Statins' dosage in patients with renal failure and cyclosporine drug-drug interactions in transplant recipient patients

Management of dyslipidemia in special groups

Dyslipidemia management in situations like pregnancy, in diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, chronic liver disease, and in the elderly are challenging scenarios. Pregnancy is a contraindication for many drugs. The interaction of various drugs used in HIV infection and rheumatoid arthritis makes it even more difficult to treat with conventional and approved drugs for dyslipidemia. Elderly and chronic renal failure patients often do not tolerate the drugs very well and the data of dyslipidemia management is very different. Lastly, COVID-19 is a unique scenario where clear information is yet to be provided. In this manuscript, the current understanding and available data on the treatment of dyslipidemia in these special situations are discussed.

Incidence of Statin-Associated Adverse Events in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Statins are the third most prescribed drug class in kidney transplant recipients as cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in this population. However, statins' safety profile remains unclear in kidney transplant recipients who are uniquely burdened by concomitant immunosuppression and comorbidities. We conducted a national study to characterize the association of statin use with adverse events in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We studied adult (18 years or older) single-organ kidney transplant recipients in 2006-2016 with Medicare as primary payer ( n =57,699). We used prescription drug claims to capture statin use and International Classification of Diseases 9/10 diagnosis codes to capture statin-related adverse events (post-transplant diabetes mellitus, hemorrhagic stroke, cataract, liver injury, and rhabdomyolysis). We conducted multivariable Cox regression for each outcome with statin use as a time-varying exposure.

RESULTS

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus was the most common outcome (5-year Kaplan-Meier incidence; 43% in statin users versus 35% in nonusers), followed by cataract (22% versus 12%), liver injury (2% versus 3%), hemorrhagic stroke (1.9% versus 1.4%), and rhabdomyolysis (1.5% versus 0.9%). In our multivariable analysis, statin use was associated with higher hazard of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (adjust hazard ratio [aHR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07 to 1.18), cataract (aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.31), and rhabdomyolysis (aHR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.71) but lower hazard of liver injury (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.95). Statin use was not associated with hemorrhagic stroke (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Statins seem to be generally well tolerated in kidney transplant recipients. However, statin use might be associated with slightly higher risk of post-transplant diabetes mellitus, cataract, and rhabdomyolysis.

ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 gene polymorphisms in the Croatian population

BACKGROUND

Organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) and the ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2, ABCG2, are important transporters involved in the transport of endogenous substrates and xenobiotics, including drugs. Genetic polymorphisms of these transporters have effect on transporter activity. There is significant interethnic variability in the frequency of allele variants.

AIM

To determined allele and genotype frequencies of ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 genes in Croatian populations of European descent.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 905 subjects (482 women) were included. Genotyping for ABCG2 c.421C > A (rs2231142) and for SLCO1B1 c.521T > C (rs4149056), was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using TaqMan^® DME Genotyping Assays.

RESULTS

For ABCG2 c.421C > A, the frequency of CC, CA and AA genotypes was 81.4%, 17.8% and 0.8% respectively. The frequency of variant ABCG2 421 A allele was 9.7%. For SLCO1B1 c.521T > C, the frequency of TT, TC and CC genotypes was 61.7%, 34.8% and 3.5% respectively. The frequency of variant SLCO1B1 521 C allele was 20.9%.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of the ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 allelic variants and genotypes in the Croatian population is in accordance with other European populations. Pharmacogenetic analysis can serve to individualise drug therapy and minimise the risk of developing adverse drug reactions.

Chances and risks of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in solid organ transplantation: A review of literatures

Solid organ transplantation offers life-saving treatment for patients with end-organ dysfunction. Patient survival and quality of life have improved over the past few decades as a result of pharmacological development, expansion of the donor pool, technological advances and standardization of practices related to transplantation. Still, transplantation is associated with cardiovascular complications, of which post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is one of the most important. PTDM increases mortality, which is best documented in patients who have received kidney and heart transplants. PTDM results from traditional risk factors seen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but also from specific post-transplant risk factors such as metabolic side effects of immunosuppressive drugs, post-transplant viral infections and hypomagnesemia. Oral hypoglycaemic agents are the first choice for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in non-transplanted patients. However, the evidence on the safety and efficacy of oral hypoglycaemic agents in transplant recipients is limited. The favourable risk/benefit ratio, which is suggested by large-scale and long-term studies on new glucose-lowering drug classes such as glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, makes studies warranted to assess the potential role of these agents in the management of PTDM.

