Personalized antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention: The MADONNA study

Role of Cyp2c19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Identification of a reliable discriminatory test to accurately stratify patient responses to antiplatelet therapy following coronary revascularization has become increasingly desirable to optimize therapeutic efficacy and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

The expansion of platelet function testing to include genotype assessment has been an evolutionary journey, initially fraught with confounding results. However, more recent and rigorous data analysis suggests that genotype testing- guided, tailored antiplatelet therapy may hold promise in optimizing treatment of patients after coronary intervention. Current evidence increasingly supports the use of genotype guided CYP2C19 testing to better match the post coronary intervention patient with the most efficacious and least risky antiplatelet inhibitor. The risk stratification of poor, intermediate, and good metabolizers of these drugs with such testing promises to yield clinical dividends in terms of morbidity, mortality and cost control, in this growing patient population.

Time-dependent changes in P2Y12 reaction unit values for predicting the different types of cardiovascular events in patients with ischemic heart disease

Several studies have investigated the association between P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with ischemic heart disease, but there is no well-established consensus on the utility of PRU value. Furthermore, the optimal PRU cut-off value varied with studies. One reason may be that the endpoints and observation periods differed, depending on the study. This study aimed to investigate the optimal cut-off and predictive ability of the PRU value for predicting cardiovascular events, while considering different endpoints and observation periods. We surveyed a total of 338 patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitors and measured PRU during cardiac catheterization. Using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis, we evaluated the cut-off and area under curve (AUC) of the PRU value for two MACEs (MACE ①: composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and cerebral infarction; MACE ②: composite of MACE ① and target vessel revascularization) at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after cardiac catheterization. MACE ① occurred in 18 cases and MACE ② in 32 cases. The PRU cut-off values at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 257, 238, 217, and 216, respectively, for MACE ① and 250, 238, 209, and 204, respectively, for MACE ②. The AUCs at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 0.753, 0.832, 0.718, and 0.717, respectively, for MACE ① and 0.724, 0.722, 0.664, and 0.682, respectively, for MACE ②. The optimal cut-off and predictive ability of PRU values for cardiovascular events varied depending on different endpoints and duration of the observation periods. A relatively high PRU value is effective for short-term event suppression, but a low value is required for long-term event suppression.

Platelets and the Atherosclerotic Process: An Overview of New Markers of Platelet Activation and Reactivity, and Their Implications in Primary and Secondary Prevention

The key role played by platelets in the atherosclerosis physiopathology, especially in the acute setting, is ascertained: they are the main actors during thrombus formation and, thus, one of the major investigated elements related to atherothrombotic process involving coronary arteries. Platelets have been studied from different points of view, according with the technology advances and the improvement in the hemostasis knowledge achieved in the last years. Morphology and reactivity constitute the first aspects investigated related to platelets with a significant body of evidence published linking a number of their values and markers to coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events. Recently, the impact of genetics on platelet activation has been explored with promising findings as additional instrument for patient risk stratification; however, this deserves further confirmations. Moreover, the interplay between immune system and platelets has been partially elucidated in the last years, providing intriguing elements that will be basic components for future research to better understand platelet regulation and improve cardiovascular outcome of patients.

Genotype-Guided Use of P2Y12 Inhibitors: A Review of Current State of the Art

The pharmacodynamics of the purinergic receptor type Y, subtype 12 (P2Y12) inhibitors has evolved. Our understanding of the metabolism of P2Y12 inhibitors has revealed polymorphisms that impact drug metabolism and antiplatelet efficacy, leading to genetic testing guided therapy. In addition, assays of platelet function and biochemistry have provided insight into our understanding of the efficacy of "antiplatelet" therapy, identifying patients with high or low platelet reactivity on P2Y12 therapy. Despite the data, the implementation of these testing modalities has not gained mainstream adoption across hospital systems. Given differences in potency between the three clinically available P2Y12 inhibitors, the balance between thrombotic and bleeding complications must be carefully considered, especially for the large proportion of patients at higher risk for bleeding. Here we review the current data for genetic and functional testing, risk assessment strategies, and guidelines for P2Y12 inhibitors guided therapy.

Antiplatelet Therapy for Atherothrombotic Disease in 2022—From Population to Patient-Centered Approaches

Antiplatelet agents, with aspirin and P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists as major key molecules, are currently the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment of atherothrombotic events including a variety of cardio- and cerebro-vascular as well as peripheral artery diseases. Over the last decades, significant changes have been made to antiplatelet therapeutic and prophylactic strategies. The shift from a population-based approach to patient-centered precision medicine requires greater awareness of individual risks and benefits associated with the different antiplatelet strategies, so that the right patient gets the right therapy at the right time. In this review, we present the currently available antiplatelet agents, outline different management strategies, particularly in case of bleeding or in perioperative setting, and develop the concept of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and the steps toward person-centered precision medicine aiming to optimize patient care.

