HLA-Specific antibodies are associated with high-grade and persistent-recurrent lung allograft acute rejection

Pushing the Survival Bar Higher: Two Decades of Innovation in Lung Transplantation

Survival after lung transplantation has significantly improved during the last two decades. The refinement of the already existing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and the introduction of new techniques for donor lung optimization, such as ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), have allowed the extension of transplant indication to patients with end-stage lung failure after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the expansion of the donor organ pool, due to the better evaluation and optimization of extended-criteria donor (ECD) lungs and of donors after circulatory death (DCD). The close monitoring of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) has allowed the early recognition of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which requires a completely different treatment and has a worse prognosis than acute cellular rejection (ACR). As such, the standardization of patient selection and post-transplant management has significantly contributed to this positive trend, especially at high-volume centers. This review focuses on lung transplantation after ARDS, on the role of EVLP in lung donor expansion, on ECMO as a principal cardiopulmonary support system in lung transplantation, and on the diagnosis and therapy of pulmonary AMR.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation: Diagnosis and Therapeutic Armamentarium in a 21st Century Perspective

Humoral immunity is a major waypoint towards chronic allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation (LT) recipients. Though allo-immunization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are well-known entities, some diagnostic gaps need to be addressed. Morphological analysis could be enhanced by digital pathology and artificial intelligence-based companion tools. Graft transcriptomics can help to identify graft failure phenotypes or endotypes. Donor-derived cell free DNA is being evaluated for graft-loss risk stratification and tailored surveillance. Preventative therapies should be tailored according to risk. The donor pool can be enlarged for candidates with HLA sensitization, with strategies combining plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and immune cell depletion, or with emerging or innovative therapies such as imlifidase or immunoadsorption. In cases of insufficient pre-transplant desensitization, the effects of antibodies on the allograft can be prevented by targeting the complement cascade, although evidence for this strategy in LT is limited. In LT recipients with a humoral response, strategies are combined, including depletion of immune cells (plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption), inhibition of immune pathways, or modulation of the inflammatory cascade, which can be achieved with photopheresis. Altogether, these innovative techniques offer promising perspectives for LT recipients and shape the 21st century's armamentarium against AMR.

A Single-Center Analysis of How HLA Mismatch and Donor-Specific Antibodies Affect Short-Term Outcome After Lung Transplantation: A Pilot Study Before a Country-Wide Histocompatibility Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Analyzing HLA polymorphism in lung transplantation (LTx) is important, given its impact on LTx recipient survival and graft function. Accordingly, we conducted a retrospective study to examine the influence of HLA mismatch and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) on short-term outcomes and early-phase post-LTx complications.

METHOD

HLA antigen or eplet mismatch in LTx patients at Tohoku University Hospital from 2018 to 2023 was determined, and DSA was measured on admission for surgery to identify preformed DSA and at weeks 4 to 12 post-LTx for de novo DSA, respectively.

RESULTS

The participants were 45 LTx recipients, HLA-A/B/DR antigen mismatch (5-6 of 6) being identified in 57%, HLA-A/B/Cw/DR/DQ mismatch (8-10 of 10) in 57%, and HLA eplet mismatch (>61) in 46%. The prevalence of preformed DSA was 24%, and persistence (uncleared) was 16%. The incidence of de novo DSA was 16% after LTx. During the study,16 recipients experienced grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD), 8 developed acute rejection, and 5 died. No HLA-related variables were significantly associated with post-LTx mortality and were not risk factors for high-grade PGD or acute rejection.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations in sample size, resulting in tentative findings, the study serves as a crucial pilot study for an ongoing multicenter prospective trial in Japan.

Immune surveillance and humoral immune responses in kidney transplantation - A look back at T follicular helper cells

T follicular helper cells comprise a specialized, heterogeneous subset of immune-competent T helper cells capable of influencing B cell responses in lymphoid tissues. In physiology, for example in response to microbial challenges or vaccination, this interaction chiefly results in the production of protecting antibodies and humoral memory. In the context of kidney transplantation, however, immune surveillance provided by T follicular helper cells can take a life of its own despite matching of human leukocyte antigens and employing the latest immunosuppressive regiments. This puts kidney transplant recipients at risk of subclinical and clinical rejection episodes with a potential risk for allograft loss. In this review, the current understanding of immune surveillance provided by T follicular helper cells is briefly described in physiological responses to contrast those pathological responses observed after kidney transplantation. Sensitization of T follicular helper cells with the subsequent emergence of detectable donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies, non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies their implication for kidney transplantation and lessons learnt from other transplantation "settings" with special attention to antibody-mediated rejection will be addressed.

