Mapping of atrial tachycardias after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Use of bi-atrial activation patterns to facilitate recognition of origin

Downstream overdrive pacing and intracardiac concealed fusion to guide rapid identification of atrial tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation

Aims

Atrial tachycardia (AT) related to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation frequently poses a diagnostic challenge. Downstream overdrive pacing (DOP) can be used to rapidly detect reentry and assess proximity of a pacing site to an AT circuit or focus. We hypothesized that systematic DOP using multielectrode catheters would facilitate AT mapping.

Methods and results

DOP identified constant fusion when the post-pacing interval (PPI)-tachycardia cycle length (TCL) <40 ms and stimulus to adjacent upstream atrial electrogram interval >75% of TCL. Mapping was performed as follows: (i) CS DOP, (ii) DOP at left atrial (LA) roof, (iii) DOP at selected LA sites based on prior DOP attempts, and (iv) mapping and ablation at regions of fractionated electrograms in region of AT. Activation mapping was performed at operator discretion. AT diagnosis was confirmed by successful ablation or additional mapping when ablation was unsuccessful. Fifty consecutive patients with sustained AT underwent mapping of 68 ATs, of whom 42 (62%) were macroreentrant, 19 were locally reentrant (28%), and 7 (10%) were focal. AT was correctly identified with a median of three DOP attempts. All macroreentrant ATs were identified with ≤6 DOP attempts. One AT (1.6%) was terminated by DOP, and three ATs (4.8%) required activation mapping. Intracardiac concealed fusion was seen in 26 ATs (38%), each of which was successfully ablated.

Conclusion

Reentry could be demonstrated in a substantial majority of AF ablation-related AT. A stepwise diagnostic approach using DOP and recognition of intracardiac concealed fusion can be used to rapidly identify and ablate reentrant AT.

Pattern and timing of the coronary sinus activation to guide rapid diagnosis of atrial tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachycardias (AT) during or after ablation of atrial fibrillation frequently pose a diagnostic challenge. We hypothesized that both the patterns and the timing of coronary sinus (CS) activation could facilitate AT mapping.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 140 consecutive postpersistent atrial fibrillation ablation patients with sustained AT were investigated by conventional mapping. CS activation pattern was defined as chevron or reverse chevron when the activations recorded on both the proximal and the distal CS dipoles were latest or earliest, respectively. The local activation of mid-CS was timed with reference to Ppeak-Ppeak (P-P) interval in lead V1. A ratio, mid-CS activation time to AT cycle length, was computed. Of 223 diagnosed ATs, 124 were macroreentrant (56%) and 99 were centrifugal (44%). When CS activation was chevron/reverse chevron (n=44; 20%), macroreentries were mostly roof dependent. With reference to P-P interval, mid-CS activation timing showed specific consistency for peritricuspid and perimitral AT. Proximal to distal CS activation pattern and mid-CS activation at 50% to 70% of the P-P interval (n=30; 13%) diagnosed peritricuspid AT with 81% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Distal to proximal CS activation and mid-CS activation at 10% to 40% of the P-P interval (n=44; 20%) diagnosed perimitral AT with 88% sensitivity and 75% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the patterns and timing of CS activation provides a rapid stratification of most likely macroreentrant ATs and points toward the likely origin of centrifugal ATs. It can be included in a stepwise diagnostic approach to rapidly select the most critical mapping maneuvers.