Reduced Mortality Associated With the Use of Metformin Among Patients With Autoimmune Diseases

OBJECTIVE

Metformin has been linked to anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. In this study, we aimed to examine the long-term impact of metformin on mortality and organ damage in patients with autoimmune diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan between 1997 and 2013. Based on metformin and other anti-diabetic agent prescriptions, we categorized all patients with autoimmune diseases into either the metformin group (metformin administration for at least 28 days) or the non-metformin group. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and annual admission rate, while the secondary outcome was target organ damage. We followed patients from the index date to the date on which the event of interest occurred, death, or the end of this study.

RESULTS

Our cohort study included 3,359 subjects for analysis. During a mean follow up of 5.2 ± 3.8 years, the event rate of all-cause mortality was 228 (33.6%) in the metformin group and 125 (36.9%) in the non-metformin group. The risk of both all-cause mortality and annual number of admissions for autoimmune diseases was significantly lower in the metformin group than in the non-metformin group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77; 95% CI 0.62-0.96 and risk ratio (RR) 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90, respectively].

CONCLUSION

Metformin may add benefits beyond T2DM control with regard to reducing all-cause mortality and admission rate, as well as minimizing end-organ injury in lungs and kidneys among patients with autoimmune diseases.

Database of adverse events associated with drugs and drug combinations

Due to the aging world population and increasing trend in clinical practice to treat patients with multiple drugs, adverse events (AEs) are becoming a major challenge in drug discovery and public health. In particular, identifying AEs caused by drug combinations remains a challenging task. Clinical trials typically focus on individual drugs rather than drug combinations and animal models are unreliable. An added difficulty is the combinatorial explosion in the number of possible combinations that can be made using the increasingly large set of FDA approved chemicals. We present a statistical and computational technique for identifying AEs caused by two-drug combinations. Taking advantage of the large and increasing data deposited in FDA’s postmarketing reports, we demonstrate that the task of predicting AEs for 2-drug combinations is amenable to the Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT). Our pAERS database constructed with LRT contains almost 77 thousand associations between pairs of drugs and corresponding AEs caused solely by drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The DDIs stored in pAERS complement the existing data sets. Due to our stringent statistical test, we expect many of the associations in pAERS to be unrecorded or poorly documented in the literature.

Clearance of cardiovascular medications during hemodialysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current understanding of hemodialysis-mediated clearance of commonly used cardiovascular medications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although cardiovascular drug dialyzability is poorly understood, many drug classes appear to include agents with substantially different degrees of dialyzability. Recent data suggest that more readily dialyzable beta-blockers associate with higher short-term mortality in patients initiating these drugs when on hemodialysis. Although this relationship was not observed in a later study with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors of varying dialyzability, studies of this kind are currently limited by pharmacokinetic data that are either incomplete or no longer applicable to modern hemodialysis procedures.

SUMMARY

There are substantial deficits in our understanding of cardiovascular medication dialyzability, which relates in large part to advances in the process of hemodialysis that have rendered older studies of dialyzability irrelevant. The importance of cardiovascular disease in patients receiving hemodialysis demands a better understanding of the effect hemodialysis exerts on cardiovascular drug pharmacokinetics.

Effects of Atorvastatin Dose and Concomitant Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors on Renal Function Changes over Time in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Observational Study

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and statins are widely used in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Our aim was to compare changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) over time in subjects with stable CAD according to atorvastatin dose and concomitant use of ACEI. We studied 78 men with stable CAD referred for an elective coronary angiography who attained the then-current guideline-recommended target level of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol below 2.5 mmol/L in a routine fasting lipid panel on admission and were receiving atorvastatin at a daily dose of 10-40 mg for ≥3 months preceding the index hospitalization. Due to an observational study design, atorvastatin dosage was not intentionally modified for other reasons. GFR was estimated during index hospitalization and at about one year after discharge from our center. Irrespective of ACEI use, a prevention of kidney function loss was observed only in those treated with the highest atorvastatin dose. In 38 subjects on ACEI, both of the higher atorvastatin doses were associated with increasing beneficial effects on GFR changes (mean ± SEM: -4.2 ± 2.4, 1.1 ± 1.6, 5.2 ± 2.4 mL/min per 1.73 m² for the 10-mg, 20-mg and 40-mg atorvastatin group, respectively, p = 0.02 by ANOVA; Spearman's rho = 0.50, p = 0.001 for trend). In sharp contrast, in 40 patients without ACEI, no significant trend effect was observed across increasing atorvastatin dosage (respective GFR changes: -1.3 ± 1.0, -4.7 ± 2.1, 4.8 ± 3.6 mL/min per 1.73 m², p = 0.02 by ANOVA; rho = 0.08, p = 0.6 for trend). The results were substantially unchanged after adjustment for baseline GFR or time-dependent variations of LDL cholesterol. Thus, concomitant ACEI use appears to facilitate the ability of increasing atorvastatin doses to beneficially modulate time-dependent changes in GFR in men with stable CAD.

