Role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor-activating antibodies in solid organ transplantation

Immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation remain suboptimal, largely related to chronic rejection. Creatinine is a late marker of renal injury, and more sensitive, early markers of allograft injury are an active area of current research.

METHODS

This is an educational review summarizing existing strategies for monitoring for rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

We summarize supporting currently available clinical tests, including surveillance biopsy, donor specific antibodies, and donor-derived cell free DNA, as well as the potential limitations of these studies. In addition, we review the current avenues of active research, including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and torque tenovirus levels.

CONCLUSION

Advancing the use of noninvasive immune monitoring will depend on well-designed multicenter trials that include patients with stable graft function, include biopsy results on all patients, and can demonstrate both association with a patient-relevant clinical endpoint such as graft survival or change in glomerular filtration rate and a potential timepoint for intervention.

The Influence of Antibodies against Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor on the Outcome of Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Allo- and autoimmune mechanisms are involved in kidney allograft rejection and loss. This study investigates the impact of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1RAbs) detected alone or in association with HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs) on the outcome of kidney transplantation (KTx). Anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs were detected in 71 kidney transplant (KT) recipients who developed biopsy-proven acute or chronic active T-cell rejection (TCMR) (n = 51) or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (n = 20), forming the rejection group (RG). The control group (CG) included 71 KTx recipients with comparable characteristics without rejection. All patients had been transplanted with negative T/B flow crossmatch (T/BFCXM). The median follow-up period was 3.7 years. Antibodies were determined pre- and periodically post-KTx by Luminex method for HLA-DSAs and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-AT1RAbs. Before KTx, twenty-three (32.4%) patients in the RG, sixteen with TCMR and seven with ABMR, were found anti-AT1Rabs-positive (≥10 U/mL) versus eleven (15.5%) patients in the CG (p = 0.031). Simultaneous detection of preformed anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs was found in five patients of the RG versus two of the CG (p = 0.355). At the time of transplant biopsy, fifteen (21.1%) patients, four with ABMR and eleven with TCMR, were positive for anti-AT1RAbs. Anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs were detected simultaneously in 7/15 (46.7%) cases, three with ABMR and four with TCMR. During the follow-up, thirteen (18.3%) patients in the RG, eight with ABMR and five with TCMR, lost their graft compared to one patient (1.4%) in the CG (p = 0.001). Six out of thirteen (46.2%) RG patients who lost the graft were found positive for anti-AT1RAbs pretransplant. Patient survival with functioning graft did not differ significantly between anti-AT1Rabs-positive and negative KT recipients (log-rank p = 0.88). Simultaneous detection of anti-ATR1Abs and HLA-DSAs did not have a significant influence on patient survival with functioning graft (log-rank p = 0.96). Graft function at the end of the follow-up was better, but not significantly, in anti-AT1Rabs-negative patients, with serum creatinine 1.48 [1.20-1.98] mg/dL and eGFR (CKD-EPI) 48.5 [33.5-59.0] mL/min/1.73 m², compared to anti-AT1Rabs-positive ones who had serum creatinine 1.65 [1.24-2.02] mg/dL (p = 0.394) and eGFR (CKD-EPI) 47.0 [34.8-60.3] mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.966). Anti-AT1RAbs detection pretransplant characterizes KT recipients at increased risk of cellular or antibody-mediated rejection. Furthermore, anti-AT1RAbs, detected alone or simultaneously with HLA-DSAs, appear to be associated with impaired graft function, but their role in graft survival has not been documented in this study. Screening for these antibodies appears to complement pretransplant immunological risk assessment.

Pre-existing non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies are associated with allograft rejection after thoracic transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence on the important role of non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in lung and heart transplant rejection. Since data on the prevalence and clinical significance of non-HLA antibodies in the Asian population are scarce, we analyzed non-HLA antibodies in heart and lung transplant patients.

METHODS

We used the Luminex method to measure non-HLA antibodies in patients who underwent heart transplantation (N = 28) or lung transplantation (N = 36) between 2016 and 2019. We evaluated the association between pre-existing non-HLA antibodies and acute rejection-free days in these recipients.

