Bulb biopsies for the diagnosis of celiac disease in pediatric patients

Role of Duodenal Bulb Biopsy in Diagnosing Suspected Celiac Disease in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Current guidelines recommend multiple biopsies from the first (D1) and second (D2) part of duodenum to establish a diagnosis of celiac disease. In this meta-analysis we aimed to find whether D1 biopsy can increase the diagnostic yield of adult celiac disease.

METHODS

Literature databases were searched until January 2023 for studies reporting diagnosis of celiac disease in the adult population using D1 biopsy. Meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I 2 % and 95% prediction interval statistics. Measured outcomes were diagnostic yield with D1 and D2 biopsies and from 4 versus 2 biopsy samples.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled diagnostic rate of celiac disease from D1 biopsy was 77.4% [95% CI (64.7-86.5, I 2 94%)] and from D2 biopsy was 75.3% [60.8-85.7, I 2 96%]. The pooled rate of increase in diagnostic yield with D1 biopsy was 6.9% I [4.6-10.2, I 2 66%]. The pooled diagnosis rate with 2 biopsy samples were 77.3% [50-92, I 2 93%] and 86.4% I [58.4-96.7, I 2 87%] from D1 and D2 respectively, whereas that with 4 biopsy samples were 83.3% [49.8-96.2, I 2 76%] and 70.5% I [51-84.6, I 2 96%] from D1 and D2, respectively, the difference being non-significant.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that taking 4 biopsy samples does not incur any additional diagnostic value over taking 2 biopsy samples from each duodenum segment. Although biopsy from the D1 and D2 has similar diagnostic yield in the adult population, there was an overall increase in diagnostic yield with D1 biopsy, especially in those with a patchy disease distribution.

Diagnosis of Seronegative and Ultrashort Celiac Disease

In its conventional form, celiac disease (CeD) is characterized by both positive serology and flat villi in the duodenum, and is well known by gastroenterologists and general practitioners. The aim of this review was to shed light on 2 neglected and not yet well-defined celiac phenotypes, that is, seronegative and ultrashort CeD. Seronegative CeD can be suspected in the presence of flat villi, positive HLA-DQ2 and/or HLA-DQ8, and the absence of CeD antibodies. After ruling out other seronegative enteropathies, the diagnosis can be confirmed by both clinical and histologic improvements after 1 year of a gluten-free diet. Ultrashort CeD is characterized by the finding of flat villi in the duodenal bulb in the absence of mucosal damage in the distal duodenum and with serologic positivity. Data on the prevalence, clinical manifestations, histologic lesions, genetic features, and outcome of seronegative and ultrashort CeD are inconclusive due to the few studies available and the small number of patients diagnosed. Some additional diagnostic tools have been developed recently, such as assessing intestinal transglutaminase 2 deposits, flow cytometry technique, microRNA detection, or proteomic analysis, and they seem to be useful in the identification of complex cases. Further cooperative studies are highly desirable to improve the knowledge of these 2 still-obscure variants of CeD.

Celiac Disease in Children: A 2023 Update

Celiac disease (CeD) is a chronic immune-mediated enteropathy, which occurs in genetically predisposed individuals by the ingestion of gluten proteins present in wheat, barley and rye. The global pooled prevalence of CeD is 0.7% and it has been reported from nations all around the globe and can affect individuals of any age. It has a wide clinical spectrum ranging from being asymptomatic to being symptomatic with severe manifestations. Though initial descriptions of CeD focused on the classical presentation with gastrointestinal manifestations, in recent years it has been found that more patients have non-classical manifestations such as anemia, osteoporosis, increased transaminases, failure to thrive or short stature. The definitive diagnosis of CeD is based on a combination of clinical history, serologic testing with/without examination of duodenal biopsies. The preferred initial serologic test regardless of age for the detection of CeD is the tissue transglutaminase (IgA anti-tTG). Children with a high tTG-IgA (≥10 ULN) AND a positive anti-endomysial IgA antibody (EMA) can be diagnosed to have CeD without the need for duodenal biopsies. The rest should undergo biopsies with at least 4 biopsies from the distal duodenum and at least 1 from the bulb. A correctly orientated biopsy showing increased intraepithelial cells and a villous to crypt ratio of <2 is suggestive of CeD. The management of CeD is a lifelong complete dietary avoidance of gluten. IgA-TGA acts as a surrogate marker for healing of the small-bowel mucosa and should be performed every 6 mo until normalization and then every 12-24 mo thereafter.

The Characteristics of Isolated Bulb Celiac Disease in Children

OBJECTIVES

Mucosal injury in celiac disease (CD) patients can be patchy, and up to 12% of CD patients can have mucosal changes limited to the duodenal bulb. Hence, recent guidelines recommend obtaining bulb biopsies in addition to distal duodenum. This study aimed to describe a cohort of children with isolated bulb CD and assess the benefit of separating bulb biopsies.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review between January 2011 and January 2022 at 2 medical centers was conducted. We included children with CD who underwent endoscopy with separated biopsies from the bulb and distal duodenum. A blinded pathologist performed Marsh-Oberhuber grading on selected cases.