Utility of a pharmacogenetic-driven algorithm in guiding dual antiplatelet therapy for patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation in China

PURPOSES

The POPular Risk Score (PRiS), a pharmacogenetic-driven algorithm consisting of CYP2C19 genotype, platelet reactivity, and clinical risk factors, is developed to evaluate ischemic risk and guide dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAPT in accordance with the PRiS in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

METHODS

A total of 1757 patients recruited in this cohort study were divided into four groups according to the PRiS and type of P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment at discharge. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization) during 1-year follow-up. The safety endpoints were defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria as major bleeding (BARC 3a, 3b, 3c, and 5) and clinically relevant bleeding (BARC 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, and 5).

RESULTS

Among 1046 patients with PRiS < 2 and 711 patients with PRiS ≥ 2, 34.2% and 38.3% of them were treated with ticagrelor, respectively. The PRiS ≥ 2 was an independent predictor for the 1-year incidence of MACE (HR(95%CI): 2.09 (1.37-3.20), p = 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression indicated that in the PRiS ≥ 2 group, ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in reducing the risk of MACE (HR(95%CI): 0.53 (0.29-0.98), p = 0.042), without increasing the bleeding risk. On the other hand, in the PRiS < 2 group, clopidogrel treatment was related to a remarkably lower rate of BARC class ≥ 2 bleeding (HR(95%CI): 0.39 (0.20-0.72), p = 0.003), but comparable incidences of MACE and BARC class ≥ 3 bleeding during 1-year follow-up. Similar associations between P2Y12 receptor inhibitors and 1-year endpoints in the PRiS < 2 and PRiS ≥ 2 group could also be identified in propensity score-weighted analysis and propensity score-matched analysis.

CONCLUSION

Tailored DAPT based on the PRiS could assist in improving the prognosis of patients undergoing DES implantation. Further randomized controlled trials are required to provide more evidence for PRiS-guided DAPT.

Ticagrelor and prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome: a single-arm crossover platelet reactivity study

AIM

To compare the degree of platelet inhibition between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

Platelet function was assessed by impedance aggregometry after 30-90 days of therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor and over 15 days after switching to prasugrel. High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) was defined for ADP test results above the upper limit of normal.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were included, 81.9% males and 33.3% people with diabetes, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 8.1 years. Mean platelet reactivity was not significantly different between the two antiplatelet strategies, as the prevalence of HRPR (8.6 vs 12.3%, P = 0.50). Switching between the two antiplatelet agents was safe and well tolerated, and effectively reduced platelet reactivity in over 95% of the patients (only 3.8% of the study population displaying ineffective response to both drugs).

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor and prasugrel have a similar effect on platelet reactivity. Switching between the two drugs can be safely done.

Platelet Function Testing and Genotyping for Tailoring Treatment in Complex PCI Patients

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is considered the cornerstone of treatment in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with complex PCI (C-PCI) constitute a special PCI subpopulation, characterized by increased ischemic risk. Identifying the optimal DAPT strategy is often challenging and remains controversial in this setting. In an attempt to balance ischemic and bleeding risks in C-PCI patients receiving DAPT, treatment individualization regarding potency and duration has evolved as a feasible approach. Platelet function testing and genotyping have been evaluated in several trials with conflicting and mostly neutral results. The aim of this review is to critically appreciate the role of these tools for antiplatelet treatment tailoring specifically in C-PCI patients. Because existing evidence is limited, dedicated future studies are warranted to elucidate the utility of platelet function testing and genotyping in C-PCI.

MicroRNA as Potential Biomarkers of Platelet Function on Antiplatelet Therapy: A Review

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAs, able to regulate cellular functions by specific gene modifications. Platelets are the major source for circulating miRNAs, with significant regulatory potential on cardiovascular pathophysiology. MiRNAs have been shown to modify the expression of platelet proteins influencing platelet reactivity. Circulating miRNAs can be determined from plasma, serum, or whole blood, and they can be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of platelet reactivity during antiplatelet therapy as well as novel therapeutic targets in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Herein, we review diagnostic and prognostic value of miRNAs levels related to platelet reactivity based on human studies, presenting its interindividual variability as well as the substantial role of genetics. Furthermore, we discuss antiplatelet treatment in the context of miRNAs alterations related to pathways associated with drug response.

The need of a multicomponent guiding approach to personalize clopidogrel treatment

Patients bearing polymorphisms termed CYP2C19 loss of function (LoF) alleles and ABCB1-C3435T may do not properly respond to standard dosage of clopidogrel and have an increased risk of thrombosis. Moreover, co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel may attenuate the antiplatelet effect. The role of pharmacogenetics and PPIs/clopidogrel drug-drug interaction has been extensively investigated in patients with acute coronary syndrome after stent implantation (ACS/PCI), while data in patients undergoing vascular surgery are scarce. Here we have performed a systematic review to evaluate the available literature in such a clinical setting and have discussed the controversies about the use of CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics and platelet function testing to personalize clopidogrel treatment. In addition, we have made a comparison of the literature data with our findings concerning patients eligible for vascular surgery and treated with clopidogrel, in whom we used a combined management based on the CYP2C19 and ABCB1 pharmacogenetic testing with monitoring of therapeutic adherence and PPIs-clopidogrel interaction. Both our data and those produced during both observational studies and randomized clinical trials confirm the validity of pharmacogenetics to personalize clopidogrel treatment and stress the importance to make a drug monitoring considering all the known variables, potentially responsible for treatment failure. However, the American Heart Association and the European Cardiovascular Society recommend against the routine use of clopidogrel pharmacogenetic testing. An update of the international guidelines on antiplatelet therapy, incorporating the evidence related to CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics and PPIs-clopidogrel drug-drug interactions is warranted both in ACS/PCI patients and subjects undergoing vascular surgery.