Preemptive treatment of de novo donor-specific antibodies in lung transplant patients reduces subsequent risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction or death

The development of donor-specific antibodies after lung transplantation is associated with downstream acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), or death. It is unknown whether preemptive (early) treatment of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms of allograft dysfunction, reduces the risk of subsequent CLAD or death. We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study to determine if early treatment of dnDSAs in lung transplant patients reduces the risk of the composite endpoint of CLAD or death. In the cohort of 445 patients, 145 patients developed dnDSAs posttransplant. Thirty patients received early targeted treatment for dnDSAs in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms of AMR. Early treatment of dnDSAs was associated with a decreased risk of CLAD or death (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.76; P < .01). Deferring treatment until the development of clinical AMR was associated with an increased risk of CLAD or death (hazard ratio, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-6.18; P < .01). This study suggests that early, preemptive treatment of donor-specific antibodies in lung transplant patients may reduce the subsequent risk of CLAD or death.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection: Diagnosis and Treatment

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a form of lung allograft rejection that is emerging as an important risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and decreased long-term survival. In this review, we provide a brief overview of our current understanding of its pathophysiology with an emphasis on donor-specific antibodies before moving on to focus on the current diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies. Our goal is to discuss the limitations of our current knowledge and explore how novel diagnostic and therapeutic options aim to improve outcomes through earlier definitive diagnosis and preemptive targeted treatment.

Immune processes in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: identifying the missing pieces of the puzzle

Lung transplantation is the optimal treatment for selected patients with end-stage chronic lung diseases. However, chronic lung allograft dysfunction remains the leading obstacle to improved long-term outcomes. Traditionally, lung allograft rejection has been considered primarily as a manifestation of cellular immune responses. However, in reality, an array of complex, interacting and multifactorial mechanisms contribute to its emergence. Alloimmune-dependent mechanisms, including T-cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, as well as non-alloimmune injuries, have been implicated. Moreover, a role has emerged for autoimmune responses to lung self-antigens in the development of chronic graft injury. The aim of this review is to summarise the immune processes involved in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, with advanced insights into the role of innate immune pathways and crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity, and to identify gaps in current knowledge.

Lung Allograft Rejection

Rejection is a major complication following lung transplantation. Acute cellular rejection (ACR), and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are risk factors for the subsequent development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and worse outcomes after transplantation. Although ACR has well-defined histopathologic diagnostic criteria and grading, the diagnosis of AMR requires a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach. This article reviews the identification, clinical and pathologic features of, and therapeutic options for ACR and AMR.

Phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein expression by immunohistochemistry correlates with de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies in lung allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

Per the ISHLT 2016 definition, a C4d-positive lung biopsy is required to meet criteria for definite antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Unfortunately, C4d has poor sensitivity and specificity, and low inter-rater reliability. Phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein (p-S6RP) expressed via the mTOR pathway has been shown to be a biomarker of AMR and correlates with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in heart allografts. However, p-S6RP immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the setting of pulmonary AMR has yet to be evaluated. We sought to determine whether p-S6RP IHC performed on lung biopsies correlates with de novo DSA.

METHODS

IHC for p-S6RP performed on 26 biopsies from lung transplant recipients with de novo HLA DSA (DSA+) and 28 biopsies from patients with no DSA (DSA-) were evaluated by 3 pathologists who independently scored the degree of alveolar macrophage and pneumocyte staining. Staining in ≥50% of the biopsy as determined by at least 2 pathologists was considered positive.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (81%) DSA+ biopsies stained positive for p-S6RP in pneumocytes and 21 (81%) in macrophages. Six DSA- biopsies (21%) stained positive for p-S6RP in pneumocytes, 6 (21%) were positive in macrophages. Pneumocyte p-S6RP staining was 81% sensitive and 79% specific for DSA. Macrophage staining showed the same sensitivity and specificity but with lower inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.53 vs 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a positive relationship between de novo DSA and p-S6RP expression in pneumocytes and macrophages using IHC. p-S6RP is relatively sensitive and specific, and has superior inter-rater reliability compared to C4d.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Lung Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now a widely recognized form of lung allograft rejection, with mounting evidence for AMR as an important risk factor for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and markedly decreased long-term survival. Despite the recent development of the consensus diagnostic criteria, it remains a challenging diagnosis of exclusion. Furthermore, even after diagnosis, treatment directed at pulmonary AMR has been nearly exclusively derived from practices with other solid-organ transplants and other areas of medicine, such that there is a significant lack of data regarding the efficacy for these in pulmonary AMR. Lastly, outcomes after AMR remain quite poor despite aggressive treatment. In this review, we revisit the history of AMR in lung transplantation, describe our current understanding of its pathophysiology, discuss the use and limitations of the consensus diagnostic criteria, review current treatment strategies, and summarize long-term outcomes. We conclude with a synopsis of our most pressing gaps in knowledge, introduce recommendations for future directions, and highlight promising areas of active research.

