Report of the ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction Part IV: Recipient-Related Risk Factors and Markers

Bilateral Lung Transplantation in Patients With Severe Chest Asymmetry: A Case Series From a Single Center

Suppurative lung diseases leading to end-stage respiratory failure are typical indications for bilateral lung transplantation (LuTx). Some cases may present severe chest asymmetry because of recurrent infections or previous surgical procedures, and the most used surgical options are single LuTx and contralateral pneumonectomy or bilateral transplantation with graft downsizing. Our purpose is to evaluate our treatment protocols for these patients and review surgical strategies reported by others. We prospectively collected clinical data of patients with significant pleural cavity asymmetry who underwent bilateral LuTx at our center from 2017 to 2022. Clinical reports of all patients who underwent LuTx for end-stage suppurative disease in the same period were reviewed as the control group. During the study period, 74 patients underwent bilateral LuTx for suppurative disease; seven of them presented with severe thoracic asymmetry, and all of them were extubated by the second postoperative day. The mean intensive care unit stay was 4 days. The postoperative radiological evaluation did not show clustering or atelectasis of the graft implanted in the smaller hemithorax. No perioperative major complications were recorded, and the average length of stay was 23 days. The perioperative course appeared remarkably good, and both the short- and long-term follow-up were similar to that of the control group.

Donor and recipient risk factors for the development of primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation

Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of both short-term and long-term morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Various donor, recipient, and technical risk factors have been previously identified as being associated with the development of PGD. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the current literature as it pertains to PGD following lung transplantation, as well as discussing current strategies to mitigate PGD and future directions. We will pay special attention to recent advances in lung transplantation such as ex-vivo lung perfusion, thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion, and up-to-date literature published in the interim since the 2016 ISHLT consensus statement on PGD and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Development and validation of a nomogram model to predict primary graft dysfunction in patients after lung transplantation based on the clinical factors

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD), a significant complication that can affect patients' prognosis and quality of life, develops within 72 h post lung transplantation (LTx). Early detection and prevention of PGD should be given special consideration. The purpose of this study was to create a clinical prediction model to forecast the occurrence of PGD.

METHODS

We collected information on 622 LTx patients from Wuxi People's Hospital from 2016 to 2020 and used the data to construct the prediction model. Information on 224 patients from 2021 to June 2022 was used for external validation. We used LASSO regression for variable screening. A nomogram was developed for model presentation. Distinctness, fit, and calibration were used to evaluate the performance of the model.

RESULTS

Subjects with respiratory failure, who received fresh frozen plasma, donor age, donor gender, donor mechanism of death, donor smoking, donor ventilator use time, and donor PaO 2/FiO 2 ratio were independent predictor variables for the occurrence of PGD. The area under the curve of the nomogram was .779. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a good model fit (P = .158). The calibration curve of the nomogram is fairly close to the ideal diagonal. Moreover, the decision curve analysis revealed a positive net benefit of the model. External validation also confirmed the reliability of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram of PGD based on clinical risk factors in postoperative LTx patients was established with high reliability. It provides clinicians and nurses with a new and effective tool for early prediction of PGD and early intervention.

History of Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation remains the only available therapy for many patients with end-stage lung disease. The number of lung transplants performed has increased significantly, but development of the field was slow compared with other solid-organ transplants. This delayed growth was secondary to the increased complexity of transplanting lungs; the continuous needs for surgical, anesthetics, and critical care improvements; changes in immunosuppression and infection prophylaxis; and donor management and patient selection. The future of lung transplant remains promising: expansion of donor after cardiac death donors, improved outcomes, new immunosuppressants targeted to cellular and antibody-mediated rejection, and use of xenotransplantation or artificial lungs.

Primary Graft Dysfunction: The Role of Aging in Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Transplant centers around the world have been using extended criteria donors to remedy the ongoing demand for lung transplantation. With a rapidly aging population, older donors are increasingly considered. Donor age, at the same time has been linked to higher rates of lung ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). This process of acute, sterile inflammation occurring upon reperfusion is a key driver of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) leading to inferior short- and long-term survival. Understanding and improving the condition of older lungs is thus critical to optimize outcomes. Notably, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) seems to have the potential of reconditioning ischemic lungs through ex-vivo perfusing and ventilation. Here, we aim to delineate mechanisms driving lung IRI and review both experimental and clinical data on the effects of aging in augmenting the consequences of IRI and PGD in lung transplantation.

Early Postoperative Management of Lung Transplant Recipients

The early postoperative period after lung transplantation is a critical time. Prompt recognition and treatment of primary graft dysfunction can alter long-term allograft function. Cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, and hematologic derangements are common and require close management to limit their negative sequelae.

