Prospective comparison of echocardiographic atrioventricular delay optimization methods for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Understanding the Application of Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Patients with Heart Failure Considered for CRT

Over the past two decades of CRT use, the failure rate has remained around 30-35%, despite several updates in the guidelines based on the understanding from multiple trials. This review article summarizes the role of mechanical dyssynchrony in the selection of heart failure patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Understanding the application of mechanical dyssynchrony has also evolved during these past two decades. There is no role of lone mechanical dyssynchrony in the patient selection for CRT. However, mechanical dyssynchrony can complement the electrocardiogram and clinical criteria and improve patient selection by reducing the failure rate. An oversimplified approach to mechanical dyssynchrony assessment, such as just estimating time-to-peak delays between segments, should not be used. Instead, methods that can identify the underlying pathophysiology of HF and are representative of a substrate to CRT should be applied.

Impact of long-term optimizing atrioventricular delay using device-based algorithms on cardiac resynchronization therapy

Sub-optimal atrioventricular delay (AVD) is one of the main causes of non-responder for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Recently, device-based algorithms (DBAs) that provide optimal AVD based on intracardiac electrograms, have been developed. However, their long-term effectiveness is still unknown. This study aims to investigate the effect of optimizing AVD using DBAs over a long period, on the prognosis of patients undergoing CRT. A total of 118 patients who underwent CRT at our hospital between April 2008 and March 2018, were retrospectively reviewed; 61 of them with optimizing AVD using DBAs were classified into the treated group (group 1), and the remaining 57 were classified into the control group (group 2). The median follow-up period was 46.0 months. The responder and survival rate in group 1 were significantly better than those in group 2 (group 1 vs. group 2: responder rate = 64% vs. 46%, p = 0.046; survival rate: 85.2% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.02). Moreover, investigating only the non-responder population showed that group 1 had an improved survival rate compared to group 2 (group 1 vs. group 2 = 72.7% vs. 45.1%, p = 0.02). Optimizing AVD using DBAs was a significant contributor to the improved survival rate in CRT non-responders in multivariate analysis (HR 3.6, p = 0.01). In conclusion, the long-term optimizing AVD using DBAs improved the survival rate in CRT and the prognosis of CRT non-responders, as well.

Prognostic predictors and echocardiographic time course after device replacement in patients treated chronically with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices

The prognostic predictors of death or heart failure hospitalization and the echocardiographic response after initial cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device replacement (CRT-r) remain unclear. We evaluated the predictors and the echocardiographic time course in patients after CRT-r. Consecutive 60 patients underwent CRT-r because of battery depletion. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the chronic echocardiographic response to CRT (left ventricular end-systolic volume [LVESV] reduction of ≥ 15%) at the time of CRT-r: CRT responders (group A; 35 patients) and CRT nonresponders (group B; 25 patients). The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause or heart failure hospitalization. Changes in LVESV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after CRT-r were also analyzed. During the mean follow-up of 46 ± 33 months after CRT-r, the primary endpoint occurred more frequently in group B (group A versus group B; 8/35 [23%] patients versus 19/25 [76%] patients, p < 0.001). No significant changes in LVESV and LVEF were observed at the mean of 46 ± 29 months after CRT-r in both groups. A multivariate analysis identified echocardiographic nonresponse to CRT, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV at the time of CRT-r as independent predictors of the primary endpoint in all patients. Residual echocardiographic nonresponse, comorbidities, and heart failure symptoms at the time of CRT-r predict the subsequent very long-term prognosis after CRT-r. No further echocardiographic response to CRT was found after CRT-r.

Pacing at accelerated heart rate during echocardiography-guided atrioventricular optimisation following cardiac resynchronisation therapy

Introduction

Although echo-guided atrioventricular optimisation (AVO) is standardly performed at rest, this approach may not provide optimal AV synchrony during daily activities.

