1
|
Grove A, Pope C, Currie G, Clarke A. Paragons, Mavericks and Innovators-A typology of orthopaedic surgeons' professional identities. A comparative case study of evidence-based practice. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2022; 44:59-80. [PMID: 34706109 PMCID: PMC9298426 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Clinical guidelines, as vehicles for evidence-based practice (EBP) attempt to standardize health-care practice, reduce variation and increase quality. However, their use for surgery has been contested, and often resisted. This article examines professional responses to EBP in hip replacement surgery using data from case study observations and interviews in three English orthopaedic departments. A professional identity perspective is adopted to explain how standardization through EBP, represents an empirical phenomenon around which surgeons enact their identities as Paragons, Mavericks or Innovators, to enhance legitimacy and stratify themselves in their response to EBP. Attention is drawn to variation between Paragon surgeons working in university (teaching) hospitals and Maverick and Innovator types located in general hospitals, and the ways this interacts with adoption of EBP. The typology shows how practice variation is related to surgeons' tendencies to align to characteristic types, with distinct social processes, power and prestige, and which are in turn influenced by organizational context. The dynamics of EBP and professional identity continues to limit attempts to standardize surgical practice. The typology contributes to the understanding of failures to follow EBP, as associated with the identities individuals create and negotiate, and with identity narratives used to legitimize differing responses to EBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Grove
- Warwick Medical SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Catherine Pope
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Graeme Currie
- Warwick Business SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Aileen Clarke
- Warwick Medical SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tal O, Booch M, Bar-Yehuda S. Hospital staff perspectives towards health technology assessment: data from a multidisciplinary survey. Health Res Policy Syst 2019; 17:72. [PMID: 31337398 PMCID: PMC6651984 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0469-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology adoption in hospitals is usually based on cost-effectiveness analysis, feasibility and potential success. Different countries have embraced a range of principles to accomplish an effective comprehensive process of health technology assessment (HTA). The aim of the study was to analyse the viewpoints and relative weight of technology-oriented hospital staff members toward the clinical, social, technological and economic aspects of HTA. METHODS Using a structured questionnaire, a survey was conducted among different professionals in an 850-bed hospital. RESULTS We revealed a range of viewpoints among hospital staff members according to their personal characteristics and professional standpoints. The clinical aspects of HTA were considered 'highly important' (HI) by most participants, especially the 'lifesaving' parameter. Similarly, the 'lack of effective alternative technology' was ranked HI by a high percentage of participants, independent of their profession. Economic aspects were ranked HI only by half of the participants, while social and technological aspects were ranked HI only by a relatively low percentage. Nurses added 'improving quality of life', 'increasing teamwork efficiency' and 'improving medical standards'. Allied health professionals focused on 'lack of effective alternative technologies' as a main argument for adoption of HTA, alongside increasing efficiency, budget savings and contribution to hospital reputation. Engineers emphasised the requirement of significant investment in infrastructure and increasing efficiency. Administrators ranked patient experience as HI. Interestingly, the high ranking of social aspects correlated with older responders, while junior staff ranked safety significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS A multi-perspective multidisciplinary approach would be beneficial for policy-makers at hospitals and even on a national scale in Israel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orna Tal
- Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), 70300, Zerifin, Israel.
- ICET - Israeli Center for Emerging Technologies, Zerifin, Israel.
