Long-term clinical outcomes of optimal medical therapy vs. successful percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with coronary chronic total occlusions

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a prevalent finding in patients with coronary artery disease and is associated with increased mortality. Prior reports on the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) were controversial. Following the emergence of recently published new evidence, a meta-analysis is warranted. The current meta-analysis assessed the effects of PCI compared to OMT in the treatment of CTO. Methods: A structured literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled studies of interventions were eligible. The primary outcome was an accumulated composite of cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction and target vessel/lesion revascularization events. Results: Thirty-two studies reporting on 11260 patients were included. Of these, 5712 (50.7%) were assigned to the PCI and 5548 (49.3%) were allocated to the OMT group. The primary outcome occurred in 14.6% of the PCI and 20.1% of the OMT group (12 trials, OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p = 0.005, I2 = 67%). Subgrouping demonstrated a consistent reduction in the primary outcome for the PCI group in RCTs (six trials, OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99, p = 0.05). The primary outcome reduction was irrespective of the study design, and it was replicable in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Advantages in other outcomes were rather related to statistical pooling effects and dominated by observational data. Conclusions: CTO-PCI was associated with improved patient-oriented primary outcome compared to OMT in a study-level meta-analysis. This composite outcome effect was mainly driven by target vessel treatment, but a significant reduction in mortality and myocardial infarction was observed, irrespectively. These findings have hypothesis-generating implications. Future RCTs with adequate statistical power are eagerly awaited.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy for stable coronary artery disease: An umbrella review

Background

Invasive management of stable coronary artery disease is still a controversial topic. The purpose of this umbrella review was to synthesize systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluate the benefits and harms of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from 2018 to August 7, 2022. We included SRs with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the question of interest. We assessed the methodological quality of the SRs with the AMSTAR-2 tool. We summarized the results of the outcomes for each SR. We calculated the degree of overlap of the RCTs included in the SRs using the corrected covered area (CCA).

Results

We found 10 SRs with meta-analyses. The SRs included 3 to 15 RCTs. The degree of overlap among the SRs was very high (CCA > 15%). No SR evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE system and 9 out of 10 had critically low methodological quality. The SRs reported heterogeneous results for the outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and angina. On the other hand, for the outcomes of cardiovascular mortality and stroke, all SRs agreed that there were no differences between PCI and OMT alone.

Conclusions

We found 10 SRs on the use of PCI compared to OMT alone for patients with stable coronary artery disease. However, none had high methodological quality, none evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach, and the results were inconsistent for several outcomes. This variability in evidence may result in divergent clinical decisions for the management of stable coronary artery disease among healthcare professionals. It is necessary to perform a high-quality SR using the GRADE approach to clarify the balance of benefits and harms of PCI.

Prognostic Value of Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio in Coronary Three-Vessel Disease

Objective

To investigate the prognostic value of fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) in the adverse outcomes of patients with coronary three-vessel disease (TVD).

Methods

A total of 4061 patients with TVD between 2013 and 2018 were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. The best cut‑off value of the FAR determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was 0.084. 2782 (68.5%) patients were in the low FAR group (FAR < 0.084) and 1279 (31.5%) patients were in the high FAR group (FAR ≥ 0.084), respectively. Three multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were applied to determine the associations of FAR with clinical outcomes. The concordance index (C-index), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to assess the incremental predictive value of the FAR and baseline models with respect to the additive effects of the established traditional risk factors on the discrimination of clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

Results

The median follow-up duration was 2.4 years (range 1.1-4.1 years). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the incidence of all-cause mortality (4.7% vs 2.2%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.52, p=0.011) and MACCE (34.6% vs 27.3%, HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.13-1.46, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the high FAR group compared to the low FAR group. The C-index was 0.72 (p < 0.001), the value of NRI was 0.3778 (p < 0.001), and the value of IDI was 0.0098 (p < 0.001) for those with FAR. After FAR was added to the traditional model, the discrimination and risk reclassification ability can be significantly improved for all-cause mortality. The similar results were found for MACCE.

