Experience of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation in France

Clinical Outcomes With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Interstitial Lung Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The evidence on indications, outcomes, and complications with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the setting of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is limited in the existing literature. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ECMO in the setting of ILD to study the prognostic factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Eighteen unique studies with a total of 1,356 patients on ECMO for ILD were identified out of which 76.5% were on ECMO as a bridge to transplant (BTT) and the rest as a bridge to recovery (BTR). The overall in-hospital mortality was 45.76%, with 71.3% and 37.8% for BTR and BTT, respectively. Among the various prognostic factors, mortality was lower with younger age (mean difference = 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82-5.49), use of awake veno-arterial (VA)-ECMO compared to veno-venous (VV)-ECMO (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.13-0.37) in the overall cohort. In the setting of BTT, the use of VA-ECMO had a decreased hazard ratio (HR) compared to VV-ECMO (adjusted HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15-0.81, p = 0.015). The findings of our meta-analysis are critical but are derived from retrospective studies with small sample sizes and thus are of low to very low-GRADE certainty.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: Practice patterns and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly relied on to bridge patients with respiratory failure to lung transplantation despite limited evidence for its use in this setting. This study evaluated longitudinal trends in practice patterns, patient characteristics, and outcomes in patients bridged with ECMO to lung transplant.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all adult isolated lung transplant patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2000 and 2019 was performed. Patients were classified as "ECMO" if supported with ECMO at the time of listing or transplantation and "non-ECMO" otherwise. Linear regression was used to evaluate trends in patient demographics during the study period. Trends in mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards modeling, with time period as the primary covariate (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, or 2015-2019) and age, time on the waitlist, and underlying diagnosis as covariates.

RESULTS

The number of patients included were 40,866, of whom 1,387 (3.4%) were classified as ECMO and 39,479 (96.6%) as no ECMO. Average age and initial Lung Allocation Score increased significantly during the study period in both cohorts, but occurred at a slower rate in the ECMO population. The hazard of death was significantly lower in more recent years (2015-2019) for both the ECMO and non-ECMO cohorts (aHR (adjusted hazards ratio) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.96 and aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70-0.79) when compared to the early years (2000-2004) of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplantation survival for patients bridged to transplantation with ECMO demonstrates ongoing improvement despite cannulation of progressively older and sicker patients.

Predictors associated with mortality of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy

BACKGROUND

The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) has rapidly increased in recent years. Today, applications of V-V ECMO include a variety of clinical conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), bridge to lung transplantation and primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. The purpose of the present study was to investigate in-hospital mortality of adult patients undergoing V-V ECMO therapy and to determine independent predictors associated with mortality.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital Zurich, a designated ECMO center in Switzerland. Data was analyzed of all adult V-V ECMO cases from 2007 to 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 221 patients required V-V ECMO support (median age 50 years, 38.9% female). In-hospital mortality was 37.6% and did not statistically vary significantly between indications (P=0.61): 25.0% (1/4) for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation, 29.4% (5/17) for bridge to lung transplantation, 36.2% (50/138) for ARDS and 43.5% (27/62) for other pulmonary disease indications. Cubic spline interpolation showed no effect of time on mortality over the study period of 13 years. Multiple logistic regression modelling identified significant predictor variables associated with mortality: age [odds ratio (OR), 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.07; P=0.001], newly detected liver failure (OR, 4.83; 95% CI: 1.27-20.3; P=0.02), red blood cell transfusion (OR, 1.91; 95% CI: 1.39-2.74; P<0.001) and platelet concentrate transfusion (OR, 1.93; 95% CI: 1.28-3.15; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality of patients receiving V-V ECMO therapy remains relatively high. Patients' outcomes have not improved significantly in the observed period. We identified age, newly detected liver failure, red blood cell transfusion and platelet concentrate transfusion as independent predictors associated with in-hospital mortality. Incorporating such mortality predictors into decision making with regards to V-V ECMO use may increase its effectiveness and safety and may translate into better outcomes.

The Lung Transplant Candidate, Indications, Timing, and Selection Criteria

Lung transplantation can be lifesaving for patients with advanced lung disease. Demographics are evolving with recipients now sicker but determining candidacy remains predicated on one's underlying lung disease prognosis, along with the likelihood of posttransplant success. Determining optimal timing can be challenging, and most programs favor initiating the process early and proactively to allow time for patient education, informed decision-making, and preparation. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation is used to elucidate disease progrnosis and identify risk factors for poor posttransplant outcomes. Candidacy criteria vary significantly by center, and close communication between referring and transplant providers is necessary to improve access to transplant and outcomes.

Contemporary trends in PGD incidence, outcomes, and therapies

BACKGROUND

We sought to describe trends in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, and define the impact on PGD incidence and early mortality in lung transplantation.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled from August 2011 to June 2018 at 10 transplant centers in the multi-center Lung Transplant Outcomes Group prospective cohort study. PGD was defined as Grade 3 at 48 or 72 hours, based on the 2016 PGD ISHLT guidelines. Logistic regression and survival models were used to contrast between group effects for event (i.e., PGD and Death) and time-to-event (i.e., death, extubation, discharge) outcomes respectively. Both modeling frameworks accommodate the inclusion of potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 1,528 subjects were enrolled with a 25.7% incidence of PGD. Annual PGD incidence (14.3%-38.2%, p = .0002), median LAS (38.0-47.7 p = .009) and the use of ECMO salvage for PGD (5.7%-20.9%, p = .007) increased over the course of the study. PGD was associated with increased 1 year mortality (OR 1.7 [95% C.I. 1.2, 2.3], p = .0001). Bridging strategies were not associated with increased mortality compared to non-bridged patients (p = .66); however, salvage ECMO for PGD was significantly associated with increased mortality (OR 1.9 [1.3, 2.7], p = .0007). Restricted mean survival time comparison at 1-year demonstrated 84.1 days lost in venoarterial salvaged recipients with PGD when compared to those without PGD (ratio 1.3 [1.1, 1.5]) and 27.2 days for venovenous with PGD (ratio 1.1 [1.0, 1.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

PGD incidence continues to rise in modern transplant practice paralleled by significant increases in recipient severity of illness. Bridging strategies have increased but did not affect PGD incidence or mortality. PGD remains highly associated with mortality and is increasingly treated with salvage ECMO.

