1
|
Lampert R, Chung EH, Ackerman MJ, Arroyo AR, Darden D, Deo R, Dolan J, Etheridge SP, Gray BR, Harmon KG, James CA, Kim JH, Krahn AD, La Gerche A, Link MS, MacIntyre C, Mont L, Salerno JC, Shah MJ. 2024 HRS expert consensus statement on arrhythmias in the athlete: Evaluation, treatment, and return to play. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:e151-e252. [PMID: 38763377 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
Youth and adult participation in sports continues to increase, and athletes may be diagnosed with potentially arrhythmogenic cardiac conditions. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide electrophysiologists, sports cardiologists, and associated health care team members in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of arrhythmic conditions in the athlete with the goal of facilitating return to sport and avoiding the harm caused by restriction. Expert, disease-specific risk assessment in the context of athlete symptoms and diagnoses is emphasized throughout the document. After appropriate risk assessment, management of arrhythmias geared toward return to play when possible is addressed. Other topics include shared decision-making and emergency action planning. The goal of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all areas in the care of athletes with arrhythmic conditions. Areas in need of further study are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Lampert
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Eugene H Chung
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Rajat Deo
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joe Dolan
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Belinda R Gray
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Andrew D Krahn
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andre La Gerche
- Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark S Link
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Lluis Mont
- Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jack C Salerno
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Maully J Shah
- Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vijayaraman P, Trivedi RS, Koneru JN, Sharma PS, De Pooter J, Schaller RD, Cano Ó, Whinnett ZI, Migliore F, Ponnusamy SS, Skeete JR, Zanon F, Heuverswyn FV, Kolominsky J, Pittorru R, Mumtaz M, Ellenbogen KA, Herweg B. Transvenous extraction of conduction system pacing leads: An international multicenter (TECSPAM) study. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:1953-1961. [PMID: 38762819 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP) by His bundle pacing or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is incorporated into Heart Rhythm Society guidelines for the management of bradycardia and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Despite increasing adoption with both lumenless leads and stylet-driven leads, concerns regarding the feasibility and safety of the extraction of CSP leads remain. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to report on the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of the extraction of CSP leads. METHODS Patients undergoing the extraction of CSP leads from 10 international centers were enrolled in this retrospective study. Data regarding indications, lead location, lead type, extraction tools, procedural success, complications, and reimplantation in the conduction system were collected. RESULTS Overall, 341 patients (age 69 ± 15 years; female 117 (34%); cardiomyopathy 157 (46%); lead dwell time 22 ± 26 months) underwent the extraction of 224 His bundle pacing and 117 LBBAP leads (lumenless leads 321; stylet-driven leads 20). Complete procedural success was achieved in 338 (99%), while clinical success was 100% with retained distal fragments in 3 patients (1%). Among patients with a lead dwell time of >6 months (6-193 months; n = 226), manual extraction was successful in 198 (87%), mechanical tools in 22 (10%), and laser in 6 (3%). Femoral tools were necessary in 3 patients. Minor complications occurred in 7 patients (2.1%). Reimplantation in the conduction system was successful in 233 of 244 patients attempted (95%). CONCLUSION The overall success rates of the extraction of CSP leads were very high (although the LBBAP lead dwell time was <3 years), with a low need for extraction tools and minimal complication. Reimplantation in the conduction system is feasible and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert D Schaller
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Óscar Cano
- Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Federico Migliore
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Raimondo Pittorru
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Mishal Mumtaz
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Bengt Herweg
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu W, Fulati Z, Tian F, Xu N, Cheng Y, Zhao Y, Chen H, Shu X. Relationship of different left bundle branch pacing sites and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. Heart Rhythm 2024:S1547-5271(24)03285-5. [PMID: 39233256 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.08.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel physiological pacing modality. However, whether it delivers comparable efficacy with different capture sites in patients with heart failure remains unclear. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the association between different pacing sites and the response of LBBP. METHODS Forty-three consecutive patients with heart failure, referred for successful LBBP implantation, were prospectively recruited in this study. Patients were assigned to 3 subgroups according to the paced QRS complex morphology (left bundle branch trunk pacing [LBTP], left posterior fascicular pacing, or left anterior fascicular pacing groups). Echocardiograms and electrocardiograms were recorded and analyzed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS The response rate was 95.0%, 88.2%, and 83.3% in LBTP, left posterior fascicular pacing, and left anterior fascicular pacing groups, respectively. All subgroups were efficient in narrowing the QRS complex (QRS complex narrowing: 38.1 ± 10.8 ms, 36.4 ± 12.6 ms, and 40.8 ± 10.8 ms) and improving cardiac function (LVEF improvement: 25.7% ± 8.1%, 15.3% ± 8.1%, and 18.8% ± 4.4%). Compared with left fascicular pacing, LBTP resulted in longer peak left ventricular activation time (76.5 ± 10.2 ms vs 82.3 ± 6.5 ms; P = .037) and shorter duration from intrinsicoid deflection in V1 or V2 to QRS end (128.0 ± 6.0 ms vs 113.3 ± 5.2 ms; P<.0001), along with better improvement in septal systolic longitudinal strain (P = .007) and lateral-septal myocardial loading inhomogeneity (P = .036). Linear regression analysis further revealed that left bundle branch capture sites were strongly associated with the improvement in peak strain dispersion (model R2 = 0.586; P = .042) and LVEF (model R2 = 0.425; P < .0001). CONCLUSION Different left bundle branch capture sites led to a subtle difference in mechanical synchrony, which may, in turn, affect LVEF improvement in patients with heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Liu
- Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zibire Fulati
- Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fangyan Tian
- Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nuo Xu
- Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yufei Cheng
- Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingjie Zhao
- Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haiyan Chen
- Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianhong Shu
- Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vijayaraman P, Longacre C, Kron J, Subzposh F, Zimmerman P, Butler K, Crossley GH, Ellenbogen KA. Conduction system pacing associated with reduced heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality compared with traditional right ventricular pacing in the Medicare population. Heart Rhythm 2024:S1547-5271(24)03270-3. [PMID: 39226948 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2024] [Revised: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as an alternative therapy to traditional right ventricular (RV) pacing. However, most CSP studies reflect small cohorts or single-center experience. OBJECTIVE This analysis compared CSP with dual-chamber (DC) RV pacing in a large, population-based cohort using data from the Micra Coverage with Evidence Development study. METHODS Medicare administrative claims data were used to identify patients implanted with a DC RV pacemaker. Lead placement data from Medtronic's device registration system identified patients treated with CSP (n = 6197) using a 3830 catheter-delivered lead or DC RV (non-3830 lead, non-CSP placement; n = 16,989) at the same centers. CSP patients were stratified into left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP; n = 4738) and His bundle pacing (HBP; n = 1459). Incident heart failure hospitalizations, all-cause mortality, complication rates, and reinterventions at 6 months were analyzed. RESULTS CSP patients with a 3830 catheter-delivered lead experienced significantly lower rates of incident heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; P = .02) and all-cause mortality at 6 months compared with DC RV patients (HR, 0.66; P < .0001). There was no difference in chronic complications (HR, 0.97; P = .62) or need for reintervention (HR, 0.95; P = .63) with CSP compared with DC RV, although LBBAP patients experienced significantly lower rates of complications (HR, 0.71; P = .001) compared with HBP. CONCLUSION DC pacemaker patients treated with CSP using a 3830 catheter-delivered lead experienced significant all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization benefits compared with DC RV pacing. LBBAP had lower complications compared with HBP. These real-world results align with findings in small clinical studies demonstrating the benefits of CSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jordana Kron
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Faiz Subzposh
- Geisinger Heart Institute, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang L, Tan C, Lei J, LEE CHONGYOU. Review of Atrioventricular Node Ablation Combined with Permanent His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2024; 25:312. [PMID: 39355600 PMCID: PMC11440395 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2509312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
With the advancement of pacing technologies, His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) has been increasingly recognized as superior to conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) and biventricular pacing (BVP). This method is characterized by a series of strategies that either strengthen the native cardiac conduction system or fully preserve physical atrioventricular activation, ensuring optimal clinical outcomes. Treatment with HPCSP is divided into two pacing categories, His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), and when combined with atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA), can significantly improve left ventricular (LV) function. It effectively prevents tachycardia and regulates ventricular rates, demonstrating its efficacy and safety across different QRS wave complex durations. Therefore, HPCSP combined with AVNA can alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who are unresponsive to multiple radiofrequency ablation, particularly those with concomitant heart failure (HF) who are at risk of further deterioration. As a result, this "pace and ablate" strategy could become a first-line treatment for refractory AF. As a pacing modality, HBP faces challenges in achieving precise localization and tends to increase the pacing threshold. Thus, LBBP has emerged as a novel approach within HPCSP, offering lower thresholds, higher sensing amplitudes, and improved success rates, potentially making it a preferable alternative to HBP. Future large-scale, prospective, and randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate patient selection and implantation technology, aiming to clarify the differential clinical outcomes between pacing modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Early Prediction and Intervention of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Peking University People's Hospital, 100035 Beijing, China
| | - Chen Tan
- Department of Cardiology, Hebei Yanda Hospital, 065201 Langfang, Hebei, China
| | - Jingshu Lei
- Department of Cardiology, Hebei Yanda Hospital, 065201 Langfang, Hebei, China
| | - CHONGYOU LEE
