The Impact of Glucomannan, Inulin, and Psyllium Supplementation (SolowaysTM) on Weight Loss in Adults with FTO, LEP, LEPR, and MC4R Polymorphisms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

This study aimed to determine the impact of a fiber supplement on body weight and composition in individuals with obesity with specific genetic polymorphisms. It involved 112 adults with obesity, each with at least one minor allele in the FTO, LEP, LEPR, or MC4R polymorphism. Participants were randomized to receive either a fiber supplement (glucomannan, inulin, and psyllium) or a placebo for 180 days. The experimental group showed significant reductions in body weight (treatment difference: -4.9%; 95% CI: -6.9% to -2.9%; p < 0.01) and BMI (treatment difference: -1.4 kg/m2; 95% CI: -1.7 to -1.2; p < 0.01) compared to placebo. Further significant decreases in fat mass (treatment difference: -13.0%; 95% CI: -14.4 to -11.7; p < 0.01) and visceral fat rating (treatment difference: -1.3; 95% CI: -1.6 to -1.0; p < 0.01) were noted. Homozygous minor allele carriers experienced greater decreases in body weight (treatment difference: -3.2%; 95% CI: -4.9% to -1.6%; p < 0.01) and BMI (treatment difference: -1.2 kg/m2; 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.4; p < 0.01) compared to heterozygous allele carriers. These carriers also had a more significant reduction in fat mass (treatment difference: -9.8%; 95% CI: -10.6 to -9.1; p < 0.01) and visceral fat rating (treatment difference: -0.9; 95% CI: -1.3 to -0.5; p < 0.01). A high incidence of gastrointestinal events was reported in the experimental group (74.6%), unlike the placebo group, which reported no side effects. Dietary supplementation with glucomannan, inulin, and psyllium effectively promotes weight loss and improves body composition in individuals with obesity, particularly those with specific genetic polymorphisms.

Evaluating the Impact of Omega-3 Fatty Acid (SolowaysTM) Supplementation on Lipid Profiles in Adults with PPARG Polymorphisms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Emerging evidence suggests that PPARG gene polymorphisms may influence lipid metabolism and cardiovascular risk, with omega-3 fatty acids proposed to modulate these effects. This study aims to assess the effects of fish oil supplementation on cardiovascular markers among adults with PPARG gene polymorphisms in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A cohort of 102 patients with LDL-C 70-190 mg/dL was randomized to receive either 2000 mg of omega-3 fatty acids or a placebo daily for 90 days. In the omega-3 group with PPARG polymorphisms, LDL-C was reduced by 15.4% (95% CI: -19.8% to -11.0%), compared with a 2.6% decrease in the placebo group (95% CI: -4.1% to -1.1%; p < 0.01). In the omega-3 group without PPARG polymorphisms, LDL-C was reduced by 3.7% (95% CI: -6.9% to -0.6%), not significantly different from the placebo group's reduction of 2.9% (95% CI: -5.1% to -0.8%; p = 0.28). The reduction in LDL-C was notably 11.7% greater in those with PPARG polymorphisms than in those without (95% CI: -19.3% to -4.0%; p < 0.01). Triglycerides decreased by 21.3% in omega-3 recipients with PPARG polymorphisms (95% CI: -26.5% to -16.2%; p < 0.01), with no significant changes in HDL-C, total cholesterol, or hsCRP levels in any groups. Minor allele frequencies and baseline characteristics were comparable, ensuring a balanced genetic representation. Omega-3 fatty acids significantly reduce LDL-C and triglycerides in carriers of PPARG polymorphisms, underlining the potential for genetic-driven personalization of cardiovascular interventions.

Sex-related differences in outcome after left atrial appendage occlusion: Insights from Europe and the EWOLUTION registry

BACKGROUND

Women with atrial fibrillation (AF) generally experience worse symptoms, poorer quality of life, and have a higher risk of stroke and death. There is limited availability of sex-related differences regarding left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the sex-related differences in patients undergoing LAAO in EWOLUTION.

METHODS

A total of 1025 patients scheduled for elective LAAO therapy employing the WATCHMAN Gen 2.5 prospectively consented for participation; 1005 patients received a successful implant and were followed for 2 years. As we detected sex-related differences in baseline data we performed a propensity score matching. The primary endpoint is a combined endpoint of survival free from mortality, major bleeding, ischemic stroke, transitory ischemic attack (TIA) and systemic embolization (SE) up to 2-year clinical follow-up. Secondary Endpoints were periprocedural data and overall 2-year survival.

RESULTS

Women were older but had less often vascular disease and hemorrhagic stroke. There was no sex-related significant difference after LAAO at 2 years in the combined endpoint of survival free from mortality, major bleeding, ischemic stroke, TIA, and SE (female vs. male: 79% vs.76%, p = 0.24) or in overall survival (female vs. male: 85% vs. 82%, p = 0.16). Procedural data showed a higher sealing rate after the implantation in women (complete sealing female 94% vs. male 90%, p = 0.033), significantly more pericardial effusions (female 1.2% vs. male 0.2%, p = 0.031) and a similar periprocedural risk profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Females undergoing LAAO differ in various baseline variables, but after adjustment, we observed similar safety and efficacy of LAAO with no significant difference in long-term outcomes between women and men.

