1
|
Jamal L, May M, Setzer MR, Yu M, Berkman B, Similuk M. Research participants' perspectives about the return of uninformative genomic test results in a clinical research setting. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:689-698. [PMID: 37641538 PMCID: PMC10899523 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
The majority of genomic sequencing and microarray results are clinically uninformative, meaning that they do not suggest a need for any behavioral action or medical intervention. Prior studies have shown that recipients of uninformative genomic testing results ("uninformative results" hereafter) may incorrectly interpret them to imply a lowered risk of disease or false reassurance about future health risks. Few studies have examined how patients understand uninformative results when they are returned in a research setting, where there is wide variation in analytical specifications of testing, interpretation and reporting practices, and resources to support the return of results. We conducted cross-sectional interviews (N = 17) to explore how a subset of research participants in one genomics study at the National Institutes of Health reacted to and understood their uninformative test results, which were returned to them via a patient portal without genetic counseling. We found that most participants did not remember the details of the informed consent process, including the distinction between "primary" and "secondary" findings. Participants had questions about what genes were tested for and, in most cases, requested a list of the genes covered. Several participants incorrectly assumed that autosomal recessive carrier results would have been reported to them if detected. Some participants interpreted their uninformative results to mean that they could forgo prenatal testing, and participants had mixed expectations about whether their results might be reinterpreted in the future. These themes suggest that there are specific challenges to returning uninformative results in research settings. Educational supplements to uninformative test reports may be most useful if they contextualize results in relation to other types of clinical genetic or genomic testing that may be made available to research participants in their lifetimes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Jamal
- Center for Cancer Research, Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
- NIH Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Makenna May
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- Medical Genetics and Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Michael R. Setzer
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mary Yu
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Benjamin Berkman
- NIH Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, Bethesda, Maryland
- Bioethics Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Morgan Similuk
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mitchell LA, Jivani K, Young MA, Jacobs C, Willis AM. Systematic review of the uptake and outcomes from returning secondary findings to adult participants in research genomic testing. J Genet Couns 2024. [PMID: 38197527 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
The increasing use of genomic sequencing in research means secondary findings (SF) is more frequently detected and becoming a more pressing issue for researchers. This is reflected by the recent publication of multiple guidelines on this issue, calling for researchers to have a plan for managing SF prior to commencing their research. A deeper understanding of participants' experiences and outcomes from receiving SF is needed to ensure that the return of SF is conducted ethically and with adequate support. This review focuses on the uptake and outcomes of receiving actionable SF for research participants. This review included studies from January 2010 to January 2023. Databases searched included Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Of the 3903 studies identified, 29 were included in the analysis. The uptake of SF ranged between 20% and 97%, and outcomes were categorized into psychological, clinical, lifestyle and behavioral, and family outcomes. The results indicate there is minimal psychological impact from receiving SF. Almost all participants greatly valued receiving SF. These findings highlight considerations for researchers when returning results, including the importance of involving genetic health professionals in consenting, results return process, and ensuring continuity of care by engaging healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas A Mitchell
- Clinical Translation and Engagement Platform, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karishma Jivani
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Clinical Translation and Engagement Platform, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda M Willis
- Clinical Translation and Engagement Platform, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hendricks-Sturrup RM, Emmott N, Nafie M, Edgar L, Johnson-Glover T, Christensen KD, Argetsinger S, Lu CY. Returning personalized, genetic health test results to individuals of African descent or ancestry in precision medicine research. HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR 2023; 1:qxad066. [PMID: 38143510 PMCID: PMC10734905 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxad066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Today, many epidemiological studies and biobanks are offering to disclose individual genetic results to their participants, including the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program. Returning hereditary disease risks and pharmacogenetic test results to study participants from racial/ethnic groups that are historically underrepresented in biomedical research poses specific challenges to those participants and the health system writ large. For example, individuals of African descent are underrepresented in research about drug-gene interactions and have a relatively higher proportion of variants of unknown significance, affecting their ability to take clinical action following return of results. In this brief report, we summarize studies published to date concerning the perspectives and/or attitudes of African Americans engaged in genetic research programs to anticipate factors in disclosure protocols that would minimize risks and maximize benefits. A thematic analysis of studies identified (n = 6) lends to themes centered on motivations to engage or disengage in the return of results and integrating research and care. Actionable strategies determined in reaction to these themes center on ensuring adequate system and health education support for participants and personalizing the process for participants engaging in return of results. Overall, we offer these themes and actionable strategies as early guidance to research programs, and provide recommendations to policy makers focused on fair and equitable return of genetic research results to underrepresented research participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nora Emmott