Primary graft dysfunction: what we know

Many advances in lung transplant have occurred over the last few decades in the understanding of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) though effective prevention and treatment remain elusive. This review will cover prior understanding of PGD, recent findings, and directions for future research. A consensus statement updating the definition of PGD in 2016 highlights the growing complexity of lung transplant perioperative care taking into account the increasing use of high flow oxygen delivery and pulmonary vasodilators in the current era. PGD, particularly more severe grades, is associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes after transplant such as chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Growing experience have helped identify recipient, donor, and intraoperative risk factors for PGD. Understanding the pathophysiology of PGD has advanced with increasing knowledge of the role of innate immune response, humoral cell immunity, and epithelial cell injury. Supportive care post-transplant with technological advances in extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) remain the mainstay of treatment for severe PGD. Future directions include the evolving utility of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) both in PGD research and potential pre-transplant treatment applications. PGD remains an important outcome in lung transplant and the future holds a lot of potential for improvement in understanding its pathophysiology as well as development of preventative therapies and treatment.

Factors affecting complications development and mortality after single lung transplant

Lung transplantation (LT) is a life-saving therapeutic procedure that prolongs survival in patients with end-stage lung disease. Furthermore, as a therapeutic option for high-risk candidates, single LT (SLT) can be feasible because the immediate morbidity and mortality after transplantation are lower compared to sequential single (double) LT (SSLTx). Still, the long-term overall survival is, in general, better for SSLTx. Despite the great success over the years, the early post-SLT period remains a perilous time for these patients. Patients who undergo SLT are predisposed to evolving early or late postoperative complications. This review emphasizes factors leading to post-SLT complications in the early and late periods including primary graft dysfunction and chronic lung allograft dysfunction, native lung complications, anastomosis complications, infections, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, and metabolite complications, and their association with morbidity and mortality in these patients. Furthermore, we discuss the incidence of malignancy after SLT and their correlation with immunosuppression therapy.

Blood transfusion of the donor is associated with stage 3 primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

The first aim of this study was to assess the association between stage 3 PGD and pre-donation blood transfusion of the donor. The secondary objectives were to assess the epidemiology of donor transfusion and the outcome of LT recipients according to donor transfusion status and massive donor transfusion status.

METHODS

This was an observational, prospective, single-center study. The results are expressed as absolute numbers, percentages, medians, and interquartile ranges. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi squared, Fischer's exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests (P < .05 was considered significant). A multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and February 2019, 147 patients were included in the analysis. PGD was observed in 79 (54%) patients, 45 (31%) of whom had stage 3 PGD. Pre-donation blood transfusion was administered in 48 (33%) donors (median of 3[1-9] packed red cells (PRCs)). On multivariate analysis, stage 3 PGD was significantly associated with donor blood transfusion (OR 2.69, IC (1.14-6.38), P = .024). Mortality at days 28 and 90 was not significantly different according to the pre-donation transfusion status of the donor.

CONCLUSION

Pre-donation blood transfusion is associated with stage 3 PGD occurrence after LT. Transfusion data of the donor should be included in donor lung assessment.

Lung Transplantation, Pulmonary Endothelial Inflammation, and Ex-Situ Lung Perfusion: A Review

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the gold standard treatment for end-stage lung disease; however, waitlist mortality remains high due to a shortage of suitable donor lungs. Organ quality can be compromised by lung ischemic reperfusion injury (LIRI). LIRI causes pulmonary endothelial inflammation and may lead to primary graft dysfunction (PGD). PGD is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality post-LTx. Research into preservation strategies that decrease the risk of LIRI and PGD is needed, and ex-situ lung perfusion (ESLP) is the foremost technological advancement in this field. This review addresses three major topics in the field of LTx: first, we review the clinical manifestation of LIRI post-LTx; second, we discuss the pathophysiology of LIRI that leads to pulmonary endothelial inflammation and PGD; and third, we present the role of ESLP as a therapeutic vehicle to mitigate this physiologic insult, increase the rates of donor organ utilization, and improve patient outcomes.

Primary Graft Dysfunction

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of acute lung injury after transplantation characterized by hypoxemia and the development of alveolar infiltrates on chest radiograph that occurs within 72 hours of reperfusion. PGD is among the most common early complications following lung transplantation and significantly contributes to increased short-term morbidity and mortality. In addition, severe PGD has been associated with higher 90-day and 1-year mortality rates compared with absent or less severe PGD and is a significant risk factor for the subsequent development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation released updated consensus guidelines in 2017, defining grade 3 PGD, the most severe form, by the presence of alveolar infiltrates and a ratio of PaO₂:FiO₂ less than 200. Multiple donor-related, recipient-related, and perioperative risk factors for PGD have been identified, many of which are potentially modifiable. Consistently identified risk factors include donor tobacco and alcohol use; increased recipient body mass index; recipient history of pulmonary hypertension, sarcoidosis, or pulmonary fibrosis; single lung transplantation; and use of cardiopulmonary bypass, among others. Several cellular pathways have been implicated in the pathogenesis of PGD, thus presenting several possible therapeutic targets for preventing and treating PGD. Notably, use of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has become more widespread and offers a potential platform to safely investigate novel PGD treatments while expanding the lung donor pool. Even in the presence of significantly prolonged ischemic times, EVLP has not been associated with an increased risk for PGD.

