1
|
Feng L, Guan J, Dong R, Zhao K, Zhang M, Xia S, Zhang Y, Chen L, Xiao F, Liao J. Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy: A meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 2024; 17:341-350. [PMID: 38651546 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively explore the risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation (IBP). METHODS We searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases up to August 24, 2023, to identify observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined risk factors for IBP. A random effects model was used to pool the adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS A total of 125 studies (91 observational studies, 34 RCTs) were included. Meta-analyses of observational studies revealed that three preparation-related factors, namely, characteristics of last stool (solid or brown liquid), incomplete preparation intake, and incorrect diet restriction, were strong predictors of IBP. The other factors were moderately correlated with IBP incidence, including demographic variables (age, body mass index, male sex, Medicaid insurance, and current smoking), comorbidities (diabetes, liver cirrhosis, psychiatric disease, Parkinson's disease, previous IBP, poor mobility, inpatient, and Bristol stool form 1/2), medications (tricyclic antidepressants, opioids, antidepressants, narcotics, antipsychotics, and calcium channel blockers), and preparation-related factors (preparation-to-colonoscopy interval not within 3 to 5/6 h, nonsplit preparation, and preparation instructions not followed). No colonoscopy indications were found to be related to IBP. Meta-analyses of RCTs showed that education, constipation, stroke/dementia, and discomfort during preparation were also moderately associated with IBP. Most of the other findings were consistent with the pooled results of observational studies. However, primarily due to imprecision and inconsistency, the certainty of evidence for most factors was very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS We summarized five categories of risk factors for IBP. Compared to demographic variables, comorbidities, medications, and colonoscopy indications, preparation-related elements were more strongly associated with IBP. These findings may help clinicians identify high-risk individuals and provide guidance for IBP prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jialun Guan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ruonan Dong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kai Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Mingyu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Suhong Xia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Liping Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Fang Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiazhi Liao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou X, Wu J, Li H, Zeng X, Luo HL. Efficacy of a full management model in daytime surgery for gastrointestinal polyps based on WeChat: A study protocol for randomized controlled trials. J Eval Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 38798179 DOI: 10.1111/jep.14022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to improve the efficiency of daytime surgery for gastrointestinal polyp and ensure the safety of patients. We tried an information management method based on WeChat platform in patients undergoing daytime gastrointestinal polypectomy and to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of a full management model. METHODS Five hundred and ninety-three patients were randomly divided into two groups: the control group was treated with traditional management methods and the experimental group was treated with the whole-process management mode based on the WeChat platform. The WeChat platform-based full management model included establishing a day surgery management WeChat group, developing multidisciplinary, full-management protocols and processes for day surgery, establishing an information-based surgical scheduling system and adopting diverse forms of day surgery education and continuity of care. This feature included illustrated brochures, vivid verbal presentations, WeChat public numbers and Internet management platforms. The treatment time, hospitalization cost and patient satisfaction of the two groups were counted. RESULTS In the experimental group, 408 patients were enrolled. The preoperative waiting time and patients' length of stay were 3 days and 1 day, respectively. The medical and nursing intake time was 7 min. The procedure cancellation rate and postoperative complications rate was 0.07% and 0.02%. In the control group, 185 patients were enrolled in the study, The preoperative waiting time and patients' length of stay was 7 days and 3 days. The medical and nursing intake time was 28 min. The procedure cancellation rate and postoperative complications rate were 0.13% and 0.05%, respectively. The hospitalization costs were reduced by an average of $140/person and the satisfaction scores were higher than the control group. In summary, the preoperative waiting time, medical reception time, surgical cancellation rate, length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost in the observation group were less than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Through the full management model based on WeChat, the preoperative waiting time, medical reception time, surgical cancellation rate, length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost in the experimental group were less than those in the control group. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher than those in the control group and the difference was statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Jiao Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Xin Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Huai-Li Luo
- Department of Cardiology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen L, Kang X, Ren G, Luo H, Zhang L, Wang L, Zhao J, Zhang R, Zhang X, Zhao L, Pan Y. Individualized intervention based on a preparation-related prediction model improves adequacy of bowel preparation: A prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled study. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:436-443. [PMID: 37735023 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
AIMS An easy-to-use preparation-related model (PRM) predicting inadequate bowel preparation (BP) was developed and proved superior to traditional models in our previous study. Here we aimed to investigate whether PRM-based individualized intervention can improve BP adequacy. METHODS Patients undergoing morning colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled in 5 endoscopic centers in China. After standard BP of split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) was completed, patients were randomized (1:1) to the individualized group or standard group. High-risk patients predicted by PRM score ≥3 were instructed to drink an additional 1.5 L PEG in the individualized group while not in standard group. The primary endpoint was the rate of adequate BP, defined by segmental Boston bowel preparation scale ≥2. Secondary outcomes included adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adverse events. RESULTS 900 patients were randomly allocated to the individualized group (n = 449) and the control (n = 451). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The rates of high-risk patients were 19.6 % in individualized group and 19.7 % in standard group. In intention-to-treat analysis, adequate BP was 91.8 % in individualized group and 84.7 % in the standard group (p = 0.001). Among high-risk patients, adequate BP rate was 94.3 % in individualized group and 49.3 % in standard group (p < 0.001), and ADR were 40.9 % vs 16.9 %, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found regarding the adverse events and willingness to repeat BP (all p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS The individualized intervention using an additional dose of PEG to high-risk patients predicted by PRM, significantly improved BP quality. The intervention significantly improved ADR in high-risk patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04434625).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaoyu Kang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Gui Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hui Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Linhui Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Limei Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shaanxi Second People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jianghai Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China
| | - Rongchun Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hongai Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaoying Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Lina Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China; Department of Radiotherapy, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Yanglin Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gimeno-García AZ, Sacramento-Luis D, Cámara-Suárez M, Díaz-Beunza M, Delgado-Martín R, Cubas-Cubas AT, Gámez-Chávez MS, Pinzón L, Hernández-Negrín D, Jiménez A, González-Alayón C, de la Barreda R, Hernández-Guerra M, Nicolás-Pérez D. Comparative Study of Predictive Models for the Detection of Patients at High Risk of Inadequate Colonic Cleansing. J Pers Med 2024; 14:102. [PMID: 38248803 PMCID: PMC10820399 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Various predictive models have been published to identify outpatients with inadequate colonic cleansing who may benefit from intensified preparations to improve colonoscopy quality. The main objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of three predictive models for identifying poor bowel preparation in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy over a 3-month period. We evaluated and compared three predictive models (Models 1-3). The quality of colonic cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. We calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval for each model. Additionally, we performed simple and multiple logistic regression analyses to identify variables associated with inadequate colonic cleansing and developed a new model. Results: A total of 649 consecutive patients were included in the study, of whom 84.3% had adequate colonic cleansing quality. The AUCs of Model 1 (AUC = 0.67, 95% CI [0.63-0.70]) and Model 2 (AUC = 0.62, 95% CI [0.58-0.66]) were significantly higher than that of Model 3 (AUC = 0.54, 95% CI [0.50-0.58]; p < 0.001). Moreover, Model 1 outperformed Model 2 (p = 0.013). However, the new model did not demonstrate improved accuracy compared to the older models (AUC = 0.671). Conclusions: Among the three compared models, Model 1 showed the highest accuracy for predicting poor bowel preparation in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy and could be useful in clinical practice to decrease the percentage of inadequately prepared patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Z. Gimeno-García
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Davinia Sacramento-Luis
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Marta Cámara-Suárez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - María Díaz-Beunza
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Rosa Delgado-Martín
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Ana T. Cubas-Cubas
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - María S. Gámez-Chávez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Lucía Pinzón
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Domingo Hernández-Negrín
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Alejandro Jiménez
- Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 Tenerife, Spain;
| | - Carlos González-Alayón
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Raquel de la Barreda
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Manuel Hernández-Guerra
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - David Nicolás-Pérez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (D.S.-L.); (M.C.-S.); (M.D.-B.); (R.D.-M.); (A.T.C.-C.); (M.S.G.-C.); (L.P.); (D.H.-N.); (C.G.-A.); (R.d.l.B.); (M.H.-G.); (D.N.-P.)