Inflammatory state does not affect the antiplatelet efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS

Inflammation leads to atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We performed a prospective, observational study to assess association between the concentrations of inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, hsCRP; high sensitivity interleukin6, hsIL-6; soluble CD40 ligand, sCD40 L) and platelet reactivity in 338 patients with ACS treated with ticagrelor and prasugrel. We also assessed whether hsCRP, hsIL-6, and sCD40 L are associated with standard inflammatory markers (white blood cell [WBC] and fibrinogen), and whether they differ according to patient diabetic status and pre-treatment with statins. Concentrations of hsCRP and concentrations of hsIL-6 and sCD40 L were assessed using turbidimetric assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Platelet reactivity was measured using multiple electrode aggregometry. There was only a weak inverse correlation between hsIL-6 and platelet reactivity (r≤-0.125). In contrast, concentration of hsIL6 and hsCRP positively correlated with WBC and fibrinogen (r ≥ 0.199). Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) was associated with higher concentration of hsIL-6 (p = .014), whereas pre-treatment with statins - with lower concentration of hsIL-6 (p = .035). In conclusion, inflammatory state does not affect the antiplatelet efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in the acute phase of ACS, confirming the safety and efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with a high inflammatory burden.

Gender Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Diabetic Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

BACKGROUND

Increased comorbidities and a perceived high-bleeding risk often prevent the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in female patients. However, more aggressive antiplatelet treatment would certainly offer additional outcome benefits in coronary artery disease, especially among diabetic patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the gender differences in high-residual on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) among diabetic patients treated with DAPT.

METHODS

Our population is represented by a consecutive cohort of diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel, ticagrelor or dose-adjusted prasugrel) for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI, undergoing platelet reactivity assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry and in diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy, by light transmission aggregometry, surface expression of P-selectin and plasma concentration of Thromboxane B2.

RESULTS

We included 472 patients, 113 (23.9%) women. Female gender was associated with more advanced age, and increased comorbidities. Mean platelet reactivity did not differ according to gender. The rate of HRPR was similar in women as compared to men (for ASA: adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.59[0.27-1.33], p = 0.21, for ADP-antagonists: adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.24[0.25-1.80], p = 0.27), however, the benefits of the new ADP-antagonists on platelet reactivity were lower in women than in men (p interaction = 0.01). No impact of gender on platelet reactivity was confirmed among 50 diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy gender does not affect platelet reactivity or high-on treatment platelet reactivity. However, the enhanced platelet inhibition provided by the new-ADP antagonists of new-ADP antagonists could be mitigated in women.

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Percutaneous coronary interventions with stent-based restorations of vessel patency have become the gold standard in the treatment of acute coronary states. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been designed to combine the efficiency of drug-eluting stents (DES) at the time of implantation and the advantages of a lack of foreign body afterwards. Complete resolution of the scaffold was intended to enable the restoration of vasomotor function and reduce the risk of device thrombosis. While early reports demonstrated superiority of BVS over DES, larger-scale application and longer observation exposed major concerns about their use, including lower radial strength and higher risk of thrombosis resulting in higher rate of major adverse cardiac events. Further focus on procedural details and research on the second generation of BVS with novel properties did not allow to unequivocally challenge position of DES. Nevertheless, BVS still have a chance to present superiority in distinctive indications. This review presents an outlook on the available first and second generation BVS and a summary of results of clinical trials on their use. It discusses explanations for unfavorable outcomes, proposed enhancement techniques and a potential niche for the use of BVS.

Stratified Approaches to Antiplatelet Therapies Based on Platelet Reactivity Testing

Antiplatelet therapy with P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor) is a cornerstone of medical therapy after percutaneous coronary interventions. Significant prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel treatment led to introduction of more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors: prasugrel (a third generation thienopyridine), ticagrelor, and cangrelor (cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidines). Nevertheless, more potent platelet inhibition and resulting low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) has led to increased risk of major bleeding events. These limitations resulted in a need for an individualized antiplatelet therapy approach. This review discusses the current role and future perspectives of diagnostic tools such as platelet function testing to optimize antiplatelet therapy with a focus on deescalating therapies to reduce bleeding risks.

Current Role of Platelet Function Testing in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

There is interindividual variability in the pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet medications. High on-treatment platelet reactivity, reflecting a failure to achieve adequate platelet inhibition, is associated with a higher risk for thrombotic events. Low on-treatment platelet reactivity, or an enhanced response to antiplatelet medications, has been linked to a higher risk for bleeding. There is evidence for the prognostic value of platelet function testing for risk prediction. This review presents the current evidence regarding platelet function testing in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. The possible role of platelet function testing for individualized antiplatelet treatment is highlighted.

Why have studies of tailored anti-platelet therapy failed so far?

