Comprehensive meta-analysis of radial vs femoral approach in primary angioplasty for STEMI

Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Diseases: From Physiology to Pathophysiology and Outcomes

Vitamin D is rightly recognized as an essential key factor in the regulation of calcium and phosphate homeostasis, affecting primary adequate bone mineralization. In the last decades, a more complex and wider role of vitamin D has been postulated and demonstrated. Cardiovascular diseases have been found to be strongly related to vitamin D levels, especially to its deficiency. Pre-clinical studies have suggested a direct role of vitamin D in the regulation of several pathophysiological pathways, such as endothelial dysfunction and platelet aggregation; moreover, observational data have confirmed the relationship with different conditions, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, and hypertension. Despite the significant evidence available so far, most clinical trials have failed to prove any positive impact of vitamin D supplements on cardiovascular outcomes. This discrepancy indicates the need for further information and knowledge about vitamin D metabolism and its effect on the cardiovascular system, in order to identify those patients who would benefit from vitamin D supplementation.

Current Management of Highly Calcified Coronary Lesions: An Overview of the Current Status

The amount of coronary calcium strongly correlates with the degree of atherosclerosis and, therefore, with the rate of future cardiac events. Calcified coronary lesions still represent a challenge for interventional cardiologists, bringing not only a higher risk of immediate complications during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but also a higher risk of late stent failure due to under-expansion and/or malapposition, and therefore, have a relevant prognostic impact. Accurate identification of the calcified plaques together with the analysis of their distribution pattern within the vessel wall by intracoronary imaging is important to improve the successful treatment of these lesions. The aim of this review is to guide readers through the assessment of the calcified plaque distribution using intracoronary imaging in order to select the best devices and strategies for plaque debulking and lesion preparation.

Current Role of Intracoronary Imaging for Implementing Risk Stratification and Tailoring Culprit Lesion Treatment: A Narrative Review

Our understanding of the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome and of the vascular biology of coronary atherosclerosis has made enormous progress with the implementation of intravascular imaging. Intravascular imaging contributes to overcoming the known limitations of coronary angiography and allows for the in vivo discrimination of plaque morphology giving insight into the underlying pathology of the disease process. The possibility of using intracoronary imaging to characterize lesion morphologies and correlate them with clinical presentations may influence the treatment of patients and improve risk stratification, offering the opportunity for tailored management. This review examines the current role of intravascular imaging and describes how intracoronary imaging represents a valuable tool for modern interventional cardiology in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and offer a tailored approach to the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease, especially in the acute setting.

Soluble PCSK9 Inhibition: Indications, Clinical Impact, New Molecular Insights and Practical Approach-Where Do We Stand?

Current research on cardiovascular prevention predominantly focuses on risk-stratification and management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) to optimize their prognosis. Several basic, translational and clinical research efforts aim to determine the etiological mechanisms underlying CAD pathogenesis and to identify lifestyle-dependent metabolic risk factors or genetic and epigenetic parameters responsible for CAD occurrence and/or progression. A log-linear association between the absolute exposure of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of atherosclerotic cardio-vascular disease (ASCVD) was well documented over the year. LDL-C was identified as the principal enemy to fight against, and soluble proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) was attributed the role of a powerful regulator of blood LDL-C levels. The two currently available antibodies (alirocumab and evolocumab) against PCSK9 are fully human engineered IgG that bind to soluble PCSK9 and avoid its interaction with the LDLR. As documented by modern and dedicated "game-changer" trials, antibodies against soluble PCSK9 reduce LDL-C levels by at least 60 percent when used alone and up to 85 percent when used in combination with high-intensity statins and/or other hypolipidemic therapies, including ezetimibe. Their clinical indications are well established, but new areas of use are advocated. Several clues suggest that regulation of PCSK9 represents a cornerstone of cardiovascular prevention, partly because of some pleiotropic effects attributed to these newly developed drugs. New mechanisms of PCSK9 regulation are being explored, and further efforts need to be put in place to reach patients with these new therapies. The aim of this manuscript is to perform a narrative review of the literature on soluble PCSK9 inhibitor drugs, with a focus on their indications and clinical impact.

New Insights into Pathophysiology and New Risk Factors for ACS

Cardiovascular disease still represents the main cause of mortality worldwide. Despite huge improvements, atherosclerosis persists as the principal pathological condition, both in stable and acute presentation. Specifically, acute coronary syndromes have received substantial research and clinical attention in recent years, contributing to improve overall patients' outcome. The identification of different evolution patterns of the atherosclerotic plaque and coronary artery disease has suggested the potential need of different treatment approaches, according to the mechanisms and molecular elements involved. In addition to traditional risk factors, the finer portrayal of other metabolic and lipid-related mediators has led to higher and deep knowledge of atherosclerosis, providing potential new targets for clinical management of the patients. Finally, the impressive advances in genetics and non-coding RNAs have opened a wide field of research both on pathophysiology and the therapeutic side that are extensively under investigation.

Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention after Acute Coronary Syndrome: Emerging Risk Factors and Novel Therapeutic Targets

The control of cardiovascular risk factors, the promotion of a healthy lifestyle, and antithrombotic therapy are the cornerstones of secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, many patients have recurrent ischemic events despite the optimal control of traditional modifiable risk factors and the use of tailored pharmacological therapy, including new-generation antiplatelet and lipid-lowering agents. This evidence emphasizes the importance of identifying novel risk factors and targets to optimize secondary preventive strategies. Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has emerged as an independent predictor of adverse events after ACS. New molecules such as anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, small interfering RNAs, and antisense oligonucleotides can reduce plasma Lp(a) levels and are associated with a long-term outcome benefit after the index event. The inflammatory stimulus and the inflammasome, pivotal elements in the development and progression of atherosclerosis, have been widely investigated in patients with coronary artery disease. More recently, randomized clinical trials including post-ACS patients treated with colchicine and monoclonal antibodies targeting cytokines yielded promising results in the reduction in major cardiovascular events after an ACS. Gut dysbiosis has also raised great interest for its potential pathophysiological role in cardiovascular disease. This evidence, albeit preliminary and needing confirmation by larger population-based studies, suggests the possibility of targeting the gut microbiome in particularly high-risk populations. The risk of recurrent ischemic events after ACS is related to the complex interaction between intrinsic predisposing factors and environmental triggers. The identification of novel risk factors and targets is fundamental to customizing patient clinical management with a precision medicine perspective.