Atorvastatin induced hepatic oxidative stress and apoptotic damage via MAPKs, mitochondria, calpain and caspase12 dependent pathways

Atorvastatin (ATO), a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor, is used widely for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Application of this drug has now been made somehow limited because of ATO associated several acute and chronic side effects. The present study has been carried out to investigate the dose-dependent hepatic tissue toxicity in ATO induced oxidative impairment and cell death in mice. Administration of ATO enhanced ALT, ALP level, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and altered the pro oxidant-antioxidant status of liver by reducing intracellular GSH level, anti-oxidant enzymes activities and increasing intracellular lipid peroxidation. Our experimental evidence suggests that ATO markedly decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, disturbed the Bcl-2 family protein balance, enhanced cytochrome c release in the cytosol, increased the levels of Apaf1, caspase-9, -3, cleaved PARP protein and ultimately led to apoptotic cell death. Besides, ATO distinctly increased the phosphorylation of p38, JNK, and ERK MAPKs, enhanced Caspase12 and calpain level. Histological studies also support the dose-dependent toxic effect of ATO in these organs pathophysiology. These results reveal that ATO induces hepatic tissue toxicity via MAPKs, mitochondria and ER dependent signaling pathway, in which calcium ions and ROS act as the pivotal mediators of the apoptotic signaling.

Protective effect of arjunolic acid against atorvastatin induced hepatic and renal pathophysiology via MAPK, mitochondria and ER dependent pathways

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin (ATO), is a highly effective drug used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Its application is restricted now-a-days due to several acute and chronic side effects. ATO induced anti hypercholesterolemia and hepatic tissue toxicity has been reported to follow different mechanisms. The present study has been carried out to investigate the protective role of arjunolic acid (AA) against ATO induced oxidative impairment and cell death in hepatic and renal tissue in mice. Administration of ATO (at a dose 30 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks) enhanced serum markers, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and altered the pro oxidant-antioxidant status of liver and kidney tissues. Our experimental evidence suggests that ATO exposure induces apoptotic cell deathby the activation of caspase-3 and reciprocal regulation of Bcl-2/Bax with the concomitant reduction of mitochondrial membrane potential and increased level of cytosolic cytochrome c, Apaf1, caspase-9. Besides, ATO markedly increased the phosphorylation of MAPKs, enhanced caspase-12 and calpain level. Histological studies and DNA fragmentation analysis also support the toxic effect of ATO in these organs pathophysiology. Post treatment with AA (at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight for 4 days), however, reduced ATO-induced oxidative stress and suppressed all these apoptotic events. Results suggest that AA could effectively and extensively counteract these adverse effects and might protect liver and kidney from ATO-induced severe tissue toxicity.

Is a flavonoid-rich diet with steamer cooking safe during calcineurin inhibitors therapy?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Dietary therapy is recommended for decreasing the symptoms of the metabolic syndrome and the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in subjects on calcineurin inhibitors. However, food-drug interactions may occur particularly with patients on such immunosuppressive therapy. This article comments on the benefit/risk assessment of a flavonoid-rich diet and steam-cooking of such food during calcineurin inhibitors therapy.

COMMENT

Patients are commonly advised against consuming citrus fruits and juices, grape juice and green tea. High vegetable intake may however increase the risk of food-diet interactions by inhibiting drug metabolic enzymes and transporters. Vegetable glucosinolates are potential interactants and may lead to adverse effects of drugs with narrow therapeutic indices and in the presence of genetic polymorphism. Examples of food components with potential drug interactants include all members of the Brassicaceae family.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The potential additive and synergistic effects of flavonoids with other molecules in interfering with drug bioavailability need to be taken into account. The risk is highest with drugs with a narrow therapeutic index and in subjects with genetic polymorphisms of proteins involved in the disposition of those drugs.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of the two recently developed statins, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin

INTRODUCTION

Statins are the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapy to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease. Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin are the two recently developed statins with less potential for drug interaction resulting in improved safety profiles.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of rosuvastatin and pitavastatin. The materials reviewed were identified by searching PubMed for publications using 'rosuvastatin', 'pitavastatin', 'statins', 'pharmacokinetics' and 'drug interaction' as the search terms.

EXPERT OPINION

Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin have favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles as their disposition does not depend on or is only marginally influenced by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, thus potentially reducing the risk of drug-drug interactions of these two statins with other drugs known to inhibit CYP enzymes. However, drug transporters play a significant role in the disposition of rosuvastatin and pitavastatin and drug interactions may occur through these. Genetic polymorphisms in drug transporters may also affect the pharmacokinetics, drug interactions and/or the lipid-lowering effect of these statins to a different extent.