RESULTS

Of 64 patients, 27 (42.2%) patients underwent rejection, with 26 (40.6%) acute cellular rejection and one (1.6%) acute antibody-mediated rejection. Among 33 identified different non-HLA antibodies, only the anti-glutathione S-transferase theta-1 (GSTT1) antibody positive rate was significantly higher in patients with acute rejection compared to those without rejection (14.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.016). The angiotensin II type I receptor positive rate was not significantly different between the two groups (40% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.129). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, anti-GSTT1 antibody-positive patients had a higher risk of acute allograft rejection (hazard ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-12.49; p = 0.010). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that anti-GSTT1 antibody-positive patients had fewer acute rejection-free days (χ² = 7.892; p = 0.005). Additionally, patients who underwent platelet transfusion (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.16-1.91; p = 0.002) before transplantation were more likely to be positive for anti-GSTT1 antibody.

CONCLUSION

Patients with antibodies against GSTT1 before heart or lung transplantation have an increased risk of acute rejection.

Immunologic risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant patients by combining HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatch is a powerful biomarker of rejection. Few studies have explored its use in assessing rejection risk in heart transplant recipients. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of HLA Epitope Mismatch Algorithm (HLA-EMMA) and Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithms can improve risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant recipients. Class I and II HLA genotyping were performed by next-generation sequencing on 274 recipient/donor pairs enrolled in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children (CTOTC). Using high-resolution genotypes, we performed HLA molecular mismatch analysis with HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II, and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Patients without pre-formed donor specific antibody (DSA) (n=100) were used for correlations with post-transplant DSA and antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). Risk cut-offs were determined for DSA and ABMR using both algorithms. HLA-EMMA cut-offs alone predict the risk of DSA and ABMR; however, if used in combination with PIRCHE-II, the population could be further stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The combination of HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II enables more granular immunological risk stratification. Intermediate-risk cases, like low-risk cases, are at a lower risk of DSA and ABMR. This new way of risk evaluation may facilitate individualized immunosuppression and surveillance.

Pre-transplant angiotensin II receptor type I antibodies in pediatric renal transplant recipients: An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) in pediatric renal transplantation is unclear. Here, we evaluated pre-transplant AT1R-Ab on transplant outcomes in the first 5 years. Secondary analysis compared pre-transplant AT1R-Ab levels by age.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients, 2-20 years old, were divided into two groups: pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- (<17 U/ml; n = 18) and pre-transplant AT1R-Ab+ (≥17 U/ml; n = 18). eGFR was determined at 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 4-year post-transplant. Allograft biopsies were performed in the setting of strong HLA-DSA (MFI > 10 000), AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml, and/or elevated creatinine.

RESULTS

Mean age in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- was 13.3 years vs. 11.0 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab+ (p = 0.16). At 6 months, mean eGFR was 111.3 ml/min/1.73 m² in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- vs. 100.2 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab + at 1 year, 103.6 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. 100.5; at 2 years, 98.9 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. and 93.7; at 4 years, 72.6 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. 80.9. 11/36 patients had acute rejection (6 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab-, 5 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab + ). There was no difference in rejection rates. All 6 subjects with de novo HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml at the time of biopsy experienced rejection. Mean age in those with the AT1R-Ab ≥40 U/ml was 10.0 years vs. 13.2 in those <40 U/ml (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

In our small cohort, pre-transplant AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml was not associated with reduced graft function or rejection. The pathogenicity of pre-transplant AT1R-Ab in pediatric kidney transplantation requires further investigation.

Levels of angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies and endothelin-1 type-A receptor antibodies correlate with antibody-mediated rejection and poor graft function in kidney-transplantation patients

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) and endothelin-1 type-A receptor antibodies (ETAR-Ab) are non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies that can elicit adverse effects on kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes. We investigated the correlation between levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab and postoperative outcomes in KT recipients.

