Predicted heart mass is the optimal metric for size match in heart transplantation

Predicted Heart Mass and Outcomes in the Contemporary Era of Heart Transplantation: Insights from the Dallas Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Donor-recipient size matching is a key factor in donor selection in heart transplantation (HT). One approach uses predicted heart mass (PHM), derived from the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We sought to examine whether predicted left ventricular mass (PLVM) derived from the Dallas Heart Study (DHS) is associated with post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS

The study cohort included participants without pre-existing cardiac disease in DHS who had a cardiac MRI (n=1,746). A PLVM model was derived by linear regression. The DHS PLVM and MESA PHM were tested for correlation. The associations of DHS PLVM and MESA PHM with 1-year mortality post-HT were assessed in the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry in three eras (Era 1: 1/1/2011-12/31/2014, Era 2: 1/1/2015-10/17/2018, and Era 3 10/18/2018 - 12/31/2021). A pre-specified threshold for low donor-to-recipient mass ratio (< 0.86) was used in Kaplan Meier survival estimation and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The DHS cohort had a median age of 43 (IQR 36-52) years, 49% male, 40% Black, and 18% Hispanic ethnicity. DHS PLVM was highly correlated with MESA PHM: r = 0.96, p <0.001. In Era 1, a low donor-to-recipient mass ratio by DHS PLVM was associated with increased 1-year mortality (log-rank p<0.001) as was MESA PHM (log rank p = 0.002). However, in Eras 2 and 3, a low donor-to-recipient mass ratio by either DHS PLVM or MESA PHM was not associated with increased 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

PLVM was highly correlated with PHM. A low donor-to-recipient mass ratio, whether assessed by PLVM or PHM, was associated with 1-year mortality post-HT in a historical era but not in the current era under the new allocation system. These findings suggest that other factors may be contributing to donor selection and mortality risk in the modern era.

Relationship between body mass index and traditional size-matching in heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor-recipient size matching is an important consideration for heart allocation, of which predicted heart mass (PHM) ratio has been found to be the most optimal metric. However, the PHM formula has not been validated in a cohort that included obese recipients. Therefore, our study seeks to add further granular data on this topic by investigating acute survival in PHM categories across multiple body mass index (BMI) groups.

METHODS

Adult heart transplant recipients were analyzed using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. BMI groups included: normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), obese class I (30.0-34.9 kg/m2), and obese class II+ (≥35.0 kg/m2). PHM ratio (PHMR) categories were: severely undersized (U2): <0.85, undersized (U1): 0.85-0.95, approximately equally sized (R): 0.95-1.05, oversized (O1): 1.05-1.25, and severely oversized (O2): ≥1.25. All-cause acute mortality was the primary outcome of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 46,141 recipients were included in our analysis. The percentage of obese patients and donors increased over the years, from 21.5 % and 17.2 % in 2000 to 34.4 % and 33.1 % in 2022, respectively. Survival analysis found a stepwise reduction in mortality risk for severely undersized grafts as BMI increased (normal: HR = 1.59, p < 0.001; overweight: HR = 1.20, p = 0.029), until ultimately reaching insignificant levels in obese groups across all PHMR categories.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a normal to overweight BMI were susceptible to increased mortality with a severely undersized graft. Conversely, obese groups appeared to be resistant to the hazards of organ size mismatching by PHMR. The clinical implications of this study may enable recruitment from a larger donor pool and improve challenges in transplantation for obese patients.

The Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY): Third Official Adult Heart Transplant Report

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY) provided data for this third official report on adult heart transplantation (HT), including information from 709 recipients.

METHODS

Data from HTs performed at seven major centers in Korea between March 2014 and December 2020 were analyzed, focusing on immunosuppression, acute rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), post-transplant survival, and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) usage.

RESULTS

The median ages of the recipients and donors were 56.0 and 43.0 years, respectively. Cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart disease were the most common preceding conditions for HT. A significant portion of patients underwent HT at waiting list status 1 and 0. In the multivariate analysis, a predicted heart mass mismatch was associated with a higher risk of 1-year mortality. Patients over 70 years old had a significantly increased risk of 6-year mortality. The risk of CAV was higher for male donors and donors older than 45 years. Acute rejection was more likely in patients with panel reactive antibody levels above 80%, while statin use was associated with a reduced risk. The employment of left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation increased from 2.17% to 22.4%. Pre-transplant extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with worse post-transplant survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this third KOTRY report, we analyzed changes in the characteristics of adult HT recipients and donors and their impact on post-transplant outcomes. The most notable discovery was the increased use of MCS before HT and their impact on post-transplant outcomes.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2022 Part II: Cardiac Transplantation

These highlights focus on research published in the year 2022 and is divided into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative sections. The preoperative section includes research on the assessment and optimization of candidates for heart transplantation; donor optimization and the use of extended donors; organ protection systems; donation after circulatory death allografts; recipient factors including cannabis use, sex, race, and comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and peripartum cardiomyopathy; the effects of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on waitlist and postoperative mortality; updates on heart transplantation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019; in pediatric patients; and those who require a bridge to transplant. The intraoperative section includes the use of a multidisciplinary team, a proposed transfusion algorithm, bench surgery on the allograft, and size matching. The postoperative section focuses on the research on the development and management of tricuspid regurgitation, echocardiography, arrhythmia management, and, finally, xenotransplantation.

Donor pulmonary hemodynamics does not impact recipient outcomes in adult heart transplantation

PURPOSE

The impact of donor pulmonary hemodynamics as assessed by mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and transpulmonary gradients (TPG) on the clinical outcome of heart transplant (HT) recipients is unknown. We compared outcomes of adult HT recipients as stratified by donor pulmonary hemodynamics in the contemporary era in the United States.

METHODS

We reviewed adult donor hearts (age ≥ 18 years) which were offered for transplantation between January 2010 and March 2023 in the UNOS database with available right heart catheterization (RHC) data. Adjusted Cox regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between 30-day and 1-year mortality after HT and donor mPAP, TPG, and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Each hemodynamic parameter was modeled as a quadratic polynomial to not assume a linear relationship with mortality.

RESULTS

2038 HT recipients with complete donor RHC were included: 58 % were on inotrope support. Elevated mPAP (≥25 mmHg), TPG (≥15), and PVR (≥1.5) were present in 416 (20.4 %), 179 (8.8 %), and 2038 (100 %), respectively. No significant association was found between donor mean PAP (HR 1.47, 95 % CI 0.80-2.67), donor TPG (HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.20-1.08), and donor PVR (HR 1.69, 95 % CI 0.77-3.72) and 30-day mortality. Similarly, no significant association was found between donor mPAP (HR 1.33, 95 % CI 0.90-1.95), donor TPG (HR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.37-1.12), and donor PVR (HR 1.38, 95 % CI 0.83-2.32) and 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor pulmonary pressures did not impact post-heart transplant survival in adult recipients. Donors with abnormal pulmonary hemodynamics remain viable donor hearts for transplantation.

Utilization rates and heart transplantation outcomes of donation after circulatory death donors with prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Heart donation after circulatory death (DCD) involves mandatory exposure to warm ischemic injury (WII) due to donor cardiac arrest resulting from withdrawal of life-support (WLS). However, potential DCD donors may also experience a cardiac arrest and undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and associated WII before WLS. We sought to investigate the effect of previous donor-CPR in DCD heart-transplantation (HT).

METHODS

Between January-2020 and April-2023, we identified 11,415 adult HTs in UNOS of whom 9456 met study criteria and had information on donor-CPR. Follow-up was available till April-2024. Study cohort was divided into four groups based on DCD vs. donation after brain death (DBD) status and donor-CPR i.e., DCD/CPR+ (n = 387), DCD/noCPR (n = 305), DBD/CPR+ (n = 5158) and DBD/noCPR (n = 3606); and compared for HT characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

With DBD/noCPR HTs as reference cohort, there were no significant differences in mortality in other HT cohorts (DCD/CPR+, DCD/noCPR and DBD/CPR+) upto 1-year of follow up using Kaplan-Meier analysis; and both unadjusted and adjusted Cox hazards-ratio models. Results were similar in propensity-matched cohorts. Duration of donor-CPR (≤20 min vs >20 min) did not influence HT survival; and rates of in-hospital secondary outcomes were similar. The utilization rates of both adult DCD/CPR+ (3.39 % to 9.71 %) and DCD/noCPR donors (4.41 % to 10.34 %) increased significantly (p < 0.01) during study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization rates of both DCD/CPR+ and DCD/noCPR donors have increased at an equal pace. A significant proportion of DCD HTs were from donors with prior CPR, but this was not associated with worse short-term survival.