- Internal Medicine Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parodi MC, Antonelli G, Galloro G, Radaelli F, Manes G, Manno M, Camellini L, Sereni G, Caserta L, Arrigoni A, Fasoli R, Sassatelli R, Pigò F, Iovino P, Scimeca D, De Luca L, Rizkala T, Tringali A, Campari C, Capogreco A, Testoni SGG, Bertani H, Fantin A, Mitri RD, Familiari P, Labardi M, De Angelis C, Anghinoni E, Rubeca T, Cassoni P, Zorzi M, Mussetto A, Hassan C, Senore C. SIED-GISCOR recommendations for colonoscopy in screening programs: Part I - Diagnostic. Dig Liver Dis 2023:S1590-8658(23)01070-8. [PMID: 38105148 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
The implementation of FIT programs reduces incidence and mortality from CRC in the screened subjects. The ultimate efficacy for CRC morbidity and mortality prevention in a FIT program depends on the colonoscopy in FIT+ subjects that has the task of detecting and removing these advanced lesions. Recently, there has been growing evidence on factors that influence the quality of colonoscopy specifically withing organized FIT programs, prompting to dedicated interventions in order to maximize the benefit/harm ratio of post-FIT colonoscopy. This document focuses on the diagnostic phase of colonoscopy, providing indications on how to standardise colonoscopy in FIT+ subjects, regarding timing of examination, management of antithrombotic therapy, bowel preparation, competence and sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulio Antonelli
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy; Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Ariccia, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Galloro
- Surgical Endoscopy Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Giampiero Manes
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Manno
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL, (Modena), Modena, Carpi, Italy
| | | | - Giuliana Sereni
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Luigi Caserta
- Department of Medicine - Unit of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Liguria, Italy
| | - Arrigo Arrigoni
- Diagnostic and Interventional Digestive Endoscopy, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, Turin, Italy
| | - Renato Fasoli
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo 12100, Italy
| | - Romano Sassatelli
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Flavia Pigò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Paola Iovino
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana," University of Salerno, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Daniela Scimeca
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca De Luca
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milano, Italy
| | - Tommy Rizkala
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Cinzia Campari
- Screening Unit, AUSL IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Antonio Capogreco
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Sabrina Gloria Giulia Testoni
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Helga Bertani
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL, (Modena), Modena, Carpi, Italy
| | - Alberto Fantin
- Unit of Surgical Oncology of Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Pietro Familiari
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, RM, Italy; Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, RM, Italy
| | - Maurizio Labardi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Firenze Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Claudio De Angelis
- Department of General and Specialist Medicine, Gastroenterologia-U, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Emanuela Anghinoni
- Servizio Medicina Preventiva nelle Comunità - AUSL Mantova, via Dei Toscani 1, 46100 Mantova, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rubeca
- S.C. Laboratorio regionale prevenzione oncologica, ISPO, Firenze, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Medical Science, Pathology unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Manuel Zorzi
- Veneto Tumor Registry, Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mussetto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Viale Vincenzo Randi, 5, Ravenna 48121, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
| | - Carlo Senore
- SSD Epidemiologia e screening - CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abu Baker F, Samhat A, Taher Natour R, Zeina AR, Kopelman Y. Colonoscopy in the young: An indication-based analysis of outcome. J Investig Med 2023; 71:797-803. [PMID: 37530168 DOI: 10.1177/10815589231193953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on colonoscopy's diagnostic yield in young adults with lower gastrointestinal symptoms are scarce. We evaluated this yield in young patients by performing an indication-based analysis of outcomes. METHODS We reviewed diagnostic colonoscopies performed in young adults (age <50 years) over 10 years. We created two groups of young adults (18-39 years, n = 4941) and quadragenarians (40-49 years; n = 6605), included a control group of average-risk patients referred for screening colonoscopies during the same period (50-60 years, n = 1453). We evaluated clinical indications for colonoscopies among the young and performed an indication-based analysis of patients' outcomes. RESULTS Chronic diarrhea and abdominal pain (42.4 and 36.2%), rectal bleeding (19.8 and 18.4%), and constipation were major indications for colonoscopy performance in quadragenarian and younger patients, respectively. Overall, diverticulosis (8.7 vs 1.3 and 3.9%; p1,2 < 0.000) and polyp detection rates (PDR) (19.6 vs 6.1 and 12.1; p1,2 < 0.000) were significantly higher in the control group, while inflammatory bowel disease (10.9 and 3.6% vs 0.1%; p1,2 < 0.000) was more prevalent in both young patients' groups. Indication-based analysis revealed that rectal bleeding was linked with increased PDR and significantly and independently associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) development (odds ratio = 10.160. p < 0.001 and 95% confidence interval = 6.201-16.647), even in the younger patients. In contrast, performing a colonoscopy for the evaluation of constipation was associated with the lowest yield. CONCLUSION We outlined the expected diagnostic yields of colonoscopy performed in young patients for multiple indications, showing that rectal bleeding was consistently associated with CRC and polyp detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi Abu Baker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillel Yaffe medical center, Hadera, Israel
- Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ahmad Samhat
- Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
- Department of internal medicine, Hillel Yaffe medical center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Randa Taher Natour
- Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
- Department of internal medicine, Hillel Yaffe medical center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Abdel-Rauf Zeina
- Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
- Department of Radiology, Hillel Yaffe medical center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Yael Kopelman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillel Yaffe medical center, Hadera, Israel
- Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
He X, Lei X, Li J, Li P. Telephone instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289063. [PMID: 37992042 PMCID: PMC10664946 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of telephone instructions on the quality of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS Online English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) were screened for randomized controlled trials on telephone instructions regarding bowel preparation for colonoscopy from inception to April 15, 2022. After data extraction, the Review Manager software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Nine randomized controlled trials with 3,836 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of adequate bowel preparation was significantly higher in the telephone group than in the control group. The pooled relative risk (RR) was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.30, P < 0.01). The pooled mean difference (MD) for the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score was 1.32 (95% CI: 0.15-2.49, P < 0.05), and that for the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale score was -1.93 (95% CI: -2.35 to -1.51, P < 0.01). The polyp detection rate was significantly higher in the telephone group than in the control group (RR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.04, P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was noted in the adenoma detection rate between the groups (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.97-1.94, P = 0.08). CONCLUSION Telephone instructions for patients undergoing colonoscopy significantly improved the quality of bowel preparation and increased polyp detection rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueqian He
- Laboratory Medicine Center, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaoju Lei
- Endoscopy Center, Nursing Department, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- Cancer Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Peng Li
- Cancer Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gimeno-García AZ, Benítez-Zafra F, Nicolás-Pérez D, Hernández-Guerra M. Colon Bowel Preparation in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Is There Potential for Enhancing Colon Bowel Cleansing? MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1834. [PMID: 37893552 PMCID: PMC10608636 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Proper bowel preparation is of paramount importance for enhancing adenoma detection rates and reducing postcolonoscopic colorectal cancer risk. Despite recommendations from gastroenterology societies regarding the optimal rates of successful bowel preparation, these guidelines are frequently unmet. Various approaches have been employed to enhance the rates of successful bowel preparation, yet the quality of cleansing remains suboptimal. Intensive bowel preparation techniques, supplementary administration of bowel solutions, and educational interventions aimed at improving patient adherence to instructions have been commonly utilized, particularly among patients at a high risk of inadequate bowel preparation. Expedited strategies conducted on the same day as the procedure have also been endorsed by scientific organizations. More recently, the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged for the preprocedural detection of inadequate bowel preparation, holding the potential to guide the preparation process immediately preceding colonoscopy. This manuscript comprehensively reviews the current strategies employed to optimize bowel cleansing, with a specific focus on patients with elevated risks for inadequate bowel preparation. Additionally, the prospective role of AI in this context is thoroughly examined. CONCLUSIONS While a majority of outpatients may achieve cleanliness with standard cleansing protocols, dealing with hard-to-prepare patients remains a challenge. Rescue strategies based on AI are promising, but such evidence remains limited. To ensure proper bowel cleansing, a combination of strategies should be performed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rezamand G, Joukar F, Amini-Salehi E, Delam H, Zare R, Samadi A, Mavadati S, Hassanipour S, Mansour-Ghanaei F. The effectiveness of walking exercise on the bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a single blind randomized clinical trial study. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:351. [PMID: 37814210 PMCID: PMC10561431 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02987-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Bowel preparation is a crucial factor affecting the diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy, and few randomized control trials evaluated enhancement in bowel preparation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of walking exercises on bowel preparation before a colonoscopy procedure. METHODS The present study is a single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 262 patients scheduled for colonoscopy procedures. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group (n = 131) and a control group (n = 131). In the intervention group, participants followed a predetermined plan that included the consumption of specific liquids and foods, bisacodyl pills, polyethylene glycol powder, and a regimen of walking exercises in preparation for their colonoscopy. Conversely, individuals in the control group followed the same regimen but were not instructed to engage in walking exercises. On the day of the colonoscopy, both groups were assessed for their level of physical activity using a foot counter. Additionally, an experienced gastroenterologist evaluated and compared the bowel preparation between the two groups using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). RESULTS The number of footsteps recorded in the two groups exhibited a significant difference (P < 0.001). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of mean BBPS scores (6.26 ± 1.9 vs. 6.29 ± 1.9, P = 0.416), individuals who took more than 6900 steps had significantly higher BBPS scores compared to those with fewer than 6900 footsteps (6.62 ± 1.8 vs. 5.92 ± 1.9, P = 0.003).In the univariate analysis, BBPS was found to be significantly associated with individuals under the age of 50 (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.30-4.61, P = 0.006) and smoking status (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.17-0.94, P = 0.043). In the multivariate analysis, the relationship between BBPS and age below 50 and smoking remained significant (OR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.30-4.70, P = 0.005, and OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.93, P = 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSION A higher number of footsteps taken especially more than 6900 can significantly enhance bowel preparation; however, walking exercise as an intervention before colonoscopy is not significantly associated with BBPS. Also, older people and smokers seem to have fewer benefits from walking exercises for bowel preparation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN32724024 (Registration date:22/08/2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gholamreza Rezamand
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Farahnaz Joukar
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Ehsan Amini-Salehi
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Hamed Delam
- Student Research Committee, Larestan University of Medical Sciences, Larestan, Iran
| | - Reza Zare
- Student Research Committee, Larestan University of Medical Sciences, Larestan, Iran
| | - Alireza Samadi
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | | | - Soheil Hassanipour
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Theunissen F, Lantinga MA, ter Borg PCJ, Ouwendijk RJT, Siersema PD, Bruno MJ. Efficacy of different bowel preparation regimen volumes for colorectal cancer screening and compliance with European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance measures. United European Gastroenterol J 2023; 11:448-457. [PMID: 37190897 PMCID: PMC10256997 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various volumes of bowel preparation are used in clinical practice. There is conflicting data on the effectiveness of individual regimens. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and compliance of currently used bowel preparations with the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) performance measures using data of the Dutch nationwide colorectal cancer screening (CRC) program. METHODS In a prospective, multicenter endoscopy database, we identified all CRC screening colonoscopies performed in 15 Dutch endoscopy centers from 2016 to 2020. We excluded procedures without documented bowel preparation or the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score. Bowel preparation regimens were categorized into three groups, that is, 4-L (polyethylene glycol (PEG)), 2-L (2-L PEG with ascorbic acid) and ≤1-L volumes (sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate, 1L-PEG with sodium sulfate and ascorbic acid or oral sulfate solution). European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance measures included adequate BBPS score (≥6) (>90%), cecal intubation rate (CIR, >90%), adenoma detection rate (ADR, >25%) and polyp detection rate (PDR, >40%). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors for adequate BBPS and patient discomfort. RESULTS A total of 39,042 CRC screening colonoscopies were included. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores, CIR, ADR and PDR for 4L, 2L and ≤1L regimens all met the minimum ESGE performance measures standards. However, an adequate BBPS score was more frequently seen with 2L regimens (98.0%) as compared to 4L (97.1%) and ≤1L regimens (97.0%) (p < 0.001), respectively. In addition, CIR was higher for ≤1L (98.4%) versus 4L (97.7%) and 2L (97.9%) regimens (p = 0.001), ADR higher for lower volume (≤1L (60.0%) and 2L (61.2)) versus higher volume (4L (58.6%)) regimens (p < 0.001), and PDR higher for ≤1L (70.0%) and 2L (70.8%) versus 4L (67.2%) regimens (p < 0.001). Boston Bowel Preparation Scale for ≤1L regimens was higher when combined with bisacodyl (97.3%) than without (95.6%) (p < 0.001). Overall, bisacodyl use was independently associated with higher patient discomfort (odds ratios = 1.47, confidence intervals = 1.26-1.72). CONCLUSIONS Despite variations in bowel preparation volumes, all regimens meet the minimum ESGE performance measures for bowel preparation and other quality parameters. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale can be further improved if ultra low volume regimens are combined with bisacodyl. The choice for either bowel preparation volume can therefore be based on volume-tolerance and patient preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Theunissen
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Marten Alexander Lantinga
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenthe Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmsterdam Gastroenterology and MetabolismUniversity Medical Centers AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Pieter C. J. ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyIkazia ZiekenhuisRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Rob J. T. Ouwendijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyIkazia ZiekenhuisRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Peter D. Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Marco J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hu X, He X. Enhanced recovery of postoperative nursing for single-port thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1163338. [PMID: 37287915 PMCID: PMC10242124 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1163338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is a common clinical malignant tumor, and the number of new lung cancer patients is increasing year by year. With the advancement of thoracoscopy technology and equipment, the scope of application of minimally invasive surgery has expanded to almost all types of lung cancer resection, making it the mainstream lung cancer resection surgery. Single-port thoracoscopic surgery provides evident advantages in terms of postoperative incision pain since only a single incision is required, and the surgical effect is similar to those of multi-hole thoracoscopic surgery and traditional thoracotomy. Although thoracoscopic surgery can effectively remove tumors, it nevertheless induces variable degrees of stress in lung cancer patients, which eventually limit lung function recovery. Rapid rehabilitation surgery can actively improve the prognosis of patients with different types of cancer and promote early recovery. This article reviews the research progress on rapid rehabilitation nursing in single-port thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiufen Hu
- The No.1 Thoracic Surgery Ward, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaodan He
- The No. 1 Gynecological Ward, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhu Y, Zhang DF, Wu HL, Fu PY, Feng L, Zhuang K, Geng ZH, Li KK, Zhang XH, Zhu BQ, Qin WZ, Lin SL, Zhang Z, Chen TY, Huang Y, Xu XY, Liu JZ, Wang S, Zhang W, Li QL, Zhou PH. Improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy with a smartphone application driven by artificial intelligence. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6:41. [PMID: 36918730 PMCID: PMC10011797 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00786-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Optimal bowel preparation is a prerequisite for a successful colonoscopy; however, the rate of inadequate bowel preparation remains relatively high. In this study, we establish a smartphone app that assesses patient bowel preparation using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based prediction system trained on labeled photographs of feces in the toilet and evaluate its impact on bowel preparation quality in colonoscopy outpatients. We conduct a prospective, single-masked, multicenter randomized clinical trial, enrolling outpatients who own a smartphone and are scheduled for a colonoscopy. We screen 578 eligible patients and randomize 524 in a 1:1 ratio to the control or AI-driven app group for bowel preparation. The study endpoints are the percentage of patients with adequate bowel preparation and the total BBPS score, compliance with dietary restrictions and purgative instructions, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate (secondary). The prediction system has an accuracy of 95.15%, a specificity of 97.25%, and an area under the curve of 0.98 in the test dataset. In the full analysis set (n = 500), adequate preparation is significantly higher in the AI-driven app group (88.54 vs. 65.59%; P < 0.001). The mean BBPS score is 6.74 ± 1.25 in the AI-driven app group and 5.97 ± 1.81 in the control group (P < 0.001). The rates of compliance with dietary restrictions (93.68 vs. 83.81%, P = 0.001) and purgative instructions (96.05 vs. 84.62%, P < 0.001) are significantly higher in the AI-driven app group, as is the rate of additional purgative intake (26.88 vs. 17.41%, P = 0.011). Thus, our AI-driven smartphone app significantly improves the quality of bowel preparation and patient compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zhu
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan-Feng Zhang
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui-Li Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Henan, China
| | - Pei-Yao Fu
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Feng
- Endoscopy Center, Central Hospital of Minhang District, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun Zhuang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xian Central Hospital, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zi-Han Geng
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun-Kun Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Henan, China
| | - Xiao-Hong Zhang
- Endoscopy Center, Central Hospital of Minhang District, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo-Qun Zhu
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Zheng Qin
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng-Li Lin
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Tian-Yin Chen
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Huang
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Yue Xu
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing-Zheng Liu
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuo Wang
- Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Quan-Lin Li
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China.
