In vitro activity of avibactam (NXL104) in combination with β-lactams against Gram-negative bacteria, including OXA-48 β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Activity of polymyxin B combined with cefepime-avibactam against the biofilms of polymyxin B-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae in in vitro and in vivo models

Bacterial biofilms, often forming on medical devices, can lead to treatment failure due to their increased antimicrobial resistance. Cefepime-avibactam (CFP-AVI) exhibits potent activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) when used with polymyxin B (PMB). However, its efficacy in biofilm-related infections is unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the activity of PMB combined with CFP-AVI against the biofilms of PMB-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Five K. pneumoniae strains and three P. aeruginosa strains known to be PMB-resistant and prone to biofilm formation were selected and evaluated. Antimicrobial susceptibility assays demonstrated that the minimal biofilm inhibitory and eradication concentrations of PMB and CFP-AVI for biofilms formed by the eight strains were significantly higher than the minimal inhibitory concentrations of the antibiotics for planktonic cells. The biofilm formation inhibition and eradication assays showed that PMB combined with CFP-AVI cannot only suppress the formation of biofilm but also effectively eradicate the preformed mature biofilms. In a modified in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic biofilm model, CFP-AVI monotherapy exhibited a bacteriostatic or effective activity against the biofilms of seven strains, whereas PMB monotherapy did not have any activity at 72 h. However, PMB combined with CFP-AVI demonstrated bactericidal activity against the biofilms of all strains at 72 h. In an in vivo Galleria mellonella infection model, the 7-day survival rates of larvae infected with biofilm implants of K. pneumoniae or P. aeruginosa were 0-6.7%, 40.0-63.3%, and 46.7-90.0%, respectively, for PMB alone, CFP-AVI alone, and PMB combined with CFP-AVI; the combination therapy increased the rate by 6.7-33.3% (P < 0.05, n = 6), compared to CFP-AVI monotherapy. It is concluded that PMB combined with CFP-AVI exhibits effective anti-biofilm activities against PMB-resistant K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa both in vitro and in vivo, and thus may be a promising therapeutic strategy to treat biofilm-related infections.

Predictors of Mortality, Drug Resistance, and Determinants among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriales Infections in Chinese Elderly Patients

Elderly patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE) infections represent considerable mortality rates. But data on the risk factors for the death of elderly patients following such infection remain limited. We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes, identify mortality-associated risk factors, and determine the antibiotic resistance and resistance genes of isolates for these patients. Hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years with CRE infection from January 2020 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Isolates identification and molecular characterization of CRE were carried out. Logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the potential factors associated with mortality. Of the 123 elderly patients with CRE infection included in our study, the all-cause mortality rate was 39.8% (49/123). The most prevalent pathogen was carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP, 116 of 123). The overall rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) were 100.0% and 66.7%. All CRE isolates exclusively harbored a singular variant of carbapenemase gene, such as bla KPC-2, bla IMP-4, bla NDM-5, or bla OXA-48, while 98.4% of isolates harbored more than one β-lactamase gene, of which 106 (86.2%) isolates harbored bla CTX-M, 121 (98.4%) isolates harbored bla TEM, and 116 (94.3%) isolates harbored bla SHV. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 33.607, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.176-270.463, P < 0.001), use of tigecycline during hospitalization (AOR = 5.868, 95% CI: 1.318-26.130, P = 0.020), and APACHE II score (AOR = 1.305, 95% CI: 1.161-1.468, P < 0.001) were independent factors associated with increasing the mortality of patients with CRE infection, while admission to intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization (AOR = 0.046, 95% CI: 0.004-0.496, P = 0.011) was a protective factor. CRE-infected elderly patients with mechanical ventilation, use of tigecycline during hospitalization, and high APACHE II score were related to poor outcomes. The isolates carried various antibiotic genes and presented high antibiotic resistance. These findings provide crucial guidance for clinicians to devise appropriate strategies for treatment.

Evolving resistance landscape in gram-negative pathogens: An update on β-lactam and β-lactam-inhibitor treatment combinations for carbapenem-resistant organisms

Antibiotic resistance has become a global threat as it is continuously growing due to the evolution of β-lactamases diminishing the activity of classic β-lactam (BL) antibiotics. Recent antibiotic discovery and development efforts have led to the availability of β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) with activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamases as well as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO). Nevertheless, there is still a lack of drugs that target metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), which hydrolyze carbapenems efficiently, and oxacillinases (OXA) often present in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. This review aims to provide a snapshot of microbiology, pharmacology, and clinical data for currently available BL/BLI treatment options as well as agents in late stage development for CRO harboring various β-lactamases including MBL and OXA-enzymes.

Non-KPC Attributes of Newer β-lactam/β-lactamase Inhibitors, Part 1: Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Gram-negative antibiotic resistance continues to grow as a global problem due to the evolution and spread of β-lactamases. The early β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) are characterized by spectra limited to class A β-lactamases and ineffective against carbapenemases and most extended spectrum β-lactamases. In order to address this therapeutic need, newer BLIs were developed with the goal of treating carbapenemase producing, carbapenem resistant organisms (CRO), specifically targeting the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). These BL/BLI combination drugs, avibactam/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/relebactam, have proven to be indispensable tools in this effort. However, non-KPC mechanisms of resistance are rising in prevalence and increasingly challenging to treat. It is critical for clinicians to understand the unique spectra of these BL/BLIs with respect to non-KPC CRO. In Part 1of this 2-part series, we describe the non-KPC attributes of the newer BL/BLIs with a focus on utility against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase variant 44 acquires ceftazidime-avibactam resistance by altering the conformation of active-site loops

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase 2 (KPC-2) is an important source of drug resistance as it can hydrolyze and inactivate virtually all β-lactam antibiotics. KPC-2 is potently inhibited by avibactam via formation of a reversible carbamyl linkage of the inhibitor with the catalytic serine of the enzyme. However, the use of avibactam in combination with ceftazidime (CAZ-AVI) has led to the emergence of CAZ-AVI-resistant variants of KPC-2 in clinical settings. One such variant, KPC-44, bears a 15 amino acid duplication in one of the active-site loops (270-loop). Here, we show that the KPC-44 variant exhibits higher catalytic efficiency in hydrolyzing ceftazidime, lower efficiency toward imipenem and meropenem, and a similar efficiency in hydrolyzing ampicillin, than the WT KPC-2 enzyme. In addition, the KPC-44 variant enzyme exhibits 12-fold lower AVI carbamylation efficiency than the KPC-2 enzyme. An X-ray crystal structure of KPC-44 showed that the 15 amino acid duplication results in an extended and partially disordered 270-loop and also changes the conformation of the adjacent 240-loop, which in turn has altered interactions with the active-site omega loop. Furthermore, a structure of KPC-44 with avibactam revealed that formation of the covalent complex results in further disorder in the 270-loop, suggesting that rearrangement of the 270-loop of KPC-44 facilitates AVI carbamylation. These results suggest that the duplication of 15 amino acids in the KPC-44 enzyme leads to resistance to CAZ-AVI by modulating the stability and conformation of the 270-, 240-, and omega-loops.

In vitro Activity of Cefepime/Avibactam Against Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Integrative Metabolomics-Proteomics Approach for Resistance Mechanism: A Single-Center Study

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial effects of combination of cefepime/avibactam against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP) and explore the resistance mechanism of FEP/AVI.

Patients and Methods

This study explored the in vitro antibacterial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and cefepime/avibactam (FEP/AVI) against 40 and 76 CRKP clinical isolates. Proteomics and metabolomics were employed to investigate the resistance mechanisms of CRKP to FEP/AVI.