Conclusion

Higher level of FAR was associated with all-cause mortality and MACCE among patients with TVD. FAR could help to improve the prognostic performance of the traditional risk factors for TVD patients.

Effect of complete percutaneous revascularization on improving long-term outcomes of patients with chronic total occlusion and multi-vessel disease

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on the comparison of clinical outcomes of complete vs. incomplete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) and multi-vessel disease (MVD). The study aimed to compare their clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 558 patients with CTO and MVD were divided into the optimal medical treatment (OMT) group ( n = 86), incomplete PCI group ( n = 327), and complete PCI group ( n = 145). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the complete and incomplete PCI groups as sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and unstable angina was defined as the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 21 months, there were statistical differences among the OMT, incomplete PCI, and complete PCI groups in the rates of MACEs (43.0% [37/86] vs. 30.6% [100/327] vs. 20.0% [29/145], respectively, P = 0.016) and unstable angina (24.4% [21/86] vs. 19.3% [63/327] vs. 10.3% [15/145], respectively, P = 0.010). Complete PCI was associated with lower MACE compared with OMT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-3.27; P = 0.005) or incomplete PCI (adjusted HR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.04-2.39; P = 0.031). Sensitivity analysis of PSM showed similar results to the above on the rates of MACEs between complete PCI and incomplete PCI groups (20.5% [25/122] vs. 32.6% [62/190], respectively; adjusted HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.32-0.96; P = 0.035) and unstable angina (10.7% [13/122] vs. 20.5% [39/190], respectively; adjusted HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.24-0.99; P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

For treatment of CTO and MVD, complete PCI reduced the long-term risk of MACEs and unstable angina, as compared with incomplete PCI and OMT. Complete PCI in both CTO and non-CTO lesions can potentially improve the prognosis of patients with CTO and MVD.

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Three-Vessel Coronary Disease After Revascularization: Results from a Large Cohort of 3561 Patients

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of systemic immune inflammation index (SII) concerning long-term outcomes in patients with the three-vessel disease (TVD) after revascularization in a large cohort.

Methods

In total, 3561 TVD patients who had undergone revascularization between 2013 and 2018 were included in the study. Patients were divided into the low SII (<694.3 × 10⁹/L) (n = 2556, 71.8%) and the high SII (≥694.3 × 10⁹/L) group (n = 1005, 28.2%). The C-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to assess whether the addition of SII to a baseline model with traditional risk factors improved the accuracy of cardiac event prediction. The primary outcome was the frequency of major adverse and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The secondary outcome was the incidence of all-cause death.

Results

After 2.4 years of follow-up, the Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis displayed that high SII was independently associated with an increased risk of developing future MACCE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23–2.21, p = 0.001) and all-cause death (HR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.19–7.32, p = 0.019). The addition of SII significantly improved the reclassification beyond the baseline model with traditional risk factors (MACCE: NRI, 0.115; p = 0.0001; all-cause death: NRI, 0.369; p = 0.0001). Reclassification with the addition of SII also demonstrated an IDI of 0.0022 (p = 0.006) in MACCE and 0.0033 (p = 0.014) in all-cause death.

Conclusion

In TVD patients after revascularization, increased SII is an independent prognostic factor for long-term outcomes of MACCE and death. Compared to traditional risk factors, SII improved the risk prediction of major cardiovascular events in TVD patients who underwent revascularization.

Revascularization of chronic total occlusion coronary artery and cardiac regeneration

Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) contributes to the progression of heart failure in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO significantly improves angina symptoms and quality of life but fails to reduce clinical events compared with optimal medical therapy. Even so, intervening physicians strongly support CTO-PCI. Cardiac regeneration therapy after CTO-PCI should be a promising approach to improving the prognosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, the relationship between CTO revascularization and cardiac regeneration has rarely been studied, and experimental studies on cardiac regeneration usually employ rodent models with permanent ligation of the coronary artery rather than reopening of the occlusive artery. Limited early-stage clinical trials demonstrated that cell therapy for cardiac regeneration in ischemic cardiomyopathy reduces scar size, reverses cardiac remodeling, and promotes angiogenesis. This review focuses on the status quo of CTO-PCI in ischemic cardiomyopathy and the clinical prospect of cardiac regeneration in this setting.

Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO), which occurs in 18. 4-52% of all patients referred for coronary angiography, represents one of the last barriers in coronary intervention. Approximately half of all patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), who undergo coronary angiography, are diagnosed with coronary CTO. In fact, these patients often develop recurrent symptoms and events, necessitating revascularization. Currently, there is neither a consensus nor developed guidelines for the treatment of CTO patients with prior CABG, and the prognosis of these patients remains unknown. In this review, we discuss current evidence and future perspectives on CTO revascularization in patients with prior CABG, with special emphasis on clinical and lesion characteristics, procedural success rates, periprocedural complications, and long-term outcomes.

Gender-Based Long-Term Outcomes After Revascularization for Three-Vessel Coronary Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort

Objective

To investigate the impact of gender on long-term outcomes after revascularization in patients with three-vessel disease (TVD), a severe and challenging subtype of coronary artery disease.

Methods

This was a single center retrospective cohort study. A total of 3776 patients with TVD who underwent revascularization between 2013 and 2018 were analyzed and were divided into the female group (n = 1039, 27.5%) and the male group (n = 2737, 72.5%). We performed a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the baseline characteristics, and a total of 1506 (504 matched pairs) patients were created after undertaking PSM. The primary outcome was the frequency of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke, and readmission for angina pectoris or heart failure. The secondary outcome was the incidence of all-cause death.

Results

Through 2.4-year follow-up, no significant differences in MACCE (25.8% vs 27.5%, p = 0.279) and all-cause death (2.1% vs 2.2%, p = 0.888) were observed between the two cohorts. Similar results as with the early detection were obtained in propensity-matched patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that female gender (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.88–1.17, p = 0.820) was not an independent predictor of MACCE but percutaneous coronary intervention (compared with coronary artery bypass graft surgery), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, left main trunk involvement and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% were independently associated with a higher MACCE rate in these patients.

Conclusion

For patients with TVD after coronary revascularization, there were no gender-based differences in the long-term outcomes and female gender was not an independent predictor of MACCE.

Predictors of Adverse Events Among Chronic Total Occlusion Patients Undergoing Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Medical Therapy

Objective

Limited data are available on the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after a successful coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy. This study aimed to identify predictors of MACE in CTO patients undergoing successful recanalization and medical therapy.

Methods

A total of 2015 patients with CTOs were enrolled. About 718 patients underwent successful CTO recanalization, and 1297 patients received medical therapy. The primary outcome was the frequency of MACE, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization. Multivariate models were used to determine predictors of MACE.

Results

In successful CTO recanalization group, MACE occurred in 123 (17.1%) patients. In multivariate analysis, heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–3.04, p = 0.036) was identified as independent predictors for MACE in successful CTO recanalization. Additionally, in medical therapy group, the significant predictors of MACE were male gender (HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.13–2.05, p = 0.005), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.11–1.74, p = 0.003), heart failure (HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.10–1.87, p = 0.007), J-CTO score (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07–1.28, p = 0.001) and multivessel disease (HR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.42–3.39, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Heart failure was predictor for composite cardiovascular events in patients with CTO after successful recanalization. Male gender, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, J-CTO score and multivessel disease were predictors of MACE in CTO patients with medical therapy.

Long-Term Outcomes of Successful Recanalization Compared With Optimal Medical Therapy for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With and Without Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Background: The number of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is significant, but the clinical outcomes of these patients are rarely reported. The present retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of successful recanalization vs. optimal medical therapy (MT) for CTOs in patients with preserved and impaired LV systolic function.

Methods: A total of 1,895 patients with CTOs were stratified according to LV function. Of these, 1,420 patients (74.9%) with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) >45% and 475 patients (25.1%) with LVEF ≤45% were treated with optimal MT or successful CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce the impact of potential confounding on the outcomes. The primary outcome was the frequency of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).