Meta-Analysis of Percutaneous Endomyocardial Cell Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure by Combination of Individual Patient Data (IPD) of ACCRUE and Publication-Based Aggregate Data

Individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analysis (ACCRUE, meta-analysis of cell-based cardiac studies, NCT01098591) revealed an insufficient effect of intracoronary cell-based therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Patients with ischemic heart failure (iHF) have been treated with reparative cells using percutaneous endocardial, surgical, transvenous or intracoronary cell delivery methods, with variable effects in small randomized or cohort studies. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transendocardial cell therapy in patients with iHF. Two investigators extracted the data. Individual patient data (IPD) (n = 8 studies) and publication-based (n = 10 studies) aggregate data were combined for the meta-analysis, including patients (n = 1715) with chronic iHF. The data are reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality and changes in global ejection fraction. The secondary safety and efficacy endpoints were major adverse events, hospitalization and changes in end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. Post hoc analyses were performed using the IPD of eight studies to find predictive factors for treatment safety and efficacy. Cell therapy was significantly (p < 0.001) in favor of survival, major adverse events and hospitalization during follow-up. A forest plot analysis showed that cell therapy presents a significant benefit of increasing ejection fraction with a mean change of 2.51% (95% CI: 0.48; 4.54) between groups and of significantly decreasing end-systolic volume. The analysis of IPD data showed an improvement in the NYHA and CCS classes. Cell therapy significantly decreased the end-systolic volume in male patients; in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension or hyperlipidemia; and in those with previous myocardial infarction and baseline ejection fraction ≤ 45%. The catheter-based transendocardial delivery of regenerative cells proved to be safe and effective for improving mortality and cardiac performance. The greatest benefit was observed in male patients with significant atherosclerotic co-morbidities.

Association between personalized evidence-based anticoagulation therapy and outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis from the Atrial Fibrillation registry

Background

The guideline treatments based on a relatively broad set of enrollment criteria inhibits the personalized evidence-based approach. Personalized evidence-based medicine (EBM) involves the ability to classify individuals into subpopulations that differ in their susceptibility to a particular disease or their response to a specific treatment.

Objective

We report the 1-year follow-up data of the Atrial Fibrillation Registry, focusing on the relationship between personalized EBM and guideline-adherent anticoagulation therapy use and the occurrence of major clinical adverse events.

Methods

2683 patients at high risk for stroke and 1-year follow-up were enrolled in study. The primary endpoint was the percentage of guideline-based and personalized EBM recommendations acted on by clinicians. Secondary endpoints include the following: outcomes for all-cause mortality, thromboembolism (TE), bleeding, and the composite endpoints.

Results

From 2683 patients, 1971 (73.5%) EMR were guideline adherent and only 824 (30.7%) of them were personalized EBM anticoagulation therapy adherent, whilst 712 (26.5%) were non-guideline adherent and 1147 (42.8%) were guideline adherent but non-personalized EBM adherent.

The composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, any TE or bleeding was significantly lower in personalized EBM adherent patients during 1-year follow-up (P=0.02). The endpoint of all cause death and any TE is increased by &gt;20% by guideline adherent but non-personalized EBM adherent treatment [hazard ratio (HR) 1.254 (95% CI 0.931; 1.689)] and &gt;80% non-guideline adherent and non-personalized EBM adherent treatment [HR 1.892 (95% CI 1.359; 2.635)]. For the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, any TE or bleeding, guideline adherent but non-personalized EBM adherent treatment increased risk by &gt;40% [HR 1.454 (95% CI 1.037; 2.040)], and non-guideline adherent and non-personalized EBM adherent treatment by &gt;110% [HR 2.113 (95% CI 1.453; 3.074)].

Conclusion

Personalized EBM anticoagulation management is associated with significantly better outcomes, including those related to the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, any TE or bleeding in high-risk patients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Initial and long-term antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN

AIMS

Evidence regarding post-procedural antithrombotic regimen other than used in randomized trials assessing percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is limited. The present work aimed to compare different antithrombotic strategies applied in the real-world EWOLUTION study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 998 patients with successful WATCHMAN implantation were available for the present analysis. The composite ischaemic endpoint of stroke, transitory ischaemic attack, systemic embolism and device thrombus, and the bleeding endpoint defined as at least major bleeding were assessed during an initial period (from implant until first medication change) and long-term period (from first change up to 2 years). The antithrombotic medication chosen in the initial phase was dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in 60%, oral anticoagulation (OAC) in 27%, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in 7%, and no medication in 6%. In the second long-term phase, SAPT was used in 65%, DAPT in 23%, no therapy in 8%, and OAC in 4%. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding the ischaemic endpoint both in the initial period (Kaplan-Meier estimated rate 2.9% for DAPT vs. 4.3% for OAC vs. 3.9% for SAPT or no therapy) and in the second period (4.2% for SAPT vs. 1.8% for DAPT vs. 3.5% for no therapy). With respect to bleeding events, the only difference was found in the initial phase with a higher incidence in patients under SAPT or no therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Tailored antithrombotic treatment using even very reduced strategies such as SAPT or no therapy showed no significant differences regarding ischaemic complications after LAA closure.

Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial

OBJECTIVES

This subanalysis of the CASTLE-AF (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF) trial aimed to address the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF burden, and hard clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with AF.

BACKGROUND

The CASTLE-AF trial demonstrated the benefit of CA compared to pharmacological treatment in decreasing mortality and CV hospitalizations in patients with AF and HFrEF. However, the impact of AF recurrence and AF burden after ablation on long-term treatment benefit remains unknown.

METHODS

The CASTLE-AF protocol randomized 363 patients with coexisting HF and AF in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to catheter ablation (n = 179) versus pharmacological therapy (n = 184). Two hundred eighty patients were included in this subanalysis (as-treated), 128 of them underwent ablation and 152 received pharmacological treatment. All patients had implanted dual chamber or biventricular implantable defibrillators with activated home monitoring capabilities. The individual AF burden was calculated as the percentage of the atrial arrhythmia time per day.

RESULTS

AF burden at baseline was not predictive of the primary endpoint (p = 0.473) or all-cause mortality (p = 0.446). AF recurrence (defined as any episode >30 s) did not show any relationship with the primary endpoints of mortality and occurrence of HF, irrespective of the treatment arm. An AF burden below 50% after 6 months of catheter ablation, was associated with a significant decrease in primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15 to 0.71; p = 0.014) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.71; p = 0.031). The risk of the primary endpoint or mortality was directly related to a low (<50%) or high (≥50%) AF burden at 6 months post-ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

AF burden at 6 months was predictive of hard clinical outcomes in HF patients with AF. The first recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia episode >30 s after ablation was not associated with improvement in mortality and hospitalization for HF. (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF [CASTLE-AF]; NCT00643188).