Acute Rejection in the Modern Lung Transplant Era

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains a common complication after lung transplantation. Mortality directly related to ACR is low and most patients respond to first-line immunosuppressive treatment. However, a subset of patients may develop refractory or recurrent ACR leading to an accelerated lung function decline and ultimately chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Infectious complications associated with the intensification of immunosuppression can also negatively impact long-term survival. In this review, we summarize the most recent evidence on the mechanisms, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of ACR. We specifically focus on novel, promising biomarkers which are under investigation for their potential to improve the diagnostic performance of transbronchial biopsies. Finally, for each topic, we highlight current gaps in knowledge and areas for future research.

Donor-specific antibodies in lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after lung transplantation has been recognized as an important risk factor for poor outcomes over the past 20 years. Recently, this has been a focus of intense research, and the purpose of this review is to summarize our current understanding of humoral responses and important recent findings as well as to identify areas of future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have identified donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) as an important biomarker associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Importantly, ddcfDNA levels are noted to be elevated approximately 3 months before the onset of clinical allograft dysfunction, making ddcfDNA a particularly appealing biomarker to predict the onset of AMR. Additional notable recent findings include the identification of an independent association between the isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from respiratory specimens and the development of DSA. This finding provides potential insights into crosstalk between innate and alloimmune responses and identifies a potential therapeutic target to prevent the development of DSA.

SUMMARY

Progress in the field of humoral responses after lung transplantation has been slow, but ongoing and future research in this area are critically necessary to improve patient outcomes in the future.

Desensitization and management of allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) limits the success of lung transplantation. Among the risk factors associated with CLAD, we recognize pretransplant circulating antibodies against the human leukocyte antigens (HLA), acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This review will summarize current data surrounding management of desensitization, ACR, AMR, and CLAD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Strategies in managing in highly sensitized patients waiting for lung transplant include avoidance of specific HLA antigens and reduction of circulating anti-HLA antibodies at time of transplant. Several multimodal approaches have been studied in the treatment of AMR with a goal to clear circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and to halt the production of new antibodies. Different immunosuppressive strategies focus on influence of the host immune system, particularly T-cell responses, in order to prevent ACR and the progression of CLAD.

SUMMARY

The lack of significant evidence and consensus limits to draw conclusion regarding the impact of specific immunosuppressive regimens in the management of HLA antibodies, ACR, and CLAD. Development of novel therapeutic agents and use of multicenter randomized clinical trials will allow to better define patient-specific treatments and improve the length and quality of life of lung transplant recipients.

Lung Transplant Pathology: An Overview on Current Entities and Procedures

Alloimmune reactions are, besides various infections, the major cause for impaired lung allograft function following transplant. Acute cellular rejection is not only a major trigger of acute allograft failure but also contributes to development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Analogous to other solid organ transplants, acute antibody-mediated rejection has become a recognized entity in lung transplant pathology. Adequate sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of alloimmune reactions in the lung can only be achieved by synoptic analysis of histopathologic, clinical, and radiological findings together with serologic and microbiologic findings.

Antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been identified as a significant form of acute allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation. The development of consensus diagnostic criteria has created a uniform definition of AMR; however, significant limitations of these criteria have been identified. Treatment modalities for AMR have been adapted from other areas of medicine and data on the effectiveness of these therapies in AMR are limited. AMR is often refractory to these therapies, and graft failure and death are common. AMR is associated with increased rates of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and poor long-term survival. In this review, we discuss the history of AMR and describe known mechanisms, application of the consensus diagnostic criteria, data for current treatment strategies, and long-term outcomes. In addition, we highlight current gaps in knowledge, ongoing research, and future directions to address these gaps. Promising diagnostic techniques are actively being investigated that may allow for early detection and treatment of AMR. We conclude that further investigation is required to identify and define chronic and subclinical AMR, and head-to-head comparisons of currently used treatment protocols are necessary to identify an optimal treatment approach. Gaps in knowledge regarding the epidemiology, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of AMR continue to exist and future research should focus on these aspects.