Published data linking clopidogrel non-responsiveness to adverse ischaemic events lead to the suggestion that the magnitude of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel can be monitored and individually adjusted. This has been tested in randomised clinical trials (ARCTIC, GRAVITAS and TRIGGER-PCI), but despite reducing platelet reactivity, a strategy of therapy adjustment based on platelet function monitoring did not reduce the incidence of cardiac ischaemic events. Several critical issues regarding the design of these trials, which might in part have led to negative results, are discussed in this article.

How to improve the concept of individualised antiplatelet therapy with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors – is an algorithm the answer?

Within the past decade, high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel and its clinical implications have been frequently discussed. Although it has been previously assumed that HTPR is a phenomenon occurring only in patients treated with clopidogrel, recent data show that HTPR might also occur during treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor in the acute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Moreover, it has been postulated that there is a therapeutic window for P2Y12 receptor blockers, thus indicating that HTPR is associated with thrombotic events whereas low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) is associated with bleeding events. The current paper focuses on tools to identify risk factors for HTPR (pharmacogenomic testing, clinical scoring and drug-drug interactions) and on the use of platelet function testing in order to identify patients who might not respond adequately to clopidogrel. The majority of recent clinical randomised trials have not supported the hypothesis that platelet function testing and tailored antiplatelet therapy are providing a favourable clinical outcome. These trials, mainly performed in low-to-moderate risk patients, will be reviewed and discussed. Finally, an algorithm based on current knowledge is suggested, which might be of use for design of clinical trials.

Platelet function testing in acute cardiac care – is there a role for prediction or prevention of stent thrombosis and bleeding?

The role of platelet function testing in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remains controversial despite the fact that high platelet reactivity is an independent predictor of stent thrombosis and emerging evidence suggests also a link between low platelet reactivity and bleeding. In this expert opinion paper, the Study Group on Biomarkers in Cardiology of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association and the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology aim to provide an overview of current evidence in this area and recommendations for practicing clinicians.

Use of Platelet Function Testing Before Pipeline Embolization Device Placement

Background and Purpose—

Thromboembolic complications constitute a significant source of morbidity after neurointerventional procedures. Flow diversion using the pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms necessitates the use of dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce this risk. The use of platelet function testing before pipeline embolization device placement remains controversial.

Methods—

A retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases at 3 academic institutions was performed from the years 2009 to 2016 to identify patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with pipeline embolization device placement. Clinical and radiographic data were analyzed with emphasis on thromboembolic complications and clopidogrel responsiveness.

Results—

A total of 402 patients underwent 414 pipeline embolization device procedures for the treatment of 465 intracranial aneurysms. Thromboembolic complications were encountered in 9.2% of procedures and were symptomatic in 5.6%. Clopidogrel nonresponders experienced a significantly higher rate of thromboembolic complications compared with clopidogrel responders (17.4% versus 5.6%). This risk was significantly lower in nonresponders who were switched to ticagrelor when compared with patients who remained on clopidogrel (2.7% versus 24.4%). In patients who remained on clopidogrel, the rate of thromboembolic complications was significantly lower in those who received a clopidogrel boost within 24 hours pre-procedure when compared with those who did not (9.8% versus 51.9%). There was no significant difference in the rate of hemorrhagic complications between groups.

Conclusions—

Clopidogrel nonresponders experienced a significantly higher rate of thromboembolic complications when compared with clopidogrel responders. However, this risk seems to be mitigated in nonresponders who were switched to ticagrelor or received a clopidogrel boost within 24 hours pre-procedure.

Association of measured platelet reactivity with changes in P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy and outcomes after myocardial infarction: Insights into routine clinical practice from the TReatment with ADP receptor iNhibitorS: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events after Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRANSLATE-ACS) study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the use of platelet function testing to guide choice of P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitor therapy in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We studied 671 myocardial infarction (MI) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the TRANSLATE-ACS Registry who had VerifyNow platelet function testing performed while on clopidogrel treatment during their index hospitalization (April 2010-October 2012).

RESULTS

High platelet reactivity (>208 platelet reactivity units [PRU]) was present in 261 (38.9%) patients. Clopidogrel was switched in-hospital to prasugrel in 80 (30.7%) patients with high platelet reactivity and 18 (4.4%) patients with therapeutic platelet reactivity (≤208 PRU). Among high platelet reactivity patients, switch to prasugrel was associated with lower major adverse cardiovascular events (death, MI, stroke, or unplanned revascularization) at 1year (10.0% vs 22.7%, P=.02; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.85, P=.02) and no significant difference in Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or higher bleeding (23.8% vs 22.1%, P=.77; adjusted OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.48-1.7, P=.77) compared with patients continued on clopidogrel. No significant differences in major adverse cardiovascular event (22.2% vs 12.8%, P=.25; adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.47-7.3, P=.38) or bleeding (22.2% vs 19.4%, P=.77; adjusted OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.27-6.8, P=.72) were observed among therapeutic platelet reactivity patients between switching and continuation on clopidogrel.