Initial and long-term antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN

Background

Evidence regarding post-procedural antithrombotic regimes other than used in randomized trials assessing percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is limited.

Purpose

The present work aimed to compare different antithrombotic strategies applied in the real-world EWOLUTION study.

Methods

A total of 998 patients with successful WATCHMAN implantation at 47 centers were available for the present analysis. The composite ischemic endpoint of stroke, TIA, systemic embolism and device thrombus as well as the bleeding endpoint defined as at least major bleeding according to BARC were assessed during an initial period (from implant until first medication change) and long-term period (from first change until up to 2 years).

Results

The antithrombotic medication chosen in the initial phase was dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in 60%, oral anticoagulation (OAC) in 27%, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in 7% and no medication in 6%. In the long-term phase SAPT was used in 65%, DAPT in 23%, no therapy in 8% and OAC in 4%. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding the ischemic endpoint both in the initial period (Kaplan-Meier estimated rate 2.9% for DAPT vs. 4.3% for OAC vs. 3.9% for SAPT or no therapy; p=0.97) and in the second period (4.2% for SAPT vs. 1.8% for DAPT vs. 3.5% for no therapy; p=0.36). With respect to bleeding events the only difference was found in the initial phase with a higher incidence in patients under SAPT or no therapy (1.0% for DAPT vs. 0.8% for OAC vs. 7.4% for SAPT or no therapy; p=0.01). No differences in bleeding complications were observed during the second period (2.6% for SAPT vs. 2.9% for DAPT vs. 2.2% for no therapy; p=0.88).

Conclusions

Tailored antithrombotic treatment using even very reduced strategies such as SAPT or no therapy showed no significant differences regarding ischemic complications after LAA closure.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific

Impact of Left Ventricular Function and Heart Failure Symptoms on Outcomes Post Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: CASTLE-AF Trial

BACKGROUND

Recent data demonstrate promising effects on left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement following ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure. We sought to study the relationship between LVEF, New York Heart Association class on presentation, and the end points of mortality and heart failure admissions in the CASTLE-AF study (Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure) population. Furthermore, predictors for LVEF improvement were examined.

METHODS

The CASTLE-AF patients with coexisting heart failure and AF (n=363) were randomized in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to ablation (n=179) versus pharmacological therapy (n=184). Left ventricular function and New York Heart Association class were assessed at baseline (after randomization) and at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS

In the ablation arm, a significantly higher number of patients experienced an improvement in their LVEF to >35% at the end of the study (odds ratio, 2.17; P<0.001). Compared with the pharmacological therapy arm, both ablation patient groups with severe (<20%) or moderate/severe (≥20% and <35%) baseline LVEF had a significantly lower number of composite end points (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; P=0.006), all-cause mortality (HR, 0.54; P=0.019), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (HR, 0.66; P=0.017). In the ablation group, New York Heart Association I/II patients at the time of treatment had the strongest improvement in clinical outcomes (primary end point: HR, 0.43; P<0.001; mortality: HR, 0.30; P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with pharmacological treatment, AF ablation was associated with a significant improvement in LVEF, independent from the severity of left ventricular dysfunction. AF ablation should be performed at early stages of the patient's heart failure symptoms.

Preventive or Deferred Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Defibrillator (BERLIN VT)

Background:

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) reduces the recurrence of VT in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The appropriate timing of VT ablation and its effects on mortality and heart failure progression remain a matter of debate. In patients with life-threatening arrhythmias necessitating ICD implantation, we compared outcomes of preventive VT ablation (undertaken before ICD implantation to prevent ICD shocks for VT) and deferred ablation after 3 ICD shocks for VT.

Methods:

The BERLIN VT study (Preventive Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Myocardial Infarction) was a prospective, open, parallel, randomized trial performed at 26 centers. Patients with stable ischemic cardiomyopathy, a left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 50%, and documented VT were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive or deferred ablation strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and unplanned hospitalization for either symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia or worsening heart failure. Secondary outcomes included sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia and appropriate ICD therapy. We hypothesized that preventive ablation strategy would be superior to deferred ablation strategy in the intention-to-treat population.

Results:

During a mean follow-up of 396±284 days, the primary end point occurred in 25 (32.9%) of 76 patients in the preventive ablation group and 23 (27.7%) of 83 patients in the deferred ablation group (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.62–1.92]; P =0.77). On the basis of prespecified criteria for interim analyses, the study was terminated early for futility. In the preventive versus deferred ablation group, 6 versus 2 patients died (7.9% versus 2.4%; P =0.18), 8 versus 2 patients were admitted for worsening heart failure (10.4% versus 2.3%; P =0.062), and 15 versus 21 patients were hospitalized for symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia (19.5% versus 25.3%; P =0.27). Among secondary outcomes, the proportions of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia (39.7% versus 48.2%; P =0.050) and appropriate ICD therapy (34.2% versus 47.0%; P =0.020) were numerically reduced in the preventive ablation group.

Conclusions:

Preventive VT ablation before ICD implantation did not reduce mortality or hospitalization for arrhythmia or worsening heart failure during 1 year of follow-up compared with the deferred ablation strategy.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02501005.

P4762What do atrial fibrillation ablation procedural volume differences across European centers reflect? An ESC EORP registry: atrial fibrillation long-term

Background

Data from the European Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Ablation Long-Term Registry suggest that there are significant differences in the volume of AF ablation procedures performed across different centers even in the same country. If these differences in AF ablation volume between centers reflect regional, socioeconomic, infrastructural/technical or other disparities has not been addressed till now.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate patient and non-patient related differences among European AF ablation centers according to the volume of AF ablations performed.

