A novel method for selectively labelling olivocochlear collaterals in the rat

Characterization of three cholinergic inputs to the cochlear nucleus

Acetylcholine modulates responses throughout the auditory system, including at the earliest brain level, the cochlear nucleus (CN). Previous studies have shown multiple sources of cholinergic input to the CN but information about their relative contributions and the distribution of inputs from each source is lacking. Here, we used staining for cholinergic axons and boutons, retrograde tract tracing, and acetylcholine-selective anterograde tracing to characterize three sources of acetylcholine input to the CN in mice. Staining for cholinergic axons showed heavy cholinergic inputs to granule cell areas and the dorsal CN with lighter input to the ventral CN. Retrograde tract tracing revealed that cholinergic cells from the superior olivary complex, pontomesencephalic tegmentum, and lateral paragigantocellular nucleus send projections to the CN. When we selectively labeled cholinergic axons from each source to the CN, we found surprising similarities in their terminal distributions, with patterns that were overlapping rather than complementary. Each source heavily targeted granule cell areas and the dorsal CN (especially the deep dorsal CN) and sent light input into the ventral CN. Our results demonstrate convergence of cholinergic inputs from multiple sources in most regions of the CN and raise the possibility of convergence onto single CN cells. Linking sources of acetylcholine and their patterns of activity to modulation of specific cell types in the CN will be an important next step in understanding cholinergic modulation of early auditory processing.

Muscarinic modulation of M and h currents in gerbil spherical bushy cells

Descending cholinergic fibers innervate the cochlear nucleus. Spherical bushy cells, principal neurons of the anterior part of the ventral cochlear nucleus, are depolarized by cholinergic agonists on two different time scales. A fast and transient response is mediated by alpha-7 homomeric nicotinic receptors while a slow and long-lasting response is mediated by muscarinic receptors. Spherical bushy cells were shown to express M3 receptors, but the receptor subtypes involved in the slow muscarinic response were not physiologically identified yet. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings combined with pharmacology and immunohistochemistry were performed to identify the muscarinic receptor subtypes and the effector currents involved. Spherical bushy cells also expressed both M1 and M2 receptors. The M1 signal was stronger and mainly somatic while the M2 signal was localized in the neuropil and on the soma of bushy cells. Physiologically, the M-current was observed for the gerbil spherical bushy cells and was inhibited by oxotremorine-M application. Surprisingly, long application of carbachol showed only a transient depolarization. Even though no muscarinic depolarization could be detected, the input resistance increased suggesting a decrease in the cell conductance that matched with the closure of M-channels. The hyperpolarization-activated currents were also affected by muscarinic activation and counteracted the effect of the inactivation of M-current on the membrane potential. We hypothesize that this double muscarinic action might allow adaptation of effects during long durations of cholinergic activation.

Targets of olivocochlear collaterals in cochlear nucleus of rat and guinea pig

Descending auditory pathways can modify afferent auditory input en route to cortex. One component of these pathways is the olivocochlear system which originates in brainstem and terminates in cochlea. Medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons also project collaterals to cochlear nucleus and make synaptic contacts with dendrites of multipolar neurons. Two broadly distinct populations of multipolar cells exist: T-stellate and D-stellate neurons, thought to project to inferior colliculus and contralateral cochlear nucleus, respectively. It is unclear which of these neurons receive direct MOC collateral input due to conflicting results between in vivo and in vitro studies. This study used anatomical techniques to identify which multipolar cell population receives synaptic innervation from MOC collaterals. The retrograde tracer Fluorogold was injected into inferior colliculus or cochlear nucleus to label T-stellate and D-stellate neurons, respectively. Axonal branches of MOC neurons were labeled by biocytin injections at the floor of the fourth ventricle. Fluorogold injections resulted in labeled cochlear nucleus multipolar neurons. Biocytin abundantly labeled MOC collaterals which entered cochlear nucleus. Microscopic analysis revealed that MOC collaterals made some putative synaptic contacts with the retrogradely labeled neurons but many more putative contacts were observed on unidentified neural targets. This suggest that both T- and D-stellate neurons receive synaptic innervation from the MOC collaterals on their somata and proximal dendrites. The prevalence of these contacts cannot be stated with certainty because of technical limitations, but the possibility exists that the collaterals may also make contacts with neurons not projecting to inferior colliculus or the contralateral cochlear nucleus.