Meta-analysis of safety of the coadministration of statin with fenofibrate in patients with combined hyperlipidemia

Addition of fenofibrate to statin therapy might represent a viable treatment option for patients whose high risk for coronary heart disease is not controlled by a statin alone. However, safety of coadministration of statin with fenofibrate has been a great concern. The present study tested the safety of coadministration of statin with fenofibrate. We systematically searched the literature to identify randomized controlled trials examining safety of coadministration of statin with fenofibrate. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate safety of coadministration of statin with fenofibrate using fixed-effects models. There were 1,628 subjects in the identified 6 studies. Discontinuation attributed to any adverse events (4.5% vs 3.1%, p = 0.20), any adverse events (42% vs 41%, p = 0.82), adverse events related to study drug (10.9% vs 11.0%, p = 0.95), and serious adverse events (2.0% vs 1.5%, p = 0.71) were not significantly different in the 2 arms. Incidence of alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase ≥3 times upper limit of normal in the combination therapy arm was significantly higher than in the statin monotherapy arm (3.1% vs 0.2%, p = 0.0009). In the 6 trials with 1,628 subjects no case of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis was reported. In conclusion, statin-fenofibrate combination therapy was tolerated as well as statin monotherapy. Physicians should consider statin-fenofibrate combination therapy to treat patients with mixed dyslipidemia.

Does rosuvastatin increase serum levels of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D?

An observational study and a “clinical trial” seem to prove that rosuvastatin (but not fluvastatin) dramatically increases serum levels of 25-(OH)-D3 (three-fold above starting values). A critical analysis of the two publications, presented below, raises serious concerns. Conclusions from these two studies have already been drawn in the scientific literature.It is argued that claiming or believing in a “novel pleiotropic effect of rosuvastatin” may be misleading and premature.

Pharmacological actions of statins: a critical appraisal in the management of cancer

Statins, among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide, are cholesterol-lowering agents used to manage and prevent cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases. Recently, a multifaceted action in different physiological and pathological conditions has been also proposed for statins, beyond anti-inflammation and neuroprotection. Statins have been shown to act through cholesterol-dependent and -independent mechanisms and are able to affect several tissue functions and modulate specific signal transduction pathways that could account for statin pleiotropic effects. Typically, statins are prescribed in middle-aged or elderly patients in a therapeutic regimen covering a long life span during which metabolic processes, aging, and concomitant novel diseases, including cancer, could occur. In this context, safety, toxicity, interaction with other drugs, and the state of health have to be taken into account in subjects treated with statins. Some evidence has shown a dichotomous effect of statins with either cancer-inhibiting or -promoting effects. To date, clinical trials failed to demonstrate a reduced cancer occurrence in statin users and no sufficient data are available to define the long-term effects of statin use over a period of 10 years. Moreover, results from clinical trials performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of statins in cancer did not suggest statin use as chemotherapeutic or adjuvant agents. Here, we reviewed the pharmacology of the statins, providing a comprehensive update of the current knowledge of their effects on tissues, biological processes, and pathological conditions, and we dissected the disappointing evidence on the possible future use of statin-based drugs in cancer therapy.

A systems biology approach to dynamic modeling and inter-subject variability of statin pharmacokinetics in human hepatocytes

Background

The individual character of pharmacokinetics is of great importance in the risk assessment of new drug leads in pharmacological research. Amongst others, it is severely influenced by the properties and inter-individual variability of the enzymes and transporters of the drug detoxification system of the liver. Predicting individual drug biotransformation capacity requires quantitative and detailed models.

Results

In this contribution we present the de novo deterministic modeling of atorvastatin biotransformation based on comprehensive published knowledge on involved metabolic and transport pathways as well as physicochemical properties. The model was evaluated on primary human hepatocytes and parameter identifiability analysis was performed under multiple experimental constraints. Dynamic simulations of atorvastatin biotransformation considering the inter-individual variability of the two major involved enzymes CYP3A4 and UGT1A3 based on quantitative protein expression data in a large human liver bank (n = 150) highlighted the variability in the individual biotransformation profiles and therefore also points to the individuality of pharmacokinetics.

Conclusions

A dynamic model for the biotransformation of atorvastatin has been developed using quantitative metabolite measurements in primary human hepatocytes. The model comprises kinetics for transport processes and metabolic enzymes as well as population liver expression data allowing us to assess the impact of inter-individual variability of concentrations of key proteins. Application of computational tools for parameter sensitivity analysis enabled us to considerably improve the validity of the model and to create a consistent framework for precise computer-aided simulations in toxicology.