Chest X-ray Sizing for Lung Transplants Reflects Pulmonary Diagnosis and Body Composition and Is Associated With Primary Graft Dysfunction Risk

BACKGROUND

Donor-recipient oversizing based on predicted total lung capacity (pTLC) is associated with a reduced risk of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) following lung transplant but the effect varies with the recipient's diagnosis. Chest x-ray (CXR) measurements to estimate actual total lung capacity (TLC) could account for disease-related lung volume changes, but their role in size matching is unknown.

METHODS

We reviewed adult double lung transplant recipients 2007-2016 and measured apex-to-costophrenic-angle distance (=lung height) on pretransplant donor and recipient CXRs (oversized donor-recipient ratio >1; undersized ≤1]. We tested the relationship between recipient lung height to actual TLC; between lung height ratio and donor/recipient characteristics; and between both lung height ratio or pTLC ratio and grade 3 PGD with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Two hundred six patients were included and 32 (16%) developed grade 3 PGD at 48 or 72 hours. Recipient lung height was related to TLC (r2=0.7297). Pulmonary diagnosis, donor BMI, and recipient BMI were the major determinants of lung height ratio (AUC 0.9036). Lung height ratio oversizing was associated with increased risk of grade 3 PGD (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-5.47; P = 0.0182) in this cohort, while pTLC ratio oversizing was not.

CONCLUSIONS

CXR lung height estimates actual TLC and reflects pulmonary diagnosis and body composition. Oversizing via CXR lung height ratio increased PGD risk moreso than pTLC-based oversizing in our cohort.

Pediatric lung transplantation in the largest lung transplantation center of China: embarking on a long road

Lung transplantation (LT) has been an effective treatment for carefully selected children with end-stage lung diseases. The aim of this retrospective study is to introduce our experience at the largest LT center in Wuxi, China and to compare the outcomes of pediatric LT between children with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) and other end-stage lung diseases. Ten pediatric patients undergoing LT from 2007 to 2019 were included. Sequential bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) with bilateral anterior thoracotomies was performed in all patients, seven of whom also underwent reduced size LT. Eight children survived until the end of our follow-up period on July 31st, 2019, with the longest survival of 11 years. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was intraoperatively used in all IPAH children and one non-IPAH child. Left heart function of IPAH children, though initially compromised, recovered after surgery. Statistically significant differences in operation time and post-operative mechanical ventilation between IPAH group and non-IPAH group were observed without discernible impact on post-LT survival. Pediatric LT appears to be a safe treatment for IPAH children to improve longevity and quality of life and ECMO may help reduce the risk of surgery and the postoperative complications.

Anellovirus Dynamics Are Associated With Primary Graft Dysfunction in Lung Transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of early death in lung transplant. Anelloviruses are small circular DNA viruses that have been noted to be present at elevated levels in immunosuppressed patients. They have been associated with both short- and long-term outcomes in lung transplant, and we hypothesized that anellovirus dynamics might be associated with the development of PGD.

Clinical Risk Factors and Prognostic Model for Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

RATIONALE

Pulmonary hypertension from pulmonary arterial hypertension or parenchymal lung disease is associated with an increased risk for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the clinical determinants of severe primary graft dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension and developed and validated a prognostic model.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the multicenter Lung Transplant Outcomes Group with pulmonary hypertension at transplant listing. Severe primary graft dysfunction was defined as Pa_O2/Fi_O2 ≤200 with allograft infiltrates at 48 or 72 hours after transplantation. Donor, recipient, and operative characteristics were evaluated in a multivariable explanatory model. A prognostic model derived using donor and recipient characteristics was then validated in a separate cohort.

RESULTS

In the explanatory model of 826 patients with pulmonary hypertension, donor tobacco smoke exposure, higher recipient body mass index, female sex, listing mean pulmonary artery pressure, right atrial pressure and creatinine at transplant, cardiopulmonary bypass use, transfusion volume, and reperfusion fraction of inspired oxygen were associated with primary graft dysfunction. Donor obesity was associated with a lower risk for primary graft dysfunction. Using a 20% threshold for elevated risk, the prognostic model had good negative predictive value in both derivation and validation cohorts (89.1% [95% confidence interval, 85.3-92.8] and 83.3% [95% confidence interval, 78.5-88.2], respectively), but low positive predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

Several recipient, donor, and operative characteristics were associated with severe primary graft dysfunction in patients with pulmonary hypertension, including several risk factors not identified in the overall transplant population. A prognostic model with donor and recipient clinical risk factors alone had low positive predictive value, but high negative predictive value, to rule out high risk for primary graft dysfunction.