METHODS

Pre-KT and post-KT serum from 79 patients was collected. Post-KT serum was collected within 1 year after KT or simultaneously as the biopsy. Levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. AT1R-Ab >17.0 U/mL and ETAR-Ab >10.0 U/mL was considered to denote positivity according to manufacturer recommendations. We measured donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA-DSA) levels using LABScreen™ single-antigen kits.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine (54 men, 25 women) formed the study cohort. Seven (8.7%) patients were positive for AT1R-Ab, 25 (31.6%) patients were positive for both AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab, and 47 (59.5%) were negative for both antibodies at all time points. No patients died during the study period. Patients with both AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab were associated with a higher prevalence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, but not allograft loss or delayed graft function. AT1R-Ab were associated with T-cell-mediated rejection, but the association was not significant. HLA-DSA were associated significantly with a higher creatinine level in serum at 12 months and 24 months in patients with AT1R-Ab and/or ETAR-Ab.

CONCLUSIONS

AT1R-Ab, ETAR-Ab, and HLA-DSA were associated with a higher prevalence of AMR and decline in graft function. Measurement of levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab in KT patients may be useful for stratification of immunological risk and identification of patients at a high risk of adverse graft outcome.

Relationship Between Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibody Positivity and Cytokine Gene Polymorphism in Renal Transplant Patients When Organ Rejection Occurs

OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplant remains the gold standard for the treatment of end-stage renal disease. Relationships between the presence of non-HLA antibodies, antibodies to AT1R, and cytokine gene polymorphisms with rejection have recently been shown. We sought to determine whether the presence of antibodies to AT1R and cytokine gene polymorphisms affected the development of rejection in pediatric and adult patients, whether a relationship is present between cytokine polymorphism and level of antibodies to AT1R, and whether their presence can be a biomarker pretransplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included 100 pediatric and adult kidney transplant patients plus 50 healthy controls. Levels of AT1R antibodies (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and gene polymorphisms of the cytokines transforming growth factor β, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukins 6 and 10, and interferon gamma cytokines (by sequence- specific primer-polymerase chain reaction) were studied retrospectively and evaluated with the SPSS statistical program.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant relationship between levels of antibodies to AT1R and gene polymorphisms among the studied cytokines in patients with rejection compared with the healthy controls and patients with uneventful courses posttransplant. However, higher levels of antibodies to AT1R were observed in pediatric compared with adult transplant recipients (P < .001). A statistically significant relationship was also observed between transforming growth factor β1 C/C G/C low-release and interleukin 6 G/C high-release gene polymorphism and levels of antibodies to AT1R (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Because we observed that some gene polymorphisms among the studied cytokines may affect AT1R antibody levels, future studies are needed to understand the mechanism of the relationship. In addition, studies with larger groups are required to sufficiently confirm that higher antibody levels are present in pediatric versus adult patients.

Non-HLA Antibodies in Hand Transplant Recipients Are Connected to Multiple Acute Rejection Episodes and Endothelial Activation

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in transplant rejection is well-known but the injury associated with non-HLA antibodies is now widely discussed. The aim of our study was to investigate a role of non-HLA antibodies in hand allografts rejection. The study was performed on six patients after hand transplantation. The control group consisted of: 12 kidney transplant recipients and 12 healthy volunteers. The following non-HLA antibodies were tested: antibody against angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-Ab), antibody against endothelin-1 type-A-receptor (ETAR-Ab), antibody against protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1-Ab) and anti-VEGF-A antibody (VEGF-A-Ab). Chosen proinflammatory cytokines (Il-1, IL-6, IFNγ) were used to evaluate the post-transplant humoral response. Laboratory markers of endothelial activation (VEGF, sICAM, vWF) were used to assess potential vasculopathy. The patient with the highest number of acute rejections had both positive non-HLA antibodies: AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab. The same patient had the highest VEGF-A-Ab and very high PAR1-Ab. All patients after hand transplantation had high levels of laboratory markers of endothelial activation. The existence of non-HLA antibodies together with multiple acute rejections observed in patient after hand transplantation should stimulate to look for potential role of non-HLA antibodies in humoral injury in vascular composite allotransplantation.