Antiplatelet Strategies for Older Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Finding Directions in a Low-Evidence Field

Patients ≥ 75 years of age account for about one third of hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend that older ACS patients use the same diagnostic and interventional strategies used by the younger ones, most elderly patients are currently treated invasively. Therefore, an appropriate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is indicated as part of the secondary prevention strategy to be implemented in such patients. The choice of the composition and duration of DAPT should be tailored on an individual basis, after careful assessment of the thrombotic and bleeding risk of each patient. Advanced age is a main risk factor for bleeding. Recent data show that in patients of high bleeding risk short DAPT (1 to 3 months) is associated with decreased bleeding complications and similar thrombotic events, as compared to standard 12-month DAPT. Clopidogrel seems the preferable P2Y12 inhibitor, due to a better safety profile than ticagrelor. When the bleeding risk is associated with a high thrombotic risk (a circumstance present in about two thirds of older ACS patients) it is important to tailor the treatment by taking into account the fact that the thrombotic risk is high during the first months after the index event and then wanes gradually over time, whereas the bleeding risk remains constant. Under these circumstances, a de-escalation strategy seems reasonable, starting with DAPT that includes aspirin and low-dose prasugrel (a more potent and reliable P2Y12 inhibitor than clopidogrel) then switching after 2-3 months to DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for up to 12 months.

Angiographic and clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: A collaborative, individual patient data meta-analysis of six registry-based studies

BACKGROUND

The characteristics and outcome of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) are still poorly known.

METHODS

The PANDEMIC study was an investigator-initiated, collaborative, individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of registry-based studies. MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Web of Sciences, and SCOPUS were searched to identify all registry-based studies describing the characteristics and outcome of SARS-CoV-2-positive STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. The control group consisted of SARS-CoV-2-negative STEMI patients undergoing PPCI in the same time period from the ISACS-STEMI COVID 19 registry. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was postprocedural reperfusion assessed by TIMI flow.

RESULTS

Of 8 registry-based studies identified, IPD were obtained from 6 studies including 941 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients; the control group included 2005 SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. SARS-CoV-2-positive patients showed a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001) and worse postprocedural TIMI flow (<3, p < 0.001) compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative subjects. The increased risk for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was significantly higher in males compared to females for both the primary (p_interaction = 0.001) and secondary outcome (p_interaction = 0.023). In SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, age ≥ 75 years (OR = 5.72; 95%CI: 1.77-18.5), impaired postprocedural TIMI flow (OR = 11.72; 95%CI: 2.64-52.10), and cardiogenic shock at presentation (OR = 11.02; 95%CI: 2.84-42.80) were independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, SARS-CoV-2 positivity is independently associated with impaired reperfusion and with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality, especially among male patients. Age ≥ 75 years, cardiogenic shock, and impaired postprocedural TIMI flow independently predict mortality in this high-risk population.

Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on short-term outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the international multicenter ISACS-STEMI registry

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is projected to become the third cause of mortality worldwide. COPD shares several pathophysiological mechanisms with cardiovascular disease, especially atherosclerosis. However, no definite answers are available on the prognostic role of COPD in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), especially during COVID-19 pandemic, among patients undergoing primary angioplasty, that is therefore the aim of the current study.

Methods

In the ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 registry we included retrospectively patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between March and June of 2019 and 2020 from 109 high-volume primary PCI centers in 4 continents.

Results

A total of 15,686 patients were included in this analysis. Of them, 810 (5.2%) subjects had a COPD diagnosis. They were more often elderly and with a more pronounced cardiovascular risk profile. No preminent procedural dissimilarities were noticed except for a lower proportion of dual antiplatelet therapy at discharge among COPD patients (98.9% vs. 98.1%, P = 0.038). With regards to short-term fatal outcomes, both in-hospital and 30-days mortality occurred more frequently among COPD patients, similarly in pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era. However, after adjustment for main baseline differences, COPD did not result as independent predictor for in-hospital death (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.913[0.658–1.266], P = 0.585) nor for 30-days mortality (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.850 [0.620–1.164], P = 0.310). No significant differences were detected in terms of SARS-CoV-2 positivity between the two groups.

Conclusion

This is one of the largest studies investigating characteristics and outcome of COPD patients with STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty, especially during COVID pandemic. COPD was associated with significantly higher rates of in-hospital and 30-days mortality. However, this association disappeared after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Furthermore, COPD did not significantly affect SARS-CoV-2 positivity.

Trial registration number: NCT 04412655 (2nd June 2020).

Radial artery access is associated with lower mortality in patients undergoing primary PCI: a report from the SWEDEHEART registry

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate the effects of radial artery access versus femoral artery access on the risk of 30-day mortality, inhospital bleeding and cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

We used data from the SWEDEHEART registry and included all patients who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Sweden between 2005 and 2016. We compared patients who had percutaneous coronary intervention by radial access versus femoral access with regard to the primary endpoint of all-cause death within 30 days, using a multilevel propensity score adjusted logistic regression which included hospital as a random effect.

RESULTS

During the study period, 44,804 patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention of whom 24,299 (54.2%) had radial access and 20,505 (45.8%) femoral access. There were 2487 (5.5%) deaths within 30 days, of which 920 (3.8%) occurred in the radial access and 1567 (7.6%) in the femoral access group. After propensity score adjustment, radial access was associated with a lower risk of death (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.88, P = 0.025). We found no interaction between access site and age, gender and cardiogenic shock regarding 30-day mortality. Radial access was also associated with a lower adjusted risk of bleeding (adjusted OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.79, P = 0.006) and cardiogenic shock (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.73, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, primary percutaneous coronary intervention by radial access rather than femoral access was associated with an adjusted lower risk of death, bleeding and cardiogenic shock. Our findings are consistent with, and add external validity to, recent randomised trials.