| | - Ping-Hong Zhou
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Testoni PA, Notaristefano C, Soncini M, Hassan C, Monica F, Radaelli F, Triossi O, Pasquale L, Neri M, Cannizzaro R, Leandro G. An Italian prospective multicenter study on colonoscopy practice and quality: What has changed in the last 10 years. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:99-106. [PMID: 36266206 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A relevant number of adenomas can be missed during colonoscopy. AIMS Assess the current status of colonoscopy procedures in Italian centers. METHODS A prospective observational study involving 17 hospitals (34 endoscopists) included consecutive patients undergoing standard colonoscopy. In the first phase, endoscopists performed consecutive colonoscopies. In the second phase, retraining via an online learning platform was planned, while in the third phase data were collected analogously to phase 1. RESULTS A total of 3,504 patients were enrolled. Overall, a BBPS score ≥6 was obtained in 95.6% of cases (94.8% and 96.9% in the pre- and post-training phases, respectively). 88.4% of colonoscopies had a withdrawal time ≥6 min (88.2% and 88.7% in the pre- and post-training phases). Median adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 39.1%, with no significant differences between the pre- and post-training phases (40.1% vs 36.9%; P = 0.83). In total, 81% of endoscopists had a ADR performance above the 25% threshold. CONCLUSION High colonoscopy quality standards are achieved by the Italian hospitals involved. Quality improvement initiatives and repeated module-based colonoscopy-training have been promoted in Italy during the last decade, which appear to have had a significant impact on quality colonoscopy metrics together with the activation of colorectal cancer screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Alberto Testoni
- Division of Gastroenterology and G.I. Endoscopy, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Chiara Notaristefano
- Division of Gastroenterology and G.I. Endoscopy, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Soncini
- Department of Internal Medicine, A. Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Monica
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Cattinara Academic Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Omero Triossi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Local Health Authority, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Luigi Pasquale
- Gastroenterology Unit, S. O. Frangipane Hospital of A. Irpino, Italy
| | - Matteo Neri
- Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, 'G. d'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Renato Cannizzaro
- Oncological Gastroenterology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Gioacchino Leandro
- National Institute of Gastroenterology "S. De Bellis" Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sun J, Chen Y, Gu Y, Chen J, Li C, Zhou Q, Hu J, Jiang G. Graphical education and appropriate time before elective colonoscopy make better bowel preparation. J Minim Access Surg 2023; 19:130-137. [PMID: 36722537 PMCID: PMC10034805 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_338_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Inadequate bowel preparation leads to lower polyp detection rates, longer procedure times and lower cecal intubation rates. However, there is no consensus about high-quality bowel preparation, so our study evaluated graphical education and appropriate time before elective colonoscopy. Patients and Methods We performed a secondary analysis of a national colorectal cancer screening programme of 738 patients. The patients were divided into a group given a graphical information manual (n = 242) or a word-only one (n = 496). They were also divided into groups according to the interval between bowel preparation and colonoscopy: 6-8 h (Group 1, n = 106), 9-12 h (Group 2, n = 228) and 13-17 h (Group 3, n = 402). All patients were scored according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) during the examination. Results The bowel preparation of the graphical group was significantly better than the text group (P < 0.001). After adjustment, the bowel preparation score of Group 1 and Group 2 were both significantly higher than that of Group 3 (P = 0.012 and P = 0.032). Maximum BBPS was 6.31 when the interval time was 6.52 h (95% confidence interval: 5.95-6.66), and when the interval was <10 h, the BBPS was ≥6. Conclusion High-quality bowel preparation was linked to graphical education and appropriate time before colonoscopy. We suggest that the interval between taking the first laxative and colonoscopy should be <10 h, preferably 6.5 h. Prospective multicentre research is needed to give more evidence of high-quality bowel preparation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiachen Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yongpeng Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yuqin Gu
- School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Junrong Chen
- Department of General Practice, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Chujun Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Qiulun Zhou
- School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jiancong Hu
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Guozhi Jiang
- School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gao X, Bian Q, Ding W, Qian H, Li W, Zhang G, Li X. Effect of Walking Exercise and Intestinal Cleansing Interval on Bowel Preparation Quality, a Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:193-201. [PMID: 35546206 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07526-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS High-quality intestinal preparation could promote intestinal cleanliness and lead to more accurate diagnosis, which patients will benefit from. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of walking exercise and intestinal cleansing interval in bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METHODS A randomized controlled single blind study was conducted during August 2021 to February 2022. Patients requiring colonoscopy were randomly divided into three groups: 0 step, 5000 steps or 10,000 steps during the intestinal preparation. Participants took the same intestinal cleansing drugs 4-6 h prior to the procedure: 2L-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG). RESULTS A total of 300 patients were enrolled in the experiment (100 patients per group), and the baseline information of the three groups was close. The BBPS of right (0-step group vs 5,000-step group vs 10,000-step group: 1.78 ± 0.65 vs 1.88 ± 0.54 vs 2.36 ± 0.69, p < 0.001), transverse (0-step group vs 5,000-step group vs 10,000-step group: 2.09 ± 0.78 vs 2.18 ± 0.61 vs 2.59 ± 0.71, p < 0.001) and left (0-step group vs 5,000-step group vs 10,000-step group: 2.01 ± 0.91 vs 2.24 ± 0.59 vs 2.51 ± 0.60, p < 0.001) colon in 10,000-step group were significantly higher than others, respectively. And we also drew the same conclusion in the aspect of ADR. The adverse events and patients' satisfaction had no differences between the two groups. Moreover, intestinal cleansing interval (< 5.12 h) was only effective in BBPS of right colon (p < 0.001) and left colon (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS This study suggested that participants took 10,000-step walking exercise and took PEG 5.12 h prior to the procedure were effective in routine pre-procedure cleanout for standard colonoscopy. NAME OF REGISTRY Effect of starting time of bowel cleansing and walking exercise after bowel cleansing on bowel preparation: A prospective randomized controlled study. REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR2100049214.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Qiugui Bian
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Wenqin Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Haisheng Qian
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Wenjie Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Guoxin Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Xuan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China.