Results

FEP/AVI (MIC50/MIC90 0.5/4-64/4 μg/mL, resistance rate 17.1%) showed better antibacterial activity against CRKP than CAZ/AVI (MIC50/MIC90 4/4-128/4 μg/mL, resistance rate 20%) in vitro. Bioinformatics analysis showed that the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were enriched in alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, and ribosome. Remarkably, transcriptional and translational activity-related pathways were inhibited in FEP/AVI resistant CRKP. Overlap analysis suggested that H-NS might play an important role in resistance to FEP/AVI in CRKP. The mRNA levels of DEPs-related genes (adhE, gltB, purA, ftsI and hns) showed the same trends as DEPs in FEP/AVI susceptible and resistant strains. FEP/AVI resistant isolates demonstrated stronger biofilm formation capacity than susceptible isolates. Metabolomics results showed that disturbed metabolites were mainly lipids, and adenine was decreased in FEP/AVI resistant CRKP.

Conclusion

These results indicated that H-NS, GltB and SpoT may directly or indirectly promote biofilm formation of CRKP and led to FEP/AVI resistance, but inhibited ribosomal function. Our study provides a mechanistic insight into the acquisition of resistance to FEP/AVI in Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Inhibition of β-lactamase function by de novo designed peptide

Antimicrobial resistance is a great public health concern that is now described as a "silent pandemic". The global burden of antimicrobial resistance requires new antibacterial treatments, especially for the most challenging multidrug-resistant bacteria. There are various mechanisms by which bacteria develop antimicrobial resistance including expression of β-lactamase enzymes, overexpression of efflux pumps, reduced cell permeability through downregulation of porins required for β-lactam entry, or modifications in penicillin-binding proteins. Inactivation of the β-lactam antibiotics by β-lactamase enzymes is the most common mechanism of bacterial resistance to these agents. Although several effective small-molecule inhibitors of β-lactamases such as clavulanic acid and avibactam are clinically available, they act only on selected class A, C, and some class D enzymes. Currently, none of the clinically approved inhibitors can effectively inhibit Class B metallo-β-lactamases. Additionally, there is increased resistance to these inhibitors reported in several bacteria. The objective of this study is to use the Resonant Recognition Model (RRM), as a novel strategy to inhibit/modulate specific antimicrobial resistance targets. The RRM is a bio-physical approach that analyzes the distribution of energies of free electrons and posits that there is a significant correlation between the spectra of this energy distribution and related protein biological activity. In this study, we have used the RRM concept to evaluate the structure-function properties of a group of 22 β-lactamase proteins and designed 30-mer peptides with the desired RRM spectral periodicities (frequencies) to function as β-lactamase inhibitors. In contrast to the controls, our results indicate 100% inhibition of the class A β-lactamases from Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae. Taken together, the RRM model can likely be utilized as a promising approach to design β-lactamase inhibitors for any specific class. This may open a new direction to combat antimicrobial resistance.

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in a KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae caused by the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase VEB-25

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, including KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, represent a major threat to public health due to their rapid spread. The beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combination ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has recently been introduced and shown to exhibit excellent activity toward multidrug-resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales strains. However, CAZ-AVI-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates are being increasingly reported, mostly corresponding to producers of KPC variants that confer resistance to CAZ-AVI but at a cost of carbapenem resistance. We have characterized here, both phenotypically and genotypically, a clinical CAZ-AVI- and carbapenem-resistant KPC-2 K. pneumoniae isolate co-producing the inhibitor-resistant extended-spectrum beta-lactamase VEB-25.

Phenotypes, genotypes and breakpoints: an assessment of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against OXA-48

BACKGROUND

Two of the three recently approved β-lactam agent (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.

METHODS

OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae wild-type, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs, and 96% (49/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

Optimizing antibiotic dosing regimens for nosocomial pneumonia: a window of opportunity for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling

INTRODUCTION

Determining antibiotic exposure in the lung and the threshold(s) needed for effective antibacterial killing is paramount during development of new antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, as these exposures directly affect clinical outcomes and resistance development. The use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling is recommended by regulatory agencies to evaluate antibiotic pulmonary exposure and optimize dosage regimen selection. This process has been implemented in newer antibiotic development.

AREAS COVERED

This review will discuss the basis for conducting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies to support dosage regimen selection and optimization for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data that supported recent hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia indications for ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and cefiderocol will be reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Optimal drug development requires the integration of preclinical pharmacodynamic studies, healthy volunteers and ideally patient bronchoalveolar lavage pharmacokinetic studies, Monte-Carlo simulation, and clinical trials. Currently, plasma exposure has been successfully used as a surrogate for lung exposure threshold. Future studies are needed to identify the value of lung pharmacodynamic thresholds in nosocomial pneumonia antibiotic dosage optimization.

A Comprehensive Overview of the Antibiotics Approved in the Last Two Decades: Retrospects and Prospects

Due to the overuse of antibiotics, bacterial resistance has markedly increased to become a global problem and a major threat to human health. Fortunately, in recent years, various new antibiotics have been developed through both improvements to traditional antibiotics and the discovery of antibiotics with novel mechanisms with the aim of addressing the decrease in the efficacy of traditional antibiotics. This manuscript reviews the antibiotics that have been approved for marketing in the last 20 years with an emphasis on the antibacterial properties, mechanisms, structure-activity relationships (SARs), and clinical safety of these antibiotics. Furthermore, the current deficiencies, opportunities for improvement, and prospects of antibiotics are thoroughly discussed to provide new insights for the design and development of safer and more potent antibiotics.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Renal Dose Adjustments in Pediatric Patients 3 months and Older

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination developed to treat serious Gram-negative bacterial infections; approved indications include complicated urinary tract infection, complicated intra-abdominal infection, and hospital-acquired pneumonia including ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients ≥ 3 months old. Because of the predominantly renal clearance of ceftazidime and avibactam, dose adjustments (reductions) are required for patients with estimated creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≤ 50 mL/min. We describe the application of combined adult and pediatric population pharmacokinetic models in developing ceftazidime-avibactam dose recommendations for pediatric patients ≥ 2 to < 18 years old with body surface area-normalized CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min/1.73 m² , including moderate, severe, or very severe renal impairment, or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, and for patients ≥ 3 months to < 2 years old with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment. Models included allometric scaling for all subjects and simulations (1,000 subjects per age group, renal function group, and indication) were performed nonparametrically using post hoc random effects. Doses were selected based on simulated pediatric patients achieving steady-state exposures similar to adults and high probability of target attainment (using a simultaneous joint target for both ceftazidime and avibactam). Because there were few children with renal impairment in the ceftazidime-avibactam clinical trials, selected pediatric doses were guided by extrapolation and matching of adult exposures associated with efficacy and within established safety margins. The recommended doses for pediatric patients with estimated CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min/1.73 m² use equivalent adjustments in dose quantity and/or administration interval (vs. the corresponding age group with normal renal function) as those for adults.

Characterization and Potentiating Effects of the Ethanolic Extracts of the Red Seaweed Gracillaria sp. on the Activity of Carbenicillin against Vibrios

β-lactam-resistant Vibrio strains are a significant clinical problem, and β-lactamase inhibitors are generally coadministered with β-lactam drugs to control drug-resistant bacteria. Seaweed is a rich source of natural bioactive compounds; however, their potential as β-lactamase inhibitors against bacterial pathogens remains unknown. Herein, we evaluated the potential β-lactamase inhibitory effect of the ethanolic extracts of the red seaweed Gracilaria sp. (GE) against four Vibrio strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration, half-maximal inhibitory concentration, checkerboard assay results, and time-kill study results indicate that GE has limited antibacterial activity but can potentiate the activity of the β-lactam antibiotic carbenicillin against Vibrio parahemolyticus and V. cholerae. We overexpressed and purified recombinant metallo-β-lactamase, VarG, from V. cholerae for in vitro studies and observed that adding GE reduced the carbenicillin and nitrocefin degradation by VarG by 20% and 60%, respectively. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition studies demonstrated that GE did not inhibit VarG via metal chelation. Toxicity assays indicated that GE exhibited mild toxicity against human cells. Through gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, we showed that GE comprises alkaloids, phenolic compounds, terpenoids, terpenes, and halogenated aromatic compounds. This study revealed that extracts of the red seaweed Gracillaria sp. can potentially inhibit β-lactamase activity.

