Subcutaneous administration of IgG

How I Treat Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Podcast

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated neuropathy that typically presents with progressive or relapsing, symmetric, proximal, and distal weakness of upper and lower limbs, sensory involvement of at least two limbs, and decreased or absent deep tendon reflexes. The symptoms of CIDP can be similar to those of other neuropathies, making diagnosis difficult, which can often lead to delays in correct diagnosis and treatment. The updated European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) 2021 guideline outlines a set of diagnostic criteria that help to identify CIDP with high accuracy and provides recommendations for the treatment of CIDP. The aim of this podcast, featuring Dr. Urvi Desai (Professor of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health Neurosciences Institute Wake Forest Baptist, Charlotte), is to discuss how the new guideline impacts diagnosis and treatment decisions in her everyday clinical practice. Using a patient case study example, the updated guideline recommends assessing a patient for clinical, electrophysiological, and supportive criteria for CIDP, enabling a more straightforward diagnosis of either typical CIDP, a CIDP variant, or an autoimmune nodopathy. A second patient case study highlights how the new guideline no longer considers autoimmune nodopathies as CIDP, as patients with these disorders do not meet hallmark CIDP criteria. This leaves an unmet need in terms of guidance on how to treat this subset of patients. Although the new guideline has not necessarily changed treatment preference in clinical practice, the addition of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) into the guideline now better reflects clinical practice. The guideline helps to define and categorize CIDP more simply and consistently, allowing quicker and more accurate diagnosis, leading to a positive impact on treatment response and prognosis. These real-world insights into the diagnosis and management of patients with CIDP could help guide best clinical practice and help facilitate optimization of patient outcomes.

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with immunodeficiencies: impact of infusion method on patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Understanding the impact of different immunoglobulin (Ig) infusion methods (intravenous [IVIg] and subcutaneous [SCIg]) upon treatment experience can potentially facilitate optimization of patient outcomes. Here, the perspective of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiency diseases (PID and SID, respectively) receiving IVIg and SCIg was evaluated, in terms of treatment satisfaction, accounting for treatment history, using Association des Patients Immunodéficients du Québec (APIQ) survey data.

METHODS

The online APIQ survey (shared October 2020-March 2021) of patients with immunodeficiencies in Canada contained 101 questions on: Ig use, history, and detailed infusion characteristics; as well as structured patient-reported outcomes such as treatment satisfaction (via TSQM-9), symptom state (via PASS), general health perception (via GHP), and physical and mental function (via PROMIS). Adult respondents (≥ 18 years old) currently using Ig were compared by their current Ig infusion method (IVIg or SCIg cohort) overall, and in a sub-analysis, the IVIg cohort was compared with the SCIg cohort after stratification by respondents who started SCIg when naïve to Ig ('SCIg naïve') or with previous IVIg experience ('SCIg switch').

RESULTS

In total, 54 respondents currently used IVIg and 242 used SCIg. The average duration per infusion of a weekly SCIg infusion was significantly shorter compared with the average duration of a 3-4 weekly IVIg infusion (p < 0.001). The SCIg cohort was associated with significantly higher scores for the TSQM-9 effectiveness domain compared with the IVIg cohort. The scores for TSQM-9 convenience and global satisfaction domains were similar in the two cohorts. The SCIg cohort was also associated with a significantly higher proportion of respondents who were in an acceptable symptom state and a lower proportion who reported very poor or poor perception of health compared with the IVIg cohort. Further, the SCIg naïve subgroup was associated with significantly higher TSQM-9 effectiveness and convenience domain scores compared with the IVIg cohort, while there was no significant difference between the SCIg switch subgroup and the IVIg cohort in terms of convenience.

CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of how different IgRT administration methods impact treatment experience and satisfaction may assist with informed treatment decision making and ultimately further improvements in patient outcomes.

A clinician's guide for administration of high-concentration and facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is the standard-of-care treatment for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases who have impaired antibody production and function. Clinicians and patients may consider intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) options, and each route may offer different benefits for the individual. IVIG requires fewer infusion sites and less frequent infusions than some formulations of SCIG. However, SCIG does not require venous access, is associated with fewer systemic adverse infusion reactions than IVIG, and can independently be self-administered at home. Importantly, tailoring treatment experiences to the needs of the individual may improve treatment adherence and quality of life for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases who often rely on long-term or lifelong treatment. This review aims to educate United States (US) healthcare providers on the administration process of SCIG, with a focus on more concentrated formulations of SCIG and facilitated SCIG. It provides practical guidance on initiating, optimizing, and monitoring SCIG therapy. The advantages and disadvantages of the different treatment options are also presented for discussion between the patient and clinician.

Systemic IgG exposure and safety in patients with primary immunodeficiency: a randomized crossover study comparing a novel investigational wearable infusor versus the Crono pump

Aim: A novel, Investigational Wearable Infusor (IWI) was evaluated in a randomized, controlled, crossover, open-label study to determine if its delivery of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IgPro20) achieved a comparable area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) versus the Crono S-PID-50 infusion pump (CP). EudraCT: 2016-003798-16. Materials & methods: Patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) were randomized to receive IgPro20 in Sequence 1 (CP/IWI) or 2 (IWI/CP). The primary end point was AUC for IgG during the final week of each 4-week period. Results: 23 patients were enrolled. Evaluation of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (pre-infusion) to 7 days after infusion (AUC_0-7 days) (IWI: 1806 h*g/l; CP: 1829 h*g/l) and geometric mean ratio indicated comparable AUCs for IgG for both devices. Conclusion: Similar IgG exposure, indicated by AUC values, can be achieved with IgPro20 using the IWI or CP in PID.

Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of subcutaneous and intravenous IgG dosing in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases

A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for comparing the PK of subcutaneously administered immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy (SCIG) with Gamunex-C 10% or SCIG 20% formulations in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases was developed using data from 3 clinical trials (N = 95, 69.5% adults, 30.5% <18 years) of intravenous IG (IVIG) 10% and SCIG 10% or SCIG 20%. Serum IgG exposure following switches from IVIG 10% every 3 or 4 weeks to biweekly SCIG 20% (dose adjustment factor 1.0 or 1.37) and from weekly SCIG 20% to biweekly SCIG 20% or SCIG 20% 2-7 times/week was simulated. The PK of IVIG 10% and SCIG 20% were adequately described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption rate constant of exogenous IgG from an SC depot compartment into the central compartment and first-order elimination from the central compartment. Switching from IVIG 10% every 4 weeks to biweekly SCIG 20% produced similar serum IgG exposure, with lower peak and higher trough serum IgG concentrations. Switching from IVIG 10% every 3 or 4 weeks to weekly and biweekly SCIG 20% yielded comparable IgG exposure and clinically effective trough IgG concentrations.