Material and methods

The AVO protocol at one of two hospital campuses had been modified to be performed while pacing at an accelerated heart rate. We tested if this approach would improve the yield from AVO compared to the other campus, where AVO was performed at the intrinsic sinus rate.

Results

Between campuses, no significant differences were seen in demographics, chamber sizes, left ventricular ejection fraction, and diastolic function grade. Those having AVO at C2 were more likely to demonstrate “fusion prone” physiology (36% vs. 9%; p = 0.006) and were more likely to display either “truncation- or fusion-prone” physiology (58% vs. 27%; p = 0.007).

Conclusions

When AVO was performed at an accelerated heart rate, patients with “truncation-prone” or “fusion-prone” physiology were identified more readily.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy and its effects in patients with type 2 DIAbetes mellitus OPTimized in automatic vs. echo guided approach. Data from the DIA-OPTA investigators

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRTd) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) optimized via automatic vs. echocardiography-guided approach.

Background

The suboptimal atrio-ventricular (AV) and inter-ventricular (VV) delays optimization reduces CRTd response. Therefore, we hypothesized that automatic CRTd optimization might improve clinical outcomes in T2DM patients.

Methods

We designed a prospective, multicenter study to recruit, from October 2016 to June 2019, 191 consecutive failing heart patients with T2DM, and candidate to receive a CRTd. Study outcomes were CRTd responders rate, hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) worsening, cardiac deaths and all cause of deaths in T2DM patients treated with CRTd and randomly optimized via automatic (n 93) vs. echocardiography-guided (n 98) approach at 12 months of follow-up.

Results

We had a significant difference in the rate of CRTd responders (68 (73.1%) vs. 58 (59.2%), p 0.038), and hospitalizations for HF worsening (12 (16.1%) vs. 22 (22.4%), p 0.030) in automatic vs. echocardiography-guided group of patients. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, the automatic guided approach (3.636 [1.271–10.399], CI 95%, p 0.016) and baseline highest values of atrium pressure (automatic SonR values, 2.863 [1.537–6.231], CI 95%, p 0.006) predicted rate of CRTd responders. In automatic group, we had significant difference in SonR values comparing the rate of CRTd responders vs. non responders (1.24 ± 0.72 g vs. 0.58 ± 0.46 g (follow-up), p 0.001), the rate of hospitalizations for HF worsening events (0.48 ± 0.29 g vs. 1.18 ± 0.43 g, p 0.001), and the rate of cardiac deaths ( 1.13 ± 0.72 g vs. 0.65 ± 0.69 g, p 0.047).

Conclusions

Automatic optimization increased CRTd responders rate, and reduced hospitalizations for HF worsening. Intriguingly, automatic CRTd and highest baseline values of SonR could be predictive of CRTd responders. Notably, there was a significant difference in SonR values for CRTd responders vs. non responders, and about hospitalizations for HF worsening and cardiac deaths.

Clinical trial ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04547244.

The Usefulness and Limitations of Impedance Cardiography for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Optimization

Identifying the optimal atrioventricular (AV) or interventricular (VV) delay is beneficial for patients using cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Ultrasonic echocardiography (UCG) has been the most commonly used method; however, it requires high technical knowledge. Impedance cardiography (ICG) can calculate stroke volume by measuring changes in transthoracic electric impedance. This study sought to assess the clinical utility of ICG in comparison with that of UCG for the optimization of CRT devices.Patients who underwent CRT device implantation were retrospectively analyzed. One week after implantation, optimization of AV delay (AVD) was performed in every patient with ICG (AVD-ICG) and UCG (AVD-UCG). VV delay (VVD) was then determined according to the optimal AVD using these two methods.Forty-two patients were enrolled. Average AVD-ICG was significantly shorter than AVD-UCG (128 ± 49 versus 146 ± 41 milliseconds, P = 0.018). Five patients (12%) had the same optimized AVD with two methods, and the difference between AVD-ICG and AVD-UCG was ≤ 20 milliseconds in 19 patients (45%). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of postoperative mitral regurgitation (MR) was an independent predictor of AVD-ICG/AVD-UCG mismatch, defined as a difference over 20 milliseconds (odds ratio = 10.71; 95% confidence interval = 1.72 to 66.72; P = 0.018). The results of optimized VVD were similar using both methods.ICG might be a promising tool for the rapid optimization of CRT devices. However, in patients with moderate-to-severe MR, ICG may not be able to optimize AVD.

