The presence of licit and illicit drugs in police stations and their implications for workplace drug testing

Establishing effective interpretation criteria in hair analysis to distinguish between passive and active cocaine exposure: Insights from authentic hair samples collected from professional individuals exposed to cocaine

Interpretation results of hair analysis, particularly for cocaine, can be challenging due to the need to differentiate between active use or passive contamination. Our study aimed to assess the impact of varying degrees of passive cocaine exposure hair analysis results and their interpretation. Hair samples (n = 25) were categorized based on the declared cocaine exposure of volunteers: (a) high, involving handling up to several kilograms of cocaine powder from dismantling illegal distribution sites; (b) medium, where staff dealt with cocaine blocks (up to kilograms); and (c) low, with staff in contact with up to grams of cocaine for laboratory analysis. Hair samples were decontaminated using dichloromethane, water, and methanol. The samples and final wash were analyzed for cocaine, benzoylecgonine, norcocaine, cocaethylene, m-OH-benzoylecgonine, and ecgonine methyl ester using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method. Cocaine hair concentrations ranges were as follows (pg/mg): high (n = 53 segments) < LLOQ(32)-7046; medium (n = 91) < LLOQ-939; and low (n = 54) < LLOQ-292. All hair samples had concentrations below the LLOQ for cocaethylene, ecgonine methyl ester, and m-OH-benzoylecgonine. Applying the SoHT cocaine cut-off in combination with a hair/wash ratio criterion identified 97% of the samples as contaminated. This study advocates for a comprehensive approach in evaluating cocaine hair concentrations. This involves integrating the 500 pg/mg decision limit for cocaine with a criterion comparing wash and hair concentration. Additionally, confirming the presence of specific metabolites is crucial. This multifaceted method effectively distinguishes between environmental contamination and active cocaine usage. The research contributes significantly to refining cocaine exposure assessment in professional contexts.

Net Weights: Visualizing and Quantifying their Contribution to Drug Background Levels in Forensic Laboratories

While the drug background in forensic laboratories has been quantified, the processes that most contribute to the background have not been extensively researched. This work presents both qualitative visualization and quantitative analysis of the spread of simulant drug particulate during the process of taking net weights. The process was modeled using three masses of powder (0.2 g, 2 g, and 100 g). The net weight process, in which the mixture was poured onto weighing paper, was mimicked and the resulting aerosolized particulate was allowed to settle. Wetted cotton swabs were then used to sample 6.45 cm² (1 in²) squares extending up to 61 cm (24 in) away from the weigh paper. The swabs were then extracted and quantified using LC-MS/MS and two-dimensional color plots were created to visualize the magnitude of particulate spread. Qualitative flow visualization of the process, accomplished using laser light sheet videography, was also completed to support the quantitative extraction experiments and provide a visual representation of the mechanism of particulate spread. Surface concentrations were found to be highest in the area immediately surrounding the weigh paper, though transport as far as 61 cm (24 in) was observed with all mass loadings. The amount of the material aerosolized and transported on the bench surrounding the weigh paper was dependent upon the mass of material being poured. These results highlight that weighing activities encountered in forensic labs may be a primary contributor to drug background and may be a potential source of inhalation exposure for chemists.

Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019

This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in controlled substances from 2016 to 2019 as a part of the 19th Interpol International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. The review papers are also available at the Interpol website at: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14458/file/Interpol%20Review%20Papers%202019.pdf.

Interpol review of toxicology 2016-2019

This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in toxicology from 2016 to 2019 as a part of the 19th Interpol International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. The review papers are also available at the Interpol website at: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14458/file/Interpol%20Review%20.Papers%202019.pdf.

An Easy to Implement Approach for Laboratories to Visualize Particle Spread During the Handling and Analysis of Drug Evidence

Recent work has shown that detectable levels of drugs exists on nearly all surfaces within a forensic laboratory - especially within the drug chemistry unit. This is an expected occurrence due to the handling and opening of drug evidence that contains powder material. The process of opening evidence, which produces aerosolized particulate that can settle on surfaces throughout the lab, has never been visualized. This work presents the first attempt to visualize the spread of particulate throughout the laboratory during the analysis of drug evidence and introduces an easy to implement approach laboratories can use to evaluate their specific protocols. By creating two simulated bricks of drugs that contained fluorescent particles, the spread of particulate was able to be monitored throughout the evidence handling process up to and including cleaning of surfaces after analysis. The protocols in this work, showed the spread of particulate, prior to cleaning, to be quite extensive, with transfer onto surfaces and items that were handled. In this study, cleaning with methanol after processing the evidence was shown to be effective at removing nearly all particulate that was released in the process. The use of visualization techniques such as this demonstrate promise for helping laboratories identify processes in their own protocols that may contribute to drug background levels and educate forensic chemists how trace residues spread.