Methods

Data for this analysis originate from the European AF Ablation Long-Term Study, a prospective registry designed to describe the clinical epidemiology of patients undergoing AF ablation. Based on 25th and 75th percentiles of AF ablation numbers performed, the participating centers were classified into high volume (HV) (≥250 procedures/year), medium volume (MV) (<250 and ≥58/year) and low volume (LV) (<58/year). Patient (demographics, comorbidities) and non-patient (center infrastructure, procedural characteristics) related differences were assessed.

Results

A total of 91 centers in 26 European countries enrolled 3368 patients. There were no significant differences concerning regional distribution, hospital/cardiology facilities or services provided among centers with the exception of electrophysiology procedures and labs which were more abundant in HV centers (p=0.02 and <0.001 respectively). HV and MV centers ablate twice more cases of long-standing persistent and persistent AF compared to LV centers, in which paroxysmal AF reaches 78.9% of all cases (Figure A). Accordingly, first AF ablation procedure was far more frequent in LV centers compared to MV and HV (85.8% vs 76.0% vs 76.1% respectively, p<0.001). Even though HV centers ablate significantly more high risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 51.4% in HV vs 46.5% in MV vs 37.2% in LV, p<0.001) (Figure B) with accompanying comorbidities, applying more elaborate ablation techniques, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose were higher among patients undergoing AF ablation in LV centers (p<0.001 for all). Despite the above-mentioned dissimilarities, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, based on adjusted data, demonstrated non-significant differences in complication rate (p=0.402) or AF recurrence rate (p=0.363) among HV, MV and LV centers.

Conclusions

Volume of AF ablations in a center is not correlated with regional or infrastructural characteristics. The higher volume in HV centers consists mainly by more long-term persistent AF and higher risk patients, suggesting that differences in volume reflect differences in experience and personnel's commitment towards AF ablation.

P1028Impact of atrial fibrillation ablation procedural volume on complication and recurrence rate across European centers. An ESC EORP registry: atrial fibrillation long-term

Background

Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective therapy in patients with symptomatic and drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite high success rates of the method, there is still heterogeneity of outcomes and complication rate across Europe. The impact of the annual procedural volume per center on success and complication rate of AF ablation, based on real-life data, has not been addressed till now.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to investigate if center AF ablation volume might be associated with one-year success or complication rate after the procedure.

Methods

Data for this analysis were extracted from the European AF Ablation Long-Term Study, a prospective registry designed to describe the clinical epidemiology of patients undergoing AF ablation. Based on 25th and 75th percentiles of AF ablation numbers performed, the participating centers were classified into high volume (HV) (≥250 procedures/year), medium volume (MV) (<250 and ≥58/year) and low volume (LV) (<58/year). One-year success was defined as patient survival free from any atrial arrhythmia, from the end of the 3-month blanking period to 12 months following the ablation procedure.

Results

A total of 91 centers in 26 European countries enrolled 3368 patients. There was a significantly higher reporting of cardiovascular complications in LV centers (5.2%), especially pericarditis (0.6%) and cardiac perforation (1.4%), while the HV and MV centers reported cardiovascular complications in 3.0 and 4.3% of cases, respectively (p=0.039). Additionally, stroke incidence after ablation was significantly higher in LV centers (0.5% of cases vs 0% in HV and MV centers, p=0.008). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on adjusted data of all complications demonstrated, however, that there was not a significant difference in complication rate according to volume's center (p=0.402, Figure A). One-year success after AF ablation ranged from 77.8% in HV vs 70.5% in LV vs 77.3% in MV centers (p<0.001). Nonetheless, adjusted recurrence rate was not significantly different among centers (p=0.363, Figure B), a result driven by differences both in ablation technical characteristics and risk/severity of cases ablated in different volume centers.

Conclusions

Despite the notion that “the higher, the better”, our results suggest that AF ablation is a safe procedure with high success rates in all European centers, independent of the AF ablation procedural volume. Differences in patients and procedural characteristics may justify the equality of complication and recurrence rate among centers, since expertise level counterbalances the risk of each case.

4282Pulmonary artery denervation in patients with residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy: one-year results of the first -in-man, sham-controlled, pilot randomized clinical trial

Background

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PE) is the method of choice in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Despite the positive effect after surgery combined with medical treatment, 10–40% of patients develop residual CTEPH. Pulmonary artery denervation (PAD) is a novel treatment in PAH with optimistic results but was not tested in patients with residual CTEPH.

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of PAD using remote magnetic navigation system in patients with residual CTEPH after PE.

Methods

278 patients with CTEPH after PE were screened. 50 patients (mean age 47.6±14.3, 50% female) with a history of residual CTEPH (a resting pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mm Hg or pulmonary vascular resistance >400 dyn sec cm–5 despite medical therapy 6 months after PE) were randomized into two groups: PAD (n=25; PAD group) or medical therapy with riociguat (n=25; MED group). In both groups right heart catheterization (RHC)was performed after randomization. In the PAD group, remote magnetic navigation systemwas used to target sympathetic nerve fibers, located near bifurcation and ostia of the main brunches of right and left pulmonary arteries. This study was conducted as double-blind and sham-controlled and the primary endpoint was change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by RHC at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included 6-minute walk test (6MWT), pulmonary artery pressure, and clinical outcomes. All patients were followed for 12 months after randomization. Unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test were used for between-group comparisons of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Two patients (one in each group) developed groin hematoma which resolved without any consequences. At the end of 12 month, the PVR was significantly low in PAD group as compared with MED group (343±149 dyn sec cm–5 vs 444±145 dyn sec cm–5, respectively; mean difference −101, 95% confidence interval: −193 to −10; p=0.032). The mean, systolic and diastolic PA pressure was also reduced significantly in PAD group compared to MED group (25.8±7.3mm Hg vs 33.8±6.4 mm Hg, 46.2±14.1mm Hg vs 54.2±8.1 mm Hg,13.2±5.3mm Hg vs 20.2±4.8mm Hg; p<0.001, p=0.002, p<0.001, respectively). The PAD group demonstrated significant improvement of the 6MWT over MED group (470±84 m vs 399±116 m, respectively, p=0.031). In the PADN group 1 (4%) patient was hospitalized due to heart failure progression compared to 7 (29%) patients in MED group (p=0.049). One patient in PAD group and two patients in MED group died.