Novel Device-Based Algorithm Provides Optimal Hemodynamics During Exercise in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

An adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm has been described for synchronized left ventricular (LV) pacing and continuous optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, there are few algorithmic data on the effect of changes during exercise.Methods and Results:We enrolled 27 patients with availability of the aCRT algorithm. Eligible patients were manually programmed to optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays by using echocardiograms at rest or during 2 stages of supine bicycle exercise. We compared the maximum cardiac output between manual echo-optimization and aCRT-on during each phase. After initiating exercise, the optimal AV delay progressively shortened (P<0.05) with incremental exercise levels. The manual-optimized settings and aCRT resulted in similar cardiac performance, as demonstrated by a high concordance correlation coefficient between the LV outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) during each exercise stage (Ex.1: r=0.94 P<0.0008, Ex.2: r=0.88 P<0.001, respectively). Synchronized LV-only pacing in patients with normal AV conduction could provide a higher LVOT-VTI as compared with manual-optimized conventional biventricular pacing at peak exercise (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The aCRT algorithm was physiologically sound during exercise by patients.

Design and results of aCRT MID-Q study: Adoption of adaptive CRT in patients with normal AV conduction and moderately wide left bundle branch block

BACKGROUND

Sub-analysis of the adaptive CRT (aCRT) trial demonstrated the potential benefits of the aCRT algorithm over conventional echo-guided bi-ventricular (BiV) pacing in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) with moderately wide QRS (120-149 ms) and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction.

METHODS

Adoption of Adaptive CRT in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block and Moderately Wide QRS (aCRT MID-Q, UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Number: 000022452) was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind study designed to investigate the superiority of the aCRT pacing algorithm compared to echo-guided BiV pacing in patients with moderately wide LBBB and normal AV conduction. The primary endpoint was the improvement in clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months; the secondary endpoints were changes in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume, LV ejection fraction, New York Heart Association classification, 6-min walk distance, and quality of life from baseline to 6 months post-randomization; heart failure administration; all-cause mortality; and cardiac mortality within 12 months.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated prematurely after enrollment of 39 patients (aCRT arm; n = 17, echo-guided BiV arm; n = 22) because of lower than expected enrollment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the improvement of CCS was achieved in 10 patients (59%) in the aCRT arm (n = 17) and 16 patients (73%) in the echo-guided BiV arm (n = 22, p = 0.36). For the secondary endpoint, only 6-min walk distance was significantly greater in the aCRT arm than in the echo-guided BiV arm, and no difference was observed in the echocardiographic parameters. Heart failure hospitalization-free survival was also not significantly different (p = 0.91). There was no death during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement of CCS was similarly observed after aCRT and echo-guided BiV in CRT recipients with moderately wide LBBB and normal AV conduction. A prospective study is needed to explore the impact of CRT and pacing algorithm on Japanese patients with moderately wide LBBB.

Advances in atrioventricular and interventricular optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy - what's the gold standard?

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most important advances in heart failure management in the last twenty years. Approximately one-third of patients appear not to respond to therapy. Although there are a number of possible mechanisms for non-response, an important factor is suboptimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) timing intervals. There remains controversy over whether routinely optimizing intervals is necessary and there is no agreed gold standard methodology. Optimization has classically been performed using echocardiography which has limits related to resource use, time-cost and variable reproducibility. Newer optimization methods using device-based sensors and algorithms show promise in reducing heart-failure hospitalization compared with echocardiography. Areas covered: This review outlines the rationale for optimization, the principles of AV and VV optimization, the standard echocardiographic approach and newer device-based algorithms and the evidence base for their use. Expert commentary: The incremental gains of optimization are likely to be real, but small, compared to the overall improvement gained from cardiac resynchronization itself. At this time routine optimization may not be mandatory but should be performed where there is no response to CRT. Device-based optimization algorithms appear to be practical and in some cases, deliver superior clinical outcomes compared to echocardiography.