Cancer-Cell-Derived IgG and Its Potential Role in Tumor Development

Human immunoglobulin G (IgG) is the primary component of the human serum antibody fraction, representing about 75% of the immunoglobulins and 10-20% of the total circulating plasma proteins. Generally, IgG sequences are highly conserved, yet the four subclasses, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4, differ in their physiological effector functions by binding to different IgG-Fc receptors (FcγR). Thus, despite a similarity of about 90% on the amino acid level, each subclass possesses a unique manner of antigen binding and immune complex formation. Triggering FcγR-expressing cells results in a wide range of responses, including phagocytosis, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and complement activation. Textbook knowledge implies that only B lymphocytes are capable of producing antibodies, which recognize specific antigenic structures derived from pathogens and infected endogenous or tumorigenic cells. Here, we review recent discoveries, including our own observations, about misplaced IgG expression in tumor cells. Various studies described the presence of IgG in tumor cells using immunohistology and established correlations between high antibody levels and promotion of cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and poor clinical prognosis for the respective tumor patients. Furthermore, blocking tumor-cell-derived IgG inhibited tumor cells. Tumor-cell-derived IgG might impede antigen-dependent cellular cytotoxicity by binding antigens while, at the same time, lacking the capacity for complement activation. These findings recommend tumor-cell-derived IgG as a potential therapeutic target. The observed uniqueness of Ig heavy chains expressed by tumor cells, using PCR with V(D)J rearrangement specific primers, suggests that this specific part of IgG may additionally play a role as a potential tumor marker and, thus, also qualify for the neoantigen category.

Long-Term Experience of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Pediatric Primary Immunodeficient Patients with Low and Normal Body Weight

PURPOSE

The aim was to review the compliance, side effects and effectiveness of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) supplementation in patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) who had previously received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy and subsequently switched to SCIG, as well as to compare these parameters in patients while considering body weight.

METHODS

Demographic data, clinical and laboratory findings, SCIG dose, and side effects of 87 patients were retrospectively obtained from patient files. In patients who first received IVIG and then SCIG, the monthly SCIG dose was calculated by multiplying the IVIG dose by 1.37. The total monthly SCIG dose was distributed via injection across three or four doses per month, thus every 7 or 10 days.

RESULTS

Of the 87 patients aged between one and 22 years, 50 were male (57.5%) and 37 were female (42.5%). The serum IgG levels of the SCIG group were higher and more stable than those of the IVIG group. The number of hospitalizations and infections decreased significantly after initiation of SCIG. Thirteen patients (14.9%) had low body weight (LBW) for their age, seven of whom were male (53.8%). Serum IgG levels of the LBW cohort were significantly elevated and more stable during the SCIG period than the IVIG period. Mild, local side effects were detected in 153 administrations (3.3%) in 30 patients with normal body weight, while no local reactions were recorded in the patients with LBW.

CONCLUSION

SCIG supplementation is an effective treatment for pediatric patients with PID. The preliminary data from the present study suggest that such treatment is also safe for LBW children. The numbers of patient hospitalizations and family visits to clinics were reduced, allowing our patients and their parents to live more normal lives.

Persons Living With Primary Immunodeficiency Act as Citizen Scientists and Launch Prospective Cohort Body Temperature Study

Background

Although fever is considered a sign of infection, many individuals with primary immunodeficiency (PI) anecdotally report a lower-than-normal average body temperature on online forums sponsored by the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF). There is limited knowledge about the average body temperature and fever response in PI.

Objective

This study aims to compare median body temperatures between adults with and without PI diagnoses living in the same household and to engage individuals living with PI throughout the research process.

Methods

Patients with PI designed and launched a prospective cohort comparison study as citizen scientists. A multidisciplinary team designed and implemented a patient-informed study with continuous patient-driven input. Median body temperatures were compared between the 2 cohorts using the Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction. The IDF conducted a post-study patient experience survey.

Results

Data from 254 households were analyzed (254/350, 72.6% participation rate). The PI population was predominantly female (218/254, 85.8%), White (248/254, 97.6%), and with a median age of 49 years. The non-PI population was largely male (170/254, 66.9%), White (236/254, 92.9%), and with a median age of 53 years. Common variable immunodeficiency was the most common PI diagnosis (190/254, 74.8%). Of the 254 individuals with PI, 123 (48.4%) reported a lower-than-normal nonsick body temperature, whereas 108 (42.5%) reported a normal (between 97°F and 99°F) nonsick body temperature. Among individuals with PI, when infected, 67.7% (172/254) reported the absence of fever, whereas 19.7% (50/254) reported a normal fever response. The recorded median body temperature was minimally but statistically significantly higher for patients with PI in the morning. Although 22.4% (57/254) of patients with PI self-reported illness, a fever of 100.4°F or higher was uncommon; 77.2% (196/254) had a normal temperature (between 97°F and 99°F), and 16.2% (41/254) had a lower-than-normal temperature (between 95.0°F and 96.9°F) when sick. For these sick patients with PI, the median body temperature was minimally but statistically significantly higher for patients in the morning and early evening. Overall, 90.9% (231/254) of participants would be very likely to participate in future IDF studies, although 94.1% (239/254) participants had never taken part in previous studies.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate average body temperature in individuals with PI. Although there were small statistically significant differences in body temperatures between PI and non-PI subjects, the clinical significance is unclear and should be interpreted with caution, given the methodological issues associated with our small convenience sample and study design. As PIs are heterogeneous, more research is needed about how the fever response differs among diverse PIs compared with healthy controls. This study highlights that individuals with PI are knowledgeable about their health and can offer unique insights and direction to researchers and clinicians.