CONCLUSIONS

Only one-third of percutaneous coronary intervention-treated MI patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity were switched to a more potent P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitor. Intensification of antiplatelet therapy was associated with lower risk of ischemic events at 1year among HPR patients.

Intensified Antiplatelet Treatment Reduces Major Cardiac Events in Patients with Clopidogrel Low Response: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel low response (CLR) is an independent risk factor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and intensified antiplatelet treatments (IAT) guided by platelet function assays might overcome laboratory CLR. However, whether IAT improves clinical outcomes is controversial.

METHODS

Relevant trials were identified in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese Medical Journal Network databases from their establishment to September 9, 2014. Trials were screened using predefined inclusion criteria. Conventional meta-analysis and cumulative meta-analysis were performed using the Review Manager 5.0 and STATA 12.0 software programs.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 5111 patients with CLR were recruited. During a follow-up period of 1-12 months, the incidences of cardiovascular (CV) death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and stent thrombosis were significantly lower in the IAT arm than in the conventional antiplatelet treatment arm (relative risk [RR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.57, P < 0.000,01), whereas bleeding was similar between the two arms (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.86-1.27, P = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

IAT guided by platelet function assays reduces the risk of CV death, nonfatal MI, and stent thrombosis (ST) without an increased risk of bleeding in patients undergoing PCI and with CLR.

Platelet aggregation and the risk of stent thrombosis or bleeding in elective percutaneous coronary intervention patients

: Platelet aggregation monitoring in patients after stent implantation is a promising way of preventing stent thrombosis and bleeding. The aim of the study was to verify whether clopidogrel (ADPtest) and aspirin (ASPItest) response measured by Multiplate (Dynabyte, Munich, Germany) analyzer in elective percutaneous coronary implantation patients predict the risk of stent thrombosis or other ischemic adverse events and bleeding. In this prospective, observational study 697 elective percutaneous coronary implantation patients were analyzed. The median ASPItest was 86 AU min. In 69 patients (9.9%), an ASPI result of more than 203 AU min was observed. The median ADP-dependent platelet aggregation was 212 AU min. In 36 (5.2%) patients, the result was at least 468 AU min. Cox regression analysis showed the prognostic factors of definite or probable stent thrombosis and cardiac death at 1 year were higher ASPItest result [odds ratio (OR) 1.006, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.004-1.008, P < 0.001], ASPItest more than 203 AU min (OR 7.61, 95% CI 2.83-20.43, P < 0.001), higher ADPtest result (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.003-1.007, P < 0.001) and ADPtest at least 468 AU min (OR 12.54, 95% CI 4.56-35.53, P < 0.001). In turn, ADPtest 188 AU min or less predicted GUSTO scale major and moderate bleeding (OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.12-15.32, P = 0.033). There was also a strong trend toward higher rate of major and moderate bleeding for the ASPItest less than 35 AU min (lowest quintile) - (OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.96-9.58, P = 0.058). Lower creatinine clearance and lower hemoglobin level were associated with both ischemic and bleeding complications. The results of this study show that impaired platelet response to clopidogrel and aspirin measured by the Multiplate analyzer results in increased risk of stent thrombosis and cardiac death. Furthermore, the study showed that increased response to clopidogrel is related to major and moderate bleeding events.

Novel strategies for assessing platelet reactivity

There are many approaches to assessing platelet reactivity and many uses for such measurements. Initially, measurements were based on the ability of platelets separated from other blood cells to aggregate together following activation with an appropriate 'aggregating agent'. Later, measurements of platelet aggregation in blood itself were performed, and this led to a point-of-care approach to platelet function testing. Measurement of secretory activity through the appearance of the activation marker P-selectin on platelets now provides an alternative approach, which enables remote testing. Measurement of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation is also moving toward application in situations remote from the testing laboratory. Here we provide an overview of the various approaches that are now available, assess their advantages and disadvantages, and describe some of the clinical situations in which they are being used.

Platelet aggregation and risk of stent thrombosis or bleeding in interventionally treated diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome

Background

Platelet aggregation monitoring in diabetic patients treated with coronary interventions (PCI) for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a promising way of optimizing treatment and outcomes in this high risk group. The aim of the study was to verify whether clopidogrel response measured by Multiplate analyzer (ADPtest) in diabetic ACS patients treated with PCI predicts the risk of stent thrombosis or cardiovascular mortality and bleeding.

Methods

Into this prospective, observational study 206 elective PCI patients were enrolled. Two cutoff points of ADPtest were used in analysis to divide patients into groups. One (345 AU x min) was calculated based on ROC curve analysis; this cutoff provided the best ROC curve fit, although it did not reach statistical significance. The other (468 AU x min) was accepted based on the consensus of the Working Group on On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity. The risk of stent thrombosis and mortality was assessed using Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

The risk of stent thrombosis was higher in the group of patients with impaired clopidogrel response for either cutoff value (for >354 AU x min - HR 12.33; 95% CI 2.49–61.1; P = 0.002). Cardiovascular mortality was also higher in the impaired clopidogrel response group (for >354 AU x min - HR 10.58; 95% CI 2.05–54.58; P = 0.005). We did not find a clear relation of increased clopidogrel response to the risk of bleeding.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that in diabetic ACS patient group treated with PCI an impaired platelet response to clopidogrel measured by the Multiplate analyzer results in increased risk of stent thrombosis and cardiac death.