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chen L, Ren G, Luo H, Zhang L, Wang L, Zhao J, Zhang R, Zhang X, Kang X, Pan Y. Superiority of a preparation-related model for predicting inadequate bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A multicenter prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:2297-2305. [PMID: 36181263 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Three models based on patient-related factors have been developed to predict inadequate bowel preparation (BP). However, the performance of the models seems suboptimal. This study aimed to develop a novel preparation-related model and compare it with the available patient-related models. METHODS Patients receiving standard BP were prospectively enrolled from five endoscopic centers. Patient-related and preparation-related factors for inadequate BP (defined by segmental Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score < 2) were identified by logistic regression. A preparation-related model was derived and internally validated in 906 patients. The comparisons of models were assessed by discrimination and calibration. The preparation-related model was also externally validated. RESULTS Several patient-related factors (male and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score ≥ 3) and preparation-related factors (drinking-to-stool interval ≥ 3 h, preparation-to-colonoscopy interval ≥ 6 h, and poor rectal effluent) were found to be independently associated with inadequate BP (all P < 0.05). C-statistics was 0.81 for the preparation-related model in the training cohort (n = 604), significantly higher than three available patient-based models (0.58-0.61). Similar results were observed in the validation cohort (n = 302). Calibration curves showed close agreement in the preparation-related model (R2 = 0.315 in the training cohort and 0.279 in the validation cohort). The preparation-related model was externally validated in another 606 patients with C-index of 0.80. CONCLUSIONS A new preparation-related model (consisting of drinking-to-stool interval ≥ 3 h, preparation-to-colonoscopy interval ≥ 6 h, and poor last rectal effluent) was developed and performed better than three available patient-related models. This easy-to-use model may be a useful decision-support tool on individualized plans in patients undergoing BP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Gui Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hui Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Linhui Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Limei Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shaanxi Second People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jianghai Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China
| | - Rongchun Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hongai Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaoying Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoyu Kang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yanglin Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao K, Dong R, Xia S, Feng L, Zhou W, Zhang M, Zhang Y, Tian D, Liu M, Liao J. Improving the quality of bowel preparation by smartphone education platform prior to colonoscopy: a randomized trail. Ann Med 2022; 54:2777-2784. [PMID: 36254495 PMCID: PMC9624253 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2130972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adequate bowel preparation is an essential factor in colonoscopy. Enhanced education on the procedure of bowel preparation is very necessary for patients before colonoscopy. We analysed the influence of a novel education platform on bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study enrolled outpatients who underwent colonoscopy in the digestive endoscopy centre of Wuhan Tongji Hospital. They were divided into the control group and the intervention group according to different educational ways. The control group patients were provided with the regular colonoscopy preparation leaflet. The intervention group patients were asked to add the education platform. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate bowel preparation. The study was registered at Chinese ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2100053547, 24/11/2021). RESULTS A total of 378 patients who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled, including 189 patients in the control group and 189 patients in the intervention group. The Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS) was significantly higher in the intervention group than that in the control group (p < .05). The adequate rate of bowel preparation in the intervention group was significantly improved than that in the control group (p = .000). Compared with the control group, the polyp detection rate (PDR) was significantly higher in the intervention group (p = .006), especially in the left colonic (p = .006). Among constipation patients, the adequate rate of bowel preparation (p = .000) and the PDR (p = .004) were significantly improved than that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS The smartphone education platform may effectively improve bowel preparation quality, PDR, and patients' compliance.Key messagesThe quality of bowel preparation mainly relies on the patients' compliance with the bowel preparation instructions.The study reveals that the superiority of the smartphone education platform by Mini Program in improving bowel preparation and colorectal polyp detection rate.The smartphone education platform may provide a more effective, convenient, and labour-saving way to provide further improvements to patients prior to colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ruonan Dong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Suhong Xia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lina Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wangdong Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Mingyu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Dean Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Mei Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiazhi Liao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Li P, He X, Yang X, Du J, Wu W, Tu J. Patient education by smartphones for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:1349-1359. [PMID: 35384043 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM We aim to evaluate the effect of smartphone education on the bowel preparation quality of patients undergoing colonoscopy by meta-analysis. METHODS Randomized controlled trials using smartphones to educate patients on bowel preparation for colonoscopy were screened from the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception to August 31, 2021. After extracting the data, Review Manager software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 12 randomized controlled trials with 4165 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were 2060 patients in the smartphone group, including 1784 patients with adequate bowel preparation, with a rate of 86.6%, and 2105 patients in the control group, including 1614 patients with adequate bowel preparation, with a rate of 76.7%, and pooled risk ratio (RR) was 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.23, P < 0.01). Eight included studies reported the adenoma detection rate. The adenoma detection rate in the smartphone group was 26.2%, and the rate in the control group was 19.3%, with an RR of 1.29 (95% CI: 1.03-1.62, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Using smartphones to educate patients on bowel preparation for colonoscopy improved the quality of bowel preparation and increased the adenoma detection rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Li
- Cancer Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
| | - Xueqian He
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Laboratory Medicine Center, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
| | - Xufang Yang
- Department of General Medicine, Dinghai Central Hospital (Dinghai District of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital), Zhoushan, China
| | - Jing Du
- Cancer Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiquan Wu
- Cancer Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiangfeng Tu
- Cancer Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
An Interactive Video Educational Tool Does Not Improve the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:2347-2357. [PMID: 34435269 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07215-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Inadequate bowel preparation leads to poor outcomes in colonoscopy. Prior investigations have demonstrated improved bowel preparation with pre-procedural educational videos. We aimed to determine whether an interactive, online educational video could improve bowel preparation scores in an outpatient population. METHODS We performed a prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial at our hospital-based outpatient endoscopy center. Eligible patients were randomized to two groups. Both groups received standard verbal and written instructions, while the intervention group also received access to an interactive, online video. The primary outcome was improvement in the bowel preparation scores graded using the Boston bowel prep score (BBPS). Secondary outcomes included adenoma detection rate, total number of polyps detected, patient satisfaction, pre-procedure anxiety, and complication rates. RESULTS The difference in BBPS in the intervention group (8) compared to the control group (7.6) did not meet statistical significance in our primary outcome of improvement in BBPS (p = 0.076). However, on subgroup analysis, there was a statistically significant improvement in BBPS in the intervention group among African Americans (p = 0.007) and patients older than 65 (p = 0.026). Those in the intervention arm rated pre-procedural materials "very easy" to understand significantly more often than in the control arm (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Use of an interactive, online educational video for bowel preparation did not lead to improvement in overall BBPS. However, among patients at higher risk for inadequate bowel preparation, such as African Americans and elderly patients, there may be a benefit.
Collapse
|
20
|
Fatima H, Wajid M, Krier C, Champion V, Carter-Harris L, Shedd-Steele R, Imperiale TF, Schwartz P, Strom S, Magnarella M, Rawl SM. Development of a Computer-Tailored Intervention/Decision Aid To Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Systems. Cureus 2022; 14:e23372. [PMID: 35475065 PMCID: PMC9020808 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
|
21
|
Li P, He X, Chen S. Impact of Patient Education via WeChat on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Comput Inform Nurs 2022; 41:00024665-900000000-99173. [PMID: 35266903 DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of education via WeChat on the quality of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Randomized controlled trials of bowel preparation education provided via WeChat for patients undergoing colonoscopy were screened from databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Papers published from the date of database construction to May 1, 2021, were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. A total of four randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that for patients undergoing colonoscopy, education via WeChat significantly improves the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, reduces the insertion time, and increases the adenoma detection rate and the patient's compliance and willingness to repeat bowel preparation. In conclusion, education via WeChat before colonoscopy can significantly improve the quality of bowel preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Li
- Author Affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology (Dr Li) and Laboratory Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine (Dr He and Dr Chen), Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Solonowicz O, Stier M, Kim K, Kupfer S, Tapper E, Sengupta N. Digital Navigation Improves No-Show Rates and Bowel Preparation Quality for Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Quality Improvement Study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:166-172. [PMID: 33471486 PMCID: PMC10065085 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Because of high historical no-show rates and poor bowel preparation quality in our unit, we sought to evaluate whether text message navigation for patients scheduled for colonoscopy would reduce no-show rates and improve bowel preparation quality compared with usual care. METHODS We performed a randomized controlled quality improvement study from April to August 2019 in an urban academic endoscopy unit. All patients scheduled for colonoscopy were randomly assigned to a control group that received usual care (paper instructions/nursing precalls) or to the intervention group that received usual care plus the text message program [short message service (SMS)]. The program provided timed-release instructions on dietary modifications and bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The primary outcome was no-shows. Secondary outcomes were no-show/same-day cancellations, no-show/cancellations within 7 days of the procedure, and bowel preparation quality. RESULTS A total of 1625 patients were randomized (SMS=833, control=792). No-show rates were significantly lower in the SMS group compared with the control group (8% vs. 14%; P<0.0001). Similar results were found for no-show/same-day cancellations (10% vs. 16%; P=0.0003), and no-show/cancellations within 7 days (18% vs. 26%; P=0.0008). There was no difference in adequate bowel preparation for all colonoscopies between the groups (89% vs. 87%; P=0.47). However, rates of adequate bowel preparation for screening/surveillance colonoscopies were significantly higher in SMS versus control groups (93% vs. 88%; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Text message navigation for patients scheduled for colonoscopy improved the quality of colorectal cancer screening by decreasing no-show rates and increasing adequate bowel preparation rates in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy compared with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Solonowicz
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago IL, 60637
| | - Matt Stier
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago IL, 60637
| | - Karen Kim
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago IL, 60637
| | - Sonia Kupfer
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago IL, 60637
| | - Elliot Tapper
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Neil Sengupta
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago IL, 60637
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jung DH, Gweon TG, Lee S, Son NH, Kim BW, Huh CW. Combination of Enhanced Instructions Improve Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Colonoscopist-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:117-124. [PMID: 34459448 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate bowel preparation is highly important for the efficacy of colonoscopy; however, up to one-third of patients do not accomplish adequate bowel preparation. OBJECTIVE We investigated the impact of the combination of enhanced instruction on the quality of bowel preparation and its impact on clinically relevant outcomes. DESIGN This was a colonoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. SETTINGS All patients received regular instructions for bowel preparation. Patients were randomly assigned to the control, telephone reeducation, and combined enhanced instruction groups. PATIENTS Outpatients aged 19 to 75 years scheduled to undergo colonoscopy were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome was adequate bowel preparation rate. RESULTS A total of 311 patients were randomly assigned to the combined enhanced instruction (n = 104), telephone reeducation (n = 101), and control groups (n = 106). An intention-to-treat analysis showed that the adequate bowel preparation rate was higher in the combined enhanced instruction group than in the telephone reeducation and control groups (92.3% vs 82.2% vs 76.4%, p = 0.007). The rate of compliance with the instructions was significantly higher in the combined enhanced instruction group than in the telephone reeducation and control groups. Method of education was associated with proper bowel preparation (adjusted OR 17.46; p < 0.001 for combined enhanced instruction relative to control). LIMITATIONS This was a single-center study conducted in Korea. CONCLUSIONS Combined enhanced instruction as an adjunct to regular instructions much improved the quality of bowel preparation and patients' adherence to the preparation instructions. The combined enhanced instruction method could be the best option for bowel preparation instruction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B673. LA COMBINACIN DE INSTRUCCIONES MEJORADAS, INCREMENTA LA CALIDAD DE LA PREPARACIN INTESTINAL ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO, CONTROLADO, ALEATORIO Y CIEGO PARA EL COLONOSCOPISTA ANTECEDENTES:La preparación adecuada del intestino es muy importante para la eficacia de la colonoscopia; sin embargo, hasta un tercio de los pacientes no logran buenos resutlados.OBJETIVO:Investigar el impacto de la combinación de instrucciónes claras en la calidad de la preparación intestinal y su impacto en los resultados clínicos.DISEÑO:Trabajo aleatorio, prospectivo y ciego para el colonoscopista.AJUSTES:Los pacientes recibieron instrucciones periódicas para la preparación intestinal. Fueron asignados aleatoriamente al grupo control, educación telefónica y de instrucción mejoradas.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes ambulatorios de 19 a 75 años programados para ser sometidos a colonoscopia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El principal resultado fue una adecuada preparación intestinal.RESULTADOS:Un total de 311 pacientes fueron asignados al azar a la instrucción mejorada combinada (n = 104), reeducación telefónica (n = 101) y grupo de control (n = 106). El análisis estadístico mostró que la tasa de preparación intestinal adecuada fue mayor en el grupo combinado de instrucción mejorada que en los grupos de reeducación telefónica y control (92,3% vs 82,2% vs 76,4%, p = 0,007). La tasa de cumplimiento de las instrucciones fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de instrucción mejorada combinada que en los otros. El método de educación se asoció con una preparación intestinal adecuada (razón de posibilidades ajustada de 17,46; p <0,001 para la instrucción mejorada combinada en relación con el control.LIMITACIONES:Estudio en un solo centro realizado en Corea.CONCLUSIONES:La instrucción mejorada combinada como complemento de las instrucciones regulares mejoró mucho la calidad de la preparación intestinal y la adherencia de los pacientes a las instrucciones de preparación. El método de instrucción mejorado combinado podría ser la mejor opción para la instrucción de preparación intestinal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B673.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da Hyun Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae-Geun Gweon
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - SeJoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nak-Hoon Son
- Data Science Team (Biostatistician), Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheal Wung Huh
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Riswijk MLM, van Keulen KE, Siersema PD. Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:13-32. [PMID: 33991373 PMCID: PMC9290948 DOI: 10.1111/den.14015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS High-quality bowel preparation is paramount for the diagnostic accuracy and safety of colonoscopy; however, it is often difficult for patients to adhere to high-volume laxatives, which may contribute to poor bowel preparation. This review aims to assess the efficacy of bowel preparation fluids of 1 L or less (≤1 L). METHODS We performed a systematic review including all relevant randomized controlled trials on ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids for colonoscopy published since 2015. Primary endpoint was the percentage of adequately prepared patients. Secondary endpoints included adenoma detection rate (ADR) and safety. RESULTS Bowel preparation with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC; 19 trials, n = 10,287), 1L-polyethylene glycol with ascorbate (PEGA; 10 trials, n = 1717), sodium phosphate (NaP; 2 trials, n = 621), and oral sulfate solution (OSS; 3 trials, n = 597) was adequate in 75.2%, 82.9%, 81.9%, and 92.1%, respectively, of patients; however, heterogeneity between studies was considerable (I2 range: 86-98%). Pooled ADRs were 31.1% with SPMC, 32.3% with 1L-PEGA, 30.4% with NaP, and 40.9% with OSS. Temporary electrolyte changes were seen with all ultra-low volume bowel preparation fluid solutions but without sustained effects in most patients. CONCLUSION Ultra-low volume bowel preparation fluids do not always meet the 90% quality standard for adequate bowel preparation as defined by current guidelines. Nonetheless, they may be considered in patients intolerant for higher-volume laxatives and without risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation or dehydration-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milou L. M. van Riswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health SciencesNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Kelly E. van Keulen
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health SciencesNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Peter D. Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health SciencesNijmegenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Afecto E, Ponte A, Fernandes S, Gomes C, Correia JP, Carvalho J. Validation and Application of Predictive Models for Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopies in a Tertiary Hospital Population. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 30:134-140. [PMID: 37008528 PMCID: PMC10050840 DOI: 10.1159/000520905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Background: Bowel preparation is a major quality criterion for colonoscopies. Models developed to identify patients with inadequate preparation have not been validated in external cohorts. We aim to validate these models and determine their applicability. Methods: Colonoscopies between April and November 2019 were retrospectively included. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≥2 per segment was considered adequate. Insufficient data, incomplete colonoscopies, and total colectomies were excluded. Two models were tested: model 1 (tricyclic antidepressants, opioids, diabetes, constipation, abdominal surgery, previous inadequate preparation, inpatient status, and American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] score ≥3); model 2 (co-morbidities, tricyclic antidepressants, constipation, and abdominal surgery). Results: We included 514 patients (63% males; age 61.7 ± 15.6 years), 441 with adequate preparation. The main indications were inflammatory bowel disease (26.1%) and endoscopic treatment (24.9%). Previous surgery (36.2%) and ASA score ≥3 (23.7%) were the most common comorbidities. An ASA score ≥3 was the only identified predictor for inadequate preparation in this study (p < 0.001, OR 3.28). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of model 1 were 60.3, 64.2, 21.8, and 90.7%, respectively. Model 2 had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 57.5, 67.4, 22.6, and 90.5%, respectively. The AUC for the ROC curves was 0.62 for model 1, 0.62 for model 2, and 0.65 for the ASA score. Conclusions: Although both models accurately predict adequate bowel preparation, they are still unreliable in predicting inadequate preparation and, as such, new models, or further optimization of current ones, are needed. Utilizing the ASA score might be an appropriate approximation of the risk for inadequate bowel preparation in tertiary hospital populations.