The Role of Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Many patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction may benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy; however, approximately 30% of patients do not experience significant clinical improvement with this treatment. AV and VV delay optimization techniques have included echocardiography, device-based algorithms, and several other novel noninvasive techniques. Using these techniques to optimize device settings has been shown to improve hemodynamic function acutely; however, the long-term clinical benefit is limited. In most cases, an empiric AV delay with simultaneous biventricular or left ventricular pacing is adequate. The value of optimization of these intervals in "nonresponders" still requires further investigation.

A multichannel bioimpedance monitor for full-body blood flow monitoring

The design, properties, and possible diagnostic contribution of a multichannel bioimpedance monitor (MBM) with three independent current sources are presented in this paper. The simultaneous measurement of bioimpedance at 18 locations (the main part of the body, legs, arms, and neck) provides completely new information, on the basis of which more precise haemodynamic parameters can be obtained. The application of the MBM during various haemodynamic stages, such as resting in a supine position, tilting, exercise stress, and various respiration manoeuvres, is demonstrated. Statistical analysis on a group of 34 healthy volunteers is presented for demonstration of blood flow monitoring by using the proposed method.

Influence of atrioventricular optimization on hemodynamic parameters and quality of life in patients with dual chamber pacemaker with ventricular lead in right ventricular outflow tract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to ascertain whether individual atrioventricular delay (AVD) optimization using impedance cardiography (ICG) offers beneficial hemodynamic effects as well as improved exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with requiring constant right ventricular pacing.

METHODS

There were 37 patients with advanced AV block included in the study. Several examinations were performed at the beginning. Next, the optimization of AVD by ICG was done. The next step of the study patients have been randomized into optimal AVD group (AVDopt) or factory setting group (AVDfab). After 3 months, the follow-up all data were collected again and crossover was performed. After another 3 months, during the final follow-up all these measures were repeated.

RESULTS

In 87.5% patients, AVDopt were different than factory value. Cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume (SV) were significantly (P < 0.001) higher in AVDopt group than in AVDfab group (CO: 6.0 ± 1.4 L/minute vs. 5.3 ± 1.2 L/minute; SV: 85.8 ± 25.7 mL vs.76.9 ± 22.5 mL; CI: 3.2 ± 0.7 L/minute/m(2) vs. 2.7 ± 0.6 L/minute/m(2) ). There was a statistical significant (P < 0.05) reduction of proBNP and NYHA class in patients with AVDopt compared to AVDfab (proBNP: 196.4 ± 144.7pg/mL vs. 269.4 ± 235.8 pg/mL; NYHA class: 1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6). Six-minute walking test was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in AVDopt group (409 ± 90 m) than in AVDfab group (362 ± 93 m). There were no statistically significant differences in echocardiographic parameters between AVDopt and AVDfab settings.

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that AVD optimization in patients with DDD pacemaker with ICG improves hemodynamic when compared to the default factory settings. Furthermore, optimally programmed AVD reduces BNP and improves exercise tolerance and functional class.

Effects of AV delay and VV delay on left atrial pressure and waveform in ambulant heart failure patients: insights into CRT optimization

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that left atrial pressure (LAP) obtained by a permanent implantable sensor is sensitive to changes in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) settings and could guide CRT optimization to improve the response rate. We investigated the effect of CRT optimization on LAP and its waveform parameters in ambulant heart failure (HF) patients.