RESULTS

We identified 224 CD patients, of which 33 (15%) had histologically confirmed isolated bulb CD. Patients with isolated bulb CD were older at diagnosis (10 vs 8 years; P = 0.03). Median anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (TTG IgA) level was lower in isolate bulb CD (2.8 vs 16.7 times the upper limit of normal [ULN], P < 0.001). Almost 88% (29/33) of isolated bulb CD patients had an anti-TTG IgA value of less than 10 times the ULN. Time to anti-TTG IgA normalization (mean 14 months) was similar between the 2 groups. A pathologist review of diagnostic biopsies could not distinguish between the bulb and distal duodenum biopsies in approximately one-third of the reviewed samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Separating bulb from distal duodenum biopsies can be considered during CD diagnosis, particularly in children with anti-TTG IgA levels less than 10 times the ULN. Larger prospective cohorts are needed to decide whether isolated bulb CD is a unique cohort or an early stage of the conventional CD.

Morphological evaluation of bulb and distal duodenal biopsies in pediatric celiac disease with clinical and serological correlation

Background and Aims

An early correct diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) is fundamental to reversal of symptoms and prevention of complications in pediatric patients. Our aim was to evaluate the role of duodenal bulb biopsy by studying the degree of mucosal damage in the duodenal bulb (D1) and second part of the duodenum (D2) and correlating the findings with serum IgA anti-tTG levels.

Settings and Design

Pediatric patients (age <18 years) with clinical suspicion of CD and positive IgA anti-tTG titers were consecutively enrolled over a period of one year. Demographic variables, anthropometry, clinical history, laboratory values and endoscopic findings were studied. Endoscopic biopsies obtained from D1 and D2 were evaluated and assigned histopathologic grades that were correlated with serology.

Statistical Analysis Used

Descriptive statistics were employed.

Results

A total of 37 clinically suspected cases of pediatric CD were studied. The mean age was 6.7 years and the M:F ratio was 1:1.3. Thirty-two (32) children had varying degrees of growth impairment. Eight (8) children had only extra-intestinal symptoms. Thirty (30) children were anemic, hypoalbuminemia was seen in five (5) children while transaminitis was seen in two (2) children. IgA anti-tTG >300 U/ml was associated with Marsh-Oberhuber Grade 3 morphology at atleast one site.

Conclusions

Low positive serology values should be confirmed by histopathology. Biopsies should be taken even in the absence of endoscopic abnormality. Additional D1 biopsies placed in a separate container can increase the diagnostic yield.

Coeliac disease in childhood: An overview

Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune condition, characterised by an immunological response to ingestion of gluten in genetically susceptible individuals, affecting about 1% of the population in many regions of the world. Increased knowledge regarding the pathogenesis, improved diagnostic techniques and increased awareness over the years have transformed our understanding of CD such that it is no longer a rare enteropathy, but rather a common multisystem disorder which affects individuals of all ages and results in wide-ranging clinical manifestations. Only a minority of children now present with the classical clinical picture of profound diarrhoea and malnutrition. An increasing number of children with CD present with either mild, non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms or extra-intestinal manifestations or even be asymptomatic, as in many screening-detected children. Knowledge about these diverse manifestations and a high index of suspicion is essential so that appropriate investigations can be undertaken, diagnosis established and treatment initiated. Although traditionally small bowel biopsy is considered essential for the diagnosis, recent guidelines from various professional bodies have paved the way to a biopsy-free diagnosis in a subset of symptomatic children. Life long, strict gluten-free diet still remains the only effective treatment at present, although several novel therapeutic agents are in various phases of clinical trials.

Duodenal Bulb Histology in Paediatric Celiac Disease: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists about optimal methods for duodenal biopsy in diagnosis of celiac disease (CD), in terms of both number of samples and anatomic location. The reliability of duodenal bulb biopsy has been questioned given that normal bulb architecture may mimic disease. However, multiple studies have reported patients with CD have histopathological lesions limited to proximal changes in the duodenal bulb alone.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared duodenal and duodenal bulb histology in a population of paediatric patients with CD and compared with a population of nonceliac controls at Stollery Children's Hospital, 2010 to 2012.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven paediatric patients diagnosed with CD and 16 nonceliac controls were included in the study. Fifty-three celiac patients (93.0%) had histopathology consistent with CD (modified Marsh score of 3A, 3B or 3C) in the duodenal bulb. The modified Marsh classification differed significantly between duodenum and duodenal bulb in nine celiac patients (15.8%). Of these, five (8.8%) had Marsh 3 in the bulb and Marsh 0 in the distal duodenum. Among controls, no patients had villous atrophy in either the distal duodenum or duodenal bulb, and all patients had a modified Marsh score of 0 at both sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study reinforce that duodenal bulb samples are critically important for diagnosing CD in paediatric patients. We suggest that duodenal bulb samples be submitted in separate containers from distal duodenal samples to facilitate accurate interpretation. In contrast to prior reports, we found villous blunting and intraepithelial lymphocytosis are actually uncommon findings in paediatric patients with nonceliac gastrointestinal disorders.