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Early Prediction and Intervention of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Peking University People's Hospital, 100035 Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gardas R, Loboda D, Biernat J, Soral T, Kulesza P, Gladysz-Wanha S, Joniec M, Sajdok M, Zub K, Golba KS. Extraction of lumenless pacing leads from the His bundle and left bundle branch area: outcomes of the high-volume centre. Europace 2024; 26:euae213. [PMID: 39137240 PMCID: PMC11363868 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS The application of conduction system pacing (CSP) in clinical practice is growing, and the need for lead extraction will also increase. The data on outcomes and safety of CSP lead extraction are limited. The aim of this study was to assess procedural outcomes and safety of CSP lead removal. METHODS AND RESULTS Forty-seven patients from the EXTRACT Registry with the indication for CSP lead removal were enrolled in the study conducted at the Department of Electrocardiology in Katowice, Poland. Extraction technique, outcomes, safety, and complication were evaluated. Forty-three (91.5%) leads were successfully removed, and 41 (87.2%) were removed with traction only. The dwelling time of 28 extracted leads was longer than 1 year, and the oldest extracted lead was implanted for 89 months. Seven (14.9%) leads were removed from the left bundle branch (LBB) area and 36 from the His bundle (HB). Transient complete atrioventricular block occurred during the procedure in two patients. In 27 out of 31 attempts (87.1%), new CSP leads were implanted: nine (33.3%) HB pacing leads and 18 (66.7%) LBB area pacing leads. CONCLUSION The CSP lead extraction is safe and feasible with a low complication rate and high rate of CSP lead reimplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafal Gardas
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice, Ziolowa 45/47, Katowice 40–635, Poland
| | - Danuta Loboda
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice, Ziolowa 45/47, Katowice 40–635, Poland
| | - Jolanta Biernat
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Tomasz Soral
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Piotr Kulesza
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Sylwia Gladysz-Wanha
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Michal Joniec
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Mateusz Sajdok
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Kamil Zub
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Krzysztof S Golba
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice, Ziolowa 45/47, Katowice 40–635, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang Q, He C, Fan X, Zhu H, Li X, Liu Z, Yao Y. Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing in older patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024. [PMID: 39210616 DOI: 10.1111/pace.15056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is safe and effective, but studies in older patients are lacking. This study compared the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of LBBAP and right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients aged ≥75 years. METHODS This prospective observational study included older patients with symptomatic bradycardia who underwent LBBAP or RVP between 2019 and 2022. Clinical data, including pacing and electrophysiological characteristics, echocardiographic measurements, and device-related complications were collected. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and upgrade to biventricular pacing. Secondary outcomes included changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). RESULTS Of 267 included patients, 110 underwent LBBAP and 157 underwent RVP. LBBAP was successful in 109 patients (success rate: 99.1%), with one patient eventually undergoing RVP. The pacing parameters of LBBAP were similar to those of RVP, except for a significantly narrower paced QRS duration (112.8 ± 11.6 vs. 138.3 ± 23.9 ms, p < .001). Ventricular lead implanting procedural duration was longer for LBBAP than RVP (14.0 vs. 6.0 min, p < .001), as was the fluoroscopy time (4.0 vs. 2.0 min, p < .001). During a mean follow-up period of 31.0 ± 16.8 months, the primary outcome incidence was significantly lower following LBBAP than RVP (15.1% vs. 21.1%; hazard ratio, 0.471; 95% confidence interval, 0.215-1.032; p = .036) in 149 patients (55.8%) with ventricular pacing burden > 20%. RVP reduced LVEF from 62.7 ± 4.1% at baseline to 59.8 ± 7.8% at the final follow-up (p = .001), whereas LBBAP preserved LVEF (61.4 ± 6.3% vs. 60.1 ± 7.4%, p = .429). CONCLUSION LBBAP demonstrated improved clinical outcomes compared with RVP and maintained LVEF in older patients with high ventricular pacing burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chen He
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohan Fan
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Haojie Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaofei Li
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhimin Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Yao
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tan ESJ, Soh R, Lee JY, Boey E, Chan SP, Seow SC, Teo LJT, Yeo C, Tan VH, Kojodjojo P. Feasibility, safety and outcomes of conduction system pacing for bradycardia amongst the very elderly. Sci Rep 2024; 14:18755. [PMID: 39138295 PMCID: PMC11322154 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69388-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
The impact of age (≥ 85 vs < 85 years) on clinical outcomes and pacemaker performance of conduction system pacing (CSP) compared to right ventricular pacing (RVP) were examined. Consecutive patients from a prospective, observational, multicenter study with pacemakers implanted for bradycardia were studied. The primary endpoint was a composite of heart failure (HF)-hospitalizations, pacing-induced cardiomyopathy requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy or all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were acutely successful CSP, absence of pacing-complications, optimal pacemaker performance defined as pacing thresholds < 2.5 V, R-wave amplitude ≥ 5 V and absence of complications, threshold stability (no increases of > 1 V) and persistence of His-Purkinje capture on follow-up. Among 984 patients (age 74.1 ± 11.2 years, 41% CSP, 16% ≥ 85 years), CSP was independently associated with reduced hazard of the primary endpoint compared to RVP, regardless of age-group (< 85 years: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.98; ≥ 85 years: AHR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.94). Among patients with CSP, age did not significantly impact the secondary endpoints of acute CSP success (86% vs 88%), pacing complications (19% vs 11%), optimal pacemaker performance (64% vs 69%), threshold stability (96% vs 96%) and persistent His-Purkinje capture (86% vs 91%) on follow-up (all p > 0.05). CSP improves clinical outcomes in all age-groups, without compromising procedural safety or pacemaker performance in the very elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene S J Tan
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Rodney Soh
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Jie-Ying Lee
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Elaine Boey
- Department of Cardiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siew-Pang Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Swee-Chong Seow
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lisa J T Teo
- Department of Cardiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Colin Yeo
- Department of Cardiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vern Hsen Tan
- Department of Cardiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pipin Kojodjojo
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Cardiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Watanabe R, Kato H, Yanagisawa S, Sakurai T, Ota R, Murakami H, Kada K, Tsuboi N, Inden Y, Shibata R, Murohara T. Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Relatively High His-Bundle Capture Threshold After Permanent His-Bundle Pacing - A Multicenter Clinical Study. Circ Rep 2024; 6:294-302. [PMID: 39132331 PMCID: PMC11309777 DOI: 10.1253/circrep.cr-24-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Outcomes in patients with relatively high His-bundle (HB) capture thresholds at implantation are unknown. This study aimed to compare changes in the HB capture threshold and prognosis between patients with a relatively high threshold and those with a low threshold. Methods and Results Forty-nine patients who underwent permanent HB pacing (HBP) were divided into two groups: low (<1.25 V at 1.0 ms; n=35) and high (1.25-2.49 V; n=14) baseline HB capture threshold groups. The HB capture threshold was evaluated at implantation, and after 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. HB capture threshold rise was defined as threshold rise ≥1.0 V at 1.0 ms compared with implantation measures. We compared outcomes between the groups. During a mean follow-up period of 34.6 months, the high-threshold group showed a trend toward a higher incidence of HB capture threshold of ≥2.5 V (50% vs. 14%; P=0.023), HBP abandonment (29% vs. 8.6%; P=0.091), lead revision (21% vs. 2.9%; P=0.065), and clinical events (all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, and new-onset or progression of atrial fibrillation; 50% vs. 23%; P=0.089) than the low-threshold group. A baseline HB capture threshold of ≥1.25V was an independent predictor of clinical events. Conclusions A relatively high HB capture threshold is associated with increased risk of HBP abandonment, lead revision, and poor clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Watanabe
- Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital Nagoya Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kato
- Division of Cardiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital Nagoya Japan
| | - Satoshi Yanagisawa
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan
- Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan
| | - Taku Sakurai
- Division of Cardiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital Nagoya Japan
| | - Ryusuke Ota
- Division of Cardiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital Nagoya Japan
| | - Hisashi Murakami
- Division of Cardiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital Nagoya Japan
| | - Kenji Kada
- Division of Cardiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital Nagoya Japan
| | - Naoya Tsuboi
- Division of Cardiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital Nagoya Japan
| | - Yasuya Inden
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan
| | - Rei Shibata
- Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan
| | - Toyoaki Murohara
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
König S, Hilbert S, Bode K. Conduction System Pacing: Hope, Challenges, and the Journey Forward. Curr Cardiol Rep 2024; 26:801-814. [PMID: 38976199 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02085-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Cardiac pacing has evolved in recent years currently culminating in the specific stimulation of the cardiac conduction system (conduction system pacing, CSP). This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the available literature on CSP, focusing on a critical classification of studies comparing CSP with standard treatment in the two fields of pacing for bradycardia and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure. The article will also elaborate specific benefits and limitations associated with CSP modalities of His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). RECENT FINDINGS Based on a growing number of observational studies for different indications of pacing therapy, both CSP modalities investigated are advantageous over standard treatment in terms of narrowing the paced QRS complex and preserving or improving left ventricular systolic function. Less consistent evidence exists with regard to the improvement of heart failure-related rehospitalization rates or mortality, and effect sizes vary between HBP and LBBAP. LBBAP is superior over HBP in terms of lead measurements and procedural duration. With regard to all reported outcomes, evidence from large scale randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) is still scarce. CSP has the potential to sustainably improve patient care in cardiac pacing therapy if patients are appropriately selected and limitations are considered. With this review, we offer not only a summary of existing data, but also an outlook on probable future developments in the field, as well as a detailed summary of upcoming RCTs that provide insights into how the journey of CSP continues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S König
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
- Helios Health Institute, Real World Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
| | - S Hilbert
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - K Bode
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Beer D, Vijayaraman P. Current Role of Conduction System Pacing in Patients Requiring Permanent Pacing. Korean Circ J 2024; 54:427-453. [PMID: 38859643 PMCID: PMC11306426 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) are novel methods of pacing directly pacing the cardiac conduction system. HBP while developed more than two decades ago, only recently moved into the clinical mainstream. In contrast to conventional cardiac pacing, conduction system pacing including HBP and LBBP utilizes the native electrical system of the heart to rapidly disseminate the electrical impulse and generate a more synchronous ventricular contraction. Widespread adoption of conduction system pacing has resulted in a wealth of observational data, registries, and some early randomized controlled clinical trials. While much remains to be learned about conduction system pacing and its role in electrophysiology, data available thus far is very promising. In this review of conduction system pacing, the authors review the emergence of conduction system pacing and its contemporary role in patients requiring permanent cardiac pacing.