METHODS

CRT optimization was performed in eight ambulant HF patients, using echocardiography as reference. LAP waveform was acquired at each of eight atrioventricular (AV) intervals and five inter-ventricular (VV) intervals. Selected waveform parameters were also evaluated for their sensitivity to CRT changes and agreement with echocardiography-guided optimal settings.

RESULTS

Optimal AV and VV intervals varied considerably between patients. All patients exhibited significant changes in waveform morphology with AV optimization. Optimal AV delay determined from echocardiography ranged between 140 ms and 225 ms. Mean LAP tended to be lower at optimal setting 14 ± 3 mmHg compared to shorter (<100 ms) or longer (>160 ms) AV settings (P = 0.16). There were clear trends to smaller peak a-wave (P = 0.11) and gentler positive a-slope (P = 0.15) and positive v-slope (P = 0.09) with longer AV delays. Mean LAP and negative v-wave slope correlated well with echo-guided optimal setting, r = 0.91 (P = 0.001) and 0.79 (P = 0.03), respectively. No significant effects on LAP or waveform were seen during VV optimization.

CONCLUSIONS

LAP and its waveform changes considerably with AV optimization. There is good agreement between echo-guided optimal setting and LAP. LAP could provide an objective guide to CRT optimization. (Clinical Trial Registry information: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00632372).

The reliability of cardiogenic impedance and correlation with echocardiographic and plethysmographic parameters for predicting CRT time intervals post implantation

AIMS

Encouraging data have been reported on the use of cardiogenic impedance (CI) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) optimization. The purposes of this study were to: evaluate the stability of certain CI vectors 24 h postimplantation, study the correlation between these CI signals and selected echocardiographic parameters, and examine the possibility of non-invasive calibration of the patient-specific impedance-based prediction model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirteen patients received a CRT-defibrillator device with monitor capability of the dynamic impedance between several electrodes. At implantation, a patient-specific impedance-based prediction model was created for identification of optimal atrioventricular and interventricular (VV) delays and calibrated on invasive measurements of left ventricular contractility (LV dP/dtmax). Simultaneously, non-invasive measurements of LV dP/dtmax and stroke volume (SV) were obtained using a finger plethysmograph. Patients were re-evaluated with echocardiography and new CI measurements the day after implantation. The hemodynamic benefit achieved by optimal VV setting according to the patient-specific impedance-based prediction model at follow-up was not as large as the one obtained at implantation. In a multivariate partial least square regression analysis, a correlation was found between aortic velocity time integral (VTI) and a generic linear combination of CI features (P < 0,005). No correlation was found between the patient-specific impedance-based prediction models and the non-invasive measurements of LV dP/dtmax and SV.

CONCLUSION

Cardiogenic impedance signals can be used to optimize CRT settings but seem less feasible as an ambulatory tool since calibration is required. The positive correlation between aortic VTI and CI measurements seems promising, although a larger cohort is required to create an echocardiography-based patient-specific model.

A novel algorithm for individualized cardiac resynchronization therapy: rationale and design of the adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy trial

BACKGROUND

The magnitude of benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies significantly among its recipients; approximately 30% of CRT patients do not report clinical improvement. Optimization of CRT pacing parameters can further improve cardiac function, both acutely and chronically. Echocardiographic optimization is used in clinical practice, but it is time and resource consuming. In addition, optimal settings at rest may change later with activity or cardiac remodeling. The adaptive CRT (aCRT) algorithm was designed to provide automatic ambulatory adjustment of CRT pacing configuration (left ventricular or biventricular pacing) and device delays based on periodic measurement of electrical conduction intervals.

