Effects of nebivolol or irbesartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide on vascular functions in newly-diagnosed hypertensive patients: the NINFE (Nebivololo, Irbesartan Nella Funzione Endoteliale) study

Blood pressure lowering effects of β-blockers as add-on or combination therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The authors performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of non-atenolol β-blockers as add-on to monotherapy or as a component of combination antihypertensive therapy in patients with hypertension. The authors searched and identified relevant randomized controlled trials from PubMed until November 2021. Studies comparing blood pressure lowering effects of β-blockers with diuretics, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were included. The analysis included 20 studies with 5544 participants. β-blockers add-on to monotherapy significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure as compared with non-β-blocker monotherapy (weighted mean difference in mm Hg [95% confidence interval]: -4.1 [-6.0, -2.2] and -3.7 [-4.6, -2.8], respectively). These results were consistent across the comparisons with diuretics (systolic pressure, -10.2 [-14.2, -6.2]; diastolic pressure, -5.4 [-8.2, -2.6]), CCBs (systolic pressure, -4.1 [-7.1, -1.0]; diastolic pressure, -2.8 [-4.1, -1.5]), and ACEIs/ARBs (systolic pressure, -2.9 [-4.3, -1.5]; diastolic pressure, -4.2 [-5.0, -3.4]). There was no significant difference in blood pressure lowering effects between combinations with and without a β-blocker (systolic pressure, -1.3 mm Hg [-5.8, 3.2]; diastolic pressure, -.3 mm Hg [-2.7, 2.1]). Metoprolol add-on or combination therapy had a significantly greater blood pressure reduction than non-β-blocker therapy (systolic pressure, -3.6 mm Hg [-5.9, -1.3]; diastolic pressure, -2.1 mm Hg [-3.5, -.7]). In conclusion, non-atenolol β-blockers are effective in lowering blood pressure as add-on to monotherapy or as a component of combination antihypertensive therapy. In line with the current hypertension guideline recommendations, β-blockers can and should be used in combination with other antihypertensive drugs.

Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Antihypertensive treatment may have different effects on central arterial hemodynamics. The extent of the difference in effects between various antihypertensive drugs remains undefined.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of antihypertensive agents on both central and peripheral systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) or central augmentation index, with a special focus on the comparison between newer [renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs)] and older antihypertensive agents (diuretics and β- and α-blockers).

Results: In total, 20 studies (n = 2,498) were included. Compared with diuretics (10 studies), β-blockers (16 studies), or an α-blocker (1 study), RAS inhibitors (21 studies), and CCBs (6 studies) more efficaciously (P < 0.001) reduced both central and peripheral SBP by a weighted mean difference of −5.63 (−6.50 to −4.76 mmHg) and −1.97 mmHg (−2.99 to −0.95 mmHg), respectively. Compared with older agents, the newer agents also more efficaciously (P < 0.001) reduced central PP (−3.27 mmHg; −4.95 to −1.59 mmHg), augmentation index (−6.11%; −7.94 to −4.29) and augmentation (−3.35 mmHg; −5.28 to –1.42 mmHg) but not peripheral PP (p ≥ 0.09). Accordingly, the newer agents reduced central-to-peripheral PP amplification significantly less than the older agents (0.11 mmHg; 0.05 to 0.17 mmHg; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Newer agents, such as RAS inhibitors and CCBs, were significantly more efficacious than older agents in their effects on central hemodynamics.

Incident hyperuricemia in relation to antihypertensive therapy with the irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination

OBJECTIVE

We investigated serum uric acid changes and incident hyperuricemia in relation to the achieved blood pressure (BP) after 12 weeks of antihypertensive therapy with the irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination.

METHODS

The study participants were 449 patients who completed the study. Analysis of covariance and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the least square mean changes (± standard error) from baseline in serum uric acid and odds ratios (ORs) for incident hyperuricemia according to the achieved levels of BP.