The Association of Echocardiographically Measured Donor Left Ventricular Mass and 1-Year Outcomes After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor-recipient heart size matching is crucial in heart transplantation; however, the often-used predicted heart mass (PHM) ratio may be inaccurate in the setting of obesity.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to investigate the association between echocardiographically measured donor left ventricular mass (LVM) for heart size matching and the risk of the primary 1-year composite outcome of death or retransplantation.

METHODS

The Donor Heart Study was a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study that collected echocardiograms from brain-dead donors. The measured LVM ratio (donor measured LVM/recipient predicted LVM) was defined as the exposure variable, and the association with the primary outcome was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard modeling. Secondary analyses evaluated the association of the PHM and predicted LVM (donor predicted LVM/recipient predicted LVM) ratios with the primary outcome.

RESULTS

In 2,015 heart transplants, the measured LVM ratio demonstrated that undersized matches (<0.80) had a 47% higher risk (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.01-2.15) and oversized (>1.20) matches had a 58% increased risk (aHR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.05-2.37) of the 1-year composite outcome compared with ideally matched transplants. However, the PHM and predicted LVM ratios were not associated with the primary outcome. Nonlinear modeling demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between the measured LVM ratio and composite outcome. The measured LVM ratio had superior predictive power for poor post-transplantation outcomes in obese recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring donor LVM with the use of echocardiography may provide a more accurate method for donor-recipient heart size matching that could improve heart transplant outcomes, especially in obese recipients.

The Safety and Late Hemodynamics of Donor Cardiac Undersizing in Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Predicted heart mass (PHM) ratio has become the standard donor-recipient size matching method in heart transplantation. Although use of small PHM ratio hearts is associated with increased 1-year mortality, the underlying mechanisms and time horizon of mortality remain uncertain.

METHODS

A single-institution analysis of 334 isolated heart transplant recipients (January 2019-July 2022) was performed. Patients were stratified by PHM ratio: undersized (<0.86; n = 106), matched (0.86-1.15; n = 175), and oversized (>1.15; n = 53). Survival within PHM ratio groups was further stratified by complex transplant group (preoperative left ventricular assist device, adult congenital, or preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) and noncomplex transplant group (all others).

RESULTS

Donor and recipient variables were similar. However, undersized patients were more likely to have a durable left ventricular assist device (P = .022). Although postoperative primary graft dysfunction and inotrope score were similar between groups, there was a trend toward increased need for postoperative dialysis with undersized hearts (P = .056). Overall, 30-day (P = .012) and 1-year survival (P = .002) was significantly worse in the undersized group compared with the matched or oversized groups. However, subset analysis showed these differences only remained among the complex transplant recipients (P = .013) but not the noncomplex transplant recipients (P = .428). Median mixed venous oxygen saturations at serial time points were maintained between 65% and 70% in all heart size groups, with cardiac indices between 2.4 and 2.8 L/min/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

Small PHM ratio hearts are associated with increased 1-year mortality, driven by complex transplant operations. Recipients who received undersized PHM ratio hearts from noncomplex transplant operations had a similar hemodynamic profile and survival as those who received matched and oversized hearts. Small PHM ratio hearts may be selectively safe for transplantation.

Impact of donor obesity on outcomes of donation after circulatory death heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

In the setting of the obesity epidemic and donor organ shortage in the United States, there is a growing need to expand the donor organ eligibility criteria for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has emerged as a promising solution, but the outcomes with obese donor hearts in DCD OHT remains unknown.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry between 2019 and 2024, recipients of DCD OHT were stratified into 3 donor obesity categories by body mass index (BMI): underweight/normal (BMI <25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI >30 kg/m2). These cohorts were subgrouped by organ procurement strategy: direct procurement and preservation (DPP) or normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Recipient and donor characteristics and risk factors for mortality were analyzed using Cox regression hazard models. Survival at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years post-transplantation were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in patient and graft survival between donor BMI categories at all time points. Among recipients of overweight (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; P = .0371) and obese (HR, 0.24; P = .0493) donor hearts, NRP was associated with decreased risk of mortality. Donor-recipient predicted heart mass (PHM) undermatching (defined as <86%) was associated with increased risk of mortality among underweight/normal weight donors (HR, 1.28; P = .0323) and overweight donors (HR, 1.08; P = .0382).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor obesity does not confer an increased risk of recipient mortality in DCD OHT, particularly when NRP is used. PHM undermatching continues to be associated with adverse outcomes in DCD OHT.

Increases in donor/recipient predicted heart mass ratios do not result in large donor right ventricles

Pulmonary hypertension puts strain on the right ventricle (RV), leading to the widespread practice of oversizing donor hearts to mitigate complications. However, contemporary evidence for this practice is neutral. We studied the relationship between donor-recipient predicted heart mass (D/R PHM) ratios and increases in donor left ventricle (LV) and RV mass. We also studied the relationship between predicted D/R PHM ratios and predicted D/R LV mass difference and RV mass difference. We find that increases in D/R PHM ratios result in minimal change in donor RV mass as well as minimal change in predicted D/R RV mass difference. However, increases in D/R PHM ratios were associated with marked increases in predicted D/R LV mass difference. We conclude that the utilization of donors with high predicted D/R PHM ratios generally does not result in the delivery of larger RVs to transplant recipients, but predominantly the delivery of larger LVs.

Right ventricular sizing and pulmonary vascular resistance: How much mass do you need?

OBJECTIVE

Right ventricular (RV) donor-recipient sizing has been demonstrated to be a sensitive predictor for mortality after heart transplantation. We sought to understand the relationship between donor-recipient RV mass (RVM) ratio and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) on outcomes after heart transplantation.

METHODS

Adult heart transplant recipients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included (N = 42,594). The influence of RVM ratio and PVR on 1-year mortality was assessed by logistic regression after multivariable adjustment.

RESULTS

Among transplant recipients, median PVR was 2.4 Wood units (WU) (range, 1.7-3.3 WU) and median RVM ratio was 1.2 (1.0-1.3). Without considering PVR, RVM ratio was highly associated with postoperative dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; P < .001) and 1-year mortality (OR, 0.64; P < .001). Without considering RVM ratio, PVR was highly associated with 1-year mortality (OR, 1.05; P < .001), but not postoperative dialysis (OR, 0.98; P = .156). When considering both RVM ratio and PVR, the risk associated with each remained significant, but PVR did not modify the effect of RVM ratio on 1-year mortality (RVM ratio × PVR: OR, 0.99; P = .858). To maintain a consistent predicted 1-year mortality, RVM ratio would need to increase by 0.12 for each WU increase in PVR. Secondary analyses found that a 1 WU change in PVR was associated with an 11% increase in mortality risk in RVM ratio mismatched patients (RVM ratio < 1; P = .001), but only a 5% increase in RVM ratio matched patients (RVM ratio ≥ 1; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

RVM ratio and recipient PVR are independent predictors of 1-year mortality. Still, a larger RV mass may be utilized to mediate the effects of an elevated PVR.

Donor Selection for Heart Transplantation in 2024

The number of candidates on the waiting list for heart transplantation (HT) continues to far outweigh the number of available organs, and the donor heart nonuse rate in the United States remains significantly higher than that of other regions such as Europe. Although predicting outcomes in HT remains challenging, our overall understanding of the factors that play a role in post-HT outcomes continues to grow. We observe that many donor risk factors that are deemed "high-risk" do not necessarily always adversely affect post-HT outcomes, but are in fact nuanced and interact with other donor and recipient risk factors. The field of HT continues to evolve, with ongoing development of technologies for organ preservation during transport, expansion of the practice of donation after circulatory death, and proposed changes to organ allocation policy. As such, the field must continue to refine its processes for donor selection and risk prediction in HT.