What's in the bag? Analysis of exterior drug packaging by TD-DART-MS to predict the contents

The need for a safe and reliable presumptive test for law enforcement, first responders, and laboratory personnel is critical in the era of dangerous synthetic opioids and other novel psychoactive substances. Obtaining drug identification information without handling bulk powder is one way of accomplishing this task. This work evaluates whether trace residue on the exterior of drug packaging presents a potential source for presumptive testing. Utilizing a wipe-based approach, the outside of the packaging of nearly 200 case exhibits were sampled and analyzed by thermal desorption direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (TD-DART-MS). While residue on the law enforcement (outer) packaging was a poor indicator of the contents (less than 50% accurate), the exterior of the drug (inner) packaging was shown to be an excellent indicator of its contents (92% accurate). Quantitative analysis of the wipes, using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) showed that typical masses of residue on the exterior of packaging ranged from single to tens of micrograms - enough for detection by a number of trace detection tools. These initial results demonstrate that wipe-based trace sampling approaches present a promising, reliable, and safe method for presumptive testing by law enforcement, first responders, or laboratory personnel.

Bioaccessibility of Drug Residues on Common Police Station Work Surfaces

The fraction of any surface-adsorbed contaminant available for absorption is considered the bioaccessible fraction. Applied previously to contaminants such as pesticides and heavy metals on surfaces such as soil, food and cosmetics, the term may also be used to describe the fraction of drug residue bound to work surfaces which may be mobilized via contact transfer with human skin. Police station work surfaces have been shown to commonly contain low levels of drug residues as thin films; however, no information is available on how readily these residues may be transferred to human skin during direct or glancing contact. A bioaccessibility study was undertaken in which jojoba oil and artificial sebum were used to mimic human sebum to identify how readily a mix of six licit and illicit drugs were transferred from three commonly used police station work surfaces. Transfer from surfaces was slightly greater for jojoba oil than sebum when using a direct pressure contact or a wiping motion. Generally, less than 5% of applied residues were recovered via direct contact, and up to 10% when a wiping motion was used to simulate a glancing contact. While swabbing of work surfaces with methanol provides a suitable environmental audit of drug residues present, it does not represent the bioaccessible fraction of residues available for contact transfer, and hence, absorption via skin or unintentional ingestion. The current study indicates that the ability of sebum to mobilize drug residues from thin films on work surfaces via casual contact is limited, and sebum may potentially assist in the preservation of residues on pitted work surfaces and on skin.

A multi-laboratory investigation of drug background levels

Identifying and quantifying the drug background in operational environments such as forensic laboratories is an emerging body of research. Knowing these levels is crucial to addressing issues like occupational exposure risk - due to the emergence of potent novel psychoactive substances and synthetic opioids - and data integrity - due to improvements in instrument sensitivity. The work presented here builds upon a prior study to provide a broader representation of the average drug background levels found on surfaces in forensic laboratories. Over 700 samples from 20 laboratories were collected, extracted, and analyzed quantitatively using LC-MS/MS, and qualitatively using TD-DART-MS. Quantitative analysis by LC-MS/MS included a panel of 18 drugs while the non-targeted qualitative analysis by TD-DART-MS screened for over three hundred drugs and excipients. The study focused primarily on surfaces within the drug unit and evidence receiving area of the laboratories, but also investigated other operational units (crime scene, drug interdiction, latent prints, and toxicology) as well as report writing. Background levels were highest within the drug unit of the laboratory, though detectable (tens of nanograms) levels were observed in nearly all sampled areas. The data from this expanded study plays a critical role in addressing laboratory concerns such as establishing drug identification reporting limits for new instrumentation and establishing new workflow or cleaning protocols while also providing a more comprehensive dataset for general environmental background studies.