Collapse
|
26
|
Di Leo M, Iannone A, Arena M, Losurdo G, Palamara MA, Iabichino G, Consolo P, Rendina M, Luigiano C, Di Leo A. Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:7748-7770. [PMID: 34963739 PMCID: PMC8661374 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is characterized by rapid declines in the wake of widespread screening. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening, but its accuracy is related to high quality of bowel preparation (BP). In this review, we aimed to summarized the current strategy to increase bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Newly bowel cleansing agents were developed with the same efficacy of previous agent but requiring less amount of liquid to improve patients’ acceptability. The role of the diet before colonoscopy was also changed, as well the contribution of educational intervention and the use of adjunctive drugs to improve patients’ tolerance and/or quality of BP. The review also described BP in special situations, as lower gastrointestinal bleeding, elderly people, patients with chronic kidney disease, patients with inflammatory bowel disease, patients with congestive heart failure, inpatient, patient with previous bowel resection, pregnant/lactating patients. The review underlined the quality of BP should be described using a validate scale in colonoscopy report and it explored the available scales. Finally, the review explored the possible contribution of bowel cleansing in post-colonoscopy syndrome that can be related by a transient alteration of gut microbiota. Moreover, the study underlined several points needed to further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Di Leo
- Unit of Digestive Endoscopy, San Paolo Hospital, Milan 20090, Italy
| | - Andrea Iannone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Monica Arena
- Unit of Digestive Endoscopy, San Paolo Hospital, Milan 20090, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Losurdo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierluigi Consolo
- Unit of Digestive Endoscopy, University of Messina, Hospital "G. Martino", Messina 98121, Italy
| | - Maria Rendina
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Carmelo Luigiano
- Unit of Digestive Endoscopy, San Paolo Hospital, Milan 20090, Italy
| | - Alfredo Di Leo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Patients' Experiences Before, During, and After a Colonoscopy Procedure: A Qualitative Study. Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 44:392-402. [PMID: 34860190 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Although colonoscopy is a common examination, there is limited research focusing on how patients experience this procedure. It is important that a colonoscopy is tolerated, as it may lead to lifesaving diagnostics and treatment. This study aims to explore adult patients' experience of undergoing a colonoscopy regarding the time prior to, during, and after the procedure. This was a qualitative study with individual interviews (n = 24) and a purposeful sample that was analyzed using thematic analysis. The analysis revealed four themes. The first, "making up one's mind," describes how the participants gathered information and reflected emotionally about the forthcoming procedure. The hope of clarification motivated them to proceed. In the theme "getting ready," self-care was in focus while the participants struggled to follow the instructions and carry out the burdensome cleansing. The next theme, "going through," illuminates' experiences during the colonoscopy and highlights the importance of feeling involved and respected. The last theme, "finally over," is characterized by experiences of relief, tiredness, and a desire for clarity. The healthcare professionals' ability to meet the participants' needs is vital, given that the experiences are highly individual. These findings contribute to a variegated image of how patients experience the process of undergoing a colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tian X, Yi LJ, Han Y, Chen H, Liu XL, Chen WQ, Jiménez-Herrera MF. Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e19915. [PMID: 34694227 PMCID: PMC8576559 DOI: 10.2196/19915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Various enhanced patient instructions (EPIs) have been used for bowel preparation (BP) and our previous meta-analysis also demonstrated the efficacy of EPIs in increasing the colonic polyp and adenoma detection rates; however, the optimal method for adequate BP has not yet been developed. Objective We performed a network meta-analysis to determine the optimal instructions. Methods We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of EPIs with each other or standard patient instructions (SPIs) for BP. We performed direct and Bayesian network meta-analyses for all instructions and used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria to appraise the quality of evidence. Results We included 23 RCTs (7969 patients) comparing 10 different instructions. In direct meta-analyses, most of the EPIs, except visual aids and mobile apps, increased the adequate preparation rate (APR). Network meta-analyses showed that additional explanations were superior to visual aids (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.59), telephone calls (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.37-0.99), educational videos (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.5-0.77), and mobile apps (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.68) with low-to-high-quality evidence; newly designed booklets (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.59-6.16), SMS text messaging (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.28-3.91), telephone calls (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-1.78), educational videos (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.40-3.65), and social media applications (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.4-3.93) were superior to visual aids and mobile apps with low-to-high-quality evidence. SMS text messaging, telephone calls, and social media applications increase adherence to and satisfaction with the BP regime. Social media applications reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs). Telephone calls and social media applications increase the polyp detection rate (PDR). Conclusions Newly designed booklets, telephone calls, educational videos, and social media applications can improve the quality of BP. Telephone calls and social media applications improve adherence to and satisfaction with the BP regime, reduce the risk of AEs, and increase the PDR. Trial Registration INPLASY (International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols) INPLASY2020120103; https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2020-12-0103/
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Tian
- Nursing Department, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Li-Juan Yi
- Department of Nursing, Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Zhuzhou, China
| | - Yang Han
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Hui Chen
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiao-Ling Liu
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei-Qing Chen
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
van der Zander QEW, Reumkens A, van de Valk B, Winkens B, Masclee AAM, de Ridder RJJ. Effects of a Personalized Smartphone App on Bowel Preparation Quality: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9:e26703. [PMID: 34420924 PMCID: PMC8414298 DOI: 10.2196/26703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Adequate bowel preparation is essential for the visualization of the colonic mucosa during colonoscopy. However, the rate of inadequate bowel preparation is still high, ranging from 18% to 35%; this may lead to a higher risk of missing clinically relevant lesions, procedural difficulties, prolonged procedural time, an increased number of interval colorectal carcinomas, and additional health care costs. Objective The aims of this study are to compare bowel preparation instructions provided via a personalized smartphone app (Prepit, Ferring B V) with regular written instructions for bowel preparation to improve bowel preparation quality and to evaluate patient satisfaction with the bowel preparation procedure. Methods Eligible patients scheduled for an outpatient colonoscopy were randomized to a smartphone app group or a control group. Both the groups received identical face-to-face education from a research physician, including instructions about the colonoscopy procedure, diet restrictions, and laxative intake. In addition, the control group received written information, whereas the smartphone app group was instructed to use the smartphone app instead of the written information for the actual steps of the bowel preparation schedule. All patients used bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate as laxatives. The quality of bowel preparation was scored using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) by blinded endoscopists. Patient satisfaction was measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18. Results A total of 87 patients were included in the smartphone app group and 86 in the control group. The mean total BBPS score was significantly higher in the smartphone app group (mean 8.3, SD 0.9) than in the control group (mean 7.9, SD 1.2; P=.03). The right colon showed a significantly higher bowel preparation score in the smartphone app group (mean 2.7, SD 0.5 vs mean 2.5, SD 0.6; P=.04). No significant differences were observed in segment scores for the mean transverse colon (mean 2.8, SD 0.4 vs mean 2.8, SD 0.4; P=.34) and left colon (mean 2.8, SD 0.4 vs mean 2.6, SD 0.5; P=.07). General patient satisfaction was high for the smartphone app group (mean 4.4, SD 0.7) but showed no significant difference when compared with the control group (mean 4.3, SD 0.8; P=.32). Conclusions Our personalized smartphone app significantly improved bowel preparation quality compared with regular written instructions for bowel preparation. In particular, in the right colon, the BBPS score improved, which is of clinical relevance because the right colon is considered more difficult to clean and the polyp detection rate in the right colon improves with improvement of bowel cleansing of the right colon. No further improvement in patient satisfaction was observed compared with patients receiving regular written instructions. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03677050; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03677050
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quirine E W van der Zander
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ankie Reumkens
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.,NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Bas van de Valk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ad A M Masclee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.,NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Rogier J J de Ridder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chandan S, Arora S, Mohan BP, Khan SR, Chandan OC, Kassab LL, Murali AR. Multimedia based education on bowel preparation improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review & meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:730-740. [PMID: 32794240 DOI: 10.1111/den.13809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer worldwide. Studies have shown a strong association between screening colonoscopy and a reduced risk of death from colorectal cancers. The incidence of poor bowel preparation has been reported in up to 25% cases. We conducted a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of patient education using multimedia platforms on adenoma detection rate and adequacy of bowel preparation. METHODS Multiple databases were searched through May 2020 for studies that reported the efficacy of multimedia education (smartphone app and online audio-visual aids) in improving quality of bowel preparation and its effect on adenoma detection rate (ADR). Meta-analysis was performed to determine whether multimedia based patient education (MM) helps improve ADR and bowel preparation quality as compared to controls (CT). RESULTS We included 13 randomized controlled trials with a total of 3754 patients. Eight studies reported outcomes on ADR and 12 reported on adequacy of bowel preparation. Overall ADR was higher in patients receiving multimedia based education as compared to CT (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.56, P = 0.04). A higher proportion of patients receiving multimedia based education achieved adequate bowel preparation (RR 1.2, CI 1.1-1.3, P = 0.001). In patients with mean age over 50 years, ADR was better in MM cohort as compared to controls (RR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.6, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Pre-colonoscopy patient education using multimedia based platforms seems to improve ADR and the adequacy of bowel preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, USA
| | - Sumant Arora
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Shahab R Khan
- Section of Gastroenterology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - Ojasvini C Chandan
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA
| | | | - Arvind R Murali
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Impact of Prepackaged Low-Residue Diet on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 44:E29-E37. [PMID: 33795626 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of prepackaged low-residue diet (PLRD) on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to August 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PLRD with clear liquid diet (CLD) or self-prepared LRD were considered for inclusion. The analysis calculated the odds ratio (OR) for the rate of adequate bowel preparation, patient tolerance, willingness to repeat bowel preparation, tolerability of bowel preparation, and overall adverse effects. Five RCTs published between 2006 and 2019 (N = 561) were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with the traditional CLD or self-prepared LRD, PLRD showed significantly higher rates of adequate bowel preparation (OR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-3.98; p = .01), patient tolerance (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.30-3.07; p = .002), and willingness to repeat the bowel preparation (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.05-2.70; p = .03), with no differences in adverse events (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.59-1.46; p = .75). Prepackaged low-residue diet improved bowel preparation quality, patient tolerance, and willingness to repeat bowel preparations. Importantly, PLRD does not increase the incidence of adverse events. This suggests that it is effective and safe to use PLRD for bowel preparation before colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
32
|