Effect of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies on the outcomes of kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been recognized as non-HLA antibodies associated with allograft rejection and poor allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the risk anti-AT1R-Abs pose for rejection and graft loss among kidney transplant populations.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published from inception until June 2021 to identify all studies concerning the role AT1R-Abs play in the clinical outcome after kidney transplantation. Two reviewers independently identified studies, abstracted outcome data, and assessed the quality of the studies. The meta-analysis was summarized using the fixed-effects models or random-effects models, according to heterogeneity. The major outcomes included delayed graft function, acute rejection, graft loss, or patient death after transplantation.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eligible studies involving a total of 4,023 kidney transplantation recipients were included in the evaluation to identified. Meta-analysis results showed that the AT1R-Ab positive kidney transplant (KT) group had a greater incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (RR = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.61-2.33, P < 0.00001) and graft loss (RR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.50-3.75, P = 0.0002) than did the AT1R-Abs negative KT group. There was no significant statistical difference in delayed graft function rate, T-cell mediated rejection, mixed rejection, acute cellular rejection, acute rejection, and patient death rate between AT1R-Ab positive KT and AT1R-Ab negative KT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the presence of anti-AT1R-Abs was associated with a significantly higher risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation. Future studies are still needed to evaluate the importance of routine anti-AT1R monitoring and therapeutic targeting. These results shows that assessment of anti-AT1R-Abs would be helpful in determining immunologic risk and susceptibility to immunologic events for recipients.

Immunosuppression as a Risk Factor for De Novo Angiotensin II Type Receptor Antibodies Development after Kidney Transplantation

(1) Background: Angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) represent a topic of interest in kidney transplantation (KT). Data regarding the risk factors associated with de novo AT1R-Ab development are lacking. Our goal was to identify the incidence of de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT and to evaluate the risk factors associated with their formation. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 56 adult patients, transplanted between 2018 and 2019. Recipient, donor, transplant, treatment, and complications data were assessed. A threshold of >10 U/mL was used for AT1R-Ab detection. (3) Results: De novo AT1R-Ab were observed in 12 out of 56 KT recipients (21.4%). The median value AT1R-Ab in the study cohort was 8.5 U/mL (inter quartile range: 6.8–10.4) and 15.6 U/mL (10.8–19.8) in the positive group. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, induction immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (OR = 7.20, 95% CI: 1.30–39.65, p = 0.02), maintenance immunosuppression with immediate-release tacrolimus (OR = 6.20, 95% CI: 1.16–41.51, p = 0.03), and mean tacrolimus trough level (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.14–4.85, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT. (4) Conclusions: De novo AT1R-Ab development at 1 year after KT is significantly influenced by the type of induction and maintenance immunosuppression.

Set Up for Failure: Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Lung Transplant

Lung transplant patients have the lowest long-term survival rates compared to other solid organ transplants. The complications after lung transplantation such as primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and ultimately chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) are the main reasons for this limited survival. In recent years, lung-specific autoantibodies that recognize non-HLA antigens have been hypothesized to contribute to graft injury and have been correlated with PGD, CLAD, and survival. Mounting evidence suggests that autoantibodies can develop during pulmonary disease progression before lung transplant, termed pre-existing autoantibodies, and may participate in allograft injury after transplantation. In this review, we summarize what is known about pulmonary disease autoantibodies, the relationship between pre-existing autoantibodies and lung transplantation, and potential mechanisms through which pre-existing autoantibodies contribute to graft injury and rejection.

Kidney re-transplantation in a child across the barrier of persisting angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) episodes in the absence of donor-specific antibodies against human leucocyte antigens (HLA-DSA) in pediatric and adult kidney transplant recipients are associated with, and presumably caused by, antibodies against the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT₁R-Ab). While the role of AT₁R-Ab for ABMR and graft failure is increasingly recognized, there is little information available on the management of these patients for re-transplantation over the barrier of persisting AT₁R-Ab.

