1
|
Ballester MP, Jalan R, Mehta G. Vaccination in liver diseases and liver Transplantation: Recommendations, implications and opportunities in the post-covid era. JHEP Rep 2023:100776. [PMID: 37360567 PMCID: PMC10241163 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The interest in vaccination efficacy and toxicity has surged following the Covid-19 pandemic. Immune responses to several vaccines have been shown to be suboptimal in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) or post-liver transplant (LT), as a consequence of cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction (CAID) or post-LT immunosuppression respectively. Accordingly, vaccine-preventable infections may be more common or severe than in the general population. The Covid-19 pandemic has greatly accelerated research and development into vaccination technology and platforms, which will have spillover benefits for liver patients. The aims of this review are: (i) to discuss the impact of vaccine-preventable infections on CLD and post-LT patients, (ii) to appraise current evidence supporting vaccination strategies, and (iii) to provide some insight into recent developments relevant for liver patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pilar Ballester
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Spain
- Incliva Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rajiv Jalan
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gautam Mehta
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
- Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Senefeld JW, Franchini M, Mengoli C, Cruciani M, Zani M, Gorman EK, Focosi D, Casadevall A, Joyner MJ. COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma for the Treatment of Immunocompromised Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2250647. [PMID: 36633846 PMCID: PMC9857047 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Patients who are immunocompromised have increased risk for morbidity and mortality associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) because they less frequently mount antibody responses to vaccines. Although neutralizing anti-spike monoclonal-antibody treatment has been widely used to treat COVID-19, evolutions of SARS-CoV-2 have been associated with monoclonal antibody-resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants and greater virulence and transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the therapeutic use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma has increased on the presumption that such plasma contains potentially therapeutic antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 that can be passively transferred to the plasma recipient. Objective To assess the growing number of reports of clinical experiences of patients with COVID-19 who are immunocompromised and treated with specific neutralizing antibodies via COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion. Data Sources On August 12, 2022, a systematic search was performed for clinical studies of COVID-19 convalescent plasma use in patients who are immunocompromised. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials, matched cohort studies, and case report or series on COVID-19 convalescent plasma use in patients who are immunocompromised were included. The electronic search yielded 462 unique records, of which 199 were considered for full-text screening. Data Extraction and Synthesis The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were extracted by 3 independent reviewers in duplicate and pooled. Main Outcomes and Meaures The prespecified end point was all-cause mortality after COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion; exploratory subgroup analyses were performed based on putative factors associated with the potential mortality benefit of convalescent plasma. Results This systematic review and meta-analysis included 3 randomized clinical trials enrolling 1487 participants and 5 controlled studies. Additionally, 125 case series or reports enrolling 265 participants and 13 uncontrolled large case series enrolling 358 participants were included. Separate meta-analyses, using models both stratified and pooled by study type (ie, randomized clinical trials and matched cohort studies), demonstrated that transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma was associated with a decrease in mortality compared with the control cohort for the amalgam of both randomized clinical trials and matched cohort studies (risk ratio [RR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.50-0.79]). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma is associated with mortality benefit for patients who are immunocompromised and have COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon W. Senefeld
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Massimo Franchini
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy
| | - Carlo Mengoli
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy
| | - Mario Cruciani
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy
| | - Matteo Zani
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy
| | - Ellen K. Gorman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Daniele Focosi
- North-Western Tuscany Blood Bank, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Arturo Casadevall
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael J. Joyner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rubio‐Rivas M, Forero CG, Mora‐Luján JM, Montero A, Formiga F, Homs NA, Albà‐Albalate J, Sánchez L, Rello J, Corbella X. Beneficial and harmful outcomes of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy 2021; 41:884-906. [PMID: 34558742 PMCID: PMC8661749 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The results of studies of tocilizumab (TCZ) in COVID-19 are contradictory. Our study aims to update medical evidence from controlled observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on the use of TCZ in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS We searched the following databases from January 1, 2020 to April 13, 2021 (date of the last search): MEDLINE database through the PubMed search engine and Scopus, using the terms ("COVID-19" [Supplementary Concept]) AND "tocilizumab" [Supplementary Concept]). RESULTS Sixty four studies were included in the present study: 54 were controlled observational studies (50 retrospective and 4 prospective) and 10 were RCTs. The overall results provided data from 20,616 hospitalized patients with COVID-19: 7668 patients received TCZ in addition to standard of care (SOC) (including 1915 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) with reported mortality) and 12,948 patients only receiving SOC (including 4410 patients admitted to the ICU with reported mortality). After applying the random-effects model, the hospital-wide (including ICU) pooled mortality odds ratio (OR) of patients with COVID-19 treated with TCZ was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.56-0.93). The pooled hospital-wide mortality OR was 1.25 (95% CI = 0.74-2.18) in patients admitted at conventional wards versus 0.66 (95% CI = 0.59-0.76) in patients admitted to the ICU. The pooled OR of hospital-wide mortality (including ICU) of COVID-19 patients treated with TCZ plus corticosteroids (CS) was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.54-0.84). The pooled in-hospital mortality OR was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.35-1.42) when TCZ was early administered (≤10 days from symptom onset) versus 0.83 (95% CI 0.48-1.45) for late administration (>10 days from symptom onset). The meta-analysis did not find significantly higher risk for secondary infections in COVID-19 patients treated with TCZ. CONCLUSIONS TCZ prevented mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. This benefit was seen to a greater extent in patients receiving concomitant CS and when TCZ administration occurred within the first 10 days after symptom onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Rubio‐Rivas
- Department of Internal MedicineBellvitge University HospitalBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute‐IDIBELLUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Carlos G. Forero
- School of MedicineUniversitat Internacional de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
| | - José María Mora‐Luján
- Department of Internal MedicineBellvitge University HospitalBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute‐IDIBELLUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Abelardo Montero
- Department of Internal MedicineBellvitge University HospitalBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute‐IDIBELLUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Francesc Formiga
- Department of Internal MedicineBellvitge University HospitalBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute‐IDIBELLUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Narcís A. Homs
- Department of Internal MedicineBellvitge University HospitalBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute‐IDIBELLUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Joan Albà‐Albalate
- Department of Internal MedicineBellvitge University HospitalBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute‐IDIBELLUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Laura Sánchez
- Department of Internal MedicineBellvitge University HospitalBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute‐IDIBELLUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Jordi Rello
- School of MedicineUniversitat Internacional de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBERES)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
- CRIPSVall d’Hebrón Institute of ResearchBarcelonaSpain
| | - Xavier Corbella
- Department of Internal MedicineBellvitge University HospitalBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute‐IDIBELLUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
- School of MedicineUniversitat Internacional de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quante M, Brake L, Tolios A, Della Penna A, Steidle C, Gruendl M, Grishina A, Haeberle H, Guthoff M, Tullius SG, Königsrainer A, Nadalin S, Löffler MW. SARS-CoV-2 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Structured Review of 2020. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2421-2434. [PMID: 34551880 PMCID: PMC8364801 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is challenging health systems all over the world. Particularly high-risk groups show considerable mortality rates after infection. In 2020, a huge number of case reports, case series, and consecutively various systematic reviews have been published reporting on morbidity and mortality risk connected with SARS-CoV-2 in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, this vast array of publications resulted in an increasing complexity of the field, overwhelming even for the expert reader. METHODS We performed a structured literature review comprising electronic databases, transplant journals, and literature from previous systematic reviews covering the entire year 2020. From 164 included articles, we identified 3451 cases of SARS-CoV-2-infected SOT recipients. RESULTS Infections resulted in a hospitalization rate of 84% and 24% intensive care unit admissions in the included patients. Whereas 53.6% of patients were reported to have recovered, cross-sectional overall mortality reported after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was at 21.1%. Synoptic data concerning immunosuppressive medication attested to the reduction or withdrawal of antimetabolites (81.9%) and calcineurin inhibitors (48.9%) as a frequent adjustment. In contrast, steroids were reported to be increased in 46.8% of SOT recipients. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 in SOT recipients is associated with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Conforming with current guidelines, modifications of immunosuppressive therapies mostly comprised a reduction or withdrawal of antimetabolites and calcineurin inhibitors, while frequently maintaining or even increasing steroids. Here, we provide an accessible overview to the topic and synoptic estimates of expectable outcomes regarding in-hospital mortality of SOT recipients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Quante
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Linda Brake
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Tolios
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Della Penna
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Steidle
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Magdalena Gruendl
- Department of Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Grishina