Russell L, Mathura P, Lee A, Dhaliwal R, Kassam N, Kohansal A. Patient-centered approaches to targeting incomplete bowel preparations for inpatient colonoscopies. Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:547-551. [PMID: 34276194 PMCID: PMC8276365 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A high-quality colonoscopy bowel prep is vital to completing the procedure. Adequate inpatient bowel preparation has been consistently difficult to achieve because of multiple factors. Incomplete bowel prep can lead to repeated colonoscopies, poor patient experience, increased costs, and prolonged hospitalization. This study aimed to develop patient-centered interventions to optimize bowel prep for inpatients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods The Model for Improvement and Donabedian frameworks guided this project. An interdisciplinary team compiled quality improvement tools that identified areas for improvement. Interventions development included a nursing tip sheet for troubleshooting symptoms, a standardized order label and a patient educational placemat. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were carried out to test and analyze the effects of the interventions. The project aim was a 30% reduction in incomplete inpatient colonoscopies from poor bowel prep. Process measures included the number of colonoscopy split prep order labels, and placemats used. The balancing measure was the number of repeat colonoscopies. Results Prior to the intervention, 44% (44/99) of inpatient colonoscopies had poor bowel prep resulting in 10 repeat procedures (10%). Post intervention, 60% (28/47) of the colonoscopies used the standardized label, 66% of physician orders used 2-L split prep, and 80% of patients were provided with the educational placemat. Of the 47 colonoscopies audited post intervention, there was a significant decrease in poor prep (27.7% [13/47], P=0.038) for colonoscopies. The percentage of repeated colonoscopies decreased to 4% (2/47). Conclusion Developing simple and easy-to-use patient-centered interventions can effectively improve colonoscopy preparation for hospitalized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Russell
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB (Lindsey Russell, Pamela Mathura, Amanda Lee, Raveena Dhaliwal, Narmin Kassam, Ali Kohansal).,McMaster University, Hamilton ON (Lindsey Russell)
| | - Pamela Mathura
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB (Lindsey Russell, Pamela Mathura, Amanda Lee, Raveena Dhaliwal, Narmin Kassam, Ali Kohansal).,Alberta Health Services, Edmonton AB (Pamela Mathura, Narmin Kassam)
| | - Amanda Lee
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB (Lindsey Russell, Pamela Mathura, Amanda Lee, Raveena Dhaliwal, Narmin Kassam, Ali Kohansal)
| | - Raveena Dhaliwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB (Lindsey Russell, Pamela Mathura, Amanda Lee, Raveena Dhaliwal, Narmin Kassam, Ali Kohansal)
| | - Narmin Kassam
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB (Lindsey Russell, Pamela Mathura, Amanda Lee, Raveena Dhaliwal, Narmin Kassam, Ali Kohansal).,Alberta Health Services, Edmonton AB (Pamela Mathura, Narmin Kassam)
| | - Ali Kohansal
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB (Lindsey Russell, Pamela Mathura, Amanda Lee, Raveena Dhaliwal, Narmin Kassam, Ali Kohansal).,Division of Digestive Care and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS (Ali Kohansal), Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Quality Improvement of Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopies: A Study of Hospital Team Resource Management in Taiwan. Qual Manag Health Care 2021; 30:127-134. [PMID: 33783425 DOI: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the impact of patient education using a medical team resource management (TRM) method on the adequacy of bowel preparation. METHODS The study setting was a single hospital in northern Taiwan, and a total of 2104 (884 female, 1220 male) healthy subjects who underwent a health checkup colonoscopy screening were enrolled before and after the application of the TRM program intervention. The efficacy of the TRM intervention and the factors affecting bowel preparation were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS The prevalence of adequate bowel preparation improved significantly from the preintervention period to the postintervention and validation periods, which had prevalence of 79.0%, 81.3%, and 84.0%, respectively. Using the preintervention period prevalence as a reference, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for adequate bowel preparation in the postintervention and validation periods were 2.199 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.538-3.142) and 2.035 (1.525-2.716), respectively. Men had a lower probability of adequate cleansing than women (aOR = 0.757; 95% CI = 0.598-0.957), and purgative containing polyethylene glycol had a lower probability of adequate cleansing than purgative containing sodium phosphate (aOR = 0.366; 95% CI: 0.277-0.483). CONCLUSIONS Bowel preparation quality for colonoscopy could be improved by enhancing patient education via TRM, and we suggest that effective quality improvement schemes should be proposed for health-screening programs.
Collapse
|
34
|
Triantafyllou K, Gkolfakis P, Skamnelos A, Diamantopoulou G, Dagas A, Tziatzios G, Thomopoulos K, Potamianos S, Christodoulou D. Impact of simple, specific, verbal instructions on the quality of bowel preparation in hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E378-E387. [PMID: 33655037 PMCID: PMC7895659 DOI: 10.1055/a-1339-0913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Bowel preparation for colonoscopy is frequently inadequate in hospitalized patients. We explored the impact of specific verbal instructions on the quality of inpatients bowel preparation and factors associated with preparation failure. Patients and methods Randomized (1:1), two strata (mobilized vs. bedridden; 3:2) trial of consecutive inpatients from four tertiary centers, who received either specific, verbal instructions or the standard of care (SOC) ward instructions about bowel preparation. The rate of adequate bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Score [BBPS] ≥ 6, no segment < 2) comprised the primary endpoint. Mean BBPS score, good (BBPS score ≥ 7, no segment score < 2) and excellent (BBPS = 9) were among secondary endpoints. Results We randomized 300 inpatients (180 mobile) aged 71.7 ± 15.1 years in the intervention (49.7 %) and SOC (50.3 %) groups, respectively. Overall, more patients in the intervention group achieved adequate bowel preparation, but this difference did not reach statistical significance neither in the intention-to-treat [90/149 (60.4 %) vs. 82/151 (54.3 %); P = 0.29] nor in the per-protocol analysis [90/129 (69.8 %) vs. 82/132 (62.1 %); P = 0.19]. Overall BBPS score did not differ statistical significantly in the two groups, but the provision of specific verbal instructions was associated with significant higher rates of good (58.1 % vs. 43.2 %; P = 0.02) and excellent (31.8 % vs. 16.7 %; P = 0.004) bowel preparation compared to the SOC group. Administration of same-day bowel preparation and patient American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2 were identified as risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation. Conclusions Provision of specific verbal instructions did not increase the rate of adequate bowel preparation in a population of mobilized and bedridden hospitalized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine – Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine – Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens
| | - Alexandros Skamnelos
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Georgia Diamantopoulou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Athanasios Dagas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine – Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens
| | - Konstantinos Thomopoulos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Spyros Potamianos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Christodoulou
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Pantaleón Sánchez MÁ, Bernad Cabredo B, García-Rodríguez A, Frago Larramona S, Nogales O, Díez Redondo P, Puig del Castillo I, Romero Mascarell C, Caballero N, Romero Sánchez-Miguel I, Pérez Berbegal R, Hernández Negrín D, Bujedo Sadornill G, Pérez Oltra A, Casals Urquiza G, Amorós Martínez J, Seoane Urgorri A, Ibáñez Zafón IA, Gimeno-García AZ. Educational nurse-led telephone intervention shortly before colonoscopy as a salvage strategy after previous bowel preparation failure: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy 2020; 52:1026-1035. [PMID: 32557475 PMCID: PMC7591317 DOI: 10.1055/a-1178-9844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most important predictor of unsuccessful bowel preparation is previous failure. For those patients with previous failure, we hypothesized that a nurse-led educational intervention by telephone shortly before the colonoscopy appointment could improve cleansing efficacy. METHODS We performed a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive outpatients with previous inadequate bowel preparation were enrolled. Both groups received the same standard bowel preparation protocol. The intervention group also received reinforced education by telephone within 48 hours before the colonoscopy. The primary outcome was effective bowel preparation according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included all randomized patients. Per-protocol analysis included patients who could be contacted by telephone and the control cases. RESULTS 657 participants were recruited by 11 Spanish hospitals. In the ITT analysis, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the rate of successful bowel preparation (77.3 % vs. 72 %; P = 0.12). In the intervention group, 267 patients (82.9 %) were contacted by telephone. Per-protocol analysis revealed significantly improved bowel preparation in the intervention group (83.5 % vs. 72.0 %; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Among all patients with previous inadequate bowel preparation, nurse-led telephone education did not result in a significant improvement in bowel cleansing. However, in the 83 % of patients who could be contacted, bowel preparation was substantially improved. Phone education may therefore be a useful tool for improving the quality of bowel preparation in those cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Antonio Alvarez-Gonzalez
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,IMIM, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel Pantaleón Sánchez
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Belén Bernad Cabredo
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
| | | | | | - Oscar Nogales
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Díez Redondo
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital del Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ignasi Puig del Castillo
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Altahia Xarxa Asistencial Universitaria de Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Noemí Caballero
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Alicia Pérez Oltra
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Agustín Seoane Urgorri
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain,IMIM, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bernstein MT, Garber J, Faucher P, Reynolds KA, Restall G, Walker JR, Singh H. New Patient Education Video on Colonoscopy Preparation: Development and Evaluation Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2020; 7:e15353. [PMID: 33084594 PMCID: PMC7641787 DOI: 10.2196/15353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although several patient education materials on colonoscopy preparation exist, few studies have evaluated or compared them; hence, there is no professional consensus on recommended content or media to use. OBJECTIVE This study aims to address this need by developing and evaluating a new video on colonoscopy preparation. METHODS We developed a new video explaining split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Of similar content videos on the internet (n=20), the most favorably reviewed video among patient and physician advisers was used as the comparator for the study. A total of 232 individuals attending gastroenterology or urology clinics reviewed the new and comparator videos. The order of administration of the new and comparator videos was randomly counterbalanced to assess the impact of presentation order. Respondents rated each video on the following dimensions: information amount, clarity, trustworthiness, understandability, new or familiar information, reassurance, information learned, understanding from the patient's point of view, appeal, and the likelihood of recommending the video to others. RESULTS Overall, 71.6% (166/232) of the participants preferred the new video, 25.0% (58/232) preferred the comparator video, and 3.4% (8/232) were not sure. Furthermore, 64.0% (71/111) of those who viewed the new video first preferred it, whereas 77.7% (94/121) of the participants who viewed the new video second preferred it. Multivariable logistic regression analysis also demonstrated that participants were more likely to prefer the new video if they had viewed it second. Participants who preferred the new video rated it as clearer and more trustworthy than those who preferred the comparator video. CONCLUSIONS This study developed and assessed the strengths of a newly developed colonoscopy educational video.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jesse Garber
- IBD Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Patrick Faucher
- George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | - Gayle Restall
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - John R Walker
- Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Harminder Singh
- IBD Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Liu A, Yan S, Wang H, Lin Y, Wu J, Fu L, Wu Q, Lu Y, Liu Y, Chen H. Ward nurses-focused educational intervention improves the quality of bowel preparation in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy: A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20976. [PMID: 32898990 PMCID: PMC7478607 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate bowel preparation is essential for the detection of pathological lesions during colonoscopy. However, it has been found to be inadequate in approximately 20% to 30% of colonoscopy examinations. Educational interventions focused on health staff, such as physicians and nurses, may improve the patients' understanding of the bowel preparation instructions, and consequently, increase the quality of bowel preparation. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether enhanced education of ward nurses could improve the bowel preparation quality in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy. DESIGN This was a single-center randomized controlled study. METHODS A total of 190 consecutive inpatients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy from March 2019 to March 2020 were randomized to the educated (nurses with enhanced education) or control group (nurses without enhanced education). We assessed the bowel preparation quality using the Boston bowel preparation scale. RESULTS There were 89 patients in the educated group and 101 patients in the control group. The proportion of colonoscopies with adequate bowel preparation was 83.1% in the educated group and 69.3% in the control group. Patients' compliance with bowel preparation in the educated group was superior to that in the control group. Furthermore, significantly better sleep quality was found in the educated group. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the ward nurses-focused enhanced educational intervention as a risk factor for bowel preparation quality. CONCLUSIONS The ward nurses-focused educational intervention improved the bowel preparation quality and reduced the adverse event rates in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under number ChiCTR2000030366.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yijia Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery
| | - Junkui Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Liping Fu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Qining Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Yi Lu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Yanan Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Honglei Chen
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kernebeck S, Busse TS, Böttcher MD, Weitz J, Ehlers J, Bork U. Impact of mobile health and medical applications on clinical practice in gastroenterology. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:4182-4197. [PMID: 32848328 PMCID: PMC7422538 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i29.4182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mobile health apps (MHAs) and medical apps (MAs) are becoming increasingly popular as digital interventions in a wide range of health-related applications in almost all sectors of healthcare. The surge in demand for digital medical solutions has been accelerated by the need for new diagnostic and therapeutic methods in the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This also applies to clinical practice in gastroenterology, which has, in many respects, undergone a recent digital transformation with numerous consequences that will impact patients and health care professionals in the near future. MHAs and MAs are considered to have great potential, especially for chronic diseases, as they can support the self-management of patients in many ways. Despite the great potential associated with the application of MHAs and MAs in gastroenterology and health care in general, there are numerous challenges to be met in the future, including both the ethical and legal aspects of applying this technology. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current status of MHA and MA use in the field of gastroenterology, describe the future perspectives in this field and point out some of the challenges that need to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Kernebeck
- Didactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten 58455, Germany
| | - Theresa S Busse
- Didactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten 58455, Germany
| | - Maximilian D Böttcher
- Department of GI-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Dresden Technical University, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of GI-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Dresden Technical University, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany
| | - Jan Ehlers
- Didactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten 58455, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bork
- Department of GI-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Dresden Technical University, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Colonoscopy is a safe and effective tool, but operator dependent. Room for improvement in the quality of colonoscopy is the impetus for the development and measurement of colonoscopy quality indicators and the focus of many efforts to improve colonoscopy quality indicator prevention and control in provider practices and health systems. We present the preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural quality indicators and benchmarks for colonoscopy. Every provider and practice must make a commitment to performing high-quality colonoscopy and implement and monitor quality metrics. There are a variety of tools available to assist in improving quality indicators that range from distal attachment devices to education and feedback. Although technology can help, it is not a substitute for proper technique. The commitment also requires provider feedback through audits and report cards. The impact of these efforts on patient outcomes is an important area of further research.
Collapse
|
40
|
Kutyla MJ, Gray MA, von Hippel C, Hourigan LF, Kendall BJ, Whaley AJ, O'Connor S, Holtmann GJ. Improving the Quality of Bowel Preparation: Rewarding Patients for Success or Intensive Patient Education? Dig Dis 2020; 39:113-118. [PMID: 32720916 DOI: 10.1159/000510461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The quality of the bowel preparation is a critical parameter for the outcome of colonoscopies. It is well established that the bowel preparation modality (e.g., split or larger volume preparation) significantly improves the quality of the bowel preparation. Patient compliance is another important factor impacting on the quality of bowel preparations that receives relatively little research attention. We aimed to explore if intensified education or a lottery ticket as reward for good bowel preparation could improve outcomes. METHODS After informed consent, all patients received a standardized printed information booklet. In a randomized fashion, patients were offered (a) a lottery scratchy ticket with an opportunity to win $25,000 as "reward" for good bowel preparation, (b) an education session delivered over the phone by a trained nurse, or (c) no additional measure. RESULTS Overall, the quality of the bowel preparation was rated good or very good in 69.1% (95% CI 61.7-75.7%) of patients. Reward intervention did not influence the quality of bowel preparation (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.09-1.91, p = 0.260); however, bowel preparation quality decreased in patients randomized to receive the additional education (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.96, p = 0.042). Neither intervention significantly impacted on polyp detection rates. CONCLUSIONS Contrasting general beliefs, additional interventions (e.g., incentives or phone consultation) did not improve the quality of the bowel preparation. The unexpected result shows that utilizing extra resources must be balanced against real-world outcomes and may not always provide the expected result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite J Kutyla
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.,School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marcus A Gray
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.,School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Courtney von Hippel
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Luke F Hourigan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bradley J Kendall
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amanda J Whaley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sam O'Connor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gerald J Holtmann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, .,Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, .,Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tian X, Xu LL, Liu XL, Chen WQ. Enhanced Patient Education for Colonic Polyp and Adenoma Detection: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e17372. [PMID: 32347798 PMCID: PMC7296415 DOI: 10.2196/17372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To improve patients’ comprehension of bowel preparation instructions before colonoscopy, enhanced patient education (EPE) such as cartoon pictures or other visual aids, phone calls, mobile apps, multimedia education and social media apps have been proposed. However, it is uncertain whether EPE can increase the detection rate of colonic polyps and adenomas. Objective This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EPE in detecting colonic polyps and adenomas. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inception to June 2019 for the identification of trials comparing the EPE with standard patient education for outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. We used a random effects model to calculate summary estimates of the polyp detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one polyp divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), adenoma detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one adenoma divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), advanced adenoma detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one advanced adenoma divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), sessile serrated adenoma detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one sessile serrated adenoma divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), cancer detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one cancer divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), or adenoma detection rate - plus (defined as the number of additional adenomas found after the first adenoma per colonoscopy). Moreover, we conducted trial sequential analysis (TSA) to determine the robustness of summary estimates of all primary outcomes. Results We included 10 randomized controlled trials enrolling 4560 participants for analysis. The meta-analysis suggested that EPE was associated with an increased polyp detection rate (9 trials; 3781 participants; risk ratio [RR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.35; P<.05; I2=42%) and adenoma detection rate (5 trials; 2133 participants; RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.64; P<.001; I2=0%), which were established by TSA. Pooled result from the inverse-variance model illustrated an increase in the sessile serrated adenoma detection rate (3 trials; 1248 participants; odds ratio 1.76, 95% CI 1.22-2.53; P<.05; I2=0%). One trial suggested an increase in the adenoma detection rate - plus (RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.91-6.61; P<.001). Pooled estimates from 3 (1649 participants) and 2 trials (1375 participants) generated no evidence of statistical difference for the advanced adenoma detection rate and cancer detection rate, respectively. Conclusions The current evidence indicates that EPE should be recommended to instruct bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy because it can increase the polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and sessile serrated adenoma detection rate. However, further trials are warranted to determine the efficacy of EPE for advanced adenoma detection rate, adenoma detection rate - plus, and cancer detection rate because of limited data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Tian
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Ling-Li Xu
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiao-Ling Liu
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei-Qing Chen
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shandro BM, Emrith K, Slabaugh G, Poullis A, Smith ML. Optical imaging technology in colonoscopy: Is there a role for photometric stereo? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12:138-148. [PMID: 32477448 PMCID: PMC7243575 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i5.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy screening for the detection and removal of colonic adenomas is central to efforts to reduce the morbidity and mortality of colorectal cancer. However, up to a third of adenomas may be missed at colonoscopy, and the majority of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers are thought to arise from these. Adenomas have three-dimensional surface topographic features that differentiate them from adjacent normal mucosa. However, these topographic features are not enhanced by white light colonoscopy, and the endoscopist must infer these from two-dimensional cues. This may contribute to the number of missed lesions. A variety of optical imaging technologies have been developed commercially to enhance surface topography. However, existing techniques enhance surface topography indirectly, and in two dimensions, and the evidence does not wholly support their use in routine clinical practice. In this narrative review, co-authored by gastroenterologists and engineers, we summarise the evidence for the impact of established optical imaging technologies on adenoma detection rate, and review the development of photometric stereo (PS) for colonoscopy. PS is a machine vision technique able to capture a dense array of surface normals to render three-dimensional reconstructions of surface topography. This imaging technique has several potential clinical applications in colonoscopy, including adenoma detection, polyp classification, and facilitating polypectomy, an inherently three-dimensional task. However, the development of PS for colonoscopy is at an early stage. We consider the progress that has been made with PS to date and identify the obstacles that need to be overcome prior to clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Shandro
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
| | - Khemraj Emrith
- Centre for Machine Vision, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, United Kingdom
| | - Gregory Slabaugh
- Department of Computer Science, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Poullis
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
| | - Melvyn L Smith
- Centre for Machine Vision, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Millien VO, Mansour NM. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22:28. [PMID: 32377915 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the USA. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening and can offer both diagnosis and therapy. The bowel preparation remains a significant barrier for patients who need to undergo colonoscopy and is often cited as the most dreaded aspect of the colonoscopy process. Inadequate bowel preparations still occur in 10-25% of colonoscopies, and this in turn can lead to increased procedural times, lower cecal intubation rates, and shorter interval between colonoscopies. From a quality standpoint, it is imperative that we do what we can to decrease the rate of inadequate bowel preparations. This review will focus on recent data regarding bowel preparation and offers a glimpse into what may be coming in the future. RECENT FINDINGS Recent advances in the field have been made to improve tolerability of bowel preparations and allow for more adequate colonoscopies. Newer, lower volume, flavored preparations, the use of adjuncts, and using split-dose preparations all can help with tolerability, compliance, and, in turn, preparation quality. Edible bowel preparations may become available in the near future. Early data on the use of artificial intelligence for assessment of preparation quality has been promising. Additionally, utilization of smartphone technology for education prior to the bowel preparation has also been shown to improve the adequacy of bowel preparations. CONCLUSIONS Ongoing efforts to improve the tolerability and palatability of colonoscopy bowel preparations are important from a quality improvement standpoint to ensure the adequacy of colonoscopy. Incorporating patient-specific factors and comorbidities is also an essential aspect of improving the quality of bowel preparation. Leveraging technology to better communicate with and educate patients on the bowel preparation process is likely to play a larger role in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentine Ongeri Millien