Geographic patterns of global isolates of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and the activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and comparators against these isolates: Results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2020

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a growing threat to public health. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) and the associated carbapenemase genes using data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method, and carbapenemase genes were detected using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints were used for interpretation of susceptibility. A total of 6753 K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from 57 countries in six regions worldwide. Of these, 1118 (16.6%) were CR-KP isolates. Among 1079 of the tested CR-KP isolates, 1017 (94.3%) had at least one of the class A (41.0%, 417/1017), B (39.3%, 400/1017), and D (38.8%, 395/1017) carbapenemase genes. The resistance patterns and associated genes differed significantly between the participating countries. India, Greece, and Argentina had the highest rates of carbapenem resistance. Susceptibility to the β-lactamase inhibitor combination, ceftazidime/avibactam was greater than that to meropenem/vaborbactam in all K. pneumoniae (93.7% vs. 90.3%, P < 0.05), CR-KP (63.3% vs. 41.5%, P < 0.05), CR-KP with genes for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-like carbapenemase (99.5% vs. 96.0%, P < 0.05), oxacillinase-like carbapenemase (98.7% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.05), and CR-KP without carbapenemase genes (93.5% vs. 79.0%, P < 0.05). CR-KP was the only exception with class B carbapenemase, with susceptibility rates of 1.4% and 9.4% to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, respectively (P < 0.05). Overall, surveillance results are important for guiding empirical antimicrobial therapy in different regions and for monitoring the global transmission of CR-KP with varying resistance mechanisms.

Phenotypes, genotypes and breakpoints: an assessment of β-lactam/ β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against OXA-48

BACKGROUND

Two out of the three recently approved β-lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.

METHODS

OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae WT, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs and 73% (37/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Resistance and Treatment Algorithm for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: An Expert Panel Opinion

Antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat for global health, causing an unacceptable burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In particular, in 2017, carbapenem-resistant organisms were listed by the WHO among the group of pathogens for which novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Fortunately, several drugs and combinations have been introduced in recent years to treat multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, a correct use of these molecules is needed to preserve their efficacy. In the present paper, we will provide an overview on the epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of the most common MDR Gram-negative bacteria, proposing a treatment algorithm for the management of infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria based on the most recent clinical evidence.

Time kill-assays of antibiotic combinations for multidrug resistant clinical isolates of OXA-48 carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Treatment of infections caused by OXA-48 carbapenemase producing multidrug-resistant isolates often necessitates combination therapy. In vitro effect of different antibiotic combinations against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were evaluated in this study. Meropenem-tobramycin (MER+TOB), meropenem-ciprofloxacin (MER+CIP), colistin-meropenem (COL+MER), colistin-ciprofloxacin (COL+CIP) and colistin-tobramycin (COL+TOB) combinations were tested by time kill-assays. Each antibiotic alone and in combination at their Cmax values were tested against 4 clinical K. pneumoniae isolates at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h. Effect of colistin and its associations were also assessed at 30 min. Bactericidal activity was defined as ≥3log10 CFU mL-1 decrease compared with initial inoculum. Synergy was defined as ≥2log10CFU mL-1 decrease by the combination compared with the most active single agent. Presence of bla OXA-48, bla NDM, bla VIM, bla IMP, bla KPC and bla CTX-M-1 genes was screened by PCR using specific primers. The bla OXA-48 gene was identified together with bla CTXM-1 group gene in all isolates. COL+MER demonstrated to be synergistic and bactericidal. MER+TOB showed synergistic and bactericidal effect on two strains although, regrowth was seen on other two strains at 24 h. MER+CIP exhibited indifferent effect on the strains. Combination therapy could be a potential alternative to treat MDR K. pneumoniae infections. This combination might prevent resistance development and secondary effects of colistin monotherapy. MER+TOB and MER+CIP might have an isolate-dependent effect, that may not always result in synergism.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology

Previous reviews of ceftazidime/avibactam have focused on in vitro molecular enzymology and microbiology or the clinically associated properties of the combination. Here we take a different approach. We initiate a series of linked reviews that analyse research on the combination that built the primary pharmacology data required to support the clinical and business risk decisions to perform randomized controlled Phase 3 clinical trials, and the additional microbiological research that was added to the above, and the safety and chemical manufacturing and controls data, that constituted successful regulatory licensing applications for ceftazidime/avibactam in multiple countries, including the USA and the EU. The aim of the series is to provide both a source of reference for clinicians and microbiologists to be able to use ceftazidime/avibactam to its best advantage for patients, but also a case study of bringing a novel β-lactamase inhibitor (in combination with an established β-lactam) through the microbiological aspects of clinical development and regulatory applications, updated finally with a review of resistance occurring in patients under treatment. This first article reviews the biochemistry, structural biology and basic microbiology of the combination, showing that avibactam inhibits the great majority of serine-dependent β-lactamases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to restore the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime. Translation to efficacy against infections in vivo is reviewed in the second co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac172).

Emergence of Hypervirulent ST11-K64 Klebsiella pneumoniae Poses a Serious Clinical Threat in Older Patients

The carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-hvKP) poses a severe therapeutic challenge to global public health, and research on CR-hvKP in older patients remain limited. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical and molecular characteristics and risk factors of CR-hvKP infections in older patients. We retrospectively investigated older patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2020 and December 2020. The clinical data, and microbiological data including antimicrobial susceptibility testing, phenotype experiment and detection of carbapenemases, string test, virulence genes, capsular serotype-specific (cps) genes, and multilocus sequence typing, of the CR-hvKP group defined by the presence of any one of the virulence genes, including rmpA, rmpA2, iucA, iroN, and peg-344 were compared with those of CR-non-hvKP strains. Of the 80 CRKP strains, 51 (63.8%) met the definition of CR-hvKP. The main mechanism of resistance to carbapenems was the presence of the bla_KPC−2 gene. Sequence type (ST)11 (81.3%, 65/80) and ST15 (16.3%, 13/80) were the most common STs in CRKP strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)₅₀ values of the CR-hvKP group against the six tested antibiotics (ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-avibactam, tigecycline, levofloxacin, and Cefoperazone-Sulbactam) exhibited elevated levels than the CR-non-hvKP group. Ceftazidime and imipenem by combining avibactam (4 μg/mL) significantly decreased the MIC₉₀ values more than 16-fold than ceftazidime and imipenem alone against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2-producing K. pneumoniae. Cardiovascular disease [odds ratio (OR) = 11.956] and ST11-K64 (OR = 8.385) appeared to be independent variables associated with CR-hvKP infection by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, higher MICs of the last line antibiotic agents (ceftazidime-avibactam, tigecycline) might be a critical consideration in the clinical management of older patients where the concentration of these toxic antibiotics matters because of underlying comorbidities. Caution regarding KPC-2-producing ST11-K64 CR-hvKP as being new significant “superbugs” is required as they are widespread, and infection control measures should be strengthened to curb further dissemination in nosocomial settings in China.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Probability of Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Pediatric Patients Aged 3 Months and Older

Increasing prevalence of infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative bacteria represents a global health crisis, and while several novel therapies that target various aspects of antimicrobial resistance have been introduced in recent years, few are currently approved for children. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for adults and children 3 months and older with complicated intra-abdominal infection, and complicated urinary tract infection or hospital-acquired ventilator-associated pneumonia (adults only in the United States) caused by susceptible gram-negative bacteria. Extensive population pharmacokinetic (PK) data sets for ceftazidime and avibactam obtained during the adult clinical development program were used to iteratively select, modify, and validate the approved adult dosage regimen (2,000-500 mg by 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours (q8h), with adjustments for renal function). Following the completion of one phase I (NCT01893346) and two phase II ceftazidime-avibactam studies (NCT02475733 and NCT02497781) in children, adult PK data sets were updated with pediatric PK data. This paper describes the development of updated combined adult and pediatric population PK models and their application in characterizing the population PK of ceftazidime and avibactam in children, and in dose selection for further pediatric evaluation. The updated models supported the approval of ceftazidime-avibactam pediatric dosage regimens (all by 2-hour IV infusion) of 50-12.5 mg/kg (maximum 2,000-500 mg) q8h for those ≥6 months to 18 years old, and 40-10 mg/kg q8h for those ≥3 to 6 months old with creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 .

Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review

Urinary tract infections, including cystitis, acute pyelonephritis, and prostatitis, are among the most common diagnoses prompting antibiotic prescribing. The rise in antimicrobial resistance over the past decades has led to the increasing challenge of urinary tract infections because of multidrug-resistant and "difficult-to-treat resistance" among Gram-negative bacteria. Recent advances in pharmacotherapy and medical microbiology are modernizing how these urinary tract infections are treated. Advances in pharmacotherapy have included not only the development and approval of novel antibiotics, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and glycylcyclines, but also the re-examination of the potential role of legacy antibiotics, including older aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. Recent advances in medical microbiology allow phenotypic and molecular mechanism of resistance testing, and thus antibiotic prescribing can be tailored to the mechanism of resistance in the infecting pathogen. Here, we provide a narrative review on the clinical and pre-clinical studies of drugs that can be used for difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria, with a particular focus on data relevant to the urinary tract. We also offer a pragmatic framework for antibiotic selection when encountering urinary tract infections due to difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria based on the organism and its mechanism of resistance.

Place in Therapy of the Newly Available Armamentarium for Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: Proposal of a Prescription Algorithm

The worldwide propagation of antimicrobial resistance represents one of the biggest threats to global health and development. Multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs), including carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negatives and Enterobacterales, present a heterogeneous and mutating spread. Infections by MDRO are often associated with an unfavorable outcome, especially among critically ill populations. The polymyxins represented the backbone of antibiotic regimens for Gram-negative MDROs in recent decades, but their use presents multiple pitfalls. Luckily, new agents with potent activity against MDROs have become available in recent times and more are yet to come. Now, we have the duty to make the best use of these new therapeutic tools in order not to prematurely compromise their effectiveness and at the same time improve patients’ outcomes. We reviewed the current literature on ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and cefiderocol, focusing on antimicrobial spectrum, on the prevalence and mechanisms of resistance development and on the main in vitro and clinical experiences available so far. Subsequently, we performed a step-by-step construction of a speculative algorithm for a reasoned prescription of these new antibiotics, contemplating both empirical and targeted use. Attention was specifically posed on patients with life-risk conditions and in settings with elevated prevalence of MDRO.

Ceftazidime-avibactam: are we safe from class A carbapenemase producers' infections?

Recently, new combinations of β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors became available, including ceftazidime-avibactam, and increased the ability to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Despite the reduced time of clinical use, isolates expressing resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam have been reported, even during treatment or in patients with no previous contact with this drug. Here, we detailed review data on global ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility, the mechanisms involved in resistance, and the molecular epidemiology of resistant isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility remains high (≥ 98.4%) among Enterobacterales worldwide, being lower among extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers and CRE. Alterations in class A β-lactamases are the major mechanism involved in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and mutations are mainly, but not exclusively, located in the Ω loop of these enzymes. Modifications in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) 3 and KPC-2 have been observed by many authors, generating variants with different mutations, insertions, and/or deletions. Among these, the most commonly described is Asp179Tyr, both in KPC-3 (KPC-31 variant) and in KPC-2 (KPC-33 variant). Changes in membrane permeability and overexpression of efflux systems may also be associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Although several clones have been reported, ST258 with Asp179Tyr deserves special attention. Surveillance studies and rationale use are essential to retaining the activity of this and other antimicrobials against class A CRE.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling to evaluate the efficacy of various dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae: a multicentre study in northern China

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) pulmonary infections.

METHODS

A total of 70 KPC-Kp strains were isolated from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples of patients with pulmonary infections in three hospitals in northern China from April 2015 to October 2015. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was performed using population pharmacokinetic parameters of CZA combined with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions gained from antimicrobial susceptibility testing to predict the efficacy of different dosing regimens. Various CZA dosing regimens were modelled using MCS.

RESULTS

The in vitro study showed potent activity of CZA against KPC-Kp strains with MIC_50/90 values of 1/2 mg/L, with a susceptibility rate of 95.7%. The values of cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for bactericidal (50%fT>5 × MIC) target were as follows: for patients with creatinine clearance (CL_Cr) >51 mL/min, the CFR was 96.01% for 2.5 g CZA every 12 h (q12h) and 97.14% for 2.5 g CZA every 8 h (q8h); and for patients with moderate renal impairment (CL_Cr >30 to ≤50 mL/min), the CFR was 95.75% for 1.25 g CZA q12h and 97.09% for 1.25 g CZA q8h.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that the recommended dose of CZA can provide adequate pharmacodynamic exposure for treating KPC-Kp pneumonia.

KPC-Mediated Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Collateral Effects in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae, represent a major threat to public health due to their rapid spread. Novel drug combinations such as ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), combining a broad-spectrum cephalosporin along with a broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor, have recently been introduced and have been shown to exhibit excellent activity toward multidrug-resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales strains. However, CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates are now being increasingly reported, mostly corresponding to producers of KPC variants. In this study, we evaluated in vitro the nature of the mutations in the KPC-2 and KPC-3 β-lactamase sequences (the most frequent KPC-type enzymes) that lead to CZA resistance and the subsequent effects of these mutations on susceptibility to other β-lactam antibiotics. Single-step in vitro selection assays were conducted, resulting in the identification of a series of mutations in the KPC sequence which conferred the ability of those mutated enzymes to confer resistance to CZA. Hence, 16 KPC-2 variants and 10 KPC-3 variants were obtained. Production of the KPC variants in an Escherichia coli recombinant strain resulted in a concomitant increased susceptibility to broad-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems, with the exceptions of ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam, compared to wild-type KPC enzymes. Enzymatic assays showed that all of the KPC variants identified exhibited an increased affinity toward ceftazidime and a slightly decreased sensitivity to avibactam, sustaining their impact on CZA resistance. However, their respective carbapenemase activities were concurrently negatively impacted.

Evaluation of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Administration in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections by Monte Carlo Simulation

Purpose

To evaluate the administration regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) for bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Methods

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CZA against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa isolated from blood cultures at member hospitals in BRICS (Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System) in 2019 were determined by broth micro-dilution methodology. A 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was used to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for different CZA dosage regimens to evaluate their efficacies and optimize the best initial dosage regimen.

Results

Altogether, 6487 Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa strains were isolated from the blood cultures. The overall CZA resistance rate was 2.31%, of which the Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa rates were 1.57% and 14.29%, respectively. The MCS showed that the greater the MIC value, the worse the therapeutic effect. When the CZA MIC was ≤8 mg/L, the standard dose (2.5g iv q8h) achieved 90% PTA in the subset of patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) values from 51 to 120 mL/min. Although the high-dose regimen (3.75g iv q8h) achieved 90% PTA in patients with CrCl values from 121 to 190 mL/min, implementing the low-dose regimen (1.25g iv q8h) was also effective for patients in the 51–89 mL/min CrCl range. Generally, the high-dose regimen (3.75g iv q8h) reached 90% CFR against all of the strains. Conversely, in patients with CrCl values of 121–190 mL/min, the standard dose (2.5g iv q8h) failed to reach 90% CFR against some Enterobacteriaceae members and P. aeruginosa. When the dose was reduced to the low-dose regimen (1.25g iv q8h), no patients reached 90% CFR against some Enterobacteriaceae members and P. aeruginosa.