METHODS

The aCRT algorithm is currently undergoing evaluation in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, worldwide clinical trial. The trial enrolled 522 patients, who satisfied standard clinical indications for a CRT device. Within 2 weeks after the implant, the patients were randomized to aCRT versus echo-optimized biventricular pacing (Echo) settings in 2:1 ratio and followed up at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postrandomization. The noninferiority primary trial objectives at 6-month postrandomization are to demonstrate that (a) the percentage of aCRT patients who improved in their clinical composite score is at least as high as the percentage of Echo patients; (b) cardiac performance as assessed by echocardiography is similar when using aCRT settings versus echo-optimized settings; and (c) aCRT does not result in inappropriate device settings. First and last patient enrollments occurred in November 2009 and December 2010, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy of the aCRT algorithm will be evaluated in this ongoing clinical trial.

Acute beneficial hemodynamic effects of a novel 3D-echocardiographic optimization protocol in cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Post-implantation therapies to optimize cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) focus on adjustments of the atrio-ventricular (AV) delay and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) interval. However, there is little consensus on how to achieve best resynchronization with these parameters. The aim of this study was to examine a novel combination of doppler echocardiography (DE) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) for individualized optimization of device based AV delays and VV intervals compared to empiric programming.

METHODS

25 recipients of CRT (male: 56%, mean age: 67 years) were included in this study. Ejection fraction (EF), the primary outcome parameter, and left ventricular (LV) dimensions were evaluated by 3DE before CRT (baseline), after AV delay optimization while pacing the ventricles simultaneously (empiric VV interval programming) and after individualized VV interval optimization. For AV delay optimization aortic velocity time integral (AoVTI) was examined in eight different AV delays, and the AV delay with the highest AoVTI was programmed. For individualized VV interval optimization 3DE full-volume datasets of the left ventricle were obtained and analyzed to derive a systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI), calculated from the dispersion of time to minimal regional volume for all 16 LV segments. Consecutively, SDI was evaluated in six different VV intervals (including LV or right ventricular preactivation), and the VV interval with the lowest SDI was programmed (individualized optimization).

RESULTS

EF increased from baseline 23±7% to 30±8 (p<0.001) after AV delay optimization and to 32±8% (p<0.05) after individualized optimization with an associated decrease of end-systolic volume from a baseline of 138±60 ml to 115±42 ml (p<0.001). Moreover, individualized optimization significantly reduced SDI from a baseline of 14.3±5.5% to 6.1±2.6% (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with empiric programming of biventricular pacemakers, individualized echocardiographic optimization with the integration of 3-dimensional indices into the optimization protocol acutely improved LV systolic function and decreased ESV and can be used to select the optimal AV delay and VV interval in CRT.

Reduced septal glucose metabolism predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of patients do not respond to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). Recent work has focused on quantifying mechanical dyssynchrony and left ventricular scar. Septal reverse-mismatch (R-MM) (reduced FDG uptake vs perfusion) has been observed in patients with cardiomyopathy and prolonged QRS duration. We hypothesized that a greater quantity of septal R-MM would indicate a greater potential for reversibility of the cardiomyopathy, when the dyssynchrony is improved with CRT. Therefore, this study's objective was to assess whether greater septal R-MM pattern predicts response to CRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-nine patients had pre-implant Rubidium-82 and Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Total and regional left ventricular scar size and extent of R-MM were calculated. Response to CRT was defined as ≥10% improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume or ≥5% absolute ejection fraction improvement. In the non-ischemic cardiomyopathy subset non-responders had significantly less septal R-MM than responders (13.1% compared to 27.1%, P = .012). There were correlations between the extent of septal R-MM and the increase in ejection fraction (r = 0.692, P = .0004) and reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (r = -0.579, P = .004). For each 5% absolute increase in extent of septal R-MM the odds ratio of being a responder was 2.17 (95% CI 1.15, 4.11, P = .017). Extent of septal R-MM displayed high sensitivity and specificity (area under curve = 0.855, P = .017) to predict response.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, greater extent of septal glucose metabolic R-MM pattern, predicted response to CRT. This parameter may be useful for identifying patients who benefit from CRT.