Management of dyslipidemia in the elderly population

The elderly population is increasing worldwide. Despite a major decrease in deaths from coronary heart disease (CHD), this malady remains the major cause of death in elderly men and women. In this paper, we review the role of dyslipidemia as a major known risk factor in the pathogenesis of CHD, age-related changes in lipoprotein metabolism, and differences in changes in lipids that occur in men and women during aging. Next we provide an overview of the available studies and recommendations from ATP III. Finally, we comment on the screening and management, cost and side effects of therapy as it applies to an aging population.

Rosuvastatin-associated adverse effects and drug-drug interactions in the clinical setting of dyslipidemia

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are the mainstay in the pharmacologic management of dyslipidemia. Since they are widely prescribed, their safety remains an issue of concern. Rosuvastatin has been proven to be efficacious in improving serum lipid profiles. Recently published data from the JUPITER study confirmed the efficacy of this statin in primary prevention for older patients with multiple risk factors and evidence of inflammation. Rosuvastatin exhibits high hydrophilicity and hepatoselectivity, as well as low systemic bioavailability, while undergoing minimal metabolism via the cytochrome P450 system. Therefore, rosuvastatin has an interesting pharmacokinetic profile that is different from that of other statins. However, it remains to be established whether this may translate into a better safety profile and fewer drug-drug interactions for this statin compared with others. Herein, we review evidence with regard to the safety of this statin as well as its interactions with agents commonly prescribed in the clinical setting. As with other statins, rosuvastatin treatment is associated with relatively low rates of severe myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, and renal failure. Asymptomatic liver enzyme elevations occur with rosuvastatin at a similarly low incidence as with other statins. Rosuvastatin treatment has also been associated with adverse effects related to the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system, which are also commonly observed with many other drugs. Proteinuria induced by rosuvastatin is likely to be associated with a statin-provoked inhibition of low-molecular-weight protein reabsorption by the renal tubules. Higher doses of rosuvastatin have been associated with cases of renal failure. Also, the co-administration of rosuvastatin with drugs that increase rosuvastatin blood levels may be deleterious for the kidney. Furthermore, rhabdomyolysis, considered a class effect of statins, is known to involve renal damage. Concerns have been raised by findings from the JUPITER study suggesting that rosuvastatin may slightly increase the incidence of physician-reported diabetes mellitus, as well as the levels of glycated hemoglobin in older patients with multiple risk factors and low-grade inflammation. Clinical trials proposed no increase in the incidence of neoplasias with rosuvastatin treatment compared with placebo. Drugs that antagonize organic anion transporter protein 1B1-mediated hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin are more likely to interact with this statin. Clinicians should be cautious when rosuvastatin is co-administered with vitamin K antagonists, cyclosporine (ciclosporin), gemfibrozil, and antiretroviral agents since a potential pharmacokinetic interaction with those drugs may increase the risk of toxicity. On the other hand, rosuvastatin combination treatment with fenofibrate, ezetimibe, omega-3-fatty acids, antifungal azoles, rifampin (rifampicin), or clopidogrel seems to be safe, as there is no evidence to support any pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction of rosuvastatin with any of these drugs. Rosuvastatin therefore appears to be relatively safe and well tolerated, sharing the adverse effects that are considered class effects of statins. Practitioners of all medical practices should be alert when rosuvastatin is prescribed concomitantly with agents that may increase the risk of rosuvastatin-associated toxicity.

Simvastatin-induced myoglobinuric acute kidney injury following ciclosporin treatment for alopecia universalis

Alopecia areata can affect the entire scalp (alopecia totalis) or cause loss of all body hair (alopecia universalis). Ciclosporin (CsA) has been suggested for its treatment, with controversial results. Concomitant use of statins and CsA may increase the risk of rhabdomyolysis due to drug–drug interactions.

Here we report the case of a 45-year-old woman treated with CsA for alopecia universalis, who presented a severe myoglobinuric acute kidney injury following the concomitant use of simvastatin. Upon admission to our unit, she was oligo-anuric. Her serum creatinine level was 13.8 mg/dl. CsA and simvastatin therapy were stopped, and haemodialysis treatment was started (eight daily dialysis sessions) until sufficient kidney function was regained. After 1 month, her serum creatinine level was 3.5 mg/dl; after 2 months and onwards (follow-up of 4 months), her serum creatinine level was 1.4 mg/dl and creatinine clearance was 43.2 ml/min.

In conclusion, physicians should be aware of the potential risks of the combined use of CsA and statins. Patients should be advised to report any muscle symptoms when they are on statins and CsA. The laboratory follow-up should include the monitoring of serum creatinine and muscle enzyme levels, blood CsA levels and liver function tests.