Williams-Beuren Syndrome and celiac disease: A real association?

Celiac disease (CD) screening in patients with Williams-Beuren Syndrome (WBS) is suggested, although data described in literature are discordant regarding CD prevalence in WBS. We retrospectively collected data from 101 WBS Italian patients [mean age: 13.5 years], to clarify the CD prevalence in a large cohort. All patients underwent a CD biochemical screening: IgA and anti-transglutaminase reflex antibodies (tTGA). CD-specific HLA typing was available for 42 patients. Small intestinal biopsy was performed in patients according to ESPGHAN guidelines. In 7 WBS patients an overt celiac disease was diagnosed. In 3 patients CD was confirmed by symptoms, HLA-DQ heterodimers and CD specific antibodies title, whereas in 4 patients, it was confirmed by a small intestinal biopsy. CD prevalence in our cohort is 6.9% (7/101). In 42/101 patients the CD-specific HLA typing was available, detecting 29/42 (69%) patients genetically predisposed to CD. The CD prevalence and CD-specific HLA prevalence are both higher than in the general population (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Our cohort is the most numerous described confirming that the CD risk in WBS patients is significantly greater than in general population. Moreover, our HLA typing results, as well as scientific literature, suggest that the higher CD prevalence in WBS patients might not be intrinsically related to the genetic disease itself but with the higher HLA prevalence. However, HLA typing should be performed in bigger WBS cohorts to confirm this hypothesis. Our data confirms that HLA typing is mandatory in WBS patients and that CD screening should be performed only if genetically predisposed.

Assessment of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidelines in an Australian paediatric population

Coeliac disease (CD) diagnosis is based on clinical assessment, detection of specific autoantibodies and histological examination of small intestinal biopsies. The European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidelines have recently been updated and recommend CD may be diagnosed without a biopsy or HLA typing in symptomatic patients with high titre IgA tissue transglutaminase antibodies (aTTG) and positive endomysial antibodies (EMA). However, the need for EMA in patients with high level aTTG has been questioned. We aimed to determine the diagnostic benefit of HLA typing, EMA and IgG antibodies to deamidated gliadin (DGP) in children with high level aTTG. We prospectively evaluated children presenting for assessment of possible CD. All patients underwent small bowel biopsy, serological testing and HLA typing. Results were analysed and correlated with histopathological diagnosis. A total of 209 children were assessed; 61.5% were found to have CD and 29% could have avoided biopsy as per 2020 ESPGHAN guidelines. Titres of aTTG ≥60 U/mL or DGP ≥28 U/mL gave 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value (PPV) for CD. HLA typing and EMA did not improve the PPV of patients with aTTG ≥60 U/mL, but addition of DGP ≥28 U/mL improved diagnostic sensitivity whilst retaining 100% specificity. Addition of HLA and EMA testing in patients with high titre aTTG antibodies does not improve diagnostic performance and may possibly be omitted from the serological workup in these patients. Our data support combining aTTG and DGP testing and optimising cut-offs to maximise specificity as an alternative biopsy-free diagnostic approach.

Duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnostic work-up of coeliac disease

Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune enteropathy which can present with patchy mucosal lesions. The aim of the present study is to investigate the significance of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnostic work-up of CD in both pediatric and adult patients, and to highlight the key points for pathologists. D1 (duodenal bulb) and D2 (distal duodenum) biopsies of 153 newly diagnosed serology-positive CD patients were evaluated for villous/crypt ratio and intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) counts on CD3-stained slides and were classified according to Marsh. Mucosal pathology was patchy in 15% (13% only D1 and 2% only D2) of patients, and 85% of patients had diffuse mucosal pathology involving both D1 and D2 biopsies which showed concordant histology in 60% and discordant in 25% of the cases. Though majority of the patients (75%) with only D1 involvement were pediatric cases, no significant difference was found between pediatric and adult patients when all cases were considered (17 vs 14%). Our results clearly indicate that without D1 sampling, diagnosis of CD would have been missed in a significant number of cases (13%), thereby highlighting the importance of taking duodenal biopsies from multiple sites in the diagnostic work-up of CD. We, therefore, conclude that every biopsy piece from both D1 and D2 should be carefully evaluated for the whole spectrum of mucosal changes caused by gluten ingestion and classified using a scheme based on Marsh to allow recognition of mild lesions.

European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2020

OBJECTIVES

The ESPGHAN 2012 coeliac disease (CD) diagnostic guidelines aimed to guide physicians in accurately diagnosing CD and permit omission of duodenal biopsies in selected cases. Here, an updated and expanded evidence-based guideline is presented.

METHODS

Literature databases and other sources of information were searched for studies that could inform on 10 formulated questions on symptoms, serology, HLA genetics, and histopathology. Eligible articles were assessed using QUADAS2. GRADE provided a basis for statements and recommendations.