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Helene Haeberle
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martina Guthoff
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stefan G Tullius
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies," University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus W Löffler
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies," University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Immunology, Interfaculty Institute for Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Senefeld JW, Klassen SA, Ford SK, Senese KA, Wiggins CC, Bostrom BC, Thompson MA, Baker SE, Nicholson WT, Johnson PW, Carter RE, Henderson JP, Hartman WR, Pirofski L, Wright RS, Fairweather DL, Bruno KA, Paneth NS, Casadevall A, Joyner MJ. Use of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients with immunosuppression. Transfusion 2021; 61:2503-2511. [PMID: 34036587 PMCID: PMC8242637 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
In the absence of effective countermeasures, human convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the causative agent of novel coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), including among patients with innate or acquired immunosuppression. However, the association between COVID-19-associated mortality in patients with immunosuppression and therapeutic use of convalescent plasma is unknown. We review 75 reports, including one large matched-control registry study of 143 COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancies, and 51 case reports and 23 case series representing 238 COVID-19 patients with immunosuppression. We review clinical features and treatment protocols of COVID-19 patients with immunosuppression after treatment with human convalescent plasma. We also discuss the time course and clinical features of recovery. The available data from case reports and case series provide evidence suggesting a mortality benefit and rapid clinical improvement in patients with several forms of immunosuppression following COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion. The utility of convalescent plasma or other forms of antibody therapy in immune-deficient and immune-suppressed patients with COVID-19 warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon W. Senefeld
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Stephen A. Klassen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Shane K. Ford
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Katherine A. Senese
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Chad C. Wiggins
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Bruce C. Bostrom
- Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Children's Hospital of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | | | - Sarah E. Baker
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Wayne T. Nicholson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Patrick W. Johnson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo ClinicJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Rickey E. Carter
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo ClinicJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Jeffrey P. Henderson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - William R. Hartman
- Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of Wisconsin‐Madison School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Liise‐anne Pirofski
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of MedicineAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNew YorkUSA
| | - R. Scott Wright
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Director Human Research Protection ProgramMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | | | - Katelyn A. Bruno
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineMayo ClinicJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Nigel S. Paneth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Pediatrics and Human DevelopmentMichigan State UniversityEast LansingMichiganUSA
| | - Arturo Casadevall
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and ImmunologyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Michael J. Joyner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arya A, Li M, Aburjania N, Singh P, Royer T, Moss S, Belden KA. COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplantation: Disease Severity and Clinical Update. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:1227-1236. [PMID: 33757628 PMCID: PMC7904466 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are a complex, immunocompromised population in whom greater coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality has been reported compared with the general population. METHODS We examined a retrospective cohort of 58 SOT recipients with first-wave COVID-19, comparing patients with severe and nonsevere illness. Additionally, SOT recipients are compared with general patients with first-wave COVID-19. RESULTS Organs transplanted included 38 kidneys, 8 livers, 5 hearts, and 3 pancreases. Average SOT recipient age was 57.4 years; 62% were male; 46.6% were African American 36.2% were white. Comorbidities included hypertension (86%), chronic kidney disease (86%), diabetes mellitus (50%), coronary artery disease (26%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14%). Twenty patients had severe COVID-19 (34.5%) and 38 had nonsevere disease (65.5%). Severe disease was more common in older SOT recipients with comorbidities and was associated with cough, dyspnea, pneumonia, C-reactive protein >10 mg/L, and platelet count <150/μL. Sex, race, body mass index, time from transplant, baseline immunosuppression, and diagnosis month did not differ among those with severe and nonsevere COVID-19. Seventy percent of SOT recipients were hospitalized vs 27.2% of general patients with COVID-19 and inpatient SOT recipients had a higher mechanical ventilation rate. Though a trend toward longer length of stay, higher intensive care unit admission, and greater inpatient mortality was observed (19.5% vs 14.8%), these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has greatly impacted SOT recipients. One-third of our SOT recipients seen during the first wave had severe illness with associated standard risk factors for poor outcome. Compared with general first-wave patients, more SOT recipients were hospitalized, although inpatient COVID-19 mortality did not significantly differ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akanksha Arya
- Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Li
- Enterprise Analytics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nana Aburjania
- Department of Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Nephrology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tricia Royer
- Department of Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sean Moss
- Department of Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Katherine A Belden
- Department of Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Klassen SA, Senefeld JW, Johnson PW, Carter RE, Wiggins CC, Shoham S, Grossman BJ, Henderson JP, Musser J, Salazar E, Hartman WR, Bouvier NM, Liu STH, Pirofski LA, Baker SE, van Helmond N, Wright RS, Fairweather D, Bruno KA, Wang Z, Paneth NS, Casadevall A, Joyner MJ. The Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:1262-1275. [PMID: 33958057 PMCID: PMC7888247 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
To determine the effect of COVID-19 convalescent plasma on mortality, we aggregated patient outcome data from 10 randomized clinical trials, 20 matched control studies, 2 dose-response studies, and 96 case reports or case series. Studies published between January 1, 2020, and January 16, 2021, were identified through a systematic search of online PubMed and MEDLINE databases. Random effects analyses of randomized clinical trials and matched control data demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 transfused with convalescent plasma exhibited a lower mortality rate compared with patients receiving standard treatments. Additional analyses showed that early transfusion (within 3 days of hospital admission) of higher titer plasma is associated with lower patient mortality. These data provide evidence favoring the efficacy of human convalescent plasma as a therapeutic agent in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A Klassen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jonathon W Senefeld
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Patrick W Johnson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Rickey E Carter
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Chad C Wiggins
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Shmuel Shoham
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brenda J Grossman
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Jeffrey P Henderson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - James Musser
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX; Center for Molecular and Translational Human Infectious Diseases, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Eric Salazar
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - William R Hartman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Nicole M Bouvier
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Sean T H Liu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Liise-Anne Pirofski
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Sarah E Baker
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Noud van Helmond
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ
| | - R Scott Wright
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Director, Human Research Protection Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Katelyn A Bruno
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Zhen Wang
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Nigel S Paneth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing; Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing
| | - Arturo Casadevall
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael J Joyner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Angelico R, Blasi F, Manzia TM, Toti L, Tisone G, Cacciola R. The Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19 Disease: An Update and Systematic Review of the Literature. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:435. [PMID: 33946462 PMCID: PMC8147172 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57050435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the management of immunosuppressive (IS) therapy in kidney transplant (KT) recipients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) requires attention. It is not yet understood whether IS therapy may protect from the cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection or a temporary adjustment/withdrawal of IS therapy to restore the immune system may be necessary. We performed a systematic literature review to investigate the current management of IS therapy in KT recipients with COVID-1. Materials and Methods: Out of 71 articles published from 1 February 2020 until 30 October 2020, 554 KT recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. Results: Modifications of IS therapy were based on the clinical conditions. For asymptomatic patients or those with mild COVID-19 symptoms, a "wait and see approach" was mostly used; a suspension of antimetabolites drugs (347/461, 75.27%) or mTOR inhibitors (38/48, 79.2%) was adopted in the majority of patients with symptomatic COVID-19 infections. For CNIs, the most frequent attitude was their maintenance (243/502, 48.4%) or dose-reduction (99/502, 19.72%) in patients asymptomatic or with mild COVID-19 symptoms, while drug withdrawal was the preferred choice in severely symptomatic patients (160/450, 31.87%). A discontinuation of all IS drugs was used only in severely symptomatic COVID-19 patients on invasive mechanical ventilation. Renal function remained stable in 422(76.17%) recipients, while 49(8.84%) patients experienced graft loss. Eight (1.44%) patients experienced a worsening of renal function. The overall mortality was 21.84%, and 53(9.56%) patients died with functioning grafts. Conclusion: A tailored approach to the patient has been the preferred strategy for the management of IS therapy in KT recipients, taking into account the clinical conditions of patients and the potential interactions between IS and antiviral drugs, in the attempt to balance the risks of COVID-19-related complications and those due to rejection or graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Angelico
- Department of Surgery Sciences, Transplant and HPB Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.A.); (F.B.); (L.T.); (G.T.); (R.C.)