Collapse
|
12
|
Okubo Y, Sakai T, Miyamoto S, Uotani Y, Oguri N, Furutani M, Miyauchi S, Okamura S, Tokuyama T, Nakano Y. Mid-term clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to accurate right ventricular septal pacing. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024:10.1007/s10840-024-01890-z. [PMID: 39073704 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01890-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) reportedly results in fewer adverse outcomes after implantation than conventional stylet-guided right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP), previous studies have not compared LBBAP with accurate RVSP using a delivery catheter. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between LBBAP and accurate RVSP among patients with atrioventricular block (AVB). METHODS This single-center observational study enrolled 160 patients requiring RV pacing due to symptomatic AVB between September 2018 and December 2021. Primary composite outcomes included all-cause death, hospitalization due to heart failure (HF), and upgrading to biventricular pacing. Secondary composite outcomes included any procedural and postprocedural complications. RESULTS Overall, 160 patients were analyzed (LBBAP, n = 81; RVSP, n = 79). No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. The RV pacing burden at 1 year after implantation was 90.8% ± 20.4% and 86.2% ± 22.6%, respectively (p = 0.21). During a mean follow-up of 840 ± 369 days, the incidence of the primary outcome was significantly lower with LBBAP (4.9%) compared to RVSP (22.8%) (Log-rank p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the secondary outcome between the two groups (3.7% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.65). In the multivariate analysis, baseline QRS duration, RV pacing burden, and LBBAP were independently associated with the primary outcome (baseline QRS duration: hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.02; p < 0.001; RV pacing burden: HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; p < 0.001; LBBAP: HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In patients requiring frequent RV pacing, LBBAP was associated with reduced adverse clinical outcome compared to accurate RVSP using a delivery catheter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousaku Okubo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | - Takumi Sakai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shogo Miyamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yukimi Uotani
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Naoto Oguri
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Motoki Furutani
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Miyauchi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Sho Okamura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takehito Tokuyama
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yukiko Nakano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vijayaraman P, West M, Dresing T, Oren J, Abbey S, Zimmerman P, Bauer R, Butler K, Mangrolia H. Safety and performance of conduction system pacing: Real-world experience from a product surveillance registry. Heart Rhythm 2024:S1547-5271(24)02871-6. [PMID: 38969050 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.06.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP), including His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), has been used as an alternative for pacemaker indicated patients requiring ventricular pacing. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize the safety and performance of HBP and LBBAP among patients enrolled in the Medtronic product surveillance registry (PSR). METHODS This observational analysis included patients who underwent pacemaker implantations for HBP or LBBAP with a Medtronic Model 3830 lead between January 2019 and December 2023 in the Medtronic PSR. The primary outcomes were lead-related complications and pacing capture threshold. Baseline characteristics, R-wave amplitude, impedance, and all-cause mortality were summarized. RESULTS A total of 2342 patients were included across 77 centers (mean age 74 years; 38.9% female). Of the patients implanted with a 3830 lead for CSP, 64.1% (n = 1502) had LBBAP placement and 35.9% (n = 840) had HBP placement. The most commonly reported indications for CSP were sinus node dysfunction (67.0%) and atrioventricular block (57.2%). LBBAP had lower pacing thresholds, higher R-wave sensing, and higher impedance (all P <.001) through 30 months. At 36 months postimplant, the lead complication rate for LBBAP and HBP was 2.5% and 6.3%, ,respectively with no difference in all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION In a multicenter cohort of LBBAP and HBP patients treated with the catheter-delivered 3830 lead, lead-related complication rates were low and electrical parameters were stable through 30 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael West
- Presbyterian Heart and Vascular Care, Albuquerque New Mexico
| | | | - Jess Oren
- Geisinger Heart Institute, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
| | - Sélim Abbey
- Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises, Groupe Confluent, Nantes, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mirmaksudov M, Ross S, Kongsgård E, Edvardsen T. Enhancing cardiac pacing strategies: a review of conduction system pacing compared with right and biventricular pacing and their influence on myocardial function. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2024; 25:879-887. [PMID: 38565632 PMCID: PMC11210972 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Traditional right ventricular pacing (RVP) has been linked to the deterioration of both left ventricular diastolic and systolic function. This worsening often culminates in elevated rates of hospitalization due to heart failure, an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, and increased morbidity. While biventricular pacing (BVP) has demonstrated clinical and echocardiographic improvements in patients afflicted with heart failure and left bundle branch block, it has also encountered significant challenges such as a notable portion of non-responders and procedural failures attributed to anatomical complexities. In recent times, the interest has shifted towards conduction system pacing, initially, His bundle pacing, and more recently, left bundle branch area pacing, which are seen as promising alternatives to established methods. In contrast to other approaches, conduction system pacing offers the advantage of fostering more physiological and harmonized ventricular activation by directly stimulating the His-Purkinje network. This direct pacing results in a more synchronized systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle compared with RVP and BVP. Of particular note is the capacity of conduction system pacing to yield a shorter QRS, conserve left ventricular ejection fraction, and reduce rates of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation when compared with RVP. The efficacy of conduction system pacing has also been found to have better clinical and echocardiographic improvement than BVP in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization. This review will delve into myocardial function in conduction system pacing compared with that in RVP and BVP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirakhmadjon Mirmaksudov
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Electrophysiology, Republican Specialized Scientific Practical Medical Center of Cardiology, Osiyo St. 4, 100052 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
| | - Stian Ross
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Erik Kongsgård
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Thor Edvardsen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jacobs M, Bodin A, Spiesser P, Babuty D, Clementy N, Bisson A. Single-center experience of efficacy and safety of atrioventricular node ablation after left bundle branch area pacing for the management of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024:10.1007/s10840-024-01847-2. [PMID: 38913133 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01847-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) with permanent pacing is an effective treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) prevents cardiac dyssynchrony associated with right ventricular pacing and could prevent worsening of heart failure (HF). METHODS In this retrospective monocentric study, all patients who received AVNA procedure with LBBAP were consecutively included. AVNA procedure data, electrical and echocardiographic parameters at 6 months, and clinical outcomes at 1 year were studied and compared to a matched cohort of patients who received AVNA procedure with conventional pacing between 2010 and 2023. RESULTS Seventy-five AVNA procedures associated with LBBAP were studied. AVNA in this context was feasible, with a success rate of 98.7% at first ablation, and safe without any complications. There was no threshold rise at follow-up. At 1 year, 6 (8%) patients were hospitalized for HF and 2 (2.7%) were deceased. Patients had a significant improvement in NYHA class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P ≤ 0.0001). When compared to a matched cohort of patients with AVNA and conventional pacing, AVNA data and pacing complications rates were similar. Patients with LBBAP had a better improvement of LVEF (+5.27 ± 9.62% vs. -0.48 ± 14%, P = 0.01), and a lower 1-year rate of composite outcome of hospitalization for HF or death (HR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.95, P = 0.037), significant on survival analysis (log-rank P-value = 0.03). CONCLUSION AVNA with LBBAP in patients with symptomatic AF is feasible, safe, and efficient. Hospitalization for HF or death rate was significantly lower and LVEF improvement was greater.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Jacobs
- University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de la république, Chambray-Les-Tours, 37170, France.
| | - Alexandre Bodin
- University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de la république, Chambray-Les-Tours, 37170, France
| | - Pascal Spiesser
- University Hospital of Orleans, 14 Avenue de l'Hopital, Orleans, 45100, France
| | - Dominique Babuty
- University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de la république, Chambray-Les-Tours, 37170, France
| | - Nicolas Clementy
- Clinic du Millenaire, 220 Boulevard Penelope, Montpellier, 34000, France
| | - Arnaud Bisson
- University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de la république, Chambray-Les-Tours, 37170, France
- University Hospital of Orleans, 14 Avenue de l'Hopital, Orleans, 45100, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ghosh A, Ka MA, Sriram CS, Pandurangi UM. Caveats related to conduction system pacing utilizing a proprietary deflectable mapping catheter with a stylet-driven lead. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:759-771. [PMID: 37840120 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01637-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hitherto, lumen less leads (LLLs) were routinely utilized for conduction system pacing (CSP). We report the largest experience using stylet-driven leads (SDLs) with a deflectable mapping catheter for CSP. METHODS Patients were prospectively and sequentially enrolled for CSP with SDL between June, 2021 and November, 2022 to (i) a novel deflectable mapping catheter (AgilisHisProTM, Abbott) (Group A) or (ii) a fixed curve sheath (Selectra3D, Biotronik) (Group B) in a 1:1 non-randomized fashion. The primary aim was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the CSP using SDL and deflectable mapping catheter (Group A) while reporting procedural success and intermediate-term follow-up. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients (59.4%M, mean age 67.2+/-10.6 years) were allocated to either (i) Group A (n = 40) or (ii) Group B (n = 39). In Group A (n = 40, 50% M, mean age 67.2+/-9.5 years, follow-up 210.7 + 25.1days), His bundle pacing (HBP) was the default strategy with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) for bailout. Procedural success with HBP was feasible in 17/40 (42.5%) patients with remaining 23/40 (57.5%) needing LBBaP bailout. After initial learning curve, a manual septal curve was introduced to successfully aid LBBaP in 6/23 (26.1%) cases. Procedural and follow-up parameters did not differ significantly in HBP vs. LBBaP. Head-to-head comparison was not performed between the groups owing to different default protocols (HBP-Group A, Discretionary-Group B). CONCLUSIONS Use of SDL with single-curve deflectable mapping catheter was safe, feasible and yielded moderate procedural success with HBP and frequently needed a LBBaP bailout strategy. In approximately one-fourth of the latter, an out-of-plane manual septal curve was needed to optimize LBBaP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anindya Ghosh
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Arrhythmia Heart Failure Academy, The Madras Medical Mission, 4-A, Dr. JJ Nagar, Mogappair, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Mohamed Akram Ka
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Arrhythmia Heart Failure Academy, The Madras Medical Mission, 4-A, Dr. JJ Nagar, Mogappair, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Chenni S Sriram
- Division of Cardiology, Sub-section of Electrophysiology, Children's Hospital of Michigan and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ulhas M Pandurangi
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Arrhythmia Heart Failure Academy, The Madras Medical Mission, 4-A, Dr. JJ Nagar, Mogappair, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Parlavecchio A, Vetta G, Coluccia G, Pistelli L, Caminiti R, Crea P, Ajello M, Magnocavallo M, Dattilo G, Foti R, Carerj S, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C, Della Rocca DG, Palmisano P. Success and complication rates of conduction system pacing: a meta-analytical observational comparison of left bundle branch area pacing and His bundle pacing. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:719-729. [PMID: 37642801 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01626-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and His bundle pacing (HBP) are the main strategies to achieve conduction system pacing (CSP), but only observational studies with few patients have compared the two pacing strategies, sometimes with unclear results given the different definitions of the feasibility and safety outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis aiming to compare the success and complications of LBBAP versus HBP. METHODS We systematically searched the electronic databases for studies published from inception to March 22, 2023, and focusing on LBBAP versus HBP. The study endpoints were CSP success rate, device-related complications, CSP lead-related complications and non-CSP lead-related complications. RESULTS Fifteen observational studies enrolling 2491 patients met the inclusion criteria. LBBAP led to a significant increase in procedural success [91.1% vs 80.9%; RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 1.08-1.22); p < 0.00001] with a significantly lower complication rate [1.8% vs 5.2%; RR: 0.48 (95% CI: 0.29-0.78); p = 0.003], lead-related complications [1.1% vs 4.3%; RR: 0.38 (95% CI: 0.21-0.72); p = 0.003] and lead failure/deactivation [0.2% vs 3.9%; RR: 0.16 (95% CI: 0.07-0.35); p < 0.00001] than HBP. No significant differences were found between CSP lead dislodgement and non-CSP lead-related complications. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis of observational studies showed a higher success rate of LBBAP compared to HBP with a lower incidence of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Parlavecchio
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy.