Blood Products Transfusion and Mid-Term Outcomes of Lung Transplanted Patients Under Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is considered a reliable technique in lung transplantation requiring cardiorespiratory support. However, the impact of this technology on blood product transfusion rate and outcomes compared to off-pump lung transplantation has been rarely investigated.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and June 2015, 52 elective adult lung transplants were performed at our institution. Of these, 15 recipients required intraoperative venoarterial extracorporeal support and 37 did not. We compared blood product consumption and other outcome variables between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

We found comparable in-hospital (86.7% vs 97.3%, P = .14) and 6-month (86.7% vs 91.9%, P = .56) survival between patients with and without extracorporeal support, respectively. Survival at 30 days was lower in the ECMO group (86.7% vs 100%, P = .02). Although patients who underwent ECMO received more intraoperative transfusions, postoperative transfusion rate was similar between the 2 groups. The ECMO group experienced longer mechanical ventilation (median 3 vs 2 days, P = .02) and intensive care unit stay (median 7 vs 5 days, P = .02), besides more cardiogenic shock and deep vein thrombosis. However, we observed no difference in other major and minor in-hospital complications and 6-month complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, despite the higher need for intraoperative transfusions, lung transplantation performed with ECMO support is comparable to the off-pump procedure as to short-term survival and outcomes.

Extracorporeal Circulation During Lung Transplantation Procedures: A Meta-Analysis

Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is an invaluable tool in lung transplantation (lutx). More than the past years, an increasing number of centers changed their standard for intraoperative ECC from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) - with differing results. This meta-analysis reviews the existing evidence. An online literature research on Medline, Embase, and PubMed has been performed. Two persons independently judged the papers using the ACROBAT-NRSI tool of the Cochrane collaboration. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to determine whether veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) resulted in better outcomes compared with CPB. Six papers - all observational studies without randomization - were included in the analysis. All were considered to have serious bias caused by heparinization as co-intervention. Forest plots showed a beneficial trend of ECMO regarding blood transfusions (packed red blood cells (RBCs) with an average mean difference of -0.46 units [95% CI = -3.72, 2.80], fresh-frozen plasma with an average mean difference of -0.65 units [95% CI = -1.56, 0.25], platelets with an average mean difference of -1.72 units [95% CI = -3.67, 0.23]). Duration of ventilator support with an average mean difference of -2.86 days [95% CI = -11.43, 5.71] and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay with an average mean difference of -4.79 days [95% CI = -8.17, -1.41] were shorter in ECMO patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment tended to be superior regarding 3 month mortality (odds ratio = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.21-1.02) and 1 year mortality (odds ratio = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.37-1.13). However, only the ICU length of stay reached statistical significance. Meta-regression analyses showed that heterogeneity across studies (sex, year of ECMO implementation, and underlying disease) influenced differences. These data indicate a benefit of the intraoperative use of ECMO as compared with CPB during lung transplant procedures regarding short-term outcome (ICU stay). There was no statistically significant effect regarding blood transfusion needs or long-term outcome. The superiority of ECMO in lutx patients remains to be determined in larger multi-center randomized trials.

Quantitative Evidence for Revising the Definition of Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplant

RATIONALE

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of acute lung injury that occurs after lung transplantation. The definition of PGD was standardized in 2005. Since that time, clinical practice has evolved, and this definition is increasingly used as a primary endpoint for clinical trials; therefore, validation is warranted.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether refinements to the 2005 consensus definition could further improve construct validity.

METHODS

Data from the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group multicenter cohort were used to compare variations on the PGD definition, including alternate oxygenation thresholds, inclusion of additional severity groups, and effects of procedure type and mechanical ventilation. Convergent and divergent validity were compared for mortality prediction and concurrent lung injury biomarker discrimination.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 1,179 subjects from 10 centers were enrolled from 2007 to 2012. Median length of follow-up was 4 years (interquartile range = 2.4-5.9). No mortality differences were noted between no PGD (grade 0) and mild PGD (grade 1). Significantly better mortality discrimination was evident for all definitions using later time points (48, 72, or 48-72 hours; P < 0.001). Biomarker divergent discrimination was superior when collapsing grades 0 and 1. Additional severity grades, use of mechanical ventilation, and transplant procedure type had minimal or no effect on mortality or biomarker discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

The PGD consensus definition can be simplified by combining lower PGD grades. Construct validity of grading was present regardless of transplant procedure type or use of mechanical ventilation. Additional severity categories had minimal impact on mortality or biomarker discrimination.

Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction is a form of acute injury after lung transplantation that is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Multiple mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of primary graft dysfunction, including ischemia reperfusion injury, epithelial cell death, endothelial cell dysfunction, innate immune activation, oxidative stress, and release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of primary graft dysfunction.