- Duke-Robert J. Margolis, MD, Center for Health Policy, Washington, DC 20004, United States
| | - Maryam Nafie
- Duke-Robert J. Margolis, MD, Center for Health Policy, Washington, DC 20004, United States
| | - Lauren Edgar
- Southern Nevada Black Nurses Association, Las Vegas, NV 89127, United States
| | | | - Kurt D Christensen
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Stephanie Argetsinger
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Christine Y Lu
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Linder JE, Tao R, Chung WK, Kiryluk K, Liu C, Weng C, Connolly JJ, Hakonarson H, Harr M, Leppig KA, Jarvik GP, Veenstra DL, Aufox S, Chisholm RL, Gordon AS, Hoell C, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Smith ME, Holm IA, Miller EM, Prows CA, Elskeally O, Kullo IJ, Lee C, Jose S, Manolio TA, Rowley R, Padi-Adjirackor NA, Wilmayani NK, City B, Wei WQ, Wiesner GL, Rahm AK, Williams JL, Williams MS, Peterson JF. Prospective, multi-site study of healthcare utilization after actionable monogenic findings from clinical sequencing. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1950-1958. [PMID: 37883979 PMCID: PMC10645563 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
As large-scale genomic screening becomes increasingly prevalent, understanding the influence of actionable results on healthcare utilization is key to estimating the potential long-term clinical impact. The eMERGE network sequenced individuals for actionable genes in multiple genetic conditions and returned results to individuals, providers, and the electronic health record. Differences in recommended health services (laboratory, imaging, and procedural testing) delivered within 12 months of return were compared among individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) findings to matched individuals with negative findings before and after return of results. Of 16,218 adults, 477 unselected individuals were found to have a monogenic risk for arrhythmia (n = 95), breast cancer (n = 96), cardiomyopathy (n = 95), colorectal cancer (n = 105), or familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 86). Individuals with P/LP results more frequently received services after return (43.8%) compared to before return (25.6%) of results and compared to individuals with negative findings (24.9%; p < 0.0001). The annual cost of qualifying healthcare services increased from an average of $162 before return to $343 after return of results among the P/LP group (p < 0.0001); differences in the negative group were non-significant. The mean difference-in-differences was $149 (p < 0.0001), which describes the increased cost within the P/LP group corrected for cost changes in the negative group. When stratified by individual conditions, significant cost differences were observed for arrhythmia, breast cancer, and cardiomyopathy. In conclusion, less than half of individuals received billed health services after monogenic return, which modestly increased healthcare costs for payors in the year following return.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodell E Linder
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| | - Ran Tao
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | | | | | - Cong Liu
- Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | | | - John J Connolly
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hakon Hakonarson
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Margaret Harr
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathleen A Leppig
- Genetic Services, Kaiser Permanente of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- University of Washington Medical Center, Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - David L Veenstra
- University of Washington, Department of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Sharon Aufox
- Northwestern University, Center for Genetic Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Rex L Chisholm
- Northwestern University, Center for Genetic Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Adam S Gordon
- Northwestern University, Center for Genetic Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Christin Hoell
- Northwestern University, Center for Genetic Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | | | - Maureen E Smith
- Northwestern University, Center for Genetic Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | | | - Erin M Miller
- Division of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sheethal Jose
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Teri A Manolio
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Robb Rowley
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | - Brittany City
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Wei-Qi Wei
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | | | | | - Janet L Williams
- Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Marc S Williams
- Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee YH, Thaweethai T, Sheu YH, Feng YCA, Karlson EW, Ge T, Kraft P, Smoller JW. Impact of selection bias on polygenic risk score estimates in healthcare settings. Psychol Med 2023; 53:7435-7445. [PMID: 37226828 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723001186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital-based biobanks are being increasingly considered as a resource for translating polygenic risk scores (PRS) into clinical practice. However, since these biobanks originate from patient populations, there is a possibility of bias in polygenic risk estimation due to overrepresentation of patients with higher frequency of healthcare interactions. METHODS PRS for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression were calculated using summary statistics from the largest available genomic studies for a sample of 24 153 European ancestry participants in the Mass General Brigham (MGB) Biobank. To correct for selection bias, we fitted logistic regression models with inverse probability (IP) weights, which were estimated using 1839 sociodemographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization features extracted from electronic health records of 1 546 440 non-Hispanic White patients eligible to participate in the Biobank study at their first visit to the MGB-affiliated hospitals. RESULTS Case prevalence of bipolar disorder among participants in the top decile of bipolar disorder PRS was 10.0% (95% CI 8.8-11.2%) in the unweighted analysis but only 6.2% (5.0-7.5%) when selection bias was accounted for using IP weights. Similarly, case prevalence of depression among those in the top decile of depression PRS was reduced from 33.5% (31.7-35.4%) to 28.9% (25.8-31.9%) after IP weighting. CONCLUSIONS Non-random selection of participants into volunteer biobanks may induce clinically relevant selection bias that could impact implementation of PRS in research and clinical settings. As efforts to integrate PRS in medical practice expand, recognition and mitigation of these biases should be considered and may need to be optimized in a context-specific manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Younga Heather Lee