RESULTS

Various symptoms are suggested for case finding, with limited contribution to diagnostic accuracy. If CD is suspected, measurement of total serum IgA and IgA-antibodies against transglutaminase 2 (TGA-IgA) is superior to other combinations. We recommend against deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (DGP-IgG/IgA) for initial testing. Only if total IgA is low/undetectable, an IgG-based test is indicated. Patients with positive results should be referred to a paediatric gastroenterologist/specialist. If TGA-IgA is ≥10 times the upper limit of normal (10× ULN) and the family agrees, the no-biopsy diagnosis may be applied, provided endomysial antibodies (EMA-IgA) will test positive in a second blood sample. HLA DQ2-/DQ8 determination and symptoms are not obligatory criteria. In children with positive TGA-IgA <10× ULN at least 4 biopsies from the distal duodenum and at least 1 from the bulb should be taken. Discordant results between TGA-IgA and histopathology may require re-evaluation of biopsies. Patients with no/mild histological changes (Marsh 0/I) but confirmed autoimmunity (TGA-IgA/EMA-IgA+) should be followed closely.

CONCLUSIONS

CD diagnosis can be accurately established with or without duodenal biopsies if given recommendations are followed.

Diagnostic accuracy and applicability of intestinal auto-antibodies in the wide clinical spectrum of coeliac disease

BACKGROUND

Intestinal coeliac auto-antibodies are the marker of coeliac disease (CD). Since the determination of these antibodies is still not widely available, we used immunoassays to identify the most suitable technology for revealing intestinal auto-antibodies in the wide clinical spectrum of CD.

METHODS

Intestinal auto-antibodies have been prospectively investigated in CD suspected children using two immunoassays: intestinal-deposits of IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG) and biopsy-culture IgA anti-endomysium (AEA). Intestinal IgM antibodies have been determined in IgA-deficient subjects.

FINDINGS

Two-hundred and twenty-one suspected CD patients were enrolled. Intestinal antibodies were tested positive for both assays in classical CD patients (n = 178) with villous atrophy and positive serum-CD antibodies, potential CD patients (n = 16) with normal intestinal mucosa and positive serum-CD antibodies, and pre-potential CD patients (n = 14) with normal intestinal mucosa and negative serum-CD antibodies. In 13/221 with normal intestinal mucosa, negative CD-serum antibodies and negative intestinal antibodies CD has been excluded. All classical, 14/16 potential and 11/14 pre-potential CD patients on gluten-free diet (GFD) improved their symptoms. In 9/11 pre-potential patients intestinal antibodies disappeared on GFD. Both assays were negative in 69/71 control subjects. The two assays showed high diagnostic sensitivity (100%) and specificity (99%).

INTERPRETATION

Intestinal CD-antibodies make prompt diagnosis in the wide clinical spectrum of CD reducing the delay in diagnosis and treatment, especially in pre-potential CD patients. The easy handling biopsy culture assay is an effective diagnostic tool which should be carried out by any gastroenterology unit to recognize all CD clinical manifestations.

FUNDING

Interreg Central-Europe, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo".

Efficacy of duodenal bulb biopsy for diagnosis of celiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Although duodenal biopsy is considered the "gold standard" for diagnosis of celiac disease, the optimal location of biopsy within the small bowel for diagnosis remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to perform a structured systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic utility of endoscopic duodenal bulb biopsy for celiac disease. Patients and methods  Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were performed from 2000 through December 2017. Review of titles/abstracts, full review of potentially relevant studies, and data abstraction was performed. Measured outcomes of adult and pediatric patients included location of biopsy, mean number of biopsies performed, and diagnosis of celiac disease as defined by the modified Marsh-Oberhuber classification. Results  A total of 17 studies (n = 4050) were included. Seven studies evaluated adults and 11 studies assessed pediatric populations. Mean age of adults and pediatric patients was 46.70 ± 2.69 and 6.33 ± 1.26 years, respectively. Overall, sampling from the duodenal bulb demonstrated a 5 % (95 % CI 3 - 9; P  < 0.001) increase in the diagnostic yield of celiac disease. When stratified by pediatric and adult populations, duodenal bulb biopsy demonstrated a 4 % (95 % CI: 1 to 9; P  < 0.001) and 8 % (95 % CI: 6 to 10; P  < 0.001) increase in the diagnostic yield of celiac disease. Non-celiac histologic diagnoses including Brunner gland hyperplasia and peptic duodenitis were reported more commonly in the duodenal bulb as compared to the distal duodenum with an increase in diagnostic yield of 4 % (95 % CI 3 - 5; P  < 0.001) and 1 % (95 % CI 1 - 2; P  < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions  Based upon our results, biopsy and histologic examination of duodenal bulb during routine upper endoscopy increases the diagnostic yield of celiac disease.

A prospective study to evaluate the role of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of celiac disease

BACKGROUND

Celiac disease (CeD) requires a biopsy from the small intestine to confirm the diagnosis. Conventionally, duodenal bulb (D1) was avoided as a biopsy site due to histological confounding factors at this site. However, sometimes, the bulb mucosa is the only affected site. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in duodenal bulb histology and compare it to distal duodenal histology and to analyze whether the addition of duodenal bulb biopsy increases the diagnostic yield of the CeD.