Early single-center experience with an ex vivo organ care system in pediatric heart transplantation

Pediatric heart transplantation (HTx) faces challenges such as limited donor availability and the need for complex reconstructions, particularly in patients with congenital anomalies. Ex vivo perfusion offers a promising approach to minimize graft ischemic time and potentially expand the donor pool. We report our single-center experience using the TransMedics Organ Care System (OCS) for ex vivo perfusion in pediatric HTx. From 2020 to 2024, 8 pediatric patients received OCS-perfused donor hearts. The median recipient age was 13 years (range 9-18), and the median weight was 58.8 kg (33.2-127.8). Indications for HTx included dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 4), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1), graft vasculopathy (n = 1), and Fontan failure (n = 2). Median OCS time was 273 minutes (195-328), and recipient ischemic time was 85 minutes (64-139). Post-transplant, all patients had normal LV function at discharge. Over a median follow-up of 11.9 months, there were no deaths. These findings suggest that ex vivo perfusion is a valuable technique in pediatric HTx.

Right Ventricular Mass Oversizing Is Associated With Improved Post-transplant Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients With Elevated Transpulmonary Gradient

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the effects of pre-transplant transpulmonary gradient (TPG) and donor right ventricular mass (RVM) on outcomes following heart transplantation.

METHODS

UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients who underwent primary isolated heart transplantation from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2018. The recipients were dichotomized into 2 groups based on their TPG at the time of transplantation, < 12 and ≥ 12 mmHg. The outcomes included 5-year survival and post-transplant complications. Propensity score-matching was performed. Subanalysis was performed to evaluate the effects of donor-recipient RVM matching, where a ratio < 0.85 was classified as undersized, 0.85-1.15 as size-matched, and > 1.15 as oversized.

RESULTS

We analyzed 17,898 isolated heart transplant recipients, and 5129 (28.7%) recipients had TPG ≥ 12 mmHg at the time of transplantation. The recipients with TPG ≥ 12 mmHg experienced significantly lower 5-year survival rates (78.4% vs 81.2%; P < 0.001) compared to the recipients with TPG < 12 mmHg, and this finding persisted in the propensity score-matched comparison. The recipients with TPG ≥ 12 mmHg experienced a higher rate of post-transplant dialysis and a longer duration of hospitalization. Oversizing the donor RVM considerably improved the 5-year survival among the recipients with TPG ≥ 12 mmHg, comparable to those with TPG < 12 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

Elevated pre-transplant TPG is associated with significantly reduced post-transplant survival. However, oversizing the donor RVM is associated with improved survival rates in recipients with elevated TPG, resulting in improved survival that is comparable to that of recipients with normal TPG. Therefore, careful risk stratification and donor matching among recipients with elevated TPG is essential to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Combined Organ Transplantation in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease

Transplantation of the liver in combination with other organs is an increasingly performed procedure. Over the years, continuous improvement in survival could be realized through careful patient selection and refined organ preservation techniques, in spite of the challenges posed by aging recipients and donors, as well as the increased use of steatotic liver grafts. Herein, we revisit the epidemiology, allocation policies in different transplant zones, indications, and outcomes with regard to simultaneous organ transplants involving the liver, that is combined heart-liver, liver-lung, liver-kidney, and multivisceral transplantation. We address challenges surrounding combined organ transplantation such as equity, utility, and logistics of dual organ implantation, but also advantages that come along with combined transplantation, thereby focusing on molecular mechanisms underlying immunoprotection provided by the liver to the other allografts. In addition, the current standing and knowledge of machine perfusion in combined organ transplantation, mostly based on center experience, will be reviewed. Notwithstanding all the technical advances, shortage of organs, and the lack of universal eligibility criteria for certain multi-organ combinations are hurdles that need to be tackled in the future.

Impact of size matching on survival post-heart transplant in infants: Estimated total cardiac-volume ratio outperforms donor-recipient weight ratio

BACKGROUND

Cardiac volume-based estimation offers an alternative to donor-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) in pediatric heart transplantation (HT) but has not been correlated to posttransplant outcomes. We sought to determine whether estimated total cardiac volume (eTCV) ratio is associated with HT survival in infants.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify infants (aged <1 year) who received HT in 1987-2020. Donor and recipient eTCV were calculated from weight using previously published data. Patient cohort was divided acc ording to the significant range of eTCV ratio; characteristics and survival were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 2845 infants were identified. Hazard ratio with cubic spline showed prognostic relationship of eTCV ratio and DRWR with the overall survival. The cut point method determined an optimal eTCV ratio range predictive of infant survival was 1.05 to 1.85, whereas no range for DRWR was predictive. Overall, 75.6% of patients had an optimal total cardiac volume ratio, while 18.1% were in the lower (LR) and 6.3% in the higher (HR) group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better survival for patients within the optimal vs LR (p = 0.0017) and a similar significantly better survival when compared to HR (p = 0.0053). The optimal eTCV ratio group (n = 2,151) had DRWR, ranging from 1.09 to 5; 34.3% had DRWR of 2% to 3%, and 5.0% had DRWR of >3.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, an upper DRWR limit has not been established in infants. Therefore, determining the optimal eTCV range is important to identify an upper limit that significantly predicts survival benefit. This finding suggests a potential increase in donor pool for infant recipients since over 40% of donors in the optimal eTCV range include DRWR values >2 that are traditionally not considered for candidate listing.

Increasing Multiorgan Heart Transplantations From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are becoming an important source of organs for heart-transplantation (HT), but there are limited data regarding their use in multiorgan-HT.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and June 2023, we identified 87 adult multiorgan-HTs performed using DCD-donors [77 heart-kidney, 6 heart-lung, 4 heart-liver] and 1494 multiorgan-HTs using donation after brain death (DBD) donors (1141 heart-kidney, 165 heart-lung, 188 heart-liver) in UNOS. For heart-kidney transplantations (the most common multiorgan-HT combination from DCD-donors), we also compared donor/recipient characteristics, and early outcomes, including 6-month mortality using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Cox hazards-ratio (Cox-HR).

RESULTS

Use of DCD-donors for multiorgan-HTs in the United States increased from 1% in January to June 2020 to 12% in January-June 2023 (p < 0.001); but there was a wide variation across UNOS regions and center volumes. Compared to recipients of DBD heart-kidney transplantations, recipients of DCD heart-kidney transplantations were less likely to be of UNOS Status 1/2 at transplant (35.06% vs. 69.59%) and had lower inotrope use (22.08% vs. 43.30%), lower IABP use (2.60% vs. 26.29%), but higher durable CF-LVAD use (19.48% vs. 12.97%), all p < 0.01. Compared to DBD-donors, DCD-donors used for heart-kidney transplantations were younger [28(22-34) vs. 32(25-39) years, p = 0.004]. Recipients of heart-kidney transplantations from DCD-donors and DBD-donors had similar 6-month survival using both KM analysis, and unadjusted and adjusted Cox-HR models, including in propensity matched cohorts. Rates of PGF and in-hospital outcomes were also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of DCD-donors for multiorgan-HTs has increased rapidly in the United States and early outcomes of DCD heart-kidney transplantations are promising.

Sex and Gender-related Disparities in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Heart Transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Limited research has been conducted on sex disparities in heart transplant (HT). The aim of this review is to analyse the available evidence on the influence of sex and gender-related determinants in the entire HT process, as well as to identify areas for further investigation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although women make up half of the population affected by heart failure and related mortality, they account for less than a third of HT recipients. Reasons for this inequality include differences in disease course, psychosocial factors, concerns about allosensitisation, and selection or referral bias in female patients. Women are more often listed for HT due to non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and have a lower burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Although long-term prognosis appears to be similar for both sexes, there are significant disparities in post-HT morbidity and causes of mortality (noting a higher incidence of rejection in women and of malignancy and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in men). Additional research is required to gain a better understanding of the reasons behind gender disparities in eligibility and outcomes following HT. This would enable the fair allocation of resources and enhance patient care.

Impact of controlled hypothermic preservation on outcomes following heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of early mortality after heart transplant, but the impact of donor organ preservation conditions on severity of PGD and survival has not been well characterized.