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tanayott Thaweethai
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yi-Han Sheu
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yen-Chen Anne Feng
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Biostatistics and Data Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Elizabeth W Karlson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunity, and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tian Ge
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Precision Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jordan W Smoller
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Precision Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clayton EW, Smith ME, Anderson KC, Chung WK, Connolly JJ, Fullerton SM, McGowan ML, Peterson JF, Prows CA, Sabatello M, Holm IA. Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1021-1033. [PMID: 37343562 PMCID: PMC10357472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Two major goals of the Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network are to learn how best to return research results to patient/participants and the clinicians who care for them and also to assess the impact of placing these results in clinical care. Yet since its inception, the Network has confronted a host of challenges in achieving these goals, many of which had ethical, legal, or social implications (ELSIs) that required consideration. Here, we share impediments we encountered in recruiting participants, returning results, and assessing their impact, all of which affected our ability to achieve the goals of eMERGE, as well as the steps we took to attempt to address these obstacles. We divide the domains in which we experienced challenges into four broad categories: (1) study design, including recruitment of more diverse groups; (2) consent; (3) returning results to participants and their health care providers (HCPs); and (4) assessment of follow-up care of participants and measuring the impact of research on participants and their families. Since most phases of eMERGE have included children as well as adults, we also address the particular ELSI posed by including pediatric populations in this research. We make specific suggestions for improving translational genomic research to ensure that future projects can effectively return results and assess their impact on patient/participants and providers if the goals of genomic-informed medicine are to be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Departments of Pediatrics and Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Department of Medicine, Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Katherine C Anderson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - John J Connolly
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Stephanie M Fullerton
- Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michelle L McGowan
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Center for Precision Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Divisions of Human Genetics and Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Center for Precision Medicine & Genomics, Department of Medicine, and Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities & Ethics Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, NY, NY 10032, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dikilitas O, Sherafati A, Saadatagah S, Satterfield BA, Kochan DC, Anderson KC, Chung WK, Hebbring SJ, Salvati ZM, Sharp RR, Sturm AC, Gibbs RA, Rowley R, Venner E, Linder JE, Jones LK, Perez EF, Peterson JF, Jarvik GP, Rehm HL, Zouk H, Roden DM, Williams MS, Manolio TA, Kullo IJ. Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network: Prevalence, Penetrance, Cardiovascular Risk, and Outcomes After Return of Results. CIRCULATION. GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE 2023; 16:e003816. [PMID: 37071725 PMCID: PMC10113961 DOI: 10.1161/circgen.122.003816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implications of secondary findings detected in large-scale sequencing projects remain uncertain. We assessed prevalence and penetrance of pathogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) variants, their association with coronary heart disease (CHD), and 1-year outcomes following return of results in phase III of the electronic medical records and genomics network. METHODS Adult participants (n=18 544) at 7 sites were enrolled in a prospective cohort study to assess the clinical impact of returning results from targeted sequencing of 68 actionable genes, including LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9. FH variant prevalence and penetrance (defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >155 mg/dL) were estimated after excluding participants enrolled on the basis of hypercholesterolemia. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of CHD compared to age- and sex-matched controls without FH-associated variants. Process (eg, referral to a specialist or ordering new tests), intermediate (eg, new diagnosis of FH), and clinical (eg, treatment modification) outcomes within 1 year after return of results were ascertained by electronic health record review. RESULTS The prevalence of FH-associated pathogenic variants was 1 in 188 (69 of 13,019 unselected participants). Penetrance was 87.5%. The presence of an FH variant was associated with CHD (odds ratio, 3.02 [2.00-4.53]) and premature CHD (odds ratio, 3.68 [2.34-5.78]). At least 1 outcome occurred in 92% of participants; 44% received a new diagnosis of FH and 26% had treatment modified following return of results. CONCLUSIONS In a multisite cohort of electronic health record-linked biobanks, monogenic FH was prevalent, penetrant, and associated with presence of CHD. Nearly half of participants with an FH-associated variant received a new diagnosis of FH and a quarter had treatment modified after return of results. These results highlight the potential utility of sequencing electronic health record-linked biobanks to detect FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozan Dikilitas
- Department of Internal Medicine (O.D.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alborz Sherafati
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Seyedmohammad Saadatagah
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Benjamin A Satterfield
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David C Kochan
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Katherine C Anderson
- Department of Medicine (K.C.A., J.E.L., J.F.P.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York (W.K.C.)