Inverse Association Between the Quantity of Human Peripheral Blood CXCR5+IFN-γ+CD8+ T Cells With De Novo DSA Production in the First Year After Kidney Transplant

BACKGROUND

We recently reported that a novel CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T-cell subset significantly inhibits posttransplant alloantibody production in a murine transplant model. These findings prompted the current study to investigate the association of human CD8 T cells with the same phenotype with the development of de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In the current studies, we prospectively and serially analyzed peripheral blood CD8 and CD4 T-cell subsets and monitored for the development of de novo DSA in kidney transplant recipients during the first-year posttransplant. We report results on 95 first-time human kidney transplant recipients with 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-three recipients (24.2%) developed de novo DSA within 1-year posttransplant. Recipients who developed DSA had significantly lower quantities of peripheral CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells (P = 0.01) and significantly lower ratios of CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cell to combined CD4 Th1/Th2 cell subsets (IFN-γCD4 and IL-4CD4 cells; P = 0.0001) compared to recipients who remained DSA-negative over the first-year posttransplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data raise the possibility that human CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells are a homolog to murine CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells (termed antibody-suppressor CD8 T cells) and that the quantity of CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells (or the ratio of CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells to Th1/Th2 CD4 T cells) may identify recipients at risk for development of DSA.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on lung transplant outcome

OBJECTIVES

Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch between donor and recipient has a differential impact on the outcome after transplant (Tx) among transplantable solid organs. Although the lung is considered a highly antigenic organ, the impact of HLA matching between the donor and the recipient has been shown to be heterogeneous on lung Tx outcome. To provide further evidence that HLA matching should be considered in the decision process prior to lung Tx, we evaluated the impact of donor/recipient HLA mismatch on the outcome after lung Tx at our institution.

METHODS

All patients who underwent lung Tx were analysed in this retrospective single-cohort study between 1994 and 2013 for HLA (-A, -B or -DR) matching between the donor and the recipient and their association with overall survival, the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

RESULTS

In total, 371 (197 men) patients were included. Of these, 117 patients had no HLA match (0/6), 143 had a 1/6 match, 77 had 2/6 matches, 28 had 3/6 matches and 6 had 4/6 matches. One hundred and twenty-two (33%) patients experienced at least 1 episode of ACR and 172 (46%) patients developed CLAD. Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between HLA mismatch and the development of CLAD, whereas multivariate analysis revealed that the number of HLA matches (hazard ratio 0.76; P = 0.002), antibodies to cytomegalovirus in either donors or recipients (hazard ratio 1.52; P = 0.036) and donor age (hazard ratio 1.03; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of CLAD. On the other hand, HLA matches did not correlate with the incidence of ACR and with the overall survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of HLA mismatches between donors and recipients after lung Tx did not correlate with ACR or with the overall survival. In contrast, HLA mismatch correlated with the development of CLAD and should therefore be considered a risk factor.

Banff Lung Report: Current knowledge and future research perspectives for diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)

The Lung session of the 2017 14th Banff Foundation for Allograft Pathology Conference, Barcelona focused on the multiple aspects of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung transplantation. Multidimensional approaches for AMR diagnosis, including classification, histological and immunohistochemical analysis, and donor- specific antibody (DSA) characterization with their current strengths and limitations were reviewed in view of recent research. The group also discussed the role of tissue gene expression analysis in the context of unmet needs in lung transplantation. The current best practice for monitoring of AMR and the therapeutic approach are summarized and highlighted in this report. The working group reached consensus of the major gaps in current knowledge and focused on the unanswered questions regarding pulmonary AMR. An important outcome of the meeting was agreement on the need for future collaborative research projects to address these gaps in the field of lung transplantation.

Human leukocyte antigens antibodies after lung transplantation: Primary results of the HALT study

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to mismatched human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are associated with worse outcomes after lung transplantation. To determine the incidence and characteristics of DSA early after lung transplantation, we conducted a prospective multicenter observational study that used standardized treatment and testing protocols. Among 119 transplant recipients, 43 (36%) developed DSA: 6 (14%) developed DSA only to class I HLA, 23 (53%) developed DSA only to class II HLA, and 14 (33%) developed DSA to both class I and class II HLA. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was 3197. We identified a significant association between the Lung Allocation Score and the development of DSA (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.001-1.03, P = .047) and a significant association between DSA with an MFI ≥ 3000 and acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥ A2 (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.04-4.27, P = .039). However, we did not detect an association between DSA and survival. We conclude that DSA occur frequently early after lung transplantation, and most target class II HLA. DSA with an MFI ≥ 3000 have a significant association with ACR. Extended follow-up is necessary to determine the impact of DSA on other important outcomes.