Impact of renin angiotensin system inhibitors on homocysteine levels and platelets reactivity in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) represent the cornerstone in the treatment of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), mainly after an acute ischemic event. However, high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR), is not infrequent despite optimal medical treatment. Homocysteine (Hcy) is a metabolite of methionine catabolism linked to atherothrombosis. Recently, a potential crosstalk between RAS and Hcy has been suggested, potentially favouring platelet aggregation and cardiovascular disease.Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of RASi on Hcy levels and platelet aggregation in patients on DAPT after PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing PCI on DAPT with ASA plus an ADP-antagonist (clopidogrel, ticagrelor or prasugrel), were included. RASi comprised angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Aggregation tests were performed by Multiple Electrode Aggregometry. We included 1210 patients, of whom 862 (71.2%) were on treatment with RASi. Overall, DAPT composition was ASA+clopidogrel in 566 (46.8%) patients, ASA+ticagrelor in 428 (35.4%) and ASA+prasugrel in 216 (17.9%). Median values of Hcy were higher in RASi patients (p = 0.006), who displayed a higher percentage of Hcy above the median value (52.4% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.019, adjustedOR [95%CI] = 1.40 [1.04-1.88], p = 0.027). No differences in HRPR rate were found according to RASi use for ASPI test (3.6% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.88) and ADP test (25.6% vs. 24.3%,p = 0.62; adjustedOR [95%CI] = 1.23 [0.89-1.70], p = 0.220) and according to ADP-antagonist type. A direct linear relationship was observed between platelet reactivity and Hcy in both patients receiving RASi and untreated ones, with higher values of platelet aggregation being observed in patients with Hcy above the median, independently from RASi administration and DAPT strategy.

CONCLUSION

In patients on DAPT after PCI, RASi treatment did not emerge as an independent predictor of HRPR. However, the levels of Hcy were significantly elevated in patients on RASi and related to higher values of platelet reactivity, independently from the DAPT strategy.

Impact of aging on the effects of intracoronary adenosine, peak hyperemia and its duration during fractional flow reserve assessment

INTRODUCTION

Functional assessment of coronary stenoses is crucial for determining the correct therapeutic strategy. Age-related modifications in cardiovascular function could alter the functional significance of an intermediate coronary lesion. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of age on fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in patients with intermediate coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We included patients undergoing coronary angiography at our Division of Cardiology from June 2008 to February 2019 for elective indication or recent acute coronary syndrome and receiving FFR assessment for an intermediate coronary stenosis (angiographic 40-70% stenoses). FFR measurement was performed by pressure-recording guidewire (Prime Wire; Volcano Imaging System Philips Healthcare, San Diego, California, USA), after induction of hyperemia with intracoronary boluses of adenosine (from 60 to 720 μg, with dose doubling at each step).

RESULTS

We included in our study 276 patients, undergoing FFR evaluation on 314 lesions, that were divided according to age (< or ≥70 years). Elderly patients displayed a higher cardiovascular risk profile and received more often specific therapy. We found significantly higher FFR values and lower Delta FFR and time to recovery in patients with age ≥70 years old even with high-dose adenosine. Elderly patients showed a trend in lower percentage of positive FFRs, especially with high-dose (P = 0.09). Overall, any FFR ≤ 0.80 was observed in 33.5% of younger patients and 21.1% of patients ≥70 years (P = 0.02). Results were confirmed after correction for baseline differences [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 0.60 (0.33-1.09), P = 0.08].

CONCLUSION

This is one of the first studies investigating the impact of age on the measurement of FFR with high-dose adenosine. Patients with age >70 years old with intermediate CAD are more likely to have higher FFR values and lower duration of hyperemia after adenosine boluses, as compared with younger patients.

Impact of uric acid on immature platelet fraction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

INTRODUCTION

Reticulated platelets have been involved in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease (CAD). Immature platelet fraction (IPF) allows their measurement in daily clinical practice, although the factors conditioning their elevation are still largely unexplored. Serum uric acid (SUA) is the end product of purine metabolism, displaying a pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory action and increasing the cardiovascular risk. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of SUA on IPF levels in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and their relationship with CAD.

METHODS

We enrolled a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography in a single center. Hyperuricemia was defined by SUA ≥ 6.5 mg/dl. Significant CAD was defined as at least 1 vessel stenosis >50%, while severe CAD was defined as left main and/or three-vessel disease. IPF was measured at admission by routine blood cells count (A Sysmex XE-2100).

RESULTS

We included in our study 2217 patients, of whom 544 had high levels of SUA, while 1673 had normal levels. Hyperuricemics were older, with higher percentage of renal failure, hypertension, dilated cardiomyopathy or valvular disease as indication to angiography, higher levels of creatinine and C-reactive protein (p < 0.001, respectively) when compared to normouricemics. Immature platelet fraction (IPF) was significant higher in hyperuricemic patients (3.96% vs 3.59%, p = 0.004). A progressive direct increase in the IPF values was observed in relation to SUA levels (r = 0.101, p < 0.001), although at multivariate analysis, hyperuricemia did not result as an independent predictor of IPC in 3rd tertile (adjusted OR [95%CI] = 1.21 [0.85-1.71] P = 0.288). When stratifying hyperuricemics and normouricemics according to IPF tertiles (<2.3%; 2.3-3.9%; ≥ 4%), reticulated platelets were not associated to the prevalence of CAD (SUA ≥6.5:80.9 vs 79.3% vs 78.6%, p = 0.60; SUA < 6.5: 79.3% vs 81.3% vs 78.9%, p = 0.878) or severe CAD (SUA ≥6.5: 34.9% vs 38.9% vs 35.2%, p = 0.99; SUA < 6.5: 30.4% vs 33.5% vs 34%, p = 0.192), and the results were confirmed at multivariate analysis for CAD (SUA ≥6.5: adjusted OR [95%CI] = 1.11 [0.81-1.51] P = 0.524, SUA < 6.5: adjusted OR [95%CI] = 0.89 [0.75-1.05] P = 0.170) or severe CAD (SUA ≥6.5: adjusted OR [95%CI] = 1.03 [0.81-1.31] P = 0.795; SUA < 6.5: adjusted OR [95%CI] = 1.10 [0.96-1.26] P = 0.192).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study we found a direct relationship between SUA levels and IPF values; however, hyperuricemia did not result as an independent predictor of higher IPF tertile values. Neither in hyperuricemics nor in normouricemics higher IPF were independently associated to the prevalence of CAD or severe CAD.

Statins and Elderly: From Clinical Trials to Daily Practice

Elderly patients represent a rising social problem, due to the exponential growth of persons in these age groups and their atherothrombotic burden. The management of this population still raises several challenges, requiring a balance between elevated cardiovascular risk, clinical complexity, frailty and co-morbidities. Statins represent the main pillar in cardiovascular prevention, lowering serum cholesterol and reducing mortality and ischemic events, especially in high-risk patients. Yet, elderly patients have often been excluded from major clinical trials of statins, thus limiting the experience with these drugs in advanced age. Moreover, important barriers to the use of statins in the elderly exist due to potential risks attributed to altered metabolism, comorbidities, polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions and financial constraints. This situation has led to a "statin paradox", since high-risk elderly patients, that would most benefit from the use of statins, may be undertreated with these drugs in real life. The vague indications provided by guidelines mean that this issue is still debated, especially regarding primary prevention. Nevertheless, the benefits in outcome offered by statins cannot be neglected. Efforts should be made in order to focus on the importance of statin use in the elderly and to provide clinicians with adequate tools for case by case decisions.