| | | | - Zachary M Salvati
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA (Z.M.S., A.C.S., L.K.J., M.S.W.)
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program (R.R.S.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amy C Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA (Z.M.S., A.C.S., L.K.J., M.S.W.)
| | - Richard A Gibbs
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (R.A.G., E.V.)
| | - Robb Rowley
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD (R.R., T.A.M.)
| | - Eric Venner
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (R.A.G., E.V.)
| | - Jodell E Linder
- Department of Medicine (K.C.A., J.E.L., J.F.P.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Laney K Jones
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA (Z.M.S., A.C.S., L.K.J., M.S.W.)
| | - Emma F Perez
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (E.F.P.)
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Department of Medicine (K.C.A., J.E.L., J.F.P.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (G.P.J.)
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge (H.L.R., H.Z.)
| | - Hana Zouk
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge (H.L.R., H.Z.)
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (H.Z.)
| | - Dan M Roden
- Departments of Medicine, Pharmacology, and Biomedical Informatics (D.M.R.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA (Z.M.S., A.C.S., L.K.J., M.S.W.)
| | - Teri A Manolio
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD (R.R., T.A.M.)
| | - Iftikhar J Kullo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Gonda Vascular Ctr (I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ohneda K, Hamanaka Y, Kawame H, Fuse N, Nagami F, Suzuki Y, Yamaguchi-Kabata Y, Shimada M, Masamune A, Aoki Y, Ishida T, Yamamoto M. Returning individual genomic results to population-based cohort study participants with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Breast Cancer 2023; 30:110-120. [PMID: 36161580 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01404-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advances in human genome research have provided evidence for genotype-phenotype associations, pathogenicity, and clinical actionability of variants and genomic risk prediction of disease. However, the return of individual genomic results to healthy individuals is fraught with ethical and practical complexity. METHODS Individual genomic results were returned to BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers of the Tohoku Medical Megabank cohort study participants with an information on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). One hundred and eighty participants, including 9 BRCA1/2 PV carriers, were asked about their willingness to receive individual genomic results, without revealing the gene name and related disorders, prior to the study. Of the 142 participants who responded, 103 showed willingness to know their genomic information. Each of the six BRCA1/2 PV carriers who consented to participate in the study received information about HBOC in person and underwent validation testing with blood resampling. RESULTS All participants were in their 60s or 70s; of the four females and two males, two had a history of breast cancer and five had a family history of HBOC-related cancers. All participants appreciated the information, without remarkable negative psychological impact of the return, and intended to undergo clinical risk surveillance. Five participants were accompanied by family members while receiving the results, and three first-degree female relatives wished to undergo genomic testing at the hospital. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that returning actionable genomic information to participants in a population-based genome cohort study is beneficial for preventing or providing early-stage intervention for associated diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinuko Ohneda
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan.
| | - Yohei Hamanaka
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kawame
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuo Fuse
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan
- Advanced Research Center for Innovations in Next-Generation Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Fuji Nagami
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan
- Advanced Research Center for Innovations in Next-Generation Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yoichi Suzuki
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yumi Yamaguchi-Kabata
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan
| | - Muneaki Shimada
- Advanced Research Center for Innovations in Next-Generation Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Masamune
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yoko Aoki
- Department of Medical Genetics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Takanori Ishida
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Masayuki Yamamoto
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan.
