The macrolide antibiotic azithromycin potently inhibits hepatitis E virus in cell culture models

Three Distinct Reporter Systems of Hepatitis E Virus and Their Utility as Drug Screening Platforms

The hepatitis E virus (HEV) is increasingly acknowledged as the primary cause of acute hepatitis. While most HEV infections are self-limiting, cases of chronic infection and fulminant hepatitis necessitate the administration of anti-HEV medications. However, there is a lack of specific antiviral drugs designed for HEV, and the currently available drug (ribavirin) has been associated with significant adverse effects. The development of innovative antiviral drugs involves targeting distinct steps within the viral life cycle: the early step (attachment and internalization), middle step (translation and RNA replication), and late step (virus particle formation and virion release). We recently established three HEV reporter systems, each covering one or two of these steps. Using these reporter systems, we identified various potential drug candidates that target different steps of the HEV life cycle. Through rigorous in vitro testing using our robust cell culture system with the genotype 3 HEV strain (JE03-1760F/P10), we confirmed the efficacy of these drugs, when used alone or in combination with existing anti-HEV drugs. This underscores their significance in the quest for an effective anti-HEV treatment. In the present review, we discuss the development of the three reporter systems, their applications in drug screening, and their potential to advance our understanding of the incompletely elucidated HEV life cycle.

Diagnostic and management strategies for chronic hepatitis E infection

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) was initially thought to cause only acute infections, but the discovery of chronic hepatitis E in immunocompromised patients has profoundly changed our understanding of the virus.

AREAS COVERED

We describe the physiopathology, diagnosis, and clinical management of chronic HEV infection. The virus can persist in nearly two-thirds of immunosuppressed patients. Reducing immunosuppression is the first immunomodulatory strategy to cure chronic hepatitis E. But this may not always be feasible or effective. Ribavirin monotherapy for 3 months has been recommended as first-line treatment for chronically infected patients. Ribavirin is around 80% effective at eradicating HEV in retrospective studies. Apart from ribavirin, interferon has been successfully used in liver transplants recipients, but if the patient does not respond, no other alternative drug is available. The vaccine available to prevent HEV infection is one available only in China.

EXPERT OPINION

HEV infection is a major concern in immunocompromised patients. But the therapeutic arsenal is limited to ribavirin and interferon. Both produce several side effects and new drugs are urgently needed. Moreover, preventive strategies to limit HEV transmission and/or evolution to a chronic infection are also required.

Chronic hepatitis E: Advancing research and patient care

The hepatitis E virus (HEV) was initially thought to exclusively cause acute hepatitis. However, the first diagnosis of chronic hepatitis E in transplant recipients in 2008 profoundly changed our understanding of this pathogen. We have now begun to understand that specific HEV genotypes can cause chronic infection in certain immunocompromised populations. Over the past decade, dedicated clinical and experimental research has substantiated knowledge on the epidemiology, transmission routes, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnosis, clinical features and treatment of chronic HEV infection. Nevertheless, many gaps and major challenges remain, particularly regarding the translation of knowledge into disease prevention and improvement of clinical outcomes. This article aims to highlight the latest developments in the understanding and management of chronic hepatitis E. More importantly, we attempt to identify major knowledge gaps and discuss strategies for further advancing both research and patient care.

Development of recombinant infectious hepatitis E virus harboring the nanoKAZ gene and its application in drug screening

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a quasi-enveloped virus with a single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome belonging to family Hepeviridae. Studies on molecular aspects of HEV and drug screening have benefited from the discovery of bioluminescent reporter genes. However, the stability of large foreign genes is difficult to maintain after insertion into the viral genome. Currently, ribavirin is used to treat HEV-infected patients who require antiviral therapy. This has several major drawbacks. Thus, the development of novel anti-HEV drugs is of great importance. We developed a system consisting of recombinant infectious HEV harboring small luciferase gene (nanoKAZ) in the hypervariable region (HVR) of the open reading frame 1 (ORF1) (HEV-nanoKAZ). It replicated efficiently in cultured cells, was genetically stable, and had morphological characteristics similar to the parental virus. Both membrane-associated (eHEV-nanoKAZ) and membrane-unassociated (neHEV-nanoKAZ) particles were infectious. HEV particles circulating in the blood stream and attaching to hepatocytes in HEV-infected patients are membrane-associated, thus, eHEV-nanoKAZ was applied in drug screening. The eHEV-nanoKAZ system is able to cover at least the inhibitor of HEV entry and inhibitor of HEV RNA replication. Four drugs with anti-HEV activity were identified. Their effectiveness in cultured cells was confirmed in naïve and HEV-producing PLC/PRF/5 cells. Two hit drugs (azithromycin and ritonavir) strongly inhibited HEV production in culture supernatants, as well as intracellular expression of ORF2 protein, and may therefore be candidate novel anti-HEV drugs. The HEV-nanoKAZ system was developed and applied in drug screening, and is expected to be useful for investigating the HEV life cycle. IMPORTANCE Bioluminescent reporter viruses are essential tools in molecular virological research. It has been widely used to investigate viral life cycles and in the development of antiviral drugs. For drug screening, the use of a bioluminescent reporter virus helps shorten the time required to perform the assay. A system, consisting of recombinant infectious HEV harboring the nanoKAZ gene in the HVR of ORF1 (HEV-nanoKAZ), was developed in this study, and was successfully applied to drug screening in which four hit drugs with anti-HEV activity were identified. The results of this study provide evidence supporting the use of this system in more variable HEV studies. In addition, both forms of viral particles (eHEV-nanoKAZ and neHEV-nanoKAZ) are infectious, which will enable their application in HEV studies requiring both forms of viral particles, such as in the investigation of unknown HEV receptors and the elucidation of host factors important for HEV entry.

Midecamycin Is Inactivated by Several Different Sugar Moieties at Its Inactivation Site

Glycosylation inactivation is one of the important macrolide resistance mechanisms. The accumulated evidences attributed glycosylation inactivation to a glucosylation modification at the inactivation sites of macrolides. Whether other glycosylation modifications lead to macrolides inactivation is unclear. Herein, we demonstrated that varied glycosylation modifications could cause inactivation of midecamycin, a 16-membered macrolide antibiotic used clinically and agriculturally. Specifically, an actinomycetic glycosyltransferase (GT) OleD was selected for its glycodiversification capacity towards midecamycin. OleD was demonstrated to recognize UDP-D-glucose, UDP-D-xylose, UDP-galactose, UDP-rhamnose and UDP-N-acetylglucosamine to yield corresponding midecamycin 2'-O-glycosides, most of which displayed low yields. Protein engineering of OleD was thus performed to improve its conversions towards sugar donors. Q327F was the most favorable variant with seven times the conversion enhancement towards UDP-N-acetylglucosamine. Likewise, Q327A exhibited 30% conversion enhancement towards UDP-D-xylose. Potent biocatalysts for midecamycin glycosylation were thus obtained through protein engineering. Wild OleD, Q327F and Q327A were used as biocatalysts for scale-up preparation of midecamycin 2'-O-glucopyranoside, midecamycin 2'-O-GlcNAc and midecamycin 2'-O-xylopyranoside. In contrast to midecamycin, these midecamycin 2'-O-glycosides displayed no antimicrobial activities. These evidences suggested that besides glucosylation, other glycosylation patterns also could inactivate midecamycin, providing a new inactivation mechanism for midecamycin resistance. Cumulatively, glycosylation inactivation of midecamycin was independent of the type of attached sugar moieties at its inactivation site.