Effect of Vasodilatory Medications on Blood Pressure in Patients Undergoing Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Comparative Study

Background:

In patients undergoing coronary intervention, different vasodilators are used to prevent the radial artery spasm (RAS). To date, no studies investigated the effect of these vasodilators in blood pressure (BP) reduction.

Aim:

The study aimed to investigate and compare the effect of vasodilatory medications on BP reduction in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography procedure.

Methods:

We consecutively included 300 patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography procedures and randomly assigned them into three equal groups to compare the effect of verapamil (2.5 mg), nitroglycerin (200 μg), and combination (verapamil 2.5 mg with nitroglycerin 200 (μg) was diluted in 5 ml of normal saline and given through radial sheath. Changes in the BP, heart rate (HR), and other clinical parameters were assessed and presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ANOVA test was performed to analyze the differences in the BP and other clinical parameters between the three groups.

Results:

Overall, the mean age of the study population was 53.26 years (standard deviation: 9.27), male patients (84%), with dyslipidemia (62.6%), and diabetes (45%). At baseline, the mean systolic BP (SBP) was 150.91 ± 31.66 mmHg, HR (72.34 ± 12.71 beats/min). After the administration of vasodilators, the combination group reduced SBP significantly (SMD: −33.35 [95% CI]: −40.27–−26.42, P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between groups for the SBP (F [2,296] =3.38, P = 0.035). Verapamil alone showed a significant decrease in the SBP by −27.23 mmHg and diastolic BP by −4.980 mmHg.

Conclusion:

Intra-arterial administration of verapamil alone showed lower BP reduction compared to the combination of vasodilators. Verapamil could be a safer and effective alternative to prevent RAS with no deleterious effect on BP and HR in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a joint position paper from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Thrombosis, in association with the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

Timely and effective antithrombotic therapy is critical to improving outcome, including survival, in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Achieving effective platelet inhibition and anticoagulation, with minimal risk, is particularly important in high-risk ACS patients, especially those with cardiogenic shock (CS) or those successfully resuscitated following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), who have a 30-50% risk of death or a recurrent ischaemic event over the subsequent 30 days. There are unique challenges to achieving effective and safe antithrombotic treatment in this cohort of patients that are not encountered in most other ACS patients. This position paper focuses on patients presenting with CS or immediately post-OHCA, of presumed ischaemic aetiology, and examines issues related to thrombosis and bleeding risk. Both the physical and pharmacological impacts of CS, namely impaired drug absorption, metabolism, altered distribution and/or excretion, associated multiorgan failure, co-morbidities and co-administered treatments such as opiates, targeted temperature management, renal replacement therapy and circulatory or left ventricular assist devices, can have major impact on the effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic drugs. Careful attention to the choice of antithrombotic agent(s), route of administration, drug-drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring and factors that affect drug efficacy and safety, may reduce the risk of sub- or supra-therapeutic dosing and associated adverse events. This paper provides expert opinion, based on best available evidence, and consensus statements on optimising antithrombotic therapy in these very high-risk patients, in whom minimising the risk of thrombosis and bleeding is critical to improving outcome.

Impact of active smoking on the immature platelet fraction and its relationship with the extent of coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Smoking represents a major cardiovascular risk factor, due to the induction of oxidative stress and low-grade, continuous, inflammation that contribute to promote atherothrombosis. However, the mechanisms leading to increased platelet aggregability associated with smoking are only partially defined. A potential role has been hypothesized for immature platelets, a younger and potentially more reactive fraction, previously associated with the main determinants of coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, the aim of our study was to define the impact of smoking on the immature platelet fraction (IPF) and its relationship with prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We enrolled a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography in a single centre. Significant CAD was defined as at least 1 vessel stenosis >50%, while severe CAD was defined as left main and/or three-vessel disease. IPF was measured at admission by routine blood cell count (Sysmex XE-2100).

RESULTS

We included in our study 2553 patients who were divided according to smoking status (active smokers: 512; nonactive smokers: 2041). Smokers were younger, more frequent males, with lower rate of diabetes mellitus, previous PCI and previous CABG (P < .001, respectively) and were in treatment less often with ARB, BB, nitrates, statins, ASA, clopidogrel, CCB and diuretics (P < .001, respectively) as compared to nonactive smokers. Higher percentage of smokers was observed in patients with higher IPF values, and at multivariate analysis, active smoking resulted as an independent predictor of higher IPF (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.59[1.03-2.45], P = .035). Among smokers, higher IPF was associated with lower ejection fraction (P = .034), percentage of acute coronary syndrome (P = .002) and platelet count (P < .001) compared to ones with lower IPF. However, the IPF (according to quartiles values) was not associated with the prevalence and extent of CAD (82.5%, 80.4%, 86.1% and 80.9%, from 1st to 4th quartile, respectively, adjusted OR[95% CI] = 0.98[0.79-1.23], P = .89) and severe CAD (31%, 31.1%, 39.1% and 35.2%, from 1st to 4th quartile, respectively, adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.03[0.86-1.23], P = .76).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows an independent association between active smoking and the levels of immature platelet fraction in patients undergoing coronary angiography. However, among active smokers, IPF did not result as an independent predictor of CAD or severe CAD.

The effect of topical medications on radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial coronary procedures: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to identify the effectiveness of topical medications on radial artery spasm (RAS) in patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary procedures.

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous coronary procedures were traditionally carried out via the femoral artery; however, over the last 20 years there has been a global increase in the number of proceduralists carrying out percutaneous coronary procedures via the transradial approach. Radial artery spasm remains an issue for the transradial approach, potentially leading to procedural failure. Topical medications have been suggested to reduce the occurrence of RAS during transradial percutaneous coronary procedures.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review considered papers that included participants aged 18 years and over undergoing non-emergency transradial percutaneous coronary procedures. This review considered papers on the utilization of topical medications prior to commencing the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary procedures to reduce RAS. Topical medications were compared to other medications. The primary outcome was the incidence of RAS as assessed by angiography or ultrasound or resistance felt by the operator while manipulating the catheter. Other outcomes of interest included change in radial artery diameter, measured by angiography or ultrasound, change in radial artery patency and side effects of medications administered. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials were considered.