Pathophysiology and classification of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

The term primary graft dysfunction (PGD) incorporates a continuum of disease severity from moderate to severe acute lung injury (ALI) within 72 h of lung transplantation. It represents the most significant obstacle to achieving good early post-transplant outcomes, but is also associated with increased incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) subsequently. PGD is characterised histologically by diffuse alveolar damage, but is graded on clinical grounds with a combination of PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) and the presence of radiographic infiltrates, with 0 being absence of disease and 3 being severe PGD. The aetiology is multifactorial but commonly results from severe ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), with tissue-resident macrophages largely responsible for stimulating a secondary 'wave' of neutrophils and lymphocytes that produce severe and widespread tissue damage. Donor history, recipient health and operative factors may all potentially contribute to the likelihood of PGD development. Work that aims to minimise the incidence of PGD in ongoing, with techniques such as ex vivo perfusion of donor lungs showing promise both in research and in clinical studies. This review will summarise the current clinical status of PGD before going on to discuss its pathophysiology, current therapies available and future directions for clinical management of PGD.

Diastolic Dysfunction Increases the Risk of Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplant

RATIONALE

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a significant cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplant and is characterized by severe hypoxemia and infiltrates in the allograft. The pathogenesis of PGD involves ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, subclinical increases in pulmonary venous pressure due to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction may contribute by exacerbating capillary leak.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a higher ratio of early mitral inflow velocity (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (é), indicative of worse left ventricular diastolic function, is associated with a higher risk of PGD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group who underwent bilateral lung transplant at our institution between 2004 and 2014 for interstitial lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pulmonary arterial hypertension. Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained during evaluation for transplant listing were analyzed for E/é and other measures of diastolic function. PGD was defined as PaO2/FiO2 less than or equal to 200 with allograft infiltrates at 48 or 72 hours after reperfusion. The association between E/é and PGD was assessed with multivariable logistic regression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After adjustment for recipient age, body mass index, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and pretransplant diagnosis, higher E/é and E/é greater than 8 were associated with an increased risk of PGD (E/é odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.64; P = 0.04; E/é >8 odds ratio, 5.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-20.01; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in left ventricular diastolic function may contribute to the development of PGD. Future trials are needed to determine whether optimization of left ventricular diastolic function reduces the risk of PGD.

Massive donor transfusion potentially increases recipient mortality after lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Donor blood transfusion has been identified as a potential risk factor for primary graft dysfunction and by extension early mortality. We sought to define the contributing risk of donor transfusion on early mortality for lung transplant.

METHODS

Donor and recipient data were abstracted from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database updated through June 30, 2014, which included 86,398 potential donors and 16,255 transplants. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing 4-level designation of transfusion (no blood, 1-5 units, 6-10 units, and >10 units, massive), we analyzed all-cause mortality at 30-days with the use of logistic regression adjusted for confounders (ischemic time, donor age, recipient diagnosis, lung allocation score and recipient age, and recipient body mass index). Secondary analyses assessed 90-day and 1-year mortality and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Of the 16,255 recipients transplanted, 8835 (54.35%) donors received at least one transfusion. Among those transfused, 1016 (6.25%) received a massive transfusion, defined as >10 units. Those donors with massive transfusion were most commonly young trauma patients. After adjustment for confounding variables, donor massive transfusion was associated significantly with an increased risk in 30-day (P = .03) and 90-day recipient mortality (P = .01) but not 1-year mortality (P = .09). There was no significant difference in recipient length of stay or hospital-free days with respect to donor transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Massive donor blood transfusion (>10 units) was associated with early recipient mortality after lung transplantation. Conversely, submassive donor transfusion was not associated with increased recipient mortality. The mechanism of increased early mortality in recipients of lungs from massively transfused donors is unclear and needs further study but is consistent with excess mortality seen with primary graft dysfunction in the first 90 days posttransplant.

Telomere length in patients with pulmonary fibrosis associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction and post-lung transplantation survival

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have shown that patients with pulmonary fibrosis with mutations in the telomerase genes have a high rate of certain complications after lung transplantation. However, few studies have investigated clinical outcomes based on leukocyte telomere length.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study of all patients with pulmonary fibrosis who underwent lung transplantation at a single center between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014. Leukocyte telomere length was measured from a blood sample collected before lung transplantation, and subjects were stratified into 2 groups (telomere length <10th percentile vs ≥10th percentile). Primary outcome was post-lung transplant survival. Secondary outcomes included incidence of allograft dysfunction, non-pulmonary organ dysfunction, and infection.

RESULTS

Approximately 32% of subjects had a telomere length <10th percentile. Telomere length <10th percentile was independently associated with worse survival (hazard ratio 10.9, 95% confidence interval 2.7-44.8, p = 0.001). Telomere length <10th percentile was also independently associated with a shorter time to onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio 6.3, 95% confidence interval 2.0-20.0, p = 0.002). Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction occurred more frequently in the <10th percentile group compared with the ≥10th percentile group (28% vs 7%; p = 0.034). There was no difference between the 2 groups in incidence of acute cellular rejection, cytopenias, infection, or renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Telomere length <10th percentile was associated with worse survival and shorter time to onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and thus represents a biomarker that may aid in risk stratification of patients with pulmonary fibrosis before lung transplantation.