Successful strategy to improve the specificity of electronic statin-drug interaction alerts

PURPOSE

A considerable weakness of current clinical decision support systems managing drug-drug interactions (DDI) is the high incidence of inappropriate alerts. Because DDI-induced, dose-dependent adverse events can be prevented by dosage adjustment, corresponding DDI alerts should only be issued if dosages exceed safe limits. We have designed a logical framework for a DDI alert-system that considers prescribed dosage and retrospectively evaluates the impact on the frequency of statin-drug interaction alerts.

METHODS

Upper statin dose limits were extracted from the drug label (SPC) (20 statin-drug combinations) or clinical trials specifying the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction (43 statin-drug combinations). We retrospectively assessed electronic DDI alerts and compared the number of standard alerts to alerts that took dosage into account.

RESULTS

From among 2457 electronic prescriptions, we identified 73 high-risk statin-drug pairs. Of these, SPC dosage information classified 19 warnings as inappropriate. Data from pharmacokinetic trials took quantitative dosage information more often into consideration and classified 40 warnings as inappropriate. This is a significant reduction in the number of alerts by 55% compared to SPC-based information (26%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of pharmacokinetic statin interactions demonstrates that more than half of the DDI alerts that presented in a clinical decision support system were inappropriate if DDI-specific upper dose limits are not considered.

Lipid management in chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, and transplantation

Recent studies have shown the spectrum of dyslipidemia in patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease to be different from that of the general population. This article discusses the pathophysiology of dyslipidemia in CKD, dialysis, and renal transplant patients, the therapeutic options, and their association with clinical outcomes. Whenever possible, comparisons are made to outcomes in the general population.

Effects of cyclosporin A and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin in rats

AIM

To evaluate the effects of cyclosporin A and itraconazole, which were used as inhibitors of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and/or cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin in rats.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic parameters of atorvastatin were measured after intravenous (2 mg/kg) and intragastric (10 mg/kg) administration of atorvastatin in rats, which were pretreated with cyclosporin A (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) or itraconazole (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Compared with the control rats, cyclosporin A and itraconazole altered the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin significantly. The AUC0-t values of atorvastatin after intragastric administration, pretreated with cyclosporin A (5-20 mg/kg), increased by 32.3%, 61.8%, and 187.2%, respectively, but the CLbile values decreased (P<0.01, 5-20 mg/kg). With pretreatment of itraconazole (5-20 mg/kg), the AUC(0-t) values of atorvastatin increased by 88.2%, 102%, and 123%, respectively, but the CL(bile) values decreased (P<0.01, 5-20 mg/kg).

CONCLUSION

These data indicated that cyclosporin A could be effective in inhibiting the efflux of atorvastatin, and itraconazole could be effective in inhibiting both the metabolism and biliary excretion of atorvastatin.

Utility of a novel Oatp1b2 knockout mouse model for evaluating the role of Oatp1b2 in the hepatic uptake of model compounds

We generated the organic anion transporting polypeptide (Oatp) 1b2 knockout (KO) mouse model and assessed its utility to study hepatic uptake using model compounds: cerivastatin, lovastatin acid, pravastatin, simvastatin acid, rifampicin, and rifamycin SV. A selective panel of liver cytochromes P450 (P450s) (Cyp3a11, Cyp3a13, Cyp3a16, Cyp2c29, and Cyp2c39) and transporters [Oatp1b2, Oatp1a1, Oatp1a4, Oatp1a5; organic anion transporter (Oat) 1, Oat2, Oat3; multidrug resistance gene 1 (Mdr1) a, Mdr1b; bile salt export pump, multidrug resistance associated protein (Mrp) 2, Mrp3; breast cancer resistance protein] were measured by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in both KO and wild-type (WT) male mice. Male KO and WT mice received each model compound s.c. at 3 mg/kg. Blood and liver samples were obtained at 0, 0.5, and 2 h postdose and analyzed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Liver/plasma concentration ratio (K(p,liver)) was calculated. Student's t test was used to compare the mRNA and K(p,liver) between the KO and WT mice. A similar mRNA expression was observed between the KO and WT for the selected P450s and transporters except for Oatp1b2, for which the level was negligible in the KO but prominent in the WT mice with P < 0.0001. The in vivo results showed a differential effect of Oatp1b2 on hepatic uptake of the model compounds, indicating that Oatp1b2 plays a more significant role in the hepatobiliary disposition of rifampicin and lovastatin than the other compounds tested. This study suggests the Oatp1b2 mouse as a useful in vivo tool to understand drug targeting and disposition in the liver.