Inpatient Management of the Acutely Decompensating Lung Transplant Candidate

Lung allocation in the US changed nearly 15 years ago from time accrued on the waiting list to disease severity and likelihood of posttransplant survival, represented by the lung allocation score (LAS). Notably, the risk of death within a year plays a stronger role on the score calculation than posttransplant survival. While this change was associated with the intended decrease in waitlist mortality (most recently reported at 14.6%), it was predictable that transplant teams would have to care for increasingly older and complex candidates and recipients. This urgency-based allocation also led centers to routinely consider transplanting patients with higher acuity, often hospitalized and, not infrequently, in the intensive care unit (ICU). According to the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, from 2009 to 2019, the proportion of lung recipients hospitalized and those admitted to the ICU at the time of transplant increased from 18.9% to 26.8% and from 9.2% to 16.5%, respectively..

Awakening in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation

Although the rate of lung transplantation (LTx), the last treatment option for end-stage lung disease, is increasing, some patients waiting for LTx need a bridging strategy for LTx due to the limited number of available donor lungs. For a long time, mechanical ventilation has been employed as a bridge to LTx because the outcome of using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridging strategy has been poor. However, the outcome after mechanical ventilation as a bridge to LTx was poor compared with that in patients without bridges. With advances in technology and the accumulation of experience, the outcome of ECMO as a bridge to LTx has improved, and the rate of ECMO use as a bridging strategy has increased over time. However, whether the use of ECMO as a bridge to LTx can achieve survival rates similar to those of non-bridged LTx patients remains controversial. In 2010, one center introduced awake ECMO strategy for LTx bridging, and its use as a bridge to LTx has been showing favorable outcomes to date. Awake ECMO has several advantages, such as maintenance of physical activity, spontaneous breathing, avoidance of endotracheal intubation, and reduced use of sedatives and analgesics, but it may cause serious problems. Nonetheless, several studies have shown that awake ECMO performed by a multidisciplinary team is safe. In cases where ECMO or mechanical ventilation is required due to unavoidable exacerbation in patients awaiting LTx, the application of awake ECMO performed by an appropriately trained ECMO multi-disciplinary team can be useful.

Long- and short-term clinical impact of awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as bridging therapy for lung transplantation

Background

As lung transplantation (LTx) is becoming a standard treatment for end-stage lung disease, the use of bridging with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasing. We examined the clinical impact of being awake during ECMO as bridging therapy in patients awaiting LTx.

Methods

In this single-center study, we retrospectively reviewed 241 consecutive LTx patients between October 2012 and March 2019; 64 patients received ECMO support while awaiting LTx. We divided into awake and non-awake groups and compared.

Results

Twenty-five patients (39.1%) were awake, and 39 (61.0%) were non-awake. The median age of awake patients was 59.0 (interquartile range, 52.5–63.0) years, and 80% of the group was men. The awake group had better post-operative outcomes than the non-awake group: statistically shorter post-operative intensive care unit length of stay [awake vs. non-awake, 6 (4–8.5) vs. 18 (11–36), p < 0.001], longer ventilator free days [awake vs. non-awake, 24 (17–26) vs. 0 (0–15), p < 0.001], and higher gait ability after LTx (awake vs. non-awake, 92% vs. 59%, p = 0.004), leading to higher 6-month and 1-year lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s: awake vs. non-awake, 6-month, 77.5% vs. 61%, p = 0.004, 1-year, 75% vs. 57%, p = 0.013). Furthermore, the awake group had significantly lower 6-month and 1-year mortality rates than the non-awake group (6-month 12% vs. 38.5%, p = 0.022, 1-year 24% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.018).

Conclusions

In patients with end-stage lung disease, considering the long-term and short-term impacts, the awake ECMO strategy could be useful compared with the non-awake ECMO strategy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01905-7.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease

Lung transplantation (LTx) can be a life-extending treatment option for patients with advanced and/or progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. IPF is now the most common indication for LTx worldwide. Several unique features in patients with ILD can impact optimal timing of referral or listing for LTx, pre- or post-transplant risks, candidacy and post-transplant management. As the epidemiology of LTx and community practices have evolved, recent literature describes outcomes and approaches in higher-risk candidates. In this review, we discuss the unique and important clinical findings, course, monitoring and management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrotic ILDs during pre-LTx evaluation and up to the day of transplantation; the need for co-management with clinical experts in ILD and LTx is emphasised. Some post-LTx complications are unique in these patient cohorts, which require prompt detection and appropriate management by experts in multiple disciplines familiar with telomere biology disorders and infectious, haematological, oncological and cardiac complications to enhance the likelihood of improved outcomes and survival of LTx recipients with IPF and other ILDs.

Lung Transplant from ECMO: Current Results and Predictors of Post-transplant Mortality

Purpose of Review

We examined data from the last 5 years describing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge to lung transplantation. We assessed predictors of survival to transplantation and post-transplant mortality.