PROMIS-29 survey confirms major impact of fatigue on health-related quality of life in common variable immunodeficiency

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an emerging topic of interest in patients with immunodeficiency. Information about HRQOL in common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is limited. The primary objective was to compare primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) patients with and without common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) on HRQOL domains using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) survey data from the United States Immunodeficiency Network (USIDNET) registry. The primary endpoint variables were scores on 7 HRQOL domains. The USIDNET registry was used to select patients with baseline PROMIS-29 data collected between 2015 and 2018. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, and Student's two-sample t test were used to compare patients with CVID versus patients with non-CVID on demographic and clinical characteristics. The single-sample t test was used to compare sample means to the normed population mean of 50. A general linear model approach to multiple regression with backward selection was used to remove factors that did not contribute significant information to the multivariable models, while controlling for multiple testing. Potential explanatory variables included group (CVID/non-CVID), sex, age, and BMI. Among 184 PIDD patients, 146 (79%) were diagnosed with CVID. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 53 (13.8), were predominantly female (83%), and were Caucasian (98%). PROMIS-29 results revealed a significant effect of group (CVID/non-CVID) on the anxiety, fatigue, and social participation domains, with fatigue being the most statistically significant. Fatigue, anxiety, and social participation may be key factors influencing HRQOL among patients with CVID. Future prospective longitudinal studies using PROMIS-29 will be needed to confirm these findings and to determine the mechanisms through which these factors develop in CVID, and how they can be improved.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in primary immunodeficiency - impact of training and infusion characteristics on patient-reported outcomes

Background

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is increasingly utilized in primary immunodeficiency (PI). Understanding factors associated with treatment experience and satisfaction can optimize patient outcomes. We analyzed Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) survey data to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in relation to SCIG training and infusion characteristics. Respondents’ PRO scores were rank ordered into ‘best’, ‘intermediate’, and ‘worst’ tertiles. Predicted probabilities of being in the best tertile with any combination of characteristics were generated for each PRO.

Results

In 366 SCIG respondents, higher odds of being in the best PRO tertile were driven by favorable training characteristics (particularly, higher confidence post-training and no training barriers) and efficient infusions (infusion preparation ≤20 min and actual infusion < 2 h). Age (≤17 years old) and treatment experience (> 2 years) increased the odds of being in the best tertiles. Compared with the least favorable training/infusion characteristics, those with the most favorable training/infusion characteristics had higher predicted probabilities of being in the best tertiles: TSQM side effects, 59% vs 4%; convenience, 52% vs 4%; effectiveness, 27% vs 13%; global, 26% vs 3%; PROMIS Fatigue, 44% vs 18%.

Conclusions

Increased experience with SCIG consistently improved PROs, but our findings predicted that enhanced training and infusion characteristics improve patient treatment satisfaction beyond that achieved by experience alone.

Update on immune-mediated therapies for myasthenia gravis

With the exception of thymectomy, immune modulatory treatment strategies and clinical trials in myasthenia gravis over the past 50 y were mainly borrowed from experience in other nonneurologic autoimmune disorders. The current experimental therapy paradigm has significantly changed such that treatments directed against the pathological mechanisms specific to myasthenia gravis are being tested, in some cases as the initial disease indication. Key advances have been made in three areas: (i) the expanded role and long-term benefits of thymectomy, (ii) complement inhibition to prevent antibody-mediated postsynaptic membrane damage, and (iii) neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition as in vivo apheresis, removing pathogenic antibodies. Herein, we discuss these advances and the potential for these newer therapies to significantly influence the current treatment paradigms. While these therapies provide exciting new options with rapid efficacy, there are anticipated challenges to their use, especially in terms of a dramatic increase in cost of care for some patients with myasthenia gravis.

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin for Antibody Deficiency in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-associated Vasculitis

Objectives

Intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) is used to treat antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) patients with recurrent infections as a result of hypogammaglobulinemia (HG) induced by treatment regimens. We sought to characterize clinical features, treatment, and outcomes for patients treated with the novel subcutaneous IgG (SCIG) for the aforementioned purpose. 

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 136 patients in our ANCA database to identify patients with recurrent infections and HG subsequently treated with SCIG. Patient demographics, serologies, treatment, and immunological parameters were assessed. 

Results

Of 136 patients, four were treated with SCIG. All were Caucasian, proteinase-3 (PR3)-positive, and the majority (n = 3) were females. All patients had pulmonary involvement, and regimens of cyclophosphamide (CYC) and/or rituximab (RTX) were employed for induction and remission. Three patients each experienced recurrent bouts of respiratory tract infections and shingles. Ig levels (G, M, and A) were reduced in all patients, except for one patient who had normal IgA levels. CD19/20 cells were depleted and CD3/4/8/NK cells were preserved in all patients. Three patients had no discernible antibody response to the pneumococcal vaccine (specific pneumococcal serotypes measured pre- and post-vaccine). The mean duration elapsed between the first rituximab administration and commencement of SCIG was 7.2 years. The IgG level normalized and none of the patients had a recurrence of infection since the initiation of SCIG. 

Conclusion

This data, albeit preliminary, is the first series that demonstrates SCIG can be a reliable alternative to IVIG in ANCA patients with recurrent infections secondary to HG. Early identification of this subset of patients is likely to mitigate infectious risks, associated morbidity, and hospitalization.

Current clinical practice and challenges in the management of secondary immunodeficiency in hematological malignancies

Objective

Despite long‐standing safe and effective use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) in primary immunodeficiency, clinical data on IgRT in patients with secondary immunodeficiency (SID) due to B‐cell lymphoproliferative diseases are limited. Here, we examine the correlation between approved IgRT indications, treatment recommendations, and clinical practice in SID.

Methods

An international online survey of 230 physicians responsible for the diagnosis of SID and the prescription of IgRT in patients with hematological malignancies was conducted.

Results

Serum immunoglobulin was measured in 83% of patients with multiple myeloma, 76% with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and 69% with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. Most physicians (85%) prescribed IgRT after ≥2 severe infections. In Italy, Germany, Spain, and the United States, immunoglobulin use was above average in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia, while in the UK considerably fewer patients received IgRT. The use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin was highest in France (34%) and lowest in Spain (19%). Immunologists measured specific antibody responses, performed test immunization, implemented IgRT, and used subcutaneous immunoglobulin more frequently than physicians overall.

Conclusions

The management of SID in hematological malignancies varied regionally. Clinical practice did not reflect treatment guidelines, highlighting the need for robust clinical studies on IgRT in this population and harmonization between countries and disciplines.