The acute effects of changes to AV delay on BP and stroke volume: potential implications for design of pacemaker optimization protocols

BACKGROUND

The AV delay optimization of biventricular pacemakers (cardiac resynchronization therapy) may maximize hemodynamic benefit but consumes specialist time to conduct echocardiographically. Noninvasive BP monitoring is a potentially automatable alternative, but it is unknown whether it gives the same information and similar precision (signal/noise ratio). Moreover, the immediate BP increment on optimization has been reported to decay away: it is unclear whether this is the result of an (undesirable) decrease in stroke volume or a (desirable) compensatory relief of peripheral vasoconstriction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To discriminate between these alternative mechanisms, we measured simultaneous beat-to-beat stroke volume (flow) using Doppler echocardiography, and BP using finger photoplethysmography, during and after AV delay changes from 40 to 120 ms in 19 subjects with cardiac pacemakers. BP and stroke volume both increased immediately (P<0.001, within 1 heartbeat). BP showed a clear decline a few seconds later (average rate, -0.65 mm Hg/beat; r=0.95 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98]); in contrast, stroke volume did not decline (P=0.87). The immediate BP increment correlated strongly with the stroke volume increment (r=0.74, P<0.001). The signal/noise ratio was 3-fold better for BP than stroke volume (6.8±3.5 versus 2.3±1.4; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Improving AV delay immediately increases BP, but the effect begins to decay within a few seconds. Reassuringly, this is because of compensatory vasodilatation rather than reduction in cardiac function. Pacemaker optimization will never be reliable unless there is an adequate signal/noise ratio. Using BP rather than Doppler minimizes noise. The early phase (before vascular compensation) has the richest signal lode.

Discordant electrical and mechanical atrial delays affect intracavitary electrogram-based cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization

AIMS

It has been shown that atrioventricular (AV) delay optimization improves cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. Recently, an automatic algorithm (QuickOpt™, St Jude Medical), able to quickly identify the individual optimal AV interval, has been developed. The algorithm suggests an AV delay based on atrial intracavitary electrogram (IEGM) duration. We hypothesized that the difference between electrical and mechanical atrial delays could affect the effectiveness of QuickOpt method. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis in 23 CRT patients who were recipients of St. Jude Medical devices.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using echocardiography, aortic flow velocity time integral (VTI) was evaluated at baseline, at QuickOpt suggested AV delay and after reducing it by 25 and 50%. Mechanical inter-atrial delay (MIAD) derived from echo/Doppler and electrical inter-atrial delay (EIAD) derived from IEGM were also analysed. Optimal AV delay was identified by the maximal VTI. In 11 patients (Group 1) the maximal VTI was achieved at the AV delay suggested by the algorithm, in 6 patients (Group 2) after a 25% reduction, and in 6 patients (Group 3) after a 50% reduction. While EIAD was similar among the three groups, MIAD was significantly different (P< 0.001). MIAD was longer than EIAD in Group 1 (P= 0.028) and shorter than EIAD in Groups 2 (P= 0.028) and 3. (P< 0.001). Mechanical inter-atrial delay was the only independent predictor of the AV interval associated with the best VTI (R(2) = 0.77; P< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that MIAD plays the main role in determining the optimal AV delay, thus caution should be taken when optimizing AV by IEGM-based methods.

Optimization of the atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy using a device for non-invasive measurement of cardiac index at rest and during exercise

AIMS

It is not clear whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) should only be optimized at rest or whether it is necessary to perform CRT optimization during exercise. Our study aims to answer this question by using an inert gas rebreathing method (Innocor®).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with congestive heart failure and implanted CRT devices were included in the study. The aetiology of the heart failure was ischaemic in nine (33%) patients. Patients had low left ventricular ejection fraction (29 ± 8%) and enlarged LV end-diastolic diameters (63 ± 7 mm). Atrioventricular delay (AVD) was optimized at rest according to cardiac index (CI), measured by inert gas rebreathing (Innocor®). Thereafter, patients performed standardized, steady-state bicycle exercise at 30 W in sitting body position. Three AVDs were tested during exercise in a random sequence: optimized resting AVD (AVD(opt)) according to baseline measurement; AVD(opt) - 30 ms; and AVD(opt) + 30 ms. Cardiac index was measured in each AVD by inert gas rebreathing. Cardiac index increased significantly during exercise. However, neither AVD(opt) shortening nor prolongation during exercise had significant effect on CI (shortening of AVD(opt) - 30 ms was accompanied by a reduction of CI of 4.8%, prolongation of AVD(opt) + 30 ms was accompanied by a reduction of CI of 7.7%).