CASE

We report on a male patient with kidney failure in infancy due to obstructive uropathy who had lost his first kidney transplant due to AT₁R-Ab-mediated chronic ABMR. Because this antibody persisted during 4 years of hemodialysis, for the 2nd kidney transplantation (living-related transplantation from his mother), he underwent a desensitization regimen consisting of 15 plasmapheresis sessions, infusions of intravenous immunoglobulin G and thymoglobulin, as well as pharmacological blockade of the Angiotensin II (AT II) pathway by candesartan. This intense desensitization regimen transiently decreased elevated AT₁R-Ab titers, resulting in stable short-term kidney allograft function. The subsequent clinical course, however, was complicated by acute cellular rejection and chronic ABMR due to persistent AT₁R-Ab and de novo HLA-DSA, which shortened allograft survival to a period of only 4 years.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the difficulty of persistently decreasing elevated AT₁R-Ab titers by a desensitization regimen for re-transplantation and the detrimental effect of the interplay between AT₁R-Ab and HLA-DSA on kidney transplant survival.

Non-HLA Abs in Solid Organ Transplantation

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ rejection is well established and these antibodies are routinely monitored both in patients in the waiting list and in the post-transplant setting. More recently, the presence of other antibodies directed towards non-HLA antigens, or the so-called minor histocompatibility antigens, has drawn the attention of the transplant community; however, their possible involvement in the graft outcome remains uncertain. These antibodies have been described to possibly have a role in rejection and allograft failure. This review focuses on the most studied non-HLA antibodies and their association with different clinical outcomes considered in solid organ transplantation with the aim of clarifying their clinical implication and potential relevance for routine testing.

What solid organ transplant healthcare providers should know about renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and COVID-19

The data on the outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients who have contracted coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) are still emerging. Kidney transplant recipients are commonly prescribed renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system (AAS) inhibitors given the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. As the angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) facilitates the entry of coronaviruses into target cells, there have been hypotheses that preexisting use of renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors may increase the risk of developing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. Given the common use of RAAS inhibitors among solid organ transplant recipients, we sought to review the RAAS cascade, the mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2 entry, and pertinent data related to the effect of RAAS inhibitors on ACE2 to guide management of solid organ transplant recipients during the COVID‐19 pandemic. At present, there is no clear evidence to support the discontinuation of RAAS inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Angiotensin II type I receptor agonistic autoantibodies are associated with poor allograft survival in liver retransplantation

Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) agonistic autoantibodies (AT1R-AA) are detrimental to kidney transplantation. Early studies suggested a similar negative effect in primary liver transplantation. Here, we studied AT1R-AA in a retrospective cohort of 94 patients who received a second liver transplant to determine their prevalence and effects. The concentrations of preformed AT1R-AA before transplantation were higher (P = .019) in the 48 patients who lost their liver grafts than in the 46 patients whose grafts survived. About half (48/94, 51.1%) of the patients were positive for AT1R-AA >17 U/mL before the second liver transplantation. In 22 (23.4%) patients, strong positive AT1R-AA (defined as >40 U/mL) were detected, of whom 16 (72.7%) patients lost their grafts. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with strong positive AT1R-AA had significantly worse graft survival than those with AT1R-AA <40 U/mL (P = .035). In multivariate Cox models that included confounders such as sex and age, either AT1R-AA >40 U/mL (HR = 1.999 [1.085-3.682], P = .026) or increased concentrations of AT1R-AA (HR = 1.003 [1.001-1.006] per incremental U/mL, P = .019) were significantly associated with elevated risk for graft loss. In conclusion, our data indicate that there is a high prevalence of AT1R-AA in candidates for second liver transplantation and that their presence is associated with inferior long-term outcomes of the second graft.

Xenoreactive antibodies and latent fibrin formation in VAD and cardiac transplant recipients can confound the detection and measurement of anti-AT1R antibodies

Autoantibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) are thought to be important in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), especially in the absence of anti-HLA antibodies. We used a variety of methods to examine the specificity of a commercially available kit designed to quantitate anti-AT1R antibodies. We found that fibrin formation in serum samples from patients awaiting cardiac transplantation with ventricular assist devices (VADs) can produce falsely elevated anti-AT1R values. In addition, absorption studies with a variety of cell lines with or without expression of human AT1R, and those that express xenoantigens, suggest that many of the antibodies detected in the AT1R test system are heterophilic and have reactivity to xenoantigens. Furthermore, we provide data that show that reactivity to the sialic acid Neu5Gc is a common finding among samples that are highest in anti-AT1R levels. We conclude that a common laboratory method for quantitation of anti-AT1R antibodies is nonspecific and overestimates the frequency of true positives. A reevaluation of the role that anti-AT1R antibodies play in allograft function and patient outcomes is warranted.