Clinical Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a New Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 16.5% (Octanorm [Cutaquig®]) in the Treatment of Patients With Primary Immunodeficiencies

Introduction: Subcutaneously administered immunoglobulin (SCIG) is increasingly used to treat patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs). Octanorm (marketed as cutaquig® in USA and Canada) is a new 16.5% solution of human SCIG, manufactured by a process based on that of the intravenous preparation (IVIG) octagam®. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of octanorm in a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase 3 study involving adult and pediatric patients with PIDs (NCT01888484; clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01888484). Methods: Patients who were previously treated with IVIG received a total of 64 weekly SCIG infusions, including 12 weekly infusions during the wash-in/wash-out period, followed by 52 weekly infusions during the evaluation period. Results: A total of 61 patients aged 2-73 years received 3,497 infusions of octanorm. The mean dose per patient was 0.175 g/kg/infusion. The mean calculated dose conversion factor from the patients' previous IVIG dose for octanorm was 1.37. No serious bacterial infections developed during the study. The rate of other infections per person-year during the primary observation period was 3.43 (upper 95% CI 4.57). All but one non-bacterial infection were mild or moderate in intensity. IgG trough levels were constant during the course of the study. Eleven patients (18.0%) experienced 14 mild or moderate systemic adverse events (AEs) related to octanorm. The rate of related AEs per infusion was 0.004. In 76.7% of infusions, no infusion site reactions were observed and only two (0.3%) reactions were deemed severe. The incidence of site reactions decreased with successive infusions. Conclusion: The new 16.5% SCIG octanorm was shown to be efficacious in preventing infections in PIDs, and was well tolerated.

Direct and Indirect Costs of Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID) and X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA) in Italy

BACKGROUND

In Italy, there is scarce evidence on the epidemiological and economic burden induced by primary antibody deficiencies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to elaborate the available epidemiological and cost data in order to estimate the annual expenditure induced by the management of patients affected by the common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) and X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) requiring immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy.

METHODS

A probabilistic cost-of-illness model was developed to estimate the number of patients with CVID and XLA, and the economic burden associated with their therapy in terms of direct or indirect costs. A systematic literature review was carried out to reveal both epidemiological and economic data. Furthermore, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 5000 Monte Carlo simulations was performed.

RESULTS

The epidemiological model allowed us to estimate the number of prevalent patients affected by XLA and CVID in Italy in 2017, corresponding to 1885 (95% confidence interval [CI] 944-3145) and 133 (95% CI 115-152) patients, respectively. The estimated total expenditure for the treatment and management of patients with CVID and XLA requiring Ig replacement therapy amounts to €42.68 million (95% CI €14.38-€86.1 million).

CONCLUSIONS

This information provides a comprehensive perspective of the economic issues, and facilitates better-informed public health decision making, in the management of CVID and XLA in Italy.

Primary immunodeficiency diseases in lung disease: warning signs, diagnosis and management

Background

Pulmonary complications are common in primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) and contribute to morbidity and mortality in these patients. However, their varied presentation and a general lack of awareness of PID in this setting make early diagnosis and treatment difficult. The aim of this study was to define the warning signs of PID in patients with respiratory manifestations, the necessary diagnostic tests, and the therapeutic management of both children and adults.

Methods

A review of the literature was performed, and 43 PID interdisciplinary specialists were consulted.

Results

This document identifies the pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations that should prompt a suspicion of PID, the immunological and respiratory tests that should be included in the diagnostic process according to the level of care, recommendations regarding the use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy according to the specific immunodeficiency, and the minimum recommended immunological and pulmonary monitoring in these patients.

Conclusions

This document is the first to combine scientific evidence with the opinion of a broad panel of experts specializing in the treatment of patients with immunodeficiencies. It aims to provide a useful tool for all practitioners who are regularly involved in the management of these patients.

Individualized immunoglobulin treatment in pediatric patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency disease

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) are a group of genetic conditions that are generally considered to be under-diagnosed, and gaps may exist in the knowledge of treatment options. This review focuses on the diagnosis of pediatric patients with primary antibody deficiency and considerations for treatment with immunoglobulin (IgG) to optimize multiple dosing variables and minimize adverse events. The possibility of individualizing IgG therapy in clinical practice represents, in this field, the next pivotal step with the goal of improving the quality of life of pediatric patients with PIDD.

Efficacy, safety and quality of life in patients receiving subcutaneous IgG treatment: experience in Bogotá, Colombia

AIM

Investigate efficacy, safety and quality of life of Gammanorm^® 16.5% (subcutaneous immunoglobulin [SCIG]) in patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) and safety and to lesser extent efficacy in autoimmune diseases.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Medical records were extracted from 31 pediatric and 12 adult patients who received SCIG as part of the Personalized Program at University Children's Hospital, Bogotá, Colombia.

RESULTS

Mean SCIG dose was 28.7 g/month. Serious bacterial infections were observed in 7/33 patients in the PID group, most often bacterial pneumonia (3/33). There were no serious adverse events related to SCIG treatment. Drug-related adverse reactions were reported in 2/43 patients.

CONCLUSION

Self-administration of SCIG provided effective protection, favorable tolerability and improved quality of life in patients with PIDs and autoimmune diseases from Colombia.

II Brazilian Consensus on the use of human immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiencies

In the last few years, new primary immunodeficiencies and genetic defects have been described. Recently, immunoglobulin products with improved compositions and for subcutaneous use have become available in Brazil. In order to guide physicians on the use of human immunoglobulin to treat primary immunodeficiencies, based on a narrative literature review and their professional experience, the members of the Primary Immunodeficiency Group of the Brazilian Society of Allergy and Immunology prepared an updated document of the 1^st Brazilian Consensus, published in 2010. The document presents new knowledge about the indications and efficacy of immunoglobulin therapy in primary immunodeficiencies, relevant production-related aspects, mode of use (routes of administration, pharmacokinetics, doses and intervals), adverse events (major, prevention, treatment and reporting), patient monitoring, presentations available and how to have access to this therapeutic resource in Brazil.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulins in patients with multiple myeloma and secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: a randomized trial

Multiple myeloma is commonly associated with a reduction of non-paraprotein immunoglobulins, resulting in a higher risk of infections that represent the leading cause of the patients' death. Therefore, immunoglobulin replacement therapy appears a logical approach. A total number of 46 myeloma patients were randomly enrolled: 24 of them were assigned to receive subcutaneous immunoglobulins, and 22 were controls. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the annual rate of severe infections in immunoglobulins-receiving patients as compared with those untreated. Subcutaneous immunoglobulins-treated patients showed a significantly lower number of severe infections per year. Adverse events were limited to the site of infusion and were easily manageable. Health-related quality of life was significantly better in subcutaneous immunoglobulins-receiving patients. By decreasing the rate of infections, the prophylactic administration of SCIg improves both adherence to chemotherapy and health-related quality of life, and is cost-effective by reducing the need of hospitalization and the use of antibiotics.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders and Impact of Treatment

PURPOSE

Common variable immunodeficiency disorder (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) often associated with severe and chronic infections. Patients commonly receive immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment to reduce the cycle of recurrent infection and improve physical functioning. However, how Ig treatment in CVID affects quality of life (QOL) has not been thoroughly evaluated. The purpose of a recent Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) mail survey was to assess the factors that are associated with QOL in patients with CVID receiving Ig treatment.