| | - Giampaolo Vetta
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Giovanni Coluccia
- Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Via S. Pio X, 73039, Tricase, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Pistelli
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Caminiti
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Pasquale Crea
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Manuela Ajello
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Michele Magnocavallo
- Arrhythmology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Via Ponte Quattro Capi 39, 00186, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Dattilo
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Scipione Carerj
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Gian Battista Chierchia
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carlo de Asmundis
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pietro Palmisano
- Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Via S. Pio X, 73039, Tricase, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vella AM, Greiss I, Mansour F, Lakkis B, Joly P, Coutu B. Cardiac resynchronization therapy through left bundle branch pacing in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava. HeartRhythm Case Rep 2024; 10:402-405. [PMID: 38983899 PMCID: PMC11228063 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Vella
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Isabelle Greiss
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Fadi Mansour
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Bassel Lakkis
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Philippe Joly
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Benoit Coutu
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kono H, Kuramitsu S, Fukunaga M, Korai K, Nagashima M, Hiroshima K, Ando K. Outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to His bundle pacing and right ventricular apical pacing in Japanese patients with bradycardia. J Arrhythm 2024; 40:333-341. [PMID: 38586856 PMCID: PMC10995588 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) emerge as better alternatives to right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) in patients with bradycardia requiring permanent cardiac pacing. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of LBBAP, HBP, and RVAP in Japanese patients with bradycardia. Methods A total of 424 patients who underwent successful pacemaker implantation (HBP, n = 53; LBBAP, n = 75; and RVAP, n = 296) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The primary study endpoint was the cumulative incidence of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) during the follow-up. Results The success rate for implantation was higher in the LBBAP group than in the HBP group (94.9% and 81.5%, respectively). Capture threshold increase >1V during the follow-up occurred in the HBP and RVAP groups (9.4% and 5.1%, respectively), while it did not in the LBBAP group. The cumulative incidence of HFH was significantly lower in the LBBAP group than the RVAP (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.12 [95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.86]; p = .034); it did not differ between the HBP and RVAP groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.17-1.34]; p = .16). Advanced age, mean percent right ventricular pacing (per 10% increase), left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, and RVAP were associated with HFH. Conclusions Compared to RVAP and HBP, LBBAP appeared more feasible and effective in patients with bradycardia requiring permanent cardiac pacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Kono
- Department of CardiologyKokura Memorial HospitalKitakyushuJapan
| | - Shoichi Kuramitsu
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineSapporo Cardiovascular Clinic, Sapporo Heart CenterSapporoJapan
| | - Masato Fukunaga
- Department of CardiologyKokura Memorial HospitalKitakyushuJapan
| | - Kengo Korai
- Department of CardiologyKokura Memorial HospitalKitakyushuJapan
| | | | | | - Kenji Ando
- Department of CardiologyKokura Memorial HospitalKitakyushuJapan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tan ESJ, Soh R, Lee JY, Boey E, Chan SP, Lim TW, Yeo WT, Leong KMW, Seow SC, Kojodjojo P. Prognostic benefits of His-Purkinje capture in physiological pacemakers for bradycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2024; 35:727-736. [PMID: 38351331 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical outcomes of long-term ventricular septal pacing (VSP) without His-Purkinje capture remain unknown. This study evaluated the differences in clinical outcomes between conduction system pacing (CSP), VSP, and right ventricular pacing (RVP). METHODS Consecutive patients with bradycardia indicated for pacing from 2016 to 2022 were prospectively followed for the clinical endpoints of heart failure (HF)-hospitalizations and all-cause mortality at 2 years. VSP was defined as septal pacing due to unsuccessful CSP implant or successful CSP followed by loss of His-Purkinje capture within 90 days. RESULTS Among 1016 patients (age 73.9 ± 11.2 years, 47% female, 48% atrioventricular block), 612 received RVP, 335 received CSP and 69 received VSP. Paced QRS duration was similar between VSP and RVP, but both significantly longer than CSP (p < .05). HF-hospitalizations occurred in 130 (13%) patients (CSP 7% vs. RVP 16% vs. VSP 13%, p = .001), and all-cause mortality in 143 (14%) patients (CSP 7% vs. RVP 19% vs. VSP 9%, p < .001). The association of pacing modality with clinical events was limited to those with ventricular pacing (Vp) > 20% (pinteraction < .05). Adjusting for clinical risk factors among patients with Vp > 20%, VSP (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]: 4.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57-14.36) and RVP (AHR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.44-6.60) were associated with increased hazard of HF-hospitalizations, and RVP (2.52, 95% CI: 1.19-5.35) with increased mortality, compared to CSP. Clinical endpoints did not differ between VSP and RVP with Vp > 20%, or amongst groups with Vp < 20%. CONCLUSION Conduction system capture is associated with improved clinical outcomes. CSP should be preferred over VSP or RVP during pacing for bradycardia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene S J Tan
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rodney Soh
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jie-Ying Lee
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elaine Boey
- Department of Cardiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siew-Pang Chan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Toon Wei Lim
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wee Tiong Yeo
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kevin M W Leong
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Swee-Chong Seow
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pipin Kojodjojo
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Cardiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Carneiro HA, Knight B. Does asymptomatic atrial fibrillation exist? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2024; 35:522-529. [PMID: 37870151 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently defined as symptomatic by asking patients if they are aware of when they are in AF and if they feel better in sinus rhythm. However, this approach of defining AF as symptomatic and asymptomatic fails to adequately consider the adverse effects of AF in patients who are unaware of their rhythm including progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF, and the development of dementia, stroke, sinus node dysfunction, valvular regurgitation, ventricular dysfunction, and heart failure. Labeling these patients as asymptomatic falsely suggests that their AF requires less intense therapy and puts into question the notion of truly asymptomatic AF. Because focusing on patient awareness ignores other important consequences of AF, clinical endpoints that are independent of symptoms are being developed. The concept of AF burden has more recently been used as a clinical endpoint in clinical trials as a more clinically relevant endpoint compared to AF-related symptoms or time to first recurrence, but its correlation with symptoms and other clinical outcomes remains unclear. This review will explore the impact of AF on apparently asymptomatic patients, the use of AF burden as an endpoint for AF management, and potential refinements to the AF burden metric. The review is based on a presentation by the senior author during the 2023 16th annual European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS) congress in Paris, France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herman A Carneiro
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bradley Knight
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lin Y, Chen H, Lee W, Ho W, Chang S, Chen Y, Yang T, Chen M. Effect of His Bundle Pacing on Abnormal Myocardial Fatty Acid and Glucose Metabolism Induced by Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e032386. [PMID: 38348809 PMCID: PMC11010098 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metabolic disorder is noted for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. The benefits of His bundle pacing over right ventricular (RV) pacing in preventing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy from a metabolic perspective are yet to be fully understood. METHOD AND RESULTS Three pig groups were established for this study: sham control, RV pacing (RV pacing for 6 months), and His pacing (RV pacing for 6 months, followed by His bundle pacing for 3 months). Complete atrioventricular block was created in the last 2 groups. Left ventricular function and dyssynchrony were assessed via echocardiography, while proteins linked to metabolism, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and inflammation in left ventricular myocardium were examined. The RV pacing group had significantly more left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony compared with the other groups. The RV pacing group exhibited triglyceride and diacylglycerol accumulation in cardiomyocytes and higher expression of binding immunoglobulin protein and tumor necrosis factor-α than the other groups. Additionally, the expression of CD36 was activated, while the expression of hormone-sensitive lipase was downregulated in the RV pacing group compared with the His pacing and sham control groups. Furthermore, the expressions of GLUT4 and pyruvate dehydrogenase were higher in the RV pacing group than the sham control and His pacing groups. Notably, the abnormal fatty acid and glucose metabolic pathways in the left ventricular myocardium during RV pacing could be corrected by His bundle pacing. CONCLUSIONS His bundle pacing can mitigate the abnormal metabolism disorders, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and inflammation induced during RV pacing and may contribute to the superiority of conduction system pacing over RV pacing in reducing heart failure hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu‐Sheng Lin
- Division of CardiologyChang Gung Memorial HospitalChiayiTaiwan
- College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Huang‐Chung Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Wei‐Chieh Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineChi Mei Medical CenterTainanTaiwan
| | - Wan‐Chun Ho
- Division of CardiologyChang Gung Memorial HospitalChiayiTaiwan
| | - Shun‐Fu Chang
- Department of Medical Research and DevelopmentChiayi Chang Gung Memorial HospitalChiayiTaiwan
| | - Yung‐Lung Chen
- College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Teng‐Yao Yang
- Division of CardiologyChang Gung Memorial HospitalChiayiTaiwan
| | - Mien‐Cheng Chen
- College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Scott M, Needleman JS, Kean AC. Conduction System Pacing in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag 2024; 15:5749-5755. [PMID: 38444449 PMCID: PMC10911636 DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Conduction system pacing involving either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a modality that has been introduced as a safe and effective alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing to help prevent pacemaker-associated cardiomyopathy. While HBP has been employed in the pediatric and congenital populations, several small studies have shown LBBP to be safe and effective in the pediatric population. We present a patient with congenital atrioventricular block and postoperative ventricular septal defect repair cardiomyopathy with subsequent left ventricular function improvement following a transition from an RV epicardial pacemaker system to an LBBP system. This case report serves as a foundation for a review of the current state of LBBP in pediatrics and congenital heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Scott
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joseph S. Needleman
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adam C. Kean
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yu J, Kong F, Gao P, Chen T, Liu Y, Cheng Z, Deng H, Lai J, Zhang L, Fan J, Wang J, Qin X, Sun K, Li J, Fang Q, Yang D, Cheng K. Case Report: Left bundle branch pacing in an amyloid light-chain cardiac amyloidosis patient with atrioventricular block. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 10:1333484. [PMID: 38274319 PMCID: PMC10808645 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1333484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Amyloid light-chain cardiac amyloidosis is a progressive infiltrative disease characterized by the deposition of amyloid fibrils in the cardiac tissue, which can cause serious atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation. Left bundle branch pacing has emerged as an alternative method for delivering physiological pacing to achieve electrical synchrony of the left ventricle. However, left bundle branch pacing in patients with amyloid light-chain cardiac amyloidosis has not been studied in detail. Therefore, in this study, we present a case of left bundle branch pacing in a patient with amyloid light-chain cardiac amyloidosis. Case summary A 66-year-old male patient with amyloid light-chain cardiac amyloidosis presented with syncope for 1 month. Holter monitoring revealed intermittent third-degree atrioventricular block. Left bundle branch pacing was performed successfully. During the 1-year follow-up, it was observed that the left bundle branch capture threshold remained stable without any pacemaker-related complications or left ventricle systolic dysfunction, and there was no recurrence of syncope. Conclusion Left bundle branch pacing appears to be a safe and feasible option for patients with amyloid light-chain cardiac amyloidosis experiencing atrioventricular block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaqi Yu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fanyi Kong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Taibo Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yongtai Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongwei Cheng
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Deng
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jinzhi Lai
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lihua Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingbo Fan
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaqi Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohan Qin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Keyue Sun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Quan Fang
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Deyan Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kang’an Cheng
- Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sdogkos E, Iliodromitis K, Xanthopoulos A, Triposkiadis F, Skoularigis J, Bogossian H, Vogiatzis I. Conduction system pacing: how far are we from the "electrical" bypass? Heart Fail Rev 2024; 29:45-63. [PMID: 37776404 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-023-10349-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
Conduction system pacing is an alternative practice to conventional right ventricular apical pacing. It is a method that maintains physiologic ventricular activation, based on a correct pathophysiological basis, in which the pacing lead bypasses the lesion of the electrical fibers and the electrical impulse transmits through the intact adjacent conduction system. For this reason, it might be reasonably characterized by the term "electrical bypass" compared to the coronary artery bypass in revascularization therapy. In this review, reference is made to the sequence of events in which conventional right ventricular pacing may cause adverse outcomes. Furthermore, there is a reference to alternative strategies and pacing sites. Interest focuses on the modalities for which there are data from the literature, namely for the right ventricular (RV) septal pacing, the His bundle pacing (HBP), and the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). A more extensive reference is about the HBP, for which there are the most updated data. We analyze the considerations that limit HBP-wide application in three axes, and we also present the data for the implantation and follow-up of these patients. The indications with their most important studies to date are then described in detail, not only in their undoubtedly positive findings but also in their weak aspects, because of which this pacing mode has not yet received a strong recommendation for implementation. Finally, there is a report on LBBP, focusing mainly on its points of differentiation from HBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Sdogkos
- Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Veroia, Veroia, Greece.