RESULTS

Adjusted analyses showed that serum uric acid changes differed according to the achieved SBP/DBP (P = 0.002), with a smaller mean (± standard error) increase in the range of 130-139/<90 mm Hg (n = 132, 19.8 ± 5.7 µmol/L) than that of ≥140/90 (n = 129, 32.4 ± 7.3 µmol/L) or <130/90 mm Hg (n = 188, 39.5 ± 5.1 µmol/L). Adjusted analyses showed similar results for the incident hyperuricemia (n = 95, 24.0%) in those patients with normal serum uric acid at baseline (n = 396). The risk of incident hyperuricemia was lower (OR, 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.83; P = 0.04) in patients with an achieved SBP/DBP of 130-139/<90 mm Hg (n = 117, incidence rate, 17.1%) than those with an achieved SBP/DBP of ≥140/90 (n = 118, 31.4%) or <130/90 mm Hg (n = 161, 23.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Thiazide-induced changes in serum uric acid or incident hyperuricemia were associated with the achieved SBP/DBP, being lower at the level of 130-139/<90 mm Hg.

Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?

Since noninvasive central blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are readily available, central BP has gained growing attention regarding its clinical application in the management of hypertension. The disagreement between central and peripheral BP has long been recognized. Some previous studies showed that noninvasive central BP may be better than the conventional brachial BP in association with target organ damages and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies further suggest that the central BP strategy for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension may be more cost-effective than the conventional strategy, and guidance of hypertension management with central BP may result in less use of medications to achieve BP control. Despite the use of central BP being promising, more randomized controlled studies comparing central BP-guided therapeutic strategies with conventional care for cardiovascular events reduction are required because noninvasive central and brachial BP measures are conveniently available. In this brief review, the rationale supporting the utility of central BP in clinical practice and relating challenges are summarized.

A Critical Review of Nebivolol and its Fixed-Dose Combinations in the Treatment of Hypertension

β-Adrenergic receptor blockers (β-blockers) are well-known useful and cost-effective drugs for managing hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. However, it is often difficult to use β-blockers for patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Moreover, most β-blockers negatively influence glucose or lipid metabolism. Nebivolol is a third-generation lipophilic β-1 receptor-selective blocker with nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory effects, metabolically neutral and usually well tolerated by patients with asthma or COPD. Nebivolol has significant effects of reduction in central blood pressure and improvements in endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness. To summarize the merits and demerits of nebivolol in different clinical situations, we conducted a review using the word 'nebivolol' on Pubmed and Embase, limiting the search to hypertension, clinical trials, and meta-analyses. This review summarizes the clinical studies on nebivolol itself and on the combination of nebivolol with other antihypertensive drugs, such as hydrochlorothiazide, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers, and amlodipine. Most studies showed the safety and well-tolerated profile of nebivolol and the combination of nebivolol with other antihypertensive drugs, which suggests that new fixed combinations of nebivolol with other antihypertensive drugs would be useful for patients who are unable to tolerate traditional β-blockers.

Potential Protective Role of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on the Balance between Hemostasis and Fibrinolysis in Hypertensive Patients at Rest and During Exercise

In patients with hypertension, the triad represented by endothelial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivity, and altered fibrinolytic function disturbs the equilibrium between hemostasis and fibrinolysis and translates into a hypercoagulable state, which underlies the risk of thrombotic complications. This article reviews the scientific evidence regarding some biological effects of antihypertensive drugs, which can protect patients from the adverse consequences of hypertensive disease, improving endothelial function, enhancing antioxidant activity, and restoring equilibrium between hemostatic and fibrinolytic factors. These protective effects appear not to be mediated through blood pressure reduction and are not shared by all molecules of the same pharmacological class.

Endothelial dysfunction in human essential hypertension

Although the endothelium has a number of important functions, the term endothelial dysfunction is commonly used to describe impairment in its vasodilatory capacity. It is increasingly recognized that this is related to hypertension, although whether it predates essential hypertension or is a consequence of it is still unknown. In this review, we explore the mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension, its prognostic significance and methods of pharmacological reversal.