Conclusions

Pulmonary artery denervation in patients with residual pulmonary hypertension was safe and effective, and resulted in substantial reduction of pulmonaryvascular resistance and pulmonary artery pressure during 12 months follow up, accompanied by improved 6-minute walk test and reduced need for hospitalization. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02745106

Acknowledgement/Funding

Grant from Biosense Webster

P341Which patients with atrial fibrillation undergo an ablation procedure today in Europe? A report from the ESC-EHRA-EURObservational Research Programme

Aims

Great heterogeneity in rhythm control management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described. The aim of this study was to investigate how selective the patient cohort referred for AF ablation is, as compared to the general AF population in Europe, and to describe the governing mechanisms for such selection.

Methods

Descriptive comparative statistical analyses of the baseline characteristics were performed between the cohorts of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term (ESC-EORP EHRA AFA-LT) Registry, designed to provide a picture of contemporary real-world AF ablation, and the AF population from the AF-General (ESC-EORP EHRA AF-Gen) PilotRegistry. Data collection was performed using a web-based system.

Results

In the AFA and in the AFG pilot registries 3593 and 3049 patients were enrolled, respectively. Patients who underwent AF ablation were younger,more commonly male, and had significantly less co-morbidities. Lone AF was predominant in AFA patients who were at lower risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc >5: 2.9% vs. 24.5%, all P<0.001) and bleeding (HAS-BLED ≥2: 8.5% vs. 40.5%, P<0.001) but with EHRA scores >1 and more prevalentAF-related symptoms such as palpitations, fatigue and weakness (all p<0.001)as compared to the general AF patients. AFA patients were significantly more often male, had higher LV ejection fraction (59.5% vs. 52.4%) and smaller left atrial size on echocardiogram (P<0.001 each).

Conclusions

The comparison of the patient chorts in the AFA and AFG registries showed that AF ablation in European clinical practice is mostly performed in relatively young, symptomatic and otherwise relatively healthy patients.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Abbott Vascular Int.; Amgen Cardiovascular, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance

In-hospital and 12-month follow-up outcome from the ESC-EORP EHRA Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term registry: sex differences

Aim

The purpose of this study was to compare sex differences of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) and to analyse the opportunities for improved outcomes.

Methods and results

All data were collected from the Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term registry, a prospective, multinational study conducted by the ESC-EORP European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) under the EURObservational Research Programme (ESC-EORP). A total of 104 centres in 27 European countries participated. Of 3593 included patients, 1146 (31.9%) were female. Female patients were older (61.0 vs. 56.4 years; P &lt; 0.001), had more comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and obesity), more episodes of arrhythmias per month (6.9 vs. 6.2; P &lt; 0.001), and a higher average EHRA score (2.6 vs. 2.4; P &lt; 0.001). The duration of the procedure was shorter in females (160.1 min vs. 167.9 min; P &lt; 0.001), irrespective of additional ablation lesions added to pulmonary vein isolation. Overall cardiovascular complications were more frequent in women than in men (5.7% vs. 3.4%; P &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, cardiac perforations (3.8% vs. 1.3%; P = 0.011) and neurological complications (2.2% vs. 0.3%; P = 0.004) were found in females in less experienced centres than in experienced ones. On a final note, at 12 months, AF recurrence rate was similar in females and males (34.4% vs. 34.2%; P = 0.897), but more females were still on antiarrhythmic drugs (50.6% vs. 44.1%; P &lt; 0.001) when compared with men.

Conclusion

Females underwent CA procedures for AF less frequently than males throughout Europe, despite more recurrent symptoms. With the same success rate, severe acute complications remained considerable in females, especially in less experienced centres.

Adapting detection sensitivity based on evidence of irregular sinus arrhythmia to improve atrial fibrillation detection in insertable cardiac monitors

Aims

Intermittent change in p-wave discernibility during periods of ectopy and sinus arrhythmia is a cause of inappropriate atrial fibrillation (AF) detection in insertable cardiac monitors (ICM). To address this, we developed and validated an enhanced AF detection algorithm.

Methods and results

Atrial fibrillation detection in Reveal LINQ ICM uses patterns of incoherence in RR intervals and absence of P-wave evidence over a 2-min period. The enhanced algorithm includes P-wave evidence during RR irregularity as evidence of sinus arrhythmia or ectopy to adaptively optimize sensitivity for AF detection. The algorithm was developed and validated using Holter data from the XPECT and LINQ Usability studies which collected surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and continuous ICM ECG over a 24–48 h period. The algorithm detections were compared with Holter annotations, performed by multiple reviewers, to compute episode and duration detection performance. The validation dataset comprised of 3187 h of valid Holter and LINQ recordings from 138 patients, with true AF in 37 patients yielding 108 true AF episodes ≥2-min and 449 h of AF. The enhanced algorithm reduced inappropriately detected episodes by 49% and duration by 66% with <1% loss in true episodes or duration. The algorithm correctly identified 98.9% of total AF duration and 99.8% of total sinus or non-AF rhythm duration. The algorithm detected 97.2% (99.7% per-patient average) of all AF episodes ≥2-min, and 84.9% (95.3% per-patient average) of detected episodes involved AF.

Conclusion

An enhancement that adapts sensitivity for AF detection reduced inappropriately detected episodes and duration with minimal reduction in sensitivity.

Combined atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure: long-term follow-up from a large multicentre registry

Aims

Long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA) and consequently the potential for stroke reduction remain unpredictable. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective mechanical alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in AF patients. This study aims to evaluate long-term clinical results of combined CA and LAAC in one single procedure.