Recent Findings

The number of lung transplants performed worldwide is increasing. This is accompanied by an increase in the type of patients being transplanted, including sicker patients with more advanced disease. Consequently, there is an increase in the need for bridging strategies, with varying success. Several predictors of failure have been identified. Major risk factors include retransplantation, other organ dysfunction, and deconditioning.

Summary

ECLS is a risky strategy but necessary for patients who would otherwise die if not bridged to transplantation. The presence of predictors for failure is not a contraindication for bridging. However, major risk factors should be approached cautiously. Other, more minor risk factors may be considered acceptable. More importantly, the strategy should be individualized for each patient to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lung transplantation

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has had a positive impact on the outcomes after lung transplantation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has a role in all phases of lung transplantation-preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. It serves as a bridge to transplantation in appropriate patients awaiting lung transplantation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is used as a preferred method of cardiopulmonary support in some centres during implantation; and, after lung transplantation, it can be used to salvage the implanted lung in cases of severe primary graft dysfunction or as a planned extension of intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation onto the postoperative period. It has now gained acceptance as a mandatory tool in most lung transplant units. This article reviews the history of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lung transplantation, their subsequent development, and the current use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during lung transplantation. Our institutional practice and experience are described. The implications of the current global coronavirus disease pandemic on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lung transplantation are also briefly discussed.

Enhancing care for individuals with advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease

While remarkable advances in cystic fibrosis (CF) care have led to improvements in survival and quality of life, many individuals with CF are living with advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease (ACFLD) and others will face continued disease progression and its associated complex treatments and choices. This review will provide a summary of recently published guidelines for ACFLD care and lung transplant referral and highlight ongoing work to enhance the care of those with ACFLD through improvements in medical and psychosocial care, palliative care, and care around lung transplantation.

Lung transplantation for emphysema

Lung transplantation (LT) is proved to be effective in patients with end-stage lung disease who are failing optimal therapy. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (emphysema) is the most common indication for adult lung transplantation. As most patients with emphysema (EMP) can survive long term, it could be difficult to decide which patient should be listed for LT. LT is a complex surgery. Therefore, it is extremely important to choose a recipient in whom expected survival is at less equal or comparable to the survival without surgery. This paper reviews patient selection, bridging strategies until lung transplantation, surgical approach and choice of the procedure, and functional outcome in emphysema recipients.

Lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The contribution of lung transplantation to the treatment of patients with end-stage cystic fibrosis (CF) has been debated. We aimed to describe achievable outcomes from high-volume CF and lung transplant programs. This study reports on the largest single-center experience of lung transplantation for adult and pediatric patients with CF. It also highlights the evolution of practice and outcomes over time.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected Toronto Lung Transplant database was carried out. Post-transplant survival in CF was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed with log-rank tests.

RESULTS

From 1983 to 2016, a total of 1,885 transplants were performed at our institution, where 364 (19.3%) were CF recipients and another 39 (2.1%) were CF retransplants. The mean age at first transplant was 29.5 ± 9.7 years where 56.6% were males and 91.5% were adults. Pre-transplantation, 88 patients (24.2%) were Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC)-positive, 143 (39.3%) had diabetes mellitus, and the mean forced expiratory volume in one second was 26.0 ± 7.2%, as predicted at listing. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year probabilities of survival in adults who were BCC-negative were 94%, 70%, and 53%, respectively. Pediatric, BCC-positive, and retransplant recipients had worse survival than adult patients who were BCC-negative. Strategies to improve the donor pool did not affect survival but possibly reduced waitlist mortality. For the entire cohort, the most common causes of death after lung transplant were infection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation for CF provides excellent short- and long-term outcomes. These results strongly support lung transplantation as the standard of care for patients with CF having advanced lung disease.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Perioperative Care of the Lung Transplant Patient

Lung transplantation (LT) is definitive therapy for end-stage lung disease. Donor allocation based on medical urgency has led to an increased trend in the transplantation of sicker and older patients. Mechanical ventilation (MV) formerly was the only method of bridging high-acuity patients to LT. When the physiological demands of ventilatory support exceeds the capability of MV, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may become necessary. Recent improvements in ECMO technology and component design have led to a resurgence of interest in its use before, during, and after LT. Survival with ECMO as a bridge to LT has improved over time, now with many centers reporting little or no difference in outcomes, and some even reporting better outcomes, as compared with MV. Extracorporeal life support may also be used intraoperatively. In many studies to date, ECMO or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been reserved for patients who became hemodynamically unstable during the procedure or patients who could not tolerate single-lung ventilation. Both methods of support are fraught with potential complications. However, multiple studies comparing ECMO with CPB have shown that intraoperative use of ECMO resulted in improved outcomes and overall survival as well as lower rates of bleeding complications. In order to further reduce complications associated with ECMO, planned intraoperative ECMO use is occasionally reserved for high-risk patients who might otherwise require CPB. Future studies will need to improve patient selection to fully take advantage of the use of ECMO in LT while minimizing its costs.

Bridging to lung transplantation with double-lumen venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Double-lumen venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be used as a bridge to lung transplantation. Predictors of outcome with this strategy have not been well described.

METHODS

All patients with irreversible lung disease who developed acute pulmonary failure and required double-lumen venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to decision or lung transplant at our institution were included in this study. Survival of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients was compared with listed patients who did not require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with lung allocation score in the highest 10% for the same period.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (46 ± 17 years old) received double-lumen venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannula. Mean length of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was 18.2 (1-60) days. Of these, seven patients were bridged to lung transplant, six died on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and two weaned to recovery. Amount of red blood cell transfusion was significantly higher (3.3 vs 18.5 U, p = 0.003) and lowest oxygen saturation was significantly lower in non-survivors (84.5% vs 66.3%, p = 0.002). Of the seven patients who were already listed for lung transplant at the onset of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, five were transplanted. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 60%. Survival of patients with lung allocation score in the highest 10% (average lung allocation score 83.4) in the same period was 80%.