Association of PCSK9 with platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor: The PCSK9-REACT study

BACKGROUND

Circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enzyme might be associated with increased activation of platelets. We aimed to assess the relationship between PCSK9 levels, platelet reactivity and ischemic outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive ACS patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in a prospective, observational study. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was determined by Multiplate Analyzer in the maintenance phase of treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, ischemic stroke were evaluated at 12months.

RESULTS

A direct association was found between increased PCSK9 serum levels and platelet reactivity (r=0.30; p=0.004). When assessed according to tertile values of PCSK9, there was a significant increase in platelet reactivity in the upper vs lower tertile (p=0.02). Clinical outcome was available at follow-up in 178 subjects. In the upper PCSK9 tertile 13/59 (22.03%) patients experienced a clinical MACE at one year, vs 2/59 (3.39%) patients in the lower PCSK9 tertile. At one-year follow-up, PCSK9 was independently associated with increased ischemic MACEs: hazard ratio for upper vs lower PCSK9-level tertile was 2.62 (95% confidence interval 1.24-5.52; p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that increased PCSK9 levels are associated with higher platelet reactivity and are a possible predictor of ischemic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

A comparison of cangrelor, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Newer P2Y12 inhibitors have more rapid onset of platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel, especially the intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor. Direct comparisons between cangrelor and oral P2Y12 inhibitors ticagrelor and prasugrel do not exist. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis to directly and indirectly compare different P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared at least two P2Y12 inhibitors including cangrelor, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Network meta-analysis with a Bayesian approach was performed to directly and indirectly compare the effects of the aforementioned P2Y12 inhibitors on clinical outcomes. Odds ratios with credible intervals (OR [CrIs]) were generated with random-effects models to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

This analysis included 15 RCTs with 54,025 patients randomized to cangrelor (n=12,475), clopidogrel (n=26,903), prasugrel (n=7455), or ticagrelor (n=7192) at time of PCI. Patients had a mean age of 63±10, 74% were male, and 82% underwent PCI for acute coronary syndrome. No significant differences between cangrelor and clopidogrel were found with respect to cardiovascular death (OR 1.01 [CrI 0.23-4.39]), myocardial infarction (OR 0.94 [CrI 0.69-1.25]), major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.91 [CrI 0.69-1.18]), stent thrombosis (OR 0.66 [CrI 0.37-1.19]), or major bleeding (OR 1.52 [CrI 0.79-2.98]). Rank probability data suggested that ticagrelor and prasugrel were better than cangrelor for reducing ischemic events, though these differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Despite rapid platelet inhibition provided by cangrelor, newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor and prasugrel have comparable clinical outcomes.

Platelet function testing as a biomarker for efficacy of antiplatelet drugs

Despite the overwhelming evidence in support of the efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, it is also obvious that not all patients benefit from these drugs to the same extent. This interindividual variability in platelet responses may underlie clinical differences in drug efficacy, with potential for optimization of antiplatelet therapy to prevent ischemic events without excessively increasing bleeding risk. This review presents the current evidence regarding platelet function testing for monitoring of antiplatelet therapy, with emphasis on the prognostic value of platelet function testing to predict ischemic and bleeding events. The potential of platelet function testing to provide personalized antiplatelet therapy is also discussed, with an outlook toward the future of platelet function testing in high-risk individuals.

Abciximab as a bridging strategy to overcome morphine-prasugrel interaction in STEMI patients

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated whether the glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab might be a successful bridging strategy to achieve adequate levels of platelet inhibition rapidly in cases where prasugrel is used in morphine-pretreated ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

METHODS

In a prospective observational cohort study, 32 patients presenting with STEMI were given prasugrel at a loading dose of 60 mg. Patients were stratified into four groups, according to morphine and/or abciximab use. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was measured at four time points: at baseline, and at 2 h, 1 day and 2 days after prasugrel loading.

RESULTS

Morphine use was associated with a three-fold higher level of ADP-induced platelet aggregation 2 h after prasugrel loading compared with no morphine/no abciximab (P = 0.019). However, when abciximab was infused in the catheterization laboratory, the effect of morphine on ADP-induced platelet aggregation disappeared (P = 0.884). This interaction was also seen in the presence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) at 2 h; while HTPR was seen in 88% of morphine users/no abciximab users, it was found in only 17-20% in the three other groups (P = 0.003). The effect of morphine disappeared by day 1 - 2.

CONCLUSION

The infusion of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab allows immediate and efficient platelet inhibition in STEMI patients concomitantly receiving the oral ADP receptor blocker prasugrel and morphine.

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Pilot Study to Find the Optimal Test and Cut Off Values

OBJECTIVE

Restenosis and stent thrombosis after endovascular intervention in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can potentially be tackled by more intensive antiplatelet therapy, such as dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor. Despite clopidogrel treatment, some patients still display high platelet reactivity (HCPR). Tailored antiplatelet therapy, based on platelet reactivity testing, might overcome HCPR. However, more data are warranted regarding the proportion of patients with HCPR in the PAD population, different platelet reactivity tests, their correlation, and the optimal timing for these tests as a stepping stone for a future trial investigating the potential benefit of tailored antiplatelet therapy in PAD patients.