Protein biomarkers associated with primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation

Severe primary graft dysfunction affects 15-20% of lung transplant recipients and carries a high mortality risk. In addition to known donor, recipient, and perioperative clinical risk factors, numerous biologic factors are thought to contribute to primary graft dysfunction. Our current understanding of the pathogenesis of lung injury and primary graft dysfunction emphasizes multiple pathways leading to lung endothelial and epithelial injury. Protein biomarkers specific to these pathways can be measured in the plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and lung tissue. Clarification of the pathophysiology and timing of primary graft dysfunction could illuminate predictors of dysfunction, allowing for better risk stratification, earlier identification of susceptible recipients, and development of targeted therapies. Here, we review much of what has been learned about the association of protein biomarkers with primary graft dysfunction and evaluate this association at different measurement time points.

Prospective validation of right ventricular role in primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction is a significant cause of lung transplant morbidity and mortality, but its underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. The aims of the present study were: 1) to confirm that right ventricular function is a risk factor for severe primary graft dysfunction; and 2) to propose a clinical model for predicting the development of severe primary graft dysfunction.A prospective cohort study was performed over 14 months. The primary outcome was development of primary graft dysfunction grade 3. An echocardiogram was performed immediately before transplantation, measuring conventional and speckle-tracking parameters. Pulmonary artery catheter data were also measured. A classification and regression tree was made to identify prognostic models for the development of severe graft dysfunction.70 lung transplant recipients were included. Patients who developed severe primary graft dysfunction had better right ventricular function, as estimated by cardiac index (3.5±0.8 versus 2.6±0.7 L·min^-1·m^-2, p<0.01) and basal longitudinal strain (-25.7±7.3% versus -19.5±6.6%, p<0.01). Regression tree analysis provided an algorithm based on the combined use of three variables (basal longitudinal strain, pulmonary fibrosis disease and ischaemia time), allowing accurate preoperative discrimination of three distinct subgroups with low (11-20%), intermediate (54%) and high (75%) risk of severe primary graft dysfunction (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.81).Better right ventricular function is a risk factor for the development of severe primary graft dysfunction. Preoperative estimation of right ventricular function could allow early identification of recipients at increased risk, who would benefit the most from careful perioperative management in order to limit pulmonary overflow.

Onset of Inflammation With Ischemia: Implications for Donor Lung Preservation and Transplant Survival

Lungs stored ahead of transplant surgery experience ischemia. Pulmonary ischemia differs from ischemia in the systemic organs in that stop of blood flow in the lung leads to loss of shear alone because the lung parenchyma does not rely on blood flow for its cellular oxygen requirements. Our earlier studies on the ischemia-induced mechanosignaling cascade showed that the pulmonary endothelium responds to stop of flow by production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We hypothesized that ROS produced in this way led to induction of proinflammatory mediators. In this study, we used lungs or cells subjected to various periods of storage and evaluated the induction of several proinflammatory mediators. Isolated murine, porcine and human lungs in situ showed increased expression of cellular adhesion molecules; the damage-associated molecular pattern protein high-mobility group box 1 and the corresponding pattern recognition receptor, called the receptor for advanced glycation end products; and induction stabilization and translocation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and its downstream effector VEGFA, all of which are participants in inflammation. We concluded that signaling with lung preservation drives expression of inflammatory mediators that potentially predispose the donor lung to an inflammatory response after transplant.

The relationship between plasma lipid peroxidation products and primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation is modified by donor smoking and reperfusion hyperoxia

BACKGROUND

Donor smoking history and higher fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) at reperfusion are associated with primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation. We hypothesized that oxidative injury biomarkers would be elevated in PGD, with higher levels associated with donor exposure to cigarette smoke and recipient hyperoxia at reperfusion.

METHODS

We performed a nested case-control study of 72 lung transplant recipients from the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group cohort. Using mass spectroscopy, F2-isoprostanes and isofurans were measured in plasma collected after transplantation. Cases were defined in 2 ways: grade 3 PGD present at day 2 or day 3 after reperfusion (severe PGD) or any grade 3 PGD (any PGD).

RESULTS

There were 31 severe PGD cases with 41 controls and 35 any PGD cases with 37 controls. Plasma F2-isoprostane levels were higher in severe PGD cases compared with controls (28.6 pg/ml vs 19.8 pg/ml, p = 0.03). Plasma F2-isoprostane levels were higher in severe PGD cases compared with controls (29.6 pg/ml vs 19.0 pg/ml, p = 0.03) among patients reperfused with FIO2 >40%. Among recipients of lungs from donors with smoke exposure, plasma F2-isoprostane (38.2 pg/ml vs 22.5 pg/ml, p = 0.046) and isofuran (66.9 pg/ml vs 34.6 pg/ml, p = 0.046) levels were higher in severe PGD compared with control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma levels of lipid peroxidation products are higher in patients with severe PGD, in recipients of lungs from donors with smoke exposure, and in recipients exposed to higher Fio2 at reperfusion. Oxidative injury is an important mechanism of PGD and may be magnified by donor exposure to cigarette smoke and hyperoxia at reperfusion.