METHODS

Data from US adult heart-transplant recipients in the Global Utilization and Registry Database for Improved Heart Preservation-Heart Registry (NCT04141605) were analyzed to quantify PGD severity, mortality, and associated risk factors. The independent contributions of organ preservation method (traditional ice storage vs controlled hypothermic preservation) and ischemic time were analyzed using propensity matching and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 1,061 US adult heart transplants performed between October 2015 and December 2022, controlled hypothermic preservation was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of severe PGD compared to ice (6.6% [37/559] vs 10.4% [47/452], p = 0.039). Following propensity matching, severe PGD was reduced by 50% (6.0% [17/281] vs 12.1% [34/281], respectively; p = 0.018). The Kaplan-Meier terminal probability of 1-year mortality was 4.2% for recipients without PGD, 7.2% for mild or moderate PGD, and 32.1%, for severe PGD (p < 0.001). The probability of severe PGD increased for both cohorts with longer ischemic time, but donor hearts stored on ice were more likely to develop severe PGD at all ischemic times compared to controlled hypothermic preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe PGD is the deadliest complication of heart transplantation and is associated with a 7.8-fold increase in probability of 1-year mortality. Controlled hypothermic preservation significantly attenuates the risk of severe PGD and is a simple yet highly effective tool for mitigating post-transplant morbidity.

Utility of Recipient Cardiothoracic Ratio in Predicting Delayed Chest Closure after Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

 Predicted cardiac mass (PCM) has been well validated for size matching donor hearts to heart transplantation recipients. We hypothesized that cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) could be reflective of recipient-specific limits of oversizing, and sought to determine the utility of donor to recipient PCM ratio (PCMR) and CTR in predicting delayed chest closure after heart transplantation.

METHODS

 A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 38 consecutive heart transplantations performed at our institution from 2017 to 2020 was performed. Donor and recipient PCM were estimated using Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis predictive models. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the discriminatory power of the ratio of PCMR to CTR in predicting delayed sternal closure.

RESULTS

 Of the 38 patients, 71.1% (27/38) were male and the median age at transplantation was 58 (interquartile range [IQR]: 47-62) years. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 31.6% of recipients (12/38). Median recipient CTR was 0.63 [IQR: 0.59-0.66]. Median donor to recipient PCMR was 1.07 [IQR: 0.96-1.19], which indicated 7% oversizing. Thirteen out of 38 (34.2%) underwent delayed sternal closure. Primary graft dysfunction occurred in 15.8% (6/38). PCMR/CTR showed good discriminatory power in predicting delayed sternal closure [area under the curve: 80.4% (65.3-95.6%)]. PCMR/CTR cut-off of 1.7 offered the best trade-off between the sensitivity (69.6%) and specificity (91.7%).

CONCLUSION

 CTR could be helpful in guiding the recipient-specific extent of oversizing donor hearts. Maintaining the ratio of PCMR to CTR below 1.7 could avoid excessive oversizing of the donor heart.

Usage of older donors is associated with higher mortality after heart transplantation: A UNOS observational study

BACKGROUND

Utilization of heart from older donors is variable across centers with uncertain outcomes of recipients. We sought to utilize a national registry to examine the usage and outcomes of heart transplant (HT) recipients from older donors. We also explored the impact of current donor heart allocation scheme on the outcomes of hearts from older donors.

METHODS

This observational study utilized the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2015 and 2023 with donors categorized into age <45 years or ≥45 years and evaluated organ disposition and geographical variation. Thirty-day, 1-, and 3-year mortality, and graft failure rates were compared among recipients as per donor age group. We also evaluated annual trends in HT for each group over the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 24,966 adult donors were recovered: 3,742 (15.0%) were ≥45 years; 3,349 (15.6%) adults received heart from such donors with significant geographical variation, and a declining utilization in the transplantation rate in current donor allocation system. Donors with age ≥45 years had higher comorbidities and were allotted with a significantly shorter ischemic time to recipients who were significantly less likely to receive temporary mechanical circulatory support and more likely female. Unadjusted and adjusted, 30-day mortality were similar but 1- and 3-year mortality and graft failure rates were significantly higher in recipients of such donors. Spline analysis suggested a higher 1-year mortality risk at older donor age with risk increasing after age 40 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Older donor age was associated with worsened 1- and 3-year mortality and graft failure for heart transplant recipients.

Transthoracic echocardiography is a simple tool for size matching in cardiac xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Preoperative size matching is essential for both allogeneic and xenogeneic heart transplantation. In preclinical pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation experiments, porcine donor organs are usually matched to recipients by using indirect parameters, such as age and total body weight. For clinical use of xenotransplantation, a more precise method of size measurement would be desirable to guarantee a "perfect match." Here, we investigated the use of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and described a new method to estimate organ size prior to xenotransplantation.

METHODS

Hearts from n = 17 genetically modified piglets were analyzed by TTE and total heart weight (THW) was measured prior to xenotransplantation into baboons between March 2018 and April 2022. Left ventricular (LV) mass was calculated according to the previously published method by Devereux et al. and a newly adapted formula. Hearts from n = 5 sibling piglets served as controls for the determination of relative LV and right ventricular (RV) mass. After explantation, THW and LV and RV mass were measured.

RESULTS

THW correlated significantly with donor age and total body weight. The strongest correlation was found between THW and LV mass calculated by TTE. Compared to necropsy data of the control piglets, the Devereux formula underestimated both absolute and relative LV mass, whereas the adapted formula yielded better results. Combining the adapted formula and the relative LV mass data, THW can be predicted with TTE.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate reliable LV mass estimation by TTE for size matching prior to xenotransplantation. An adapted formula provides more accurate results of LV mass estimation than the generally used Devereux formula in the xenotransplantation setting. TTE measurement of LV mass is superior for the prediction of porcine heart sizes compared to conventional parameters such as age and total body weight.

End-stage heart failure: The future of heart transplant and artificial heart

In the last decades, outcomes significantly improved for both heart transplantation and LVAD. Heart transplantation remains the gold standard for the treatment of end stage heart failure and will remain for many years to come. The most relevant limitations are the lack of grafts and the effects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy that involve infectious, cancerous and metabolic complications despite advances in immunosuppression management. Mechanical circulatory support has an irreplaceable role in the treatment of end-staged heart failure, as bridge to transplant or as definitive implantation in non-transplant candidates. Although clinical results do not overcome those of HTx, improvement in the new generation of devices may help to reach the equipoise between the two therapies. This review will go through the evolution, current status and perspectives of both therapeutics.

Assessing Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Lessons Learned From Over 7,500 Transplants

BACKGROUND

To date, no studies have identified an optimal metric to match donor-recipient (D-R) pairs in pediatric heart transplantation (HT).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify size mismatch metrics that predicted graft survival post-HT.

METHODS

D-R pairs undergoing HT in Pediatric Heart Transplant Society database from 1993 to 2021 were included. Effects of size mismatch by height, weight, body mass index, body surface area, predicted heart mass, and total cardiac volume (TCV) on 1- and 5-year graft survival and morbidity outcomes (rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy) were evaluated. Cox models with stepwise selection identified size metrics that independently predicted graft survival.

RESULTS

Of 7,715 D-R pairs, 36.0% were well matched (D-R ratio: -20% to +20%) by weight, 39.0% by predicted heart mass, 50.0% by body surface area, 57.0% by body mass index, 71.0% by height, and 93.0% by TCV. Of all size metrics, only D-R mismatch by height and TCV predicted graft survival at 1 and 5 years. Effects of D-R size mismatch on graft survival were nonlinear. At both 1 and 5 years post-HT, D-R undersizing and oversizing by height led to increased graft loss, with graft loss observed more frequently with undersizing. Moderately undersized donors by height (D-R ratio: <-30%) frequently experienced rejection post-HT (P < 0.001). Assessing D-R size matching by TCV, minimal donor undersizing was protective, while oversizing up to 25% was not associated with increased graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric HT, D-R appear most optimally matched using TCV. Only D-R size mismatch by TCV and height independently predicts graft survival. Standardizing size matching across centers may reduce donor discard.