METHODS

It was a prospective study comprising of 98 patients of CeD who were symptomatic clinically and had positive anti tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody. Endoscopically four mucosal biopsies were taken, two each from the bulb and distal duodenum, and morphology was graded as per modified Marsh grade.

RESULTS

Iron deficiency anemia (40%) was a most common clinical presentation followed by chronic diarrhea (30%). Sixty patients showed same Marsh grade and 38 showed different Marsh grade at both sites. Patients who were showing the difference in the Marsh grade at the two biopsy sites, in place of; descending duodenum showed higher grade in 24 patients while higher mucosal atrophy was documented in the bulb in 14 patients. No patient of CeD had isolated D1 involvement. In eight patients, the correct diagnosis of CeD could be made only because of bulb biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Majority of the patients had no classical symptoms. Different Marsh grade at the two biopsy sites was documented demonstrating the patchy distribution of CeD. Combining biopsy from both bulb and descending duodenum maximizes the diagnostic yield of the CeD.

Small bowel villous atrophy: celiac disease and beyond

Small bowel villous atrophy can represent a diagnostic challenge for gastroenterologists and pathologists. In Western countries small bowel atrophy and mild non-atrophic alterations are frequently caused by celiac disease. However, other pathology can mimic celiac disease microscopically, widening the differential diagnosis. The several novelties on this topic and the introduction of the device-assisted enteroscopy in the diagnostic flowchart make an update of the literature necessary. Areas covered: In this review, a description of the different clinical scenarios when facing with small bowel mucosal damage, particularly small bowel atrophy, is described. The published literature on this subject has been summarized and reviewed. Expert commentary: When an intestinal mucosal alteration is histologically demonstrated, the pathology report forms part of a more complex workup including serological data, clinical presentation and clinical history. A multidisciplinary team, including pathologists and enteroscopy-devoted endoscopists, is frequently required to manage patients with small bowel alterations, especially in cases of severe malabsorption syndrome.

Paediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines

This guideline refers to infants, children, and adolescents ages 0 to 18 years. The areas covered include indications for diagnostic and therapeutic esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy; endoscopy for foreign body ingestion; corrosive ingestion and stricture/stenosis endoscopic management; upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; and endoscopic ultrasonography. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and endoscopy specific to inflammatory bowel disease has been dealt with in other guidelines and are therefore not mentioned in this guideline. Training and ongoing skill maintenance are to be dealt with in an imminent sister publication to this.

Analysis of Biopsies From Duodenal Bulbs of All Endoscopy Patients Increases Detection of Abnormalities but has a Minimal Effect on Diagnosis of Celiac Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients with positive results from serologic tests for celiac disease, analysis of tissues samples from the duodenal bulb, in addition to those from other parts of the small bowel, might increase the diagnostic yield. However, biopsies are not routinely collected from the duodenal bulb because of concerns that villous atrophy detected there could be caused by other disorders (Brunner glands or peptic duodenitis, gastric metaplasia, shorter villi, or lymphoid follicles). We investigated whether analysis of biopsies from duodenal bulbs of all patients undergoing endoscopy (a population with a low probability for celiac disease) increases diagnoses of celiac disease.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 679 patients (63% female; mean age, 50 years) from whom duodenal bulb and small bowel biopsies were collected during endoscopy at 3 Mayo Clinic sites, from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Records were reviewed for age, sex, pathology findings, serology test results (HLA DQ2 or DQ), indications for biopsy analyses, and adherence to a gluten-free diet. Patients with celiac disease were identified on the basis of increased intraepithelial lymphocytosis, with or without villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, and results from serology tests. Findings from duodenal bulbs were compared with diagnoses using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Of all patients undergoing endoscopy, 16 patients (2%) were found to have celiac disease. Analysis of the duodenal bulb biopsies identified 1 patient (0.1%) with celiac disease limited to this region. Of 399 patients whose celiac serology was not known before endoscopic examination, only 2 patients had histologic changes consistent with celiac disease but not limited to duodenal bulb. Abnormal duodenal histology was detected in 265 patients (39%), most commonly in the bulb (n = 241; P < .0001). Of abnormal bulb histologies, chronic peptic duodenitis was most common (observed in 114 patients, 47%). In patients with a normal distal duodenum (n = 576), the duodenal bulb had abnormal histology in 162 (28%).

CONCLUSIONS

In a low pretest probability cohort, separate sampling of the duodenal bulb had minimal effect on celiac disease detection. Abnormal histologic findings are more commonly detected in the duodenal bulb; although they do not seem to impair identification of celiac disease, their clinical implications are unclear.