Pathology of Lung Rejection: Cellular and Humoral Mediated

Acute rejection is an important risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, the clinical manifestation of chronic airway rejection in lung allograft recipients. Patients with acute rejection might be asymptomatic or present with symptoms that are not specific and can be also seen in other conditions. Clinical tests such as pulmonary function tests and imaging studies among others usually are abnormal; however, their results are also not specific for acute rejection. Histopathologic features of acute rejection in adequate samples of transbronchial lung biopsy of the lung allograft are currently the gold standard to assess for acute rejection in lung transplant recipients. Acute alloreactive injury can affect both the vasculature and the airways. Currently, the guidelines of the 2007 International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus conference are recommended for the histopathologic assessment of rejection. There are no specific morphologic features recognized to diagnose antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung allografts. Therefore, the diagnosis of AMR currently requires a “triple test” including clinical features, serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies, and pathologic findings supportive of AMR. Complement 4d deposition is used to support a diagnosis of AMR in many solid organ transplants; however, its significance for the diagnosis of AMR in lung allografts is not entirely clear. This chapter discusses the currently recommended guidelines for the assessment of cellular rejection of lung allografts and summarizes our knowledge about morphologic features and immunophenotypic tests that might help in the diagnosis of AMR.

Prevention of chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Long-term survival after lung transplantation (LTx) is limited by chronic rejection (CR). Therapeutic strategies for CR have been largely unsuccessful, making prevention of CR an important and challenging therapeutic approach. In the current review, we will discuss current clinical evidence regarding prevention of CR after LTx.

Acute rejection

Despite induction immunosuppression and the use of aggressive maintenance immunosuppressive regimens, acute allograft rejection following lung transplantation is still a problem with important diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. As well as causing early graft loss and mortality, acute rejection also initiates the chronic alloimmune responses and airway-centred inflammation that predispose to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), also known as chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which is a major source of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Cellular responses to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) on the allograft have traditionally been considered the main mechanism of acute rejection, but the influence of humoral immunity is increasingly recognised. As with other several other solid organ transplants, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now a well-accepted and distinct clinical entity in lung transplantation. While acute cellular rejection (ACR) has defined histopathological criteria, transbronchial biopsy is less useful in AMR and its diagnosis is complicated by challenges in the measurement of antibodies directed against donor HLA, and a determination of their significance. Increasing awareness of the importance of non-HLA antigens further clouds this issue. Here, we review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical presentation and treatment of ACR and AMR in lung transplantation, and discuss future potential biomarkers of both processes that may forward our understanding of these conditions.

Humoral responses after lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, there has been increasing awareness and appreciation for the role of humoral immune responses in lung allograft rejection. This review summarizes our current understanding of this role and the associated challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have described a syndrome of acute antibody-mediated rejection with a generally poor response to therapy and a high mortality. In addition, there is significant evidence implicating donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. However, the optimal intervention to mitigate the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction after donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies development remains unclear.

SUMMARY

There is mounting evidence that humoral immune responses play an important role in lung allograft rejection. However, therapeutic implications of this increased awareness have been limited. Indeed, there is insufficient evidence to adequately guide therapy, and the optimal treatment is unknown.

Early clearance vs persistence of de novo donor-specific antibodies following lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

The natural history of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) after lung transplantation is not well-described. We sought to determine the incidence and risk factors associated with dnDSA and compare outcomes between recipients with transient (or isolated) vs persistent dnDSA after transplantation.

METHODS

A single-center review of all lung transplants from 1/2009-7/2013. DSAs were tested eight times in the first year and every 4 months thereafter. Outcomes examined included acute rejection and graft failure.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 18 months (range: 1-61 months), and 24.6% of 333 first-time lung-only transplant recipients developed a dnDSA. Ethnicity, HLA-DQ mismatches, post-transplantation platelet transfusion and Lung Allocation Score >60 were associated with dnDSA (P<.05). Overall graft survival was worse for dnDSA-positive vs negative recipients (P=.025). Of 323 recipients with 1-year follow-up, 72 (22.2%) developed dnDSA, and in 25 (34.7%), the dnDSA was transient and cleared. Recipients with transient dnDSA were less likely to develop acute rejection than those with persistent dnDSA (P=.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-lung transplantation, dnDSA occurred in 1/4 of recipients, was associated with peri-transplant risk factors and resulted in decreased survival. Spontaneous clearance of dnDSA, seen in one-third of recipients, was associated with a lower risk of acute rejection.