Heart Transplant Human Leukocyte Antigen Matching in the Modern Era

BACKGROUND

Although numerous reports have studied the consequences of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching in renal transplantation, there are limited and outdated data analyzing this association in thoracic organ transplantation. Therefore, our study reviewed the impact of HLA mismatching at both the total and the loci levels in the modern-era heart-transplant procedure on survival and chronic rejection outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients after heart transplant by using the United Network for Organ Sharing database from January 2005-July 2021. Total HLA and HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR mismatches were analyzed. Survival and cardiac allograft vasculopathy were the outcomes of interest during a 10-year follow-up period using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 33,060 patients were included in this study. Recipients with a high degree of HLA mismatching had increased incidences of acute organ rejection. There were no significant differences in mortality rates among any of the total or loci level groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences between total HLA mismatch groups in time to first cardiac allograft vasculopathy, though mismatching at the HLA-DR locus was associated with an increased risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that HLA mismatch is not a significant predictor of survival in the modern era. Overall, the clinical implications of this study provide reassuring data for the continued use of non-HLA-matched donors in an effort to increase the donor pool. If HLA matching is to be considered for heart transplant donor-recipient selection, matching at the HLA-DR locus should take priority due to its association with cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Non-inferior outcomes in lower urgency patients transplanted with extended criteria donor hearts

BACKGROUND

Recent work has suggested that outcomes among heart transplant patients listed at the lower-urgency (United Network for Organ Sharing Status 4 or 6) status may not be significantly impacted by donor comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes of extended criteria donors (ECD) in lower versus higher urgency patients undergoing heart transplantation.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult patients undergoing heart transplantation from October 18, 2018 through December 31, 2021. Patients were stratified by degree of urgency (higher urgency: UNOS 1 or 2 vs lower urgency: UNOS 4 or 6) and receipt of ECD hearts, as defined by donor hearts failing to meet established acceptable use criteria. Outcomes were compared using propensity score matched cohorts.

RESULTS

Among 9,160 patients included, 2,320 (25.4%) were low urgency. ECD hearts were used in 35.5% of higher urgency (HU) patients and 39.2% of lower urgency (LU) patients. While ECD hearts had an impact on survival among high-urgency patients (p < 0.01), there was no difference in 1- and 2-year survival (p > 0.05) found among low urgency patients receiving ECD versus standard hearts. Neither ECDs nor individual ECD criteria were independently associated with mortality in low urgency patients (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant outcomes among low urgency patients are not adversely affected by receipt of ECD vs. standard hearts. Expanding the available donor pool by optimizing use of ECDs in this population may increase transplant frequency, decrease waitlist morbidity, and improve postoperative outcomes for the transplant community at large.

Heart transplantation in patients from socioeconomically distressed communities

BACKGROUND

Studies examining heart transplantation disparities have focused on individual factors such as race or insurance status. We characterized the impact of a composite community socioeconomic disadvantage index on heart transplantation outcomes.

METHODS

From the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), we identified 49,340 primary, isolated adult heart transplant candidates and 32,494 recipients (2005-2020). Zip code-level socioeconomic disadvantage was characterized using the Distressed Community Index (DCI: 0-most prosperous, 100-most distressed) based on education, poverty, unemployment, housing vacancies, median income, and business growth. Patients from distressed communities (DCI ≥ 80) were compared to all others.

RESULTS

Patients from distressed communities were more often non-white, less educated, and had public insurance (all p < 0.01). Distressed patients were more likely to require ventricular assist devices at listing (29.4 vs 27.1%) and before transplant (44.8 vs 42.0%, both p < 0.001), and they underwent transplants at lower-volume centers (23 vs 26 cases/year, p < 0.01). Distressed patients had higher 1-year waitlist mortality or deterioration (12.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6-13.0] vs 10.9% [95% CI 10.5-11.3]) and inferior 5-year survival (75.3% [95% CI 74.0-76.5] vs 79.5% [95% CI 79.0-80.0]) (both p < 0.001). After adjustment, living in a distressed community was independently associated with an increased risk of waitlist mortality or deterioration hazard ratio (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.18) and post-transplant mortality (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients from socioeconomically distressed communities have worse waitlist and post-transplant mortality. These findings should not be used to limit access to heart transplantation, but rather highlight the need for further studies to elucidate mechanisms underlying the impact of community-level socioeconomic disparity.

One Year Outcomes Following Transplantation with COVID-19-Positive Donor Hearts: A National Database Cohort Study

The current understanding of the safety of heart transplantation from COVID-19+ donors is uncertain. Preliminary studies suggest that heart transplants from these donors may be feasible. We analyzed 1-year outcomes in COVID-19+ donor heart recipients using 1:3 propensity matching. The OPTN database was queried for adult heart transplant recipients between 1 January 2020 and 30 September 2022. COVID-19+ donors were defined as those who tested positive on NATs or antigen tests within 21 days prior to procurement. Multiorgan transplants, retransplants, donors without COVID-19 testing, and recipients allocated under the old heart allocation system were excluded. A total of 7211 heart transplant recipients met the inclusion criteria, including 316 COVID-19+ donor heart recipients. Further, 290 COVID-19+ donor heart recipients were matched to 870 COVID-19- donor heart recipients. Survival was similar between the groups at 30 days (p = 0.46), 6 months (p = 0.17), and 1 year (p = 0.07). Recipients from COVID-19+ donors in the matched cohort were less likely to experience postoperative acute rejection prior to discharge (p = 0.01). National COVID-19+ donor heart usage varied by region: region 11 transplanted the most COVID-19+ hearts (15.8%), and region 6 transplanted the fewest (3.2%). Our findings indicate that COVID-19+ heart transplantation can be performed with safe early outcomes. Further analyses are needed to determine if long-term outcomes are equivalent between groups.

Heart Transplantation

Heart transplantation (HTx) remains the last therapeutic resort for patients with advanced heart failure. The present work is a clinically focused review discussing current issues in heart transplantation. Several factors have been associated with the outcome of HTx, such as ABO and HLA compatibility, graft size, ischemic time, age, infections, and the cause of death, as well as imaging and laboratory tests. In 2018, UNOS changed the organ allocation policy for HTx. The aim of this change was to prioritize patients with a more severe clinical condition resulting in a reduction in mortality of people on the waiting list. Advanced heart failure and resistant angina are among the main indications of HTx, whereas active infection, peripheral vascular disease, malignancies, and increased body mass index (BMI) are important contraindications. The main complications of HTx include graft rejection, graft angiopathy, primary graft failure, infection, neoplasms, and retransplantation. Recent advances in the field of HTx include the first two porcine-to-human xenotransplantations, the inclusion of hepatitis C donors, donation after circulatory death, novel monitoring for acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, and advances in donor heart preservation and transportation. Lastly, novel immunosuppression therapies such as daratumumab, belatacept, IL 6 directed therapy, and IgG endopeptidase have shown promising results.

Predicted heart mass based on ideal body weight for donor-to-recipient size matching

BACKGROUND

Predicted heart mass (PHM) is a commonly used tool for donor-to-recipient size matching. However, incorporating body weight as part of PHM can be considered problematic given its high variability, and low metabolic nature of fat. We sought to assess whether substituting the actual donor and recipient weight with the ideal body weight (IBW) would affect the association of donor-to-recipient PHM ratio with 1-year and overall survival after heart transplantation.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for adult patients who received a primary heart transplant between January 2000 and September 2021.

RESULTS

Both PHM and ideal PHM (IPHM) ratios were associated with one-year (PHM: p = .003; IPHM: p = .0007) and overall (PHM: p = .02; IPHM: p = .02) survival. In the continuous analysis with restricted cubic splines, both PHM (p = .0003) and IPHM (p = .00001) were associated with relative hazards of death.

CONCLUSION

IPHM is significantly associated with post-transplant survival and may be a useful compliment to PHM.

No Evidence for Oversizing Hearts and Donor Size Impact on 1-Year Survival in Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device

The predicted heart mass (PHM) ratio has recently emerged as a better metric for donor-to-recipient size-matching than weight ratios. It is unknown whether this applies to transplant candidates on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Our study examines if PHM ratio is optimal for size-matching specifically in the LVAD patient population. Patients with LVAD who received a heart transplant from January 1997 to December 2020 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were studied. We compared 5 size-matching metrics, including donor-recipient ratios of weight, height, body mass index, body surface area, and PHM. Single and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models for 1-year mortality were calculated. Our sample consisted of 11,891 patients. In our multivariate analysis, we found that patients in the undersized group with PHM ratios <0.83 had a hazard ratio for 1-year mortality of 1.34 (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.65, p = 0.007) suggestive of increased mortality with the use of undersized donors. There was no statistical difference in mortality between the matched (PHM ratio 0.83 to 1.2) and oversized group (PHM ratio ≥1.2). In heart transplant recipients on LVAD support, the PHM ratio provides better risk stratification than other metrics. Use of undersized donor hearts with PHM ratio <0.83 confers higher 1-year mortality. Using oversized donor hearts for transplantation in recipients on LVAD support has no benefit.