Glutamatergic Projections to the Cochlear Nucleus are Redistributed in Tinnitus

Tinnitus alters auditory-somatosensory plasticity in the cochlear nucleus (CN). Correspondingly, bimodal auditory-somatosensory stimulation treatment attenuates tinnitus, both in animals and humans (Marks et al., 2018). Therefore, we hypothesized that tinnitus is associated with altered somatosensory innervation of the CN. Here, we studied the expression of vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 (VGLUT1 and VGLUT2) in the CN, which reveals glutamatergic projections from the cochlea as well as somatosensory systems to this brainstem auditory center. Guinea pigs were unilaterally exposed to narrowband noise and behaviorally tested for tinnitus using gap-prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle. Following physiological and behavioral measures, brain sections were immunohistochemically stained for VGLUT1 or VGLUT2. Puncta density was determined for each region of the ipsilateral and contralateral CN. Tinnitus was associated with an ipsilateral upregulation of VGLUT2 puncta density in the granule cell domain (GCD) and anteroventral CN (AVCN). Furthermore, there was a tinnitus-associated interaural asymmetry for VGLUT1 expression in the AVCN and deep layer of the dorsal CN (DCN3), due to contralateral downregulation of VGLUT1 expression. These tinnitus-related glutamatergic imbalances were reversed upon bimodal stimulation treatment. Tinnitus-associated ipsilateral upregulation of VGLUT2-positive projections likely derives from somatosensory projections to the GCD and AVCN. This upregulation may underlie the neurophysiological hallmarks of tinnitus in the CN. Reversing the increased ipsilateral glutamatergic innervation in the CN is likely a key mechanism in treating tinnitus.

Cholinergic responses of acoustically-characterized cochlear nucleus neurons: An in vivo iontophoretic study in Guinea pig

The responses of guinea pig cochlear nucleus neurons to in vivo iontophoretic application of various neurotransmitter agonists were recorded with extracellular multi-barrelled electrodes. Where possible, neurons were physiologically identified using strict criteria. Emphasis was placed on the action of cholinergic agonists in relation to the possible action of olivocochlear collateral innervation. Excitatory responses (increase in action potential firing) to glutamate were confirmed in a number of neuronal response types. Application of acetylcholine (ACh) or the broad spectrum cholinergic agonist carbachol produced reliable excitatory responses in about 47% of neurons (n = 29 out of 61 neurons). The remaining neurons were unresponsive to cholinergic agonists and no inhibitory responses were observed. Cholinergic responses were more common in dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) (73% of 30 neurons tested) than in ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) (23% of 31 neurons). Of the total neuron sample in which cholinergic responses were investigated, 41 neurons were able to be categorized according to established acoustic response features. Excitatory responses to cholinergic agonists were seen in "Pauser-buildup" (Pb) and "Transient chopper" (Ct) response types. Primary-like neurons (PL and Pn) as well as "Onset chopper" (Oc) neurons (n = 6) were unresponsive to either ACh or carbachol. Oc neurons also did not show any effect on their acoustic responses. Robust cholinergic responses were also seen in several VCN and DCN neurons that were either unresponsive to sound, or had acoustic response properties that did not fit standard classification. The results suggest a relatively more robust cholinergic innervation of DCN compared to VCN. The excitatory cholinergic responses of some Ct neurons and the lack of effect on Oc neurons are consistent with previous results in mouse brain slice studies, but are in conflict with reports of medial olivocochlear collateral excitatory responses in onset-type neurons in vivo. The results also indicate that a number of neurons of unknown identity may also receive cholinergic input.

Cholinergic top-down influences on the auditory brainstem

Descending connections are present in many sensory systems and support adaptive information processing. This allows the sensory brain to code a wider range of inputs. A well characterized descending system is the olivo-cochlear cholinergic innervation of the inner ear, which mediates a reduction of the sensitivity of the inner ear upon perception of intense sounds. Because this inhibits the response to background noise, the olivo-cochlear system supports detection of transient sound events. Olivo-cochlear neurons also innervate the cochlear nucleus through axon collaterals. Here, acetylcholine increases the excitability of central neurons without reducing their temporal precision. Thus their target neurons in the superior olivary complex can more effectively process binaural temporal cues. We argue that the central effect of the olivo-cochlear system augments the peripheral effect. In addition, olivo-cochlear cholinergic neurons are under top-down control of cortical inputs, providing further adaptability of information processing on the level of the auditory brainstem.

All the way from the cortex: a review of auditory corticosubcollicular pathways

Enrico Mugnaini has devoted part of his long and fruitful neuroscientific career to investigating the structural similarities between the cerebellar cortex and one of the first relay stations of the mammalian auditory pathway: the dorsal cochlear nucleus. The hypothesis of the cerebellar-like nature of the superficial layers of the dorsal cochlear nucleus received definitive support with the discovery and extensive characterization in his laboratory of unipolar brush cells, a neuron type unique to certain regions of the cerebellar cortex and to the granule cell domains of the cochlear nuclei. Paradoxically, a different line of research carried out in his laboratory revealed that, unlike the mammalian cerebellar cortex, the dorsal cochlear nucleus receives direct projections from the cerebral cortex, a fact that constitutes one of the main differences between the cerebellum and the dorsal cochlear nucleus. In an article published in 1995, Mugnaini's group described in detail the novel direct projections from the rat auditory neocortex to various subcollicular auditory centers, including the nucleus sagulum, the paralemniscal regions, the superior olivary complex, and the cochlear nuclei (Feliciano et al., Auditory Neuroscience 1995; 1:287-308). This review gives Enrico Mugnaini credit for his seminal contribution to the knowledge of auditory corticosubcollicular projections and summarizes how this growing field has evolved in the last 20 years.