- Advanced Research Center for Innovations in Next-Generation Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Outcomes of Returning Medically Actionable Genomic Results in Pediatric Research. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12111910. [PMID: 36422086 PMCID: PMC9694255 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Phase III study was undertaken to assess clinical utility of returning medically actionable genomic screening results. We assessed pediatric clinical outcomes following return of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in autosomal dominant conditions with available effective interventions. Methods: The two eMERGE III pediatric sites collected outcome data and assessed changes in medical management at 6 and 12 months. Results: We returned P/LP results to 29 participants with outcome data. For 23 of the 29 participants, the P/LP results were previously unknown. Five of the 23 participants were already followed for conditions related to the P/LP variant. Of those receiving novel results and not being followed for the condition related to the P/LP result (n = 18), 14 (77.8%) had a change in healthcare after return of results (RoR). Following RoR, cascade testing of family members occurred for 10 of 23 (43.5%). Conclusions: The most common outcomes post-RoR included imaging/laboratory testing and health behavior recommendations. A change in healthcare was documented in 77.8% of those receiving results by 6 months. Our findings demonstrate how return of genomic screening results impacts healthcare in pediatric populations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Jones LK, Strande NT, Calvo EM, Chen J, Rodriguez G, McCormick CZ, Hallquist MLG, Savatt JM, Rocha H, Williams MS, Sturm AC, Buchanan AH, Glasgow RE, Martin CL, Rahm AK. A RE-AIM Framework Analysis of DNA-Based Population Screening: Using Implementation Science to Translate Research Into Practice in a Healthcare System. Front Genet 2022; 13:883073. [PMID: 35692820 PMCID: PMC9174580 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.883073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: DNA-based population screening has been proposed as a public health solution to identify individuals at risk for serious health conditions who otherwise may not present for medical care. The clinical utility and public health impact of DNA-based population screening is a subject of active investigation. Geisinger, an integrated healthcare delivery system, was one of the first healthcare systems to implement DNA screening programs (MyCode Community Health Initiative (MyCode) and clinical DNA screening pilot) that leverage exome data to identify individuals at risk for developing conditions with potential clinical actionability. Here, we demonstrate the use of an implementation science framework, RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance), to conduct a post-hoc evaluation and report outcomes from these two programs to inform the potential impact of DNA-based population screening. Methods: Reach and Effectiveness outcomes were determined from the MyCode research program, while Adoption and Implementation outcomes were measured using the clinical DNA screening pilot. Reach was defined as the number of patients who were offered and consented to participate in MyCode. Effectiveness of DNA screening was measured by reviewing MyCode program publications and synthesizing findings from themes. Adoption was measured by the total number of DNA screening tests ordered by clinicians at the clinical pilot sites. Implementation was assessed by interviewing a subset of clinical pilot clinicians about the deployment of and recommended adaptations to the pilot that could inform future program dissemination. Results:Reach: As of August 2020, 68% (215,078/316,612) of individuals approached to participate in the MyCode program consented. Effectiveness: Published evidence reported from MyCode demonstrates that DNA screening identifies at-risk individuals more comprehensively than clinical ascertainment based on phenotypes or personal/family history. Adoption: From July 2018 to June 2021, a total of 1,026 clinical DNA screening tests were ordered by 60 clinicians across the three pilot clinic sites. Implementation: Interviews with 14 clinicians practicing at the pilot clinic sites revealed motivation to provide patients with DNA screening results and yielded future implementation strategies. Conclusion: The RE-AIM framework offers a pragmatic solution to organize, analyze, and report outcomes across differently resourced and designed precision health programs that include genomic sequencing and return of clinically actionable genomic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laney K. Jones
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Natasha T. Strande
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Evan M. Calvo
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Jingheng Chen
- Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Juliann M. Savatt
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Heather Rocha
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Marc S. Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Amy C. Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Adam H. Buchanan
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Russell E. Glasgow
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christa L. Martin
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Alanna Kulchak Rahm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Alanna Kulchak Rahm,
| |
Collapse
|