Adequacy of Size Matching With Predicted Heart Mass Ratio in Diverse Types of Cardiomyopathies

Predicted heart mass ratio (PHMr) has been proposed as an optimal size metric in the selection of a donor heart for transplant; however, it is not known if the same size matching criteria pertains uniformly to all types of cardiomyopathies. Heart transplant recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry database were categorized into 6 groups based on the type of cardiomyopathy, dilated, coronary artery disease, hypertrophic, restrictive, valvular and adult congenital heart disease. Patients in each group of etiology were stratified based on the PHMr into 5 groups: severely undersized <0.86, moderately undersized 0.86 to 0.94, matched 0.95 to 1.04, moderately oversized 1.05 to 1.24, and severely oversized >1.25. The survival and cause of death of patients in each etiology group were reviewed. The United Network for Organ Sharing registry database from January 1987 to July 2021 included 53,573 patients who received a heart transplant. Compared with patients with size matched hearts, recipients with dilated (hazard ratio 1.17, p = 0.001) and valvular (hazard ratio 1.79, p = 0.032) cardiomyopathy who had an undersized heart with PHMr <0.86 had decreased survival. In addition, the survival of patients with hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy and adult congenital heart disease was not affected by size matching based on the PHMr (0.601 and 0.079, respectively, p = 0.873). In conclusion, our analysis suggests that the size matching criteria based on PHMr may not be uniform to all patients across various etiologies of cardiomyopathy. Therefore, the data can be used to increase the acceptance rate of donor hearts, particularly, for patients with hypertrophic, restrictive cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease in which size matching is less significant for survival outcome.

A Paradigm Shift in Heart Preservation: Improved Post-transplant Outcomes in Recipients of Donor Hearts Preserved With the SherpaPak System

Traditional ice storage has been the historic standard for preserving donor's hearts. However, this approach provides variability in cooling, increasing risks of freezing injury. To date, no preservation technology has been reported to improve survival after transplantation. The Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS) is a controlled hypothermic technology clinically used since 2018. Real-world evidence on clinical benefits of SCTS compared to conventional ice cold storage (ICS) was evaluated. Between October 2015 and January 2022, 569 US adults receiving donor hearts preserved and transported either in SCTS (n = 255) or ICS (n = 314) were analyzed from the Global Utilization And Registry Database for Improved heArt preservatioN (GUARDIAN-Heart) registry. Propensity matching and a subgroup analysis of >240 minutes ischemic time were performed to evaluate comparative outcomes. Overall, the SCTS cohort had significantly lower rates of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) ( p = 0.03). When propensity matched, SCTS had improving 1-year survival ( p = 0.10), significantly lower rates of severe PGD ( p = 0.011), and lower overall post-transplant MCS utilization ( p = 0.098). For patients with ischemic times >4 hours, the SCTS cohort had reduced post-transplant MCS utilization ( p = 0.01), reduced incidence of severe PGD ( p = 0.005), and improved 30-day survival ( p = 0.02). A multivariate analysis of independent risk factors revealed that compared to SCTS, use of ice results in a 3.4-fold greater chance of severe PGD ( p = 0.014). Utilization of SCTS is associated with a trend toward increased post-transplant survival and significantly lower severe PGD and MCS utilization. These findings fundamentally challenge the decades-long status quo of transporting donor hearts using ice.

Donor/recipient ascending aortic diameter ratio as a novel potential metric for donor selection and improved clinical outcomes in heart transplantation: a propensity score-matched study

Background

Donor/recipient size matching is paramount in heart transplantation. Body weight, height, body mass index, body surface area, and predicted heart mass (PHM) ratios are generally used in size matching. Precise size matching is important to achieve better clinical outcomes. This study aims to determine the donor/recipient ascending aortic diameter (AAoD) ratio as a metric for donor selection and its effect on postoperative clinical outcomes in heart transplant patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent heart transplantation from January 2015 to December 2018. A cutoff value of 0.8032 for the donor/recipient AAoD ratio (independent variable for the primary endpoint during unmatched cohort analysis) was determined for predicting in-hospital mortality. The patients were divided into two groups based on the cutoff value. Group A, AAoD < 0.8032 (n = 96), and Group B, AAoD > 0.8032 (n = 265). A propensity score-matched (PSM) study was performed to equalize the two groups comprising 77 patients each in terms of risk. A Cox regression model was developed to identify the independent preoperative variables affecting the primary end-point. The primary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 361 patients underwent heart transplantation during the given period. On the multivariate analysis, donor/recipient PHM ratio [HR 16.907, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.535-186.246, P = 0.021], donor/recipient AAoD ratio < 0.8032 (HR 5.398, 95% CI 1.181-24.681, P = 0.030), and diabetes (HR 3.138, 95% CI 1.017-9.689, P = 0.047) were found to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Group A had higher 3-year mortality than Group B (P = 0.022). The surgery time was longer and postoperative RBC, plasma, and platelets transfusion were higher in Group A (P < 0.05). Although not statistically significant the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (P = 0.054), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P = 0.086), was realatively higher, and ventilation time (P = 0.079) was relatively longer in Group A.

Conclusions

The donor/recipient AAoD ratio is a potential metric for patient matching and postoperative outcomes in heart transplantation. A donor/recipient AAoD ratio > 0.8032 could improve post-heart transplantation outcomes and donor heart utilization.

Addressing Barriers for Women with Advanced Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Describe disparities in diagnosis and management between men and women with advanced heart failure (HF). Our goal is to identify barriers and suggest solutions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Women with advanced HF are less likely to undergo diagnostic testing and procedures (i.e., revascularization, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy, mechanical circulatory support, and orthotopic heart transplantation). Disparities related to gender create less favorable outcomes for women with advanced HF. The issues arise from access to care, paucity of knowledge, enrollment in clinical trials, and eligibility for advanced therapies. In this review, we propose a call to action to level the playing field in order to improve survival in women with advanced HF.

Total ventricular mass oversizing +50% or greater was a predictor of worse 1-year survival after heart transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Current donor-recipient size matching guidelines rely primarily on body weight, with no specified oversizing cutoff values. Recent literature has explored predicted total ventricular mass matching over body weight matching. We aim to explore the impact of total ventricular mass oversizing on heart transplant outcomes.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adults who underwent primary heart transplant from 1997 to 2017. By using validated equations, donor-recipient total ventricular mass mismatch was calculated. Donor-recipient pairs were divided into 3 groups by total ventricular mass mismatch. Post-heart transplant 1-year survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. We also investigated post-heart transplant complications, independent predictors for mortality, donor-recipient sex mismatch, and donor-recipient body habitus in total ventricular mass mismatch greater than +50%.

RESULTS

A total of 34,455 donor-recipient pairs were included. Fractional polynomial regression demonstrated increased the risk of mortality with higher total ventricular mass mismatch. Total ventricular mass mismatch of +48.3% maximized the Youden Index. Donor-recipient pairs were subsequently grouped by total ventricular mass mismatch as -20% to +30%, +30% to +50%, and greater than +50%. Total ventricular mass mismatch greater than +50% was an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.40, P = .004) and was associated with increased postoperative stroke (P = .002). Some 80.3% of these recipients were smaller female patients with male donors. Total ventricular mass mismatch from +30% to +50% was not associated with worse survival (P = .17).

CONCLUSIONS

Total ventricular mass mismatch greater than +50% is associated with worse 1-year survival, although this group comprises a small portion of heart transplant. total ventricular mass mismatch from +30% to +50% is not associated with worse survival. These outcomes should be considered in selecting donors and in efforts to expand the potential donor pool.