Conclusion

CZA has good antibacterial activity against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa in bloodstream infections. Clinicians could make individualized treatment regimens in accordance with the sensitivity of the strains and the level of renal function in their patients to best predict the drug-related clinical responses.

Discovery of Novel Chemical Series of OXA-48 β-Lactamase Inhibitors by High-Throughput Screening

The major cause of bacterial resistance to β-lactams is the production of hydrolytic β-lactamase enzymes. Nowadays, the combination of β-lactam antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) is the main strategy for overcoming such issues. Nevertheless, particularly challenging β-lactamases, such as OXA-48, pose the need for novel and effective treatments. Herein, we describe the screening of a proprietary compound collection against Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48, leading to the identification of several chemotypes, like the 4-ideneamino-4H-1,2,4-triazole (SC_2) and pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine (SC_7) cores as potential inhibitors. Importantly, the most potent representative of the latter series (ID2, AC₅₀ = 0.99 μM) inhibited OXA-48 via a reversible and competitive mechanism of action, as demonstrated by biochemical and X-ray studies; furthermore, it slightly improved imipenem’s activity in Escherichia coli ATCC BAA-2523 β-lactam resistant strain. Also, ID2 showed good solubility and no sign of toxicity up to the highest tested concentration, resulting in a promising starting point for further optimization programs toward novel and effective non-β-lactam BLIs.

Antimicrobial Resistance Conferred by OXA-48 β-Lactamases: Towards a Detailed Mechanistic Understanding

OXA-48-type β-lactamases are now routinely encountered in bacterial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales These enzymes are of high and growing clinical significance due to the importance of carbapenems in treatment of health care-associated infections by Gram-negative bacteria, the wide and increasing dissemination of OXA-48 enzymes on plasmids, and the challenges posed by their detection. OXA-48 confers resistance to penicillin (which is efficiently hydrolyzed) and carbapenem antibiotics (which is more slowly broken down). In addition to the parent enzyme, a growing array of variants of OXA-48 is now emerging. The spectrum of activity of these variants varies, with some hydrolyzing expanded-spectrum oxyimino-cephalosporins. The growth in importance and diversity of the OXA-48 group has motivated increasing numbers of studies that aim to elucidate the relationship between structure and specificity and establish the mechanistic basis for β-lactam turnover in this enzyme family. In this review, we collate recently published structural, kinetic, and mechanistic information on the interactions between clinically relevant β-lactam antibiotics and inhibitors and OXA-48 β-lactamases. Collectively, these studies are starting to form a detailed picture of the underlying bases for the differences in β-lactam specificity between OXA-48 variants and the consequent differences in resistance phenotype. We focus specifically on aspects of carbapenemase and cephalosporinase activities of OXA-48 β-lactamases and discuss β-lactamase inhibitor development in this context. Throughout the review, we also outline key open research questions for future investigation.

Activity of cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) against 'problem' antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria sent to a national reference laboratory

BACKGROUND

Triple-action diazabicyclooctanes, e.g. zidebactam, combine β-lactamase inhibition, antibacterial activity, and 'enhancement' of PBP3-targeted β-lactams.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the activity of cefepime/zidebactam against consecutive 'problem' Gram-negative bacteria referred to the UK national reference laboratory.

METHODS

MICs were determined by BSAC agar dilution for 1632 Enterobacterales, 745 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 450 other non-fermenters, categorized by carbapenemase detection and interpretive reading.

RESULTS

Universal susceptibility to cefepime/zidebactam 8 + 8 mg/L was seen for otherwise multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales with AmpC, extended-spectrum, K1, KPC and OXA-48-like β-lactamases, or with impermeability and 'unassigned' mechanisms. Unlike ceftazidime/avibactam and all other comparators, cefepime/zidebactam 8 + 8 mg/L also inhibited most (190/210, 90.5%) Enterobacterales with MBLs. Resistance in the remaining minority of MBL producers, and in 13/24 with both NDM MBLs and OXA-48-like enzymes, was associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae ST14. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MICs of cefepime/zidebactam rose with efflux grade, but exceeded 8 + 8 mg/L for only 11/85 isolates even in the highly-raised efflux group. Among 103 P. aeruginosa with ESBLs or MBLs, 97 (94.5%) were inhibited by cefepime/zidebactam 8 + 8 mg/L whereas fewer than 15% were susceptible to any comparator. MICs for Acinetobacter baumannii with acquired OXA carbapenemases clustered around 8 + 8 to 32 + 32 mg/L, with higher values for MBL producers. A strong enhancer effect augmented activity against many isolates that were highly resistant to cefepime and zidebactam alone and which had mechanisms not inhibited by zidebactam.

CONCLUSIONS

Assuming successful clinical trials, cefepime/zidebactam has scope to widely overcome critical resistances in both Enterobacterales and non-fermenters.

The Building Blocks of Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Implications for Current Resistance-Breaking Therapies

P. aeruginosa is classified as a priority one pathogen by the World Health Organisation, and new drugs are urgently needed, due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. Antimicrobial-resistant nosocomial pathogens such as P. aeruginosa pose unwavering and increasing threats. Antimicrobial stewardship has been a challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a majority of those hospitalized with SARS-CoV2 infection given antibiotics as a safeguard against secondary bacterial infection. This increased usage, along with increased handling of sanitizers and disinfectants globally, may further accelerate the development and spread of cross-resistance to antibiotics. In addition, P. aeruginosa is the primary causative agent of morbidity and mortality in people with the life-shortening genetic disease cystic fibrosis (CF). Prolonged periods of selective pressure, associated with extended antibiotic treatment and the actions of host immune effectors, results in widespread adaptive and acquired resistance in P. aeruginosa found colonizing the lungs of people with CF. This review discusses the arsenal of resistance mechanisms utilized by P. aeruginosa, how these operate under high-stress environments such as the CF lung and how their interconnectedness can result in resistance to multiple antibiotic classes. Intrinsic, adaptive and acquired resistance mechanisms will be described, with a focus on how each layer of resistance can serve as a building block, contributing to multi-tiered resistance to antimicrobial activity. Recent progress in the development of anti-resistance adjuvant therapies, targeting one or more of these building blocks, should lead to novel strategies for combatting multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa. Anti-resistance adjuvant therapy holds great promise, not least because resistance against such therapeutics is predicted to be rare. The non-bactericidal nature of anti-resistance adjuvants reduce the selective pressures that drive resistance. Anti-resistance adjuvant therapy may also be advantageous in facilitating efficacious use of traditional antimicrobials, through enhanced penetration of the antibiotic into the bacterial cell. Promising anti-resistance adjuvant therapeutics and targets will be described, and key remaining challenges highlighted. As antimicrobial stewardship becomes more challenging in an era of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases and global conflict, innovation in antibiotic adjuvant therapy can play an important role in extending the shelf-life of our existing antimicrobial therapeutic agents.

Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Era of Multidrug-Resistance: Updates in Diagnosis and Management

Nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-intubated patients and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is one of the most frequent hospital-acquired infections, especially in the intensive care unit. NP has a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and health care costs, especially when the implicated pathogens are multidrug-resistant ones. This narrative review aims to critically review what is new in the field of NP, specifically, diagnosis and antibiotic treatment. Regarding novel imaging modalities, the current role of lung ultrasound and low radiation computed tomography are discussed, while regarding etiological diagnosis, recent developments in rapid microbiological confirmation, such as syndromic rapid multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction panels are presented and compared with conventional cultures. Additionally, the volatile compounds/electronic nose, a promising diagnostic tool for the future is briefly presented. With respect to NP management, antibiotics approved for the indication of NP during the last decade are discussed, namely, ceftobiprole medocaril, telavancin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam.

Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in thirteen tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Carbapenems are the antibiotics of last-resort for the treatment of bacterial infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. The emergence of resistance is a critical and worrisome problem for clinicians and patients. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are spreading globally, are associated with an increased frequency of reported outbreaks in many regions, and are becoming endemic in many others.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the molecular epidemiology of CRE isolates from various regions of Saudi Arabia to identify the genes encoding resistance and their clones for a better understanding of the epidemio-logical origin and national spread.

DESIGN

Multicenter, cross-sectional, laboratory-based study.

SETTING

Samples were collected from 13 Ministry of Health tertiary-care hospitals from five different regions of Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Isolates were tested using the GeneXpert molecular platform to classify CRE.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of various types of CRE in Saudi Arabia.

SAMPLE SIZE

519 carbapenem-resistant isolates.

RESULT

Of 519 isolates, 440 (84.7%) were positive for CRE, with Klebsiella pneumoniae (410/456, 90%) being the most commonly isolated pathogen. The distribution of the CRE-positive K pneumoniae resistance genes was as follows: OXA-48 (n=292, 71.2%), NDM-1 (n=85, 20.7%), and NDM+OXA-48 (n=33, 8%). The highest percentage of a single blaOXA-48 gene was detected in the central and eastern regions (77%), while the blaNDM-gene was the predominant type in the northern region (27%). The southern regions showed the lowest percentages for harboring both blaOXA-48 and blaNDM genes (4%), while the western region isolates showed the highest percentage of harboring both genes (14%).

CONCLUSION

The results illustrate the importance of molecular characterization of CRE isolates for patient care and infection prevention and control. Larger multicenter studies are needed to critically evaluate the risk factors and trends over time to understand the dynamics of spread and effective methods of control.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of phenotypic susceptibility and clinical data.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Phenotypic Detection and Differentiation of Carbapenemase Classes Including OXA-48-Like Enzymes in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a Highly Specialized Micronaut-S Microdilution Assay

The objective of this study was to evaluate the Micronaut-S carbapenemase detection microtiter plate assay for the detection of carbapenemases and Ambler class determination. The Micronaut-S carbapenemase detection microtiter plate was tested using a challenging collection of 154 carbapenemase-producing and 150 carbapenemase-negative clinical strains of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa The Micronaut-S carbapenemase detection assay was able to detect 148/154 carbapenemase producers correctly, whereas 5/150 non-carbapenemase-producing isolates tested as false positive. This resulted in an overall sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 97%. Regarding the detection of the carbapenemase class, the sensitivities and specificities were 93%/100%, 96%/100%, and 97%/99% for class A (n = 27), class B (n = 54), and class D (n = 73) carbapenemases, respectively. The Micronaut-S carbapenemase detection microtiter plate represents an easy-to-use and valuable tool for accurate and reliable detection of carbapenemases. In addition, it provides identification of the class of carbapenemase in most cases which can provide significant therapy guidance.

Recent advances in the development of β-lactamase inhibitors

β-Lactam antibiotics are the most commonly prescribed antibiotics worldwide; however, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global challenge. The β-lactam resistance in Gram-negative bacteria is due to the production of β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases, metallo-β-lactamases, and carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases. To restore the efficacy of BLAs, the most successful strategy is to use them in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLI). Here we review the medically relevant β-lactamase families and penicillins, diazabicyclooctanes, boronic acids, and novel chemical scaffold-based BLIs, in particular approved and under clinical development.

Identifying Oxacillinase-48 Carbapenemase Inhibitors Using DNA-Encoded Chemical Libraries

Bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is largely mediated by β-lactamases, which catalyze the hydrolysis of these drugs and continue to emerge in response to antibiotic use. β-Lactamases that hydrolyze the last resort carbapenem class of β-lactam antibiotics (carbapenemases) are a growing global health threat. Inhibitors have been developed to prevent β-lactamase-mediated hydrolysis and restore the efficacy of these antibiotics. However, there are few inhibitors available for problematic carbapenemases such as oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48). A DNA-encoded chemical library approach was used to rapidly screen for compounds that bind and potentially inhibit OXA-48. Using this approach, a hit compound, CDD-97, was identified with submicromolar potency (Ki = 0.53 ± 0.08 μM) against OXA-48. X-ray crystallography showed that CDD-97 binds noncovalently in the active site of OXA-48. Synthesis and testing of derivatives of CDD-97 revealed structure-activity relationships and informed the design of a compound with a 2-fold increase in potency. CDD-97, however, synergizes poorly with β-lactam antibiotics to inhibit the growth of bacteria expressing OXA-48 due to poor accumulation into E. coli. Despite the low in vivo activity, CDD-97 provides new insights into OXA-48 inhibition and demonstrates the potential of using DNA-encoded chemistry technology to rapidly identify β-lactamase binders and to study β-lactamase inhibition, leading to clinically useful inhibitors.

Precision medicine for the diagnosis and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: time to think from a different perspective

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) represent a global public health problem. Precision medicine (PM) is a multicomponent medical approach that should be used to individualize the management of patients infected with CRE.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we differentiate carbapenem-producing CRE (CP-CRE) from non-CP-CRE and the importance of this distinction in clinical practice. The current phenotypic CRE-case definition and its implications are also discussed. Additionally, we summarize data regarding phenotypic and molecular diagnostic tools and available antibiotics. In order to review the most relevant data, a comprehensive literature search of peer-reviewed articles in PubMed and abstracts presented at high-impact conferences was performed.

EXPERT OPINION

PM in CRE infections entails a multi-step process that includes applying the current phenotypic definition, utilization of the right phenotypic or molecular testing methods, and thorough evaluation of risk factors, source of infection, and comorbidities. A powerful armamentarium is available to treat CRE infections, including recently approved agents. Randomized controlled trials targeting specific pathogens instead of site of infections may be appropriate to fill in the current gaps. In light of the diverse enzymology behind CP-CRE, PM should be employed to provide the best therapy based on the underlying resistance mechanism.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam, or Both? Clinical and Formulary Considerations

Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are changing the management of invasive infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), leading to higher rates of clinical cure, decreased mortality, and decreased rates of acute kidney injury compared with colistin-based regimens. However, these 2 agents are not interchangeable with regard to management of CRE infections, and clinicians need to be aware of their differences. This review focuses on differences in the in vitro activity of these agents as a function of mechanism of carbapenem resistance, the clinical data supporting their superiority over colistin-based therapy, and the differences between agents with regard to propensity for selection of resistance. Furthermore, considerations and recommendations for hospital formularies and antibiotic stewardship programs regarding positioning of these agents are discussed.

Cefepime/sulbactam as an enhanced antimicrobial combination therapy for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections

BACKGROUND

β-Lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations are widely used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Cefepime has not been widely studied in combination with BLIs. Sulbactam, with dual BL/BLI activity, has been partnered with very few BLs. We investigated the potential of cefepime/sulbactam as an unorthodox BL/BLI combination against MDR Gram-negative bacteria.

METHODS

In vitro activity of cefepime/sulbactam (1:1, 1:2 and 2:1) was assessed against 157 strains. Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the PTA with a number of simulated cefepime combination regimens, modelled across putative cefepime/sulbactam breakpoints (≤16/≤0.25 mg/L).

RESULTS

Cefepime/sulbactam was more active (MIC50/MIC90 8/8-64/128 mg/L) compared with either drug alone (MIC50/MIC90 128 to >256 mg/L). Activity was enhanced when sulbactam was added at 1:1 or 1:2 (P<0.05). Reduction in MIC was most notable against Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacterales (MIC 8/8-32/64 mg/L). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling highlighted that up to 48% of all isolates and 73% of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii with a cefepime/sulbactam MIC of ≤16/≤8 mg/L may be treatable with a high-dose, fixed-ratio (1:1 or 1:2) combination of cefepime/sulbactam.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefepime/sulbactam (1:1 or 1:2) displays enhanced in vitro activity versus MDR Gram-negative pathogens. It could be a potential alternative to existing BL/BLI combinations for isolates with a cefepime/sulbactam MIC of 16/8 mg/L either as a definitive treatment or as a carbapenem-sparing option.