CONCLUSION

Double-lumen venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannula is a feasible option to bridge patients to decision or lung transplantation. Blood transfusion requirement and low oxygen saturation are markers of poor prognosis. Listing status at the time of cannulation and ambulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support may be important indicators of good outcome.

Bridging to Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation is the gold standard for treating patients with end-stage lung disease. Such patients can present with severe illness on the waitlist and may deteriorate before a lung donor is available. Bridging strategies with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are valuable for getting patients to transplant and provide a chance at survival. The current article describes the indications, contraindications, and techniques involved in bridging to lung transplantation with ECMO.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Bridge to Lung Transplantation in the United States: A Multicenter Survey

The clinical use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (LTx) has greatly increased in recent years. However, clinical practices for ECMO as a bridge to LTx vary widely between LTx centers. To better define the current practice of ECMO as a bridge to LTx, we surveyed pre-LTx ECMO practices among all adult LTx programs in the United States. All US LTx centers were surveyed (n = 57) between January and December 2014. Responses were received from 33 of 57 centers (58%). Of 33 responding centers, six (18%) performed ≥50 LTxs per year (defined as high volume) and two (6%) performed <10 LTxs per year (low volume). Two-third of responding centers, 22/33 (67%), reported use of ECMO as a bridge to LTx. Of these 22 centers, 18 (82%) successfully used venovenous (VV) ECMO as a bridge to LTx using the dual-lumen Avalon cannula. Patient >65 years of age was judged an ECMO contraindication in 15/33 (45%) of responding centers, but 12/33 (36%) centers, including the six high-volume centers, had no official age cutoff for ECMO candidacy. There was no consensus on the maximum acceptable duration of pre-LTx ECMO therapy; although 18/33 (55%) of programs had no defined maximal duration of ECMO pre-LTx, 10/33 (30%) considered >10 days on ECMO support contraindicated. Our survey suggests that in the United States, ECMO is used frequently pre-LTx, particularly VV ECMO at high-volume centers. However, criteria for ECMO initiation, age eligibility, bedside care, and maximum duration of support varied significantly between survey respondents.

Twenty-year experience with extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal life support is increasingly used to bridge deteriorating candidates to lung transplantation. Nevertheless, only few systematic reports with a limited number of patients exist describing this practice and its changes over time.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database and performed an era analysis to identify trends over time and risk factors for mortality. After applying propensity score matching, outcomes of bridged patients were compared with those of standard lung transplantation recipients.

RESULTS

Extracorporeal life support was used in 120 patients as an intention to bridge to lung transplantation. Eleven patients (9.2%) were bridged between 1998 and 2004, 39 patients (32.5%) were bridged between 2005 and 2010, and 70 patients were bridged (58.3%) between 2010 and 2017. In the first era, the main bridging modality was venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 10, 90.9%), whereas venovenous devices were primarily used in later eras (second era: n = 18, 46.2%; third era: n = 39, 55.8%). In the second and third eras, 9 patients (23.1%) and 24 patients (34.3%) could be bridged awake. Short-term outcome was poor in the first era, with only 36.4% of patients discharged alive but improved in later eras (53.8% and 77.1%; P = .002). Extracorporeal life support-bridged patients showed an impaired short-term outcome compared with standard recipients. However, survival conditional on 90 days did not differ among the groups (P = .178). In univariate and multivariate analyses, awake extracorporeal life support was protective for survival, whereas acute retransplantation was a risk factor for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 2 decades, the role of extracorporeal life support bridging evolved from an acute rescue therapy to a semi-elective procedure. Stratified outcome analysis revealed that extracorporeal life support bridging yielded similar long-term survival compared with nonbridged patients.

Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Bridge to Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) has become a critical component of caring for patients with end-stage lung disease. This study examined outcomes of patients who received ECMO as a BTT.

METHODS

Statistical analysis was performed on data gathered retrospectively from the electronic medical records of adult patients who received ECMO as BTT at Columbia University Medical Center from April 2009 through July 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 121 adult patients were placed on ECMO as BTT, and 70 patients (59%) were successfully bridged to lung transplantation. Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, unplanned endotracheal intubation, renal replacement therapy, and cerebrovascular accident were identified as independent predictors of unsuccessful BTT. Ambulation was the only independent predictor of successful BTT (odds ratio, 7.579; 95% confidence interval, 2.158 to 26.615; p = 0.002). Among the 64 patients (91%) who survived to hospital discharge, survival was 88% at 1 year and 83% at 3 years. Propensity matching between BTT and non-BTT lung transplant recipients did not show a significant difference in survival (log-rank = 0.53) despite significant differences in the lung allocation score (median, 92.2 [interquartile range, 89.0 to 94.2] vs 49.6 [interquartile range, 40.6 to 72.3], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

ECMO can be used successfully to bridge patients with end-stage lung disease to lung transplantation. When implemented by an experienced team with adherence to stringent protocols and patient selection, outcomes in BTT patients were comparable to patients who did not receive pretransplant support.

The Role and Impact of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Critical Care

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been exponentially increasing over the last decade and is now considered a mainstream lifesaving treatment modality in critical care medicine. However, the need for physician education, training, and experience remains imperative. Although ECMO has traditionally been used in end-stage lung disease and circulatory collapse, it is being adopted for use in right heart failure, as a bridge to heart and lung transplantation, and as rescue therapy for both sepsis and post-organ transplantation. The following article discusses indications, management, complications, and challenges of ECMO as well as our experience at the Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center.