Methods and results

Patients with non-valvular AF who underwent combined CA and LAAC procedure were included in the retrospective compilation of independent prospective general LAAC registries at the individual centres. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) was used to evaluate device position and LAA sealing. Between 2009 and 2015, 349 patients with AF (58% male, age 63.1 ± 8.2 years; score for stroke prediction in AF patients (CHA2DS2-VASc) 3.0; score for major bleeding in patients on anticoagulation (HAS-BLED) 3.0; 56% paroxysmal AF) were included. Indications for LAAC included previous stroke (38%), history of bleeding (22%), and physician/patient preference (29%). Periprocedural complications up to 30 days included pericardial effusion (1.5%) and one minor stroke (0.3%) but no death. After 6 weeks, TOE showed successful sealing of the LAA in 98.9%. After 35 months of follow-up, 51% of patients had AF recurrence. A total of nine ischaemic strokes were recorded, resulting in an annualized stroke rate of 0.9% compared to an expected stroke rate of 3.2% without anticoagulation and combined treatment.

Conclusion

This large pooled multicentre analysis of five prospective registries shows that combining CA and LAAC is feasible, safe, and successful. Long-term follow-up shows greatly reduced stroke and bleeding rates despite recurrence of AF in more than half of the patients.

Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Catheter ablation is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation (AF), but its effects on long-term mortality and stroke risk are uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether catheter ablation is more effective than conventional medical therapy for improving outcomes in AF.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation trial is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial involving 126 centers in 10 countries. A total of 2204 symptomatic patients with AF aged 65 years and older or younger than 65 years with 1 or more risk factors for stroke were enrolled from November 2009 to April 2016, with follow-up through December 31, 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

The catheter ablation group (n = 1108) underwent pulmonary vein isolation, with additional ablative procedures at the discretion of site investigators. The drug therapy group (n = 1096) received standard rhythm and/or rate control drugs guided by contemporaneous guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. Among 13 prespecified secondary end points, 3 are included in this report: all-cause mortality; total mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization; and AF recurrence.

RESULTS

Of the 2204 patients randomized (median age, 68 years; 37.2% female; 42.9% had paroxysmal AF and 57.1% had persistent AF), 89.3% completed the trial. Of the patients assigned to catheter ablation, 1006 (90.8%) underwent the procedure. Of the patients assigned to drug therapy, 301 (27.5%) ultimately received catheter ablation. In the intention-to-treat analysis, over a median follow-up of 48.5 months, the primary end point occurred in 8.0% (n = 89) of patients in the ablation group vs 9.2% (n = 101) of patients in the drug therapy group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.65-1.15]; P = .30). Among the secondary end points, outcomes in the ablation group vs the drug therapy group, respectively, were 5.2% vs 6.1% for all-cause mortality (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.60-1.21]; P = .38), 51.7% vs 58.1% for death or cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.74-0.93]; P = .001), and 49.9% vs 69.5% for AF recurrence (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.45-0.60]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with AF, the strategy of catheter ablation, compared with medical therapy, did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. However, the estimated treatment effect of catheter ablation was affected by lower-than-expected event rates and treatment crossovers, which should be considered in interpreting the results of the trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00911508.

Combining Watchman left atrial appendage closure and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: multicentre registry results of feasibility and safety during implant and 30 days follow-up

Aims

Long-term results from catheter ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) remain uncertain and clinical practice guidelines recommend continuation of long-term oral anticoagulation in patients with a high stroke risk. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with Watchman has emerged as an alternative to long-term anticoagulation for patients accepting of the procedural risks. We report on the initial results of combining catheter ablation procedures for AF and LAAC in a multicentre registry.

Methods and results

Data were pooled from two prospective, real-world Watchman LAAC registries running in parallel in Europe/Middle-East/Russia (EWOLUTION) and Asia/Australia (WASP) between 2013 and 2015. Of the 1140 patients, 139 subjects at 10 centres underwent a concomitant AF ablation and LAAC procedure. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.4 ± 1.4 and HAS-BLED score 1.5 ± 0.9. Successful Watchman implantation was achieved in 100% of patients. The overall 30-day serious adverse event (SAE) rate was 8.7%, with the device and/or procedure-related SAE rate of 1.4%. One pericardial effusion required percutaneous drainage, but there were no strokes, device embolization, or deaths at 30 days. The 30-day bleeding SAE rate was 2.9% with 55% of patients prescribed NOAC and 38% taking warfarin post-procedure.

Conclusion

The outcomes from these international, multicentre registries support the feasibility and safety of performing combined procedures of ablation and Watchman LAAC for patients with non-valvular AF and high stroke risk. Further data are needed on long-term outcomes for the hybrid technique on all-cause stroke and mortality.

Long-term suppression of atrial fibrillation by botulinum toxin injection into epicardial fat pads in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Three-year follow-up of a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin (BTX) injections into epicardial fat pads in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has resulted in suppression of atrial fibrillation (AF) during the early postoperative period through 1-year of follow-up in a pilot program.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to report 3-year AF patterns by the use of implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs).

METHODS

Sixty patients with a history of paroxysmal AF and indications for CABG were randomized 1:1 to either BTX or placebo injections into 4 posterior epicardial fat pads. All patients received an ICM with regular follow-up for 3 years after surgery. The primary end point of the extended follow-up period was incidence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia after 30 days of procedure until 36 months on no antiarrhythmic drugs. The secondary end points included clinical events and AF burden.

RESULTS

At the end of 36 months, the incidence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 23.3% in the BTX group vs 50% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.88; P = .02). AF burden at 12, 24, and 36 months was significantly lower in the BTX group than in the placebo group: 0.22% vs 1.88% (P = .003), 1.6% vs 9.5% (P < .001), and 1.3% vs 6.9% (P = .007), respectively. In the BTX group, 2 patients (7%) were hospitalized during follow-up compared with 10 (33%) in the placebo group (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Injection of BTX into epicardial fat pads in patients undergoing CABG resulted in a sustained and substantial reduction in atrial tachyarrhythmia incidence and burden during 3-year follow-up, accompanied by reduction in hospitalizations.