Results: Throughout a 2.6-year follow-up and after adjusting for confounders, among patients with preserved LV function, successful CTO PCI was associated with reduced incidence of MACE (14.2 vs. 23.9%, adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48–0.83, p = 0.001) compared to MT. There was no significant difference in MACE occurrence (29.6 vs. 28.9%, adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.71–1.56, p = 0.792) between successful recanalization and MT in patients with LV systolic dysfunction. The primary outcome among patients with impaired and preserved LV systolic function after PSM was similar to that from earlier findings before PSM was conducted. A significant interaction between LV function and therapeutic strategy for MACE was observed (interaction p = 0.038).

Conclusions: Compared to MT alone for management of patients with CTOs, successful CTO PCI may reduce the risk of MACE in patients with preserved LV systolic function, but not in patients with LV dysfunction.

Colchicine administration for percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of colchicine administration in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of colchicine administration versus placebo on treatment efficacy for PCI.

METHODS

We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through June 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of colchicine administration versus placebo in patients with PCI. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs involving 5526 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI, colchicine intervention can significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.97; P = 0.02), but reveals no obvious impact on mortality (OR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.32; P = 0.57), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.17; P = 0.39), serious adverse events (OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.31 to 1.61; P = 0.41), or restenosis (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.64; P = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Colchicine treatment may be effective to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing PCI.

Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion Versus De Novo Chronic Total Occlusion

Limited data are available on long-term outcomes and health status in the treatment of in-stent coronary chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) and de novo coronary chronic total occlusion (de novo CTO). This study compared the long-term clinical outcomes and health status of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with IS-CTO versus patients with de novo CTO in the drug-eluting stent era. We screened 483 consecutive patients with 1 CTO lesion, including 81 patients with IS-CTO and 402 patients with de novo CTO. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. The clinical end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The success rates of CTO lesion revascularization were similar in both groups. In the propensity score-matched patients, after a median follow-up of 36 months, MACE was observed in 32.8% of patients with IS-CTO versus 13.5% of the patients with de novo CTO (P < .001), mainly driven by target-vessel revascularization (21.9% vs 6.7%; P < .01). Moreover, patients with IS-CTO had significantly worse Seattle Angina Questionnaire anginal stability scores than the patients with de novo CTO. In conclusion, patients with IS-CTO after PCI had a worse clinical outcome, mainly MACE, and a poorer anginal stability in the long term than patients with de novo CTO.

Impact of Renal Function on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: Results From an Observational Single-Center Cohort Study During the Last 12 Years

Background: The number of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients with renal insufficiency is huge, and limited data are available on the impact of renal insufficiency on long-term clinical outcomes in CTO patients. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. medical therapy (MT) in CTO patients according to baseline renal function. Methods: In the study population of 2,497, 1,220 patients underwent CTO PCI and 1,277 patients received MT. Patients were divided into four groups based on renal function: group 1 [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m²], group 2 (60 ≤ eGFR <90 ml/min/1.73 m²), group 3 (30 ≤ eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m²), and group 4 (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m²). Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was the primary end point. Results: Median follow-up was 2.6 years. With the decline in renal function, MACE (p < 0.001) and cardiac death (p < 0.001) were increased. In group 1 and group 2, MACE occurred less frequently in patients with CTO PCI, as compared to patients in the MT group (15.6% vs. 22.8%, p < 0.001; 15.6% vs. 26.5%, p < 0.001; respectively). However, there was no significant difference in terms of MACE between CTO PCI and MT in group 3 (21.1% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.211) and group 4 (28.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.289). MACE was significantly reduced for patients who received successful CTO PCI compared to patients with MT (16.7% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.006; 16.3% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.003, respectively) in group 1 and group 2. eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m², age, male gender, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, multivessel disease, and MT were identified as independent predictors for MACE in patients with CTOs. Conclusions: Renal impairment is associated with MACE in patients with CTOs. For treatment of CTO, compared with MT alone, CTO PCI may reduce the risk of MACE in patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, reduced MACE from CTO PCI among patients with CKD was not observed. Similar beneficial effects were observed in patients without CKD who underwent successful CTO procedures.