Extracorporeal support, during and after lung transplantation: the history of an idea

During recent years, continuous technological innovation has provoked an increase of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use for perioperative cardiopulmonary support in lung transplantation. Initial results were disappointing, due to ECLS-specific complications and high surgical risk of the supported patients. However, the combination of improved patient management, multidisciplinary team work and standardization of ECLS protocols has recently yielded excellent results in several case series from high-volume transplant centres. Therein, it was demonstrated that, although the prevalence of complications remains higher in supported patients, there may be no difference in long-term graft function between supported and non-supported patients. These results are important, because most of the patients who require ECLS support in lung transplantation are young and have no other chance to survive, but to be transplanted. Moreover, there is no device for "bridging to destination" therapy in lung transplantation. Of note, the evidence in favour of ECLS support in lung transplantation was never validated by randomized controlled trials, but by everyday experience at the patient bed-side. Here, we review the state-of-the-art ECLS evidence for intraoperative and postoperative cardiopulmonary support in lung transplantation.

Increasing Opportunity for Lung Transplant in Interstitial Lung Disease With Pulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation for end-stage interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) has varying results based on ECMO configuration. We compare our experience using venovenous (VV) and venoarterial (VA) ECMO bridge to transplantation for ILD with PH on survival to successful transplantation.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was done of patients with ILD and secondary PH who were placed on either VV or VA ECMO as bridge to transplantation from 2010 to 2016. Comparisons for factors associated with survival to transplantation between VV and VA ECMO strategies were made using Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analysis included comparisons of VV ECMO patients who remained on VV or were converted to VA ECMO.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients with ILD and PH were treated initially with either VV (n = 19) or VA (n = 31) ECMO as bridge to lung transplantation. Initial VA ECMO had a significantly higher survival to transplantation compared with initial VV ECMO (p = 0.03). Cox proportional hazards modeling showed a 59% reduction in risk of death for VA compared with VV ECMO (hazard reduction 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.92, p = 0.03). Patients converted from VV to VA ECMO had significantly longer survival awaiting transplant than patients who remained on VV ECMO (p = 0.03). Ambulation on ECMO before transplantation was associated with an 80% reduction in the risk of death (hazard reduction 0.20, 95% confidence interval: 0.08 to 0.48, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Venoarterial ECMO upper body configuration for patients with end stage ILD and PH significantly improves overall survival to transplantation.

Contemporary Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Used as Bridge to Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), when used as bridge to lung transplantation, (BTT) identifies high-risk candidates. Recent advances in cannula design and patient selection fosters "awake ambulatory ECMO" as a viable option for critically ill candidates in an attempt to retard deconditioning while awaiting allografts.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2015, 30 patients underwent ECMO as BTT. Candidacy for ECMO was determined before listing for transplant. A dual-lumen single cannula was used first in 13 of 30 patients (43%). Of the remaining 30 patients, 6 (20%) were supported with venoarterial ECMO and 11 (37%) with venovenous ECMO, with double-site cannulation in 11 (37%), and 6 of 11 converted to a dual-lumen single cannula. All ECMO patients were managed in a dedicated heart/lung failure intensive care unit, and early aggressive physical therapy, ambulation, and spontaneous breathing trials were emphasized.

RESULTS

BTT was successful in 26 patients (87%). In the 19 patients with dual-lumen single cannula, 5 (26%) were successfully ambulated, and 6 (32%) achieved spontaneous ventilation. Median (25th, 75th percentile) lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital were 33 days (20, 46 days) and 56 days (28, 78 days), respectively, and were 20 and 31 days, respectively, in patients successfully ambulated (intensive care unit: p = 0.5; hospital: p = 0.4). Among all patients who received a transplant, 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year survival were 92%, 85%, and 80%, respectively. Among patients undergoing primary transplants, 3-year survival was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

ECMO as BTT has led to encouraging perioperative outcomes and early survival. Careful patient selection and early use of ECMO seems to allow for preservation of vitality while these critically ill candidates await donor organs, which may improve outcomes.

ECFS best practice guidelines: the 2018 revision

Developments in managing CF continue to drive dramatic improvements in survival. As newborn screening rolls-out across Europe, CF centres are increasingly caring for cohorts of patients who have minimal lung disease on diagnosis. With the introduction of mutation-specific therapies and the prospect of truly personalised medicine, patients have the potential to enjoy good quality of life in adulthood with ever-increasing life expectancy. The landmark Standards of Care published in 2005 set out what high quality CF care is and how it can be delivered throughout Europe. This underwent a fundamental re-write in 2014, resulting in three documents; center framework, quality management and best practice guidelines. This document is a revision of the latter, updating standards for best practice in key aspects of CF care, in the context of a fast-moving and dynamic field. In continuing to give a broad overview of the standards expected for newborn screening, diagnosis, preventative treatment of lung disease, nutrition, complications, transplant/end of life care and psychological support, this consensus on best practice is expected to prove useful to clinical teams both in countries where CF care is developing and those with established CF centres. The document is an ECFS product and endorsed by the CF Network in ERN LUNG and CF Europe.

Recent advances in extracorporeal life support as a bridge to lung transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Invasive mechanical respiratory support in candidate bridging to transplant (BTT) has become common practice in recent years. This usually consists of mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) or a combination of both techniques. Areas covered: This review covers epidemiology, technical considerations, indications and outcome of ELCS as BTT. Published literature was identified by searching the MEDLINE bibliographic database (1946-present) and appropriate papers were reviewed. In a retrospective analysis of the period 2010-2016 (n = 92 cases of ECLS bridging, 62% ECLS only) at our institution, bridging success was 73%, with 1-year survival among patients surviving to transplant 78%, surpassing our previously published results between 2005-2009 (bridging success 58%, 1-year survival 58%, p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively). Expert commentary: While ECLS success has influenced lung transplant selection criteria, bridging remains technically and ethically challenging. Candidate selection and organ allocation are crucial to achieving acceptable results.