Impact of body mass index on the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Objectives

The association between obesity and atrial fibrillation (AF) is well-established. We aimed to evaluate the impact of index body mass index (BMI) on AF recurrence at 12 months following catheter ablation using propensity-weighted analysis. In addition, periprocedural complications and fluoroscopy details were examined to assess overall safety in relationship to increasing BMI ranges.

Methods

Baseline, periprocedural and follow-up data were collected on consecutive patients scheduled for AF ablation. There were no specific exclusion criteria. Patients were categorised according to baseline BMI in order to assess the outcomes for each category.

Results

Among 3333 patients, 728 (21.8%) were classified as normal (BMI <25.0 kg/m2), 1537 (46.1%) as overweight (BMI 25.5–29.0 kg/m2) and 1068 (32.0%) as obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2). Procedural duration and radiation dose were higher for overweight and obese patients compared with those with a normal BMI (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). An index BMI ≥30 kg/m2 led to a 1.2-fold increased likelihood of experiencing recurrent AF at 12-months follow-up as compared with overweight patients (HR 1.223; 95% CI 1.047 to 1.429; p=0.011), while no significant correlation was found between overweight and normal BMI groups (HR 0.954; 95% CI 0.798 to 1.140; p=0.605) and obese versus normal BMI (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.965 to 1.412; p=0.112).

Conclusions

Patients with a baseline BMI ≥30 kg/m2 have a higher recurrence rate of AF following catheter ablation and therefore lifestyle modification to target obesity preprocedure should be considered in these patients.

Safety and efficacy of early anticoagulation drug regimens after WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure: three-month data from the EWOLUTION prospective, multicentre, monitored international WATCHMAN LAA closure registry

AIMS

While LAA closure has recently been incorporated into both European and US guidelines for stroke prevention, uncertainties regarding post-procedural drug therapy so far limit its adoption. The aim of this analysis is to compare real-world outcome data stratified for the post-procedural drug regimen employed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One thousand and five patients were implanted with a WATCHMAN device in the prospective EWOLUTION study at 47 centres; 73.5% of the patients were deemed contraindicated for long-term OAC therapy. Here we report on three-month data including the first follow-up TOE exam for 94% of the study population. Following LAA closure, patients received DAPT, VKA, NOAC, single antiplatelet or no therapy (60.3%, 15.4%, 10.9%, 7% and 6.5%, respectively). Device thrombus (2.6%), stroke (0.4%) and major bleeding SAE (2.6%) rates were low overall and did not vary by post-implantation medication strategy. Patients on NOAC had the lowest bleeding rate, without an increase in device thrombus or stroke rates.

CONCLUSIONS

LAA closure with the WATCHMAN device is feasible in patients with a relative or absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation. Neither DAPT nor NOAC therapy leads to a significant increase in device thrombus, stroke or bleeding compared to the standard VKA regimen. Numerically, NOAC therapy had the lowest event rate.

Incidence of pericardial effusion after left atrial appendage closure: The impact of underlying heart rhythm-Data from the EWOLUTION study

INTRODUCTION

Pericardial effusion/tamponade (PE/PT) is a rare but serious complication following left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). It may be speculated that LAA contraction during sinus rhythm (SR) exerts mechanical force on the device that eventually leads to PE. We sought to determine the incidence and predictors of PE following LAAC using Watchman with special emphasis on the underlying heart rhythm during implant.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 47 centers in 13 European countries 1,020 patients underwent LAAC and data on baseline rhythm were available from 1,010 patients (mean age 73 ± 9 years, 60% male, median CHA2DS2-VASc = 4). Data were collected via electronic case report forms. A Cox proportional hazard model was calculated adjusting for multiple variables: age, gender, number of recaptures, and device oversizing. During implant, 41% and 59% of patients were in SR and atrial fibrillation (AF), respectively. PE/PT rate was significantly lower in patients implanted during AF at day 30 postimplant (n = 1; 0.2% vs. n = 6; 1.5%; P = 0.02). No PE requiring intervention occurred in the AF group compared to 5 events (1.2%) in the SR group (P = 0.01). While univariate analysis identified SR and gender as predictors for PE/tamponade, multivariate analysis only showed a statistical trend for both variables.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of PE/PT was very low after LAAC using Watchman. Although SR was not identified as an independent predictor of PE/PT, all events requiring intervention occurred in patients with SR. It may be advisable to perform an extended echocardiographic follow-up in that patient population.

Pulmonary vein isolation with concomitant renal artery denervation is associated with reduction in both arterial blood pressure and atrial fibrillation burden: Data from implantable cardiac monitor

BACKGROUND

Renal artery denervation (RDN) has provided incremental atrial fibrillation (AF) suppression after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with AF in the setting of drug-resistant hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between changes of mean blood pressure (BP) and AF recurrences/AF burden after PVI combined with RDN.

METHODS

All patients from two randomized studies with symptomatic paroxysmal AF and/or persistent AF and resistant hypertension who underwent PVI-only (n=37) or PVI with RDN (n=39), and implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) implantation were eligible for this study. Mixed-effects linear models were used to investigate the effect of RDN on mean BP and mean AF burden and associations between the two during the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Concomitant RDN was associated with a significant reduction in both mean AF burden (2.43 [95% CI: 1.76-3.09] % vs 6.95 [95% CI: 5.44-8.45] %) and mean BP (104 [95% CI: 103-106] mm Hg vs 112 [95% CI: 110-113] mm Hg). Decrease in mean BP was positively correlated with decline in mean AF burden: reduction of 5-10 mm Hg was accompanied by a 7.0% decreased mean AF burden, with greater reduction (up to 20 mm Hg) associated with on average 17.7% lower mean AF burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal artery denervation when added to PVI decreases AF recurrences, AF burden, and mean BP. Reduction in mean BP is associated with both AF burden and recurrences. Further large-scale studies are needed to define the mechanistic pathway(s) of the antiarrhythmic effects of RDN.