Lung transplantation in IIP: A review

The idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) encompass a large and diverse subtype of interstitial lung disease (ILD) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) being the most common types. Although pharmacologic treatments are available for most types of IIP, many patients progress to advanced lung disease and require lung transplantation. Close monitoring with serial functional and radiographic tests for disease progression coupled with early referral for lung transplantation are of great importance in the management of patients with IIP. Both single and bilateral lung transplantation are acceptable procedures for IIP. Procedure selection is a complex decision influenced by multiple factors related to patient, donor and transplant centre. While single lung transplant may reduce waitlist time and mortality, the long-term outcomes after bilateral lung transplantation may be slightly superior. There are numerous complications following lung transplantation including primary graft dysfunction, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), infections, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and airway disease that limit post-transplant longevity. The median survival after lung transplantation is 4.7 years in patients with ILD, which is less than in patients with other underlying lung diseases. Although long-term survival is limited, this intervention still conveys a survival benefit and improved quality of life in suitable IIP patients with advanced lung disease and chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a severe form of acute lung injury that is a major cause of early morbidity and mortality encountered after lung transplantation. PGD is diagnosed by pulmonary oedema with diffuse alveolar damage that manifests clinically as progressive hypoxemia with radiographic pulmonary infiltrates. Inflammatory and immunological response caused by ischaemia and reperfusion is important with regard to pathophysiology. PGD affects short- and long-term outcomes, the donor organ is the leading factor affecting these adverse ramifications. To minimize the risk of PGD, reduction of lung ischaemia time, reperfusion optimisation, prostaglandin level regulation, haemodynamic control, hormone replacement therapy, ventilator management are carried out; for research regarding donor lung preparation strategies, certain procedures are recommended. In this review, recent updates in epidemiology, pathophysiology, molecular and genetic biomarkers and technical developments affecting PGD are described.

Primary graft dysfunction: lessons learned about the first 72 h after lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 2005, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation published a standardized definition of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), facilitating new knowledge on this form of acute lung injury that occurs within 72 h of lung transplantation. PGD continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This article will summarize the current literature on the epidemiology of PGD, pathogenesis, risk factors, and preventive and treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2011, several manuscripts have been published that provide insight into the clinical risk factors and pathogenesis of PGD. In addition, several transplant centers have explored preventive and treatment strategies for PGD, including the use of extracorporeal strategies. More recently, results from several trials assessing the role of extracorporeal lung perfusion may allow for much-needed expansion of the donor pool, without raising PGD rates.

SUMMARY

This article will highlight the current state of the science regarding PGD, focusing on recent advances, and set a framework for future preventive and treatment strategies.

Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction in a low-volume lung transplantation center

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a severe acute lung injury syndrome following lung transplantation. Previous studies of clinical risk factors, including a multicenter prospective cohort trial, have identified a number of recipient, donor, and operative variables related to Grade 3 PGD. The aim of this study was to validate these risk factors in a lung transplantation center with a low volume of procedures. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 45 consecutive lung transplantations performed between January 2011 and September 2013. PGD was defined according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grading scale. Risk factors were evaluated independently and the significant confounders entered into multivariable logistic regression models. The overall incidence of Grade 3 PGD was 35.5% at T24, 17.7% at T48, and 15.5% at T72. The following risk factors were associated with Grade 3 PGD at the indicated time points: recipient female gender at T24 (P=.034), mixed diagnoses at T72 (P=.047), ECMO bridge-to-lung transplantation at T24 (P=.0004) and at T48 (P=.038), donor causes of death different from stroke and trauma at T24 (P=.019) and T72 (P=.014), blood transfusions during surgery at T24 (P=.001), intraoperative venoarterial ECMO T24 (P<.0001). Multivariate analysis at T24 identified recipient female gender and intraoperative venoarterial ECMO as risk factors (P=.010 and P=.018, respectively). This study demonstrated that risk factors for severe PGD in a low-volume center were similar to international reports in prevalence and type. ECMO bridge-to-lung transplantation emerged as a risk factor previously underestimated.

Lung transplantation for severe pulmonary hypertension--awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postoperative left ventricular remodelling

BACKGROUND

Bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) is an established treatment for end-stage pulmonary hypertension (PH). Ventilator weaning failure and death are more common as in BLTx for other indications. We hypothesized that left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is the main cause of early postoperative morbidity or mortality and investigated a weaning strategy using awake venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

METHODS

In 23 BLTx for severe PH, ECMO used during BLTx was continued for a minimum of 5 days (BLTx-ECMO group). Echocardiography, left atrial (LA) and Swan-Ganz catheters were used for monitoring. Early extubation after transplantation was attempted under continued ECMO.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, all patients had severely reduced cardiac index (mean, 2.1 L/min/m2). On postoperative day 2, reduction of ECMO flow resulted in increasing LA and decreasing systemic blood pressures. On the day of ECMO explantation (median, postoperative day 8), LV diameter had increased; LA and blood pressures remained stable. Survival rates at 3 and 12 months were 100% and 96%, respectively. Data were compared to two historic control groups of BLTx without ECMO (BLTx ventilation) or combined heart-lung transplantation for severe PH.