Angiotensin receptor blockers & endothelial dysfunction: Possible correlation & therapeutic implications

The endothelium is one of the most important constituents of vascular homeostasis, which is achieved through continual and balanced production of different relaxing and contractile factors. When there is a pathological disturbance in release of these products, endothelial dysfunction (ED) will probably occur. ED is considered to be the initial step in the development of atherosclerosis. This pathological activation and inadequate functioning of endothelial cells was shown to be to some extent a reversible process, which all together resulted in increased interest in investigation of different beneficial treatment options. To this point, the pharmacological approach, including for example, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or statins, was clearly shown to be effective in the improvement of ED. One of many critical issues underlying ED represents instability in the balance between nitric oxide and angiotensin II (Ang II) production. Considering that Ang II was confirmed to be important for the development of ED, the aim of this review article was to summarize the findings of up to date clinical studies associated with therapeutic application of angiotensin receptor blockers and improvement in ED. In addition, it was of interest to review the pleiotropic actions of angiotensin receptor blockers linked to the improvement of ED. The prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo or active-controlled clinical trials were identified and selected for the final evaluation.

Bioequivalence study between a fixed-dose single-pill formulation of nebivolol plus hydrochlorothiazide and separate formulations in healthy subjects using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Systemic arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for cerebrovascular disease. Therefore, adequate control of blood pressure is of enormous importance. One of the many fixed-dose single-pill antihypertensive formulations available on the market is the combination of nebivolol and hydrochlorothiazide. The objective of this study was to develop two distinct high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry methods to simultaneously quantify nebivolol and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma. The methods were employed in a bioequivalence study, the first assay involving a nebivolol fixed-dose single-pill formulation based on healthy Brazilian volunteers. Nebilet HCT™ (nebivolol 5 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet, manufactured by Menarini) was the test formulation. The reference formulations were Nebilet™ (nebivolol 5 mg tablet, manufactured by Menarini) and Clorana™ (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg tablet, manufactured by Sanofi). For both analytes, liquid-liquid extraction was employed for sample preparation and the chromatographic run time was 3.5 min. The limits of quantification validated were 0.02 ng/mL for nebivolol and 1 ng/mL for hydrochlorothiazide. Since the 90% CI for C_max , AUC_(0-last) and AUC_(0-inf) individual test/reference ratios were within the 80-125% interval indicative of bioequivalence, it was concluded that Nebilet HCT™ is bioequivalent to Nebilet™ and Clorana™.

Impact of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

New evidence suggests that central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) and augmentation index (AI) are superior predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to peripheral systolic BP (pSBP). We performed a meta-analysis assessing the impact of antihypertensives on cSBP and AI.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched until September 2014 to identify eligible articles. A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Fifty-two and 58 studies incorporating 4,381 and 3,716 unique subjects were included for cSBP and AI analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, antihypertensives reduced pSBP more than cSBP (WMD 2.52 mm Hg, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.69; I (2) = 21.9%). β-Blockers (BBs) posed a significantly greater reduction in pSBP as compared to cSBP (WMD 5.19 mm Hg, 95% CI 3.21 to 7.18). α-Blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors and nicorandil reduced cSBP and pSBP in a similar manner. The overall reduction in AI from baseline was 3.09% (95% CI 2.28 to 3.90; I (2) = 84.5%). A significant reduction in AI was seen with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors, BBs, α-blockers (ABs), nicorandil, and moxonidine reduced AI nonsignificantly.

CONCLUSIONS

BBs are not as beneficial as the other antihypertensives in reducing cSBP and AI.

Clinical Significance of Endothelial Dysfunction in Essential Hypertension

The endothelium is recognized as a major determinant of vascular physiology and pathophysiology. Over the last few decades, a plethora of studies have implicated endothelial dysfunction in the progression of atherosclerosis and the subclinical target organ damage observed in essential hypertension. However, the clinical significance of diagnosing endothelial dysfunction in patients with essential hypertension remains under investigation. Although a number of vascular and non-vascular markers of endothelial dysfunction have been proposed, there is an ongoing quest for a marker in the clinical setting that is optimal, inexpensive, and reproducible. In addition, endothelial dysfunction emerges as a promising therapeutic target of agents that are readily available in clinical practice. In this context, a better understanding of its role in essential hypertension becomes of great importance. Here, we aim to investigate the clinical significance of endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension by accumulating novel data on (a) early diagnosis using robust markers with prognostic value in cardiovascular risk prediction, (b) the association of endothelial dysfunction with subclinical vascular organ damage, and (c) potential therapeutic targets.