Evaluation of the Synergy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination with Meropenem, Amikacin, Aztreonam, Colistin, or Fosfomycin against Well-Characterized Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative organisms are a major health concern due to lack of effective therapy. Emergence of resistance to newer agents like ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) further magnifies the problem. In this context, combination therapy of CZA with other antimicrobials may have potential in treating these pathogens. Unfortunately, there are limited data regarding these combinations. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate CZA in combination with amikacin (AMK), aztreonam (AZT), colistin (COL), fosfomycin (FOS), and meropenem (MEM) against 21 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and 21 MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. The potential for synergy was evaluated via MIC combination evaluation and time-kill assays. All strains were further characterized by whole-genome sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR, and SDS-PAGE analysis to determine potential mechanisms of resistance. Compared to CZA alone, we observed a 4-fold decrease in CZA MICs for a majority of K. pneumoniae strains and at least a 2-fold decrease for most P. aeruginosa isolates in the majority of combinations tested. In both P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae strains, CZA in combination with AMK or AZT was synergistic (≥2.15-log10 CFU/ml decrease). CZA-MEM was effective against P. aeruginosa and CZA-FOS was effective against K. pneumoniae Time-kill analysis also revealed that the synergy of CZA with MEM or AZT may be due to the previously reported restoration of MEM or AZT activity against these organisms. Our findings show that CZA in combination with these antibiotics has potential for therapeutic options in difficult to treat pathogens. Further evaluation of these combinations is warranted.

Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Alone and in Combination with Ertapenem, Fosfomycin, and Tigecycline Against Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The aim of this study was to investigate the synergy between ceftazidime-avibactam, ertapenem, fosfomycin, and tigecycline against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae using the E test MIC:MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) ratio synergy method. The results were interpreted using fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) to describe the effects of antimicrobial combinations in vitro. To assess the clinical significance of each antibiotic combination, the susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI) was calculated for each combination, and within each strain. The FICI method revealed that the most synergistic combinations against carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae were ceftazidime-avibactam with ertapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam with fosfomycin. This effect was demonstrated in 47% (9/19) of all tested clinical K. pneumoniae isolates. Considering the effects of all drug combinations in K. pneumoniae harboring bla_KPC, bla_NDM, and bla_OXA-48 genes, we observed that the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam with fosfomycin was the most synergistic in New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing K. pneumoniae, and the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam with ertapenem was the most synergistic in K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae. In addition, all tested combinations were synergistic against oxacillinase (OXA)-48-producing K. pneumoniae, except the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam with tigecycline. The SBPI index showed that ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with fosfomycin reduced the MIC to less than the susceptibility breakpoint among all tested carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. Moreover, the combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam with ertapenem, and ceftazidime-avibactam with tigecycline were able to reduce the MIC to less than the susceptibility breakpoint in all KPC- and OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae.

Defining the Role of Novel β-Lactam Agents That Target Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms

With the current carbapenem-resistant organism crisis, conventional approaches to optimizing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters are frequently inadequate, and traditional salvage agents (eg, colistin, tigecycline, etc) confer high toxicity and/or have low efficacy. However, several β-lactam agents with activity against carbapenem-resistant organisms were approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration, and more are anticipated to be approved in the near future. The primary goal of this review is to assist infectious disease practitioners with preferentially selecting 1 agent over another when treating patients infected with a carbapenem-resistant organism. However, resistance to some of these antibiotics has already developed. Antibiotic stewardship programs can ensure that they are reserved for situations in which other options are lacking and are paramount for the survival of these agents.

Developments on antibiotics for multidrug resistant bacterial Gram-negative infections

Introduction: The constantly increasing spread of severe infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is a critical threat to the global medical community. After a long period of antibiotic pipeline pause, new antibiotic compounds are commercially available or are at late stages of clinical evaluation, promising to augment the therapeutic armamentarium of clinicians against deadly pathogens. Areas covered: This review summarizes available data regarding agents with potent activity against critical MDR Gram-negative pathogens, which urgently require new efficient antibiotics. Recently approved antibiotic formulations; and agents in advanced stages of development, including combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, novel cephalosporins (cefiderocol), tetracyclines (eravacycline), aminoglycosides (plazomicin), quinolones (delafloxacin and finafloxacin) and pleuromutilins (lefamulin) are discussed in this review. Expert opinion: The recent introduction of new antibiotics into clinical practice is an encouraging step after a long period of pipeline stagnation. New formulations will be a useful option for clinicians to treat serious infections caused by several MDR Gram-negative pathogens. However, most of the new compounds are based on modifications of traditional antibiotic structures challenging their longevity as therapeutic options. More investment is needed for the discovery and clinical development of truly innovative and effective antibiotics without cross-resistance to currently used antibiotics.

Evaluating the Efficacies of Carbapenem/β-Lactamase Inhibitors Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in vitro and in vivo

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a major clinical concern as they cause virtually untreatable infections since carbapenems are among the last-resort antimicrobial agents. β-Lactamases implicated in carbapenem resistance include KPC, NDM, and OXA-type carbapenemases. Antimicrobial combination therapy is the current treatment approach against carbapenem resistance in order to limit the excessive use of colistin; however, its advantages over monotherapy remain debatable. An alternative treatment strategy would be the use of carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor (βLI) combinations. In this study, we assessed the in vitro and in vivo phenotypic and molecular efficacies of three βLIs when combined with different carbapenems against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates. The chosen βLIs were (1) Avibactam, against OXA-type carbapenemases, (2) calcium-EDTA, against NDM-1, and (3) Relebactam, against KPC-2.

Methods

Six Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates were screened for bla _OXA-23-like, bla _OXA-24/40, bla _OXA-51-like, bla _OXA-58, and bla _OXA-143-like, and eight Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates were screened for bla _OXA-48, bla _NDM-1, and bla _KPC-2. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of Imipenem (IPM), Ertapenem (ETP), and Meropenem (MEM) with corresponding βLIs for each isolate were determined. The efficacy of the most suitable in vitro treatment option against each of bla _OXA-48, bla _NDM-1, and bla _KPC-2 was assessed via survival studies in a BALB/c murine infection model. Finally, RT-qPCR was performed to assess the molecular response of the genes of resistance to the carbapenem/βLI combinations used under both in vitro and in vivo settings.

Results

Combining MEM, IPM, and ETP with the corresponding βLIs restored the isolates' susceptibilities to those antimicrobial agents in 66.7%, 57.1%, and 30.8% of the samples, respectively. Survival studies in mice revealed 100% survival rates when MEM was combined with either Avibactam or Relebactam against bla _OXA-48 and bla _KPC-2, respectively. RT-qPCR demonstrated the consistent overexpression of bla _OXA-48 upon treatment, without hindering Avibactam's activity, while bla _NDM-1 and bla _KPC-2 experienced variable expression levels upon treatment under in vitro and in vivo settings despite their effective phenotypic results.

Conclusion

New carbapenem/βLI combinations may be viable alternatives to antimicrobial combination therapy as they displayed high efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Meropenem/Avibactam and Meropenem/Relebactam should be tested on larger sample sizes with different carbapenemases before progressing further in its preclinical development.