| | - Meirav Booch
- Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), 70300, Zerifin, Israel
- ICET - Israeli Center for Emerging Technologies, Zerifin, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jacobs S, Fegan T, Bradley F, Halsall D, Hann M, Schafheutle EI. How do organisational configuration and context influence the quantity and quality of NHS services provided by English community pharmacies? A qualitative investigation. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204304. [PMID: 30235289 PMCID: PMC6147574 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Community pharmacies are expanding their role into medicines-related healthcare and public health services, previously the domain of physicians and nurses, driven by policies to improve healthcare access for patients and to address problems of increasing demands and rising costs in primary and urgent care services. Understanding the organisational context into which this expansion is taking place is necessary given concerns over the extent to which pharmacies prioritise service volume over the quality of service provision. As part of a larger programme of work, this paper aims to explore stakeholder perceptions of the organisational and extra-organisational factors associated with service quality and quantity in community pharmacy as an established exemplar of private sector organisations providing publicly-funded healthcare. With ethics committee approval, forty semi-structured interviews were conducted with service commissioners, superintendent and front-line pharmacists, purposively selected from across nine geographical areas and a range of community pharmacy organisational types in England. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Findings highlight the perceived importance of appropriate staffing and skill-mix for promoting service quantity and quality in community pharmacy. Organisational cultures which supported team development were viewed as facilitatory whereas those prioritising business targets over service quality seen to be inhibitive. Older local populations and low patient expectations were thought to limit service uptake as was poor integration with wider primary care services. The contractual framework and commissioning processes were also seen as a barrier to increasing service quality, quantity and integration in this sector. These findings suggest that healthcare administrations should take account of organisational and extra-organisational drivers and barriers when commissioning services from private sector providers such as community pharmacies to ensure that the quality of service provision is incentivised in addition to service quantity. Additionally, collaborative working should be encouraged through integrated commissioning mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Jacobs
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Tom Fegan
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Fay Bradley
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Devina Halsall
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Hann
- Centre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen I. Schafheutle
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hann M, Schafheutle EI, Bradley F, Elvey R, Wagner A, Halsall D, Hassell K, Jacobs S. Organisational and extraorganisational determinants of volume of service delivery by English community pharmacies: a cross-sectional survey and secondary data analysis. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e017843. [PMID: 29018074 PMCID: PMC5652532 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify the organisational and extraorganisational factors associated with existing variation in the volume of services delivered by community pharmacies. DESIGN AND SETTING Linear and ordered logistic regression of linked national data from secondary sources-community pharmacy activity, socioeconomic and health need datasets-and primary data from a questionnaire survey of community pharmacies in nine diverse geographical areas in England. OUTCOME MEASURES Annual dispensing volume; annual volume of medicines use reviews (MURs). RESULTS National dataset (n=10 454 pharmacies): greater dispensing volume was significantly associated with pharmacy ownership type (large chains>independents>supermarkets), greater deprivation, higher local prevalence of cardiovascular disease and depression, older people (aged >75 years) and infants (aged 0-4 years) but lower prevalence of mental health conditions. Greater volume of MURs was significantly associated with pharmacy ownership type (large chains/supermarkets>>independents), greater dispensing volume, and lower disease prevalence.Survey dataset (n=285 pharmacies; response=34.6%): greater dispensing volume was significantly associated with staffing, skill-mix, organisational culture, years open and greater deprivation. Greater MUR volume was significantly associated with pharmacy ownership type (large chains/supermarkets>>independents), greater dispensing volume, weekly opening hours and lower asthma prevalence. CONCLUSIONS Organisational and extraorganisational factors were found to impact differently on dispensing volume and MUR activity, the latter being driven more by corporate ownership than population need. While levels of staffing and skill-mix were associated with dispensing volume, they did not influence MUR activity. Despite recent changes to the contractual framework, the existing fee-for-service reimbursement may therefore not be the most appropriate for the delivery of cognitive (rather than supply) services, still appearing to incentivise quantity over the quality (in terms of appropriate targeting) of services delivered. Future research should focus on the development of quality measures that could be incorporated into community pharmacy reimbursement mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Hann
- Centre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ellen I Schafheutle
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fay Bradley
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Elvey
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Greater Manchester, Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Wagner
- Division 5, NIHR Comprehensive Research Network – Eastern, Norwich, UK
| | - Devina Halsall
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Controlled Drugs Team, NHS England (North Region) Cheshire and Merseyside, Liverpool, UK
| | - Karen Hassell
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- College of Pharmacy, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA
| | - Sally Jacobs
- Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Frith L. The changing face of the English National Health Service: new providers, markets and morality. Br Med Bull 2016; 119:5-16. [PMID: 27554282 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldw034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One significant change in the English National Health Service (NHS) has been the introduction of market mechanisms. This review will explore the following questions: should we have markets in healthcare? What is the underlying philosophy of introducing more market mechanisms into the NHS? What are the effects of this and does it change the NHS beyond anything Bevan might have imagined in 1948? SOURCES OF DATA The review will use empirical studies, philosophical literature, bioethics discussion, policy and NHS documents. AREAS OF AGREEMENT The NHS is facing unprecedented challenges at the beginning of the 21st century, with funding levels not meeting the increase in demand. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY The extent and appropriate role for market mechanisms in the NHS is hotly debated. It will be argued that we are moving towards a more market-based NHS and the possible effects of this will be discussed. GROWING POINTS Rarely are the policy changes in the NHS evidence based in any meaningful way and they are often driven by ideological considerations rather than clear evidence. There needs to be a greater reliance on evidence of what works and a continuing commitment to healthcare as a societal good. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH There needs to be a discussion of what the NHS should be-a funder and provider, a funder or a partial funder? How the balance of power between regulators, different types of provider, commissioners and ultimately patients will play out in this changing environment are also areas for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Frith
- Department of Health Service Research, The University of Liverpool, Block B, The Waterhouse Building, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sheaff R, Charles N, Mahon A, Chambers N, Morando V, Exworthy M, Byng R, Mannion R, Llewellyn S. NHS commissioning practice and health system governance: a mixed-methods realistic evaluation. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr03100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundBy 2010 English health policy-makers had concluded that the main NHS commissioners [primary care trusts (PCTs)] did not sufficiently control provider costs and performance. After the 2010 general election, they decided to replace PCTs with general practitioner (GP)-controlled Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). Health-care commissioners have six main media of power for exercising control over providers, which can be used in different combinations (‘modes of commissioning’).ObjectivesTo: elicit the programme theory of NHS commissioning policy and empirically test its assumptions; explain what shaped NHS commissioning structures; examine how far current commissioning practice allowed commissioners to exercise governance over providers; examine how commissioning practices differ in different types of commissioning organisation and for specific care groups; and explain what factors influenced commissioning practice and the relationships between commissioners and providers.DesignMixed-methods realistic evaluation, comprising: Leximancer and cognitive frame analyses of policy statements to elicit the programme theory of NHS commissioning policy; exploratory cross-sectional analysis of publicly available managerial data about PCTs; systematic comparison of case studies of commissioning in four English sites – including commissioning for older people at risk of unplanned hospital admission; mental health; public health; and planned orthopaedic surgery – and of English NHS commissioning practice with that of a German sick-fund and an Italian region (Lombardy); action learning sets, to validate the findings and draw out practical implications; and two framework analyses synthesising the findings and testing the programme theory empirically.ResultsIn the four English case study sites, CCGs were formed by recycling former commissioning structures, relying on and maintaining the existing GP commissioning leaderships. The stability of distributed commissioning depended on the convergence of commissioners’ interests. Joint NHS and local government commissioning was more co-ordinated at strategic than operational level. NHS providers’ responsiveness to commissioners reflected how far their interests converged, but also providers’ own internal ability to implement agreements. Commissioning for mental health services and to prevent recurrent unplanned hospital readmissions relied more on local ‘micro-commissioning’ (collaborative care pathway design) than on competition. Service commissioning was irrelevant to intersectoral health promotion, but not clinical prevention work. On balance, the possibility of competition did not affect service outcomes in the ways that English NHS commissioning policies assumed. ‘Commodified’ planned orthopaedic surgery most lent itself to provider competition. In all three countries, tariff payments increased provider activity and commissioners’ costs. To contain costs, commissioners bundled tariff payments into blocks, agreed prospective case loads with providers and paid below-tariff rates for additional cases. Managerial performance, negotiated order and discursive control were the predominant media of power used by English, German and Italian commissioners.ConclusionsCommissioning practice worked in certain respects differently from what NHS commissioning policy assumed. It was often laborious and uncertain. In the four English case study sites financial and ‘real-side’ contract negotiations were partly decoupled, clinician involvement being least on the financial side. Tariff systems weakened commissioners’ capacity to choose providers and control costs. Commissioners adapted the systems to solve this problem. Our findings suggest a need for further research into whether or not differently owned providers (corporate, third sector, public, professional partnership, etc.) respond differently to health-care commissioners and, if so, what specific implications for commissioning practice follow. They also suggest that further work is needed to assess how commissioning practices impact on health system integration when care pathways have to be constructed across multiple providers that must tender competitively for work, perhaps against each other.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rod Sheaff
- School of Government, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | - Nigel Charles
- School of Government, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | - Ann Mahon
- Manchester Business School, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Naomi Chambers
- Manchester Business School, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Richard Byng
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Sue Llewellyn
- Manchester Business School, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|