Direct NMR evidence for the dissociation of sulfur-dioxide-bound acetaldehyde under acidic conditions: Impact on wines oxidative stability

1H NMR based sulfonation reaction kinetics of wine relevant thiols in comparison with known carbonyls

Sulfite addition is a common tool for ensuring wines' oxidative stability via the activity of its free and weakly bound molecular fraction. As a nucleophile, bisulfite forms covalent adducts with wine's most relevant electrophiles, such as carbonyls, polyphenols, and thiols. The equilibrium in these reactions is often represented as dissociation rather than formation. Recent studies from our laboratory demonstrate, first, the acetaldehyde sulfonate dissociation, and second, the chemical stability of cysteine and epicatechin sulfonates under wine aging conditions. Thus, the objective of this study was to monitor by 1H NMR the binding specificity of known carbonyl-derived SO2 binders (acetaldehyde and pyruvic acid) in the presence of S-containing compounds (cysteine and glutathione). We report that during simulated wine aging, the sulfur dioxide that is rapidly bound to carbonyl compounds will be released and will bind to cysteine and glutathione, demonstrating the long-term sulfur dioxide binding potential of S-containing compounds. These results are meant to serve as a complement to existing literature reviews focused on molecular markers related to wines' oxidative stability and emphasize once more the importance of S-containing compounds in wine aging chemical mechanisms.

Mechanisms of the initial stage of non-enzymatic oxidation of wine: A mini review

Non-enzymatic oxidation is a primary factor affecting wine quality during bottling or aging. Although red and white wines exhibit distinct responses to oxidation over time, the fundamental mechanisms driving this transformation remain remarkably uniform. Non-enzymatic oxidation of wine commences with the intricate interplay between polyphenols and oxygen, orchestrating a delicate redox dance with iron and copper. Notably, copper emerges as an accelerant in this process. To safeguard wine integrity, sulfur dioxide (SO2) is routinely introduced to counteract the pernicious effects of oxidation by neutralizing hydrogen peroxide and quinone. In this comprehensive review, the initial stages of non-enzymatic wine oxidation are examined. The pivotal roles played by polyphenols, oxygen, iron, copper, and SO2 in this complex oxidative process are systematically explored. Additionally, the effect of quinone formation on wine characteristics and the intricate dynamics governing oxygen availability are elucidated. The potential synergistic or additive effects of iron and copper are probed, and the precise balance between SO2 and oxygen is scrutinized. This review summarizes the mechanisms involved in the initial stages of non-enzymatic oxidation of wine and anticipates the potential for further research.

Chemical Stability of Thiol and Flavanol Sulfonation Products during Wine Aging Conditions

Bisulfite (HSO3-) is the predominant form of sulfur dioxide, present as free and bound to wine relevant electrophiles under wine acidic pH. While sulfonation reactions of flavanols and thiols have been recently reported as key for wine preservation against oxidation, the transient mechanisms and physicochemical parameters responsible for that remain unknown. In the present study, sulfonation reaction kinetics of thiols and flavanols were monitored under simulated wine aging conditions. The reaction products were then characterized by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis, and their chemical stability during time was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Thiol and flavanol sulfonation reaction yields were both promoted by the presence of iron and oxygen, while their chemical stability was confirmed under the same conditions. The sulfonation derivatives of epicatechin and cysteine were synthesized and quantified in young and aged wines. Higher concentrations were reported for both metabolites in older wines, indicating their participation on the strongly bound sulfur dioxide fraction. These findings offer new prospects for more precise use of sulfur dioxide in winemaking.