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St., Suite 8B, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Nabil M Mansour
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St., Suite 8B, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sharma P, Burke CA, Johnson DA, Cash BD. The importance of colonoscopy bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal lesions and colorectal cancer prevention. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E673-E683. [PMID: 32355887 PMCID: PMC7165013 DOI: 10.1055/a-1127-3144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has reduced CRC incidence and mortality and improved prognosis. Optimal bowel preparation and high-quality endoscopic technique facilitate early CRC detection. This review provides a narrative on the clinical importance of bowel preparation for colonoscopy and highlights available bowel preparations. Methods A PubMed search was conducted through June 2019 to identify studies evaluating clinical outcomes, efficacy, safety, and tolerability associated with bowel preparation for CRC screening-related colonoscopy. Results Selecting the optimal bowel preparation regimen is based on considerations of efficacy, safety, and tolerability, in conjunction with individual patient characteristics and preferences. Available bowel preparations include high-volume (4 L) and low-volume (2 L and 1 L), polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions, sodium sulfate, sodium picosulfate/magnesium oxide plus anhydrous citric acid, sodium phosphate tablets, and the over-the-counter preparations magnesium citrate and PEG-3350. These preparations may be administered as a single dose on the same day or evening before, or as two doses administered the same day or evening before/morning of colonoscopy. Ingesting at least half the bowel preparation on the day of colonoscopy (split-dosing) is associated with higher adequate bowel preparation quality versus evening-before dosing (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.9-3.4). Conclusions High-quality bowel preparation is integral for optimal CRC screening/surveillance by colonoscopy. Over the last 30 years, patients and providers have gained more options for bowel preparation, including low-volume agents with enhanced tolerability and cleansing quality that are equivalent to 4 L preparations. Split-dosing is preferred for achieving a high-quality preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prateek Sharma
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
| | | | - David A. Johnson
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, United States
| | - Brooks D. Cash
- University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Guo X, Li X, Wang Z, Zhai J, Liu Q, Ding K, Pan Y. Reinforced education improves the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0231888. [PMID: 32343708 PMCID: PMC7188205 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Inadequate bowel preparation (BP) is an unfavorable factor that influence the success of colonoscopy. Although standard education (SE) given to patients are proved useful to avoid inadequate BP. Studies concerning the effects of reinforced education (RE) on the quality of BP were inconsistent. The aim of this updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial was to compare the quality of BP between patients receiving RE in addition to SE and those receiving SE alone. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systemically searched to identify the relevant studies published through April 2019. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate BP. Subgroup analyses were conducted. Secondary outcomes included BP score, adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), insertion time, withdrawal time, adverse events, >80% purgative intake and diet compliance. Dichotomous variables were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were reported as mean difference (MD) with 95%CI. Pooled estimates of OR or MD were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was accessed by calculating the I2 value. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 18 randomized controlled trails (N = 6536) were included in this meta-analysis. Patients who received RE had a better BP quality than those only receiving SE (OR 2.59, 95%CI: 2.09–3.19; P<0.001). A higher ADR (OR 1.35; 95%CI: 1.06–1.72; P = 0.020) and PDR (OR 1.24, 95%CI: 1.02–1.50; P = 0.030), shorter insertion (MD -0.76; 95%CI: -1.48-(-0.04); P = 0.040) and withdrawal time (MD -0.83; 95%CI: -1.83-(-0.28); P = 0.003), less nausea/vomiting (OR 0.78; 95%CI: 0.64–0.97; P = 0.020) and abdominal distension (OR 0.72; 95%CI: 0.68–0.92; P = 0.020) were achieved in the RE group. More patients had >80% purgative intake (OR 2.17; 95%CI, 1.09–4.32; P = 0.030) and were compliant with diet restriction (OR 2.38; 95%CI: 1.79–3.17; P<0.001) in the RE group. Conclusion RE significantly improved BP quality, increased ADR and PDR, decreased insertion and withdrawal time and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyang Guo
- Department of Ultrasound, The 305 Hospital of PLA, Bejing, China
- Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Pneumology, The Second Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyan Wang
- Department of Pneumology, The Second Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junli Zhai
- Department of Pneumology, The Second Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, The 305 Hospital of PLA, Bejing, China
| | - Kang Ding
- Department of Ultrasound, The 305 Hospital of PLA, Bejing, China
| | - Yanglin Pan
- Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Effect of Short Message Service Use on Bowel Preparation Quality in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs 2020; 43:89-95. [PMID: 31990877 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effect of SMS use on the bowel preparation quality and satisfaction in patients who underwent colonoscopy. This study was conducted as an experimental-control study with 200 patients who had received colonoscopy in the endoscopy unit of a university hospital in Eastern Thrace of Turkey between December 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017. All patients received a standard bowel preparation. The SMS was sent in addition to the standard bowel preparation to patients in an SMS group. In the SMS group, patients were informed about the standard bowel preparation practices via SMS 3 days before colonoscopy. "Patient identification," "bowel preparation quality," and "patient satisfaction" forms were used for data collection. Chi-square and independent sample t tests were used in data analysis. The average age of the participants was 57.57 ± 12.37 years, and it was determined that most of the participants were male (64.5%) and had colonoscopy experience (55%). The bowel preparation quality was significantly higher in the SMS group than in the no-SMS group (p = .044), and most patients (91%) were "very satisfied" with being informed via SMS. Sending SMS about bowel preparation practices to colonoscopy patients improves bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction. Integrating SMS into standard care may help patients manage the bowel preparation process.
Collapse
|
47
|
Kaminski MF, Robertson DJ, Senore C, Rex DK. Optimizing the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening Worldwide. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:404-417. [PMID: 31759062 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Screening, followed by colonoscopic polypectomy (or surgery for malignant lesions), prevents incident colorectal cancer and mortality. However, there are variations in effective application of nearly every aspect of the screening process. Screening is a multistep process, and failure in any single step could result in unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Awareness of variations in operator- and system-dependent performance has led to detailed, comprehensive recommendations in the United States and Europe on how colonoscopy screening should be performed and measured. Likewise, guidance has been provided on quality assurance for nonprimary colonoscopy-based screening programs, including strategies to maximize adherence. Quality improvement is now a validated science, and there is clear evidence that higher quality prevents incident cancer and cancer death. Quality must be addressed at the levels of the system, provider, and individuals, to maximize the benefits of screening for any population. We review the important aspects of measuring and improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Douglas J Robertson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and The Dartmouth Institute, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Carlo Senore
- Epidemiology and Screening Unit-CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Xia T, Zhu YB, Zeng YB, Chen C, Wang SL, Zhao SB, Su XJ, Wang D, Yao J, Li ZS, Bai Y. Video education can improve awareness of risks for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized trial. J Dig Dis 2019; 20:656-662. [PMID: 31618520 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a randomized trial aiming at improving patients' informed consent for undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in clinical care by comparing the efficacy of an additional educational video to written informed consent with that of written informed consent alone. METHODS This was a single-center, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive patients undergoing ERCP were randomized to a video education or a control group. An educational video detailing ERCP procedure plus standard written informed consent was administered to the video education group, while the control group reviewed standard written informed consent only. The primary outcome was the patients' perception of the risk or possibility of ERCP complications. Their perception of the benefits of ERCP, alternative treatments and overall satisfaction with the process of informed consent were also compared. RESULTS In total 205 patients were included in the study (104 in the control group and 101 in the video education group). Patients' comprehension of ERCP-related complications in the video education group was significantly increased (P < 0.001), and these patients were more likely to correctly identify the incidence of such complications. Significantly more patients in the video education group were very satisfied with informed consent process (87.1% vs 76.0%, P = 0.040) and fewer patients needed additional explanations (31.7% vs 47.1%, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS A supplementary educational video could greatly improve patient's understanding of ERCP procedure, in particular, its potential risks and complications, as well as their overall satisfaction with the process of informed consent (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT02810379).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Xia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gongli Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.,Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Bei Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Eighth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Bo Zeng
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Cui Chen
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu Ling Wang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng Bing Zhao
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Ju Su
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gongli Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.,Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jinan University of Second Clinical Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Municipal People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zhao Shen Li
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gongli Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.,Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hernández G, Gimeno-García AZ, Quintero E. Strategies to Improve Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6:245. [PMID: 31781565 PMCID: PMC6857107 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Bowel cleansing is one of the most important parameters included in the evaluation of colonoscopy quality. The available evidence suggests that inadequate bowel preparation reduces the diagnostic yield of colorectal neoplasia and increases post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer risk. Nowadays, up to 30% of patients referred for colonoscopy have a poor bowel cleansing. Recently, several studies have analyzed the risk factors for inadequate bowel cleansing as well as the strategies to optimize bowel preparation. In this review, we have focused on summarizing the available evidence in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goretti Hernández
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Antonio Z Gimeno-García
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Enrique Quintero
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB) & Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.,Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schooley B, San Nicolas-Rocca T, Burkhard R. Cloud-based multi-media systems for patient education and adherence: a pilot study to explore patient compliance with colonoscopy procedure preparation. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2019; 10:89-103. [PMID: 34104428 DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2019.1663974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Technology based patient education and adherence approaches are increasingly utilized to instruct and remind patients to prepare correctly for medical procedures. This study examines the interaction between two primary factors: patterns of patient adherence to challenging medical preparation procedures; and the demonstrated, measurable potential for cloud-based multi-media information technology (IT) interventions to improve patient adherence. An IT artifact was developed through prior design science research to serve information, reminders, and online video instruction modules to patients. The application was tested with 297 patients who were assessed clinically by physicians. Results indicate modest potential (43.4% relative improvement) for the IT-based approach for improving patient adherence to endoscopy preparations. Purposively designed cloud-based applications hold promise for aiding patients with complex medical procedure preparation. Health care provider involvement in the design and evaluation of a patient application may be an effective strategy to produce medical evidence and encourage the adoption of adherence apps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Schooley
- Health Information Technology, University of South Carolina, College of Engineering and Computing, Columbia, SC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|