Short stature is a risk factor for heart transplant morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Short stature is associated with mortality after cardiac surgery and may increase size mismatch risk among transplant recipients. Yet, stature's impact on heart transplant outcomes is not well-characterized.

METHODS

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was queried for data on all adult heart transplants in the United States from 2000 to 2022. Recipients were stratified into five cohorts by sex-corrected stature. Morbidity was assessed with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared tests. Mortality was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Risk factors for mortality were assessed with multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Among 43,420 transplant recipients, 5321 (12.2%) had short stature (females >4'11″ & ≤5'1″; males >5'4″ & ≤5'7″) and 765 (1.8%) had very short stature (females ≤4'11″; males ≤5'4″). Very short stature patients had higher waitlist status (1A and 1), more congenital heart disease, and received more oversized donor hearts than other cohorts (all p < 0.05). Very short stature patients had decreased 30-day, 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival (94.6%, 84.3%, 69.3% and 52.5%, respectively, all p < 0.001), but less acute rejection (p = 0.005) and comparable stroke rates (p = 0.107). On multivariable regression adjusting for congenital heart disease and oversized donor hearts, very short and short stature were associated with 10-year mortality (hazard ratios: 1.40 and 1.12, respectively, both p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Short stature confers increased mortality risk for heart transplant recipients and merits inclusion in prognostic models.

Indexed donor cardiac output for improved size matching in heart transplantation: A United Network for Organ Sharing database analysis

Objective

Implantation of an appropriately sized donor heart is critical for optimal outcomes after heart transplantation. Although predicted heart mass has recently gained consideration, there remains a need for improved granularity in size matching, particularly among small donor hearts. We sought to determine if indexed donor cardiac output is a sensitive metric to assess the adequacy of a donor heart for a given recipient.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed (2003-2021) in isolated orthotopic heart transplant recipients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Donor cardiac output was divided by recipient body surface area to compute cardiac index (donor cardiac index). Predicted heart mass ratio was computed as donor/recipient predicted heart mass. The primary outcome was mortality 1 year after transplant.

Results

Among transplant recipients, median donor cardiac output was 7.3 (5.8-9.0) liters per minute and donor cardiac index was 3.7 (3.0-4.6) liters per minute/m2. Predicted heart mass ratio was 1.01 (0.91-1.13). After multivariable adjustment, higher donor cardiac index was associated with lower 1-year mortality risk (odds ratio, 0.92, P = .042). Recipients with predicted heart mass ratio less than 0.80 (n = 255) had a lower median donor cardiac index than those with a predicted heart mass ratio of 0.80 or greater (3.2 vs 3.7, P < .001). As predicted, heart mass ratio became smaller and the association between donor cardiac index and 1-year mortality became progressively stronger.

Conclusions

Higher donor cardiac index was associated with a lower probability of 1-year mortality among patients undergoing heart transplantation and served to further quantify mortality risk among those with a small predicted heart mass ratio. Donor cardiac index appears to be an effective tool for size matching and may serve as an adjunctive strategy among small donor hearts with a low predicted heart mass ratio.

Understanding and Investigating Sex-Based Differences in Heart Transplantation: A Call to Action

Women represent only about 25% of heart transplant recipients annually. Although the number of women living with advanced heart failure remains unknown, epidemiologic research suggests that more women should be receiving advanced heart failure therapies. Sex differences in risk factors, presentation, response to pharmacotherapy, and outcomes in heart failure have been well described. Yet, less is known about sex differences in heart transplant candidate selection, waitlist management, donor selection, perioperative considerations, and post-transplant management and outcomes. The purpose of this review was to summarize the existing published reports related to sex differences in heart transplantation, highlighting areas in which sex-based considerations are well described and supported by available evidence, and emphasizing topics that require further study.

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant in patients with borderline estimated glomerular filtration rate without dialysis dependency

BACKGROUND

Appropriate patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (sHK) in patients with moderate renal dysfunction remains challenging.

METHODS

From the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2003-2020), we identified 5678 adults with an estimated pre-transplant glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 30 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and no pre-transplant dialysis. Patients undergoing sHK (n = 293) were compared with those undergoing heart transplantation alone (n = 5385) using 1:3 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The sHK utilization rate increased from 1.8% in 2003 to 12.2% in 2020 (p < .001). After matching, 1 and 5-year survival was 87.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.3-91.0) and 80.0% (95% CI 74.2-84.6) after sHK, and 87.3% (95% CI 85.2-89.1) and 71.8% (95% CI 68.4-74.9) after heart transplant alone (p = .04). In the subgroup analysis, sHK was associated with a 5-year survival benefit only in patients with 30 < eGFR ≤ 35 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = .05) but not in those with 35 < eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = .45). Patients who underwent heart transplants alone also had a higher incidence of becoming chronic dialysis-dependent after transplant within 5-year follow-up (10.2%, 95% CI 8.0-12.6 vs. 3.8%, 95% CI 1.7-7.1, p = .004). The 5-year incidence of subsequent kidney waitlisting and transplants after heart transplants alone was 5.6% and 1.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among propensity-matched patients without pre-transplant dialysis, compared to heart transplants alone, sHK had improved 5-year survival in those with 30 < eGFR ≤ 35 but not in those with 35 < eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . One-year survival was similar irrespective of eGFR. Receiving a kidney after a heart transplant alone is rare under the current allocation system.

Heart retransplant recipients with renal dysfunction benefit from simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Given ongoing donor shortages, appropriate patient selection for dual-organ transplantation is critical. We evaluated outcomes of heart retransplant with simultaneous kidney transplant (HRT-KT) vs isolated heart retransplant (HRT) across varying levels of renal dysfunction.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database identified 1189 adult patients undergoing heart retransplantation between 2005 and 2020. Recipients undergoing HRT-KT (n = 251) were compared to those undergoing HRT (n = 938). The primary outcome was 5-year survival; subgroup analyses and multivariable adjustment were performed utilizing the following 3 estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) groups: <30 ml/min/1.73m2, 30-45 ml/min/1.73m2, and >45 ml/min/1.73m2.

RESULTS

HRT-KT recipients were older and had longer waitlist times, longer inter-transplant periods, and lower eGFR levels. HRT-KT recipients were less likely to require pretransplant ventilator (1.2% vs 9.0%, p < 0.001) or ECMO (2.0% vs 8.3%, p < 0.001) support but were more likely to have severe functional limitation (63.4% vs 52.6%, p = 0.001). After retransplantation, HRT-KT recipients had less treated acute rejection (5.2% vs 9.3%, p = 0.02) and more dialysis requirement (29.1% vs 20.2%, p < 0.001) before discharge. Survival at 5-years was 69.1% after HRT and 80.5% after HRT-KT (p < 0.001). After adjustment, HRT-KT was associated with improved 5-year survival among recipients with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73m2 (HR:0.42, 95% CI: 0.26-0.67) and 30 to 45 ml/min/1.73m2 (HR:0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.65), but not among those with eGFR>45 ml/min/1.73sm2 (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.30-1.54).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous kidney transplantation is associated with improved survival following heart retransplantation in patients with eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73m2 and should be strongly considered to optimize organ allocation stewardship.

Use of extended criteria donor hearts in combined heart-kidney transplant confers greater risk of mortality

BACKGROUND

Extended criteria donors (ECD) hearts have demonstrated acceptable outcomes in select populations. However, their use in patients undergoing simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) has not been explored. This study is assessed the effect of ECD hearts in patients undergoing SHKT vs isolated heart transplants (IHT).

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult patients undergoing IHT and SHKT. Patients were stratified by receipt of ECD heart, defined as donor hearts failing to meet established acceptable use criteria. Interaction effects between ECDs and simultaneous kidney transplants were generated. Postoperative outcomes, risk factors, and patient/graft survival were compared across cohorts using Fine-Gray, Kaplan Meier, and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses.

