to others and were eventually divided into two groups: the oocyte donation group (those who donated) and the control group (those who declined). The basic patient parameters and CLBR, as well as the number of supernumerary embryos after achieving live birth, were compared. These two factors were also compared in all patients (2,144) with oocyte ≥10.

RESULTS

In 830 IVF-ET patients who were eligible for oocyte donation, only the oocyte number was significantly different between two groups, and the donation group had more than the control group (25.49 ± 5.76 vs. 22.88 ± 5.11, respectively; p = 0.09). No significant differences were found between the two groups in other factors. The results indicate that the live birth rate in the donation group was higher than that in the control group (81.31% vs. 82.95%, p = 0.371), without significance. In addition, CLBR can still reach as high as 73% when the oocyte number for own use was 10. Supernumerary embryos also increased as the oocyte number increased in all patients (oocyte ≥10).

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, oocyte donation did not compromise CLBR, and oocyte donation can decrease the waste of embryos. In addition, in patients with 10 oocytes retrieved, the CLBR was still good (73%). Thus, it is possible to expand oocyte donors if the number of oocyte kept for own use was decreased from 15 to 10 after enough communication with patients.

Cumulative live birth rates among gestational surrogates in altruistic surrogacy arrangements

Understanding the likelihood of a live birth is important for fertility treatment planning, particularly when one cycle fails and further treatment may be contemplated. This study aims to estimate the chance of live birth among gestational surrogates undergoing altruistic surrogacy arrangements between 2009 and 2016 in Victoria, Australia. A total of 81 gestational surrogates with 170 embryo transfer cycles were included. Of the 170 embryo transfer cycles, the majority were single embryo transfers (SETs; 97.1%), using frozen/thawed embryos (97.6%) which had been fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (77.6%). The cumulative live birth rate was 23.5% (95% CI, 15.6-33.8%) after the first cycle and increased to 50.6% (95% CI, 40.0-61.2%) after the sixth cycle. Of the 41 deliveries, 40 were singletons and one was a twin delivery. Two of the 42 deliveries were preterm, two were low birthweight and one was small for gestational age. The findings imply that surrogacy treatment can be offered up to six consecutive embryo transfer cycles to gestational surrogates. SET is encouraged in surrogacy practice to improve perinatal outcomes. These estimates can be used in counselling and decision-making for intended parents and gestational surrogates to continue a surrogacy treatment and informing public policy on assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Age-related natural fertility outcomes in women over 35 years: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

What is the rate of natural conception leading to ongoing pregnancy or livebirth over 6–12 months for infertile women of age ≥35 years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Natural conception rates were still clinically relevant in women aged 35 years and above and were significantly higher in women with unexplained infertility compared to those with other diagnoses.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In recent years, increasing numbers of women have attempted to conceive at a later age, resulting in a commensurate increase in the need for ART. However, there is a lack of data on natural fertility outcomes (i.e. no interventions) in women with increasing age.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic review with individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis was carried out. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov were searched until 1 July 2018 including search terms ‘fertility service’, ‘waiting list’, ‘treatment-independent’ and ‘spontaneous conception’. Language restrictions were not imposed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Inclusion criteria were studies (at least partly) reporting on infertile couples with female partner of age ≥35 years who attended fertility services, underwent fertility workup (e.g. history, semen analysis, tubal status and ovulation status) and were exposed to natural conception (e.g. independent of treatment such as IVF, ovulation induction and tubal surgery). Studies that exclusively studied only one infertility diagnosis, without including other women presenting to infertility services for other causes of infertility, were excluded. For studies that met the inclusion criteria, study authors were contacted to provide IPD, after which fertility outcomes for women of age ≥35 years were retrieved. Time to pregnancy or livebirth and the effect of increasing age on fertility outcomes after adjustment for other prognostic factors were analysed. Quality of studies was graded with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (non-randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) or the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (for RCTs).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