CONCLUSION

Early after BLTx for severe PH, the LV may be unable to handle normalized LV preload. This can be effectively bridged with awake venoarterial ECMO.

Influence of right ventricular function on the development of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a significant cause of lung transplant postoperative morbidity and mortality. The underlying mechanisms of PGD development are not completely understood. This study analyzed the effect of right ventricular function (RVF) on PGD development.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively assessed cohort was performed at a single institution between July 2010 and June 2013. The primary outcome was development of PGD grade 3 (PGD3). Conventional echocardiographic parameters and speckle-tracking echocardiography, performed during the pre-transplant evaluation phase up to 1 year before surgery, were used to assess preoperative RVF.

RESULTS

Included were 120 lung transplant recipients (LTr). Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (48 ± 20 vs 41 ± 18 mm Hg; p = 0.048) and ischemia time (349 ± 73 vs 306 ± 92 minutes; p < 0.01) were higher in LTr who developed PGD3. Patients who developed PGD3 had better RVF estimated by basal free wall longitudinal strain (BLS; -24% ± 9% vs -20% ± 6%; p = 0.039) but had a longer intensive care unit length of stay and mechanical ventilation and higher 6-month mortality. BLS ≥ -21.5% was the cutoff that best identified patients developing PGD3 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.85; p = 0.020). In the multivariate analysis, a BLS ≥ -21.5% was an independent risk factor for PGD3 development (odds ratio, 4.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-17.38; p = 0.026), even after adjusting for potential confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

A better RVF, as measured by BLS, is a risk factor for severe PGD. Careful preoperative RVF assessment using speckle-tracking echocardiography may identify LTrs with the highest risk of developing PGD.

Comparison of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus cardiopulmonary bypass for lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

This study compared differences in patient outcomes and operative parameters for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) versus cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing lung transplants.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2008, and July 13, 2013, 316 patients underwent lung transplants at our institution, 102 requiring intraoperative mechanical cardiopulmonary support (CPB, n=55; ECMO, n=47). We evaluated survival, blood product transfusions, bleeding complications, graft dysfunction, and rejection.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively, the CPB group required more cell saver volume (1123±701 vs 814±826 mL; P=.043), fresh-frozen plasma (3.64±5.0 vs 1.51±3.2 units; P=.014), platelets (1.38±1.6 vs 0.43±1.25 units; P=.001), and cryoprecipitate (4.89±6.3 vs 0.85±2.8 units; P<.001) than the ECMO group. Postoperatively, the CPB group received more platelets (1.09±2.6 vs 0.13±0.39 units; P=.013) and was more likely to have bleeding (15 [27.3%] vs 3 [6.4%]; P=.006) and reoperation (21 [38.2%] vs 7 [14.9%]; P=.009]. The CPB group had higher rates of primary graft dysfunction at 24 and 72 hours (41 [74.5%] vs 23 [48.9%]; P=.008; and 42 [76.4%] vs 26 [56.5%]; P=.034; respectively). There were no differences in 30-day and 1-year survivals.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to CPB, the ECMO group required fewer transfusions and had less bleeding, fewer reoperations, and less primary graft dysfunction. There were no statistically significant survival differences at 30 days or 1 year.

Recipient-related clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the main cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results for PGD risk factors. Herein, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature to identify recipient-related clinical risk factors associated with PGD development.

Method

A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus) for studies published from 1970 to 2013 was performed. Cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies that examined recipient-related risk factors of PGD were included. The odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were calculated using random-effects models

Result

Thirteen studies involving 10042 recipients met final inclusion criteria. From the pooled analyses, female gender (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.75), African American (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.36 to 2.45), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.13), sarcoidosis (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 16.52), primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) (OR 3.73, 95%CI 2.16 to 6.46), elevated BMI (BMI≥25 kg/m²) (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.64), and use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.65) were significantly associated with increased risk of PGD. Age, cystic fibrosis, secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH), intra-operative inhaled nitric oxide (NO), or lung transplant type (single or bilateral) were not significantly associated with PGD development (all P>0.05). Moreover, a nearly 4 fold increased risk of short-term mortality was observed in patients with PGD (OR 3.95, 95% CI 2.80 to 5.57).

Conclusions

Our analysis identified several recipient related risk factors for development of PGD. The identification of higher-risk recipients and further research into the underlying mechanisms may lead to selective therapies aimed at reducing this reperfusion injury.