METHODS

Thirty patients on DAPT after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty underwent platelet reactivity testing by VerifyNow, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and platelet activation assay, and CYP2C19-polymorphism testing.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with HCPR measured by VerifyNow varied between 43.3% and 83.3%, depending on the cut off values used. Testing within 24 hours of initiation of DAPT gave a higher proportion of HCPR than testing after more than 24 hours. According to DNA testing, 14.8% were CYP2C19*2 homozygote, 22.2% heterozygote, and 63% CYP2C19*2 negative. VASP assay revealed 24% HCPR. The highest HCPR rate was found with a VerifyNow cut off of less than 40% inhibition, whereas the lowest HCPR rate was found with the VASP assay. There was a low correlation between the tests.

CONCLUSION

HCPR is present in PAD patients and research on HCPR is needed in this population; timing of tests is relevant and standardisation of tests is needed. The optimal conditions for platelet function testing should be determined.

The Ratio of ADP- to TRAP-Induced Platelet Aggregation Quantifies P2Y12-Dependent Platelet Inhibition Independently of the Platelet Count

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association of clinical factors with P2Y12-dependent platelet inhibition as monitored by the ratio of ADP- to TRAP-induced platelet aggregation and conventional ADP-induced aggregation, respectively.

BACKGROUND

Controversial findings to identify and overcome high platelet reactivity (HPR) after coronary stent-implantation and to improve clinical outcome by tailored anti-platelet therapy exist. Monitoring anti-platelet therapy ex vivo underlies several confounding parameters causing that ex vivo platelet aggregation might not reflect in vivo platelet inhibition.

METHODS

In a single centre observational study, multiple electrode aggregometry was performed in whole blood of patients after recent coronary stent-implantation. Relative ADP-induced aggregation (r-ADP-agg) was defined as the ratio of ADP- to TRAP- induced aggregation reflecting the individual degree of P2Y12-mediated platelet reactivity.

RESULTS

Platelet aggregation was assessed in 359 patients. Means (± SD) of TRAP-, ADP-induced aggregation and r-ADP-agg were 794 ± 239 AU*min, 297 ± 153 AU*min and 37 ± 14%, respectively. While ADP- and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation correlated significantly with platelet count (ADP: r = 0.302; p<0.001; TRAP: r = 0.509 p<0.001), r-ADP-agg values did not (r = -0.003; p = 0.960). These findings were unaltered in multivariate analyses adjusting for a range of factors potentially influencing platelet aggregation. The presence of an acute coronary syndrome and body weight were found to correlate with both ADP-induced platelet aggregation and r-ADP-agg.

CONCLUSION

The ratio of ADP- to TRAP-induced platelet aggregation quantifies P2Y12-dependent platelet inhibition independently of the platelet count in contrast to conventional ADP-induced aggregation. Furthermore, r-ADP-agg was associated with the presence of an acute coronary syndrome and body weight as well as ADP-induced aggregation. Thus, the r-ADP-agg is a more valid reflecting platelet aggregation and potentially prognosis after coronary stent-implantation in P2Y12-mediated HPR than conventional ADP-induced platelet aggregation.

The Importance of the Mean Platelet Aggregation Degree in Long-term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

INTRODUCTION

The dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and the response of clopidogrel were two pivotal issues in drug-eluting stent (DES) era.

AIMS

To analyze the combined impacts of DAPT and the response to clopidogrel to evaluate their long-term effect on patients undergoing DES implantation.

METHODS

Platelet aggregation was serially measured by light transmission aggregometry in all eligible patients during the course of treatment with DAPT, and the mean platelet aggregation degree of each participant was calculated. Based on the duration of DAPT and the mean platelet aggregation degree, all the enrolled patients were then divided into four groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1245 suitable patients in this study. They were divided into four groups: Group A (12-month DAPT & low platelet aggregation degree) with 233 subjects, Group B (12-month DAPT & high platelet aggregation degree) with 260 subjects, Group C (>12-month DAPT & low platelet aggregation degree) with 374 subjects, and Group D (>12-month DAPT & high platelet aggregation degree) with 378 subjects. Group C was associated with a decreased incidence of primary endpoints [HR 0.512, 95%CI (0.27-0.97); P = 0.040]. The Cox proportional hazard model was further analyzed with Groups A and B combined as the reference category [HR for Group C vs. Group A, 0.84, 95%CI (0.33-2.15); P = 0.719; HR for Group C vs. Group B, 0.45, 95%CI (0.21-0.98); P = 0.043]. Their respective multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions confirmed these trends.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean platelet aggregation degree is of importance in long-term use of DAPT; extension of DAPT beyond 1 year should be implemented cautiously in patients implanted with DESs.

Low On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Predicts Long-Term Risk of Bleeding After Elective PCI

BACKGROUND

Bleeding after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is an important complication with impact on prognosis.