[Pharmacokinetics of amprenavir in HIV-1 patients with renal insufficiency]

Amprenavir is an HIV-1 protease inhibitor which is hepatically metabolized (>80%) with a low renal elimination. It has thus been suggested that no dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with renal dysfunction. However, no data are available on the pharmacokinetics of amprenavir in patients with renal insufficiency. We report on the pharmacokinetics of amprenavir in two HIV patients with severe and end-stage renal insufficiency. Amprenavir pharmacokinetics did not differ in our patients as compared with normal renal function subjects. Furthermore, amprenavir was not dialysable (FHD<25%). As a result, the drug may be administered at its normal dose in patients with renal failure, even when severe. In dialysis patients, amprenavir may be administered before or after the session.

Statins and myotoxicity: a therapeutic limitation

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors represent the most successful class of drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia and dyslipidaemia implicated in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease and atherosclerosis. However, the popular profile of statins in terms of efficacy has been maligned by its adverse events. The myotoxicity, ranging from mild myopathy to serious rhabdomyolysis, associated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, during treatment of hypercholesterolaemia is of paramount importance. Rhabdomyolysis is a rare but idiosyncratic muscle wasting disorder of different etiologies. Statin-associated rhabdomyolysis causes skeletal muscle injury by self-perpetuating events leading to fatal irreversible renal damage through a series of biochemical reactions. Preferential distribution and action of statins in liver could be the key to minimise myotoxicity concerns. Hepato-specific distribution of statins is governed by various factors such as physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic properties and selective transporter-mediated uptake in liver rather in extrahepatic cells. The interactions of statins with concomitant drugs of different classes merit attention for their safety profile. Although pharmacokinetic as well as pharmacodynamic interactions have been implicated in pathophysiology of statin-induced muscle wasting, the underlying mechanism is not clearly understood. Besides, pharmacokinetic and phramcodynamic factors, statin-associated myotoxcity may also implicate pharmacogenomic factors. The pharmacogenomics characterised by CYP polymorphism and other genetic factors is responsible for inter-individual variations to efficacy and tolerability of statins. The pathophysiological mechanisms may include statin-induced differences in cholesterol:phospholipid ratio, isoprenoid levels, small GTP binding proteins and apoptosis. However, the present understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, does not offer a reliable approach to address the same at preclinical level. Although statin-associated myotoxicity affects compliance, quality of life of patient and discontinuation rate, yet the low incidence of myotoxicty including rhabdomyolysis and less severity of commonly occurring myopathy and myalgia do not raise doubts about the clinical efficacy and tolerability of statins. Medical management of myotoxicity seems to be pivotal for the proper compliance of patients with statin treatment. The appropriate and judicious use of drugs would substantially reduce the likelihood of developing clinically important myopathy.

Management of dyslipidemias in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the mortality rate in stage 5 CKD is even higher in patients with diabetes. CVD risk reduction includes control of hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and BP. An LDL cholesterol goal of 70 mg/dl has been suggested for such high-risk patients. Most studies that have showed CVD risk reduction with statins have been in patients without CKD. However, some studies have had sufficient numbers of patients with CKD stages 2 to 3 to permit analysis, and these generally have shown CVD benefits similar to those found in patients without CKD. Studies that have shown benefit in patients who were on dialysis or after transplantation have been mixed, in part because CVD in such patients is far advanced and may not respond as well to intervention. As GFR falls, the dosages of many of the drugs that are used for the treatment of dyslipidemias need to be modified. In general, however, atorvastatin and fluvastatin dosages do not have to be modified. Drug interactions with cyclosporine also occur. In general, combinations of statins and fibrates should be avoided, and fenofibrate should be avoided in all patients with decreased GFR levels. Overall, on the basis of the very high risk for CVD in patients with diabetes and CKD, aggressive management of dyslipidemias is warranted, with an LDL goal of 70 mg/dl.

Management of Dyslipidemia in Special Populations

Dyslipidemia is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. Because it is often intertwined with other medical conditions, its management is becoming progressively more complex. Populations that pose a particular challenge to clinicians include diabetic patients, children and adolescents, elderly persons, transplant patients, patients with the human immunodeficiency virus, and patients with chronic kidney disease. When establishing lipid goals, it is imperative to have a thorough understanding of the evidence, or lack thereof, supporting the use of lipid-lowering agents among these patients. To maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of pharmacological intervention, clinicians must consider not only the unique alterations in the lipid profile of the aforementioned populations but also individual changes in patients' pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, as well as the potential for drug-drug and drug-disease interactions.