Percutaneous coronary intervention provided better long term results than optimal medical therapy alone in patients with chronic total occlusion: A meta-analysis

AIMS

Studies comparing the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) along with optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus OMT alone in treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO) are limited by observational design, variable follow-up period, diverse clinical outcomes, high drop-out and cross-over rates. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of published data of observational as well as randomized studies comparing long term outcomes of PCI+OMT versus OMT alone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed. 15 studies meeting criteria were included in the meta-analysis. The New-castle Ottawa scale was used to appraise the overall quality of the studies. Random-effects model with inverse variance method was undertaken. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which comprises of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and un-planned revascularization were significantly lower in the PCI+OMT group (RR:0.76; 95% CI:0.61 to 0.95; P=<0.00001; I² = 85%). All-cause mortality and cardiac death were significantly lower in the PCI+OMT group (P=<0.00001 in both). Myocardial infarction and stroke rates were lower in the PCI+OMT group, however they did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.24, P = 0.15 respectively). Unplanned revascularizations (of any vessel) were also similar in both the groups (P = 0.78, I² = 88%).

CONCLUSION

PCI of CTO is rewarded with better long term outcome, in terms of MACE, all-cause mortality and cardiac death with similar rates of un-planned revascularization.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Optimal Medical Treatment for Chronic Total Occlusion: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis

The presence of concurrent chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a strong predictor for both short-term and long-term mortality. Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of CTO has been associated with clinical benefit. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing CTO-PCI versus optimal medical therapy. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published from 2006 to 2019. A total of 16 studies, with 11,314 patients were included. We analyzed data on mortality, cardiac deaths, myocardial re-infarction, major adverse cardiac events, stroke, and repeat CTO-PCI using random-effects models. The odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed and P < 0.05 was considered as a level of significance. Compared with medical therapy alone, CTO-PCI was associated with lower mortality (OR: 0.45, CI: 0.32-0.63, P < 0.00001) and cardiac deaths (OR: 0.58, CI: 0.38-0.89, P = 0.01). These results were primarily driven by observational studies with no difference observed in randomized controlled trials. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (OR: 0.71, CI: 0.48-1.05, P = 0.54), myocardial re-infarction (OR: 0.71, CI: 0.48-1.05, P = 0.54), stroke (OR: 0.61, CI: 0.32-1.17, P = 0.14, and repeat PCI (OR: 1.28, CI: 0.91-1.78, P = 0.16). This meta-analysis shows lower long-term mortality and cardiac deaths in CTO-PCI group as compared to OMT driven by observational studies with no difference observed in randomized controlled trials. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate long term results.

Long-Term Outcomes of Successful Revascularization for Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: A Report of 1,655 Patients

Background: To date, the benefit of successful revascularization of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) on prognosis remains uncertain, and there is a paucity of data on the impact of successful revascularization for CTO patients on long-term cardiovascular survival. This study aimed to investigate the long-term cardiovascular survival for patients with successful and unsuccessful CTO revascularization in a large cohort of patients.

Methods: There were 1,655 consecutive patients with at least one CTO included and were grouped into successful revascularization (n = 591) and unsuccessful revascularization (n = 1,064). Propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out to balance the clinical and the angiographic characteristics. Cardiac mortality was defined as the primary endpoint. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was assessed as a “secondary endpoint.”

Results: After 3.6 years of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the successful and the unsuccessful revascularization groups in the rate of cardiac mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59–1.58, p = 0.865]. After the PSM analysis (371 pairs) between the two groups, the cardiac mortality rate values (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23–1.15, p = 0.104) were equivalent, whereas the adjusted risk of MACE (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32–0.58, p = 0.001) and target-vessel revascularization (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29–0.58, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with unsuccessful revascularization.