METHODS

A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. A search of various databases was carried out followed by a search for unpublished literature between 1989 to January 2017. Only papers published in English were included in the review. Papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). There was no need for a third reviewer. Quantitative data was extracted from papers included in the review using the JBI data extraction instrument and entered in to RevMan5 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane). All results were subject to double data entry. Effect sizes were expressed as odds ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for analysis.

RESULTS

Only three studies involving 697 participants met the inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of RAS in patients treated with a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics compared to subcutaneous lidocaine (OR 0.26; 95%CI 0.07,0.96). However there were no significant differences in RAS in studies that compared eutectic mixture of local anesthetics and placebo or a combinations of lidocaine with nitroglycerine compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

It is difficult to draw a valid conclusion, given the low number of studies, small sample sizes and heterogeneity between the studies.

Impact of vascular access on the development of contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication of procedures that foresee the use of contrast media. Several risk factors have been identified as independent predictors of CIN, but, to date, no definitive data are available about the association between the angiographic approach and its development.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our population included 4199 patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or PCI. CIN was defined as an absolute ≥0.5 mg/dl or a relative ≥25% increase in creatinine level at 24-48 h after the procedure without another clear cause for the acute kidney injury. The total incidence of CIN was 12.4%. We divided our population into two groups, according to the angiographic approach: transradial (TR) n = 1915 or transfemoral (TF) n = 2284. Patients treated with TR approach were more often males, with history of hypertension, and PCI, but less often diabetic, with previous myocardial infarction, coronary artery by-pass graft surgery and cerebrovascular accident. They had a higher ejection fraction, higher prevalence of PCI, elective indication but interestingly a lower amount of contrast volume. Patients treated with TR approach had higher platelets, Total, LDL and HDL cholesterol, but lower triglycerides, glycaemia and basal creatinine. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the development of CIN (TR 13.2% vs TF 11.7%, p = 0.16). The absence of association between angiographic approach and the incidence of CIN was also confirmed at multivariate analysis after correction for baseline confounders (Adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.2 [0.97-1.50], p = 0.09) and at subgroup analysis according to main risk factors for CIN. Similar results were obtained dividing our population according to propensity score tertiles: 1st Tertile CIN (TF 8.8% vs TR 8.9%), p = 0.95; OR (99% CI) = 1.01 (0.96-1.48), p = 0.95, 2nd Tertile CIN (TF 10.8% vs TR 12.4%), p = 0.35; OR (99% CI) = 1.17 (0.84-1.62), p = 0.35, and 3rd Tertile CIN (TF 15.6% vs TR 17.2%), p = 0.41; OR (99% CI) = 1.12 (0.85-1.48), p = 0.41.

CONCLUSION

This is the first large study showing the absence of relationship between the angiographic access and the incidence of CIN.

Optimal TR-band weaning strategy while minimizing vascular access site complications

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study is to develop an optimal TR-Band weaning strategy while minimizing vascular access site complications of hematoma or radial artery occlusion (RAO).

METHODS

The trial was a randomized, prospective, single center study of 129 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization via the radial artery. Group A was an accelerated protocol in which weaning was initiated 20 min after sheath removal. Group B was an adjusted protocol, in which weaning was dependent on the amount of anti-platelet or anti-coagulation used. All patients underwent radial artery ultrasound to demonstrate arterial patency.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, and PCI was performed in 36.7% of patients in Group A and 37.7% of patients in Group B. RAO occurred in 7.7% of patients overall, with no statistical difference between groups (Group A 5% versus Group B 10.1%, p-value = 0.337). Hematoma formation >5 cm in diameter occurred in 4.6% of patients in the overall cohort, without statistical difference between groups (Group A 5% versus Group B 4.3%, p-value = 1). The TR-Band duration was significantly shorter in Group A compared to Group B (112.9 ± 50.7 versus 130.7 ± 51.1 in minutes, respectively, p-value = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated an accelerated weaning protocol is simple to utilize for nursing staff without increased vascular site complications of RAO or hematoma formation.

Percutaneous Versus Surgical Revascularization for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Results From a Large-Scale Meta-Analysis in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents

The best treatment options for left main (LM) or multivessel coronary disease (MVD) are still debated. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing percutaneous versus surgical revascularization for LM or MVD. Primary end point was overall mortality. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeated revascularization, or stroke. A total of 8 randomized trials were included, involving 8694 patients, 50% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). At a mean follow-up of 39.7 months, mortality was 8.2% with no difference for PCI versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18 [0.90-1.55]; P = .24, P for heterogeneity [ Phet] = .01). However, CABG was slightly favored for MVD (OR [95% CI] = 1.54 [1.12-2.13]; P = .008, Phet = .14 for PCI) whereas noninferior for LM disease (OR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.60-1.29]; P = .50, Phet = .10, P interaction = .03). A similar benefit with CABG was also observed in terms of repeated coronary revascularization, whereas PCI significantly reduced stroke. This meta-analysis shows that surgical coronary revascularization still offers advantages in survival and recurrent ischemic events compared to PCI using drug-eluting stents (DES) in MVD although burdened by an increased risk of stroke. In LM disease, CABG did not provide outcome benefits but was associated with a higher risk of stroke compared to PCI. Additional randomized trials are certainly needed with new-generation DES.

Exploration of Bivalirudin Use during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for High Bleeding Risk Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion

The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high bleeding risk patients with chronic total occlusion lesions (CTO) has not been studied till date. The use of bivalirudin may increase the thrombotic events during CTO-PCI.Between May 2013 and April 2014, a total of 117 high bleeding risk patients with CTOs underwent PCI. Bivalirudin was used in 89 cases with different strategies, including standard usage, combination of heparin, and additional bolus of bivalirudin on the basis of standard usage. The clinical characteristics, procedural details and antithrombotic strategies were assessed, and the bleeding and ischemic events were evaluated. The first 7 of 9 patients with standard application of bivalirudin exhibited acute thrombogenesis in the procedure. Heparin was then added in decreasing amounts in the next 8 patients wherein no thrombosis occurred; however, 2 patients had bleeding complications. The subsequent 72 patients were randomly assigned to the heparin bolus or additional bivalirudin bolus groups before the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was performed. The baseline clinical characteristics and procedure information were identical in both the groups. There were no ischemic and bleeding events in both the groups during the 6-month follow-up.Monotherapy with bivalirudin in CTO-PCI should be treated with caution, as the potential risk of thrombogenesis may be due to the long procedure time, the frequent change of equipment and temporary blood flow convection. Combination of heparin or an additional bolus of bivalirudin before PTCA was observed to be likely to decrease the incidence of thrombogenesis.