Pre-transplant AT1R antibodies correlate with early allograft rejection

Studies investigating the potential pathogenic effects of non-HLA antibodies (Ab) have identified Ab against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁R-Ab) as a risk factor for rejection and kidney graft loss. This study sought to validate the risk of AT₁R-Ab for acute rejection and to explore the role of other non-HLA Abs in this capacity. Pre- and post-transplant sera from a cohort of 101 patients (n=453 samples total) were tested for AT₁R-Ab and other non-HLA Ab using a commercially available ELISA kit and the Luminex platform, respectively. Patients positive for pre-transplant AT₁R-Ab were more likely to develop de novo donor-specific Ab (dnDSA) compared to patients that were negative for AT₁R-Ab (28% vs 10%, p=0.027). Pre-transplant positivity for AT₁R-Ab was associated with TCMR in the first year post-transplant (p=0.034), but did not predict graft loss independent of dnDSA (p=0.063). AT₁R-Ab positivity was significantly associated with positivity for Ab against the endothelin A type 1 receptor (ET_AR-Ab) inclusive of all study time points (p=0.0021). Given the high prevalence of AT₁R-Ab pre-transplant (20%) and its association with dnDSA and early TCMR, a prospective study to determine if more intense immunosuppression and/or AT₁R blockade has an impact on outcomes in these patients is warranted.

Endothelial Cells in Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Kidney Transplantation: Pathogenesis Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been identified as a main obstacle for stable immune tolerance and long survival of kidney allografts. In spite of new insights into the underlying mechanisms of AMR, accurate diagnosis and efficient treatment are still challenges in clinical practice. Endothelium is the first barrier between recipients' immune systems and grafts in vascularized organ transplants. Considering that endothelial cells express a number of antigens that can be attacked by various allo- and autoantibodies, endothelial cells act as main targets for the recipients' humoral immune responses. Importantly, emerging evidence has shown that endothelial cells in transplants could also initiate protective mechanisms in response to immune injuries. A better understanding of the role of endothelial cells during the pathogenesis of AMR might provide novel therapeutic targets. In the present review, we summarize the antigens expressed by endothelial cells and also discuss the activation and accommodation of endothelial cells as well as their clinical implications. Collectively, the progress discussed in this review indicates endothelial cells as promising targets to improve current diagnosis and therapeutic regimens for AMR.

Pretransplant angiotensin II type 1-receptor antibodies are a risk factor for earlier detection of de novo HLA donor-specific antibodies

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1Rabs) have been associated with significantly reduced graft survival. Earlier graft loss has been observed in patients who had pretransplant AT1Rabs and posttransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA).

METHODS

The main goal of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the association between AT1Rabs and the time period to detection of de novo human leukocyte antigen (HLA-DSA) posttransplantation in living donor kidney transplant recipients (KTR). The analysis included 141 KTRs. Pretransplant frozen serum samples were tested for AT1Rabs by ELISA and HLA-DSA by SAB (Luminex) at both the pre- and post-KT time points.

RESULTS

The median AT1Rab level was 9.13 U (interquartile range 5.22-14.33). After a mean follow-up period of 3.55 years, 48 patients were found to harbour de novo HLA-DSAs. The presence of AT1Rabs [hazard ratio (HR) 1.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.002-1.01, P = 0.010], male-to-male transplantation (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.42-4.67, P = 0.002) and antecedent borderline changes or acute cellular rejection (ACR) (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.29-4.75, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with de novo DSA detection. A dose-dependent association between AT1Rab levels (<10 U, 10.1-16.9 U, 17-29.9 U and >30 U) and de novo DSA detection was observed (log-rank P = 0.0031). After multivariate analysis of AT1Rab levels (continuous variable), AT1Rabs >30 U, male-to-male transplantation, donor age, higher class I percentage of Panel Reactive Antibody and antecedent borderline changes or ACR remained as independent significant risk factors for the detection of de novo DSAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that higher levels of pretransplant circulating antibodies against AT1R (>30 U) in kidney graft recipients constitute an independent risk factor for earlier de novo HLA-DSA detection during the posttransplant period.