| | - Francesca Blasi
- Department of Surgery Sciences, Transplant and HPB Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.A.); (F.B.); (L.T.); (G.T.); (R.C.)
| | - Tommaso Maria Manzia
- Department of Surgery Sciences, Transplant and HPB Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.A.); (F.B.); (L.T.); (G.T.); (R.C.)
| | - Luca Toti
- Department of Surgery Sciences, Transplant and HPB Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.A.); (F.B.); (L.T.); (G.T.); (R.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Department of Surgery Sciences, Transplant and HPB Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.A.); (F.B.); (L.T.); (G.T.); (R.C.)
| | - Roberto Cacciola
- Department of Surgery Sciences, Transplant and HPB Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.A.); (F.B.); (L.T.); (G.T.); (R.C.)
- Department of Surgery, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moore JL, Stroever SJ, Rondain PE, Scatena RN. Incidence of Secondary Bacterial Infections Following Utilization of Tocilizumab for the Treatment of COVID-19 - A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study. J Glob Infect Dis 2021; 13:67-71. [PMID: 34194172 PMCID: PMC8213077 DOI: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_358_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Immunosuppressive agents are theorized to target the cytokine storm syndrome in COVID-19. However, the downstream effects regarding susceptibilities to secondary infection risk remains unknown. This study seeks to determine risk differences for secondary infections among COVID-19 patients who did and did not receive tocilizumab. Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study from two large, acute care hospitals in Western Connecticut from March 1, to May 31, 2020. We collected variables using manual medical record abstraction. The primary exposure variable was any dose of tocilizumab. The primary outcome was any healthcare-associated bacterial or fungal infection as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network. We performed a Kaplan–Meier analysis to assess the crude difference in cumulative probability of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) across exposure groups. We also performed a multivariable Cox regression analysis to determine the hazard ratio for HAI by exposure group while controlling for potential confounders. Results: The Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in the cumulative probability of HAI across groups. The adjusted hazard of HAI for patients given tocilizumab was 0.85 times that of patients not given tocilizumab (95% confidence interval = 0.29, 2.52, P = 0.780) after controlling for relevant confounders. Conclusions: Tocilizumab did not increase the incidence of secondary infection among COVID-19 patients. Larger, randomized trials should evaluate infection as a secondary outcome to validate this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna L Moore
- Department of Medicine, Nuvance Health, University of Vermont School of Medicine, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA
| | - Stephanie J Stroever
- Department of Innovation and Research, Nuvance Health, Danbury, Connecticut, USA
| | - Patricia E Rondain
- Department of Medicine, Nuvance Health, University of Vermont School of Medicine, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA
| | - Robyn N Scatena
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Yale School of Medicine, University of Vermont School of Medicine, Nuvance Health, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Samidoust P, Nikoupour H, Hemmati H, Samidoust A. Clinical Manifestations and Characterization of COVID-19 in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series. Ethiop J Health Sci 2021; 31:429-438. [PMID: 34158795 PMCID: PMC8188090 DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i2.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review is conducted to explore available information on clinical presentations, laboratory finding and outcomes of SARS-COV-2 in liver transplant patients. METHODS We searched four databases for relevant terms related to COVID-19 and liver transplantation and collected both case reports and case series on liver transplantation published up to the end of September 2020. RESULTS After initial screening of irrelevant articles, 25 studies were included and analyzed in this review. Among the 59 patients included, 78.3% were over 50 years old, and 71.6% were males. The majority of patients (93.3%) were hospitalized. The most common presenting symptoms were fever (72.9%) followed by dyspnea and cough (54.2%). The majority of patients revealed a high level of CRP (64.3%). Moreover, high level ALT, AST and ALP were reported in 64.3, 37.5, 30.5 and 22.2% of patients. A total, 9(15.3%), of cases died as a result of complications of COVID-19. Chest radiographs were reported in 72.9%(43/59) of cases that 94% demonstrated radiologic evidence of abnormality. CONCLUSION The results demonstrated that the most prevalent symptoms and signs were fever, dyspnea and cough. Moreover, most patients were males and hospitalized. The rate of mortality and high level of CRP, ALT/AST and ALP is similar within the non-immune suppressed and general population. However, early detection of high level of serum CRP, ALT/AST and ALP combined with a clinical COVID-19 symptom and finding of CT scan may be used as an index for the presence and severity of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pirouz Samidoust
- Razi Clinical Research Development Unit, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Hamed Nikoupour
- Shiraz Transplant Center, Abu Ali Sina Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hossein Hemmati