Principi e indicazioni dell’assistenza circolatoria e respiratoria extracorporea in chirurgia toracica

In origine, l’extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) era una tecnica di assistenza respiratoria che utilizzava uno scambiatore gassoso a membrana. Per estensione, l’ECMO è diventata una tecnica respiratoria e cardiopolmonare utilizzata in caso di deficit respiratorio e/o cardiaco nell’attesa della restaurazione della funzione deficitaria o di un eventuale trapianto. Il supporto emodinamico può essere parziale o totale. Gli accessi vascolari possono essere periferici o centrali. Questo tipo di assistenza utilizza il concetto di circolazione extracorporea (CEC) sanguigna che in epoca moderna si è estesa con l’utilizzo di polmoni artificiali a membrana. Il circuito di base è semplice e comprende una pompa, un ossigenatore (che permette al sangue di caricarsi di O₂ e di eliminare CO₂) e delle vie d’accesso (una di drenaggio e una di reinfusione). La sua attuazione è facile, veloce e può essere avviata al letto del malato. Il miglioramento delle attrezzature, una migliore conoscenza delle tecniche e delle indicazioni, e le politiche di salute pubblica hanno reso popolare questa tecnica. Alcuni centri di chirurgia toracica la utilizzano di routine come assistenza alla realizzazione di un intervento terapeutico (soprattutto trapianto) assieme a team di rianimazione per il trattamento della sindrome da distress respiratorio acuto. Nel quadro della malattia polmonare dell’adulto, l’idea principale è quella di sviluppare il concetto di strategia minimalista con l’uso di una CEC adiuvante parziale – più che sostitutiva totale – che permetterebbe il recupero metabolico ad integrum del paziente. Nei prossimi anni, i progressi della tecnologia e dell’ingegneria così come le conoscenze approfondite permetteranno il miglioramento della prognosi dei pazienti colpiti da deficit respiratorio sotto assistenza meccanica.

Bridging to lung transplantation with extracorporeal circulatory support: when or when not?

Patients with end-stage lung disease who are candidates for lung transplantation may acutely decompensate before a donor organ becomes available. In this scenario, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) may be considered as a bridge to transplant or as a bridge to decision. In the current chapter, we review the indications, techniques, and outcomes for bridging to lung transplantation with ECLS.

Outcomes after lung transplantation

With more than 50,000 procedures having been performed worldwide, lung transplantation (LT) has become the standard of care for patients with end-stage chronic respiratory failure. LT leads to dramatic improvements in both pulmonary function and health related quality of life. Survival after LTs has steadily improved, but still lags far behind that observed after other solid organ transplantations, as evidenced by a median survival rate that currently stands at 5.8 years. Because of these disappointing results, the ability of LT to expand survival has been questioned. However, the most recent studies, based on sophisticated statistical modeling suggest that LT confers a survival benefit to the vast majority of lung transplant recipients. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) that develops in about 50% of recipients 5 years after LT is a major impediment to lung transplant survival. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying CLAD could allow for better post-transplant survival.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: A single-center experience in the present era

OBJECTIVE

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been used as a bridge to lung transplantation in patients with rapid pulmonary function deterioration. The reported success of this modality and perioperative and functional outcomes are varied.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent lung transplantation at our institution over 1 year (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015). Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support as a bridge to transplant; preoperative characteristics, lung transplantation outcomes, and survival were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 93 patients, 12 (13%) received bridge to transplant, and 81 (87%) did not. Patients receiving bridge to transplant were younger, had higher lung allocation scores, had lower functional status, and were more often on mechanical ventilation at listing. Most patients who received bridge to transplant (n = 10, 83.3%) had pulmonary fibrosis. Mean pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was 103.6 hours in duration (range, 16-395 hours). All patients who received bridge to transplant were decannulated immediately after lung transplantation but were more likely to return to the operating room for secondary chest closure or rethoracotomy. Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction within 72 hours was similar between groups. Lung transplantation success and hospital discharge were 100% in the bridge to transplant group; however, these patients experienced longer hospital stays and higher rates of discharge to acute rehabilitation. The 1-year survival was 100% in the bridge to transplant group and 91% in the non-bridge to transplant group (log-rank, P = .24). The 1-year functional status was excellent in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be used to safely bridge high-acuity patients with end-stage lung disease to lung transplantation with good 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival and excellent 1-year functional status. Long-term outcomes are being studied.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following lung transplantation: indications and survival

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is employed to rescue patients with early graft dysfunction after lung transplantation (LTx). Rates of post-LTx ECMO and subsequent outcomes have been limited to single-center reports.

METHODS

UNOS registry was queried for LTx recipients from March 2015 to March 2016; 2,001 recipients were identified and stratified by need for post-LTx ECMO. Logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with post-LTx ECMO. Cox proportional hazards modeling identified factors associated with survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing was employed for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2,001 recipients identified, 107 required post-LTx ECMO (5.1%). Recipients requiring ECMO were younger (56 vs 60 years, p = 0.007) and had higher body mass index (27.2 vs 25.8, p = 0.012). Recipients requiring post-LTx ECMO were more likely to have required mechanical ventilation before transplant (9.3% vs 4.9%, p = 0.049) and were more likely to have required pre-transplant ECMO (15% vs 3.7%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, pre-transplant ECMO and increasing ischemic time were associated with post-LTx ECMO. Six-month survival for recipients requiring ECMO was 62.2%. On multivariable analysis, need for post-transplant dialysis was associated with mortality. Six-month survival for recipients requiring ECMO with and without dialysis was 25.8% and 86.7% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationally representative database, ischemic time and pre-transplant ECMO and/or ventilator requirement were associated with need for post-LTx ECMO. Need for post-transplant dialysis was associated with mortality in patients requiring post-LTx ECMO. These data may permit improved prediction of graft dysfunction. Strategies to minimize renal toxicity in the perioperative phase may lead to improved early survival post-LTx.