Investigation of Serum Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibodies at the Time of Renal Allograft Rejection

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is responsible for cardiovascular effects mediated by angiotensin II. This study aimed to investigate the impact of antibodies directed against AT1R (anti-AT1R) in renal allograft rejection.

METHODS

We evaluated 53 patients who had biopsy-proven rejection including antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (N=22), T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (N=29), and mixed AMR and TCMR (N=2). Donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and anti-AT1Rs were simultaneously determined.

RESULTS

Anti-AT1Rs were detected in 9.4% (5/53) of rejection patients (one with acute AMR, two with chronic active AMR, one with acute TCMR, and one with mixed acute AMR & TCMR). HLA antibodies and DSA were detected in 75.5% (40/53) and 49.1% (26/53) of patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in transplant characteristics between anti-AT1R(+) and anti-AT1R(-) patients except for the association of HLA class-I DSA(+) and anti-AT1R(+). Four of five anti-AT1R(+) patients had DSA and were also found to have AMR. A single anti-AT1R(+)/DSA(-) patient developed acute TCMR. Detection rates of DSA, HLA antibodies, or anti-AT1R were not different between AMR and TCMR. However, DSA(+)/anti-AT1R(+) was more frequently found in AMR than in TCMR (P=0.036). Patients with anti-AT1R showed a greater tendency to develop high-grade rejection as Banff IIA/IIB or AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of anti-AT1R was significantly associated with HLA class-I DSA in renal allograft rejection patients. Both anti-AT1R and DSA positivity was associated with AMR in patients with renal allograft rejection.

Coronary microvasculopathy in heart transplantation: Consequences and therapeutic implications

Despite the progress made in the prevention and treatment of rejection of the transplanted heart, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains the main cause of death in late survival transplanted patients. CAV consists of a progressive diffuse intimal hyperplasia and the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, ending in wall thickening of epicardial vessels, intramyocardial arteries (50-20 μm), arterioles (20-10 μm), and capillaries (< 10 μm). The etiology of CAV remains unclear; both immunologic and non-immunologic mechanisms contribute to endothelial damage with a sustained inflammatory response. The immunological factors involved are Human Leukocyte Antigen compatibility between donor and recipient, alloreactive T cells and the humoral immune system. The non-immunological factors are older donor age, ischemia-reperfusion time, hyperlipidemia and CMV infections. Diagnostic techniques that are able to assess microvascular function are lacking. Intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve, when performed during coronary angiography, are able to detect epicardial coronary artery disease but are not sensitive enough to assess microvascular changes. Some authors have proposed an index of microcirculatory resistance during maximal hyperemia, which is calculated by dividing pressure by flow (distal pressure multiplied by the hyperemic mean transit time). Non-invasive methods to assess coronary physiology are stress echocardiography, coronary flow reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance. In this review, we intend to analyze the mechanisms, consequences and therapeutic implications of microvascular dysfunction, including an extended citation of relevant literature data.

Graft microvascular disease in solid organ transplantation

Alloimmune inflammation damages the microvasculature of solid organ transplants during acute rejection. Although immunosuppressive drugs diminish the inflammatory response, they do not directly promote vascular repair. Repetitive microvascular injury with insufficient regeneration results in prolonged tissue hypoxia and fibrotic remodeling. While clinical studies show that a loss of the microvascular circulation precedes and may act as an initiating factor for the development of chronic rejection, preclinical studies demonstrate that improved microvascular perfusion during acute rejection delays and attenuates tissue fibrosis. Therefore, preservation of a functional microvasculature may represent an effective therapeutic strategy for preventing chronic rejection. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of the role of the microvasculature in the long-term survival of transplanted solid organs. We also highlight microvessel-centered therapeutic strategies for prolonging the survival of solid organ transplants.