Impact of anticoagulation strategy with bivalirudin or heparin on nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Transradial approach has significantly decreased the rate of access site bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), therefore potentially mitigating the benefits offered by bivalirudin in lowering major bleeding complications as compared to heparin. However, nonaccess site bleeding, that represent the majority of hemorrhagic complications, still carry negative prognostic consequences for these patients and no study has so far defined the exact impact of bivalirudin on nonaccess site bleeding, that was therefore the aim of present meta-analysis.

METHODS AND STUDY OUTCOMES

Literature archives (Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane) and main scientific sessions were scanned comparing bivalirudin vs. heparin in patients undergoing PCI. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of nonaccess site bleeding within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were 30 days mortality and the occurrence of access-site bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of nine randomized clinical trials were finally included, involving 32,587 patients, 55.8% randomized to bivalirudin. Bivalirudin significantly reduced the rate of nonaccess site bleeding (2.6 vs. 3.8%, OR [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.60-0.77], P < 0.00001, P_het  = 0.10). However, the reduction of hemorrhagic events was more pronounced when bivalirudin was compared to heparin plus glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors than when it was compared to heparin alone (r = -0.01 (-0.02; -0.001), P = 0.02). Similar results were observed for access-site bleeding (OR [95% CI] = 0.67 [0.57-0.79], P < 0.000001, P_het  = 0.10), with a significant role of glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors use (r = -0.02 (-0.04; -0.004), P = 0.017). Moreover, the observed benefits in hemorrhagic complications did not translate into mortality benefits (OR [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.76-1.05], P = 0.18; P_het  = 0.12; r = 0.21 (-1.12; 1.53), P = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis shows that bivalirudin can provide a significant reduction of both access and nonaccess site bleeding in patients undergoing PCI. However, these hemorrhagic benefits did not impact on survival, and moreover, were significantly conditioned by the association of heparin with potent antithrombotic strategies, such as glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors, rather than by heparin or bivalirudin alone. Therefore, we could not provide any clinical evidence for the routine use of bivalirudin as preferred anticoagulation strategy for PCI. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The effect of vasodilatory medications on radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial coronary artery procedures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The uptake of percutaneous coronary procedures via the radial artery has increased internationally due to the decreased risk of complications and increased patient satisfaction. The increased susceptibility of the radial artery to spasm however presents a potential risk for procedural failure. Although most experts agree on the need for prophylactic medications to reduce radial artery spasm, currently there is inconsistency in literature regarding the most effective vasodilatory medication or combination of medications.

REVIEW OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to identify the effectiveness of vasodilatory medications on radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial coronary artery procedures.

INCLUSION CRITERIA TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

This review considered studies that included participants aged 18 years and over undergoing non-emergent transradial percutaneous coronary artery procedures.

TYPES OF INTERVENTION(S)

This review considered studies that used vasodilating intravenous and intra-arterial medications or combinations of medications prior to commencing and during transradial coronary approaches to reduce radial artery spasm.

OUTCOMES

The outcomes of interest were the incidence of radial artery spasm during percutaneous coronary procedure using objective and/or subjective measures and its effect on the successful completion of the procedure.

TYPES OF STUDIES

Randomized controlled trials published in the English language between 1989 to date were considered for inclusion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. An initial search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus was undertaken, followed by a search for unpublished studies.

ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

Papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments. Any disagreements that arose between the reviewers were resolved through discussion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Quantitative data was extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from RevMan5 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Quantitative data, where possible, was pooled in statistical meta-analysis using RevMan5. All results were subject to double data entry. Effect sizes expressed as risk ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for analysis.

RESULTS

Nine trials involving 3614 patients were included in the final review. Pooled data involving 992 patients on the effect of calcium channel blockers demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of vasospasm in patients who received verapamil 5 mg compared to those who received a placebo (OR 0.33; 95%CI 0.19, 0.58). Similarly patients who received verapamil 2.5 mg or 1.25 mg had significantly fewer incidences of vasospasm when compared to those who received a placebo. Nitroglycerine 100mcg was demonstrated to be associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of vasospasm.

CONCLUSION

The evidence demonstrates a benefit in the use of vasodilatory medications for the reduction of vasospasm in patients having radial coronary procedures. Further large-scale multi-center trials are needed to determine the preferred medication.

Risk and Benefits of Triple Therapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation Requiring Oral Anticoagulation: A Meta-Analysis of 16 Studies

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronary artery disease who undergo stent implantation and have concomitant indication for long-term oral anticoagulation represent a considerable proportion of the overall population. To date there is still no consensus about the optimal antithrombotic strategy to choose in this kind of patients, due to the difficult balance between an increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the risk and benefits of triple antithrombotic therapy versus dual antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation, requiring long-term oral anticoagulation.

METHODS

We performed formal searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and major international scientific session abstracts from January 1990 to September 2015 regarding the use of triple antithrombotic therapy (TT) versus dual therapy (DT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation that required chronic oral anticoagulation. Data regarding study design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of patients, and selected endpoints was extracted by 2 investigators. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials with a total of 21716 patients undergoing coronary stent implantation with indication to long term oral anticoagulation, were finally included. A total of 6950 received TT, whereas 14766 received DT alone. The follow-up period ranged from 180 to 730 days. Data regarding mortality were available in 21658 patients (99.7 %). All cause mortality was observed in 10.4 % patients in TT versus 16.3 % in DT (OR [95 % CI] =0.73 [0.66-0.80], p <0.001; p _het <0.001). In addition, TT was associated with a reduced incidence of MI (6.4 versus 9.8 %, OR [95 % CI] = 0.74 [0.65-0.84], p < 0.001; p_het < 0.001) and ischemic stroke (1.8 versus 3.9 %, OR [95 % CI] = 0.55 [0.45-0.68], p < 0.001; p _het  = 0.07). As expected, TT was associated with a significant increase in major bleeding events (10.8 versus 8.5 %, OR [95 % CI] = 1.38 [1.25-1.53], p < 0.001; p _het  = 0.02). By meta regression analysis we found that benefits in mortality with TT were inversely related with the risk of bleedings (beta [95 % CI] = 2.25 (1.55; 2.95), p < 0.00001). The benefits with TT regarding overall mortality, recurrent MI and ischemic stroke were also confirmed in a pre-specified analysis versus DAPT or oral anticoagulation in association with a single antiplatelet agent.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that among patients undergoing coronary stent implantation, requiring chronic OAC, the use of a TT is associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality, recurrent MI and ischemic stroke. As expected, we found a higher incidence of bleedings in patients treated with triple therapy. The benefits in mortality were lost in patients at high-risk for bleedings.