Models of Lung Transplant Research: a consensus statement from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop

Lung transplantation, a cure for a number of end-stage lung diseases, continues to have the worst long-term outcomes when compared with other solid organ transplants. Preclinical modeling of the most common and serious lung transplantation complications are essential to better understand and mitigate the pathophysiological processes that lead to these complications. Various animal and in vitro models of lung transplant complications now exist and each of these models has unique strengths. However, significant issues, such as the required technical expertise as well as the robustness and clinical usefulness of these models, remain to be overcome or clarified. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) convened a workshop in March 2016 to review the state of preclinical science addressing the three most important complications of lung transplantation: primary graft dysfunction (PGD), acute rejection (AR), and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). In addition, the participants of the workshop were tasked to make consensus recommendations on the best use of these complimentary models to close our knowledge gaps in PGD, AR, and CLAD. Their reviews and recommendations are summarized in this report. Furthermore, the participants outlined opportunities to collaborate and directions to accelerate research using these preclinical models.

Proteasome Inhibitor Carfilzomib-Based Therapy for Antibody-Mediated Rejection of the Pulmonary Allograft: Use and Short-Term Findings

We present this observational study of lung transplant recipients (LTR) treated with carfilzomib (CFZ)-based therapy for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of the lung. Patients were considered responders to CFZ if complement-1q (C1q)-fixing ability of their immunodominant (ID) donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antibody (DSA) was suppressed after treatment. Treatment consisted of CFZ plus plasma exchange and immunoglobulins. Fourteen LTRs underwent CFZ for 20 ID DSA AMR. Ten (71.4%) of LTRs responded to CFZ. DSA IgG mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) fell from 7664 (IQR 3230-11 874) to 1878 (653-7791) after therapy (p = 0.001) and to 1400 (850-8287) 2 weeks later (p = 0.001). DSA C1q MFI fell from 3596 (IQR 714-14 405) to <30 after therapy (p = 0.01) and <30 2 weeks later (p = 0.02). Forced expiratory volume in 1s ( FEV₁ ) fell from mean 2.11 L pre-AMR to 1.92 L at AMR (p = 0.04). FEV₁ was unchanged after CFZ (1.91 L) and subsequently rose to a maximum of 2.13 L (p = 0.01). Mean forced expiratory flow during mid forced vital capacity (25-75) (FEF_25-75 ) fell from mean 2.5 L pre-AMR to 1.95 L at AMR (p = 0.01). FEF_25-75 rose after CFZ to 2.54 L and reached a maximum of 2.91 L (p = 0.01). Responders had less chronic lung allograft dysfunction or progression versus nonresponders (25% vs. 83%, p = 0.04). No deaths occurred within 120 days and 7 patients died post CFZ therapy of allograft failure. Larger prospective interventional studies are needed to further describe the benefit of CFZ-based therapy for pulmonary AMR.

Autologous and Allogenous Antibodies in Lung and Islet Cell Transplantation

The field of organ transplantation has undoubtedly made great strides in recent years. Despite the advances in donor-recipient histocompatibility testing, improvement in transplantation procedures, and development of aggressive immunosuppressive regimens, graft-directed immune responses still pose a major problem to the long-term success of organ transplantation. Elicitation of immune responses detected as antibodies to mismatched donor antigens (alloantibodies) and tissue-restricted self-antigens (autoantibodies) are two major risk factors for the development of graft rejection that ultimately lead to graft failure. In this review, we describe current understanding on genesis and pathogenesis of antibodies in two important clinical scenarios: lung transplantation and transplantation of islet of Langerhans. It is evident that when compared to any other clinical solid organ or cellular transplant, lung and islet transplants are more susceptible to rejection by combination of allo- and autoimmune responses.

Diagnosis of Acute Cellular Rejection and Antibody-Mediated Rejection on Lung Transplant Biopsies: A Perspective From Members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society

Context.—

The diagnosis and grading of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung allograft biopsies is important because rejection can lead to acute graft dysfunction and/or failure and may contribute to chronic graft failure. While acute cellular rejection is well defined histologically, no reproducible specific features of AMR are currently identified. Therefore, a combination of clinical features, serology, histopathology, and immunologic findings is suggested for the diagnosis of AMR.

Objective.—

To describe the perspective of members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society (PPS) on the workup of lung allograft transbronchial biopsy and the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection and AMR in lung transplant.

Data Sources.—

Reports by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), experience of members of PPS who routinely review lung allograft biopsies, and search of literature database (PubMed).