Clinical and Immunologic Features of Ultra-Short Celiac Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The clinical effects of gluten-sensitive enteropathy with villous atrophy limited to the duodenal bulb (D1) have not been delineated in adults with celiac disease. We investigated the sensitivity of D1 biopsy analysis in the detection of celiac disease, the number and sites of biopsies required to detect ultra-short celiac disease (USCD, villous atrophy limited to D1), and the clinical phenotype of USCD.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 1378 patients (mean age, 50.3 y; 62% female) who underwent endoscopy at a tertiary medical center in the United Kingdom from 2008 through 2014; routine duodenal biopsy specimens were collected from D1 and the second part of the duodenum (D2). Quadrantic D1 biopsy specimens were collected from 171 consecutive patients with a high suspicion of celiac disease (mean age, 46.5 y; 64% female). Clinical data from patients diagnosed with USCD, based on biopsy analysis, were compared with those from patients with conventional celiac disease (CCD) (villous atrophy beyond D1) and individuals without celiac disease (controls). The number of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) and immune phenotypes were compared between D1 vs D2 in patients with celiac disease.

RESULTS

Of the 1378 patients assessed, 268 (19.4%) were diagnosed with celiac disease; 9.7% of these patients had villous atrophy confined to D1 (USCD; P < .0001). Collection of a single additional biopsy specimen from any D1 site increased the sensitivity of celiac disease detection by 9.3%-10.8% (P < .0001). Patients with USCD were younger (P = .03), had lower titers of tissue transglutaminase antibody (P = .001), and less frequently presented with diarrhea (P = .001) than patients with CCD. Higher proportions of patients with CCD had ferritin deficiency (P = .007) or folate deficiency (P = .003) than patients with USCD or controls. Patients with celiac disease had a median of 50 IELs/100 enterocytes in D1 and a median of 48 IELs/100 enterocytes (P = .7) in D2. The phenotype of IELs from patients with D1 celiac disease was indistinguishable from those of patients with D2 celiac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Collection of a single additional biopsy specimen from any site in the D1 intestine increases the sensitivity of detection for celiac disease. Patients with USCD may have early stage or limited celiac disease, with a mild clinical phenotype and infrequent nutritional deficiencies.

Revisiting Pathological Criteria for Earlier Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) remains sometimes difficult because the histological criteria are not fully met. The aim of this study was to refine histological diagnostic criteria of CD.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-five duodenal bulb D1 (n = 79) and duodenal D2 (n = 96) biopsies of 96 patients with CD (58 girls, mean age 7 years), 135 normal D2 biopsies (69 girls, mean age 12 years), and 64 D2 biopsies of other digestive disorders (DDs) (39 girls, mean age 13 years) obtained from children during a period of 4 years were reviewed.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was greater for the classification of Corazza-Villanacci than for Marsh-Oberhuber (κ = 0.812 vs κ = 0.409, respectively). Between 40 and 70 intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) per 100 epithelial cells (ECs), 32% of patients were CD, whereas 50% had other DD. Above 70 IELs per 100 EC, 53% were CD, and only 6% had other DD. In CD, IELs were significantly located above EC nuclei compared with other DD, (12 IELs/100 EC vs 2 IELs/100 EC, respectively). In 21% of CD cases, D2 were normal and the diagnosis could only be made on D1. Finally, 6% of CD cases showed isolated increase of IELs in D1 without architectural modification.

CONCLUSIONS

D1 allowed diagnosis of CD in 21% of cases and IEL >70 per 100 EC correlated strongly with CD. Between 40 and 70 IELs per 100 EC, CD is very likely but other DD must be considered. Finally, the preferential localisation of IELs above EC nuclei favours CD, and increased IEL in D1 may be the sole abnormality.

Celiac Disease: Ten Things That Every Gastroenterologist Should Know

There are 10 things that all gastroenterologists should know about celiac disease (CD). (1) The immunoglobulin A tissue transglutaminase is the single best serologic test to use for the detection of CD. (2) CD can be recognized endoscopically, and water immersion enhances villi detection, although a normal endoscopic appearance does not preclude the diagnosis. (3) It is recommended that 4 biopsies be taken from the second part of the duodenum and 2 bulb biopsies be taken at the 9 o'clock and 12 o'clock positions to maximize the sensitivity for histologic confirmation of CD. (4) Consider serologic testing of first-degree relatives, patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, Down's, Turner's, and Williams' syndromes, as well as those with premature osteoporosis, iron deficiency, abnormal liver biochemistries, and other manifestations of CD. (5) Patients already on a prolonged gluten-free diet (GFD) should be tested for the presence of HLA DQ2 or DQ8, thereby avoiding the need for further evaluation of CD in non-allelic carriers. (6) The basic treatment of CD is a strict, lifelong GFD, enabled by an expert dietitian. (7) Newly diagnosed adults with CD should be assessed for micronutrient deficiencies (iron, B12, folate, zinc, copper), fat soluble vitamin deficiencies (vitamin D), and bone densitometry. (8) All patients diagnosed with CD should have clinical follow-up to ensure response and adherence to a GFD. (9) In those with persistent or relapsing symptoms, the robustness of the original diagnosis should be reviewed, gluten exposure sought, and a systematic evaluation for alternative and associated diseases performed. (10) Evaluate those with refractory disease for malignant transformation.

Mapping histologic patchiness of celiac disease by push enteroscopy

BACKGROUND

Despite great improvements in serologic testing, duodenal biopsies are still required to diagnose the majority of celiac disease (CD) cases. Nevertheless, the histologic pattern of CD is often patchy, leading to the risk of missing the diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the patchiness of the CD histologic lesions along the small bowel (SB), push enteroscopy has been performed instead of conventional upper GI endoscopy.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-center study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 41 pediatric patients with suspected CD.