Conclusion: For the treatment of CTO patients, successful revascularization was not associated with a lesser risk for cardiac mortality as compared with unsuccessful revascularization. However, successful revascularization reduced MACE and target-vessel revascularization.

Long-term outcomes of medical therapy versus successful recanalisation for coronary chronic total occlusions in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background

In this study, we compared the outcomes of medical therapy (MT) with successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic total occlusions (CTO) patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

A total of 2015 patients with CTOs were stratified. Diabetic patients (n = 755, 37.5%) and non-diabetic patients (n = 1260, 62.5%) were subjected to medical therapy or successful CTO-PCI. We performed a propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the baseline characteristics. A comparison of the major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was done to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 2.6 years. Through multivariate analysis, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher among diabetic patients compared to the non-diabetic patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.61, p = 0.005). Among the diabetic group, the rate of MACE (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.87, p = 0.006) was significantly lower in the successful CTO-PCI group than in the MT group. Besides, in the non-diabetic group, the prevalence of MACE (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64–1.15, p = 0.294) and cardiac death (adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.51–1.70, p = 0.825) were comparable between the two groups. Similar results as with the early detection were obtained in propensity-matched diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Notably, there was a significant interaction between diabetic or non-diabetic with the therapeutic strategy on MACE (p for interaction = 0.036).

Conclusions

For treatment of CTO, successful CTO-PCI highly reduces the risk of MACE in diabetic patients when compared with medical therapy. However, this does not apply to non-diabetic patients.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients with Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The proportion of the elderly in the total population of the world is growing, and the number of elderly patients with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) is huge. The elderly patients often have more extensive coronary artery disease, more severe ischemic burden and higher risk of cardiovascular events, as compared to younger patients, and thereby they might greatly benefit from coronary revascularization, even though they may have higher risk of operative complications. Most interventional cardiologists are more likely to be reluctant to operate complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients. The latest refinements in dedicated CTO-PCI equipment and techniques have led to high rates of success and low complications rates and have made the CTO-PCI procedures safe and effective among the elderly patients. However, up to now, there is no widely recognized consensus or guideline on treatment strategy of elderly CTO patients, and the prognosis in this population is unknown. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the current evidence and future perspectives on PCI in elderly patients with CTOs.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of medical therapy and successful recanalisation for coronary chronic total occlusions in elderly patients: a report of 1,294 patients

Background

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of medical therapy (MT) versus successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

Methods

There were 1,294 consecutive patients with 1,520 CTOs included (2007 to 2016) and were divided into the younger group (age <65 years; n=664, 51.3%) and the older group (age ≥65 years; n=630, 48.7%). In the older group, 630 patients were divided into MT group (n=421) and successful CTO-PCI group (n=209) according to the initial treatment strategy. In the younger group, they were divided into two groups: 379 patients in the MT group and 285 patients in the successful CTO-PCI group. We performed propensity score matching to minimize any selection bias. The primary end point was cardiac mortality. The secondary end point was major adverse cardiac event (MACE).

Results

After 3.6 (IQR, 2.1-5.0) years follow-up, no significant difference was observed between the MT and successful CTO-PCI groups in terms of cardiac mortality (MT vs. successful CTO-PCI: 9.3% vs. 5.0%, P=0.378) and MACE (28.3% vs. 15.1%, P=0.070) in the older group. After propensity score matching analysis (120 pairs), the risk of cardiac mortality (6.7% vs. 8.3%, P=0.624) was found to be comparable between the two groups. In the younger group, the occurrence of cardiac death (MT vs. successful CTO-PCI: 3.7% vs. 1.4%, P=0.072) was similar, whereas the MACE rate (27.7% vs. 17.9%, P=0.003) was significantly higher in MT group. After multivariate analysis, previous myocardial infarction (MI) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-2.49, P=0.006], CTO in right coronary artery (HR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.07-2.25, P=0.020), multivessel disease (HR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.10-3.72, P=0.024) and calcification (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.07-2.42, P=0.023) were independent predictors of MACE in elderly.