Conclusions.—

Acute cellular rejection should be assessed and graded according to the 2007 working formulation of the ISHLT. As currently no specific features are known for AMR in lung allografts, the triple test (clinical allograft dysfunction, donor-specific antibodies, pathologic findings) should be used for its diagnosis. C4d staining might be performed when morphologic, clinical, and/or serologic features suggestive of AMR are identified.

De-novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies 30 days after lung transplantation are associated with a worse outcome

BACKGROUND

The impact of de-novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) on patient and graft survival after lung transplantation remains controversial. We analyzed DSA that developed at Day 7 and Month (M) 1, M3, M6 and M12 after lung transplantation and evaluated their impact on chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) development and survival.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-four patients who underwent lung transplantation at our institution between November 2007 and August 2013 were included in this study. During the first post-transplant year, 82 (61%) patients developed de novo DSA and 52 (39%) patients did not. Three mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) intervals were used to define scores of anti-HLA antibody positivity: score 4 if MFI was 500 to 1,000; score 6 if MFI was 1,000 to 3,000; and score 8 if MFI was ≥3,000. Patients' records were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

DSA with MFI scores of ≥4 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 to 4.54, p = 0.03), 6 (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.27 to 5.20, p < 0.01) and 8 (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.67, p < 0.01) at M1; female gender (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.87, P = 0.01); and with post-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.28, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with CLAD. Multivariate analysis identified score 8 at M1 (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.34 to 5.47, p < 0.01) as an independent risk factor for mortality. Overall, 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 76%, 52% and 41% compared with 84%, 74% and 70% for patients with or without de-novo DSA at M1, respectively (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Early de-novo DSA may significantly impact long-term outcomes after lung transplantation and should therefore prompt regular screening.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation: Clinical Outcomes and Donor-Specific Antibody Characteristics

In the context of lung transplant (LT), because of diagnostic difficulties, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a matter of debate. We retrospectively analyzed an LT cohort at Foch Hospital to demonstrate the impact of AMR on LT prognosis. AMR diagnosis requires association of clinical symptoms, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and C4d(+) staining and/or histological patterns consistent with AMR. Prospective categorization split patients into four groups: (i) DSA positive, AMR positive (DSA(pos) AMR(pos) ); (ii) DSA positive, AMR negative (DSA(pos) AMR(neg) ); (iii) DSA limited, AMR negative (DSA(Lim) ; equal to one specificity, with mean fluorescence intensity of 500-1000 once); and (iv) DSA negative, AMR negative (DSA(neg) ). AMR treatment consisted of a combination of plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab. Among 206 transplanted patients, 10.7% were DSA(pos) AMR(pos) (n = 22), 40.3% were DSA(pos) AMR(neg) (n = 84), 6% were DSA(Lim) (n = 13) and 43% were DSA(neg) (n = 88). Analysis of acute cellular rejection at month 12 showed higher cumulative numbers (mean plus or minus standard deviation) in the DSA(pos) AMR(pos) group (2.1 ± 1.7) compared with DSA(pos) AMR(neg) (1 ± 1.2), DSA(Lim) (0.75 ± 1), and DSA(neg) (0.7 ± 1.23) groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated AMR as a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR] 8.7) and graft loss (HR 7.56) for DSA(pos) AMR(pos) patients. Our results show a negative impact of AMR on LT clinical course and advocate for an early active diagnostic approach and evaluation of therapeutic strategies to improve prognosis.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the lung: A consensus report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a recognized cause of allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Unlike AMR in other solid-organ transplant recipients, there are no standardized diagnostic criteria or an agreed-upon definition. Hence, a working group was created by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation with the aim of determining criteria for pulmonary AMR and establishing a definition. Diagnostic criteria and a working consensus definition were established. Key diagnostic criteria include the presence of antibodies directed toward donor human leukocyte antigens and characteristic lung histology with or without evidence of complement 4d within the graft. Exclusion of other causes of allograft dysfunction increases confidence in the diagnosis but is not essential. Pulmonary AMR may be clinical (allograft dysfunction which can be asymptomatic) or sub-clinical (normal allograft function). This consensus definition will have clinical, therapeutic and research implications.

Antibody-mediated rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) while contributing to acute and chronic allograft dysfunction remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The diagnostic tenets upon which AMR is defined will be reviewed in the light of recent studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The introduction of solid phase assays such as the Luminex platform has provided a wealth of quantitative data on the presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Further studies are required to better define the relationship of circulating DSA and activation of proinflammatory immune pathways that result in allograft dysfunction. The limitations of C4d staining in defining AMR are highlighted from recent studies in lung transplantation and from the 2013 Banff meeting on renal transplantation.