INTERVENTION

Prospective evaluation of bulb, duodenal, and jejunal biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of CD.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Pattern of lesion distribution along the SB (from bulb up to 60 cm beyond the ligament of Treitz) and yield as well accuracy of pediatric CD diagnosis by using push enteroscopy.

RESULTS

There was a homogeneous pattern of histologic damage in 17 patients (41.5%), whereas 24 patients (58.5%) had a lesion pattern of patchiness. The second and fourth duodenal regions were involved in 38 children (92.7%) and 37 children (90.2%), respectively; the bulb was involved in 37 patients (90.2%); both distal and proximal jejunal samples showed histologic lesions in 38 children (92.7%). In 1 patient, without lesions in the bulb and duodenum, CD was diagnosed according to proximal and distal jejunal biopsies only (3B and C, respectively). A significant correlation was found between the degree of villous atrophy and the serum anti-transglutaminase titer.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size; academic tertiary-care setting.

CONCLUSION

CD histologic lesions often have a discontinuous distribution along the SB, occasionally with an exclusive jejunal involvement. A high degree of villous atrophy correlates with a high anti-transglutaminase titer. When the new ESPGHAN "biopsy-sparing" criteria are not applicable, in case of potential CD, push enteroscopy might be a valuable second-step tool to re-evaluate and identify false "potential" CD hiding exclusive jejunal lesions.

Diagnostic dilemmas in celiac disease

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated systemic condition triggered by dietary gluten occurring in genetically susceptible individuals. Our understanding of its numerous and varied clinical presentations has evolved over time, which has contributed to the incidence of CD increasing. In most cases, the diagnosis is readily established and patients promptly improve after commencing a gluten-free diet (GFD). However, in some, the diagnosis is not straightforward and presents a challenge to clinicians. Potential dilemmas include those with positive serology but normal histology, negative serology but abnormal duodenal mucosal histology, failure to respond to a GFD or response to a GFD without evidence of CD. In recent years, development of new assays and modifications to existing diagnostic algorithms for CD has also challenged the traditional role of small-bowel histology as critical in CD diagnosis.

Duodenal bulb biopsy in children for the diagnosis of coeliac disease: experience from Perth, Australia

AIM

The study aims to assess the usefulness of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) in a paediatric population.

METHODS

Since February 2009, in our institution, we have routinely included duodenal bulb biopsy in addition to distal duodenal biopsies in children undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. All children diagnosed with CD between February 2009 and May 2011 were identified, and those children who had biopsy finding of CD limited to duodenal bulb were reviewed with regard to clinical, serological and histopathological parameters. Duodenal bulb biopsy reports of those children who did not have CD were also reviewed as control group.

RESULTS

A total of 101 children were diagnosed with CD during the study period. The mean age was 8.21 years (±3.63), 33 males and 68 females. There were 8 out of 101 (7.92%) who had histological changes consistent with CD exclusively in the duodenal bulb, with normal histology in the distal duodenum. None of duodenal bulb biopsy was abnormal in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

In some children, diagnostic CD changes may be limited to the duodenal bulb only and hence we recommend that duodenal bulb biopsies be included routinely in children suspected with CD to improve the diagnostic yield.

Duodenal bulb biopsies for diagnosing adult celiac disease: is there an optimal biopsy site?

BACKGROUND

Recent studies highlight the role of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of celiac disease.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a targeted duodenal bulb biopsy in addition to distal duodenal biopsies is the optimal strategy to identify villous atrophy.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

Seventy-seven patients undergoing clinically indicated EGD with duodenal biopsies were recruited. Of these, 28 had newly diagnosed celiac disease and 49 were controls.

INTERVENTIONS

At endoscopy, 8 duodenal biopsy specimens were taken: 4 from the second part of the duodenum and 4 quadrantically from the bulb (at the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-o'clock positions).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Increasing the diagnostic yield and detection of the most severe villous atrophy in celiac disease with the addition of a targeted duodenal bulb biopsy.

RESULTS

The most severe degree of villous atrophy was detected when distal duodenal biopsy specimens were taken in addition to a duodenal bulb biopsy specimen from either the 9- or 12-o'clock position (96.4% sensitivity; 95% CI, 79.7%-100%). The difference between the 12-o'clock position biopsy and the 3-o'clock position biopsy in detecting the most severe villous atrophy was 92% (24/26) versus 65% (17/26) (P = .02).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample and study performed in a tertiary referral center.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the patchy appearance of villous atrophy that occurs within the duodenum. A targeted duodenal bulb biopsy from either the 9- or 12-o'clock position in addition to distal duodenal biopsies may improve diagnostic yields by detecting the most severe villous atrophy within the duodenum.

Duodenal bulb in celiac adults: the "whether biopsying" dilemma

BACKGROUND

Celiac disease (CD)-related lesions were described in duodenal bulb of celiac patients.