Vascular stiffening in pulmonary hypertension: cause or consequence? (2013 Grover Conference series)

Recent studies have indicated that systemic arterial stiffening is a precursor to hypertension and that hypertension, in turn, can perpetuate arterial stiffening. Pulmonary artery (PA) stiffening is also well documented to occur in pulmonary hypertension (PH), and there is evidence that pulmonary vascular stiffness (PVS) may be a better predictor of outcome than pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). We have hypothesized that the decreased flow-damping function of elastic PAs in PH likely initiates and/or perpetuates dysfunction of pulmonary microvasculature. Recent studies have shown that large-vessel stiffening increases flow pulsatility in the distal pulmonary vasculature, leading to endothelial dysfunction within a proinflammatory, vasoconstricting, and profibrogenic environment. The intricate role of stiffening-stimulated high pulsatile flow in endothelial cell dysfunction includes stepwise molecular events underlying PA hypertrophy, inflammation, endothelial-mesenchymal transition, and fibrosis. In addition to contributing to microenvironmental alterations of the distal vasculature, disordered proximal-distal PA coupling likely also plays a role in increasing ventricular afterload, ultimately causing right ventricle (RV) dysfunction and death. Current therapeutic treatments do not provide a realistic approach to destiffening arteries and, thus, to potentially abrogating the effects of high pulsatile flow on the distal pulmonary vasculature or the increased work imposed by stiffening on the RV. Scrutinizing the effect of PA stiffening on high pulsatile flow-induced cellular and molecular changes, and vice versa, might lead to important new therapeutic options that abrogate PA remodeling and PH development. With a clear understanding that PA stiffening may contribute to the progression of PH to an irreversible state by contributing to chronic microvascular damage in lungs, future studies should be aimed first at defining the underlying mechanisms leading to PA stiffening and then at improved treatment approaches based on these findings.

Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular therapy

The world population is aging and the number of old people is continuously increasing. Arterial structure and function change with age, progressively leading to arterial stiffening. Arterial stiffness is best characterized by measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV), which is its surrogate marker. It has been shown that PWV could improve cardiovascular event prediction in models that included standard risk factors. Consequently, it might therefore enable better identification of populations at high-risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The present review is focused on a survey of different pharmacological therapeutic options for decreasing arterial stiffness. The influence of several groups of drugs is described: antihypertensive drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, diuretics, and nitrates), statins, peroral antidiabetics, advanced glycation end-products (AGE) cross-link breakers, anti-inflammatory drugs, endothelin-A receptor antagonists, and vasopeptidase inhibitors. All of these have shown some effect in decreasing arterial stiffness. Nevertheless, further studies are needed which should address the influence of arterial stiffness diminishment on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

Nebivolol reduces central blood pressure in stage I hypertensive patients: experimental single cohort study

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES

Assessment of central blood pressure (BP) has grown substantially over recent years because evidence has shown that central BP is more relevant to cardiovascular outcomes than peripheral BP. Thus, different classes of antihypertensive drugs have different effects on central BP despite similar reductions in brachial BP. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of nebivolol, a β-blocker with vasodilator properties, on the biochemical and hemodynamic parameters of hypertensive patients.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Experimental single cohort study conducted in the outpatient clinic of a university hospital.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients were recruited. All of them underwent biochemical and hemodynamic evaluation (BP, heart rate (HR), central BP and augmentation index) before and after 3 months of using nebivolol.

RESULTS

88.5% of the patients were male; their mean age was 49.7 ± 9.3 years and most of them were overweight (29.6 ± 3.1 kg/m2) with large abdominal waist (102.1 ± 7.2 cm). There were significant decreases in peripheral systolic BP (P = 0.0020), diastolic BP (P = 0.0049), HR (P < 0.0001) and central BP (129.9 ± 12.3 versus 122.3 ± 10.3 mmHg; P = 0.0083) after treatment, in comparison with the baseline values. There was no statistical difference in the augmentation index or in the biochemical parameters, from before to after the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Nebivolol use seems to be associated with significant reduction of central BP in stage I hypertensive patients, in addition to reductions in brachial systolic and diastolic BP.