Prescription des statines en cas d’insuffisance rénale

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is extremely common in adults, although often undiagnosed and thus untreated. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among patients with CKD and reducing its risk in this population is an important priority. Dyslipidemia is almost always present when proteinuria is above 3 gr/24 hours. Roughly two thirds of all patients with end-stage renal failure and kidney transplants suffer from dyslipidemia and should receive lipid-lowering therapy, as suggested by recent Afssaps (French drug agency) and NKF-K/DOQI (National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) guidelines. We reviewed recent studies on efficacy, tolerability and prescription recommendations of statins in CKD and renal transplant patients.

METHODS

We searched Medline, the international medical database, to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of statins in CKD and renal transplant patients and on specific recommendations for dosage adjustments in this population.

RESULTS

The efficacy of statins in decreasing total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels in dialysis and renal transplant patients is similar to that in the general population. On the other hand, large-scale randomized clinical trials among CKD (4D) and renal transplant (ALERT) patients do not demonstrate that statins significantly decrease rates of cardiovascular disease. They have a beneficial effect on proteinuria and lower the rate of kidney function deterioration in patients with dyslipidemia. Early introduction of a statin in transplant patients did not lead to improved kidney function or prevent loss of the graft. Although most statins are not excreted by the kidneys, the dosage of some must be adapted in CKD patients because of pharmacokinetic modifications induced by renal impairment.

CONCLUSION

Statins at appropriately adapted doses have the same efficacy in CKD patients as in subjects with normal kidney function, and tolerance is not a problem. Their effectiveness in cardiovascular prevention in this population has not been demonstrated to date. Results about statin-induced kidney protection are encouraging but further and more specific studies are needed.

Long-term cardiac outcomes in renal transplant recipients receiving fluvastatin: the ALERT extension study

Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have an increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. The ALERT study is the first trial to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on cardiac outcomes following renal transplantation. Patients initially randomized to fluvastatin or placebo in the 5-6 year ALERT study were offered open-label fluvastatin XL 80 mg/day in a 2-year extension to the original study. The primary endpoint was time to first major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Of 1787 patients who completed ALERT, 1652 (92%) were followed in the extension. Mean total follow-up was 6.7 years. Mean LDL-cholesterol was 98 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) at last follow-up compared to a pre-study level of 159 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L). Patients randomized to fluvastatin had a reduced risk of MACE (hazards ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.036), and a 29% reduction in cardiac death or definite non-fatal MI (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.93, p = 0.014). Total mortality and graft loss did not differ significantly between groups. Fluvastatin produces a safe and effective reduction in LDL-cholesterol associated with reduced risk of MACE in RTR. The lipid-lowering and cardiovascular benefits of fluvastatin are comparable to those of statins in other patient groups, and support use of fluvastatin in RTR.

Statin-induced myositis: a commonly encountered or rare side effect?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Statins are well established as first-line agents for cholesterol lowering in cardiovascular disease, with accumulating evidence supporting their initiation and guidelines recommending treatment to lower LDL levels. Although generally well tolerated with few side effects, including headaches and gastrointestinal symptoms, concerns are raised regarding myopathy, which may lead to fatal rhabdomyolysis. This review examines current evidence on statin interactions, mechanism of injury and toxicity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant myopathy is rare with an incidence of less than 0.5% of patients. Statin side effects may be dose-related, associated with other drug interactions that interfere with statin metabolic pathways through cytochrome p450 pathways or glucuronidation, or related to co-morbidities. Several theories have suggested that statin myotoxicity may be due to intracellular cholesterol depletion, or interference with oxidative phosphorylation pathways. Exact mechanisms are yet to be fully defined. Individuals with mixed dyslipidaemia may require combination therapy to achieve target lipid levels. No large-scale randomized trials have yet reported on the safety of combination therapy, although more recent studies may shed some light when they report.

CONCLUSION

As most individuals on statins are 'high-risk' patients, they tend to be on multiple agents for cardiovascular disease which may interact with their statin. Progression of myalgia or myositis to rhabdomyolysis is rare (one in 30-100,000 patient-years of exposure), but if progressive muscle symptoms are ignored then fatalities can occur. When prescribing statins, physicians should be alert to potential risks and educate patients to report any potentially significant symptoms.

Managing the Failing Allograft

Managing the failing allograft juxtaposes immunosuppressive management and routine chronic kidney disease care. The complications of immunosuppression can be more pronounced in those with renal failure (infection, anemia, bone disease). The withdrawal of immunosuppression may be associated with acute allograft rejection, arthralgias, and the development of antidonor antibodies. Likewise depression is prevalent. Improving well-being and overall survival necessitates proper titration of immunosuppressive medications and control of blood pressure, anemia, lipids, and glucose along with attention to treatment of depression.