METHODS

A 75-question survey developed by the IDF and a 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) to assess QOL were mailed to adults with CVID. Mean SF-12 scores were compared between patients with CVID and the general US adult population normative sample.

RESULTS

Overall, 945 patients with CVID completed the surveys. More than half of the patients (54.9%) received intravenous Ig and 44.9% received subcutaneous Ig treatment. Patients with CVID had significantly lower SF-12 scores compared with the general US population regardless of sex or age (p < 0.05). Route of IgG replacement did not dramatically improve QOL. SF-12 scores were highest in patients with CVID who have well-controlled PIDD, lacked physical impairments, were not bothered by treatment, and received Ig infusions at home.

CONCLUSION

These data provide insight into what factors are most associated with physical and mental health, which can serve to improve QOL in patients in this population. Improvements in QOL can result from early detection of disease, limiting digestive system disease, attention to fatigue, and implementation of an individual treatment plan for the patient.

Increased Incidence of Fatigue in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders: Prevalence and Associations Within the US Immunodeficiency Network Registry

INTRODUCTION

Patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) often report fatigue, yet this symptom has not been studied in PID. Fatigue affects 6-7.5% of healthy adults. The goal of this study is to estimate the prevalence of fatigue in patients with PID and investigate its associated factors.

METHODS

We analyzed 2537 PID patients registered in USIDNET to determine responses to the field "fatigue" in the core registry form. Demographics, immune phenotypes, and comorbid conditions were compared between fatigued and non-fatigued patients to identify relevant associations and potential drivers. A focused analysis was performed for patients with predominantly antibody deficiency disorders (PADs).

RESULTS

Fatigue was reported in 25.9% (95% CI 23.7-28.3) of PAD patients, compared to 6.4% (95% CI 4.9-8.2) of non-PAD. Patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) had the highest prevalence of fatigue (p < 0.001) among all PID diagnoses. Other factors that were associated with a higher rate of fatigue among PAD patients included female sex, higher BMI, depression, bronchiectasis, and autoimmunity. Additionally, fatigued PAD patients had lower absolute lymphocyte, CD3, CD4, and CD8 counts compared to non-fatigued patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that fatigue is overrepresented in PAD patients. Prospective studies to estimate prevalence, risk factors, and fatigue etiology in PID are warranted, so therapeutic interventions can be considered.

Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: A review of evidence

Human immunoglobulin preparations for intravenous or subcutaneous administration are the cornerstone of treatment in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases affecting the humoral immune system. Intravenous preparations have a number of important uses in the treatment of other diseases in humans as well, some for which acceptable treatment alternatives do not exist. We provide an update of the evidence-based guideline on immunoglobulin therapy, last published in 2006. Given the potential risks and inherent scarcity of human immunoglobulin, careful consideration of its indications and administration is warranted.

Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in the Treatment of Neuromuscular Disorders

Many neuromuscular diseases may be treated with immunoglobulins. In the United States, the major form of immunoglobulin used is intravenous (IV). Recently, there has been an increased interest in research regarding the use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg), mainly for improved patient quality of life, convenience, potential for fewer systemic adverse events, and avoiding wear-off. The widespread use of the subcutaneous formulation in neurology has been affected by some limitations, mainly the smaller volume and higher frequency of infusions compared to IV administration. Also, there are different pharmacokinetic properties that should be considered to evaluate whether they change the immunomodulatory effect. There are several formulations available that address some limitations. Several studies have assessed efficacy, safety, and quality of life of SCIg in neurology. This review article summarizes the current evidence for the use of SCIg in neuromuscular diseases. It also addresses the pharmacokinetic differences and the different formulations available. The current available preliminary evidence indicates that SCIg is at least as effective as the IV formulations.

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in the Chronic Management of Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin therapy has become a major treatment option in several autoimmune neuromuscular disorders. For patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been used for both crisis and chronic management. Subcutaneous Immunoglobulins (SCIg), which offer the advantage of home administration, may be a practical and effective option in chronic management of MG. We analyzed clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in nine cases of chronic disabling MG who were either transitioned to, or started de novo on SCIg.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This was a retrospective cohort study for the period of 2015-2016, with a mean follow-up period of 6.8 months after initiation of SCIg. All patients with MG treated with SCIg at the Ottawa Hospital, a large Canadian tertiary hospital with subspecialty expertise in neuromuscular disorders were included, regardless of MG severity, clinical subtype and antibody status. The primary outcome was MG disease activity after SCIg initiation. This outcome was measured by 1) the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification, and 2) subjective scales of disease activity including the Myasthenia Gravis activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL), Myasthenia Gravis Quality-of-life (MG-QOL 15), Visual Analog (VA) satisfaction scale. We also assessed any requirement for emergency department visits or hospitalizations. Safety outcomes included any SCIg related complication. All patients were stable or improved for MGFA class after SCIg initiation. Statistically significant improvements were documented in the MG-ADL, MG-QOL and VAS scales. There were no exacerbations after switching therapy and no severe SCIg related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SCIg may be a beneficial therapy in the chronic management of MG, with favorable clinical outcome and patient satisfaction results.

Long-Term Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase-Facilitated Subcutaneous Infusion of Human Immunoglobulin for Primary Immunodeficiency

Purpose

Treatment of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) with subcutaneous (SC) infusions of IgG preceded by injection of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) (IGHy) to increase SC tissue permeability was evaluated in two consecutive, prospective, non-controlled, multi-center studies.

Methods

Subjects >4 years of age received SC IgG replacement at a weekly dose equivalent of 108 % of their previous intravenous (IV) dose, facilitated by prior injection of 75 U/g IgG of rHuPH20. Starting with weekly SC infusions, the interval was increased (ramped-up) to a 3- or 4-week schedule.

Results

Eighty-three subjects (24 < 18 years; 59 ≥ 18 years) received 2729 infusions (excluding ramp-up) at a mean dose of 0.155 g/kg/week in the pivotal and 0.156 g/kg/week in the extension study. IGHy exposure exceeded 30 months in 48 subjects.