We included nine studies (seven cohort studies and two RCTs) (n = 4379 women of at least age 35 years), with the observed composite primary outcome of ongoing pregnancy or livebirth occurring in 429 women (9.8%) over a median follow-up of 5 months (25th to 75th percentile: 2.5–8.5 months). Studies were of moderate to high quality. The probability of natural conception significantly decreased with any diagnosis of infertility, when compared with unexplained infertility. We found non-linear effects of female age and duration of infertility on ongoing pregnancy and tabulated the predicted probabilities for unexplained infertile women aged 35–42 years with either primary or secondary infertility and with a duration of infertility from 1 to 6 years. For a 35-year-old woman with 2 years of primary unexplained infertility, the predicted probability of natural conception leading to ongoing pregnancy or livebirth was 0.15 (95% CI 0.11–0.19) after 6 months and 0.24 (95% CI 0.17–0.30) after 12 months. For a 42-year-old woman, this decreased to 0.08 (95% CI 0.04–0.11) after 6 months and 0.13 (95% CI 0.07–0.18) after 12 months.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

In the studies selected, there were different study designs, recruitment strategies in different centres, protocols and countries and different methods of assessment of infertility. Data were limited for women above the age of 40 years.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Women attending fertility services should be encouraged to pursue natural conception while waiting for treatment to commence and after treatment if it is unsuccessful. Our results may aid in counselling women, and, in particular, for those with unexplained infertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

S.J.C. received funding from the University of Adelaide Summer Research Scholarship. B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437), B.W.M. reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck, Merck KGaA, iGenomix and Guerbet. B.W.M. reports research support by Merck and Guerbet.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018096552.

Total follicle stimulating hormone dose is negatively correlated with live births in a donor/recipient model with fresh transfer: an analysis of 8,627 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry

OBJECTIVE

Oocyte donation has optimized our understanding of ovarian stimulation. Increasing the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose has been shown to adversely affect live birth rates in autologous cycles. Our objective is to assess whether this relationship holds true within the donor/recipient population.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Data from 2014-2016 included 8,627 fresh donor cycles.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Live birth, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates.

RESULTS

The mean donor age ± standard deviation (SD) was 25.8 ± 2.8 years. Donors underwent a median of 16 days (interquartile range [IQR] 12, 19) of stimulation with a median (IQR) total FSH dose and daily dose of 2,350.0 (1,800.0, 3,025.0) and 153.8 (113.2, 205.0) IU, respectively. The live birth rate was 56.7% per transfer. For every 500-unit increase in FSH dose, there was a 3% reduction in the odds of a live birth (odds ratio [OR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.95, 0.99), and a 3% reduction in the odds of a clinical pregnancy (OR 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.95, 0.99). Days of stimulation and average daily dose were not significantly associated with live birth or clinical pregnancy. No significant association was found between miscarriage rates and total FSH dose, days of stimulation, or average daily dose.

CONCLUSION

This is a novel report of a negative association of total FSH dosage on fresh IVF live births, performed in the donor population to control for oocyte source and endometrial receptivity.

Having a baby in your 40s with assisted reproductive technology: The reproductive dilemma of autologous versus donor oocytes

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of women ≥40 years old are accessing assisted reproductive technology (ART) due to age-related infertility. There is limited population-based evidence about the impact on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of women aged ≥40 years using their own oocytes, compared to women of a similar age, using donor oocytes.

AIMS

To compare the CLBR for women ≥40 years undergoing ART using autologous oocytes and women of similar age using donor oocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study used data from all women aged ≥40 years undergoing ART with donated (n = 987) or autologous oocytes (n = 19 170) in Victoria, Australia between 2009 and 2016. A discrete-time survival model was used to evaluate the CLBR following ART with donor or autologous oocytes. The odds ratio, adjusted for woman's age; male age; parity; cause of infertility; and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated. The numbers needed to be exposed (NNEs) were calculated from the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and the CLBR in the autologous group.

RESULTS

The CLBR ranged from 28.6 to 42.5% in the donor group and from 12.5% to 1.4% in the autologous group. The discrete-time survival analysis with 95% CI demonstrated significant aOR on CLBR across all ages (range aOR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.62-4.01 to aOR: 15.40, 95% CI: 9.10-26.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Women aged ≥40 years, using donor oocytes had a significantly higher CLBR than women using autologous oocytes. The findings can be used when counselling women ≥40 years about their ART treatment options and to inform public policy.