Three-months optical coherence tomography analysis of a biodegradable polymer, sirolimus-eluting stent

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess early neointimal healing by optical coherence tomography (OCT) 3 months after implantation of the ultrathin Orsiro® sirolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer.

BACKGROUND

New generations of drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer have been developed to avoid the continued vascular irritation of durable polymers.

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label study, 34 patients received an Orsiro® sirolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer. In a subgroup of patients (n = 15), the intervention was performed under OCT guidance. All patients underwent OCT-examination at three months. The primary endpoint was 3-month neointimal healing (NIH) score, calculated by weighing the presence of filling defects, malapposed and uncovered struts. Secondary endpoint was maturity of tissue coverage at 3 months.

RESULTS

At 3 months, NIH score was 13.7 (5.4-22), covered struts per lesion were 90% (84-97%), malapposed struts were 2.7% (0.8-5.4%) and rate of mature tissue coverage was 47% (42-53%). No target lesion failure occurred up to 12 months. Patients with OCT-guided stent implantation demonstrated a trend toward earlier stent healing as demonstrated by superior NIH scores (angio guided: 17.6% [8.8-26.4]; OCT-guided: 9.8% [4.0-15.5]; mean difference -8, [95%CI: -18.7-2.9], P = 0.123). This group had significantly more covered struts per lesion (angio-guided: 86% [82-90]; 95% [92-99]; mean difference 9% [95%CI: 3-15], P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Orsiro® sirolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer shows early vascular healing with a high rate of strut coverage at 3-month follow-up. OCT guided stent implantation had a positive impact on early vascular healing.

Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation during isthmus ablation for atrial flutter: Three-year outcomes of the PREVENT AF I study

INTRODUCTION

The PREVENT AF I study demonstrated that prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with pure typical atrial flutter (AFL) resulted in substantial reduction of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) during 1-year follow-up as assessed by continuous implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). The objective of this study was to assess 3-year outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty patients with documented AFL were randomized to either cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation alone (n = 25) or CTI with concomitant PVI (n = 25). The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia with the monthly burden exceeding 0.5% on the ICM. At the end of 3 years, freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32-72%) in the CTI plus PVI group as compared to 20% (95% CI: 9-44%) in the CTI-only group (P = 0.01). Freedom from redo procedures was also higher: 92% (95% CI: 82-100%) versus 68% (95% CI: 52-89%), respectively (P = 0.027). The 3-year AF burden favored the combined ablation group: 6.2% versus 16.8% (P = 0.03). In the CTI-only group, 12 (48%) patients were hospitalized compared to 4 (16%) in the PVI + CTI group (P = 0.03). Two patients in the CTI-only group developed stroke with no serious adverse events in the PVI + CTI group.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic PVI in patients with only typical AFL resulted in a significant reduction of new-onset AF and burden during long-term follow-up as assessed by ICM, with consequent reduction in hospitalizations and need to perform repeat ablation for AF.

Contemporary management of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: in-hospital and 1-year follow-up findings from the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry

Aims

The ESC-EHRA Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term registry is a prospective, multinational study that aims at providing an accurate picture of contemporary real-world ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib) and its outcome.

Methods and results

A total of 104 centres in 27 European countries participated and were asked to enrol 20-50 consecutive patients scheduled for first and re-do AFib ablation. Pre-procedural, procedural and 1-year follow-up data were captured on a web-based electronic case record form. Overall, 3630 patients were included, of which 3593 underwent an AFib ablation (98.9%). Median age was 59 years and 32.4% patients had lone atrial fibrillation. Pulmonary vein isolation was attempted in 98.8% of patients and achieved in 95-97%. AFib-related symptoms were present in 97%. In-hospital complications occurred in 7.8% and one patient died due to an atrioesophageal fistula. One-year follow-up was performed in 3180 (88.6%) at a median of 12.4 months (11.9-13.4) after ablation: 52.8% by clinical visit, 44.2% by telephone contact and 3.0% by contact with the general practitioner. At 12-months, the success rate with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) was 73.6%. A significant portion (46%) was still on AADs. Late complications included 14 additional deaths (4 cardiac, 4 vascular, 6 other causes) and 333 (10.7%) other complications.

Conclusion

AFib ablation in clinical practice is mostly performed in symptomatic, relatively young and otherwise healthy patients. Overall success rate is satisfactory, but complication rate remains considerable and a significant portion of patients remain on AADs. Monitoring after ablation shows wide variations. Antithrombotic treatment after ablation shows insufficient guideline-adherence.

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Mortality and morbidity are higher among patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure than among those with heart failure alone. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation has been proposed as a means of improving outcomes among patients with heart failure who are otherwise receiving appropriate treatment.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation who did not have a response to antiarrhythmic drugs, had unacceptable side effects, or were unwilling to take these drugs to undergo either catheter ablation (179 patients) or medical therapy (rate or rhythm control) (184 patients) for atrial fibrillation in addition to guidelines-based therapy for heart failure. All the patients had New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less, and an implanted defibrillator. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening heart failure.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 37.8 months, the primary composite end point occurred in significantly fewer patients in the ablation group than in the medical-therapy group (51 patients [28.5%] vs. 82 patients [44.6%]; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.87; P=0.007). Significantly fewer patients in the ablation group died from any cause (24 [13.4%] vs. 46 [25.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.86; P=0.01), were hospitalized for worsening heart failure (37 [20.7%] vs. 66 [35.9%]; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.83; P=0.004), or died from cardiovascular causes (20 [11.2%] vs. 41 [22.3%]; hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.84; P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure was associated with a significantly lower rate of a composite end point of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening heart failure than was medical therapy. (Funded by Biotronik; CASTLE-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00643188 .).