During 187.7 subject-years of IGHy exposure, 2005 adverse events (AEs) (10.68 per subject-year) occurred. The rate of related systemic AEs during consecutive 1-year periods remained low; the rate of related local AEs decreased from 3.68/subject-year in months 1–12 to approximately 1.50/subject-year after 30 months of treatment. Fifteen subjects transiently developed anti-rHuPH20 binding antibody. There was no difference in AE rates in these subjects before and after the first titer increase to ≥1:160.

The rate of infections during IGHy exposure was 2.99 per subject-year and did not increase during the studies. Annual infection rates were 3.02 in subjects <18 years and 2.98 in subjects ≥18 years.

Conclusions

Long-term replacement therapy with IGHy was safe and effective in 83 pediatric and adult subjects with PIDD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10875-016-0298-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Various Administration Routes of Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis

The study's primary objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) 300-mg doses of natalizumab with IV 300-mg doses of natalizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Secondary objectives included investigation of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of repeated SC and IM natalizumab doses. DELIVER was a 32-week, open-label, multicenter study of natalizumab-naive patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) randomized to receive 300 mg natalizumab by SC injection, IM injection, or IV infusion. PK and PD were evaluated over 8 weeks after the first natalizumab treatment (Part 1) and over 24 weeks with repeated dosing every 4 weeks, beginning at week 8 (Part 2). Seventy-six patients (24 with RRMS and 52 with SPMS) were enrolled in DELIVER. Following SC or IM administration of natalizumab, peak serum concentrations were approximately 40% of those observed with IV administration and showed no major differences in elimination characteristics. Mean bioavailability relative to IV administration was 57.1% to 71.3% with SC administration and 48.7% with IM administration; mean trough serum concentrations were similar with SC or IV administration and lower with IM administration. Following single or multiple doses of natalizumab, PD response was comparable across administration routes and disease stages. No meaningful differences were observed across administration groups in the incidence or nature of overall adverse events, serious adverse events, administration site reactions, hypersensitivity reactions, or antinatalizumab antibodies. These findings support the comparability of PD measures of natalizumab administered IV, SC, or IM.

Quantitative Evidence of Wear-Off Effect at the End of the Intravenous IgG (IVIG) Dosing Cycle in Primary Immunodeficiency

PURPOSE

Intravenous IgG (IVIG) treatment wear-off is commonly experienced by patients, who report increased susceptibility to infection, and decreased quality of life towards the end of their 3- or 4-week dosing cycle, when serum IgG levels approach their trough. We quantified IVIG wear-off in terms of treatment efficacy and patient well-being.

METHODS

Data were collected from patients enrolled in three Phase III trials of Sandoglobulin NF Liquid or Privigen, treated every 3- or 4- weeks. Pooled analyses of raw patient data compared the rate of infection and other clinical outcomes during the course of the dosing cycle. Subjective symptoms of wear-off were quantified by comparing patient-reported overall well-being scores.

RESULTS

The probability of a first infection in the final week of the IVIG cycle was 1.26 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.76-2.11; p = 0.3621) and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.04-2.32; p = 0.0314) times higher than in the first week, for patients on a 3-week cycle and 4-week dosing cycles, respectively. Wear-off, as manifested by a decrease in overall well-being, was experienced in 10% of all cycles and reported at least once by 61% of the patients on a 3-week cycle, and 43% of those on a 4-week cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the existence of decreased efficacy (treatment wear-off) towards the end of a 3-4 week IVIG dosing cycle, and provide a quantifiable evaluation to a phenomenon typically reported anecdotally. For patients experiencing wear-off, increasing the IgG dose or shortening the dosing interval and/or a switch to SCIG may be beneficial.

Facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIg) therapy--practical considerations

There is an increasing range of therapeutic options for primary antibody-deficient patients who require replacement immunoglobulin. These include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg), rapid push SCIg and most recently recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIg (fSCIg). Advantages of fSCIg include fewer needle punctures, longer infusion intervals and an improved adverse effect profile relative to IVIg. Limited real-life experience exists concerning the practical aspects of switching or starting patients on fSCIg. We describe the first 14 patients who have been treated with fSCIg at the Immunodeficiency Centre for Wales (ICW), representing more than 6 patient-years of experience. The regimen was well tolerated, with high levels of satisfaction and no increase in training requirement, including for a treatment-naive patient. Two patients discontinued fSCIg due to pain and swelling at the infusion site, and one paused therapy following post-infusion migraines. Ultrasound imaging of paired conventional and facilitated SCIg demonstrated clear differences in subcutaneous space distribution associated with a 10-fold increase in rate and volume delivery with fSCIg. Patient profiles for those choosing fSCIg fell into two main categories: those experiencing clinical problems with their current treatment and those seeking greater convenience and flexibility. When introducing fSCIg, consideration of the type and programming of infusion pump, needle gauge and length, infusion site, up-dosing schedule, home training and patient information are important, as these may differ from conventional SCIg. This paper provides guidance on practical aspects of the administration, training and outcomes to help inform decision-making for this new treatment modality.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in treating inflammatory neuromuscular disorders

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous immunoglobulin administration has long been used in the treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular disorders. Immunoglobulins may be administered by intramuscular, intravenous or subcutaneous routes.

METHODS

This is a report on the long-term clinical follow up of six patients with inflammatory neuromuscular disorders, that is, three chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), one multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), one inclusion body myositis (IBM) and one myasthenia gravis (MG), treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulins for a mean of 3.25 years.

RESULTS

One MMN and two CIDP patients received a weekly dose of subcutaneous immunoglobulins equivalent to intravenous immunoglobulin. One CIDP patient received a 50% dose reduction, the IBM patient received a 30% reduction and the MG patient a 20% reduction. The lower dose chosen in the majority of patients was based not only on clinical effects, but also on studies of primary immunodeficiency syndromes. One patient with CIDP showed clinical fluctuation, which was successfully treated with an adaptation of the dose of subcutaneous immunoglobulins, while the remaining patients with neuromuscular disorders had a stable clinical course for 2 years. No serious side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that subcutaneous immunoglobulins can be an attractive alternative therapy in autoimmune neuromuscular disorders.

Recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) facilitates subcutaneous infusions of large volumes of immunoglobulin in a swine model

Many patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) require lifelong immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy. Home-based subcutaneous (SC) infusion provides advantages to patients with PIDD compared to hospital-based intravenous infusion. One limitation of current practice with SCIg infusion is the need for small-volume infusions at multiple injection sites on a frequent basis. A method was developed for large-volume SC infusion that uses preinfusion of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) to facilitate fluid dispersion. Miniature swine was used as a preclinical model to assess the effects of rHuPH20-facilitated infusions, of a single monthly dose, on fluid dispersion, infusion-related pressure, swelling, induration, and tissue damage. Preinfusion of vehicle (control) or rHuPH20 (75 U/g Ig) was performed simultaneously on contralateral abdominal sites on each animal, followed by infusion of 300 mL 10 % Ig (30 g) at each site. Compared to control infusions, rHuPH20 significantly reduced infusion pressure and induration (p < 0.05) and accelerated postinfusion Ig dispersion. Histological evaluation of infusion site tissue showed moderate to severe swelling for the control. Swelling after rHuPH20-facilitated infusion was mild on day 1 and had completely resolved shortly thereafter. Laser Doppler imaging of control infusion sites revealed local cutaneous hypoperfusion during Ig infusion, which was reduced almost 7-fold (p < 0.05) with the use of rHuPH20. These results demonstrate that rHuPH20-facilitated Ig infusion is associated with improved dispersion of Ig, resulting in reduced tissue pressure, induration, and reduced risk of tissue damage from mechanical trauma or local ischemia, thus enabling SC administration of large volumes of Ig at a single site.

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy in secondary hypogammaglobulinemia

Immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy dramatically changed the clinical course of primary hypogammaglobulinemias, significantly reducing the incidence of infectious events. Over the last two decades its use has been extended to secondary antibody deficiencies, particularly those related to hematological disorders as lymphoproliferative diseases (LPDs) and multiple myeloma. In these malignancies, hypogammaglobulinemia can be an intrinsic aspect of the disease or follow chemo-immunotherapy regimens, including anti-CD20 treatment. Other than in LPDs the broadening use of immunotherapy (e.g., rituximab) and immune-suppressive therapy (steroids, sulfasalazine, and mycophenolate mofetil) has extended the occurrence of iatrogenic hypogammaglobulinemia. In particular, in both autoimmune diseases and solid organ transplantation Ig replacement therapy has been shown to reduce the rate of infectious events. Here, we review the existing literature about Ig replacement therapy in secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, with special regard for subcutaneous administration route, a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment approach, currently well established in primary immunodeficiencies and secondary hypogammaglobulinemias.

Initiation of immunoglobulin therapy by subcutaneous administration in immunodeficiency patients naive to replacement therapy

Background

Patients with immunodeficiency diseases require lifelong treatment with immunoglobulin (Ig), yet few studies have vetted dosing strategies and effectiveness of Ig in older patient populations. Patients requiring subcutaneous (SC) Ig (SCIG) typically start with intravenous dosing before transitioning to SCIG weekly maintenance. In this retrospective review, we investigated an alternate strategy with higher initial SC doses among an older patient population with antibody deficiency syndromes.

Findings

Records of 13 patients (mean age, 70 years) with antibody deficiencies who were naive to treatment with Ig were assessed. SCIG (Vivaglobin® [Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 16% Liquid] or Hizentra® [Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 20% Liquid]) was given twice weekly (100 mg/kg) for 2 weeks, followed by weekly (100 mg/kg) administration The mean pretreatment IgG level was 460 mg/dL; at 1, 3, and 6 months after SCIG initiation, mean IgG serum levels were 852, 907, and 943 mg/dL, respectively. Maintenance doses were unchanged during 6 months of follow-up. All patients remain on SCIG (median, 44 months). One patient developed sepsis/cholangitis unrelated to treatment 3 months after starting SCIG; no other serious bacterial infections were reported.

Conclusions

Initiation of SCIG by doubling the maintenance dose over 2 weeks may be a well-tolerated and effective option for patients with antibody deficiencies requiring Ig replacement, especially among older patients.

Cost-minimization analysis of IgPro20, a subcutaneous immunoglobulin, in Japanese patients with primary immunodeficiency

PURPOSE

IgPro20, Hizentra(®) an L-proline-stabilized 20% human subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG), has been shown in a Phase III pivotal study to be well tolerated and efficacious in adult and pediatric Japanese patients with primary immunodeficiency. Economic aspects of SCIG treatment in comparison with previous intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy were analyzed in this Phase III study in Japan.

METHODS

Twenty-four Japanese patients with primary immunodeficiency on IVIG treatment were switched to IgPro20 at an equivalent dose (full analysis set). The study consisted of a screening period, an IVIG treatment period with 3 planned infusions every 3 or 4 weeks, a 12-week SCIG wash-in and wash-out period, and a 12-week SCIG efficacy period. The difference in medical cost and productivity loss resulting from changes in hospital frequency between the SCIG and IVIG treatment was evaluated. Information about treatment cost was collected as part of the Life Quality Index questionnaire. In addition, productivity loss and hospital-related absenteeism were evaluated.

FINDINGS

Life Quality Index scores for all domains were higher with SCIG than with IVIG in this patient population. In the full analysis set, the mean (SD) Life Quality Index score of the Costs domain increased from 45.1 (26.34) at Week 1 (IVIG period) to 71.9 (18.52) at Week 24 (end of the SCIG efficacy period), representing a mean change of 26.74 and a large score improvement effect size (1.01). Median productivity loss was reduced by 60% from baseline to Weeks 12 and 24. This resulted in a reduction in costs of JPY 10,875 per patient per month at Weeks 12 and 24. Subcutaneous treatment with IgPro20 also reduced hospital-related absenteeism. The number of patients, parents, or guardians who were not absent from work or housework duties and had no reduction in working time increased from 4 (17.4%) at Week 1 to 9 (39.1%) at Week 24. Similar results were obtained in the per-protocol set (n = 21).

IMPLICATIONS

Switching from IVIG to SCIG reduced markedly productivity loss and hospital-related absenteeism. The reduction in hospital visit frequency due to the use of home-based IgG therapy enabled by the change in administration route is expected to produce an important pharmacoeconomic benefit in Japan. Study Code: ZLB06_002CR, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01199705.

Enhancing Patient Flexibility of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin G Dosing: Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Various Maintenance and Loading Regimens in the Treatment of Primary Immunodeficiency

Introduction

Standard treatment for patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) is monthly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or weekly/biweekly subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) infusion. We used population pharmacokinetic modeling to predict immunoglobulin G (IgG) exposure following a broad range of SCIG dosing regimens for initiation and maintenance therapy in patients with PID.