Spontaneously Breathing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support Provides the Optimal Bridge to Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is being increasingly used as a bridge to lung transplantation. Small, single-institution series have described increased success using ECMO in spontaneously breathing patients compared with patients on ECMO with mechanical ventilation, but this strategy has not been evaluated on a large scale.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, all adult patients undergoing isolated lung transplantation from May 2005 through September 2013 were identified. Patients were categorized by their type of pretransplant support: no support, ECMO only, invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV) only, and ECMO + iMV. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing was performed to compare survival based on type of preoperative support. A Cox regression model was used to determine whether type of preoperative support was independently associated with survival, using previously established predictors of survival as covariates.

RESULTS

Approximately 12,403 primary adult pulmonary transplantations were included in this analysis. Sixty-five patients (0.52%) were on ECMO only, 612 (4.93%) required only iMV, 119 (0.96%) were on ECMO + iMV, and the remaining 11,607 (94.6%) required no invasive support before transplantation. One-year survival was decreased in all patients requiring support, regardless of type. However, mid-term survival was similar between patients on ECMO alone and those not on support but significantly worse with patients requiring iMV only or ECMO + iMV. In multivariable analysis, ECMO + iMV and iMV alone were independently associated with decreased survival compared with nonsupport patients, whereas ECMO alone was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with worsening pulmonary disease awaiting lung transplantation, those supported via ECMO with spontaneous breathing demonstrated improved survival compared with other bridging strategies.

[Extracorporeal life support in thoracic surgery: What are the indications and the pertinence?]

INTRODUCTION

In thoracic surgery, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) technologies are used in cases of severe and refractory respiratory failure or as intraoperative cardiorespiratory support. The objectives of this review are to describe the rationale of ECLS techniques, to review the pulmonary diseases potentially treated by ECLS, and finally to demonstrate the efficacy of ECLS, using recently published data from the literature, in order to practice evidence based medicine.

STATE OF THE ART

ECLS technologies should only be undertaken in expert centers. ECLS allows a protective ventilatory strategy in severe ARDS. In the field of lung transplantation, ECLS may be used successfully as a bridge to transplantation, as intraoperative cardiorespiratory support or as a bridge to recovery in cases of severe primary graft dysfunction. In general thoracic surgery, ECLS technology seems to be safe and efficient as intraoperative respiratory support for tracheobronchial surgery or for severe respiratory insufficiency, without significant increase in perioperative risk.

PERSPECTIVE

The indications for ECLS are going to increase. Future improvements both in scientific knowledge and bioengineering will improve the prognosis of patients treated with ECLS for respiratory failure. Multicenter randomized controlled trials will refine the indications for ECLS and improve the global care strategies for these patients.

CONCLUSION

ECLS is an efficient therapeutic strategy that will improve the prognosis of patients suffering from, or exposed to, the risks of severe respiratory failure.

Awake Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Lung Transplantation: A 9-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used as a bridge to lung transplantation, but characteristics that influence its success are poorly understood. This large, single-center experience evaluated the implementation and outcomes of ECMO in this setting.

METHODS

Data were collected for patients at our institution (New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center in New York) who received ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation from January 1, 2007 through July 10, 2016. Data were analyzed for demographics, baseline characteristics, survival, and ECMO configuration.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients received ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation. Of the 72 patients, 40 (55.6%) underwent the transplantation procedure, 37 (92.5%) survived to discharge, and 21 (84.0%) survived for 2 years. Inotropy or vasopressor support (70% vs 93.8%; p = 0.011), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (26.8 vs 30.5; p = 0.048), and ambulation (80% vs 56.2%; p = 0.030) were significantly different between the patients who underwent lung transplantation and those who did not. Patients with cystic fibrosis were more likely to have a bridge to transplantation than patients with other lung diseases (47.5% vs 25%; p = 0.050). Daily participation in physical therapy was achieved in 50 patients (69.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated favorable survival in patients receiving ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation and achieved high rates of physical therapy and avoidance of mechanical ventilation while ECMO was used in patients awaiting lung transplantation. With more than half of these patients successfully bridged to lung transplantation, we gained insight into the factors influencing patients' outcomes, including patient selection, timing of ECMO, and patient management.

State of the Art: Bridging to lung transplantation using artificial organ support technologies

Lung transplantation increasingly is being performed in recipients of higher risk and acuity. A subset of these patients has severely abnormal gas exchange and/or right ventricular dysfunction, such that artificial organ support strategies are required to bridge patients to lung transplantation. We review the rationales and currently used and potential strategies for bridging to lung transplantation and characterize bridging outcomes. Based on physiologic reasoning and a study of the existing literature, we provide a working strategy for bridging to lung transplantation.