Conclusions

In the treatment of elderly patients with CTOs, successful CTO-PCI compared with MT alone didn't reduce the risk of cardiac death or MACE.

Gender Differences in Long-Term Outcomes of Medical Therapy and Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions

Background

There is a paucity of information about the gender differences in clinical outcomes of successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with medical therapy (MT) in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the impact of gender on long-term clinical outcomes associated with successful CTO-PCI versus MT in patients with CTOs.

Methods

Between January 2007 and December 2016, a total of 1702 patients with ≥1 CTO were enrolled. After exclusion, 1294 patients with 1520 CTOs were analyzed and were divided into the female group (n = 304, 23.5%) and the male group (n = 990, 76.5%). The patients in the female or male group were assigned to a MT group or successful CTO-PCI group according to the treatment strategy. In the female group, they were divided into two groups: 177 patients in the MT group and 127 patients in the successful CTO-PCI group. In the male group, they were divided into two groups: 623 patients in the MT group and 367 patients in the successful CTO-PCI group. The primary outcome was cardiac death. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac event (MACE).

Results

The median overall follow-up duration was 3.6 (IQR, 2.1–5.0) years, there were no significant differences between the MT and successful CTO-PCI groups with respect to the prevalence of cardiac death (MT vs. successful PCI: 6.8% vs. 3.9%, p=0.287) and MACE (20.9% vs. 21.3%, p=0.810) in female patients. In the male group, the occurrence of cardiac death (MT vs. successful PCI: 6.6% vs. 3.8%, p=0.066) was similar between the two groups. The MACE rate (30.0% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the MT group. Heart failure (hazard ratio 3.40, 95% confidence interval 1.23–9.40, p=0.018) was an independent predictor of cardiac death in female patients.

Conclusions

Successful CTO-PCI was not associated with reduced risk of cardiac death compared with medical therapy alone in both female and male patients. However, men have a significant reduction in MACE rate after successful CTO-PCI. Aggressive CTO-PCI should be considered carefully among female patients.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose of Review

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary arteries is a significant clinical problem and has traditionally been treated by medical therapy or coronary artery bypass grafting. Recent studies have examined percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as an alternative option.

Recent Findings

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared medical therapy to PCI for treating CTOs.

Summary

PubMed and Embase were searched from their inception to March 2019 for studies that compared medical therapy and PCI for clinical outcomes in patients with CTOs. Quality of the included studies was assessed by Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The results were pooled by DerSimonian and Laird random- or fixed-effect models as appropriate. Heterogeneity between studies and publication bias was evaluated by I² index and Egger’s regression, respectively. Of the 703 entries screened, 17 studies were included in the final analysis. This comprised 11,493 participants. Compared to PCI, medical therapy including randomized and observational studies was significantly associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 1.99, 95% CI 1.38–2.86), cardiac mortality (RR 2.36 (1.97–2.84)), and major adverse cardiac event (RR 1.25 (1.03–1.51)). However, no difference in the rate of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization procedures was observed between the two groups. Univariate meta-regression demonstrated multiple covariates as independent moderating factors for myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization but not cardiac death and all-cause mortality. However, when only randomized studies were included, there was no difference in overall mortality or cardiac death. In CTO, when considering randomized and observational studies, medical therapy might be associated with a higher risk of mortality and myocardial infarction compared to PCI treatment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11883-019-0804-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Successful recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions is not associated with improved cardiovascular survival compared with initial medical therapy