Meta-Analysis of Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to reduce mortality and vascular complications compared to femoral access in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, efficacy and safety of radial access PCI in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) is not well understood. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed through July 2015 to search and identify relevant studies. We evaluated the following short-term outcomes: all-cause mortality, major bleeding, access site bleeding, and need for blood transfusions. In addition, we evaluated 1-year mortality. Studies were pooled using random effects model. Nine studies including a total of 220,126 patients (radial approach: 94,663 patients [43%], femoral approach: 125,463 patients [57%]) were included in the analysis. On pooled analysis, no significant difference in incidence of short-term all-cause mortality was found between radial and femoral access (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.07, p = 0.12). Radial access was associated with significant reduction in major bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.73, p = 0.0002), access-site bleeding (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.78, p = 0.007), and need for blood transfusions (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91, p = 0.02). Furthermore, the 1-year mortality was significantly lower in radial approach (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.95, p = 0.02). In conclusion, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI, radial access is associated with decreased bleeding and access-site complications.

Radial Versus Femoral Access in Invasively Managed Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing invasive management showed conflicting conclusions regarding the effect of access site on outcomes.

PURPOSE

To summarize evidence from recent, high-quality trials that compared clinical outcomes occurring with radial versus femoral access in invasively managed adults with ACS.

DATA SOURCES

English-language publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases between January 1990 and August 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized trials of radial versus femoral access in invasively managed patients with ACS.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two investigators independently extracted the study data and rated the risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 17 identified randomized trials, 4 were high-quality multicenter trials that involved a total of 17 133 patients. Pooled data from the 4 trials showed that radial access reduced death (relative risk [RR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.90]; P = 0.003), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.86 [CI, 0.75 to 0.98]; P = 0.025), and major bleeding (RR, 0.57 [CI, 0.37 to 0.88]; P = 0.011). Radial procedures lasted slightly longer (standardized mean difference, 0.11 minutes) and had higher risk for access-site crossover (6.3% vs. 1.7%) than did femoral procedures.

LIMITATION

Heterogeneity in outcomes definitions and potential treatment modifiers across studies, including operator experience in radial procedures and concurrent anticoagulant regimens.

CONCLUSION

Compared with femoral access, radial access reduces mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and major bleeding in patients with ACS undergoing invasive management.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015022031).

The choice of arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome: An expert opinion perspective

The prevention of major bleeding during percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the most widely discussed and often controversial topics within interventional cardiology. The choice of arterial access should be considered a mechanism for bleeding avoidance, and various strategies have been proposed to prevent or lower major bleeding and vascular complications with varying levels of strength. Herein, we review the current literature on arterial access as a bleeding avoidance strategy during percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome and provide a consensus opinion based on the strength of the evidence supporting various techniques.

Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) bleedings in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) performed through transradial approach (TRA) or transfemoral approach (TFA) with systematic closure by FemoSeal™.

BACKGROUND

Although the risk of bleeding can be reduced using vascular closure devices (VCD), there are few data comparing TRA and TFA with VCD, particularly in the setting of pPCI.

METHODS

we included in this retrospective registry 777 patients who underwent pPCI at two centers from years 2010 to 2013. Exclusion criteria were implantation of intra-aortic balloon pump and achievement of femoral hemostasis by other means than FemoSeal™. We performed propensity-score matching and multivariate analysis to adjust for clinical and procedural confounders.

RESULTS

We enrolled 511 patients in TRA group and 266 in TFA group. Both in the general population and in the propensity-matched population, the incidence of MACCE was comparable in TRA vs. TFA patients (3.5 vs. 3.4% and 4.4 vs. 2.6%, respectively; P = ns). On the contrary, we observed a higher incidence of TIMI bleedings in TFA vs. TRA patients (5.6 vs. 2.2% in the general population and 6.6 vs. 1.3% in the propensity-matched population; P < 0.05); this difference was mainly driven by TIMI major bleedings. TFA was an independent predictor of bleeding at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In pPCI the rate of TIMI major bleedings was higher in TFA with closure by FemoSeal™ as compared to TRA, whereas the rates of minor bleedings and of MACCE were similar.

Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the use and outcome of radial versus femoral access in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

The radial approach for PCI in patients with STEMI has been suggested to have a lower rate of complications and bleeding and to improve prognosis compared with the femoral approach. However, there still is a large regional and national variation in its use.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2012 a total of 17,865 patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock undergoing primary PCI were prospectively enrolled in the observational German PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft leitende kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Transfemoral (TF) access was used in 15,270 (85.5%), transradial (TR) access in 2,530 (14.2%), and other access in 65 (0.3%) patients. In this analysis, 10,264 patients from 20 centers that had performed at least 5 TR-PCI for STEMI were included. This study compared TR-PCI (n = 2,454 23.9%) with TF-PCI (n = 7,810, 76.1%).

RESULTS

Procedural success was high in both cohorts. Hospital mortality (1.8 vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001) and vascular access complications (0.3 vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001%) were lower in the TR group. In the multivariate analysis radial access was associated with an improved in-hospital survival rate (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The radial approach for PCI can be performed with excellent procedural success in selected STEMI patients and is associated with a lower rate of vascular access complications and hospital mortality.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and the Extent of Coronary Artery Disease: Results From a Large Cohort Study

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory biomarker, may be of predictive and prognostic value for cardiovascular (CV) events. We evaluated the relationship of NLR with the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) in consecutive patients undergoing elective or urgent coronary angiography. Our population (n = 3738 patients) was divided into NLR quartiles. Higher NLR was associated with aging and established CV risk factors, previous percutaneous coronary revascularization, acute presentation, and more complex pharmacological therapy. The NLR was related to platelet count, white blood cell count, creatinine, glycemia, uric acid, and C-reactive protein (all P = .001) levels but inversely related to hemoglobin (P < .001), total cholesterol (P = .005), and triglycerides (P < .001) levels. The NLR was associated with multivessel disease (P < .001), anterior descending, right coronary arteries (P < .001) or circumflex branch lesions (P = .01), percentage of stenosis (P < .001), coronary calcification (P < .001), and intracoronary thrombus (P < .001) but inversely with in-stent restenosis (P < .001) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow (P = .04). The NLR was directly related to the prevalence of CAD (P = .001) and severe CAD (P < .001). In patients undergoing coronary angiography, the NLR is independently associated with the prevalence and severity of CAD.