AIM

To evaluate the predictive value of enhanced platelet responsiveness to dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, for bleeding, after elective PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed multiple electrode aggregometry (MAE) platelet functional tests induced by arachidonic acid (ASPI) and adenosine-diphosphate (ADP) before PCI, and 24 hours after PCI, in 481 elective PCI patients who were followed-up for an average of 15.34 ± 7.19 months. Primary end point was the occurrence of any bleeding, while ischemic major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was a secondary endpoint. The incidence of total, BARC ≤ 2, and BARC ≥ 3 bleeding, according to BARC classification, was 19, 18, and 1%, respectively. Groups with any, and BARC ≤ 2 bleeding, had a lower average value of MAE ADP test after 24 hours, compared to the group without bleeding: 45.30 ± 18.63 U versus 50.99 ± 19.01 U; P = 0.005; and 45.75 ± 18.96 U versus 50.99 ± 18.99 U; P = 0.01; respectively. Female gender (HR 2.11; CI 1.37-3.25; P = 0.001), previous myocardial infarction (HR 0.56; CI 0.37-0.85; P = 0.006), lower body mass (HR 0.78; CI 0.62-0.98; P = 0.03), and MAE ADP test after 24 hours (HR 0.75; CI 0.61-0.93; P = 0.009) were the independent predictors for any bleeding by Cox univariate analysis. After adjustment, MAE ADP test after 24 hours, was the only independent predictor for any (HR 0.7; CI 0.56-0.87; P = 0.002), and BARC ≤ 2 (HR 0.71; CI 0.56-0.89; P = 0.003) bleeding, by Cox multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

MAE ADP test before and after PCI, was associated with any, and BARC ≤ 2 bleeding after elective PCI.

Inter-patient variability of platelet reactivity in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of platelet reactivity values in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor. This prospective observational study enrolled 200 patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Platelet aggregation was determined by multiple electrode aggregometry after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the maintenance phase of treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Only 3% of patients in the prasugrel group and 2% of study participants in the ticagrelor group had high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). The majority of patients displayed low on treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR; prasugrel: 69%; ticagrelor: 64%). The pharmacodynamic effect was similar in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor: the median level of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was 15U (interquartile range IQR 9-21U) under prasugrel treatment and 17U (IQR 8-24U) under ticagrelor treatment (p=0.370). In conclusion, our study suggests that there is some degree of variability in ADP-induced platelet aggregation under treatment with prasugrel and ticagrelor.

On-treatment platelet reactivity: State of the art and perspectives

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HcPR) during dual-antiplatelet therapy is a marker of vascular risk, in particular stent thrombosis, in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Genetic determinants (CYP2C19*2 polymorphism), advanced age, female gender, diabetes and reduced ventricular function are related to a higher risk to develop HcPR. In addition, inflammation and increased platelet turnover, as revealed by the elevated percentage of reticulated platelets in patients' blood, that characterize the acute phase of acute coronary syndromes, are associated with HcPR. To overcome the limitation of clopidogrel, new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor) were developed and the demonstration of their superiority over clopidogrel was obtained in the two randomized trials, TRITON TIMI 38 and PLATO. Emerging evidence is accumulating on the role of high-on aspirin platelet reactivity (HaPR), especially in the clinical context of diabetes. Finally, the presence of new, potent antiplatelet drugs has shifted the focus from thrombotic to bleeding risk. Recent data document that low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) is associated with a significantly higher bleeding risk. Due to the current possibility to choose between multiple antiplatelet strategies, the future perspective is to include in the management of ACS, in addition to clinical data and classical risk factors, the definition of platelet function during treatment in order to set a tailored therapy.

Changes in platelet function independent of pharmacotherapy following coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

BACKGROUND

High on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is common in patients receiving clopidogrel following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); it's also associated with increased morbidity and mortality. More potent and predictable antiplatelet drugs have addressed this issue at the expense of increased bleeding. Identification of HTPR and the targeted use of more potent antiplatelet drugs has, so far, broadly failed. We investigate this approach in terms of the timing of platelet function testing and how this can impact on the ability of these bedside tests to predict HTPR around the time of coronary intervention.

METHODS

High risk ACS patients treated with 5 days of clopidogrel had platelet function assessed using the multiple electrode aggregometry system (MEA) pre, post and 24 h following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Simultaneous detailed analysis of platelet status was undertaken with quantification of platelet bound and soluble p-selectin and mass spectrometry quantification of the eicosanoid 12-HETE.

RESULTS

As assessed by MEA 40.5% of patients had HTPR pre-PCI; mean aggregation units (AU) in response to ADP were 499.1 ± 46.3 pre-PCI, 407.6 ± 37.7 post-PCI and 269.1 ± 24.6 AU 24 h post-PCI (pre to post PCI p > 0.05, pre to 24 h post-PCI p = 0.0002). This highly significant drop in platelet reactivity was contrasted with on-going expression of platelet bound p-selectin, increased soluble p-selectin and rising 12-HETE concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study outlines significant changes in ex-vivo platelet aggregation that occur within 24 h of PCI in high risk NSTEMI patients using bedside PFT. Whilst there were no changes in antiplatelet therapy during the study period its clear that timing is crucial when assessing high on treatment residual platelet activity.