Principi e indicazioni dell’assistenza circolatoria e respiratoria extracorporea in chirurgia toracica

In origine, l’extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) era una tecnica di assistenza respiratoria che utilizzava uno scambiatore gassoso a membrana. Per estensione, l’ECMO è diventata una tecnica respiratoria e cardiopolmonare utilizzata in caso di deficit respiratorio e/o cardiaco nell’attesa della restaurazione della funzione deficitaria o di un eventuale trapianto. Il supporto emodinamico può essere parziale o totale. Gli accessi vascolari possono essere periferici o centrali. Questo tipo di assistenza utilizza il concetto di circolazione extracorporea (CEC) sanguigna che in epoca moderna si è estesa con l’utilizzo di polmoni artificiali a membrana. Il circuito di base è semplice e comprende una pompa, un ossigenatore (che permette al sangue di caricarsi di O₂ e di eliminare CO₂) e delle vie d’accesso (una di drenaggio e una di reinfusione). La sua attuazione è facile, veloce e può essere avviata al letto del malato. Il miglioramento delle attrezzature, una migliore conoscenza delle tecniche e delle indicazioni, e le politiche di salute pubblica hanno reso popolare questa tecnica. Alcuni centri di chirurgia toracica la utilizzano di routine come assistenza alla realizzazione di un intervento terapeutico (soprattutto trapianto) assieme a team di rianimazione per il trattamento della sindrome da distress respiratorio acuto. Nel quadro della malattia polmonare dell’adulto, l’idea principale è quella di sviluppare il concetto di strategia minimalista con l’uso di una CEC adiuvante parziale – più che sostitutiva totale – che permetterebbe il recupero metabolico ad integrum del paziente. Nei prossimi anni, i progressi della tecnologia e dell’ingegneria così come le conoscenze approfondite permetteranno il miglioramento della prognosi dei pazienti colpiti da deficit respiratorio sotto assistenza meccanica.

How to minimise ventilator-induced lung injury in transplanted lungs: The role of protective ventilation and other strategies

Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage pulmonary diseases. In order to avoid or reduce pulmonary and systemic complications, mechanical ventilator settings have an important role in each stage of lung transplantation. In this respect, the use of mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 to 8 ml  kg(-1) predicted body weight, positive end-expiratory pressure of 6 to 8 cmH2O and a plateau pressure lower than 30 cmH2O has been suggested for the donor during surgery, and for the recipient both during and after surgery. For the present review, we systematically searched the PubMed database for articles published from 2000 to 2014 using the following keywords: lung transplantation, protective mechanical ventilation, lung donor, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, recruitment manoeuvres, extracorporeal CO2 removal and noninvasive ventilation.

Vascular access for extracorporeal life support: tips and tricks

In thoracic surgery, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) techniques are performed to (I) provide a short to mid term extracorporeal mechanical support; (II) realize the gas exchanges; and (III)-depending the configuration of the circuit-substitute the failed heart function. The objective of this review is to describe the rational of the different ECLS techniques used in thoracic surgery and lung transplantation (LTx) with a specific attention to the vascular access. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is the most common ECLS technique used in thoracic surgery and represents the best strategy to support the lung function. VV ECMO needs peripheral vascular access. The selection between his double-site or single-site configuration should be decided according the level of O2 requirements, the nosological context, and the interest to perform an ECLS ambulatory strategy. Venoarterial (VA) ECMO uses peripheral and/or central cannulation sites. Central VA ECMO is mainly used in LTx instead a conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to decrease the risk of hemorrhagic issues and the rate of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Peripheral VA ECMO is traditionally realized in a femoro-femoral configuration. Femoro-femoral VA ECMO allows a cardiocirculatory support but does not provide an appropriate oxygenation of the brain and the heart. The isolated hypercapnic failure is currently supported by extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) devices inserted in jugular or subclavian veins. The interest of the Novalung (Novalung GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) persists due to his central configuration indicated to bridge to LTx patients suffering from pulmonary hypertension. The increasing panel of ECLS technologies available in thoracic surgery is the results of a century of clinical practices, engineering progress, and improvements of physiological knowledges. The selection of the ECLS technique-and therefore the vascular access to implant the device-for a given nosological context trends to be defined according an evidence-based medicine.

A global perspective of lung transplantation: Part 1 - Recipient selection and choice of procedure

Lung transplantation has grown considerably in recent years and its availability has spread to an expanding number of countries worldwide. Importantly, survival has also steadily improved, making this an increasingly viable procedure for patients with end-stage lung disease and limited life expectancy. In this first of a series of articles, recipient selection and type of transplant operation are reviewed. Pulmonary fibrotic disorders are now the most indication in the U.S., followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis. Transplant centers have liberalized criteria to include older and more critically ill candidates. A careful, systematic, multi-disciplinary selection process is critical in identifying potential barriers that may increase risk and optimize long-term outcomes.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung re-transplantation: Is there a role?

BACKGROUND

In this study we sought to determine survival rates after use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung re-transplantation (re-LT).

METHODS

Propensity-adjusted analysis was performed on data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to evaluate survival in recipients between the years 1988 and 2012, based on the use of ECMO before re-LT.

RESULTS

A total of 854 adult re-LT recipients were identified. Extracorporeal support had been used as a bridge in 55 (6.8%) of the recipients, whereas 799 (93.2%) had undergone re-LT without the use of ECMO. Compared with non-ECMO patients, the ECMO patients were more likely to have: higher body mass index (p = 0.003); received lungs from an older donor (p = 0.04); higher total bilirubin (p = 0.002); undergone bilateral lung transplantation (p = 0.01); diabetes (p = 0.04); mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0005); and been hospitalized in the intensive care unit (p < 0.0001). They were also more likely to have a diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (p < 0.0001), be on inhaled nitric oxide (p < 0.0001), and have a shorter waitlist time before re-LT (p < 0.0001). Compared with the non-ECMO group, 30-day survival for the ECMO group was lower (67.3% vs 91.2%, p = 0.0002). Obesity was identified as a predictor of increased mortality in re-LT hazard ratio 2.97 (1.18 to 7.50), p = 0.02.

CONCLUSION

This contemporary analysis of survival after use of ECMO as a bridge to re-LT revealed lower survival in the ECMO group.