Effects of testosterone undecanoate replacement and withdrawal on cardio-metabolic, hormonal and body composition outcomes in severely obese hypogonadal men: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Modifications of cardiovascular and metabolic parameters during testosterone (T) replacement and withdrawal have never been investigated in severely obese hypogonadal men.

METHODS

Twenty-four severely obese (mean BMI 42; mean age 54.5) hypogonadal men (mean T = 245 ± 52 ng/dL) were enrolled in an observational, parallel-arm, open-label, 54-week study of hypocaloric diet plus physical activity (DPE; n = 12) or DPE plus T injections (DPE + T; n = 12), followed by 24 weeks of DPE alone. Primary endpoints were variations from baseline of cardiovascular (cardiac performance, blood pressure, endothelial function, carotid intima-media thickness, CIMT; epicardial fat thickness, EF) and body composition (fat/lean mass) parameters. Secondary endpoints were variations from baseline of hormonal (T and GH) and metabolic (oral glucose tolerance test, lipids, fibrinogen) parameters.

RESULTS

At 54 weeks, DPE + T showed improvements in EF, ejection fraction, diastolic function, CIMT and endothelial function (p < 0.01 vs. controls). Also, hormonal (T, p < 0.0001; GH, p < 0.01), metabolic (HOMA, p < 0.01; microalbuminuria, p < 0.01), lipid (total cholesterol, p < 0.05) and inflammatory (fibrinogen, p < 0.05) parameters improved. After 24 weeks from T withdrawal, all cardiac and hormonal parameters returned to baseline, while fat but not lean mass and blood pressure ameliorations were maintained. An inverse relationship either between EF vs. endothelial function and EF vs. T levels was found (r (2) = -0.46, p < 0.001 and r (2) = -0.56, p < 0.0005, respectively) while direct relationship between T vs. endothelial function occurred (r (2) = 0.43, p < 0.005) in DPE + T. A 33 % dropout rate was reported in DPE without serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In middle-aged hypogonadal obese men, 1-year T treatment was safe and improved cardio-metabolic and hormonal parameters. We firstly demonstrated that T withdrawal determines a return back to hypogonadism within 6 months, with loss of cardiovascular and some body composition improvements attained.

β-Blockers

Objective: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic properties of commonly used β-blockers (atenolol, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, metoprolol tartrate, and nebivolol). Data Sources: A MEDLINE literature search (1966-May 2013) was performed using the following key terms: hypertension, β-blockers, atenolol, carvedilol, metoprolol tartrate, metoprolol succinate, nebivolol, pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, blood pressure, metabolic, lipid, central aortic pressure, diabetes, and insulin resistance. References from publications reviewed were included. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language articles identified were reviewed. Animal studies and studies in patients for a primary diagnosis of coronary artery disease were excluded. Data Synthesis: β-Blockers are no longer recommended first-line therapy for primary hypertension, based on data showing that β-blockers are inferior to other antihypertensives and no better than placebo, in spite of provision of blood pressure reduction. Because atenolol is the β-blocker used in 75% of these studies, uncertainty about widespread application to all β-blockers exists. Different pharmacological and physiological properties, both within β-blockers and compared with other antihypertensives, may explain divergent effects. Evidence shows that β-blockers have a truncated effect on central aortic pressure, an independent predictor of cardiovascular events, compared with other antihypertensive classes; differences within the class may exist, but the evidence is inconclusive. Metabolic effects differ within the β-blocker class, with evidence that carvedilol causes less metabolic dysregulation. Conclusion: Emerging evidence reveals physiological differences within the β-blocker class and in comparison to other antihypertensives. These differences provide insight into the diverse clinical effects β-blockers provide in cardiovascular disease.