CONCLUSION

Shortening or lengthening of the AVD during exercise has no impact on CI in CRT patients. On the basis of our results, we conclude that in CRT patients the AVD should be programmed, fixed even during exercise.

Atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy: physiological principles and overview of available methods

In this review, the physiological rationale for atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy is discussed including the influence of exercise and long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy. The broad spectrum of both invasive and non-invasive optimization methods is reviewed with critical appraisal of the literature. Although the spectrum of both invasive and non-invasive optimization methods is broad, no single method can be recommend for standard practice as large-scale studies using hard endpoints are lacking. Current efforts mainly investigate optimization during resting conditions; however, there is a need to develop automated algorithms to implement dynamic optimization in order to adapt to physiological alterations during exercise and after anatomical remodeling.

Patterns of left ventricular contraction in strain vector space related to bundle branch block with heart failure by speckle-tracking echocardiography

The aim of this research is to study bundle branch block (BBB)-related patterns of radial strain in the left ventricles of patients with heart failure by speckle-tracking echocardiography. Twenty-seven left-BBB (LBBB), 10 right-BBB (RBBB), and 11 narrow QRS-complexes (non-BBB) patients and 11 healthy subjects were assessed. Strain fractions used to quantify thickening-during-systole and thinning-during-diastole, and timing parameters defined as time to onset-of-thickening and peak-strain were measured. Principal strain vectors were conducted on the fractions and parameters to analyze mechanical discoordination and dyssynchrony. Heart failure patients show a significantly greater extent of discoordination and dyssynchrony compared with healthy subjects. Significant differences between the LBBB and RBBB groups are demonstrated by deflection, a spatial characteristic of myocardial coordination. New information provided by these findings can provide a better understanding of BBB-related mechanisms of myocardial coordination and may be useful in improving patient selection, electrode placement and subsequent outcomes for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Primary Results From the SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (SMART-AV) Trial

Background

One variable that may influence cardiac resynchronization therapy response is the programmed atrioventricular (AV) delay. The SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (SMART-AV) Trial prospectively randomized patients to a fixed empirical AV delay (120 milliseconds), echocardiographically optimized AV delay, or AV delay optimized with SmartDelay, an electrogram-based algorithm.

Methods and Results

A total of 1014 patients (68% men; mean age, 66±11 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 25±7%) who met enrollment criteria received a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, and 980 patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio. All patients were programmed (DDD-60 or DDDR-60) and evaluated after implantation and 3 and 6 months later. The primary end point was left ventricular end-systolic volume. Secondary end points included New York Heart Association class, quality-of-life score, 6-minute walk distance, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The medians (quartiles 1 and 3) for change in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months for the SmartDelay, echocardiography, and fixed arms were −21 mL (−45 and 6 mL), −19 mL (−45 and 6 mL), and −15 mL (−41 and 6 mL), respectively. No difference in improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months was observed between the SmartDelay and echocardiography arms ( P =0.52) or the SmartDelay and fixed arms ( P =0.66). Secondary end points, including structural (left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular ejection fraction) and functional (6-minute walk, quality of life, and New York Heart Association classification) measures, were not significantly different between arms.

Conclusions

Neither SmartDelay nor echocardiography was superior to a fixed AV delay of 120 milliseconds. The routine use of AV optimization techniques assessed in this trial is not warranted. However, these data do not exclude possible utility in selected patients who do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT00677014.