A snapshot of drug background levels on surfaces in a forensic laboratory

While background studies have been commonplace in many occupational fields for a long time, attempts to understand the chemical background in forensics labs has been largely understudied. Such studies can help define the efficiency of cleaning procedures and the integrity of collected data, which is becoming increasingly important due to improving sensitivity of instrumentation and the prevalence with which potent drugs of abuse, such as the opioids, are being seen. The results from this study provide a snapshot of the drug background levels on surfaces in a laboratory system comprised of a central laboratory and two satellite laboratories. Samples were collected from work surfaces by swiping with meta-aramid wipes, and extracted for analysis by LC/MS/MS, for quantitation, and TD-DART-MS, for non-targeted screening. Surfaces were sampled from within the drug unit (where drug evidence is processed) and the evidence receiving unit (where drug cases are handled) in all laboratories as well as the report writing area, the toxicology unit and the crime scene unit in the central laboratory. Results showed that the background was restricted primarily to the benches, balances, and instrumentation within the drug unit – with approximately an order of magnitude higher concentrations observed on the balances, compared to the benches. Higher levels were also observed in analyst specific surfaces when compared to general use surfaces within the drug unit – which corresponded to where bulk evidence handling was completed. Background in the evidence receiving and report writing sections was minimal. Comparison of the main laboratory to the satellite laboratories showed similarities amongst frequently encountered drugs like cocaine, but noticeable differences in opioids which could be attributed to differences in the make-up of exhibits each laboratory receives. Understanding the background levels of drugs in a forensic laboratory environment is crucial to improving cleaning protocols, helping define detection limits for highly sensitive analyses, and providing additional results to the broader community that has been establishing background levels in other environments.

Analysis of Contact Traces of Cannabis by In-Tube Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled to Nanoliquid Chromatography

Because of its inherent qualities, in-tube solid-phase microextraction (IT-SPME) coupled on-line to nanoliquid chromatography (nanoLC) can be a very powerful tool to address the new challenges of analytical laboratories such as the analysis of traces of complex samples. This is the case of the detection of contact traces of drugs, especially cannabis. The main difficulties encountered in the analysis of traces of cannabis plants on surfaces are the low amount of sample available (typically < 1 mg), the complexity of the matrix, and the low percentages of cannabinoic compounds in the samples. In this work, a procedure is described for the detection of residues of cannabis on different surfaces based on the responses obtained by IT-SPME coupled to nanoLC with UV diode array detection (DAD) for the cannabinoids Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabinol (CBN); the proposed conditions can also be applied for quantitative purposes through the measurement of the percentage of THC, the most abundant cannabinoid in plants. The method is based on collecting the suspected drug samples with cotton swabs, followed by the extraction of the target compounds by ultrasound assisted extraction. The extracts are then separated and processed by IT-SPME-nanoLC. The proposed approach has been applied to the detection of traces of cannabis in different kind of items (plastic bags, office paper, aluminum foil, cotton cloths, and hand skin). Sample amounts as low as 0.08 mg have been collected and analysed for THC. The selectivity and effect of the storage conditions on the levels of THC have also been evaluated. The percentages of THC in the samples typically ranged from 0.6% to 2.8%, which means that amounts of this compound as low as 1–2 µg were adequately detected and quantified. For the first time, the reliability of IT-SPME-nanoLC for the analysis of complex matrices such as cannabis plant extracts has been demonstrated.

Occupational health and safety in cannabis production: an Australian perspective

The legal Australian cannabis industry has been rapidly expanding due to increased awareness of the plant's therapeutic potential, as well its diverse range of applications including biofuel, textiles, building materials, food, nutritional supplement, and animal feed. The objective of this paper is to describe the current landscape of the commercial Australian cannabis industry, summarise occupational health and safety (OHS) hazards in cannabis-related working environments, and provide suggestions for safeguarding worker health and well-being in this emerging industry. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 1900 and 2017 was undertaken to identify case studies and original epidemiological research on OHS hazards associated with the cannabis cultivation and the manufacture of cannabis-based products. The review found that the majority of OHS studies were undertaken in the hemp textile industry during the late twentieth century, with a small number of articles published from a variety of occupational environments including forensic laboratories and recreational marijuana farms. Cannabis harvesting and initial processing is labour intensive, and presents a physical hazard Depending on the operation, workers may also be exposed to a variety of biological, chemical, and physical hazards including: organic dusts, bioaerosols, pollen/allergens, volatile organic compounds, psychoactive substances (tetrahydrocannabinol [THC])), noise, and ultraviolet radiation. Little research has been undertaken on the exposure to inhalable organic dust and other bioaerosols during the commercial cultivation and manufacture of cannabis-based products. Furthermore, there is an absence of Australian-based research and OHS guidance materials to help professionals develop risk management strategies in this evolving industry. It is recommended that: Investigation into the toxicological properties of cannabis dusts, specifically in relation to potential occupational exposures during cultivation and manufacture, should be a priority. The interim adoption of the respirable cotton dust exposure standard of 0.2 mg/m3 for workplace exposure in hemp facilities until a cannabis workplace exposure standard is developed, and that exposure to medicinal cannabis containing THC are kept as low as reasonably practicable. An industry partnership be established for the development of an Australian health and safety guideline for the production of medicinal cannabis and hemp. A classification to meet the requirements of the Global Harmonization Scheme should be undertaken to ensure consistency in the use of safety and risk phrases in cannabis-related industries.