Effects of Various Antihypertensive Drugs on Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflections

We reviewed trials that tested the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing arterial stiffness and wave reflections as assessed by pulse wave velocity and augmentation index, respectively. Regardless of cross-over or parallel-group comparison design, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that antihypertensive drugs were effective in reducing pulse wave velocity. In actively-controlled parallel-group comparison studies, this effect on arterial stiffness was more evident for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers than other classes of antihypertensive drugs, particularly when brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity was measured. Regardless of cross-over or parallel-group comparison or placebo- or actively-controlled design, the reviewed trials showed that β-blockers were inferior to all the other classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing augmentation index. However, these studies had a small sample size and a short follow-up time and did not link the changes in measurements of arterial function with cardiovascular events. Whether the superiority or inferiority is clinically relevant for cardiovascular protection and prevention remains to be investigated.

Effects of nebivolol and atenolol on central aortic pressure in hypertensive patients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study

INTRODUCTION

The main objective was to compare the mean change in augmentation index of hypertensive patients treated with nebivolol or atenolol.

METHODS

Multicenter, double-blind randomized study conducted in six Spanish centers. We enrolled outpatients between the ages of 40 and 65 years with mild or moderate essential hypertension (systolic blood pressure, SBP ≥ 140 mmHg to ≤ 179 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure, DBP ≥ 90 mmHg to ≤ 109 mmHg after a 2-week run-in placebo period). Patients received nebivolol 5 mg or atenolol 50 mg once daily. At week 3, atenolol could be titrated up to 100 mg qd for non-responders. Additionally, patients not achieving normal blood pressure after 6 weeks could be treated with 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide. Follow-up visits were at 3, 6 and 10 weeks.

RESULTS

The final study population of 138 patients (58% men; median age 52.6 years, range 40-67 years) was randomized into two groups of 69 patients each. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. At the screening visit, 69% presented with mild hypertension. Nebivolol modified the mean augmentation index to a lesser extent than atenolol after 10 weeks (mean difference 3.1%, 95% CI 0.55-5.69; p = 0.027). A higher proportion of patients in the atenolol group required a diuretic. Reductions in central aortic pressure and peripheral arterial pressure were similar for both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that nebivolol produces a less pronounced impact on augmentation index than atenolol.

Beneficial effects of nebivolol and hydrochlorothiazide combination in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Objective

This study examined the combined effect of nebivolol (NEB) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on cardiovascular function in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).

Methods

SHR normotensive male rats were randomly assigned to five groups ( n = 8 per group): (i) SHR control group; (ii) NEB 2 mg/kg per day group; (iii) HCTZ 10 mg/kg per day group; (iv) NEB 2 mg/kg per day + HCTZ 10 mg/kg per day group; (v) Eight age-matched Wistar-Kyoto normotensive male rats served as the control group. All groups were treated orally for 8 weeks.

Results

The combination of NEB + HCTZ synergistically reduced systolic blood pressure and heart rate compared with either monotherapy. HCTZ increased water intake, which is a sign of diuresis. NEB reduced plasma angiotensin II concentration, which was increased in SHR and after HCTZ treatment. NEB + HCTZ increased plasma nitric oxide (NO) concentration and NO synthase activity, which were both reduced in SHR. NEB + HCTZ normalized femoral arterial vasorelaxation induced by acetylcholine, which was impaired in SHR.

Conclusions

The combination of NEB + HCTZ provided a number of beneficial and additive effects due to the synergistic characteristics of both drugs, in an experimental rat model of hypertension.

Increased night heart rate is associated with worse large artery elasticity in chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with high overall and cardiovascular mortality. Numerous studies have reported that increased heart rate is a risk factor for all-cause mortality. We investigated the link between sleep heart rate and artery stiffness in CKD patients.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, we enrolled 100 prevalent Chinese CKD patients (55 males, aged 52.5 ± 16.40 years). Heart rate was measured with an automatic system. Arterial stiffness was evaluated by using a calibrated tonometer.

RESULTS

Large artery elasticity index (LAEI) was positively correlated with body mass index and hemoglobin but negatively associated with age and systolic blood pressure. Furthermore, LAEI was negatively associated with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and sleep heart rate. In multivariate regression, LAEI was independently predicted by SBP, BMI, age, sleep heart rate, and gender. Adjusted R (2) of the model was 0.486.

CONCLUSION

Elevated sleep heart rate is significantly associated with increased arterial stiffness in CKD patients. Further investigation is needed to explore the potential benefits of sleep heart rate lowering therapy in this patient group.