Must protection, sulfites versus bioprotection: A metabolomic study

The reduction of chemical inputs in wine has become one of the main challenges of the wine industry. One of the alternatives to sulfites developed is bioprotection, which consists in using non-Saccharomyces strains to prevent microbial deviation. However, the impact of substituting sulfites by bioprotection on the final wine remains poorly studied. For the first time, we characterized this impact on Chardonnay wine through an integrative approach. Interestingly, physico-chemical analysis did not reveal any difference between both treatments regarding classical oenological parameters. Nevertheless, bioprotection did not seem to provide as much protection against oxidation as sulfites, as observed through phenolic compound analysis. At a deeper level, untargeted metabolomic analyses revealed substantial changes in wine composition according to must treatment. In particular, the specific footprint of each treatment revealed an impact on nitrogen-containing compounds. This observation could be related to modifications in S. cerevisiae metabolism, in particular amino acid biosynthesis and tryptophan metabolism pathways. Thus, the type of must treatment seemed to impact metabolic fluxes of yeast differently, leading to the production of different compounds. For example, we observed glutathione and melatonin, compounds with antioxidant properties, which were enhanced with sulfites, but not with bioprotection. However, despite substantial modifications in wines regarding their chemical composition, the change in must treatment did not seem to impact the sensory profile of wine. This integrative approach has provided relevant new insights on the impact of sulfite substitution by bioprotection on Chardonnay wines.

Novel insight into the role of sulfur dioxide in fruits and vegetables: Chemical interactions, biological activity, metabolism, applications, and safety

Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) are a category of chemical compounds widely used as additives in food industry. So far, the use of SO₂ in fruit and vegetable industry has been indispensable although its safety concerns have been controversial. This article comprehensively reviews the chemical interactions of SO₂ with the components of fruit and vegetable products, elaborates its mechanism of antimicrobial, anti-browning, and antioxidation, discusses its roles in regulation of sulfur metabolism, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/redox, resistance induction, and quality maintenance in fruits and vegetables, summarizes the application technology of SO₂ and its safety in human (absorption, metabolism, toxicity, regulation), and emphasizes the intrinsic metabolism of SO₂ and its consequences for the postharvest physiology and safety of fresh fruits and vegetables. In order to fully understand the benefits and risks of SO₂, more research is needed to evaluate the molecular mechanisms of SO₂ metabolism in the cells and tissues of fruits and vegetables, and to uncover the interaction mechanisms between SO₂ and the components of fruits and vegetables as well as the efficacy and safety of bound SO₂. This review has important guiding significance for adjusting an applicable definition of maximum residue limit of SO₂ in food.

Sulfonation Reactions behind the Fate of White Wine’s Shelf-Life

White wine’s oxidative stability after several years of bottle aging is synonymous to its organoleptic quality. In order to gain control over the cascade of chemical reactions that are implicated in that phenomenon, fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS)-based metabolomics and sensory evaluation were combined for the analysis of a vertical series of white wines from different vineyard plots. Data mining using supervised cluster analysis allowed the extraction of known and unknown sulfur- and nitrogen-containing molecular features, with oxidative stability molecular markers presenting an increased number of S and O atoms in their formulas. In their majority, S-containing molecular features possessed between 4 to ~12 O atoms, indicating the relatively higher importance of sulfonation reactions as opposed to dimerization reactions. Molecular networking, based on sulfonation reaction transformations, evidences the importance of hitherto unknown and/or minor sulfur dioxide binders (peptides, aldehydes, and polyphenols) on wine’s oxidative stability.

An Index for Wine Acetaldehyde Reactive Potential (ARP) and Some Derived Remarks about the Accumulation of Acetaldehyde during Wine Oxidation

The amount of acetaldehyde accumulated during wine oxidation was very small, far less than expected. The existence of polyphenols specifically reactive to acetaldehyde was postuled. In order to assess the acetaldehyde reactive potential (ARP) of wines, different reactive conditions have been studied: acetaldehyde concentration, temperature and pH. The evaluation/validation of developed ARP assay was made with 12 wines. Results have shown that high temperatures cannot be used to estimate wine ARP. In fact, at 70 °C acetaldehyde reacts strictly proportionally to wine total polyphenols. A reproducible index by letting wine at pH 2 react with 35 mgL⁻¹ of acetaldehyde for 7 days was obtained and applied to 12 wines. Rosés did not consume any, whites consumed 8% and reds between 18 and 38% of their total acetaldehyde content. After pH correction, whites ARP can be similar to low ARP reds. Basic kinetic considerations derived from the measurement of ARP were applied to interpret observed acetaldehyde accumulation and consumption during the forced oxidation of the 12 wines. It is concluded that wine ARPs cannot explain the huge fraction of acetaldehyde presumably consumed by wine and the fraction of H₂O₂ produced during oxidation and not consumed by SO₂ has to oxidize majorly wine components other than ethanol.