GOAL

Our aim was to evaluate the morphology of bulb mucosa in adult celiac patients and in controls to evaluate its usefulness for CD diagnosis.

STUDY

We studied 43 celiac patients (10 male, median age: 35.2 y) at diagnosis and 43 gastroenterological controls (10 male, median age: 37.8 y), submitted to upper endoscopy for gastroenterological complaints. Histologic lesions were assayed by an experienced pathologist according to the Marsh modified classification. Antiendomysium antibodies and antitransglutaminase antibodies-tTGAb (ELISA and/or RIA) have been tested. In selected patients, DNA was typed for DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 genes by sequence-specific primer polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

In all celiac patients lesions were present in the bulb mucosa. One female with thyroiditis, who had a CD daughter, showed lesions only in the duodenal bulb. Patchy villous atrophy was found in another patient. All celiacs were antiendomysium and/or tTGAb positive. DQ2 heterodimer was present in 5 CD patients. The gastroenterological controls showed normal mucosa in the duodenum.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that CD-related histologic lesions are present in duodenal bulb of adult patients. Moreover, the normal aspect of this mucosa in gastroenterological controls implies the high negative predictive value of this finding. Therefore, we suggest taking at least 1 biopsy on the bulb area and 1 from the distal duodenum for CD diagnosis, in all the patients submitted to upper endoscopy, to avoid missed or delayed diagnosis.

Advances in coeliac disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article critically summarizes the recent scientific and clinical advances in coeliac disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Epidemiological studies have shown that coeliac disease is as common in parts of Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe as in the western world. Genome-wide association studies continue to identify genetic susceptibilities that are both unique to coeliac disease and overlap with other autoimmune diseases. Human leukocyte antigen genotyping offers additional sensitivity in detecting coeliac disease in individuals who have self-prescribed gluten-free diets (GFD) or have atypical presentations. Immunological advances have highlighted the potential proinflammatory pitfalls of vitamin A supplementation in active coeliac disease and have enabled identification of oat and barley subsets that may be safely incorporated into coeliac diets. Large population-based studies have expanded our knowledge of the long-term risks of coeliac disease, in addition to excluding infertility as a cause for concern once a GFD has been established.

SUMMARY

The long-term implications of active coeliac disease emphasize the need for early detection and strict adherence to GFD, which remains the cornerstone of management. Technological advances in food modulation and immuno-therapies offer promise, but remain in the translational phases of clinical trials at present.

Disaccharidase deficiency in pediatric patients with celiac disease and intact villi

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The "gold standard" for the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) is the small intestinal biopsy. A significant number of biopsies are inadequate for interpretation. Furthermore, the labeling of a biopsy as a Marsh I or II is somewhat subjective and may vary with the experience of the pathologist. Our hypothesis is that patients with intact villi undergoing biopsies frequently have associated disaccharidase deficiencies (DSD).

METHODS

We reviewed 220 charts of pediatric patients with CD and selected those with a duodenal biopsy Marsh score of I/II. The disaccharidase (DS) levels of these patients were compared with a randomly selected, age-matched control group. DSD is defined as levels below the lower limits of normal.

RESULTS

Lactase (mean lactase = 18.8 in the control group vs. 4.2 in the diseased group, p = 0.004); sucrase (mean sucrase = 46.4 in the control group vs. 21.4 in the diseased group, p = 0.001); maltase (mean maltase = 138 in the control group vs. 52.5 in the diseased group, p = 0.001); palatinase (mean palatinase = 9.6 in the control group vs. 3.3 in the diseased group, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a profound deficiency of DS levels in pediatric patients with CD who have intact villi.

A prospective study of duodenal bulb biopsy in newly diagnosed and established adult celiac disease

OBJECTIVES

Recent reports suggest that the duodenal bulb may be the only site to demonstrate villous atrophy (VA) in celiac disease. However, there is a paucity of data from newly diagnosed adult celiac patients and no data from those patients with established celiac disease. The objective of this study was to compare the histological findings in the duodenal bulb and distal duodenum of patients with adult celiac disease (newly diagnosed or established) against controls.

METHODS

A total of 461 patients were prospectively recruited. Biopsies were graded using the Marsh criteria.

RESULTS

In all, 461 patients (300 females and 161 males) with median age 51 years were analyzed. In all, 126 had newly diagnosed celiac disease, 85 established celiac disease, and 250 controls. New diagnosis celiac disease (9%, P<0.0001) and established celiac disease (14%, P<0.0001) were more likely than controls to have VA in the bulb alone. Overall, when comparing the histological lesion of the bulb against the distal duodenum, 31/85 with established celiac disease (P<0.0001) and 21/126 newly diagnosed (P=0.0067) had a discrepancy in the severity of the lesion between the two sites compared with 18/250 controls. In all, 24/31 with established celiac disease and 16/21 newly diagnosed had the more severe lesion in the bulb.

CONCLUSIONS

VA may be present only in the duodenal bulb. This study suggests that the optimal assessment of patients in whom celiac disease is suspected (with positive serology) and those with established celiac disease requires a duodenal bulb biopsy in addition to distal duodenal biopsies.