Objective. To compare the clinical outcomes associated with successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus initial medical therapy (MT) in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Methods. Between January 2007 and December 2016, a total of 1702 patients with ≥1 CTO were enrolled. Patients who had a failed CTO-PCI were excluded. After exclusion, 1294 patients with 1520 CTOs were divided into the MT group initially (did not undergo a CTO-PCI attempt) (n = 800) and successful PCI group (n = 494). Propensity-score matching was also performed to adjust for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was cardiac death. Results. The median overall follow-up duration was 3.6 (IQR, 2.1-5.0) years, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the prevalence of cardiac death (MT vs. successful PCI: 6.6 vs. 3.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-2.14, p = .867). In the propensity-matched population (286 pairs), there were no significant differences in the prevalence of cardiac death (MT vs. successful PCI: 5.9% vs. 3.1%, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23-1.15, p = .104) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-1.09, p = .130) between the two groups. Conclusion. In the treatment of patients with CTOs, successful PCI is not associated with improved long-term cardiovascular survival or reduced the risk of MACE compared with MT alone initially.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The optimal treatment strategy for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) has not been well established. The benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was inferred mainly from observational studies comparing successful versus failed PCI without a control group receiving optimal medical therapy (OMT). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing PCI using drug-eluting stent (DES) versus OMT alone in patients with CTO. Eight studies were identified: 3 RCTs and 5 observational studies. Among a total of 4784 included patients, 2461 patients underwent PCI and 2323 patients received OMT. There was a significant association between PCI and lower cardiac mortality (odds ratio = 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.93; P = .02). There was no significant difference between PCI and OMT regarding major adverse cardiac events, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, or stroke. In the RCT subset (1399 patients), there was no significant difference between PCI and OMT regarding clinical outcomes. Compared with OMT alone, PCI with DES for CTO was associated with lower cardiac mortality, mainly driven by observational studies, without significant difference in recurrent MI or repeated revascularization. Further RCTs are needed to investigate the role of PCI for management of patients with CTO.

Two-year clinical outcomes of medical therapy vs. revascularization for patients with coronary chronic total occlusion

OBJECTIVES

There are little data on the long-term clinical outcomes of medical therapy (MT) compared with revascularization in patients with chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2016, a total of 1655 patients with ≥1 CTO were enrolled in our center and were divided into the MT group (n = 800) and revascularization group (n = 855) according to the initial treatment strategy. Propensity score matching was also performed to adjust for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was cardiac death.

RESULTS

After 2 years of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the prevalence of cardiac death (MT vs. revascularization: 6.6% vs. 4.2%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-1.49, p = 0.820). In the propensity-matched population (406 pairs), there were no significant differences in the prevalence of cardiac death (MT vs. revascularization: 5.4% vs. 4.7%, HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.48-1.63, p = 0.694), except for target vessel revascularization (TVR) (0.44, 0.31-0.63, <0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (0.51, 0.38-0.68, <0.001), between the two groups. There were also no significant differences in the prevalence of cardiac death (MT vs. successful CTO-PCI: 6.6% vs. 4.0%, HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.41-2.15, p = 0.881) between the MT and successful CTO-PCI groups.

CONCLUSION

As an initial management strategy in patients with CTOs, revascularization did not reduce the risk of cardiac death compared with treatment with medical therapy alone. However, revascularization was associated with reduction in the prevalence of TVR and MACE. Furthermore, successful CTO-PCI was also not associated with improved long-term survival compared with MT alone.

Efficacy of liraglutide intervention in myocardial infarction : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of liraglutide intervention for myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of liraglutide intervention versus placebo on cardiac function for MI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through April 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of liraglutide intervention versus placebo on MI. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials involving 469 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for MI, liraglutide intervention significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference [MD] = 4.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.71 to 7.14; P = 0.001), superoxide dismutase (MD = 6.89; 95% CI = 1.80 to 11.98; P = 0.008), and decreased high-sensitivity C‑reactive protein (MD = -0.21; 95% CI = -0.33 to -0.09; P = 0.0006), but had no remarkable influence on major adverse cardiovascular events (risk ratio = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.28-1.09; P = 0.09), recurrence of MI (risk ratio = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.19-1.30; P = 0.16), repeated revascularization (risk ratio = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.17-1.42; P = 0.19), and cardiac death (risk ratio = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.12-2.73; P = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide intervention is associated with significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction and superoxide dismutase, reduced high-sensitivity C‑reactive protein in patients with MI, but has no remarkable impact on major adverse cardiovascular events, recurrence of MI, repeated revascularization or cardiac death.