OXA-48-Mediated Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Is Associated with Evolutionary Trade-Offs

Infections due to carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens are associated with limited treatment options and consequently lead to increased mortality and morbidity. In response, combinations of existing β-lactams and novel β-lactamase inhibitors, such as ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), have been developed as alternative treatment options. To understand the development of resistance and evolutionary trajectories under CAZ-AVI exposure, we studied the effects of ceftazidime (CAZ) and CAZ-AVI on the carbapenemase OXA-48 and the epidemic OXA-48 plasmid in Escherichia coli Exposure of CAZ and CAZ-AVI resulted in single (P68A) and double (P68A,Y211S) amino acid substitutions in OXA-48, respectively. The antimicrobial susceptibility data and enzyme kinetics showed that the P68A substitution was responsible for an increased activity toward CAZ, whereas P68A,Y211S led to a decrease in the inhibitory activity of AVI. X-ray crystallography and molecular modeling of the mutants demonstrated increased flexibility within the active site, which could explain the elevated CAZ hydrolysis and reduced inhibitory activity of AVI. Interestingly, these substitutions resulted in collateral effects compromising the activity of OXA-48 toward carbapenems and penicillins. Moreover, exposure to CAZ-AVI selected for mutations within the OXA-48-encoding plasmid that severely reduced fitness in the absence of antimicrobial selection. These evolutionary trade-offs may contribute to limit the evolution of OXA-48-mediated CAZ and CAZ-AVI resistance, as well as potentially resensitize isolates toward other therapeutic alternatives.IMPORTANCE The recent introduction of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations like ceftazidime-avibactam has increased our ability to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales However, the increasing number of cases of reported resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam is a concern. OXA-48 is a carbapenemase that has no significant effect on ceftazidime, but is inhibited by avibactam. Since isolates with OXA-48 frequently harbor extended-spectrum β-lactamases that are inhibited by avibactam, it is likely that ceftazidime-avibactam will be used to treat infections caused by OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales. Our data show that exposure to ceftazidime-avibactam can lead to changes in OXA-48, resulting in increased ability to hydrolyze ceftazidime and withstand the inhibitory effect of avibactam. Thus, resistance toward ceftazidime-avibactam among OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales should be monitored. Interestingly, the compromising effect of the amino acid substitutions in OXA-48 on other β-lactams and the effect of ceftazidime-avibactam exposure on the epidemic OXA-48 plasmid indicate that the evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance comes with collateral effects.

Dose Selection and Validation for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Adults with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, and Nosocomial Pneumonia

Avibactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved in combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections, and nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia. In Europe, ceftazidime-avibactam is also approved for the treatment of Gram-negative infections with limited treatment options. Selection and validation of the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen was guided by an iterative process of population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling, whereby population PK models for ceftazidime and avibactam were developed using PK data from clinical trials and updated periodically. These models were used in probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations using joint pharmacodynamic (PD) targets for ceftazidime and avibactam derived from preclinical data. Joint PTA was calculated based on the simultaneous achievement of the individual PK/PD targets (50% free time above the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC for ceftazidime and free time above a critical avibactam threshold concentration of 1 mg/liter for avibactam). The joint PTA analyses supported a ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen of 2,000 + 500 mg every 8 h by 2-h intravenous infusion for patients with creatinine clearance (CL_CR) >50 ml/min across all approved indications and modified dosage regimens for patients with CL_CR ≤50 ml/min. Subgroup simulations for individual phase 3 patients showed that the dosage regimen was robust, with high target attainment (>95%) against MICs ≤8 mg/liter achieved regardless of older age, obesity, augmented renal clearance, or severity of infection. This review summarizes how the approved ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimens were developed and validated using PK/PD targets, population PK modeling, and PTA analyses.

Antimicrobial treatment challenges in the era of carbapenem resistance

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are burdened by high mortality and represent an urgent threat to address. Clinicians are currently at a dawn of a new era in which antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacilli is being dealt with by the availability of the first new antibiotics in this field for many years. Although new antibiotics have shown promising results in clinical trials, there is still uncertainty over whether their use will improve clinical outcomes in real world practice. Some observational studies have reported a survival benefit in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections using combination therapy, often including "old" antibiotics such as colistin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, and carbapenems. These regimens, however, are linked to increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, and their efficacy has yet to be compared to new antimicrobial options. While awaiting more definitive evidence, antibiotic stewards need clear direction on how to optimize the use of old and novel antibiotic options. Furthermore, carbapenem-sparing regimens should be carefully considered as a potential tool to reduce selective antimicrobial pressure.

In Vitro Activities of Ceftaroline/Avibactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Other Comparators Against Pathogens From Various Complicated Infections in China

Background

We conducted a national antimicrobial surveillance study of both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms isolated from hospitalized patients. This report presents data on antimicrobial susceptibility among 4998 organisms collected in China between 2012 and 2014.

Method

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and susceptibilities of ceftaroline/avibactam (CPA), ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and a range of comparative agents were determined according to guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).

Results

The highest overall susceptibility levels for all Enterobacteriaceae during the study period were observed for CPA, CZA, doripenem (DOR), meropenem (MEM), and amikacin (AMK), which were all >90%. However, both CPT and CAZ alone and in combination with avibactam showed low activities for Acinetobacter spp., whereas CPA and CZA exhibited MIC90 values for Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were reduced by 4- and 8-fold, respectively, compared with those of CPT and CAZ. High susceptibilities of Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa to colistin and P. aeruginosa to AMK were observed. For the gram-positive strains, no significant activity changes were seen for Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, and viridans group streptococci to CPT or CAZ alone or in combination with avibactam, whereas Streptococcus pneumoniae and β-hemolytic Streptococcus showed almost 100% susceptibility to both CPT and CPA.

Conclusion

The addition of 4 mg/L avibactam greatly increased the activities of CPT and CAZ against most Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa isolates, whereas no significant changes were observed in Acinetobacter spp. or any of the gram-positive strains.

Meropenem-vaborbactam for adults with complicated urinary tract and other invasive infections

INTRODUCTION

Complicated urinary tract infections are increasingly caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) constitute a rising threat among uropathogens with significant morbidity and mortality. Meropenem-vaborbactam is a novel carbapenem and cyclic boronic acid-based beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with potent activity against subtypes of CRE. Areas covered: This article reviews mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, existing treatment options for CRE, and the current evidence to support the use of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of infections caused by subtypes of CRE including complicated urinary tract infections. Expert commentary: Meropenem-vaborbactam is a superior treatment option for infections secondary to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing CRE. It is associated with higher rates of treatment success and lower rates of toxicity than traditional agents and demonstrates a potentially higher barrier to acquired antimicrobial resistance than ceftazidime-avibactam. At present, meropenem-vaborbactam should be regarded as a preferred treatment option for invasive infections secondary to KPC-producing CRE.

Treatment of Infections by OXA-48-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) contribute significantly to the global public health threat of antimicrobial resistance. OXA-48 and its variants are unique carbapenemases with low-level hydrolytic activity toward carbapenems but no intrinsic activity against expanded-spectrum cephalosporins. bla _OXA-48 is typically located on a plasmid but may also be integrated chromosomally, and this gene has progressively disseminated throughout Europe and the Middle East. Despite the inability of OXA-48-like carbapenemases to hydrolyze expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, pooled isolates demonstrate high variable resistance to ceftazidime and cefepime, likely representing high rates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) coproduction. In vitro data from pooled studies suggest that avibactam is the most potent beta-lactamase inhibitor when combined with ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, meropenem, or imipenem. Resistance to novel avibactam combinations such as imipenem-avibactam or aztreonam-avibactam has not yet been reported in OXA-48 producers, although only a few clinical isolates have been tested. Although combination therapy is thought to improve the chances of clinical cure and survival in CPE infection, successful outcomes were seen in ∼70% of patients with infections caused by OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae treated with ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy. A carbapenem in combination with either amikacin or colistin has achieved treatment success in a few case reports. Uncertainty remains regarding the best treatment options and strategies for managing these infections. Newly available antibiotics such as ceftazidime-avibactam show promise; however, recent reports of resistance are concerning. Newer choices of antimicrobial agents will likely be required to combat this problem.