| | - Konstantinos Iliodromitis
- Klinik Für Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Brusebrinkstraße 20, 58135, Hagen, Germany
- School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany
| | | | | | - John Skoularigis
- Department of Cardiology, University Ηospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Harilaos Bogossian
- Klinik Für Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Brusebrinkstraße 20, 58135, Hagen, Germany
- School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany
| | - Ioannis Vogiatzis
- Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Veroia, Veroia, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yang Z, Liang J, Chen R, Pang N, Zhang N, Guo M, Gao J, Wang R. Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing: Prognosis and specific applications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 47:80-87. [PMID: 38112026 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac pacing has become a widely accepted treatment strategy for bradyarrhythmia and heart failure. However, conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) has been associated with electrical dyssynchrony, which may result in atrial fibrillation and heart failure. To achieve physiological pacing, Deshmukh et al. reported the first case of His bundle pacing (HBP) in 2000. This strategy was reported to have preserved ventricular synchronization by activating the conventional conduction system. Nonetheless, due to the anatomical location of the His bundle (HB), several issues such as high pacing thresholds, lead fixation, and early battery depletion may pose a challenge. Recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a novel physiological pacing strategy to achieve conduction system pacing by capturing the left bundle branch through the deep septum. Additionally, several studies have investigated the clinical outcomes of LBBAP. In this paper, we describe the pacing parameters, QRS duration (QRSd), cardiac function, complications, and specific applications of LBBAP in recent years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Yang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
- Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Jiadong Liang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
- Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Ruizhe Chen
- The First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
- Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Naidong Pang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
- Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Nan Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Min Guo
- Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Jia Gao
- Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sola-García E, Molina-Lerma M, Jiménez-Jáimez J, Macías-Ruiz R, Sánchez-Millán PJ, Tercedor L, Álvarez M. Autothreshold algorithm feasibility and safety in left bundle branch pacing. Europace 2023; 26:euad359. [PMID: 38042980 PMCID: PMC10766140 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Autothreshold algorithms enable remote monitoring of patients with conventional pacing, but there is limited information on their performance in left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). Our objective was to analyse the behaviour of the autothreshold algorithm in LBBP and compare it with conventional pacing and manual thresholds during initial device programming (acute phase), after 1-7 days (subacute), and 1-3 months later (chronic). METHODS AND RESULTS A prospective, non-randomized, single-centre comparative study was conducted. Consecutive patients with indication for cardiac pacing were enrolled. Implants were performed in the left bundle branch area or the right ventricle endocardium at the discretion of the operator. Left bundle branch pacing was determined according to published criteria. Autothreshold algorithm was activated in both groups whenever allowed by the device. Seventy-five patients were included, with 50 undergoing LBBP and 25 receiving conventional pacing. Activation of the autothreshold algorithm was more feasible in later phases, showing a favourable trend towards bipolar pacing. Failures in algorithm activation were primarily due to insufficient safety margins (82.8% in LBBP and 90% in conventional pacing). The remainder was attributed to atrial tachyarrhythmias (10.3% and 10%, respectively) and electrical noise (the remaining 6.9% in the LBBP group). In the LBBP group, there were not statistically significant differences between manual and automatic thresholds, and both remained stable during follow-up (mean increase of 0.50 V). CONCLUSION The autothreshold algorithm is feasible in LBBP, with a favourable trend towards bipolar pacing. Automatic thresholds are similar to manual in patients with LBBP, and they remain stable during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Sola-García
- Cardiology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Avenida de las Fuerzas Armadas n° 2, Granada 18014, Spain
- Instituto de investigación biosanitaria de Granada (FIBAO), Edificio Licinio de la Fuente, Calle Dr. Azpitarte nº 4, Planta 5ª, Granada 18012, Spain
| | - Manuel Molina-Lerma
- Instituto de investigación biosanitaria de Granada (FIBAO), Edificio Licinio de la Fuente, Calle Dr. Azpitarte nº 4, Planta 5ª, Granada 18012, Spain
- Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Avenida de las Fuerzas Armadas n° 2, Granada 18014, Spain
| | - Juan Jiménez-Jáimez
- Instituto de investigación biosanitaria de Granada (FIBAO), Edificio Licinio de la Fuente, Calle Dr. Azpitarte nº 4, Planta 5ª, Granada 18012, Spain
- Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Avenida de las Fuerzas Armadas n° 2, Granada 18014, Spain
| | - Rosa Macías-Ruiz
- Instituto de investigación biosanitaria de Granada (FIBAO), Edificio Licinio de la Fuente, Calle Dr. Azpitarte nº 4, Planta 5ª, Granada 18012, Spain
- Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Avenida de las Fuerzas Armadas n° 2, Granada 18014, Spain
| | - Pablo J Sánchez-Millán
- Instituto de investigación biosanitaria de Granada (FIBAO), Edificio Licinio de la Fuente, Calle Dr. Azpitarte nº 4, Planta 5ª, Granada 18012, Spain
- Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Avenida de las Fuerzas Armadas n° 2, Granada 18014, Spain
| | - Luis Tercedor
- Instituto de investigación biosanitaria de Granada (FIBAO), Edificio Licinio de la Fuente, Calle Dr. Azpitarte nº 4, Planta 5ª, Granada 18012, Spain
- Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Avenida de las Fuerzas Armadas n° 2, Granada 18014, Spain
| | - Miguel Álvarez
- Instituto de investigación biosanitaria de Granada (FIBAO), Edificio Licinio de la Fuente, Calle Dr. Azpitarte nº 4, Planta 5ª, Granada 18012, Spain
- Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Avenida de las Fuerzas Armadas n° 2, Granada 18014, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Glikson M, Jastrzebski M, Gold MR, Ellenbogen K, Burri H. Conventional biventricular pacing is still preferred to conduction system pacing for atrioventricular block in patients with reduced ejection fraction and narrow QRS. Europace 2023; 26:euad337. [PMID: 38153385 PMCID: PMC10754179 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
It is well established that right ventricular pacing is detrimental in patients with reduced cardiac function who require ventricular pacing (VP), and alternatives nowadays are comprised of biventricular pacing (BiVP) and conduction system pacing (CSP). The latter modality is of particular interest in patients with a narrow baseline QRS as it completely avoids, or minimizes, ventricular desynchronization associated with VP. In this article, experts debate whether BiVP or CSP should be used to treat these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Glikson
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Marek Jastrzebski
- First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| | - Michael R Gold
- Virginia Commonwealth University, VCU Medical Center Gateway Building, 1200 E. Marshall Street, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
| | - Kenneth Ellenbogen
- MUSC Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, MS-592, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Haran Burri
- Cardiac Pacing Unit, Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Palmisano P, Parlavecchio A, Vetta G, Crea P, Carerj S, Della Rocca DG, Guido A, Accogli M, Coluccia G. Spontaneous Sinus Rhythm Restoration in Patients With Refractory, Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Who Underwent Conduction System Pacing and Atrioventricular Junction Ablation. Am J Cardiol 2023; 209:76-84. [PMID: 37865121 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
Ablate and pace (A&P) with conduction system pacing (CSP) improves outcomes in patients with symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on spontaneous sinus rhythm restoration (SSRR) in this setting are lacking. This study aimed to assess the incidence and the predictors of SSRR in a population of patients with permanent AF who underwent A&P with CSP. Prospective, observational study, enrolling consecutive patients with symptomatic permanent AF (of documented duration >6 months) and uncontrolled, drug-refractory high ventricular rate, who underwent A&P with CSP. The incidence and predictors of SSRR were prospectively assessed. A total of 107 patients (79.0 ± 9.1 years, 33.6% male, 74.8% with New York Heart Association class ≥III, 56.1% with ejection fraction <40%) were enrolled: 40 received His' bundle pacing, 67 left bundle branch area pacing. During a median follow-up of 12 months SSRR was observed in 14 patients (13.1%), occurring a median of 3 months after A&P (interquartile range 1 to 6; range 0 to 17). Multivariable analysis identified a duration of permanent AF <12 months (hazard ratio 7.7, p = 0.040) and a left atrial volume index <49 ml/m2 (hazard ratio 14.8, p = 0.008) as independent predictors of SSRR. In patients with coexistence of both predictors the incidence of SSRR was of 41.4%. In a population of patients with symptomatic, permanent AF, treated with A&P with CSP, SSRR was observed in 13% of patients during follow-up. A duration of permanent AF <12 months and a left atrial volume index <49 ml/m2 were independent predictors of this phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Parlavecchio
- Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Tricase, Italy; Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Vetta
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, UniversitairZiekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pasquale Crea
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Scipione Carerj
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vazquez PM, Mohamed U, Zanon F, Lustgarten DL, Atwater B, Whinnett ZI, Curila K, Dinerman J, Molina-Lerma M, Wiley J, Grammatico A, Lee K, Vijayaraman P. Result of the Physiologic Pacing Registry, an international multicenter prospective observational study of conduction system pacing. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:1617-1625. [PMID: 37348800 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP), including both left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been proposed as an alternative therapy option for patients with indication for cardiac pacing to treat bradycardia or heart failure. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate implant success, safety, and electrical performances of HBP and LBBAP in the multinational Physiological Pacing Registry. METHODS The international prospective observational registry included 44 sites from 16 countries globally between November 2018 and May 2021. RESULTS Of 870 subjects enrolled, CSP lead implantation was attempted in 849 patients. Subjects with successful CSP lead implantation were followed for 6 months (5 ± 2 months). CSP lead implantation was successful in 768 patients (90.4%). Implant success was 95.2% (239/251) for LBBAP and 88.5% (529/598) for HBP (P = .002). Procedural duration and fluoroscopy duration were comparable between LBBAP and HBP (P = .537). Capture threshold at implant was 0.69 ± 0.39 V at 0.46 ± 0.15 ms in LBBAP and 1.44 ± 1.03 V at 0.71 ± 0.33 ms in HBP (P <.001). Capture threshold at 6 months was 0.79 ± 0.33 V at 0.44 ± 0.13 ms in LBBAP and 1.59 ± 0.97 V at 0.67 ± 0.31 ms in HBP (P <.001). Pacing threshold rise ≥1 V was observed at 6 months in 3 of 208 (1.4%) of LBBAP and 55 of 418 (13.2%) of HBP (P <.001). Serious adverse events related to implant procedure or CSP lead occurred in 5 of 251 (2.0%) with LBBAP and 25 of 598 (4.2%) with HBP (P = .115). CONCLUSION This large prospective multicenter study demonstrates that CSP is technically feasible in most patients with relatively higher implant success and suggests that, with current technology, LBBAP may have better pacing parameters than HBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Brett Atwater
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Zachary I Whinnett
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karol Curila
- Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady, Czech Republic
| | - Jay Dinerman
- Heart Center Research, LLC., Huntsville, Alabama
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Palmisano P, Parlavecchio A, Crea P, Guido A, Accogli M, Coluccia G. Superior approach from the pocket for atrioventricular junction ablation performed at the time of conduction system pacing implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 46:1652-1661. [PMID: 37864437 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP) and atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) improve outcomes in patients with symptomatic, refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Superior approach (SA) from the pocket via axillary or subclavian vein has been proposed as an alternative to the conventional femoral venous access (FA) to perform AVJA. OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility and safety of SA for AVJA performed simultaneously with CSP, and to compare this approach with FA. METHODS A prospective, observational study, enrolling consecutive patients with symptomatic, refractory AF undergoing simultaneous CSP and AVJA. RESULTS A total of 107 patients were enrolled: in 50, AVJA was primarily attempted with SA, in 69 from FA. AVJA with SA was successful in 38 patients (76.0%), while in 12 patients, a subsequent FA was required. AVJA from FA was successful in 68 patients (98.5%), while in one patient, a left-sided approach via femoral artery was required. Compared with FA, SA was associated with a significantly longer duration of ablation (238.0 ± 218.2 vs. 161.9 ± 181.9 s; p = .035), a significantly shorter procedure time (28.1 ± 19.8 vs. 19.8 ± 16.8 min; p = .018), an earlier ambulation (2.7 ± 3.2 vs. 19.8 ± 0.1 h; p < .001), and an earlier discharge from procedure completion (24.0 ± 2.7 vs. 27.1 ± 5.1 h; p < .001). After a median follow-up of 12 months, the rate of complications was similar in the two groups (2.0% in SA, 4.3% in FA; p = .483). CONCLUSION Simultaneous CSP and AVJA with SA is feasible, with a safety profile similar to FA. Compared to FA, this approach reduces the procedure times and allows earlier ambulation and discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Parlavecchio
- Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Tricase, Italy
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Pasquale Crea
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dasgupta S, Mah DY. Lead Management in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2023; 15:481-491. [PMID: 37865521 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric patients with congenital heart disease present unique challenges when it comes to cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing strategy is often determined by patient size/weight and operator experience. Anatomic considerations, including residual shunts, anatomic obstructions and barriers, and abnormalities in the native conduction system, will affect the type of CIED implanted. Given the young age of patients, it is important to have an "eye on the future" when making pacemaker/defibrillator decisions, as one can expect several generator changes, lead revisions, and potential lead extractions during their lifetime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soham Dasgupta
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children's Hospital, University of Louisville, 231 East Chestnut Street, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Douglas Y Mah
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Moore JP, Dalal AS. Conduction System Pacing for Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2023; 15:457-466. [PMID: 37865519 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
For patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), chronic ventricular pacing may lead to progressive cardiomyopathy owing to electromechanical dyssynchrony. Cardiac conduction system pacing (CSP) has been proposed as a physiologic pacing strategy-directly engaging the His-Purkinje system and preserving electromechanical synchrony. CSP may be indicated for a wide variety of children and adults with CHD and has emerged as an important tool in the armamentarium for cardiac implantable electronic device operators. This review provides the rationale, background, and supportive evidence for CSP in patients with CHD and discusses implant strategies and outcomes in the context of dominant ventricular morphologic categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy P Moore
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Aarti S Dalal
- Division of Cardiology, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University, 2200 Children's Way, Suite 5230, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Diaz JC, Duque M, Aristizabal J, Marin J, Niño C, Bastidas O, Ruiz LM, Matos CD, Hoyos C, Hincapie D, Velasco A, Romero JE. The Emerging Role of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2023; 12:e29. [PMID: 38173800 PMCID: PMC10762674 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2023.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces the risk of heart failure-related hospitalisations and all-cause mortality, as well as improving quality of life and functional status in patients with persistent heart failure symptoms despite optimal medical treatment and left bundle branch block. CRT has traditionally been delivered by implanting a lead through the coronary sinus to capture the left ventricular epicardium; however, this approach is associated with significant drawbacks, including a high rate of procedural failure, phrenic nerve stimulation, high pacing thresholds and lead dislodgement. Moreover, a significant proportion of patients fail to derive any significant benefit. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently emerged as a suitable alternative to traditional CRT. By stimulating the cardiac conduction system physiologically, LBBAP can result in a more homogeneous left ventricular contraction and relaxation, thus having the potential to improve outcomes compared with conventional CRT strategies. In this article, the evidence supporting the use of LBBAP in patients with heart failure is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Diaz
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Clinica Las Vegas, Universidad CES Medical SchoolMedellin, Colombia
| | - Mauricio Duque
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Clinica Las Vegas, Universidad CES Medical SchoolMedellin, Colombia
| | - Julian Aristizabal
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Clinica Las AmericasMedellin, Colombia
| | - Jorge Marin
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Clinica Las AmericasMedellin, Colombia
| | - Cesar Niño
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Hospital Pablo Tobón UribeMedellin, Colombia
| | - Oriana Bastidas
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Hospital Pablo Tobón UribeMedellin, Colombia
| | | | - Carlos D Matos
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, US
| | - Carolina Hoyos
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, US
| | - Daniela Hincapie
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, US
| | - Alejandro Velasco
- Electrophysiology Section, University of Texas Health Sciences CentreSan Antonio, TX, US
| | - Jorge E Romero
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, US
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abdin A, Werner C, Burri H, Merino JL, Vukadinović D, Sawan N, Gajek J, Böhm M, Ukena C. Outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to His bundle pacing as a primary pacing strategy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 46:1315-1324. [PMID: 37812167 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Novel pacing technologies, such as His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP), have emerged to maintain physiological ventricular activation. We investigated the outcomes of LBBP with HBP for patients requiring a de novo permanent pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS Systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing LBBaP with HBP until March 01, 2023 was performed. Random and fixed effects meta-analyses of the effect of pacing technology on outcomes were performed. Study outcomes included pacing metrics, QRS duration, lead revision, procedure parameters, all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Overall, 10 studies with 1596 patients were included. Implant success rate was higher in LBBaP compared with HBP (RR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.42, p = .002). LBBaP was associated with lower capture threshold at implantation (mean difference (MD) -0.62 V, 95% CI: -0.74 to -0.51 V, p < .0001) and at follow-up (MD -0.74 V, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.53, p < .0001), shorter procedure duration (MD -14.66 min, 95% CI: -23.54 to -5.78, p = .001) and shorter fluoroscopy time (MD -4.2 min, 95% CI: -8.4 to -0.0, p = .05). Compared with HBP, LBBaP was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.77, p = .002) and HFH (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33 to 1.00, p = .05). No statistical differences were found in lead revisions and QRS duration before and after pacing. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis found that LBBaP was superior to HBP regarding pacing metrics and implant success rate as an initial pacing strategy, although absence of head-to-head randomized comparison warrants caution in interpretation of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr Abdin
- Internal Medicine Clinic III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Christian Werner
- Internal Medicine Clinic III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Haran Burri
- Cardiology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - José L Merino
- Arrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, University Hospital La Paz, Autonoma University, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Davor Vukadinović
- Internal Medicine Clinic III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Noureddin Sawan
- Städtische Kliniken Mönchengladbach, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Jacek Gajek
- Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Michael Böhm
- Internal Medicine Clinic III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Christian Ukena
- Internal Medicine Clinic III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vernooy K, Keene D, Huang W, Vijayaraman P. Implant, assessment, and management of conduction system pacing. Eur Heart J Suppl 2023; 25:G15-G26. [PMID: 37970519 PMCID: PMC10637838 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing, together referred to as conduction system pacing, have (re)gained considerable interest over the past years as it has the potential to preserve and/or restore a more physiological ventricular activation when compared with right ventricular pacing and may serve as an alternative for cardiac resynchronization therapy. This review manuscript dives deeper into the implantation techniques and the relevant anatomy of the conduction system for both pacing strategies. Furthermore, the manuscript elaborates on better understanding of conduction system capture with its various capture patterns, its potential complications as well as appropriate follow-up care. Finally, the limitations and its impact on clinical care for both His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing are being discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Vernooy
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Keene
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Weijian Huang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Frausing MHJP, Bæk AL, Kristensen J, Gerdes C, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB. Long-term follow-up of selective and non-selective His bundle pacing leads in patients with atrioventricular block. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2023; 66:1849-1857. [PMID: 36753028 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01488-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND His bundle pacing (HBP) is a novel treatment with limited knowledge on long-term outcome. We aimed to assess long-term safety and effectiveness of HBP in patients with atrioventricular block treated with HBP and a back-up right ventricular pacing (RVP) lead. METHODS We included 38 patients from a completed single-center, randomized controlled cross-over trial designed to compare left ventricular (LV) function after 12 months of HBP vs. RVP conducted between September 2007 and August 2011. Lead performance beyond the 2-year study period was assessed based on a retrospective review of capture thresholds, sensing, impedance, energy consumption, and rate of HBP interruption. RESULTS Patients were followed for a mean of 7 ± 4 years. Both at baseline and during follow-up, HBP leads displayed significantly higher capture thresholds than RVP leads (P < 0.001), multifold higher energy consumption (P < 0.001), and lower sensing amplitudes (P < 0.001). During follow-up, 17 (53%) HBP leads were deactivated or abandoned. The principal cause for HBP interruption was high pacing thresholds in patients with preserved LVEF during RVP. Device longevity was shorter than that of contemporary cohorts treated with dual-chamber pacing or CRT, and time to first device exchange was 6.8 ± 1.5 years. No lead dislodgements occurred, but four patients (10%) developed device-related infections requiring device extraction. CONCLUSION HBP was interrupted in > 50% of patients during long-term follow-up. The principal cause was unacceptably high capture thresholds and no significant difference in LV function with HBP compared with RVP. Device longevity was shorter, and infection rates were higher than anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Hee Jung Park Frausing
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Aleksander Laust Bæk
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Kristensen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian Gerdes
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Cosedis Nielsen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mads Brix Kronborg
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ali N, Saqi K, Arnold AD, Miyazawa AA, Keene D, Chow JJ, Little I, Peters NS, Kanagaratnam P, Qureshi N, Ng FS, Linton NWF, Lefroy DC, Francis DP, Boon Lim P, Tanner MA, Muthumala A, Agarwal G, Shun-Shin MJ, Cole GD, Whinnett ZI. Left bundle branch pacing with and without anodal capture: impact on ventricular activation pattern and acute haemodynamics. Europace 2023; 25:euad264. [PMID: 37815462 PMCID: PMC10563660 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) can deliver physiological left ventricular activation, but typically at the cost of delayed right ventricular (RV) activation. Right ventricular activation can be advanced through anodal capture, but there is uncertainty regarding the mechanism by which this is achieved, and it is not known whether this produces haemodynamic benefit. METHODS AND RESULTS We recruited patients with LBBP leads in whom anodal capture eliminated the terminal R-wave in lead V1. Ventricular activation pattern, timing, and high-precision acute haemodynamic response were studied during LBBP with and without anodal capture. We recruited 21 patients with a mean age of 67 years, of whom 14 were males. We measured electrocardiogram timings and haemodynamics in all patients, and in 16, we also performed non-invasive mapping. Ventricular epicardial propagation maps demonstrated that RV septal myocardial capture, rather than right bundle capture, was the mechanism for earlier RV activation. With anodal capture, QRS duration and total ventricular activation times were shorter (116 ± 12 vs. 129 ± 14 ms, P < 0.01 and 83 ± 18 vs. 90 ± 15 ms, P = 0.01). This required higher outputs (3.6 ± 1.9 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 V, P < 0.01) but without additional haemodynamic benefit (mean difference -0.2 ± 3.8 mmHg compared with pacing without anodal capture, P = 0.2). CONCLUSION Left bundle branch pacing with anodal capture advances RV activation by stimulating the RV septal myocardium. However, this requires higher outputs and does not improve acute haemodynamics. Aiming for anodal capture may therefore not be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Ali