Bivalirudin as compared to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization: A meta-analysis of 22 randomized trials

Bivalirudin has gained ground against unfractionated heparin (UFH) in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), due to a reported better safety profile. However, whether bivalirudin may provide also advantages in clinical outcome beyond the known benefits in major bleedings, is still a debated matter and was, therefore, the aim of present meta-analysis of randomized trials, evaluating efficacy and safety of bivalirudin as compared with UFH in PCI.

METHODS AND STUDY OUTCOMES

Literature archives (Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane) and main scientific sessions were scanned. Primary endpoint was overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were: 1) mortality within 30-days; 2) overall and within 30-days non fatal myocardial infarction; 3) overall and within 30-days stent thrombosis. Safety endpoints were major bleedings (per protocol definition or TIMI classification). A prespecified analysis was conducted according to clinical presentation (Elective, ACS, STEMI).

RESULTS

A total of 22 randomized clinical were finally included, involving 40156 patients randomized to bivalirudin (52.9%) or to UFH (47.1%). Death occurred in 1100 (2.8%) of patients, with no difference between bivalirudin and UFH (2.7% vs 2.8% OR[95%C]=0.94[0.83,-.06], p=0.32, phet=0.48). The results did not change according to clinical presentation. By meta-regression analysis, the effects on mortality were not related to patients risk profile (r=-0.38(-0.89-0.14), p=0.15) or the reduction in bleeding complications (r=-0.008(-0.86-0.85), p=0.98). A significant increase in short-term stent thrombosis was observed with bivalirudin (OR[95%CI]=1.42 [1.10-1.83], p=0.006). However, Bivalirudin significantly reduced bleedings according to both study protocol definition (OR[95%CI]=0.62[0.56-0.69],p<0.00001; phet=0.0003) or TIMI major criteria (OR[95%CI]=0.65[0.53-0.79],p<0.0001, phet=0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In present meta-analysis, among patients undergoing PCI, bivalirudin, as compared with UFH, is associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding complications that, however, does not translate into mortality benefits. Furthermore, bivalirudin is associated with higher rate of 30-days stent thrombosis and recurrent MI among STEMI patients.

ST elevation myocardial infarction: recent advances and updates

ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and disability worldwide. Statistically, a trend towards improvements in morbidity and mortality has been consistent over the years, which is attributed primarily to the modification of risk factors, healthier lifestyles, treatment advances and better management of door-to-balloon times via STEMI systems. However, a major challenge in the coming years will be the baby boomers (born between the years 1946 and 1964) coming into old age. The first baby boomers turned 65 in year 2011. As the baby boomers age in the coming years, the incidence of coronary heart disease is likely to increase, and so there will be a greater need to have major advances in the management of coronary heart disease in order to deal with this additional incidence. The scope of this article is to review recent advances in the management of STEMI and to provide an updated overview.

Platelet glycoprotein IIIa Leu33Pro gene polymorphism and coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of cohort studies

Great interest has been focused in the last year on genetic predictors of cardiovascular risk. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa), fibrinogen receptor, is the final common pathway for aggregation and a key point for atherothrombosis. A single nucleotide polymorphism of IIIa subunit (Leu33Pro-PlA(1)/PlA(2) allele) has been suggested to increase aggregation and adhesion, however, contrasting reports have been reported so far on its effects on coronary artery disease (CAD). Aim of the current study was to perform a large meta-analysis including cohorts of patients undergoing coronary angiography in order to evaluate whether this polymorphism is associated with coronary artery disease. Literature archives (Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane) and main scientific sessions abstracts were scanned for data of consecutive cohorts of patients undergoing coronary angiography, where PlA genotype was assessed. Primary endpoint was the prevalence of CAD. Secondary endpoint was severity of CAD defined as prevalence of multivessel disease (≥2 vessels). Data from seven studies were extracted, including a final number of 6700 patients. Among them 1893 (28.3%) carried the PlA(2) polymorphism, 163 of them in homozygosis. Angiographically defined CAD was present in 3573 (74.3%) PlA(1)/PlA(1) patients and in 1430 (75.5%) PlA(2) carriers. PlA(2) polymorphism was not associated with an increased prevalence of coronary artery disease, (OR [95% CI] = 1.07 [0.95-1.21], p = 0.28, pheterogeneity = 0.39). Similar results were obtained for multivessel disease (OR [95% CI] = 1.07[0.95-1.20], p = 0.27, pheterogeneity = 0.12). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between the risk of CAD among the PlA(2) carriers and ageing (r = -0.044, (-0.09, -0.0008), p = 0.046). Present meta-analysis demonstrates that 33Leu → Pro substitution of GPIIIa does not influence the prevalence and extent of angiographically defined coronary artery disease in general population, although apparently playing a role among younger patients.

Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions in acute coronary syndrome

Transradial access (TRA) is becoming increasingly used worldwide for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). TRA compared with transfemoral access has been noted to improve clinical outcomes in clinical trials and large registry cohort studies. However, much of the benefits of TRA PCI are noted in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI, where TRA PCI has been associated with reductions in major bleeding events and potentially lower short- and long-term mortality rates. Although much less data exist for TRA PCI in unstable angina and/or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, similar reductions in bleeding and mortality have not been consistently described. Differences in outcome benefit with TRA PCI among various ACS subtypes may be attributable to the potentially increased inherent risk of periprocedural bleeding in STEMI compared with unstable angina and/or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Pre- and intra-procedural factors associated with STEMI treatment, such as use of pharmacoinvasive therapy and aggressive antithrombotic regimens likely increase bleeding risk in patients. In conclusion, this review describes the evidence for TRA PCI across the spectrum of ACS and highlights why differences in clinical benefit may exist among ACS subtypes.

European Society of Cardiology ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Guidelines in Perspective - Focused on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Patients suffering acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) require full attention of the whole STEMI network to save their lives and to improve the quality of life after a heart attack. Implementation of the most recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) STEMI Guidelines into the practice is the holy grail of the healthcare systems and all stakeholders. In relation to this, the Stent for Life Initiative can serve as one of very successful and effective models in Europe and beyond. Although the evidence-based approach may be applied to majority of patients, the tailored and updated therapy needs to be modified in concordance with the patients´ risk profile, experience and availability of medical resources. Some 'hot topics', issues, differences between the ESC and ACC/AHA Guidelines, latest information and perspectives are discussed in this short review; focused on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the most effective reperfusion therapy.