- Razi Clinical Research Development Unit, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Aryan Samidoust
- Razi Clinical Research Development Unit, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Raja MA, Mendoza MA, Villavicencio A, Anjan S, Reynolds JM, Kittipibul V, Fernandez A, Guerra G, Camargo JF, Simkins J, Morris MI, Abbo LA, Natori Y. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35:100588. [PMID: 33246166 PMCID: PMC7666542 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory virus syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to a worldwide pandemic. Early studies in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients suggested a wide variety of presentations, however, there remains a paucity of robust data in this population. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of SOT recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 1st t October 9th, 2020. Pooled incidence of symptoms, treatments and outcomes were assessed. Two hundred and fifteen studies were included for systematic review and 60 for meta-analysis. We identified 2,772 unique SOT recipients including 1,500 kidney, 505 liver, 141 heart and 97 lung. Most common presenting symptoms were fever and cough in 70.2% and 63.8% respectively. Majority (81%) required hospital admission. Immunosuppressive medications, especially antimetabolites, were decreased in 76.2%. Hydroxychloroquine and interleukin six antagonists were administered in59.5% and 14.9% respectively, while only few patients received remdesivir and convalescent plasma. Intensive care unit admission was 29% from amongst hospitalized patients. Only few studies reported secondary infections. Overall mortality was 18.6%. Our analysis shows a high incidence of hospital admission in SOT recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. As management of SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, long-term outcomes among SOT recipients should be assessed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed A Raja
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Maria A Mendoza
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Aasith Villavicencio
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Shweta Anjan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - John M Reynolds
- Department of Health Informatics, Calder Memorial Library, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, FL, USA
| | - Veraprapas Kittipibul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Anmary Fernandez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Giselle Guerra
- Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jose F Camargo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jacques Simkins
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michele I Morris
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lilian A Abbo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Yoichiro Natori
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marinaki S, Tsiakas S, Korogiannou M, Grigorakos K, Papalois V, Boletis I. A Systematic Review of COVID-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Universal Effort to Preserve Patients' Lives and Allografts. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E2986. [PMID: 32947798 PMCID: PMC7563559 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a significant challenge to physicians and healthcare systems worldwide. Evidence about kidney transplant (KTx) recipients is still limited. A systematic literature review was performed. We included 63 articles published from 1 January until 7 July 2020, reporting on 420 adult KTx recipients with confirmed COVID-19. The mean age of patients was 55 ± 15 years. There was a male predominance (67%). The majority (74%) were deceased donor recipients, and 23% were recently transplanted (<1 year). Most patients (88%) had at least one comorbidity, 29% had two, and 18% three. Ninety-three percent of cases were hospitalized. Among them, 30% were admitted to the intensive care unit, 45% developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 44% had acute kidney injury with 23% needing renal replacement therapy. From the hospitalized patients a total of 22% died, 59% were discharged, and 19% were still in hospital at the time of publication. Immunosuppression was reduced in 27%, discontinued in 31%, and remained unchanged in 5%. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to 78% of patients, antibiotics to 73%, and antivirals to 30% while 25% received corticosteroid boluses, 28% received anti-interleukin agents, and 8% were given immunoglobulin. The main finding of our analysis was that the incidence of COVID-19 among kidney transplant patients is not particularly high, but when they do get infected, this is related to significant morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smaragdi Marinaki
- Clinic of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Laiko Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (M.K.); (I.B.)
| | - Stathis Tsiakas
- Clinic of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Laiko Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (M.K.); (I.B.)
| | - Maria Korogiannou
- Clinic of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Laiko Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (M.K.); (I.B.)
| | | | - Vassilios Papalois
- Renal and Transplant Directorate, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK;
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Ioannis Boletis
- Clinic of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Laiko Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (M.K.); (I.B.)
| |
Collapse
|