SUMMARY

The current challenge to the lung transplant community is to agree on a working definition of pulmonary AMR. Only then can we better appreciate the epidemiology, clinical phenotypes, and treatment of AMR.

Lung Transplantation

The therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disorders are currently limited. Lung transplantation remains one of the few viable interventions, but on account of the insufficient donor pool only a minority of these patients actually undergo the procedure each year. Following transplantation there are a number of early and late allograft complications such as primary graft dysfunction, allograft rejection, infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and late injury that is now classified as chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The pathologist plays an essential role in the diagnosis and classification of these myriad complications. Although the transplant procedures are performed in selected centers patients typically return to their local centers. When complications arise it is often the responsibility of the local pathologist to evaluate specimens. Therefore familiarity with the pathology of lung transplantation is important.

Antibody-mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation

There has been increasing awareness of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) as an important cause of graft failure after lung transplantation in recent years. However, the diagnostic criteria for pulmonary AMR are not well defined. All four tenets of AMR in kidney and heart transplantation, graft dysfunction, complement component deposition, circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and histopathologic changes consistent with AMR, are infrequently present in lung transplantation. Nonetheless, the lung transplant community has made important progress recognizing cases of AMR and developing a definition. However, AMR is often refractory to therapy resulting in graft failure and death. In this review, we discuss the progress and challenges in the diagnosis and therapeutic options for pulmonary AMR. In addition, we briefly examine emerging paradigms of C4d-negative AMR and chronic AMR, and conclude that significant progress is needed to mitigate the effects of humoral immune responses after lung transplantation.

Human leukocyte antigen mismatching and survival after lung transplantation in adult and pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

The influence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching on survival in adult and pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) after lung transplantation (LTx) is unknown.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 1987 to 2013 to determine the influence of HLA mismatching on survival in adult and pediatric CF LTx recipients by assessing the association of HLA mismatching with survival in first-time adult (aged ≥ 18 years) and pediatric (aged <18 years) recipients.

RESULTS

Of 3149 adult and 489 pediatric patients with CF, 3145 and 489 were used for univariate Cox analysis, 2687 and 363 for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and 2073 and 257 for multivariate Cox analysis, respectively. Univariate analyses in adult and pediatric patients with CF demonstrated conflicting associations between HLA mismatching and survival (adult hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.1; P = .45 vs pediatric HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99; P = .032). Multivariate Cox models including both pediatric and adult patients confirmed that HLA mismatching had an initially protective effect at young ages (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.99; P = .044) and that this protective effect diminished at older ages and was no longer associated with survival at P < .05 beyond age 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA mismatching has significantly different implications for survival after LTx in adult compared with pediatric patients with CF.

Detecting the humoral alloimmune response: we need more than serum antibody screening

Whereas many techniques exist to detect HLA antibodies in the sera of immunized individuals, assays to detect and quantify HLA-specific B cells are only just emerging. The need for such assays is becoming clear, as in some patients, HLA-specific memory B cells have been shown to be present in the absence of the accompanying serum HLA antibodies. Because HLA-specific B cells in the peripheral blood of immunized individuals are present at only a very low frequency, assays with high sensitivity are required. In this review, we discuss the currently available methods to detect and/or quantify HLA-specific B cells, as well as their promises and limitations. We also discuss scenarios in which quantification of HLA-specific B cells may be of additional value, besides classical serum HLA antibody detection.

The impact of pre-transplant allosensitization on outcomes after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allosensitization can be a significant barrier to transplantation for some patients, and previous studies suggested that pre-transplant allosensitization was associated with worse outcomes after lung transplantation. However, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody testing has evolved significantly over the past 10 years, and current assays are highly sensitive and specific.

METHODS

We examined the impact of pre-transplant allosensitization on post-transplant outcomes in the era of solid-phase multiplex HLA antibody detection assays in this retrospective, single-center study of 304 adult transplant recipients between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2012. We accepted donor organs for allosensitized patients if a virtual crossmatch was compatible with all previously identified antibodies.

RESULTS

In univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, pre-transplant allosensitization, the calculated panel reactive antibody, and the number of pre-transplant HLA antibodies were not associated with the development of acute cellular rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, donor-specific HLA antibodies, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, or graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-transplant allosensitization does not adversely affect outcomes after lung transplantation when the potentially reactive HLAs are avoided in the donor by a virtual crossmatch with the recipient.