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Khulat Saqi
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Ahran D Arnold
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Alejandra A Miyazawa
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Daniel Keene
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Ji-Jian Chow
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | | | - Nicholas S Peters
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Prapa Kanagaratnam
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Norman Qureshi
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Fu Siong Ng
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Nick W F Linton
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - David C Lefroy
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Darrel P Francis
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Phang Boon Lim
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Mark A Tanner
- St Richard’s Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Watford, UK
| | - Amal Muthumala
- St Bartholomew’s Hospital and North Middlesex University Hospital, Watford, UK
| | - Girija Agarwal
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Matthew J Shun-Shin
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Graham D Cole
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Zachary I Whinnett
- National Heart and Lung Institute—Cardiovascular Science, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London,B-Block South, 2nd Floor, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Palmisano P, Ziacchi M, Dell'Era G, Donateo P, Ammendola E, Aspromonte V, Pellegrino PL, Del Giorno G, Coluccia G, Bartoli L, Patti G, Senes J, Parlavecchio A, Di Fraia F, Brunetti ND, Carbone A, Nigro G, Biffi M, Accogli M. Ablate and pace: Comparison of outcomes between conduction system pacing and biventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 46:1258-1268. [PMID: 37665040 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP), including His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), have been proposed as alternatives to biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients scheduled for ablate and pace (A&P) strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes, including the rate and nature of device-related complications, between BVP and CSP in a cohort of patients undergoing A&P. METHODS Prospective, multicenter, observational study, enrolling consecutive patients undergoing A&P. The risk of device-related complications and of heart failure (HF) hospitalization was prospectively assessed. RESULTS A total of 373 patients (75.3 ± 8.7 years, 53.9% male, 68.9% with NYHA class ≥III) were enrolled: 263 with BVP, 68 with HBP, and 42 with LBBAP. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were similar. Compared to BVP and HBP, LBBAP was associated with the shortest mean procedural and fluoroscopy times and with the lowest acute capture thresholds (all p < .05). At 12-month follow-up LBBAP maintained the lowest capture thresholds and showed the longest estimated residual battery longevity (all p < .05). At 12-months follow-up the three study groups showed a similar risk of device-related complications (5.7%, 4.4%, and 2.4% for BVP, HBP, and LBBAP, respectively; p = .650), and of HF hospitalization (2.7%, 1.5%, and 2.4% for BVP, HBP, and LBBAP, respectively; p = .850). CONCLUSIONS In the setting of A&P, CSP is a feasible pacing modality, with a midterm safety profile comparable to BVP. LBBAP offers the advantage of reducing procedural times and obtaining lower and stable capture thresholds, with a positive impact on the device longevity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriele Dell'Era
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Paolo Donateo
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, Lavagna, Italy
| | - Ernesto Ammendola
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Pier Lugi Pellegrino
- Department of Cardiology, Policlinico Riuniti, University Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | - Lorenzo Bartoli
- Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Patti
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Jacopo Senes
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, Lavagna, Italy
| | - Antonio Parlavecchio
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Fraia
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Natale Daniele Brunetti
- Department of Cardiology, Policlinico Riuniti, University Hospital, Foggia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Angelo Carbone
- Cardiology Unit, "Maria Ss Addolorata" Hospital, Eboli, Italy
| | - Gerardo Nigro
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau C, Dal Forno ARJ, Al‐Khatib SM, Arora V, Birgersdotter‐Green UM, Cha Y, Chung EH, Cronin EM, Curtis AB, Cygankiewicz I, Dandamudi G, Dubin AM, Ensch DP, Glotzer TV, Gold MR, Goldberger ZD, Gopinathannair R, Gorodeski EZ, Gutierrez A, Guzman JC, Huang W, Imrey PB, Indik JH, Karim S, Karpawich PP, Khaykin Y, Kiehl EL, Kron J, Kutyifa V, Link MS, Marine JE, Mullens W, Park S, Parkash R, Patete MF, Pathak RK, Perona CA, Rickard J, Schoenfeld MH, Seow S, Shen W, Shoda M, Singh JP, Slotwiner DJ, Sridhar ARM, Srivatsa UN, Stecker EC, Tanawuttiwat T, Tang WHW, Tapias CA, Tracy CM, Upadhyay GA, Varma N, Vernooy K, Vijayaraman P, Worsnick SA, Zareba W, Zeitler EP, Lopez‐Cabanillas N, Ellenbogen KA, Hua W, Ikeda T, Mackall JA, Mason PK, McLeod CJ, Mela T, Moore JP, Racenet LK. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. J Arrhythm 2023; 39:681-756. [PMID: 37799799 PMCID: PMC10549836 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne M. Dubin
- Stanford University, Pediatric CardiologyPalo AltoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Taya V. Glotzer
- Hackensack Meridian School of MedicineHackensackNew JerseyUSA
| | - Michael R. Gold
- Medical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | | - Eiran Z. Gorodeski
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of MedicineClevelandOhioUSA
| | | | | | - Weijian Huang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouChina
| | - Peter B. Imrey
- Cleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
- Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Julia H. Indik
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart CenterTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Saima Karim
- MetroHealth Medical CenterCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Peter P. Karpawich
- The Children's Hospital of MichiganCentral Michigan UniversityDetroitMichiganUSA
| | | | | | - Jordana Kron
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | | | - Mark S. Link
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | | | - Wilfried Mullens
- Ziekenhuis Oost‐Limburg GenkBelgium and Hasselt UniversityHasseltBelgium
| | - Seung‐Jung Park
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | | | | | - Rajeev Kumar Pathak
- Australian National University, Canberra HospitalGarranAustralian Capital TerritoryAustralia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jagmeet P. Singh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kevin Vernooy
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ramdat Misier NL, Jessen ME, Fares M, Scott WA, Nguyen HH. Left bundle branch pacing after His bundle lead dysfunction due to physical activity in a pediatric patient. HeartRhythm Case Rep 2023; 9:715-719. [PMID: 38047192 PMCID: PMC10691949 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nawin L. Ramdat Misier
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael E. Jessen
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Munes Fares
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - William A. Scott
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Hoang H. Nguyen
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau CP, Dal Forno ARJ, Al-Khatib SM, Arora V, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Cha YM, Chung EH, Cronin EM, Curtis AB, Cygankiewicz I, Dandamudi G, Dubin AM, Ensch DP, Glotzer TV, Gold MR, Goldberger ZD, Gopinathannair R, Gorodeski EZ, Gutierrez A, Guzman JC, Huang W, Imrey PB, Indik JH, Karim S, Karpawich PP, Khaykin Y, Kiehl EL, Kron J, Kutyifa V, Link MS, Marine JE, Mullens W, Park SJ, Parkash R, Patete MF, Pathak RK, Perona CA, Rickard J, Schoenfeld MH, Seow SC, Shen WK, Shoda M, Singh JP, Slotwiner DJ, Sridhar ARM, Srivatsa UN, Stecker EC, Tanawuttiwat T, Tang WHW, Tapias CA, Tracy CM, Upadhyay GA, Varma N, Vernooy K, Vijayaraman P, Worsnick SA, Zareba W, Zeitler EP. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:e17-e91. [PMID: 37283271 PMCID: PMC11062890 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 133.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eugene H Chung
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | - Anne M Dubin
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology, Palo Alto, California
| | | | - Taya V Glotzer
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | - Michael R Gold
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Zachary D Goldberger
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Eiran Z Gorodeski
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Weijian Huang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Peter B Imrey
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Julia H Indik
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Saima Karim
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Peter P Karpawich
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan, Central Michigan University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Yaariv Khaykin
- Southlake Regional Health Center, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jordana Kron
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | | | - Mark S Link
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Joseph E Marine
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wilfried Mullens
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk, Belgium and Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Seung-Jung Park
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ratika Parkash
- QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Rajeev Kumar Pathak
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Morio Shoda
- Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jagmeet P Singh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David J Slotwiner
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cynthia M Tracy
- George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | | | - Kevin Vernooy
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Moustafa AT, Tang ASL, Khan HR. Conduction system pacing on track to replace CRT? Review of current evidence and prospects of conduction system pacing. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1220709. [PMID: 37649666 PMCID: PMC10463741 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Conduction system pacing (CSP) has been emerging over the last decade as a pacing option instead of conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing and biventricular (BiV) pacing. Numerous case reports, some observational studies and a few randomized control trials have looked at optimum pacing strategies for heart failure (HF) with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or cases where left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is anticipated due to chronic RV pacing (RVP). Evolution of pacing strategies from standard RVP to septal RVP, BiV pacing and now CSP have shown improving hemodynamic responses and possible ease of implantation of CSP systems. In this review article, we review the literature on the evolution of CSP and common scenarios where it might be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Habib Rehman Khan
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ezzeddine FM, Leon IG, Cha YM. Cardiac Resynchronisation with Conduction System Pacing. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2023; 12:e22. [PMID: 37654672 PMCID: PMC10466271 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2023.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
To date, biventricular pacing (BiVP) has been the standard pacing modality for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. However, it is non-physiological, with the activation spreading between the left ventricular epicardium and right ventricular endocardium. Up to one-third of patients with heart failure who are eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy do not derive benefit from BiVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP), which includes His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as an alternative to BiVP for cardiac resynchronisation. There is mounting evidence supporting the benefits of CSP in achieving synchronous ventricular activation and repolarisation. The aim of this review is to summarise the current options and outcomes of CSP when used for cardiac resynchronisation in patients with heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isaac G Leon
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, US
| | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Padala SK, Ellenbogen KA. Pacing of Specialized Conduction System. Cardiol Clin 2023; 41:463-489. [PMID: 37321695 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Right ventricular pacing for bradycardia remains the mainstay of pacing therapy. Chronic right ventricular pacing may lead to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. We focus on the anatomy of the conduction system and the clinical feasibility of pacing the His bundle and/or left bundle conduction system. We review the hemodynamics of conduction system pacing, the techniques to capture the conduction system and the electrocardiogram and pacing definitions of conduction system capture. Clinical studies of conduction system pacing in the setting of atrioventricular block and after AV junction ablation are reviewed and the evolving role of conduction system pacing is compared with biventricular pacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santosh K Padala
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Gateway Building, 3 Road Floor, 3-216, 1200 East Marshall Street, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kenneth A Ellenbogen
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Gateway Building, 3 Road Floor, 3-216, 1200 East Marshall Street, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Diaz JC, Sauer WH, Duque M, Koplan BA, Braunstein ED, Marín JE, Aristizabal J, Niño CD, Bastidas O, Martinez JM, Hoyos C, Matos CD, Lopez-Cabanillas N, Steiger NA, Kapur S, Tadros TM, Martin DT, Zei PC, Tedrow UB, Romero JE. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing as Initial Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 9:1568-1581. [PMID: 37212761 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an alternative to biventricular pacing (BiVp). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes between LBBAP and BiVp as an initial implant strategy for CRT. METHODS In this prospective multicenter, observational, nonrandomized study, first-time CRT implant recipients with LBBAP or BiVp were included. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcomes were acute and long-term complications. Secondary outcomes included postprocedural New York Heart Association functional class and electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters. RESULTS A total of 371 patients (median follow-up of 340 days [IQR: 206-477 days]) were included. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 24.2% in the LBBAP vs 42.4% in the BiVp (HR: 0.621 [95% CI: 0.415-0.93]; P = 0.021) group, driven by a reduction in HF-related hospitalizations (22.6% vs 39.5%; HR: 0.607 [95% CI: 0.397-0.927]; P = 0.021) without significant difference in all-cause mortality (5.5% vs 11.9%; P = 0.19) or differences in long-term complications (LBBAP: 9.4% vs BiVp: 15.2%; P = 0.146). LBBAP resulted in shorter procedural (95 minutes [IQR: 65-120 minutes] vs 129 minutes [IQR: 103-162 minutes]; P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy times (12 minutes [IQR: 7.4-21.1 minutes] vs 21.7 minutes [IQR: 14.3-30 minutes]; P < 0.001), shorter QRS duration (123.7 ± 18 milliseconds vs 149.3 ± 29.1 milliseconds; P < 0.001), and higher postprocedural left ventricular ejection fraction (34.1% ± 12.5% vs 31.4% ± 10.8%; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS LBBAP as an initial CRT strategy resulted in a lower risk of HF-related hospitalizations compared to BiVp. A reduction in procedural and fluoroscopy times, shorter paced QRS duration, and improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction compared with BiVp were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Diaz
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Clinica Las Vegas, Universidad CES Medical School, Medellin, Colombia
| | - William H Sauer
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mauricio Duque
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Clinica Las Vegas, Universidad CES Medical School, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Bruce A Koplan
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric D Braunstein
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jorge Eduardo Marín
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Las Americas Cardiovascular Institute, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Julian Aristizabal
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Las Americas Cardiovascular Institute, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Cesar Daniel Niño
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Clinica SOMER, Rionegro, Colombia
| | - Oriana Bastidas
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Clinica Las Vegas, Universidad CES Medical School, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Juan Manuel Martinez
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Las Americas Cardiovascular Institute, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Carolina Hoyos
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carlos D Matos
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Nathaniel A Steiger
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sunil Kapur
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas M Tadros
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David T Martin
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul C Zei
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Usha B Tedrow
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jorge E Romero
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tan ESJ, Soh R, Boey E, Lee JY, de Leon J, Chan SP, Gan HH, Seow SC, Kojodjojo P. Comparison of Pacing Performance and Clinical Outcomes Between Left Bundle Branch and His Bundle Pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 9:1393-1403. [PMID: 37558292 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch (LBBP) and His-bundle pacing (HBP) provide physiological ventricular activation. OBJECTIVES This study investigated differences in feasibility, device performance, and clinical outcomes between LBBP and HBP. METHODS Consecutive patients with LBBP and HBP from 2018 to 2021 in 2 centers were prospectively studied. The primary endpoint was optimal device performance during follow-up, defined as the presence of pacing thresholds <2.5 V, R-wave amplitude ≥5 V, and absence of conduction system pacing (CSP)-related complications. The secondary endpoint was the composite of heart failure hospitalizations or all-cause mortality. RESULTS Among 338 patients, 282 underwent successful CSP (119 HBP, 163 LBBP). Success rates, CSP-related complications, and need for reoperations did not differ between LBBP and HBP (P > 0.05). Pacing thresholds were lower, whereas R-wave amplitudes and lead impedance were higher in LBBP (P < 0.05). The primary endpoint was more frequent in LBBP than HBP (79% vs 34%; P < 0.001), with LBBP independently associated with 9-fold increased odds of optimal device performance (adjusted OR: 9.31; 95% CI: 5.14-16.86). LBBP was less likely to have increased pacing thresholds by >1 V (1% vs 19% HBP, P < 0.001). The secondary outcome was less frequent in LBBP than HBP (9% vs 24%, P = 0.001), with LBBP trending towards higher event-free survival (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.31-1.23). The secondary outcome was independent of pacing burden or pacing indication. CONCLUSIONS Despite similar feasibility and safety profiles, LBBP confers additional benefits in pacing performance and reliability, shows trends towards improved survival compared to HBP, and should be the preferred first-line CSP modality of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene S J Tan
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore.
| | - Rodney Soh
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore
| | - Elaine Boey
- Department of Cardiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jie-Ying Lee
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore
| | - Jhobeleen de Leon
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore
| | - Siew-Pang Chan
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore
| | - Hiong-Hiong Gan
- Department of Cardiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Swee-Chong Seow
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore
| | - Pipin Kojodjojo
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore; Department of Cardiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Malaty MM, Sivagangabalan G, Qian PC. Beyond Conventional Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: A Review of Electrophysiological Options in the Management of Chronic Heart Failure. Heart Lung Circ 2023; 32:905-913. [PMID: 37286460 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of heart failure (HF) continues to grow and burden our health care system. Electrophysiological aberrations are common amongst patients with heart failure and can contribute to worsening symptoms and prognosis. Targeting these abnormalities with cardiac and extra-cardiac device therapies and catheter ablation procedures augments cardiac function. Newer technologies aimed to improvement procedural outcomes, address known procedural limitations and target newer anatomical sites have been trialled recently. We review the role and evidence base for conventional cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) and its optimisation, catheter ablation therapies for atrial arrhythmias, cardiac contractility and autonomic modulation therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Malaty
- Department of Cardiology, Blacktown Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gopal Sivagangabalan
- Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine, Sydney Campus, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Pierre C Qian
- Department of Cardiology, Blacktown Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Khurshid S, Frankel DS. Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy. Cardiol Clin 2023; 41:449-461. [PMID: 37321694 PMCID: PMC11194687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is typically defined as left ventricular systolic dysfunction resulting from electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony caused by RV pacing. RV PICM is common, occurring in 10-20% of individuals exposed to frequent RV pacing. Multiple risk factors for PICM have been identified, including male sex, wider native and paced QRS durations, and higher RV pacing percentage, but the ability to predict which individuals will develop PICM remains modest. Biventricular and conduction system pacing, which better preserve electrical and mechanical synchrony, typically prevent the development of PICM and reverse left ventricular systolic dysfunction after PICM has occurred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaan Khurshid
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 5B Heart Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - David S Frankel
- Cardiovascular Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 9 Founders Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Palmisano P, Ziacchi M, Dell'Era G, Donateo P, Ammendola E, Coluccia G, Guido A, Piemontese GP, Lazzeri M, Ghiglieno C, Veroli A, Maggi R, Russo V, Rago A, Nigro G, Senes J, Patti G, Biffi M, Accogli M. Rate and nature of complications of conduction system pacing compared with right ventricular pacing: Results of a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter registry. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:984-991. [PMID: 36906165 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP) using His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as an alternative to right ventricular pacing (RVP). Comparative data on the risk of complications between CSP and RVP are lacking. OBJECTIVE This prospective, multicenter, observational study aimed to compare the long-term risk of device-related complications between CSP and RVP. METHODS A total of 1029 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation with CSP (including HBP and LBBAP) or RVP were enrolled. Propensity score matching for baseline characteristics yielded 201 matched pairs. The rate and nature of device-related complications occurring during follow-up were prospectively collected and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS During a mean follow-up duration of 18 months, device-related complications were observed in 19 patients: 7 in RVP (3.5%) and 12 in CSP (6.0%) (P = .240). On dividing the matched cohort into 3 groups with similar baseline characteristics according to pacing modality (RVP, n = 201; HBP, n = 128; LBBAP, n = 73), patients with HBP showed a significantly higher rate of device-related complications than did patients with RVP (8.6% vs 3.5%; P = .047) and patients with LBBAP (8.6% vs 1.3%; P = .034). Patients with LBBAP showed a rate of device-related complications similar to that of patients with RVP (1.3% vs 3.5%; P = .358). Most of the complications observed in patients with HBP (63.6%) were lead related. CONCLUSION Globally, CSP was associated with a risk of complications similar to that of RVP. Considering HBP and LBBAP separately, HBP showed a significantly higher risk of complications than did both RVP and LBBAP whereas LBBAP showed a risk of complications similar to that of RVP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Istituto di Cardiologia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriele Dell'Era
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Paolo Donateo
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, ASL 4 Chiavarese, Lavagna, Italy
| | - Ernesto Ammendola
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Pio Piemontese
- Istituto di Cardiologia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Divisione di Cardiologia, Dipartimento di Malattie Cardiovascolari, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Mirco Lazzeri
- Istituto di Cardiologia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Ghiglieno
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veroli
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Roberto Maggi
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, ASL 4 Chiavarese, Lavagna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Russo
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Rago
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Gerardo Nigro
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Jacopo Senes
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, ASL 4 Chiavarese, Lavagna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Patti
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Istituto di Cardiologia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|