Methods

Simulations of SCIG dosing were performed to predict IgG concentration–time profiles and exposure metrics [steady-state area under the IgG concentration–time curve (AUC), IgG peak concentration (C_max), and IgG trough concentration (C_min) ratios] for various infusion regimens.

Results

The equivalent of a weekly SCIG maintenance dose administered one, two, three, five, or seven times per week, or biweekly produced overlapping steady-state concentration–time profiles and similar AUC, C_max, and C_min values [95% confidence interval (CI) for ratios was 0.98–1.03, 0.95–1.09, and 0.92–1.08, respectively]. Administration every 3 or 4 weeks resulted in higher peaks and lower troughs; the 95% CI of the AUC, C_max, and C_min ratios was 0.97–1.04, 1.07–1.26, and 0.86–0.95, respectively. IgG levels >7 g/L were reached within 1 week using a loading dose regimen in which the weekly maintenance dose was administered five times in the first week of treatment. In patients with very low endogenous IgG levels, administering 1.5 times the weekly maintenance dose five times in the first week of treatment resulted in a similar response.

Conclusions

The same total weekly SCIG dose can be administered at different intervals, from daily to biweekly, with minimal impact on serum IgG levels. Several SCIG loading regimens rapidly achieve adequate serum IgG levels in treatment-naïve patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13554-014-0018-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in lymphoproliferative disorders and rituximab-related secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: a single-center experience in 61 patients

Intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy represents the standard treatment for hypogammaglobulinemia secondary to B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusion is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment approach in primary immunodeficiencies but no extensive data are available on their use in secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, a frequent phenomenon occurring after treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in lymphoproliferative disorders. In this retrospective study we evaluated efficacy (serum IgG trough levels, incidence of infections per year, need for antibiotics) and safety (number of adverse events) of intravenous (300 mg/kg/4 weeks) versus subcutaneous (75 mg/kg/week) immunoglobulin replacement therapy in 61 patients. In addition, the impact of the infusion methods on quality of life was compared. All patients were treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin, and 33 out of them had been previously treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Both treatments appeared to be effective in replacing Ig production deficiency and in reducing the incidence of infectious events and the need for antibiotics. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin obtained a superior benefit when compared to intravenous immunoglobulin achieving higher IgG trough levels, lower incidence of overall infection and need for antibiotics. The incidence of serious bacterial infections was similar with both infusion ways. As expected, a lower number of adverse events was registered with subcutaneous immunoglobulin, compared to intravenous immunoglobulin, with no serious adverse events. Finally, we observed an improvement in health-related quality of life parameters after the switch to subcutaneous immunoglobulin. Our results suggest that subcutaneous immunoglobulin is safe and effective in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia associated to lymphoproliferative disorders.

Subcutaneous IgG in neurologic diseases

Subcutaneous administration of IgG (SCIG) has become widely used in primary immune deficiency diseases but it has only recently been studied for maintenance therapy in autoimmune peripheral neuropathies, such as chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy. Weekly self-administration of SCIG is safe and well-tolerated, and results in steady-state serum IgG levels, as contrasted with the peaks and troughs of monthly immune globulin (human) for intravenous use. Freedom from the need for venous access or medical personnel for infusions, flexibility in scheduling, convenience of home therapy, and improved clinical stability due to the steady-state IgG levels, lead many patients to prefer SCIG to immune globulin (human) for intravenous use. Long-term studies are needed to determine if the constant IgG levels and clinical stability translate into better long-term outcomes.

Common variable immunodeficiency

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a common primary immunodeficiency characterized by a failure in B-cell differentiation with defective immunoglobulin production. Affected patients are uniquely susceptible to recurrent infection with encapsulated organisms and have an increased propensity for the development of inflammatory and autoimmune manifestations. The diagnosis of CVID is commonly delayed and the underlying cause of the disorder is not understood. Replacement antibody therapy reduces the risk of serious infections. However, optimal treatment regimens for the uncommon manifestations associated with this disease, such as granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease, require further research.

Adverse effects of IgG therapy

IgG is widely used for patients with immune deficiencies and in a broad range of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Up to 40% of intravenous infusions of IgG may be associated with adverse effects (AEs), which are mostly uncomfortable or unpleasant but often are not serious. The most common infusion-related AE is headache. More serious reactions, including true anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions, occur less frequently. Most reactions are related to the rate of infusion and can be prevented or treated just by slowing the infusion rate. Medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihistamines, or corticosteroids also may be helpful in preventing or treating these common AEs. IgA deficiency with the potential of IgG or IgE antibodies against IgA increases the risk of some AEs but should not be viewed as a contraindication if IgG therapy is needed. Potentially serious AEs include renal dysfunction and/or failure, thromboembolic events, and acute hemolysis. These events usually are multifactorial, related to combinations of constituents in the IgG product as well as risk factors for the recipient. Awareness of these factors should allow minimization of the risks and consequences of these AEs. Subcutaneous IgG is absorbed more slowly into the circulation and has a lower incidence of AEs, but awareness and diligence are necessary whenever IgG is administered.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (16 or 20%) therapy in obese patients with primary immunodeficiency: a retrospective analysis of administration by infusion pump or subcutaneous rapid push

A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single centre, capturing data on 173 primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) patients, including 40 obese patients, using subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin (Ig) (SCIG) (16 or 20%) delivered by infusion pump or subcutaneous (s.c.) rapid push. Patients previously using Ig administered as intravenous (i.v.) infusions (IVIG) were converted to SCIG dosing on a 1:1 basis. In both obese and non-obese patients, mean serum Ig levels were higher during SCIG administration (steady state) compared with IVIG administration (trough values). Similar SCIG dose : serum IgG level relationships were observed between obese and non-obese patients, suggesting the consistent bioavailability of SCIG regardless of body mass index (BMI). The mean SCIG volume per dosing site and the mean number of dosing days per week were greater with s.c. rapid push compared with infusion pump in this cohort, but the mean number of sites per infusion session was lower with s.c. rapid push. Both methods were well tolerated. The use of 20 versus 16% SCIG in obese patients improved dosing efficiency, resulting in smaller weekly volumes (54·7 versus 74·5 ml/week) and dosing on fewer days per week (2·3 versus 3·4 days). These data do not suggest a need for SCIG dosing adjustments in obese individuals relative to non-obese patients. The administration of SCIG using either infusion pump or s.c. rapid push is a practical and well-tolerated alternative to IVIG in obese patients. Offering various administration techniques provides a greater opportunity for treatment satisfaction and patient empowerment, which may support high levels of patient compliance.