RESULTS

Among 26,207 patients included, 1,766 (7%) underwent SHKT. ECD hearts were used in 25% of both IHT and SHKT cohorts. Five-year survival among SHKT/ECD patients (67.3%) was reduced (p < 0.01) compared to SHKT/SDC (80.3%), IHT/ECD (78.1%) and IHT/SCD (80.0%) groups. Among SHKT patients, use of ECD hearts was associated with increased risk (SHR: 1.48; p < 0.01) of renal graft failure compared to SCD hearts. Among SHKT patients, receipt of an ECD heart, and individual ECD criteria (coronary disease and size mismatch >20%), predicted mortality. The interaction effect of receiving both ECD and SHKT predicted mortality and graft failure (HR 1.43; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing SHKT with an ECD heart face greater risks of mortality and graft failure in comparison to those undergoing IHT with ECD hearts. Careful selection of donor organs should be applied to this high-risk cohort.

Early Outcomes of Adult Heart Transplantation From COVID-19 Infected Donors

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data on heart transplantation (HT) using COVID-19 donors.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated COVID-19 donor use, donor and recipient characteristics, and early post-HT outcomes.

METHODS

Between May 2020 and June 2022, study investigators identified 27,862 donors in the United Network for Organ Sharing, with 60,699 COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) performed before procurement and with available organ disposition. Donors were considered "COVID-19 donors" if they were NAT positive at any time during terminal hospitalization. These donors were subclassified as "active COVID-19" (aCOV) donors if they were NAT positive within 2 days of organ procurement, or "recently resolved COVID-19" (rrCOV) donors if they were NAT positive initially but became NAT negative before procurement. Donors with NAT-positive status >2 days before procurement were considered aCOV unless there was evidence of a subsequent NAT-negative result ≥48 hours after the last NAT-positive result. HT outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,445 "COVID-19 donors" (COVID-19 NAT positive) were identified; 1,017 of these were aCOV, and 428 were rrCOV. Overall, 309 HTs used COVID-19 donors, and 239 adult HTs from COVID-19 donors (150 aCOV, 89 rrCOV) met study criteria. Compared with non-COV, COVID-19 donors used for adult HT were younger and mostly male (∼80%). Compared with HTs from non-COV donors, recipients of HTs from aCOV donors had increased mortality at 6 months (Cox HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.02-2.96; P = 0.043) and 1 year (Cox HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.22-3.22; P = 0.006). Recipients of HTs from rrCOV and non-COV donors had similar 6-month and 1-year mortality. Results were similar in propensity-matched cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this early analysis, although HTs from aCOV donors had increased mortality at 6 months and 1 year, HTs from rrCOV donors had survival similar to that seen in recipients of HTs from non-COV donors. Continued evaluation and a more nuanced approach to this donor pool are needed.

Association of Size Matching Using Predicted Heart Mass With Mortality in Heart Transplant Recipients With Obesity or High Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

Importance

Pretransplant obesity and higher pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) are risk factors for death after heart transplant. However, it remains unclear whether appropriate donor-to-recipient size matching using predicted heart mass (PHM) is associated with lower risk.

Objective

To investigate the association of size matching using PHM with risk of death posttransplant among patients with obesity and/or higher PVR.

Design, Setting, and Participants

All adult patients (>18 years) who underwent heart transplant between 2003 and 2022 with available information using the United Network for Organ Sharing cohort database. Multivariable Cox models and multivariable-adjusted spline curves were used to examine the risk of death posttransplant with PHM matching. Data were analyzed from October 2022 to March 2023.

Exposure

Recipient's body mass index (BMI) in categories (<18.0 [underweight], 18.1-24.9 [normal weight, reference], 25.0-29.9 [overweight], 30.0-34.9 [obese 1], 35-39.9 [obese 2], and ≥40.0 [obese 3]) and recipient's pretransplant PVR in categories of less than 4 (29 061 participants), 4 to 6 (2842 participants), and more than 6 Wood units (968 participants); and less than 3 (24 950 participants), 3 to 5 (6115 participants), and 5 or more (1806 participants) Wood units.

Main Outcome

All-cause death posttransplant on follow-up.

Results

The mean (SD) age of the cohort of 37 712 was 52.8 (12.8) years, 27 976 (74%) were male, 25 342 were non-Hispanic White (68.0%), 7664 were Black (20.4%), and 3139 were Hispanic or Latino (8.5%). A total of 12 413 recipients (32.9%) had a normal BMI, 13 849 (36.7%) had overweight, and 10 814 (28.7%) had obesity. On follow-up (median [IQR] 5.05 [0-19.4] years), 12 785 recipients (3046 female) died. For patients with normal weight, overweight, or obese 2, receiving a PHM-undermatched heart was associated with an increased risk of death (normal weight hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34; overweight HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.23; and obese 2 HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14). Moreover, patients with higher pretransplant PVR who received an undermatched heart had a higher risk of death posttransplant in multivariable-adjusted spline curves in graded fashion until appropriately matched. In contrast, risk of death among patients receiving a PHM-overmatched heart did not differ from the appropriately matched group, including in recipients with an elevated pretransplant PVR.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this cohort study, undermatching donor-to-recipient size according to PHM was associated with higher posttransplant mortality, specifically in patients with normal weight, overweight, or class II obesity and in patients with elevated pretransplant PVR. Overmatching donor-to-recipient size was not associated with posttransplant survival.

Artificial intelligence, big data and heart transplantation: Actualities

BACKGROUND

As diagnostic and prognostic models developed by traditional statistics perform poorly in real-world, artificial intelligence (AI) and Big Data (BD) may improve the supply chain of heart transplantation (HTx), allocation opportunities, correct treatments, and finally optimize HTx outcome. We explored available studies, and discussed opportunities and limits of medical application of AI to the field of HTx.

METHOD

A systematic overview of studies published up to December 31st, 2022, in English on peer-revied journals, have been identified through PUBMED-MEDLINE-WEB of Science, referring to HTx, AI, BD. Studies were grouped in 4 domains based on main studies' objectives and results: etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment. A systematic attempt was made to evaluate studies by the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD).

RESULTS

Among the 27 publications selected, none used AI applied to BD. Of the selected studies, 4 fell in the domain of etiology, 6 in the domain of diagnosis, 3 in the domain of treatment, and 17 in that of prognosis, as AI was most frequently used for algorithmic prediction and discrimination of survival, but in retrospective cohorts and registries. AI-based algorithms appeared superior to probabilistic functions to predict patterns, but external validation was rarely employed. Indeed, based on PROBAST, selected studies showed, to some extent, significant risk of bias (especially in the domain of predictors and analysis). In addition, as example of applicability in the real-world, a free-use prediction algorithm developed through AI failed to predict 1-year mortality post-HTx in cases from our center.

CONCLUSIONS

While AI-based prognostic and diagnostic functions performed better than those developed by traditional statistics, risk of bias, lack of external validation, and relatively poor applicability, may affect AI-based tools. More unbiased research with high quality BD meant for AI, transparency and external validations, are needed to have medical AI as a systematic aid to clinical decision making in HTx.

Evaluating age-based eligibility thresholds for heart re-transplantation - an analysis of the united network for organ sharing database

BACKGROUND

Risk-adjusted survival after late heart re-transplantation may be comparable to primary transplant, but the efficacy of re-transplantation in older candidates is not established. We evaluated outcomes after heart re-transplantation in recipients > 60 years.

METHODS

We identified 1026 adult patients undergoing isolated heart re-transplantation between 2003 and 2020 from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Older recipients (> 60 years, n=177) were compared to younger recipients (≤ 60 years, n=849). Five and ten-year post-transplant survival was estimated using the Kalpan-Meier method and adjusted with multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

Older recipients were more likely to be male and have diabetes or previous malignancies with higher baseline creatinine. They also more frequently required pre-transplant ECMO (11.9% vs. 6.8%, p=0.02) and received re-transplantation due to primary graft failure (13.6% vs. 8.5%, p=0.03). After the transplant, older recipients had a higher incidence of stroke (6.8% vs. 2.6%, p=0.01) and dialysis requirements (20.3% vs. 13.2%) before discharge (both p<0.05), and more frequently died from malignancy-related causes (16.3% vs. 3.9%, p<0.001). After adjustment, recipient age >60 was associated with an increased risk of both 5-year (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-2.01, p=0.04) and 10-year mortality (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.20-2.45, p=0.003). Restricted cubic spline showed a non-linear relationship between recipient age and 10-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Heart re-transplantation in recipients > 60 years has inferior outcomes compared to younger recipients. Strict patient selection and close follow-up are warranted to ensure the appropriate utilization of donor hearts and to improve long-term outcomes.